The troll is on you, tadpole. If you read my message carefully you'll see there's a few spelling errors and that's what you get with out a leader like Adolf Hitler.
I hate Xhtml, css, xml and all that shit..fuck it!!!
html is fine as it is and as it was.
fuck xml! fucking write your own parser and language if you really need shit like that. granted i doubt the majority do need it, ever. xml and its parsers are a bunch fat hogs. keep it simple or slap on a real database. css...what a joke, hehe..
singel-clicking to engage a download works different from shift-singel-click. The first, works by downloading to a/tmp/ file and then moving it to its destination. Obviously this is not how it should be,/tmp or any other directory that isn't the intended destination most likely lies on a other partition/storage-device, which leads to redundant io-throughput as, completed, downloaded files are moved around.
Under-clock/volt - let us say - an athlon cpu at 1.4GHz,1.70V to ~400MHz,1.2V and you land on a maximum cpu heat dissipation of about 15W.
Now pick a CPU from http://users.erols.com/chare/elec.htm with a similar heat dissipation and let us have a match! How about that juicy Cyrix M1-PR90+ (80MHz)?;-)
that should be "No there are no compelling arguements against a matrix-kind-of-idea", was that hard for you to figure out?
The ones that are against it are jibberish and indeed not far from poems..
Examples? well take Nozick's theory of knowledge, full of logical loopholes. If you don't see why then perhaps you should focus your time on praising nietzsche.
> The well educated individual can form an argument for, or against just about anything, so you should pull your head out of your ass before you unilaterally denounce to existence of independent thought.
There are an infinite amount of things that needs you to be rambling nonsens if you'd like to form arguments against alt. for. So shut your piehole.
> It can be a great modern myth however after you study a bit of philosophy in the area of knowledge and skeptisism, you will find that on the surface the matrix looks good but there are some very compelling arguements against it.
No there are no compelling arguements..a bunch of jibberish poems perhaps.
Sounds like genetic algorithms is "THE" milestone then..
You build an environment, with the possibility for things to create/change things, add a few rules regarding how much creating/changing that can be done, also add some unsertainty to everything that is done in the environment. Then you threw in a couple of billion random things, let them do what they do. And you're bound to end up with things that create/change things to the better.
If acting intelligent is 'good' according to the environment, that will come too. The same thing goes for intelligent things creating even more intelligent things..
> In fact, by many scientists virii aren't alive, because they can only replicate themsemves inside a host cell.
Talking about replication as a primer for being alive is so unclever.. It is, as a fact, a hopeless project trying to give a correct definition to many concepts constructed by humans, due to the fact that the concepts, per se, doesn't need to make sence, not even for the humans them self..
Well we know that sound travels at about 340m/s. If we take a bas wave at 20Hz, e.g 20 oscillations per second, we see that each wave is 340/20 = 17 meters.
regarding the interpretion of high/low directional data; I think it's easier to hear were from high pitched sounds come from, more then low ones, due to the fact that high pitched sounds easily gets absorbed by the surrounding. I'm not sure about that one. It probably has alot to do with the shape of our ears and that our brains do different things with the sound - depending of its pitch. Someone fill up here!
> I will be little heretic, but i think genetic enineering is the ONLY thing which can SAVE US.
Maybe so.
> Natural selection does not work anymore (at least in "civilised" world) thanks to progress in medicine.
Natural selection still works on humans.
> If the mankind does not want to give up its humanitarian ideas and make artificial selection
It would still be a natural selection.
Sorry for repeating my self but I really like people to stop believing that "we" are artifical and what we do to be artifical - it's absurd! And it's also very bad that people often claim natural selection not to work, when it in fact works perfectly, perhaps not in favour to some political ideas, but nevertheless, it still works.
> "humans are incapable of changing or analyzing much of how their own brain works."
That's false, I can study and completly understand how my brain worked when it consisted of 1 brain cell, and 2, and 3, and 4,..., if necessary arrangements were taken of course.
it would be impossible to understand completly, for me, my brain, in realtime though.
Re:Are we Hu-mans speaking English?
on
8.6 GB Internet?
·
· Score: 0
IANTP, and I have no understanding of Spanish, but isn't it obvious it could be Portuguese?
Slashdot Mirror
> that was an amazingly lame attempt at a troll.
The troll is on you, tadpole. If you read my message carefully you'll see there's a few spelling errors and that's what you get with out a leader like Adolf Hitler.
I hate Xhtml, css, xml and all that shit..fuck it!!!
html is fine as it is and as it was.
fuck xml! fucking write your own parser and language if you really need shit like that. granted i doubt the majority do need it, ever.
xml and its parsers are a bunch fat hogs. keep it simple or slap on a real database.
css...what a joke, hehe..
flash is good though.
give me a fart joke about uranus, and I'll laugh
first post????
You anonymous coward!
Not only users, developers that would like to read about important API changes are in the shitter too!
Have you followed bonobos development documentation? A hint: it's easy reading..
singel-clicking to engage a download works different from shift-singel-click. The first, works by downloading to a /tmp/ file and then moving it to its destination. Obviously this is not how it should be, /tmp or any other directory that isn't the intended destination most likely lies on a other partition/storage-device, which leads to redundant io-throughput as, completed, downloaded files are moved around.
I think this needs to be fixed...
HAHAHAHHA!!! :))))
thx for a great laugh, very funny
k
> Glad you don't live here too!
Where? In the place he just described?
> Freedom does not mean "pretty" buddy.
What are you talking about? Freedom is recognised as the most beautiful thing in the entire world. Do you mean something else?
> If we have not already bombed your country already then we will probably be there to save it from someone that is.
Do you mean this is pretty?
> Like we have done to 100's of others all over the world. If it was not for the US you would be speaking German or Japanese.
Om inte, sa kanske du skulle ha forstaelse for andra sprak...
for fucks sake, buy your stuff..
...no code can ***ever*** be 100% optimized, ***unless*** it is compiled for weeks.
Oh I see!
Under-clock/volt - let us say - an athlon cpu at 1.4GHz,1.70V to ~400MHz,1.2V and you land on a maximum cpu heat dissipation of about 15W.
;-)
Now pick a CPU from
http://users.erols.com/chare/elec.htm
with a similar heat dissipation and let us have a match!
How about that juicy Cyrix M1-PR90+ (80MHz)?
If no one votes no one gets elected, problem solved.
Thus the none voter isn't to blaim, it's the voter you should blaim.
that should be "No there are no compelling arguements against a matrix-kind-of-idea", was that hard for you to figure out?
The ones that are against it are jibberish and indeed not far from poems..
Examples? well take Nozick's theory of knowledge, full of logical loopholes. If you don't see why then perhaps you should focus your time on praising nietzsche.
> The well educated individual can form an argument for, or against just about anything, so you should pull your head out of your ass before you unilaterally denounce to existence of independent thought.
There are an infinite amount of things that needs you to be rambling nonsens if you'd like to form arguments against alt. for.
So shut your piehole.
> It can be a great modern myth however after you study a bit of philosophy in the area of knowledge and skeptisism, you will find that on the surface the matrix looks good but there are some very compelling arguements against it.
No there are no compelling arguements..a bunch of jibberish poems perhaps.
Like it's hard to simulate analog behavior..
what kind of church do you go to, the satanic one?
you filthy rich people will never come to heaven!
Sounds like genetic algorithms is "THE" milestone then..
You build an environment, with the possibility for things to create/change things, add a few rules regarding how much creating/changing that can be done, also add some unsertainty to everything that is done in the environment. Then you threw in a couple of billion random things, let them do what they do. And you're bound to end up with things that create/change things to the better.
If acting intelligent is 'good' according to the environment, that will come too.
The same thing goes for intelligent things creating even more intelligent things..
> In fact, by many scientists virii aren't alive, because they can only replicate themsemves inside a host cell.
Talking about replication as a primer for being alive is so unclever..
It is, as a fact, a hopeless project trying to give a correct definition to many concepts constructed by humans, due to the fact that the concepts, per se, doesn't need to make sence, not even for the humans them self..
Imagine a hurd of GM people with support to cluster their brains!
I'd settle with a sixth finger though..
Well we know that sound travels at about 340m/s.
If we take a bas wave at 20Hz, e.g 20 oscillations per second, we see that each wave is 340/20 = 17 meters.
regarding the interpretion of high/low directional data; I think it's easier to hear were from high pitched sounds come from, more then low ones, due to the fact that high pitched sounds easily gets absorbed by the surrounding. I'm not sure about that one. It probably has alot to do with the shape of our ears and that our brains do different things with the sound - depending of its pitch. Someone fill up here!
> I will be little heretic, but i think genetic enineering is the ONLY thing which can SAVE US.
Maybe so.
> Natural selection does not work anymore (at least in "civilised" world) thanks to progress in medicine.
Natural selection still works on humans.
> If the mankind does not want to give up its humanitarian ideas and make artificial selection
It would still be a natural selection.
Sorry for repeating my self but I really like people to stop believing that "we" are artifical and what we do to be artifical - it's absurd!
And it's also very bad that people often claim natural selection not to work, when it in fact works perfectly, perhaps not in favour to some political ideas, but nevertheless, it still works.
> "humans are incapable of changing or analyzing much of how their own brain works."
..., if necessary arrangements were taken of course.
That's false, I can study and completly understand how my brain worked when it consisted of 1 brain cell, and 2, and 3, and 4,
it would be impossible to understand completly, for me, my brain, in realtime though.
IANTP, and I have no understanding of Spanish, but isn't it obvious it could be Portuguese?
As I recall they used a beta of netscape6.0 in some shots, that's a plus I'd say.
Very cool movie btw - a geek girl!