Excuse my ignorance, but how many connections are "high latency, low bandwidth"
Dialup is high latency, low bandwidth.
Dialup? Slow latency.
I think your confused here. Latency is the time it takes for a packet to reach its destination. (And get back if talking round trip time) Bandwidth is how much data can be transmitted per second. See here
The problem is that in a system like freenet there is no way of only censoring the stuff you seem to disagree with, if there was then it wouldn't be FREEnet. Of course your always free not to run freenet, but based on this conversation I'm guessing your not anyway.
...but I don't believe in freedom of speech as an absolute right.
Why? When is it ok to silence speech? When it goes against something you belive in? I personally don't agree with your post but that doesn't mean that I think you shouldn't be allowed to speak your opinion.
Same here, I have 4 180GXPs, they've never given me a single problem. The problem definatly seems to be related to drive temp, I'm monitoring them with mrtg and they were getting pretty hot before I got some fans on them.
Re:I like reason #4
on
SCOoby Snacks
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
So the DOS attack that took out their website last week was normal business operation?
Not at all, as I pointed out in this post they claim that SCO UNIX is immune to DOS attacks and has better security features than the competition, yet they run their website on linux. That tells me that they consider linux to be a better option than their own product.
As seen here one of the benefits is "These security features guard against business interruption, denial of service attacks and protect against identity or corporate information theft." (emphasis mine) It makes one wonder why they don't run their web server on it instead of linux?
My point was that with all the click through agreements you never know how the company might try to screw you. Sure, the EULA might not hold up in court but how many end users can afford to got to court against a mutimillion dollar company? With Linux anyone with sufficent knowledge can host their own domain and have complete ownership and control.
Slashdot Mirror
Excuse my ignorance, but how many connections are "high latency, low bandwidth"
Dialup is high latency, low bandwidth.
Dialup? Slow latency.
I think your confused here. Latency is the time it takes for a packet to reach its destination. (And get back if talking round trip time) Bandwidth is how much data can be transmitted per second. See here
You can grab it off my server here
http://mirror.openbarr.com/mac/The_First_Mac.mov
Mirror here
Heres a mirror of the movie.3 rt.avi
http://mirror.openbarr.com/20040509_egoshooters_q
Sure, but install VMWare inside of VirtualPC inside of VMWare...
Does it concern anyone else that the phrase "10 countries and the United States" was used instead of "11 countries including the United States"?
It seems down now, here is a full mirror.
Wouldn't it be easier to do this with iptables:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -p tcp --dport 80 -j SNAT --to $FIRST_T1
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -p udp --dport 27015 -j SNAT --to $SECOND_T1
IIRC this will route all web traffic to the first T1 and all halflife traffic to the second T1, or did I miss something?
The problem is that in a system like freenet there is no way of only censoring the stuff you seem to disagree with, if there was then it wouldn't be FREEnet. Of course your always free not to run freenet, but based on this conversation I'm guessing your not anyway.
Ok, thats valid, but those aren't covered under the 1st amendment anyway.
...but I don't believe in freedom of speech as an absolute right.
Why? When is it ok to silence speech? When it goes against something you belive in? I personally don't agree with your post
but that doesn't mean that I think you shouldn't be allowed to speak your opinion.
Same here, I have 4 180GXPs, they've never given me a single problem. The problem definatly seems to be related to drive temp, I'm monitoring them with mrtg and they were getting pretty hot before I got some fans on them.
So the DOS attack that took out their website last week was normal business operation?
Not at all, as I pointed out in this post they claim that SCO UNIX is immune to DOS attacks and has better security features than the competition, yet they run their website on linux. That tells me that they consider linux to be a better option than their own product.
As seen here one of the benefits is "These security features guard against business interruption, denial of service attacks and protect against identity or corporate information theft." (emphasis mine) It makes one wonder why they don't run their web server on it instead of linux?
www.sco.com doesn't resolve anymore, and check out their serial in the SOA 2004013103 Updated just in time!
This
Of course your hub/switch work with IPv6, the only protocol your hub/switch care about is ethernet, IP rides on top of ethernet.
I thought changing your number was a BENIFIT. This way it lets me get rid of everyone who happens to have my number and shouldn't, like my ex.
If you look here linux and os/2 are still listed as being supported.
My point was that with all the click through agreements you never know how the company might try to screw you. Sure, the EULA might not hold up in court but how many end users can afford to got to court against a mutimillion dollar company? With Linux anyone with sufficent knowledge can host their own domain and have complete ownership and control.
This is why I host everything for my domain myself. Its hard to trust any company in this day and age.
No, that company sucked. I didn't get paid for my unused vacation time either, the last job that laided me off at least gave me that much respect.
Good point, but since I already had another job lined up I didn't have to worry about such things!
I quit before they had the chance. Why let them have all the fun?