Slashdot Mirror


Massive Two Towers Battle

ShadowLight writes ""In December vast hordes of eager filmgoers will mob cineplexes across the land and witness, at the climax of The Two Towers, one of the most anticipated scenes in recent movie history: the great Battle of Helm's Deep." This article talks about the software, named Massive, used to create this 50,000 creature battle."

544 comments

  1. Did you know... by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 0, Troll

    You can already download The Two Towers from various *cough* sources?

    1. Re:Did you know... by gazbo · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nasty cough there. Do you need cough syrup? Rubbed chest?

    2. Re:Did you know... by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 1

      It's on IRC, but it hasn't hit the P2P networks much yet, and besides the P2P networks are completely staked out by the **AA. Try DalNET.

    3. Re:Did you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, downloading movies from P2P sucks. There are so many fakes/misnamed files. I tried downloading something advertised as "Die Another Day" from Kazaa, but I got a file called "Lilo and Stitch DVD Rip", which was when played, a movie called "Nosferatu".

      Not sure if it's the MPAA at work, or if users just don't have a clue.

    4. Re:Did you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's on none of the release sites, so either you're deeper inside the scene than I am (which certainly doesn't mean a whole lot), or what you're talking about are fakes. I'm pretty sure the latter is true; if it's on public IRC channels, there's really no reason why it wouldn't be listed.

    5. Re:Did you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I tried downloading something advertised as "Die Another Day" from Kazaa, but I got a file called "Lilo and Stitch DVD Rip", which was when played, a movie called "Nosferatu".

      You've got a copy of Nosferatu! AWESOME! That movie ROCKS!

    6. Re:Did you know... by BasharTeg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but by the time my turn comes around on the XDCC list and I finish receiving it at 1.05 kilobytes per second, the DVD will be out, ordered, delivered, and playing on my television.

    7. Re:Did you know... by packeteer · · Score: 2

      and uits people who who download em liek you but dont fix the errors then upload em that cause these problems

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    8. Re:Did you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think that's bad, I downloaded a clip which was supposed to be Anna Kournikova engaging in hot lesbo action and it turned out to be a film of a dog fucking some guy up the ass!

    9. Re:Did you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know Anna looks a lot like a guy from behind, all that tennis has given her pretty muscly buttox, and maybe it was a female dog, so you might have got the right movie after all ??

  2. The AI used by Damion · · Score: 5, Funny

    The way I heard that the AI for the battle scene was programmed was such that every one of the creatures had a slightly different set of paramaters, with the same goal of maximizing damage, while minimizing casualties.
    On the first run, every single one of the thousands of little AIs decided that the best way to minimize casualties was to turn and run away.

    --
    Common sense is what tells you the world is flat.
    1. Re:The AI used by theedge318 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I hate to appear to be a pacifist ... but wouldn't it be great if modern army's were governed by similar algorithms.

      That said ... bomb the fuck out of Afghanistan ... don't send in troops (that would violate the "minimize casulties" algorithm)

      --
      Sig Nazi- "No Sig for you, come back 1 year."
    2. Re:The AI used by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      if thats true, i want to see the outtake

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    3. Re:The AI used by duckpoopy · · Score: 5, Funny

      "The only way to win is not to play." -WOPR, 1982

      --
      word.
    4. Re:The AI used by lawndart · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually one of the guys from Massive gave a talk at my lab and they had video of it. All the little dudes in back rows turned and ran away. Evidently their software agents couldn't see any of the enemy agents so they ran around trying to find some!

    5. Re:The AI used by br0ck · · Score: 5, Informative

      You've heard an exaggeration from the previous SlashDot article.

      In another early simulation, Jackson and Regelous watched as several thousand characters fought like hell while, in the background, a small contingent of combatants seemed to think better of it and ran away. They weren't programmed to do this. It just happened. 'It was spooky.' Jackson said in an interview last year.

    6. Re:The AI used by pyros · · Score: 3, Funny

      I like the helicopter flight sim demo in australia where the kangaroo AI's were modeled too closely to people. They scattered, regrouped, and launched a surface-to-air strike taking down the chopper. Sorry I don't have a link, but I did actually read it from some news site or magazine, like Info World or something.

    7. Re:The AI used by Verne · · Score: 5, Funny

      I got it in email as follows:

      The reuse of some object-oriented code has caused tactical
      headaches for Australia's armed forces. As virtual reality
      simulators assume larger roles in helicopter combat training,
      programmers have gone to great lengths to increase the
      realism of their scenarios, including detailed landscapes and,
      in the case of the Northern Territory's Operation Phoenix,
      herds of kangaroos (since disturbed animals might well give
      away a helicopter's position).

      The head of the Defence Science & Technology Organization's
      Land Operations/Simulation division reportedly instructed
      developers to model the local marsupials' movements and
      reactions to helicopters.

      Being efficient programmers, they just re-appropriated some
      code originally used to model infantry detachment reactions
      under the same stimuli, changed the mapped icon from a
      soldier to a kangaroo, and increased the figures' speed of
      movement.

      Eager to demonstrate their flying skills for some visiting
      American pilots, the hotshot Aussies "buzzed" the virtual
      kangaroos in low flight during a simulation. The kangaroos
      scattered, as predicted, and the visiting Americans nodded
      appreciatively... then did a double-take as the kangaroos
      reappeared from behind a hill and launched a barrage of
      Stinger missiles at the hapless helicopter. (Apparently the
      programmers had forgotten to remove that part of the
      infantry coding.)

      The lesson? Objects are defined with certain attributes,
      and any new object defined in terms of an old one inherits
      all the attributes. The embarrassed programmers had learned
      to be careful when reusing object-oriented code, and the
      Yanks left with a newfound respect for Australian wildlife.

      Simulator supervisors report that pilots from that point
      onward have strictly avoided kangaroos, just as they were
      meant to.

      From June 15, 1999 Defence Science and Technology Organization
      Lecture Series, Melbourne, Australia, and staff reports


      Right, now hit me with the karma baby!

      --


      There are only two things in this world that smell like fish. And one of them's fish...
    8. Re:The AI used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTFLOL

      Never ever trust a Kli... Kangaroo.

    9. Re:The AI used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The actual quote is:
      "Strange game. The only winning move is not to play."

    10. Re:The AI used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, myself once dabbled in pacifism...

    11. Re:The AI used by TheGrimace · · Score: 5, Informative

      Only somewhat true. Check out snopes for a more accurate (although less humourous) rendition and the true origins of this not quite urban legend.

    12. Re:The AI used by child_of_mercy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually Wellington once observed that the French infantry columns broke from the rear, that is it wasn't the guys at the front taking the damage who ran away, it was the guys getting nervous at the back who couldn't take it, and as they ran more guys would take the hint and bail.

      it sounds like the AI were arriving at a similar conclusion.

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    13. Re:The AI used by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


      watched as several thousand characters fought like hell while, in the background, a small contingent of combatants seemed to think better of it and ran away

      Those characters had the AI modelled after French soldiers. You do know why the streets of Paris are lined with trees, yes? Because the Germans like to march in the shade.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    14. Re:The AI used by rynthetyn · · Score: 1

      Even though it is partly an urban legend, there is still a valuable lesson to be learned from the part that is true. Namely, when you are using inheritance, make sure that the object that you are inheriting from really does what you want.

      --
      Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
    15. Re:The AI used by BubbaTheBarbarian · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dear /.,
      AI orcs?! We Surrender!!!!!
      -France

    16. Re:The AI used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and follow orders from other commands

      Because they're America's bitches!

    17. Re:The AI used by moonbender · · Score: 0, Troll

      A sin that'd prevent you from ever being president, amongst other things.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    18. Re:The AI used by Control42 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      That really does sound very French-like.

    19. Re:The AI used by Control42 · · Score: 1

      Haha, right on. Bay of Pigs anyone? Somalia?

    20. Re:The AI used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      h4n h4n @_@

      Come back when you've had the sand to attempt a land invasion of Russia. A quick read of the inside of l'Arc de Triomphe should show what's up, too.

    21. Re:The AI used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They haven't incorporated group-mentality in the software yet then. Group-mentality is what you learn in military's model of learn-to-follow-like-sheep. Basically it sums up like this: If an agent don't know what to do, it'll follow the pack.

    22. Re:The AI used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bay of Pigs ===> not US military (sorry)

      Somalia ===> around 200:1 kill-ratio. Yeah... we ran away.

      Know what you're talking about before saying something utterly stupid.

    23. Re:The AI used by stuntpope · · Score: 1
      Bay of Pigs combatants were mostly anti-Castro Cubans, not Americans. There were some American CIA, and things went badly from the beginning.


      Somalia? Forces were pulled out by executive order, mostly a political, not military, decision.


      Neither involved the cowardice of soldiers on the ground or mass retreats by troops afraid to engage in battle, which was the aspersion cast towards the French in the parent post. Your comparisons are invalid.

    24. Re:The AI used by _Gus · · Score: 1

      That really does sound very French-like.

      Why is it that in the USA (and no other country) people think the French are/were cowards? Its very strange. Consider the American War Of Independance, WW1 and WW2, la resistance etc etc. At no time have the French ever done anything that would allow them to be characterised as cowardly.

      Strange...
    25. Re:The AI used by Economist · · Score: 1
      (although less humourous)
      You call this less humourous?: ...so what the kangaroos fired at us was in fact the default object for the simulation, which happened to be large multicoloured beachballs.
    26. Re:The AI used by crotherm · · Score: 1

      heheh... A Jim Rome fan..

      --
      "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" - JFK
    27. Re:The AI used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Not in 'Nam of course!

    28. Re:The AI used by ScuzzMonkey · · Score: 2

      Well, there was that whole capitulating right at the start of WWII thing... ;)

      I'm just kidding, mostly... there were a sizable number of Free French who escaped and returned to fight another day. But I think that this is where the modern conception of the French as cowards comes from. Although they fought very valiantly during the opening rounds of the Battle of France, the early capitulation and subsequent refusals to cooperate with Allied efforts (not that they weren't in a bad spot, but still, actively resisting the North African invasion was a bit much), contrasted especially to Britain's spirited resistance with far fewer resources, didn't leave the country in a very favorable light.

      That would be my guess, anyway...

      --
      No relation to Happy Monkey
    29. Re:The AI used by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Neither of those were defeats for the US, but they did both involve extremely bad decisions by US policy makers. Bay of Pigs was a defeat for the Cuban rebels, largely because the US backed out of their promised support, kind of like what happened in Iraq in the Gulf War. Somalia was yet another politically motivated military action without good military objectives.

    30. Re:The AI used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      But we digress. French policy was actually to plant trees for French officers to plot the extraction of resources from their colonies in French Indo-China and Africa.

      American policy may be bad, but Europe taught us how. We were at least original enough to come up with Lend-Lease and the Marshall Plan.

    31. Re:The AI used by zonker · · Score: 0

      most people i know are of the opinion they would rather have died fighting than live under the nazi regime. perhaps that has something to do with it?

  3. I only hope..... by Kenja · · Score: 0, Troll

    I only hope they got around to hiring a script supervisor by the time they started shooting the footage for the second movie. LOTR was so full of inconsistencies it ALMOST detracted from the movie.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:I only hope..... by miu · · Score: 1, Informative
      I only hope they got around to hiring a script supervisor by the time they started shooting the footage for the second movie. LOTR was so full of inconsistencies it ALMOST detracted from the movie.

      I think this must have happened while editing for length was going on. The extended release is much more coherent.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    2. Re:I only hope..... by Kenja · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Sorry, but no.

      The dead orc still looks up when steped on. The arrow counts are still way off. The size of the hobbits still keeps changing.

      Of course it seems I'm a troll for even thinking that there could be anything wrong with these movies. (sigh)

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:I only hope..... by lvdrproject · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Name an instance where a converted-from-the-novel movie was accurate, please. I've been watching movies my whole life, and i've yet to see one. As for LOTR, it was more accurate than most novels-to-movies i've seen.

      :Lav

    4. Re:I only hope..... by Kenja · · Score: 1

      It's not a matter of accuracy but of constancy. It's the script supervisors job to make sure that people and objects are where they should be when moving between scenes. Even low budget porn productions have them. That a reasonably large budget movie with a lot of talented people behind it can't get some rather simple things to work is absurd. It's like in Saving Private Ryan when the medic gets shot in the kidney and starts spurting strawberry syrup, when anyone who's looked into human anatomy could have told them what a kidney wound should look like. They just about killed what should have been a very good scene by not buying a .25$ thing of brown food coloring.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    5. Re:I only hope..... by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Funny

      The dead orc still looks up when steped on.

      Who says he's dead? He's just disabled and bleeding to death.

      The arrow counts are still way off.

      If you're talking about what I think you're talking about, even the book says that Legolas picked up orc and goblin arrows along the way. Besides, if you sat through the movie counting the arrows, I think it's possible that you might have missed the point.

      The size of the hobbits still keeps changing.

      Yeah, and in episode 2F09, when Itchy plays Scratchy's skeleton like a xylophone, he strikes the same rib twice in succession, yet he produces two clearly different tones. I mean, what are we to believe, that this is some sort of a (heh heh) magic xylophone or something? Boy, I really hope somebody got fired for that blunder.

      Of course it seems I'm a troll for even thinking that there could be anything wrong with these movies.

      Hee hee. I get it! Lord of the Rings! Troll! Brilliant!

      (-1, Hobbit)

      --

      I write in my journal
    6. Re:I only hope..... by mrjive · · Score: 1

      I think he's talking more about the inconsistencies in the filmmaking, not in the translation from the book. Some of the mistakes are just sloppy.

      That being said, I never noticed any of them when I saw it in theaters, and I'm not anal enough to sit down and nitpick over all of them on dvd.

      --
      If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. -George Carlin
    7. Re:I only hope..... by Kenja · · Score: 0, Troll
      While I don't normally reply to sarcastic Hobbits. What the hell, I'm board.

      Who says he's dead? He's just disabled and bleeding to death.
      That must be why he looks at the camera, gets a panicked expression and then puts his head back down.

      If you're talking about what I think you're talking about, even the book says that Legolas picked up orc and goblin arrows along the way. Besides, if you sat through the movie counting the arrows, I think it's possible that you might have missed the point.
      It's like in westerns when the good guy shoots ten times with a six shooter. When the guy has three arrows left and he shots five times, I cry foul.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    8. Re:I only hope..... by mrjive · · Score: 3, Informative

      FYI:

      This is the list of all the known inconsistencies in FotR. Some of them are actually quite simple and some are rather amusing.

      --
      If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. -George Carlin
    9. Re:I only hope..... by miu · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'll see your reference...

      Yeah, and in episode 2F09, when Itchy plays Scratchy's skeleton like a xylophone, he strikes the same rib twice in succession, yet he produces two clearly different tones. I mean, what are we to believe, that this is some sort of a (heh heh) magic xylophone or something? Boy, I really hope somebody got fired for that blunder.

      I'll field that one. Let me ask you a question. Why would a man whose shirt says "Genius at Work" spend all of his time watching a children's cartoon show?

      and up you one with...

      Now I'm not necessarily an-an aficionado necessarily of 'Lord of the Rings' but the elvish that was spoken at Imladris between Aragorn and Arwen Undomiel, the Evenstar of her people...?

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    10. Re:I only hope..... by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I do notice these things in the theater. Wish I didn't.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    11. Re:I only hope..... by Kenja · · Score: 1

      To quote Tolken. "Its ELVEN you fool, not elfish."

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    12. Re:I only hope..... by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's like in Saving Private Ryan when the medic gets shot in the kidney and starts spurting strawberry syrup, when anyone who's looked into human anatomy could have told them what a kidney wound should look like. They just about killed what should have been a very good scene by not buying a .25$ thing of brown food coloring.

      Uh... the kidneys are positively packed full of arterial blood. When wounded in the kidney, one does, for all practical purposes, spew strawberry syrup. Arterial blood is a bright, almost improbable, red. Like stop-sign red, or fire-engine red.

      Girlfriend's a surgical resident. She brings home snapshots of her operations on the digital camera. When she did a trauma surgery rotation, one of the injuries she had to treat was a kidney lac. Strawberry syrup was everywhere.

      --

      I write in my journal
    13. Re:I only hope..... by BarrettAnderson · · Score: 0

      Who says he's dead? He's just disabled and bleeding to death. thank you, at least someone has common sense. the first time i saw that i was like "HA... oh..." it's not like they kill every orc they touch instantly. unless elves have zap powers... and humans... and dwarves... and hobbits too...

    14. Re:I only hope..... by Kenja · · Score: 1

      My bad, the wound was to the liver, not the kidney. From what I've read and seen it should have been dark, almost black.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    15. Re:I only hope..... by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When the guy has three arrows left and he shots five times, I cry foul.

      Cry all you like. The underlying point of my previous post was that movies (and, by the same token, Itchy and Scratchy) are meant to be enjoyed. They're positively riddled with continuity errors as a result of the way they're made. So what?

      Here, just to really get you excited, I'll throw you a couple of bones. During Boromir's death scene, his right hand appears and disappears from Aragorn's left shoulder about a million times. Or how about the magic disappearing pony? Or the way Merry and Pippin keep changing places during the scene in the inn?

      None of these things detracts from the story, friend. Not a one of them. They're not important, they're not insightful; hell, they're not even really mistakes as much as they are harmless side-effects of the movie-making process.

      Oh, and whatever you do, stay away from the climactic scene of Return of the Jedi. The smudges on Vader's helmet will no doubt send you into a fit of apoplexy.

      --

      I write in my journal
    16. Re:I only hope..... by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Informative

      My bad, the wound was to the liver, not the kidney. From what I've read and seen it should have been dark, almost black.

      You read wrong. Liver lacs are just like kidney lacs; they positively spew arterial blood, because of the dense vascularization of the organ. Now the liver produces bile, but it doesn't actually contain bile. Bile is held in the gall bladder, but only a very small quantity of it. And it's a pale, translucent green, not black at all.

      If you have a bowel perforation, it's possible for fecal matter to leak out into the belly, and from the belly out through an open wound or incision. But that's kinda... well, it looks kinda like tiny nuggets of mud embedded in blood or bile. It's not really black, either.

      Realistic depictions of serious injuries are really not that interesting to look at; everything is one color, the bright red of arterial blood, and one texture, the texture of raw meat.

      --

      I write in my journal
    17. Re:I only hope..... by miu · · Score: 1
      To quote Tolken. "Its ELVEN you fool, not elfish."

      I know you were joking and I was quoting.

      http://www.tolkiensociety.org/faq01.html#elvish

      http://www.elvish.org/

      Elvish seems to be fairly acceptable. It's even in the jargon file somewhere. Now that's canon!

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    18. Re:I only hope..... by EngMedic · · Score: 1

      The size of the hobbits still keeps changing. yes. merry and pippin get bigger. Ent drafts do that. nifty, huh?

      --
      filter: +3. Hey, look! all the trolls went away!
    19. Re:I only hope..... by jmo_jon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Girlfriend's a surgical resident. She brings home snapshots of her operations on the digital camera.

      Sounds cozy. Do you watch them in front of an open fire drinking wine?

    20. Re:I only hope..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Girlfriend's a surgical resident. She brings home snapshots of her operations on the digital camera. When she did a trauma surgery rotation, one of the injuries she had to treat was a kidney lac. Strawberry syrup was everywhere.
      Uhhh... I'm not a doctor or anything but maybe she should put the sundae in the fridge until AFTER she does the operation.
    21. Re:I only hope..... by Kenja · · Score: 1

      For what its worth. Tolken used the term Elven. However his editors insited on using Elvish. This caused Tolken to get rather pissed.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    22. Re:I only hope..... by Kintanon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What kind of anal retentive dick head even NOTICES this shit?! No offense to you personally since I doubt you noticed these during the movie, but looked them up later. But WHO sees the movie the first time through and sees shit like this without having purposely looking for it?! My GOODNESS people! You're complaining that a FUCKING ELF didn't have as many arrows in his quiver as you think he shot, and that HOBBITS aren't 100% fixed in size (WTF did you do? Get a fucking ruler and measure the size of everything on the screen and calculate?!) get a fucking LIFE!!

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    23. Re:I only hope..... by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      dude I almost threw up...

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    24. Re:I only hope..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what its worth. Tolken used the term Elven.

      The comma: learn it, love it, use it.

      Only you can stop sentence fragments.

    25. Re:I only hope..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ent drafts do that.

      Please: "draughts"

    26. Re:I only hope..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn i would mod you up if i had the points ;)

    27. Re:I only hope..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you just jumped the ass of a guy that was arguing (much better, I might add) the same point you got all hot and bothered about...

      For christ's sake, take a valium, and go see an anger management professional.

    28. Re:I only hope..... by miu · · Score: 1
      How funny. I should probably read one of the biographies floating around as I am actually interested in this sort of trivia.

      Over lunch we call these sort of conversations 'birth control' as they do much to ensure the participants don't breed. :)

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    29. Re:I only hope..... by stickyc · · Score: 2

      Actually, I was amazed at the bookmovie accuracy of Fear & Loathing in Las Vegas, given the majority of the subject matter. Most directors would have copped out on the acid trip scenes and used it for an excuse to put their own (or the DP's or the art directors, or...) views of being under the influence on the screen.

    30. Re:I only hope..... by FireballFreddy · · Score: 1

      Mmm, meat. Now I'm hungry for a steak.

      -FF

      (Yes, it's off-topic, but it's on-thread. Doesn't that count for something?)

      --
      SQUEAK, the Death of Rats explained.
    31. Re:I only hope..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kenja, you keep getting shut up. Why not quit while... well, you're not ahead. While not quit while you're still only moderately behind?

      Or perhaps you can say something like "Oh shit, I remember now! I was the heart!"

    32. Re:I only hope..... by meringuoid · · Score: 2
      The size of the hobbits still keeps changing.

      Yeah, and in episode 2F09, when Itchy plays Scratchy's skeleton like a xylophone, he strikes the same rib twice in succession, yet he produces two clearly different tones. I mean, what are we to believe, that this is some sort of a (heh heh) magic xylophone or something? Boy, I really hope somebody got fired for that blunder.

      Actually, that was the error that I noticed the most, and actually found annoying. We see a _lot_ of Frodo, and he's frequently standing right next to either Gandalf or Aragorn - and he varies enormously in height. Gimli stays much the same - it seems to be just the Hobbits who change in size.

      This isn't a geeky pedant point like the comment about Scratchy's ribs; this is a fundamental physical characteristic of the main character of a major motion picture. Just how tall is Frodo supposed to be? This is something that _does_ get noticed; several friends who didn't really know the books came out wondering exactly how tall Hobbits were relative to Men. The film had been extremely ambiguous.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    33. Re:I only hope..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you have a bowel perforation, it's possible for fecal matter to leak out into the belly, and from the belly out through an open wound or incision. But that's kinda... well, it looks kinda like tiny nuggets of mud embedded in blood or bile. It's not really black, either.

      And did your girlfriend get pictures of that? Inquiring minds want to know!
    34. Re:I only hope..... by user+flynn · · Score: 1

      Anyone hear of 'suspension of disbelief'?

      --
      In the distance you hear an ominous moo.
    35. Re:I only hope..... by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do you watch them in front of an open fire drinking wine?

      A nice chianti would seem appropriate...

    36. Re:I only hope..... by darqchild · · Score: 1

      tuesday's coming
      did you bring your coat?

      --
      What? Me? Worry?
    37. Re:I only hope..... by facelessnumber · · Score: 1

      I agree, and nevermind it being true to the book's description of an acid trip - It's just plain accurate. I almost had flashbacks watching that movie.

    38. Re:I only hope..... by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      No no, I was agreeing with him. Hence the thing about "no offense to you personally" I was making sure I mentioned that my diatribe was not directed at him, but at the people who noticed stuff like that and harped on it enough that he probably found out about it.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    39. Re:I only hope..... by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      This isn't a geeky pedant point like the comment about Scratchy's ribs; this is a fundamental physical characteristic of the main character of a major motion picture. Just how tall is Frodo supposed to be?

      Somewhere in the documentaries or the commentaries or someplace buried in the ~18 hours of stuff on the extended edition DVD set, somebody makes mention of a really great point. Tolkien wrote (allegedly; see my other posts for my experience with the books) that hobbits are smaller than men a few times, but for the most part didn't keep bringing it up. He didn't keep saying things like, "Frodo looked at Gandalf, craning his neck upward and straining to make out the wizard's features from the approximate level of his belly-button." Instead, he just established that hobbits are shorter than men, and then moved on to talk about Tom Bombadil or some other damn fool way of avoiding getting on with the plot.

      Er, sorry. Bit of a digression.

      Anyway, the point is that they didn't spend a lot of time trying to get the hobbits exactly right in the films. They used a few tricky and expensive establishing shots to say that hobbits are shorter than men, and used scale doubles in every wide shot, but for the most part they just told the story and didn't make a big deal out of the details.

      Actually, there are a few shots in Fellowship where they just didn't care about scale at all, but it works anyway because your eye is already accustomed to thinking of hobbits as small. I'm thinking specifically of the shot where Boromir tackles Frodo just before the big fight on Amon Hen. No scale doubles, no forced perspective, just Sean Bean body-tackling Elijah Wood. On the screen, it really looks like Boromir is twice Frodo's size.

      --

      I write in my journal
    40. Re:I only hope..... by Zerelli · · Score: 0

      The other poster is correct about liver and kidney wounds, the blood is gonna be really red as there are lots of arteries in both organs. But more importantly (ok not more) there is no such thing as brown food coloring ;-). You have to use chocolate or cocoa powder.

    41. Re:I only hope..... by tedrlord · · Score: 1
      The arrow counts are still way off.

      If you're talking about what I think you're talking about, even the book says that Legolas picked up orc and goblin arrows along the way. Besides, if you sat through the movie counting the arrows, I think it's possible that you might have missed the point.

      I'm not much of a pedant myself when it comes to movies, but I noticed how Legolas had a seemingly infinite supply of arrows, even in the middle of a battle when he couldn't replenish them. Personally, I just thought it was pretty funny. Kind of the fantasy equivalent of the action hero that never stops to reload his pistol.
      --
      [insert witty quote here]
    42. Re:I only hope..... by TheShalafi · · Score: 1

      Just to beat the dead horse, or in this case hobbit... ent draughts didn't show up until Pippin and Merry had been found by Fangorn, in the Two Towers...

  4. Did you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That if enough of us PAY to see movies like this one, MORE might be made?

    1. Re:Did you know by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm going to go see it in the theater anyway, maybe multiple times. I just want to see it earlier and have my own copy. :)

    2. Re:Did you know by yomegaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I'm sure New Line spent $0 on promotion, and they get every penny of the box office with the theaters getting nothing.

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    3. Re:Did you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kazaa Lite, my good man,
      Kazaa Lite.

  5. BFD. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 4, Funny
    I have this awesome rendering package called B.R.A.I.N... When I read the book, it made this breathtaking scene with over 100,000 monsters...

    And the coolest thing about it is that I did it 3 years ago when I actually read the book.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:BFD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, when I read the book, there were only 500 monsters. Talk about one of the most insignificant battles in the series.

    2. Re:BFD. by jayratch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Who does these mods? Ten minutes ago parent was +3 funny, now it's 1 Redundant. Did two moderators miss the punchline or what?

    3. Re:BFD. by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have this awesome rendering package called B.R.A.I.N...

      I tried that technique too, but after 200 pages of Frodo and his buddies wandering through the woods and talking about mushrooms, my B.R.A.I.N. made me throw the fucking thing across the room.

      Maybe I'm just a low-brow or something, but I tend to prefer books where things happen.

      --

      I write in my journal
    4. Re:BFD. by captaincucumber · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you need to install a plugin package called P.A.T.I.E.N.C.E.

    5. Re:BFD. by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Personally, I hated the book the first time I read it. Unlike The Hobbit, which is filled with action and adventure, the vast majority of Lord of the Rings consists of traveling to somewhere where something might happen, and having a sense of dread and foreboding about it. When I read it the second time, I knew that nothing was going to happen for long stretches of the book, so I was able to have greater patience with the whole thing, and get more out of it. Although I still found the endless talk of destiny and family trees and Elven racial superiority to be extremely tedious. (Incidentally, I'll be interested to see if the dark-complexioned evil men of Harad and their war elephants will show up in the next two movies.)

    6. Re:BFD. by JebusIsLord · · Score: 2

      The Hobbit was written for young children, i think he was hoping an older audience had more patience. Apparently he was wrong.

      --
      Jeremy
    7. Re:BFD. by rgoer · · Score: 2, Funny
      Blockquoth DarkHelmet:
      And the coolest thing about it is that I did it 3 years ago when I actually read the book.
      Sad thing about BRAIN, though, is that it apparently hasn't made much improvement over the years (even though it has been in a constant state of development); I ran this same test, rendering the battle at Helm's Deep, some decades past and got very similar results to those you achieved just three years ago.
    8. Re:BFD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he has. But it's got low bandwidth.

    9. Re:BFD. by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude, I was like 12 when I read it the first time. Do people lurk on this board waiting for the opportunity to lash out and prove their intellectual superiority?

    10. Re:BFD. by daeley · · Score: 2

      BFD.
      by DarkHelmet


      Awww, you're just jealous since SpaceBalls 2 never got made. ;)

      Dark Helmet: What's the matter, Colonel Sandurz? CHICKEN???

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    11. Re:BFD. by mekkab · · Score: 5, Funny

      yes.

      P.S.- my wife just read the trilogy in a day or two.

      I asked "How?!"

      She replied "Oh, I skipped all that stupid singing crap. Man! They sing abou everything!"

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    12. Re:BFD. by EvilAlien · · Score: 5, Funny
      "Do people lurk on this board waiting for the opportunity to lash out and prove their intellectual superiority?"

      <whisper>
      Did you just figure that out??

      Sure, they decided to use "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters." instead of "We're smarter than you. Suck it." like originally planned, but the result has been the same. </whisper>

      Anyways, I'm really trying hard not to get too excited about little AI warriors each making their own combat decisions on screen. I'm really trying hard not to think about this. I tell myself, repeatedly, that getting excited about artificial intelligence is normal.

      I think I need to shower.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    13. Re:BFD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do people lurk on this board waiting for the opportunity to lash out and prove their intellectual superiority?

      Yes. It's how they measure their virtual penis. (*lash*)

    14. Re:BFD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Maybe I'm just a low-brow or something..."

      No "or something" needed. You got it right the first time - You're just a low brow.

      Try Reading comic books next time. "Things happen" a lot, and there are lots of pretty pictures to entertain your feeble mind.

    15. Re:BFD. by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 4, Funny

      I prefer to just link the reading routines to libskimmer.so. If nothing's happening, flip ahead a few (2-3) pages. If people are swinging swords or some important-sounding exchange is going on, flip back and read the intervening pages. If not, set mypage=thispage, and recurse. If Tom Bombadil is singing or if someone is explaining elven family structures, skip the whole damn chapter.

      (ob-herasy)It works well on the Old Testament, too!(*lightning bolt*)

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    16. Re:BFD. by 3Bees · · Score: 1

      LOL! I recomend that to everyone who asks me about the books: Don't bother with the poetry unless you are a big poetry fan! It has no importance to the story, and is only interesting after two or three readings.

      --
      "I think we should tax people who stand in water! " - Mr. Gumby
    17. Re:BFD. by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      you are lowbrow. you are also cultureless. i hope one day you come to realize the error of your ways.

      sometimes the journey is more important than the destination.

    18. Re:BFD. by chabotc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well i think you sumerised the feeling that the book was supposed to replay quite well. A large part of the book is about man's journey towards death .. "dread and foreboding"

      It is also definatly true the book is very much about the characters development, and not the modern heroism that most current books seem to aspire to.

    19. Re:BFD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlikely, considering the brain can barely keep track of 7 different things.

    20. Re:BFD. by Bunji+X · · Score: 1

      Yes, what is all this crap about "Three Rings for the Elven-kings... yadda yadda". In the very first chapter. Man, am I glad I filed that book into the big archive.

      ;-)

      --
      ---
      The combined human population is enough to feed every living tiger for app. 28000 years.
    21. Re:BFD. by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 2, Funny
      Well, my implementation of B.R.A.I.N. keeps complaining about someone / something called Pinky and how stupid he/it is.

      /me shrugs

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    22. Re:BFD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do people lurk on this board waiting for the opportunity to lash out and prove their intellectual superiority?

      You've been around /. that long and you've only just figured this out? You have my sympathy. :)

    23. Re:BFD. by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 3, Funny

      But, if the journey hadn't been so damned long, maybe Frodo could have cast the Ring away, without losing a finger.

      Just writing that reminds me how many miles I have walked around malls with the wife, when we only went there to get one thing. By the end, I'm delusional too.

    24. Re:BFD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe I'm just a low-brow or something, but I tend to prefer books where things happen.

      Try more interesting fantasy series like Dragonlance or any of R.A. Salvatore's books. The Icewind Dale trilogy has been one of my favorites for years now. I really would have much rather seen a Dragonlance or Dark Elf Trilogy movie than the Lord of the Rings. I've never bothered to read the book (from what I understand it was written a long time ago so it's probably not very good) but from what I saw of the movie it's pretty boring. Hobbits suck compared to Halflings and Dark Elves!

    25. Re:BFD. by EuroChild · · Score: 4, Funny

      After months of trying to get my brother to read LotR he finally started and sent me this email which sums up Fellowship pretty well:

      Very different to the movie isn't it? Lots of unecessary, and not very interesting detail. He likes to take his time, old JRRT. You know: they travelled along the creek before reaching an outcrop of green grass, which in turn lead to a valley of birches. Passing through them, they noticed a green mound upon which was some moss which has nothing to do with the story, nor does the ridge they then decided to walk across. The oak lined track they followed for several hours is also irrelivant, but it can be seen in a map in the back of the book. "Would you like me to carry that pack for you sir?" Sam asked Frodo obediently. "No thankyou Sam. Sit boy. Good Hobbit!" Frodo replied.

      --
      Does this make my brain look big?
    26. Re:BFD. by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      (ob-herasy)It works well on the Old Testament, too!(*lightning bolt*)

      Makes no difference if you read that or not, because the New Testament is a revamp of it. Alot like knowing C, then trying to learn C++ :P I guess that's how the Spanish Inquisition came around. Someone decided to put the two codes together into the same program.

      LOL

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    27. Re:BFD. by Col.+Panic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Very different to the movie isn't it? Lots of unecessary, and not very interesting detail.

      Yes, unlike film, books must convey ideas that stimulate all the senses in simple print. Authors strive to describe sights, sounds and scents using nothing more than pen and paper. Some readers relish such writing and pore over the pages word-by-word. Others just want to get to the action. To each their own.

    28. Re:BFD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from what I understand it was written a long time ago so it's probably not very good

      are you fucking serious? god, i hope you were trolling.

      there have been a couple of authors who wrote a long time ago and their writing is still worth reading

      dumbfuck

    29. Re:BFD. by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      Makes no difference if you read that or not, because the New Testament is a revamp of it. Alot like knowing C, then trying to learn C++

      Hmm. Methinks maybe you haven't read your Bible. It's more like knowing C, then trying to learn cross-country skiing.

      --

      I write in my journal
    30. Re:BFD. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      Dude, I was like 12 when I read it the first time. Do people lurk on this board waiting for the opportunity to lash out and prove their intellectual superiority?

      Hah! I read it when I was 9! Now I'm intellectually superior! ;)

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    31. Re:BFD. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Offtopic
      Not like anyone's gonna care but I can read the trilogy in two days myself. I've done it in both paperback and PDF (obviously I'm used to being in front of the PC for long stretches, ha ha.) When I was in elementary they put me on a speed reading machine (as part of my GATE experience), and I'm sure they thought they were doing me a favor but they made a criminal of me.

      See, I can't afford to buy books considering the speed at which I read them... thank god for USENET!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    32. Re:BFD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have four words for you... "Gotta Catch 'Em All."

    33. Re:BFD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should skip those difficult "words" and "letters" too. Just read the cover blurb. The whole story's there.

    34. Re:BFD. by dswensen · · Score: 1

      You should tell your brother his email is full of lots of unecessary, and not very interesting detail. His description of the book's problems are irrelevant. He should have just said "it is teh stupid."

    35. Re:BFD. by Blackneto · · Score: 1

      The first book does drag.
      It actually took me years to get in the right mindset to force my way through it. I don't think I read the entire first volume the first couple of times I read the series. Now I have no problem with it.

      --
      Ursula Andress, Catherine Deneuve, and Charo, twice...
    36. Re:BFD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha! I did all in a day, on a flight over the Pacific.

    37. Re:BFD. by wheany · · Score: 1

      I raed it when I was 7 hahahaha now your teh infarior!!!!!!!111111111111

    38. Re:BFD. by beowulfcluster · · Score: 0

      I read it when my FATHER was 9.
      In a really tiny paperback.

      Beat that!

    39. Re:BFD. by peterpi · · Score: 1
      Is the backwards compatibility there too?

      That is to say, is any Old Testament chapter also a legal New Testament chapter?

      Why am I even asking? I'm sure gcc has frontends for both.

    40. Re:BFD. by Scooter · · Score: 2

      "There are no matte lines in your imagination." - G. Lucas

    41. Re:BFD. by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      It is also definatly true the book is very much about the characters development, and not the modern heroism that most current books seem to aspire to.

      Character development? What character development? Every character in the books acts and talks in exactly the same way. The hobbits, in particular, are completely interchangeable.

      At least in the movie they chose to have Pippin played by a Scottish actor. If they hadn't, it would be completely impossible to tell them apart. Hell, they could have made a running gag out of it.

      "Well, I guess this is the end, Merry."

      "I'm Pippin. He's Merry."

      "Whatever. Just tell Merry I said bye."

      --

      I write in my journal
    42. Re:BFD. by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      I also read too quickly to make it worthwhile to buy a lot of individual books (not because of speed reading training, just because I read a _lot_ when I was a kid), so I've ended up adopting a couple of tactics:

      1. Look for trilogies (to make the pleasant experience last longer).

      2. Read while standing next to the book shelf at the bookstore :-) As long as I don't sit down, and aren't bending the spine of the book, I generally don't get bothered.

      (This used to be "visit the library", but I read everything in the science fiction/fantasy section in my local library, and they don't update it often enough to be worthwhile...)

    43. Re:BFD. by captaincucumber · · Score: 2, Funny

      A better comparison is C to Java. In the old testament you had to be careful about garbage pointers and deallocating memory and platform interoperability and committing various other sins, but in the Java you just give your sins over to Jesus and all will be forgiven.

    44. Re:BFD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good on you. Not all of us have that software installed.

      But hey, it leaves room for the optional symbolic-logic processing module.

    45. Re:BFD. by EuroChild · · Score: 1

      Dude - it is a joke and not to be taken seriously, hence the "Score: 4, Funny". Sheesh.

      --
      Does this make my brain look big?
    46. Re:BFD. by dswensen · · Score: 1

      I know.

  6. Re:First Post! Repost! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... got ... to ... hrefy ... link....

    got... to ... stop ... talking ... like ... you know who ...

  7. Anticipation by GeckoFood · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...this 50,000 creature battle...

    This is sure to be a big box office draw, but 50,000 scantily-clad beach bimbo babes might do even better at the box office!

    --
    Be excellent to each other. And... PARTY ON, DUDES!
    1. Re:Anticipation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is sure to be a big box office draw, but 50,000 scantily-clad beach bimbo babes might do even better at the box office!

      Nah, you wouldn't be able to tell the blonds from the artifical blonds.

    2. Re:Anticipation by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well, it's not quite 50,000, but if a half-dozen or so will do you, there is always Dead Or Alive Xtreme Beach Vollyball for the Xbox? :P

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    3. Re:Anticipation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      REAL slashdotters hate microsoft. You Wannabe

    4. Re:Anticipation by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Mud wrestling, to take advantage of the "combat" decisions? Hair pulling, etc.? :)

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    5. Re:Anticipation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      REAL slashdotters are horny teens who won't ever get a chick so they jerk off to video game women and post AC so nobody knows who they are.

    6. Re:Anticipation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzt. Wrongo my friend.

      REAL /.ers are gay

    7. Re:Anticipation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, like this didn't happen in the labs while the scenes for the movie were being rendered. Must be nice to be naive. ;)

  8. I hope they have some interesting features on the Two Towers DVD(s) related to MASSIVE. There was a bit on the Special Edition DVD of the Fellowship of the Ring, but not as much as I would've liked.

  9. You may pass through the theatre gates, only if... by dagg · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Only if you answer this question:
    Question...
    You can only pass if you are deemed a special person.
    --
    Sex - Find It
  10. Truely a victory of open source by unterderbrucke · · Score: 0, Interesting

    It is wonderful to see open source in an integral role in a popular movie such as this. This is just the beginning of the mainstreaming of open source, hopefully.

    1. Re:Truely a victory of open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad MASSIVE isn't open source.

    2. Re:Truely a victory of open source by ender81b · · Score: 1, Insightful

      RTFA. Massive isn't open-source and their is no mention of what hardware they used either. If this is a victory for anything it is the company for producing what looks to be like a very nice piece of software.

    3. Re:Truely a victory of open source by raytracer · · Score: 2
      It is wonderful to see open source in an integral role in a popular movie such as this. This is just the beginning of the mainstreaming of open source, hopefully.

      Moviemaking at the scale of The Two Towers is unlikely to ever be mainstream.
    4. Re:Truely a victory of open source by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      There was a guy on Ars selling a bunch of SGI x86 rackmounts that he obtained from the WETA group that did the special effects for the LOTR movies, so unless IRIX has been ported or they used Windows for their render farm, I would guess that they were rendered on Linux.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    5. Re:Truely a victory of open source by The+Bungi · · Score: 0

      That didn't get you much karma, did it?

    6. Re:Truely a victory of open source by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      they said the same thing about "home movies" sometime in the forties.

      see me in 50 years.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    7. Re:Truely a victory of open source by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      They were, I have a PC magazine at home where they interview the project manager about the tech, and he mentions linux workstations for the artists a few times. I'll try and find a link for ya.

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
  11. This software... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This software looks really l33t. Can someone score me a w4r3z copy?

  12. From the article by SuperMario666 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Return of the King, the final film in the Lord of the Rings trilogy, the climactic battle--yes, the Battle of Helm's Deep is just a run-up--is rumored to employ more than 100,000 characters.

    Oh Hell Yes.

    I can't be the only geek with a hard-on here can I?

    1. Re:From the article by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh Hell Yes.

      I can't be the only geek with a hard-on here can I?


      um... yeah, you can be.
    2. Re:From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      I can't be the only geek with a hard-on here can I?

      Nope. I've got a half-dozen Mozilla tabs browsing autopr0n right now. :)

    3. Re:From the article by MWelchUK · · Score: 1

      So whys IBM doing so much with Linux?

    4. Re:From the article by Elentar · · Score: 1

      No, but that's just because some of us work with porn.

      -Elentar

      --
      The wheel it turns, around and around, with an ancient rumbling sound.
  13. anticipated? by ArmorFiend · · Score: 3, Interesting
    one of the most anticipated scenes in recent movie history: the great Battle of Helm's Deep.

    Uh, what kind of monkey anticipates this battle? It's hardly ranks among the many battles in Return of the King. And at the end of the day there's plenty of similar stuff out there: braveheart, Ben Hur, yadda yadda yadda. Please spin down the hype reflex.

    1. Re:anticipated? by |c0bra| · · Score: 0

      One word: ents

      --
      There are strange things done, under the midnight sun by the men who moil for gold - Robert Service
    2. Re:anticipated? by jgalun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, I am very much anticipating the Battle of Helm's Deep. Let me give you my good reason, and then my bad reason.

      The good reason is that, if I recall correctly (and I'm not positive I do), the three major battles in the Lord of the Rings are different: the Battle of Helm's Deep is about holding on with no reinforcements coming, the battle at Minas Tirith is heavy on Nazgul and is about holding out til reinforcements come, and the final battle is about dying valiantly in an effort to delay Sauron until Frodo can destroy the ring. So they do have different feels.

      Anyway, the bad reason for why I am looking forward to the Battle of Helm's Deep is that I didn't really like the first LoTR movie that much. I was a huge fan of the books when I was younger (I read them, and the Silmarillion, dozens of times), but I felt that the movie lacked the sense of mystery and sadness (at the passing of the great ages of magic and elves) that the books had. To me, the magic of the written word could not be translated into the screen. I could imagine Gandalf somehow becoming more imposing, but seeing it in the movie seemed like a parlor trick rather than magic. Similarly, I could imagine Galadriel being somehow different and magical, but seeing her with a glow about her is just...too straightforward.

      That being said, the one thing I loved about the movie was how beautiful it was. The scenes in that movie were astounding. And that's why I'm looking forward to the Battle of Helm's Deep. :)

    3. Re:anticipated? by wnknisely · · Score: 2

      I was a huge fan of the books when I was younger (I read them, and the Silmarillion, dozens of times), but I felt that the movie lacked the sense of mystery and sadness (at the passing of the great ages of magic and elves) that the books had. To me, the magic of the written word could not be translated into the screen.

      I don't know if you've seen the extended version of the movie yet or not - but if you haven't go and do so. I found that the longer version fixed most of the rough spots of the studio release version and added enough atmosphere that I really felt I had seen Middle Earth at the turn of the age.

      Many, many kudos to Jackson for an extraordinary bit of work. It's a true pity that the longer version wasn't the studio release version - it's truly a masterpiece.

      --
      In illa quae ultra sunt
    4. Re:anticipated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, you actually made it through the Silmarillion? More than once even!

      I could never get past the first chapter in that book. Elvish names upon elvish names upon elvish places. Hell, the whole book might as well be written in elvish!

      However, I have read the LotR trilogy half a dozen times.

    5. Re:anticipated? by Soulslayer · · Score: 2

      I agree.

      LOTR:FOTR Sepcial Edition is to LOTR:FOTR Theatrical

      as

      The Abyss Special Edition is to The Abyss Theatrical

      In other words, the entire feel of the film changes and the characters are much more enaging. The Special Edition puts back in all the character development and haunting sorrow missing from the Theatrical Edition. It also gives us much needed downtime between the action sequences and smooths out the pacing. The repair of the pacing issue (something that bothered me in the theater particularly since Jackson had proved he was a master of pacing with The Frighteners) also corrects the impression of too much land traveled in too short a time. The days, weeks, and months that pass between certain events are more readily apparent now.

      --


      Once more unto the breach dear friends...
    6. Re:anticipated? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      i must agree too.

      only thing bothering me now is that instead of seeing the theatre vers. of two towers, i would much rather see the extended version of that straight away..

      though.. in my feelings, you could twist the two towers to theatre length better than fotr(simply because it's more fast paced imho, and theres less explaining to do, more just theatrical showings of courage &etc).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  14. Calling Dr. Freud by kitzilla · · Score: 5, Funny

    The "Two Towers." Now a software program called "Massive." No trend here.

    My Vorpal Sword is bigger than yours.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    1. Re:Calling Dr. Freud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a keen insight of yours, because I heard that the original, working title for the series was Lord of the Cock Ring

    2. Re:Calling Dr. Freud by anzha · · Score: 2

      My Vorpal Sword is bigger than yours.

      Aw. How cute. Munckinism Lives...

      --
      Do you know why the road less traveled by is littered with the bones of the unwary?
    3. Re:Calling Dr. Freud by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

      Dude, sometimes a Vorpal Sword is just a Vorpal Sword.

      Now, having said that:

      "So I see your Schwartz is as big as mine".

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    4. Re:Calling Dr. Freud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that should be pronounced, "Schvartz"

  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. edit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In December vast hordes of very geeky, albeit quite eager filmgoers will mob cineplexes across the land...

    Not to complain, but doesn't it make just a little more sense now? Thought so.

  17. Re:Peter Jackson You Rock! by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Just after the four Hobbits get past the watchman in Bree, on their way to the Pracing Pony, Peter Jackson appears on the right hand side of the screen, and announces his presence with a lovely belch.

  18. How did they prototype it ? by BESTouff · · Score: 1

    To modelize an AI capable of behaving like a mob inflicting a maximum damage, they simply tried to reproduce slashdotted sites' apache logs.

    1. Re:How did they prototype it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To modelize a foot capable of kicking your ass, I will use petroleum and ky jellies.

  19. Notice the closing comment. by Prince_Ali · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dan Koeppel, a film-school dropout, has written for Wired and The New York Times Magazine. Although a longtime Tolkien reader, he draws the line at The Silmarillion.

    Wuss.

    1. Re:Notice the closing comment. by David+Gould · · Score: 3, Funny


      Reading The Silmarillion and The Book of Lost Tales was great! For the better part of a year, my insomnia was cured -- whenever I would have trouble sleeping, I'd try to slog through the next three or four pages and it would knock me out like a hammer to the head. I can't tell you how often I've wished for such a soporific book since finishing those, but nothing else that I've found comes close.

      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    2. Re:Notice the closing comment. by Funkitup · · Score: 1

      I noticed that, and thought wuss.

      But then I realised that I am a longtime Tolkien reader and I also never finished the Silmarillion. Neither did I get through much of the Old Testament (of which the Silmarillion seems to be a copy).

      Hmmmm, one wonders if you could write a computer program to 'simulate' the simlarillion. Just enter 50 names and they could all beget, begat or begot each other - or whatever else it was they did in the Silmarillion.

      If you read it, did it have an actual plot? Is there a basic plot summary anywhere?

    3. Re:Notice the closing comment. by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      It wasn't as much of a plotted story as a narrative. Kinda a then this happened and this and this, and this person was known by these 20 names.

      If you like Lord of the Rings, this is basically the back story - how the world got the way it was in LotR.

      Much as WWI is the way the world got setup for WWII, this has what brought Sauron to power.

    4. Re:Notice the closing comment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they worked the first time, wouldn't they work even better the second time?

    5. Re:Notice the closing comment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried (mostly successfully) to wade through it - I skipped lots of songs, though - so I really only read about 17 pages.

      In my defense I was about 14 and had discovered myself already so it was kind of difficult to keep my mind on the Silmarillion. :/

    6. Re:Notice the closing comment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA HA HA you have the attention span of a goldfish! THAT IS SO FUCKING FUNNY! Oh how I envy you your inability to finish a book! You are truly one of the elite.

  20. I don't know why anyone by dubbayu_d_40 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    would care what effects are in movies anymore. They can do anything, they have BIG computers.


    This is a good thing. The last Star Wars finially convinced me that Lucas is a POS because I wasn't distracted by his "special effects."


    Hopefully effects will now be more relevant to the story if we are taking cgi for granted.


    My guess is TTT can hold it's own without the gee whiz cgi.

    1. Re:I don't know why anyone by Patik · · Score: 3, Informative
      They can do anything, they have BIG computers.
      They have effects that fit seamlessly into the video? They have entire films of CG humans that are indistinguishable from real humans?

      Sorry, but I think they've got a ways to go, and I'm really interested to see what these movies can do to raise the bar.

    2. Re:I don't know why anyone by zaffir · · Score: 1

      Excellent point. CG should be used to enhance the story, it shouldn't be there just to make us go "pretty!"

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    3. Re:I don't know why anyone by Soko · · Score: 2

      This is a good thing. The last Star Wars finially convinced me that Lucas is a POS because I wasn't distracted by his "special effects."

      POS being "Point Of Sale", of course, IMHO. ;-)

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    4. Re:I don't know why anyone by japhmi · · Score: 1

      Right, like epic battle sequences involving human and non-human combatants...

      I liked how they tried to not use fancy CG stuff in FotR when they didn't need to, and used things like forced perspective. There was a lot less CG than I originally thought there was. Most of the effects that they did was color grading.

      I agree that I hope that directors will soon start saying "wow, I can use this to tell a great story." Not "wow, I can use this to make some big battle." Although I'll still be interested in the technology used to make the big battle in the middle of the great story. :-)

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    5. Re:I don't know why anyone by fferreres · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And sometimes, too pretty = too fake. I don't know, but the original Millenium Falcon looks to me more real than the shiny silver plane in the new series or the "parachute" weasel.

      The SW story in the original SW was not *that* much innovative, but it was beautifully narrated, well acted and at times hilariuos (not perfect, but the guys looked like they actually where there and alive, real people not script-followers). The plot had many unexpected clever twists also.

      It was not so much the special effects. They added ambience, but the story could have been placed in the past or even further in the future and still be a classic.

      The new saga well, I can't criticize part by part, I just didn't feel anything at all, the characters felt like reading a stupid script ("I MUST do this, it's in the script!!").

      E.2 was a bit better (compared to the boredness that E.1 provided me). The only guy that felt slightly real was the fallen Jedi (which didn't even look like a bad guy at all) and the cloning aliens.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    6. Re:I don't know why anyone by dr00g911 · · Score: 2

      BIG computers != talented VFX artists.

      Check out the latest Bond film for one hell of a lot of God-awful effects. I mean jarring, mouth-gapingly bad effects.

      God-awful acting, plot, direction, editing and music, too, for what it's worth :-)

      And not even a REAL half-naked woman in the title squence (all CG)? I'm struggling to find anything redeeming about it at all? John Cleese? Hally Barry's T&A?

      Quality filmmaking isn't about the effects, anyhow. If it were, Episodes I and II wouldn't have been the complete piles of steaming excrement they were. (For the record: Warcraft III's cutscenes were better).

      Remember, kids: it's not the size of your pencil -- it's how you write your name.

    7. Re:I don't know why anyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The artist can paint anything with a paintbrush, but only a few paintings become special.

  21. This has *gotta* be a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Our perception of characters is very sharp, which makes it all the more difficult to get the subtle details of artificial life forms believable," says Karl Sims, a former MIT researcher whose 1994 paper, "Evolving Virtual Creatures," outlined the key challenge that digital animators grapple with.

    They are quoting a Mr. Sims about virtual creatures? Right...

  22. sweet christ, enough with the duplicates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how hard is it to build yourself a checker script if you don't want to work?

    yeah, i'm rude. you're paid. act like it.

  23. Random sequences + Beowulf requirement ;-p by saitoh · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ok, to get it out of the way before someone else does;
    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these ;-p

    but besides that point, on the second page, about half way down, they talk about how nobody really knew what was going to happen when "orc met elf" par say, so they just let it randomly play out. Friggin neat IMHO. So in theory, they could throw extra renders on of different battles for special edition dvds and such.... Imagine the posibilities (while you imagine a beowulf cluster of these).

    Saitoh

    --
    We don't need an "overrated" so much as we need a "you completely missed the parent's point, dumbass..."
    1. Re:Random sequences + Beowulf requirement ;-p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That horse is dead... stop trying to beat it ;)

  24. MASSIVE Hordes of Slashdot Readers Ecstatic by dmccarty · · Score: 3, Funny

    In a momentous surge of self-denial, Timothy was able to restrain himself for a full 20 days before posting a repeat story about The Two Towers. Slashdot readers, rejoice!

    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
  25. NEW CATEGORY by Viking+Coder · · Score: 3, Funny

    How about a new category? "Movie SPOILERS". That way, I can filter out articles on it, so I don't have to accidentally read about "the most anticipated scene" in a movie that's not out yet, just in case I've been working very hard to NOT see anything about the movie, so that I can fully enjoy it when it finally DOES come out?

    Damnit.

    Oh by the way:
    It's a sled.
    They drive off the cliff.
    It's a guy.
    Rose lives, Jack dies.
    He's dead.

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
    1. Re:NEW CATEGORY by daeley · · Score: 1

      I'm impressed you've managed to not read the books over the past, what, 60 years they've been available.

      Besides, why not just filter out the Movies topic?

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    2. Re:NEW CATEGORY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you haven't already read the books you don't deserve to see this movie. Besides, I don't know why you spoiler-whiners are so upset, reading this article has only increased my yearning to see it.

    3. Re:NEW CATEGORY by joshki · · Score: 2

      Umm.... the book was published in the mid 1950's. It's not like this is news. Most people already know the whole story -- even the few around here who aren't Tolkien fans. I read them when I was 12 (Including the silmarillion -- unlike the author of the article).

      --
      I do not read or respond to AC's. If you want a discussion, log in. Otherwise, don't waste your time.
    4. Re:NEW CATEGORY by Drogo+Knotwise · · Score: 1

      Most people here can't be spoiled, because they've actually read the book.

    5. Re:NEW CATEGORY by bugnuts · · Score: 5, Funny

      Argh, there are TOWERS in this?

      Thanks for ruining the movie. :)

    6. Re:NEW CATEGORY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citizen Kane
      Themla & Louise
      ???
      Titanic
      Sixth Sense

      what's the third one though?

    7. Re:NEW CATEGORY by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, I heard that since Tolkein died there won't be a third book in the Trilogy. Whaaa! Now I'll never find out if Frodo and Sam made it to Mordor!!!

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    8. Re:NEW CATEGORY by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2

      I haven't read the books in 15 years. I've read a bunch of sci-fi/fantasy in the meantime, so it's fairly easy to not THINK about Lord of the Rings, so I don't ruin it for myself.

      [W]hy not just filter out the Movies topic?

      Because I like movie retrospectives (how they animated Final Fantasy, etc.), and I like being informed about new movies coming out that I might not have already heard about. But I detest movie spoilers so much so that I can't watch trailers at all - they show far too much, and I guess my visual memory is far too good. I end up anticipating every scene I've already seen.

      I'm not really that pissed about this specific event, but I would appreciate some consideration on this point in the future.

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    9. Re:NEW CATEGORY by halftrack · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're on /. and haven't read LOTR??

      Watch out, /.'s infiltrated, the enemy agents are in.

      --
      Look a monkey!
    10. Re:NEW CATEGORY by jayratch · · Score: 0, Troll

      (begin trolling)
      Right, this is a spoiler, because we now know that a movie based on a classic book contains a significant event from the book and incidentally uses some pretty cool effects technology. Fortunately, none of us have seen the Table of Contents to the volume, which gave us significantly more spoiler information than this thread.

      I'm not going to spoil it for you, but just so you know, they already released the ENTIRE story in book form- and it's better, longer, and of course, uncut, and even comes in an innovative media format that requires no separate viewer hardware or software; chances are your library has a dozen editions. And if you haven't read it, you're missing out more than if you miss the movie.

      Be warned, here's the biggest spoiler of all- it will have a cliffhanger ending, they DON'T get to Mount Doom, etc, but don't worry, if you're really stuck on what happens next, you can wait a year for the Return of the King, or you can read the book!

      There is no such thing as a spoiler for a movie made from a well-known book, especially when posted among geeks who, as a whole, tend to have read the books at least once.

    11. Re:NEW CATEGORY by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Mrs. Doubtfire or Tootsie?

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    12. Re:NEW CATEGORY by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2

      I bet I could spoil Ender's Game pretty quick - and I bet some people would get pretty pissed.

      Like I said, I'm not complaining about this specific incident - but in general a "spoilers" category, or at least warning, doesn't hurt anyone, and it could certainly make ME happy.

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    13. Re:NEW CATEGORY by aWalrus · · Score: 1

      My guess is "The crying game". I guess that one would fit the bill.
      --

      --
      Overcaffeinated. Angry geeks.
    14. Re:NEW CATEGORY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and they should really take those pesky books off the shelf, too - you can read about everything that will happen in the movie! How irresponsible!

    15. Re:NEW CATEGORY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next you're gonna tell me he was commanding the real fleet the whole time. NFW...

    16. Re:NEW CATEGORY by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      I bet I could spoil Ender's Game pretty quick - and I bet some people would get pretty pissed.

      Let's find out: He thinks he's playing a game but hes not, and he blows up the buggers home world. Some of his friends die, etc, adolescent angst, and so on. For more angst, see Speaker of the Dead. Oh and Alvin Maker is Jesus.

      --
      Why not fork?
    17. Re:NEW CATEGORY by Herkum01 · · Score: 2

      The script has been out for around 80 years, and he is complaining about Slashdot ruining the suprise for him?

      I wonder if he gets mad at George Lucas for not releasing the movies in order, so we already know that Anakin Skywalker is Luke's father *OOPS*, sorry about that.

    18. Re:NEW CATEGORY by xigxag · · Score: 5, Funny

      Aw fuck, all that moderation I just did, down the drain. But what the hell...

      You're on /. and haven't read LOTR??

      Translation:

      You're on /. and you're not a VIRGIN??

      And the inevitable follow-up:

      Er, wot's that? I've read LOTR twenty-eight times, that once every year since my 12th birthday, and I'm certainly no virgin...I've gotten laid twice in fact...once by a hot "Ensign Ro" bird at a Trek convo, another time by an "Akane" at a cosplay...what's so funny?...no I'm not really British, I just say "wot" and "bird" and "convo" naturally...cheers!

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    19. Re:NEW CATEGORY by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      I have a couple friends who didn't know Anikin was Anikin, fer crying out loud.

      "Hey, why doesn't Luke remember all this during the original movie, when he's older?"

      I damn near had a heart attack, trying to not laugh in my friend's face. He was honestly trying to figure this out.

    20. Re:NEW CATEGORY by t_parker16 · · Score: 1

      rose lives, jack dies? what's that a spoiler for?

    21. Re:NEW CATEGORY by mekkab · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      titanic. google it. I did (gawd! I wasn't gonna watch that dreck!)

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    22. Re:NEW CATEGORY by binaryhazard · · Score: 1

      Actually rosebud was the name for his wifes pussy. Orsen Wells changed it for the movie.

    23. Re:NEW CATEGORY by oktane96 · · Score: 1


      It's a sled.
      They drive off the cliff.
      It's a guy.
      Rose lives, Jack dies.
      He's dead.

      How about: "I am your father"?

    24. Re:NEW CATEGORY by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but why don't the DROIDS remember any of it eh???

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    25. Re:NEW CATEGORY by Scooter · · Score: 1

      I agree - and the damm book of the movie is already out!!

    26. Re:NEW CATEGORY by ivrcti · · Score: 1

      I'm a serious /. 'er and I have 4 kids and a beautiful wife. Something must be seriously wrong with me!

    27. Re:NEW CATEGORY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citizen Kane
      Themla & Louise
      ???
      Titanic
      Sixth Sense

      what's the third one though?


      Profit ?:/

    28. Re:NEW CATEGORY by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      Star Wars: Episode 3: Reboot of the Droids

      In the final scene, Darth Vader faces R2D2 and C3PO. Darth Vader waves his hand in front of the droids and says, "I am not the Sith Lord you are looking for."

      C3PO: "You are not the Sith Lord we are looking for."

      R2D2: "Beep beep beep, whirr."

      Vader, waving again: "You must find Her Eminence Ellen Feiss."

      3PO: "Yes, R2, we now must find Her Eminence Ellen Feiss, for the switch."

      R2: "Brr, arrrrrgh."

      3PO: "Yes, it is a bummer."

    29. Re:NEW CATEGORY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But are you a Virgin? (That is the nice way of asking if the kids are yours...) ;)

  26. Please let this not suck by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I cringed during the CGI sequences of "Attack of the Clones." I really liked Lord of the Rings. Please let this new scene be a breakthrough and not an embarrasing distraction.

    1. Re:Please let this not suck by selectspec · · Score: 2

      Golem looked a little jarjar like. I'm worried.

      --

      Someone you trust is one of us.

    2. Re:Please let this not suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Daysa gotta precious and messa wants it!

    3. Re:Please let this not suck by Bunji+X · · Score: 1

      "Golem looked a little jarjar like. I'm worried."

      But of course he did. Jars are made of clay and according to the legend, so is Golem. That is why they look like each other. =)

      --
      ---
      The combined human population is enough to feed every living tiger for app. 28000 years.
    4. Re:Please let this not suck by Maxime+Lefrancois · · Score: 1
      I cringed during the CGI sequences of "Attack of the Clones."

      Let me guess, you have not seen Episode I with General Jar Jar Binks, huh?
    5. Re:Please let this not suck by L0rdJedi · · Score: 2

      He may look a little like him, but he definitely won't ACT like him. JarJar is an annoying turd that needs to go away. Gollum is a creature you're supposed to take pity on because of what he's become. I think Gollum would kick JarJar's ass any day.

      "Mesa JarJar Binks!"
      "You've got the ring! It's mine give it to me!"
      "But mesa just..ack...acck!" (as Gollum wraps his dirty little hands around JarJars throat)

      "It's my preciousssss!"

    6. Re:Please let this not suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a just world, you'd be moderated funny for that.

      I got it, at least. :-)

    7. Re:Please let this not suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure it was the CGI and not the non existent chemistry and overall suck of the movie anytime Anikin and Amadala were on the screen together that made you cringe

  27. Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by Allen+Varney · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Two Towers Visual Companion, a movie tie-in, features a nice four-page foldout illustrating the battle's progress. (N.B. The book's foreword, by Viggo Mortensen (who played Aragorn), is worth a read. Maybe I'm a bigot, but I hadn't expected an actor's commentary to be so perceptive and nuanced.)

    1. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by bravehamster · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Maybe I'm a bigot, but I hadn't expected an actor's commentary to be so perceptive and nuanced.)


      Do yourself a favor and go buy the 4 disc version of FoTR. Find a time when you have 7 hours to spare and watch the last two discs. Viggo is "an old school actor, a gentleman" as some of the others refer to him. This is a guy that takes his craft very, very seriously. That guy impressed the hell outta me, moreso even than Ian McKellan or Christopher Lee. And that's saying quite a lot. He's intelligent, soft-spoken, and cares about what he does. When's the last time you saw an actor like that?

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    2. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by TheOverlord · · Score: 1

      IIRC, when shooting one sword fight part of Viggo's front tooth got chipped. They wanted to stop shooting so he could go get it fixed by a dentist but he asked if they could just glue the chip back on so he could finish filming first.

      Just the fact that he places the movie before his vainity astounds me. Perhaps that's why he plays the role of Aragorn so well, he has a very similar mindset as the character.

    3. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And don't forget that he was called in when they were already shooting. The original actor was cast "too young". Which if my calculations are correct, Aragorn is supposed to be at least in his 50s - going on the basis of the Story of Arwen and Aragorn (in the appendix). After being in NZ for two days he had to shoot Weathertop.

      The originally cast actor (I refuse to name him - he appeared in Queen of the Damned if you must know) has said in an interview that Wellington is the arsehole of the world (No Karma for guessing where I am), but he says he's "not bitter."

      For those who haven't bought/watched the appendencies of the extended version: after talking on the phone to PJ, he wasn't sure about whether to do it or not, but his son Henry said something like "OMG, they want you to be Aragorn, and you're thinking about it???". Henry was also responsible for checking that Thror Oakenshield's map is still around for Gandalf to look at.

      --
      Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
    4. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by ChrisJones · · Score: 2

      I was immensely impressed by all of the main characters, they really did an excellent job, but viggo shines as the best of the pack. it's a pity there aren't more roles in hollywood that suit his skills.

      --
      Chris "Ng" Jones
      cmsj@tenshu.net
      www.tenshu.net
    5. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Mortensen always plays all his parts with his whole heart. In "A Perfect Murder", he played an artist, and all the art in the character's studio, Viggo painted himself. I thought that was very impressive.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    6. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by kcurtis · · Score: 1

      Gods, how I hate to be a "me too, me too", but I was just amazed by the cast as a whole. Viggo seems like a true actor, and also someone who would be great to go fishing with.

      The selection of Mortenson, McKellan and Lee was fantastic, and their insight into the movie was great. Actually, even Liv Tyler's commentary was entertaining, and she's probably the most light-weight actor/tress of them all.

      The difference between the youthful hobbit characters and the older (except Legolas), more distinguished humans and elves was remarkable, and is definitely reflected in their performance. And even Legolas was more reserved, as befits his character.

      The director, Peter Jackson, discussed how he had the hobbits come in early, together, and build a camaraderie. He also talks about how Christopher Lee is one of those people who reads LOTR every year, and didn't really need character development direction. Indeed, having a few stage actors around, and Lee's great voice and presence, definitely helps the movie.

      The only downside was that, in an effort to avoid spoilers, info about the 2nd and 3rd movies is avoided. It would have made the DVD even better- but I'm sure they'll get me coming and going, and I'll buy that set when it is out.

    7. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stuart Townsend was originally cast as Aragorn.

    8. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by kubrick · · Score: 2

      Which if my calculations are correct, Aragorn is supposed to be at least in his 50s - going on the basis of the Story of Arwen and Aragorn (in the appendix).

      Wasn't his overall lifespan pretty high, though, in true "heroic" fashion? I get 206 going by the dates in "The Complete Guide to Middle Earth". Also by the dates given there, he was 77 when he met Frodo and companions in the Prancing Pony.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    9. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by Bunji+X · · Score: 1

      He also made the only performance worth remembering in Crimson tide. Well, he and George Dzundza.

      --
      ---
      The combined human population is enough to feed every living tiger for app. 28000 years.
    10. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by Datafage · · Score: 1

      Heh, I'm on the cheerleading team and we have girls who've finished routines they sprain their ankles in halfway through, smiling the whole time. It's amazing what some people do.

      --

      Nicotine free Amish .sig.

    11. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Interesting
      And don't forget that he was called in when they were already shooting. The original actor was cast "too young". Which if my calculations are correct, Aragorn is supposed to be at least in his 50s - going on the basis of the Story of Arwen and Aragorn (in the appendix). After being in NZ for two days he had to shoot Weathertop.


      Well, that's the official line, yes. I believe in reality it had rather more to do with the original actor blowing up mailboxes in the neighborhood in Wellington he was staying in.


      Jedidiah

    12. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by dr00g911 · · Score: 2

      I (just yesterday) got finished watching all seven hours of extras on the Extended DVD set (FOTR).

      I have to say, coming out of that, that I've got huge amounts of respect for the actors and production team.

      I've been on film shoots before, and I have to tell you guys that the amount of love and dedication to the craft and art displayed by these guys is really amazing. The stories about Mortensen actually treating his sword and armor as if they were real, and coming to grips with the character give the guy pretty high marks in my book. He's pretty eloquent and takes his art VERY seriously.

      I was particularly impressed with the actors' sequences. They really convinced me that they digested, understood and respected the material and their roles.

      Not to be a glaring commercial for the extended set, but if you're into the films or into the books or both, at least rent the set and watch for the amount of nuance, (mind-blowing) detail and love these guys put into these films. It's mind-boggling to me still, and let me enjoy the film from a much more intimate standpoint.

    13. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by dank113 · · Score: 1

      The originally cast actor (I refuse to name him...

      me too:

      http://pro.imdb.com/name/nm0870204/

      --
      what if the hokey-pokey _is_ what it's all about?
    14. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by rotenberry · · Score: 2, Funny

      "...said in an interview that Wellington is the arsehole of the world..."

      Then I guess he was just passing through.

    15. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by BoneFlower · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure how old he got to... Normal humans could expect 120 barring violent death IIRC... the descendants of Numenor often lived even longer.

    16. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by BoneFlower · · Score: 2

      Liv Tyler impressed me most- McKellan and Lee, well I knew they would do a good job. The new people, well I didn't have an idea what to expect, so I was pretty open to seeing horrible acting and equally open to seeing brilliant acting.

      But when I heard Liv Tyler was playing Arwen, I thought "well, Arwen was supposed to be the most beautiful woman in the world, so I guess they figured they needed a hot piece of ass for the role". But WOW. She actually pulled it off and I was thinking of her as Arwen, NOT as Liv Tyler.

    17. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by BoneFlower · · Score: 2

      When you are truly commited to something, NOTHING can stop you.

    18. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those of us *without* a subscription to the Pro version of IMDB, click here

    19. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by drew · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm a bigot, but I hadn't expected an actor's commentary to be so perceptive and nuanced.

      well, besides being a really good actor, you might be surprized to know that he's also an artist and a writer, and has conducted a symphony playing music he wrote.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    20. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      And don't forget that he was called in when they were already shooting. The original actor was cast "too young". Which if my calculations are correct, Aragorn is supposed to be at least in his 50s - going on the basis of the Story of Arwen and Aragorn (in the appendix). After being in NZ for two days he had to shoot Weathertop.

      Remember, though, that Aragorn is one of the last of Numenor, who were granted lifespan far greater than that of normal men. Originally from the isle of Numenor, the long life and hardiness of Aragorn and his people was a reward for fighting with the Valar against the original enemy, Morgoth. (As an aside, you may note that when Gandalf falls into darkness, his foe is identified as a "Balrog of Morgoth")

      So Aragorn is older than he appears, but one cannot compare him to normal men because of his noble lineage.

    21. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by frankie · · Score: 2
      Aragorn is supposed to be at least in his 50s

      Shamelessly taking from Usenet research and Appendix B of Red Book:

      Aragorn was born in Third Age year 2931, and he meets Frodo at the Prancing Pony on September 29, 3018. He is therefore 88 years old, but as a true Numenorean he is still in the prime of his life. 60 years of wandering the wilderness will take some toll on your skin, though.

      King Elessar (Aragorn) gave up the ghost at the age of 210, by an act of will. His physique at that point was comparable to a modern man in his 60s.

  28. interesting by selectspec · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "...you can still usually tell when something is synthetic. But we'll soon be crossing over into a time where that's not possible."


    I think we're pretty close to this already. I remember watching the sept 11 planes hitting the towers and thinking it looked "fake" like a movie, simply because it was too incredible believe.

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

    1. Re:interesting by ArsonPerBuilding · · Score: 1

      The mods choose the catagory, you choose a subject.

      --
      1 tequila 2 tequila 3 tequila floor
    2. Re:interesting by Sebastopol · · Score: 2


      There were 24 CG scenes in Demi Moore's "Showgirls".

      CG appears in far more movies than you would ever expect.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    3. Re:interesting by tritab · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is that you are right. Quite a few people I know who watched the second plane hit (I was one of them) didn't quite know what to believe. I had to wonder if the entire thing was some "War of the Worlds" fiasco for our generation.

    4. Re:interesting by beanyk · · Score: 1
      There were 24 CG scenes in Demi Moore's "Showgirls".

      CG appears in far more movies than you would ever expect.


      Uh-uh. Demi Moore's film was Striptease. Showgirls was someone else entirely.

      But since I bothered posting this, can I ask which film you actually had in mind? I saw the latter (God it was bad) but not the former.
    5. Re:interesting by hoagieslapper · · Score: 1

      Demi Moore was in Striptease. Elizabeth Berkly was in Showgirls.

    6. Re:interesting by RedWizzard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. I noticed that a lot of the people who complained that the CG in Fellowship was bad were only complaining about the bits that had to be CG - the cave troll, gollum, the eagle. Most of the CG went completely unnoticed because it was so seamless and realistic.

    7. Re:interesting by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      Elizabeth Berkley, yunno, Zac's girlfriend from Saved By The Bell.

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    8. Re:interesting by blancolioni · · Score: 2

      But since I bothered posting this, can I ask which film you actually had in mind? I saw the latter (God it was bad) but not the former.

      The movie with CG shots is Showgirls.

      Striptease is horrible ... I couldn't watch the whole thing even though I'd, um, sent my brain on a little journey. Showgirls, on the other hand, is wildly underrated. I won't bother defending this, but it's nevertheless true.

      Anyway, the CG: little things like making the (water) fountains bigger. Touches that you wouldn't normally notice as CG. Apparently the male dancers were all playing it straight before the computers were called in.

    9. Re:interesting by keller · · Score: 1
      You've still got to admit that, some of these CG bits are horrible...
      I am yet to see a movie where actual characters get on the back of a CG object - as happened with the cave-troll - which is the slightest bit realistic. The lighting and shadows are fine, but the movement is absolutely terrible.


      It is not very difficult to make realistically looking CG, as long as it isn't the center of attention. All of your examples are exactly that.

      --

      Enig? Det alt for hot det smor!

    10. Re:interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Hey! I haven't seen "Sept 11" yet, and now you ruined it to me! :)

    11. Re:interesting by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      You've still got to admit that, some of these CG bits are horrible...

      I am yet to see a movie where actual characters get on the back of a CG object - as happened with the cave-troll - which is the slightest bit realistic.

      There are bits that jar somewhat, sure. But you shouldn't judge the movie's effects as a whole on a handful of less than perfect shots. Shots which aren't that bad anyway. IMO people are not evaluating them objectively because when they see them their brains are telling them "that's CG" regardless of what their eyes tell them. Your complaint about the cave troll is a case in point - you clearly didn't know that the characters on the cave troll's back were also CG - so the movement is accurate as far as physics goes. You seem to be complaining about compositing that never happened. If the movement didn't look right in a live action shot it wouldn't bother you but since you know it is CG you blaim the effects.
      It is not very difficult to make realistically looking CG, as long as it isn't the center of attention. All of your examples are exactly that.
      So why has no one been complaining about the Nazgul's horses at the ford, or the tentacles of the Watcher, or the fellowship itself running across the Bridge (in in some of the shots on the stairs). All these things were the centre of attention and also CG yet most people didn't realise that and there have been few complaints.
    12. Re:interesting by keller · · Score: 1
      Your complaint about the cave troll is a case in point - you clearly didn't know that the characters on the cave troll's back were also CG...

      Well not for all of the shots, close-up of Legolas, for example... The physics of these kind of shots doesn't match the physics of the pure CG shots. I'm sure they have a really good P-engine but it is definately not good enough yet.


      So why has no one been complaining about the Nazgul's horses at the ford,

      Granted, I can't from menory say which shots are CG, but if it's the part where they are taken over by the river you mean, then nobody complained about the river shaped as a horse either, and here in particular, I'm sure that the river got more attention than the horses...

      or the tentacles of the Watcher,

      you tell me... does it look realistic? Nobody knows! Is it CG well of course it is, and everybody knows! Could you tell that it was CG? Definately! This was better than the Cave-troll IMO, but not perfect.

      or the fellowship itself running across the Bridge

      Again here I cannot give specific shots that are CG, but what is the center of attention here? Is it the Fellowship? The camera is flying all over the place, and a thousand things are happening, so you are not focused on the characters only... Of course the most obvious and badly made examples are pointed out. I'm sure some /.'er has sat down and scrutinized the movie, writing down every little CG detail that was flawed.

      And adding to your list how about the Balrog? I loved the way they made it, so I won't complain (much). As great as I thought it was, the physics are still not good enough. Yet nobody complains about this, why? Because people find it better than a lot of the other CG in the movie.


      I think a good experiment would be to convince them a particular movie was made without CG, and afterwards make them point out what they believe to be CG anymays. That way the subjectivity you are talking about would be gone. I'm sure there would be stuff that wasn't identified, but a lot would also be revealed. Guess we won't find out today...

      --

      Enig? Det alt for hot det smor!

  29. get your ad-free version on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  30. 2 repeats in 1 day... by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    What is this Fark? This has gotta be some kind of record

  31. Fuzzy Logic.... by tgrotvedt · · Score: 1
    Fuzzy logic sounds very cool, but is it just a buzz word? In the article there is mention that the models don't think in the traditional way: If (condition) Then (command).

    However, it seems that fuzzy logic can have slightly different meanings in different contexts.

    --
    What makes a man want to be a mouse? (Python's Flying Circus)
    1. Re:Fuzzy Logic.... by bmwm3nut · · Score: 1

      yes, fuzzy logic is, imho, a buzz word. what people mean when they say fuzzy logic is that there isn't a definate yes or no answer, but a probability, then the computer picks the next step by the probability. fuzzy logic defines a broad range of things that are better described by the algorithms used:

      the baysian spam filter we read so much about is "fuzzy logic", it uses baysian algorithms to calculate the probability that mail is spam, and then it takes certain actions depending on that probability (e.g. delete mail when the probability of being spam is greater than 95%).

      the algorithm that recognizes your handwriting on a palm pilot uses "fuzzy logic". i'm not sure, but i'd bet that it has a neural network in there that looks at what you write and comes up with a probability that it's an a,b,c...and so on, and then picks the one with the highest probability.

      i'm betting that in this "massive" program, the "nodes" and "connections" that the author describes are also the elements of a neural network. each creature/monster/whatever you want to call it, takes input from a number of things (what it sees, what it feels, how angry it is, etc) and through the use of a neural network predicts what it's move should be (swing sword, run, climb latter, etc) and the one with the highest probability gets executed. - this is only how i THINK it works, i know no more about "massive" than what i just read in the arcitle.

    2. Re:Fuzzy Logic.... by tgrotvedt · · Score: 1

      hi,

      mod this comment down please, i accidentally hit Submit halfway through my comment, the complete one is further down

      --
      What makes a man want to be a mouse? (Python's Flying Circus)
    3. Re:Fuzzy Logic.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If (condition) then (command)

      Actually, it's more like this:

      If (condition and random_number) then (command)

      The fuzzy part of the process is letting the computer guess the random number...

    4. Re:Fuzzy Logic.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know lots of models who obviously think using fuzzy logic.

  32. From the article... by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 5, Funny
    Regelous' laptop still contains an early sequence in which a pair of fighters--an Orc and a human--began a strange dance borne of too-finely balanced combat and obstacle avoidance modules.

    This kind of reminds me of the middle-school "proms" we would have at graduation.

    --
    Forget the whales - save the babies.
  33. More on Massive on the FotR DVDs by PeekabooCaribou · · Score: 1

    The special features on the new Fellowship of the Ring DVD set has a bit to say on Massive as well. Pretty interesting stuff.. I hope at some point we get to see the various testing stages of these battles, when they didn't quite work out as expected. =) (The earlier comment about "actors" running away from each other as an example.)

    --
    "I'll say it again for the logic-impaired." -- Larry Wall.
  34. Ah, the "Python-Camelot" defense tactic... by Rai · · Score: 5, Funny

    RUNAWAY!!

    1. Re:Ah, the "Python-Camelot" defense tactic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! Brave Sir Robin, he bravely ran away!

  35. I felt nothing in the Ep 1 battle by bugnuts · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the star wars episode 1 big battle, it looked like a bunch of CGI fighting more CGI. Granted part were robots, but they all looked robotic. I felt nothing, and it was due to the obvious cgi and actions.

    Sounds like Massive may do it right, assuming the graphics and actions are both believable. This sounds to be quite promising!

    1. Re:I felt nothing in the Ep 1 battle by dswensen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In the star wars episode 1 big battle, it looked like a bunch of CGI fighting more CGI. Granted part were robots, but they all looked robotic. I felt nothing, and it was due to the obvious cgi and actions.

      Yeah, and in Empire Strikes Back all the AT-ATs look to me like models that are being clumsily animated with stop-motion, and Jabba looks like a puppet whose lips don't match the words, and there are big dark grey boxes aroung all the TIE fighters.

      But my imagination took up the slack. I don't know where the idea came from that CGI is somehow supposed to supplant the moviegoing imagination. I think, ironically, it's because the effects look very close to realistic, but not 100% indistinguishable. Perhaps if they looked worse, the audience's imagination could fill in the gaps, but I doubt that will work anymore -- the audience simply expects too much.

      No, the battle in Episode I is not easily mistaken for the "real" thing -- but it wouldn't have been any more convincing, IMHO, if it were a dozen guys running around in rubber Gungan suits as squibs go off all around. (Although it probably would have been funnier, at the very least.)

      So, no. CGI isn't perfect. Special effects have limitations. They always have. I don't know why, all of a sudden, they're expected not to.

  36. Yeah, still... by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 5, Funny


    <HUMOR>
    We still need to get Jackson to rename the movie, because he's obviously trying to cash in on 9/11!
    </HUMOR>

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    1. Re:Yeah, still... by craenor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Personally...I think they should change the title, "Return of the King". It's an afront to Elvis, the King never died, he doesn't have to return.

    2. Re:Yeah, still... by chopkins1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, according to MIB team member "K" (Tommy Lee Jones) he only went home.

    3. Re:Yeah, still... by fungus · · Score: 2

      I can't beleive 3598 signed that petition...

    4. Re:Yeah, still... by Nerull · · Score: 1

      Actually, if its the same petition i looked through before, most (almost all, in fact) of those signatures are actually flames, and not endorsements.

    5. Re:Yeah, still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the second entry is Klerck, so its obviously horse shit.

    6. Re:Yeah, still... by Fryboy · · Score: 1

      http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi? twotower&1501

      Its not so much "signed" the petition, as scrawled a large 'X' and spat on it.

    7. Re:Yeah, still... by rmohr02 · · Score: 2

      Well, just think of the people that support this movement.

    8. Re:Yeah, still... by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

      I think "Return of the King" refers to Georgw W. Bush. It's scheduled to open on December 2003, about the time Dubya pulls a Palpatine...

  37. Slower than Doom III by scotay · · Score: 5, Funny

    A 50,000 character particle system would run slower than Doom III!!!

    This Massive stuff will be slow on the fastest next-generation movie theater accelerators even with tons of memory.

    When the credits are rolling, the frame rates might be okay, but in the battle scene I bet they drop to around 24fps.

    1. Re:Slower than Doom III by Some+Wanker · · Score: 0, Redundant

      These scenes are not generated in real time.

      There is a big difference between real-time (game) and cinematic rendering. Movies can and do take longer then 1 second to render 1 second of film, they fix quality and vary time to render. Games only have one second to render one second, and thus vary quality.

      Once the frames of a cinematic sequence have been rendered, they go to film (disk first really), and are played back at full speed. Which is how game pre-generated cinematics are done as well.

      IWAGP (I was a game producer)

    2. Re:Slower than Doom III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IWAGP (I was a game producer)

      you were? lemme guess why you arent anymore..

      you take things too seriously, you were working on a FPS game, and thought murder was wrong so when the player shot a bad guy, the cops would come and arrest your character, and bring the bad guy to the hospital., then the rest of the game would be you sitting in jail for life.

      DUMBASS HE WAS MAKING A JOKE, ANYONE WHO THINKS A MOVIE CAN BE RENDERED REALTIME IS A GEORGE W BUSH, I MEAN MORON.

    3. Re:Slower than Doom III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh... you missed the joke dude.

      24fps should have given it away...

    4. Re:Slower than Doom III by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Where's the mod for "Hook, Line, and Sinker"?

      --
      Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
    5. Re:Slower than Doom III by sean23007 · · Score: 2

      Dude, 24 fps kills. When they pan the screen across a lot of small things, my eyes pop out of my head, look me in the sockets, and ask "Why the hell couldn't they have chosen 30? It couldn't have been that much harder, and it's ever so much closer to the necessary 100 that keep us in there." I hate it when they do that.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    6. Re:Slower than Doom III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hidden inside the "+1 Funny" mod. Seems like these mods on cracks didn't notice.

    7. Re:Slower than Doom III by Scooter · · Score: 2

      Yeah and what if they had taken the AI from QIII?

      "Pete we've got problems with Massive - on that last take, Orc 5345 spontaneously aquired a rail gun and slayed 2000 Elves with one shot.. "

      That'll teach em to stand in a neat line :)

      "WTF are the elves doing?"
      "I believe they're camping the flag.."

      Orc 456: "I 0wn j00!"
      Legolas: "Lag! dammit!"

      Gandalf "Forget the damm ring - go for the quad!!"

      Jackson: "Ok you're fired - get me 50,000 scruffy looking dudes, pronto!"

    8. Re:Slower than Doom III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahahahahhaahhahahhahahhaahhahahahahaha

      I think i just wet myself!

      I cant wait till december.

      all i want for christmas is a 2gb avi file of the two towers!

      and to see that Q3 battle!

    9. Re:Slower than Doom III by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Actually, here's a true story very similar to that.

      Mutant Marsupials Take Up Arms Against Australian Air Force

      The reuse of some object-oriented code has caused tactical headaches for Australia's armed forces. As virtual reality simulators assume larger roles in helicopter combat training , programmers have gone to great lengths to increase the realism of the their scenarios, including detailed landscapes and -- in the case of the Northern Territory's Operation Phoenix -- herds of kangaroos (since groups of disturbed animals might well give away a helicopters position).

      The head of the Defense Science and Technology Organization's Land Operations/Simulations division reportedly instructed developers to model the local marsupials' movements and reaction to helicopters.

      Being efficient programmers, they just re-appropriated some code originally used to model infantry detachments reactions under the same stimuli, changed the mapped icon from a soldier to a kangaroo, and increased the figures' speed of movement.

      Eager to demonstrate their flying skills for some visiting American pilots, the hotshot Aussies "buzzed" the virtual kangaroos in low flight during a simulation. The kangaroos scattered, as predicted, and the Americans nodded appreciatively . . . and then did a double-take as the kangaroos reappeared from behind a hill and launched a barrage of stinger missiles at the hapless helicopter. (Apparently the programmers had forgotten the remove "that" part of the infantry coding).

      The lesson? Objects are defined with certain attributes, and any new object defined in terms of the old one inherits all the attributes. The embarrassed programmers had learned to be careful when reusing object-oriented code, and the Yanks left with the utmost respect for the Australian wildlife.

      Simulator supervisors report that pilots from that point onwards have strictly avoided kangaroos, just as they were meant to.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  38. Particles Vs. Agents by _Sambo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We may witness the birth of Agent Smith's (of Matrix fame) Ancestors. Agents are nearly independent reactive creations, using Fuzzy Logic (not to be confused with Dubya's Fuzzy Numbers) to simulate reality... if the battle were a reality.

    Particle Technology such as that used in the Charge of the Huns in Disney's "Mulan" is now yesterday's fishwrapping-newspaper software, worthy of MST3K review.

  39. I love this game by mekkab · · Score: 5, Informative

    okay, lesse,

    Citizen Cain,
    Thelma & Louis,
    Crying Game
    Titanic
    The sixth sense

    This game is GREAT!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:I love this game by mjc_w · · Score: 1

      What is Titanic doing in this list? It just has
      the standard plot of boy meets ship, boy gets
      ship, boy loses ship.

      --
      This is the Constitution.This is the Constitution under the Bush administration. Any questions?
    2. Re:I love this game by Carmody · · Score: 2

      if you love this game, take the Andy spoiler quiz

      http://www.dougshaw.com/puzzles/spoilers.html

      --
      God is real unless declared integer
    3. Re:I love this game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be Citizen KANE, if you please.

      It's a great day on Slashdot when shit like that makes a +5 Informative.

    4. Re:I love this game by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2

      I thought I'd farm one out to the female crowd.

      Well, the female contingent.

      Okay, okay, the one female who reads Slashdot.

      Lou: "Do you hold a grudge against Montgomery Burns?"
      Moe: "No!" BZZZ
      "OK, maybe I did, but I didn't shot him!" DING!
      Lou: "Checks out chief. OK, sir, you're free to go."
      Moe: "Good, because I got a hot date tonight!" BZZZ
      "A date." BZZZ
      "Dinner with friend." BZZZ
      "Dinner alone." BZZZ
      "Watching TV alone." BZZZ
      "Alright, alright! I'm gunna sit at home and oggle the girls in the Victoria's Secret Catalog!" BZZZ
      "Sears catalog." DING
      "Now will you unhook this thing already! I don't desirve this shabby treatment!" BZZZ

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
  40. No one believed me... by tellezj · · Score: 1

    But I always knew that Tron was a revolutionary film, but everyone always just said I was crazy. "What audiences will see on December 18 marks another step on the road to creating digital characters that feel so real that viewers can't tell them from their flesh-and-blood Hollywood co-actors, a journey that started two decades ago with Tron."

    --

    End of Line.

    1. Re:No one believed me... by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1

      Excuse me for not remembering properly, but weren't the Tron characters simply actors in funky outfits?

    2. Re:No one believed me... by kpansky · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but you're missing the point. It was _the_ first movie to use computers in a very direct and visible way. The first time you saw a character "glow" was the very first combination of live action and computer animation in a seamless (more or less) way.

      Truly revolutionary. Sorta like the first guy to combine peanuts and beer.

      --

      --Kevin
  41. Fuzzy Logic by tgrotvedt · · Score: 1
    Fuzzy logic sounds very cool, but is it just a buzz word? In the article there is mention that the models don't think in the traditional way: If (condition) Then (command).

    However, it seems that fuzzy logic can have slightly different meanings in different contexts. Seatle Robotics: A Fuzzy Introduction explains that fuzzy logic lets a machine arrive at a definite conclusion "based upon vague, ambiguous, imprecise, noisy, or missing input information".

    The introduction then goes on to explain that:

    "FL incorporates a simple, rule-based IF X AND Y THEN Z approach to a solving control problem..."

    This completely condtradicts the Popular Science article, so either one is incorrect or the meaning of FL is kind of.... fuzzy....

    Stop me if I'm wrong, stop me if I'm wrong

    --
    What makes a man want to be a mouse? (Python's Flying Circus)
    1. Re:Fuzzy Logic by dlakelan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Look up info on Fuzzy expert systems.

      In general a fuzzy expert system has a slew of if-then rules.

      Each If-then rule has a condition that is expressed as a fuzzy membership function, and a consequent that is expressed as a fuzzy membership function.

      All the if-then rules are applied "in parallel" to produce a set of fuzzy output sets. These fuzzy output sets are combined in a process called defuzzification (there are many algorithms for this) to produce a definite action (ie. move forward).

      The very cool thing about fuzzy rules is that they are generally expressed in terms of linguistic statements that make sense, as in

      "if attacked then fight_back" and
      "if attacked_heavily then retreat".

      attacked, fight_back, attacked_heavily, and retreat are all "fuzzy sets" (usually represented as arrays).

      --
      ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) http://www.endpointcomputing.com a scientific approach to custom computing.
  42. The better point ... by pgrote · · Score: 2

    I think most people saw it and thought the same thing. I know when I saw it I thought of Die Hard for some reason right away. It was amazing.

    As time has passed I still fire up the video clips and am amazed that Hollywood has come so far. So far in that they could duplicate an effect like that without injuring anyone.

    And right there is the point. We've become so enamored with what movies can do and bring us that we're to the point where it does mimic real life. If you extrapolate that out to the fantasy environment we're seeing things that man hasn't seen in a long time or ever.

    For instance think of the work on Jurassic Park. We weren't around when the dinos were, but we have the best look at what they might have moved like. Amazing.

    I can't wait for the next generation of effects.

    1. Re:The better point ... by ZaMoose · · Score: 3

      Yeah, it was almost like some bad Jerry Bruckheimer movie, wasn't it?

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    2. Re:The better point ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We weren't around when the dinos were, but we have the best look at what they might have moved like. Amazing.

      No, the dinosaurs in the movies were too fast. Some researchers did some calculations on the amount of muscle mass needed for those kind of movements and it turned out to be ridculously large that it was improbable.

    3. Re:The better point ... by Soulslayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That issue of the Onion is one of the most amazing things I have ever seen in my entire life. I remember when it first came out.

      I mean yes, those guys have done a wonderful job of producing biting satire for years, but to tackle a subject that sensitive so soon after the event itself was something no one in their right minds would do. And yet The Onion managed to find small glimmers of dark dark humour in an otherwise depressing event while still paying great respect to those that lost their lives and not feeling like an attempt to wring attention out of a horrible event.

      Using humour to pay respect to a tragedy like Sept 11th is an enormous challenge. The Onion made it looks easy.

      I found this article in particular to be a perfect balance of the two: God Angrily Clarifies "Don't Kill" Rule.

      --


      Once more unto the breach dear friends...
    4. Re:The better point ... by Blackneto · · Score: 1

      That weeks Onion was fucking brilliant.
      The Onion crew really put themselves out there and won.
      This one line in the article you linked summed the 9/11 events up well:
      "In the movies, when the president says, 'It's war,' that usually means the good part is just about to begin," said hardware-store owner Thom Garner of Cedar Rapids, IA. "Why doesn't it feel that way now? It doesn't feel like the good part is about to begin at all. It feels there's never going to be another good part again."

      --
      Ursula Andress, Catherine Deneuve, and Charo, twice...
  43. Re:I can't wait for this! by prockcore · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who needs Star Wars, real geeks know what they love! And it's not Luca, let me tell you!

    My name is Lucas.. I created Episode 4. I live upstairs from you. I think you worshipped me before.

  44. It reminds me... by spagiola · · Score: 1

    of the story of the programming team asked to create realistic scenery software for a helicopter simulator to be demo'd in Australia. They decided it would be cute to have herds of kangaroos that would scatter if the helicopter flew low over them, as in all those National Geographic documentaries. So they found some code from an infantry war game that already had the desired scattering behavior and re-used it, replacing the soldier images with kangaroo images. And sure enough, the kangaroos scattered on cue when the helicopter flew over -- and then the 'roos ducked behind a hill and fired shoulder-mounted missiles back at the helicopter!

  45. Wheeeee! by Cervantes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ok, I know I can't be the only one who wants a copy of this to run on my own. Fuck the Sims, I want MASSIVE!

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  46. 50,000? by more+fool+you · · Score: 1

    wasn't there more "participants" in the book?

    1. Re:50,000? by guile*fr · · Score: 1

      in the book gangalf explictly says to treebeard that he have to deal with 10,000 orcs...

    2. Re:50,000? by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      I guess I need to reread it, but I always imagined the battles (both at Helms Deep and at Minas Tirith) as being a lot smaller than this. Anyone recall if JRRT actually mentioned numbers?

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    3. Re:50,000? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

      Yes, I believe so. What's more, Tolkien had names and complete family histories for every single one, too.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  47. ...vast hordes... by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 5, Funny
    vast hordes of eager filmgoers will mob cineplexes across the land...

    Forget your piddly 100K of Orcs. I can't wait to see the CGI scene showing that horde charging the theatres!!

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  48. A Bonk with the Clue-bat by FreeUser · · Score: 5, Insightful

    RTFA. Massive isn't open-source and their is no mention of what hardware they used either.

    The software is running on a cluster of GNU/Linux boxes. That is what he is likely referring to, and while this article may make no reference to the operating system, device drivers, libraries, and compilers used both to compile Massive itself, and to support the cluster upon which its renders run, it is well documented in any number of places, findable by google, and such common knowledge by most who read slashdot that he probably didn't feel the need to elucidate further.

    The growth of GNU/Linux in Hollywood, the financial industry (in which I work), and any number of other areas of serious computational endeavor is indeed a very big victory for free software and open source, and a glaring black eye for the likes of Microsoft. One of free software's strongest advantages is the way it facilitates rapid development, maintenance, and long term stability of in-house software (by avoiding things like coerced upgrades, arbitrarilly moving API targets, shoddy infrastructure, poor security, and other such costly and detrimental things that Microsoft & Co. are so well known for).

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:A Bonk with the Clue-bat by ender81b · · Score: 2

      I stand corrected still he should've at least mentioned that in his post rather than make a blatant "victory for open source" without explaining why exactly this would be/is a victory for open source.

    2. Re:A Bonk with the Clue-bat by PissedOffGuy · · Score: 1

      why is this insightful? first, its wrong, and second, the only free software advantage here is that its free. if youre running custom software on a render farm, the OS isnt providing anything anyway.

    3. Re:A Bonk with the Clue-bat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These markets were traditionally dominated by Unix. All Linux has done is help to kill off UNIX, increasing Microsoft's relative share of R&D (since Sun, SGI, et al. have been forced to reduce R&D while MS continues to increase it).

  49. Massive is now for sale on CD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    At only $50 it is a steal.
    Available for Mac OS X, Win32 and Linux.

    AA Batteries and Beowulf Cluster not provided.

    1. Re:Massive is now for sale on CD. by sgtsanity · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they would probably make you buy a copy for each participant in your battle.

      I love sneaky marketing.

    2. Re:Massive is now for sale on CD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says on their website that its going for $40,000. I'll just wait till it comes out on kazaa, it only runs on Linux and Irix though

  50. The cell phone user orcs... by Peterus7 · · Score: 1
    God, cell phones are everywhere! Even in middle earth! Dear god, that battle scene is gonna rock.

    I love how some of the orcs when programmed for survival ran away, that's great. Adds realism, I think.

    And for return of the king, 100000 guys? Holy crap, they'll kill their processors before they get that... And if they manage to do that, they'll kill the audience by overloading their brain!

  51. Watch out for the cellphone user in TT though by chopkins1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I found it rather amusing that one of the quotes from this story says, "...keep an eye out for a background character in The Two Towers who, in the middle of the battle, seems to take a call on his cellphone."

    1. Re:Watch out for the cellphone user in TT though by Bunji+X · · Score: 1

      That made me wonder, what kind of fuzzy logic would make a CG fighter character make moves like that?

      "Ûrhkud speaking." ... "No hon, there are like thousands of humans, elves here, don't expect me home for dinner ... ... Add weird walking trees to that. No, no dinner. Bye, love you too."

      --
      ---
      The combined human population is enough to feed every living tiger for app. 28000 years.
    2. Re:Watch out for the cellphone user in TT though by Cinnibar+CP · · Score: 2

      I found it rather amusing that one of the quotes from this story says, "...keep an eye out for a background character in The Two Towers who, in the middle of the battle, seems to take a call on his cellphone."

      "Can you hear me now? .... Good, good..."

    3. Re:Watch out for the cellphone user in TT though by chopkins1 · · Score: 1

      Of course, considering they blew out the wall defending Helm's Deep with some kind of explosives, maybe he was calling in an air strike or mortar bombardment.

  52. Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some get it - some don't. You didn't.

  53. Did You Feel Anything in LOTR FoTR? by FreeUser · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the star wars episode 1 big battle, it looked like a bunch of CGI fighting more CGI. Granted part were robots, but they all looked robotic. I felt nothing, and it was due to the obvious cgi and actions.

    Did you feel anything in the opening sequence of the Fellowship of the Ring, at the battle where Isildur cut the ring from Sauron's hand? If so, that would confirm your evaluation of massive (at least for yourself), and would quite frankly agree with mine.

    OTOH Star Wars I and II were without feeling for reasons having nothing to do with the quality of the computer animation and special effects, and everything to do with terrible writing, mediocre directing, and wooden delivery ... something I doubt any of the LOTR movies suffer from, but I digress. :-)

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:Did You Feel Anything in LOTR FoTR? by fiftyfly · · Score: 1
      and wooden delivery ... something I doubt any of the LOTR movies suffer from, but I digress. :-)

      Well, I know that I'm expecting great things from treants in TTT ;p

      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
    2. Re:Did You Feel Anything in LOTR FoTR? by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 2



      Haha, funny.

      Just for your information, it's Treebeard and he is an Ent.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  54. Waldo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The real question is, Where's Waldo?

  55. The nerve! by SpiffyMarc · · Score: 1

    I know dude, can you believe they published the entire script to these movies in book form?! Talk about spoilers...

    I saw that in stores and was like, horrified. :)

  56. Out of date already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been playing a game called "Medieval: Total war" and IT has thousands of combatants bashing each other with swords, in real-time, on a "simple" P4 laptop. Even though the game (cleverly) uses sprites, and the TTT render uses every 3d trick in the book, when I saw the LOTR:TTT trailer, I was surprised how under-impressed I felt. It is amazing that modern games can even come close to "feeling" like these scenes rendered at great cost and time. The game has the thrill of interaction,sure, but still amazing how it stole the awe of the TTT trailer for me!! Anyone else feel the same?

    BTW, I wonder how long before we are playing games that look as good as TTT render?

  57. I like this movie and all, but where are the by Real+World+Stuff · · Score: 0

    underrepresented population actors. There are hardly any actors of color working in this film. Sure, label me a troll, but I hardly believe that Tolkiens universe is as lily white as this movie represents. Just my $.085 CDN.



    --
    If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
    1. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actors of colour? I hardly think that a species where an entire gender is missing doesn't classify as being "of colour".

      Or do you have something against the Ents?

      But if you're being serious, there's Irish representation here. And the Irish are pretty colourful.

      --
      Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
    2. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by Elentar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Anyone who has read Tolkien's works with half an eye open for cultural stereotypes was probably surprised at how much of the real world pops out in them.

      It is important to understand that Tolkien was raised in a different culture, before racial equality (as opposed to simple racial tolerance) began to be accepted and widespread. I love his books as much as ever, and I can appreciate that he was writing using the cultural ideas of the time. It is not that he wished to be racist - but rather, he had learned that his readers would expect evil to be physically apparent in the form of dark skin and short stature.

      Middle Earth is comprised of vast lands between the ever-shining light of the Uttermost West and the dark, lost lands of the East. Also, because the Elves travelled over the northern ice to reach Middle Earth, the areas to the south are also considered less enlightened.

      The populations of the southern lands are described as 'swarthy' and untrustworthy, and the further east you go the shorter, darker, and less civilized the peoples of Middle Earth (also known as Europe) become. It takes little effort to realize that Numenor, from which the race of kings from which Aragorn is descended comes, is the Isle of Britain and that Eressea, the final stop before the Undying Lands, is Ireland.

      In the Silmarillion, the world is bent from flat to spherical so that no mortal may ever sail the way to the divine lands again. So I'm not sure whether Valinor is America, or whether America is the easternmost land, furthest from the light and wisdom of the West.

      -Elentar

      --
      The wheel it turns, around and around, with an ancient rumbling sound.
    3. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by crawdaddy · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that most people were described as fair skinned...and if their skin color was different, that was mentioned too. Also, I'm fairly certain that Middle Earth is nothing like Real Earth and hence doesn't need to reflect any kind of reality at all. Not having people "of color" in the film isn't a very big deal when you think of it in terms of reality.

    4. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 2

      I suspect the latter; Tolkien had something of a reactionary bent. His books support a belief in a natural aristocracy, rather than meritocracy. His notion of bloodlines is inconsistent with hybrid vigor. ("The race of men has declined." "The blood of Numinor has grown thin.")

      Also, living in WWII Britain, the men held the belief that there were 3 things wrong with yanks: overpaid, oversexed, and over here. A conservative might be more inclined to believe this than otherwise.

      I love the books. I don't buy the ideology.

    5. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or maybe there just weren't than many 'coloured' people back in ancient england/euorpe where the story was set in.

    6. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      So what? I see nothing wrong with an all-White cast of actors in a movie.

    7. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It worked for Titanic. Why the fuck can't we have movies presented the way the authors wrote them instead of making them politically correct? If I see another WWII 'war' movie where damn near 1/2 the plot is focused on some resistance fighter smuggling Jews out of the continent, I'm going to puke. If they ever remake Hogan's Heroes are they going to free the jewish slaves in the factories instead of blowing them up?

    8. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It is important to understand that Tolkien was raised in a different culture, before racial equality (as opposed to simple racial tolerance) began to be accepted and widespread.

      yeah, yeah, blah, blah, blah. It's better for everyone not to participate in any kind of "Tolkien was a racist" discussion, because most likely nothing fruitful will ever come from it. =)

      In the Silmarillion, the world is bent from flat to spherical so that no mortal may ever sail the way to the divine lands again. So I'm not sure whether Valinor is America, or whether America is the easternmost land, furthest from the light and wisdom of the West.

      I don't remember enough of Tolkien maps, and may be not knowing anything, so thwack me, but wasn't there a land mass east of that of Middle-Earth? Not well described, and that would have been the Americas. I was always thinking of Valinor as a third big land mass with no modern counterpart whatsoever.

      this was the best map I could find?

    9. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Geographically, what you're describing is the location of the second evil of Middle Earth, Sauron. The first evil, Morgoth, made his home much farther north and rather west of Mordor. Those southern and eastern landmarks for evil were only found in the second wave, not the first.

    10. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

      Well, orcs are kinda green, does that count? And the Balrog was black. Yeah, he's a villain, but at least he doesn't rap or sells drugs.
      Really, people who HAS to see everything through their own racist sensibilities are such lamers.
      Damn. Have to remember to stop feeding the trolls...

    11. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

      Didn't you see "Robin Hood Prince of Thieves"? If you can sign Morgan Freeman, then you can have colored people anywhere, whether it makes sense or not...

    12. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by Mike1024 · · Score: 2

      Hey,

      It takes little effort to realize that Numenor, from which the race of kings from which Aragorn is descended comes, is the Isle of Britain and that Eressea, the final stop before the Undying Lands, is Ireland.

      Tolkien repeatedly stated that he did not intend his story to be represetative of anything. Isn't it possible that you're reading too much into it?

      One could say that the Harry Potter series is about how if you want to succeed in life, you need the right parents, connections in the establishment, and natural sporting ability. But this would be, well, silly.

      It's easy to 'read in' undertones that aren't there. Sometimes it's better to enjoy a book as nothing more than fiction.

      Just my $0.02,

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
  58. warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look he by nebenfun · · Score: 5, Funny

    my friends,
    This is my last post of slashdot. After seeing this, I have decided that life is not worth living. I loved Star Trek and Tolkien and then this happened.
    Doing the real ctrl-alt-del,
    nbfn
    This is a real site...
    not goat stuff

  59. Like vants, only bloodier! by raddan · · Score: 1

    Yes, I know, there are quite a few differences, but it reminded me of this program which I spent a lot of time playing with when I was a kid hanging out in my dad's office at BBN.

  60. They've been waiting for the harware to catch up by Pac · · Score: 2

    I agree with you, I used the same package somewhere in between you two, and my son used it two years ago. Same results every time.

    I heard the problem they are having is that the new versions of their software does not run with the present hardware. They hope the Coming Singularity will solve the problem and allow the new version to be launched.

  61. OK, new category: by Jerf · · Score: 1

    OK, new category:

    It sucked.

    Good luck!

    1. Re:OK, new category: by MWelchUK · · Score: 1

      How about:

      "It was him"?

      Hint KS...

    2. Re:OK, new category: by d_i_r_t_y · · Score: 1

      oh come on, that's easy without the hint. the usual suspects.

    3. Re:OK, new category: by d_i_r_t_y · · Score: 1

      actually, without the hint it could several others: memento, fight club, ...

  62. More information on WETA and their infrastructure by CrackHappy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is an interesting article which addresses some of WETA's other issues in creating the film, and talks a little about their uses of Linux as their core OS.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
  63. To answer the question by friday2k · · Score: 5, Informative

    It runs on Irix and Massive is being ported to Linux. Quote: From the beginning of preproduction, Weta Digital has also used the IRIX OS-based Octane visual workstations to write extensions to Maya and create proprietary technology. This technology includes Massive, a custom-built crowd animation or "artificial ecology" system developed on IRIX and now ported to Linux that draws from a huge database of motion-capture data. (see here).

    1. Re:To answer the question by FreeUser · · Score: 2
      It runs on Irix, that is true. It also runs on GNU/Linux.

      "We're making pretty significant steps into Linux-based workstations. They now appear to be becoming stable enough to be a viable alternative in both the 2D and 3D space" ... Weta had just taken delivery of 25 Linux workstations from IBM and Labrie reported that IBM and Hewlett Packard were the frontrunners for additional Linux workstation upgrades.

      And, from your own quote:

      From the beginning of preproduction, Weta Digital has also used the IRIX OS-based Octane visual workstations to write extensions to Maya and create proprietary technology. This technology includes Massive, a custom-built crowd animation or "artificial ecology" system developed on IRIX and now ported to Linux that draws from a huge database of motion-capture data. [emphesis mine]

      "Ported. As in past tense. As in done. Based on that quote alone, your assertion of it "being ported" (implying an ongoing, unfinished process) is at odds with what SGI and others are saying (that the process is in fact finished), and with other technical articles on WETA and Massive that appear to indicate it is, in fact, running and being rendered on GNU/Linux systems. It is quite possible they are also rendering in Irix workstations, although the only article I found specifying the hardware mentioned that they had purchased "Silicon Graphics Octane and dual-processor 330 and 230 series Linux workstations." Unless the reporter parsed their English incorrectly (or got their facts wrong) it would appear that the massive rendering is being performed on GNU/Linux boxes (both SGI and generic intel hardware).

      If that is wrong, and you can provide a citation indicating that, I would be greatful (and more than happy to eat my own words).

      From another post [not yours!] which I'll reply to here, as this reply, and indeed yours as well, debunks rather thoroughly:

      the only free software advantage here is that its free. if youre running custom software on a render farm, the OS isnt providing anything anyway.

      To the claim that the operating system contributes nothing to the process, much less the system libraries (e.g. libc, etc.) I can only shake my head at the state of CS education today, or the quality of people claiming expertise in the field (again, not your or your post, but another in this thread which the above quotes debunk).

      The OS, whether it is Irix, FreeBSD, or GNU/Linux, contributes a great deal to the system and its capabilities, be it the clustering technology, the underlying system utilities, capabilities, and stability, the system libraries to which the applications are linked, or simply the raw speed of the operating system (in which GNU/Linux for example clobbers every Microsoft offering there is), which is certainly a non-neglibable concern in such film projects. Given that the operating system is essentially the foundation upon which all else is built, I can only shake my head that there are people reading slashdot, and believing themselves to be technically savvy, who would assert something so fundamentally wrong and trivially falsifiable as "the free software (in this case the OS) ins't providing anything." Indeed, in addition to the examples (performance, system libraries, system services, stability, clustering infrastructure, filesystem access [probably SGI's excellent XFS], security, and speed), there is the counter example of Microsoft Windows itself, whose contribution to the instability and overall flakeyness of services which rely on Windows NT, Windows XP, Windows 2k, etc., be it in terms of interoperability with other standards compliant software, security, or overall stability, is certainly non-zero. Negative, yes (and notoriously so), but, like any other operating system and platform upon which user space software runs, most emphatically non-zero and non-neglibable.
      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    2. Re:To answer the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your argument is pretty amusing, since you seem really obsessed with pretenging the OS is somehow central to 3D rendering. It isn't. The three most important things are the quality of the CPU's floating-point unit(s), the quality of the rendering software, and the ability of the compiler to generate efficient FP code for the target platform.

      Carrying on about the 'raw speed of the operating system', and other inane drivel, just exposes your ignorance.

  64. no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now go read the book.

  65. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happened to your formatting?

    Anyway.. i saw this the other day.. It seriously is the most desturbing thing I have ever seen. (and ive seen lots, im a regular reader of ogrish and goregasm and other such sites, nothing affects me)

    this is just pure evil.

  66. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by CrackHappy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh my GOD. I am going to die. I cannot breathe. I am laughing so hard, tears are rolling down my face.

    Thank you for posting this.

    I really need to stop reading /. at work.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
  67. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That has go to be the most bizarre thing I have ever seen.

  68. cell phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I hear 1 cell phone go off during the movie, I will pull out a gun and blow the mother fucker away, or just simply tear their goddamn head off with my bare hands.

  69. Re:I can't wait for this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bravo! Brilliant :)

  70. Re:I can't wait for this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, this is the royal swedish tenniscourt. There is no one living here.

  71. Re:I can't wait for this! by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

    Hey, MY name is Luca. I live on the second floor. You got some kinda friggin problem?!

  72. Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    keep an eye out for a background character in The Two Towers who, in the middle of the battle, seems to take a call on his cellphone

    Don't people ever learn? How many more people have to die before we stop using our cell phones during battle?

  73. Actually by Pac · · Score: 2

    If memory serves, OSDN made them drop "We're smarter than you. Suck it" when they bought the whole thing. But if you Google for it you may find an older version of the FAQ stating that the whole point of the site is to lash out and prove your intellectual superiority.

  74. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  75. Re:NEW CATEGORY -- I second that, only for LOTR by simetra · · Score: 2

    Please, please, please, let's have a new category for LOTR so that those of us who don't give a rat's ass about it can never see it.

    Please, oh please oh please already!

    And okay, yes, make a special category for me so you don't have to see my posts. Hardy har har, I beat you to it this time.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  76. best description of the battle yet... by tralfamador · · Score: 1

    at this review.

  77. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  78. Re:Funny comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you got it from the top of this page genius.

  79. (-1, hobbit) by StandardDeviant · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wouldn't that only be -1/2? :)

  80. You're mistaken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's an elf, a dwarf, numerous orcs, a handful of ents, and several hobbits.

  81. Re:They've been waiting for the harware to catch u by japhmi · · Score: 1

    I used the same BRAIN program several times, and each time I get a slightly different result. My wife also has a slightly different result when she reads the book. Interesting...

    --
    "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
  82. Dr. Sims Studies Virtual Battle by Vegan+Pagan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is it just a coincidence that the biggest set of virtual humans in movie history is studied by a guy called Sims?

  83. Genetic algorithms by Funkitup · · Score: 1


    One wonders why they chose to employ artists to program the agents rather than use some kind of learning or genetic algorithm to improve their behaviour - maybe this will start happening in the future when the agents start getting really complex.
    </geek mode>
    <sarcy humourous mode>
    One wonders when the time will come when you'll just be able to press a button and your movie will be generated for you. Surely it will be simpler to simulate hollywood producers first?
    </sarcy humourous mode>

    1. Re:Genetic algorithms by hengist · · Score: 1
      One wonders when the time will come when you'll just be able to press a button and your movie will be generated for you. Surely it will be simpler to simulate hollywood producers first?

      If it stops Hayden Christiansen getting in front of a camera again, I'm all for it.

  84. The real question. by compjma · · Score: 1

    All I want to know is when can I get something like as a video game on my PC? (Have cluster, will frag)

    1. Re:The real question. by CrackHappy · · Score: 1
      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
    2. Re:The real question. by lpret · · Score: 2

      Actually the Playstation 3 is supposed to be clusterable. You'll be able to share processing power and thus be able to render stuff like this. I guess some of their R&D guys read Slashdot and thought "it'd be funny if you had a beowulf clust..."

      (Sees his karma rise, then drop)

      --
      This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  85. WOW! Where can I get my own B.R.A.I.N??? by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    err. nevermind ;-)

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  86. The End of the Sims by DeadBugs · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe in a few years when the Sims Online has run it's course, they can integrate the "Massive" program and have a huge battle at the end.

    I would pay to see that.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  87. You Tool!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    autopr0n doesn't use Open Source! Ever notice the MSSQL messages? That's why the chicks are skanky.

    1. Re:You Tool!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh well, better skanky "windows" chicks than the shaved apes that use Linux...and i didn't say female.

  88. Offtopic, but interresting by Bunji+X · · Score: 1

    "A computer without a Microsoft operating system is like a dog without bricks tied to its head."

    You mean a computer without a Microsoft operating system actually floats when you drop it into water?

    Got to try that some time.

    --
    ---
    The combined human population is enough to feed every living tiger for app. 28000 years.
    1. Re:Offtopic, but interresting by Faggot · · Score: 2

      No no, you've missed the point entirely. How else is a dog going to deflect a slapshot aimed at its head?

      --

      But what do I know. I'm just looking for anonymous gay sex.

  89. OK this would really be fun. by eadint · · Score: 1

    heres the real way to do it.
    1) use the quake arena engin
    2) create the battlefield.
    3) allow a tone of people to assume a charactor.
    4) charge them to fight in the movie.
    5) invent a new kind of movie style gamming.
    hell if you dont make anything from the movie . the plaers paying for the oportunity to play will rake in the dough.
    use the gamers computers as the rendering engin for the charactors.
    have a really good time.
    a beowolf cluster that other people pay you to participate in.

    1. Re:OK this would really be fun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know full well, that if a gaming arena was turned into a movie, nothing but TeamKilling would occour.

  90. Fuzzy Logic Functions by Sheriff+Fatman · · Score: 2, Funny

    (Nicked from http://www.brunching.com/fuzzylogic.html)

    whatever

    whatever LIST

    This function returns one of the nine neo-boolean values used in fuzzy logic: true, false, maybe, sure, what, whoa, depends, look-let's-talk-about-this-later-when-we're-not-in -public, and elbows. The value returned is determined by standard anti-random vacillation routines.

    reconsider

    reconsider EXPR

    This causes the program to evaluate an expression until such time as it feels reasonably sure of its conclusion. Depending on the system and expression, this may take a fraction of a second or an entire freshman semester.

    while holdon

    while (EXPR) BLOCK holdon (EXPR) BLOCK

    This works like a standard while loop at first, but at some point the function realizes it's been bringing personal issues into the evaluation in an inappropriate manner and begins to evaluate the expression named by holdon instead in an attempt to appear reasonable.

    goaway

    goaway LABEL

    This causes the program to execute starting at LABEL, while making it clear to the program that you could care less whether it ever returned to the present execution point or not. Calling the apology function later may cause the program to return to the statement directly after the goaway, but it may also cause the program to exit entirely, depending on how much you've been taking it for granted. Use of this function has been generally deprecated since the publication of the landmark essay "'GOAWAY' Considered Thoughtless."

    pile

    pile LIST

    This function takes a LIST and sorts it until the function realizes there are too many items in the "miscellaneous" category and tries to figure out a better sorting scheme, then gets bored and leaves a big pile of unsorted items at the end. Returns a semi-sorted list with a big pile of unsorted items at the end.

    grudge

    grudge VARIABLE

    The grudge function causes a program to develop an immediate dislike of the named variable, causing many operations involving that variable to return false for no apparent reason.

    pedestal

    pedestal VARIABLE

    This causes the program to attach unhealthy significance to VARIABLE. The program will consider the named variable to be a microcosm of its own existence and will fall into a deep depression if the variable is undefined, ignored, or treated poorly. Both grudge and pedestal can be used on the same variable, causing the program to develop a love-hate relationship with the variable in question. This can be fun.

    skim

    skim FILEHANDLE

    This function quickly looks over the data contained in FILEHANDLE, trying to get the gist of it and looking for any dirty bits or clever quotations it can use at parties to impress people.

    oblique

    oblique PLAINTEXT, WIT

    The oblique function uses a form of lossy encryption to convert PLAINTEXT into a witty-but-obscure cultural or social reference which will only make sense to people or processes that share a similar background with the calling program. WIT is a number between 0 and 7 which determines the cleverness and obscurity of the reference, where 0 will return a catchphrase from a recent television advertisement and 7 will return a reference to The Consolation of Philosophy by Boethius. With careful application, this function can be used to create entire online humor magazines.

    --
    -- Open Source: It's mad, but you don't have to work here to help.
  91. The Tolkien Cellphone by Alien54 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Of course, there's humor too:
    • To avoid surprises, Massive programmers weeded out ineffective agents and duplicated ones that worked. About a dozen initial master characters formed the basic genetic blueprint for more than 50,000 digital creations, which were then individualized by adding random variables such as aggression or happiness. (A few update Tolkien; keep an eye out for a background character in The Two Towers who, in the middle of the battle, seems to take a call on his cellphone.)
    At least they're not calling in an air strike, like Granada.
    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  92. Meet the Feebles sequel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can Jackson do with his puppets, what Lucas did with his?

  93. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by Stormie · · Score: 5, Funny

    I saw an entire tech company destroyed by that video. Someone mailed it around the office and reduced all the programmers to gibbering drooling idiots, incapable of ever writing another line of code.

  94. Allusion(s) by Zen+Programmer · · Score: 1
    Nice allusions to Edith Wharton's "Ethan Frome" and "Titanic", though the former is a work of immense talent, while the latter is pure syrup.

    There is another allusion in there, but I didn't get it. Oh well.

  95. Another article link... by Kalgash · · Score: 1

    from the December issue of Time Magazine with LOTR:TTT on the cover.

  96. The end of CGi and back to stories... by dargaud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yesterday I went and saw James Bond. There was a whole bunch of action movie previews (including LOTR) before that, where you could (barely) tell that all the action sequences were CGI... And I thought that now that they can do basically anything with CGI we are going to go back to good story lines to distinguish movies. No more 'the story was so-so but the effects where great'. Now that all the movies have effects for anything (explosions, fights, monsters, impossible scenes, dead actors...) they won't be able to do better only based on the effects. The newer Star Wars proved that. As effects become more commonspread and cheaper, I hope the money goes to the (good) story writers.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
    1. Re:The end of CGi and back to stories... by kstumpf · · Score: 2

      I really, really hope you're right. I've felt, for a long time, that the effects craze has diminished movies. I go to maybe two or three movies a year now. I think before people will go back to caring more about substance over glitter, it will take a cultural change. The masses generally have terrible taste, but maybe movies like LOTR can help tip the tide. The Star Wars prequel sure won't. ;)

    2. Re:The end of CGi and back to stories... by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      As effects become more commonspread and cheaper, I hope the money goes to the (good) story writers.

      I don't think so. To have effective CGI, there's always going to be a minimum level of effort that's going to be quite large. Even if Doom 4 will be able to do Two-Towers level animation for $50 and the price of a Voodoo 8 card, using the powers effectively will require artists and programmers, and will never be as cheap as hiring a struggling actor.


      Only a strong studio system can afford to make a CGI-based movie, and studio systems, so far, aren't willing to take risks. I expect CGI movies will be a long stream of the "generic-but-good" or "generic-but-bad" movies that are out now.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    3. Re:The end of CGi and back to stories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of James Bond, did you see the CGI in that movie. Holy Christ, was it shitty, particularly Jinx diving off the cliff. I haven't seen anything that poor in a big budget film since "Mission to Mars."

  97. Uhhhhhh by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    I think the assumption is that since the book has been out for (checks book) 48 YEARS if teh date in my edition is correct, that the story is pretty well read and known by now.

    You do realise this whole thing is based off Tolkien's books, right?

  98. The Silmarillion. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, there is a plot. There are five parts.

    Ainulindale, the music of the Ainur. It began with Eru, the One, whom the Elves call Iluvatar. His thoughts became the Ainur, the most mighty of whom were called the Valar (the others were Maiar). As Iluvatar created and shaped Arda, the world, Melkor, mightiest of the Valar, tried to shape the world in his image, to achieve dominance. He rebelled against Iluvatar and was from then on known as Morgoth.

    Valaquenta. Mostly an enumeration of the fourteen Valar (after his fall, Melkor was not counted among them), and the most important of the Maiar, such as Sauron and the Balrogs.

    Quenta Silmarillion. Something about two lamps being destroyed by Morgoth and the Sun and Moon being created to replace them. The First Age starts with the creation of the Sun and ends with Morgoth's final defeat by the Valar. There's some stuff about Silmarils in there, too.

    Akallabeth. As a reward for their service to the Valar, the men who fought with them (the Dunedain, "men of the west") were given a great island which they called Numenor. They built a great empire, but were deceived by Sauron, who told them that if they defeated the Valar and took possession of their forbidden land, Valinor, that they too would become immortal. The last king of Numenor, Ar-Pharazon, tried this, and the Valar called upon Iluvatar to reshape the world. Numenor sunk into the sea (though a few escaped), and Valinor was removed from the plane of the world.

    Of The Rings of Power and the Third Age. Sauron forges the twenty rings of power. The Last Alliance of men and elves defeats him, ending the Second Age. Isildur refuses to destroy the ring; he is killed by the orcs and it is lost. It passes to Gollum, and that's where LOTR begins.

    This is from a quick skimming of The Encyclopedia of Arda. See, when "Gil-galad" or "Morgoth" are mentioned, I can look them up and find out what the heck he's talking about.

    If someone has actually read the Silmarillion, feel free to correct me. I'm leaving out quite a bit and possible screwing other stuff up. (For instance, the dwarves were first-created after the Ainur, but the elves awoke first.)

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:The Silmarillion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You leave out a good bit from the Quenta Silmarillion. I actually read it. It is about how Feanor created the Silmarils, and Morgoth coveted them and stole them. The Noldor (the people of Feanor) pursued him from the West to Middle Earth. There they waged almost constant war to regain the precious Silmarils. Beren the Man took one from the very crown of Morgoth with the help of Luthien the Fair. Two brothers (I forget the names) took the other two, but were burned by the hallowed gems and fell one into a crevasse and the other into the sea. Beren passed the silmaril to Earendil, who carried it to the West and thence into the sky to bear it as a symbol of hope to those of middle earth.

    2. Re:The Silmarillion. by The_Shadows · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Valaquenta. Mostly an enumeration of the fourteen Valar (after his fall, Melkor was not counted among them), and the most important of the Maiar, such as Sauron and the Balrogs.


      And Olorin. You know, Gandalf. Gandalf was, in actuality a Maiar who wanted to remain after the Valar sealed themselves away. Not exactly a fallen Maiar, like Sauron or Balrogs. Make for odd family reunions though.

      I will say that your grasp of the parts you mentioned is fairly cohesive, excluding the parts from the Quenta Silmarillion. The other 4 parts comprise around under 20% of the book "The Silmarillion."

      The Quenta Silmarillion, in addition to the creation of the sun and moon, details the creation and awakening of the elves. It deals with one of the original (or second gen, can't remember now) elves, Feanor and his lust for power. He was the one that created the Silmarils (Silmarillion -- Silmarils, it's not actually coincidence). They were three jewels crafted by Feanor and they contained light from, effectively, the tree of life.

      Morgoth entered a pact with Sheloeb's kin (not entirely clear if it is or isn't actually Sheloeb) to steal all the elves jewels and drain the tree of life. They were successful, and stole the Silmarils as well. The elves and the Valar could have used the Silmarils to restore the tree, had they been present.

      The rest of the Silmarillion revolves around Feanor and his offspring having taken an oath to find the Silmarils and keep them, and to fight anyone who got in their way, including the Valar. They were outcast into Middle-Earth.

      The story then goes through to be one of the more potent that Tolkien has written. It details the arrival of men and dwarves, the lives of the elves and their collective struggle against Morgoth.

      It contains, among other things, the stories of Turin, Beren and Luthien, the final downfall of Morgoth, and the eventual loss of the Silmarils.

      So, I'm really just expounding on what you said. But, it's a great book, and I really would recommend it.

    3. Re:The Silmarillion. by Linknoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've read it. Actually, most of the book is Quenta Silmarillion. The other parts are kind of like an introduction and a followup on what happened afterwards. Shelob, the giant spider who shows up near the end of TTT, was the last child of Ungoliant. Morgoth, whom Sauron had only been a servant of, offered the two trees, Telperion (which the white tree in Gondor was in the image of) and Laurelin, that Yavanna (another of the Valar) had created to light middle earth. Ungoliant would have killed Morgoth after consuming the trees, but Morgoth's Balrogs came and rescued him. Anyway, once the trees were destroyed, the only place where the glory of them was preserved was in the Silmarils, which Feanor had created (two leaves that were saved, one from each tree, and carried by 2 Maiar to become the Sun and the Moon). Yavanna asked for the Silmarils so she might try to save the trees, but Feanor refused. While the elves and valar were arguing about what to do, Morgoth broke into Feanor's home and stole the Silmarils. When Feanor found out what happened, he and his sons swore an oath that they would not rest until the Silmarils were in their possession. They followed Morgoth to Middle Earth, killing kin along the way and getting banned from returning, and waged a long war against Morgoth and his servants. Most of the Silmarillion is the story of that war. Feanor died right away in battle, but his sons had to keep their oath for many millenia. Finally Earendil, son (or was it grandson) of Beren (who had cut a Silmaril from Morgoth's crown with the help of Luthien), took the Silmaril and sailed for the forbidden land of Aman, where the Valar and the elves who had not followed Feanor lived. He convinced the Valar to get in the act, but he was not permitted to return to middle earth. Instead, he was to carry the Silmaril across the heavens, which is where the light came from in the Phial that Galadriel gave to Frodo. Anyway, the Valar finally got in the act and broke Morgoth's stronghold, Thangorodrim, and banished him from the world. Sauron fled rather than submit to the Valar. But that leaves out all the stories of the war between the elves and Morgoth, which is most of the story. Sauron took new form and gained favor with the elves, and they made their rings of power, and when he had fasioned The One Ring, he demanded the other rings be turned over to him because they had been made from his knowledge. But Celebrimor had made the 3 most powerful, Nalya, Nenya, and Vilya, and when Sauron put on his right, the elves became aware of him and hid the three, and did not use them. After the Last Alliance, when Isildur cut the ring from Sauron's hand, Isildur travelled north, and thinking all the enemy had been destroyed, didn't realize the ring attracted orcs. His company was ambushed, and he escaped via the ring, but while he swam away, the ring slipped from his finger into the Anduin, and the orcs saw him and shot him. There it laid until Smeagol found it, and well, the rest is found in LotR, for the most part. Hope that helps a bit. It's a long and challenging read, with many, many names of people and places, don't expect a LotR type story.

    4. Re:The Silmarillion. by Linknoid · · Score: 1
      And Olorin. You know, Gandalf. Gandalf was, in actuality a Maiar who wanted to remain after the Valar sealed themselves away. Not exactly a fallen Maiar, like Sauron or Balrogs. Make for odd family reunions though.


      Actually, after Aman was removed from the world, the Valar would never again fight a war like they did with Morgoth. Instead they sent the Istari, Gandalf, Saruman, and Radagast being 3 of the 5, to middle Earth to rally those living in Middle Earth against Sauron. They were not sent with the might to oppose Sauron, the people of middle earth must be where the strength comes from. But yeah, your point that they were Maia is correct, just not that Gandalf was there because he hadn't wanted to leave.


      Morgoth entered a pact with Sheloeb's kin (not entirely clear if it is or isn't actually Sheloeb)


      No, Shelob was definitely a decendant of Ungoliant. And the spiders of Mirkwood that Frodo had to fight in The Hobbit were Shelob's decendants.

    5. Re:The Silmarillion. by Nept · · Score: 2

      the silmarillion is just the beginning...
      The 12 volumes of the history of middle earth (and the book of unfinished tales) are worth reading.

      The Book of Lost Tales 1 & 2
      The Lays of Beleriand
      the Shaping of Middle Earth
      The Lost Road
      the Return of the Shadow
      The Treason of Isengard
      The War of the Ring
      Sauron Defeated
      Morgoth's Ring
      The war of the Jewels
      the peoples of middle earth

      Actually, Sauron defeated was interesting because it had a sci-fi story by Tolkien in it. He wrote it on a bet with CS Lewis - csl ended up writing the space trilogy, out of a silent planet etc., while nothing much came of Tolkien's except for an interesting short story on some members of a group like the Inklings Numenor.
      Also, the PoME has the rough draft for the LotR sequel. It's extremely exciting, and dissapointing that Tolkien didn't finish it.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    6. Re:The Silmarillion. by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If someone has actually read the Silmarillion, feel free to correct me.

      I've actually read the Silmarillion, and, indeed, I prefer it to the Lord of the Rings. However, it has to be said that I've also read the Old Testament, the Heimskringla and assorted other similar things. You can't approach the Silmarillion as if it were a novel. It isn't. It's a complete synthetic mythos, one of very few that exist, and probably the best.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    7. Re:The Silmarillion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bilbo fought in the hobbit, not frodo. yadda yadda.

    8. Re:The Silmarillion. by Scooter · · Score: 2

      Music of the Ainur:-

      "I don like Krikitar. Ooooh No.. Illuvatar.."

      Is that my cloak?

    9. Re:The Silmarillion. by amoebius · · Score: 1

      Instead they sent the Istari, Gandalf, Saruman, and Radagast being 3 of the 5 ...

      And the Blue wizards, Allatar and Pellandro, who disappeared into the East and never returned to play a part in the war against Sauron, being the other two.

    10. Re:The Silmarillion. by BoneFlower · · Score: 2


      And Olorin. You know, Gandalf. Gandalf was, in actuality a Maiar who wanted to remain after the Valar sealed themselves away. Not exactly a fallen Maiar, like Sauron or Balrogs. Make for odd family reunions though

      Actually, in the beginning of the Third Age, the Valar sent 5 of the Maia to Middle Earth to guard against the return of Sauron. Their powers were limited to ward against the corruption of the other Maia who had gone to middle earth(the who absolute power corrupts absolutely thing) though they obviously were immensely powerful. These are the Istari- Saruman the White, leader of the council, Gandalf the Grey, Radagast the Brown, and two others who wore blue robes and went into the east prior to Fellowship(at least one joining the pirate bands south of Mordor) and were effectively non players since the ejection of Sauron from Mirkwood. And as we saw, only two of them still supported good at the opening of LOTR(Gandalf and Radagast) and only Gandalf was fully commited to his original charge. But in the end, it was enough. Gandalfs interest in the people of middle earth, especially the Hobbits, was thankfully enough in the end for the mission of the Istari to be a success, despite the total loss of two of the 5, treason of a third(Saruman), and general apathy of a fourth(Radagast).

      The tale of the Istari can be a lesson- Radagast was lost in his animals and plants, and lost touch with his mission to protect the free peoples from lack of contact with sentients. Saruman felt his powers elevated him above those he was charged with defending, thus was corrupted thoroughly. Gandalf however, he was engaged with people- He made friends of all, Kings down to the lowest peasant were treated as equals. These connections grounded him and enabled him to use his great power with responsibility and honor, and to the benefit of all life.

      Tolkien may not have knowingly set out to teach moral lessons when he wrote, but they crept in anyways.

    11. Re:The Silmarillion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You can't approach the Silmarillion as if it were a novel. It isn't. It's a complete synthetic mythos, one of very few that exist, and probably the best.
      The Silmarillion may be the best synthetic mythos, but it hasn't sold as much as the Old Testament.
    12. Re:The Silmarillion. by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      ...was thankfully enough in the end for the mission of the Istari to be a success, despite the total loss of two of the 5...

      Were the blue wizards lost? I know they went east with Saruman and never returned...but I always had the feeling that they were basically Orome's "hit men" - you know, the Jules and Vincent of middle earth.

      The whole story takes place in "middle earth", and all the maps show the continent heading off into the unknown east. "There are older and fouler things in the depths of the earth..." My guess was that the blue were sent by the hunter to dispatch them.

      Weaselmancer

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    13. Re:The Silmarillion. by BoneFlower · · Score: 2

      Were the blue wizards lost?

      From what I remember reading, they went off and basically were never heard from again, except one that threw in with the corsairs to the southeast, but even he never made a significant impact after Sauron was thrown out of Mirkwood. I could be wrong though, I haven't read everything.

    14. Re:The Silmarillion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the Tolkein zealots need to start leaving copies of the Silmarillion in every hotel room too...

  99. Re:big fucking deal by Chexsum · · Score: 0

    Hehe, I wouldnt say gay but pipin looked like a woman.

    I liked the movie but I did think parts of it were half-assed considering it is based on a very famous novel. I think the battle scene in this next episode (TTT) will be really good. =)

    --
    Pixels keep you awake!
  100. He can't be. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We run the dates around the other way here i.e. date/month

    The 9th of November has already came and went.

  101. This is already happening! by PCM2 · · Score: 2
    We may witness the birth of Agent Smith's (of Matrix fame) Ancestors.
    If you had even watched the first movie, you'd know that in the Middle-Earth universe, Agent Smith is already here. In fact, he's been around since back when Elendil was still battling Sauron with a sword.
    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:This is already happening! by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      If you had even watched the first movie, you'd know that in the Middle-Earth universe, Agent Smith is already here. In fact, he's been around since back when Elendil was still battling Sauron with a sword.

      And he plays exactly the same character as he does in the Matrix: "Welcome to Rivendell... Mr Baggins".

    2. Re:This is already happening! by oojah · · Score: 1

      I'm glad that it wasn't just me that thought that... :)

      --
      Do you have any better hostages?
    3. Re:This is already happening! by Matthaeus · · Score: 2

      As you can see, Sauron's had his...eye on you for...some time now, Mr. Underhill.

  102. You left off a few. by gblues · · Score: 2
    The boat sinks.
    It's the cripple.
    It's himself.
    The butler did it.

    Nathan

    1. Re:You left off a few. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Perfect Storm?
      Unbreakable
      Fight Club
      dunno

    2. Re:You left off a few. by WeeLad · · Score: 1

      1. Perfect storm 2. Usual suspects 3. Fight club 4. Clue?

      --
      Seriously, Don't take anything I say seriously.
    3. Re:You left off a few. by gblues · · Score: 2

      Actually #1 was Titanic. :) You nailed the others, though.

      Nathan

  103. wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *crickets chirping*

  104. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by evilrunner · · Score: 1

    I think that will replace the monsters in my nightmares.

    --

    --
    "I've figured out what's wrong with life: It's other people." -Dilbert
  105. they're all about reinforcments. by ArmorFiend · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    The good reason is that, if I recall correctly (and I'm not positive I do), the three major battles in the Lord of the Rings are different: the Battle of Helm's Deep is about holding on with no reinforcements coming, the battle at Minas Tirith is heavy on Nazgul and is about holding out til reinforcements come, and the final battle is about dying valiantly in an effort to delay Sauron until Frodo can destroy the ring. So they do have different feels.

    Helm's Deep is about holding out until the Ents come. Minas Tirith is about holding out till Rohan comes, then holding out some more till Aragorn comes with the reserves of Gondor. The final battle is about holding out till the Eagles come, and holding out some more till Frodo sneaks up under sauron and bites off his 'nads. Eeew.

    But you're right in the larger sense that they do have different feels.

    1. Re:they're all about reinforcments. by WeeLad · · Score: 1
      I haven't read Return of the King in a while, but I did read the Two Towers about a year ago. I was under the impression that the combatants at Helm's Deep were not aware the Ents were coming. It was a relief they did, but the combatants thought there was no one coming to their rescue (or at least that's how I remember it.)

      --
      Seriously, Don't take anything I say seriously.
  106. Now now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take your pills, lie down and think about your 'happy' place...

    1. Re:Now now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then Blow the Motherfucker AWAY!

  107. Grenada by wiredog · · Score: 4, Funny
    They didn't use cell phones, they used pay phones and calling cards. When I was in the Army in 85-88 I knew some guys who were there.

    The only one I knew who was wounded by enemy, rather than friendly, action was shot in the ass by an irate farmer, armed with a shotgun, who thought it 'them damn kids' after his livestock again.

  108. D20? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    Just curious if MASSIVE is a D20 system... Mmm.. Improved Crit with a masterwork Scimitar weapon focus and Great Cleave.. IT'S CLOBBERIN' TIME!!!!

  109. Ents. by FireballFreddy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I want to see an Ent beat the living crap out of Julia Butterfly Hill.

    "Get those nasty feet off me, pathetic human!"

    -FF

    --
    SQUEAK, the Death of Rats explained.
  110. ooooooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys are in looooove!

  111. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for ruining my life, you... you...

    The elven chicks were hot though. Too bad they were ripping off each others clothes behind the hill.

  112. Good point. by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

    I read the series when I was a teenager, and have held off reading it again recently because I want to be surprised during the movie. I don't want to hear the details of major scenes of any of them before I see them in the theater either.

    Too bad everyone one else who replied wants to see every detail in the trailers months before the movie even comes out. And for all the movies they watch, not just LotR. Probably learn all the cheat codes for their games before starting to play too. Lame.

    And, unfortunately, this is the Lone Gunmen Are Dead site. Possibly spoiling someone's enjoyment of a widely anticipated event is what they feed on somedays.

    1. Re:Good point. by Viking+Coder · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Good Lord! Someone actually agreed with me?!

      I've actually been closing my eyes in the movie theater when Two Towers trailers come on. I tried plugging my ears, but theaters are too loud - you can still hear everything. One of my friends actually steps out into the hallway while they play trailers, exactly because of this.

      To everyone who doesn't believe me that trailers ruin movies - pick a movie that you know is coming out, but possibly haven't seen any trailers for, yet. For instance, The Matrix 3. Whenever you realize that you're watching a trailer for it, or seeing footage from it, close your eyes or turn the channel. I bet you'll like the movie more, because of it. I first tried this with Face/Off, and I think I was one of the few people in the theater who enjoyed it, because every stunt was brand new for me, when I was watching it in the movie.

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    2. Re:Good point. by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      Several of the big movies lately have been ruined for me because of the previews. They show too much of the good parts, usually that being the two good explosions, and all three really funny lines in the whole movie. Why waste $30 when I already saw the best five scenes?

      So, yeah, some of us don't need the visual crack of trailers (I still hate that word). But we are obviously either a small portion of the population, or just really quiet.

    3. Re:Good point. by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2

      Or we're all just being modded -1 Flamebait or -1 Offtopic.

      *grumble*

      I didn't watch any trailers for Die Another Day, I will not watch any for Star Trek : Nemesis, The Two Towers, Matrix 2, Terminator 3, or X-Men 2.

      I guess I care too much about these movies to allow the trailers to ruin them for me. And trust me, I have a near photographic memory when it comes to trailers.

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
  113. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  114. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by Phantasmo · · Score: 1

    The saddest part of it is, I think that they were supposed to be Vulcans, Nimoy included.

    --

    The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
  115. actually by peterjm · · Score: 2

    24 fps is what movies are shown at.

    24 of those little film cells run past the light projector every second. However, if you could count the flashes of light on the screen, you would see 48. This is because, for every cell, an inverted fan with two non-blades (*), allows the light to pass through the lens twice. hence, each cell is flashed on the screen twice and the effective fps is 48.

    I was a projectionist here in santa cruz for a while about 5 years ago. Fun job, basically just paid to smoke and start a few movies every few hours. Plus I got to toy with the sound in the theatres. I used to crank it up for the mib closing track.

    (*) picture a fan with two blades. Now picture a metal ring connecting the outside of the fan blades. Now invert the fan-blade, no-fan-blade spots (ie, there are two holes which are smaller than the spots that don't all the light to pass through), and you've probably got a picture of this thing in your head.

  116. not quite offtopic: Dec 18th by timothy · · Score: 1

    Peter Jackson may not put it in the credits, because it might make other people feel too much envy, but he's releasing this movie not only on an evening that I have off, but on the anniversary of my birth oh so many years ago. Anyone who would like to buy me a ticket ... well wait, on my birthday, won't they let me in for free?!

    Thanks, Pete.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  117. THE TWO TOWERS IS INSENSITIVE TO SEPTEMBER 11th! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The name THE TWO TOWERS is incredibly offensive to me! The movie making industry is obviously trying to profit off the 9/11 terrorist attacks!

    Make your voice be heard! Sign this petiton... ;)

  118. Better idea by wadetemp · · Score: 2

    I don't know if this is what you're getting at or not, but wouldn't it be cool if rather than UI, all 50,000 characters "filmed" in the movie were controled in some kind of realtime online battle game made specifically for the "filming" of the scene? And then you'd get to try to find yourself in the battle when the movie hit theatres?

    Unfortunately half of the creatures would be spinning in place or jumping up and down and making gestures. But hey, it *could* be cool.

  119. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by Ninja+Programmer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is why /. needs a special "6" score for certain posts. God damnit, that's fricking funniest thing I have ever seen!

  120. How Apropos... by WeirWolf · · Score: 1

    I like how the MIT researcher's name is "Sims"

  121. Re:Peter Jackson You Rock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i hope i get the dildo that modded parent offtopic in metamod

  122. Uhhhhh part 2 by wadetemp · · Score: 2

    You do realize you don't read every book in the library through telepathy just becuase you're within telepathic range of the library, don't you?

    1. Re:Uhhhhh part 2 by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

      This is just slightly different. First off, Tolkien's universe forms the basis of an enormous amount of fantasy worlds today. D&D is a good example, while certianly unique in its own right, you can clearly see the Tolkenian roots. Second, and related to that, the books are very popular and well known. They are the kind of thing that even poeple who are not in to fantasy read. Third, the release of the movie has caused the books to be republished and featured promenatly in bookstores again. Finally, however, I think it is not unreasonable to expect that if you really care about the story you would read the books FIRST since their version is the correct, and unedited version. The movies are an interpretation and abbreviation of the story told in the books.

      I think it is a little silly to whine about someone ruining the story to these movies, when it is such a well known story. We aren't talking obsuce literature here, but a fantasy world so large and well known that it has it's own complete history, mythology and even a couple of languages.

  123. PARENT: +5 Spoiler by fferreres · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Handle with care. I read LOTR so much time ago that I forgot all the details. I'm trying and making a huge effort not to remember anything. Would be nice not to see many spoilers and still be able to have a discussion about the visual effects and other generics that do not tell what will happen.

    --
    unfinished: (adj.)
  124. Availability by wadetemp · · Score: 2

    Had I also been available for those 60 years I might have read them.

  125. My AI can do 1 million characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I created several battle simulators that are even bigger in scope. Every character had one of the following AI's:

    1. Dead
    2. Die as fast as possible
    3. Commit harikiri

    My simulator can realistically portray the unneeded death of millions of characters.

  126. Boo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Waffling away from the actual topic, I feel this entire scene is going to be disappointing. Rumor has it that the battle for Helm's Deep is going to be over a half hour of film.

    Oy. I bet they'll have Neo, erm, I mean 'Legolas', doing Elven Ninjitsu, too.

    I'm disgusted by Jackson's focus on shiny pointy objects. Tolkien did not write action; Helm's deep was a single chapter. (For the love of Eru, the legendary battle between Morgoth and Fingolfin was over in a select few paragraphs!)

    Oh, I understand, things need to be changed to translate a book to film. But what, pray tell, will they leave out? Everything they shouldn't. All the character development, the friendship between Gimli and Legolas, et cetera.

    And they'll repackage it all and sell it to us again a few months after as some sort of 'special edition'.

    Boo.

    1. Re:Boo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      People don't want to see character development. They want to see armour, swords, and gore. If you want character development, go see some French film about a fag that's in love with his ass.

  127. MASSIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I want to see MASSIVE orgy

  128. You've got it the wrong way round... by Bruce+Losis · · Score: 1

    Seems to me that it's the other way round. The WTC was obviously trying to trade off the good name of LoTR.

    The irony never ceases to amaze me that a country that was colonised by a European trying to show that world extended past the horizon, is so firmly convinced that the world stops at its borders.

    --
    Don't believe the nonsense, unless you hear it from me directly.
  129. But what about the extras...? by s4m7 · · Score: 1

    What does MASSIVE do, aside from putting professional movie extras out of work? Just curious.

    --
    This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
    1. Re:But what about the extras...? by TheRIAAMustDie · · Score: 1

      haha professional extras.. haha

      --

      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. it's the only thing that ever has.
  130. NOT Memento by PatientZero · · Score: 2

    "It was him" doesn't actually cover Memento. For that one, "It *wasn't* him" is correct.

    --
    Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
    I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    1. Re:NOT Memento by d_i_r_t_y · · Score: 1

      memento -- it *was* him -- guy pierce's character was the one who killed his wife. we find this out only at the very end (chronological start) of the movie. he then proceeds to invent a murderer to give himself something to do for the rest of his life.

    2. Re:NOT Memento by MrR0p3r · · Score: 1

      Sounds like OJ...

      --
      Whatever man, I spelled it write!
  131. Stop laughing... there might be some future here by Goldenhawk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    After I stopped laughing at the parent post, I had to ask myself *when*, not *if*, this actually might be the way movie theaters work.

    After all, if you can really generate a scene completely in software, it probably takes a LOT fewer bytes to describe it than the raw imagery. How big was the entire source material for Final Fantasy? I'd bet it was a LOT smaller than a fully-digital movie at full theater resolution.

    Taken to its logical conclusion, I wonder how far away the day will be when a "movie" as delivered to the studio is actually merely the script, along with a bunch of texture files, character maps, landscape grids, MIDI files, etc., essentially a huge .WAD file. I can easily see the day when a photorealistic movie could be generated solely by the computer.

    To karma whore for a second, too, it's interesting to note that if the movie theater rendering system that drove this method were sufficiently more advanced than the average user's home PC, it would make it completely impossible to pirate a digital movie on a 1-for-1 basis - you'd only be able to capture the rendered film, and have a much larger digital file to handle. What a bonus for the movie industry that could be.

    A final thought about this idea. Assuming that the hardware in each theater were not identical, and even if they were, it's entirely likely that each time the film were projected (hence rendered then projected), it would be slightly different. Hmmm.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

  132. Automated crowd scenes by Animats · · Score: 5, Insightful
    CG effects people have been doing this sort of thing for a while, and it's been getting steadily better. Early attempts include the penguin army in one of the Batman movies, and the baby 'zillas in Godzilla. Back when I was doing Falling Bodies in 1997, another startup did KinemaWay, which was a particle-based system for crowd scenes, done as a plug-in for Softimage|3D. Worked OK, but the market is so tiny that it's hard to make any money selling such a thing as a software package. Motion Factory did something a bit more powerful as a game engine, but that engine was used for Prince of Persia 3D and not heard from again. Recently, it's resurfaced as a part of Softimage|XSI, selling for $40K.

    So far, the characters driven by these systems don't have real physics. They're mostly canned animation sequences being keyed by a state machine. Often, the moves are motion-captured and blended; otherwise they're created by animators. It's more of an automated cut-and-paste at the motion level than general motion generation as in robotics. The motions generated wouldn't necessarily work in the real world, but from a distance, they look good.

    Incidentally, doing software for Hollywood is a pain. Hollywood film projects have two modes. Either the project is in development hell and they don't have any money but want freebies. Or the project is in production and there's plenty of money but no time.

    1. Re:Automated crowd scenes by foniksonik · · Score: 2

      Thanks for rehashing all of the INSIGHTFUL and INTERESTING posts from ALL of the previous slashdot stories on Massive(TM)

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    2. Re:Automated crowd scenes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy actually works in the industry and writes animation software! Don't be such a dick.

  133. kewl by iomega · · Score: 1

    f**ken kewl,
    nuff said,
    that is the most impressive thing i have ever seen,, and the article lays it out awesomely

  134. That would be nice... by Milinar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but the hollywood infrastructure is such that writers are almost at the bottom of the food chain. Effects studios are definitely at the bottom, but once a script is sold the writer has very little, if any, control over it.

    Next time you go see a movie, try and think about what was stupid and what might have worked if X or Y was different about it. You'll see that there are many promising scripts out there that get ruined by bad actors, directors, etc.

    I'm not a screenwriter or an insider or anything, but I've had ambitions for a while, but decided that it was probably the most frustrating job in the world, to have your ideas taken and twisted around until they're an unrecognizable pile of steaming crap, for basically peanuts.

    So I decided to go into CGI. God knows what I was smoking when I decided that one.

  135. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by vicviper · · Score: 3, Funny

    When Yoda was babbling on about fear, *this* is what he was talking about.

  136. Your sir, are Correct! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Spoiler: White sails burned so black ones used.


    "Oh no!.... Wait, they're helping us...!"

  137. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

    Ah, I cough up scarier things before breakfast.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  138. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At first I tried to close the web page but my hands wouldn't move. It's just like when you're going down the freeway and see an accident, and no matter how hard you try you can't look away...

  139. I haven't read the books by SethJohnson · · Score: 2


    Could someone who has read the books tell those of us who haven't if the two towers resist the attack of the 747s in the movie, or do they come crashing down?
    1. Re:I haven't read the books by foniksonik · · Score: 2

      Dude you've got to wait at least 2 years before posting black humor like this. I think it's funny just for the creative juxtapostion but it's still too early for some folks.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    2. Re:I haven't read the books by SethJohnson · · Score: 1
      I know in my heart that you are right. I guess I wanted to test the waters, anyway.
    3. Re:I haven't read the books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      begin rant:

      awwwww poor muffin... all got your panties in a knot from having your countries front teeth knocked out?

      You deserved it.

      Your government has been the biggest dominant global dictatorship since the romans!

      your government has built an "economic empire" every country you have by the balls now.

      your united states of death are far more brutal than any taliban force.
      your tax dollars have funded the deaths of millions in the middle east supplying weapons to Isreal, arguably one of the most distructive people on the planet since WW2.

      they want the entire middle east... and they dont care how many people die.

      and now you blazing idiots are fuxxing with us canadians and bitchslapping us with economic hardship via tarrifs of every kind (despite our free trade policy).

      word of wisdom... dont piss us off.

      remember what happened to the last white house? (see war of 1812)

      in conclusion.. eat me!

      End Rant:

      P.S.
      this movie is gonna be sweet...

  140. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by simetra · · Score: 3, Funny

    Actually, it's a pretty catchy tune.

    I might actually see Twin Towers now, just to hear that theme song again.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  141. I submitted this three weeks ago... by crashnbur · · Score: 2

    ...and it was rejected. I'm confused.

  142. Sig (offtopic) by MourningBlade · · Score: 1

    EA: as I originally heard it, Winston Churchill said to Lady Astor "Yes, madame, it is true. I am drunk. But you are ugly, and in the morning I will be sober."

    Kinda has a better ring to it at the least. Just thought you might like to know.

    (I really need to learn how to send a message to someone. I thought you could do that in the new slashcode)

    1. Re:Sig (offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Madam, I may be drunk, but you my dear are ugly, and I shall be sober in the morning."

      or:

      "Madam, I may be drunk, but an iron curtain has descended upon BLEAAAAAAAURGH!!!"

  143. The sickness of glorifying war by David+Wong · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I for one look to the day when nations can resolve their differences with such software rather than actual warfare.

    There is no excuse for sacrificing young lives when a simple computer simulation would show the world exactly how the USA would kick their asses deeply into the dirt.

    1. Re:The sickness of glorifying war by msouth · · Score: 2

      like we did in viet nam, you mean?

      --
      Liberty uber alles.
    2. Re:The sickness of glorifying war by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

      naahhh.... you would get own3d by russian haxors... >:)

    3. Re:The sickness of glorifying war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LoL!!!!

      you guys are far from invinceable...

      but keep living in your bubble.

      one day you will get it good.

      9/11 will look like a paper cut if you keep down your paths...

      pay attention to who your government pisses off... you will pay the burden of there errors in blood.

  144. Games Dude, Games! by Luminous · · Score: 2

    When is this technology going to be incorporated into games? I want to raise an army and send it against my foes!!

    --
    This is not the way to build a lasting empire.
  145. Funny you should say that. by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 2

    Lord of the Cock Ring has been the named dubbed to a very, very off broadway play in NY. Its somewhere down in the village, I think Tribeca area. I really can't remember, I was rather drunk. A search of google or Timeout.com should find it though.

  146. 1 page 2 early by hswerdfe · · Score: 1

    book 1 is slow
    books 2->6 are much better and well worth the wait

    --
    --meh--
  147. It's worse than that by duck_prime · · Score: 2
    How many more people have to die before we stop using our cell phones during battle?
    It's worse than that... that orc was also driving a chariot at the same time. He came *this* *close* to running over some elves.
    1. Re:It's worse than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If hes an orc wouldnt running over some elves be a good thing?

  148. Would that be... by dswensen · · Score: 1

    Sim-ageddon?

    I would definitely pay money for a Sims(TM) "End of Days" expansion pack.

  149. TRON characters weren't CG by kobotronic · · Score: 2

    The backgrounds and the various vehicles were CG in Tron; everything else, esp. the characters and the "glow" suits (made mostly of foam latex iirc) were illuminated and colorized with mechanical animation masking techniques -- each on-screen frame with glow suit characters and CG background were laboriously composited on animation stands with handmade (!) opague stencils and different colored gels for the "glow" layers. Thus, TRON, while deservedly acclaimed for its spectacular CG pioneering efforts, did not as such really venture into CG character animaton.

    Pixar's TIN TOY wasn't until 1988, and before that there really hadn't been anything remotely credible in the way of CG animated human (or truly realistic animal) characters, flexing skin and kinetic joints with tension, etc. Can you think of anything appearing before 1988 which had actual computer animated humans in it?

    1. Re:TRON characters weren't CG by Soulslayer · · Score: 2

      Can you think of anything appearing before 1988 which had actual computer animated humans in it?

      Young Sherlock Holmes is generally credited as beign the first major motion picture to use CG for an animated character in a film. It also marked the first time CG had been used to represent something that was meant to be a real part of the movies world rather than a simulation or part of a computer (such as in Wrath of Khan or Tron). The movie came out in 1985.

      --


      Once more unto the breach dear friends...
    2. Re:TRON characters weren't CG by Soulslayer · · Score: 2

      I forgot to mention.

      The CG character was a knight composed of stained glass. I remember beign extremely impressed with this effect when I originally saw the film in theaters.

      --


      Once more unto the breach dear friends...
  150. The real lesson... by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1
    The lesson? Objects are defined with certain attributes, and any new object defined in terms of an old one inherits all the attributes.
    The real lesson: Don't fuck with the kangaroos. You never know what they have hidden in those pouches.
    --
    People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
  151. Re:Stop laughing... there might be some future her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm.. no. Scenes for FF:TSW were around 2+gigs per frame.

  152. Wire doggy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wire doggy!

  153. Tolkien hated attempted allegories by mulhall · · Score: 1

    The book is just not that simple, however you must understand that it was written in the desire to restore the English folklore that was lost to us when the Normans invaded. This is critical in understanding what the book is about.

    It is also obvious that the Hobbit lifestyle is drawn from the English, but this *does* *not* make the Hobbits and allegory for the English... :)

  154. Za Moosey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Za Moosey!

  155. Another example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    A friend of mine, coder of "Commandos", tells a similar story: They put in a new character, a lion. To build it they adapt the "soldier" class, cutting all the human behaviors off... almost. During the first integration test, the lion suddenly sit down on a ladder, took out a cigarrete and smoked it. Coder team is now shorter.

  156. Enough already!! by CausticPuppy · · Score: 1

    I'm getting lightheaded just reading this thread now.

    Put head between knees.... deep breaths....

    --
    -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  157. Wrong.. by Jonathan+Hamilton · · Score: 0

    Nope not just the USA. Try England, Germany, India, and Saudi Arabia.

    Those are all countries that I know of that people who were born in those countries tell me that the same stereotype manifest itself in their countries too..

    Besides most Americans are thankful for the French for helping us out during the Revolution.

    And go Google. French has had many more surrenders then wins. French Indian War, Franko Prussian war,
    just to name a few off the top of my limited knowledge.

  158. The chants you will hear are 25,000 real people! by mraymer · · Score: 1
    I don't know if anyone will read this or not, but I just thought I'd mention:

    "The Orc battle cries for the Helm's Deep battle sequence were provided by a stadium of 25,000 cricket fans, who screamed the war chants, spelled out on the Diamond Vision screen, with Jackson himself leading the crowd."

    Read the rest at imdb.com

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

  159. Illogical paths? by empereur · · Score: 1

    A little off topic, but I have a question for LOTR fans. I've just finished the book, down to the very end. But seeing the map, there's something bothering me about the logic of the story

    In the map, I can see that Minas Tirith, Osgiliath, the Cross Road, Minas Morgul, Cirith Ungol, and then Mt. Doom went almost in a straight line. So, it's only logical for me that the great battles should take place somewhere in this line, rather than far north in Morannon.

    When Frodo arrived in the Black Gate of Morannon, Gollum argued that Sauron's attention would be concentrated in the north. 'He thinks no one can come to the Moontower without fighting big battles at the bridges, or getting lots of boats which they cannot hide and He will know about'. Off course Gollum was probably lying, but to me that statement was very ridiculous. After all, though he had enemies all round him, Minas Tirith was the nearest and that path was the most logical

    When finally the Captains of the West captured the Crossroad (without big battles at the bridges, nor lots og boats), they again make a ridiculous move by riding north for several days to knock Mordor at their 'front door'. Off course Gandalf supposedly try to drive Sauron's attention away from Cirith Ungol where Frodo would pass, but actually he should know (by Faramir's account) that at that time Frodo was long gone from the pass

    And then a logical move for Sauron is to take back the Crossroad (instead of moving his army to the north) and then either chase the silly army from behind of attemp another strike at Minas Tirith. After all he still outnumbers his enemies many time over at that point

    Well, that's what's bugging me, hope someone could give a logical explanation

    1. Re:Illogical paths? by CrackHappy · · Score: 1

      Please note that Mordor is surrounded by mountains.

      Later in the books, when they pass the "moontower" or Minas Morgul, also note how difficult it is for 2 people, much less an entire ARMY, to pass over these mountains. The only way for the Western army to gain access to Mordor is through the gates, and the only way for the armies of Sauron to get out is also through those gates. From the descriptions of the valley that the gates are contained in, this is a fabulous place for an ambush. Please keep in mind that maps are not always the end all be all of what it should have looked like.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
    2. Re:Illogical paths? by empereur · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't think there'll be any different in the Black Gate in Morannon. Gollum even said that the mountains at Minas Morgul are lower than in the north.

  160. Re:I don't know why you didn't like the new 007 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Re: Bond - well that's your opinion.
    I personally didn't even notice the special effects. I thought they were fine.

    And I liked this Bond installment.
    It's not often you see Bond being tortured during the opening credits :)

    I thought it did well to put the gadgets back into the background. Bond movies sometimes fall into the trap of making it all about the gadgets saving the day. It's really always been about Bond, and this movie puts it back in his lap. It's his driving skill, and not just the cars gadgets which put him on top, for example.

    YMMV

  161. I can believe anyone takes this seriously by sideshow · · Score: 1

    the email address for the creator of the site is: slashdotwidener@yahoo.com for Christ's sake!

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

  162. YOU JUST BLEW MY MIND! by mekkab · · Score: 1

    Wait, he killed his own wife?!

    I didn't get that at all! /reads Salon article Oh shizznizz! I missed the whole sammy jankis was him thing!

    Time to go see that movie again!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  163. Welcome Friend. by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

    I decided to finally become a full Slashdotter, and start making Friends. Congrats on being the first on my list. It may be a mixed blessing for you, as I have been told my political/social beliefs are bad. But, what the hell, eh?

    1. Re:Welcome Friend. by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2

      That's cool.

      I have a few weirdo political/social/economic views, myself. =)

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
  164. Porsche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget Porsche cashing in with the 911.

  165. Bush is Gandalf, Saruman is Bin Laden by Endimiao · · Score: 1

    Actually, when watching the trailer I started thinking weather or not the messages on it would be used for political propaganda. Just watch it and replace:

    Bush for Gandalf
    Blair for Aragorn
    The riders of rohan for the United Nations
    Bin Laden for Saruman
    The King of Rohan for the EU
    Sauron for Saddam

    Its puzzling about how much sense it makes :p

  166. Re:Stop laughing... there might be some future her by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

    I had to ask myself *when*, not *if*, this actually might be the way movie theaters work. ... I can easily see the day when a photorealistic movie could be generated solely by the computer.

    There are "movies" being distributed now that work very similar to the way that you have described.
    These are not big productions, though, and they are definitely not photorealistic.
    If you are interested, there is at least one web site devoted to the movies: Machinima.

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  167. AC You Ignornant Slut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your argument is pretty amusing, since you seem really obsessed with pretenging[sic] the OS is somehow central to 3D rendering. It isn't. The three most important things are the quality of the CPU's floating-point unit(s), the quality of the rendering software, and the ability of the compiler to generate efficient FP code for the target platform.

    Carrying on about the 'raw speed of the operating system', and other inane drivel, just exposes your ignorance.


    Nonsense. An Operating System is critical to any userspace program that runs upon it. It is the foundation upon which everything else is built, including the 3d software you assume to be the center of its universe. The free operating systems your Microsoft mind has so much trouble grasping deliver vastly better performance, clustering capabilities, and stability to those 3d applications than the overrated, overpriced, and underperforming dreck emitting from Redmond.

    To recap your extraordinarilly pathetic argument in terms accessible to even your small mind:

    "our argument is pretty amusing, since you seem really obsessed with pretending the FOUNDATION is somehow central to INTERIOR DESIGN. It isn't. The three most important things are the quality of the FURNISHINGS, COLOR CHOICES, the quality of the DESIGNER, and the ability of the DESIGNER to generate ATTRACTIVE INTERIOR DESIGN.

    Carrying on about the 'support of the foundation', and other inane drivel, just exposes your ignorance [of basic architecture]."

    Your assertions as to the irrelevance of an operating system to the performance of the software running upon it, be it 3d software or anything else, (much less the c and c++ libraries said software is linked to, and likely make up the bulk of the binary code that is any application, 3d or otherwise) exposes your woeful ignorance of basic computer science, software, and operating system design. Grow up and educate yourself on the topic before spewing such nonsense in the future (but what am I saying, your an AC on slashdot, and likely a troll to boot. A successful troll perhaps, but that does nothing to negate the fact that you are and remain in addition, on this subject at least, an ignorant fuck.)

  168. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by dvk · · Score: 1

    Guess it's already been /.-ted :(

    "We're sorry, but we can't find the HomePage you've requested."

    Any kind sole made a cached copy (Google has none either *sniff*)?

    --
    "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
  169. Right yes, sorry by PatientZero · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I thought the other posting was saying that it was Lenny that killed his wife. God that was such a good movie. Definitely required multiple viewings to catch everything. I also liked the use of black-n-white versus color to merge the two timelines (one going forward, the other backward) at the end. Brilliant!

    --
    Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
    I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
  170. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Sorry for mailing this article, I've obviously made a typo (168!=186)
    that's the price for being up all night and doing some "quick"
    checks before you go to bed ....
    -- Herbert Rosmanith

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...