Slashdot Mirror


Nintendo DS Emitting Anomalous Signal?

An Anonymous reader writes "An owner of Nintendo's Shiny New Portable, has noticed his DS is emitting a signal that is projecting a ghostly image of his screen onto his TV- and he's not even multiplayer gaming. He and several others have uploaded photos of their DSs interfering with their TV's reception. As one forum-goer points out, this doesn't seem like the DS is adhering to FCC standards." More news from a forum, so enjoy some NaCl with this.

97 comments

  1. Yeah, and? by mrseigen · · Score: 1

    This is pretty much what the whole TEMPEST dealie was about, wasn't it? I'd wager the same thing happens with a GBA LCD if you strip off the case and shielding bits.

    I really like how the forum-goers keep claiming it's a secret feature from Nintendo.

    1. Re:Yeah, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I spent a good amount of time at the WarpPipe forums, but left. The majority of the posters are stupid 12 to 16 year old Nintendo fanboys who have nothing better to do than praise the company. What a load of crap.

    2. Re:Yeah, and? by bynary · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Wow! It must be some hidden feature that Nintendo will release an add-on for!" And your blender is sending "special messages" to your TV everytime you turn it on. I wonder if KitchenAid is going to release an add-on so you can watch your blending live on television?

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    3. Re:Yeah, and? by nukem1999 · · Score: 1

      TEMPEST dealie?

    4. Re:Yeah, and? by Student_Tech · · Score: 3, Informative

      TEMPEST @ Wikipedia
      Another article with some more links.
      I think the original poster may be referring to the Van Eck Phreaking, not TEMPEST as TEMPEST is the US code limiting the radiation out from electronic equipment, and Van Eck Phreaking is actually receiveing the signal emitted from the equipment.
      Actually for more go to Google and look up "Van Eck Phreaking"

    5. Re:Yeah, and? by yutt · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I spent a good amount of time at the WarpPipe forums, but left. The majority of the posters are stupid 12 to 16 year old...boys who have nothing better to do...

      Sounds like Slashdot.

    6. Re:Yeah, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dunno. My POS microwave puts out so much interference that the TV gets wavy lines. I wonder if I should check to see if I'm getting cooked??!

      The 12 year old 3733t gam3r logic on the warp pipe forums is classic. The DS shouldn't generate interference so therefore Nintendo are doing this deliberately! Woot!

  2. FCC can suck it by Mr.Dippy · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the FCC has arbitrary standards for indeceny why not WIFI?

    --


    -Dipster
  3. Interesting Possibilities by blueZhift · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hmmm, well this certainly has some interesting possibilities if true. It might be kinda cool to be able to project one's gameplay on a good TV. I wonder if anyone will try to enhance this "feature"?

    1. Re:Interesting Possibilities by Ayaress · · Score: 1

      That may be cool, but I doubt it's something controllable To that extent. A TI-86 will mess up an FM radio. I had the same issue with my old GBC, but on different stations. Isn't the FCC regulation that a device has to accept outisde interferance, not that it can't produce any itself?

    2. Re:Interesting Possibilities by wikdwarlock · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that would be cool! And then, we could get like controllers, 'cause, you know, the GBA is a bit small, and it's hard for two people to play at the same time. Maybe it could have rubber pads on the bottom, so it'll stay put on a table, and we'd better make it a bit bigger so it doesn't move around when we pull on the cables.

      Oh, wait, that's a retarded idea. Never mind.

      What part of portable don't you understand?

      --

      "I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer." -Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear
    3. Re:Interesting Possibilities by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      I think it's both.

      My question is: what happens if there's one object bound by FCC rules that is interfered by another that also bound by FCC rules?

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    4. Re:Interesting Possibilities by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "What part of portable don't you understand?"

      The idea is to have good games that happen to be portable, not just good portable games. If your portable gaming is your gaming choice of last resort, why bother with anything more complicated than an old Game & Watch?

      In other words, if you wouldn't want to play the game on a TV, why would you want to play it at all?

    5. Re:Interesting Possibilities by nomel · · Score: 1

      Someone made some software for the TI-82 that let you play music on AM radio.

      From those pictures, it looks like it only interferes when the tv signal is very weak. I don't think able to pic it up on a channel with mostly static would be called "harmful interference". The TV is turning up it's reciever gain, getting any signal it can.

      Japan, Korea, and many other Eastern countries have very strick EMC regulations, so, it's garanteed that these were tested before being sold. Although, they could have pulled out some components and shielding for US moduls to reduce cost, since we don't realy have any standards besides a complaint based and 'what the customer accepts as quality' system.

    6. Re:Interesting Possibilities by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      Someone made some software for the TI-82 that let you play music on AM radio.

      Back in the 70s and early 80s, that's how we made sound effects on home computers. Games sometimes contained loops specifically designed to do nothing but generate sound effects when you placed an AM radio in close proximity to the computer.

      Signed,
      You Damned Kids, Stay Off My Lawn!

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  4. An Excerpt from the Forum... by devnull17 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's an excerpt from the thread:

    i really really hope ninty crakes some sort of hardware or wire so we can play our DS's ON a TV. Wud be a really nice idea, but then again the 2 screens on 1 tv would have to be cut down and also you would still have to keep looking at your DS on a lot of games becuase of the touch screen so its kinda pointless in some ways! still, for games like n4su2 and mario 64 wud be mint!!!!!!!!!

    OK, given that the majority of the posts look a lot like that one, why the hell would anyone with half a brain take this seriously? It's obviously just interference coming from an improperly shielded cable. I'm sure the FCC will have something to say about this--well, they would if Michael Powell weren't so busy acting as the Christian right's moralistic attack dog, anyway...

    1. Re:An Excerpt from the Forum... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      -1 Flamebait

      The increased fines were levied by the Democrat on the FCC's board, not Michael Powell.

      Controlling the airwaves is a bipartisan "effort."

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    2. Re:An Excerpt from the Forum... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, last I checked, it was Michael Powell jumping up and down in front of the media over the Monday Night Football thing.

      That aside, with Republicans controlling every part of the federal government, Michael Powell in the chairman's seat, and the absurd deregulation that's occurred under this administration's watch, you still really think that Democrats control the FCC? That's asinine.

      Besides, the fines are chump change. The media exposure is far more valuable. Didn't the 2004 election teach you anything?

    3. Re:An Excerpt from the Forum... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      you still really think that Democrats control the FCC? That's asinine.

      No, I don't still think that since I never said that. It is a fact that the FCC is bipartisan.

      Besides, the fines are chump change. The media exposure is far more valuable.

      If the FCC didn't have as much power as it does, there would be no fines, and there would be no media coverage.

      It sounds like we're both against what the FCC does, but for some reason you keep trying to pin it on Republicans.

      The sad fact is this country is filled with puritans, and until that is thoroughly disposed of, we'll still have this problem regardless of which party has control, because as long as the FCC exists, there will be people lodging complaints with them.

      We are making progress, though. Thirty years ago you couldn't have gotten away with half the shit we say and do on TV/radio nowadays.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    4. Re:An Excerpt from the Forum... by devnull17 · · Score: 1

      I agree that it's a social problem. I blame the Republican party because they've been shamelessly exploiting the naive puritanism of these people for political gains.

      If you look at the people behind the most recent "controversy," you'll find that they're all of the usual Republican suspects--the Christian Coalition, Rush Limbaugh, etc. The story didn't even really break until Wednesday; only two papers (both in Philadelphia) said anything about the clip on the day after the game. It took 24 hours of conservative chest-pounding and mock outrage to even turn it into an issue. The same thing happened when Kerry mentioned Mary Cheney in the third presidential debate and the GOP, after a few days of cold, quiet calculation, went completely berzerk. (If you watched the antecedent vice presidential debate, you may remember that John Edwards said something similar, and Dick Cheney actually thanked him "for your kind words about my daughter.") It's all being used to manipulate people who are too stupid, religious or undereducated to know better into supporting officials whose only real interest is to shovel as much money out of the Treasury and into their own pockets as they possibly can, at the expense of the rightful recipients of that money (i.e. the American taxpayers).

      This really isn't about the FCC. I'm not sure how I feel about decency standards over public airwaves. I'd probably feel a lot more strongly about it if I had kids, but as long as they keep their hands off of everything that isn't going over the public airwaves, I really can't complain.

      From your sig, it seems likely that you think the Republican and Democratic parties are identical. I (presumably) agree with you that Democratic legislators are a little too cozy with corporate interests, and that they've pulled their own share of political dirty tricks in the past. But the actions of the right wing and the Bush administration over the past four years are simply beyond the pale. They are unparallelled in American history, and it's partially because of their utilization of the FCC as a propaganda outlet that we all have to endure four more years of this shit. Sorry if I sound bitter, but, well, I am.

  5. When I turn on my microwave... by vasqzr · · Score: 5, Insightful


    I get funny lines on my TV. Same goes for the dehumidifier.

    Gonna recall those, too?

    1. Re:When I turn on my microwave... by Rev+Wally · · Score: 3, Funny

      You get funny lines on your dehumidifier when you turn on the microwave? Weird.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    2. Re:When I turn on my microwave... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not if the artifacts are due to line noise in your AC mains, as opposed to the device itself emitting RF. This is most likely the case, and it isn't the device manufacturer's problem if you have bad wiring.

      Naturally, this couldn't possibly be the case for the battery-powered DS producing a likeness of the screen image. Like it or not, this will probably be a problem for Nintendo and its users.

    3. Re:When I turn on my microwave... by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Is your microwave licensed under FCC Class B? If it is, it's not supposed to do that. Class A-licensed parts, however, *can* do that.

      RTFM.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    4. Re:When I turn on my microwave... by stevew · · Score: 1

      It also could be do to something ALOT simpler called reflections on the cable itself. If they didn't do a good job at matching their output to 75 ohms (assuming they're using cable to hookup to the TV), it could just be a reflection on the cable itself causing the ghosting. This is an effect similar to what multi-path looks like on an over-the air broadcast (though a completely different cause.)

      --
      Have you compiled your kernel today??
  6. No worky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I turned on the old 70's tv and the ds, can't get nothing. I'll try again later maybe.

  7. Re:FCC Forced Recall BABY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    i've read stupid things before; but you, my friend, take the fuckin cake.

  8. Shield it yourself by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

    Just don't play by a TV or shield it yourself or something. I think it would be pretty cool to see a ghostly image of your DS on the screen either way.

    --
    Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    1. Re:Shield it yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh great, now I need tinfoil for my TV too. This is just the MAN trying to bankrupt me by increasing my need for tinfoil.

  9. WOW, L33T! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is clearly intentional, doodz and this is how it happens.

    The DS uses super-sekrit rays which come out of the batteries (or maybe the thumbpad i dont no im just a leet), which beam to a satellite near the moon which nintendo has which then transmits to your tv. It works even with your radio, makes pictures on the screen if u dont have 1 u need a dot matrix printer it workz with those 2.

    This is uber, we can use a HANDHELD on the TV! I think we shud make a mod so we can take the screenz off the DS and put in a bigscreen TV insted! r0xx0r!

    1. Re:WOW, L33T! by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      noa but teh fbi harvists teh signols too find out were yuo haev been surching teh web and den th3y arerst you olol. onli noobs get arested by the FbI.

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
  10. Re:FCC Forced Recall BABY! by Muad'Dave · · Score: 4, Informative

    I doubt seriously this will happen. Here's a link to the DS's FCC Certification Report. Just because a part 15 device impacts a non-part 15 device doesn't mean it is not operating within spec. All it means is that the part 15 device must be moved, turned off, etc to eliminate the objectionable interference. Read that little FCC label on the DS (or in the manual). Note that the DS user and TV owner are the same person in this case. They can choose to play and accept the interference or turn off either the DS or TV. My guess is that the DS can't interfere far enough away to cause a neighbor's TV to show interference, so the product probably won't cause harmful interference to anyone but its owner, and only right next to a TV.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  11. Excerpt from Nintendo's Press Release.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "It has been discovered that portions of a recent batch of DS units were accidentally exposed to a paranormal mutagenic agent before shipment.

    The unfortunate result is that some DS units are possessed by demonic spirits, and have been known to display erratic behavior, including but not limited to: emitting strange ghost signals, shooting protoplasm, and spontaneously opening dimensional rifts to hell.

    If you have experienced any of these irregularities yourself, we apologize for the inconvenience. Please mail your DS to our new Exorcist Repairs Department and we will repair it free of charge."

  12. I had the same issue by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Funny
    I found the signal was directed at the planet Jupiter. It's been silent though ever since.

    BTW, has anyone noticed that giant fetus that appears to be orbiting Jupiter all of a sudden? Where the hell did that come from?

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:I had the same issue by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      nah but mine sent a message to a monolith on the moon.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    2. Re:I had the same issue by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Hunh. And my monolith keeps broadcasting stars on my DS.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    3. Re:I had the same issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My God!

    4. Re:I had the same issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried this with Super Mario 64 DS, and:
      My God! it's full of stars!

    5. Re:I had the same issue by yamcha666 · · Score: 1
      has anyone noticed that giant fetus that appears to be orbiting Jupiter all of a sudden?

      Ohhh, don't mind him, that's just the Space Baby ...

      Mmmmmm.. nope. I got nothin' ...

    6. Re:I had the same issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's related to those noise spikes from Uranus.

  13. Why is it a problem for _some_ users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And why is this not a problem for ALL owners of the DS? I'm guessing it's because the people who are bitching about the interference have cheapass television sets, which don't have enough shielding to protect them from interference.

    The shielding is supposed to protect other devices from being harmed by the emitter, but it's also supposed to protect the emitter from things that don't have shielding around them (power cables, speakers, etc.). If a television set doesn't have adequate shielding, it won't only interfere with other devices, it will be easier to interfere with.

    1. Re:Why is it a problem for _some_ users? by the+morgawr · · Score: 1

      Someone mod the parent and GP up, they are correctly answering the question but are AC (and currently at zero).

      --
      The policy of the United States is worse than bad---it is insane. -- Ludwig von Mises, Economic Policy(1959)
    2. Re:Why is it a problem for _some_ users? by Westacular · · Score: 1

      It's only a "problem" for DS owners who've managed to dig up old (and likely more poorly shielded) televisions, with rabbit ears, and then play with the DS two inches away from the antenna. Hardly something the FCC would be concerned about.

      Even then, I'm still skeptical about the claims that the noise seen on the television screen at all resembles the contents of the DS screens -- anyone skilled at signal processing care to speculate on that? The DS' two screens both have a resolution of 256x192 pixels.

    3. Re:Why is it a problem for _some_ users? by danila · · Score: 1

      The rules (part 15, as you can see on ANY electronic device in your house) are that the device may not cause any harmful interference and must not accept any it receives. So while a TV might be in violation too, the DS clearly is, because it does cause harmful interference. This is clearly illegal, dangerous (imagine a DS in a hospital or a nuclear submarine, if you permit me some exaggeration) and should be banned, recalled and destroyed. The company should be fined and anally probed. This is really unacceptable.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    4. Re:Why is it a problem for _some_ users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it truly is broadcasting on the same frequencies as terrestrial TV signals, and being picked up by the tuner in the TV rather than other components at another frequency, surely by your logic, the transmission of TV signals should also be banned for fear that they may mess up hospital equipment, etc? Luckily for the rest of the world, important equipment isn't susceptible to those frequencies, otherwise we'd all be screwwed anyway!

    5. Re:Why is it a problem for _some_ users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, the FCC Rules state that electronic devices may not cause harmful interference and *must* accept any it recieves. For this reason, almost any piece of electronic equipment you can find will have adequate ways of dealing with any interference recieved -- and sensitive electric equipment in a hospital or submarine, in continuing with your exaggeration, must have acceptable ways of accepting the many forms of indirect interference recieved.


      So, uh, don't worry about some stoner crew member's DS launching a nuke from a nuclear submarine somewhere. :)

  14. Bookmark by Keebler71 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'll need to bookmark this story for the next time someone claims FAA regulations against mobile devices serves no purpose...

    --
    "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    1. Re:Bookmark by the+morgawr · · Score: 1

      They do serve no purpose. The airlines can just as easily make rules prohibiting their use, and the electronics companices can make properly sheilded devices. Putting the government in the loop only slows the feedback process down.

      --
      The policy of the United States is worse than bad---it is insane. -- Ludwig von Mises, Economic Policy(1959)
    2. Re:Bookmark by Keebler71 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The airlines can just as easily make rules prohibiting their use, and the electronics companices can make properly sheilded devices.

      I don't like to throw down credentials for fear of sounding like a braggart but in this case it is relevant. I am a test pilot (or more specificly a test NFO). For a living, I flight test new equipment on military aircraft. Every time a new piece of equipment is introduced, the aircraft and new equipment must go through varying levels of EMC/EMI/TEMPEST testing. Devices that were designed to be properly shielded fail all the time. The aircraft I test used to have a problem with the ship-board radar causing the aircraft's wing-lock mechanism to repeated lock/unlock in an attempt to fold the wings. Having an aircraft's wings fold during a catapult shot or landing is generally considered to be a "bad thing". I seriously doubt that the gaming industry has invested dollar-one in EMI shielding. From what the guy describes, it sounds like video signal is not properly shielded and the nearby TV antenna is picking it up. If it is interfering with the TV signal, it is probably somewhere in the 170-200 MHz range - and thus potentially could interfere with VHF communcations and radio navigation equipment. Think there might be an IC somewhere in the aircraft that has a clock frequency in this range? Probably. Over what other frequencies is this think leaking? Is it really worth putting an airliner at risk because you would rather level-up than read a book?

      Now you are correct in asserting that if properly tested, this should be a non-issue. The problem is that flight testing is ridiculously expensive. And it doesn't matter how much you harden the aircraft, you still need to test each portable device in every combination of aircraft configurations. This of course is impossible. Even if you could certify certain types of machines, who is goinig to maintain the list of approved devices and do you really expect an airborne cocktail waitress to know that your Nintendo DS is approved but the guy with the RIO next to you isn't? I actually think that the current policy is somewhat reckless. Basicly the FAA has taken the position that they will let passengers use most electronic devices above 10,000 FT with hopes that if there was some catastrophic failure, the flight crew would have a few minutes to deal with the problem.

      Putting the government in the loop only slows the feedback process down.

      True statement but what is the alternative? Not having the government regulate airline safety? Let the free market punish reckless airlines in lost sales after a disaster?

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    3. Re:Bookmark by the+morgawr · · Score: 1

      I think you don't understand my point. The airline itself has the power to require its passengers to not use those devices under the same rules the FAA sets or their own rules that they deam safer. Having the government also create and enforce rules is redundant and creates hidden costs. There is no benefit provided to consumers by the government regulation. None of what you have said changes this. All of the problems you pretend will suddenly crop up exist today: government regulation doesn't magically make engineering schools teach EMC, make electronics less noisy, and make testing easier. These costs should be properly borne by those who choose to fly, not by all taxpayers.

      --
      The policy of the United States is worse than bad---it is insane. -- Ludwig von Mises, Economic Policy(1959)
  15. Whoops... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i really really hope ninty crakes some sort of hardware or wire so we can play our DS's ON a TV. Wud be a really nice idea, but then again the 2 screens on 1 tv would have to be cut down and also you would still have to keep looking at your DS on a lot of games becuase of the touch screen so its kinda pointless in some ways! still, for games like n4su2 and mario 64 wud be mint!!!!!!!!!

    "OK, given that the majority of the posts look a lot like that one"

    Damn shame. Looks like we left a few childs behind.

    1. Re:Whoops... by bartyboy · · Score: 4, Funny
      Damn shame. Looks like we left a few childs behind.

      Looks like we should have left one more.

  16. ahhh.Cryptonomicron reminders by AgentGray · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wasn't this called VanEck Phreaking or something like that when you could see what was broadcasted on the screen from one computer to another?

    It was a scene in Cryptonomicron, I believe.

    --
    "Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely."
    1. Re:ahhh.Cryptonomicron reminders by Alarash · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was in Cryptonomicron part. II :) They spy on their boss whom is writting some journal about his wife and their sexual life :)

  17. signal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's clearly stated that you need an antenna close to the DS, so the signal is very faint if you need that close to the DS

    those old black and white tv's even get bad reception if you hold some remote controlled toy next to it

  18. Something else by hords · · Score: 1

    I didn't notice this issue, but I did notice one weird thing with mine. When I have the volume up all the way it interferes with the actual display on the LCDs. It gets a little wavy.

    1. Re:Something else by daeley · · Score: 1

      It's because the sound waves are so intense, they cause perturbations in your eyeball goo. No, really!

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  19. They're making fun of us by MentalMooMan · · Score: 1
    --
    43rd Law of Computing:
    Anything that can go wr
    fortune: Segmentation violation -- Core Dumped
    1. Re:They're making fun of us by bonzoesc · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey we may be a bunch of freakin nerdos but our site is purple and not a default phpBB template so there.

  20. Doesn't make sense by dfj225 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ok IANAEE but I believe one poster said he saw an image of Mario in his TV. Now, to my understanding his TV was analogue and the DS is entirely digital. It might make sense to see lines or other noise, but projecting the image seems impossible. I'm not buying it...most TVs get interference from microwaves or vaccuum cleaners or other high powered devices, I have a hard time believing that the DS, which is a low powered DC, digital device would interfere with a television.

    --
    SIGFAULT
    1. Re:Doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've tried it, GBA games show up, and I played it looking at the TV without any problems, though it was Black and White and a bit scrambled. For Mario DS I could only make out the bottom screen.

    2. Re:Doesn't make sense by MBCook · · Score: 1
      The only way it could happen, would be if the screens were analog. That would mean the DS would generate a TV signal (just like a normal console) and that signal was sent up to the LCD unit where it was then decoded and displayed (like an LCD TV). That's unneccessary and probably more expensive. So unless that's the case (and the wire/trace that carries the signal is radiating at a specific frequency that the TV can pick up (say channel 3 VHF)) then I'm with you and call bunk.

      Lines, wavyness, causing ghosting of the normal image, etc would all make sense to me. Making static or beeps or some such on a radio would make sense to me. Magical TV transmition is doubtfull. I don't have a TV to test it with (all mine lack antennas), but untill someone posts a good video of it, I doubt it.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:Doesn't make sense by GoRK · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Even if the screen is driven digitally, it's still serially updated. If the timings are in sync enough to 60hz (or 30Hz even), then you could get some kind of semblance of an image on your TV (59.97Hz) from the interference. This is proably likely, too, since most games are striving to run at 30-60Hz. Maybe you don't get an image all the time as the framerate is not always high enough to reach 60Hz updates -- this is further backed by the evidence of people only getting decent screenshots of things like menus, etc. where there are low poly counts and the hardware can easily manage a constant 60fps.

    4. Re:Doesn't make sense by KFK+-+Wildcat · · Score: 1

      The DS screens refresh at 60Hz. Period. It's the same with a PC: you refresh your monitor at 60, 75 or 85Hz perhaps. It's constant and doesn't depend on either the CPU or GPU load. Besides, the DS uses a line buffer (and not a frame buffer). If the rendering engine can't follow, lines will drop, but the refresh rate will still be 60Hz.

    5. Re:Doesn't make sense by vax · · Score: 1

      perhaps its like the woman who claimed to see the virgin mary in her grilled cheese sandwich (Which recently sold on ebay for an absurd sum of money) .. point is.. people see what they want to.

  21. Using the NDS on an airplane by Chimp_On_Stilts · · Score: 1

    As a frequent airplane traveller and lover of handheld gaming, the NDS concerns me. I know any device which emits a signal (wireless devices, cell phones espcially) are BANNED for usage on airplanes because they can interfear with the airplane's equipment.

    Apparently, the issue is sereous enough that the Nokia N-Gage includes a special "airplane" mode that will not emit any such signals.

    Back to the DS, using it on airplanes worries me. I do not think you can turn off the wireless, and last I checked it was constantly checking around itself for the presence of other DSs (IE: Even when single player gaming, it will occasionally send out a signal). This news that the NDS has shielding problems only worries me further - this discounting the fact that I am developing a fear of flying the more I travel. =(

    I know that when I fly I can avoid using the DS if it is a problem, but could that ten year old sitting in the back row with no knowledge of these kinds of things end up interfering with the crew - or possibly crashing the plane?

    I'm worried, and I hope someone more tech savvy can give me advice. Can or should I use the DS on a plane? Can I use the wireless multiplayer on a plane? Is it enough of an issue that the masses should be instructed NOT to use these on airplanes? Would the problem, if it exists, be eliminated by turning off the wireless abilities of the DS or will the shielding problems still be an issue?

    Thank you for your responses.

    1. Re:Using the NDS on an airplane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we'll probably find out pretty soon if this is a problem or not.

    2. Re:Using the NDS on an airplane by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 4, Informative
      I used to be an airborne Ranger. While prepping our equipment during an airborne operation, a lot of times, guys would be doing radio checks as well as using their radios to communicate with guys in other airplanes and guys that were already on the ground.

      We're talking radios with 5 watt transmit power, minimum. If we weren't screwing up instruments then, I have a really hard time believing that low-power interferrence is that big of a problem. instruments have to be pretty on, or we'd have a misdrop and drop in some farmer's field or something, which didn't happen, so I'm pretty sure we didn't screw them up badly, if at all.

      I'm pretty sure that the FAA is just paranoid about their restrictions.

      I wouldn't worry about playing games on airplanes.

    3. Re:Using the NDS on an airplane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an aircraft EMC engineer you almost certainly where screwing with the instruments. Particularly if you ever tried it in a helicopter. You never did it in a blackhawk did you? Brave brave man.

    4. Re:Using the NDS on an airplane by neumayr · · Score: 1

      If cellphones were any danger to airplane equipment, how come they aren't collected by the crew before takeoff and given back after landing?

      I've read somewhere that Airbus is actually working on a way to use cellphones on their airplanes, by having a small "basestation" or whatever they're called on board and transmitting the signal via satellite.

      The same article mentioned that cellphones onboard an airplane are actually prohibited because it would seriously confuse the network when a few hundred cellphones move at a few hundred km/h across a city. A much more likely explanation, imho. Though I wonder how Airbus fixes this..

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    5. Re:Using the NDS on an airplane by Sick+Boy · · Score: 1

      And I'm sure that the planes the military uses for troop transport and parajumps are bit better sheilded from interferance than the average commuter jet.

      --
      Does narcissism count as a hobby? --Shawn Latimer
    6. Re:Using the NDS on an airplane by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1
      no, in rotary wing craft, there were enough headsets that the people that needed radios could just wear those until it was time to rope out.

      out of curiousity, what kind of effects were we causing?

    7. Re:Using the NDS on an airplane by farnz · · Score: 1
      Cellphones regulate their output power according to the received signal strength; if Airbus put a base station on board that lets any cellphone register with it, the phones will select the lowest power level that lets them talk to the base station.

      Thus, it could be true that at full power (which can be set for as much as 35km line of sight), cellphones would interfere with the plane's electronics, but at the power levels needed to communicate within a plane (considerably less than 1km) the phone is not problematic. That said, the network would be confused by a few hundred cellphones moving at high speed; you're handing over from cell to cell so often that you may not complete handover before you're needing to restart it.

  22. keyboard interference by Axis+of+Weasel · · Score: 0

    i get funny lines at the bottom of /. posts


    oh wait those are sigs

    --

    this sig has been discontinued.
  23. touchscreen tv? by justforaday · · Score: 1

    So, does this mean that if I use a DS near my TV it'll suddenly become a touchscreen TV? I've always wanted one of those...

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  24. Mandatory DS accessory, eliminates by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    the affects of these anamolous waves, it also protects you from other nasty waves as well HERE

  25. Re:FCC Forced Recall BABY! by hambonewilkins · · Score: 1

    Right, but since the device is portable, you can probably interfere other people's TVs. Also, you want to think about what it's emitting that is strong enough to appear on a TV? Not good.

    --

    God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
  26. I never liked the DS anyway. by Gizmoguy · · Score: 0

    I knew something like this would happen. I suppose it could be used as an advantage for showing somone how good you doing, but your mate would get a bit angry when Pac-Man flicks on halfway through X-Files.

    --
    -- There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, And those who don't.
    1. Re:I never liked the DS anyway. by Zorilla · · Score: 0

      Gabe?

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    2. Re:I never liked the DS anyway. by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      Ooookay, I got modded overrated by a mod who apparently doesn't read Penny Arcade, thereby not understanding the whole Pac Man on the TV thing.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  27. Airplane Ban? by Sux2BU · · Score: 1

    If this is true, then it's likely that airlines or the FAA will ban the DS due to communication concerns. I just hope they don't use this as an excuse to ban all game systems. On the other hand they have been becoming more relaxed recently regarding electronics, so this might not even be an issue.

  28. Maybe Nintendo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...plans to release a special antenna for tv sets which could properly receive this mysterious DS signal, and what we're seeing is an unfiltered unamplified signal?

  29. How can this be true? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, I'm not an EE but for this to be true, it would have to mean that the video signal that is being sent to the LCD screen is of the same analog format that the TV's antenna can recieve and decode to display on the TV?

    That seems rather far fetched to me. Think about your computer connected to an LCD display via a DVI connector. This is a pure digital signal that an analog TV is simply not going to be able to decode and display.

    At best, if you got "interference" from this signal it would look like random garbage.

    This has to be a hoax. Or if it is real, then Nintendo had to purposely create this type of signal in the device.

  30. barely a signal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It does indeed leak what can be viewed on a tv set to channel 3. It's barely readable but clearly the video, you can pick out parts of the changing image easily.

    Maybe a hardware guy can chime in and tell how these small lcd's typically handle the signal. My ignorance assumed it was a digital signal to the lcd, but clearly it's not. From what I saw, the signal is probably a harmonic at best.

  31. Does the DS have a tv out? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    I thought the DS used a lcd. A lot of people always want to reuse their old laptop LCD's and have to be told that sadly this is not possible because LCD's need special hardware to get them to work. This hardware is an integral part of you laptop.

    Unless the DS has a tv out why should it ever generate a tv signal? It simply computes a screen and sends it to the lcd. The only way they would have a tv signal is if the computer first generates a digital image, this is then converted to a analog signal (this signal leaks to your tv) then the analog is send to a tv receiver wich decodes the analog signal to the digital signal the lcd needs.

    Even if the screen could be send over wifi or usb it would be send as digital data and how the hell should a tv be able to do anything with that?

    TV's are also interlaced and lcd's and presumably the DS like all other computers are not.

    Can anyone explain how the hell the DS could or would generate a signal that a tv could display?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  32. It's likely... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    It's likely that the chip ultimately responsible for the display is not quite a custom fab and contains both an LCD driver and also an S-Video/Composite output as well.
    Sort of like how every Radeon chip has a DVI, VGA-RGBA and S-Video outputs, even if not all three are enabled on various models.
    There could be a trace with no terminating connector inside that if held near a TV, could radiate that signal to be picked up somewhere after the RF-baseband but before being amplified... or something like that.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  33. Probably because... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    there's an enabled but unused S-Video/Composite NTSC output pin on the video driver chip, which is being picked up by the TV. ... the TV would have to pick that up somewhere post-channel filter but pre-amplification... because the signal in the DS wouldn't also be accidentally RF modulated, that's for sure. But the signal the TV gets from antenna/cable after demodulation is basically the same as a composite output... so there you go.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:Probably because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds feasable, but the rf is what gets me. I thought the same way you did but doubted my tv would pick up composite video this way.

      So I did a test and fed it composite on the same vhf input and nothing, not a peep. So somehow that stray signal is getting mixed, which isn't really a stretch on a device like this.

  34. No... by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    I think what it is... is that there's a bit of circuitry after the RF input on the TV, after the channel filter, but before the amplifier that would get it to the voltage level of external regular composite input.
    If that part of the circuit is being interfered with, then it could overlay the composite signal leaking from teh DS, which gets amplified, and appears in the NTSC feed.

    A standard composite input wouldn't need that amplifier so that circuitry in that signal path is probably not sensitive enough to pick up the stray NTSC from the DS.

    Similarly, feeding straight composite into your RF does absolutely jack, since you'd have to modulate your NTSC signal for that to work (the RF interface always demodulates, and demodulating a non-modulated signal == garbage)

    But maybe other composite/s-video enabled devices can leak a signal in this fashion? Try it!

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  35. Crappy TVs by n1ywb · · Score: 1

    Besides, it's just as likely that the TV doesn't meet FCC interference REJECTION standards. Most TVs are made in Taiwan or something these days are are pretty piss poor quality. Even Sony doesn't really make a lot of their own guts anymore. Remember the recent story about the TV that was emitting the spurious EPRB distress signal?

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
  36. Not sure there is a problem with FCC standards by gorim · · Score: 1


    Televisions fall under FCC Part B rules. If they pick up stray interference, they are required to "accept the situation". It is the responsibility of the manufacturer and consumer/owner to create a tv less susceptible to interference and/or to adjust their antenna/cable/etc accordingly. The TV owner has no recourse.

    The DS is only afoul of FCC rules if it interferences with licensed radio reception equipment(Public safetly, aircraft, ham, etc...).

    If somehow it was powerful enough to interfere with the actual TV signal in the air (as opposed to interfering with the TV receiver itself) then thats also a serious matter, but highly unlikely to happen. If someone finds a DS that can jam a TV or Radio broadcast I want it.

    So, only when police officers, ambulances, pilots, and hams (and so on...) can't communicate due to a nearby DS is there any FCC issue.

  37. HA HA by Forthac4 · · Score: 1

    I am really really stupid Sad I have an atena on my tv and I shoved it in the headphone jack and my DS froze Crying or Very sad but then im turned it off and on again then it was ok Smile But now every time it turns on and off it makes more of a click sound Confused -this is one of the funniest things I have ever seen

  38. HOW IS THIS INSIGHTFUL??!! by potcrackpot · · Score: 1

    How the hell do you shield a television? You shield something by putting it in a metal box. Hell yeah, lets shield the TV by putting the tube in a metal box. That'll work well. Only thing is, I won't be able to see it!

    A CRT works by glowing when you interfere with the glass end electromagnetically. Hence, you can't shield the glass end, or you can't interfere with it from the inside.

    Note that you can shield the tuner, but that won't help completely. Hence even if you've got a shielded tuner, and you stick an unshielded speaker on the top of it, your picture will go funny.

    Note that you CAN shield speakers.

  39. leik omg rofl at j00 guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Itz obivosicly a feature of the ds that was intentianlalal and it make j00r pensi biggar.

  40. Re:FCC Forced Recall BABY! by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1
    The emitted signal doesn't have to be very strong at all - since it appears on all channels, it's probably on the IF freq - 45 MHz.

    Historically VCRs have been very suseptible to RF interference from Amateur Radio Operators using 2-30MHz signals. The head is quite good at receiving such freqs. Remember that there are two sides to this issue - the emitted signal strength and the TV's suseptibility to undesired signals. It takes both to prevent interference. Most electronics these days are poorly shielded at best.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  41. strange coincidence by Forthac4 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this has anything to do with it? http://www.joystiq.com/entry/1234000997020865/