Slashdot Mirror


Windows 10 Now Showing Full Screen Ads On Lock Screen (consumerist.com)

Striek writes: Several media outlets are reporting that Windows 10 has now started showing full screen ads on users' lock screens. They can be turned off, but how many people will actually bother with this? "Tips site How-To Geek discovered that Windows Spotlight, which normally rotates between a selection of photographs, was being used to display an ad for Square Enix's Rise of the Tomb Raider. Understandably, most people probably don't want to be hit in the face with a full-screen ad for a video game before they even unlock their computer. If you want to make sure you're not hit with these ads, follow these steps to disable Windows Spotlight: Open the Start Menu and search for "Lock Screen Settings."; Under "Background," select either Picture or Slideshow, instead of Windows Spotlight.; Scroll down to "Get fun facts, tips, tricks, and more on your lock screen" and this toggle." Apparently the "and more" is where Microsoft hid the advertisements.

599 comments

  1. And so ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... it begins.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. I saw the writing on the wall long ago and have heard from many deniers/shills who claimed I was overreacting or paranoid.

      To those same people I say "Enjoy your spyware, ads and eventually your subscription fees, suckers".

    2. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, I didn't mind it until the p0rn ads began showing.
      I'm the Pope - could be a problem.

      CAP === 'torture'

    3. Re: And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all of that has no bearing on the fact that you're still a paranoid fuckwit

    4. Re: And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet I don't have spyware or ads in my OS.

      Have a nice day.

    5. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the heck is "... it begins" modded "Insightful"?

    6. Re: And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...that you know about.

    7. Re:And so ... by bobjr94 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Win 10 just gets worse and worse as it matures. I'm still happily on 7 with autoupdates disabled and the win 10 upgrade notifier removed

    8. Re:And so ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      I'm still happily on 7 with auto-updates disabled and the win 10 upgrade notifier removed

      Me too, though MS keeps trying to sneak it in every month. Hopefully when the free "upgrade" period is over they'll knock it off.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    9. Re:And so ... by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      How the heck is "... it begins" modded "Insightful"?

      This most certainly won't be the end of it.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    10. Re:And so ... by niftydude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yep - internet streamed ads to your lock screen.

      Awesome.

      I wonder how long until someone manages to hack a keylogger in via this vector and start recording passwords?

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    11. Re:And so ... by execthis · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not long ago those of us who warned against "upgrading" were being lambasted for being alarmists.

      Well. I have something I'd like to say:

      HA! HA! HA! HA!

      ROFL!

    12. Re: And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike you, I know everything that gets transmitted or received by my computer. As for ads, I have working eyes and nope, not a single ad in my OS ever.

      Don't project your own incompetence and blindness on to others.

    13. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went a step further. I bought a Mac.

      The Win7 box, with updates disabled, is now just a torrent seedbox, and used to visit untrustworthy sites like /. If (when?) it gets infected, I have a disk image to use to wipe it all and start over.

      Microsoft deleta est.

    14. Re:And so ... by Black+LED · · Score: 1

      Hopefully when the free "upgrade" period is over they'll knock it off.

      This is what I hope too, however knowing Microsoft they'll just start pushing updates that tell me "Buy Windows 10 now!", probably amongst other ads. That's assuming I ever decide to get any updates again.

      I also have an elementary OS partition on my PC and I find myself booting into Windows less and less. Within the next year or two, I can realistically see removing Windows entirely.

    15. Re:And so ... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      How the heck is "... it begins" modded "Insightful"?

      Because the pebbles were unable to vote.

    16. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd consider a Macbook if they made one with a decent GPU. Currently the best you can get is with an AMD Radeon R9 M370X, which is garbage.

    17. Re:And so ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      I wonder how long until someone manages to hack a keylogger in via this vector and start recording passwords?

      Pretty sure that functionality is already baked into Windows 10. Or was that your point? :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    18. Re:And so ... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      more like "it continues"

      Microsoft already started the second Win10 was released, with having no way to turn off sending what you are doing on the computer to Microsoft. Microsoft hasn't just been doing UI research to make windows work better. They are selling that information.

      For Microsoft, their reasoning is, you didn't pay for this 'upgrade', they have the right to generate money from your using it in any way they can.

      I will not be surprised when Microsoft turns on 3rd party background task processing, where you pay Microsoft $X to have some processing intensive task done, and Microsoft farms it out to execute on a bunch of computers running Windows 10.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    19. Re: And so ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yes, but sadly, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out there to get you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    20. Re:And so ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      This is /. And that is a Bab5 quote.

      Toss your geek card in the /dev/null provided on your way out.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    21. Re:And so ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Same. Sadly I had to get a new laptop recently that didn't offer an upgrade to Win7, so I now have to use Win10 for the time being 'til I have some spare time to upgrade it to Linux.

      So far I have not seen one redeeming feature of Win10. It's awkward, it's messy, it's impossible to find anything you need within a reasonable time, hell, even the Event log is buried under a metric ton of crap. I pretty much found it by pure accident.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re:And so ... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Well, the joke's only half funny. What are you going to do when Win7 reaches its EOL and MS didn't step back from the brink of insanity?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:And so ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I think he was talking about third party, not built-in functionality.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    24. Re:And so ... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      If the UI of Win10 is any proof then that MS is certainly not even doing research to make it more useful. The UI of Win10 is a HUGE step back from Win7, it's almost like they learned little to nothing from the Win8 fallout.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    25. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that with the security issues constantly discovered in all software, not upgrading is not really an option. So you're fucked if you upgrade, and you're fucked if you don't. In one case the ads would come from Microsoft, and in the other - from your malware author. So it seems the reasonable way to avoid those is to not use Windows.

    26. Re:And so ... by execthis · · Score: 4, Informative

      I totally agree.

      For now the thing is to keep writing to companies like Adobe, Steinberg, Native Instruments, MakeMusic, Canon, etc. to ask them to support Linux. In the end, if they don't, then I guess running the necessary apps under a VM with hopefully good graphics performance, under Linux.

      Linux is usable but its just a matter of how much is one willing to dispense with to use it? How much convenience, such as putting a laptop in suspend and expecting it to work? Wanting to be able to scan a document wireless from a multi-function printer?

      People are still on Windows not because of one big thing, but all the small things which collectively they don't want to deal with.

      If you ask people who switched from Linux back to Windows, they may say it was x or it was because of y, but actually its because of x, y, z, etc. Not sure if it will take some entirely different approach to ever make an Open Source OS the primary one used by people in the world, or whether some change of thinking around Linux can do it. However nothing major has happened with Linux after all these years and attempts so I really wonder.

    27. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, celebrate? EOL just means Microsoft stops pushing out their unwanted spyware updates. It's not like Windows 7 will magically just stop working.

      So what I'll do is exactly what I'm doing now, continue to use my PC without updates. It's already running perfectly with no performance or stability issues. My security is handled by things other than Windows and always has been. When the day comes that Windows 7 is somehow no longer adequate, then I'll run Linux Mint, Korora, Ghost BSD, PC-BSD or buy a Mac.

    28. Re:And so ... by Lotana · · Score: 1

      To be fair, Linux also took several major UI steps backward with Gnome 3, Unity, etc. That caused even more fragmentation (Trinity, Cinnamon, MATE). Guess current UX trends are contagious. I blame the tablet hype.

    29. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That gives them several years to decide between Linux and OSX. And that's just till Windows 7 reaches EOL, that doesn't mean it will stop working. It will just stop getting security updates, and then after maybe another half a year, it will be so infested with adware that it starts showing ads on the lock screen...

      With Windows 10, you get all that today.

    30. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that the Linux community takes steps in every direction simultaneously, and lets the users decide which of those are fit to survive.

      What you call fragmentation, the western world used to call "Freedom". Think cars. If you don't like Ford, buy a Honda, if you don't like Volvo, buy a BMW. On the other side of the wall, they didn't have fragmentation, they got to choose between a Trabant.

    31. Re:And so ... by Psiren · · Score: 1

      even the Event log is buried under a metric ton of crap. I pretty much found it by pure accident.

      You mean right clicking on Start Button, and selecting Event Viewer is too much? Or Opening Start Menu, typing "event" and selecting Event Viewer is too much? Okay, whatever.

    32. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha and what are you going to do when it's not supported anymore and your only upgrade path is another AD filled, Privacy violating OS from Microsoft? I'll never understand Windows users, it's like they feel like they "need" to use Windows and no alternative exists.

      Alternatives DO exist, you don't "need" Windows. It's an addiction, treat it as such and move on.

    33. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    34. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why so cynical everyone knows how seriously ad-firms takes security...

    35. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much convenience, such as putting a laptop in suspend and expecting it to work?

      I'd say for the past few years, it just does. Unless you buy really cheap crap.

      My Thinkpad running Ubuntu Gnome has zero issues with suspend/resume (unlike my MacBook Pro which hangs about once a month).

      The better multi-function printers and copiers support a few different options for transferring scans, such as sending to email or FTP or a Samba share. Again, if you buy cheap crap, then you get what you paid for.

      My Android phone hooks up to Ubuntu and is trivial to transfer files/photos.

    36. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're still a dumbass. I keep auto updates enabled, but disabled the Windows 10 upgrade pending a new computer purchase. Pity you couldn't figure out how to do the same.

    37. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the guy who trusts Microsoft updates to maintain security.

    38. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right click windows icon (start button). Click event viewer. ;)

    39. Re:And so ... by c0d3g33k · · Score: 1

      Wanting to be able to scan a document wireless from a multi-function printer?

      It's not FOSS, but VueScan (scanning software) does an excellent job of this, and is excellent in general. It's very actively maintained and seems to support just about every device out there. I bought a license many years ago and have been happy with it since.

      https://www.hamrick.com/

    40. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea. Turned off auto update in W7 after beta-testing W10 before last summer. Frankly, those who didn't see the writing on the wall then, should leave their geek card at the door. Those who bought _any_ incarnation of W8+, have only themselves to thank for it, after all the stupidity we were forced to go through on Vista (PC's running Vista were generally not hardware-wise backwards-compatible with XP).

      Clearly, you cannot expect anything more from companies who sees customers as someone to force and coerce into their "business model" of predatory behaviour. For toddlers who don't know, search: Haloween documents

    41. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I didn't mind it until the p0rn ads began showing. I'm the Pope - could be a problem.

      Especially when people you know start showing up in the ads.

      Or you do.

    42. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll never understand Windows users, it's like they feel like they "need" to use Windows and no alternative exists.

      There's not a "need" to use Windows per se, but there often is a need to use a particular software package that is only available on Windows. WINE under Linux is a poor substitute. There are too many damned Linux/FOSS fanboys out there that really have no damned clue of what goes on in the real world.

    43. Re:And so ... by Muros · · Score: 1

      It's not like Windows 7 will magically just stop working.

      If you used XP and kept it fully updated in the run-up to EOL, it did stop working at an acceptable level. The windows update service started doing crazy shit to machines, apparently processing update supercedence lists. Windows XP took about 30-45 minutes after switching on to become useable when Microsoft were on their big upgrade drive.

    44. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be easier to hijack DNS on outgoing data so that an attacker could MITM the telemetry data going back to Microsoft (as those DNS names are hard coded). Send the compromise-accessed data around the telemetry data and pick it out as you sit in the middle (i.e. only sending actual telemetry data on). The network admin sees bursts of data outgoing anyway and unless doing deep-packet won't know if someone added a new win10 machine to the network or if the data rate actually changed. MS won't know because the "extra" data doesn't make it back to them from the source / victim.

    45. Re:And so ... by Alumoi · · Score: 1

      You mean except Microsoft?
      How many keyloggers do you need?

    46. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how long until someone manages to hack a keylogger in via this vector and start recording passwords?

      Why not just intercept the communications from the Win10 Keylogger, er I mean Cortana?

    47. Re:And so ... by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Well for those only using word editors and internet like my wife, Chromebooks (soon to become android notebooks I guess?) are awesome. For software developers like me, I'm tempted toward Linux but just too many MS products still needed for the workplace... sigh.

    48. Re: And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure? So you are not connected to the internet, and you are not connected to slashdot, and you did not use a program on a device to display it? Amazing how you found the subject and commented. You are being tracked, you just refuse to acknowledge it.

    49. Re:And so ... by operagost · · Score: 1

      My studio PC is blocked from the internet, so the fact that it's currently running an unsupported Windows XP is not a big deal*. It would be nice if Steinberg would make Linux drivers, but if I have to run an unsupported OS then I can wall it off.

      * although it's annoying, and it's really because finding a non-garbage capture card just to dump old VHS tapes is still a problem in 2016.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    50. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not long ago those of us who warned against "upgrading" were being lambasted for being alarmists. Well. I have something I'd like to say...

      ...right after this advertisement for Rise of the Tomb Raider! Click here to unlock and see my response!

    51. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Settle down.

      I can see that "Windows Spotlight" option in the "Background" dropdown list, but it never turned on by itself, and when the option got introduced (I'm guessing as part of a recent update), it kept respecting my previous selection.

      What a non-story.

    52. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. People don't mind that MS is harvesting their files to sell them to ad companies.

    53. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For now the thing is to keep writing to companies like Adobe, Steinberg, Native Instruments, MakeMusic, Canon, etc. to ask them to support Linux. In the end, if they don't, then I guess running the necessary apps under a VM with hopefully good graphics performance, under Linux.

      This will be the year that works. LOLZ

    54. Re:And so ... by suutar · · Score: 1

      That contributed, sure, but I blame the following two beliefs (and the developers/designers who hold them):
      a) making it cute will not harm intuitiveness significantly
      b) what's intuitive to me will be intuitive to my audience

    55. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is usable but its just a matter of how much is one willing to dispense with to use it?

      As are other non-Linux but *nix-like systems.
      (Recent PC-BSD convert obligatory plug complete.)

    56. Re:And so ... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Actually, I didn't mind it once the p0rn ads began showing.

      FTFY, at least for Slashdot.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    57. Re:And so ... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, this is completely true.

      However, the good thing about Linux is that alternative DEs do exist and you can pretty easily use a distro with one of those instead. KDE hasn't fallen for the tablet hype, and as you mentioned there's Cinnamon, MATE, and Trinity, and there's also XCFE and Lxde.

      Stop following the crowd with the Gnome3 and Unity BS; use a distro with one of the above non-tabletified UIs instead.

    58. Re:And so ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Selecting Event Viewer... where? It's not there. There's a ton of bullshit that I neither need, want or otherwise could care less about, but no event viewer. Trust me, I spent some time looking for it.

      And yes, eventually I found it by typing "event". Lucky me, I know what the thing is called. Now try for someone who doesn't know what the logging feature is called.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    59. Re:And so ... by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      I find myself Googling all the updates before I even think of applying them to Windows 7 these days; before I consider them safe.

      What the world has come to.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    60. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure that build-in "functionality" is NOT been used by third party's?

    61. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully by then I will be less of a gamer and the gaming industry will have embraced linux

    62. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So then disable the update service entirely so that it doesn't even run.

      Also, Windows 7 isn't Windows XP.

    63. Re:And so ... by slapout · · Score: 1

      Win 10 looks too much like Win 95 to me.

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    64. Re: And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My browser isn't my OS.

      When I load up a site in my browser, I am giving explicit permission for the browser to render whatever gets served and makes it through my ad blocker, tracker blocker, JavaScript whitelist and cookie whitelist. I also do most browsing through a proxy. That is very different than having unauthorized spyware and ads embedded into the very core of the PC with no way to remove it.

      So no, I'm not being tracked by anyone that I don't want tracking me. All you are doing is projecting your ignorance.

    65. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep using win7 of course, I still have 2 wonderful XP machines still running fine

    66. Re:And so ... by Muros · · Score: 1

      So then disable the update service entirely so that it doesn't even run.

      Also, Windows 7 isn't Windows XP.

      I am aware of both of those, and have not used XP myself in many years. I was merely commenting on the previous "It's not like Windows 7 will magically just stop working" remark. Microsoft have shown their willingness to allow old OSs degrade when they are pushing a new product. I'm not complaining, it provided an impetus for customers to replace ancient pieces of crap they expected me to provide support for.

    67. Re:And so ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Not really, Win95 was pretty usable and quite logical. You could easily reach pretty much all the places where you could make adjustments to your OS in one place. With Win10 it seems kinda random how they are strewn across various areas of the OS.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    68. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the windows 10 system, even without the adds, will still suck forever because it will always be unstable by design

      im intend to put 2 hard drives in my next computer, one with linux one with win7/win10 partitions. The win10 partition, im not going to put anything personal on it, just for gaming like the 7 partition, but the win7 partition will be stable since i can control the updates, but the win10 partition will boot a different system every day, that makes it unstable. Its not just the spying, i dont want it to change my video drivers when new are relased, i dont want to have the newest ones ever for PRECAUTION

      with windows 10 you never ever boot the same system you booted yesterday, that is stupid, it can fail every day for any reason. I cant possibly think of something more crappy than windows 10

    69. Re:And so ... by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

      I've been on Windows 10 for quite a while, I don't get ads, and it works just fine for me.
      No I am not a MS employee, or even a big fan of MS. I have Apple products, and multiple Linux servers. Windows Server absolutely sucks but I'll take Windows 10 over 7, or 8 any day because:
      Windows 8 just plain sucked
      Windows 10 has a USABLE start menu with an EXCEPTIONAL way to setup shortcuts to the apps I use all the time.
      Windows 10 makes it oh so easy to get to the control panel items you actually use
      Windows 10 starts faster and shuts down quicker
      Windows 10 plays nice with my Office 365
      Windows 10 replicates the task bar on all monitors

      I could care less that MS is watching. My company does web dev, so I am a bit of an expert on how your web activities are tracked, if you want privacy get a flip phone, disconnect the internet service, watch OTA HDTV, and use all cash...

      --
      Murphy was an optimist
    70. Re:And so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I was commenting on how stupid your comment was because there is an easy fix and that Windows XP does not reflect upon Windows 7 in any way.

      Any OS can be kept secured, even without updates from the manufacturer. You just have to know what you're doing.

    71. Re:And so ... by movdqa · · Score: 1

      I have two Windows desktops that I don't use that much. One is on Windows 8.1 and the other is on Windows 7. I will likely upgrade one of them to Windows 10 as I feel that I need to have some knowledge of using it as part of me being the IT guy for family and friends. BTW, upgrading to 8.0 and 8.1 was a mistake - I really don't like it but I am using Classic Start that helps. They spyware is probably there though. I do the vast majority of my PC computing on my MacBook Pro these days and am very, very happy to do very little on Windows anymore. Microsoft has been shooting themselves in the foot for quite some time now.

  2. This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the price of "free" MS upgrades.

    1. Re:This is the price of "free" by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's official, CEO #3 is just as jerky as #1 and #2. The MS tradition of corporate mayhem continues.

    2. Re:This is the price of "free" by AbRASiON · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I imagine people who actually paid for a legitimate full copy are getting the ads as well. I don't know for certain but do they even distinguish the 2 (once initial activation is complete?)

      I continue to be satisfied with Windows 7, until they try to damage it somehow.

    3. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      'Free' from a profit seeker equals DICK.

    4. Re:This is the price of "free" by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      This is the price of "free" MS upgrades.

      MS Win10 upgrade has outgrown the "free upgrade" category a while ago.
      It is now firmly in "shoved down your throat when you are not looking" category

      I have warned all of my immediate non-tech family to ignore "free upgrade" offer, but what if (when!) MS sneaks it in anyway?

      Also, it is getting harder to buy a new desktop/laptop without Windows 10 (yes, yes, I know, year of the Linux is upon us, blah blah).

    5. Re:This is the price of "free" by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is the price of "free" MS upgrades.

      I actually had to pay full price for this.

    6. Re: This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about as bad as the rest of that sinking ship of an OS. But I'm glad they decided to kill it of quickly like this. In ten years there will be no MS Windows.

    7. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I am still on Windows 7, but I can't get the damn Free Windows 10 Upgrade shit to go away in my task bar.

    8. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you serious? What if your phone started doing this whenever you pulled it out and went to unlock it?

      You're ok with that?

      What the fuck is wrong with you? It's not broadcast TV you know. It's a product you've payed for.

    9. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      MS providing an attack vector for malvertising on every Windows 10 machine doesn't seem like something to be outraged about?

      This has to be trolling.

    10. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I continue to be satisfied with Windows 7, until they try to damage it somehow.

      Good for you. I'm sticking with my poor man's Puppy Linux, thanks very much.

    11. Re: This is the price of "free" by KGIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I really don't think Joe Average is gonna give a shit. Joe Average really don't mind and Joe Average is the target market. Hell, I don't even give a shit. I'd just turn it off. Then again, I've either used no lock screen or a blank lock screen for a very long time. There's not much chance of me seeing ads - and I hate ads. Hell, I've been blocking ads since the mid 1990s. Not even *I* would bother getting out pitchforks and torches for this - assuming I used Windows. Just turn the damned thing off. It's not like it's hard - even Joe Average can figure it out, if he's so inclined. This knee-jerk reaction isn't even remotely rational. It's literally seeking reasons to be outraged. If you don't like it, turn the damned thing off.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    12. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm thankful that I've never seen those alerts on mine. Probably because I've had automatic updates disabled since the beginning. I've never trusted them since some updates fucked up my XP machine years prior.

    13. Re:This is the price of "free" by KGIII · · Score: 3, Informative

      Change the damned settings. It's RIGHT THERE in the summary.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    14. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Free comes with a dick up your ass." - David 'Future' Porter

    15. Re:This is the price of "free" by KGIII · · Score: 1, Informative

      Did you read the summary? This is not complicated. Change the settings. tada.wav! There, closed. You're all set and, best of all, you got to pick what's displayed instead of relying on a third party to do so. That and, as of yet, this has not been shown to be a malware route. It probably is but we can not make that accusation until it's demonstrated to be so. They provide network access, that's the greatest route of malware right there. Change the damned settings and move on. Who the hell wants ads on their lock screen? Nobody, that's who. Change it and move on. What the hell do you think "other" is, anyhow? This is MS we're talking about. Of course it's ads. Turn that shit off and be done with it. Hell, you see the same thing on a Kindle, except you can't turn it off - unless you buy a more expensive version (or maybe upgrade? I dunno about that part).

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    16. Re: This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Joe Average" does "give a shit" -- rest assured or ask any end losers you know if you want to confirm it.
      "Joe Average" does not know how to change/modify the setting and will have to get someone to help (free or paid help) or let it be.

    17. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck off you piece of shit. they don't just get to add this to my OS after I bought it.

    18. Re:This is the price of "free" by Rainwulf · · Score: 2

      google for GWX Control Panel

    19. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes it was listed as free for a while. Then it was an annoying task bar icon. Then it appeared if you opened up Windows Update as what could only be construed as an advertisement.. that you had to click through to get your patches. Then the pop-ups from the task bar into your workspace announcing how many millions of other desktop users have upgraded. Then it became a "recommended" update. Then without your consent.. the update auto-downloaded as long as you had automated updates turned on and you were not in an Active Directory domain. Then suddenly if you were not running the Enterprise version.. MS decided to change the direction of the global wind and suddenly you were yet another Windows 10 candidate and started the madness all over again.

      Third party groups tried to help by explaining what updates to avoid, providing free apps to avoid it/block it and MS started to play sneak/and/hide and change how they presented it. I've tried to help my friends by showing them the local group policy or domain group policy to block it which has worked for now.. but the task bar icon madness is like a virus. Every time you figure out how to block the latest "GWX" it morphs into another form and you're back on the defensive again.

      I used to be an MS fanboy.. and an Apple hater for their walled garden. Now we just see two cash cows trying to rope us all into their corral while we lose our freedom to use our computer in the way we might/hope/want to see fit.

      Peace out.

    20. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I prefer "tada.flac"

      CAP === 'scruple'

    21. Re: This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you're an expert in dicks in the ass.

    22. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it's easy, just fire up the settings thing, look for ads, ..., find nothing, look everywhere until you find something that might be it, test it, it works !!!! For now at least... (a quote from darth vader comes to mind)

    23. Re:This is the price of "free" by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Outrage is that these are OUR machines. They do not belong to Microsoft. It may be true that Microsoft can not survive financially without serving up ads, but it's not our job to provide charity to companies with bad business models.

    24. Re:This is the price of "free" by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Funny

      Personally I block the ads by using electricians tape over the screen.

    25. Re:This is the price of "free" by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah! It's not like they reset settings during forced updates!!!

      oh wait... Never mind, they do occasionally "fix" your setting s for you.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    26. Re:This is the price of "free" by ShaunC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Did you read the summary? This is not complicated. Change the settings.

      And how long before a "bug" resets your changes back to what Microsoft prefers?

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    27. Re:This is the price of "free" by QuietLagoon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ... It may be true that Microsoft can not survive financially without serving up ads,...

      I'd be more than happy to pay Microsoft for an upgrade for my copies of Windows 7, providing the upgrade is really an upgrade and not just a means for Microsoft to begin data harvesting of my family..

    28. Re:This is the price of "free" by Lotana · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The outrage is not that you are somehow trapped with this ... "feature". The real fury is Microsoft's attitude towards its customers.

      Why is that now companies see pushing unwanted adds on to our hardware as perfectly acceptable? In the past this was a category of malware! Why is that I now need to know and take conscious effort to make sure I disable such settings, lest bandwidth I pay for will be wasted. When administrators will be deploying on mass scale, this will become yet another thing they need to remember to script to be disabled.

      Is it because it is a free upgrade? User paid for Windows 7/8 she upgraded from. Also what about professional version that one paid for: Is that setting off by default? Really, no one even asked for Microsoft to have their next major version to be free* in the first place!

      This is just bad faith from the creator to the consumer.

      *Free as in no money. You will pay in other ways...

    29. Re:This is the price of "free" by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Did you read the summary? This is not complicated. Change the settings.

      And how long before a "bug" resets your changes back to what Microsoft prefers?

      A bug? I have to go back into my settings after each update. It's a feature!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    30. Re:This is the price of "free" by Lotana · · Score: 1

      Exactly! You hit the nail straight on the head!

      Unfortunately this (Very brief, detail-poor) article does not state if this is only in Home edition or if all versions are affected.

    31. Re: This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dude ! How many times do they have to tell you? It's just a bug. They didn't mean it geez.

    32. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup: that ch-ching sound you hear is microsoft finding a way to lock-in revenue without the pesky need to provide consumers with an OS that is in any meaningful way better than version n-1.

      Advertisements (bought with lashings of user habits data) for incremental revenue over the life of the product. Forced upgrade paths to make sure you upgrade your hardware semi-regularly (and pay the MS tax on the way past go). What was the old saying about never trusting a CEO bearing gifts?

    33. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Have you looked at windows settings recently? Gone are the days when they were contained in a reasonably sensible arrangement in the control panel. Now they are all over the shop - some in the control panel, some accessible only through that irritating tile screen, some hidden behind a wizard. It's a complete mess, and a cynic might think deliberately so.

      Also... want a wager that the setting will be removed in version 11 or 12? My bet would be that you'll have to buy a premium version for a while, then the opt-out will go away altogether (c/f ads on pay tv).

    34. Re:This is the price of "free" by Lotana · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Alas, if you want to stay current/work in the IT industry, you better get familiar with Windows 10. This is the next major version, so it is the target platform to develop for.

      I use Debian myself for my main usage, but keep a Windows laptop for testing/learning on what real-world uses. Windows 7 was excellent and the "upgrade" to 10 was a sad day indeed. But one has to stay current in the industry trends :-(

    35. Re:This is the price of "free" by Stan92057 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bullcrap nowhere does it say this will turn off ads nowhere. the word AD is nowhere to be found none. I would have had a hard time figurine that purposely worded bullshit.

      And I "QUOTE" Get fun facts,tips,tricks and more on your lock screen END QUOTE"
      that is decetful as it gets not one word stating turn off ads here

      Sure the summery tells everyone how to turn the crap off not everyone read slashdot and tech news its worded so you cant find how to turn off ads that is decetful on microsofts part..

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    36. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE TO YOU FUCKWIT.

      Holy fuck. You know what at this point don't even talk. If anyone wanted your opinion we would take microsofts cock out of your mouth.

    37. Re: This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This begs the question: If you disable the ad display, does the OS still download them ?

    38. Re:This is the price of "free" by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      Got 30 days to remove it only benefit for a mistaken install i guess.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    39. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Change the damned settings.

      Maybe you're right. After all, that's what the other spammers and adware developers say. 99,000 other cockroaches can't be wrong.

    40. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome... to the machine.

    41. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      @echo off
       
      rem Compatibility update for upgrading Windows 7
      wusa /uninstall /kb:2952664 /quiet /norestart
      rem Update that enables you to upgrade from Windows 7 to a later version of Windows
      wusa /uninstall /kb:2990214 /quiet /norestart
      rem Update to Windows 7 SP1 for performance improvements
      wusa /uninstall /kb:3021917 /quiet /norestart
      rem Update for customer experience and diagnostic telemetry
      wusa /uninstall /kb:3022345 /quiet /norestart
      rem Update installs Get Windows 10 app in Windows 8.1 and Windows 7 SP1
      wusa /uninstall /kb:3035583 /quiet /norestart
      rem Update that enables you to upgrade from Windows 8.1 to a later version of Windows
      wusa /uninstall /kb:3044374 /quiet /norestart
      rem Update for customer experience and diagnostic telemetry
      wusa /uninstall /kb:3068708 /quiet /norestart
      rem Update that adds telemetry points to consent.exe in Windows 8.1 and Windows 7
      wusa /uninstall /kb:3075249 /quiet /norestart
      rem Update for customer experience and diagnostic telemetry
      wusa /uninstall /kb:3080149 /quiet /norestart
      rem Updated capabilities to upgrade Windows 8.1 and Windows 7
      wusa /uninstall /kb:3123862 /quiet /norestart

    42. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a kindle? Amazon does the same thing. Customers base their purchasing decisions on sticker price. Advertising is away of reducing price while still getting revenue. If you don't like it you're welcome to buy products from a supplier who doesn't pull this crap or lobby congress to ban the practice. If nobody is allowed to do it then it loses it's advantage for price competition. The downside to that is higher prices for people who don't mind. The same issue applies to "overtime pay" and working for >40 hours. If you don't regulate the entire market, then you end up with a race to the bottom that nobody is really happy with.

    43. Re: This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're only licensing it, you don't actually own the copy of the OS.

    44. Re:This is the price of "free" by pjbgravely · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Outrage is that these are OUR machines. They do not belong to Microsoft. It may be true that Microsoft can not survive financially without serving up ads, but it's not our job to provide charity to companies with bad business models.

      You own the computer but Microsoft owns the software. You choose to run one of their OSs. They allow you to run the software but they own all rights to it. If you care about the ads then you should run an OS that you own, and can modify to fit your needs. I assume you choose not to, because anyone who posts on /. should be able to install and run what ever they want on their computer.

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    45. Re:This is the price of "free" by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's like, where the fuck is your memory. Repeatedly M$ has been caught resetting end users settings on updates. So yeah, ha ha ha, set the settings only to have M$ change them back to want when ever it wants using compulsory upgrades, yeah, really fucking funny your comment. Oh how about sticking that privacy invasive shit in windows 7 not permission, no warning, just bend over the probe is going in. Any settings to fix that, nope, you have to look it all up and then individually remove the anal probe elements from your OS effectively hidden as security patches mind you, bug fixes and security patches, nope M$ delivering windows anal probe 10 features to windows 7 stripping away security and privacy.

      Now adding in M$ is no longer delivering anonymous upgrades but individually target able upgrades. Each and every user individually accessed at upgrade time and some of us are lucky enough to get an extra special delivery and that is all versions of windows currently being updated. Privacy is cool being a perv is evil.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    46. Re:This is the price of "free" by camperdave · · Score: 1

      How about I turn something on to get ads instead of having to turn something off to prevent them?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    47. Re:This is the price of "free" by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      And I "QUOTE" Get fun facts,tips,tricks and more on your lock screen END QUOTE"

      It's the "and more" part, that's the loophole.

      "And more", now with 50% more ads!

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    48. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, he seems to be much better. Google and Facebook made nearly all of their fortune from data-harvesting and advertising. Seems like Microsoft is on the right track to make a lot of money and keep their dominance of the market.

      What did people think Microsoft's turn towards services was about anyway? And the ambiguous way in which they did it was perfect, they didn't scare their investors by telling people they would be giving their biggest product away for free for ever, and they can backtrack anytime they want in case the service-based strategy doesn't work well enough.

      I'd be buying Microsoft stock right now.

    49. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be true that Microsoft can not survive financially without serving up ads,

      Then let them die!

    50. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real fury is Microsoft's attitude towards its customers.

      Why? Microsoft's customers want to serve you ads, so they're providing the service. How's that saying go? If you aren't paying for the product, you are the product?

      Personally I wouldn't even mind lock screen advertising in theory. In practice it has the same flaws as every other advertising method: it doesn't show me new and interesting products. I don't see new games, I see games I already know are coming regardless of my interest in it. I see ads for the new McDonald's deals that I already saw on the two restaurants I pass by in the morning. I see ads for the product I just bought (thanks targeted cookies) - not similar, not competitors, the exact same one, usually a link back to the same Amazon page I used. I am reminded that Pepsi still exists and that Honda hasn't stopped making cars, as I sit in my Honda drinking a Pepsi.

      But craft brewers can't pay for the coverage Anheuser-Busch can, so you see Bud Light signs everywhere instead. Because it isn't about showing you something new, it's about the winners staying ahead by shouting louder than everyone else. And they are the ones paying Microsoft, where you don't invest a red cent. Your value to MS is dependent on how much you will put up with before you go elsewhere. This is them dancing around to find that peak.

    51. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called Theft of Services.

      Microsoft should be billed for their advertising on your equipment.

    52. Re:This is the price of "free" by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Do you have a kindle? Amazon does the same thing

      One of the reasons I do not. Another is their ability to remotely delete ebooks.

    53. Re:This is the price of "free" by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I have warned all of my immediate non-tech family to ignore "free upgrade" offer, but what if (when!) MS sneaks it in anyway?

      Then you get calls along the line of how their computer is too slow to use and how skype doesn't work any more because Win10 has reset sound settings to default.

      Going by past history we are only four days away from a massive MS fuckup that a high school student with a programming assignment would not be able to excuse.


      Zune, Azure, what is it this time that won't like the leap year?

    54. Re:This is the price of "free" by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Better yet, turn updates off. Better to take a vague chance on a drive by than enable a known hijacker.

    55. Re:This is the price of "free" by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Then turn the damned thing off again. Welcome to Microsoft. It's like the other day, people were bitching 'cause it changed the settings back. Like that's a NEW thing? No! I used to use Windows all the time. I'd have to reset the damned thing back to OE instead of Outlook for NNTP and Email. Welcome to Microsoft.

      Did you *really* expect anything better?

      I wish I had initiative to reply to each one individually but the answer's the same to all of you. Turn the damned thing off. By the time you've done it a few times, you'll be used to it. Of all the things to get outraged about, this one's pretty damned low on the list. WTF did you think "and more" meant? It means they're gonna give you ads. They'd give you aids if they thought they could sell you the cure. It's just ads. On the lock screen. And no, slippery slope arguments are still not accepted.

      "But they might do this in the future!!!" Sure, they might turn into aliens and show that they've been using computers to control humans and are now going to eat us. We'll worry about that when we get there. Until then, turn the damned thing off. This is not rocket science. It even tells you how to turn it off in the summary. Hell, if you stop blocking telemetry they might noticed you turned it off and decide to kill the program... Probably not, but it could happen. But that's no different than the slippery slope. Turn the damned thing off and you'll be okay. When you can't turn it off - get out the pitchforks or get another phone. Right now, turn the damned thing off and you've got nothing to worry about.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    56. Re:This is the price of "free" by KGIII · · Score: 1

      You do. You have to turn on lock screen with that setting or leave it on if it's already on - I think it was disabled by default in 8. Reading the summary, it looks like you still do. Not only that, when you turn it on - you've got multiple choices, this is one of them. This is *not* some outrage to go burn the campus down. I mean, yeah, I like rioting and burning down buildings as much as the next guy but it kind of starts to lose its meaning when you'll just burn down any ol' building.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    57. Re:This is the price of "free" by aevan · · Score: 1

      You know, I'd almost say you had a point, excepting those people that bought Win 7 then woke up to Win 10. Then put Win 7 back on, only to wake up to Win 10 as it was now an important update. They chose to run a different one of the OSs after all. Don't recall anywhere in the installs that says they can freely use up bandwidth either (of import for those that tether).

      For the record, you're stating that prescience is a requisite of posting on /., and before this information became known they should have already known and turned the non-advert-labeled option off or used a different OS? Also, those that do not post on /. but are outraged by this behavior, are they allowed to be so?

    58. Re:This is the price of "free" by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Start saving money if you haven't done so, then.
      You'd expect the server version to not do that crap, so get the server version when it comes you. That will be $800 per seat, thanks for your business!

      NB : you can pay. Upgrade from Windows 7 Home to Windows 10 Home, then pay the fee to go from Home to Pro. That way, you pay for the update and get all the spyware anyway.

    59. Re: This is the price of "free" by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Quite the opposite. Joe Average started to give a shit about ads and blocking them. If he didn't, ad companies would not be in such a hurry to sue ad-blocking companies or put up "you have to turn your blocker off" walls to protect their revenue stream.

      You can rest assured it's not for the 0.0005% of their visitors that are actually computer geeks that they're concerned about.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    60. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the hardware belongs to us, and the software to M$. If I were to redefine how I use the software, i have to cough up money. I do provide the hardware and other system requirements - network connectivity, electricity - yet M$ somehow thinks it's okay to just abuse those resources without my permission. The problem lies not with M$ in particular, but the entire online advertising community. Those leeches think it is okay to just steal my resources without me opting into their scheme.

    61. Re:This is the price of "free" by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, now I have that bit of information. An there is this setting that I have to adjust, there that option I have to turn off, here is this plugin I have to install, there is that third party addon that keeps me from being flooded with bullshit...

      Why the FUCK is that even necessary?

      According to your argument, it doesn't matter 'cause all I have to do is find a way to turn it off and then simply turn it off, right? Ok. You're paying for the time I spend doing this? No? Didn't think so.

      Do you think people would put up with this shit if this wasn't computers but their car, dishwasher or lawn mower?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    62. Re:This is the price of "free" by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You can turn updates off now in Win10?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    63. Re:This is the price of "free" by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's ... unlikely that Win10 will be the next major version a (sensible) company is going to use. At least in its current state. What is likely going to happen is that MS will do some "minor adjustments" to the Enterprise edition that clean up some of the more atrocious security problems before you will see widespread acceptance in security conscious companies.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    64. Re:This is the price of "free" by zakwaldrop13 · · Score: 1

      Mines windows 8 and even though most of my friends told me to upgrade. I didn't do it. Now I'm Laughing so hard about this

    65. Re:This is the price of "free" by Lotana · · Score: 1

      Do you have a kindle? Amazon does the same thing.

      No, I do not own a Kindle and I was not aware that Amazon also pushes adds. Thank you for pointing it out though: This will definitely be a point to take into consideration if I ever find myself shopping for an e-book reader.

      Yes, you do have a good point. Majority of customers do only look at the sticker price and accept adds. However, it is still a very disappointing direction that Microsoft as an industry leader is taking. I do not know if the Professional version has the adds as well or not. If it does, then Microsoft does not even give you an option to get addware-free version of their core product.

      I do not want to get into a political debate regarding how much this should be regulated. It is sufficient to say that in my view, this is a new low for an OS vendor. My slim hope is that this will cause other players to gain more market share in the desktop arena.

    66. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems your "real" world is really low end.

    67. Re: This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit, you own the copy that you buy.

    68. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the setting should not exist nor should ADS BUILT INTO THE FUCKING OS.

      Seriously junior, go throw your PC in the trash. You don't deserve to have a computer.

    69. Re:This is the price of "free" by Black+LED · · Score: 1

      Until the next forced update turns the advertising back on. "Accidentally" of course.

    70. Re:This is the price of "free" by Lotana · · Score: 1

      Why? Microsoft's customers want to serve you ads, so they're providing the service. How's that saying go? If you aren't paying for the product, you are the product?

      I have looked through the EULA before I did an upgrade and I don't remember anything in there about my system to be used for advertisements from third parties. Yes, there was a section about sharing information and diagnostics, but not this. Perhaps I am wrong and I missed it, but I certainly would of thought hard if this section was in there...

      Nothing in the world is ever free, so I agree with you to a degree. But even in that case MS should of been quite clear and upfront about this. Google, for all their ills and faults at least get this right: They are open about tracking and what information they share with others. This is certainly new for Microsoft as far as I am aware. Which is why I feel like they are acting dishonestly.

    71. Re:This is the price of "free" by rl117 · · Score: 1

      No business is going to *choose* to target Windows 10 as a rational business decision. You eliminate all your potential Windows 7 and 8 customers, and they are the majority of Windows users right now.

      It's not many months since XP was the baseline to target for most people. Now it's 7 (or Vista, but the market share is sufficiently low to ignore it).

      At least where I work, we support 7 and to a lesser extent 8. 10 is totally off the radar, at least for the present. It's not worth our time to support.

    72. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure you *do* see your lock screen -- for example when you unlock your fucking computer. So, yes, it's an effective way to ensure someone will see your ad AND get confirmation they say it by logging the login. Dipshit.

    73. Re:This is the price of "free" by Lotana · · Score: 1

      I'd be buying Microsoft stock right now.

      Please don't encourage them. This is bad turn for our industry.

    74. Re:This is the price of "free" by Lotana · · Score: 1

      You are correct sir. We don't support Windows 10 either, but this is just a matter of time before we will have to. May as well get familiar with it as soon as practical.

    75. Re:This is the price of "free" by Lotana · · Score: 1

      Did you get the Home or Pro edition?

      There might be some leeway if this is only in the Home edition. But if the Pro has adds by default enabled as well, that will be low.

    76. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me it wasn't worth it. The situation now is a lot worse than it was in 2005 and going by what ex-colleagues told me 2005 was worse than 2000. The writing is on the wall, so I've decided to switch careers. I now hardly touch a computer during a normal working day and that's a huge improvement. I never expected I'd ever say that when I started my developer career in 2005, but there it is.

    77. Re:This is the price of "free" by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Alas, if you want to stay current/work in the IT industry, you better get familiar with Windows 10. This is the next major version, so it is the target platform to develop for.

      I use Debian myself for my main usage, but keep a Windows laptop for testing/learning on what real-world uses. Windows 7 was excellent and the "upgrade" to 10 was a sad day indeed. But one has to stay current in the industry trends :-(

      I have been a developer for something like 3 decades. I have worked in MVS, MS DOS, Windows (since 2.11), OS/2, all the UNIXes and Linux. I have not used Windows professionally since before 2000, and I have plenty of work. Admittedly, I work more on the backend, but when I need to do GUI, I more and more use Java. Not because it is wonderful, but because it is adequate and very portable. I don't think anybody really needs to live with Windows.

    78. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The outrage is not that you are somehow trapped with this ... "feature". The real fury is Microsoft's attitude towards its customers.

      I've been hating microsoft for as long as anyone. But I can't quite feel your fury on this one.

      If they'd been the first to do this, maybe then I would feel fury toward them for it. But you know what? they're *last* ones to do this. *All* of the other OS vendors have been cramming as many ads down our necks as they could get away with for years now. So yes, I feel disappointment, possibly a touch of anger, but I'm reserving my fury for the day I can't turn it off.

    79. Re:This is the price of "free" by rl117 · · Score: 1

      Yes, same for us, though the nature of our "support" will likely be "client libraries and programs tested to run on Windows 10" in addition to 7 and 8. I would seriously doubt we would use any Windows 10-specific features. For us, we're already supporting Linux, MacOS X and BSD, so Windows is already a major additional cost. In fact, we're already dropping Windows support entirely in certain areas (currently server side) due to that (and the fact that it's a complete nightmare compared with the rest). I'll have to wait until our enterprise site licence is updated before I can even start testing though.

    80. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't the deal I had with the store when I bought the software.

      If Microsoft claims ownership of my installation then I call them thieves.

    81. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did you dream?

    82. Re: This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you don't. Read the EULA.

      Remember, you can't have a nightmare if you never dream.

    83. Re: This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just turn the damned thing off. It's not like it's hard

      Bullshit, if one has to waste so much time with every new version of windows, might as well install gentoo.

      I had to reinstall windows 7 some time ago:
      - had to attach an USB dongle because it didn't have drivers for a pretty common network card, certainly older than Win7
      - had to waste an hour to find the right KB fix to get windows updates to work, which magically had problems since win10 came out
      - had to manually select updates to prevent win10 malware

    84. Re:This is the price of "free" by SB2020 · · Score: 1

      That's the problem with the modern internet, don't you care about data caps? load times? mobile users?
      Can we at least get a "tada.mp3"?

    85. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy, unplug the network cable.

    86. Re:This is the price of "free" by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Don't recall anywhere in the installs that says they can freely use up bandwidth either (of import for those that tether).

      Honest question - did you read the EULA and consulted a lawyer for its implications?

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    87. Re:This is the price of "free" by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      The fact that people woke up with an "upgraded" OS is beside the point pjb was making. If you read the Windows EULA (who am I kidding, most here don't even read the summary) you'll see that you do not own the OS, you lease it. Through MS's legal-ese, nobody has ever owned a copy of Windows except Microsoft, and they've been getting away with it for decades.

      I'd imagine that even if there was a big privacy lawsuit filed against MS, it would get class-action status in a hurry... but I'm sure MS has the "you don't own this" as well as the "you agree for us to collect stuff" right there in the EULA. Whether or not that would stand up in court is another matter.

    88. Re: This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So suddenly Windows' login screen will show ads based on the browsing history. Do you really think that people don't care, that the login screen will in practice reveal the browsing history? Or does Joe sixpack care, if the ad will suddenly exploit some vulnerability in the Windows and root the machine without user interaction? This is possibly the biggest mistake Microsoft has done since the Metro user interface.

    89. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, stop that with this "you don't own the software" crap! Regardless of their EULA or licensing crap, by law I OWN my copy of Windows that I paid for! The right of first sale says so. There may be restriction on what I can do with it, but I still own it.

    90. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop calling them "adds"! It makes it sound like they actually add something. They're "ads", as in "advertisements".

    91. Re:This is the price of "free" by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      I"m running a legit copy, haven't seen any ads as of yet on my lock screen. I also went through the options to disable the ads, didn't see the particular option shown. Either I'm behind on my updates or I've already had them disabled.

      dun dun dun... by malware delivered through the lock screen ad network...

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    92. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why is that now companies see pushing unwanted adds on to our hardware as perfectly acceptable?

      Mobile phones.

      How many millions of advertising dollars support Linux and all of its components/features being free for you to download and use courtesy of some advertising on open source pages?

    93. Re:This is the price of "free" by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      This is one of my biggest beefs about Win 10. They took roughly half of the stuff that used to be nicely consolidated in the control panel and spread it around a set of new interfaces, while leaving the other half back in the control panel. I have to go to two or three places to find things. Definitely a case of fixing what wasn't broken.

    94. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is incorrect, it used to be when you bought a software package, you owned a copy but were licensed to use it. The EULA insured that you could use it in some ways but not others.

      First sale doctrine applied, which is why you are able to legally buy an old copy of Windows on eBay.

    95. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The right of first sale does not apply to licensed items like software. You do not own your copy. If you bought it on a DVD, you own the physical DVD but not the software on it. That's the way things work these days.

      BTW, other things are going that way too. If you buy a TV, you own the physical components but not the software that makes it work, and the TV company can do whatever it wants within that software. Similar thing with cars - some carmakers are now asserting copyright protection on the computers and other gadgets that make everything work, so you can no longer fix your own car (nor can an independent mechanic, since the manufacturer is not required to make information available to others regarding how things work). Discussions are going on about the car thing, but no resolution yet. Have fun...

    96. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be happy to pay microsoft to never make an OS again.

    97. Re: This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It used to be that way, but isn't anymore. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernor_v._Autodesk,_Inc.

      Hopefully this idiotic ruling will be struck down in the future.

    98. Re:This is the price of "free" by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, if you install Windows 10 on your machine, then you're ceding control of your machine to MS. And as far as I'm concerned, if you willingly use Windows, you have absolutely no right to complain about MS's business practices or what they do with your private data or if they bombard you with advertising. You made your bed, now you get to lie in it.

    99. Re:This is the price of "free" by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You have a valid point, however I contend that anyone who's been paying any attention over the past 30 years or so should have known that Microsoft is infamous for abusing its customers and its monopoly position; they even had a giant court case about it in the late 90s. So it should have come as no surprise that MS would have abused its customers even more by force-"upgrading" them to Win10.

    100. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They altered the deal. Not joking.

    101. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      W7 is "excellent" if you like the "green ribbon of death" and all the other screwy things about it.

    102. Re: This is the price of "free" by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna save my post count because repeating myself is an exercise in futility.

      Reread the summary. Seriously. Put your big-boy britches on, read the summary anew, and apply some critical thinking. This isn't even enabled by default. It's not even the solitary option. You have to turn it on AND make sure to leave it (this is the default "on" setting - at least it is on 8) at that setting. If you don't like it, you can pick one of a few different settings.

      So, to be clear. There is NO lock-screen by default.
      If you enable the lock screen, this is the default setting (on Windows Phone 8).
      If you do not like this setting, you can pick others - they do not have ads.
      If you do not like any of the settings, you can disable them entirely.
      If you want to control it even further, and have the tech chops to do so, there's an API and you can write your own lock-screen.

      Here's how for Windows Phone 8:
      https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-...

      One of these links will help you out with Windows 10:
      https://msdn.microsoft.com/lib...

      You don't even fucking use a Windows phone. You've never even SEEN a Windows phone. You're never going to BUY a Windows phone. YOU are not the target audience for a Windows phone. Joe Average doesn't give a shit. Joe Average doesn't even have a lock screen. Joe Average sure as hell doesn't even get confused about it - he can figure out how to change it.

      This is NOT some sort of major issue and the concern trolling is absurd. There's a million legit reasons to be annoyed with Microsoft. Contrary to popular opinion (though the moderators have since fixed it), there is no outrage here. Read carefully what I've written. If you have a problem understanding it, try again.

      It's not on by default. If you turn on the lock screen, this is one of the choices. It is the default choice when you enable the lock screen. If you don't like it, you can use one of a number of other optional screens. Those screens are built in and the options are available to anyone wanting to use them. If you don't like any of the screens, you can even go so far as to make your own. I'm pretty sure there are alternatives right in the App Store.

      This is not complicated, this is not a justifiable reason to be outraged. There's no problem here. Nothing... If I were wrong, I'd admit it. I'm *good* at that. If this were sleazy, I'd admit that too. If there were any reason to be pissed, I'd be pissed - I like being pissed off about stuff. I like ranting and raving. I like pitchforks and torches. I like tearing up bad choices and making people realize that they've done stupid things. This? This is not that time. Doing so just makes you look like an ignorant fool who's frothing at the mouth about unseen enemies. You're about a half a step away from standing on the street corner screaming about Jesus and aliens at this point.

      Actually, screw it. I'll post this as logged in. Then the rest can see it. I'm not gonna repeat it over and over.

      Unless I'm missing something (and I do not believe I am) this is about as much a non-issue as was Google changing their font and favico.ico file. There's a lot of legitimate complaints. This is not one of them.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    103. Re:This is the price of "free" by Lotana · · Score: 1

      Thank you for pointing it out. I will be more careful in the future.

    104. Re: This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to all of the places that legally sell used games and used music.

      Also, I don't live in the USA and am not subject to its laws or court rulings.

    105. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus they will continue to add more and more of these "features" to Windows 10. So far it's been a constant battle just to maintain your Windows 10 OS in a reasonable state against Microsoft's ever changing defaults. Why would anyone think that the worst is over?

    106. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. I'm gonna post this as an AC 'cause I already said it once.

      http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

      It's a phone, for starters. I too am an idiot - I thought it was on the computer as well. But no, it's on the phone. You're still an idiot. See the response there. Turn it off if you don't want to see it.

    107. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite possibly. I'm not sure if they'd lie and say it was by accident. The thing is, this isn't even on by default. When you enable the lock-screen this is the default lock screen. Right there, at that spot in the settings, is when/where you can change it. There are other options. There are multiple other options. Not only that, you can change it pretty easily if you want to dig into it and write your own. No, that's not a viable solution for everyone but it's in the SDK and you can write an app and submit it today and put goatse there. Hell, it looks like you can do some customization to it already - without needing an extra app.

      It really is (mostly) benign at this point. When I first read it, I thought it was for the computer. It's for the phone. However, that doesn't actually change my opinion or the reality. The reality is that it's trivial. If you're not used to setting your settings back to where they were, well... You're not used to computers and not used to Microsoft.

      I've not used Windows in a while but I used to have to reset my default email and newsgroup client - every time there was an Office update. I used to have to reset my default browser once in a while. I'm not okay with that but it's just a fact of life.

      Also, it's not just Windows. When I say "Linux" then I mean more than the kernel, the kernel's kind of useless by itself. Anyhow, the most recent was my SAMBA settings that got eaten. In fact, the whole GUI (samba-tool) went missing. Default applications changed when I upgraded from 15.04 to 15.10. I expect the same changes to be made again when I upgrade to 16.04 in the not-too-distant future. Hell, for whatever reason, something keeps changing my default browser from Opera Beta to Opera Stable.

      Of course, I don't get ads on my lock screen. As it's a computer, I don't even use a lock screen. I can implement it. I don't. I could probably put ads there if I wanted, so there's that. I don't, technically, know how to put ads there - but I'm sure I can figure it out. Hell, I can probably even make them dynamic ads. I'm not gonna.

      So, really, this is a really trivial thing. It's quite literally one of the least offensive things that Microsoft has done. Oh, I wrote this:
      http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

      If you want to swear at me, call me names, or yell at me - that's where you can do it. This is getting posted as an AC, I'm saving my post count in case I get chatty later. Err... I dare say that my writing style is fairly unique. It's poor enough that it'd be tough to emulate. But, 'tis I... I'm just AC 'cause there's a silly 50 post limit even when you max out your karma.

    108. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beats this being the price of "free":
      http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/02/extremely-severe-bug-leaves-dizzying-number-of-apps-and-devices-vulnerable/

    109. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's their phone. So, I'm going with yes. Yes they would.

      I'm also not sure why you're saying "I." You do not have a nickel invested. You do not have a Windows phone. There's no plug-in, there's no extension, there's no app, there's no anything. You just select the lock-screen that you want when you enable it. It's not even enabled by default.

      I'm gonna post this as an AC 'cause I've already repeated this enough. If you want more details:
      http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

      So, no... You have an Android. You've mentioned it before. This is Windows 10 Phone. Hell, you don't even have Windows 10 - if I recall correctly. You sure as hell don't have a Windows phone. It's okay, I thought that it was a computer at first too. Well, it is "technically" a computer. However, no... It's not that type of computer. Even if it was that computer, I'd still not give a shit. Turn the damned thing off, don't use that particular setting, or pick a better OS. it's the damned lock-screen.

      Also, you do put up with it on your car. There's an ad for your speakers (depending on your model), the brand name, logos, a radio brand, a logo on the glove compartment, maybe logos on the seat, and people go out and buy ads to stick on 'em 'cause they didn't have ENOUGH on there to begin with. They want you to know that it's a Jeep thing, a Ford, a MOPAR, etc... They ad adds to 'em! I'm willing to bet that there's people who add ads to their lawnmower. I know you can buy John Deere stickers, I've seen 'em.

      At any rate, I'd not bother replying because I am saving my posts for important things but you're usually pretty sane. In this particular case, well... You're kind of not being all that rational. You don't even have a Windows phone, who are you kidding about this "I' thing? Sheesh...

      Also, this is AC. I won't see your reply. Feel free to yell at me under the linked reply. I sent that logged in.

    110. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the PHONE. It's a PHONE lock screen. Don't worry - I thought it was the computer too. It *still* doesn't change my view on the subject. It's off by default. You turn on the lock screen, you select a lock screen, and one of the options is this. One of the options, at an optional feature, is this... One... Optional... Phone...

      *sighs*

      I wrote this up earlier:
      http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

      I'm gonna post this as AC, if you want me to see a response, chuck it under the link above. I won't get notified if you reply here. At any rate, it's an optional screen on the phone - the lock screen on your phone. It is the default lock screen option, however. But there are several others and it looks like you can adjust some settings and make it how you want or just go ahead and write your own (if you really want).

      Y'all are going nuts over this... When, really... There's plenty of good reasons to be pissed.

    111. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like, where the fuck is your memory. Repeatedly M$ has been caught resetting end users settings on updates. So yeah, ha ha ha, set the settings only to have M$ change them back to want when ever it wants using compulsory upgrades, yeah, really fucking funny your comment. Oh how about sticking that privacy invasive shit in windows 7 not permission, no warning, just bend over the probe is going in. Any settings to fix that, nope, you have to look it all up and then individually remove the anal probe elements from your OS effectively hidden as security patches mind you, bug fixes and security patches, nope M$ delivering windows anal probe 10 features to windows 7 stripping away security and privacy.

      I'm a little confused, are you using M$ to refer to Microsoft or Mozilla? Apple fits too but doesn't start with a "M". Ever read the terms of service on ITunes?

    112. Re:This is the price of "free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because this country's economy is rapidly becoming exclusively rent-seeking and extortion.

    113. Re:This is the price of "free" by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Actually, that came from from Windows 8. Though Microsoft messing around with Control Panel is nothing new. It seems every release they rename a bunch of the items in there for no reason whatsover.

    114. Re:This is the price of "free" by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is they made a lot of that stuff better in Windows 8. Going back to Windows 7 in some ways is a bit painful due to it's stupid quirks that will likely never get fixed, or even get worse. Like the massive memory and CPU usage from Windows Update in Windows 7 that Microsoft won't fix either. It's too bad that Microsoft completely dropped the ball on the UI in Windows 8. If it was the under-the-hood improvements with the Vista/7 UI on top, it would have been a real winner.

  3. What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by kheldan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are you still being paid enough to shill for Windows 10, even in the face of something like this? Honestly, how much more of this do you think people are going to put up with before they say 'enough is enough'? Doesn't matter if you can turn them off or not -- they shouldn't be there in the first place! There's no excuse for this, none whatsoever.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by tnk1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Windows 10 is okay, all things told. The problem is when they sneak this shit in, but people who know what they are doing will consult the appropriate guide to turn it all off. Just like we did with all the other junk Windows tried to get in under the radar.

      However, while I have to admit that it is a pretty ballsy move to have your OS serve you ads, it's not like no one saw this one coming. I was wondering when I'd have Windows 10, "sponsored by Square Enix and Coca-Cola". It seems that it has now arrived. Welcome to the future.

    2. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't reason with unreasonable people. I expect more rationalization. I can hear it now...

      "Well the upgrade was free. So a few ads are OK"

    3. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, there's no excuse for this. Microsoft though is doing this shit because for many people, it's simpler to put up with it than move to anything else and deal with another operating system's shit. Linux isn't a drop-in replacement and OS X costs money (and another computer). It's just too much hassle to move over something that's really not that big a deal. It's ANNOYING yes, but not a great motivator.

      And Microsoft knows this.

    4. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Best part will be when someone manages to insert malware into one of the ads and pwns every single Windows 10 box. And someone at Microsoft will say "oops, we're sorry. Well we'll refund you the price of the OS OH WAIT THAT'S RIGHT IT WAS FREE so sorry.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by imidan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's interesting to compare the development of Software as a Service with television programming. Most people are not outraged by commercials on television--it is understood that someone else 'owns' the show you're watching and that they have the right to put ads in it. It seems like what MS (and others) are trying to do is gradually shift to a software environment where normal people think of Windows as a thing that belongs to someone else (MS), and as a result, MS has the right to put ads in.

      Of course, we hate this idea because we grew up owning software, but if they can persist this long enough, a whole generation will grow up not owning software, but consuming it instead, and at that point, using computers could become as bad as trying to watch the evening news. You'll try to start a word processor, and as the thing 'loads', you'll be subjected to ads for household disinfectants and medications with alarming arrays of side-effects.

    6. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by youngone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Honestly, how much more of this do you think people are going to put up with before they say 'enough is enough'?

      I think people will just assume that that's what Windows 10 is supposed to do, and not change a thing.

      Most people are not like you and me, they don't think too deeply about the laptop they've just bought. They bring it home, turn it on, accept some EULA, click a few 'next" buttons and an "OK" or two then start using it.

      I'm sure if it came with Linux Mint preinstalled an awful lot of people wouldn't even notice, because Gmail would work fine.

      I regularly need to ask people "What version of Windows does your computer run"? and about 2 in 10 know.

    7. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      ad for Square Enix's Rise of the Tomb Raider.

      What do you say now, Microsoft shills?

      Microsoft is not going to go tits up from displaying boobs by default.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    8. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

      Considering it can be easily turned off (for now) I don't really see a problem here. I checked my Windows 10 settings and it was already turned off. *shrug*

    9. Re: What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by johnsmithperson123 · · Score: 1

      I am still trying to rid myself of the tiles. For the last time, I don't want to look at MSNBC or play Minecraft!

    10. Re: What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah until they do daily updates to ensure all your settings go back to default for "best performance."

    11. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by penguinoid · · Score: 2

      Just wait a bit, and they'll start resetting your "don't show me ads" setting by "accident" every update.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    12. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      However, while I have to admit that it is a pretty ballsy move to have your OS serve you ads, it's not like no one saw this one coming. I was wondering when I'd have Windows 10, "sponsored by Square Enix and Coca-Cola". It seems that it has now arrived. Welcome to the future.

      Welcome to the past. They tried this shit with Active Desktop "channels" in a Windows 95 add-on and part of the core install of Windows 98

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    13. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That I hanv't seen this at all and its probably massively overblown if it is true at all?

    14. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      > we grew up owning software,

      No, you never did, unless you wrote it yourself.

      > a whole generation will grow up not owning software, but consuming it

      Several generations already have, including you. You have just been deluded about what you 'bought' for years.

    15. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by tom229 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I run into the same thing, except in my case it's 1 in 5.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    16. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, how much more of this do you think people are going to put up with before they say 'enough is enough'?

      And what? Switch to Ubuntu (Brought to you by Amazon)?

      I kid, I kid, though I'm in no rush to "upgrade" to Win10. Hopefully there will be enough backlash to ensure Windows 11 is acceptable.

    17. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh..no. Even I will torrent a show before switching the source to the unused cable box. Commercials are annoying.

    18. Re: What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by slazzy · · Score: 1

      Wait until it brings an entire new type of malware...

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    19. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by nmb3000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Windows 10 is okay, all things told.

      No, it's not!

      Have standards sunk so low that an operating system which:

      - Has the ugliest and most backwards user interface in history.
      - Does not allow you to control the installation of updates.
      - Incorporates advertising into the shell (and now) the lock screen.
      - Steals your Internet bandwidth to help pay for the distribution costs of Windows Updates.
      - Gleefully violates your privacy by sending microphone recordings, keystrokes, email, file contents, and who knows what else to external servers without explicit consent.

      is "okay, all things told"? Even with the privacy concerns being associated with a company already found to be working with and providing data en masse to the NSA?

      Windows 10 is, at best, a complete disaster. Any systems improvements under the hood are completely overshadowed. I just can't wait to see what other fresh bullshit Microsoft pulls in a year or two when more people are on 10 and the OS is fully on the OSX model of perpetual updates. At that point there will be so little recourse, your computer may as well be owned by Microsoft and simply be leased to you (as long as you behave yourself).

      I don't know why they even call it a "personal computer" anymore.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    20. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah, the time-honored refrain from every malware author, spammer, and other online lowlife in the history of computing: "Just delete it/turn it off. What's the problem?"

    21. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yeah. But the typical television watcher doesn't even know what 'torrent' means.

    22. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you never did, unless you wrote it yourself.

      Just because software companies like to assert that all I've bought is a license doesn't make it so. But when I can't even continue to use a program unless I make subscription payments, and the whole thing runs in 'the cloud', that's pretty clearly different.

    23. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by nametaken · · Score: 2

      At best, it's tacky as fuck. Just when you start to think MSFT is getting their shit together, they go and do something absolutely absurd like this.

    24. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, it's not free right? Just try to download a copy or order a free copy from somewhere.

      It may have been a free upgrade for some people, but the OS is not free. It costs about $100 for home currently.

    25. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Honestly, how much more of this do you think people are going to put up with before they say 'enough is enough'?

      What are they gonna do about it? Write a *strongly worded letter*?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    26. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kheldan, I recently AC'd a snarky post about how you're not a revolutionary or hero for using Linux. That very night I got the "failure configuring windows update" message and read it could take several hours to get my computer booted into the OS again.

    27. Re: What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am still trying to rid myself of the tiles. For the last time, I don't want to look at MSNBC or play Minecraft!

      I have one windows 10 machine, I just right clicked on each tile in the start menu and deleted them... then shrunk the empty space. All text now for the most part.

    28. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      However, while I have to admit that it is a pretty ballsy move to have your OS serve you ads, it's not like no one saw this one coming. I was wondering when I'd have Windows 10, "sponsored by Square Enix and Coca-Cola". It seems that it has now arrived. Welcome to the future.

      The future without Windows.

    29. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spent an hour or two formatting thinking "I completely deserve this for getting on my high horse and bashing that guy". I still stand by my message but I thought you'd appreciate someone getting their comeuppance.

    30. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 1

      We're talking about Windows 10 here which I've only seen but not used. (The person I watched using it eventually downgraded back to Windows 7.)

      However, I'd like to report that the Windows 8 tile menu makes a very good video game launch interface. I get big tiles for Star Citizen and Fallout 4, I can make a group of little tiles for various Civ 4 expansions, and my Battle.net games get their own group of little tiles. I can even conveniently sort my programs into "Apps!" for Chrome and PuTTY and "Apping Game Apps!" for the games. I could even create a "Cow Apps MOO!" category if necessary! Not sure what else I'd use anything past Windows 7 for.

    31. Re: What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 1


      A STRANGE GAME.
      THE ONLY WINNING MOVE IS
      NOT TO PLAY.

      HOW ABOUT A NICE GAME OF MINESWEEPER?

      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!

      Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

    32. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well then don't use it, and quit bitching.

      Jesus...

    33. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 10 is okay, all things told.

      Well shit, there's a damning indictment if there ever was one. Windows 7 was perhaps the apex of Microsoft operating systems, and ever since then, with everything they've learnt about what works and what doesn't, the best that they can muster is something that's "okay"? Geeze.

    34. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 1

      That's nothing compared to when systemd got on the basement router. It drank all the beer and kicked a puppy from my 6RD prefix! Then it accused me of hating handicapped people! Posting AC for obvious reasons.

      *submit!*

      Forgot to click the post AC box! Oh shi---!%$^^%#$NO CARRIER

    35. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      However, while I have to admit that it is a pretty ballsy move to have your OS serve you ads, it's not like no one saw this one coming. I was wondering when I'd have Windows 10, "sponsored by Square Enix and Coca-Cola". It seems that it has now arrived. Welcome to the future.

      Welcome to the past. They tried this shit with Active Desktop "channels" in a Windows 95 add-on and part of the core install of Windows 98

      Wow, Active Desktop. Enabled by default in ...windows 98? 98SE? And the most common error in the OS, even more common than... well, all the other errors, was a long pause where the system wouldn't respond, followed by the Active Desktop Recovery screen. The first thing I did when working on any PC was turn that crap off. (The second was to disable browse master. Or maybe that was Win95...)

      That takes me back. Or is it forward?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    36. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I guess the expectations of PC users are a lot lower now.

      Personally, I'm sticking with Windows 7 until I can figure out how to get my apps running on Mint.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    37. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Mr.+Jackson · · Score: 0

      ... it is a pretty ballsy move to have your OS serve you ads....

      Actually more "me too" than ballsy. Ever heard of Android.

    38. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Wait until the ads try to install stuff. Sure, you know better than to click "ok", but what about mother-in-law?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    39. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      He's a nice dog, you should buy him. Sure he'll bite all your children and neighbors, but castrate him and he'll mellow out. Just a simple reconfiguration that's not beyond the ability of your Average Joe.

    40. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      It's called a personal computer because it keeps trying to be intimate with you.

    41. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      "We heard from you, the customer, and decided to improve over the mistakes we made in Windows 8. Then we heard from our marketing department and decided we hadn't gone far enough."

    42. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why they even call it a "personal computer" anymore.

      I call it a personal computer because I run Slackware, Debian, PC-BSD, and straight FreeBSD on the back-end with a FreeNAS box in my home. It sucks ass over proprietary alternatives, but at least it's personal.

    43. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2

      I run into the same thing, except in my case it's 1 in 5.

      Similar situation for me, except it was 1.5 out of 7.5.

      In related news, I could use some money for bail.

    44. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought *every* OS was on the "perpetual updates" model, or am I mistaken?

    45. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had some remarkable success running Windows apps with Wine lately. Surprising success. Otherwise you are looking at a VM or VNC type solution.... combined with FreeNAS.

    46. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Television is showing us content for free, so we put up with some unobstrusive ads that don't transmit diseases. Windows 10 is not free, we paid for it or for the OS that we upgraded from, and yet we still get the ads and a vector for malware. At the very least Microsoft could act like web sites and whine at us to please turn off adblock or else they'll go out of business.

    47. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Mitreya · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm sure if it came with Linux Mint preinstalled an awful lot of people wouldn't even notice, because Gmail would work fine.

      Not until they want wireless to work -- and are then told on all discussion forums that they have to recompile the kernel for that. I am sure they will notice the difference then

      I know it will cost me some karma (and that everyone's grandma uses Linux now). I also do not know Linux Mint, but I run into things like this all the time with other flavors.
      "For X to work, need to install these 15 libraries, some of which have to be compiled from source or installed from custom repositories that have to be identified and configured first" (CentOS).
      "Wireless USB card will not work unless you follow these instructions to recompile the kernel" (Debian, a couple of years ago).

      Ok, now you can downmod me and pretend that what I say isn't true. But these are my actual experiences.

    48. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      If you're talking to halflings, I don't think money will bail you out of the padded room.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    49. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      We wrote it ourselves, and we also shared the software for free with no conditions attached. We also purchased software with license agreements granting us full use of the software in any and all conditions, licenses we could understand without consulting a lawyer. We also got personal service from the companies we purchased the software from and if there were bugs we'd often get an apology along with the patch.

    50. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by SemperUbi · · Score: 2

      Yeah; too bad my pepper spray won't work.

    51. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Sure.. theres all sorts of tutorials on castrating Windows 10.. How sure are you that *your* system is going to *stay* castrated?? Sure, you can completely turn off updates by messing around in the registry (shudder), but when you have such a "trustworthy" corporation like MS, who is to say *your* system will *stay* castrated?? I used/supported Windows for close to 20 years, retired in 2010, and decided I was done with MS products.. After seeing the nightmare that *is* Windows 10, I couldn't be happier on Linux...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    52. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ANYbody who pays $$$ for the turd that is Windows 10 should have a nice long visit with "those nice young men in their clean white coats"....

    53. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Not until they want wireless to work -- and are then told on all discussion forums that they have to recompile the kernel for that. I am sure they will notice the difference then

      Bullshit for very large values of bullshit. I haven't had wireless not work: on any installs I've done in the last 8-10 years now.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    54. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Lotana · · Score: 1

      Forgot to click the post AC box! Oh shi---!%$^^%#$NO CARRIER

      No you clicked it perfectly: It is the systemd on your router that stripped it

    55. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Expectations of PC users (MS hopes) are driven by their acceptance of all this "stuff" on their phones. But it *is* possible to turn 10 into a credible equivalent of 7, and MS even provides all the gory details at technet for those willing to dig. Some of it's even available in the standard settings apps (plural - app and control panel). I'm no MS shill, and probably will not upgrade my desktop to 10 (it's old enough that support is likely to be iffy anyway) since it's running well in 7. But I do have one computer running 10, and in general it's OK. Of course, I spent some time "reading the instructions" (which are not all from MS) and doing a moderately extensive effort to lock down the worst of the data collection and advertising support stuff.

      > - Has the ugliest and most backwards user interface in history.
      Not really true. It's different from what you had in XP thru 7, but you can, with a little work, dial the interface back to where it closely resembles 7. Of course, it has a different "start" menu that I'm growing to accept. If you really want the olde style, get one of the start menu apps developed for Win8; most work fine in 10 as well. Certain things are, of course, somewhat broken no matter what: for example, in 7, you could shut down with 3 keystrokes (win key, right arrow, enter); in 10, the minimum (if you don't have a substitute start app installed) is 5 (win key, up arrow, enter, up arrow, enter).

      - Does not allow you to control the installation of updates.
      You are correct here to some degree, though Pro (and even Home, in terms of short-term scheduling) allows you to delay them for some time. Also, W10Privacy.exe makes some of the otherwise Pro and Enterprise settings available in Home as well, using the information provided at technet. Should this degree of hacking be needed to control how updates are done? Of course not, for knowledgeable users, but for people who ignore updates because it's too much trouble to think about it the process probably is a good thing.

      - Incorporates advertising into the shell (and now) the lock screen.
      This is a surprise how? When they assign a unique advertising ID by default? And then provide explicit settings for turning it all off? You get ads on your phone the same way, why not on your computer? Most people won't notice, and those that do and are bugged by it can turn it off easily. And unlike Active Desktop in 98, it doesn't crash the computer if you turn the ads off.

      - Steals your Internet bandwidth to help pay for the distribution costs of Windows Updates.
      That's also an easy, one-click disable in publicly available settings, that works. In my copy (a 'free' update'), in fact, that distribution tweak was set by default to local network access only, not Internet (the middle level). Again, the publicly available settings let you turn it off completely if yours is the only W10 computer in sight.

      - Gleefully violates your privacy by sending microphone recordings, keystrokes, email, file contents, and who knows what else to external servers without explicit consent.
      Most of this can be turned off in Settings. What isn't turned off there, can be controlled using things like W10Privacy.exe, which can set rules in your computer's firewall that prevent nearly all communication with MS (of course, some things, including WU, break when you set all of them, so be careful). For full-on tinfoil hat types, you can set rules in your router's firewall, too, that should take care of the couple of things the computer firewall can't. Should all of this stuff be turned on by default? Heavens no! But your phone does the same thing so again why not your PC? And if you have a Smart TV you are already being monitored by camera and microphone at all times, with information being sent to the manufacturer insecurely to be used for selling advertising.

      Bottom line:Windows 10 takes too much effort to set up and maintain properly, but when you expend the effort and acquire the tools and knowledge, it works as well as and arguably better (especially for power management) than 7.

    56. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My phone doesnt show me ads on the lock screen. In fact the OS doesn't show me ads at all.

    57. Re: What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buddy asked me how to do this the other day. There is a little square in the upper left corner that links to options. It sort of looks like the options button of a browser. Turn mobility mode off.

    58. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wireless USB card will not work unless you follow these instructions to download a binary from a Chinese site and run it as admin" (Windows, a couple of weeks ago).

    59. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Stan92057 · · Score: 0

      You would think this would be linux opening and its hasn't made a tiny bit of difference. no ones switching in numbers, inability to run or install win programs on linux is closing that door oh and games cant forget the games.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    60. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by brantondaveperson · · Score: 2

      Incorporates advertising into the shell .... This is a surprise how?

      It's a surprise to me. When did we start accepting advertising into our lives like this? It's an outrage that software that costs money should display advertisements. The money goes to MS, right? That's just not acceptable.

      You get ads on your phone the same way

      I don't. :)

    61. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Mitreya · · Score: 1, Informative

      Bullshit for very large values of bullshit. I haven't had wireless not work: on any installs I've done in the last 8-10 years now.

      I think this is one rare example where anecdotal data counts. I am not saying it never works. It clearly worked for you. Perhaps you did your research in choosing the WiFi card first (I did not).
      First Google page hit on debian wireless not working supports my claim. I am not saying it is Linux's fault, but there appears to be consensus on wiki.debian.org that "Wifi has always been a problem for free software users. USB Wifi cards are becoming less free."

    62. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And, as I recall ... it was a gaping security hole they deprecated.

      Then they did the same thing in Vista with gadgets. Also, a gaping security hole they deprecated.

      And, I seem to remember they had them in Windows 7. And, again, it was a gaping security hole they deprecated.

      Trusting Microsoft hasn't fucked this up again is idiotic.

      But, more importantly, putting fucking ads on people's computers pretty much means Microsoft have gone full asshole on this one, and have really decided to fuck over their user base.

      Shit like this needs to stop. We don't have our computers to provide Microsoft with fucking ad revenue, we have them to do work and manage our stuff.

      I'm really beginning to think I'd be better off running my Windows 8.1 behind my own firewall with all updates turned off -- Windows 10 sounds like a bigger pile of shit every week.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    63. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Waccoon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The sad thing is that people don't need to be paid to shill.

      When I discuss what Win10 is doing with ordinary non-geeks, the reactions usually vary from, "It's not a big deal", to "Oh, I doubt they're doing that". Almost everybody agrees that the control panel options to disable the spyware actually do work, so there's no reason to worry. There doesn't really need to be an excuse for what MS is doing, because even when people are informed about what's happening, they still don't see why there's anything wrong and see us nerdy weirdos as paranoid. Interestingly enough, every day I keep finding more and more people that support Windows10 and actually like it. Hey, it's free, so why not?

      I don't like Linux and have always had trouble when experimenting with various distros over the last 12-or-so years. Nonetheless, I am very thankful that it exists and will be switching my workstation to it shortly. My game machine runs Win 7, though, and I honestly have no idea what to do when that OS no longer runs the newest games.

    64. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Stan92057 · · Score: 0

      Linux zealots still after all these years looking down their noses at the average PC user who just expects a PC to work. With all this BS Microsoft is pulling people still don't want linux, that's saying alot but they just don't get it.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    65. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try spraying it into the fan at the back of your PC.

    66. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      Ya know, people should be writing Square Enix emails telling them they will not support their games until they remove their support of ad on win 10. People have been doing this to advertiser on TV shows for years it does work.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    67. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but your could shear the wool off the tops of their feet to weave a blanket and keep you warm at night.

    68. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you implying that a laptop with a preinstalled OS (other than Windows and OSX) would not have the appropriate drivers built-in?

    69. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Ah, the time-honored refrain from every malware author, spammer, and other online lowlife in the history of computing: "Just delete it/turn it off. What's the problem?"

      Yes, and then they obfuscate, confuse, and make it just about impossible to uninstall or change the setting. Next thing you know, they'll change the option to disable this from "Show ads on your lock screen?" to something like "Get fun facts, tips, tricks, and more on your lock screen". Then they'll reset the setting every update or other excuse.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    70. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... I'm on a Windows 10 PC and it's not actually that bad. I actually like it better than Windows 8(although I still like Windows 7 better than both of them).

      Microsoft really did a great job with Windows 7, but Windows 10 is pretty good too. When everyone pirates your software, they have to transition to the same business model as their competitors who are giving their software away for free. Since Windows isn't maintained by an army of volunteers in the same way Linux is: Microsoft is at a disadvantage vs. Google and Amazon. They realize they aren't going to steal market back from Apple which is the primary "not Microsoft" competitor, but they need to hold territory against Google and Amazon to survive. I own a Chromebook and can easily see it slowly replacing my Windows PC as time progresses.

      Right now, the only advantage of Windows 10 vs. ChromeOS for me is my Windows 10 laptop has a 256gb SSD and a Core i7, and my ChromeOS laptop has a 32gb SSD and a Tegra K1. It's not really an apples to apples comparison. As people become more accustomed to ChromeOS, they're going to be willing to pay more for higher performance laptops. A $400 Tegra X1 Chromebook witha 128gb SSD would be ridiculously slick for instance.

    71. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but Gnome 3 easily beats anything else out there in the ugly/backwards UI contest (in fact it isn't even a contest).

      As for the update issue, it is a damned if you do damned if you don't situation. Allow users to control updates and the users simply don't install the updates, leading to security vulnerabilities never being fixed.

      At this point most software that can be dangerous auto updates - Chrome / Firefox for example - because history has shown it is the only way to keep the users of the software safe.

    72. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      Not until they want wireless to work -- and are then told on all discussion forums that they have to recompile the kernel for that. I am sure they will notice the difference then

      I call bullshit.

      I've done 8 or 9 installs of Mint in the last month on a variety of hardware (laptops and desktops) and the wireless functions have worked without a hitch every single time. In fact everything has worked every single time, I've not had a problem with any hardware yet. Scanners, USB ports, wireless, bluetooth, printers, it all seems to work fine without any problem.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    73. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by tsotha · · Score: 1

      I didn't pay for my Windows 10 upgrade, and I've been reasonably satisfied with it. While I'd rather not have Microsoft pushing ads at me, it seems like every other company is doing the same.

      Now, if I'd paid $100 bucks (or whatever) for a copy I might be a bit upset.

    74. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Every cycle some turd says "we can leverage our locked-in user base to display partner promotions that will make $XXX million in revenue growth". And every cylce someone high enough up in the company org chart says "great idea! 0-risk income! bonuses all around!"

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    75. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a piece of cake to watch the Nightly News commercial free. I've been doing it for years. If you want I can send you the source code so you can do it too.

    76. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I know Tim Cook likes getting his cock sucked but you could at least try and make it less obvious you have done so.

    77. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

      "For X to work, need to install these 15 libraries, some of which have to be compiled from source or installed from custom repositories that have to be identified and configured first" (CentOS).

      I ran into those issues when I started with linux 15 years ago, but soon realized it stems from a different way of deciding what to install. In Windows, you search the internet and find a specific program and then figure out how to install that. If you do that in Linux you can end up with some very painful complicated install processes. What you should do in Linux is instead search your repositories for the function you want fulfilled and install whatever it recommends. The only things I've installed from outside the repositories are Chrome and Skype, and I haven't had any problem finding the tools I need.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    78. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Sun · · Score: 1

      Wow, Active Desktop. Enabled by default in ...windows 98? 98SE?

      IE4 for Windows 95.

      I was working with a company that had OEM products for computer manufacturers. I was in NEC's offices, trying to help integrate this ball of manure, when IE4 release candidate came out. I installed it, and immediately started calling it "IE4 RC1". I simply couldn't believe they will ship it like that.

      Well, <spoiler>they did</spoiler>.

      Worst MS software release until Windows ME.

      Shachar

    79. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Not until they want wireless to work -- and are then told on all discussion forums that they have to recompile the kernel for that

      Nice try but linux had modules before this site even existed.

    80. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 is okay, all things told. The problem is when they sneak this shit in...

      You realize this is a contradiction, correct?

    81. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it as good as this ?

    82. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's almost 20%!

    83. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Honestly, how much more of this do you think people are going to put up with before they say 'enough is enough'?"

      If people put up with OSes the way they put up with elected politicians, we've got a LONG way to go yet. Sadly.:P

      capcha: liberals

    84. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 0

      That's true, but what happens then is that in linux you have to give up what you were trying to do. Forget it altogether or wait monthes/years for a new distro version to try again.

    85. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by melting_clock · · Score: 1

      As a long term Linux user, I love what MS is doing with Windows 10. It is making it much easier to move friends and family over to Linux. A bit of background on the crap that Windows 10 does and a demo of KDE is all it takes to convert them. It doesn't hurt that I also point our that they are running Linux already on the Android phones and tablets.

      I don't care if the rest of the world continues to use Windows, my only interest is in a specific group of people. My mother hated windows 8 on her new laptop and things were only marginally better with Windows 10 which I put on there to see if she could live with it. Can't see I didn't give MS a fighting chance...

    86. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Mitreya · · Score: 0

      I've done 8 or 9 installs of Mint in the last month on a variety of hardware (laptops and desktops) and the wireless functions have worked without a hitch every single time. In fact everything has worked every single time,

      I have pretty specifically said that I do not have any direct experience with Linux Mint -- you could at least finish reading my entire post before "calling bullshit" (unless you think I am making everything up?). Personally, I have dealt with Debian, CentOS (mostly) and Ubuntu at various times. Trying to get wireless to work was a Debian problem. Message boards seemed to suggest kernel recompilation -- I am not even saying it had to be done, I am saying that's what Google research showed at the time.

      Not knowing which flavor of Linux to install is actually the first problem I have encountered when setting up a new machine with Linux. If everyone here swears by it, Linux Mint may be the one I used next time.

    87. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by youngone · · Score: 1
      I'm a bit late coming back to defend myself here, but I can see from the other comments you've been shot down pretty well.

      Wireless works in Linux.

    88. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      but I can see from the other comments you've been shot down pretty well.

      Indeed, I have.

      Wireless works in Linux.

      I believe you when you say it worked for you, but that does not generalize. We are in a rare scenario where anecdotal data actually applies. Assuming you believe me, of course.
      Wireless did not work for me ~2 years ago in Debian. Honest. I spent quite a few hours googling things over a couple of days and trying what things Internet recommended, after which I moved on to another flavor of Linux (which had other issues).

      There are more than a few webpages online dedicated specifically to helping choose the right chipset/WiFi card properly supported by Linux.
      See Debian's Wiki on the topic. "Currently there are only a few modern wifi chipsets readily available that work with free software systems." Do you honestly think that to be equivalent to "Wireless works in Linux"?

    89. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Lotana · · Score: 1

      Don't be ridiculous. That is far too advanced for current UX designers! Next thing you will be asking for multiple, overlapping windows on the screen!

    90. Re: What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Lotana · · Score: 1

      I am still trying to get rid of OneDrive and XBox entries from the "All Applications" list in the Start menu...

    91. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Television isn't free, I know because I ditched television because it costs too much compared to what I got out of it. And I always muted the ads and used the time to go to the bathroom, put up the kettle, fetch snacks, that kind of thing. As does everyone I know who still has television (a dwindling population thanks to Netflix and torrents).

    92. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The games situation has improved drastically in the past 2 years. Go browse the Steam library for "SteamOS" games and you'll find quite a decent selection (about 20-25% of the list). There's PCI pass-through for the times when you absolutely need something to run under WinVM (and in the future it won't require a 2nd video card).

      WINE keeps getting improvements, with more and more Windows-only software running just fine.

      If you look closely at the various operating statistics, there's been a definite uptick in the number of Linux users over the past 6 months. Going from 1% to 2% of the market may not sound like much, but it's definite progress (and may be as much as 3% now). Even OS X only has 10-11% of the market and is still considered a viable alternative.

      If Microsoft had taken Win7's UI and used that for Win10, without the spyware, advertising, and nagging updates, Win10 would be far more popular as a replacement for the aging Win7. They'd have guaranteed lock-in for another decade. Instead, they seem determined to piss all over the user base and drive them to the alternatives.

    93. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your premise is ludicrous to begin with.
      We are talking about a pre-installed laptop. The installation will be a working one. If the particular distribution doesn't work out of the box with that laptop the store that installed it will fix it before sale.

      I can find plenty of computers that windows doesn't work on. (Unsupported CPU or whatever.)
      It is silly to think that someone would sell a computer like that with Windows pre-installed.

    94. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was wondering myself when something like that is going to happen.
      Hard to believe it wont, given how Microsoft security works....

      About the only positive aspect is that Microsoft will be so damaged by
      it that the Windows desktop monopoly will then be seriously jeopardized.
      A real alternative will appear at that point because the demand will be there.

    95. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      Hey, my business partner just said that.

    96. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      A cold shower does

    97. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 is okay, all things told. The problem is when they sneak this shit in, but people who know what they are doing will consult the appropriate guide to turn it all off. Just like we did with all the other junk Windows tried to get in under the radar.

      It would be better if End Task actually fucking worked! I'm honestly looking at Reactos https://www.reactos.org/ for my next OS

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    98. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows goes in alternate good, bad releases. XP? Good. Vista? Bad. Windows 7? Good. Windows 8? Bad. Windows 10? Mostly good. At any rate it's the OS Windows 8 should have been, but annoyances like these are not ideal.

      Intel annoyed me far more than Microsoft with Windows 10: the Windows 10 HD graphics drivers no longer support HD graphics 2000, despite the fact that Sandy Bridge is still an officially supported architecture. And it's not even for any good reason - the beta drivers worked, and the Windows 8.1 drivers still work (you have to obtain them from leshcatlabs.net as the official Windows 8.1 HD graphics driver installer borks on a Windows 10 system), they just decided to shit on their customers.

    99. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Games are the only reason I still have 1 Windows computer, but a lot of new games are Linux-compatible these days, especially because of the Steambox. I'm hoping I won't have to keep my gaming machine on Windows 10 for long, but sadly it would be an expensive and nonsensical decision to stay on Win7 past the free upgrade deadline.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    100. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by mlw4428 · · Score: 1

      The excuse is that you own a license for the OS. You don't own its content. And most people will not agree with you. Linux and Apple don't have applications that Windows does. They don't have all of the games. MS is still, by far and wide, the biggest laptop/desktop player in town. Bar none. Getting all pissy doesn't change the fact that people aren't going to move to Linux or Crapple any faster because of something lie this. It's an ad and people see them whenever they browse, watch tv, or drive down the road. More people will leave Windows over them removing the start menu button than they will over ads.

    101. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people don't know what's on their computer, and don't care. So long as they can see Facebook and videos online that's all they need. Heck most people nowadays don't even need a desktop or laptop, a tablet would suffice. Desktop PCs will soon go back to being for enterprise and hobbyists and will die in the consumer space, so all the nerd outrage about Windows 10 is a little ridiculous. No one but geeks wants to bother with installing an OS and especially don't want to spend the hours/days configuring and tweaking to get it to run, and then have to give up popular applications so they have more "freedom" like with Linux. Linux on consumer desktops will always be a niche product, get used to it. The day of Windows/MSFT Armageddon where the company dies is never going to happen. I'm done with this site.

    102. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by tom229 · · Score: 1

      I think you're a little confused. As you mentioned, the average user just wants their personal computer to work as a tool for them. So by your own statement they don't specifically want one tool over another.

      Where the real fault lies is with the people in the industry. The people who know better and who should be building and maintaining these tools. Not just the developers and creators but the entire IT community including technicians, authors, reviewers, salesman, etc. In a single generation we've gone from a people that will bring a class action lawsuit against Microsoft for bundling their own browser with their os, to not only allowing all operating systems to do that by default, but allow them to distribute all software through their own store, track everything we do through mandatory "cloud" accounts, data mine us, deliver us targeted ads at their leisure, and much more.

      This has nothing to do with the attractiveness of other platforms and everything to do with the staggering level of apathy and ignorance present in the instant gratification generation.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    103. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Alumoi · · Score: 1

      But think about the convenience!
      We already know all about you, your relatives, your friends, what sites you visit, what you bought since installing Windows 10 and so on.
      We're just showing you relevant ads based on your profile.
      Don't worry, in our next upgrade we'll even order them for for you.

    104. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Alumoi · · Score: 1

      I'm all for being intimate with my computer, but I'd like to be the one doing the fucking, not otherwise.

    105. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I have pretty specifically said that I do not have any direct experience with Linux Mint -- you could at least finish reading my entire post before "calling bullshit" (unless you think I am making everything up?).

      Okay, fair enough- I was a little quick on the trigger there. :)

      With that said, I'd recommend giving Mint a try. I've had nothing but success with it so far.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    106. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Has the ugliest and most backwards user interface in history.

      I thought we were talking about Windows 10, not Linux. <rimshot>

    107. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      One of the problems with Linux is it seems very much YMMV. I had no problem with Ubuntu when I installed it recently. I have had problems with various distros in the past, including Ubuntu, sometimes when people were claiming it "just worked" for them. I will say, however, that my luck getting stuff working with Debian was worse than any other distro I tried, including Slackware.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    108. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why can't we just have Windows 10, sponsored by Windows 10, or yourself, because you bought it?

    109. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by AntiSol · · Score: 2

      This. I haven't had a single piece of hardware not work in at least 5 years. In fact, I can't remember the last time something didn't work. Last time I checked, Linux supported more hardware than Windows. I've been using Linux for well over 10 years now and I've never recompiled the kernel. And I've never researched what hardware I buy, either.

    110. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I did do an install of Linux Mint where it seemed like the mouse, of all things, didn't work. WTF?

      And then I realized I was using an optical mouse on a glass table. I put a piece of paper under it and it started working.

      I had to wait 30 days to get my Geek Card back. :(

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    111. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      ^ THIS.

      I only see ads in two aps on my phone (Waze and Pandora - if I used it more, I would pay for Pandora to eliminate them). Never in my OS. Never on my lockscreen.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    112. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cable TV. You paid for access (at first) to a community antenna, then satellite, then thousands of channels (most of them shopping). If you wanted "premium" service (no commercials, better programming) you could pay extra for HBO and the like - oh wait, they have commercials now, too?

    113. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 is, at best, a complete disaster.

      I completely disagree. It seems like a resounding success to me. It's proven that Windows users are such idiotic sheep that they'll put with any amount of abuse that MS decides to heap on them, whether it's spyware, forced advertising, a horrible UI designed to push them to buy a Windows Phone, etc. There's simply no limit to how far MS can push its users, as they've found out, so expect things to get much worse for them, and for them to continue to say things like "it's okay, all things told".

    114. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Television is showing us content for free, so we put up with some unobstrusive ads that don't transmit diseases.

      Speak for yourself. More and more of us aren't just "cutting the cord", we're not watching TV any more at all (except for stuff like Netflix which has no ads).

    115. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it the Year of the Trial Size Dove Bar yet?

    116. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not free you fucking moron. The "upgrade" was free because both Windows 10 and Windows 8 are piles of trash. But when you put it on a new PC you have to buy it.

    117. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Black+LED · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is going to keep trying to sneak this kind of stuff into Windows 10. I have my computer to make my life easier and more enjoyable, not to have to fight with it every single time I go to use it.

      Right now I am very glad that I didn't install Windows 10.

    118. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck a lot people leave the dealership ads on the back of the car they buy for anywhere between $15,000 - $500,000 because they simply do not think about it. Or taking 5 minutes to remove 2 screws is just too much trouble. I don't know. People are dupes.

    119. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Having had a little Win8 experience, I don't think Win10 has the ugliest and most backwards user interface in history.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    120. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had some recent install kernel panic on first boot because the installer failed to properly handle some update. On the plus side, wireless was working.

    121. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sell an App called Pepper Spray - I will buy it if the features below

      1) Disable/Block all bandwidth stealing traffic. One box - disableALL*+/

      2) Choke bandwidth and send fake downstream data - like you saw the ads - but really didn;t.

      3) Record stolen info, then launch a bloat attack to the offending IP addresses.

      4) Settings restore - alert if settings changed

    122. Re:What do you say now, Microsoft shills? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      Not having used Win10, is the user interface actually worse than Win8? Admittedly, I didn't mind the tiles as much as some people, but Win7 was still the highlight for me.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  4. Confused?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does an operating system need to show ads?

    1. Re:Confused?? by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      It doesn't. You're being monetized.

    2. Re:Confused?? by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      They tried to get into the ad game by muscling in on Google with Bing... and lolfailed hard.

      Molesting Windows users is all they have left in the game. Well, Windows and Xbox users.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    3. Re:Confused?? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Why does an operating system need to show ads?

      Same reason "God" needs a spaceship.

    4. Re:Confused?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly explains why they're ramming Windows 10 down everyone's throats, whether they want it or not, whether it will work on their computer or not: home users are no longer their customers, advertisers are.

    5. Re:Confused?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft's strategy is starting to make sense. Google Search ads are effective because they're based on what you searched for. Microsoft hopes to target ads even better by mining your entire PC.

    6. Re:Confused?? by I4ko · · Score: 1

      Well, then it is again time to do a long-term evaluation ..cough...cough... of Windows 2012, just like back in the days of XP and 2003. 2003 was better in every regard over XP, especially when running Autocad and 3DS Max even with Geforce 2 cards softmoded to Quadro and overclocked Duron @+30% clock. This served me well for ages, and the whole reinstallation of the OS and the apps every 30 or 60 days was not even a bad idea when you had your disk partitioned in the right way.

    7. Re: Confused?? by johnsmithperson123 · · Score: 1

      Resistance is futile. Prepare to be assimilated. We will add your license keys to our own, and your PC will adapt to service us. Windows 10, lead project manager

    8. Re:Confused?? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Microsoft doesn't refer to this as molesting. They prefer "customer experience."

    9. Re:Confused?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They tried to get into the ad game by muscling in on Google with Bing... and lolfailed hard.

      Eh, Google got completely rekt by Bing's image search.

      'course, people searching for teh b00b13s via free image search aren't exactly a valuable market to begin with.

    10. Re:Confused?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monetize does NOT mean to make money off of. It means to literally use as money. Those little, green, rectangular clothes we call dollar bills are being monetized. Selling cars is not monetizing cars.

    11. Re:Confused?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      monetize transitive verb

      "3 : to utilize (something of value) as a source of profit"

      http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/monetize

  5. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just get pretty pictures.

  6. Y'know... by maugle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The annoying part isn't that Microsoft would try to advertise on your own lock screen. No, the moment we heard that Windows 10 was announced as a free upgrade, we all knew they'd eventually stoop to this level. The annoying part is how they refer to it in their settings.

    "Get fun facts, tips, tricks, and more"!? Go piss up a rope, you insincere, weasel-mouthed, marketing stooges. You've already hidden the option to turn the ads off behind a labyrinth of menus, you could at least give us the courtesy of not bullshitting us any further than that.

    1. Re:Y'know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > as a free upgrade...

      But John Thompson, the guy running Microsoft that was appointed for his race, has hinted that the free upgrades will be converted to a paid subscription model. It's too early to call it free.

    2. Re:Y'know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > as a free upgrade...

      But John Thompson, the guy running Microsoft that was appointed for his race, has hinted that the free upgrades will be converted to a paid subscription model. It's too early to call it free.

      Even Bill Gates himself admits that he was only hired for that role because of his political connections to Obama. Political appointments in tech companies never go well.

    3. Re: Y'know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because he was picked for his race doesn't mean that he can't do the job.

    4. Re: Y'know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he also said he was considering backing down from that position.

    5. Re: Y'know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is only the chairman that has Gates' support. He doesn't have that much power.

    6. Re: Y'know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft already stated that the future of Windows will be subscription based. They also said 10 is the last version.
      2+2=fuck you.

    7. Re: Y'know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was considered for the position of Secretary of Commerce so I sure as hell trust him over you.

    8. Re: Y'know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Gates appointed a moron, but he isn't man enough to admit that.

    9. Re:Y'know... by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      But John Thompson, the guy running Microsoft that was appointed for his race, has hinted that the free upgrades will be converted to a paid subscription model. It's too early to call it free.

      Yeah, I hate it too when they always appoint the white guy just because he's white, but what are you going to do?

    10. Re: Y'know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you work at github?

    11. Re:Y'know... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      The annoying part isn't that Microsoft would try to advertise on your own lock screen. No, the moment we heard that Windows 10 was announced as a free upgrade, we all knew they'd eventually stoop to this level. The annoying part is how they refer to it in their settings.

      Actually I expected them to pull the old bait and switch by coming out with something quite reasonable and innocent then boil the frog slowly. But I guess they figured they got the lid on the situation....

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    12. Re: Y'know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People that have never been held accountable for their actions and always fallback on accusing others of racism aren't the type to backdown.

    13. Re: Y'know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gates is not an idiot. He knees damn well he appointed an idiot.

    14. Re:Y'know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also hate all the nasty things that Windows 10 does by default, and I hate how much work it takes to learn about it all and turn it off. But since you can turn all of it off, I don't imagine it's hard to code up a batch file or something similar, to turn off ads and all the spying features with just two clicks. That's the kind of thing even my mom could handle. Then again, I told her to never click on .bat files...

    15. Re:Y'know... by snizzitch · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of this XKCD https://xkcd.com/870/

    16. Re:Y'know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      obvioiusly, the ads fall under "tricks"

    17. Re:Y'know... by agristin · · Score: 2

      " ...You hadn't exactly gone out of your way to call attention to them had you? I mean like actually telling anyone or anything.' But the plans were on display...' o n display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them.' `That's the display department.' `With a torch.' `Ah, well the lights had probably gone.' `So had the stairs.' `But look you found the notice didn't you?' `Yes,' said Arthur, `yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying "Beware of The Leopard".' -- Douglas Adams.

      It's about the same to turn off the ads. Or will be soon. You get what you pay for.

    18. Re:Y'know... by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      The annoying part isn't that Microsoft would try to advertise on your own lock screen. No, the moment we heard that Windows 10 was announced as a free upgrade, we all knew they'd eventually stoop to this level. The annoying part is how they refer to it in their settings.

      I had figured it was a way for MS to avoid losing faulty-product lawsuits when poeple would use Win 10 to run something expensive or large.

      No Consideration means no Contract. Hey, wait a minute! Does that mean also that there can be no enforceable EULA, either?

    19. Re:Y'know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't pay anything* for Debian and I get an excellent operating system. 16 years so far without this bullshit.

      * I donated, but that isn't a payment

  7. So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who the fuck stares at their screen AFTER THEY ARE DONE USING IT?

    They do the same thing on my Kindle. It shows ads after I am done using it.
    I couldn't give a shit if they put "You are a giant tool." on the screen after I am done using it.

    1. Re:So what by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      Seriously, you can't see Microsoft going down the YouTube route with this? The next thing will be that you'll open your computer to login and have to wait through five seconds of advertising before you can click "Skip ad" to get to the actual username/password prompt.

    2. Re:So what by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 1

      I usually don't, but (especially) since my user at work has some network administration privileges, I'm in the habit of pressing Win+L any time I leave the computer. (It's a small business, so hey.)

      I would be completely pissed if, upon returning, I found myself looking at Lara Croft's oversized tits. 1.) I don't care about video game characters meant to appeal to the adolescent heterosexual male market, and frankly they make sure I won't buy or play those games. 2.) What if one of the sexist assholes I work with walked by while I was returning from a meeting or before the screen completely blanked and believed I had put Lara Croft's oversized tits on my lock screen because I like ogling grossly disproportionate women?

      (Circle of protection: I'm a complete hypocrite! I may or may not have set my background to a series of images of Kevin Sorbo as Hercules and Kevin Smith [the beefcake one, not the silent one] as Ares with interludes of Leonardo DiCaprio characters! Ok, I haven't. It's currently the Crab Nebula.)

    3. Re:So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well of course not. You are a giant tool. Nearly negligible kudos to you for acknowledging that about yourself though.

    4. Re:So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That seems tame compared to making your password an Ad-Captcha. (Where you have to watch a video to get the code to type into the prompt)

    5. Re:So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello shill! Get to the cash desk please for your cheque.

    6. Re:So what by Alumoi · · Score: 1

      Seriously, you can't see Microsoft going down the YouTube route with this? The next thing will be that you'll open your computer to login and have to wait through five seconds of advertising before you can click "Pay now" to get to the actual username/password prompt.

  8. Update by InfectedPacket · · Score: 1

    Well I guess I won't have any ads on my lock screen until the next update restores Windows Spotlight as default...

    --
    @cyberrecce
    1. Re:Update by gman003 · · Score: 1

      Weirdly, I don't think I ever disabled Windows Spotlight, but it already was. It either kept it on "picture" from my W7 install, or Spotlight is actually a non-default option.

  9. Still wondering? by Aethedor · · Score: 1

    Hee, advertisement companies. Still wondering why people hate advertisements so much? Because these days it's really being overdone!! Flashy, beeping and screaming shit at places where you don't want them. Advertisements in the lockscreen of my own fucking PC is not only crossing the line, it's first spitting and taking a big dump on it before crossing it. It might even be going back, jumping on your own shit to make it extra messy and crossing it again!

    --
    It doesn't have to be like this. All we need to do is make sure we keep talking.
  10. Reeking of desperation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reeks of desperation. What's bizarre is that MSFT is finally beating the S&P. How long does that last though? The analysts might like this shit, but customers won't and in the end that's what matters. We can't get rid of Nadella soon enough. He's an insider with no vision.

  11. Time to write a Linux ad by penguinoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    How much would it cost to get a Linux ad placed there?

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:Time to write a Linux ad by KGIII · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That would be epic! I'm willing to throw some dollars at a "mission" like that. Unfortunately, I don't have any contacts there any more. (Years ago, for about a dozen years, I was an MS MVP.) I'd throw a few bucks to help make that happen so long as it's ethical and legal. Depending on how well they sanitize inputs, maybe you can get goatse there - but I'm not gonna help pay for that. I will, on the other hand, download the ISO and run it from a VM and take screen shots of it.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    2. Re:Time to write a Linux ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're thinking too small. How about a BSOD ad. How many people will curse MS and restart their computer losing some work they didn't need to lose? Or a phishing ad: "Virus detected, visit virus.com". Imagine the helicopter parents' lawsuits when some kid hacks in a pornographic ad for his school system (these ads are stored locally right?).

    3. Re:Time to write a Linux ad by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

      Or show Apple's 1984 commercial.

    4. Re:Time to write a Linux ad by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Right there on the BSOD the ad would say "Tired of this crap? While we're spooling to disk consider these alternatives to Windows..."

    5. Re:Time to write a Linux ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Until Linux can be used without ever needing to use the Terminal(which is never so far because of elitist bastards who doesn't want to let it go to make Linux more user friendly), you can shove it up where the sun doesn't shine, I'll keep windows.

    6. Re:Time to write a Linux ad by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Actually, I hear Apple has a huge pile of cash, they could definitely afford to run some ads.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  12. Just use Microsoft for games by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Enjoy your advanced gpu and play some computer games.
    After that turn Microsoft off and return to any other real OS. No need to go deep into settings on a real OS to get basic users rights back.
    Its always your computer :)

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by tom229 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's nothing that makes Windows run more games other than the fact that Windows runs more games. If you want to have a real impact, only buy multiplatform games. Demand is the only thing that will change the industry. It will be complete waste of your time no doubt. The instant gratification generation never gets behind an issue or boycott that actually matters or requires critical thought.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    2. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've actually stopped gaming since Windows 10 came out. I did the upgrade, like a dumbass in hinidsight, initially I was thinking DX12 was going to be worth it but boy was I stupid. Not much if anything uses it yet, and they've already put the bums rush on monetizing every damn thing you do with your computer. I'm just disgusted and have stopped booting Windows altogether....seriously. If I ever get the urge to game I'm going to have to flatten that p.o.s. OS and reinstall 7. Hopefully the key I used to upgrade to 10 will still activate 7.

    3. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Other OS just have to get their developer 3D support, audio and gpu support up to a great standard.
      The frame rate and visual quality has to be equal or better and developer support made more easy.
      Every other aspect of computing seems to have been worked out well on other OS's.
      All that can be done is to reduce the amount of useful, new, unique data users store, interact with or request via MS. Games is one area people are kind of locked into, so just reduce the data exposure and move other tasks on better OS's.
      GPU support has to offer the same easy and advanced hair, smoke, particle, water, wave ability.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      DX12 was the bait that games will need and use "soon". Wait until your fav game is upgraded to or released with DX12 support :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by tom229 · · Score: 1

      Drivers and features are already pretty close (at least with regards to nvidia and Linux) as far as I can tell. Any shortfall is simply caused by feature lag due to the obvious desire to support the most popular platform first. I don't know enough about the differences between directx and opengl to comment much on that, except that valve, creative assembly, projekt red, etc seem to be making AAA games multiplatform. Regardless, again this becomes a chicken and egg problem. Windows has more users because they have better support and features which is because they have more users. The power always lies with the consumer. Your dollar is a vote for how you want something to be.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    6. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 1

      The only thing I can't do in Linux I can in Windows is offload H.265 decoding to hardware, which I understand is not a permanent limitation (as soon as nVidia gets around to blessing me with a driver that supports it). The last time I ran benchmarks, I got better numbers from Linux than Windows. Admittedly, that was a few years ago before my current gaming rig (which is currently folding proteins at breakneck speed for the red site's team under Linux--had to make sure it didn't run during the day so it wouldn't be ~10 degrees warmer in my room than the rest of the house).

    7. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The reason is that there are more Windows PCs than any other PC. So that's where the games are if you don't use consoles.

      Overall Windows games tend to not be Windows-only whereas it is not uncommon for console games to be "exclusive".

    8. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The feature list can be seen on sites like: http://www.geforce.com/hardwar...
      http://www.geforce.com/hardwar...
      http://www.geforce.com/hardwar...
      https://developer.nvidia.com/w...
      If Linux has that gpu support vs CPU bound, thats great :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    9. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, it's not your computer. The manufacturers have all sorts of rights over how you use the computer. Also, the software manufacturers are pretty clear that what you do on the computer must conform to their standards. Also, if you use social media, the terms and conditions stipulate that what you post belong to the social media platform, not you.

    10. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      That won't have any impact at all. The only thing that would happen is I'd miss out on the games that would really entertain me and be eating Carob instead of Chocolate out of stubbornness. It wouldn't change a fucking thing.

      No thanks. I prefer games on my high end gaming computer. I'll play them on a console if they're console only, but I like mods and being able to throw as much graphics hardware as I can afford at them.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    11. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Because that worked so well for DX10 and DX11, right? Yeesh, how long were we stuck with DX9 (and 32-bit support) simply because of how long XP and the last generation of consoles hung around? Trust me, videogame developers are a pragmatic bunch. We'll be seeing DX11 games for a long time to come simply because plenty of people are sticking with Windows 7.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    12. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That won't have any impact at all. The only thing that would happen is I'd miss out on the games that would really entertain me and be eating Carob instead of Chocolate out of stubbornness. It wouldn't change a fucking thing.

      Pretty much. I have been trying to buy multiplatform (specifically Linux + Windows) games for a while even though I'm primarily a Windows user, just so that if I got fed up enough to move entirely to Linux that I wouldn't lose.

      But even after following this for a few years, it's clear that probably only a microscopic handful of people are following this approach, making no discernible affect on the market, hence ensuring Windows remains cemented in its position of having the majority of games, particularly the best ones. Stubbornness didn't really achieve much for me except for some personal satisfaction that I had for a while that I was following some "code" about my purchase decisions.

    13. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by melting_clock · · Score: 1

      Good advice. I've been doing that for many years. Things have changed a bit though...

      I get my games through Steam and there are plenty that support Linux so I buy them and on rarely have to boot into Windows. Ten years ago it was a struggle to get games on Linux and it is now very easy, often easier than Windows. There are still a lot of Windows only games released and that will probably not change for a while.

    14. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then id just switch to one of the thousands of games that do run on a proper OS, no tux, no bux

    15. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty close doesn't cut it.

      Pretty close is the difference between spending countless hours fucking around trying to get something to work, and something working out of the box.

      Pretty close can go fuck itself when it comes to entertainment.

    16. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw, I game on Linux. Have for several years now. Don't need much, just good gameplay, which is easily found on Steam, like L4D2.

      Most games are not worth to buy. Never have been, so not missing much. My gaming rig do play just as good as on Windows though, although not the latest hw, stationary PCs provide substantial bang for the buck over laptops.

    17. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by tom229 · · Score: 1

      Well it sounds like we can all go fuck ourselves either way, according to Microsoft. This message was brought to you by American Express.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    18. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did we ever get into this mess, in which merely loading and running some software forfeits your total control of your own machine?

    19. Re:Just use Microsoft for games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most games seem to still support dx9.

  13. Must... find.. way... by Rinikusu · · Score: 4, Funny

    to get into the MS ad network and display gape porn on their network...

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    1. Re:Must... find.. way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please do! I'd like the sound of the reassuring thump at my desk in the mornings as I open my workstation. You know, that remainder that I still got it.

  14. Just picked up a surface pro 4 - rant by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    3 BSODs within 2 days of taking it out of the box. Tablet mode is unusable, They sell it on the strength of using existing Windows apps, like firefox but clicking on the text boxes inside firefox (or older windows apps that don't use the stock windows edit boxes) don't bring up the on-screen keyboard. Power saving modes like you find on android or iOS devices are an after thought. Microsoft still treats this thing as a PC so coming out of sleep mode is not fast.

    Basically it's an overpriced but nice ultrabook.

    So I reached the level of acceptance as it, still, barely, serves the purpose I bought it for.

    Last night I wanted to order a pizza - something stupidly easy to do on android or my iPhone with an app - So I went to the microsoft store and searched for a papa johns app for a lark.
    No apps found.
    No apps found?! WTF?!
    Fine, how about Dominos.
    Here's one... for India. That's nice except I live in the United States.

    OMG...Here I am trying to at least "live" in the Microsoft eco-system and it's like a bunch of Paklids running the joint - "We have Microsoft App Store! We are Smart!"

    And now... NOW they're forcing ads onto the lock screen?!

    Microsoft is dead. I've got everyone in my friends and family holding onto Windows 7 (and have disabled windows update) and while I'm forced on my surface to use Windows 10 - Well, this is where I leave you.

    1. Re:Just picked up a surface pro 4 - rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last night I wanted to order a pizza - something stupidly easy to do on android or my iPhone with an app - So I went to the microsoft store and searched for a papa johns app for a lark.

      Why would you need an app for that? There are things called websites, some of which display okay on a small-screened device.

    2. Re:Just picked up a surface pro 4 - rant by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      You don't need an app for everything. If I was to order a pizza on any platform, I would likely go straight to the website to begin with. If the Surface is unable to identify when to use the mobile version of a website, I suppose that could be an issue. But all the same.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    3. Re:Just picked up a surface pro 4 - rant by Jahoda · · Score: 2

      Microsoft receives no love from me for the privacy invasion that is windows 10. But are you seriously nitpicking your surface because you wanted a pizza application from the app store and there wasn't one? I guarantee you that it took you more time to search the appstore than to simply open papajohns.com and log in with your account from any of the multiple browsers that work on the device?

      Oh, and multiple blue screens in two days? Let me go ahead and call Bull. Shit. Either you have bad hardware out of the box, or you installed something you shouldn't have. This is not 2001 and windows XP. BSODs are bad hardware, or bad driver.

    4. Re:Just picked up a surface pro 4 - rant by reboot246 · · Score: 0

      Even easier - there are these things called phones. I have the numbers for all the local pizza places already saved on my phone. Touch the name and the phone makes the call. Why use an app when you can just call?

      You don't need the internet for every freaking thing you do.

    5. Re:Just picked up a surface pro 4 - rant by the_skywise · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yeah, I am.

      Pizza apps are a staple of any app ecosystem. Generally I use my web browser on my LAPTOP or safari on my iPhone (or the pizza app, whichever happens to be on screen sooner) The point is that Microsoft is trying to setup an ecosystem like the apple or google app stores for applets. But if they don't even have basic apps like those to order pizza after, what... 3 - 4 years of running an app store, they're seriously hurting. Because it's THOSE apps that are designed intentionally to be used on a metro/touchscreen interface they're vital to the success of the surface but they're not there.

      So - as a tablet - it's an utter failure. I can't recommend it to my grandmother or tech-challenged friends and family when a droid tablet or iPad will work right out of the box. As an ultrabook with a touchscreen it does much better but then it gets compared to macbooks or ultrathin laptops

      And no it wasn't bullshit but thanks for your concern. Aside from palemoon there's nothing on the surface but pure unadulterated Microsoft goodness. Sure, it's probably a bad driver (hardware seems fine otherwise) but they're all Microsoft drivers either from the stock install or the windows update and, being that it's a Microsoft built device, they can't claim it's a weird hardware configuration or some driver the vendor didn't properly test.

    6. Re:Just picked up a surface pro 4 - rant by the_skywise · · Score: 1

      Oh wow... I never thought of using my smartphone as a.... PHONE!

      Or maybe I just find it easier to use two clicks to launch the app and hit re-order my favorite - rather than try to orally communicate my order over the phone in a crowded and noisy pizza shop where the pizza-guy can't even hear me.

      Hey, why should I even use a PHONE - I can just drive over to the pizza place, walk in and order it right there at the window and have it ready in 10 minutes!

      You don't even need advanced technology for every freaking thing you do.

    7. Re:Just picked up a surface pro 4 - rant by vux984 · · Score: 2

      And no it wasn't bullshit but thanks for your concern.

      Then you have dodgy hardware, or you are doing something you aren't admitting. One or the other. The devices simply do not BSOD 3 times a week out of the box, not even running pale moon, unless it is defective.

      Send it in for warranty.

      Pizza apps are a staple of any app ecosystem

      Staple or not they are irrelevant nonsense. The Windows app store does have lots of BIG gaping holes... many banks don't have a windows phone app. Many peripherals don't either... from Lego Mindstorms to Harmony Remotes, to communications stuff like RingCentral.

      But Pizza? Give me a break. You can still order a pizza on your surface via the website. That's a minor inconvenience at best. Me, I find it MUCH faster to just phone it in.

    8. Re:Just picked up a surface pro 4 - rant by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Here: https://www.papajohns.com/

      Now you don't need an app to order online.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    9. Re:Just picked up a surface pro 4 - rant by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck would I call when I can click a few buttons. Don't even have to interrupt the conversation I'm having with the nice woman at the bar to shout at some half-wit in a noisy restaurant.

      I haven't ordered anything over the phone in years, and I LIKE it that way.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    10. Re:Just picked up a surface pro 4 - rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, how hard is Linus' cock shoved up your asshole? Maybe you should get an Ipad. It is a device made for fucking retards like you.

    11. Re:Just picked up a surface pro 4 - rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 BSODs within 2 days of taking it out of the box.

      Don't be an idiot. I've seen this before from people who buy notebooks with the same problem. You have a defective machine. Take it back where you bought it and exchange it for a new one.

    12. Re:Just picked up a surface pro 4 - rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some banks *had* a Windows Store app, but have pulled it due to lack of interest over the past year. The whole Windows App store is basically dead and/or dying at this point. Which is probably why Microsoft bought Xamarian...

    13. Re:Just picked up a surface pro 4 - rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wow... I never thought of using my smartphone as a.... PHONE!

      That's obvious, smartass!

      You don't even need advanced technology for every freaking thing you do.

      So you agree. Then why insisting on using a fucking app?
      I guess you're one of those who look at their screen to see if it's sunny outside.

    14. Re:Just picked up a surface pro 4 - rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pizza apps are a staple of any app ecosystem.

      Wow, so true. I won't even consider buying a computing device that doesn't come with a pizza app included. Imagine the horror! We're all going to die!!!!!

    15. Re:Just picked up a surface pro 4 - rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you heard? Web sites are out of fashion, because they're too slow on phones, because there's too much adware and tracking code in them. Besides, the only web sites anybody needs are Google, Facebook, Amazon and Netflix, and there are apps for those on your phone. Keyboards are old hat, and big screens are for TV, not that old "web" stuff. Our corporate overseers know what's best for us.

    16. Re:Just picked up a surface pro 4 - rant by Audguy · · Score: 1

      Maybe I don't want to carry cash or give some random minimum wage teenager my CC number.

  15. Be direct by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why doesn't MS offer a "normal" edition and a "spam and snoop" edition ("Windows 10 SSE" *). The normal version would cost more. At least you'd know what you are getting and can avoid junk by paying more.

    * Or Godwin it: "SS"

    1. Re:Be direct by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      I believe that do, in the form of what they'll sell to the U.S. DoD.

      AFAIK, it's just something they won't sell to regular people for regular amounts of money.

    2. Re:Be direct by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Their normal edition *IS* their spam and snoop edition.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:Be direct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now they have sold the spying capabilities to NSA, Microsoft cannot afford to exclude any users from its reach. This is why thay are so heave handed in pushing the "free upgrade".

    4. Re:Be direct by Lanforod · · Score: 2

      Why doesn't MS offer a "normal" edition and a "spam and snoop" edition ("Windows 10 SSE" *). The normal version would cost more. At least you'd know what you are getting and can avoid junk by paying more.

      * Or Godwin it: "SS"

      They do, but not for consumers. The enterprise version does not have this, even with Windows Spotlight - there is no link for fun tips etc.

    5. Re:Be direct by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You mean the enterprise editions?

    6. Re:Be direct by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      You mean the enterprise editions?

      Maybe, but I'm not certain for a few reasons.

      I've heard some people claim that even Enterprise Edition phones home sometimes, regardless of settings that a competent admin might provide. Since I've heard that the DoD version may be entirely free of phoning home, I'm not sure the DoD version is precisely the Enterprise Edition.

      Also, I've heard people refer to "long-term support" versions of Windows that the DoD and maybe enterprises can get. I'm not sure if that's the same thing as Enterprise Edition or not.

    7. Re:Be direct by srichard25 · · Score: 1

      The DoD editions still "phone home". They are just calling themselves anyway.

    8. Re:Be direct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm running windows 10 enterprise here and the option is there.

    9. Re:Be direct by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Given what people are claiming and not understanding about Windows 10, I'm skeptical of claims that enterprise editions do that. Especially the way reddit users did their "controlled" (what a joke) tests that have been cited by the IT media as of late.

  16. sue them by negrace · · Score: 1

    Can't we sue them for loss of traffic, electricity used, and using your device as an ad board?

  17. I didn't expect this, but I'm not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - Microsoft makes software, lots of it
    - Microsoft makes things... phones, tablets, games consoles
    and probably other stuff too...

    But like most companies, the most important thing to make is....
      MONEY

    The employees, the shareholders, the tax people want it... there's charities, plaintiffs, and lots of other people who want it. So ads make all of these people happy, at your expense. I use Linux.

  18. "The Smoking Gun Presents" Video Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who shouts into the front door of a bar he was just thrown out of to "JUST FUCK ME IN THE ASS" over and over. That's me. To Microsoft.

    And thank you! Microsoft. May I have another!

  19. Can't justify spying for product improvement now by bug_hunter · · Score: 2

    Up to this point I wasn't really put off by Microsoft's spying - and I know I was very much in the minority there (but I'm not a Windows user so I guess that was purely a hypothetical opinion anyway).

    I was under the assumption it was there for usage statistics to make a better product. I've work on a paid iPhone app where we recorded anonymous usage statistics so we can see how people are interacting with the product and it was super useful for making a better product - note that users were informed of this tracking and had to opt in.

    With advertising, Microsoft poison that argument, now they spy on you for the same reason as every other company.

    --
    It's turtles all the way down.
  20. Better instructions.... by Stephan+Schulz · · Score: 0

    If you want to make sure you're not hit with these ads, follow these steps to disable Windows...

    --

    Stephan

    1. Re:Better instructions.... by Stephan+Schulz · · Score: 2

      Point taken, but then substitute Debian or OpenBSD or ...

      --

      Stephan

    2. Re:Better instructions.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't see the difference, just try to fork windows.

    3. Re:Better instructions.... by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2

      Precisely. And I actually worked there at the time. Made me physically ill.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  21. How much more of this will people take? by steveha · · Score: 4, Interesting

    About half of my family is running Linux instead of Windows. We're geekier than the average, but I can tell you that non-geeks in my family have no problem at all running a Linux desktop. (And I've installed Windows and Linux, and overall it's easier to do a Linux install.)

    It has never been easier to junk Windows and switch to Linux. Many people just use email, a web browser, and Facebook; those all Just Work on Linux. Video, sound, it's all fine.

    And desktop is getting less important all the time; people are using mobile devices more and more. And Microsoft missed the boat on mobile.

    So even as the "network" that makes Windows important is crumbling ("network" as in "network effect"), even as Microsoft's actual power to push people is waning, they keep finding new ways to punish people who stick with them. Hey, nobody will mind if we monitor them a bunch, right? Make it almost impossible to figure out whether it's enabled or not. (If it's even possible to disable it... maybe it isn't!) And start pushing ads, because nobody hates having full-screen ads in their faces.

    Is Microsoft actually trying to achieve Windows 8 levels of hatred for Windows 10? Does Linus Torvalds have sleeper agents inside Microsoft trying to make Windows crumble from inside?

    Keep this up, MIcrosoft, and we may yet see the Year of Linux on the Desktop.

    P.S. I haven't bothered to keep up with all the settings one must change to disable all the bad behaviors in Windows 10. I just checked to see if there's a tool for it... there's a bunch and it's not obvious which one(s) to use. Is there a clear favorite tool to fix the Windows 10 settings?

    http://www.ghacks.net/2015/08/14/comparison-of-windows-10-privacy-tools/

    Hmm... maybe this one: Spybot Anti-Beacon

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:How much more of this will people take? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Personally I'm hoping all this means the Amiga really will rise again.

    2. Re:How much more of this will people take? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The perfect tool to fix the WIndows 10 settings is implied in your very post: a Linux distribution install image.

    3. Re:How much more of this will people take? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Linus Torvalds have sleeper agents inside Microsoft trying to make Windows crumble from inside?

      As long as they have a sleeper agent at Redhat I am fine with a sleeper agent at Microsoft.

    4. Re:How much more of this will people take? by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      Keep this up, MIcrosoft, and we may yet see the Year of Linux on the Desktop.

      I just moderated you Insightful, BTW.

      People continue to think I'm crazy and slam me on here and other sites, but running Linux as one's daily OS is becoming easier and easier for non-neckbeards. ReactOS development seems to be accelerating after twenty years of gestation, and WINE continues to improve on a weekly basis. Unless you're running some really obscure Windows app, most stuff runs under WINE without show-stopping problems. If there is some bug, it's as likely the fault of the app as it is something not yet supported under WINE. And to all the naysayers, no, I don't have Linus Torvalds' cock in my mouth or up my arse.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    5. Re:How much more of this will people take? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as hibernate, sleep, display brightness control and quite a number of other things don't work in Linux, people will take infinitely more.

    6. Re:How much more of this will people take? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For impaired users who enjoy a limited selection of 3rd rate software and a GUI hacked together by amateurs, Linux is a viable option so long as users don't try to do in-place distro upgrades. Even seasoned Linux users get fucked by those.

    7. Re:How much more of this will people take? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      Apparently no one does mind the monitoring. To wit, note the preponderance of smart phones you mention, which are all just as busy spying as Windows 10.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    8. Re:How much more of this will people take? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there any job openings for "paid Microsoft shill"? I could use a few more bucks

      I'm asking because this is clearly professional-grade FUD. Well done sir or madam

    9. Re:How much more of this will people take? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. Good luck with that.

      Last time it was attempted, nobody wanted it.

      Hell, you can run AmigaOS in UAE, or download AROS if you want that experience. Nobody else seems to.

  22. WINDOWS IS DEAD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WINDOWS IS DEAD.

  23. no longer purchasing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, I was going to get that game, but I guess I won't now since they paid for that sort of obnoxious advertising.

  24. FTFY... by Yaztromo · · Score: 2

    If you want to make sure you're not hit with these ads, follow these steps to disable Windows Spotlight: buy a Mac (or install Linux!)

    FTFY.

    Yaz

    1. Re:FTFY... by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      That's not much help if you like to play AAA computer games. Yes I know Tux is 3d rendered. It's not much fun.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re:FTFY... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      World of warcrack runs on linux and minecraft used to so probably still does.

    3. Re:FTFY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to make sure you're not hit with these ads, follow these steps to disable Windows Spotlight: buy a Mac (or install Linux!)

      FTFY.

      Yaz

      Better yet, buy a Mac and install Linux on it :p

    4. Re:FTFY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EVE Online runs great on Linux, the only issue is you need to use Wine 1.9.3 RC to use the non-XP launcher (you need that version to enable the option to hide the wine version from the application in winecfg). Once the game actually starts, it's flawless. EVE has always run great on Linux via wine.

      I really hate that they're adamant on keeping the damn launcher. Before the launcher, it was a totally flawless experience on wine. I personally don't think the launcher adds any value.

    5. Re:FTFY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you copy your username into the body of every one of your posts? Are you still stuck in 1985? Too stupid to realize your username is already at the top of your post? Too stupid to look around at all the other posts on this site and notice that you're the lone obtuse idiot?

  25. Makes a certain amount of sense by iamacat · · Score: 1

    Windows is the only consumer operating system which is not free as in beer. Upgrades to OSX, iOS and Android are always available for free. Android is also free to OEMs. This disadvantage can not be competitive long term. Since Microsoft doesn't sell much hardware, they have to make money on advertisement, cloud services or Windows store commissions.

    1. Re:Makes a certain amount of sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows is the only consumer operating system which is not free as in beer.

      Shit really? when did MorphOS and Hyperion start giving away their OS for free?

      Upgrades to OSX, iOS and Android are always available for free.

      Only when the OEM offers them, which is fucking rare.

      Android is also free to OEMs.

      No, it's not.

      Your whole post is made of lies.

    2. Re:Makes a certain amount of sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Android is also free to OEMs.
      > No, it's not.

      Android itself is free. Google Play and all that crap on top of it has licensing fees.

  26. Linux Community; Get with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now could be a good time to make some serious headway with Apple and Microsoft being such overt douches.
    Most computer sales now are tablets and UEFI only,secure boot crap with onboard wireless(BT etc)... I have 4+ x86 tablets in the family I'd love to run Linux on; but theres no distribution that works 'fully'(mostly BT, wireless, but also odd uefi boot configs)... Heck I'd pay for full functioning linux; is there a bounty site still around to encourage development?

    Winbook TW-700, TW-802, Acer Transformer TA-100's, so many more...
    intel Baytrail systems/chips.. .

  27. UFIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And more" now may include UFIA. http://www.urbandictionary.com...
    which a judge has found is perfectly legal.

    1. Re:UFIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unsolicited Finger In the Anus. Popularized on the website Fark.com and is a cliche among TotalFarkers. Originated from a news story about a young man who poked his friends in the backdoor with his finger on a high school football bus trip. In the story, the judge is quoted as saying "an unsolicited finger in the anus, while crude, is not criminal".

    2. Re:UFIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UFIV is of course perfectly legal in the same sense. Sometimes finger is just a finger. Or multiple fingers. Or the whole fist.

    3. Re:UFIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I give you a hand with that?

    4. Re:UFIA by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

      I believe this is a prank called "goosing". Here's an example where Robert De Niro gooses Zac Efron on the set of Bad Grandpa.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
  28. No it began with Amazon by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Kindles have always had two prices. The lower price with ads is the advertised price. You can pay a higher price for the one without ads on the lock screen.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:No it began with Amazon by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      The Gizmondo handheld console did that first.

    2. Re:No it began with Amazon by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      Well I was talking about major OS. Sure and some cell phones did this too. Amazon is a major OS provider.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    3. Re:No it began with Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The price difference is $15 between the ad version and the ad-free version of Kindle.
      The ads appear only on the "lock" screen on my Kindle Touch.

    4. Re:No it began with Amazon by UVB-76 · · Score: 1

      that stupid ad supported kindle crap actually caused me to pay the 20$ to get rid of it :( i guess their ploy worked

    5. Re:No it began with Amazon by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 0

      Kindles have always had two prices. The lower price with ads is the advertised price. You can pay a higher price for the one without ads on the lock screen.

      I'll be happy (okay, happier) to pay for an ad-free and spyware-free version of Windows 10. However, I suspect the retail versions behave just like the free version. This means Windows 7 will be the last version of Windows I use.

      P.S. Making people pay for an ad-free version of Solitaire is a dick move MS.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    6. Re:No it began with Amazon by ITRambo · · Score: 2

      Too bad Microsoft treats all free upgrade, and paid OEM, installs of Windows 10 Home and Pro the same. You're had by default.

    7. Re:No it began with Amazon by dbIII · · Score: 0

      I'll be happy (okay, happier) to pay for an ad-free and spyware-free version of Windows 10.

      Windows 7 is still on sale, performs far better, and has an interface that is doesn't have people ringing up tech support to ask how to turn it off.

    8. Re:No it began with Amazon by Threni · · Score: 1

      I'm outside the US so they didn't actually charge me anything to turn the ads off.

    9. Re:No it began with Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just let them know children are using the kindle.

      Had two kindles for two different children. Used the "chat" option in amazon and told the operator, I expected an argument but in both cases they made the change immediately and less than 10 seconds the lock screen changed to the stock images.

    10. Re:No it began with Amazon by CSMoran · · Score: 1

      I'll be happy (okay, happier) to pay for an ad-free and spyware-free version of Windows 10.

      Windows 7 is still on sale, performs far better, and has an interface that is doesn't have people ringing up tech support to ask how to turn it off.

      I know, but good luck finding a new laptop with Windows 7. The effort to remove Win8 or Win10 from your new purchase, installing Win7 and hunting for necessary Win7 drivers is non-negligible. And you better make sure those Win7 drivers exist in the first place.

      --
      Every end has half a stick.
    11. Re:No it began with Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? I can pop my Windows 7 Pro disc or flash drive into any PC I buy and have it installed in no time. And why would you have to first remove Windows 8 or Windows 10? Why would you not just tell the Windows 7 installer to format the drive and clean install? Fabricating extra steps to make it sound more complex than it really is, are we?

      Also, Windows Vista/7 drivers are the same as Windows 8 and Windows 10 drivers. They are interchangeable.

    12. Re:No it began with Amazon by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 had ads on the default start screen too. It's been going on for years.

      This year will be pivotal in the first great ad war.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:No it began with Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 8 had ads on the default start screen too.

      No it didn't.

    14. Re:No it began with Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kindles have always had two prices.

      Windows 10 has always been free.

      Not free as in beer, or even free as in speech, but free as in worthless.

    15. Re: No it began with Amazon by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Exactly. you took the words out of my mouth. With the kindle you at least have the option to pay for removing the "bad things". I'd pay money to have windows 7 with windows 10 internals and improvements but it seems Microsoft isn't interested in selling such a thing

    16. Re:No it began with Amazon by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      Not always. When I bought my Kindle, you had a choice between the Kindle... or uh... the Kindle. One device. One Price.
      Having said that, I'm happy they kept an ad-free version. I have no qualms about their sales model.

    17. Re:No it began with Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Kindle has never shown ads. Maybe this is a newer thing as my Kindle is pretty old, but there were not two prices other than for a larger size.

    18. Re:No it began with Amazon by d0rp · · Score: 1

      And honestly, I don't really mind the ads on my Fire tablet. They're attractive ads (i.e. not ugly or overly obtrusive), and some times they're rather interesting, even though I've never actually purchased anything that was advertised that way.

    19. Re:No it began with Amazon by fisted · · Score: 1

      I paid the ad-infested price, getting rid of the ads manually was straightforward, even on stock.
      I shortly thereafter installed cyanogenmod to the device though, since that was what i bought it for in the first place.

    20. Re:No it began with Amazon by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      Except it's free to disable them on Windows. So no problem then. I'm quite happy for adverts on other people's machines to fund my OS.

    21. Re:No it began with Amazon by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Windows 7 may not even work on some new laptops because of limited support for new processors and chipsets. Or the new laptops may have devices that have no Windows 7 driver.

    22. Re:No it began with Amazon by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The secure boot bullshit can make installing Windows 7 (or anything that's not Windows 8 or 10) on some laptops difficult. Drivers can be a bit tricky too, if the hardware is sufficiently different that the standard drivers don't work, then you are dependent on the manufacturer to publish Windows 7 drivers. And Intel has announced that there will be no drivers for older versions of Windows moving forward. Since most laptops now depend on Intel's GPU (amongst other things), the number of new laptops that will be able to run older versions of Windows will start to get pretty limited.

      On the other hand, you can still order yourself a brand new Thinkpad with Windows 7 (or Windows 8.1) today if you don't want Windows 10.

    23. Re:No it began with Amazon by CSMoran · · Score: 1

      Huh? I can pop my Windows 7 Pro disc or flash drive into any PC I buy and have it installed in no time. And why would you have to first remove Windows 8 or Windows 10? Why would you not just tell the Windows 7 installer to format the drive and clean install? Fabricating extra steps to make it sound more complex than it really is, are we?

      Quite an attitude you've got there. I'm not fabricating anything. Looks like your experience is different. Mine was the following. The PCs was not mine, I was helping out my mom. It came with Win8 preinstalled, together with the "backup partition" nonsense that laptop vendors throw in. This had to be cloned first, so that it could be returned to pristine state in case installing Win7 did not work (missing drivers, etc.). Extract the drive, pop into a USB enclosure, connect to a second laptop, clonezilla, done. Easy? Yes, but an extra step. Then *my* Win7 installation disc just "blackscreened" early during the installation process. The error message was rather generic, along the lines of "This installation disc will not work with this system", and it took me a while to figure out that it was something to do with the EFI/UEFI boot process. Took some fiddling with BIOS settings, I think this is what toddestan referes to as the secure boot bullshit. So yes, the install was not smooth at all.

      Also, Windows Vista/7 drivers are the same as Windows 8 and Windows 10 drivers. They are interchangeable.

      What, vendor-provided drivers for NIC, touchpad, chipset and so on advertised as Win10 drivers work without issues under Win7? Maybe for you they do, can't say they did for me.

      --
      Every end has half a stick.
    24. Re:No it began with Amazon by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      I've been running Windows 8 for 1.5-2 years now, and I've never seen any ads. What "default start screen" are you talking about?

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    25. Re:No it began with Amazon by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Live tiles on the start screen. They advertise Microsoft services.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    26. Re:No it began with Amazon by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      I suppose you could consider them that; it feels weird to call an app that comes with the OS an ad, but there is some rationale there.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  29. Abandon ship by Smiddi · · Score: 2

    Another reason to move to either Linux or Mac O/S. Games are the only reason to stay with Microsoft unfortunately

    1. Re:Abandon ship by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2

      Another reason to move to either Linux or Mac O/S. Games are the only reason to stay with Microsoft unfortunately

      And Photoshop + LightRoom, for those of us who (1) can't easily afford a Mac and (2) must use actual Photoshop + LightRoom and (3) have color-calibration hardware that doesn't necessarily do the right thing when Windows is running as a guest OS.

    2. Re:Abandon ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use KVM/QEMU and get direct gpu access with 95% available. The windows vm solved.

    3. Re:Abandon ship by Lotana · · Score: 1

      With Steam and GOG supporting Linux, Wine, and PlayOnLinux it is a golden age for gamers on Linux.

      Which games do you currently run that keep you on Windows?

    4. Re:Abandon ship by unapersson · · Score: 1

      And Photoshop + LightRoom, for those of us who (1) can't easily afford a Mac and (2) must use actual Photoshop + LightRoom and (3) have color-calibration hardware that doesn't necessarily do the right thing when Windows is running as a guest OS.

      You're really listing trademarks rather than requirements there (at least for the first two). If you're tied to Acme(TM) then platform becomes pretty much an irrelevance as an independant choice, as you're limited by what Acme(TM) supports.

    5. Re:Abandon ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Rockwell RSLogix for Allen Bradley automation controllers. Automation software and corporate Windows are the only reasons I don't run Qubes or similar 24/7... but it still runs fine in a VM.

    6. Re:Abandon ship by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      You're really listing trademarks rather than requirements there

      It was short-hand. I wasn't looking to start a Yet Another Conversation about why some professionals will not be moving away from Photoshop and Lightroom.

    7. Re:Abandon ship by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Well, since you ask,

      A Story About My Uncle, abyss_odyssey, Ace Combat Assault Horizon, Age Of Empires 3, Age2HD, Air Conflicts - Pacific Carriers, Alpha Prime, Always Sometimes Monsters, American Truck Simulator, Amnesia The Dark Descent, AmongRipples, Arma 2, assettocorsa, Audiosurf, Aveyond Lord of Twilight, Baldur's Gate Enhanced Edition, Baldur's Gate II Enhanced Edition, BattleWorldsKronos, Besiege, Bioshock, Blackguards, Blackguards 2, Borderlands 2, BreachAndClear, Breath of Death VII, Broforce The Expendables Missions, BrutalLegend, Bulletstorm, Card City Nights, Cities XL Platinum, Citizens of Earth, City of Heroes Going Rogue, Civilization IV Colonization, Coin Crypt, Company of Heroes 2, Company of Heroes Relaunch, Consortium, Contagion, Creeper World 3, Crimzon Clover, Crypt of the NecroDancer, Crysis 2 Game of the Year, Cthulhu Saves the World, Dark Messiah Might and Magic Single Player, Dark Souls Prepare to Die Edition, Dawn of Magic II, Dawn of War 2, Dawn of War II - Retribution, Dawn of War Soulstorm, DCSWorld, Dead Island Epidemic, Deadlight, Dear Esther, DeathSpank, Defcon, DefenseGrid2, Desperados 2, Desperados Wanted Dead or Alive, Direct Hit Missile War, DiRT 3 Complete Edition, Disciples 3, Disciples III Resurrection, Dishonored, divinity2_dev_cut, DoorKickers, Dr Langeskov, The Tiger, and The Terribly Cursed Emerald A Whirlwind Heist, DrawAStickmanEpic, Dungeon of the Endless, Eador. Masters of the Broken World, Earth 2160, Eisenwald, Eldritch, Elemental Fallen Enchantress, Endless Legend, Endless Space, Europa Universalis III - Complete, EvolutionRTS, FE Legendary Heroes, Fishing Planet, FlatOut Ultimate Carnage, Floating Point, For The Glory, FORCED, Freedom Planet, Frontline Road to Moscow, Frozen Endzone, Frozen Synapse, FTL Faster Than Light, FullMojoRampage, Future Wars, Galactic Civilizations II - Ultimate Edition, Galaxy On Fire 2 HD, Galcon Legends, Game Character Hub, Game Guru, GasGuzzlersExtreme, Gauntlet, GearUp, Gish, Gnomoria, Goats on a Bridge, Gone Home, Grand Ages Rome, Gratuitous Space Battles, Gratuitous Space Battles 2, Gratuitous Tank Battles, Great Big War Game, grid 2, Grotesque Tactics, Haegemonia Legions of Iron, Half-Life 2, Hexcells, Hexcells Infinite, Hoard, How to Survive, IL 2 Sturmovik 1946, Imperium Romanum, insurgency2, International Snooker, JABIA, Jagged Alliance Crossfire, Jedi Academy, Joe Danger 2 The Movie, Just Cause 2, Kerbal Space Program Demo, KingArthurII, Kings Bounty Legions, Knights of Honor, Knights of the Old Republic II, KOAReckoning, Kohan II, Kyn, L.A.Noire, Labyrinthine Dreams, Larva Mortus, Last Word, Left 4 Dead 2, Legend of Grimrock, Limbo, Little Racers STREET, Lone Survivor, Machinarium, Magic 2013, Magic 2014, Magic 2015, Magic The Gathering - Duels of the Planeswalkers, Magic the Gathering DotP 2012, Majesty 2, Man Of Prey, MarchOfWar, Max Payne 2 The Fall of Max Payne, Max Payne 3, MegabytePunch, Men of War Assault Squad, Meridian - New World, Metal Gear Solid Ground Zeroes, Metal Slug 3, Metro 2033, Metrocide, Monaco, MountBlade Warband, Omerta, One Finger Death Punch, OpenVR, Order of War, Oscura Lost Light, OTTTD, Outland, Pacific Skies, PapoYo, Patrician III, Patrician IV, Pe-2 Dive Bomber, Penguins Arena, Penumbra Black Plague, pixeljunkeden, PlagueInc, Pole Position 2012, Portal, Portal 2, Prison Architect, Pro Evolution Soccer 2016 myClub, Project Freedom, Qvadriga, R.U.S.E, RAGE, Recettear, Red Faction Guerrilla, Red Orchestra 2, Remnants Of Isolation, Ride em Low, RingRunner, RIP, RIP 2 - Strike Back, RIP 3 - The Last Hero, Rise of Prussia Gold, Rise of the Triad, Rise of Venice, rocketleague, Rome Total War Alexander, Rome Total War Gold, RPGVXAce, Saints Row IV, Saints Row the Third, SalvationProphecy, Samorost 2, Sang-Froid Tales of Werewolves, Shadow Warrior, Shadowrun Dragonfall Director's Cut, Shadowrun Hong Kong, Shadowrun Returns, Ship Simulator Extremes, Sid Meier's Ace Patrol, Sid Meier's Civilization IV, Sid Meier's Civilization IV Beyond the Sword, Sid Meier's Civilization IV Warlords, Sid Meier's Pirates

  30. Best part... by cloud.pt · · Score: 1

    Best thing is they're probably gonna be served directly from Microsoft servers, making it impossible to block through host blacklisting without losing anything actually useful, like security patches. But oh, well, the setting does exist. The wider problem here is the amount of people who they will reach out of the fact they simply aren't savvy enough to disable them, much like most Google opt outs. Either that or the setting itself filled with WARNING screens saying how much they lose disabling it, pretty much mitigating the soul count turning that crap off out of fear. It's mesmerizing the lenght companies will go instilling the notion that ads are good for all of us. Get a fukin clue

    1. Re:Best part... by Pikoro · · Score: 1

      Disabling those options doesn't do much either. Microsoft collected 1.2 million points of data from my computer over the course of 6 days. This is with all the privacy options disabled. Details here: http://init.sh/?p=331

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    2. Re:Best part... by cloud.pt · · Score: 1

      Wow. That is some serious sniffing around. No wonder Gates has no quarry with the FBI demands on Apple... Great article mate. I'll definitely be waiting for the next chapter on your antics with them.

  31. Microsoft can't innovate. They only copy. by ZeroZen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ubuntu is way ahead of the curve.
    http://yro.slashdot.org/story/...

    When will Apple catch up?

  32. I can pratically see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ./ readers jacking off with this "news"

  33. Now we sit back and wait for infected ad servers.. by grilled-cheese · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now we just sit back and wait for infected ad servers to deliver 0-day malware....

  34. Ads Are Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ads are great I cannot lie. Some other brothers might deny. But when they're late I... ummm... miss a chance at buying the next.... ummm. Ads suck I cannot lie!

  35. time capsule schadenfreude by epine · · Score: 1

    If I put this story in a bottle (along with enough context to make it meaningful), and put the bottle into a time machine, and set my former self as the recipient, I'd have to dial all the way back to cow-pasture Iowa 80386 (circa 1986) before my former self would do much more than go "oh my god, that's awful, but not actually all that hard to envision—if mass society remains dumber than trees for another three entire decades".

    Then my former self would think, "wow, the generation gap is truly smaller than it first appears" and then "shit, I was kind of hoping the enter key would be gone by then" and soon I'd be in my cups and on my way to rent a copy of WarGames so as to even more earnestly root on the WOPR.

    1. Re:time capsule schadenfreude by epine · · Score: 1

      Parity error in that first sentence went undetected. Probably should have installed that ninth RAM chip.

  36. Well, thats fucked by The_Revelation · · Score: 1

    I'll contact Microsoft right now and see what the process is of downgrading this license to Windows 7. After today I don't think anyone will buy this product.

  37. Ask amazon. by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    How much would it cost to get a Linux ad placed there?

    You could ask amazon? they use Linux to run their kindles which have ads. You could buy a Linux ad from amazon.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  38. Great work, Microsoft! Keep it up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    With this, interest in Linux and *BSDs just got a little bit stronger. More users means more potential developers and advocates.

  39. How soon... by mhkohne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Till the first bit of malvertising that uses this as it's infection vector? Is someone taking bets?

    --
    A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
    1. Re:How soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How soon until Comcast et. al. MITM this and start pushing their own ads?

    2. Re:How soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure the spyware / telemetry in Windows 10 is tunneled over https, so MITM would be a challenge. I assume the ads on the lock screen will be the same way.

    3. Re:How soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It eats up bandwidth for no reason, it IS malware

  40. Re:*nix was the first to use Ad sponsored OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That doesn't matter, with free software if enough people don't like it, they can fork it. If you can't, it's not free software (that's why GPL is better).
    With the huge, and growing, place of computers in our life, it's madness to let a corporation control your computer.

  41. Re:*nix was the first to use Ad sponsored OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And remember, kindle fires run *nix. So it was free software not Microsoft that went their first. Likewise ChromeOS forces you to have a google account just to log in or update so everything you browse is know to google. The ads you see on that browser are derived from your history. Again ChromeOS is *nix.

    only apple seems to be the hold out on this. So it hardly seems fair to pillory microsoft for this, especially on Slashdot.

    It wasn't "free software that went there first". It was a massive multi-international organization using "free" software to go there.

    Dont try to place the blame on *nix.

  42. Monetize me harder baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You know those telemetry updates you can't turn off? It'll be reporting back to Microsoft exactly what your lock screen setting is.

    In a week or two, a group of MBA fuckwits will be poring over a report entitled, "Percentage of users to disable Spotlight in period 2/24 to 3/9" and reaching conclusions from it.

    If it's low, expect this shit to ramp up in intensity. If not, expect a pukeworthy "We've listened to our valued customers decided the time in not right to bring exciting and engaging content tailored to your interests"

    How's it feel to be monetized until the pips squeak, calculated with exquisite perfection?

  43. Great new feature by MrKaos · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is one of the really great things about Windows, how it introduces features to people that they really want and need. Having Windows constantly context aware insert product placements directly into peoples lives will really help them be aware of the things they need to spend money on.

    Ads are great and anyone who doesn't like this won't know what they are missing. I want to thank Microsoft for introducing this feature to computers. Anyone who doesn't like these features in windows is probably just really stupid.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    1. Re:Great new feature by the_skywise · · Score: 2

      So you approve of Microsoft as the great stalker boyfriend? :)

    2. Re:Great new feature by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      especially the part where people who might be religiously or philosophically offended at certain hollywood movies now get to have their horizons broadened whether they want it or not. How uplifting of Microsoft.

      I'm thinking of some relatives of mine who lead churches, just wonderful if their computer in church office all of a sudden pops up movie post glamorizing war and/or senseless bloody mayhem, or a woman pole dancing (or otherwise being a sex object) while they are say counselling someone.

      either of those subjects fine with me, by the way, but some people in this world don't have my trashy taste in entertainment, understand?

    3. Re:Great new feature by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      So you approve of Microsoft as the great stalker boyfriend? :)

      Of course. It's exciting! Someone that knows *everything* about me, wants me all the time. I'll never be alone again. I'm so happy.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  44. Non-Jerks in Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... It's official, CEO #3 is just as jerky as #1 and #2. The MS tradition of corporate mayhem continues ...

    Those of us who have had a couple of rounds on the tech sphere already know this fact --- you just have to be a jerk to survive the Microsoft corporate culture

    In fact, the more jerk one happened to be the hire the Microsoft corporate ladder that individual gonna attained

    1. Re:Non-Jerks in Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, the more jerk one happened to be the hire the Microsoft corporate ladder that individual gonna attained

      This is certainly true in the case of a jackass named Van Lanning (vlan@microsoft.com), one of the most gigantic assholes ever to be a manager at Microsoft. The bigger an asshole he became, the more revered he became.

      Fuck you, Van, you'll be an asshole until the day you die, after which all of your coworkers will have a party to celebrate your passing.

    2. Re:Non-Jerks in Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... It's official, CEO #3 is just as jerky as #1 and #2. The MS tradition of corporate mayhem continues ...

      Those of us who have had a couple of rounds on the tech sphere already know this fact --- you just have to be a jerk to survive the Microsoft corporate culture

      In fact, the more jerk one happened to be the hire the Microsoft corporate ladder that individual gonna attained

      pulpfictionenglishdoyouspeakit.jpg

  45. Re:*nix was the first to use Ad sponsored OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose guns kill people too?

    "No, sir. I didn't kill that fellow! It was the gun that did it, I simply pulled the trigger."

  46. customer-focused by supernova87a · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When you see something like this, you know that the Product development group has taken a back seat to the commercial / sales groups at a company.

    No self-respecting product designer / owner at a company would allow such a fundamental, first impression of the product to be tainted by advertising as they designed the thing. What product manager would say, during the design process, "wouldn't it be great if we could show ads all over the home screen of people's phones!"

    No. Only after the filter had been applied by the marketing / sales department and commercial officers to say, "well, we need to raise more revenue to make our shitty product line seem good" would the product team reluctantly agree to allow ads to make their way into this.

    All respect lost.

    1. Re:customer-focused by Shados · · Score: 1

      Dunno, worked at plenty of companies where PMs thought crap like that was a good idea (I obviously didn't stay at those companies very long).

      You know how in IT, software engineering, etc, there's always all of these idiots that shouldn't be there, that seriously don't have any kind of talents but somehow managed to pass the interviews and they never seem to get fired?

      Well, they exist in other fields too, including at big companies.

    2. Re:customer-focused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Only after the filter had been applied by the marketing / sales department and commercial officers to say, "well, we need to raise more revenue to make our shitty product line seem good" would the product team reluctantly agree to allow ads to make their way into this.

      It is at that point a company needs a strong leader that can say no.

    3. Re:customer-focused by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      What product manager would say, during the design process, "wouldn't it be great if we could show ads all over the home screen of people's phones!"

      I now have this happen occasionally on the lock screen of my Moto G (HBO Go, most of the times). I think it's from AppLock, but I'm on Verizon, so maybe it's them.

    4. Re:customer-focused by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

      Uhm, that may have been true like 20 years ago, but there's this thing called the internet and it's changed how marketing is done, duah, Dumb rant.

  47. This is great! by no-body · · Score: 1

    I won't upgrade then - seems to click this little popup on the lower right corner boasting millions of idiots are using it off, is the lower pain....

  48. Re:*nix was the first to use Ad sponsored OS by brantondaveperson · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is no longer true. It is possible to download open source iOS apps, and build and install them into your iOS device. That whole $$$ required to get a developer certificate quietly went away a while back.

    To be sure, you do need an apple account to get the now free device cert, and so this doesn't quite qualify as 'opening up their devices', but at least it no longer costs cash. That said, there are few iOS open source apps, since the vast majority of people don't seem to mind paying a bit of money for an app. They also don't mind that they're being 'tracked', whatever that might mean in the context of installing applications. If I visit a website, I am constantly bombarded by ads from that site until I go and delete the tracking cookies. If I install an iOS app, this doesn't happen (of course). So while they know I've installed an app - a good thing, by the way, since the purchase can be restored if you lose the device, and even installed on what appears to be an unlimited number of additional iOS devices - they don't appear to do anything with that information.

    For OSX of course, there has never been any restriction beyond having to turn off gatekeeper. The dialog that pops up and complains that you're trying to run unsigned software even directs you to the appropriate place in the system settings.

  49. Re:Uh... might want to think about that rage by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    What Amazon,Google OS version is out for me to get for my PC please?

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  50. Re:And so ... (CORR... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it begins.

    ... ECTION)

    And so it ends. Hooray for the impending death of Microsoft!

  51. Um, NO. 100% WRONG. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And remember, kindle fires run *nix. So it was free software not Microsoft that went their first. Likewise ChromeOS forces you to have a google account just to log in or update so everything you browse is know to google. The ads you see on that browser are derived from your history. Again ChromeOS is *nix.

    only apple seems to be the hold out on this. So it hardly seems fair to pillory microsoft for this, especially on Slashdot.

    That's an incredible stretch, Mr. Incredible! It's also completely WRONG.

    IF they'd based the Kindle's OS on UNIX, it STILL wouldn't MAKE IT a UNIX, any more than if I yanked the engine out of a BMW, put it in something I had built, would make THAT a BMW!

    HOWEVER, it's not. It's based on ANDROID which itself is based on LINUX*, which is a re-implementation of UNIX sharing NO CODE WHATSOEVER with ANY OF THE UNIX OPERATING SYSTEMS. You can't even blame the GNU guys, since the point of Android was to use the Linux KERNEL without the GNU (read, "GPL-encumbered") utilities. Know how some people insist you call your Linux OS on your computer, "GNU/Linux?" Well, the part of Linux that is actually LINUX is the kernel, and that's about it, (or at least it was, things may be different now though I doubt it,) the entire rest of the OS (all the utilities, etc.,) are GNU. In the case of Android, though they don't bother with the formalities, if Linux (as you see it installed on the typical desktop PC,) must be called, "GNU/Linux," then Android should be called, "Android/Linux". And NONE of ANY of that is UNIX, in any way, shape or form. Similar, yes. interoperable? Sometimes.

    Directly related or sharing code? NO.

    Incidentally, know what OS actually IS a UNIX and has been so for about a decade? Apple's Mac OS X. (Underneath all the pretty, it's based on one of the BSD's, still has a lot of that code, and this is why it's as robust as it is, and successful. It is certified by the OpenGroup as a UNIX, so there. (Ref: http://arstechnica.com/apple/2007/08/mac-os-x-leopard-receives-unix-03-certification/)

    If you doubt, open a terminal on a modern Mac running OS X, type "man ls" and see what it says. The 'ls' command lists files in the active directory, and the first line of the MAN-Page reads:

    LS(1) BSD General Commands Manual LS(1)

    BSD as in Berkeley Software Distribution... of UNIX. If you still doubt, scroll to near the bottom where it says, " An ls command appeared in Version 1 AT&T UNIX."

    Or look it up and actually read about it.

    Impugning UNIX or its creators for the actions of ONE or MORE groups of people who took the freely available sources of something ELSE that was SIMILAR, makes as much sense as SOLELY crediting them with the successes of any others. For example:

    Not only is OS X UNIX-based, but so are iOS, and probably WatchOS, though they've gone further astray from their roots to become specialized for their specific purpose. So I guess Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie deserve credit for creating the iMac?

    Of course not. Could it be you just want people not to feel how they should about Microsoft, perhaps maybe you're on their payroll?

    Microsoft SUCKS. Always has, always will. Fuck 'em.

    * (Android being based around Linux is a bit inaccurate. Android is built on TOP of Linux, just as a GNU/Linux installation or distro is)

    1. Re: Um, NO. 100% WRONG. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really cool how you called him those names. You sure showed him, and definitely won the argument.
      Overweight homosexual.

    2. Re: Um, NO. 100% WRONG. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really cute how much you care.

      Fat faggot.

      If you don't care about accuracy of information, what brings you to a science/tech nerd site like Slashdot?

      Wait... timothy? Is that you posting AC again?

    3. Re: Um, NO. 100% WRONG. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's whipslash. He has no limit on posts. Sneaky owners.

  52. Ad-supported software by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

    I wish MS had been more upfront about the fact that Windows 10 is advertising/personal data collection-supported software. Between the automatically installed Candy Crush Saga, the Get Office and Get Skype ads which reinsert themselves with every Windows update, and of course the keylogger, Microsoft should be paying the end users substantial sums of money to run Windows 10.

    --
    Sent from my iPhone
    1. Re:Ad-supported software by norite · · Score: 1

      The big clue was that they're giving it away for free, and the user is the product...

      --
      -- Fuck Beta
  53. Even on business systems? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    I could hardly imagine a business system where full screen commercials keep popping up.

    No business that I have worked for would put up with that.

  54. Golden opportunity? by saramakos · · Score: 1

    I would love to see Anonymous, Lizard Squad or whoever are the latest "hacktivists" poison the Ad servers to push out ads for Apple, Ubuntu, heck even Haiku or ReactOS. I think it would be somewhat poetic!

  55. Watch out for Samsung too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Samsung is starting to pull similar sleazy shit on their TVs... the newer ones will show advertisements at the bottom of the screen when you bring up the menu... guess I won't be getting another Samsung TV, that's for sure.

  56. to vux984: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i believe that railing against marketing is ultimately a losing battle. just keep your head down and your ad-blockers hot.

  57. Such ridiculousness by Mass+Overkiller · · Score: 2

    I feel bad people have to deal with this nonsense. I am very happy to have moved on to OS X.

    1. Re:Such ridiculousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I happily moved on to Linux a few years ago. I wouldn't use Windows again if you paid me.

  58. Normal user here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not completely ignorant when it comes to computers, but I got Win 8.1 shortly before Win 10 came out and it's been a nightmare.

    Win7 was working fine for me, but I needed a new laptop. First, I have to figure out how to disable the constant Win10 upgrade nagging. I did that, but in doing so I completely fucked my Windows updates. I just don't get them anymore - it doesn't even tell me there available. I can go into Windows update and select which ones I want so I guess that's okay.

    But for some reason, Windows 8.1 spontaneously reboots sometimes. I haven't figured this out yet, but if I even go downstairs to get another beer I'm no longer surprised if my laptop has rebooted for no apparent reason. WTF, Microsoft? I was doing something. Now I have to spend 5 minutes getting everything back up and running and restoring files that were closed by the reboot without having been saved.

    I've tried switching to Linux. It works great in a VM although it's a bit slow, but otherwise works just great. But before wiping Windows out completely I've tried booting Linux from a USB flash-drive. It starts out okay, but within 5 minutes or so the whole thing is just unresponsive and completely fucked. This has been the case for several Linux flavors.

    As far as we've come I sometimes long for the old days - the early '80s when all I had was an Apple ][ with a CPM card, 2 floppy drives, a joystick and a couple of game paddles and a 1200 baud modem.

    Life was simple then. Sure, I couldn't stream porn although I did print a few ASCII art centerfolds on my printer but I knew what was going on with my machine.

    Now, it's just a fucking mess.

  59. Proof that Microsoft is pure evil by melting_clock · · Score: 1

    Windows 10 = adware = malware... Now we are starting to see why MS was trying to force windows 10 upgrades on us.

    Time to start complaining to local regulators, at least in those countries with consumer protection laws.

  60. Re: *nix was the first to use Ad sponsored OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, tell me again how I can't fork projects under a BSD license.

  61. Pirates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the pirated copies I've installed I kinda feel like I owe them this one...

    In fact, I would support this for free windows copies to be honest!

  62. Re:Win7 performs even BETTER, safer & faster v by dbIII · · Score: 1

    The above product advertisement from an AC is actually on topic and the sort of thing that could be used in this situation so should not have been modded down.

  63. Solution ~ $35 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://pi-hole.net/

    1. Re:Solution ~ $35 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Javashit-rendered website, DON'T CLICK

  64. A New Life Awaits you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the off world colonies. A chance to start again....

    In your face advertising brought to you by Microsoft, the advertising device manufacturer of the future.

  65. 9 month old story, even for /. thats old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was first reported last May.

    Perhaps belongs in the "history for nerds" section, cause its not news.

    http://news.softpedia.com/news/Microsoft-Brings-Ads-in-Windows-10-But-You-Can-Block-All-of-Them-480745.shtml

  66. Re:Now we sit back and wait for infected ad server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The moment the ad servers are infected is the moment when the Windows Store is infected. Tomb Raider became available in the Store which has by default the right to show "notifications", apparently now at the lock screen as well. *goes reviewing the lock screen notifications settings*

  67. Re:Win7 performs even BETTER, safer & faster v by Lotana · · Score: 3

    Even if APK's solution would be appropriate and on-topic, he has lost any goodwill from this community by his incessant spamming.

  68. "Fun facts" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with Dave Gorman's assessment of "fun facts". They are almost universally neither fun, nor facts.

  69. MS don't care less by thermidor · · Score: 2

    Not surprisingly /.ers are irate, but it won't matter a jot to MS. Leaving the corporate world aside, most domestic Windows users aren't those in the know. They're families, students and old ladies who don't know how to turn off updates, don't know how to turn of ads, but more importantly, have been conditioned into thinking that Windows is the only option if you want a home computer. Back in the 1970s/80s, people in the UK actually bought Austin Allegros, which were an unmitigated fiasco of a car, but your average car buyer never really went through the process of thinking maybe there was something better out there.

  70. Commercial opportunity for anti-malware companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that free anti-virus programs are the rule, security software vendors should shift from protecting users from threats against their Windows machines to protecting them directly against their Windows machines.

    A new nasty move from Microsoft? Update regularly the anti-nasty-move-from-Microsoft software that we sell, which also works in previous versions of Windows, and you'll be safe.

  71. My Windows 10 has no lock screen by evilsofa · · Score: 1

    What do you need a lock screen for? All it's there for is to make you hit a key to make it go away. Utterly useless. So get rid of it! Regedit, HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows, create a Personalization key if there isn't one, make a DWORD (32-bit) Value of NoLockScreen and set it to 1. Reboot and it's gone.

    1. Re:My Windows 10 has no lock screen by Lanforod · · Score: 1

      For a single user, secure location (ie. at home) PC, you don't. That isn't the typical use case, most people share computers somewhat, and you DO want a lock screen for a portable device.

  72. Re:Now we sit back and wait for infected ad server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we just sit back and wait for infected ad servers to deliver 0-day malware....

    Yup, I was thinking the same thing.
    Especially since the lock screen runs as "system".
    I know this, because I use a little trick to give myself admin rights on my locked down corporate computer that way...

  73. How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adblockplus for windows 10 lockscreen when?

  74. Re:Win7 performs even BETTER, safer & faster v by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, he's a pretty cool guy

  75. Uh, about that. by SIGBUS · · Score: 1

    Unlike Microsoft, Canonical actually listened to its users. Unity 8 will have the Amazon thing as opt-in instead of opt-out.

    Besides which, there are other Linux options out there besides Ubuntu, and there are other desktop options besides Unity.

    Opt-out is the standard excuse of spammers, scammers, and assorted miscreants.

    --
    Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
    1. Re:Uh, about that. by ZeroZen · · Score: 2

      Are we going to be giving Microsoft 2 years to change their minds? :)

  76. Where have I been? by danieldids · · Score: 1

    Is it April 1st yet?

  77. My house is not a billboard! by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

    I'm not having an operating system that inserts advertising into my most private device in my home.

    --
    SURELY NOT!!!!!
  78. Now Will You Finally Dump Windows? by hardburlyboogerman · · Score: 1

    If the spying wasn't bad enough,now ads ON YOUR HOME COMPUTER? NO MORE,Micro$oft -get off my machine

    --
    Geek Hillbilly
  79. Re:Can't justify spying for product improvement no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "note that users were informed of this tracking and had to opt in."

    This one thing that has me irritated. Why should I have to OPT OUT of M$ bull... They should be required to leave it OFF by default unless someone wants to opt in.

  80. Bad surprises by DrYak · · Score: 1

    The better multi-function printers and copiers support a few different options for transferring scans, such as sending to email or FTP or a Samba share. Again, if you buy cheap crap, then you get what you paid for.

    And then sometimes you have bad surprises.

    We've bought a network connected Cannon i-SENSYS mf8550Cdw Laserprinter/Scanner multifunction. (with support for Google Print and Air Print)
    In my opinion Cannon is supposed to be a more or less reliable brandname.

    Big surprise:
    the thing doesn't speak Postscript.

    It only speaks UFR (an obscure proprietary format of Cannon) for which the drivers are a bit PITA to get to compile (cannon provides a mixed binary and source-code components)
    and PCL - for which luckily there's a driver, requiring only to manually craft a PPD (sorry, no links yet).

    Note that, Mac OS X is similarily left in the dust (the official Canon driver fails to install, I can't get pxlcolor to work), luckily at leat AirPrint seems to work (and let the printer's firmware rasterize the PDF documents).

    Google Print still doesn't function - the steps described in the manual just fail.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  81. Frustrating to Learn by osswmi · · Score: 1

    I would be lying if I didn't say that it gets annoying to learn on this site about all the crappy shit MS has been pulling with Windows 10 since it's release. If my laptop hadn't fried over a month ago I don't think I would have to worry about this as much but since I needed a replacement device asap and most of us still have that one program that only runs on windows (for now, anyways), I had to bite the bullet. Thankfully there are some dedicated to finding this crap and letting the rest of us know.

  82. Begun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the ad wars have.

  83. Windows 10 Now Showing Full Screen Ads On Lock Scr by fergettabatit · · Score: 1

    Yet another reason to switch to Linux...

  84. The world of free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We can thank Google for the perversion of how people are now approaching software.

    Their model of offering everything (mostly) for free puts the pressure onto the revenues of ads for revenue stream.... which apparently works fine for them because they are making a gazillion of revenues from this approach to software/service offering. However, this has shift the tight equilibrium of how "much" ads is shoved into the user experience. From slight to overwhelmingly excessive, and thus more and more user will eventually try to remove those ads from their environment (ad-blocker) and even ISP are starting to embark on the add blocking. True, ads have always been in the landscape, from cable distributor to newspaper to radio etc, ads was always part of the landscape, even if we paid for some of those services. But since the user was paying a fee for the content, I'm pretty sure that there was more thought being put into the placement/size/amount of ads that were added to the paid content.

    Now the regular user seems to no longer want to pay for content. Be it software (games, app), musical, news articles, etc... Every time I see an article coming down on Microsoft on their "bad" practice on how they are adapting to the landscape of services and how to provide them to the end user, I always think to myself that Google is probably overwhelming worst on what metrics they are harvesting from their end-user base. Be it from using the android OS, chrome OS or the chrome browser, gmail, etc... It must be huge. Everything they do I'm sure that behind all software development and service development, they have a number of ways to introduce adds down the road, or use the user metrics to their needs for later servicing ads in other places the user might venture too. And yet, since this was how they started up, no one really cares as they have agreed to using something for free, from the get-go.

    So back to the initial story, Microsoft is being slapped on the hand for possibly (I have not witness this) putting ads on the unlock screen to those who apparently are using a "free" version of windows (http://appleinsider.com/articles/16/02/24/users-of-microsofts-free-windows-10-find-unexpected-ads-on-lock-screen). The problem is not the ad, nor is the possibility of having a free full fledge OS, the problem is in the execution. So the reality now is that someone who decides to use something free should no longer be surprised of being served up advertisement down the road, this is the current context of the software ecosystem that we are in. You want free, they will feed you ads. So yes, Microsoft might have pushed the ad servicing too far by putting it onto the unlock screen, they are a mature company, a mature company should have found a better way to insert ad into their product if that is what they are looking to do. I can understand that for example on android, that a free game or free app will force ads in a mater that is obtrusive

    Now the only company right now that seems to be staying away from that trend is Apple... and the only reason they can allow that to happen is because they are making another gazillion of money from selling expensive hardware and have established a trusted ecosystem with their app store, making another gazillion money.... for now.

  85. Ubuntu Unity and Amazon 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very reminiscent of the UBUNTU and amazon ads in search.
    http://www.howtogeek.com/126995/how-to-disable-the-amazon-search-ads-in-ubuntus-unity-dash/

  86. Bandwidth thieves to boot by coinreturn · · Score: 1

    Everyone is complaining about the ads themselves. What about the bandwidth thievery happening? All you whippersnappers on FIOS may not mind a little stolen bandwidth, but for all of us who are rural dwellers and have to rely on satellite, I say FUCK YOU WITH A SLEDGEHAMMER, MICROSOFT! My satellite provider only gives me 10 gigs/month before I get throttled. I don't want even more advertising hogging my limited bandwidth!

  87. Just don't have it by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    This is what we get for needing to have fancy clocks, slide shows, weather updates, and all other kinds of garbage cluttering up our PC experience. To me this is kind of like the sound scheme, just another thing to turn off. Who the heck even wants to hear beep-boop every time they click on anything? And who the heck even wants tips, photos, or anything else on the lock screen? The same sort of idiot who walks on my lawn I assume.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  88. Apps to disable this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are there any good apps yet that disable all the Microsoft-designed malware in Win10?

    I did a Google search, but I only came up with long lists of system settings to change.

    At some point, we'll need an app that makes all the changes at once.

    Another thing I'm interested in: I'll be running Win10 only in a VMware guest under Linux, so I'll be interested in any configuration I can do in Linux or VMware that will block all the "phone home" attempts from the Win10 guest.

    1. Re:Apps to disable this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple: set the VM to no network or host network only. Or, block all outgoing traffic from it except what you explicitly allow. VMware, like other VM systems, can be used like your router.

    2. Re:Apps to disable this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple: set the VM to no network or host network only.

      Thanks. I should have mentioned that I will want the Win10 guest to be able to access the Internet. (Or, most of it, excluding the Microsoft telemetry servers.)

      Or, block all outgoing traffic from it except what you explicitly allow. VMware, like other VM systems, can be used like your router.

      Does anyone have a complete list yet of what I need to block? I've read that Win10 uses both domain names AND direct IP addresses to access its servers, so it looks like the solution might need to incorporate both IP blocking and a special DNS server.

      I haven't yet found a good, comprehensive site that gives me a full solution. I just see a lot of little bits and pieces -- things like "here's what I found using WireShark". The problem is I really need this to be complete solution, because it's a fundamental security issue. For example, I might even need periodic updates of the blacklists as more holes are discovered in the future. Has anyone found a good resource for this yet?

      It sort of looks like it's still a bit too early for this. Am I right? Or have I just not found a good resource yet?

  89. Thanks Micro$oft by Mr.Fork · · Score: 1

    What bothers me is Windows 10 computers for kids. Micro$oft will be showing ads to them as well? I think in Quebec, that my friend Micro$oft, is a bad move as advertising directly to minors is prohibited. I think I'll just sit back and watch this one explode on Micro$oft in a most spectacular way.

    --
    Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things. - Peter F. Drucker
  90. Re:Win7 performs even BETTER, safer & faster v by JazzLad · · Score: 2

    If I had mod points, APK, I'd toss you a +1 this time - unfortunately, it is trivial for MS to get around your Hosts (as well as all adblocks) as they can hardcode IPs at a more base level. Only proper way to do this is at the router level now*.


    * Ok, maybe always, but before now** it still worked the other way.
    **now ==current version of Windows, my Win7 still behaving itself (though I have a very modified hostfile and adblocks).

    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  91. garbage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Gates.

    Hardened heart.

    Buy Linux in Hell.

    http://drbo.org/x/d?b=drb&bk=47&ch=19&l=24#x

    Global Mother Fucking Spyware.

  92. Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't seen innovation like this since PointCast(?) screen saver. circa 1995

    Now it's built into the OS.

  93. BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call BS on this. They showed a screenshot of the game, and I'm assuming that one of the links told you what the game was.
    If you're going to call that an ad then I'm going to call all of those pictures of exotic locations ads as well. How dare they try to get me to travel!

  94. Re:Win7 performs even BETTER, safer & faster v by Painted · · Score: 1

    APK will NEVER get a +1 from me, no spammer should ever be rewarded even if they're correct.

    --
    http://marsandmore.com - Posters of space, spacecraft, and astronomy.
  95. Re:Win7 performs even BETTER, safer & faster v by JazzLad · · Score: 2

    I view the merits of the posts individually. In theory, receiving +1's when appropriate could encourage good behaviour. In practice ... maybe not, but even chronic trolls like Sexconker say something good every now and then & I don't think it's fair to judge the message by the messenger (and he has been down-modded to -1 - I'm not saying he deserves a +5, but a +1 would not be inappropriate).

    --
    "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
  96. Re:Win7 performs even BETTER, safer & faster v by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    Cool guys don't spend all day spamming and trolling.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  97. Change in haiku by david_thornley · · Score: 2

    Several years ago, I wrote a haiku:

    Thunderstorms outside
    Microsoft software inside
    It's safer out there

    Now that I've started using Windows 10, please substitute "Hurricane" for "Thunderstorms".

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  98. Re:*nix was the first to use Ad sponsored OS by citylivin · · Score: 1

    Hmm maybe you didnt tell the last sideloaded application that i recieved for some of my users. The thing had some sort of code in it that expired and had to be re-sideloaded every year or something like that. Im not a developer but the error that came up was something along the lines of "Untrusted Enterprise Developer..." and the application soon stopped running at all with NO error message (thanks for the troubleshooting help there apple!).

    Whereas a trivially rooted android device is beyond trivial to sideload things 100% effectively for all time.

    --
    As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
  99. Kindle Ads Listed Up Front by Immerial · · Score: 1

    I do have a Kindle. As a matter of fact, I have one of the ad supported ones... but I knew that when I bought it. It was advertised up front. Unlike *free* Windows 10 which I don't recall ever advertising that it has ads. That's the problem... and Microsoft knows it. Why do you think they waited to turn this feature on? I bet a ton of people wouldn't have done the *free* upgrade if they knew they were going to ads right off the bat. Imagine the ads there from day one... how do you think that would look? Crappy, of course. :P

    1. Re:Kindle Ads Listed Up Front by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't even HAVE a Windows phone. (I can say that, statistically I've got a good shot.) Who the fuck are you kidding?

      If you want more information, see this:
      http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

      I'm gonna post this as an AC.

  100. Re: *nix was the first to use Ad sponsored OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What?

  101. PENIS ENLARGEMENT ads at TWO in the FUCKING AM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what you have to look forward to, if you're stupid enough to keep using Windows.

  102. Win7 performs even BETTER, safer & faster via by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://www.start64.com/index.p...

    Gets data for blocking ads, trackers + known bad sites via 10 reputable security community sites.

    * Better on power/cpu/ram+ other IO resource use vs. local DNS servers & certainly less security issues vs. DNS servers + routers for years now too - Blocks all ads + known bad sites, all the time (not like "AlmostALLAdsBlocked" bribed by google to let ads through)

    APK

    P.S.=> Does more for speed (hardcoded favorites + adblocking), security (adblocking + blocking known bad sites/servers & dns issues avoiding DNS), reliability (vs. downed or dns poisoned dns), & anonymity (avoids dns request logs) vs. ANY other SINGLE "so-called -solution'" out there, bar-none using what you already natively have. Unlike Adblock\UBlock\Ghostery it's also not detectable & blockable by ClarityRay/BlockIQ + it uses FAR LESS RESOURCES yet does far more (especially vs. DNS security issues)

    ... apk

  103. Not entirely true.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you've set your system up to automatically receive new wallpapers/lock-screens from Bing/Microsoft --- then you gave up your control of your desktop to this service. The Tomb Raider 'advertisement' showed up as an image of Lara Croft climbing a wall or something (it was a few weeks back when I saw it come across). I don't recall being particularly offended though I did think it was 'odd' in that it wasn't a real world image like most Bing images that are used. It was no more advertisement than a backdrop for a beach resort.

    If you manually set your own background/lock-screen ... it never changes. If you choose to let Bing/Microsoft set it according to the theme of the day, then you accept that the theme might be "Final Fantasy XXVI".

    This whole argument is kind of about nothing.

  104. Lotana: EAT YOUR WORDS #2/2, 10++:1 vs. you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context" - by chihowa (366380)

    "I find your hosts file admirable." - by vel-ex-tech (4337079)

    "I've never tried to belittle (APK's) work, I've flat out said it's good" - by BronsCon (927697)

    "I support APK's stand on the hosts file and can't see why it's not used more than it is." by Trax3001BBS (2368736)

    See subject - How'd they taste? Like your foot in your mouth??

    APK

  105. Thanks JazzLad: MS is f'ing up large... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: I hate to say it but I have to - they've been messing w/ the hosts file for YEARS now, VISTA onward & MS' VP of the Windows Client PERFORMANCE division had to agree with me on it no less here, RIGHT HERE ON /. no less -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * They're doing the WRONG THINGS, & that's 1 of them!

    They're driving users away from more recent version of Windows (or don't the sales figures prove that for me?)

    Everyone's TRYING to be Google - & google, oddly enough, KNOWS the advertising model's dying & diversifying away (purchasing Boston Dynamics showed me that, as an "example proof thereof")

    APK

    P.S.=> They get around it for Windows update (this is ok, that assures protection vs. a bushwhacked hosts file which can't happen when my program's resident protecting it & I've tried corrupting it myself then, couldn't do it - I protect it beyond WFP/SFP protecting it too)... apk

  106. Thanks dbill (so much for Lotana's bs)... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: He's "speaking for everyone" in absolutes & I put up 10++ users disagreeing with him - JazzLad + you do the rest putting HIM to rest, easily.

    * You're a reflection of "the unsilent majority" along with sales figures of Win7 & its usage vs. more modern versions of Windows which MS has messed up bigtime & continues to do so, rather stupidly...

    (You can't SELL PEOPLE what they DO NOT WANT!)

    APK

    P.S.=> MS is f'ing up large man - especially TRYING to be Google & failing by cutting their cash-cow mainstay fundamental product's throat (or don't VISTA onward sales prove it for me?) & on hosts? TAKE A READ-> http://mobile.slashdot.org/com... be enlightened... apk

  107. You've done BETTER than this amicusnycl? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & a FREE program of mine doing a job better vs. ANY other single "so-called 'solution'" http://mobile.slashdot.org/com... out there!

    (For more speed, security, reliability, & anonymity DOING FAR MORE for FAR LESS for ALL OF THE ABOVE noted benefits + from a single file output (& single multithreaded portable exe I built for it no less))

    It's the best on tons of fronts (especially abilities & efficiency) - bar none!

    * When you can show us you've done more, better, & EARLIER than I have on this front? THEN, you can talk, blowhard...

    APK

    P.S.=> Now, here's the BEST part - I know DAMN WELL you haven't & can't show that, lol... so guess what? I am LAUGHING @ YOU + you can bank on it anyone else is reading this... apk

  108. Lotana: EAT YOUR WORDS #1/2, 10++:1 vs. you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011)

    "his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359)

    "I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832)

    "No complaints from me, I like APK's spam. Reminds me to use a host file. Also, his stuff is free." - by aaaaaaargh! (1150173)

    "APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928)

    * See subject!

    (Want more? Ask! I've got 'em - & I have 100's more - JazzLad & dbill BOTH put YOU IN YOUR PLACE too here)

    APK

    P.S.=> Downmods to HIDE it here http://mobile.slashdot.org/com... ? You made my point for me - you FAIL!

    ... apk

  109. Re:Win7 performs even BETTER, safer & faster v by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your post history shows you troll apk starting trouble with him. You're not cool amicusnycl. Get over your butthurt and do something useful like apk with his free program instead of being a mediocre trolling loser.

  110. Sounds like someone has malware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So out of the 25+ PCs I deal with in a day with all manor of versions of 10 installed I have yet to see this problem. Sure sounds like 3rd part malware has snuck in and is posing as a Microsoft "feature". Posting as AC due to all the raging neckbeards.

  111. Re: *nix was the first to use Ad sponsored OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, and how much did you pay for Windows 10?

  112. Routers alone = highly exploitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Routers = lousy security & I prove it to Ash-Fox here w/ 225++ instances of router exploits http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * The ONLY thing Windows overrides hosts on is Windows Update (which is NOT necessarily a bad thing in case of hosts being hijacked - which CANNOT HAPPEN from usermode while my program is resident (I've tried to break thru its protection myself & couldn't) above & beyond WFP/SFP protections via ACL protecting hosts too...)

    APK

    P.S.=> Hosts do the job on more levels for LESS by far vs. ANY single other "so-called 'solution'" out there with less risk as well by far, no questions asked... apk

  113. What ad companies are doing by movdqa · · Score: 1

    Maybe they'll activate your camera to see your reactions to ads next as is being done with some billboards.