I am sorry, but I would not have called that nearly naked. Yes, if you go by percentage of body surface they are nearly naked. But not every square inch is equally important. Simply said: They still had their speedos on - nothing about being gay or something like that.
Of course it is brave to do this - also because not all of them have the ideal figure..
..might include the "rewrite" of OpenBSD's packet filter. While the reason for this rewrite was motivated "politically" (license restriction of Darren Reed's ipf) it was a rewrite - and a good one!
Decompile and analyse it. And then write a crack. Or a replacement in case it is a simple DLL file. (I guess it is.)
Shouldn't be that hard, should it?:)
..more large-scale firms will just say foad to SCO, SCO's share value will drop because the shareholders will realize it's not that easy to get the money from the licenses. As soon as share value drops SCO has not as much money for lawyers anymore.
But instead the people born on 29th of February should be happy we have a leap year this time again.
I should think about some present for my 18-year-old grandma soon..
Well but that's something different. Google would need to "know" about "links to the books" (and preferably also "links from the books"). But citations (which come to my mind first) don't have a standardized format as hyperlinks have (i.e. <a href="blabla">linktext</a>)
Quote from Google Print FAQ: During this trial, publishers' content is hosted by Google and is ranked in our search results according to the same technology we use to evaluate websites.
Now I wonder how this is done. Google's PageRank uses links from other pages to rank results - but in usual books there aren't any "hyperlinks".
Could anyone offer me insight into this? - thanks!
Oh, thank you for your insight. What I don't understand: By doing so it would make big mail server impossible. Because they're sending thousands of emails per hour (or minute or second) but have only limited CPU power.
I.e. by using (up) the sender's CPU you would hurt even "innocent" mail servers (which are sending thousand of email per minute but not using the same other mail server).
..because of incompatible format but because most people just don't want to read a book on the computer screen.
They want to take the book with them (and not everyone has a laptop), they want to read it on the toilet, they think it's uncomfortable reading long texts from screen, and with many screen and workplace setups it is unhealthy too.
Maybe Xandros 2 might be banned from Germany and Austria for using this logo which looks a bit like a swastika; Germany and Austria have rather strict laws about the use of symbols like that.
The installation procedure (and what question it asks you) is not the point. That doesn't mean it's welded in. (Comparison: You're installing Winamp. You can't chose not to install whatsnew.txt - does that mean whatsnew.txt is welded in into Winamp? Not really. Ok, Winamp searches for whatsnew.txt to display it in the what's new about box. but it certainly isn't needed.)
Just before we read that browser integration is bad (like MSIE into MS Windows) but now this article reports that KDE's Konqueror is integrated better into KDE. That seems strange to me.
Admittedly KDE isn't an operating system as MS Windows is. But still it's a "system near" piece of software. So where to draw the border?
I can't imagine why they'd write specially malicious viruses since they depend on all the infrastructure they'd destroy. They need the thousands of unsecured running windows boxes, trojaned of course. They also need the bandwidth.
That's why I don't think we'll see viruses which are particularly evil for everybody. (There might be a rise in viruses which are used of a dDoS attack which of course is a bad thing - but it's not dangerous for most users' computers)
I think this is actually a good thing because it links spammers with viruses and therefor reinforces the association "spammer = evil". Perhaps sooner or later more people (and gov. agencies and companies) see spam not just as annoyance but as attack.
Slashdot Mirror
Right. Thongs in fashion now!
I am sorry, but I would not have called that nearly naked. Yes, if you go by percentage of body surface they are nearly naked. But not every square inch is equally important. Simply said: They still had their speedos on - nothing about being gay or something like that.
Of course it is brave to do this - also because not all of them have the ideal figure..
..might include the "rewrite" of OpenBSD's packet filter. While the reason for this rewrite was motivated "politically" (license restriction of Darren Reed's ipf) it was a rewrite - and a good one!
XP is not a total rewrite, there is still some code in there from win 3.1 and nt 3.51
As well as code from BSD..
Decompile and analyse it. And then write a crack. Or a replacement in case it is a simple DLL file. (I guess it is.) :)
Shouldn't be that hard, should it?
hahaha how funny
learn latin, cocksucker
..more large-scale firms will just say foad to SCO, SCO's share value will drop because the shareholders will realize it's not that easy to get the money from the licenses. As soon as share value drops SCO has not as much money for lawyers anymore.
Any good (IRL) links to some guys of this sort? Like working in a large business, dumping nearly-fresh Sparcs and the like?
But instead the people born on 29th of February should be happy we have a leap year this time again.
I should think about some present for my 18-year-old grandma soon..
Iomega's Clik! drive didn't have 40 gigabytes as the article says (which wouldn't be that bad for 10$) but only 40 megabytes.
Well but that's something different. Google would need to "know" about "links to the books" (and preferably also "links from the books"). But citations (which come to my mind first) don't have a standardized format as hyperlinks have (i.e. <a href="blabla">linktext</a>)
Quote from Google Print FAQ: During this trial, publishers' content is hosted by Google and is ranked in our search results according to the same technology we use to evaluate websites.
Now I wonder how this is done. Google's PageRank uses links from other pages to rank results - but in usual books there aren't any "hyperlinks".
Could anyone offer me insight into this? - thanks!
Oh, thank you for your insight. What I don't understand: By doing so it would make big mail server impossible. Because they're sending thousands of emails per hour (or minute or second) but have only limited CPU power.
I.e. by using (up) the sender's CPU you would hurt even "innocent" mail servers (which are sending thousand of email per minute but not using the same other mail server).
It's sort of the already known tarpit.
..because of incompatible format but because most people just don't want to read a book on the computer screen.
They want to take the book with them (and not everyone has a laptop), they want to read it on the toilet, they think it's uncomfortable reading long texts from screen, and with many screen and workplace setups it is unhealthy too.
Maybe Xandros 2 might be banned from Germany and Austria for using this logo which looks a bit like a swastika; Germany and Austria have rather strict laws about the use of symbols like that.
It's not (only) copyright infringement but about trade secrets.
The installation procedure (and what question it asks you) is not the point. That doesn't mean it's welded in. (Comparison: You're installing Winamp. You can't chose not to install whatsnew.txt - does that mean whatsnew.txt is welded in into Winamp? Not really. Ok, Winamp searches for whatsnew.txt to display it in the what's new about box. but it certainly isn't needed.)
Just before we read that browser integration is bad (like MSIE into MS Windows) but now this article reports that KDE's Konqueror is integrated better into KDE. That seems strange to me.
Admittedly KDE isn't an operating system as MS Windows is. But still it's a "system near" piece of software. So where to draw the border?
Oh, I didn't know such things existed. Do you have an URL handy? - thank you!
Get it here. ;-)
Looks quite nice to me. Even an integrated ethernet port, audio... - nice, where can I get it?
You're succeeding in making your own customers hate you! Well done, good work!
I can't imagine why they'd write specially malicious viruses since they depend on all the infrastructure they'd destroy. They need the thousands of unsecured running windows boxes, trojaned of course. They also need the bandwidth.
That's why I don't think we'll see viruses which are particularly evil for everybody. (There might be a rise in viruses which are used of a dDoS attack which of course is a bad thing - but it's not dangerous for most users' computers)
I think this is actually a good thing because it links spammers with viruses and therefor reinforces the association "spammer = evil". Perhaps sooner or later more people (and gov. agencies and companies) see spam not just as annoyance but as attack.