The full SSL specification also states that both parties have an trusted certificate. Its a 20-something step handshake. only two of those are sending user data. This is not used in todays web
If you'd bothered reading anything from their faq, you'd known that they plan on using OpenGL and was going to, but they can't yet because it draws inn all X11 libs. AKA GLX. And network transparency will come, they even say so in TFV. "It's trivial"
Which? Microsoft and Apple?
So to on each side then.. And guess what; Microsoft don't support h264 in IE, they just support plugins.
Blah blah everybody blah blah.
zero devices and a microscopic share of the whole video format ecosystem but think the whole world will bend to their will for WebM.
Yeh google should remove all support for h264 in android. Oh thats 60% of smart phones. woops. And remove flash and h264 from youtube. Should make webM relevant then. How many sites do you use which have videos?
And they don't. Unlike Apple you can actually install whatever you want from wherever you want. Download it from SourceForge and copy it onto your phone, and it'll run. But google can and will pull something they don't like away from *their own* store.
It may, but since Linux has been time driven rather then feature driven for the last 6 years it shouldn't be so. Also 3.0 marks Linux 20 year Anniversary
I'm not to sure. Ibas says they are almost impossibly to wipe out. That even with secure delete, almost 90% is still intact. And I think I believe them.
So why did we go for h264 then? When it came there was only MPEG2 hardware chips. In your line of thought no change should ever take place. Why buy TV when there is nothing on. That was the big question in the 40- and 50s. And There *are * hw chips for webm. And more is being produced. In 2 years you can bet every phone have it. Hopefully by then no one will even remember h264.
Uhm no.
On two accounts.
1. An proprietary codec can never be freedom. So you can't loose any freedom by having it removed
2. Cromium is free software. If you like you can put H264 right back in there.
Slashdot Mirror
The full SSL specification also states that both parties have an trusted certificate. Its a 20-something step handshake. only two of those are sending user data. This is not used in todays web
You don't allow them to update? I'm sorry but I really can't find anything to be upset about here.
If you'd bothered reading anything from their faq, you'd known that they plan on using OpenGL and was going to, but they can't yet because it draws inn all X11 libs. AKA GLX. And network transparency will come, they even say so in TFV. "It's trivial"
Companies that won't support H.264: Mozilla
And Opera
Companies that won't support WebM: Many...
Which? Microsoft and Apple? So to on each side then.. And guess what; Microsoft don't support h264 in IE, they just support plugins. Blah blah everybody blah blah.
zero devices and a microscopic share of the whole video format ecosystem but think the whole world will bend to their will for WebM.
Yeh google should remove all support for h264 in android. Oh thats 60% of smart phones. woops. And remove flash and h264 from youtube. Should make webM relevant then. How many sites do you use which have videos?
I AM...THE LAW!
What? And let it fall in the hands of the zombie Nazis?
But its ok that none warnings are issued just because mybank.com spent a lot of money to buy a signed certificate from douchebags-ca.com?
and later pdf printers.
So that means that the GSM patents are just now in public domain
But Religions non the less. Religion of a person, namely Staling and Hitler.
We had scart for a loong time (1970). Also Cat5 isn't something new
And they don't. Unlike Apple you can actually install whatever you want from wherever you want. Download it from SourceForge and copy it onto your phone, and it'll run. But google can and will pull something they don't like away from *their own* store.
It may, but since Linux has been time driven rather then feature driven for the last 6 years it shouldn't be so. Also 3.0 marks Linux 20 year Anniversary
Actually in every other country then US you can call with the Galaxy. They only took it out because carriers in US sux ;)
Sony has never supported directX on any console. OpenGL on the other hand
Wait what? PS1 cd, PS2 dvd, PS3, bluray, PS4?. I demand another format for my PS4!
or just, edit /etc/ file and then make iptables reread it. Simple :)
I'm not to sure. Ibas says they are almost impossibly to wipe out. That even with secure delete, almost 90% is still intact. And I think I believe them.
perhaps, but microsoft/bing might want to come out to play as well...
So why did we go for h264 then? When it came there was only MPEG2 hardware chips. In your line of thought no change should ever take place. Why buy TV when there is nothing on. That was the big question in the 40- and 50s. And There *are * hw chips for webm. And more is being produced. In 2 years you can bet every phone have it. Hopefully by then no one will even remember h264.
So ff for windows gets h264. What about Opera or FF for mac/linux/bsd then?
Uhm no.
On two accounts.
1. An proprietary codec can never be freedom. So you can't loose any freedom by having it removed
2. Cromium is free software. If you like you can put H264 right back in there.
Uhm Hindi is the official language of India.
It's Mr. Hilter to you
Or Microsoft denying itunes or safari on Windows