Politicians are not interested in reforming. Once you commit a crime, you crossed the other side, i.e. you become a person that should have not existed.
SIMD and MIMD architectures are well known solutions for parallelizable problems for over 40 years now.
The Transputer was released in 1984. Transputer CPUs in 16x16 or in 32x32 configurations could do raytracing in low resolutions in almost real-time, back then.
Stream processing is nothing new, it just became affordable for PCs.
Although the movie is incredibly bad, people go see it.
It's because it has the names Kirk and Spock in the titles. The exact same movie with Picard and Data would be labeled as boring and as bad as Nemesis.
When the mouse is over the sidebar, the sidebar expands and presents all the tabs. When the mouse gets away from the sidebar, the sidebar is minimized and the web page is shown in all its glory.
"I did not get filthy rich, because instead of you people paying me money for every shitty movie I have made, you download it from the internet; therefore, the internet is useless".
The brain is a neural network with only one function: pattern matching.
All the experiences of a person (sight, sound, smell, etc) are stored in the brain and linked with responses. The brain's function is to apply pattern matching in order to find the response that matches the current experience in the maximum degree.
For example, when we see danger, our levels of discomfort rise above normal levels. This is because the brain has recalled a previous experience which is linked with a response that makes us move.
This is why babies, that lack those experiences, are not afraid of dangerous things, for example fire or heights.
When the scientists realize this simple truth, AI will become a child's problem.
Innocently? you mean taking photos or army and airforce bases? where it is strictly prohibited and there are labels everywhere around the bases that taking photos or videos is explicitly forbidden?
Boost::signals doesn't need to work across threads because it can be made to work across threads with very little code. All that you need is a single template class which wraps the signal into a QEvent.
No ugly mess if whatever common functionality they have is removed from Qt.
I was listening to a sports show on my local radio station, and the people talked about Star Trek. Do you know what they talked about? the Borg!!!
It seems that the Borg were different enough as a threat from other sci-fi shows that made them stuck in people's minds. I think the Borg was good sci-fi, due to the fact that they were a mixture of biological and mechanical entities and being a single collective consciousness.
Seriously, with all the writing talent out there, this is the best they can do? ANOTHER time travel plot? I'm surprised Spock didn't try to save some whales while he was there.
That's your criterion, and mine as well. Not to Paramount though: their criterion is the $$$, and judging from the opening so far, it is quite successful.
Don't hold your breath for a proper Star Trek movie or series. The best we will get from now on is Star Wars in the Trek universe.
It's not the gameplay that is important in these games, it's the atmosphere, the wow factor. In all single-player FPS, the gameplay is nothing more than shoot-the-bad-guys, but some games do it in a fun way, some are dull...
1) the whole Federation Fleet was at another sector, leaving Earth and Vulcan unprotected.
2) The Narada kicks the shit out of the few vessels that traveled to Vulcan, which means they had some serious weaponry, but when it was time to fight the Enterprise...they had nothing.
3) The transporters became magic devices. First Scotty and Kirk beam out from Delta Vega to the USS Enterprise, while the latter is in warp, and then from Titan to Earth.
4) Wasn't Delta Vega at the edge of the Milky Way?
5) why did they fire at the Narada in the end? it was going down.
Slashdot Mirror
Politicians are not interested in reforming. Once you commit a crime, you crossed the other side, i.e. you become a person that should have not existed.
If I need to play the new games now, instead of 5 years later, then I don't think paying $100 more now is very important.
SIMD and MIMD architectures are well known solutions for parallelizable problems for over 40 years now.
The Transputer was released in 1984. Transputer CPUs in 16x16 or in 32x32 configurations could do raytracing in low resolutions in almost real-time, back then.
Stream processing is nothing new, it just became affordable for PCs.
You are right.
Although the movie is incredibly bad, people go see it.
It's because it has the names Kirk and Spock in the titles. The exact same movie with Picard and Data would be labeled as boring and as bad as Nemesis.
When the mouse is over the sidebar, the sidebar expands and presents all the tabs. When the mouse gets away from the sidebar, the sidebar is minimized and the web page is shown in all its glory.
You just revealed the next step.
Watch how this plan fails spectacularly...and then they will ask to put a chip in our children...and then the adults will follow...
I am not touching G. W. Bush, no matter how hungry I am. I'd rather die...
"I did not get filthy rich, because instead of you people paying me money for every shitty movie I have made, you download it from the internet; therefore, the internet is useless".
The oldest christian Church is the Orthodox Church, not the Catholics.
That's a lower level function which is not normally used. Since std::vector is widely available, the need to use memcpy in C++ is minimal.
Please let's not over-complicate things.
The brain is a neural network with only one function: pattern matching.
All the experiences of a person (sight, sound, smell, etc) are stored in the brain and linked with responses. The brain's function is to apply pattern matching in order to find the response that matches the current experience in the maximum degree.
For example, when we see danger, our levels of discomfort rise above normal levels. This is because the brain has recalled a previous experience which is linked with a response that makes us move.
This is why babies, that lack those experiences, are not afraid of dangerous things, for example fire or heights.
When the scientists realize this simple truth, AI will become a child's problem.
Innocently? you mean taking photos or army and airforce bases? where it is strictly prohibited and there are labels everywhere around the bases that taking photos or videos is explicitly forbidden?
Imaging putting a little bit of that in ones shoe...a great laugh!
1) functors and lambdas simplify code greatly.
2) it's time for C++ devs to know about functors.
3) I can't bind functors with Qt signals.
Qt works on Windows, Mac, Linux/X11, embedded Linux, Windows CE (according to Trollech).
Boost works on almost any modern operating system, including UNIX and Windows variants (phrase copied and pasted from boost site).
So I think boost works in more platforms than Qt.
Boost::signals doesn't need to work across threads because it can be made to work across threads with very little code. All that you need is a single template class which wraps the signal into a QEvent.
No ugly mess if whatever common functionality they have is removed from Qt.
1) parent-child relationships are not enough in many cases where objects are shared across multiple domains.
2) nowadays STL is as efficient as it gets across all major compilers - plus you'll get big speed ups with the upcoming changes in C++0x.
3) I did not say anything about pthreads. I said 'replace Qt threads with boost threads'.
4) Introspection has nothing to do with signals and slots. Qt signals and slots are very limited in what they can do.
1) replace Qt memory management with TR1::shared_ptr (or boost).
2) replace Qt collections with STL collections.
3) replace Qt threads with boost::threads.
4) replace Qt signals and slots with boost::signals.
In other words, make Qt play nice with STL and boost, which are the foundations for developing C++ code these days.
But the true question is: can we get a new series? it was the series that had the Star Trek magic, not the movies.
Funny that you say that.
I was listening to a sports show on my local radio station, and the people talked about Star Trek. Do you know what they talked about? the Borg!!!
It seems that the Borg were different enough as a threat from other sci-fi shows that made them stuck in people's minds. I think the Borg was good sci-fi, due to the fact that they were a mixture of biological and mechanical entities and being a single collective consciousness.
That's your criterion, and mine as well. Not to Paramount though: their criterion is the $$$, and judging from the opening so far, it is quite successful. Don't hold your breath for a proper Star Trek movie or series. The best we will get from now on is Star Wars in the Trek universe.
It's not the gameplay that is important in these games, it's the atmosphere, the wow factor. In all single-player FPS, the gameplay is nothing more than shoot-the-bad-guys, but some games do it in a fun way, some are dull...
You also forget:
1) the whole Federation Fleet was at another sector, leaving Earth and Vulcan unprotected.
2) The Narada kicks the shit out of the few vessels that traveled to Vulcan, which means they had some serious weaponry, but when it was time to fight the Enterprise...they had nothing.
3) The transporters became magic devices. First Scotty and Kirk beam out from Delta Vega to the USS Enterprise, while the latter is in warp, and then from Titan to Earth.
4) Wasn't Delta Vega at the edge of the Milky Way?
5) why did they fire at the Narada in the end? it was going down.
What about the beam up from Titan to Earth? isn't that silly or what?