Slashdot Mirror


The Lost 1984 Mac Video

An anonymous reader writes "Never seen video footage of the introduction of the Macintosh in January 1984 was published for the first time on the Internet today. Renowned Mac user Scott Knaster kept that Betamax video tape for 21 years, and German media agency TextLab has unearthed this only surviving video tape of the launch." They could probably use more mirrors for the 22MB movie.

636 comments

  1. Patience, honey. by maxdamage · · Score: 5, Funny

    Patience, honey.
    The next download slot will be free

    in 0 minutes und while(01); seconds

    1. Re:Patience, honey. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      It was like this even before the slashdot article.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:Patience, honey. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow in under 10 minutes its already met its limits.

    3. Re:Patience, honey. by Rei · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "They could probably use more mirrors for the 22MB movie."

      I have 5 words to say about this statement:

      BitTorrent, BitTorrent, BitTorrent, BitTorrent, BitTorrent.

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
    4. Re:Patience, honey. by aichpvee · · Score: 1, Funny

      developers developers developer dev... oh, sorry. Wrong video.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    5. Re:Patience, honey. by Selecter · · Score: 1
      totally OT.....but how about replacing the Quicksilver G4 with a G5, /.?

      Teh quicksilvers are SO 2001. K TNKS BYE

    6. Re:Patience, honey. by Mage+Inq. · · Score: 1

      Would be funny if "developers" was two syllables. Hmmm, coders, coders, coders, coders...

    7. Re:Patience, honey. by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? They're still coding for Netscape 3 users.

      Probably running kernel 2.0, too.

      C'mon, Taco and Neal... Make with the CSS already.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    8. Re:Patience, honey. by nodnarb1978 · · Score: 1

      As noted further down, I've got it mirrored at my place. (redundant postage for short attention spans; please don't deem me a k/w ;) )

    9. Re:Patience, honey. by _martini_ · · Score: 1

      http://tracker.piratbyran.org/download.php/3281344 /Apple%201984%20-%20The%20Macintosh.torrent

    10. Re:Patience, honey. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anyone else notice the certificate has the Date January 24th 1984 during the presentation... Exactly 21 years ago today that they release the video???? Cute.

    11. Re:Patience, honey. by imyourfoot · · Score: 1

      He's talking about Steve Balmer, not badgers. Google "steve balmer developers" if you don't know what I'm talking about.

  2. Insult to injury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Saying "They could probably use more mirrors for the 22MB movie." as you post it to Slashdot's frontpage mid-day is like walking up to a guy after a fight, knifing him in the stomach and saying "You could probably use more bandages for your wounds."

    Here are some magnet/edonkey mirror links:

    magnet:?xt=urn:bitprint:CGUXHDIRWXFK362VRT63RMU6VA ZJPNAS.VSUEDMAYUMKDSRKBIA6TDCW6DIZ5MTYD26FOONQ&dn= 1984macintro_2.mov

    ed2k://|file|1984macintro_2.mov|21939485|c72b7ecf8 d3dc495ee743d7c54f5e29e|/

    1. Re:Insult to injury by PktLoss · · Score: 4, Informative

      My attempt at a mirror:

      http://www.preinheimer.com/1984macintro.mov

      Decent box, I say odds are good it makes it, if not, no worries.

    2. Re:Insult to injury by MatrixXForm · · Score: 1
      Here's another mirror: Fast connection, should do OK I hope.
    3. Re:Insult to injury by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Found in the server logs, last entry before the server went up in smoke:
      ###user:/.###All your bandwidth are belong to us!###

    4. Re:Insult to injury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry dude - at 5:20 Eastern, you are down.

    5. Re:Insult to injury by Me-The-Person · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wait for it.... Wait for it.... /.'d!!!!!!

    6. Re:Insult to injury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sorry sir, it .. it didn't make it.

    7. Re:Insult to injury by CoolQ · · Score: 1

      Another mirror:

      http://us3.comclub.org/mirror/1984macintro.mov

      --Quentin

  3. Hold Your Horses! by fembots · · Score: 5, Funny

    After Lord Of The Rings, I have learnt to wait for the extended director's platinum cut version before committing myself.

    Wait for the 33MB version!

    1. Re:Hold Your Horses! by superpulpsicle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please, this is Apple. Wait for the Mini version.

    2. Re:Hold Your Horses! by techwolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm, I would have expected the i1984 version

      --
      I don't do this for karma, I do it for cash. It's much better.
  4. never seen? by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Funny

    Never seen video footage [...] Renowned Mac user Scott Knaster kept that Betamax video tape for 21 years

    And he never watched it?!?! What about the camera man? Was he blind?

    I'm afraid to watch this - I heard about that world's funniest joke. Sounds like they've taken special precautions here.

    1. Re:never seen? by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      The mirror is already down so I can't tell, but isn't this the 1984 superbowl commercial where the lady throws the mallot in to the 'big brother' screen? Article says 'never before released' but latley you can't tell if the ./ articles have errors in them or not.

    2. Re:never seen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blind and a eunuch.

    3. Re:never seen? by abb3w · · Score: 1
      What about the camera man? Was he blind?

      Judging by our local TV station news crew, it wouldn't be anything new if he was....

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    4. Re:never seen? by Deacon+Jones · · Score: 1

      no, unfortunately, it most certainly is [i]not[/i]. its steve jobs introducing the mac, with the chariots of fire theme playing while it makes pretty drawings and mac fanatics scream. and then highly disappointing, as i sure did want to see that commerical you speak of.

      --
      I pulled a jack move to cop this sig
    5. Re:never seen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, I imagine it's for the event at which the Mac was introduced; you know, "It sure is great to get out of that bag" and all that.

    6. Re:never seen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:never seen? by saider · · Score: 1

      I heard about that world's funniest joke.

      You'l be fine as long as you don't hear/see more than a few words. The funniest joke (below) has been assembled by a team of professionals. Nobody was killed in the making of this joke, although one person was hospitalized after viewing several words at once.

      Joker: My dog has no nose.

      Audience: How does it smell?

      Joker: Awful!

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    8. Re:never seen? by syd2000 · · Score: 4, Informative
    9. Re:never seen? by neonstz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wenn ist das Nunstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beierhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!

    10. Re:never seen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I distinctly remember seeing clips of this in the documentary Triumph of the Nerds.

    11. Re:never seen? by Deacon+Jones · · Score: 1

      ah, well thank you very much...:)

      --
      I pulled a jack move to cop this sig
    12. Re:never seen? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      By-the-by. . .

      Are you a really old fan of the Los Angeles Rams?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    13. Re:never seen? by Deacon+Jones · · Score: 1

      Well, no, but that's a good guess, for sure (i do know who he was). Its actually a reference to a Louis Jordan song.

      --
      I pulled a jack move to cop this sig
    14. Re:never seen? by Milikki · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why do people go out of their way to make downloading these things so cryptic?

      Try this URL: http://www.uriah.com/apple-qt/movies/Apple.1984.mo v

      No worrying about dropout because of network traffic and even works with dialup.

      Kevin

    15. Re:never seen? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "No, I imagine it's for the event at which the Mac was introduced; you know, "It sure is great to get out of that bag" and all that."

      You're right. Man... I wish I could put myself in the right state of mind to cheer on what the Mac was doing. Was it really that startling?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    16. Re:never seen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The betamax tape was incompatible with his VHS-format player.

    17. Re:never seen? by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      At least this 1984 video shows the desktop widgets that Apple stole from Konfabulator in 2004. Wish I had a time machine, too.

  5. How do you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdotted in German?

    1. Re:How do you say... by phyruxus · · Score: 2, Funny

      fleigende kindersheisse!

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
      "d'Oh!" ~Homer
    2. Re:How do you say... by InternationalCow · · Score: 1

      That would be : "Scharf stinkende Pumascheisse" for something really untoward happening :)

      --
      ----- One learns to itch where one can scratch.
    3. Re:How do you say... by chriguhose · · Score: 1

      geslashdotted

    4. Re:How do you say... by easter1916 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Slashdotted in German... how about "upgefuckt"?

    5. Re:How do you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe "ausgefickt"?

    6. Re:How do you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdottentag!

    7. Re:How do you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kaput!

    8. Re:How do you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dersitegoplopen

    9. Re:How do you say... by EdHockery · · Score: 1

      I think its something like "Streichpunkte", but I'm Dutch not German...

      --
      "Each man has his price Bob, and yours was pretty low...", Roger Waters, Amused To Death.
    10. Re:How do you say... by the_gordian_knot · · Score: 1

      Slashdotten

    11. Re:How do you say... by piquadratCH · · Score: 5, Informative

      Slashdotted in German?

      As the Heise Newsticker tends to have the same effect as Slashdot on linked sites, the term "geheised" is a accurate translation of "slashdotted".

    12. Re:How do you say... by coopaq · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Q: Wie sagen Sie Slashdotted auf Deutsch?

      A: Slashdotted

    13. Re:How do you say... by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

      Gestrichpunktet in Deutsch :D

      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    14. Re:How do you say... by easter1916 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nah, it's funnier when you only half-translate it, and poorly at that! I was in a Betriebsrat (worker's council) meeting one day at my former employer in Raunheim, Hesse, and the worker's council head (who spoke German only) used the word "ge-updated" in reference to a system we were rolling out... for some reason that Denglish word has just stuck with me ever since.

    15. Re:How do you say... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Slashendotten

    16. Re:How do you say... by m50d · · Score: 1
      Slashgedotten I'd imagine. It might not be "proper" german, but it's what a real german would say

      /not a real german

      --
      I am trolling
    17. Re:How do you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Schrägstrichpunktiert ?

    18. Re:How do you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Schrägstrichpunktiert ?

      Damn, that sounds nasty.

    19. Re:How do you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was than at least it would be spelled "Fliegende Kinderscheiße". But although I am German I never have heard anybody say this.

    20. Re:How do you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      They must have hosted the site on the 1984 Mac!!!!1111

      LoLzors

    21. Re:How do you say... by hunterx11 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's easy. Take the sentence, "This website no longer operates due to excessive traffic caused by being linked to from Slashdot." Translate it into German. Remove the spaces. You now have a valid German word.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    22. Re:How do you say... by tehshen · · Score: 1

      Try "geschrägstrichpunktiert" with the ge (makes it past).

      It's long, but they only need to use it once

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    23. Re:How do you say... by funnyVegetable · · Score: 2, Informative

      no direct translation possible! Slash = [german]Schrägstrich Dot = [german]Punkt Germans (which are known worldwide, as native English speakers :) would say: "(ge)strichpunktet" --- Die Botschaft hör` ich wohl, allein mir fehlt der Glaube. (Goethe, "Faust I", Nacht, Vers 765)

    24. Re:How do you say... by 3dr · · Score: 2, Funny

      kaput?

    25. Re:How do you say... by snorklewacker · · Score: 1

      rolls off the tongue better if you say "upgedated". Largely because it sounds like the much more common coinage "upgefukt", as in "the lab machine ist upgefukten". Just used that one today.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    26. Re:How do you say... by Mike626 · · Score: 2, Informative

      slash = Schrägstrich

      dot = Punkt

      so...

      Schrägstrichpunkten?

      --
      http//injoke.org -- Culling The Interesting
    27. Re:How do you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And since "geheised" is phonetically very similar to "gheist", a.k.a. ghost, the word "geheised" has the required slangy coolness for geekspeak.

    28. Re:How do you say... by mjpaci · · Score: 1

      F: Wie sagt man "Slashdotted" auf Deutsche?
      A: Schadenfreude.

      (The German (and possibly English) grammar may be wrong, but Safari's built-in, multi-language dictionary picked up my original misspelling of 'Schadenfreude')

    29. Re:How do you say... by dswensen · · Score: 2, Funny

      And to save work for people who will actually do this:

      DieseWebsiteläßtnichtmehrwegendesübermäßigenVerk eh rslaufendervonSlashdotdurchverbundenwerdenverursac htwird

    30. Re:How do you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about "upgehfuched"?

    31. Re:How do you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, the 'GE' form of the word is called the past particiable not past tense. If you used it in a sentance it the sentence would not be past tense it would be called 'Present Perfect'

      eg:
      Ich habe gehabt. ...is 'Present Perfect', while:
      Ich hatte. ...is 'Past' tense.

    32. Re:How do you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man schreib "ghost" auf Deutsch als "geist," Dummkopf. Geheised meint auf Englisch "hosed."

    33. Re:How do you say... by coopaq · · Score: 1

      Schadenfreude (n): The pleasure one gets from slashdotting another's website.

    34. Re:How do you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /.'ed in german: Scheisse!

    35. Re:How do you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Und ich schreibe "mein Schwanz" als "lang und dick", Arschloch. Auf Englisch, und auf Deutsch.

    36. Re:How do you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... of Ulm.

    37. Re:How do you say... by loki1978 · · Score: 1

      Well, as you are no real german and i am, i can inform you that this is certainly not, what a german would say,
      cause noone would make these grammatical errors
      you can either leave the "ge" out and just go with the normal english word, as everyone who knows Slashdot
      and understands the phenomenon of slashdotting know english or you put it at the start.
      That would be at least grammatically correct, although i never heard anyone say that

      --
      According to prophecy
    38. Re:How do you say... by m50d · · Score: 1

      Really? I was just extrapolating from "downgeloaded", which I do know real germans say. Slashdotten looks like it should be seperable, "Ich dotte die Webseite slash" or something like that.

      --
      I am trolling
  6. Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does anyone else find it oddly fitting that this was preserved on a Betamax tape?

    1. Re:Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Does anyone else find it oddly fitting that this was preserved on a Betamax tape?

      Quality from day one.

    2. Re:Betamax? by stox · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not really, A VHS would not have survived as long. Beta was a significantly more robust format.

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    3. Re:Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I woudn't say the video was preserved on Betamax tape, but rather the Betamax tape itself was preserved.

      Saying the video was preserved on Betamax would be saying the video was transferred to Betamax specifically for preservation.

      I highly doubt this was the case, as Betamax was most likely one of the original formats.

    4. Re:Betamax? by DarthBart · · Score: 1

      Betamax doesn't suck? And it actually uses all 525 scan lines of NTSC video, whereas VHS uses half that?

    5. Re:Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I woudn't say the video was preserved on Betamax tape, but rather the Betamax tape itself was preserved.

      Saying the video was preserved on Betamax would be saying the video was transferred to Betamax specifically for preservation.

      I highly doubt this was the case, as Betamax was most likely one of the original formats.


      What I meant was, that they chose the higher quality format of the time for their tapes, whatever the intened use was.

    6. Re:Betamax? by itsnotthenetwork · · Score: 1

      Scan lines are not the same things as line of resolution.

    7. Re:Betamax? by Cowclops · · Score: 2, Informative

      525 scan lines = vertical. VHS very much uses all of it. Betamax has slightly more horizontal bandwidth than VHS, but its not night an day.

    8. Re:Betamax? by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does anyone else find it oddly fitting that this was preserved on a Betamax tape?

      They likely mean Betacam not betamax. But who knows.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    9. Re:Betamax? by hjf · · Score: 0, Troll

      oh shut up cunt. what the fuck is "robust" anyway? I have my 1st birthday VHS tape and I can watch it OK. And it's a VHS, and I'm 22. fucking beta-vs-vhs pussies. get over it!

    10. Re:Betamax? by Bob+McCown · · Score: 5, Funny

      Time to switch to decaf, dude, or were you scared by a Beta camera at an early age?

    11. Re:Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      PLease link me to an article stating that Betamax is better for long time archiving than VHS.

    12. Re:Betamax? by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      the funny part is that both Beta and Apple are considered by many to be a technically superior format that lost out to a brutal competitor

    13. Re:Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're just inviting the ignoramous tools who don't know the difference between BetaMAX and BetaCAM.

    14. Re:Betamax? by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 0

      Erm, no. Of those 525 lines, only 486 are picture lines. The rest are vertical blanking. And all NTSC recorders of all types record all 486 lines. If they didn't, you'd get a big black stripe across your screen.

    15. Re:Betamax? by yiantsbro · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, you are just to young to remember. I remember having "our" side of the video rental store and looking over at all the rich kids on the Beta side. Of course, there were also the videodisk freaks in the middle.

    16. Re:Betamax? by SirWinston · · Score: 5, Informative

      > Not really, A VHS would not have survived as long. Beta was a significantly more
      > robust format.

      This is a common misconception, but no. The magnetic tape used is almost identical and will last roughly as long. VHS and Beta, using magnetic tape and analog formats, are very long-lasting and decay gracefully.

      You might see extra noise and dropouts on a 25-year-old VHS or Beta, but it will play perfectly fine as long as it wasn't stored in a hot or wet place. Hot and wet is great when you're with a lady, but not when you're storing media. ;-)

      --
      "It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word."--Andrew Jackson
    17. Re:Betamax? by hyu · · Score: 1

      I'm just curious, but why did it take 20+ years for this to surface? Especially since it's about Macs, systems renowned for video abilities. One would figure that it would have come out sooner.

      Did the guy just not have a Betamax player?

    18. Re:Betamax? by SirWinston · · Score: 1

      Betacam was just Sony's name for their Betamax video recorders. Betacam SP is their professional format, but it didn't exist until years later.

      --
      "It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word."--Andrew Jackson
    19. Re:Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was last year, right?

    20. Re:Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Hot and wet is great when you're with a lady, but not when you're storing media. ;-)

      Speak for yourself pal! I prefer mine cold and dry...in fact, I prefer them dead! muahahahahahaahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
      [croak]

    21. Re:Betamax? by StarWreck · · Score: 1

      When this was filmed, Mac's did not have any video capability... at all (other than a crappily animated clip-art thing). 20 years ago, the only personal computer with real video, high-fidelity audio, and real photograph capabilities was the Amiga 1000!

      --
      ... and in the DRM, bind them.
    22. Re:Betamax? by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      the funny part is that both Beta and Apple are considered by many to be a technically superior format that lost out to a brutal competitor

      I guess you can say "many" people thought that way, but as truth has it "even more" people thought differently.

      Mac has 2% of the marketshare. If more people wanted them, they would have bought one. It just turns out that Mac fans are an extremely vocal minority. But loud voices don't help sales numbers.

      (I've used Macs but honestly don't like them. User preference, that's all)

    23. Re:Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, VHS is definitely the format of the future.

    24. Re:Betamax? by EulerX07 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hot and wet is great when you're with a lady, but not when you're storing media. ;-)

      I think you lost half of the /. audience at that sentence.

    25. Re:Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was indeed Betamax (the home game), recorded from a public TV rebroadcast of the event. Beta III, to be precise, which helps explain the crappy quality.

      -S.

    26. Re:Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you can say "many" people thought that way, but as truth has it "even more" people thought differently.

      Wait a minute, Mac users are supposed to be the ones who think differently.

      If more people wanted them, they would have bought one.

      Have you by any chance scientifically surveyed PC users to find out how many have even *tried* a Mac?

      I thought not. I haven't either. But I'd be surprised if it much exceeds 2%. And unless it does, I question the qualifications of "even more" people to decide what they want based on technical merits.

      I'm not a Mac user, but I don't see the logic in your post.

    27. Re:Betamax? by grumbel · · Score: 1

      ### If more people wanted them, they would have bought one.

      Its a question of money, people buy what is cheap and gets the job done, not what is best. Apple computers tended to be extremly expensive compared to the PC counterparts (even so that is changing with the Mac mini), so they only sold to a minority, that doesn't mean that they are worse. Of course today there is also a bunch of vendor log-in into play, you can't just swap architecture and OS without losing all your apps, so people stay with what they are familar with.

    28. Re:Betamax? by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      Have you by any chance scientifically surveyed PC users to find out how many have even *tried* a Mac?

      Everyone I went to school with had to use a Mac. The school only had Macs. Many schools I know of are the same way. And nobody that I still hang out with uses a Mac.

      I thought not. I haven't either. But I'd be surprised if it much exceeds 2%.

      You're probably looking for a percentage of people who tried Macs and bought a PC vs people who tried Macs and bought a Mac afterwards. I don't have those numbers.

      I'm not a Mac user, but I don't see the logic in your post.

      Nice try at giving yourself some credibility. You're a staunch Mac fan and that's why you posted as an Anonymous Coward.

    29. Re:Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone I went to school with had to use a Mac. The school only had Macs. Many schools I know of are the same way. And nobody that I still hang out with uses a Mac.

      I think school macs are the biggest reason for anti-mac bigotry. I had to use classic Macs at school, and grew to hate them. I hated the OS, I hated the lousy performance, and I hated the tiny screen built into them. Then I moved on to University where I was forced to use PowerMacs - these still used the same unreliable OS and appeared to perform horribly.

      A lot of mac fans have recently told me that many school macs are not set up optimally, but that doesn't matter. When you try a mac at school and the thing runs like a two legged dog, and then you try someone's PC at home and see what decent performance is like, you're going to remember that: macs are slow and pcs are fast.

      With the introduction of macosx, I've changed my rabidly anti-mac stance, and will be buying one soon... but we're talking almost 15 years of prejudice from only a few hours experience with crap machines.

    30. Re:Betamax? by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      I think school macs are the biggest reason for anti-mac bigotry. I had to use classic Macs at school, and grew to hate them. I hated the OS, I hated the lousy performance, and I hated the tiny screen built into them. Then I moved on to University where I was forced to use PowerMacs - these still used the same unreliable OS and appeared to perform horribly.

      A lot of mac fans have recently told me that many school macs are not set up optimally, but that doesn't matter. When you try a mac at school and the thing runs like a two legged dog, and then you try someone's PC at home and see what decent performance is like, you're going to remember that: macs are slow and pcs are fast.

      With the introduction of macosx, I've changed my rabidly anti-mac stance, and will be buying one soon... but we're talking almost 15 years of prejudice from only a few hours experience with crap machines.


      You may be right about that. I haven't tried one in quite a while. I'm still open to trying one again. I'll have to see how those Mini's turn out.

    31. Re:Betamax? by hyu · · Score: 1

      That still does not explain how nobody has captured the video since then. I mean, he had the tape still. And a Betamax casette player is not that hard to find.

      I have one in my basement.

    32. Re:Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because there are hundreds of articles comparing the archival robustness of a storage technology that failed pre-Internet to one that was never inteded for archiving at all. I'll get right on that link buddy.

    33. Re:Betamax? by StarWreck · · Score: 1

      Since it was probably a Mac user who had the film all these years, he probably didn't want to admit that he had to actually WAIT for the Mac to catch up to the Amiga. So he just waited until he "thought" everyone forgot that Amiga's had video capability before Mac's did.

      --
      ... and in the DRM, bind them.
    34. Re:Betamax? by Patik · · Score: 4, Funny
      Hot and wet is great when you're with a lady
      +1 Informative

    35. Re:Betamax? by T3kno · · Score: 1

      I tried telling that to a Panasonic VP in Tokyo once, he was not impressed. :)

      --
      (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
    36. Re:Betamax? by srvivn21 · · Score: 1

      Roosevelt E. Roosevelt? Is that really you?

    37. Re:Betamax? by n1vux · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it is truely fitting the Mac debut was recorded for posterity on Betamax. Each is a superior technology (in some key technical respects) doomed by its other tradeoffs (in both marketing and technical aspects). Yes, amusing.

    38. Re:Betamax? by cyclobotomy · · Score: 1

      I think the parent was alluding to how the standards war between Windows and Mac OS was similar to the war between VHS and Betamax; what might have been a superior technology got pushed to the wayside in favor of the one the market favored.

    39. Re:Betamax? by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      This is just another example of the dangerous FUD the Betamax fanatics dish out against us poor, oppressed VHS users.

      FWIW, I've got VHS tapes that old, and they're still fine.

    40. Re:Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's why the video was so well preserved. No one could find anything to play it on since the 80's.

    41. Re:Betamax? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      (even so that is changing with the Mac mini)
      No it is not, and if you really think about it, I am sure you will agree. The Mac Mini is not upgradeable at all. You can stick in a bigger stick of Ram and that is it. You can get tons of better value from a $500 PC. A lot of people try to compare a $500 Dell to the $500 Mac Mini. However, there are even better deals out there then Dell, for example E-Machines.

      I am not busting on the Mac Mini since I just placed an order for one. However, the Mac Mini still doesn't position the Mac to compete with a PC. A typical Mac Mini comes with a puny 256MB of Ram, a sad 40GB hard-drive and a _dog_ slow laptop hard-drive to boot. It is missing speakers, keyboard, mouse and monitor.

      For that same price you can get a decent PC that included a _real_ hard-drive, monitor, keyboard, mouse, speakers and usually a printer or scanner.

      The Mac Mini is really only a good deal to Mac geeks that are used to paying a premium for a computer. Joe User will continue to look to a PC and sadly MS WinXP to meet their needs.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    42. Re:Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, hot and wet is great when you're with a lady and "storing media," if you catch my meaning...

    43. Re:Betamax? by AlreadyStarted · · Score: 1

      +1 Good Morning Vietnam Ref

    44. Re:Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh. Yeah. 2% marketshare.

      Boy it's sure fun to read people regurgitating whatever dribble Dvorak and similar hacks put out. Some day you might start thinking about installed base instead of regurgitating new unit sales over and over. Besides which Apple hasn't even been close to 2% of new unit sales since before the iMac launch. You know, that original iMac, released years ago? Surely you noticed it.

      It's also quite odd how Mac users purchase such a disproportionally large amount of software. Maybe it's because most PC users pirate software while most Mac users don't. Or maybe it's just because the installed base is larger than 2%. Or maybe both.

      But whatever the case, just remember to make Bill give you a reacharound the next time he's having his way with your anal tract.

    45. Re:Betamax? by bmxbandit · · Score: 1

      You could argue (as you have) that 2% of computer users 'choose' a mac.

      Or you could argue (I would suggest more accurately) that 98% of computer users do nothing more than send emails, write letters/spreadsheets, browse the web etc. As every computing platform can do this, it therefore make sense to use the (percieved) cheapest platform.
      I would suggest that a very large proportion of people who actually need to do something with a computer (publish books/magazines, design products and packaging, edit movies, make music) are using macs/*nix already.

  7. Oh man.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apple is really gonna sue him!

    1. Re:Oh man.. by SirWinston · · Score: 1

      Fortunately the copyright on a video belongs to the videographer unless waived by contract, and a 20-year-old Mac launch can't be considered a trade secret.

      Though, I wouldn't put it past Apple Legal to try... "Your honor, the defendant's video tape reveals the trade secrets of our proprietary Reality Distortion Field..." ;-)

      --
      "It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word."--Andrew Jackson
  8. Best Mirror. by sjrstory · · Score: 1, Redundant

    "They could probably use more mirrors for the 22MB movie."

    The best mirror would be a torrent. Anyone have one yet? I'm sure this is going to get /.'ed real quick. At least the site has a sense of humor about it...

    http://industrial-technology-and-witchcraft.de/vid eo.php
    Patience, honey.
    The next download slot will be free

    in 0 minutes and 18 seconds


    And the countdown seems to repeat over and over again :/

  9. Erm, Lost!? What!? by OverlordQ · · Score: 5, Informative

    I know I've seen this video online a while back. I dont exactly remember it being 'lost' anywhere.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by adagioforstrings · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. Was this the commercial they (Apple?) modified to add an iPod to the runner?

    2. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I know I've seen this video online a while back. I dont exactly remember it being 'lost' anywhere.

      I remember seeing it played at a Macromedia trade show during the dot-com peak (when they would give away a lot of cool prizes using all that deep dot-com investor cash.)

    3. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 0

      Are they claiming to have additional footage of the 1984 commercial? Or just a copy of it?

      Because the original 1984 commercial has been all over the 'net and on my computer several times in the last few years.

    4. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by Flamesplash · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yea. I've had a copy of it since 1995 actually that I found online somewhere.

      --
      "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    5. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by dafz1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, Apple made a modified version that had the runner with an iPod. Also, I have a copy of the 1984 commercial. It was included as freeware with the Other World Computing firewire drive I bought. It is the original, non-iPod version(but it's small...can't remember the size).

    6. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by EricWright · · Score: 2, Informative

      This video is NOT the infamous 1984 commercial. This is Steve Jobs in a Macworld-like auditorium setting introducing the Macintosh to a cheering audience, then giving a small demo.

    7. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the fucking commercial, dipshit.

    8. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      It was January 24, 1984, and the setting was Apple's annual shareholders' meeting.

      Here's a description of the event from somebody who was there.

    9. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by pisces22 · · Score: 1

      The cool thing about this is that the Jobs Mac demo actually worked...unlike some of Billy G's infamous demos.

    10. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > infamous

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    11. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by yabos · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could WATCH the damn video and you'd see that it's not.

    12. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1

      You're think 1984, the commercial. This is actual footage of Steve Jobs onstage introducing the Macintosh.

    13. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by Robotron2084 · · Score: 1

      This might also look familiar to people because parts of this are on Robert Cringeley's 'Triumph of the Nerds'.

    14. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by nekonoko · · Score: 2, Informative

      Part of this same video is shown in the PBS presentation 'Triumph of the Nerds' from 1996. I can only image that if a documentarian was able to obtain the footage that it was never really lost.

    15. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the one where behind the curtains, the Macintosh team confronts Bill Gates over an NEC running Windows?

      And then the big Bill Gates head and...
      "Waaatch out, you might get what you're after."

    16. Re:Erm, Lost!? What!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong, as usual. If I were you, I'd do pushups on the third rail.

  10. Patience honey... by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1, Funny

    CGI-limits reached, please try again later!

    Oh well, guess I waited for 21 years, I can wait a few more hours until it's mirrored elsewhere.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  11. yea right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only surviving copy? i remember downloading this out of "zelifcam" on aol like ten years ago

    1. Re:yea right by trick-knee · · Score: 1

      > only surviving copy? i remember downloading this
      > out of "zelifcam" on aol like ten years ago

      well then post it somewhere ya knucklehead! or did it not survive?

    2. Re:yea right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy Jeebus..."Zelifcam" brings back so many, many many memories. Makes me want to dig up a copy of "Fate X".

    3. Re:yea right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zelifcam.. OMG I remember that hahaha and macfilez too!

  12. I can't believe I'm asking for this but ... by dcarey · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't believe I'm asking for a mirror for a betamax tape ...

    --

    -- (Score:i , Imaginary)

  13. Mirror by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's a mirror, hosted, appropriately, on an Apple Xserve and Xserve RAID:

    http://mirror.services.wisc.edu/mirrors/temp/1984m acintro.mov

    1. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      And your mirror is toast.

    2. Re:Mirror by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link, but unfortunately it cuts out right in the middle of the MacInTalk demo. Does anyone have a copy of the full (22MB) file?

    3. Re:Mirror by xtracto · · Score: 0

      lol... /.'ed as well...
      guess we will have to wait more time...

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    4. Re:Mirror by therevolution · · Score: 1

      For me, it made it almost to the end (with about 30 left to go). The crowd is appluading at that point; the talk demo already finished. At that point, the video seems to be corrupted.

    5. Re:Mirror by xtracto · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile... a cool link I found (looking for this movie in yahoo) with other Apple movies:
      http://www.esm.psu.edu/Faculty/Gray/movies.html

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    6. Re:Mirror by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1

      Damn... Started going good, then WAAAAY down. Thanks anyway ;)

      --
      This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
    7. Re:Mirror by Kardnal · · Score: 3, Informative

      They got smart. Now they only have a link to the torrent there, instead of the full movie...

      --
      ------------------
      "Never Attribute to malice what is adequately explained by stupidity..."
    8. Re:Mirror by sycotic · · Score: 1

      Many thanks for the effort but my download stopped at 7.something MB

      I think I'll try some of the German mirrors mentioned in some of the other comments :)

      --
      -- If I were a fish, I'd be wet
    9. Re:Mirror by FEEBLE*BMX · · Score: 1

      Why is this modded informative when it's actually just a link to another copy of the torrent. This is not the movie you are looking for.

    10. Re:Mirror by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because I made the torrent, I'm hosting the torrent, I'm providing the tracker for the torrent, and I'm seeding the torrent with three servers.

    11. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I am an idiot!
      Could you turn that off for a while pleas?

    12. Re:Mirror by BloggerErrant · · Score: 1

      While I was reading through Andy Hertzfeld's musings on the birth of the Mac on folklore.org, I came across mention of this presentation, and decided then and there that I wanted to see it. Of course, I never thought I would. Thanks Slashdot!

      In order to spread it, I've mirrored on my blog, located here: http://geekfactor.uni.cc/vids/TheFirstMac.mov

    13. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry about that it should work now

    14. Re:Mirror by jeriqo · · Score: 1
      --
      Alexis 'jeriqo' BRET
  14. BETAMAX by zenneth · · Score: 3, Funny

    Renowned Mac user Scott Knaster kept that Betamax video tape for 21 years, and German media agency TextLab has unearthed this only surviving video tape of the launch.

    1984 called... it wants its technology back.

    --
    The Chronic *WHAT* les of Narnia!
    1. Re:betamax by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      ebay

    2. Re:BETAMAX by drxenos · · Score: 1

      Betamax was a better technology than VHS, which is still being used today. So, what's your point?

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
  15. Thanks for the help by CGP314 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They could probably use more mirrors for the 22MB movie.

    You could do something useful and make a torrent before posting the story to slashdot.


    -Colin

  16. 22MB in 1984 by Hosting+Geek · · Score: 4, Funny

    That must of been the biggest file ever, how could they loose something so big?

    --
    For FREE NO ADS! 1GB/20GB PHP MySQL With a Control Panel Hosting
    1. Re:22MB in 1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That must of been the biggest file ever, how could they loose something so big?

      -1 Retarded

    2. Re:22MB in 1984 by Game+Genie · · Score: 1

      How large of a file could one resonably store in 1984 anyway? (I was born in 1984 so obviosly I wasn't paying attention)

    3. Re:22MB in 1984 by twoes00 · · Score: 1

      It was recorded on tape...

    4. Re:22MB in 1984 by WD_40 · · Score: 1

      That must of been the biggest file ever, how could they loose something so big?

      My guess is that it would be the opposite of tightening something that big.

      --

      "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -- RFC 1925

    5. Re:22MB in 1984 by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1
      That must of been the biggest file ever, how could they loose something so big?

      Networks were slow then. Only now is the internet fast enough for it to be loosed upon us.

    6. Re:22MB in 1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It was recorded on tape...

      Well, duh, but I think the poster was asking whether it would have been feasible to store 22MB of digital data in 1984.

      It would have been difficult. I believe the original macintosh used an 800K (single-density) 3.5" drive. Commercially available hard disks at the time were around 5-10MB.

      That said, you couldn't have stored that video as a 22MB file anyway, since modern video codecs did not yet exist.
    7. Re:22MB in 1984 by Chris+Pruett · · Score: 1

      "How large of a file could one resonably store in 1984 anyway? "

      Well that Mac that Steve pulled out of the bag had a 400 kilobyte floppy disc in it. That was a lot of storage for a personal computer back then. Now, if you had two floppies for a staggering 800 kilobytes, you were cooking with gasoline. In 1984, I was using a tape recorder connected to my TRS-80 Color Computer. A floppy drive was expensive, advanced technology. hehe

    8. Re:22MB in 1984 by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      Technically that file could not have existed on any affordable consumer grade computer hardware.

      File streaming from the smallish available hard drives hadn't been realized.

      That file is playing full screen at 320x240 at 25 frames per second, not at all within the realm of possibility on an 8mhz 68000.

      That file was in color, and the first Mac... well...

      It could've played the sound though. :)

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    9. Re:22MB in 1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 Retarded

      -1 No Sense of Humor

  17. Bandwidth limit already reached by InternationalCow · · Score: 1

    Now we know that slashdot is frequented by hordes and hordes of closet mac lovers. That will be some coming out when all the Linux geeks here finally come out of the closet and get a nice, shiny, cuddly mac mini :) I think they will succeed in /.-ing Apple's web site - which would be a first in Internet history methinks. Something else - is there something similar available for the iMac's first introduction, or for the NeXT cube? I would like to have those.

    --
    ----- One learns to itch where one can scratch.
    1. Re:Bandwidth limit already reached by somethinghollow · · Score: 1

      Be careful, though, fellow Slashdotters, as you declare that Macs are good machines! You might get on the Apple Fanboy List if you say you like Macs. There you will be hated and viewed at -1, even if you post useful content. Ooooooooh. Be afraid!!!!!!

  18. They could probably use more mirrors for the 22MB by aztektum · · Score: 1
    Good idea, michael. Since you mentioned it and having posted the link on /., maybe you wouldn't mind obliging the notion and putting a link to a mirror that you've graciously setup in the article?

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  19. Here we go... by byolinux · · Score: 5, Informative

    Thanks for checking for "The Lost 1984 Mac Video"

    You can try a time sliced download here, and if this is overloaded (it probably is), there are mirrors at macnews.de, php-schmiede.de, ppcnux.de, ftp.ppcnux.de, MacTechNews.de and elbewerk.

    And now that the US are with us, you guys could back us up with some mirrors. Thanks bunches to all the folks who are helping us out!

    1. Re:Here we go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The second mirror, php-schmiede.de, is fast. I'm getting 400 KB/s.

    2. Re:Here we go... by techathead · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or Here
      Just trying to help

    3. Re:Here we go... by nodnarb1978 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Got your US mirror here:

    4. Re:Here we go... by IGTeRR0r · · Score: 1


      Another mirror - should be a fast download - if not, damn my server: The Lost 1984 Mac Video

    5. Re:Here we go... by yack0 · · Score: 1

      Hey - you haven't turned into a smouldering pile of ruin! Thanks for mirroring :)

      --
      -- There is no sig line, only Zuul.
    6. Re:Here we go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's available, guys
      This post doesn't exactly bowl me over, I'm afraid.

    7. Re:Here we go... by drunkenbatman · · Score: 1

      Here's a mirror.... Thanks for throwing it up, appreciated.

    8. Re:Here we go... by nodnarb1978 · · Score: 1

      I pray regularly at Our Lady of the Righteous Uplink. ;) Thanks for the love.

    9. Re:Here we go... by WD_40 · · Score: 1

      I don't think I've ever had anyone say to me, "Thanks for throwing it up."

      --

      "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -- RFC 1925

  20. Amazing... by angst7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is just a pathetic attempt to overshadow the *real* 20 year old mega-story: Bill Gate's 1983 Teen Beat Spread.

    --
    StrategyTalk.com, PC Game Forums
    1. Re:Amazing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one of the most uncomfortable and hilarious things I have ever seen. Egads!

    2. Re:Amazing... by xorowo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not to rain on anyone's parade, but this isn't actually a "Teen Beat" photo: http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/gates.asp. Not that it matters, it actually seems worse knowing that this was a publicity shot.

    3. Re:Amazing... by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but as was pointed out by people smarter than I, there's a Mac in the background of that shot, making the 1983 date suspect at best.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    4. Re:Amazing... by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      As the snopes people point out, it's actually a picture from 1985, not 1983.

    5. Re:Amazing... by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Somewhere around here I have some old Amiga ads shown on latenite television... MTV 120min to be specific. But nothing beats Bill Gate's 1983 Teen Beat spread.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  21. Mirror by larry2k · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's another mirror: http://www.larry.org.mx/The_First_Mac.mov

    --

    The package said "Windows XP or better. Pentium Class Processor or better"... So I got a Mac with OS X

  22. Not just "me too-ing"... by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 2, Informative

    The site's /.ed, but I remember seeing the video... our company Mac Dweeb (Hey, I liked him and called him that to his face, so no flamebaiting is going on... really) played that for me sometime in 1999 or 2000.

    So, add one more to the list of people who swear this is not quite a "first time ever"

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
    1. Re:Not just "me too-ing"... by Titeuf_87 · · Score: 1

      How do you know it's the same when you haven't seen it ?

  23. http is such a great transfer mechanism by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

    Although wouldn't it be a antastic revolution if we could download from people who had already dowloaded it, thus allowing us all to share bandwidth. The data would arrive at such a high speed that one might consider it a torrent. A bittorrent, one might say. If only such a technology existed...

    1. Re:http is such a great transfer mechanism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      now just imagine if every major ISP in the US didn't give us all such rediculously low upload caps in hopes of making "businesses" pay more for the exact same line with an increased upload speed. The world may very well come to an end!

    2. Re:http is such a great transfer mechanism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's 'an' antastic revolution.

    3. Re:http is such a great transfer mechanism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then we can go off to college where overzealous network administrators block things such as this magical torrent of which you dream.

    4. Re:http is such a great transfer mechanism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Although wouldn't it be a antastic revolution if we could download from people who had already dowloaded it, thus allowing us all to share bandwidth.


      Many ISPs don't permit file sharing so that would violate their AUP.

    5. Re:http is such a great transfer mechanism by Lysol · · Score: 1

      Dude your post just killed all the magic..

    6. Re:http is such a great transfer mechanism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine does. Get a better ISP. It's all about supply and demand.

  24. It is from a Dan Rather report. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 0, Troll
    This video was captured live on-the-set in 1984 using a Sony MiniDV camcorder. The file was then edited on a (then state of the art) Apple //GS, using iMovie software. After this, it languished on someone's DVD-ROM for 21 years. Now at last we have it.

    Courage.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:It is from a Dan Rather report. by JDAustin · · Score: 1

      modded flamebait?

      Dang someone does not have a sense of humor and irony.

    2. Re:It is from a Dan Rather report. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think thats pretty funny.

      thankfully they FIRED the top 4 employess of 60 minutes and partly demoted Dan Rather the idiotic liar with no grasp on digital typography, technology, or honesty.

      bush won, get over it

  25. Re:PC competition for the Mini-MAC? by Nugget · · Score: 1

    Why not just buy the Mac? It's a real computer.

  26. Here's a challenge by WickedClean · · Score: 1

    I want a betamax emulator for my PC!! Then we won't have to wait for stuff like this.

    --
    ...All I can say is that my life is pretty strange...
  27. betamax or betacam? by Curialis · · Score: 1

    If it was a professional video I would bet it was actually on betacam not betamax.

    1. Re:betamax or betacam? by raventh1 · · Score: 1

      Too bad they didn't deinterlace for the final file. (professional, I think not.)

  28. Slashdotted? by delta_avi_delta · · Score: 5, Funny

    If der linken ist geslashdotted, relaxen und watchen der blinkenlights

    1. Re:Slashdotted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If der linken ist geslashdotted, relaxen und watchen der blinkenlights

      Translation:
      If the link has been was slashdotted, they relax and launder the blinking lights.

    2. Re:Slashdotted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, "launder" would be "waschen", just like "wash" in english.

    3. Re:Slashdotted? by Stephen+Maturin · · Score: 1

      it's das blinkenlights!

      --
      Non tam praeclarum est scire Latine, quam turpe nescire
      -- Cicero
  29. Re:"Renowned Mac user Scott Knaster ..." by cbiagini · · Score: 1

    He's an author. Make sense now?

  30. Not that part. by cocoa+moe · · Score: 1

    The speech of Steve was somewhere on the net a while ago.

    But the images on the mac-screen and the "chariots of fire-soundtrack" have been missing in that version.

  31. How about a bittorrent? by The+Conductor · · Score: 1

    That'll get us some instant bandwidth. But, given that many d'loaders will be using Macs, do Macs support torrents natively?

    1. Re:How about a bittorrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      YES, you limp dipshit. "Do Macs support torrents" indeed.

    2. Re:How about a bittorrent? by valkraider · · Score: 2, Informative

      do Macs support torrents natively

      Yes.

    3. Re:How about a bittorrent? by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 3, Funny

      About 15 years ago, I had a job as a PC repair monkey at the computer center at my university. As was often the case with student jobs, people came and went all the time. We were hiring new kids every couple of weeks.

      About halfway through my senior year, we hired this freshman. Nice kid, but a little on the clueless side. Not only had he never worked on a Mac before, he'd never even seen one in person.

      One day he had to go to one of the computer labs to pick up a Mac and bring it into the shop for service. (The analog board needed replacing, or something like that.) He hauled it in, set it on the bench, and proceeded to dig through all the bins in the shop.

      "What are you looking for?" I asked him.

      "A Mac power cord," he said. I just kinda stared for a minute. "What?" he demanded.

      Without saying anything, I reached down into the bin by my bench, grabbed a power cord, and threw it at him.

      "You mean Macs use regular power cords?" he asked.

      Your question wasn't quite that stupid. But man, was it ever close.

    4. Re:How about a bittorrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like your style.

    5. Re:How about a bittorrent? by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      Actually, Mac power cords are traditionally beige, instead of black.

      This is, of course, a beige-era phenomenon. Long live the SE/30!!

    6. Re:How about a bittorrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "You mean Macs use regular power cords?" he asked.

      Your question wasn't quite that stupid. But man, was it ever close.
      Was it, really? Lots of A/V equipment (like game consoles and boomboxes) use nonstandard power cords, if the power cords are detachable in the first place. Laptop power cords are not interchangeable; even if their transformers output the same exact voltage and wattage their connectors are likely to be of different sizes and/or polarity. That's true, in fact, of anything that has a transformer between the wall and the device.

      It's easy to see how someone might assume that Apple's propriety hardware would have a proprietary shape to its power cord connector.
    7. Re:How about a bittorrent? by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
      Ok, "natively" was a poor choice of wording...I meant to ask if Macs come with a bittorrent client in the default OS install, or alternately, if a well-featured nice-n-clicky client was common enough that it can be treated like Winzip or Adobe Acrobat; ie, safe to assume any power user would have it.

      Given recent Macs' BSD nature, of course there is a port.

    8. Re:How about a bittorrent? by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      You are lazy, aren't you? Tomato is king... easy, simple, cocoa.

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    9. Re:How about a bittorrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ. How about you look at the fucking BitTorrent download page, where there is a Mac client available in "nice-n-clicky" Cocoa. There are also a couple other unofficial clients, as another poster alluded to.

      You stupid fucking arsebum.

    10. Re:How about a bittorrent? by BitchKapoor · · Score: 1

      Agreed on laptops, but A/V equipment that actually has a detachable power cord, like game consoles and boomboxes, usually use the same sort of ungrounded power cord/connector. For example, the PlayStation, PlayStation 2, Dreamcast, and this old Radio Shack tape recorder from my TRS-80 all use compatible power cords.

    11. Re:How about a bittorrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed they are. And I like the beige power cords so much that I'm using the one from my old Mac Quadra to deliver sweet AC love to my current Athlon space heater (very useful in the cold Midwestern winter).

    12. Re:How about a bittorrent? by rjung2k · · Score: 1

      I don't think a Bittorrent client comes in the native OS install for Windows, does it?

    13. Re:How about a bittorrent? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      this old Radio Shack tape recorder from my TRS-80

      Heh. As I watched the movie, I was thinking of my TRS-80, which my parents gave me when I was four. I can't believe that and the machine he was demoing were on the market at the same time (pretty much, at least). I don't think I ever realized how revolutionary the Mac was til I thought about what computer *I* was using when it came out...

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  32. A couple of thoughts by Alan · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that I've seen this before, or parts of it anyway on the Truiumph of the Nerds movie. Also, it's obvious that the mac-heads have been insane for a hell of a lot longer than I thought :)

    1. Re:A couple of thoughts by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      That's insanity? Cheering at what was truly groundbreaking in its day?

      I'd love to hear your thoughts on monkeyman Ballmer prancing around the stage to the whoops of his developers, developers, developers.

    2. Re:A couple of thoughts by Alan · · Score: 1

      Well since you asked, I think Ballmer is hilarious, it's damn scary he's CEO of the company.

      Well, to be honest, he's probably a great businessman or something, multi-billion dollar corps don't put idiots in the drivers seat. Of course, that apparently doesn't stop him from doing stupid things on camera that can be ridiculed for the ages :)

  33. "Renowned Mac user" by Dr.+Dew · · Score: 2, Funny
    Renowned Mac user Scott Knaster

    I'm not arguing the accuracy of this description, but it's an odd turn of phrase. "Look at the way he presses that Apple command key! Astonishing!"

    Imagine instead "renowned spoon user Dr. Dew."

    "Renowned telephone user Mrs. Dew."

    Pithy enough to fit on a headstone, too.

    1. Re:"Renowned Mac user" by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Scott Knaster wrote some notable books on debugging Macintosh software. One was titled, "How to Write Macintosh Software". They were pretty good books back in the day.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  34. BitTorrent mirror here by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:BitTorrent mirror here by pchan- · · Score: 1

      holy shit... 300 KB/s in the first second of downloading and rising. it's like a reverse slashdotting.

    2. Re:BitTorrent mirror here by Celt · · Score: 1

      I'm on it (once I get home from work) :)

      --
      "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
    3. Re:BitTorrent mirror here by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it. I'm looking at the tracker and torrent stats and it passed DS3 bandwidth within 5 minutes of posting.

  35. *Burp* by jfengel · · Score: 1

    Next!

  36. You could use the Software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about choosing the menu-item that says "eject"?

    Remember? That thingy comes with a mouse.

    1. Re:You could use the Software? by aichpvee · · Score: 0
      Which is 100% unuseful when the power is off, but thanks for playing.

      +1 Uninsightful
      +1 Fanboi
      +1 Retard

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    2. Re:You could use the Software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... which didn't do what you think it should back in 1984. The correct menu item was "Put Away".

  37. I suppose.. by andr0meda · · Score: 1

    .. there is no wmv version of this ?

    --
    With great power comes great electricity bills.
    1. Re:I suppose.. by valkraider · · Score: 1

      There is, but it is in WM9 which doesn't play on the Mac. :)

    2. Re:I suppose.. by syd2000 · · Score: 1

      Are you sure?

    3. Re:I suppose.. by syd2000 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, what I meant was:
      Are you sure?"

    4. Re:I suppose.. by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am sure. But perhaps I could have been more specfic (instead of sarcastic) and said that you can't play WMV3 video which is a new WM9 codec that not even the Microsoft WM9 for the Mac will play, nor VLC or MediaPlayer.

    5. Re:I suppose.. by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      Windows Media Player 9 for the Mac will play WM9 (WMV3) encoded video... but it will not play .AVI files. It will, however, play WM9-WMV files. (I have also heard it will not play ASF files.) Since there is no other program which will play WMV3 codec files on a Mac (the existing open-source codecs are x86-only), there is no way currently for a Mac to play a WM9-AVI file, other than somehow translating the file to a WMV container format.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  38. Funny... by TrippTDF · · Score: 1

    There is nothing on the Apple.com mainpage about the 20th anniversary of the Mac... I'm surprised they didn't make a cute graphic of the Original Mac next to the Mini or something similar....

    Hey- Congrats to the Mac anyway!

    1. Re:Funny... by Snap+E+Tom · · Score: 1

      Well, today's actually the 21st anniversary of the Mac. And I'm not surprised that there's no mention of it. They didn't do anything last year during the big 2-0.

    2. Re:Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe because the 20th anniversary was a year ago?

    3. Re:Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's because it's the 21st anniversary. I believe they did have some material posted last year.

    4. Re:Funny... by RustNeverSleeps · · Score: 1

      Today is not the 20th anniversary of the Mac, it's the 21st anniversary. Last year for the 20th anniversary of the Mac, Apple released an updated version of the famous "1984" commercial originally shown during the Superbowl in 1984. The updated version was the same except that the woman running with the sledgehammer is listening to an iPod. Apple used to have the video on their website, but they seem to have removed it recently.

    5. Re:Funny... by imgunby · · Score: 1, Informative

      Uh, actually, Apple did do something for the 20th... it is known as the 20th Anniversary Mac (TAM), http://tam.axon.net/, and has something of a cult following (it being a low-end 604e and all).

      - smarmy sig omitted

    6. Re:Funny... by javaxman · · Score: 1
      There is nothing on the Apple.com mainpage about the 20th anniversary of the Mac... I'm surprised they didn't make a cute graphic of the Original Mac next to the Mini or something similar....

      Um... yea.

      That would have been last year. You know, 20 years ? 1984-2004 ?

      It did go by with a remarkable lack of fanfare from Apple, though. A few words from Steve on the anniversary. There was a "20th Anniversary Macintosh", but it was for the 20th anniversary of Apple ( back in '97 ), not of the Macintosh.

      It wasn't like they made special machines or threw a big party or anything. Steve did show a remake of the 1984 video at MacWorld, but it wasn't a huge deal. It seems they were busy with OS X and iPods or iTunes or GarageBand or something else Insanely Great(TM).

    7. Re:Funny... by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      The TAM was created to celebrate Apple's 20th birthday, not the 20th birthday of the Macintosh.

    8. Re:Funny... by gphinch · · Score: 1

      I think thats why they didn't do something for the 20th anniversary of the mac (2004)

      --
      in bed.
    9. Re:Funny... by soft_guy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I find it rather unsurprising that they wouldn't make a huge fuss about the 20th anniversary of the Mac. Why, you ask?

      The "old Apple" used to love to look backwards and do things like celebrate anniversaries (20th Anniversary Mac, many "special edition" products like the clear Newton 110, etc.). Unfortunately, I think looking at the past 20 years of the Mac, while there have been some great milestones, there have also been a lot of missed opportunities. I think the current management at Apple understands this better and is more focused on the next 20 years of the Mac.

      It's kind of ironic that Steve Jobs has much better business sense than the "business" people they put in charge of Apple originally because they didn't think Steve Jobs could really run Apple. Man, has he proven those folks wrong!

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    10. Re:Funny... by JamesCronus · · Score: 1

      strnage, why when the 20th Anniversary was very recent would they base the 20th Anniversay Mac on a 604e? talk about slow. now 10th Anniversary, now THAT i could buy with that product. far be it from me to critise a website, i cant remember the 20th Anniversary mac being launched. and that site your pointing to really looks like the 10th anniversay mac they produced in a small number

      --
      dybia felly dwi a hampster (i think therefore i am a hampster)
    11. Re:Funny... by javaxman · · Score: 1
      I find it rather unsurprising that they wouldn't make a huge fuss about the 20th anniversary of the Mac.

      I absolutely agree. "Surprising" was the parent post's word, not mine. "Remarkable lack of fanfare" was mine. Remarkable for just the reason you state... like I said, they were busy with other things. OS X. Garage Band. iPods. iTunes. Next-generation HD video codecs. G5s. You know, the future.

      I'm fairly certain Steve intentionally played down the whole "20 years of Macintosh" thing to keep everyone focused on the task ( and products ) at hand.

    12. Re:Funny... by digitalcowboy · · Score: 1

      It's kind of ironic that Steve Jobs has much better business sense than the "business" people they put in charge of Apple originally because they didn't think Steve Jobs could really run Apple. Man, has he proven those folks wrong!

      From what I've read, I think the "they" that didn't think he could do it was Steve himself. He was probably right. NEXT (I gave up trying to remember their clever misuse of capitalization.) was a colossal business failure despite the technological vision. My theory is that Steve needed a colossal failure to hone the rough edges of his genius and that's why he is so successful as Apple CEO 2.0.

      I'm not a fan boy, but you cannot deny that the man has a natural instinct for selling and an ability to see the future, it would (now) seem.

      Steve is everything Billg pretends to be, wishes he was and has convinced Wall Street he is.

    13. Re:Funny... by Socket+Scientist · · Score: 1

      Of course you're correct in that it was Steve who personally recruited John Sculley, the man who later ousted him from Apple. But as regards NeXT being a "colossal business failure," that depends on who's telling the story -- Canon for example, who lost tens of billions of dollars on NeXt -- or Jobs, who sold it to Apple for $400 million (many times his personal investment) and basically got to keep it as well. :-)

    14. Re:Funny... by Socket+Scientist · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I meant to say Canon's loss was tens of millions not billions. Billions would have been a colossal failure!

    15. Re:Funny... by digitalcowboy · · Score: 1

      that depends on who's telling the story -- Canon for example, who lost tens of billions of dollars on NeXt -- or Jobs, who sold it to Apple for $400 million (many times his personal investment) and basically got to keep it as well. :-)

      Good point. I thought of that right after posting. It was a colossal business failure until he used it as leverage to get back into Apple.

      And it wasn't just Canon. Ross Perot also pissed away a lot of money into that particular RDF.

  39. isn't this what bittorrent is for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to be the one to mention this on a nerds-and-technology oriented site but all this "mirror" nonsense seems so.. 2003. Isn't someone out there, I don't know, not at work today, and able to do that whole seed torrent tracker whoosits?

    Anyone? Bueller?

    1. Re:isn't this what bittorrent is for? by rincebrain · · Score: 1

      As has been posted no less than three times above by Shad0w, he has made a torrent. Currently, I just finished, and the thing has over 200 people on it.

      http://tracker.degreez.net/downloads/1984macintr o. mov.torrent

      --
      It's only an insult if it's not true.
  40. Wow, just like "The Ring" by mveloso · · Score: 1

    See how easy it is to get lots of people to watch something?

    Soon, they'll be giving the movie to friends and buying Mac Minis. The ring's got you!

    1. Re:Wow, just like "The Ring" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they will just die, and we would have a lot less rabid apple zealots.

  41. Mirror by kevinmf · · Score: 2, Informative

    A mirror set up on Case Western's network - should be able to handle a lot. http://dasystem.student.cwru.edu/1984macintro_2.mo v

  42. Re:Corniest.video.ever.. by therevolution · · Score: 3, Insightful

    WTF? If you saw that in 1984, you'd be cheering too.

  43. MOD PARENT UP!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no text. nothin to see here move along

  44. Mirror by ender- · · Score: 1

    I've posted a mirror at a hosting facility:

    http://olaf.fearthepenguin.net/~ender/video/apple/ 1984macintro.mov

    Enjoy

  45. BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:BitTorrent by JMPrice · · Score: 1

      Bump parent up! Working fine as we speak.

    2. Re:BitTorrent by TTimo · · Score: 0

      the crappy tracker is slashdotted, oh well..

    3. Re:BitTorrent by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Manyard thanks! ;)

      5 minutes to download via BT verses a mirror that has been Slashdotted.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    4. Re:BitTorrent by pittnat · · Score: 1

      getting a file not found error... apparently can't connect to the tracker. ahhh, the major shortcoming of bit torrent. (mind you, there aren't very many of them)

    5. Re:BitTorrent by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

      Note to self: Leaving Apache's maximum process at the default of 150 when each access will hit the SQL database several times is a reeeeally bad idea.

      This'll be fixed soon, I hope.

    6. Re:BitTorrent by Lucidwray · · Score: 4, Informative

      Same Torrent file, same tracker, different http server.

      http://www.keyholedesign.com/1984macintro.torrent

      What is the world coming too when even 7k text files get ./'ed and take 30 seconds to get a download slot.... sad..

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
    7. Re:BitTorrent by rbrito · · Score: 1

      Thank you very much for this torrent.

      It has a huge amount of both peers and seeds and that just shows how large is the "slashdot effect" and how it can be used inteligently for the benefit of the community.

      Thanks again, Rogério.

    8. Re:BitTorrent by FLaSh+SWT · · Score: 1

      I'm now seeding...seems to be holding up great.

    9. Re:BitTorrent by ColeNielsen · · Score: 1

      0 - 800 kbps in less than 1 second :) :) What a great idea BitTorrent is :)

      Cole

    10. Re:BitTorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3m07s on 1.5mbit/sec DSL circuit - FAST :)

  46. Worst day of the year, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    'I don't like Monday 24 January', said the server just before getting slashdotted.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4187183.stm

  47. North American Mirror by PktLoss · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:North American Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you already post this before?

      What a sleazy attempt at an advertisment.

  48. Recorded off TV by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    It's betamax recorded from public TV.

    Why there are no master copies of the original broadcast... not sure, but being public TV goes a long way to explaining it. They probably overwrote that tape fifty times after they aired it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Recorded off TV by suso · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't think this is the first time this has been showed. I know that part of it (or a very simular) presentation was shown during "Triumph of the Nerds" on PBS.

    2. Re:Recorded off TV by bani · · Score: 1

      triumph of the nerds had the same video, and it looked like it was much higher quality than this.

  49. Lost video, wtf by Celt · · Score: 1

    I first saw this about 3-4 years ago, this video has hardly been lost.
    Loads of sites have a copy of this video, this is hardly news?

    --
    "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
    1. Re:Lost video, wtf by Macrat · · Score: 1

      This video isn't the commercial silly.

    2. Re:Lost video, wtf by yabos · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could watch the damn thing before shoving your foot in your mouth.

    3. Re:Lost video, wtf by Celt · · Score: 1

      indeed :)
      i was at work and since the source site was down i coudn't watch it till i got access to bittorrent @home

      --
      "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
  50. Stylish! by sulli · · Score: 2, Funny

    Steve never should have given up the bow ties.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Stylish! by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      He's afraid John Stewart will make fun of him.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:Stylish! by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      Steve never should have given up the bow ties.

      Or lost his hair. But maturing does that to you.

  51. Re:"Renowned Mac user Scott Knaster ..." by Pwned · · Score: 1

    How does one get to be a "Renowned Mac user" or a "Renowned computer user"? Saving Orphans?

  52. Re:Corniest.video.ever.. by lokedhs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, not corny at all. Remember that this was 1984. This was back when the C64 was considered state of the art. The PC programs were text only. Most people in the audience had never seen anything like that before.

  53. Re:PC competition for the Mini-MAC? by SoTuA · · Score: 0, Redundant
    When my wife asks for the "cute little MAC", what real computer can I buy instead?

    Do you take your wife to McDonald's when she asks you to take her to dinner at the cute french bistro downtown?

    Get her the "cute little MAC" or get her nothing, but don't get her a clunky PC case and say "It's a real computer, honey". That will get you a week's worth of couch-sleeping at the very least ;)

  54. Yeah.. seen it. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Not exactly one of Ridley's greatest pieces of work though was it, and lets face it, he's done some pretty hokey stuff.

    I mean the most recent major travesty was the 2000 film Galdiator. A long winded ego-fest with the historical accuracy of disney cartoon. Then before that, there was the atrocious "Blade runner2. A movie so terrible that even the studio stepping in couldn't save it. Years later, he released a directors cut. This just showed us how bad it would have been.

    This ad captured the tedium of Alien in a piece that was a 120th of the length.

    1. Re:Yeah.. seen it. by suchire · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but this isn't the 1984 ad you're thinking of. Try watching it.

      --
      Such irE
  55. Moderators - shame on you. by JonTurner · · Score: 1

    "Flamebait?" C'mon -- that was +5 informative if I've ever seen it.

    It was fake, but accurate.

    1. Re:Moderators - shame on you. by michaeldot · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Get over it. Everyone knows most Slashdot moderators simply rate up or down posts that they agree or disagree with their cause.

      Metamoderate if you want to encourage people who do it properly.

  56. Re:Corniest.video.ever.. by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 1

    Spoken like someone who's never seen a Stevenote. Some things never change.

  57. Ich glaube ... by cocoa+moe · · Score: 1

    ... verstrichpunktet" ist deutscher. However I usually prefer to call the slash just Schäger" instead of Schrägstrich".

    verschrägstrichpunktet" would be more complete.

    Well, in reality geplättet" would be more understandable.

    Oh, I hope the "Plain Old Text"-setting supports umlauts...

  58. TORRENT by potuncle · · Score: 2, Informative
  59. www.heise.de (Was: Re:How do you say...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the style of a well known German News Site: geheis(e)t.

    In Anlehnung an einen bekannten deutschen News-Ticker: geheis(e)t.

  60. The Circle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch this and you only have seven days left to live.

  61. Text described for the bandwidth impaired by Kurt+Gray · · Score: 4, Informative

    (Sometimes I wish others who downloaded a huge video or slashdotted site would bother to describe some of it so I will for the rest of y'all)

    Steve Jobs ca. 1984 is speaking on a stage in front of an audience, suit coat and bow tie, these are his pre-jeans-and-black-turtleneck days. He tells the audience "All of the images you about to see on the large screen will be generated by what's in that bag." The lifts the black bag to reveal a Mac on a table (applause) he inserts a diskette into the Mac and steps back. The word MACINTOSH slowly scrolls across the screen to the tune of "Chariots of Fire" (wild appluase) Screen shots of paint program, word processor and calculator, fonts, program editor, 3d chess (cheering, applause). Steve introduces Macintosh speaking for itself. A bad robotic voice reads a few paragraphs of text on the screen. (applause, cheering) (wide shot of audience appluading) (end)

    I do recall the days when PC DOS and the Apple II ruled the world and first time I saw a Mac in action was easy to recognize it was a big step forward.

    1. Re:Text described for the bandwidth impaired by ps_inkling · · Score: 0
      [parent summary of video]

      Not all of the images were generated by the Macintosh. Unless it was fitted with a color screen for the demonstration, the "Macintosh Insanely Great" is rendered in White and Blue on Black screen. That could have been done with a IIgs.

      And what is the initial boot image on the screen? It's not the traditional "Welcome to Macintosh" message box.

    2. Re:Text described for the bandwidth impaired by syd2000 · · Score: 1

      The initial boot images appeared to be some sort of startup screen (possible in system 6?) showing the Golden Gate Bridge.

    3. Re:Text described for the bandwidth impaired by rjung2k · · Score: 1

      According to Andy Hertzfield, all of the stuff was done on the Mac, except for the "Chariots of Fire." The software team cheated, however, by using a Mac with 256K of RAM instead of the stock 128K.

    4. Re:Text described for the bandwidth impaired by outZider · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not blue. Just a video artifact. It was the Mac's "Grey", alternating white and black pixels to create a halftone.

      --
      - oZ
      // i am here.
    5. Re:Text described for the bandwidth impaired by bjb · · Score: 1
      the "Macintosh Insanely Great" is rendered in White and Blue on Black screen. That could have been done with a IIgs.

      The IIgs didn't come out for at least another year. I don't know the release date off hand, but it was either mid-to-late 1985 if not early 1986.

      However, the //e would have been perfectly capable of rendering somewhat sharp white and blue on black graphics if in double hi-res mode (560x192, if I remember correctly).

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    6. Re:Text described for the bandwidth impaired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a previous responder to your comment said, it's an issue with the whitepoint setting of the Mac's display.

      If you can find early color pictures of the Mac, most of them will clearly show the bluish cast to the display.

      In many cases, it's even more apparent, with room lighting being tungsten or other warm light source.

    7. Re:Text described for the bandwidth impaired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unnecessary, given the bluish cast to the Mac's display.

      Beyond that, there is absolutely *no* chance that Steve would have permitted something like this to be done. After all, he referred to those in Apple 8-bit (Apple//) engineering as not having what it took to be part of a "real" computer company.

      We'll ignore the fact that they paid for the 32-bit division's work during the long period of Lisa and Mac development, and made the whole thing possible.

  62. Mirror here by sean1121 · · Score: 1
    --
    "The road from legitimate suspicion to rampant paranoia is very much shorter than we think." - Picard
  63. Torrent by kss · · Score: 4, Informative
  64. One More Mirror by techathead · · Score: 1

    I mentioned it above, but I put it on the box I run. Feel free to try and crash it.
    Here

  65. Re:"Renowned Mac user Scott Knaster ..." by cbiagini · · Score: 1

    No. As a general rule, authors are known for writing books ;)

  66. Looks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well at least Steve Jobs looks way better in 1984 than Bill 'The Sex Machine' Gates.

  67. NOT the 1984 Commercial by Agar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just in case any one is confused, this is not the Big Brother ad that showed during the Super Bowl.

    It's a video of the actual introduction by Jobs at an Apple event.

    Screen shots, speech synthesis, Jobs in a bow tie.

    Interesting to see what geeks in 1984 cheered at, but that's about it.

    1. Re:NOT the 1984 Commercial by opusman · · Score: 1

      Exactly the same thing they cheer at in 2005 - Steve Jobs.

    2. Re:NOT the 1984 Commercial by Agar · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you do want to see the 1984 commercial, you can find it here: http://www.apple-history.com/frames/body.php?page= gallery&model=1984&format=small

    3. Re:NOT the 1984 Commercial by oob · · Score: 1

      Interesting to see what geeks in 1984 cheered at, but that's about it.

      I attended one of these demos as a kid in 1984 in New Zealand, conducted by Steve Wozniac and Andy Hertzfeld (founding partner in Apple and Mac lead engineer respectively.) Here is a scan of my invite to the event which I still possess after all these years.

      At the time Apple ]['s were still in wide use, Commodore, Acorn and BBC machines were coming in for the low end home market and IBM were the expensive, user-unfriendly systems for the office market.

      The Mac truely was revolutionary. Up until that time applications had GUIs but not the entire user interface for the OS and audio had been rudimentary. seeing a Mac in action had the audience completely mesmerised as people realised that the machines that they currently possessed had just become obsolete.

    4. Re:NOT the 1984 Commercial by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Two things struck me after watching it:

      - I can not conceive that at that point in time anything that used transistors was even remotely as cool as the mac. It's a sad testament to the power of low prices and commodity software that the mac didn't do better.

      - Steve Jobs used to look a lot cooler.

    5. Re:NOT the 1984 Commercial by ArmedLemming · · Score: 1

      Whoa! That's the same voice guy that's done all those Visa commercials all these years... He's been around for a lot longer than I realized! Doesn't he get tired of doing that stuff?

      --
      Two fish swim into a wall, one turns to the other and says, "Dam".
    6. Re:NOT the 1984 Commercial by big+daddy+kane · · Score: 1

      did anyone else notice that the 20th anniversary edition of that commercial that apple released has been doctored? in the new one the runner sports an ipod, which definatly wasnt around in 1984.

    7. Re:NOT the 1984 Commercial by DeltaHat · · Score: 1

      From a historical perspective this event was so much more then just another tech demo. This was watching the world of computing turn upside-down in a matter of minutes and the people in the audiance knew it. Although not often attributed, the 1984 release of the Macintosh was the genesis that brought about practicaly all of modern computing. This was big. Jobs knew it, you could see it on his face. Call me sentimental but, that was the face of a man who knew he had just changed the world.

    8. Re:NOT the 1984 Commercial by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      It's a sad testament to the power of low prices and commodity software that the mac didn't do better.

      Well, maybe just a little bit also to do with the same thing that destroyed Netscape, Lotus 123, DR-DOS, OS/2, WordPerfect, etc, etc.

      You know, that 2-bit company that can't stand 1-bit of competition.

    9. Re:NOT the 1984 Commercial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I could give you more pos moderation I would. THANK YOU For saving me from downloading some boring ass 33 meg file.

    10. Re:NOT the 1984 Commercial by Socket+Scientist · · Score: 1
      ... seeing a Mac in action had the audience completely mesmerised as people realised that the machines that they currently possessed had just become obsolete.

      Fast forward a couple of decades and you find the same guy, in the same room, convincing us of the same thing ... every damn year.

      Plus ça change ...

  68. Re:PC competition for the Mini-MAC? by Tsiangkun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can't find a more real computer that has aseperate video card, tiny form factor, rock solid OS, includes software to get productive, and comes with a warranty.

    If you really want to impress your wife, try listening to her.

    Yeah yeah, it's a troll. He posted a whole topic about it last week.

  69. Tucker Carlson by pbrinich · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or does Steve look just like tucker carlson from the now cancelled crossfire show on CNN?

    1. Re:Tucker Carlson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the exact same thing, then I realized the bowtie wasn't colorful enough for Mr. Tucker.

  70. 6th word? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

    Exeem.

    1. Re:6th word? by DarkMantle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry, I don't install spyware on my computer. (eXeem ships with Cydoor bundled.)

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    2. Re:6th word? by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      (eXeem ships with Cydoor bundled.)

      but you can choose not to install it

  71. I wish moderation included... by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    "Unintentionally Funny".

    Hey, it happens to everyone at least once. I once posted on MacSlash that I was waiting for the new iBook because I wasn't happy with video mirroring and wanted true external monitor support. Turns out the existing iBook already had it. D'oh!

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:I wish moderation included... by TrippTDF · · Score: 1

      As soon as I posted, I realized is was 2005... DAMNIT.

      The funny thing is, none of the replies were totally rude (at least not yet)... When I post something even slightly serious, I get insulted, flamed and demeaned... I swear I have a personal detractor on /., but I guess he was alseep today.

    2. Re:I wish moderation included... by Infonaut · · Score: 1
      I swear I have a personal detractor on /., but I guess he was alseep today.

      Well, it's me. But since it's a Monday I decided to go soft on you. ;-)

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    3. Re:I wish moderation included... by TrippTDF · · Score: 1

      Considering the day at work I've been having, thanks.

  72. Yeah... by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Informative

    "The torrent" that I made, am hosting on that server, tracking on that server, and seeding on that server (as well as three others).

  73. Not really... by midifarm · · Score: 0
    Considering Beta is still the industry standard for professional video cameras. I do doubt that it was archived to Betamax, but rather Beta SP.

    Peace

  74. take the mac ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and give her your computer instead ;-)

  75. "learnt " by MisanthropicProgram · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    I, here in the good'ol US of A, have been marked down a few times on my papers at school because of "learnt". The sad thing is, I was in a graduate program that I just finished. And yes, it was a MBA program - thank-you-very-much.
    My classmates being mostly people who have english as a second language, thought that was perfectly fine. I having my favorite magazine being British (Economist), also thought "learnt" was perfectly fine. But my completely ignorant "American" professor took points off of our team paper.

    my Point I don't have one. I need help getting a point. I learnt that everything is a team project in MBA school and I can't have an original thought!

    1. Re:"learnt " by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't learnt valid older english?

  76. MODD UP FUNNAYY!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAR

  77. Re:PC competition for the Mini-MAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um.... its Mac not MAC

    Apple announced their Mac Mini. Mac did not announce anything.

    thank you!

  78. Unscrupulous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Then the record companies could call open season and track all the ips of people downloading as some excuse that they might have downloaded other illegal things with it by using their open connections... sigh...

  79. OMG by Sophrosyne · · Score: 2, Funny

    I WANT ONE!!!

  80. Man We were easily impressed back then. by barfy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    oohhhh... Rounded Rectangles! Wild Applause.
    And it took till the Ibook G4 before I bought another Apple (my first was a IIc).
    Seriously, the mac is back. OsX and Ilife, are as awe inspiring today as MacOS and MacWrite/MacPaint were back then...

    1. Re:Man We were easily impressed back then. by Drakonian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Since then, has there been anything else as revolutionary as the Mac was at the time? I can't think of any. It really *was* something to get excited about.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    2. Re:Man We were easily impressed back then. by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Amiga. I remember when everyone was sure that the Amiga (with 4096 colors) was going to clean the clock of the gray-scale Mac.

    3. Re:Man We were easily impressed back then. by skogs · · Score: 1

      One could say the Apple Newton was a similarly revolutionary device. While it is now defunct, it did succeed in spawning an entire new class of computing devices. Palm, iPAQ, Pocket windows devices and cellular phones with software all got their start with the Newton.

      --
      Who is this that even the wind and the waves obey Him? Surely this computer must submit also!
    4. Re:Man We were easily impressed back then. by NilObject · · Score: 1

      Seriously, the mac is back.

      Where did it go? And why wasn't I notified of it leaving?

    5. Re:Man We were easily impressed back then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're right that the Amiga had colors, but 4096 colors (the so-called HAM mode) was only available at lower res and had some unfortunate effects (horizontal bleeding). Therefore, HAM was not usable in anything (like games or general purpose software) other than displaying photos.

      I don't remember the details but the Amiga could go to 16 colors (all res) and up to 64 colors in lower res, without the bleeding effects of the HAM mode.

      The Amiga had color bitmapped graphics (the original Mac didn't have colors) and preemptive multi-tasking. The Amiga was designed to be a game machine and was therefore equipped with some amazing custom chips. The quality of games on the Amiga was mostly because of those specialized chips.

      Unfortunately, even though those custom chips did a lot to differentiate the Amiga, they also proved to be quite difficult and expensive to update. The demise of the Amiga could probably explained in part by the virtual impossibility to compete with the PC's graphics chips.

    6. Re:Man We were easily impressed back then. by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      Where did it go? And why wasn't I notified of it leaving?

      Around 1995-98, the odds were that Apple would go under and the Mac would have become another Amiga.

      The little matter of that guy in the video returning is the only thing that stopped that from happening.

      Even now, the Mac has less than 2% marketshare and is sneered at by almost everyone outside the fanboys (who probably kept the company alive by continuing to buy the products even in its dark days), technical elite (Mac often gets a good writeup on Slashdot, but other places treat it as an amusing diversion), and the want-an-alternative-to-M$-but-don't-like-Linux people (who are unfortunately very small in number).

    7. Re:Man We were easily impressed back then. by David+Rolfe · · Score: 1

      Didn't the Amiga come out some months after the Mac? I mean I'll gladly eat crow if you can point me to some authentic document that points out the Commodore Amiga for sale before Jan. 1984. I thought the Amiga landed at the end of '84.

      FWIW, this argument suffers from the same things that plagues the "iMac wasn't revolutionary" debate, namely the 'all in one-ness' of both vs the "hooks up to a TV" like all post-PET Commodores (and all Ataris and all Tandys etc etc). I mean compare the Apple Mac to the earlier [almost] all-in-one Commodore PET and you'd be giving a standing ovation too ;)

      (Of course this ignores the horrible state of [IBM] PC displays in '84... ah for the days before the term personal computer was co-opted by the wintel hegemony.)

      Anyway, I look forward to any comments.

      --
      Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
    8. Re:Man We were easily impressed back then. by David+Rolfe · · Score: 1

      Oh, nevermind. The Amiga 1000 was introduced July 23, 1985. My faulty memory was too kind by 6 months. :-D

      So anyhow, that just makes my point, the Mac was public knowledge while 4k colors [HAM] was still just Jay Miner's pet project... Commodore couldn't talk me into upgrading though, the next machine I could afford after the C-128 was 286.

      --
      Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
    9. Re:Man We were easily impressed back then. by am46n · · Score: 1

      Obligatory link to the RoundRects anecdote:

      http://www.folklore.org/StoryView.py?project=Mac in tosh&story=Round_Rects_Are_Everywhere.txt

    10. Re:Man We were easily impressed back then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since then, has there been anything else as revolutionary as the Mac was at the time? I can't think of any. It really *was* something to get excited about.

      Yes. The introduction of the Amiga in 1985. 4096 colour palette, 8 bit, 4 channel sound, and a preemptive multitasking OS. When Macs were choppily scrolling two colours, and PC's were proudly beeping and showing off Green and amber monochrome displays, the Amiga 1000 was doing mind blowing graphics and sound.

  81. Also on TOTN by chiph · · Score: 1

    This was also shown on Robert X Cringely's Triumph of the Nerds

    After watching the 2005 Macworld keynote, does anyone know where I can get the older ones? Maybe on a "Steve Jobs' Greatest Hits" DVD?

    Chip H.

    1. Re:Also on TOTN by bani · · Score: 1

      not only that, the clip in TOTN looked a lot better than this copy.

    2. Re:Also on TOTN by chiph · · Score: 1

      Very true.

      Chip H.

  82. Re:"Renowned Mac user Scott Knaster ..." by chriswaco · · Score: 1

    >How does one get to be a "Renowned Mac user"

    Knaster wrote two very early and excellent books on Mac programming. Both "Macintosh Programming Secrets" and "How to Write Macintosh Software" were must reads back in the day.

    How can you not love a programming book whose cover resembles (and was drawn by an artist from) MAD Magazine ?!?

  83. Re:PC competition for the Mini-MAC? by x40sw0n · · Score: 1

    I mean seriously, does your wife need any more geek cred than that she married you? My wife is pretty literate from a computer perspective, but really she likes the small form, and the fact that it 'just works' and that I am particularly unlikely to do anything to it. It is quite possible that your wife's reasoning is similar... and hell if she wants to get her geek on she can just start running BSD scripts from a command prompt. How do you get geekier than BSD?? BeOS??? AmigaOS???

  84. Mirror by Deaper · · Score: 1

    Mirror here Right click save as.

  85. Never-before-seen, eh? by the+pickle · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure at least part of this video, if not all of it, was in Pirates of Silicon Valley . I've DEFINITELY seen some of it before.

    p

    1. Re:Never-before-seen, eh? by Socket+Scientist · · Score: 1
      I'm pretty sure at least part of this video, if not all of it, was in Pirates of Silicon Valley.

      Err, not quite. This scene was in the movie, but that would have been Noah Wyle on stage, not Jobs. :-)

    2. Re:Never-before-seen, eh? by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      I know that seems like the obvious mistake to make, but I'm pretty sure they used some archive footage (including this) in parts of the movie that actually had Jobs and Gates in it, rather than Wyle and Hall playing them.

      p

    3. Re:Never-before-seen, eh? by Socket+Scientist · · Score: 1

      I confess it's been a while since I've seen Pirates ... I only remembered archival footage from Triumph of the Nerds. In the movie version, wasn't this the scene in which, while Jobs was doing the demo, other Apple employees overheard Gates and Ballmer backstage discussing their designs on the Mac?

    4. Re:Never-before-seen, eh? by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      Not sure. It's been a while since I saw it, too :) /me goes to find someone selling a DVD of it, realising that this movie is on his list of movies he needs to own...

  86. Andy Hertzfeld Tells The Story by rufo · · Score: 1

    You can find a lot more interesting info surrounding the launch of the Mac at Andy Hertzfeld's Folklore.org. Probably most relevant would be the story about this very moment in time, The Times They Are-a Changin'. /karmawhore

    --
    My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
  87. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not the commerical. It never said it was the commerical. It's a presentation by Steve Jobs.

  88. Re:Corniest.video.ever.. by valkraider · · Score: 2, Funny

    Most of Slashdot readers weren't born yet in 1984.

  89. Stop Talking About the Mini-Mac For a Second... by FEEBLE*BMX · · Score: 1

    That video was great and everything but can we get a link to the files that were on that disk instead?

    1. Re:Stop Talking About the Mini-Mac For a Second... by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      Where are the Mac Mini posts? I've been browsing the comments for 5 mins and all I've read about all mirrors and torrents and the Mac haters saying nothing to see here move along.

      There are people talking about Macs here?! Must have been modded to oblivion.

  90. .Torrent by p0rnking · · Score: 1

    http://mirror.services.wisc.edu/mirrors/temp/1984m acintro.torrent

    I don't think much else needs to be said about this

  91. Re:Huh? by ICA · · Score: 1

    RTFA (or see the post above you) this is not the superbowl ad, it is Job's introduction and demonstration of the MAC itself.

  92. Re:7th word? by jo42 · · Score: 1

    eXlax!

  93. It's valid CURRENT English! by MisanthropicProgram · · Score: 1
    That's my point. I see it in NON-USA english all the time and yet my dumb-ass business professor took points off of our team paper.

    Argue with her?!?! No way!! I made the mistake of questioning some of her reasonings and I got totally slammed!!

    1. Re:It's valid CURRENT English! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Is it a business professor at an American school or a British school? I think you need to accept that using foreign spellings because you think it looks cool is not professional.

      I got marked down in grade school for using aeroplane instead of airplane in an essay. The essay was about a book, and in the book it was spelled airplane. At the time I thought the teacher just didn't like me, but really she was right. It was only 1 point off and I learned (learnt?) a few things from the whole ordeal.

      If you want to argue with her after you're done with the course here's some ammo from Oxford dictionaries

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:It's valid CURRENT English! by secretsquirel · · Score: 0

      In USA we speak USA english. Sorry to be a dick about it but I bet outside the USA I'd get marked of for spelling colour without the u, and it would be a valid deduction too, oh well.

    3. Re:It's valid CURRENT English! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I learnt that new tyres can greatly improve your traction in the rain!

    4. Re:It's valid CURRENT English! by Alleyoopsoyale · · Score: 0

      Yeah, in Australia we dont get marked down for using American english. The reason being, is that most students can't change MS Word from US English to Australian English. Even when you do change it, word keeps changing back to US English. I've never had any of these problems with Open Office

    5. Re:It's valid CURRENT English! by msim · · Score: 1

      It's come to that? cripes winword 2 never gave me that extent of grief. But then again we would get pulled up for americanised spelling of things. We were expected to pull out a dictionary if we were unsure of the spelling.

      But i was raised in Canberra and they are the hippiest place short of Nimbin, i mean, Pot being semi legal? ;-) My point, uhm shit i don't know what i was trying to get at.

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
  94. at that time, I don't think SP existed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would have been Betacam. Not Betacam SP.

    And of course it wasn't Betamax. It would have taken extra effort to convert it to 1/2" tape.

  95. Re:Huh? by EricWright · · Score: 1

    This is NOT the superbowl ad. It's a video of the release of the Mac with Steve doing a Macworld-like presentation in front of a cheering audience.

  96. Re:Huh? by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 1
    I'm an idiot. No one else need apply. People talk about Jan 1984, Mac. I think Superbowl Commercial. My fault. It's fairly rare to see the actually commerical itself. I know that Apple was pretty serious about never, ever using it more then once.

    Kirby

  97. Typical.. by StikyPad · · Score: 1, Funny

    And now that the US are with us, you guys could back us up with some mirrors. Thanks bunches to all the folks who are helping us out!

    I see how it is.. when in need, call on the US. When everything's fine, screw the US. Why does that sound so familiar?

  98. Torrent mirror by NitroWolf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a torrent mirror: http://208.29.16.74/1984macintro.mov.torrent

  99. betamax by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

    just curious, anyone know where you can get a betamax machine nowadays?

  100. Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  101. Corniest ever? Not hardly! by macdaddy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Young one, obviously you've never seen the music video of "The Ballad of Bilbo Baggins".

  102. More to come .... by juggledean · · Score: 1


    Thank-you Scott Knaster. Thank-you Textlab. Thanks for the trip down amnesia lane.

    Now does anyone have that athletic girl with a sledge hammer?

  103. "she likes the small form" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, bad joke.

  104. I was there... by sillivalley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seven or eight rows back, on the left side, wearing one of those red shirts

    hoping, praying, that everything would work

    that Andy got everything working (smooth horizontal scrolling was hard)

    what an incredible feeling, to be part of the family, the project, the revolution.

    Was it really that many years ago?

  105. Wost encoding job EVER by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1
    22 megabytes for a little 300x200 video that's mostly 4 minutes of still scenes? I never use it so I dunno, but surely Quicktime's got to be more capable than this??

    The Mac people need to download Xvid and learn how to do 2-pass VBR encoding in Mpeg4.... this video should be 3 megabytes tops at this quality level.

    On another note, when the Mac speaks the text-to-speech thing, it sounds like GOVERNOR ARNOLD!

    1. Re:Wost encoding job EVER by ozzmosis · · Score: 1

      MPEG-4 has a problem encoding bad quaility video, the reason being is because say you have a spot of red on the bottom of the screen for 100 frames, the first frame has the spot of red until frame 100 comes around and says it's a new color. The problem with bad quaility video is that there is so much noise nothing is ever the same for very long.

    2. Re:Wost encoding job EVER by InstantCool · · Score: 1

      QuickTime can do 2 pass VBR MPEG4 encoding. The problem/great part about quicktime is it give you a shitload(TM) of possible encoders. Unless you know what your doing there are all sorts of ways to fuck it up. QuickTime is still the most capable and clean looking compressed video I've seen if you use it properly.

      --
      InstantCool
    3. Re:Wost encoding job EVER by DLWormwood · · Score: 4, Informative
      22 megabytes for a little 300x200 video that's mostly 4 minutes of still scenes?

      This movie was encoded using Sorenson Video and QDesign Music. They are both poorish choices for downloadable video nowadays, with MPEG-4 being preferred. The codecs used date back to the tail end of the era when QuickTime was mostly used for CD kiosks and presentations, and just when QT was starting to develop towards Internet streaming applications.

      At least it wasn't done in Cinepak and MACE...

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    4. Re:Wost encoding job EVER by mkiwi · · Score: 1

      It could always be worse- what if it were Real Media or Windows Media?

  106. Lesson: by itomato · · Score: 1

    The MBA program is there to squish you into the acceptible "MBA" mold.

    What master of business administration is going to go around (in the USA) using English that makes him look like a hillbilly to CEO's that are closed-minded as the prof, and expect to get anywh'ar?

    D'you's reckon ye' orta warsh?

    They can't tell that from perfectly acceptible "proper" English phrases.

    Point is, it's not an acceptible dialect for Business discourse.

    But I agree with you!! Dang that gal!

    1. Re:Lesson: by soft_guy · · Score: 5, Funny

      What master of business administration is going to go around (in the USA) using English that makes him look like a hillbilly

      You mean besides the Preseident?

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  107. high-bandwidth mirror by Benley · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:high-bandwidth mirror by amgqmp1 · · Score: 1

      Gracias! The math server is pushing this out to me now. You've got some shiny mirrors there!

  108. applecare, laserwriter, hyperdrive videos by -DeeT · · Score: 2, Funny

    I still have my mid-1980s Apple videos about Applecare, Laserwriter repair, and Hyperdrive installation. I get no points for exoticness, though, because they're VHS, not beta.

    My favorite moment is in one of the repair videos, where it shows the technician crossing fingers behind the back before discharging the CRT anode.

    -DeeT

    --
    fghit entyrop
  109. bow tie by sometwo · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm glad Steve doesn't wear bowties anymore.

  110. Re:Huh? by pascalpp · · Score: 0

    This video is not the 1984 commercial. It's Steve Jobs introducing the Mac onstage at an Apple-hosted event. (Actually i think it was held on the campus of a nearby community college in Cupertino.)

  111. Sorry... by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

    ...you (and a few others who got partial downloads) probably got nailed when I restarted apache. It is indeed the full movie, but is currently up in the form of a locally hosted, locally seeded torrent (there's apparently another torrent out there now as well). So for now you can download the full movie via torrent here.

  112. M$ would like to be there now! by mugjuh · · Score: 1

    Microsoft would like to do today what Apple did in the days... Where do you wanna go today?

    1. Re:M$ would like to be there now! by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      Do you mean innovate? Microsoft won't do that because it doesn't get you anywhere financially.

      The most Apple ever had was 18% marketshare (late 80s, "before the Empire," as Obi-Wan Kenobi would put it).

      Microsoft glued pictures to DOS and got to 98+% marketshare.

      Innovation doesn't pay.

  113. VTFV by Matey-O · · Score: 1

    It _isn't_ the commercial.

    But you alreay know that by now, don'cha?

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  114. Indeed, downloaded with 900 kilobytes/sec by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    anothe fine example of the power of bittorrent. :D

    1. Re:Indeed, downloaded with 900 kilobytes/sec by jhill · · Score: 1

      Sort of. I set up a torrent on an OC3 that people were sharing this torrent off of, max I got to was about 990k/s upload. Without the above OC3 I doubt you'd have reached such speeds.

    2. Re:Indeed, downloaded with 900 kilobytes/sec by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      :D I was wondering, it seemed unusual. And it took aged to get uploaded 60mb.
      Nice job

    3. Re:Indeed, downloaded with 900 kilobytes/sec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      another fine AND LEGAL example of the power of bittorrent. ;D

  115. Try this by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try this. It should perform a lot better.

    1. Re:Try this by John+Harrison · · Score: 0

      It doesn't. At least not for me. Nothing coming at all.

    2. Re:Try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweet! 200KB/s from daveschoeder's torrent!

  116. Re:PC competition for the Mini-MAC? by bperkins · · Score: 0, Troll

    Bullshit.

    He's the one who's going to be supporting it.

    He probably doesn't want to pay 4x for RAM.

    He probably doesn't want to worry about voiding the warranty just for cracking the case.

    The original post doesn't explain the situation in detail, but perhaps her requirements aren't met by a mac. My wife might like a Mac, but her telecommuting software very likely won't run under it.

    Me, I'd prefer not to spend $500 for a machine whose specs are met by the three year old laptop I'm using right now.

    My wife ended up with a Dell Dimension 4700C, which isn't as small as the mini, but it's a nice smalltowert that can sit next to the desk. The only drawback is that it has a laptop cd drive, which is a bit awkward to use.

  117. No, you fools! by ukleafer · · Score: 1

    Don't look at it!!! It's just a cheap trick to make you watch the clip!!!

    Everyone who watches it dies within seven days.

    Or becomes a totally retarded Mac zealot who loses all grip on reality, spends 23 of 24 hours each day furiously masturbating over rumours that other zealots have invented about which product line Apple is going to point-upgrade for a $300 fee next, and dreams of being reincarnated as a hamster and living inside Steve Job's underwear draw. Personally I think I'd go for the dying after a week thing.

    1. Re:No, you fools! by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Then how do you explain the fact that I was already a zealot, just as you described?

      By the way, is "underwear draw" another way of saying "rectum"? Or did you mean underwear drawer?

      =)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:No, you fools! by ukleafer · · Score: 1

      No, I meant underwear drawer.

      But I think rectum works just as well.

  118. No not so much by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Betamax is the consumer format, Betacam is the pro format. Betacam SP was a tape enhancement on normal Betacam. Same size, better materials, higher bandwidth, more scanlines. Both are much larger than Betamax tape, and much higher res. Betamax died, Betacam has always been a success, and continues success now as Betacam Digital, though it's losing out to the various DV derivitives in many cases.

    1. Re:No not so much by SirWinston · · Score: 1

      > Betamax is the consumer format, Betacam is the pro format.

      Incorrect. As I said, Betacam was Sony's name for their Betamax video recorders, including personal models--it started as a marketing brand like "Handycam." Only later, in 1986, was Betacam SP invented--prior to that, Betacam was the same as Betamax.

      --
      "It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word."--Andrew Jackson
    2. Re:No not so much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My nuts itch!

  119. Four US Mirrors by codermarc · · Score: 0

    http://hijackthat.com/1984macintro_2.mov

    http://dldll.com/1984macintro_2.mov

    http://syntaxmishap.com/1984macintro_2.mov

    http://scottwatch.com/1984macintro_2.mov

    *PLEASE NOTE* The updload is done to hijackthat.com - the other one's are queued up and should be done in about 20 minutes!
    1. Re:Four US Mirrors by codermarc · · Score: 0

      All the mirrors are up.

  120. Who has a copy of the SLASHDOT-L Mac intro thread? by Shag · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When the Mac introduction happened in 1984, there was a lengthy, somewhat heated thread on the "SLASHDOT-L" BITNET Listserv. I foolishly didn't save a copy of it, but I'm sure someone out there has it and will post it in the next few days. From my recollections, people were of divided opinions.

    A small minority thought it was "insanely great," and I suppose they still do. Most readers, though, found flaws with it.

    Some viewed the Macintosh as "just a toy," and insisted that they were holding out for a real computer - the Lisa.

    Some thought it had promise, but wouldn't be truly useful until Apple added support for the Commodore-based SIDplayer music format.

    Quite a lot said it was too expensive. Some of these pointed out that there were any number of kit computers they could build for less, while others questioned having a screen built in - and a small one at that - when most people already had televisions.

    Purists were quick to point out that the Mac lacked features that had been developed years earlier by Douglas Engelbart and others. Why wasn't the keyboard more of a chording model? And why did the mouse have only one button? Even Engelbart's original patent drawings, they argued, had shown a multi-button mouse. What good was a single button?

    And of course, there were the hardcore geeks and techies, who were quick to point out that it wasn't any good if it couldn't run a real operating system, like VAX/VMS.

    Ah, the good old days. If anyone has a copy of the thread, please post it!

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  121. Re:Corniest.video.ever.. by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 4, Funny

    People are cheering on various screens shown on a Macintosh. Quite corny.

    Yeah, thank God nobody ever does that any more.

  122. Re:PC competition for the Mini-MAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmm, Dell trolls! My Favorite!

  123. triumph of the nerds also had this video... by bani · · Score: 1

    ...and from what i could tell it looked like it was much higher quality. so this video wasn't lost by any means. nor is it the first time it's been seen. TOTN broadcast in 1996.

    can anyone else who has a copy of triumph of the nerds confirm the video quality?

  124. Behold the speaking computer! by cioxx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's amazing how 21 years later MacOS still has the same crappy voice synthesizer. Why has the industry been so stagnant when the issue came to text-to-speech?

    I know there are solutions out there, among them AT&T Natural Voices (which I might add costs more than my computers put together), but generally, the speech thing didn't really take off.

    To be fair, Windows also ships with the most annoying text-to-speech engine which hasn't made any progress since Windows 95.

    What brings?

    1. Re:Behold the speaking computer! by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 1

      Well, there is Speechissimo, which sounds pretty good in English and German and utterly fucking fantastic in French. You've got to hear it! Demo. But yeah, you're right, it's a pity that something even better is not included by default... :-(

    2. Re:Behold the speaking computer! by zulux · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try Festival !!!!

      Festival speech

      75% as good at AT&T Natural Voices - and it's free, with a BSD like license.

      Quite good when set up properly.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    3. Re:Behold the speaking computer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple did license some text-to-speech technology a few month back. Big news in the text-to-speech users commuity. Everyone though we were getting new voices in ADDITION to VoiceOver technologies in Tiger. Tiger beta comes out and VoiceOver is there, but the same old voices too...

    4. Re:Behold the speaking computer! by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Informative

      All the free tts systems sound the same as they did since the early 80s. Because they all use the same algorithms and data generated by the Navy. The nicer sounding ones that have more complete data sets, improved algorithms and are computationally more intensive are only available through special licensing. (the algorithms have multiple patents, the data has copyrights, etc).

      Compare a public domain TTS like rsynth to a free, but commercial quality TTS like festival or Bell Lab's. It's funny how rsynth sounds a lot like the mac (although rsynth doesn't have a bunch of predefined settings to do different voices, you have to set all the parameters yourself to make it sound exactly like Bruce).

      TTS technology doesn't move terribly fast. the TTS that was in the Mac 21 years ago is basically the same technology 30 years ago. But that's no excuse for Apple not to have moved on to using diphonemes or triphonemes like other systems. Apple is behind, but in the TTS world, 20 years behind is not all that far behind. (unlike say the harddrive world, where 20 years behind is the difference between 100s of gigabytes to 10s of megabytes. ouch)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    5. Re:Behold the speaking computer! by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      I actually think Victoria sounds quite nice. How old is your Mac?

    6. Re:Behold the speaking computer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Festival sounds like ass too!

    7. Re:Behold the speaking computer! by xil · · Score: 1
      It's amazing how 21 years later MacOS still has the same crappy voice synthesizer.

      That particular speech synthesizer hasn't been used for almost 15 years. This old technote describes why. Brief summary: it talked directly to the sound hardware, and Apple never actually owned the code.

    8. Re:Behold the speaking computer! by dsanfte · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why the fuck can't they provide binaries? Not everyone puts a C++ compiler on their win32 box.

      Devs who only provide sources but "claim to support" win32 should be shot.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    9. Re:Behold the speaking computer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Devs who only provide sources but "claim to support" win32 should be shot.

      Losers who use win32 should swallow a handful of bullets.

    10. Re:Behold the speaking computer! by D4rkn1ght · · Score: 1

      I still use the Victoria voice on my old Mac G3 (Mac OS 9), is my favorite voice. My first real computer was the Mac 512k, which I still own, and still working in great conditions after all these years! Watching this video made me take it out of the closet and fire it up! :-) I still have most of those programs that were shown on the video, Mac Paint, Mac Write, Mac Terminal, etc... The Mac runs on 400k floppies, it doesn't use hard drives. For OS I use System 1.0 through System 4.0. I wish I could make screenshots! ;-)

    11. Re:Behold the speaking computer! by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

      Sure I'm terribly off-topic, but isn't that simply the *perfect* example of software patents stopping development?
      Imagine if there was no patent on that - would all computers be speaking smoothly by now?

      --
      Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
    12. Re:Behold the speaking computer! by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      What is "commercial quality"??

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    13. Re:Behold the speaking computer! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Nothing is stopping you from developing your own even better algorithm and giving it away for free. There are many ways to slice up the problem, and some of them are not that obvious, I'm sure there are many other ways yet to be discovered.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    14. Re:Behold the speaking computer! by IvanXQZ · · Score: 1

      Ah, but you can make screenshots: shift-command-3. Works all the way back to Finder 1.0 - I just tried (using MiniVMac). It will save a MacPaint file called Screen 0, which Mac OS X Preview or Mac OS 7/8/9 QuickTime Picture Viewer will open without difficulty. Of course, if you don't have a floppy drive for your G3, you need to buy one or find a Mac that does have one.

      Also, with your G3 you can make disk images (use Disk Copy 4.2, I think, buried somwhere in http://downloads.info.apple.com) of your old disks and use them in MiniVMac.

  125. Welcome to... by Morrog · · Score: 1

    1984 called, it wants it's Mac presentation back.

  126. triumph? by babyphatman · · Score: 1

    Some of this footage was used before in the doumentary Triumph of the Nerds.

    --
    A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals...
  127. Another mirror by breadiu · · Score: 1

    Here's yet another mirror.

    1. Re:Another mirror by arturov · · Score: 1

      Bah! take off the last slash and it should work. Sorry, guys.

  128. not very good quality, could use some work... by bani · · Score: 1

    looks like it had NO cleanup. they didn't bother to run it through a TBC or correct any dropouts. no noise reduction either. and they left it interlaced, which is just wrong for display on progressive displays (eg every PC monitor in the world).

    with a bit of work it could be something special. this posted one is pretty rough.

  129. Uhh... that video has been widely available by SageMadHatter · · Score: 1

    Hardly has that video been lost. Slashdot's favorite pundit writer, Robert X. Cringely, put together a documentary a few years back called "Triump of the Nerds". In the documentary, the video linked in this news story, appears in it's entirety.

    1. Re:Uhh... that video has been widely available by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      The same video, or the same event? I doubt Scott Knaster would have lied, but you do make a fair point.

      I remember Triumph of the Nerds and thought it fascinating at the time.

      I wish Robert Cringely would update it. Call it 'Return of the Nerds' maybe!

  130. Re:PC competition for the Mini-MAC? by binder520 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Me, I'd prefer not to spend $500 for a machine whose specs are met by the three year old laptop I'm using right now." You have a 1.25 GHz G4 on your 3 year old laptop?

  131. Macintosh Folklore by fo0bar · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you are interested by this video, check out Andy Hertzfeld's accounts of that presentation. (Andy was one of the developer of the Mac back then.) While you're they're, check out the rest of the Classic Macintosh section of that site. It's a lot of stories (mostly by Andy) of how the Mac came to be.

    (I'm not associated with folklore.org or Andy Hertzfeld or anything. I found the site a couple weeks ago while googling for little rubber feet, and got hooked.)

  132. This aint nothing new......!!!! by Randy+Rathbun · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it is neat to see the thing - I mean, hell, Steve looks like he is about to explode when the Mac talks and crowd goes nuts...

    But this video is not "lost" at all. I have seen it numerous times in numerous programs over the years - if memory serves, it is featured in Robert X. Cringley's Triumph of the Nerds, and probably a ton of other shows.

    And if one person replies to this and says "it's not the commercial they are talking about!" I will personally kick thier ass. I know it is not the commercial.

    1. Re:This aint nothing new......!!!! by MrDolby · · Score: 1

      Mod this up, I too have already seen this footage on Triumph of the Nerds, which I have the VHS tapes of. Which I think anyone can order from the PBS website. That program came out in I think late ninetys.

  133. Another mirror by code0 · · Score: 1

    http://code0.net/1984macintro.mov

    --
    ---------- I laugh at a dumb SysAdmin.
  134. Where was the event held? by tinrobot · · Score: 1

    Looks like a fairly large auditorium... I'm scratching my head trying to match the place to the ones I know in the Bay Area.

    1. Re:Where was the event held? by jfroot · · Score: 1

      The event was held at the Flint Center

      --
      j

  135. I can buy it for my iTheater by starglider29a · · Score: 1

    What's the big rush? I can download it from the Apple iVid Store for my iTheater <*POP*> errr... sorry, I was dreaming.

    My kids have never seen it. Ever try to explain what using a computer was like before GUI to a kid? Or that the big scary Big Brother monopolistic dude in the video is NOT Bill Gates?

    Good luck...

    1. Re:I can buy it for my iTheater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not Bill Gates, who wasn't scary yet. He's Big Brother, representing IBM.

      -S.

  136. Pity the video file didn't include... by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    the section just before the demo, Steve's buildup to the 1984 video.

    1. Re:Pity the video file didn't include... by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're right. The emotion of the event sounds intense.

      Scott Knaster must have that on tape too. Maybe he'll release it next, in a more complete form?

      By the way, your post should be modded up as informative as it is a fascinating link. Maybe it would be if the moderators weren't simply interested in wasting their points on the smartass putdowns.

  137. filmed at Davies Symphony Hall? by Thumpnugget · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know where this was filmed? It's pretty dark and hard to tell, but it looks like this was filmed at Davies Symphony Hall in San Francisco. Can anyone confirm this?

    --
    Free yourself. Everything else will follow.
    1. Re:filmed at Davies Symphony Hall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Flint Center in Cupertino.

    2. Re:filmed at Davies Symphony Hall? by Thumpnugget · · Score: 1

      wow, yeah, i'm an idiot. That would make much more sense, although it does look similar to Davies on the inside. Thanks!

      --
      Free yourself. Everything else will follow.
  138. Date shown by Macintosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Anyone notice that the date shown by Macintosh in the slideshow is exactly 21 years ago to the day?

    1. Re:Date shown by Macintosh by HyperVerbal · · Score: 1

      Good point!!!!!!!!!

      --
      Stan M. ~~~Verbal~~~
  139. The video we need is Gates looking over Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The video we need is Gates looking over Jobs as Big Brother during the announcement of MS investing money in Apple!!!

  140. Re:Corniest.video.ever.. by chrome · · Score: 1

    ee-yup. I think thats why most of them don't "get it".

    I was 9, back then 8-bit was what it was all about. GEOS was about the best desktop UI you could get at the time on the commodore 64.

    Macs were otherworldly, wholely different peices of engineering that were orders of magnitude more powerful than anything else at the time.

  141. This was part of Cringely's excellent documentary by AgentCooper · · Score: 3, Informative
    Most of this footage has been available for years within Robert Cringely's excellent documentary, Triumph of the Nerds. No self-respecting geek or Apple fan should be without it! Three tapes' worth of interviews with industry pioneers, from Homebrew Computer Club to Microsoft. Steve Ballmer and Larry Ellison are fascinating, but Steve Jobs steals the show:
    The only problem with Microsoft is they just have no taste, they have absolutely no taste, and what that means is - I don't mean that in a small way I mean that in a big way. In the sense that they don't think of original ideas and they don't bring much culture into their product ehm and you say why is that important - well you know proportionally spaced fonts come from type setting and beautiful books, that's where one gets the idea - if it weren't for the Mac they would never have that in their products and ehm so I guess I am saddened, not by Microsoft's success - I have no problem with their success, they've earned their success. For the most part. I have a problem with the fact that they just make really third rate products. - Steve Jobs
  142. Never Seen? Not true by colin_n · · Score: 1

    I have seen this before. I cant remember where, but I distinctly remember seeing this footage. I dont think it was in Pirates of Silicon valley, but there is no way I havent seen this before. Does anyone else have the same recollection?

    --

    --------- I have no signature
  143. 100mbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mirror, fast for australians here:

    http://eddie.ratm.net/slashdot/1984macintro.mov

  144. And the History channel.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... will soon be playing rarely seen restored film reels of the "1980's desktop war" in color.

    Seriously, I like to see this vintage stuff. I used to read BYTE magazine, and saw the adverts for "The Computer Chronicles",
    but never got to see the series. Fortunately, these are available for download at archive.org

  145. That video is great! by mattyohe · · Score: 1

    I'm glad it has made it out into the net... I was practically tearing up at the end of it.

    --
    - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
  146. Re:Corniest.video.ever.. by David+Rolfe · · Score: 1

    Man. I sure did love GEOS, and it's descendent for the PC/XT, Geoworks. Damn you Windows, DAMN YOU! :-D

    --
    Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
  147. thanks [nt] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  148. I saw this video too... by LookSharp · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing this video sometime between 1994 and 1999, when I still had my Macintosh Quadra 840av. It was Quicktime clip on a CD, and while the video size was similar or a little smaller, it was digitzed much more "crisply" than this cassette transfer.

    Now if only I could remember if it was on a CD that came with my Mac, or maybe the CD with one of the "Late Night with MacHack" books... I honestly don't remember.

    But somebody had this "lost" content in QuickTime format between 6 and 10 years ago.

  149. Mirror by `Sean · · Score: 3, Informative
  150. Mirroring heavy files posted on /. by kling0n · · Score: 1

    It only takes a pslit second to append the ".nyud.net:8090" suffix to content links to make sure that the content is more readily available.

    (see Coral CDN for details..)

    Quick, easy and very well implemented (also makes sure that we dont /. the hell out of their servers)

    --
    This is not a sig

  151. Yet Another Mirror by wersh · · Score: 1

    I doubt it's needed by now, but here's another mirror (it'll stop working after 100 GB of traffic though).

  152. It strikes me that Jobs was an asshole his whole.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Jobs was an asshole his entire life.

    The presentation wasn't about Macintosh, it was about Jobs. The pictures were of jobs, the digitized voice was about jobs.

    The guy never said "This was a team effort". Look at when the digitized mac voice say "he's been like a father", the guy grins like he really was a father.

    The only thing worse are the Mac fanboi's cheering every little... nothing. If jobs said "You guys should all be killed", they would have cheered him.

    No wonder he was fired. He deserved to be.

  153. Any DivX version, plz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm tired of these MOV's.

  154. MOD PARENT UP by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

    thanks, keep up the good work. I couldnt get the other torrent, but yours worked fine :-), dling as I type this

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  155. Hell, remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that the IBM PC was introduced only in 1981.

    VGA was only introduced back in 1987.

    1. Re:Hell, remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      VGA was only introduced back in 1987.

      I didn't get a computer with VGA until 1991. CGA was good enough for me. Who needs more than a 4 color palette? :-)

  156. who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm serious, why does anyone care about this video?

  157. WTFM by yabos · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Watch the fucking movie no it's not.

    1. Re:WTFM by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Did you watch the movie? Point me in the direction of a mirror that's not a smoking pile of rubble, fucktard.

    2. Re:WTFM by yabos · · Score: 1

      How about any number of the bittorrent mirrors.

  158. My ISP... by darin3200 · · Score: 1

    gave me 25MB of space, the video is 22. Good thing they don't charge or apparently keep track of bandwidth :)
    Mirror

  159. fanboy to da core by asjk · · Score: 1
    Yep,

    Same RDF that Steve exudes nowadays. Observe the flourish with which he removes the boot disc from his jacket and starts the machine up. It's exciting to see this early presentation of many components of compuring that we take for granted. And how great was the execution of the device itself--both in hardware and software? Many people hadn't seen a mouse at the time. Small floppy format, text to speech and a GUI! I believe that some of those images are shown utilizing an application that was part of the included software. MacDraw maybe? Perhaps most thrilling was the pan of the audience at the end. Literally, the first Mac was something to stand and cheer about.

    On the humorous side was the File or Edit pull-down menu with about 2 sub-items in it.

  160. Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AHHHH!!! Back then free information wasn't allowed, for Big Brother controlled the world. Only now, after 1984 has passed away and weve triumphed over the persecution of people, has free information come back to us again...

  161. Re:Corniest ever? Not hardly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.tolkiencollector.com/bilbo5.mov

  162. 7th word by snorklewacker · · Score: 1

    Lite

    --
    I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
  163. 21 year old Beta Tape by nurb432 · · Score: 0

    Lets see a crappy VHS tape survive that long..

    Yes i know Sony lost the battle, but it wasnt due to lesser quality ( it was due to the morons running the show )

    Ok. so im off topic.. but i am right..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:21 year old Beta Tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got quite a few tapes that old, considering how the tape that was actually used to build the casettes was the same, I'm not sure how you think that beta-max would somehow survive longer. Also considering that VHS is still in widespread use and finding a betamax machine it getting harder and harder, that would seem to indicate that storing stuff on bta was actaully the poorer descision.

    2. Re:21 year old Beta Tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 30-or-so VHS tapes from 1982 have proven you wrong.

  164. Watch Out!!! by vwjeff · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not really, A VHS would not have survived as long. Beta was a significantly more robust format.

    And the VHS vs. Betamax wars begin. Keep it clean. Fight!!!

  165. Triumph of the Nerds? by ethank · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this clip in Triumph of the Nerds, Mr. Cringley's excellent documentary from 1996?

    It is nice to have in Quicktime though, if not just to show my wife that the fanatical, cult like audiences from this years Mac World keynote are not unique :)

  166. 1 minute 20s for 20MB by guet · · Score: 1

    Wow, downloaded in less than 2 minutes. Wouldn't it be great if other media files on the www (as opposed to the internet) were distributed this way? Have left the torrent up as I watch it...

    Now why aren't Slashdot offering to do this for other content-heavy sites before they post the stories? I guess that'd be too much like work.

  167. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Patents.

    The "technology" is owned already.

  168. Origin by pat_trick · · Score: 1

    This is where the Mac fanaticisim started. All right here. I mean, look at those people. And Steve Job's smirk. He's all over it.

    Also, thinking back, that was amazing at the time. I mean, a talking computer the size of a small monitor? Who'd a thunk? The crack at the IBM Mainframe was also classic for the time, though relations between Apple and IBM have certainly shifted since then.

  169. not new (no, I'm not talking about the commercial) by chickenrob · · Score: 1

    This footage was in the PBS special the triumph of the nerds. I think I recall the guy remarking about steve beaming like a proud new father at his baby.

    --
    People say my sig is the best thing about me.
  170. Re:PC competition for the Mini-MAC? by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
    Simple... just don't buy Apple's RAM. Buy the least you can get and move on to a RAM vendor.

    Next, if you're careful, I've never seen Apple try to prove someone's been in a case and broken their warranty. Yes, if you open the case with a can opener they might try to tell you "no."

    And, finally, when my mother wanted a new PC a few years back, and I handed her specs for three different vendors (including Apple), she went with a Sony (not on my list) and I am STILL expected to support it (even though I work on a Mac, have a Mac at home, and loaned her an older Mac when her Sony's hard drive decided to slip this mortal coil). It comes down to: you'll support what your family member wants to get. If you're lucky, they'll listen to you when you suggest what that should be, but that's a rare thing in this day and age.

    Personally, the sooner I can get my mother onto a Mac mini and off the Vaio, the happier I become...

  171. Yawn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoop-de-doo. Don't waste your time.

  172. Re:Who has a copy of the SLASHDOT-L Mac intro thre by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll always remember this:

    Apple's new Macintosh.

    Smaller than a PDP-11. No wireless. Lame.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  173. Australian mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  174. betamax is dead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    the only thing left to do with them old betamax VCRs is convert them to cute mini-itx projects

    crying yet? ;-)

  175. Oooh. That IS a good one. by ccmay · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mod parent funny. I'm a Bush man, but I know when to say 'touché.'

    --
    Too much Law; not enough Order.
  176. Slashdot rant here (Offtopic) by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    It's really annoying... I create the torrent, post this link, an Anonymous Coward posts the same link as a response to an earlier item, and my post gets modded down. Maybe I'm a karma whore, but is this fair?

  177. Re:Betamax? -- The parent is flat out wrong by michaeldot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not really, A VHS would not have survived as long. Beta was a significantly more robust format.

    This is a load of crap. My father, an engineer who was given the task of evaluating the formats for use in education, managed to get hold of a highly bootleg copy of Star Wars on VHS, in 1977.

    The JVC machine we played it on even had mechanical type buttons, none of this newfangled soft touch nonsense.

    Not robust...? I actually played this old 1977 VHS cassette just a month or two ago (2004) to compare against my recently purchased Star Wars trilogy DVD.

    It played just fine thank you, and this is after being originally played many, many times, a long time ago, as you can imagine a 7 year and all his friends would...

    I don't know which of the formats was actually this mythical more robust thing you speak of, but I can imagine if there was any difference, it would be beta that was weaker due to the continuous take up spooling to ensure a fast start playback.

  178. 3 1/2 inch floppies by SiliconEntity · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Mac was the first major computer with support for the 3 1/2 inch hard cased floppies. PCs continued to use the 5 1/4 inch soft floppies for years afterwards. I remember reading a magazine article where Jobs pulled a floppy out of his pocket and tossed it onto the table. Everyone gasped. They had learned how fragile floppy drives were and the importance of always carrying them careully and putting them promptly into the box (not only did the 5 1/4s bend, they had holes so dust could get onto the disk surfaces).

    That's why everyone claps right at the beginning, he pulls the floppy out of his pocket(!) and sticks it into the computer.

    People watching today might not realize that the Mac did not have a hard drive. One was later provided as an expensive extra option. But initially the Mac had only a floppy drive to boot from.

    Those were the days... I loved the Mac. I bought one back in 1984, the first GUI I'd ever used. Then a year later I laboriously unsoldered the memory chips and upgraded the system from 128K to a whole half a meg of memory. I can't count how many Macs I've bought over the years since then... we've got 7 right now, counting the 2 my kids in college have.

  179. Steve Jobs is my Daddy by arron_nz · · Score: 1

    A portion of this video was floating around as audio on the net. I can't help but think that Jobs probably assembled that self-glorifying mac speech himself ;)

    --
    garble
    1. Re:Steve Jobs is my Daddy by rjung2k · · Score: 1

      You lose the bet. According to Andy Hertzfeld, it was written by Steve Hayden, the same guy who conceived of the "1984" commercial.

  180. Oh man, they ripped of Konfabulator! by michaeldot · · Score: 1

    I saw a desk accessory in those screenshots. Man those Apple dudes are devious.

  181. When I was a young teenage geek... by emjoi_gently · · Score: 1

    ... 1980? 1981? 1982? I forget. I went to a Computer Exhibition, looking at what would be the best computer to buy. At the time the choice was between the Commodore Pet, the Apple II, the TRS-80, and the Sinclair ZX-80. (Went with a TRS-80 clone. It was cheap).
    Unisys and the like were showing off the mini-computers running lame Space Invaders games drawn in text with extended character sets. Arcade games were big, and they wanted to show they were "with it".

    But Apple had set up the LISA. A monster of a Ten Grand computer with the most gorgeous graphics you'd ever seen. WYSIWYG was the big theme. Text editors with FONTS, a windowing system, a mouse, a painting program. Jaw dropping at the time and a complete rethink of how a computer should be.
    And here we are nearly 25 years later, running with the same paradym, just with the pictures colour in.

    (Why did I write all that? Dunno. Just in a mood for waffling)

  182. Just curious by bedouin · · Score: 1

    Why did the first Mac have a monochrome display? I mean, it was an expensive computer in the first place, I'm not sure a color display would've made it much more expensive.

  183. I like this torrent... by Burning+Plastic · · Score: 1

    444 seeds already (averaging 90k/s down)

    Yay!

    --
    [All Your Fish Are Belong To Us]
  184. Ummm... because nobody cares? by istartedi · · Score: 1

    If my PC spoke by default, the voice would suffer the same fate as that stupid search dog. Unless you're visually impaired, text-to-speech is not that useful. My cousin is totally sightless and last time I checked was still using a DOS program, yes, that's right, DOS text-to-speech that was incomprehensable to me and other regular people in the room. I wouldn't be surprised if he preferred it that way, since he could work without people necessarily knowing what he is doing.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Ummm... because nobody cares? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      My wife is deaf-blind, but her braille pda has text to speech. It's invaluable for me to do tech support, but it is nearly impossible to understand at times. And yes, the default mode for the voice is "off" in our house, both to keep from annoying me and to provide her with privacy.

      How else can she bitch about me to her online friends?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  185. Steve Jobs' Attire by rollerbob · · Score: 1

    I think he was wearing his black sweater and blue jeans under that suit.

  186. I've seen that video by cyrax256 · · Score: 1

    My HCI teacher has that video on VHS!!!, it looks so old. It was fun to see it, anyway :)

  187. Download Rate: 460KB/s by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    Total elapsed time: 54 seconds.

    Nice Torrent.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  188. If only that was true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just think about how much nicer slashdot would be.

    For one thing there is the chance that we would see fewer Apple© Slashvertisement "Stories" being posted.

    Another nice benefit would be finally getting them to shut up about their overrated mp3 players.

  189. Can't identify the music being played by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, -

    I know it's something familiar but I cannot identify the piece of music that is being played back during the screenshots slide show.

    Maybe someone can enlighten me on this one?

    Thanks!

    1. Re:Can't identify the music being played by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the theme from the contemporaneous movie "Chariots of Fire".

      -S.

  190. It wasn't 3D Chess by jmichaelg · · Score: 1

    The "chess" program was actually Alice.

  191. Explosion by DOS-5 · · Score: 1

    At the end after the computer finished talking it looked like Jobs was about to explode or die of laughter. His face was very red.

  192. Abgefackt == upgefuckt == shabby by ex-geek · · Score: 0

    At least in Austria "abgefackt" (pronounced "upgefucked") means shabby, run-down, worn out etc.

    I'm not sure about the etymology of that word. It probably came from english. On the other had, there is an austrian village called "Fucking" (pronounced Fook-ing) and also "Petting".

    "abgeraucht" would be a good word as an equivalent for "slashdotted".

    1. Re:Abgefackt == upgefuckt == shabby by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Does "abgeraucht" mean, sort of, "smoked out" or "burned out"? It's been ages (1996) since I lived in Germany... getting rusty at the language.

    2. Re:Abgefackt == upgefuckt == shabby by ex-geek · · Score: 0

      Yup! That's right. dict.leo.org actually gives "to fume off" as translation for "abrauchen", which is the infinitive of "abgeraucht".

  193. Re:Corniest ever? Not hardly! by macdaddy · · Score: 1

    Oh no! My link to the movie was lost. Here's another link. Hey, that doesn't work either. Damn it all. Ah ha! There's an errant single-quote in the link I've been copying and pasting. Interesting. It's a shame Slashcode didn't give me any error. Here's a working link

  194. Asymmetrical technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And just image consumer broadband using the same technology as a T1 line, at consumer prices.

  195. I would almost pay money... by jellisky · · Score: 1

    ... to hear someone attempt to say that entire word in one breath.

    -Jellisky

  196. I still have the original 1984 Mac! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still have the first Mac that came out. It was called a 'Thin' Mac back then, and came with 128KB RAM and a 400KB floppy, as compared to the 'Fat' Mac that came with 515KB RAM. At $4000 (Oz$, about $3000 US$ back then), the thin was all I could scrape to afford. It also came with a nice padded case, although I think I might have had to cough up even more for that.

    Everything runs on a single 400KB floppy. Microsoft Excel, Word, Basic etc. Half the OS is on each floppy. All your data files have to fit.

    The interesting thing is, I don't really need any
    more functionality in the bloated Excel now than I did in that skinny version from 1984.

    Maybe my trusty old Mac will be worth something one day!

  197. Re:Corniest ever? Not hardly! by roelbj · · Score: 1

    Here is a torrent for "The Ballad of Bilbo Baggins."

  198. I've had that 30sec video for almost 10 years now. by cryptomancer · · Score: 1

    ..but it was *just* published on the net. "Published?" I'm sure I got it by right-clicking a link and choosing 'save as,' too. Is this 'publish' somehow more legitimate than that? Is this one endorsed by Apple?

    --
    Yes, we understand these tags always apply: fud, dupe, typo, slashdotted, topic name
  199. Re:Who has a copy of the SLASHDOT-L Mac intro thre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You do realize that these kids are too young to get this joke? BITNET is probably meaningless to them.

  200. Triumph of the Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have the DVD, browse to Chapter 5 on "Volume 3: Great Artists Steal"

    Its the same clip, just with Robert Cringley narrating a bit.

  201. Re:It strikes me that Jobs was an asshole his whol by michaeldot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most people would probably agree with you, even those who know Jobs personally.

    And yet, without Jobs to goad people into stroking his ego, there would have been no Mac, no NeXTSTEP, no Apple post-1997, no iMac, no iPod, no standards of excellence in GUI computing.

    Sometimes it takes an asshole to make a dent in the universe.

  202. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think that is the commercial they are talking about.

  203. maybe i'm too much of a nerd, but... by k2enemy · · Score: 1

    i couldn't disagree more. i literally had chills running down my spine watching it. i can't imagine how exciting it must have been for the audience members.

  204. It's "black turtleneck" and it's symbolic too by michaeldot · · Score: 1

    I think he was wearing his black sweater and blue jeans under that suit.

    The suit went when Apple lost all interest from the enterprise and had to sell iMacs to soccer moms to stay in business.

    This is not a Mac-hating troll post (I've had more Macs than most of you have had steak dinners). It's a realistic assessment of Apple decline in fortunes from its 18% marketshare in the 80s (much of it from the corporate world) to under 2% today.

    1. Re:It's "black turtleneck" and it's symbolic too by Thu25245 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about "decline in fortunes." Apple's got a crapload of money....something around $6 Billion, according to their last financial conference call.

      2% of today's computer market is much larger, in terms of revenue and units sold, than 18% of the 1980s market.

      And no, Apple was never very big in the corporate world. The corporate world bought mainframes, until the IBM PC came out. After which it bought IBM PCs, until the PC clones came out. Since which time it has bought PCs. Apple always sold mostly to hobbyists, home users, schools, and artistic/media people.

    2. Re:It's "black turtleneck" and it's symbolic too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure about "decline in fortunes." Apple's got a crapload of money....something around $6 Billion, according to their last financial conference call.

      Most of that $6Billion (about $4Billion IIRC) was amassed from selling its shares of ARM. This just means they have money to do cool stuff with, to invest in new technologies, etc. etc. etc.

    3. Re:It's "black turtleneck" and it's symbolic too by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      I agree but disagree with you. Those are people who the Mac ethos has always appealed to, but in the mid-80s a Mac cost more than a small car. So while they liked the Mac, they used them at work, because corporations (or the very financially well-off hobbyists) were the only ones who could afford them.

      It was the LaserWriter and Macintosh Office which made the Mac a success. Combined, the cost was enormous. Only a company could afford it.

      Also, from a marketing position (the parent post was talking about "suits" after all), for a long time Apple was dead against having the Macintosh appear as a games machine and discouraged all developers from making games for it. That's hardly a strategy to sell into the home, now is it.

      It was later that the Mac became more of an educational thing, with all the good hackers on it from the universities (Dartmouth had a huge Mac following) and with more affordable models (and heavily discounted educational prices - those were the days!)

      I don't think we're necessarily at odds, just talking different timescales. I feel my suit-to-turtleneck analogy was quite appropriate.

      As to the decline in fortunes: Apple has enough billions to survive now, but relative to what other companies make it is small change. Look at Dell: the most innovative thing Michael Dell ever pulled out of a bag was a cheaply made clone assembled from parts from the lowest cost vendor. But Dell's quarterly revenue is four times that of Apple's, even with lower gross margins.

      Look at Microsoft: it was assisted by Apple to write Word and Excel (programs that came out on the Mac in 1985) and indeed licensed to use Mac GUI elements in them (which is why Apple lost the look & feel lawsuit).

      Today, sales from a single upgrade would make Apple sales look like a kid's lemonade stand.

      I'd call that a decline in fortunes, relatively speaking!

  205. I have seen the video by Performaman · · Score: 1

    And it is insanely great.

    --

    I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
  206. Re:Oooh. That IS a good one. by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do you know when to say 'sorry'?

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  207. Re:Corniest ever? Not hardly! by macdaddy · · Score: 1

    Good call. Isn't that hilarious? My mother even laughed.

  208. Seen it by cyclobotomy · · Score: 1

    ... Never seen video footage...

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I could swear I've seen that footage before. Perhaps in Crinley's Silicon Valley documentary Triumph of the Nerds ?

  209. hmmm by XO · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's pretty egotistical of geeks everywhere to think that the original Macintosh computer ad has only one surviving copy, and that's from a computer geek.

    Hello, it was on during the freaking SUPER BOWL.

    There's GOT to be a bazillion people out there with tapes of some kind of the entire super bowl probably for every year since there's been something you could farkin record it on!

    Think about it!

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    1. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not the Super Bowl ad. This is the introduction event at Flint Center in Cupertino.

      -S.

    2. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about it!

      Yes, you should. How about you watch the fucking video before you run your mouth off like the fool you've proven yourself to be? Maybe even RTFA and you'd understand it's not the fucking Superbowl commercial. Or read the myriad comments before yours saying it's not the 1984 commercial? Dammit, you have to be three times a retard to do what you did.

  210. Robust? Simpler than that. by repetty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Robust" is pretty vague. You oughta seen me naked: I'm robust.

    Beta technology was gentler on tape than VHS. The transport system on a Beta deck pulled out a lot more tape than VHS did and was more sophisticated. The benefit was less stress on the tape -- really.

    A rewound Beta tape is less taut than a rewound VHS tape and for long term storage that counts for a lot.

    I have a related suggestion for any VHS users: when you are done watching your tape, don't rewind it. Let it sit and then rewind it right before you watch it again.

    The reason is that fast-rewinds really wrap the tape tightly onto the spindle, stretching it over time. When you watch a tape or fast-scan forward/backward, the tape remains pulled into the machine where it benefits from the relatively gentle handling of the pulleys and capstans.

    As an aside, I was an early video adopter, which is to say that I bought Beta. I used my Beta unit for years and then the VHS units began to include video filters for prettier pictures. I bought one of these nice new VHS units but the picture was not superior to my Beta unit.

    --Richard

  211. I've already seen it! by parawing742 · · Score: 1

    This clip was shown in a part of a computer history video at my school. That exact same piece! This video has NOT been lost for decades as the story says... Still, it makes me cry everytime I watch it.

  212. Bow Tie by TheMediaWrangler · · Score: 1

    You have to go back a long way to see Steve Jobs out of uniform. He's actually wearing a button down shirt and bow tie. Reality distortion field still in full effect, however.

    --
    People should not fear what they do not understand; people should fear because they do not understand.
  213. Actually pretty close to blue by zieroh · · Score: 1



    The original Mac screen had a whitepoint that, well, tends toward blue, as did many Apple monitors that came after that. When Apple introduced the legendary 13" Color Display (made by Sony) the whitepoint was carried over, and the version of white displayed by that monitor tended toward blue as well.

    On the Kelvin scale, it's 9600+8MPCD. If I recall correctly, the CIE1931 xy value is x=0.283 y=0.289. It's pretty much blue.

    --
    People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
  214. http://redir.netc.dk/apple1984.torrent by thestoffer · · Score: 1

    Thanx to thepiratebay.org :-)

  215. Amiga by Ostie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't see what's amazing about Macintosh classic when 1 year later Amiga came with colorful graphics(up to 4096 colors), a real preemptive multitask OS and all the hot stuff. You could actualy format a disk drive while printing and doing some other stuff while on Mac you had to wait in front of a black & white screen.

    1. Re:Amiga by Ostie · · Score: 1

      Read the original Macintosh instead of Macintosh classic. This stuff is just classic to me.

    2. Re:Amiga by robnauta · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I don't see what's amazing about Macintosh classic when 1 year later Amiga came with colorful graphics(up to 4096 colors), a real preemptive multitask OS and all the hot stuff. You could actualy format a disk drive while printing and doing some other stuff while on Mac you had to wait in front of a black & white screen. Yeah I remember that. Amiga owners were always bragging about multitasking, which to them meant formatting floppies while doing something else. I guess some people just kept several floppies by their machine and formatted them over and over and over again when they got bored, to make them feel better about the superiority of their machine.

    3. Re:Amiga by catdevnull · · Score: 1

      Yeah? And where is Amiga now?

      --

      I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
    4. Re:Amiga by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The Amiga's fate was probably sealed when Commodore bought out Amiga. The Mac had the charismatic Jobs and his trademark Reality Distortion Field, with serious attempts at making a business computer. And the Amiga had Commodore, who just kind of threw it out there, expected people to play games on it and otherwise treated it as a shiny toy.

      Another difference is that while Amiga focused on flashy hardware, Apple focused on a solid user interface. It's a lot easier to be backwards compatible with software than it is with hardware. Amiga was pretty much doomed to have to re-implement the same chipset and video modes in every future version, where Quickdraw on the Mac, and discouraging direct writes to the video hardware (which was just a simple bitmap to begin with), allowed Apple the flexibility to change the graphics hardware.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    5. Re:Amiga by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Well actually, the OS is still being developed, unlike classic MacOS..

    6. Re:Amiga by catdevnull · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm aware of the continued OS development...but I have two questions:

      1. Where is Amiga OS now? Literally? It's changed hands so many times, it's becoming a bit of a joke.

      2. Who is actually developing software for Amiga OS? It seems that there must be some developer making something for it.

      My point is, just because it's still being developed doesn't mean that it outlasted MacOS. I think more people are running the GNU HURD than Amiga OS.
      I remember the first time I saw an Amiga computer--I thought it was the coolest thing ever. Then again, Beta was so much better than VHS.

      --

      I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
    7. Re:Amiga by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Any my point is that even if you consider them both in an equal state of non-development, asking where Amiga is now is no more relevant than asking where classic MacOS is now.

      Yet people are always allowed to go on about how the 20 year old Mac was first to do this or that. Does the fact that no one's still using the original Mac affect this, or the fact that other platforms are far more greatly used? Of course not.

    8. Re:Amiga by catdevnull · · Score: 1

      Maybe--but I see MacOS 9 on desktops and in use all over the place. I can still find software for it--development for new apps has halted, however. I haven't seen an Amiga (dead or alive) in ages. I meant my question quite literally--where is the Amiga and who is developing software for it?

      I'm not trying to beat a dead horse here--the original Mac has morphed into something else--as any computer and OS should. The Amiga has morphed itself into utter obscurity. Original Macs and the last/latest release of Amiga OS are not the same question and therefore the relevancy issue is moot.

      Props to the Amiga for being the first and best of its kind, though. No arguing that. I'm just saying that it died on the vine while the Mac continued through today.

      --

      I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  216. Intro @ De Anza's Flint Center by NoodleSlayer · · Score: 1

    I find it really surprising that there wouldn't be more tapes of this floating around somewhere. And that it would wind up in Germany of all places.

    The theatre is the Flint Center at De Anza College in Cupertino. A whole 3 blocks away from the current Apple World HQ. Other places on the net I know will confirm this.

    However DA is a fairly wired school. I'd be surprised if there wasn't a tape of that laying around somewhere at DA right now. Not to mention something sitting at Apple...

    More likely this is just the first time anyone has cared to post a video of the original debut of the Mac on the web.

  217. Re:I've had that 30sec video for almost 10 years n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the 30 second video was the commerical you fucktard.

  218. Another mirror by theunixman · · Score: 2, Informative
  219. Re:It strikes me that Jobs was an asshole his whol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes it takes an asshole to make a dent in the universe.

    But an asshole already IS a dent in the universe... oh wait, that's blackhole.

  220. Re:Corniest.video.ever.. by Psykechan · · Score: 1

    Hmm... January 24, 1984 to January 24, 2005.

    That Macintosh is old enough to drink.

  221. He has two hours of video by Alien54 · · Score: 1

    which they have promised to make available in the coming weeks

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  222. Re:Who has a copy of the SLASHDOT-L Mac intro thre by Shag · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah... the fact that it got rated "insightful" is amusing in its own way.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  223. They cut out the last part of the video by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Where the Woz comes running through the crowd and hurls a hammer at the Mac. That's the real reason this video was "lost."

  224. Anniversary by jayratch · · Score: 1

    Was this the genuine first unveiling?

    That would make today (Jan 24) a particular 20 year anniversary. I'd expect Apple to be doing something celebratory, or something... like sell a few "Anniversary edition" iMacs. Not that that hasn't been beaten to death already with past special editions...

    1. Re:Anniversary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right... nevermind. It's only Jan 24. It's pretty hard to remember what year it is before about March, isn't it.

  225. Re:Betamax? -- The parent is flat out wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if someone would just make a permanent copy of the original 1977 Star Wars for posterity. And send a copy to George L. @ I.L.M. Don't trust George Lucus to preserve the original version of Star Wars because in his view the original movie no longer exists.

  226. Re:It strikes me that Jobs was an asshole his whol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, no, no, you're thinking of the Goatse.cx guy.

    Although...

    Wait a moment, Ladies and Gentlemen, it seems that we have discovered the true identity of Bob Goatse! He and Steve Jobs are in fact the same person!

  227. This is news to me! by frob2600 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this is definitly news to me. I have been able to find this commercial on the web for the last 5 years. Amazing that it just came out today.

    I must have the browser from the future or something!

    Even better... go find the SNL spoof with the Macintosh Jr. It is usually on the same 10 pages that have had this 1984 ad for the last couple of years. And at least it is funny.

    Note: Yes I do have my own copy of the 1984 commericial... for historical reasons. But this is not a new thing. It seriously has been on the web for years. In the same 22MB file as well. I'll try and turn up one of the older pages...

    I don't know who thought this was news.

    --

    ---
    "Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins,
    for they are subtle and quick to anger."

    1. Re:This is news to me! by frob2600 · · Score: 1

      STRIKE THAT.

      I was thinking the commercial -- of which I do have a 22MB version. This video is different.

      It was taking a while to download but seemed to be the same thing I had already on my computer.

      I still recommend the Mac Jr. Commericial.

      http://www.uriah.com/apple%2Dqt/

      One of which is found here... very funny.

      --

      ---
      "Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins,
      for they are subtle and quick to anger."

  228. Douglas Adams put Dent into the universe... by cocoa+moe · · Score: 1

    ...but let's stay on topic:

    I think it's OK for Steve Jobs to feel proud. He was really there, when the Mac was designed.

    All of its look and feel, the box, Quickdraws round-rects, the clover-key all these have sprung from his opinion what the perfect computer should look like.

    Of course Smith, Atkinson, Hertzfeld, Crow, Capps and the famous Susan Kare did create the Computer and Frog-Design created the box, but Steve always was with them, judging thier designs and deciding when something was finished (which tended to be never).

    So his style helped the team a lot. They surpassed their own expectations.

  229. The Macintosh Talks by professorfalcon · · Score: 1

    How did they fit Stephen Hawking into a box that small?!

  230. Another mirror. by talornin · · Score: 1

    http://www.goweee.com/1984macintro.mov

    --
    When in danger, whewn in doubt! Run in circles, scream and shout!
  231. Re:It strikes me that Jobs was an asshole his whol by dgrgich · · Score: 1

    I'm going to make a bumper sticker out of that saying and make millions!!

  232. where's the turtleneck? by steff_stuff · · Score: 1

    Who's that man? Ahh! It's Steve! Where's the turtleneck?

  233. Iam Greedy ! by earthstar · · Score: 1

    Hey ! Can I get that 22 MB video as a 22 Kb file on my 33,600 bps dial up! ;-)

  234. Sales and upgradeability by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

    Part of what has contantly hurt Apple's sales percentages is the fact that Apples have a longer usage lifespan. The Mac mini can put a dent in this by its lack of upgradeability, at least for a short time.

    The other thing to consider when comparing the Mac mini to other computers is the incredibly small form factor. A few days ago the Slashdot crowd tried (and failed) to find a Windows-compatible PC of the same size, performance and price.

    This is a computer designed to complement the existing home PC (KVM switch required) and gradually assume the existing PC's tasks. Thus the lack of keyboard, monitor and other gizmos. If you want those, then you're supposed to buy an iMac G5 or an iBook.

  235. Re:Betamax? -- The parent is flat out wrong by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    How's about capturing that and torrenting it? Or just snail-mailing me a copy. My email's right at the top of this comment. I'd LOVE to get my hands on a copy of that!

  236. ...and this is why... by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    And this is why Steve Jobs is the applause whore he is today!
    :-)

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  237. Moderating fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The response to your poker face joke is not so amusing as sad to me, an example of where Slashdot's moderation system shows off where it breaks. I supose I'm partly motivated because my ability to moderate seems to have been permanently impaired despite that when I did moderate I did so conscientiously and thoughtfully.

    Anyhow, the fact that the moderators of this thread are unable to recognize that Slashdot wasn't even a concept in 1984 is really sad. This reminds me of what French philosopher Jean Baudrillard said about the postmodern age, which is that it is without history. No one seems to know history. Slashdotters don't even know the history of Slashdot.

    Incroyable.

  238. Re:Corniest.video.ever.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found this somewhat funny. In my last year of high school, the school got some shiny new 286's equipped with 30MB hard drives, with Windows 3.0 installed. It took Windows 3.0 _longer_ to load by several seconds (from typing "win" at the dos prompt, not even including booting DOS.) than it did to load GEOS off of floppy on the C64.

  239. Re:Oooh. That IS a good one. by Upphew · · Score: 0

    I like neatly shaven more than bush...

  240. grammar by PDubNYC · · Score: 1

    well, considering how bad your grammar is in your post, I think you have bigger things to worry about than the spelling of an individual word.

    Ouch! It hurts my head just trying to read your post.

  241. apple fags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's so funny seeing apple fags defend Macs. They think with no logic and rely on raw emotion as a substitute.

    They are quick to point out that PC users are wrong, yet they cannot find any sort of evidence apart from Apple's own website.

    But whatever the case, just remember to make Bill give you a reacharound the next time he's having his way with your anal tract.

    Will do. And you do the same with Steve "hand" Jobs.

    Face it, you're a liberal little twit that borders on homosexuality. Shove that iDildo up your ass.

    1. Re:apple fags by bmxbandit · · Score: 1

      You're a perfect example of the kind of brainless scum MS exploit (sorry sell to). The only person laughing louder than Apple users is big Bill himself. You may not be bright enough to understand what a computer is, but your comments, as you try, are pure comedy gold!

  242. mac cost by hawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even in the 80's, Macintosh was (generally) only significantly more expensive than the cheap brands. If you compared it to the better built and more expensive brands fitted with comparable video and sound, there wasn't much difference (in most cases).

    The 5 year typical service life of a mac compared to 3 years for dos/windows typically made it less expensive than even the cheap brands over the long term.

    And once you factored in support costs in a business, the mac made up for the purchase price difference in the first year or two (there was about a 4:1 factor there!)

    hawk

  243. To be fair to Jobs... by rjung2k · · Score: 1

    To be fair to Steve, he did insist the key developers sign the inside of the case, and they did receive free Macs after the presentation (see the already-cited folklore.org site).

    And if that's still not good enough, let's note that Andy Hertzfeld himself has given Steve Jobs the mantle of Father of the Macintosh:

    "But ultimately, if any single individual deserves the honor, I would have to cast my vote for the obvious choice, Steve Jobs, because the Macintosh never would have happened without him, in anything like the form it did. Other individuals are responsible for the actual creative work, but Steve's vision, passion for excellence and sheer strength of will, not to mention his awesome powers of persuasion, drove the team to meet or exceed the impossible standards that we set for ourselves. Steve already gets a lot of credit for being the driving force behind the Macintosh, but in my opinion, it's very well deserved."

  244. Re:Who has a copy of the SLASHDOT-L Mac intro thre by greed · · Score: 1
    Smaller than a PDP-11. No wireless. Lame.

    You're getting ahead of yourself with the wireless. It was really:

    Smaller than a PDP-11. No thicknet. No TTYs. Lame.

  245. Re:It strikes me that Jobs was an asshole his whol by mkiwi · · Score: 1
    Actually, Steve has changed a lot since he got married and focused on his family life. He used to be an asshole, but he changed his tune as he got older. After all, he has over $1 billion (pinky to corner of mouth). he does not need to prove himself to the corporate world.

    On the other hand, Bill Gates is relatively unchanged since Windows- screwd businessman, 2nd best in his class (allusion to Harvard Mathematics and operating systems), etc.

    Then there's Larry Elison. He has not changed with time- scratch that- changed positively. The size of Ellison's ego is directly proportional to how much he can screw Bill Gates.

  246. Re:Mirror (bit torrented) by wealthychef · · Score: 1

    They have now posted a torrent link (untested) http://mirror.services.wisc.edu/mirrors/temp/1984m acintro.html

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
  247. Re:It strikes me that Jobs was an asshole his whol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No way!

    Jobs would never have pictures of himself taken in such bad lighting conditions.

  248. Re:Oooh. That IS a good one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd mod this comment up if I hadn't just used my last mod point.

  249. A Time Machine -- finally! by zenwarrior · · Score: 1

    Now that's a real time machine! Watching it actually gave me chills. I want my Mac back!!!

    --
    /.'s Psychic-in-Residence: Psychic to the Geeks
  250. Where's HAL? Talk to me, HAL. (Taking bets!) by zenwarrior · · Score: 1

    As much advancement as there has been in computers over the past 20 years, the saddest thing demonstrated by that video is the fact that computers can't really speak any better now than they did then. A computer still sounds like a computer, and pretty much like the original Mac.

    So how many more years will it take before we actually talk to a HAL, and a HAL actually talks back in a voice very much like that of a human? Another 20 years? Less than 5 years? Taking bets here!

    --
    /.'s Psychic-in-Residence: Psychic to the Geeks
  251. Re:Oooh. That IS a good one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent funny. I'm a Bush man, but I know when to say 'touché.'

    Was that French?

  252. Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for that video!!!