Both Alan Cox and Linus Torvalds are uncircumcised due to socialized medicine's cost controls. That is why they should relinquish control to Stallman, who is properly cut, and therefore able to concentrate on the Linux kernel do to having a clean penis.
Typical Zionist propaganda. What a surprise that a son of the "Poor us, we wandered around the desert for a few years once and got killed by Zyklon this other time" race is at the forefront of the software-stealing fanatic community, a man universally recognized in the software community as self-centered and unpossessing of the most rudimentary ethics of intellectual property. Anyone who has walked within sixteen cubits of Mr. Stallberg could tell you that there simply isn't a chance, de-foreskinned or not, that his penis could be clean.
Yet fine Norseman Linus Torvalds and robust Briton Alan Cox, with cock uncut and nose unhooked, intimidate you.
Why do you think that is?
Circumcision should be recommended in every country, look how simple it is in this video. Hopefully everyone will choose this procedure, and maybe we can have a charity drive to raise money for Linus' and Alan's circumcision.
A full set of sex organs certainly doesn't seem to impair Linus or Alan from their kernel duties or personal lives; the Linux kernel is stable and strong, Linus is happily married with children, and although Cox doesn't talk about his personal life online, it is an open secret in the software community that he is a practicing homosexual. RMS, conversely, has no sexual prospects and has the GNU Hurd project to lay claim to (along with its record of 15 straight years in development without producing a working kernel).
I think your personal stake in Jewry has clouded your judgement.
Translation: AI is Nowheresville
on
Infinite Games?
·
· Score: 1, Interesting
Computer scientists drooled like curs at true AI twenty or thirty years ago, but that was before people had run out of ideas pertaining to AI. Today the only problems AI can solve are uninteresting ones.
In the case of a game, I'd call it "automatic choosing of next state" rather than any form of "intelligence".
Because if your $100 sink gives way, you can have $50000+ of water damage to contend with.... whereas on a computer the stakes are usually much lower.
Oh really? So if the database for the payroll department gets trashed, thats low stakes, huh? I think this discussion was pointed toward IT professionals, which you are obviously not.
I said "usually" you braindead fucking choad. I am also an IT professional, and I'll bet you $100 that I am smarter than you in both Verbal and Math areas. And while I'm in ad hominem territory, I will also bet that you are ugly and unloved.
Because if your $100 sink gives way, you can have $50000+ of water damage to contend with.... whereas on a computer the stakes are usually much lower.
For important systems, get certified techs. For Joe Everyman, there's usually no need -- esp. with all the cheap underage (high school) proficient labor around.:)
Deflection of blame and its subsequent justification by any/all onlookers is one thing about the present mode of thought that I could really do without.
If you do something for a while and it's not fun anymore, you stop. Unless you're an addict, in which case you continue on your path of compulsive behavior with renewed dedication.
Gamers don't have trouble leaving games behind when they're done with them. Addicts do. And saying "Damn you Sony, you should have filled my 21-online-hours-per-day months-long bender with more FUN!" is weak.
Gaming addiction is not a behavior of gamers... it's a behavior of addicts. The games just happen to be there for the addict's mind to latch onto.
Blaming particular games (particularly in a manner which reeks of personal bitterness) for addictions is like blaming alcohol for alcoholism, or blaming heroin for junkies: it's a foil. The real ones to blame are the ones who are addicted.
Well, that and the fact that they've run out of decimal space for SunOS 5.X. And suits don't speak hex.
you must admit
on
Secure PDAs
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
If microsoft did "biometric user identification", we'd be screaming bloody 1984. Instead, it's linux-based. Neat-o.
There's plenty of automatic-MS-bashing that goes on here, and plenty of automatic-MS-bashing-bashing. But if you look at the facts and stick to the numbers, it's not very farfetched to assume Microsoft is always trying to screw us somehow.
Look at Palladium, with which they will entrench DRM on every desktop. Look at Word's closed and obfuscated binary file format. Look at all their OEM tricks, and EULA abuse, their fake Switch ads and their systematic abuse of power.
Their strategy (whose final step is most assuredly "PROFIT !!") has been to fuck consumers and users as much as they can get away with and rob their pockets of change. Next to a Finnish hobbyist's OS, they look pretty bad.
Slashdot Mirror
Do you think that Slashdot-run book reviews are worth reading in the first place?
In my experience, no.
I bet something else inconsequential happened five years ago too. Maybe even three or four other totally useless events.
Come on, who cares when the label was "officially" coined? Six years ago I was using OSS, even though it wasn't "official" yet.
no.
they were never.
Both Alan Cox and Linus Torvalds are uncircumcised due to socialized medicine's cost controls. That is why they should relinquish control to Stallman, who is properly cut, and therefore able to concentrate on the Linux kernel do to having a clean penis.
Typical Zionist propaganda. What a surprise that a son of the "Poor us, we wandered around the desert for a few years once and got killed by Zyklon this other time" race is at the forefront of the software-stealing fanatic community, a man universally recognized in the software community as self-centered and unpossessing of the most rudimentary ethics of intellectual property. Anyone who has walked within sixteen cubits of Mr. Stallberg could tell you that there simply isn't a chance, de-foreskinned or not, that his penis could be clean.
Yet fine Norseman Linus Torvalds and robust Briton Alan Cox, with cock uncut and nose unhooked, intimidate you.
Why do you think that is?
Circumcision should be recommended in every country, look how simple it is in this video. Hopefully everyone will choose this procedure, and maybe we can have a charity drive to raise money for Linus' and Alan's circumcision.
A full set of sex organs certainly doesn't seem to impair Linus or Alan from their kernel duties or personal lives; the Linux kernel is stable and strong, Linus is happily married with children, and although Cox doesn't talk about his personal life online, it is an open secret in the software community that he is a practicing homosexual. RMS, conversely, has no sexual prospects and has the GNU Hurd project to lay claim to (along with its record of 15 straight years in development without producing a working kernel).
I think your personal stake in Jewry has clouded your judgement.
Computer scientists drooled like curs at true AI twenty or thirty years ago, but that was before people had run out of ideas pertaining to AI. Today the only problems AI can solve are uninteresting ones.
In the case of a game, I'd call it "automatic choosing of next state" rather than any form of "intelligence".
This is as absurd as taxing every blank digital medium that gets sold in America, in case they're used to pirate music!!
oh.
Wait a sec.
Disreputable dealers have had 120GB for $110 for months now. FP, btw.
Because if your $100 sink gives way, you can have $50000+ of water damage to contend with.... whereas on a computer the stakes are usually much lower.
Oh really? So if the database for the payroll department gets trashed, thats low stakes, huh? I think this discussion was pointed toward IT professionals, which you are obviously not.
I said "usually" you braindead fucking choad. I am also an IT professional, and I'll bet you $100 that I am smarter than you in both Verbal and Math areas. And while I'm in ad hominem territory, I will also bet that you are ugly and unloved.
Because if your $100 sink gives way, you can have $50000+ of water damage to contend with.... whereas on a computer the stakes are usually much lower.
:)
For important systems, get certified techs. For Joe Everyman, there's usually no need -- esp. with all the cheap underage (high school) proficient labor around.
I don't want folks seeing my posts and assuming that they has more or less relevance because of the info in the sig.
I'd say we're about squarely opposite here.
Step 2: Log in
Step 3: FP
Step 4: ???
Step 5: PROFIT!!!
...and develop a DVD substrate that won't ignite as lasers move to higher power and lower wavelength.
I hereby patent that idea.
Deflection of blame and its subsequent justification by any/all onlookers is one thing about the present mode of thought that I could really do without.
If you do something for a while and it's not fun anymore, you stop. Unless you're an addict, in which case you continue on your path of compulsive behavior with renewed dedication.
Gamers don't have trouble leaving games behind when they're done with them. Addicts do. And saying "Damn you Sony, you should have filled my 21-online-hours-per-day months-long bender with more FUN!" is weak.
Gaming addiction is not a behavior of gamers... it's a behavior of addicts. The games just happen to be there for the addict's mind to latch onto.
Blaming particular games (particularly in a manner which reeks of personal bitterness) for addictions is like blaming alcohol for alcoholism, or blaming heroin for junkies: it's a foil. The real ones to blame are the ones who are addicted.
If you haven't read every single google link about your Significant Other, you're just not in love.
Land on a planet.
Has this been disproven/proven yet?
Don't hold your breath, aerobic-boy.
Squid
Know how I sniffed you out?
I'm sorry, but the only reason I even bothered signing with a label was to SELL MY STUFF. Make money, that's all.
There are *SO* many reasons to sign to a label!
I mean, don't get me wrong. Even with all these advantages there are significant disadvantages:
No actual recording artist these days is naive enough to think that labels are solely useful for printing and sales.
And I feel that most other Internet users, AOL or not, probably are thinking the same thing. Let's show them this.
No no, you've missed the point entirely. How else is a dog going to deflect a slapshot aimed at its head?
If you like Sleater-Kinney, try eating indie girl pussy.
Well, that and the fact that they've run out of decimal space for SunOS 5.X. And suits don't speak hex.
If microsoft did "biometric user identification", we'd be screaming bloody 1984. Instead, it's linux-based. Neat-o.
There's plenty of automatic-MS-bashing that goes on here, and plenty of automatic-MS-bashing-bashing. But if you look at the facts and stick to the numbers, it's not very farfetched to assume Microsoft is always trying to screw us somehow.
Look at Palladium, with which they will entrench DRM on every desktop. Look at Word's closed and obfuscated binary file format. Look at all their OEM tricks, and EULA abuse, their fake Switch ads and their systematic abuse of power.
Their strategy (whose final step is most assuredly "PROFIT !!") has been to fuck consumers and users as much as they can get away with and rob their pockets of change. Next to a Finnish hobbyist's OS, they look pretty bad.
HOWEVER, the Mac versions are basically unusable
Mozilla start time on my G4/667MHz/1GB RAM Powerbook: 29sec (!?)
IE start time on same machine: 2sec
Omniweb start time on same machine: 1.5sec
not to mention that Mozilla hangs for seconds at a time quite often, and looks and feels clunky and bolted-together.