I fail to understand why we give any credence to the two thousand year old garbled and inconsistent myths of a bunch of middle eastern nomadic goat fuckers.
What's worse is the number of people who go to school and learn about Greek Mythology, Roman Mythology, Norse Mythology, Egyptian Mythology, etc and then fail to recogize what they learn on Sunday is just Christian Mythology.
While I find your comment interesting, I would like to propose a different view. Religion, in itself, is one of the things that is trying to win the "survival of the fittest" contest. It is essentially a parasite living within the human race. It has survived through evolution (of ideas) and is fighting against atheism for survival. That's why it proseltyzes (for reproduction).
The Apple PowerBook series, introduced in October 1991, pioneered changes that are now de facto standards on laptops, such as room for a palm rest, and the inclusion of a pointing device (a trackball).
But, but, but Apple never invented anything. They just, like, copy stuff and, um, spit-shine it for hipsters, then overcharge.
Actually, the RESET key had a stronger spring than the others and required pressing simultaneously the SHIFT key for it to have effect, IIRC.
While it did have a much stiffer spring on my Apple II+, it did not require a press of shift or any other modifiers. This may have changed with the IIe, IIc, or IIgs; I don't know.
Maybe if you're growing crops where's there's no water or fallow land it takes petro. Fact: I grow crops. Fact: I only use manure (from other people's cattle). Fact: Water spouts out of my land - more than I can use. Of course you can do nothing but accuse others of knowing nothing. Drilling? Combines? You're talking the kind of Ag that supports feedlots, not people. For the same number of acres, growing hay or veggies is comparable. Yes, I know. Yes, I've done both. I guess your land must really suck out there in Montana. You're not as smart as you pretend to be.
Oh, so there's enough grass year round to graze cattle in Montana? You are full of shit. You must use fossil fuels to harvest hay to feed them in the winter.
Oh, fuck off, my butt is feeling just fine. Of course cows can live off the land; it's just that not enough of them can do that to support the meat frenzy this country lives on - that takes fossil fuels.
Grass-fed beef is, in point of fact, less carbon-intensive than vegetarian fare. And when grazing is managed well, it's net-negative as good management sequesters MORE carbon in the soil, even when some fuel use for hay harvest is factored in.
No it is not. I don't know where you get your so-called "facts."
Hay and silage are two different things, city boy.
And no, putting up hay does not require "substantial" fuel amounts compared to other crops.
Don't call me a city boy, whippersnapper. FYI, I own 216 acres in rural WV. Of course, I don't raise cattle, as I am a vegetarian. Yes, putting up hay requires just as much fuel as raising other crops per acre - cut, ted, bale, store, unless you include inorganic fertilyzer (I don't).
Turn it up to 11 much? I was only commenting that grass-fed beef still requires fossil fuels (in response to poster claiming that it is less carbon-intensive than food grown for humans). I did not advocate for any of the stuff you raged about or for leaving things at status quo. Get a fucking grip.
You do realize that most of the US has a season known as winter, right? Grass does not grow in the winter. That is why grass-fed beef is fed hay (aka silage) during the winter. Adequate hay harvesting requires substantial fuels.
Well her point in her book is that you'd be better just letting cows eat their natural diet, grass. Then we eat the cows. Like the food chain was originally.
Yeah, back when there were millions fewer people in this country and billions fewer in the world. Good luck finding the grassland for year-round grazing of cows that can support the human consumption of meat.
What about grass fed beef? not much carbon footprint there. No fossil-fuel-based fertilizer, no tractors. It could have a lower carbon footprint than a vegetarian's corn/soy/wheat diet.
Cattle that is fed ONLY by pasture grass is very rare in the U.S. Grass-fed beef includes cattle that are fed hay in the winter. That hay is harvested with tractors and fossil-fuels. There aren't a lot of areas of the country that can support year-round grazing.
Slashdot Mirror
Don't see any chimps or dolphins wringing their hands/flippers over who has what rights...
That's because you only pay attention to the human media.
I fail to understand why we give any credence to the two thousand year old garbled and inconsistent myths of a bunch of middle eastern nomadic goat fuckers.
What's worse is the number of people who go to school and learn about Greek Mythology, Roman Mythology, Norse Mythology, Egyptian Mythology, etc and then fail to recogize what they learn on Sunday is just Christian Mythology.
What the hell is a "pound"?
It's what I do to the face of smartass AC's.
Of those 3000 gods you mention I believe in the one true one (with a margin of error of +/- one)
While I find your comment interesting, I would like to propose a different view. Religion, in itself, is one of the things that is trying to win the "survival of the fittest" contest. It is essentially a parasite living within the human race. It has survived through evolution (of ideas) and is fighting against atheism for survival. That's why it proseltyzes (for reproduction).
It says: "Any similarity to persons dead or alive is purely coincidental."
Wrong. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_laptops
The Apple PowerBook series, introduced in October 1991, pioneered changes that are now de facto standards on laptops, such as room for a palm rest, and the inclusion of a pointing device (a trackball).
But, but, but Apple never invented anything. They just, like, copy stuff and, um, spit-shine it for hipsters, then overcharge.
... on that slick snowy road, no braking system on earth could've gotten you to stop in less than 100 yards. You can't cheat physics.
How about a concrete wall?
USA is 36-24-28. Sounds about right - top-heavy.
Well, no, it isn't. There may be regulations like that on the books, but they're not enforceable. No court in the US would uphold them.
There are probably a few courts in the US that would uphold them, but they'd be overturned at higher levels.
Actually, the RESET key had a stronger spring than the others and required pressing simultaneously the SHIFT key for it to have effect, IIRC.
While it did have a much stiffer spring on my Apple II+, it did not require a press of shift or any other modifiers. This may have changed with the IIe, IIc, or IIgs; I don't know.
+900, informative.
The snag with doing this, this also wastes my time too. I don't want to be tied up on the phone talking to these jackasses.
Then test out your prototype voice-activated AI program.
The URL on your redirect page links to "http://wwww.robots-everywhere.com/", with four Ws.
And our company proxy identifies it as a malicious site.
Maybe if you're growing crops where's there's no water or fallow land it takes petro. Fact: I grow crops. Fact: I only use manure (from other people's cattle). Fact: Water spouts out of my land - more than I can use. Of course you can do nothing but accuse others of knowing nothing. Drilling? Combines? You're talking the kind of Ag that supports feedlots, not people. For the same number of acres, growing hay or veggies is comparable. Yes, I know. Yes, I've done both. I guess your land must really suck out there in Montana. You're not as smart as you pretend to be.
Oh, so there's enough grass year round to graze cattle in Montana? You are full of shit. You must use fossil fuels to harvest hay to feed them in the winter.
Oh, fuck off, my butt is feeling just fine. Of course cows can live off the land; it's just that not enough of them can do that to support the meat frenzy this country lives on - that takes fossil fuels.
Grass-fed beef is, in point of fact, less carbon-intensive than vegetarian fare. And when grazing is managed well, it's net-negative as good management sequesters MORE carbon in the soil, even when some fuel use for hay harvest is factored in.
No it is not. I don't know where you get your so-called "facts."
Hay and silage are two different things, city boy.
And no, putting up hay does not require "substantial" fuel amounts compared to other crops.
Don't call me a city boy, whippersnapper. FYI, I own 216 acres in rural WV. Of course, I don't raise cattle, as I am a vegetarian. Yes, putting up hay requires just as much fuel as raising other crops per acre - cut, ted, bale, store, unless you include inorganic fertilyzer (I don't).
Turn it up to 11 much? I was only commenting that grass-fed beef still requires fossil fuels (in response to poster claiming that it is less carbon-intensive than food grown for humans). I did not advocate for any of the stuff you raged about or for leaving things at status quo. Get a fucking grip.
You do realize that most of the US has a season known as winter, right? Grass does not grow in the winter. That is why grass-fed beef is fed hay (aka silage) during the winter. Adequate hay harvesting requires substantial fuels.
Well her point in her book is that you'd be better just letting cows eat their natural diet, grass. Then we eat the cows. Like the food chain was originally.
Yeah, back when there were millions fewer people in this country and billions fewer in the world. Good luck finding the grassland for year-round grazing of cows that can support the human consumption of meat.
What about grass fed beef? not much carbon footprint there. No fossil-fuel-based fertilizer, no tractors. It could have a lower carbon footprint than a vegetarian's corn/soy/wheat diet.
Cattle that is fed ONLY by pasture grass is very rare in the U.S. Grass-fed beef includes cattle that are fed hay in the winter. That hay is harvested with tractors and fossil-fuels. There aren't a lot of areas of the country that can support year-round grazing.
... people I know who style themselves anarchists would prefer small, more or less self-sustaining communities and networks of lose association.
Freudian slip in bold.
"Out of 420,000 apps, does finding malware every month really signify something? Or is 1% a high rate?"
You need a comparison, what's Apple's rate?
As TFA states: "By design, Android applications can be disassembled, modified and reassembled to provide new functionalities."
Fortunately, that's not the case in the "walled garden" of derision.