Slashdot Mirror


User: Ayanami+Rei

Ayanami+Rei's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,987
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,987

  1. *crying* on Doom Movie Update · · Score: 1

    Why do movie producers INSIST on alienating and disgusting their target market?

    It's not like people who weren't familiar with the game are going to go see it. (Unless it involves a hot female role: See Ecks vs. Sever or Tomb Raider).

    But jesus, it's Doom. It fucking WRITES ITSELF. Just give us imps, gore, and cool FX in space and hell.

  2. Not a joke: 3M is huge lol. on Golden Spam Cans to Promote Python Musical · · Score: 1

    I think people downplay Minnesota... they shouldn't. North Dakota it ain't.

  3. An idea: on Running a Server at Freezing Temperatures? · · Score: 1

    Many BIOS allow for a hard-drive spin-up before booting. It would be wise if this was set for it's longest setting. This would give the CPU a chance to heat up the case a bit.

  4. Mmmmm... I don't know. on Thunderbird 1.0 RC1 Released · · Score: 1

    I like the idea of a theme-able, CSS-toting IRC client. It makes for interesting possibilities (think JerkCity).

    Can't we have both? ^_^

  5. No... on Nintendo DS Emitting Anomalous Signal? · · Score: 1

    I think what it is... is that there's a bit of circuitry after the RF input on the TV, after the channel filter, but before the amplifier that would get it to the voltage level of external regular composite input.
    If that part of the circuit is being interfered with, then it could overlay the composite signal leaking from teh DS, which gets amplified, and appears in the NTSC feed.

    A standard composite input wouldn't need that amplifier so that circuitry in that signal path is probably not sensitive enough to pick up the stray NTSC from the DS.

    Similarly, feeding straight composite into your RF does absolutely jack, since you'd have to modulate your NTSC signal for that to work (the RF interface always demodulates, and demodulating a non-modulated signal == garbage)

    But maybe other composite/s-video enabled devices can leak a signal in this fashion? Try it!

  6. Probably because... on Nintendo DS Emitting Anomalous Signal? · · Score: 1

    there's an enabled but unused S-Video/Composite NTSC output pin on the video driver chip, which is being picked up by the TV. ... the TV would have to pick that up somewhere post-channel filter but pre-amplification... because the signal in the DS wouldn't also be accidentally RF modulated, that's for sure. But the signal the TV gets from antenna/cable after demodulation is basically the same as a composite output... so there you go.

  7. It's likely... on Nintendo DS Emitting Anomalous Signal? · · Score: 1

    It's likely that the chip ultimately responsible for the display is not quite a custom fab and contains both an LCD driver and also an S-Video/Composite output as well.
    Sort of like how every Radeon chip has a DVI, VGA-RGBA and S-Video outputs, even if not all three are enabled on various models.
    There could be a trace with no terminating connector inside that if held near a TV, could radiate that signal to be picked up somewhere after the RF-baseband but before being amplified... or something like that.

  8. *applaud* on Top Ten Persistent Design Flaws · · Score: 1

    Seriously... what a maroon.

  9. What the hell are you talking about? on Top Ten Persistent Design Flaws · · Score: 1

    There are tons of tower-replacement type computers out there. HTPCs, those mini Shuttle PCs, those tiny Dell Dimensions, DTR laptops, etc. etc.
    You're just not _looking_ for them, or maybe the price is turning you off?

  10. There is a reason for the 4-seconds to off... on Top Ten Persistent Design Flaws · · Score: 1

    on the power button; preventing accidental power-off.

    I can't tell you how often it is that accidentally press the power button with my leg, foot, or arm, especially if I want to get behind it for some reason. (This was back in the day when my APM was never set up right).
    The fact that now a mere brush against it will only bring up a dialog box and not shut the system down immediately is a great comfort.

  11. Take a lesson from databases. on Top Ten Persistent Design Flaws · · Score: 1

    Leave the original as is, but update a redo log as the user performs operations.
    Only when the user saves do you commit the changes from the log to the file.
    This has the added benefit of being an undo/redo history backing for your "project" file (assuming the app is based on projects or workspaces).

  12. Compared to un-patrolled oil pipelines in Alaska? on Creating Hydrogen With (Very) Hot Water · · Score: 2, Interesting

    An oil pipeline would make a much more impressive explosion than a burst H2 transport. (primarily because H2 dissapates _very_ rapidly).
    I think hydrogen is safer w.r.t. terrorists/industrial accidents.
    Unfortunately we don't have an inexpensive way to get it from hither to thither.
    It might be that we have to go to intermediary carriers, like methane or something.

  13. But is that a more or less efficient process? on Creating Hydrogen With (Very) Hot Water · · Score: 1

    1) you need to produce the coke
    2) you need to do something with the carbon monoxide
    3) you need to heat the water to > 1000 C directly (not as a side effect of some other process, as in the articles' nuclear reactor)

    Are the energy/material costs of 1, 2 and 3 close to or not much greater than the costs of operating a nuclear reactor and dealing with the cooling reduction placed on it by the hydrogen producing process?

  14. Maybe universe? on Creating Hydrogen With (Very) Hot Water · · Score: 1

    I'd bet my left kidney it is the smallest molecule in the universe. I mean, there ain't much else smaller that one of the hydrogens in H2 could bond to 'cept more hydrogen. ::eye roll::

  15. It's not a theory... on Jon Bringing WMV9 to Linux · · Score: 1

    Jon repackages existing, available stuff, and likes to take a bit of credit for that.

  16. Re:No evidence? on Jon Bringing WMV9 to Linux · · Score: 1

    playfair was first. Jon didn't write playfair. in fact, the usage notes for deDRMS mention you need to use VLC to get your "user key"; a feature that was part of the original playfair which was later integrated into VLC.

    http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=105348&c id =8967845

    Similarly, we've got no evidence he's done anything except compile the freely available VC-1 code in this latest iteration. No idea if it supports encrypted streams or what.

  17. *All* phones can downsize when you email... on 7 Megapixel Camera Phone · · Score: 1

    of course, the quality of software bundled varies from network to network.
    I would be surprised if it didn't in most camera phones here because most people would be too stupid to know any better, and they'd complain if the email was too slow.

  18. But they do have a dynamic aperature... on 7 Megapixel Camera Phone · · Score: 1

    plus your eyes have a long "exposure" (although it's not synrconous... this allows for a compromise of quick motion detection plus fine-detail resolution in dim light)

  19. No evidence? on Jon Bringing WMV9 to Linux · · Score: 2, Interesting
  20. Well how did he get around the DRM? on Jon Bringing WMV9 to Linux · · Score: 1

    I mean, is the whole stream encrypted or is there a content-control header that DirectShow marshals that you can ignore?

  21. No he doesn't do any of those things. on Jon Bringing WMV9 to Linux · · Score: 1

    He is I guess what you would call a "PR guy" for a group of talented individuals (hackers) who do the work. It didn't even have to be anyone at nanocrew, it could have been someone else who was too shy or afraid to release this stuff herself. (Big bad microsoft and all)

  22. What needs to happen first: on Unifying Linux Package Management · · Score: 1

    The issue with that is that a user won't be able to call those programs, nor ldconfig find those libraries, if they are in weird directories.

    What's needed is for distros to adopt the /etc/profile.d whole-heartedly, and to sort of "abuse" that to add managed scripts that set up your environment to deal with packages outside of /usr/bin.

    So if you install mozilla, which drops a bunch of binaries in /opt/mozilla/mozilla-1.8/bin, then you also get a script called mozilla.sh in /etc/profile.d, which states somewhere:

    MOZHOME=/opt/mozilla/mozilla-1.8
    PATH=$PATH:$MO ZHOME/bin
    export PATH

    You get the idea.

    Similarly, if installing libs, maybe it needs a post install script that simply seds through /etc/ld.so.conf and adds the directory for lib if ain't there, then runs ldconfig after?

    Otherwise we'll continue to see this sort of uncertainty about what files belong where.

    Now, one other thing to keep in mind is... rpm -q --whatprovides somefile is very useful. Even if you have cluttered directories, you should always know what package owns which file. You just have to ask. So now we ask ourselves, is it that big a deal, so long as you don't --force too often?

  23. I think that's a mis-communication. on Unifying Linux Package Management · · Score: 1

    It's trying to say that it's what you add in later that doesn't come with the system.
    A system being defined as the ENTIRE distro (Linux, Solaris, whatever)... of course you would not have installed the whole thing, but just because you add the package later doesn't mean it's not "the system".

  24. I would disagree. on Will Open Source Solaris Kill Linux? · · Score: 1

    Despite what you may think, glibc IS linux. (hurd doesn't count)
    Anyone who thinks otherwise is fooling themselves.

    The linux kernel makes concessions to glibc, and vice-versa.

    The linux PAM implementation is very linux-specific. NIS is userspace, but the implementation is tied to and implements parts of glibc, making it a linux-only thing.

    These things are important to linux interoperability and managability. But the ideas came from Sun.

  25. No. on Australian Idol And ISP Censorship · · Score: 1

    You _can_ sue an ad agency for some sort of action like this, provided you can prove it was malicious.

    But it is ultimately the site owners' duty to pay the bandwidth bill. The bandwidth provider doesn't care how the traffic was directed to your site, and whether it was wanted or not. At no point does the ad agency enter into that contract.

    If they can get any money back by suing for damages, I suppose that's the fairest outcome.