Slashdot Mirror


Japanese Pocket-Size PC Cube Demonstrated

rocketjam writes "The Japanese company, Personal Media Corporation, has demonstrated a prototype of a cube-shaped pocket-sized computer called the T-Cube (tentative name). The T-Cube runs the T-Engine OS, an operating system apparently being developed by a consortium of Asian companies for embedded devices and networked computers. The machine is about the size of an orange, uses a CPU made by NEC and sports a desktop written for the Chinese Market supporting Multi- and Super-Chinese Character sets. It is scheduled to ship in Q1 of 2004."

254 comments

  1. Larger photo by Karamchand · · Score: 5, Informative

    Get it here.
    Looks quite nice to me. Even an integrated ethernet port, audio... - nice, where can I get it? ;-)

    1. Re:Larger photo by thedillybar · · Score: 1

      It looks very nice, and appears to be quite an accomplishment. But...who actually wants this thing? And what are you using it for?

      I can't think of any large advantages, considering the availability of PocketPCs, laptops, and desktops. What do we need another configuration for?

    2. Re:Larger photo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it just had a second ethernet port. Very sweet OpenBSD box. And it also looks very box-like.

    3. Re:Larger photo by Magnus+Reftel · · Score: 1

      The label by the little yellow connector to the left of the audio jacks seems to say "TV IN". If it is, then this thing might be rather nice as a PVR (assuming that the 400MHz MIPS CPU can encode to some sensible format in real time, that is...)

      --
      print "Yet another p{erl,ython} hacker\n",
    4. Re:Larger photo by Kenja · · Score: 1

      And just think how much video you'll be able to store in one of these, what with their massive hard disk aray.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    5. Re:Larger photo by Magnus+Reftel · · Score: 1

      What? You didn't see the ethernet connector?

      --
      print "Yet another p{erl,ython} hacker\n",
    6. Re:Larger photo by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But...who actually wants this thing? And what are you using it for?

      Seems like a natural for the wearable computing platform. This thing can be easily concealed inside a fanny pack, and still be hooked up to more traditional perhiperals when not on-the-go.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    7. Re:Larger photo by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      If they just make it thinner then it could plug into Kirk's command chair.

      Still, if that's the power connector, it seems awfully close to the speaker out connector. There could be AC noise bleedthrough. How much isolation can it have at that size?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    8. Re:Larger photo by Magnus+Reftel · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I misread that one. In the close-up on the LAN-side ports, it's clear that it's a power connector, not TV IN. Oh, well... :-(

      --
      print "Yet another p{erl,ython} hacker\n",
    9. Re:Larger photo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can bolt it into/onto just about any space and set up a kiosk/terminal.

    10. Re:Larger photo by gregfortune · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Anything requiring a thin client would be perfect for this thing. It's small, quiet, probably relatively cool and it has plenty of power for a kiosk or retail terminal.

    11. Re:Larger photo by tambo · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Seems like a natural for the wearable computing platform.

      How does a box the size of an orange fit into anyone's apparel? Even with the emphasis on thinness in the PDA/cellphone market, we have to choose between cargo pants and bulging pockets.

      Integrated ethernet port? I guess you can wear the computer as a necklace by using the ethernet cable that you'll also have to carry around. Why in the world wouldn't they build in an 802.11(something) chip?

      Integrated audio? I hope but doubt that it's also got integrated speakers.

      This is just about the low point in bad tech design. I am crazy about the idea of truly portable computing - schlepp your entire data store and OS on a high-density flash card; pop it into any computing device - handheld, notebook, public-access workstation, kiosk - and get instant and full access to your data, according to your preferred interface style, in a presentation appropriately scaled to the device. But toys like this represent a step back from that movement. They're totally useless for a dozen reasons, and they lead people to believe that buzzwords like "wearable computing" have no non-geek future.

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    12. Re:Larger photo by trentblase · · Score: 1

      Since the AC/DC conversion is probably done in an external transformer, I don't think the problem will be very big.

    13. Re:Larger photo by Frogg · · Score: 2, Informative
      easily concealed inside a fanny pack

      It's worth pointing out that in the UK we call 'em "bum bags" -- as the word 'fanny' is slang for that part of the anatomy that is particular to only the female of the species.

      [insert variant on obvious joke here..]

    14. Re:Larger photo by beeblebrox87 · · Score: 1

      It has a CompactFlash slot. Add a CF enet card.

    15. Re:Larger photo by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 2, Funny

      Make them into earrings hand have a 2 node beowolf cluster.

    16. Re:Larger photo by Karamchand · · Score: 1

      Oh, I didn't know such things existed. Do you have an URL handy? - thank you!

    17. Re:Larger photo by timeOday · · Score: 1
      How does a box the size of an orange fit into anyone's apparel? Even with the emphasis on thinness in the PDA/cellphone market, we have to choose between cargo pants and bulging pockets.
      The poor guy goes to all the trouble to spell out "fanny pack" and you completely ignore it.
    18. Re:Larger photo by sfe_software · · Score: 1

      But...who actually wants this thing? And what are you using it for?

      I gathered that it was intended for embedded devices, from the summary. Re-reading the summary, I realize they may have been referring to the device itself as embedded, thus it runs an embedded OS.

      However, I could think of potential uses for it, specifically embedded. I'd think a touch-screen LCD combined with this (which would be no larger than the LCD's own power supply) would certainly make for a nice, space-saving kiosk...

      --
      NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
    19. Re:Larger photo by sfe_software · · Score: 1

      This is just about the low point in bad tech design.

      Well, the grandparent suggested this application, not the designers of it (from what I can tell). I suspect it's more designed for kiosk applications personally.

      Combine this with a touch-screen LCD with integrated speakers, and you have a kiosk who's CPU unit is about the size of the LCD power supply brick.

      --
      NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
    20. Re:Larger photo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw this yesterday at penny arcade, of all places. /. is so goddamn SLOW at posting news.

    21. Re:Larger photo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How does a box the size of an orange fit into anyone's apparel? Even with the emphasis on thinness in the PDA/cellphone market, we have to choose between cargo pants and bulging pockets.

      I've got cargo pants. Besides, it'll fit just fine in a backpack or fanny pack, as the post you're replying to stated.

      Why in the world wouldn't they build in an 802.11(something) chip?

      Then the antenna sticks you in the nuts. GENIUS!

      Integrated audio? I hope but doubt that it's also got integrated speakers.

      They're called headphones.

      You go to all this trouble to come down on this guy about using this cube as a wearable computer, and you completely miss the obvious. It doesn't have a fucking battery and is designed to be plugged into an outlet with a power supply that's several times bigger than the computer.

    22. Re:Larger photo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check it out! They're using TRON OS, which uses TRON-CODE, the arch-nemesis of UNICODE! Fight!

    23. Re:Larger photo by SkippyTPE · · Score: 1

      I agree that it's pretty useless in it's current form, but I'm not with you on writing of the entire concept. They may be totally useless for a dozen reasons, but they only need to be useful for the right one or two reasons to make someone a ton of money. With some minor modifications and a cheap wearable display and input device, I could see outfitting survey teams (or other field data collectors) with these. Having an orange sized PC in my pocket would beat the hell out of schlepping around a laptop or fragile PDA.

      And as to your comment about carrying around your data so that you can drop it into whatever device happens to be handy, it may be worth noting that there is insufficient infrastructure (to say nothing of commercial opportunity) in this sector to make this viable for most of the country (and perhaps for most of the World, though I'm not well traveled enough to speak to that).

    24. Re:Larger photo by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

      If the size is convenient, the shape is a little cumbersome. Those of us who don't carry a 'fanny pack' (man purses), or a purse for that matter, will have some trouble fitting this thing into our jacket pockets. Why a cube? Could the same hardware not be wedged into an iPod shaped container? I'm not exactly sure of the purpose of the cube shape. And as for wearability, the lack of a battery rules that out.

      --


      TallGreen CMS hosting
    25. Re:Larger photo by tambo · · Score: 1
      The poor guy goes to all the trouble to spell out "fanny pack" and you completely ignore it.

      :shrug: I saw these as two different concepts. A fanny pack is no more part of "wearable computing" than is a shoulder bag. "Wearable" = clothing, i.e., not a separate container that you add to your clothing for the sole purpose of carrying a device.

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    26. Re:Larger photo by tambo · · Score: 1
      And as to your comment about carrying around your data so that you can drop it into whatever device happens to be handy, it may be worth noting that there is insufficient infrastructure (to say nothing of commercial opportunity) in this sector to make this viable for most of the country (and perhaps for most of the World, though I'm not well traveled enough to speak to that).

      Well, this could easily be broken into two tiers.

      You carry around the very small file store containing your OS, programs, and your data store. You can plug that into any large kiosk you like.

      You can also make a PDA-sized interface for this same device. Or a cellphone device, or an MP3 device. Each device just has some input devices, some output devices, and a general-purpose processor. The software in your file store knows how to present these devices to you, the user, and how to provide access to your data through them. No worldwide infrastructure needed!

      So - if you just want to carry around your data, you can do that. If you also want to carry around a small portable interface for it, you can do that, too. It's the best of both worlds!

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    27. Re:Larger photo by macshit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the answer is simple: people who like cool, small, cute, things will buy them.

      Maybe in the U.S. that wouldn't fly, but there are lots of people like that in Japan. Some of it is for a purpose (e.g., if your room is smaller, you may be less willing to have a big-ol' tower case taking up space and looking ugly), but in part it's also simply preference, and fashion.

      A laptop can also satisfy this, but the integrated nature of laptops is an unecessary restriction for many uses, and let's face it -- laptops are rather Old Hat these days. A cute little brightly colored cube is something new and interesting (at least for a while!).

      [If you going into any Japanese computer store, there's pretty clearly a bigger market for small computers than in the U.S. In japan, the coolest cars are small, cute, and emphasize design; in the U.S., giant hulking SUVs are king.]

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    28. Re:Larger photo by !3ren · · Score: 1


      This seems like a good platform for localised processor nodes.
      They are about the right size that you could embed them in a wall between studs if you wanted computers spread out in a house, ie. wireless controllers or functional controllers per room
      There are other platforms available for this sort of thing, but this is completely packaged as is and only needs programming.

      my $0.02 anyways...

    29. Re:Larger photo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try this.

    30. Re:Larger photo by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Why a cube? Could the same hardware not be wedged into an iPod shaped container?

      There may be cooling concerns that require some minimum space between components. Having at least one flat side is important if you ever want to take it out of your pack and put it on a desk. And that most ports want to be attached to flat surfaces.

      And as for wearability, the lack of a battery rules that out.

      It only needs 5V DC in. Just takes someone to come up with an external battery solution that is also portable. One that is complementary to the design of the cube would be good.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  2. Buried under a big T by pheared · · Score: 0, Troll

    T-Marketing needs some T-Help.

  3. site's a bit slow by ejaw5 · · Score: 3, Funny

    they must be beta testing them as webservers today...

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
  4. Strange that they call it a "pocket computer"... by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 5, Funny

    The machine is about the size of an orange...

    That's some pocket computer. Excuse me, but is that a PMC T-Cube in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

  5. Now we need the foldable screen ... by foobsr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... to make full use of it (and perhaps learn chinese ).

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    1. Re:Now we need the foldable screen ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... to make full use of it

      to play emulated console games on the go!

  6. rock on!! by nyteroot · · Score: 1, Insightful
    any bets on how long before linux gets ported? ill say.. 2 weeks.


    in all seriousness, imagine linux on that thing. your own desktop pc to take with you whereveer you go. and if you bought one of those pocket tv's, it could serve as a pda too, maybe ..

    ok that would need some hacking, but you get my point

    --
    Ratio of replies to old sig content : replies to actual post content > 0.5. Sig changed.
    1. Re:rock on!! by penguinoid · · Score: 1, Funny

      You said "imagine" without mentioning "beowulf cluster"?!?
      Bad boy, no karma for you!

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    2. Re:rock on!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would imagine that a beowulf cluster of these things could look like a rubik's cube.

    3. Re:rock on!! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "in all seriousness, imagine linux on that thing. your own desktop pc to take with you whereveer you go. and if you bought one of those pocket tv's, it could serve as a pda too, maybe ..

      ok that would need some hacking, but you get my point"


      Once they're done hacking it, I propose they call it 'Zaurus'.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  7. Computers that fit in a pocket by t0qer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    End up going home in a pocket.

    1. Re:Computers that fit in a pocket by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

      Computers that fit in a pocket...

      Are great for throwing at coworkers.

    2. Re:Computers that fit in a pocket by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Sure would make the old Tech Park Softball League more interesting.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    3. Re:Computers that fit in a pocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      End up going home in a pocket.

      I feel a haiku thread a'comin!

    4. Re:Computers that fit in a pocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Computers that fit in a briefcase... ...end up going home in a briefcase.

      A clock you can wear on your wrist... ...ends up going home on a wrist.

      Stupid ass...what a moronic statement. Of all the stuff that's been...never mind, I'm not going to waste any more bandwidth proving your idiocy.

    5. Re:Computers that fit in a pocket by bitrott · · Score: 1

      Someone who tries stealing my pocket computer will go home with one less hand! MWAAHAHAHAa... eh

    6. Re:Computers that fit in a pocket by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1

      That's very humanitarian of you. Why don't you move to Iran or Saudi Arabia where such punishments are quite natural? I'm sure you'd love it there.

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    7. Re:Computers that fit in a pocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Stupid ass...what a moronic statement. Of all the stuff that's been...never mind, I'm not going to waste any more bandwidth proving your idiocy

      apparently you didn't get what he was saying, like going home in a pocket meaning it could be going courtesy of a 5 finger discount very easily

    8. Re:Computers that fit in a pocket by bitrott · · Score: 1

      I was joking nimrod.

  8. screen by penguinoid · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Uhh, with the screen it is bigger than a laptop :-(

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:screen by wed128 · · Score: 1

      yea but think of the possibilities... they could set up public terminals at places, issue them to the workforce...and BAM...you're using the same computer everywhere...

  9. is that an orange in your pocket? by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While it might be the size of a small orange it isn't exactly flat and I don't consider it to be conducive to fitting in my pocket. The other PDA to the left of the screen shot, while being quite a bit taller, is far thinner and would probably fit into a pocket easier than this.

    So the OS is some non-standard thing w/probably little or no support, the shape is not really good for "pocket PCs", there is no screen, and everything is in yen and Japanese ;)

    No thanks. I'll stick to my rarely stable PocketPC for now.

    1. Re:is that an orange in your pocket? by RevAaron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First, this isn't meant as a PocketPC. Yes, there's no screen and instead a VGA port- duh.

      The TRON family of OSes (of which this t-engine is a derivative) have plenty of support- in Asia. Not in the US, no.

      Rarely stable PocketPC? You should get a Linux PDA! I had to reboot my Zaurus far more times than I've had to reboot any PocketPC; and the reboots take 5 minutes instead of 20 seconds. Count your blessings. :)

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    2. Re:is that an orange in your pocket? by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm waiting for unlocked sidekicks, but the details are sketchy if SSH application will work without access to the application servers.

      The Sony P900 or the Treo 600 is the one that I would go with. But I really like the sidekicks size and layout. Too bad its locked to 1 carrier. Being able to SSH and having a fullsize thumbboard is really nice.

      The T-Cube seems like a perfect replacement for an audio/visual pc. I play all my mp3s/videos over the network on an Xbox. The t-cube has audio, not sure if the vga can do fast enough video for movies. 400mhz seems fast enough for it. Looks like a nice thin-client, but not being x86, having to port software would be a chore. If there was network streaming video/audio from a server, then it would be nice and seemeless. Mplayer streaming or VLAN streaming is the most popular.

      But ya, 2 different types of uses.

    3. Re:is that an orange in your pocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of the OS, from the article:

      Seems they want to build something that does not require to license Windows. Don't know why they not just adopt Linux.

      Sometimes people are blinded to marketforces by their own obsessions. How about the answer to this question is: Licensing Cash?

      Crazy people.

  10. So what? by rjstanford · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Honestly, I don't think that the size of a (not-very-powerful) computer matters beyond thresholds. Ie:

    Can it easily slip into my pocket?
    Yes: iPod, etc
    No: cube the size of an orange

    Can I carry it around easily?
    Yes: cube, laptop
    No: server

    Does it need reinforced flooring?
    Yes: mainframe
    No: server

    So, basically, I'm not seeing much of a reason to go minimalistic on computers. If portability is a concern, that's already solved with modern laptops - which this isn't meaningfully smaller than (I mean, can't be treated much differently than). If it isn't a concern, then you don't need the extreme small size. And if density is a concern, you're better off with more powerful systems (per cubic whatever) than smaller ones.

    Just MHO, of course.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    1. Re:So what? by Xzzy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I quite disagree.

      The lure of a small fully functional PC that's easily totable (granted this one isn't really pocket sized but it's still quite portable) and can plug into a full size keyboard/monitor kiosk type thing is definetly there. For me anyways.

      Granted the current world doesn't have the infastructure for this sort of thing but if it took off, I think it would be awesome to have a fully configured machine to my tastes available wherever I went.

      Even if it was just a gateway to accessing my real machine at home, it would have value because I would have every bit of software I'd need to get to my stuff.

    2. Re:So what? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A teach of mine told me that, back in the old mainframe and terminal days, when mass storage and computing were costly, students would be asked to buy keyboards. Owning a keyboard permitted you to use the mainframe at any terminal on campus.

      This seems almost like the reverse idea. Build docking stations to fit the cube, and you can carry the COMPUTER with you. No need to worry about the privacy of your data, or the expense of a monitor. I could see where this could become VERY popular in Asia, where the resources to give each person their own computer aren't there yet.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    3. Re:So what? by RevAaron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I totally agree. A small computer has a huge appeal to me and a lot of other folks. No, it'll never be the thing for gamers, or folks who prefer having a large and loud computer. Some people like that, just like some folks like having a large and loud car.

      I have a WinCE-based PDA/handheld PC/palmtop, the Sigmarion III. Japanese-only (like all the good stuf!), but as a non-Japanese speaker it works great for me after I had it imported.

      It has USB, which is rare on a PDA- so there is external kb and mouse. One day, I'd like to get a VGA out card for it. Software comes with it to run it on an external monitor at 1024x768- and not just for presentations, but acting as a regular video card. The cost is prohibative for me at this point, though, and not all that neccesary. As long as I have at least 640x480 I'm fine, and this thing runs at 800x480. VNC, remote X11, SSH/telnet, etc etc- I usually run all of my apps locally, but having the ability to run any app I need from my Linux file server (can't keep all those mp3s on SD cards!) is a bonus.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    4. Re:So what? by Ion+Berkley · · Score: 1

      Well, just concentrating on the purely technical aspects of size. Smaller is better because it implies shorter signal run which can then be faster, lower power and emit less radiation (radio noise).
      As for the shape...well a single board should always be more space efficient and cheaper because of the absence of interboard connectors, however when it is desirable to have a sensitive analog style componants mixed with noisy microprocessor style componants moving them to different boards can really simplfy things. Also if the board with the CPU needs many signal layers but the others only a few then that can change the cost equation.

    5. Re:So what? by kisrael · · Score: 1

      Yeah...I'm really tempted by those shuttlecases w/ the integrated handle (like the fragbox) especially since my friend convinced me to put my minitower on my desk rather than on the floor, for catfur reasons...

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    6. Re:So what? by astrawinski · · Score: 1
      As the parent suggested, a modern laptop fits the bill just fine. I carry mine around in a backpack designed for laptops. It doesn't weigh much. I can still plug my laptop into a "full size keyboard/monitor kiosk type thing" if I feel like I need to. If you have a laptop, you already have a fully configured machine to suit your tastes wherever you went. A laptop is also fully capable of being a "gateway" to your real machine at home. I have a cell modem on mine, but usually don't have any trouble scoring internet access unless I'm stuck in my car for some reason.

      I never understood the world's pre-ocupation with Pocket PC's. I get alot more bang for my buck with a laptop. My laptop bag weighs 17 lbs, which is easy to carry as it's a backpack. I weighed it just now and did a quick inventory.

      It's fully loaded, including
      • laptop (with a 15" screen, mind you)
      • Power Adapter
      • GPS receiver + USB cable
      • digital camera
      • rotor lock for my motorcycle
      • UTP patch cables
      • console cables (for cisco routers)
      • a spare hub
      • cell phone + USB cable (for cell modem functionality)
      • various adapters
      • CF card reader
      • small toolkit
      • T1-WIC (ya never know)
      • a few CD's.
      The only complaint I imagine one having is the weight. Obviously, the stuff I carry is in there is job related, so alot of it could be removed if you were not a network engineer. Even still, I'd put forth the notion that if someone thought 17 lbs was too heavy, then perhaps a trip to the gym every now and then might do them some good. Basically, I think modern laptops are quite "easily totable".
    7. Re:So what? by 87C751 · · Score: 1
      No need to worry about the privacy of your data
      You still have to trust that the kiosk isn't bugged. There could be a sniffer built into the keyboard, or the PS-2 cables you plug into your cube could lead to another computer instead of to the keyboard and mouse.

      When security is the issue, ask yourself if you are paranoid enough.

      --
      Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
    8. Re:So what? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      ask yourself if you are paranoid enough.

      Kid, you're paranoid enough for the both of us.

      Obviously, if your only source of communication is public, you've got to be careful what you're saying, no matter the transmission method. But there is a big security difference between reading unencrypted files saved on a public machine, and building an inline sniffer device. The former can be done by any curious person who comes along. The latter requires know how and intent. You're talking the difference between hidden cameras in the shower, and public nudity.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    9. Re:So what? by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      So, basically, I'm not seeing much of a reason to go minimalistic on computers.

      Perhaps the point is simply to demonstrate that it can be done? Look at it this way:

      1) Given that this thing can be crammed into an orange-sized cube, think how much more stuff could be crammed into a normal desktop (or laptop), using these components;
      2) Space - it doesn't occupy much, doesn't weigh much, and if you're launching one into space, those are both good characteristics.

      Sure, the thing as it is right now may not be the most useful toy around, but the techniques used in building it may well help put a Chinese base on the Moon...

  11. Nice by wobedraggled · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Looks like a mini gamecube.

    God, I love mini machines

    --
    Ubuntu- Linux for human beings.
  12. Imagine a beowu... by Takara · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I guess the web server, running on a 250 T-cube beowulf cluster mind you, couldn't stand up to the throngs of slashdotters.

  13. Re:Strange that they call it a "pocket computer".. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    What I want to know is... when did oranges become cubical?

  14. Just bad engineering by Rorschach1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't you think they could have designed a less-pointy form factor for a pocket computer? Sheesh.

    1. Re:Just bad engineering by Cruel+Angel · · Score: 1
      It does suck for the pocketses, but imagine a more rounded version. Maybe more orange like.

      "Damn, my computer keeps rolling off of the table."

      --
      Two Rules For Success:
      1) Never tell people everything you know.
    2. Re:Just bad engineering by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
      Don't you think they could have designed a less-pointy form factor for a pocket computer? Sheesh.

      I'd prefer one shaped like a cucumber, much more bang for the buck when you carry it around in your pocket.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  15. What's the big deal? by TWX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We've had PDAs for years, since the days of the Apple Newtons and early US Robotics Palms. We've had handhelds like the Casio handheld computer with the 200MHz MediaGX processor from Cyrix in it. We've had HP and Compaq handhelds that are powerful enough to play mp3s for about three years.

    Another small computer is cool, but is it really especially newsworthy?

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to get technical, the Pilot was releasedbefore USR bought the company ;)

      - DRFSR

    2. Re:What's the big deal? by exhilaration · · Score: 1

      Anything with the word "TRON" in its description is newsworthy... at least on Slashdot.

    3. Re:What's the big deal? by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      Another small computer is cool, but is it really especially newsworthy?

      Yes it is. There's a difference between a PDA (which you compared it to) and actual computer (desktop or laptop). The first PDAs failed because they were trying to be small computers with all the features. Palm realized this is not the way to go and created palm pilots as add ons to computers instead. That meant simple but stable interface, excellent battery life, etc. A palm owner was expected to have a desktop or laptop as his main computer, and use a PDA on the side, syncing the data whenever necessary.

      The article however mentions actual computer with it's own OS, various ports, etc. but in a very small form factor. This is not a PDA. You connect it to a monitor, keyboard, printer, ethernet, whatever, before you start working on it.

      Yes, the OS might not be very stable, only available in various Asian languages, but remember it's a first model. There will be upgrades and improvements. The fact that it is a full blown computer in such a form factor is however newsworthy.

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
  16. Orange you glad! by Wonderkid · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sorry. Old pun for a new age.

    --

    O'WONDERWe're working on it.

  17. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Replace the VGA output with another ethernet port, sell it for under $250, and I'll buy one.

  18. Article: New PC T-Cube as small as an Orange by thedillybar · · Score: 2, Informative

    At the TRON 2004 Show Japanese Personal Media Company shows off the T-Cube a pocket-size PC running T-Engine.

    T-Engine is somekind of OS standardization project for networked computers in Japan that started in 2002. Seems they want to build something that does not require to license Windows. Don't know why they not just adopt Linux.

    The T-Cube runs the current T-Engine OS and uses a CPU from NEC VR5701. The desktop is written for the chinese Market supporting Multi- and Super-Chinese Character sets.

    The T-Cube (tentative name) is supposed to ship in Q1 2004. Press-Release (Raw Translation)

    See also the Java Wrist Watches that were presented at the TRON 2004 show in Tokyo.

    1. Re:Article: New PC T-Cube as small as an Orange by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      I've been seeing alot of news and slashdot posts about TRON being the most popular OS in the world, but have not see it or used it.

      Is there an SDK for this OS somewhere, free for download? Support on migrating linux apps to it?

      Just currious, if TRON will make a migration to the US and electronics over here. That t-cube looks sweet, 400mhz cpu, even audio support.

  19. A little scary... by mr_mischief · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know that it's a pain for the Japanese, Chinese, Arabic, Russian, et cetera speaking people in the world to use systems mainly built by and for people who speak English, French, and German.

    It's a little scary, though, that the east Asian countries are developing their own track of OSes with which we in the west may have to learn to deal. It's also a scary thought that having a group of OSes for one set of people and another set of OSes for another set of people may slow or even reverse the growing commonality of international communication.

    Of course, this is coming from an American spoiled by the fact that most of the world is willing to learn my native language. I know enough of two other languages to make do, and enough of a fourth to find a taxi, hospital, restaurant, toilet, and hotel -- enough to travel in a pinch I guess. So I'm not the average Anglophonic snob. But still, it's a bit scary.

    Hopefully all the multi-byte character support and such built into the systems such as this can improve the same on other OSes. It' be a shame if we were to be separated by both language and platform from a substantial part of the world.

    1. Re:A little scary... by Xzzy · · Score: 1

      > It's a little scary, though, that the east Asian countries are developing their own track of OSes
      > with which we in the west may have to learn to deal.

      Man, that's a good thing. It's the competition microsoft always pays lip service to but never really deals with.

      I think if a powerful OS started filtering into the states from the east, nothing better could happen to our "western" systems. If the new system truly is an improvement, it will force us to adapt or die.

    2. Re:A little scary... by Quill_28 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      > So I'm not the average Anglophonic snob

      People like to slam American because they only know english, and frankly I am getting tired of it. Do you know how much learning another language would help me? Very little, see American is a pretty big place, and everyone(almost) speaks English.
      So the investment in time for most Americans to learn a language doesn't pay off. And even if I did what language should I learn?
      Spanish maybe, but every other language is a crapshoot.
      So lay off the "American are arrogant and stupid because they only know one languag" statements.

    3. Re:A little scary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe you should learn English a little bit better first.

    4. Re:A little scary... by gillbates · · Score: 1

      No, actually, it's a good thing.

      Homogenous systems tend to force everyone to adhere to the same standard, no matter what that standard is. With the substantial rise of non-Wintel platforms, Microsoft will lose their ability to shut competitors out of the market with proprietary file formats and protocols.

      Because the only truly portable documents are composed of byte streams, Microsoft will have to adopt fully open and standardized formats, or risk their customers losing connectivity with the rest of the civilized world.

      In much the same way that Microsoft destroyed the browser market by offering IE for free, I see Linux destroying the operating system market. It doesn't matter if only 10 percent of the users prefer Linux; Microsoft knows that some major manufacturers are selling PC's for less than the cost of a Windows license - a fact made possible because the vendor didn't have to pay Microsoft for an OS. And every hardware vendor can hang this over Microsoft's head: Give us windows at a price we like, or we'll push Linux and you won't get a dime . It really doesn't matter how many people choose Linux; the fact that it's available is problematic to Microsoft.

      In the same way, the prominence of a non-Wintel platform could reduce Microsoft's influence to a truly marginal role. They would be "just another vendor" as far as computer users were concerned. If I don't like the MS-Palladium DRM equipped PC, I'll just buy some far-east hardware and run Linux on it.

      Either way, it will be good for us, and good for Microsoft - they'll have to respond to what their customers want once again, and we'll get software at prices we can afford.

      --
      The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    5. Re:A little scary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do know English just not a great proof reader.

    6. Re:A little scary... by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      you're right. According to your arguments, they're only arrogant.

      There was a great interview on NPR earlier today, where the reporter being telephone interviewed described how his perception of events in Iraq was sometimes 180 degrees away from that of the military commanders'. The difference: the reporter's colleague spoke fluent arabic.

    7. Re:A little scary... by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      No, I have heard people call Americans arrogant because they only know one language.

      Maybe they assume Americans feel english is superior to other languages so they refuse to learn another language. But that is not the case for most people, it is simply is a matter not worth the time and effort.

      Also, I never claimed that knowing another isn't useful, but it is not near as useful for Americans as most other people.

      I for one do not like English and feel sorry for those that have to learn it.

    8. Re:A little scary... by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      Hopefully all the multi-byte character support and such built into the systems such as this can improve the same on other OSes.

      Other OSes already have excellent MBCS and Unicode support. Windows has been 100% Unicode since about NT 4; MacOS was designed to support Far Eastern languages from the ground up, and since OS 9 even the American version has had that support built in; and most modern Unix desktops (CDE, KDE, Gnome) have pretty good I18n, although it can be a little tricky to get CJK input working, and a lot of older Unix applications still assume all characters are 8 bits.

      In fact, the only thing I spend much time looking at on my computer that doesn't support multi-byte characters is Slashdot. ;)

    9. Re:A little scary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that it's a pain for the Japanese, Chinese, Arabic, Russian, et cetera speaking people in the world to use systems mainly built by and for people who speak English, French, and German.

      Look, goddamnit, we developed that technology! If they want it to speak their lingo, then they should develop their own.

      Which is, err, uh, just exactly what this article is about! Never mind!

    10. Re:A little scary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      English, apparently, doesn't like you either.

    11. Re:A little scary... by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      Hahahaha woohoo that's a good one.... how about a your momma joke? Or a dead baby joke?

      Those are great, I mean not as funny as you but still since we're acting like we are in jr high, I say go for it.

    12. Re:A little scary... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "It's a little scary, though, that the east Asian countries are developing their own track of OSes with which we in the west may have to learn to deal."

      Yeah well, it looks like everybody except Japan is going to be screwed in the future as everything is going to be displayed in constantly scrolling backwards kanji/kana if the Matrix is anything to go by.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    13. Re:A little scary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    14. Re:A little scary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not difficult to create a sentence that doesn't truncate words. Hell, you can't even tell the difference between two completely seperate statements! Repeat after me: "I do know English, but I'm not a great proof reader."

      That was EASY, WASN'T IT?

  20. Big Question. by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

    Is it, or does it Emulate X86?

    can't tell from the since it's slashdotted.

    1. Re:Big Question. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      does it really matter? did you read the blurb?

      the part conserning the t-engine os. you're not going to be running windows on it if that's what you're asking.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Big Question. by RevAaron · · Score: 1
      No it isn't x86. It's a NEC VR5701, which is a MIPS CPU, running a 400 MHz. Uhh, sure it could emulate x86- you could port bochs and run Linux or Windows that way. haha, that'd suck.



      hahahahaha. bochs. yeah right.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  21. All things considered by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 5, Funny

    Right now I'd rather have an orange.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:All things considered by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
      Right now I'd rather have an orange

      "The eating of an orange is a lot like a good marriage." - Hans Moleman

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    2. Re:All things considered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's a mikan, not an orange.

  22. alternatively by Bram+Stolk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Alternatively, you could get a cerfcube,
    which *does* run linux, and is smaller.

    see:
    http://www.intrinsyc.com/products/cerfcube /

    tcube site is slashdotted, but I suspect
    that the cerfcube consumes less power as
    well.

    --
    Bram Stolk http://stolk.org/tlctc/
    1. Re:alternatively by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      The T-Cube and CerfCube would use very similar amounts of power. Why would you assume the CerfCube uses less? PDA CPUs being used in both. Unless you're running on battery- which you're not by default, but still not likely in both these cases- the difference in power is negligable. We're not comparing a CerfCube and a laptop here.

      I imagine any difference in power has a lot to do with the functionality that the CerfCube lacks- no display out or input in. There's ethernet and CF. Not very useful as some ultra-mini-tiny desktop as they show the T-Cube.

      Unless you run everything via VNC serving from the CerfCube, and have a big, loud, 'n ugly 486 where you run your VNC client. :P

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  23. good job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You were the first to post a joke so stale it makes IN SOVIET RUSSIA look like pure comedic gold!

    A Winner Is You!

    1. Re:good job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but IN SOVIET RUSSIA the joke POSTS YOU!!!!

      Bwah ha ha ha ha!

  24. Stupid question by Godeke · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What is a "Super Chinese" character set? The main link goes to a machine translated article that makes for good post-modern poetry, but I don't have a clue why Super Chinese is better than internationally standard character sets. Does it bound tall monitors in a single scroll wheel flick or what?

    --
    Sig under construction since 1998.
    1. Re:Stupid question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the set with 13 million characters instead of the usual 11,000.

    2. Re:Stupid question by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      Super Chinese Super Buffet!

  25. Re:The next.. by billimad · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    heh their server is vapourware now

  26. Japan is working on that by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 5, Funny
    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
    1. Re:Japan is working on that by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Why am I not surprised?

    2. Re:Japan is working on that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $83 for a watermelon? Tell me I'm not parsing that correctly.

  27. Watermelons by The_Rippa · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now if the Japanese could only make cube-shaped watermelons...

    oh wait.

    1. Re:Watermelons by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not only can they make it, they have the market cornered.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Watermelons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen the square watermelons in Japanese super markets! Very cool. Once you see a Japanese fridge you'd see why they did this as well. Stack 2 hotel barfridges on top of each other and you've got the average Japanese fridge.

    3. Re:Watermelons by TheTomcat · · Score: 1

      You know that puns are the lowest form of humor, right?

      (-:

      S

    4. Re:Watermelons by foobsr · · Score: 1

      Oh heaven -- I recall a Barks story from my childhood (waaaay back) where they were producing square eggs exactly for the reason to save space.

      Yes, and of course there is some reference to it ... http://coa.inducks.org/coa/c1/story.php/0/W+OS++22 3-02

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    5. Re:Watermelons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knife...melon...space

  28. Re:Strange that they call it a "pocket computer".. by Storm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its gotta be the same pockets that we used to carry around 5.25" floppies in before they introduced the 3.5".

    No wonder fashion was so atrocious back then. 5.25" pockets...Helicopter collars...Platform shoes...ick.

    --
    --Storm
  29. I can put this down my pants but not in my pocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the spare room in my pants is in the crotch area, but not my pockets (I mostly wear baggy jeans). I could maybe see fitting an orange comfortably in my crotch, but not in my pocket. The trouble is, then I'd have a big bulge in the croth area.

  30. Exactly how big? by SlowDancing · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that an African or a European orange?

    1. Re:Exactly how big? by mstefanus · · Score: 1

      Asian orange... it's made in Japan.

    2. Re:Exactly how big? by Black+Perl · · Score: 1

      Asian orange...

      Okay, is it a Mandarin or a Satsuma orange?

      --
      bp
    3. Re:Exactly how big? by Descartes · · Score: 1

      How could a five ounce orange carry a one pound coconut?

    4. Re:Exactly how big? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a mikan, actually.

    5. Re:Exactly how big? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's believed to be Mandarin. In fact a swallow could carry it easily.

      Anyone who wants a good idea of its size should judge by the relative size of the vga port, since that gives you reliable measurements. Those oranges are particularly small-but as we all know it's not how big the orange is, it's how you use it. Unless you use it for the purpose other than the intended purpose, in which case it has to be very small to fit in there.

    6. Re:Exactly how big? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, a mikan (mandarin orange). Which is about half the size of an orange.

    7. Re:Exactly how big? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      "Asian orange..."
      Didn't we use that stuff in 'nam?

      --
      What?
  31. Specs? by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

    I can't get to the site... What are the specs on this little thing? How much of a hard drive and RAM are we talking?

    --
    Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
  32. This beats the pants off of Mini-ITX by billcopc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wouldn't you just love to build a super computer out of these tiny cubes ? Get a dozen, pop them in an old gutted VCR case and you just built a clustered TiVo.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:This beats the pants off of Mini-ITX by supremebob · · Score: 1

      So, in other words, you CAN imagine a Beowulf cluster of these! :)

  33. Pocket-sized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I hope the Japanese are fond of painter's pants and bib overalls.

  34. Apples and Oranges by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    So, is it the size of an orange, or of an apple?

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  35. It's probably a little smaller than an orange by djqed · · Score: 1

    Actually, the citrus fruit in the photo looks more like a mikan, a citrus fruit very common in Japan, similar to a tangerine (maybe it is actually a tangerine?) which is a fair bit smaller than your average Valencia orange. It's not as small as, say, a kumquat, but it can be enclosed in your average male fist to the point of being almost invisible. So the machine is maybe a bit smaller than people are initially thinking.

    1. Re:It's probably a little smaller than an orange by elmegil · · Score: 1

      I was actually going to make that point, those definitely look like tangerines or something related, not oranges.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    2. Re:It's probably a little smaller than an orange by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Still a bit awkward to have in one's pocket, though. That said, this isn't a PDA- it's a damn tiny computer. You're not going to be carrying it aroudn with you at all times like one often does with a PDA. You may have it in your pocket as you travel between work and home, sure- and in that case, it's a helluva lot smaller than any laptop.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    3. Re:It's probably a little smaller than an orange by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Well, you can always use the standard size vga and ethernet ports as a size reference

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  36. need to carry LCD? by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 2, Funny

    if this is meant to be a pocket PC, then I don't know where into my pocket I would fit this big LCD display (shown on the photo)...

    (all the sites are /. so I'll ask here:) does this thing come equipped with some small erm... pocket display?

    btw: IMHO the thing of this size and proportions does not fit good into trousers pocket.

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
  37. "Wearable?" by shakamojo · · Score: 1

    This might not be small enough to truly fit in your pocket, but it's powerful enough to make a good basis for the heart of a "wearable" comptuer system... nifty!

  38. more pictures by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Informative

    USB and CRT ports
    pictures of ports
    inside board stack (looks like it's 3 boards total)

  39. better picture by paradesign · · Score: 2, Informative
    better picture here .

    it comes in many colors!

    --
    I want 2D games back.
    1. Re:better picture by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      it comes in many colors!

      And if you put one of each color all together, they form a tiny giant robot!

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  40. These are cute, by webwench_72 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    very cute. But, I'm not seeing anything here besides citeness to sell these little things.

    They're portable: but so are PDAs. And unlike the tcube, PDAs come with an integrated screen and some means for inputting data. These don't, so they're of limited use on the road. Even for telecommuters, you might as well stick with your laptop.

    I suppose if you wanted to transport an entire data center to the other side of the floor, or even across town, these could be carried in a crate rather tna shipped on a truck. But, honestly, how often is this a consideration when choosing hardware?

    I suppose they could come in handy for a home network or informal hosting operation out of your basement. But unless they're cheap, I doubt people would choose them over the eight too-obolete-for-gaming-but-perfectly-good-for-any- other-purpose desktops they already have in their basements.

    What is the target market for these? People who like cute little multicolored boxes?

    --

  41. First fist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Is that an "averaged sized" asian male fist or occidental male fist?

    And why not flat? Seems PCBs are flat, it'd be easier to do.

  42. All else being equal by Freedom+Bug · · Score: 1

    Sure, but all else being equal or similar, I'll take the smaller item.

    The category for this one is "it fits easily inside pretty much any backpack". Laptops don't.

    Bryan

    1. Re:All else being equal by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      It also looks like it could take more than a wee bit of abuse, unlike just about any laptop out there ;)

      --
      No Comment.
  43. Potential Form Factors...Geekbook? by hirschma · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The "motherboard" on this must be super tiny. I'm guessing that it uses very little electricity, too.

    I'd love to see it in a clamshell handheld configuration - 800x480, wide format screen, perhaps 7" diagonal, minimal psion like keyboard, and a big old battery, something off the shelf, perhaps a pair of cell phone batteries. Trackpad eraser would be nice, too.

    Offer it with no memory (but with a SO-DIMM slot), cf slot (two better), ethernet, serial.

    Hardware only warranty, and let the user or vars populate the memory, storage device (flash or CF hard drive), memory. That way, it could be offered as cheaply as possible. Use a standard boot method, too.

    Then let the community decide on what OS to port to it - NetBSD, Linux, whatever. You'd end up with one device that spans from a very stripped PDA like config (minimal flash, memory), to something that could be a mini-notebook (lots of memory and up to 4 gigs of rotating storage), and everything in between.

    It could be a portable serial terminal for sysadmins, a mobile web/internet platform, a portable media player, or a total notebook replacement. Whatever you want it to be.

    I'd love one, and would pay near-notebook prices to get one. At under $600, it'd be a killer. Anyone else?

    Jonathan

    1. Re:Potential Form Factors...Geekbook? by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      cerfcube, man, cerfcube. :)

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    2. Re:Potential Form Factors...Geekbook? by elmegil · · Score: 1

      in a clamshell? Cerf doesn't look any nicer to carry around than the tangerine.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    3. Re:Potential Form Factors...Geekbook? by RevAaron · · Score: 3, Informative

      Such a beast exists, although it runs WinCE. My main machine has an 800x480 screen, though only 5" in size. Touch typable keyboard, etc too. sigmarion III. Fits in my pocket though, unlike a clamshell with a 7" screen. $500, which is very cheap compared to the handful of contenders.

      Buuut, there is a similar beast with a bigger screen and very similar stats. The Zupera Smartbook. Has a slower CPU though- 206 MHz StrongARM. (XGA = 800x480)

      Now all someone has to do is port Linux, NetBSD, whatver. Shouldn't be that bad, though I don't know what support chips it uses, which really is where the work comes in with these PDAs.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    4. Re:Potential Form Factors...Geekbook? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Do you know what the cerfcube is? It's expensive. And it doesn't have almost any of the features he listed. Seems enough to disqualify it.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    5. Re:Potential Form Factors...Geekbook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd love to see it in a clamshell handheld configuration - 800x480, wide format screen, perhaps 7" diagonal, minimal psion like keyboard, and a big old battery, something off the shelf, perhaps a pair of cell phone batteries.


      It's called a Windows CE portable, dumbass.

    6. Re:Potential Form Factors...Geekbook? by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure about that. Here are the biggies:
      Offer with no RAM + upgradeable: The site says it comes with 16/32 meg flash RAM, upgradeable, + 32/64megs SDRAM. While not exactly on the money, it's close
      He asked for ethernet: check
      He asked for serial connections: check
      Upgradeable storage: check (you can buy micro-drives for it)
      Standard Boot method: unsure. Hey, it runs Linux.
      Last I checked, this was about $470, much less than the $600. There are even upgradeable modules for customization available from the company. Not bad at all for a board that's readily accessible *today* for today's discriminating hobbyists.

      Admittedly, though, I skimmed over his "needs" of a clamshell case, 800x600 display, keyboard input, etc, but then again, I thought most of that was just merely wishful thinking on his half. Hell, I want a pony.

      A cerfcube would do fairly well in starting off a budding embedded engineer for pretty cheap. Go find some surplus LCD's, etc, and you could have a working prototype of whatever you wanted (although I'd probably ditch the cerfcube format and get the plain cerfboard). It's all in how you use it..

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    7. Re:Potential Form Factors...Geekbook? by hirschma · · Score: 1

      Both are great finds. The Smartbook, with the built in GPRS "modem", is amazing - outside of OS, it is damn near perfect. Wonder if anyone is going to actually sell them, and for how much?

      Thanks for the info.

      jonathan

    8. Re:Potential Form Factors...Geekbook? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      No problem. I prefer WinCE myself, for a number of reasons (more well ported/adapted unix tools than for the Zaurus, which is backwards!), but getting some Linux or NetBSD action on the Smartbook shouldn't be all that hard. On a list I'm on- Yahoo! Groups HandheldPCs - the topic of the Smartbook has come up a few times. A few people really want them, I imagine details on how to get one will pop up eventually too there. :)

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  44. 'Cube' and 'Pocket-Sized' in the same sentence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...should always set off the bullshit detector. A pocket-sized cube might be comfortable between the size of a sugar cube and a cube of pool cue chalk. We're a few years away from a computer in a 1" cube.

  45. PSU by fuck_this_shit · · Score: 0

    Nice, but now big is the powersupply going to be? I found that most "tiny" PCs out there often come with an external PSU not much smaller than the PC itself, making the device essentially worthless as something you can stick in your pocket or glue under your desk with a used chewinggum.

  46. I like them... by cuyler · · Score: 1, Funny

    Although they probably won't fit in a picket easily you could likely have the cutest beawulf cluster out there - it would be like playing with blocks. I'd love to have a server room that looked like this.

  47. So like PC/104 but different. by Kenja · · Score: 1

    Its a little smaller then PC/104 and lacks the customization options that PC/104 has. How is this at all interesting?

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:So like PC/104 but different. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet it's cheaper.

  48. T-Engine to Linux by mekkab · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just to bring this to reality for you geeks out there, Some info on the embedded OS word.

    See? It all comes back to Linux! ;)

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  49. Re:Hello? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my flu-incubating brain actually laughed at this...

  50. Tron, The Most Popular OS in the World by fuck_this_shit · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It's running tron judging by the screenshots.

    What is the world's most widely used operating system? It's not Windows , Unix or Linux, but ITRON, a Japanese real-time kernel for small-scale embedded systems. ITRON runs on mobile phones , digital cameras, CD players and countless other electronic devices.

    ITRON emerged as an ambitious Japanese initiative known as The Real-time Operating system Nucleus (TRON). Launched in 1984, TRON was designed to replace disparate computer systems with a unified, open architecture for a "total computer environment."

    [...]

    The ITRON specification is a standard real-time OS kernel that can be tailored to any embedded system. ITRON already has been ported to a wide range of microprocessor architectures and has quickly become Japan's de facto standard for embedded systems. Today, the specification is used in an estimated 3 billion microprocessors.

    http://www.linuxinsider.com/perl/story/31855.html

    1. Re:Tron, The Most Popular OS in the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We know. Please stop karma whoring.

    2. Re:Tron, The Most Popular OS in the World by fuck_this_shit · · Score: 1

      You might know, but after reading the +5 replies before I posted the above I could conclude that neither those "important" commentators nor the moderators do.

  51. bigger than it looks. by jonhuang · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Note that the power supply isn't shown. Chances are, they'll use a commercial wallwart which will increase the size 25 to 100%

    that said, neato. looks way too much like a gamecube.

  52. Re:Strange that they call it a "pocket computer".. by RevAaron · · Score: 1

    Sounds a bit more like the 70s than the 80s- I you sure you're not thinking about 8" floppies rather than 5.25"?

    --

    Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  53. The Deadly CUBES! by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2, Funny

    When combined, these cubes can form various deadly weapons!!

    Be afraid!

  54. It gets worse: by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    "It is almost double, or even triple, that of a normal watermelon. "

    God bless America, where I can get my watermelon for $2 a piece on the Independence and Memorial days, as is proper.

    Now if I could just find a way to ship those $2 watermelons to Japan and sell them for $30!!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:It gets worse: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing you're not a business-man, otherwise you'd know that shipping and distribution would leave you with debt.

    2. Re:It gets worse: by bpd1069 · · Score: 1

      Whats the cost per gallon (or litre) of desalination these days?

      Get a bunch of decomissioned barges, plop a desalination rig on one, have it securely anchored in some storm resistant bay/inlet, and pump out a butt load of hydroponic produce! At the prices these asian countries are paying for fruit, I suspect there has got to be a *sweet* spot in there somewhere.

      This blurb pegs a new design circa 1996 (nuke plant required) pegs in at 1000$/acre... Assuming thats per year (or even growing season), you could couple the technologies to solve alot of the problems evident in arid/thrid world countries...

      Hmmmmm... anyway, back to reality...

      --
      --
  55. cluster? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    You could put a ton of those in a two-rack-space case... probably 16 or 20, right? I wonder how the heat dissapation is, because that would beat the rack density of just about everyone!

    --
    stuff |
  56. If it could play games by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

    I'd buy one in a hearbeat.

  57. Cube? Or Sphere? by fishbowl · · Score: 3, Funny

    A cube the size of an orange, Would that be the average of Riemann sums of the cube inside the orange versus the cube that contains the orange?

    There is a pretty big difference in size between a cube that would fit inside an orange, versus a cube that an orange would just barely fit inside.

    Isn't there some cubic object that would have made a better analogy? The only thing I see on my desk is the rubik's cube. I'm sure I could do better but I'm in a hurry.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  58. Re:Strange that they call it a "pocket computer".. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know, with computers that small, they might as well come up with interesting cases for them. Who wouldn't want a functional pocket-size computer in the shape of a miniature Cray X-MP? Or inside an empty 12 oz. can of Jolt Cola?

    Think of the applications for toy lines, particularly action and fashion figures!

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  59. Answer by kahei · · Score: 1

    By 'super chinese' the article seems to mean 'the set of characters supported by ChoKanji'. I have no idea what it means by 'multi chinese'. You'd think they could have just given the names of the character sets.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    1. Re:Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idea what it means by 'multi chinese'.

      MBCS?

  60. Actual size of the T-Cube by base_chakra · · Score: 4, Informative

    The T-Cube's dimensions are 52x52x45mm. That's pretty damn small!

    For those outside Asia, comparing the T-Cube's size to an orange may be a little misleading, although it's apparent from the photo that the oranges are smaller than navel oranges. To further clarify the point of reference, djqed is right in that the oranges in the photos are mikan. 'Mikan' is the Japanese word for mandarin oranges, of which tangerines are one type (but the oranges in the photos aren't tangerines).

  61. TRON by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    Tron is not an OS, but a specification (like POSIX is not an OS, but a specification). Tron is normally used for embedded applications. This device should have two benefits: expanding the use of Tron into a new area and also drawing on Tron expertise.

    I've heard there's a tTRON wrapper for eCOS, but have not checked this out personally.

    A 400MHz CPU can achieve a lot if not loaded with a fat-ass OS. One of the slickest machines I've ever seen was a RiscOS box running on a 200MHz ARM.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:TRON by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      There have been various *TRON-based desktops in Japan for quite a while. See bTRON. Looking at those screenshots it looks like this is what the T-Cube is running, although it's been renamed and remarketed. Same company, PMC.

      Indeed, without a big, slow OS a lot can be done. Certain things will be slow no metter the OS on a 400 MHz CPU- MP3 encoding, for example. My main machine is a 400 MHz WindowsCE box. Tiny, light, and fast as hell. Anything else that Win9x/NT has I don't need and haven't missed. And in a ROM of 32 MB the whole OS and a ton of support apps fit.

      A lot of people are probably wondering here why I'd be running Windows CE instead of Linux on a slower CPU. There are a lot of reasons, the biggest being that Linux can't hack it in this area yet. The Zaurus C760- even with the same CPU, twice the RAM and twice the ROM- is less functional and tons slower. I may run Linux on my file server (was a desktop, long ago), but I'm not going to cripple myself again. One day I'll be able to switch back on my primary...

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    2. Re:TRON by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure about this device, but quite a few CPUs have basic dsp capability which can be of significant benefit for MP3 etc. Having worked on a few WinCE and Linux projects at the OS level, I'd say WinCE isn't as efficient as Linux in raw kernel terms. The WinCE GUI side is reasonably fast though, so long as you don't use MFC. I have never used a Zarius so can't make any comparisons.

      It would be nice to think that at some stage we'll see a trend back towards lighter-weight software. There might seem little point (with Moore's Law bringing us faster CPUs etc), but lighterweight software means we can do the same thing with smaller CPUs, less power etc (eg. maybe a 200MHz ARM using 500mW rather than a 3GHz Pentium using ???W).

      --
      Engineering is the art of compromise.
    3. Re:TRON by RevAaron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just working with something that is raw calculations, I wouldn't doubt that Linux can squeeze out a percent or two more than WinCE. What does this matter when the applications and libraries written on top of this perform poorly? No, the blame can't go to Linux, but as far as the majority of folks are concerned, it's irrelevant.

      But when it comes down to actually using the thing, the whole WinCE package *feels* a ton faster (even using MFC, provided it's a newer machine) than using Linux/Qtopia or Linux/X11. Linux/PicoGUI is another story, though not far enough along.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    4. Re:TRON by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

      IMHO, the WinCE drivers etc are pretty expensive CPU wise. They're a complete suck to develop for too. I can do a build (1 source file changed)+tftpboot of a Linux image on ARM in 15 seconds. At present it takes me about 10-15 minutes on WinCE mainly due to rally broken build tools. Of course this does not really matter to the user.

      --
      Engineering is the art of compromise.
  62. Out of this World by zwanglos · · Score: 1

    If only it could speak to me, pretend to be my father, and I could freeze time, I could be just like that girl in Out of this World - that sweet show from the 80s that featured Burt Reynolds trapped in a cube.

    1. Re:Out of this World by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      That the Burt Reynolds? I can't tell if that ruined my unending adoration for the Out-of-this-World Dad (#1!!) or if it boosted it. Wow. What a day.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  63. Camera by penguinoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can I use my digital camera as a screen for one of these? Heh, nothing like having a few GB of hard drive for storing pictures.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  64. Can't find its daddy. by blair1q · · Score: 1

    The thing looks almost exactly like the red-headed bastard child of a Telebit Qblazer modem, although I can't find a pic...

  65. Bastards! by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

    They stole my design!

    I am planning a nano-itx box, with a laptop DVD and hard drives, in a tiny case, either cube-shaped or the size of a medium sized paperback book.

    I can't move forward until the nano-itx boards come out in the spring.

    Of course, I'm planning on making mine black, not hideous orange...

    1. Re:Bastards! by gordyf · · Score: 1

      This thing is way smaller than a laptop dvd... check out the pics..

    2. Re:Bastards! by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      A laptop DVD is only a few milimeters bigger than a nano-itx board.

      My plan is a quasi-laptop like thingy the size of one of those tiny portable DVD players.

    3. Re:Bastards! by gordyf · · Score: 1

      You can still hardly say that they stole your design - my point being that a laptop DVD alone makes your design much larger than this one.

  66. Borg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another incident of life imitating Star Trek? Watch out, these things will be en route to earth in about 375 years.

  67. Maybe they are aimed at the Hello Kitty buyers.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe Tamagouchi...

  68. Is it painted red/white/green? by hoochiepapa · · Score: 0

    So do you have to twist it around about a milio times to get the ports to line up? (think Rubiks cube)

    1. Re:Is it painted red/white/green? by bhima · · Score: 2, Funny

      No you just peel the labels off and put them in the right place!

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  69. Re:Strange that they call it a "pocket computer".. by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it's going to be a pocket computer, why can't they shape it like a bratwurst?

    --
    What?
  70. Not really an orange. by infinite9 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, it's not sitting next to oranges. They're mikans, sort of like tangerines. These things are somewhere between the size of a golf ball and a tennis ball. Very tasty too.

    And that price tag is not really abnormal in Japan. When I was there, 10,000 yen was about $40. They were selling cantaloupes for that price. They would cut the vine nicely and gift wrap them in little window boxes. Now, that's about $100. Oddly enough, honeydew melons were only about 500 yen at the time, maybe $2.

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    1. Re:Not really an orange. by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      "Not really an orange"
      Maybe not, but how does it compare to an Apple?

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Not really an orange. by los+furtive · · Score: 1
      My lazy attempt to quote the Simpsons:

      Moe: "And to think I'll die without ever tasting a cantaloupe."

      Krusty: "Honeydew, that's the money melon."

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    3. Re:Not really an orange. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, this little computer is smaller than an orange.

  71. How about this one ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Is that a PC in your pocket or you just happy to see me." ** ducks **

  72. Oranges and mikans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you look at the photo,the computer is compared to a mikan--a tangerine much smaller than an orange. That'll better accommodate most pockets.

  73. "Pocket-size cube" is an oxymoron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless maybe the cube is a pair of dice.

  74. custom operating systems rarely win by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The world rarely needs more than 2-3 operating systems. Windows, Linux, and MacOS more than fill this market.

    1. Re:custom operating systems rarely win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about embedded systems, etc?

      As far as computers go, let's forget Windows and Linux and let's all switch to Mac OS X (if Apple would go OSS all the way, that is - which they'll never do).

    2. Re:custom operating systems rarely win by bhima · · Score: 1
      Desktop OS and RTOS aren't the same thing or in the same market. TRON (and ITRON) are extremely popular RTOS platforms / API and they are used in a lot of devices developed in Japan. I'd say kernels with their API are at least as successful Linux + Mac + *BSD in their arena!.

      In fact I wouldn't be particularly surprised if they had more installations.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  75. Buy Two by PingPongBoy · · Score: 3, Funny

    When you put them in your shirt pockets you look like you have breast implants.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    1. Re:Buy Two by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Bizarro breast implants, maybe.

      "You hate me implants, me not think cubist, me make smaller for you, hello!"

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  76. Mini-Dvd media? by NightWulf · · Score: 1

    I see a little slot in some of the pictures. I know it's much too small for an average floppy or CD. I figure it must be for mini-disc as that's popular in Japan. My question is in America, could those mini-dvd discs; such as those used in the Gamecube be used?

    1. Re:Mini-Dvd media? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats a CF slot

  77. Efficient computer design by BeProf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've thought for a while (ever since the G4 Cube) that cubes make for a more effiecient use of space. Unfortunately, 'efficient' here means more internal volume for less surface area. That tends to lead to heat problems, but that shouldn't be a problem here.

    What I'd really like to see is a 'cluster' appliance that looks something like this, but can 'stacked' via some kind of edge connector on the sides.

    Lego computing!

    --
    You are attempting to read sigs. Cancel or Allow?
  78. One Lump or Two? by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    One advantage of a cube is stackability. The Virginia Tech's X is an example of how to build yourself a very powerful computer, but can you run that in the back of a van? Too much space is wasted. I can link cubes together, put some legs on them and end up with a computer centipede.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  79. This wouldn't suck. by MsGeek · · Score: 1
    No it isn't x86. It's a NEC VR5701, which is a MIPS CPU, running a 400 MHz. Uhh, sure it could emulate x86- you could port bochs and run Linux or Windows that way. haha, that'd suck.

    Not really, Debian has you covered. Native Linux, probably ready to go.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:This wouldn't suck. by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Yes, Linux, NetBSD and others support MIPS. But this isn't a standard x86 PC; support chips and other factors vary so widely that it isn't a matter of putting in some standard bootable CD/floppy/CF card and letting the install fly. Folks without any embedded experience often don't appreciate this. (not saying you don't, so don't freak out) One MIPS machine can be entirely and totally different from another, even when the CPU is identical; but since there are about a million and one MIPS variants, that too is likely to be an issue.

      It's pretty unlikely that this is ready to go. But you never know- PMC may have been doing work toward this end as a way to push their products in the non-Asian world.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  80. It has to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that a T-Cube in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

  81. !=orange by not_anne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The pictures show tangerines, not oranges. Tangerines are smaller, flattened at the poles, fatter at the equator, and darker orange.

    --
    My comments here are my own; I do not speak for my employer.
  82. The specs.... I think. Maybe... It is in japanese by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Specs for the cube

    Looks like standard PDA type hardware except for the resolution out. But then of course it doesn't have a display of its own.

    BTW looking at the larger pics. Doesn't the design seem awfully open? I can see inside through several large holes. In my pocket that would not survive long. And yes my pocket is large enough to fit it though the corners may be a bit much.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  83. firewall by krokodil · · Score: 1

    One use I see, is to add another ethernet port and use it as firwall. You just put it on the cable between your DSL/cable modem and the hub.

    WI-FI would be nice add-on as well.

  84. Lego by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    They should just make them out of lego - would make clustering one HELL of a lot easier.

  85. Pointless pedantry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The plural of "mikan" is "mikan".

  86. navel or valencia? by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    I've always liked the Cerfcube myself.

  87. I expect this to happen sooner than we think by Artifex · · Score: 1
    I think if a powerful OS started filtering into the states from the east, nothing better could happen to our "western" systems. If the new system truly is an improvement, it will force us to adapt or die.


    If you ask yourself what the two most populous nations are on Earth, and what their primary languages are, you end up with lots of Chinese and Indian dialects.

    Not only that, but other languages' needs have pushed the envelope for everyone already: English is the language of convenience, but we wouldn't have the quality of display systems or input methods we have now if Asians hadn't needed the ability to type their many-thousand-character pictographic languages and have them readable on computer screens or TV overlays (news broadcasts, movies, etc.)

    Once they get the intellectual capital they need, which it looks like they just about have, everyone had better hang on tight. Like Neal Stephenson predicted, the US might eventually be known best for things like pizza delivery. I already have my storage unit picked out :)
    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  88. small pc by bobsalt · · Score: 1

    this is all fine and dandy, but where can I find something that I can isntall linux on, that is 100% solid state and has 2 eth ports?


    1. Re:small pc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.soekris.com/

  89. Re:Strange that they call it a "pocket computer".. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not an orange, that's a mikan! Much smaller.

  90. Thin Client by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    This thing would be great as a thin client. If you could have an X-Server running on there, then it would simply be a matter of plugging in and go. Or, if you had VNC then you could use you computer from any room. You would just need a screen, keyboard and mouse.

    At the end of the day you really need to look at it and see in what ways it could be used. Go beyond the shape and think of what sort of things this could be integrated into, without its case.
    I could also imagine a wall based MP3 player. Your imagination is the limits.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  91. What you're missing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that portable doesn't just mean carrying it around. This would be the perfect PC for a in-car PC setup. Cube are way to big to fit into an already small car (like a sports car), and this would be the perfect platform to use to play MP3s, do navigation, etc and controlled via voice or touchscreen.

    Even if this thing costs $1000, if I coud get a touchscreen for $300, USB GPS for $150, harddrive, mic, and misc for a total of less than $2000, I'm at the cost of factory nav way more capability (and cool geek factor)

    1. Re:What you're missing.. by tambo · · Score: 1
      What you're missing... is that portable doesn't just mean carrying it around. This would be the perfect PC for a in-car PC setup.

      Alright, people, let's think about this for a sec. You have a portable computer with no screen, no speakers, no input devices. But it does have a processor, and a network adapter, and some audio circuitry. Why? These components are basically useless unless you have more gear, so why carry them around?

      Look at it another way. When you plug your personalized device into a general-purpose device, what do you want that's personalized? You want your data, of course... but you don't need, or even want, your personal CPU. Or your personal network card, or your personal audio hardware...

      Just evision it. You walk up to a keyboard-video-mouse (KVM) kiosk, plug in your Pentium-6-Embedded-Edition processing device, and do some computing. Then you unplug it and walk away, and the next guy walks up and plugs in his Pentium-6-Embedded-Edition processor. And the next guy, and the next guy. Don't you see that the chips are fungible? Why does everyone need one for themselves? Is using your friend's portable-computing processor any different from using yours to do the same computing?

      There's an obvious alternative: embed the processor into the KVM kiosk, and into every other general-use device. All you carry around is your data, because that's the only component that is useful to personalize.

      (There's a second alternative, too. You don't carry around anything, except maybe a general-purpose access device for reaching your home computer. Every device you use in public or carry around is just a gateway to your home server. It doesn't get much more elegant than that.)

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    2. Re:What you're missing.. by Physics+Nobody · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "There's an obvious alternative: embed the processor into the KVM kiosk, and into every other general-use device. All you carry around is your data, because that's the only component that is useful to personalize."

      This was done back in the day. It was called the floppy disk. Of course these days we laugh at the capacity of floppies, but there was a time when the only storage computers had was the floppy disk you put in! It's sort of sad that we've moved away from this concept, but nobody can agree on a friggin standard. You might claim that CD-RWs are it, but most machines don't have the capability to write to them and even those that do can't do it nearly fast enough.

      This is really a technical problem (don't expect to see a successor to the floppy disk, since if you don't make the heads part of the disk it can't be competetive in performance but if you do it will make the media cost too damn much). Maybe some sort of flash technology will do it someday, but right now flash is just too expensive and too small.

      "There's a second alternative, too. You don't carry around anything, except maybe a general-purpose access device for reaching your home computer. Every device you use in public or carry around is just a gateway to your home server. It doesn't get much more elegant than that."

      This can sort of be done today. I leave my computer running all day, ssh into it from the lab and even run X applications on it (and everyone bitches about the networking stuff in X...do you people have any idea how useful it is?), but I can't do the same thing anywhere because most places don't have the right software installed and don't have the bandwidth (I am lucky enough to have my computer at home hooked into the same campus-wide network as the machine in the lab). I don't see either of those problems going away anytime soon.

      Processors are cheap (well, cheap processors are cheap...that doesn't mean that the latest Pentiums and Athlons are, but most people don't need that). If you can improve compatability and utility by putting the processor in there then I say go for it.

      --

      Physics is good

    3. Re:What you're missing.. by tambo · · Score: 1
      This was done back in the day. It was called the floppy disk. Of course these days we laugh at the capacity of floppies...

      Yeah, but that difference is key. Even without Windows bloatware, you couldn't carry around your OS, programs, and all of your files on one floppy. Maybe on a box of floppies, but that's painful beyond belief.

      It's sort of sad that we've moved away from this concept, but nobody can agree on a friggin standard.

      Java is a good, open computing standard. You probably own a dozen microprocessors that implement Java directly at the hardware level - including your microwave and your car stereo. The interface between Java hardware and Java software is defined with elegance and crystal clarity: in theory and (mostly) in practice, any device that runs the Java instruction set can run programs based on the Java software standard.

      The only component truly missing is middleware: a good Java-based operating system that can provide a consistent computing interface to your software (programs and data), and that can cope with whatever Java hardware you want to use. Interface scaling will be key: a Java desktop with a large screen and lots of memory should provide a much more robust interface than a Java PDA.

      This can sort of be done today. I leave my computer running all day, ssh into it from the lab and even run X applications on it...

      I do the same with Terminal Services. Using that package made me realize the idea that I posted above.

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    4. Re:What you're missing.. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      When you plug your personalized device into a general-purpose device, what do you want that's personalized? You want your data, of course... but you don't need, or even want, your personal CPU.

      You do when when you want your own personal platform that isn't a Pentium-6-Embedded-Edition.

      Maybe I'm in a place that has only PCs, maybe one that has only Macs. Maybe for accessibility reasons they lock all the machines to a 640x480 resolution, and restrict customization. But if it is my OS running on my processor, I should have full freedom to customize my experience.

      And I don't need much infrastructure to take advantage of my platform. Unless the venue caters only to laptops, then displays, keyboards, mice, and Ethernet are already present and I just patch in my cube. (OK, there are some problems finding compatible devices as the cube has VGA and USB ports and there's DVI, ADC, PS/2, and ADB devices to deal with and no easy way to convert VGA and USB to them.)

      But then if you know you're going to be dealing with Mac workstations, you could just install Mac OS X into your iPod and boot any modern Mac off the iPod as a Firewire drive. But then, that's not using the almighty Pentium processor. (Even if you could also install Microsoft Windows XP to the same drive, you can't boot just any machine off of it due to their licensing method being tied to the system configuration. Microsoft has effectively locked themselves out of the portable OS market.)

      All you carry around is your data, because that's the only component that is useful to personalize.

      Not so. People also wan't to personalize their displays to a comfortable resolution, change mouse sensitivity, double-click rate, maybe even keyboard layouts. There are many other things one might want to customize, including using applications that aren't ubiquitous. It is reasonable to want a customized OS.

      And it isn't much to extend that to want your own processor that is capable of running your OS of choice. Even if it is T-Engine.

      Is there a version of Linux ported to Java?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    5. Re:What you're missing.. by tambo · · Score: 1
      You do when when you want your own personal platform that isn't a Pentium-6-Embedded-Edition.

      The OS is different from the processor. Sure, you want an OS interface that's closely tailored to your needs. But the OS is software, held within your data store, so you do get the same user interface wherever you go.

      As long as that's true, do you really care what processor is running that OS? All you want is a processor that adds, loads, stores, does binary compares... Windows XP runs 99.99999999% the same on a Pentium as on an Athlon chip. A cross-platfrom OS like I'm describing wouldn't care about the brand of chip you're running.

      if you know you're going to be dealing with Mac workstations, you could just install Mac OS X into your iPod and boot any modern Mac off the iPod as a Firewire drive.

      But see, that's the point. You don't have a Mac OS or a Microsoft OS or a Linux OS. You just have an operating system that provides an interface customized as you wish, ready to match the hardware you've provided.

      Is it really far-fetched? Modern OS's look pretty damn similar - we're down to small differences in application launching and window styles. And they all run Java right now. This could be done right now: Java middleware designed to provide a universal OS experience could be built into the data store and auto-run on every platform.

      People also wan't to personalize their displays to a comfortable resolution, change mouse sensitivity, double-click rate, maybe even keyboard layouts.

      Again, you're confusing hardware with OS. Are those settings stored somehow on the processor? No, they're just software settings stored in files (win.ini, or the OS registry.) Of course you carry those around in your file store, to be run by the OS stored in the same file store.

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    6. Re:What you're missing.. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      The OS is different from the processor. Sure, you want an OS interface that's closely tailored to your needs. But the OS is software, held within your data store, so you do get the same user interface wherever you go.

      As long as that's true, do you really care what processor is running that OS?


      It matters if the OS I want to run won't run on that processor. It matters if the proprietary apps I need to run have not been (and will not be) ported to a cross-platform OS. Maybe I want a portable platform capable of running NEXTSTEP. Maybe I need a faster processor than is provided by the kiosk, or I need multiple processors because I can't be standing by a kiosk for 12 hours while it encodes in multiple passes my DV footage into MPEG-2 video. (But if multiple users each provided their own processor, perhaps cycles could be shared and tasks performed much faster than a single service provider could do.)

      There are many things of concern to the end user that would warrant the end user having control over what CPU is used. OS choice is only one of them. Not everyone wants to unify under one operating system. Not everyone wants to be one with the Borg, no matter who gates to be the queen.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  92. Re:Cube? Or Sphere? by BitchKapoor · · Score: 1

    Probably similar volume

  93. A Beowulf cluster of these would.... by Zendude · · Score: 1

    ...fit in a shoebox.

  94. More reason to support Unicode by GCP · · Score: 1

    Microsoft and Apple have both achieved an extraordinary reduction in platform fragmentation by making some form of Unicode the native system charset in all of their current OSes, and the native text handling APIs are richly internationalized.

    If all users could take for granted that any standard Linux installation was as well equipped, by default, to handle their own language as it was to handle any other, then there wouldn't be so much pressure in various countries to produce local or regional variants (not just of OSes, but of things like protocols -- DNS hostnames, for example).

    Insist on Unicode-based systems if you want to minimize the fragmentation, incompatibility, and confusion that will otherwise result as the Internet revolution sweeps over the non-Western world.

    It's not just in their best interest, but in *yours* too.

    --
    "Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
  95. POSIX, The Third Most Popular OS in the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Specification != Operating System.

    1. Re:POSIX, The Third Most Popular OS in the World by fuck_this_shit · · Score: 1
      TRON == OS

      POSIX != OS

      Your argumentation != Logic.

  96. Computer the size of an orange? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I suppose I need to setup a Citrix server?

  97. A PC the size of an Orange, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I bet Apple are getting worried.

  98. so.... by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    how long do you think until netbsd gets ported over to this?

  99. Re:Strange that they call it a "pocket computer".. by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

    Or inside an empty 12 oz. can of Jolt Cola?


    What do you mean you "recycled" my computer?

    Sera
    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.