That would create a united Korea in the same position as Germany after the curtainwent down, spending a huge amount of it's GDP rebuilding half the country from nothing.
They wouldn't be nearly in the same position as Germany was after the reunification. The DDR can't be compared to NK at all. The DDR had quite a few problems but they were not even close to the problems NK has. As a starter nobody starved to death in the DDR.
Put Foxyproxy on top of that list. It's an extension for firefox to enably easy proxy setting switching and has an option to route all dns request through a chosen proxy.
well if there were any other countries on the map which might be much better suited for a comparison to the US. Like pretty much all of europe, australia, canada....
and that's why i like to live in Europe. The European human rights court (don't know the proper name) killed a similar law same weeks ago. Germany tried to pull of the same shit, with the same argumentation and failed.
You really have a big problem over there and need to act.
But where's the picture? "Michelle Obama monkey" doesn't find it. Why can't we link to it in the summary if it's clear that the whole discussion will be about a picture 99% didn't see?
my friend told a similar story. He worked as an electrician some years ago when one of the customers complained about sleeping bad because of all the electrical interference in his bedroom. So they drove to the guy, mounted a switch somewhere connected to nothing and told him to switch it off at night. Some days later he called again, extremely happy because now he was able to sleep like the gullible baby he was...
At least with Obama there is a decent chance that he's cautious enough not to use inflammatory rhetoric. Imagine what Bush would have said and how Ahmadinedschad would have used it. There are some things Obama did that i didn't like but right now i'm very glad the he's the leader and uses his brain, not his guts.
Both of these statements either imply that killing kittens is fine (which I doubt your implying), or that its a lesser problem than war, and thus we shouldn't be mad about it.
not that we shouldn't be mad about it, that is the point where you get it wrong. Organizing a global hunt for someone who kills kittens strikes me as mad. Not only in the face of cruelties done to humans but generally. I can understand if people in the area get mad about it and try to catch the asshole. But if one can watch the news and do nothing but see a cat killed and participate in that then the person has their priorities skewed.
I shouldn't help that guy over there, because there are millions of other people who need my help in Africa!
That is fallacious reasoning.
That's why i didn't say that. Read it again
People who kill kittens for fun are probably going to be dangerous in other ways. It is one of the signs of a burgeoning serial killer, for example. Actually, if I saw someone killing a kitten for fun on the street, I'd beat them within an inch of their lives, then take the kitten home with me, then call the cops on him, and his boss, and his family.
yes, i seem to be the dangerous one. Beating a human almost to death because of a cat makes you practically a saint
That would create a united Korea in the same position as Germany after the curtainwent down, spending a huge amount of it's GDP rebuilding half the country from nothing.
They wouldn't be nearly in the same position as Germany was after the reunification. The DDR can't be compared to NK at all. The DDR had quite a few problems but they were not even close to the problems NK has. As a starter nobody starved to death in the DDR.
So there's a reason for your username
or vagina
Put Foxyproxy on top of that list. It's an extension for firefox to enably easy proxy setting switching and has an option to route all dns request through a chosen proxy.
two digits for the year. What could ever go wrong with that scheme?
And now for ruby please. I love ruby, but the performance issues drive me crazy sometimes.
well if there were any other countries on the map which might be much better suited for a comparison to the US. Like pretty much all of europe, australia, canada ....
we had this story on slashdot some years ago but i can't find it right now.
this i kind until the insurance decides not to pay because the are no traces of a obvious theft ...
IT IS.
see? i won
s/government/military/
so if you ruin one line like the laser in the video, they only have several hundred left to identify you ...
We did already lose the TOFU war. There is no way people would ever do this since it means more work for them.
Dexter, is it you?
Seriously, why is this still an issue 150 years later?
wow, you're old
and that's why i like to live in Europe. The European human rights court (don't know the proper name) killed a similar law same weeks ago. Germany tried to pull of the same shit, with the same argumentation and failed.
You really have a big problem over there and need to act.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Populous here you go
But where's the picture? "Michelle Obama monkey" doesn't find it. Why can't we link to it in the summary if it's clear that the whole discussion will be about a picture 99% didn't see?
so you suggest we profile people by their religion *and* create an easy to circumvent security protocol? Genius
my friend told a similar story. He worked as an electrician some years ago when one of the customers complained about sleeping bad because of all the electrical interference in his bedroom. So they drove to the guy, mounted a switch somewhere connected to nothing and told him to switch it off at night. Some days later he called again, extremely happy because now he was able to sleep like the gullible baby he was ...
more like 'rm -rf /home/*'. Nobody would care about 'rm -rf /root' ...
You can help: by keeping out of it.
At least with Obama there is a decent chance that he's cautious enough not to use inflammatory rhetoric. Imagine what Bush would have said and how Ahmadinedschad would have used it. There are some things Obama did that i didn't like but right now i'm very glad the he's the leader and uses his brain, not his guts.
It outrages me far more than crimes against people, as people at least have the theoretical ability to protect themselves
I really can't find an answer to your post. Your priorities are that off you're practically insane.
Both of these statements either imply that killing kittens is fine (which I doubt your implying), or that its a lesser problem than war, and thus we shouldn't be mad about it.
not that we shouldn't be mad about it, that is the point where you get it wrong. Organizing a global hunt for someone who kills kittens strikes me as mad. Not only in the face of cruelties done to humans but generally. I can understand if people in the area get mad about it and try to catch the asshole. But if one can watch the news and do nothing but see a cat killed and participate in that then the person has their priorities skewed.
I shouldn't help that guy over there, because there are millions of other people who need my help in Africa!
That is fallacious reasoning.
That's why i didn't say that. Read it again
People who kill kittens for fun are probably going to be dangerous in other ways. It is one of the signs of a burgeoning serial killer, for example. Actually, if I saw someone killing a kitten for fun on the street, I'd beat them within an inch of their lives, then take the kitten home with me, then call the cops on him, and his boss, and his family.
yes, i seem to be the dangerous one. Beating a human almost to death because of a cat makes you practically a saint