I think the real problem is that the first thing that comes to mind after hearing the words "PC Pitstop" are "what the hell is that?" I read my EULAs... if I had actually installed such software, I would have won the money. Maybe people who make more useful software should start implementing the same scheme.
You inevitably have to fiddle with it for minutes to find the menu option that lists the devices that you have already registered with
I would do this by clicking the KDE Bluetooth icon, and then clicking the device name... or simply right-clicking and choosing the device from the recent list, if I used it recently.
I take it you are used to Microsoft's so-called user-friendly approach.
The reason people should be surprised is that Base64 and UUEncode are extremely popular ways to encode data in email. A few pieces of software evidently send this data in the email body, incorrectly but perhaps intentionally. The process of a user manually UUEncoding data into the body of an email is supposedly pretty common in itself, and is one of the tricks email auditing software is expected to detect.:-)
If zip (or any) files are blocked, I like sending files encrypted, or merely scrambled.
You would be surprised how few email filters detect an attachment which is simply sent as Base64 or UUEncoded text, in the body. As it's not an attachment, it frequently gets ignored.
Tough, but not as hard as O(n^2). For various reasons, adding two hashes together doesn't actually make the work much harder than it already was. You get better security out of switching to a newer hash function.
Nevertheless, code designed while testing using Opera or Konqueror tends to work in Firefox, as do any other combination of those browsers. IE is the only browser which is consistently broken.
Another way to look at it though, is to try to ignore the existence of the book. The first part of the original radio series was roughly 3 hours in length if you add it all up, and I'm sure it would be possible to cover all of that in a single movie, even if in a frantic fashion. The next 3 hours could be movie #2, and the next 3 hours could be movie #3.:-)
The whole point behind stringprep (of which domainprep, which is supposed to be applied to all domain names, is a profile), is that two characters which look identical would be resolved to the same character. So the user shouldn't have such problems.
Slashdot Mirror
I think the real problem is that the first thing that comes to mind after hearing the words "PC Pitstop" are "what the hell is that?" I read my EULAs... if I had actually installed such software, I would have won the money. Maybe people who make more useful software should start implementing the same scheme.
I have this on mine, and break it out whenever somebody's brain needs breaking. Works quite well. Still have the ROM binary around. :-)
How can it be hip, when it's hip to be square, and the iPod's rounded corners are far from square? Just a thought.
You mean I can use my mouse as a calculator? Talk about feature creep!
Actually, Ford Explorer would be closer to the original meaning of the word "explorer" than Internet Explorer was.
Virus scanners obviously already detect that sort of trick, as it's about the oldest trick in the book.
I bet sex would result in better conductivity than handshakes, too. If that's the case, then having sex would put you at a greater risk of infection.
You inevitably have to fiddle with it for minutes to find the menu option that lists the devices that you have already registered with
I would do this by clicking the KDE Bluetooth icon, and then clicking the device name... or simply right-clicking and choosing the device from the recent list, if I used it recently.
I take it you are used to Microsoft's so-called user-friendly approach.
As they say, Google does have a cache of all the articles. Maybe this really was Google's fault somehow. ;-)
The reason people should be surprised is that Base64 and UUEncode are extremely popular ways to encode data in email. A few pieces of software evidently send this data in the email body, incorrectly but perhaps intentionally. The process of a user manually UUEncoding data into the body of an email is supposedly pretty common in itself, and is one of the tricks email auditing software is expected to detect. :-)
If zip (or any) files are blocked, I like sending files encrypted, or merely scrambled.
You would be surprised how few email filters detect an attachment which is simply sent as Base64 or UUEncoded text, in the body. As it's not an attachment, it frequently gets ignored.
I find XForms the better idea, as it doesn't rely on the ludicrous assumption that HTML is the only markup language which forms will ever be used in.
Jokes aside, Qt NetHack is actually pretty cool. :-)
Tough, but not as hard as O(n^2). For various reasons, adding two hashes together doesn't actually make the work much harder than it already was. You get better security out of switching to a newer hash function.
That's assuming you even knew that the machine was infected when you downloaded the CD. :-)
Last I checked, Windows didn't come preconfigured to use directories either. :-)
What if the spyware intercepted the download of the disk you're using to check the spyware?
Yeah. I looked and noticed that nobody had said it yet, so it looked like a good idea.
I would replace the word "Loses" with "Sells". And perhaps tack "To Terrorists" on the end for good luck.
And I bet it's broken a lot more than 25 million. :-)
It's too bad IE still can't actually handle XHTML correctly. If it could, that would also make for easier web development.
Nevertheless, code designed while testing using Opera or Konqueror tends to work in Firefox, as do any other combination of those browsers. IE is the only browser which is consistently broken.
Another way to look at it though, is to try to ignore the existence of the book. The first part of the original radio series was roughly 3 hours in length if you add it all up, and I'm sure it would be possible to cover all of that in a single movie, even if in a frantic fashion. The next 3 hours could be movie #2, and the next 3 hours could be movie #3. :-)
The whole point behind stringprep (of which domainprep, which is supposed to be applied to all domain names, is a profile), is that two characters which look identical would be resolved to the same character. So the user shouldn't have such problems.
I thought that stringprep was supposed to resolve these problems. Is it not?