Slashdot Mirror


User: UserGoogol

UserGoogol's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,093
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,093

  1. Re:Yes it is on Using Copyright To Suppress Political Speech · · Score: 1

    Proportional Representation (I like Single-Transferrable Vote) only works for stuff like Congress where you're electing more than one seat. When you're awarding only one seat, (like with the President) you have to do something like Condorcet Method or Instant Runoff Voting.

  2. Re:I would feel safer if... on Judges Junk Jailcam · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That would still leave crimes of passion (where they don't have enough time to think about the consquences) and organized crime (where they have the resources to avoid jail fairly well.)

  3. Re:Here we go again... on What Are You Looking At? · · Score: 1

    They are both attractive body parts, but breasts secrete delicious milk, whereas the butt secretes somewhat less delicious poop. Boobs win.

  4. Re:Thoughtcrime on What Are You Looking At? · · Score: 1

    Similarly, we also prosecute thought crimes under the guise of "terrorism." If I blow up your office building because I want the government to support Tibetan independence, it is more severe than if I blew up it because I thought it would be funny.

  5. Re:Like Ice-Nine on Artificial Prion Created · · Score: 1

    Well, crystalizing room temperature water is a little hard to swallow, (water's too simple a chemical to do much to it) but you have to realize that the ultimate Ice-Nine is a little feller by the name of DNA. DNA may influence nearby nucleotides to polymerize into other DNA molecule.

  6. Re:In Five Years... on Wikipedia Founder Jimmy Wales Responds · · Score: 1

    No, I think it'll go down alongside "Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect." as one of the cute things geeks say.

  7. Re:see: a-non-y-mous cow-ard on Wikipedia Founder Jimmy Wales Responds · · Score: 1

    No, there's a real article on the subject but that ain't it.

  8. Re:He underestimates evil nature on Wikipedia Founder Jimmy Wales Responds · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People don't do graffiti in pencil.

  9. Re:I Just Hope... on Unix's Founding Fathers · · Score: 1

    You're free to call your it whatever you want, but if you don't call it GNU/Linux, you suck and RMS won't like you.

  10. Re:I once posted to Slashdot from on Reading Slashdot From Strange Locations · · Score: 0, Redundant

    No, most of us have posted from your girlfriend's apartment.

  11. Re:Critical that it stays Open Source on The Internet Meets the Neural Net · · Score: 1

    Ghost in the Shell, actually, but same thing.

  12. Re:Argh! No more! on Ethernet at 10 Gbps · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that meme is banished... IN JAPAN.

  13. Re:he just had to have revenge on Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith · · Score: 1

    Jar-Jar was a bane onto humanity, but what's wrong with midiclorians? You need an explanation for why a energy force which goes through all things can only be manipulated by the select few, (training alone won't do it, you have to be born with the talent) and midiclorians fits the bill quite nicely.

    And you still can get all the Zen stuff without leaving The Force in the domain of magic elves. A theory I worked out was that although midiclorians manipulate the force for you, manipulating the midiclorians ain't easy and it involves midiclorians responding to the stimuli of your endocrine and nervous systems. Thusly, in order to control the midiclorians, you need to be in control of yourself.

    Although the idea of Anakin being concieved by midiclorians was just stupid.

  14. Re:Insanity on Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith · · Score: 1

    Episode Two was better than Episode One. If this trend continues, Episode Three should be near RotJ in quality.

  15. Re:We are all anarchists on The Anarchist in the Library · · Score: 1

    Anarcho-Capitalism exists. It's basically Libertarianism on Crack. Although I'm not sure what Christianity has to do with any of this.

  16. Re:Why is this such a surprise? on Software Monoculture in Schools? · · Score: 1

    Besides the factual inaccuracy of "It grew out of Red Hat," which is addressed elsewhere, the libraries have Windows boxes. (So hobos who don't have an Athena account can access the Internet, I guess.) Some of them don't even run Mozilla.

  17. Re:No parallel universes? Bastard! on Hawking Gracefully, Formally Loses Black Hole Bet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can still believe in paralell worlds via the "Many Worlds" interpetation of Quantum Physics. This just says that Black Holes probably don't lead to them.

  18. Re:Mirror small sites directly on SlashDot on Building Your Own Extra-Large Keyboard · · Score: 1

    See themonkeysareaftermymedicine.slashdot.org. I think you'll find that Slashdot's nameserver automatically redirects all unused subdomains to slashdot.org.

  19. Re:Bad News, Good News..... on How Would You Handle a $1,000,000 Coding Error? · · Score: 1

    Yes, but they print the "Kill the Rainforest Weekly."

  20. Re:I claim prior art on Sun's "Java Powered" Campaign · · Score: 1

    Well, considering that they are both languages which may be used to program the computational machine, and they both have keywords taken from English words, yes, they are the same.

  21. Re:Semi-serious? on Game with God · · Score: 1

    Oh, of course. But there's no evidence for God. He's a popular idea, but when you look for evidence, he's just as well-supported as magic elves. You should certainly keep the whole God-theory in the back of your mind, just-in-case, but with the generous grain of salt of having no evidence.

    If you would actually talk to some scientists, you'd found that scientists are also amazed at the massive amount of complexity the universe has. But instead of just sitting there saying, "Oh, it's so mysterious and amazing," we try to actually examine its awesomeness. And since we can get some neat stuff out of it, everybody's happy.

    Yes, we'll probably never know everything. Who cares? We know what we know, and what we don't know we simply don't know.

    And it's not non-intuitive that the more we know, the more questions we have. The more we know, the more stuff we have to ask questions about. And scientists are primarily in the business of finding and answering questions, so they'll be sure to search for every last question they can find.

  22. Re:Not about our right to privacy on 1984 Comes To Boston · · Score: 1

    Republics are a form of representive democracy. Stop pretending democracy only means pure direct democracy.

  23. Re:Yes on Is Math A Sport? · · Score: 1

    It's spelt programme, but it's pronounced throatwarbler mangrave.

  24. Re:perfect, just what I needed on More on Toronto's Linux-only Computer Store · · Score: 1

    You misunderstand his sentence. What we meant was (Pats, Donuts, and Computer) (Repair Shop.) That is, a Repair Shop with pats, donuts, and a computer.

  25. Re:Arabs are semites. on Bobby Fischer Found · · Score: 1

    Inflammable means flammable!?