Rubbish. Lots of people invest in long-term instruments. They just don't make a noise about it. There is a lot of finance out there for large projects (I agree, probably not this one given the risks) but for realistic stuff, it's not hard. Insurers and pension providers need somewhere to park their cash.
That's exactly why the posturing now, to stir some shit in an election year. The Russians do not genuinely believe the West intends to annihilate then; they just think that if they scream and cry they can attain a negotiating position to bargain for something they do want.
The flaw was going too fast in a danger zone because all involved wanted to prove how big their dicks were. Big ships don't turn on a dime, full stop. By the time the iceberg was in view, any ship at that speed was going to hit it.
Alternatively, perhaps she bothered to learn a tiny little bit about the implications of kidney transplantation beforehand and happens to know why that doesn't make sense.
Actually, you've got it exactly backwards. Doctors are entirely free to do things in everyday practice using their own judgement that, were they involved in a trial, they would not be permitted to do.
Organised, disciplined warfare of the type you describe is a fairly late development. In more typical hand to hand scrapping with bronze swords a lefty has an advantage, just as left handed fencers do today.
The chaos it would cause would be massive, and you are talking about one of the biggest television events you can get.
Lobbing a home-made mortar out of a local back garden would be neither difficult nor particularly dangerous and would have a massive impact. Frankly, I will be astonished if we get through these olympics without a major terror event (most likely a backpack on public transport, but siller scenarios are also perfectly possible)..
This is a common refrain. Yet economics is a hard, hard, science - why else do we understand it so badly? Newtons invented calculus and a few mere centuries later we built atom bombs and mapped out the history of the universe nanoseconds after its birth. Yet for all the history of human commerce, we barely understand a subject that affects all of us, every single day.
Legally, a contract is only formed when there is an agreement of minds. Not initialling handwritten alterations to a printed contract is a pretty good way of allowing a court to conclude that there was not an agreement in place. Ultimately, when faced with these things, a court has to interpret them as equitably as they can and that does not necessarily work in your favour.
Unless you can show that they knew you did that, it's quite possible a court would not accept the stricken-out clauses. Depends on your local contract law, of course, but this is a really bad idea.
I don't have details to hand, but there is plenty evidence out there that companies that aggressively pursue talent in environments where that's not the norm do outperform. Classic examples today are Western companies operating in Asia, where they can typically hoover up people that their system has rejected (mothers, the laid off, etc).
I quite agree about productivity. Creating a company culture is an interesting and difficult thing; it is however possible and worth doing. And of course a culture which is negative about "political correctness" is not going to be a good place to work.
If people are not bright enough to choose the correct option, when that option is already available to them, what exactly is it that makes people likely to use this newfangled whatever-it-is option?
No it isn't, don't be bloody stupid. The damned things are engineered to do it. This is the equivalent of arguing that you should never use your brakes and instead just roll to a halt. Who the hell manages to dump enough energy down a driveshaft to damage a transmission in this day and age?
Slashdot Mirror
Rubbish. Lots of people invest in long-term instruments. They just don't make a noise about it. There is a lot of finance out there for large projects (I agree, probably not this one given the risks) but for realistic stuff, it's not hard. Insurers and pension providers need somewhere to park their cash.
Not to criticise your answer - which is as good as it could be - but is this not just a little, well, ridiculous? How on earth is this user-friendly?
That's exactly why the posturing now, to stir some shit in an election year. The Russians do not genuinely believe the West intends to annihilate then; they just think that if they scream and cry they can attain a negotiating position to bargain for something they do want.
Nope; just got home and can still connect. Either they're ignoring it or haven't gotten round to it.
Are you on the light version (?Connect)? One Sky package is completely BT administered and Sky just supply branding, billing admin and take a cut.
Pfft, you Eurpoeans and your Napoleonic Codes. Here in Britain (and in the US) we have this majestic concept called the Common Law.
The flaw was going too fast in a danger zone because all involved wanted to prove how big their dicks were. Big ships don't turn on a dime, full stop. By the time the iceberg was in view, any ship at that speed was going to hit it.
Alternatively, perhaps she bothered to learn a tiny little bit about the implications of kidney transplantation beforehand and happens to know why that doesn't make sense.
Actually, you've got it exactly backwards. Doctors are entirely free to do things in everyday practice using their own judgement that, were they involved in a trial, they would not be permitted to do.
Organised, disciplined warfare of the type you describe is a fairly late development. In more typical hand to hand scrapping with bronze swords a lefty has an advantage, just as left handed fencers do today.
Lobbing a home-made mortar out of a local back garden would be neither difficult nor particularly dangerous and would have a massive impact. Frankly, I will be astonished if we get through these olympics without a major terror event (most likely a backpack on public transport, but siller scenarios are also perfectly possible)..
Those are increases driven by fundamentals; principally, the fact that the oil is running out. Apart from college tuition: now that's a scam.
This is a common refrain. Yet economics is a hard, hard, science - why else do we understand it so badly? Newtons invented calculus and a few mere centuries later we built atom bombs and mapped out the history of the universe nanoseconds after its birth. Yet for all the history of human commerce, we barely understand a subject that affects all of us, every single day.
All I know is that every damn time I observe it, the nappy needs changing.
Dude, your argument might have more force if you were to consider spelling "civil" correctly.
Legally, a contract is only formed when there is an agreement of minds. Not initialling handwritten alterations to a printed contract is a pretty good way of allowing a court to conclude that there was not an agreement in place. Ultimately, when faced with these things, a court has to interpret them as equitably as they can and that does not necessarily work in your favour.
Unless you can show that they knew you did that, it's quite possible a court would not accept the stricken-out clauses. Depends on your local contract law, of course, but this is a really bad idea.
Well, until you get a CIFAS listing or equivalent. Then you're innocent but your life becomes very difficult.
I quite agree about productivity. Creating a company culture is an interesting and difficult thing; it is however possible and worth doing. And of course a culture which is negative about "political correctness" is not going to be a good place to work.
Because if I run a business, I want my workforce to be the most talented people available, not just assholes that get on with each other.
This is just a PR stunt from some careers website. I wouldn't get overexcited about it.
How many consumer transmissions have you seen damaged by this in the last twenty years?
If people are not bright enough to choose the correct option, when that option is already available to them, what exactly is it that makes people likely to use this newfangled whatever-it-is option?
No it isn't, don't be bloody stupid. The damned things are engineered to do it. This is the equivalent of arguing that you should never use your brakes and instead just roll to a halt. Who the hell manages to dump enough energy down a driveshaft to damage a transmission in this day and age?
Apart from not being damaging at all, in an emergency it is reasonable to not worry too much about damaging things.