That makes sense - if we're not busy complaining about Wiley & Sons vs. Kirtsaeng, we really shouldn't complain about anything else. Folks, remember: you should only ever take issue with one thing at a time. If you're not cool with something, make darn sure the rest of the world is alright by you until you're done being mad about that one thing! I, for one, am glad we've had focus brought to this conversation, so that instead of talking about the gamers' bill of rights, or simcity, we can instead just talk about Wiley & Sons vs. Kirtsaeng. And that's thanks to you, CanHasDIY. From all of us: thank you.
Do what they did in one of the earliest scathing reviews of it. Start a game, then simply press "Next Turn" around 200 times until the AI wins the game for you.
Can we just get back to saying "while" instead of using its pretentious trendy douchey variant? Sure, if you're British, and you use it regularly, fine. Otherwise, get over yourself.
If you'd actually read Asimov, you'd know that emotional and financial harm would both have fallen under the same First Law umbrella as physical harm, in his canon.
Let's not miss an important aspect of this: Obama just proposed ACTUAL POLICY SPECIFICS. This is really turning over a new leaf for him.
That wasn't the vapid argument that I was pointing out, but hey. You kids and your reading comprehension.
Oh, I was just following your vapid argument to its dumb conclusion. I guess that upset you, but to be fair, you do seem pretty easy to upset.
That makes sense - if we're not busy complaining about Wiley & Sons vs. Kirtsaeng, we really shouldn't complain about anything else. Folks, remember: you should only ever take issue with one thing at a time. If you're not cool with something, make darn sure the rest of the world is alright by you until you're done being mad about that one thing! I, for one, am glad we've had focus brought to this conversation, so that instead of talking about the gamers' bill of rights, or simcity, we can instead just talk about Wiley & Sons vs. Kirtsaeng. And that's thanks to you, CanHasDIY. From all of us: thank you.
Ugh, it's "reticulating splines", not "matriculating splines." lrn2readmadeupphrases
To be fair, he never said X didn't equal zero. ;)
Do what they did in one of the earliest scathing reviews of it. Start a game, then simply press "Next Turn" around 200 times until the AI wins the game for you.
At the very least, gays are generally cultured enough not to eat ramen. Does that make them varelse, by definition?
You think he paid to get into the beta? Umm...
If he's getting it on with that many women, may I suggest condomS? Using the same one over and over might not get the results he's hoping for.
You mean the Peter Norton who hasn't been caught yet?
Are we sure this just isn't a grilled cheese sandwich that looks like it has Noah's face on it?
Can we just get back to saying "while" instead of using its pretentious trendy douchey variant? Sure, if you're British, and you use it regularly, fine. Otherwise, get over yourself.
EHRMAGERDES!
Because dickery is less well-regarded than equivalent counterdickery.
Maybe you should look up the difference between "tempo" and "meter".
"Single player MMOs"? Derp?
Oh, fine. You and your technicalities ;)
Staying out of jail is not one of my motivations.
Then turn yourself in already, you ninny!
Nobody has a "love affair" with the QWERTY keyboard. It's just the de facto standard since it's been used for ages. Dumb headline.
Maybe the "old dog" graduated 5th grade and knows that the phrase is "should have" and not "should of".
Asimov dealt with that exact issue in The Robots of Dawn.
You haven't read Asimov either, have you?
If you'd actually read Asimov, you'd know that emotional and financial harm would both have fallen under the same First Law umbrella as physical harm, in his canon.
You can watch the same movie at 24 FPS if you want to. But just to warn you - it's going to take twice as long.