Correct, but the quote is not in the story that the quote was linked to, which is why the submission itself is misleading. Still a good article though.
So the only ones with the power and the WILL to NUKE are Christian fundamentalists?
I think that religious fundamentalism is wrong no matter what religion it is since fundamentalists typically don't give much creedance to anything other than their worldview. However, if it's about people with nukes and their will to use them that you feel are the threat then make it about that. Don't insert your own politically biased agenda into it please.
The problem in this case isn't a technical one per se. It is a classic failure in project management. We can talk all day about the technical merits of implementing it "this way" or "that way", but if they don't listen to the technical side for feasability and design then actually test our their design, then the PMO's projects will die a horrible flaming death (like the D.C. project has).
Sounds like their were critical failures in the interoperability and "testing" departments before go-live.
Actually, politics aside, more of your dollar goes to the actual victims than to the "administrative" fees since the majority of people are volunteers when donating to the Salvation Army. I will donate to them. To each his own.
And as far as being a Jewish nation, given treatment of Jews through history (Obviously Holocaust, but also pograms in Russia, Inquisition in Spain, being inferior dhimmis in Arab lands, etc) the point of Israel is to create an outlet for discriminated Jews to go there.
OK, then I want my people (the physically disabled) to have a homeland in which we can be free of discrimination (except that we'll discriminate against the able-bodied, who we don't trust).
Seriously, though, there are plenty of places where it's safe to be Jewish other than Israel.
Where would you "ship" the Israelis if they shouldn't be in Israel?
I could also reverse the argument and say "Ther are lots of other safe places for the Palestinians other than "Palestine".
It would be nice if everyone "could get along" but I doubt that will happen in our lifetimes.:/
How does building military bases equate to to oil? I would assume military bases would be built as centers for military control, but that would be too obvious.
I guess I should be wearing my tin-foil hat so I can fit in with the rest of you loons.
I think it is simply safe to say that all freedoms come with their limitations and restrictions, whether it be 1st,2nd, or whatever Ammendment.
Where the line is drawn is subjective and made frankly by those living in the time period.
Personally, the only restriction I think there should be to voting is that they have to show proof of citizenship (i.e. ID). It's also asinine that you can actually vote more than once just because you go in and say you are Joe, then come back and say you are Bob, etc.
Yes and thanks you, we are where we are because our previous president was too busy giving out blow-jobs instead of doing his job which is to protect the U.S.
Slashdot Mirror
I think you misunderstood my point. CO2 concentration changes throughout Earth's history are a result of temperature change, not the other way around.
Rule #1: Correlation does not equal causation.
http://www.climate-gate.org/
Kind of like Al Gore? :)
I am sorry you feel this way, but it's really not that bad here.
:)
A bit warmer too I might add.
Battery? Probably more like a litle UPS inside.
Correct, but the quote is not in the story that the quote was linked to, which is why the submission itself is misleading. Still a good article though.
Well, for you I guess ignorance is bliss isn't it?
n uclear_weapons
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_
Have a nice day.
Interesting dodge.
So the only ones with the power and the WILL to NUKE are Christian fundamentalists?
I think that religious fundamentalism is wrong no matter what religion it is since fundamentalists typically don't give much creedance to anything other than their worldview. However, if it's about people with nukes and their will to use them that you feel are the threat then make it about that. Don't insert your own politically biased agenda into it please.
Implying that fundamentalist Christians are responsible for (future) nuke bombings? Nice.
How can this be anything but a troll or someone who's really naive?
Mod parent down please.
The problem in this case isn't a technical one per se. It is a classic failure in project management. We can talk all day about the technical merits of implementing it "this way" or "that way", but if they don't listen to the technical side for feasability and design then actually test our their design, then the PMO's projects will die a horrible flaming death (like the D.C. project has).
Sounds like their were critical failures in the interoperability and "testing" departments before go-live.
This is not Iraq.
"My sister may be ugly, but damned be the man who calls her that" - Unknown
Actually, politics aside, more of your dollar goes to the actual victims than to the "administrative" fees since the majority of people are volunteers when donating to the Salvation Army. I will donate to them. To each his own.
You can get it here
You obviously aren't married. :P
whats even funnier than that is that it isn't even right.
Geekily speaking, you are correct!
Also, here is an interesting link you might find interesting...
http://www.masada2000.org/historical.html
I totally agree. The means by which you get there is EVERYTHING. The end does not justify it's means by which you get there. i.
And as far as being a Jewish nation, given treatment of Jews through history (Obviously Holocaust, but also pograms in Russia, Inquisition in Spain, being inferior dhimmis in Arab lands, etc) the point of Israel is to create an outlet for discriminated Jews to go there.
:/
OK, then I want my people (the physically disabled) to have a homeland in which we can be free of discrimination (except that we'll discriminate against the able-bodied, who we don't trust).
Seriously, though, there are plenty of places where it's safe to be Jewish other than Israel.
Where would you "ship" the Israelis if they shouldn't be in Israel?
I could also reverse the argument and say "Ther are lots of other safe places for the Palestinians other than "Palestine".
It would be nice if everyone "could get along" but I doubt that will happen in our lifetimes.
How does building military bases equate to to oil? I would assume military bases would be built as centers for military control, but that would be too obvious.
I guess I should be wearing my tin-foil hat so I can fit in with the rest of you loons.
Hey, it's not CHARITY WORK if you WANT YOUR MONEY BACK.
I think it is simply safe to say that all freedoms come with their limitations and restrictions, whether it be 1st,2nd, or whatever Ammendment.
Where the line is drawn is subjective and made frankly by those living in the time period.
Personally, the only restriction I think there should be to voting is that they have to show proof of citizenship (i.e. ID). It's also asinine that you can actually vote more than once just because you go in and say you are Joe, then come back and say you are Bob, etc.
Well, he shouldn't have had the blow job, now should he?
Yes and thanks you, we are where we are because our previous president was too busy giving out blow-jobs instead of doing his job which is to protect the U.S.
Thanks.
HOW is this flamebait people?