Yep. Garbage in, garbage out. Models are like maps, they are not the territory. Since these "scientists" want me to ignore their 4.5 billion years of climate change and accept their area of focus that would not even qualify as a sliver of that time frame. They are just promoting pseudo-science. I to can smell a scam.
in an email interview years ago when asked about security, data privacy and such things. He said anyone is a fucking idiot to trust him; indeed you are.
Indeed. Hence their moniker change from "global warming" to the more general and happens everyday "climate change". Much harder to disprove that climate changes everyday. They had to adopt something to hid their half truths.
Not after man gets there as man IS the cause of climate change. So in a short while after their arrival it will turn into hell. So says the pseudo-scientists of global warming, erm I mean climate change, erm I mean whatever new term they come up with to add to the confusion.
Actually I have never heard of a law making it illegal. I suppose it depends how you want to categorize their actions. Is it colluding? At its most basic level; "come to a secret understanding for a harmful purpose; conspire." its certainly done in secrecy but who is it harming? Obviously the worker since it limits their employability not because of their skills but simply by who employes them, so I think such collisions should be illegal.
Jail time? Your chances are better at getting struck by lightning or winning a lottery. Its always the big fish getting called out on these practices but it would not surprise me if the same occurs with the small fry.
Teaches self control? Tell that to Tiger Woods ex-wife.
Ug. Remedy is such a bitter pill.
Right. There isn't an engineer or a group of engineers smart enough to do that without dire consequences.
Because they are talking out their ass and ignoring or minimizing anything that does not support their "theory".
Could not have said it better.
Yep. Garbage in, garbage out. Models are like maps, they are not the territory. Since these "scientists" want me to ignore their 4.5 billion years of climate change and accept their area of focus that would not even qualify as a sliver of that time frame. They are just promoting pseudo-science. I to can smell a scam.
needs to pull their head out of their ass.
Agreed. Its their software/product, its been around now for how long(?) and they have given more than ample warnings about its "retirement".
Exactly.
in an email interview years ago when asked about security, data privacy and such things. He said anyone is a fucking idiot to trust him; indeed you are.
Indeed. Hence their moniker change from "global warming" to the more general and happens everyday "climate change". Much harder to disprove that climate changes everyday. They had to adopt something to hid their half truths.
Use global warming or climate change or whatever the word/phrase the charlatans are now using.
Not after man gets there as man IS the cause of climate change. So in a short while after their arrival it will turn into hell. So says the pseudo-scientists of global warming, erm I mean climate change, erm I mean whatever new term they come up with to add to the confusion.
I haven't or don't recall running across a site with such a message but agree its a site I would never again visit.
Didn't know about Ghostery. Just installed it for firefox and seems to work as, erm advertized. Thanks.
Or just their fucking imagination, geesh what mental gyrations "scientists" and the holy believers will go through to "support" their religion.
Well then, everyone should be using a Babelfish.
They should count themselves lucky the CEO does not apply the same standard to those demanding he step down.
Then Jimmy needs to apply the same level of scrutiny to climate change.
This "call" no doubt falls into the same category of the Patriot Act Obama railed against as a Senator but has since expanded.
HR, the one department in a company that does more damage than all others.
Yep and then try to convince us all it was the fault of capitalism.
Actually I have never heard of a law making it illegal. I suppose it depends how you want to categorize their actions. Is it colluding? At its most basic level; "come to a secret understanding for a harmful purpose; conspire." its certainly done in secrecy but who is it harming? Obviously the worker since it limits their employability not because of their skills but simply by who employes them, so I think such collisions should be illegal.
Jail time? Your chances are better at getting struck by lightning or winning a lottery. Its always the big fish getting called out on these practices but it would not surprise me if the same occurs with the small fry.
That's not capitalism.