Slashdot Mirror


Mobile Phone with PC running Linux 2.6

A8 writes "There is a new toy (aka the S101) around the corner from a German company called Road GmbH. Looks like the Nokia Communicator, but is a little PC with GSM, GPRS, IrDA, Bluetooth, WLAN -- you name it, running Linux 2.6/Qtopia! Sorry seems like the page is in German only." There are also versions based on the same hardware but running Windows CE and Symbian.

191 comments

  1. Keyboard like the Psion 5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ah, the Psion 5 ... that was a really decent bit of hardware for the time. Quite a usable keyboard too, even on the minimal Revo model.

  2. Translation by Electronik · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is the Goggle translation

    --
    -=test-sig_0.1.5(NoWhitespaceVersion)=-
    1. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How was this redundant? It was the first translation post, even if the other one (at time of writing) actually was a link to the English version of the webpage.

    2. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know... karma whoring at its best.

    3. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you couldn't even manage to spell "Google" right. Jeez.

    4. Re:Translation by Bri3D · · Score: 3, Funny

      I like it... "Acoustic output over earphones or free speech mechanism." Even though it's German it ensures your First Amendment rights in the U.S.

  3. Photo by relluf · · Score: 0

    And the shot of it shows it running outlook.. under WINE I suppose.

    1. Re:Photo by fewnorms · · Score: 1

      Where do you see it running Outlook?
      That screenshot is so small it might just be any decent mailclient.
      And besides, TFA merely states it can talk with outlook for synchronization...

      --
      Veni, Vidi, Velcro!
    2. Re:Photo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That screenshot is so small it might just be any decent mailclient.

      You have gravely sinned with your foul insinuations. May your soul forever be tormented by large breasted igunanas.

    3. Re:Photo by SirDrinksAlot · · Score: 1

      No, thats a shot of it running WinCE. The post says the hardware runs WinCE, Linux or symbian. Read the entire thing next time.

    4. Re:Photo by chasingporsches · · Score: 2, Insightful

      there is no other mail client that looks like that. black background windows logo in the top right, the windows fade bar on top, the word formatting toolbar right above the text box... it's outlook. but who cares.

    5. Re:Photo by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's a mock-up, using an Outlook 97 or 98 screenshot as the window on it.

      Look more closely.

    6. Re:Photo by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Looking a little more closely, I now see why it's an Outlook window - the window title for the screenshot (I copied the image URL) is "remote access to a stationary PC".

      Still CLEARLY a mock-up, though. If this (the other picture they had) doesn't look like a mock-up, I don't know what does.

  4. Great keyboard! by claes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Take a look at the keyboard - finally a keyboard at a PDA-size device that includes keys for international characters. It takes germans to understand that some alphabets are longer than a-z!

    1. Re:Great keyboard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zes, take a good look at where thez placed the 'y' character. Btw, it doesn't support my native language's additional 3 characters. Uncool when I have to fake it using 'ae', 'oe' and 'aa'.

    2. Re:Great keyboard! by whovian · · Score: 1

      Odd. They missed the 'irgend eine' key.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    3. Re:Great keyboard! by IversenX · · Score: 1

      In case you missed the joke, "irgend eine" key means "any key" :-)

      --
      With great numbers come great responsibility!
    4. Re:Great keyboard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Take a look at the keyboard

      Look at the LCD screen. That is Outlook Express there. So long Linux...

  5. For those of us... by freralqqvba · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:For those of us... by bettlebrox · · Score: 0
      It makes slash much more readable: Pornolized Slashdot:
      Linux: Mobile Phone with PC pecking Linux 2.6 Handhelds
      Posted by timothy on Sunday "Dirk Diggler" February 20, @05:51PM
      from the wanking good-for-the-ski-lift dept.
      A8 writes "There is a new toy (aka the felching S101) around the spewing corner from a squirting German company called Road GmbH. Looks like the Nokia "Superdick" Communicator, but is a little PC with GSM, GPRS, IrDA, Bluetooth, WLAN -- you name it, entering Linux 2.6/Qtopia! Sorry dripps like the page is in German only." There are also versions based on the same hardware but running Windows CE and Symbian.
      --

      I have a very small mind and must live with it.
      -- E. Dijkstra

    2. Re:For those of us... by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Well, that'll teach me to RTFA first!

      After stumbling through it with my high-school Deutsch, I find in the first reply that there was an English page all along. Oh, well; it's useful to maintain some semblance of an ability to read a few other languages, even if I do live in the US. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  6. ROAD runner? by KontinMonet · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Looks to me like vapourware. Hardly any info, pictures tooled up with Photoshop (or whatever). No address or phone number, just a one address email. Is it a 'skam' (as we might say auf Deutsch)?

    --
    Did he inhale?
    1. Re:ROAD runner? by Stuwee · · Score: 1
      Looks to me like vapourware


      Indeed it does; we have here a phone running Linux 2.6.x which lists "MS Outlook" as a part of its software collection. Mis-marketing any which way you look at it.
    2. Re:ROAD runner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      German commercial websites are required to publish address and phone number in a way which makes it easily accessible from every page. It's usually called "Impressum" or "Kontakt". The link is at the bottom of the page and leads to http://www.road-gmbh.de/impressum/index.html

      Products have been announced for the fourth quarter of 2005.

      Hans Constin is also director of Constin GmbH at the same address.

    3. Re:ROAD runner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've announced that the gadget will be able to run Linux, Symbian or WinCE. MS Outlook on WinCE would not be too much of a surprise.

    4. Re:ROAD runner? by NamShubCMX · · Score: 1
      Connectivity with outlook.

      I believe this is quite possible...

      That doesn't nullify skepticism about vapourware, though :)

      --
      We've always been at war with Eurasia.
    5. Re:ROAD runner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Here is your address and phone number:
      http://www.road-gmbh.de/impressum/index.h tml

      Viel Glück with your German knowledge while on the phone!

      PS: I think it's a fake as well, but hey, they have an address...

    6. Re:ROAD runner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They allegedly showed a prototype at this year's 3GSM in Cannes. The founder of Road GmbH has more than 20 years of business experience with his other company "Constin Design GmbH". You will probably recognize some of the housings they've designed.

    7. Re:ROAD runner? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      For german-deficient/english readers:
      http://www.road-gmbh.de/en/impressum/index.html

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:ROAD runner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not vaporware. I know the developers personally, I've seen the prototypes and everything is straight up. It is as exciting as it sounds.

      This phone is a little heavier than the phone you're probably using today, but hey, it is a real Linux PC. It runs Windows apps remotely.

    9. Re:ROAD runner? by KontinMonet · · Score: 1

      Ah, hidden in the grey area. Didn't see that!

      --
      Did he inhale?
    10. Re:ROAD runner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Hardly any info, pictures tooled up with
      > Photoshop (or whatever).
      Most likely the gimp http://www.gimp.org/, if they are a linux company.

      > No address or phone number, just a one address
      > email.
      http://road-gmbh.de/impressum/index.html

      Look like they are in early development. But I want one of these for sure

    11. Re:ROAD runner? by ulitu · · Score: 2, Informative

      A prototype of the device could be seen at Trolltech's both at the Cannes conference (3GSM) last week. While it sure looked like it was in heavy development, it was far from vaporware. The device was demonstrated to be operational as a cell phone and qtopia apps could be seen running.

  7. The Windows CE and Symbian versions by Catullus · · Score: 1

    ...are "still under development". Considering the difficulty of getting hold of licenses for either of these two OSes as a small developer, don't hold your breath.

    I'll be interested to see how this competes with Nokia's Communicators. It doesn't seem to offer any new features, so it might have to compete on price.

    1. Re:The Windows CE and Symbian versions by wertarbyte · · Score: 2, Informative

      It might also rely on the geek factor, it seems to work for other devices as well.

      --
      Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    2. Re:The Windows CE and Symbian versions by cecom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know wbout Symbian, but getting licenses for Windows CE is not a problem for any size developer. I used to work for a very small company (less than 10 people) in 1999 and we developed an embedded device with Windows CE (2.1 I think). Getting the licenses was not a problem at all. The environment (to build custom CE images) wasn't expensive either (I don't remember exactly, but less than $1K).

      A CE license in our miniscule volumes was about $50 (again, I don't remember exactly), which might be considered prohibitive for devices in the $200-300 range. I don't know.

      OTOH, Linux in a phone is mighty cool. I doubt it will be available in the US, though.

  8. Advantages of Linux by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    Can someone inform me/us what the advantages of running the Linux version would be? I already assume it would be cheaper to aquire such a phone dollar wise , and being immune to viruses (sp), but what about in day-to-day operations?

    1. Re:Advantages of Linux by CAIMLAS · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll probably get modded troll for this :(

      If you don't already understand the whole "Linux" appeal, I doubt you'd find anything particularly appealing about a Linux-powered phone.

      For the most part, I think the appeal is the ability to tinker with it, add software that wouldn't be intended, and various other 'geeky' things that most consumers wouldn't give a damn about. It would give the sysadmin type a great deal of mobile administration ability. If you don't grok grep and pine for sed, there's not a perl of wisdom I can give you which would likely make you see the significance.

      Additionally, since it uses Opie, there's a lot of available software out there for the device already. Much of it is 'geeky' software, but as a for instance: you'd be able to emulate PalmOS without any problems, provided you had the ROMs. I don't know if this is possible with WinCE, though, so it might not be all that 'special'.

      This particular device looks fairly useful to me, and that's saying a lot, as I tend to thing such things are just trendy toys. The existence of the SD slot is definately nice, as it'd allow you to use this device for quite a few things, including a portable MP3 player. It's got a built-in keyboard which - while not full-size, is a hell of a lot bigger than those on other chick-key keyboards.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    2. Re:Advantages of Linux by Erik+Hensema · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To the user it probably has no advantages at all. You won't even notice it's Linux.

      To the manufacturer it's just the usual freedom/free beer thing.

      --

      This is your sig. There are thousands more, but this one is yours.

    3. Re:Advantages of Linux by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      I guess if it would be possible to port normal linux apps to it, it would be a great geak device. I'd love to be able to hack away on a linux "box" anywhere. Could run all my favorite linux console apps, and maybe even X stuff if it supported some sort of X interface.

      But other then that, the Linux "Qt" PDA GUI has been used in Sharp PDA's and others, and provides most if not all (or more?) of what you'd find on a Windows CE based device.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    4. Re:Advantages of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nethack, duh.

    5. Re:Advantages of Linux by Surur · · Score: 1

      This device will sell in much greater volume if released with win CE. There is a real momentum building around win ce phone devices, such as the xda 2 (which is actually being aggressively advertised on billboards and TV in the UK), the various MS smartphones (such as the SDA) in Germany, the underpowered Mpx and many others (like the wonderful MDA 4, which has a vga screen, wifi, bluetooth, GSM, GPRS, 3G and a qwerty keyboard) to be released soon.

      When normal people think windows mobile they think the power of a desktop in their hand. When they think symbian they just think pretty wall paper, games and ring tones. If you want to scare them tell them their phone is running Linux.

      The cellphone networks are firmly behind win CE because they generate much greater GPRS data profits that symbian devices (average 3 times more), because they get used used more to access the internet etc.

      Now if they release both it may be interesting to see if enough geeks (who will be the main consumers of such a device) will choose Linux over Win CE.

      In short however, they wont be doing themselves much favours by releasing a Linux version in preference to a Win CE version.

      Surur

      --
      Information is the location of things. Computation is moving things around.
    6. Re:Advantages of Linux by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Jokes aside, Qt NetHack is actually pretty cool. :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    7. Re:Advantages of Linux by Taladar · · Score: 1
      The cellphone networks are firmly behind win CE because they generate much greater GPRS data profits that symbian devices (average 3 times more), because they get used used more to access the internet etc.
      That might be simply because geek users (a.k.a. don't fall for marketing scams as easily) tend to buy more Linux Devices than the average user.
    8. Re:Advantages of Linux by Surur · · Score: 1

      That would be Symbian geeks. Linux smartphone devices dont have a significant presence at the moment. Either way, if you want to make money you want to appeal to the dumb overusers, who surf over expensive GPRS with images on, instead of finding the small checkbox to switch if off and save megabytes of data and money.

      Hence you target windows users ;)

      Surur

      --
      Information is the location of things. Computation is moving things around.
    9. Re:Advantages of Linux by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      For the most part, I think the appeal is the ability to tinker with it, add software that wouldn't be intended, and various other 'geeky' things that most consumers wouldn't give a damn about.

      But consumers care a great deal about the things those tinkerers come up with. Example: Firefox.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    10. Re:Advantages of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess if it would be possible to port normal linux apps to it, it would be a great geak device.

      It is indeed possible, and blessed.

    11. Re:Advantages of Linux by nickos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure about advantages, but I was speaking to someone from one of the big mobile phone manufacturers on Saturday and they were saying that when making a phone, it was very important to the network companies that a company was legally responsible for how their equipment dealt with the numerous communication protocols (and so presumably could be sued or whatever if it caused a problem). He went on to say that sadly Linux might have a problem with this as there is no company to take legal responsibility.

      I wonder if these network companies have problems with Microsoft which has licences that deny all responsibility for any problems caused by their products...

    12. Re:Advantages of Linux by idlake · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but what about in day-to-day operations?

      Potentially lots more software than for any of the other platforms: it's the same kernel and APIs as on the desktop (not true for any of the other phone platforms), and there is lots of Linux software that runs on small screens and limited memory (due to the age and previous uses of UNIX).

    13. Re:Advantages of Linux by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      I'll probably get modded troll for this :(

      Yes, you will probably be modded troll for posting a disection of this product's geek appeal... on Slashdot. Your bold Slashdot martyr complex is truely verging on mastrubatory.

    14. Re:Advantages of Linux by jedi_pj · · Score: 1

      I do not see how this could be a problem as most of the protocols used in the Mobile are specified by standards body and not readily available on Linux or Windows. It either needs to be developed or procured from another company. Not sure how being Linux or Windows would make a difference.

  9. Linux for handhelds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What use is linux for handhelds, considering there are currently no good open source mini browsers (eventually, there will be minimoz) or handwriting recognition programs.

    For less than this, you could get palm or windows devices that are fully functional. Until there is a free handheld environment, we can't just say "stick linux on it".

    --
    Dogs are annoying. Go ECFA. Buy a K9Zap today.

    1. Re:Linux for handhelds? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "What use is linux for handhelds, considering there are currently no good open source mini browsers (eventually, there will be minimoz) or handwriting recognition programs."

      I'm more interested in being able to synch up with Outlook or an equivalent app. Honestly, I don't care what OS it runs.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Linux for handhelds? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Ah, you did notice that this guy has a keyboard? And no stylus. Not much use for handwriting recognition.

    3. Re:Linux for handhelds? by tijmentiming · · Score: 1

      Well, they can run MS outlook/word/excel and a PDF viewer on this PDA/Phone. so way can't they do an opera browser?

      btw, i wonder if i could remove the M$ware and install thunderbird, abiword and xpdf ;-)

      offcourse we want midpssh too!

    4. Re:Linux for handhelds? by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      hmm konqueror is pretty good IMHO

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    5. Re:Linux for handhelds? by Bri3D · · Score: 1

      There's Opie Konqueror and also a version of Opera that was made for the Sharp Zaurus. The Opera was really quite good but had some page rendering issues(there's no pocket browser that doesn't). Konqueror is sorta hard to use but has the KHTML renderer.

    6. Re:Linux for handhelds? by philo_enyce · · Score: 1
      linux is great on handhelds. i use dillo, a good, open source mini browser on my zaurus c760. i'm running the excellent pdaXrom which is a very lightweight x11 enviornment for the clamshell zaurii. try doing a little research before you post next time.

      philo

    7. Re:Linux for handhelds? by evilviper · · Score: 4, Informative
      What use is linux for handhelds, considering there are currently no good open source mini browsers (eventually, there will be minimoz) or handwriting recognition programs.

      Good call Anonymous Moron...

      There's no good Open Source mini-browsers like Konqueror Embedded, Dillo, or (GUI) Links2. Which is too bad, because the universe would colapse on itself if you used a non-open source browser (such as Opera) on Linux, just like every other embedded device ever made.

      And you're sure to need good handwriting recognition on a device with a full keyboard... An on-screen keyboard (which most PDA users use) like xkbd couldn't possibly be good enough. And someone that wanted handwriting recognition couldn't possibly adapt one of the open source Linux OCR programs to suit this purpose...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:Linux for handhelds? by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      Actually opera already runs on Qt/embedded qtopia. Take a look here . It currently runs on the sharp zaurus which is very similar in specs to this device. I'm sure it would take little to no porting at all to get this running.

      -kaplanfx

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    9. Re:Linux for handhelds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And someone that wanted handwriting recognition couldn't possibly adapt one of the open source Linux OCR programs to suit this purpose...

      Er, no. Handwriting recognition is very reliable. OCR of handwriting is very poor. Ever wonder why?

      Handwriting recognition has much more information: the direction of the strokes, the order they were created in, the speed of the pen and so on. OCR really isn't a good place to start.

    10. Re:Linux for handhelds? by Nifrith · · Score: 1

      OCR really isn't a good place to start.
      I think the point they was trying to make was that OCR is still a place to start, even if it's a little mis-suited to handwriting.
      The whole point of their post was that with the multitude of Open-Source software avaliable, anything could be a starting point. (I think.)

    11. Re:Linux for handhelds? by jedi_pj · · Score: 1

      Check out Motorola A760/A768 based Linux smartphone. It supports handwriting recognition.

  10. english translation [google] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    S101/S101K
    Technical features
    Software
    - standard applications
    - GSM telephone with SMS/MMS
    - PIM also
    * Directory
    * Appointment calendar
    * Tasks
    - pocket calculators
    - dictating machine
    - indication program
    - MP3 Player
    - PC synchronisation Ms Outlook
    - remote ACCESS
    - InterNet Browser
    - email client (POP and IMAP), repeated accounts
    - Office Viewer (Ms Word, Ms Excel, Adobe pdf)

    [Customized applications]
    - cryptology (only S101K)
    - Business applications for direct access to firm servers
    - Providerspezifi on-line services

    [Operating system]
    - LINUX Kernel 2.6.x
    - Qtopia Graphic user interface

    [Hardware]
    - GSM telephone
    * Display: LCD mono chrome 102x65 pixel
    * Keyboard: 20 keys standard layout
    * Acoustic output over earphones or free speech mechanism
    - PC
    * Display: Color TFT 640x240 pixel with Touchscreen
    * Keyboard: 63 keys PC-compatible layout
    - Diktiergeraet/Audioplayer
    * 4 separate keys for control
    * Rendition over loudspeakers/earphones
    - camera (optional)
    * 2 megapixels

    Actual working time
    - GSM telephone: actively 4h, standby 240h
    - PC: actively 5h, standby 30 days (GSM telephone switched off)

    Konnektivitaet
    - wireless: GSM quadband (850, 900, 1800, 1900MHz) with EDGE
    * WLAN
    * Bluetooth
    * IRDA infrared modules
    - wire-bound
    * USB 2,0, mini USB socket
    * SD Card base
    * Power supply unit 5V DC, RK 1A
    * Telephone Headset or stereo earphone

    [Interior life]
    - CCU Intel Xscale PXA 263 with 400 MHz
    - memory 64MB RAM, 64MB Flash
    - Akku lithium polymer 1500mAh, load time 3h
    - vibration alarm

    [General data]
    - weight 210g inclusive Akku
    - dimensions 128x60x25m

  11. Ah memories... by goofyheadedpunk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does anyone else remember the simpler days, when phones where just phones? When you didn't have to bother with your friends sending you pictures over their $400 internet phone camera thingies? When you didn't have to interupt a kernel compile just to check your voice mail?

    I do. Good times.

    --

    What if the entire Universe were a chrooted environment with everything symlinked from the host?
    1. Re:Ah memories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      At least with this phone you could argue that it is an 'old-school' (i.e., Psion style) PDA with wireless internet capability and mobile functionality built in.

      Then you can bitch when it gets nicked and not only do you lose the phone, but you lose the stuff you've been working on earlier in the day because you were out of the office, etc.

    2. Re:Ah memories... by datastalker · · Score: 1

      Remember back in the old days, when a washing machine was just a scrub-board and a tub, and you got to spend all day washing one load of laundry with your bare hands? Remember how you'd have to then hang your clothes on a long piece of rope by attaching it with wooden pins? Remember when you could spend a whole day doing nothing but laundry? You wouldn't have time to do anything else, but boy, it was fun spending all that time doing laundry.

      I decry these new-fangled machines that let you toss in the clothes and go away for three hours to find that your clothes have been washed *and* dried! Bah, convergence is for hippies!

      It's called "progress". Get used to it. ;)

    3. Re:Ah memories... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Does anyone else remember the simpler days, when phones where just phones?"

      Yep, and now I have a ton of extra pocket space!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Ah memories... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I remember those times.

      I remember the absolutely atrocious low-frequency ringtones which would set me on edge every time someone's phone would ring (at least the new 'personalized' ringtones have a fuller frequency). I remember the shitty quality signals and the battery life which required the phone to be recharged after about 8 hours of in-pocket use and maybe 20 minutes of talk time. I remember having to cart around a huge brick which took horribly grainy photos if I wanted to use a digital camera. I remember having to wear a watch around in addition to carrying my phone if I wanted to tell the time. I remember not having voice mail, so that when my phone was off I'd not recieve calls. I remember having only 20 slots to store my friends' and family members' addresses.

      Now, granted, there's something to be said for simplicity. I don't think I'd want this "phone" but I sure as hell don't want to go back to the irritation of old technology. I would like a simple, durable phone with just basic phone/clock/alarm features, though.

      If you don't like the extra features, just don't use them or turn them off. That's still a possibility.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    5. Re:Ah memories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm longing for the days when we will finally get phones where you can turn off the phone feature. I don't want it. I want a mobile clock, alarm, mp3-player, camera, organizer etc. the size of a box of matches, but I don't want people to call me all the time. That's annoying.

    6. Re:Ah memories... by gmplague · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else remember when phones were JUST phones? When they were tethered to a jack on your wall? When you didn't have to worry about "checking your voicemail"? When someone would call you to arrange a meeting and then you'd meet them IN PERSON?

      I do. Good times.

      --
      __________________________________________
      Take comfort in your ignorance.
      Grandmaster Plague
    7. Re:Ah memories... by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else remember when Telegraphs were just telegraphs...?

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    8. Re:Ah memories... by Surur · · Score: 1

      I'm longing for the days when we will finally get phones where you can turn off the phone feature. I don't want it. I want a mobile clock, alarm, mp3-player, camera, organizer etc. the size of a box of matches, but I don't want people to call me all the time. That's annoying.

      It's called flight mode. All smartphones in the last 2-3 years have it.

      Surur

      --
      Information is the location of things. Computation is moving things around.
    9. Re:Ah memories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone remember when we used to grunt and throw our women over our shoulders?

    10. Re:Ah memories... by Taladar · · Score: 2

      "Smart" Phones are NOT progress. They just waste a lot of time for a lot of people and are really annoying the shit out of everyone when someone not up to date with current microphone technology yells into his/her phone so everyone in a 10 meter radius can hear his/her part of the conversation.

      I agree that mobile phones are a progress for certain people who travel a lot and have to be reachable (like service technicians e.g.) but cameras, games, ringtones and all that other shit companies put into "modern" phones are just a big scam.

    11. Re:Ah memories... by pdcull · · Score: 1

      .. -.. --- (try here if, like me, you don't actually remember those days.

    12. Re:Ah memories... by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Does anyone else remember the simpler days, when phones where just phones?
      Want to save some bandwidth? Let's establish short code words for slashdot cliches such as this. Just like the cops on their CB's, "we got a 1014 in progress on maple and central." I also nominate "in Russia..", "Step 5..profit," and "why, when OSX already has it?"
    13. Re:Ah memories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nothing should be fun...entertainment value means nothing...wah

    14. Re:Ah memories... by piGuy314 · · Score: 1

      Do you remember a time when cell phones were simple and easy to use? Pepperidge Farms does.

    15. Re:Ah memories... by pekkak · · Score: 1

      It would be progress if the reliability of phones didn't go down the toilet when all the new features were added into phones. I'im afraid that the mobile phone manufacturers are in the middle of the process of learning how to make all the gizmos realiable when facing an hostile environment (viruses et al.).

      Then again at least Nokia (possibly other manufacturers also, I wouldn't know) is still marketing a very matter of fact, voice communications and text messages only phone model. In Europe the model goes by the number 1100. It's ugly as hell, but if you don't need any extra features, there you have it.

      --
      What are we going to do tomorrow night? The same thing we do every night, Pinky. Try to take over the world!
    16. Re:Ah memories... by pekkak · · Score: 1

      Yes, I still remember the day I was trying to reach a good friend of mine so we could meet and have fun. No, not that kind of fun, you perverts. We both kept calling back and forth, back and forth, and always the other person was out of house when the other person was calling him. That's one fine summerday to remember.

      Whereas now, if I want to talk to someone, I just call him or her and magically (s)he answers the phone if possible, if not I can send him/her a text message stating my intentions. Then we actually get to meet in person, because no time is lost in setting up the meeting. Neat.

      --
      What are we going to do tomorrow night? The same thing we do every night, Pinky. Try to take over the world!
    17. Re:Ah memories... by dago · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know what, such phones still exists ... Nokia 1100 for example.

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
  12. Keyboard has a "Windows" key by Linuxathome · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the English version of the page, if you look at the larger picture of the device, the keyboard has a Windows key next to the Alt button. I understand we can remap that key to do whatever we want, but can't we use another image? I'd like to be reminded less of the pervasive MS Windows monopoly.

    1. Re:Keyboard has a "Windows" key by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1

      You want the Happy Hacking Keyboard.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    2. Re:Keyboard has a "Windows" key by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Who cares about the icon printed on the key, when the same screenshot you reference clearly depicts Windows running on the screen? Surely that is a much more heinous crime?

    3. Re:Keyboard has a "Windows" key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares about the icon printed on the key, when the same screenshot you reference clearly depicts Windows running on the screen?

      It's VNC. It's possible that penguin key caps will be available to replace the ugly flag.

    4. Re:Keyboard has a "Windows" key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you look at the larger (or smaller for that matter) picture of the device, you will notice that it's computer generated and not a photograph; i think getting picky about its realization is a bit jumping the gun.

    5. Re:Keyboard has a "Windows" key by Gubbe · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, in the same picture, it also seems to be running Outlook.

  13. Outlook Express by ward.deb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think I see Outlook Express running here: http://www.road-gmbh.de/grafik/foto_pro_s101_02.jp g On Windows 9x...strange ;-)

    1. Re:Outlook Express by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.road-gmbh.de/grafik/foto_handypc.jpg

      so if the Start button is part of its linux GUI, why does it have the windows logo next to it?

  14. some developer's wet dream by danimrich · · Score: 1

    This is -at most- a work in progress. The phone looks as if it were just a computer graphic(look at the large image). The firm is just being founded. Everything is copyright 2005 only. The features look as if they were some developer's dream.

    --
    where's all that Karma?
    1. Re:some developer's wet dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The features look as if they were some developer's dream.

      It does sound like a dream, doesn't it? But it's real.

    2. Re:some developer's wet dream by ultrabot · · Score: 1

      This is -at most- a work in progress. The phone looks as if it were just a computer graphic(look at the large image).

      It might also be a way to pump money out of some investors.

      They claim availability of Symbian OS, which seems rather fishy to me. They can't be shipping w/ Nokia S80 variant (because Nokia aren't licensing it), and I don't believe Psion is going to license their UI kit either. They definitely aren't going to be implementing the software themselves, it's tons of work even for a giant like Nokia.

      Linux might be realistic if Qtopia works "out of the box".

      --
      Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
  15. Power use by pdxdada · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What strikes me as odd is that they claim a 5 hour battery life using it as a computer but only a 4 hour battery life for calls. Are cell phones really that power hungry or are portable computers really that power lean?

    --
    Don't mess with the bunny, outsideworld.org
    1. Re:Power use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phones are radio transmitters, using power to communicate with the base stations.

    2. Re:Power use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Cellphones have to transmit a signal that can be picked up by a tower that is some miles away. An electromagnetic signal attenuates at rate of some constant I can't remember times pi times r to the power of two ( the surface area of a sphere. ) I think modern cellphones tend to use about a tenth of a watt to transmit, from memory.
      But basically anything that broadcasts a radio signal uses a lot of power.

    3. Re:Power use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably has more to do with the radio. transmitting takes a good bit of power.

    4. Re:Power use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      radio time is the highest usage of power on a mobile device..

      I have hurd that companys like Palm and nokia spend millions on making their device use as little radio time as possible when doing transfers of images etc etc over gprs..

  16. Those "old good times" you paird $500 for nothing by giaguara · · Score: 1

    Those "old good times" you paid $500 to have something like a Motorola Flare (my first mobile, and left me a horror towards Motorola phones really).

  17. No, it doesn't say Outlook is part of the software by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    It says:

    - PC-Synchronisation MS-Outlook

    Even the English version of their page is somewhat poorly translated, but it's pretty obvious they mean you can synchronize with Outlook, not that it INCLUDES outlook.

    They also say there's viewers for office documents - don't confuse that with "Includes Microsoft Office."

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  18. For those of us... by marko123 · · Score: 0
    --
    http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
  19. Fishy by pherthyl · · Score: 1

    While it looks cool, it seems more vapourware than anything else, as other posters have mentioned.

    Which company in their right mind plans 3 models of a phone, with the only difference being the OS?

    1. Re:Fishy by cmclean · · Score: 1

      Which company in their right mind plans 3 models of a phone, with the only difference being the OS?

      It's called being OS-agnostic. Not something most slashdotters would recognise :-)

      --
      "Any similarity between the hooting of a million eager monkeys and Slashdot is purely coincidental." -THEFLASHMAN
  20. qwertz keyboard? by lawguy2006 · · Score: 1

    Anyone know why the "Y" and "Z" keys are switched?

    1. Re:qwertz keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Germans do that.

    2. Re:qwertz keyboard? by chillmost · · Score: 1

      That's how the keyboard is laid out in Germany (Perhaps other countries as well?) but I don't know why it is different or if it makes a difference in typing speed. On the French keyboard layout the first row starts with AZERTY. See here.

    3. Re:qwertz keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cause it's a german keyboard.... DUH!!!

    4. Re:qwertz keyboard? by b0lt · · Score: 1

      German keyboard arrangement, most likely

      -b0lt

      --
      got sig?
    5. Re:qwertz keyboard? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What the fuck is wrong with German people?

    6. Re:qwertz keyboard? by Taladar · · Score: 1

      It is different because y is not very common in german while z is. These are not the only differences btw. Most special characters are different and we have umlaut-keys. I use an english keyboard though because the german one has the / key on the shift-7 which is just awkward to type all the time in Linux (there are other advantages, this is just the most important one for me).

    7. Re:qwertz keyboard? by idlake · · Score: 1

      Anyone know why the "Y" and "Z" keys are switched?

      I ask myself that every day.

    8. Re:qwertz keyboard? by kariboo · · Score: 1

      Because it is a German Keyboard.

  21. Oh great... by n2dasun · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...as soon as I've ordered my Treo 650, they introduce the phone that will mother my children.

    --
    I'm determined to reclaim my karma. Now, if I can only find a groundbreaking article and something witty to say....
  22. Calm down with the "Vapourware" talk. by cmclean · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hey, let's get this out in the open, shall we. The product was "announced" at the 3GSM World Congress, it don't exist, you can't buy it. Yet...
    But the specs have been announced, you can email the company about pre-ordering, and it's getting some decent coverage. Plus the fact it looks pretty cool (the screen may have been photoshopped, but the model looks like a prototype).

    Usually I like to give a product more than 72 hours before denouncing it as "Vapourware".

    Now, about the 1400 Euro pricetag :-(

    --
    "Any similarity between the hooting of a million eager monkeys and Slashdot is purely coincidental." -THEFLASHMAN
  23. Issues: Size and GSM by Arch_dude · · Score: 1
    I just measured my current cell phone: it is 86x47x22 mm. This is an 3-year-old Samsung, not a big old qualcomm.

    The ROAD is 128x60x25mm

    I abandoned my belt holster three years ago when I shifted to the Samsung. Qualitatively, the ROAD is on the bleeding edge of being too large to keep in your pocket if you wear guy-type casual clothes. I guess it's back to wearing the phone in a belt holster if I move to the ROAD.
    On the other hand, 128mm looks like an absolute minimum width for a QWERTY keyboard, and 47mm is really short for a usable screen, so unless we go virtual, it looks like a belt holster is mandatory.

    My service provider is Verizon. No GSM. Will ROAD eventually have CDMA, or will the US eventually have GSM?

    1. Re:Issues: Size and GSM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US will have GSM. My current Cingular phone does TDMA and GSM (as well as analog...) in anticipation of the switch.

    2. Re:Issues: Size and GSM by jrumney · · Score: 2, Informative
      My service provider is Verizon. No GSM. Will ROAD eventually have CDMA, or will the US eventually have GSM?

      The US has GSM already, you just need to switch networks and/or move to another state.

      But for a phone with these specs looking to release in almost a year's time, I'm surprised they're going with GSM rather than WCDMA, or is Germany that far behind in 3G rollout?

    3. Re:Issues: Size and GSM by Taladar · · Score: 1

      In Europe we never had CDMA and thus I guess we won't go to WCDMA. UMTS seems to be the next big thing here now.

    4. Re:Issues: Size and GSM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron. UMTS and WCDMA are the same fucking thing.

    5. Re:Issues: Size and GSM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest carrier in the US is GSM, just because the tinpot operation Verizon uses CDMA, don't go thinking the rest of the world does.

      Dump your crappy, power hungry, brick of a CDMA phone and go for a sleep, lean, GSM phone.

    6. Re:Issues: Size and GSM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GSM is avalible over there at the moment. T-Mobile and Cingular are both GSM based networks.. (AT&T was as well but they are now cingular)

      I am supprised that this device is going to be using GSM. I would have htough that they would have been looking at UTMS (3G) rather than GPRS(2.5G). The other thing I find that is odd is that this device does not look like it is going to use EDGE (2.75G 3 times the data rate or 3 times the number of users mixture of phone and network descides) which if they are going to support GPRS at this late stage in the game would make more sence..

      again with G3 The US is going to end up been on a completly diffrent system to Euorpe. Though I guess the likes of Cingular and T-mobile might end up migrating to UMTS as well.

    7. Re:Issues: Size and GSM by jrumney · · Score: 1

      As the anonymous idiot rather rudely pointed out, UMTS is a layer on top of WCDMA, the same way that GPRS and EDGE are layers on top of GSM.

    8. Re:Issues: Size and GSM by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Troll...

      Sprint also uses CDMA. So does Tracfone and Alltel.

      IIRC, Japan also largely uses CDMA...

      My Nokia 6225 is pretty damn small, FWIW.

  24. Linux? by kronchev · · Score: 1

    Using a Qtopia handheld myself, I can say it doesnt really count as "linux" persay

  25. MÄrvelØus by adnvvfr · · Score: 2, Funny

    The wait was unbearable.
    Finally a Cell Phone you can use to type viking names without knowing the ASCII codes.

  26. You can run Outlook on a Linux phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's cool and all, but what is up with the composite screenshot?

  27. Death of the stand alone PDA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As I read this, I am surprised at how common cellphones and PDA's are becoming. The functionality between standalone PDAs and cellphones are becoming more and more similar. It seems that the stand-alone PDA will be extinct in a couple of years, along with the stand-alone cellphone.

  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. it will contain TWO arm processors by lkcl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    like the XDA-2 and the XDA-3, it will contain not one but TWO ARM processors:

    - GSM-Telefon: aktiv 4h, standby 240h

    - PC: aktiv 5h, standby 30 Tage (GSM-Telefon ausgeschaltet)

    that translates into "one ARM to run the GSM, one ARM to run the PDA". thank god there isn't one ARM to rule them all and one to get them and little toto too, is all i can say.

    anyway.

    the first is as shown, the Intel PXA 263 running at 400 Mhz.

    these devices are approx $30 in volume quantities, and after your 400% to 1000% markup, minus the expected subsidies, would result in a price tag of oh around £70 in stores (_if_ it was running the GSM phone bit on its own, but nobody would buy it because...)

    this processor it will be possible to place into "suspend/sleep" mode, to conserve battery life, which would otherwise be drained in a ridiculously short period of time.

    the second processor will be an ARM 7, 8 or 9 processor, running at an _absolute_ maximum of 100mhz, consuming sufficiently little power to provide the talk-times and standby-times we expect.

    these processors are oh around $20 in volume, and after your 400% to 1000% markup minus subsidies, you're looking at a price tag on the phone of "free" or £10-£20 (_if_ you didn't have the second processor)

    put TWO of these processors into one device, and your subsidies mysteriously disappear or become insignificant.

    result: a price tag of £200 if you get one of these types of phones [XDA-2, MDA-3, one of these german phones, doesn't matter] with a hefty per-month guaranteed usage contract, or £400 if you buy it without any subsidies.

    those 400 to 1000% markups are a _real_ kicker when you get these two-processor PDA+phone jobs.

    i'd _love_ to see a linux phone running on just one of these 100Mhz ARM processors, not this oh-we-must-put-two-processors-in-it crap.

    1. Re:it will contain TWO arm processors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I can understand where you are comming form on this regarding the Two processors I would have to disagree with you.

      If you are in the middle of doing some work and an email came in would you want the phone to virtualy hang untill the Radio had stoped doing it's job?

      This is why they are going with 2 processors..

      Having used devices with only one processor I would have to say the extra cost is worth while expecialy if you are intending to use this to it;s full extent..

    2. Re:it will contain TWO arm processors by lkcl · · Score: 1

      your comment about the one processor being too busy is exactly why a second one is needed... ... and consequently, these separate-processor things are prohibitively expensive for mass production.

      if dual-core ARM processors were, say $35 in volume, it'd be a different story.

  30. *Everybody* has a Windows Key by fm6 · · Score: 1

    If you click on the links on this page, you'll find that the company plans future phones using the same hardware, but with Windows CE or Symbian in place of Linux. They're hedging their bets!

  31. comparison to Communicator? by rjasmin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What is the real difference between this and Nokia 9500? One that I can think of is availability - 9500 is on the market, at half the price of S101, which in turn look like a marketing prototype. 9500 has WLAN, EDGE, GPRS, BT, IrDA, ability to do IMAP/POP mail, Opera browser, m$ doc support (although rudimentary)
    I dont see the point of S101 as it isnt any lighter or smaller than 9500. OK, it runs Linux, but so what, using keyboard that small is excercise in futillity anyway..
    What it has as a big plus is touchscreen, 9500 has navigation pad that is painfull to use in browser.

    so WHEN it comes to market, it will have its little advantages, but compared to 9500 and with bigger price, I doubt it can make nothing more than a cameo appearance on the market..

    1. Re:comparison to Communicator? by Xenna · · Score: 1

      And then there's the Nokia 9300. Newer, smaller, cheaper and better looking than the 9500.

      A much better deal if you can do without the camera & Wifi of the Nokia 9500.

      http://nokia.com/phones/9300
      http://nokia.com/phones/9500

    2. Re:comparison to Communicator? by metarot · · Score: 1

      But the S101 *is* smaller and lighter than the Nokia 9500 Communicator. Well, shorter anyway, by 20mm. It's about the same size as the Nokia 9300, although it weighs quite a bit more - but the latter doesn't have camera or WiFi. S101: 210g / 128x60x25mm 9500: 230g / 148x57x24mm 9300: 167g / 132x51x21mm

  32. New Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux for Nokia Communicator...

  33. Is the stylus dead? by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I do input on a handheld device, I prefer a stylus to a keyboard, since it takes two hands to type, and I'm not a motie. Yet all PDAs now seem to be deisgned with a keyboard instead of a stylus. Oh well...

    1. Re:Is the stylus dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it takes two hands to write as well
      one to grasp the device
      another to write with the stylus

    2. Re:Is the stylus dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can thank Xerox and the damn writing recognition patent.

    3. Re:Is the stylus dead? by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1
      I prefer a stylus to a keyboard, since it takes two hands to type, and I'm not a motie
      Ford was not going to be outcooled.

      "Zaphod," he drawled, "great to see you, you're looking well, the extra arm suits you. Nice ship you've stolen."
      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    4. Re:Is the stylus dead? by fm6 · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Is the stylus dead? by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      I do know what a motie is (note my sig is a Niven quote), but just thought the hhgttg ref might be funnier. :-P

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  34. 3G is coming soon enough, really this time.... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    ... Cingular has already started rolling UMTS out for evaluation, and they already have EDGE support. Dunno about TMobile, but maybe in a year's time it'll be time to switch...

    So, in other words, buying any non-subsidized non-3G smartphone at this point would be foolish unless your company is footing the bill.

    In theory, if I had a job, I would be sorely tempted to go with the SE 910a, but I would refrain from splurging knowing that they'll probably have a 3G smartphone with a better CPU, bluetooth 2.0, video, etc.. in a year or 18 months... Luckily I have other things to worry about first, like rent, broadband, xbox live, cans of soup, the essentials....

  35. Photos show it running Windows? by victorhooi · · Score: 1
    Hi,

    Is it just me, or does the photo

    http://www.road-gmbh.de/grafik/foto_pro_s101_02.jp g

    show it running Microsoft Outlook...

    Oh the irony...

    Now, to wait for my Zaurus 5500...which I paid AU$300 (US$228) for...lol.

    bye,

    Victor

    1. Re:Photos show it running Windows? by Jasperke · · Score: 1

      Better image here.

      Running Linux, with a Windows-button on your keyboard? Showing a Outlook Express screenshot?

      This smells a bit fishy to me...

      Jasper.

  36. Is it a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "heavy phone and a slow computer"?

  37. Why? by jdog1016 · · Score: 0

    I've never really understood why anyone would want to run Linux on a PDA, let alone a cell phone. The amount of overhead required for running a multitasking operating system really isn't compatible with the hardware being used (that is, its speed), and isn't compatible with the way its being used anyway. Some people use their phones as datebooks I suppose, but most people use their phones as phones--to communicate with other people. As for PDA's, the same situation seems to apply. People pick up PDA's and generally put them back in their pocket/purse/whatever after about 10 or 15 seconds of use. Why run a linux kernel on that?

    1. Re:Why? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      The best reason for me is, in potential at least, ease of development and porting. I was using opie on my ipaq for a while, and loved some parts of it. The only reason I removed it was that I could never find a SDL package that was fully compatible nor get SDL to compile for it. Aside from that, it was pretty easy to take applications I'd quickly thrown together for my linux desktop, and put them on my pda. For the average user, not so useful. For a programmer using linux at home it can be pretty nice.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      . The amount of overhead required for running a multitasking operating system really isn't compatible with the hardware being used (that is, its speed), and isn't compatible with the way its being used anyway.

      You're quite simply wrong. Windows CE/Smartphone stuff is actually less efficient in many areas than Linux. For one, the use of XIP (which MS seems to prefer) for most applications eats a lot of flash and cuts down on performance. A typical PocketPC image is generally much larger than a Qtopia and Busybox based Linux fs and kernel.
      And multitasking is perfectly suited for a PDA despite what you might say. I doubt Windows CE would have had any acceptance as a PDA platform if it did not have multitasking capability.

      The cpufreq stuff in Linux gives comparable or better net power consumption for a wide variety of tasks as well.

      The linux kernel is a win here because it gives respectable performance without having to put up with the hassle of a crippled API like Windows CE (anyone that has programmed CE apps of any significance knows exactly what the C stands for).

      You have to realize that many of these phones are using processors like Freescale and Intel PXAs that are power efficient, yet they are among the fastest ARM implementations available. These processors are many many times faster than any 386...so are you saying that Linux should never have been created? They are thoroughly fast enough to run graphical environments like Qtopia and even a surprisingly large number of roms on MAME.

      It's a win because with Linux you get a fairly stable platform with the ability to use many POSIX and POSIXish libraries, many that are PDA relevant (OpenOBEX, Bluetooth) (plus have things like UNIX shell scripting and python for hackers). JFFS2 for all its problems is still more robust than that abortion called IPSM.

      You should be aware that for ARM platforms (what most of these phones are anyway) there is work being put into linux 2.6 that uses the domain feature of the ARM MMU to make context switches extremely fast.

      It sounds like you are completely clueless when it comes to running software on smaller systems and really don't have a fucking clue what "overheads" are involved in running a system like Linux..

      You should check to see what your drinking water pipes are made of.

    3. Re:Why? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      "The amount of overhead required for running a multitasking operating system really isn't compatible with the hardware being used (that is, its speed), and isn't compatible with the way its being used anyway."

      You're quite simply wrong. Windows CE/Smartphone stuff is actually less efficient in many areas than Linux. For one, the use of XIP (which MS seems to prefer) for most applications eats a lot of flash and cuts down on performance. A typical PocketPC image is generally much larger than a Qtopia and Busybox based Linux fs and kernel.
      And multitasking is perfectly suited for a PDA despite what you might say. I doubt Windows CE would have had any acceptance as a PDA platform if it did not have multitasking capability.

      The cpufreq stuff in Linux gives comparable or better net power consumption for a wide variety of tasks as well.

      The linux kernel is a win here because it gives respectable performance without having to put up with the hassle of a crippled API like Windows CE (anyone that has programmed CE apps of any significance knows exactly what the C stands for).

      You have to realize that many of these phones are using processors like Freescale and Intel PXAs that are power efficient, yet they are among the fastest ARM implementations available. These processors are many many times faster than any 386...so are you saying that Linux should never have been created? They are thoroughly fast enough to run graphical environments like Qtopia and even a surprisingly large number of roms on MAME.

      It's a win because with Linux you get a fairly stable platform with the ability to use many POSIX and POSIXish libraries, many that are PDA relevant (OpenOBEX, Bluetooth) (plus have things like UNIX shell scripting and python for hackers). JFFS2 for all its problems is still more robust than that abortion called IPSM.

      You should be aware that for ARM platforms (what most of these phones are anyway) there is work being put into linux 2.6 that uses the domain feature of the ARM MMU to make context switches extremely fast.

      It sounds like you are completely clueless when it comes to running software on smaller systems and really don't have a fucking clue what "overheads" are involved in running a system like Linux..

      You should check to see what your drinking water pipes are made of.


      Mod up...

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a guy who develops solely for Windows CE devices I can state that you are very wrong.
      The Windows Mobile API is not "crippled". It is a full UNICODE implementation of most of the Windows API. This means that any Windows programmer can pick it up very quickly. You guys don't understand this. The Windows CE platform and other Windows based technologies WILL succeed because the developers don't need to learn yet another API/toolset in order to be productive.

      Forget Linux on the cellphone, it will never be of any signifigance.

    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a guy who develops solely for Windows CE devices I can state that you are very wrong.
      The Windows Mobile API is not "crippled". It is a full UNICODE implementation of most of the Windows API. This means that any Windows programmer can pick it up very quickly. You guys don't understand this.


      Ummmkay. I have developed numerous stream and IFS drivers and OAL ports to a number of platforms. Additionally I have developed a number of apps including a rather complex multi terminal emulation product for industrial. I understand the WinCE API backwards and forwards, and it is quite simply crippled.

      Although the coredll entry points bare a naming resemblance to the Win32 counterparts most of them are very limited. Functions like CreateProcess ignore most of their arguments.. If your Win32 app actually uses the STARTUP_INFO and such, you're screwed..
      OVERLAPPED_IO isn't supported at all. A Windows app that uses it will have to have all I/O converted to use threads and blocking.
      Named pipes.. nope, not available.
      Security... no, there is no access control mechanism available at all in WinCE.

      File locking?? Only in 5.0 (latest)..

      Storage management... Well the CE functionality is actually pretty nifty (with much more emphasis on mount points and abstract namespace ops) but alas that API is completely WinCE specific and shares nothing in common with WinNT.
      An exper in WinNT of course knows about the abstract namespace model in NT, but this stuff isn't implemented in Windows CE.

      Devices... Well in addition to giving a much simpler model with no async I/O the model is kind of a weird reminder of DOS (eveything is three letter code, instance, colon)... certainly nothing like NTs \Device namespace.

      And then many things like change notifications on directories weren't available until very recent releases... so if your software has to run on a 3 year old industrial terminal you will still have to cull a lot of the stuff you might be depending on in the Windows NT API.

      Winsock is fun because there is no async facility (either the Win message style or EVENT signalling) and of course there is no O_NONBLOCK so you are completely screwed. 90% of the Win32 apps I have worked on either used the post to message queue (older) or the EVENT signalling for socket ops.. Those will have to have there core logic changed to use blocking ops in threads..

      The Serial port routines are simplified to the point of requiring special case handling.

      IrDA and bluetooth applications are totally different because the interfaces are different.
      The registry in Windows CE is similar to NT in that it is a huge tree of key/value pairs but the layout for things like device management are completely different... IN OTHER WORDS THERE IS NOTHING IN COMMON BETWEEN THEM. The driver model is completely different. There is no SCM in CE.

      There are very few Windows NT applications of any consequence that even provide good examples of how to program CE. If you are attempting to use a book like Programming Windows or Advanced Windows to program CE, I wish you the best of luck. I challenge to try some of the examples from different chapters of these books and see what actually works.

      I could go on, but I think I have enough things that you can look up to see what an idiot you are.

      Contrast this to an embedded linux platform on a PDA.. You get a complete kernel with as many features as you need.. The bluetooth support is the exact same bluetooth support on your desktop..so is IrDA..so is shm, socket API, I/O, multiple fs support, epoll, I can go on and on..
      The syscall interface is IDENTICAL.

      WinCE has a completely different set from NT of core third party support libraries and systems.


      The Windows CE platform and other Windows based technologies WILL succeed because the developers don't need to learn yet another API/toolset in order to be productive.

      This is a complete bunch of crap. Even if you enjoy programming Windows CE

  38. Thanks for the info by Catullus · · Score: 1

    I don't know where I'd picked up the impression that Microsoft didn't like to hand out CE licences, but it was obviously wrong!

  39. Re:No, it doesn't say Outlook is part of the softw by jc42 · · Score: 1

    They also say there's viewers for office documents - don't confuse that with "Includes Microsoft Office."

    Yeah, I noticed that. But then, why would a sensible person want to produce proprietary documents? I'd much rather produce documents in a format that can be read by anyone that I send them to, without first checking to see if they have decoding software.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  40. Cool! by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    Cool! Another gadget running Linux that 99.99999% of the technology-buying public will never see! SWEET!

  41. Linux or not, it has WLAN by ktorn · · Score: 1

    Mobile phones with WLAN is what I want to see. The more and cheaper the better.

    I really want a cheap phone that I can make WLAN based VoIP calls from anytime I'm near a hotspot.

  42. What I noticed ... by jc42 · · Score: 1

    ... was that it's 128x60x25mm and weighs 210g. This isn't a pocket device, unless you've got deep pockets. It's a small laptop with a builtin phone.

    I did also notice that the specs include 640x240 touchscreen. I wonder if you could use a random stylus with the screen? If so, what's the sensitivity? I do have a couple of those multi-gadget pens that include a stylus (plus pencil and red/black or red/blue pens). It'd be cool if you could use these. Of course, a stylus that hides inside the device would be more likely to be there when you need it.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    1. Re:What I noticed ... by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Probably you could use a stylus, but the screen's not designed for more precision than you could get with a forefinger.

      This device is too small to be a real laptop. But you're right, it's too big to be a pocket device. It's one of those in-between devices I hate. Still, somebody must like them, 'cause there sure are a lot of them.

      This is yet another all-in-one device, a category I hate. Do people actually want this? I suspect they exist solely because that's what wireless providers want to sell. The alternative is simple cell phones that interoperate with PDA and other pocket devices -- and wireless providers don't sell those other devices, so they don't make any money off them.

    2. Re:What I noticed ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ***This device is too small to be a real laptop. But you're right, it's too big to be a pocket device. It's one of those in-between devices I hate. Still, somebody must like them, 'cause there sure are a lot of them.***

      I don't think anyone likes them, we just put up with them because we don't have much alternative. My personal phone is also a pda and it's freaking huge. I've been looking to trade it in for a real phone lately. Too big.

  43. it's fake by idlake · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to the web site, the guy who founded the company has a patent (filed in 1995) for a combination of "mobile PC with a cellular telephone" and then in 2005, he "founded" this company, whose "goal" it is to create a product. The product "photographs" are obviously fake: the scale of the screen is wrong and a keyboard with concave keycaps makes no sense on a small device. This guy may be trying to cause some trouble with his patent, that's all.

    Motorola makes several Linux-based cell phones that are apparently quite nice. Otherwise, the Nokia 9300 and 9500 are great little cell phones with a decent operating system (Symbian).

  44. Never! by fm6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is why you should never buy any electronic device, no matter how useful. The very moment you click on "place order", something twice as good and half as expensive will appear on the market, and make you hate yourself!

  45. Dear Verizon by k33bz · · Score: 1

    Please carry this phone. sincerely, Valued Customer

  46. Why is this a PC? by Ulrich+Hobelmann · · Score: 1

    This is as much a portable "PC" as all the Zauruses before it.

  47. Yeah but... by jbNet · · Score: 0

    does it run Windows?

  48. Re:No, it doesn't say Outlook is part of the softw by droolfool · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry to inform you that many people don't really care about formats that "can be read by anyone you send them to". They only care about Outlook compatibility. If it works with Outlook, then they say fsck everything else.

  49. Personal Area Network by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    These little PCs, running Linux, can really handle some work. Even my iPaq3670/Familiar0.8 is a great little "compute server" running over ethernet; it easily plays 320Kbps MP3 streams out its stereo headphone jack. I bet its battery would last 10x longer with Bluetooth. So a Bluetooth/WiFi or /GSM or /CDMA gateway, with its own batteries, in my coat pocket or pack, could give it hours of between-plugs use. Keyboards with batteries and Bluetooth are plentiful. What we need is a Bluetooth headset display, so all those parts can stay in the bag or coat pockets, and just wear the goggles. Where's the $300 SVGA/stereo HMD?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  50. [OT] What is GmbH by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

    These four letters seem to come up quite often when dealing with German companies, what do they mean?

    Google search didn't help me a lot because it just comes up with lots of company names.

    1. Re:[OT] What is GmbH by Ozan · · Score: 3, Informative

      It denotes the business structure, which is similar to that of an american LLC or Ltd.

    2. Re:[OT] What is GmbH by elambi · · Score: 1

      My Google Search returned this:

      Web definitions for GmbH
      A German limited liability company.

      --
      Sig, we don't need no stinking Sig!
    3. Re:[OT] What is GmbH by k7net · · Score: 2, Informative

      It means limited liability company (Gesellschaft mit Beschränkter Haftung in German).

  51. More Linux Mobile Phones by wehe · · Score: 1

    There have been even more mobile (cell) phones with Linux announced, e.g. from the German company Invair, from Curitel, Datang, E28, Motorola, NEC, PalmPalm, Panasonic, Samsung and Yuhua.

  52. Re:No, it doesn't say Outlook is part of the softw by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

    I work for Adobe, you insensitive clod!

  53. Where it will really win over the Nokia/Symbian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The big attraction of a Linux phone, rather than Symbian, is that it should be easier to get GNUemacs running on it... or has anyone ported it to Symbian yet (there was no sign of this last time I looked)?

  54. Remote Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen a many comments wondering about the outlook display on the handy-pc screen http://road-gmbh.de/startimage/pro_02.html
    Road is placing the device as a remote access device in the market. The screen probably shows vnc, rdesktop or something alike connected to a windows pc.

  55. Re:No, it doesn't say Outlook is part of the softw by karakal · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah! Let's try and start a flamewar, wouldn't we? Would be amusing....

  56. English website by uluckas · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is an "english" link at the top of the page - pointing to http://road-gmbh.de/en/index.html

  57. VoIP by uluckas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A hackable phone with WLAN. I guess it won't be long before someone puts a VoIP client on there.

    Use WLAN to make cheap calls and GSM for backup if there is no WLAN available.

  58. Re:it's fake [following taken from web site....] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In June 1995 Hans Constin obtains a German patent for remote office access equipment - uniting the characteristics of a laptop with that of a mobile phone (phone-pc). World-wide patent registrations for the phone-pc follow: USA, Russia, China and Europe. At the beginning of 2005 Hans Constin and Hubertus in Berlin create the company 'ROAD GmbH' - the mission is the useful advancement and introduction to the market of the phone-pc, Hans Constin, managing director of Constin GmbH Berlin, has 20 years experience in product development and product Design. Dipl. Ing. Hubertus is specialist for hardware and software development.

  59. MOD PARENT UP - it IS a fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comment is correct and was modded up, subsequently modded down....

    Oh I wonder why?

  60. Motorola A720 ? by WoodieR · · Score: 1

    have we not already seen something like this in the Motorola A720 ... seems to recall reading something on /. re: the specs on the A720, though said device apparently will never reach North America ... it has been available in Japan and some say EU for well over a year, if not 2 years ...

    --
    Question Authority before IT questions You ...
  61. Ahem... top right corner = English.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did the site owners add that one or have several posters simply not noticed?