Slashdot Mirror


Artificial Prion Created

jabberjaw writes "Nature is reporting that researchers at the University of California San Diego have created a synthetic prion which, when injected into mice will bring about symptoms similar to those displayed by cattle suffering from bovine spongiform encephalopathy, aka mad cow disease. The researchers first crafted healthy prion proteins using bacteria. They then shook these proteins until they resembled the tangled structure of an unhealthy prion. Afterwords, these prions were injected into the brains of mice who fell ill two years later. Perhaps someone who is more familiar with this field of research would care to fill us in on the details as the article was rather light."

496 comments

  1. whoo hoo? by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Funny

    We gave mice mad cow disease! Yay!

    This is the first step, I'm sure, to giving it to politicians.

    On perhaps a bit more serious of a note, what does this do for us? Is this highlighting that we now know HOW the disease is created, so we can start developing a cure? Or am I wrong. Again. :)

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:whoo hoo? by MadBiologist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's most likely... by creating a model disease in a biological system, different drugs can be tried out on it to test efficacy.

      There are all sorts of protocols like this already... ie, EAE (Experimental Allergic EncephaloMyelitis) where they give mice... um... artificial MS, then test drug canidates out on them to see what the effect is. It's not very nice to watch.

      That's why I'm glad that I'm in molecular studies. However, it's done to help people with these diseases, and animal reseach is really the only way to conduct some of these tests.

      Peace...

      --
      'Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?'
    2. Re:whoo hoo? by nilius · · Score: 2, Informative

      "On perhaps a bit more serious of a note, what does this do for us? Is this highlighting that we now know HOW the disease is created, so we can start developing a cure?"

      Acording to a genetic biologist that I briefly "dated", there has been a long standing debate over whether prions are the cause of or end result of brain wasting type diseases. So I believe the answer to your question is yes.

      Which is fairly ironic since her masters research was based on searching for hiden viri that could posibly be affecting protein folding in the brain.

      -n

    3. Re:whoo hoo? by mrfunnypants · · Score: 5, Informative
      This is huge because it was still not very clear that Prions even existed. Many people in the field didn't agree with the very existence and this group has basically just proven that in fact proteins can cause disease. In the world if you had started sprouting off that proteins caused disease in as late as the 80's scientist would laugh and remove you from any future funding. Just to give you an idea, read this link at UCSD where Prions are discussed:

      ucsd link

      As for your question of how the disease works. Theories were made about how this was possible, dealing with stereochemistry of the prion proteins causing your natural protein to switch its stereochemistry to the unnatural state found within the Prions in a cascade effect resulting in death. It appears this group may have verified this theory.

      --
      "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" -Confucius
    4. Re:whoo hoo? by bcrowell · · Score: 5, Funny

      We gave mice mad cow disease! Yay!
      The lesson is clear. If someone comes at you with a big long needle, and wants to stick it in your brain, don't let him!

    5. Re:whoo hoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, no. It's more like, "If someone comes at you with a mouse sandwich, don't eat it!"

    6. Re:whoo hoo? by syousef · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It seems to me that creating a new version of a highly contagious disease is a dubious way to go about trying to cure it. What happens if the new disease escapes into the wild? The plague was carried by mice and their flees after all.

      Am I way off base here?

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    7. Re:whoo hoo? by DeeBs · · Score: 3, Informative

      Creutzfeldt-Jakobs disease (spelling?) is not highly contagious. Far from it. The risks of a person contracting it from tainted meat are blown out of proportion by politicians looking for reasons to hinder imports of meat from other countries. Even among cattle, where it is *most* common, it is still rare. The entire North American herd has only had, I believe, 2 confirmed cases of BSE in something close to 50 years. I would hardly call that common.

    8. Re:whoo hoo? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      I've decided to open my mini-fridge at work to science. There, you will find many things.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    9. Re:whoo hoo? by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 1

      No... this just shows that they rolled the dice, and created a disease. It might take years before they figure out the full effect of what they've done. Who knows... we might have something like the Andromeda Strain going on and no one would know for years.

      That might be why the article is kind of thin. Do you really want someone like Castro sinking time and money to duplicate this stuff? And then inflicting is upon his own citizens? Or whoever happens to be on his bad side that week? I just think this whole thing is a bad idea... right up there with gene-splicing. Someday, someone is going to create a really nasty bacteria or virus by accident, and we'll have a nasty go of it.
      I guess the cat is out of the bag. The dictators/terrorists know that this stuff is possible... it's just a matter of time.

      --
      -- No sig for you!
    10. Re:whoo hoo? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 5, Informative
      Am I way off base here?

      Yes.

      Prion diseases (to oversimplify a bit) are caused by incorrectly folded proteins that induce "correctly" folded proteins to assume the prion form. They are typically communicated by ingestion of meat (or meat products) from infected animals.

      Bubonic plague is a bacterial infection by Yersinia pestis.

    11. Re:whoo hoo? by kanthoney · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, but there have been 150 *human* deaths (so far) from vCJD due to the BSE outbreak here in Britain. Of course, the reason it spread through cattle here is because we put the remains of dead cows in their feed as a protein supplement. As long as they don't do that in the US then there won't be any problem.

    12. Re:whoo hoo? by Veridium · · Score: 0, Redundant

      We hope.

      --
      Think for yourself, destroy your television.
    13. Re:whoo hoo? by escallywag · · Score: 1

      This is the first step, I'm sure, to giving it to politicians Yep.... rats are next. Once we can infect rats, giving it it politicians will be easy.

    14. Re:whoo hoo? by dwater · · Score: 1

      > This is the first step, I'm sure, to giving it to politicians.

      A bit pointless, wouldn't you say?

      --
      Max.
    15. Re:whoo hoo? by zors · · Score: 1

      Oh please, did you even read the article? This is nothing like the fictional andromeda strain, its not a virus, or a bacteria, i forget which one the andromeda strain was. its a protein that causes other brain proteins to become misshapen, leading to degeneration of the brain, which is bad for obvious reasons. These diseases are non-infectious, they result from either a hereditary problem, or acquiring it from an outside source, e.g. cannibalism, human growth hormone products, and corneal or dural grafts.* So this is really only practical from a research pov to prove that prions can cause diseases like CJD on their own. If "the bad guys" wanted to get their hands on these things, they just need a CJD sufferer's corpse's pituitary glands.* As for the cat being out of the bag, where have you been? Engineered biological and chemical weapons have been a reality for years if not decades. Though i'm probably just wasting my time on a troll.

      Information taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creutzfeldt-Jakob_Dis ease

    16. Re:whoo hoo? by syousef · · Score: 1

      I was not talking about the method of contagion. Just the fact that once a disease spreads into the wild, however it spreads, its one more disease you have to fight.

      Humans are not the only animals that ingest meat, and we do live in an ecosystem.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    17. Re:whoo hoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Is this highlighting that we now know HOW the disease is created, so we can start developing a cure?"

      Cure? Stop shaking your preon!

    18. Re:whoo hoo? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Yes, but there have been 150 *human* deaths (so far) from vCJD due to the BSE outbreak here in Britain.
      post hoc ergo propter hoc.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    19. Re:whoo hoo? by aastanna · · Score: 1

      But cows and pigs do not naturally eat cows and pigs. Especially not their brains. For this disease to really spread you'd need some kind of situation where animal A eats animal B, and animal B eats animal A. Maybe scavengers? They'd need to share the meat too, or it would only ever be 1 to 1 transmission. They'd also have to live more than a few years after ingestion....sounds pretty tough to spread.

    20. Re:whoo hoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      um... artificial MS

      Must. Resist. Microsoft joke...

    21. Re:whoo hoo? by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that creating a new version of a highly contagious disease is a dubious way to go about trying to cure it.

      Well it worked in Mission Impossible 2...

    22. Re:whoo hoo? by procrusteous · · Score: 1

      If only they could discover something like 'smart cow disease'. Now there would be something to infect politicians with.

    23. Re:whoo hoo? by maximilln · · Score: 3, Informative
      This is huge because it was still not very clear that Prions even existed

      This isn't _that_ huge.

      About 30% of Tg196 mice develop spontaneous illness at ~550 days of age.

      The transgenic mice being studied are already susceptible to this genetic defect and the researchers antagonized it by adding the purified product of the genetic defect. Is there any surprise that more mice became more sick more quickly?

      Additionally one must look closely at the graphs on page 674. I can't locate in the article what "RML" is, but apparently administering RML caused conditions and antagonized the CNS of the mice even more than the purified MoPrP(89-231). 100% of the RML group experienced CNS dysfunction after less than 200 days. On top of that the researchers haven't proven that there's a clear prion effect. Immunoblot analysis of a brain tissue puree is hardly a characteristic identifier of MoPrP(P101L). The RML and PBS lanes are nearly identical to the lanes of mice which received the bacterial broth.

      The authors acknowledge that 30% of their mice will develop spontaneous disease at ~550 days but they try to pooh-pooh that fact when they begin to discuss their findings

      In earlier studies, uninoculated Tg9949 mice lived for more than 500 days without any signs of neurologic dysfunction... In the study reported here, Tg9949 mice were healthy at ~670 days of age and failed to show any signs of disease at 620 days after inoculation or 525 days with SHa Sc237 prions.

      Then, on page 675

      When the healthy Tg9949 mice inoculated with the Sc237 prions were killed at 525 days after inoculation, five of the seven Tg9949 mice inoculated with the seeded amyloid were already ill.

      That's probably because Sc237 is the prion protein for sheep scrapie. While Europe was busy killing ever cow in sight, sane scientists were trying to tell them that the chance of a prion crossing the interspecies barrier is minimal. Conveniently, there is no immunoblot of the Sc237 inoculated mice. I wouldn't be surprised if it looks the same as the 9949 and RML lanes.

      Does anyone else read these things critically?
      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    24. Re:whoo hoo? by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      I think if Castro (or anyone, for that matter) wants to kill his own citizens, bullets are a lot cheaper than the R&D required to develop a sufficiently lethal prion. Actually, not even bullets, guys with clubs, an even cheaper alternative.

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    25. Re:whoo hoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 150 people killed _every_ _fucking_ _year_ in the world, all entirely preventable, from being hit in the head by falling coconuts. This is 100 times the rate of prion disease, or 15 time the rate of death from shark attack.

      Should we provide billions of dollars for hard hats and shark cages for people?

      You are going to die from cancer, heart disease, lung disease, or some stupid accidently, like falling down the stairs, slipping in the tub, or your car hitting a deer or having a blow out, or simply getting the flu. Your chances of dying from one of the above causes in any one year are greater than all other causes combined for 100 years.

      If you even waste a second of time worrying about being killed in a nuke war, killed by an asteroid, killed by a prion, killed by a plane crash, or a terrorist attack, then you are a moron along the lines as chicken little.

      Of course we should not do outright stupid things, like let farm animals be fed farm animals, but this was known more than 10,000 years ago when we first made the taboo against cannabilism.

    26. Re:whoo hoo? by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      Stale old punchline: Easier giving it to politicians as there some thing even rats won't do. (OK, it was a lawyer joke, but lawyer, politician, what's the difference...)

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    27. Re:whoo hoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck it just go to a slum and you'll probably find a suitably nasty flu or form of TB. Or hangout in a hospital and there are plenty of far more lethal and faster acting contagions.

    28. Re:whoo hoo? by stevesliva · · Score: 1
      Does anyone else read these things critically?
      I'm sure. How many labs are reading it and beginning similar experiments of their own? Other labs should be able to duplicate the results, or not. And if independent results do not show prion disease sooner in the innoculated mice than the controls, then this paper looks foolish. They must think others will find their results significant, and be able to duplicate them.

      And the researchers probably didn't write the press release.

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    29. Re:whoo hoo? by maximilln · · Score: 1

      Other labs should be able to duplicate the results, or not

      The results will be very duplicatable. If you know someone has a bad leg then it's safe to say that kicking them in the knee will be severely debilitating. These mice are known to have bad brains and the researchers are injecting even more of the purified product of that malfunction.

      More significant would be if they bothered to show the immunoblot for the Sc237 inoculated mice alongside the others.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    30. Re:whoo hoo? by BK425 · · Score: 1

      Can prions be destroyed? A friend that I normally trust on these things (biology background, although she is active in Sierra Club ; ) tells me that once formed, prions do not break down. That burying cattle for instance, leaves these proteins in the ground and that they don't ever break down. Is that true?
      If that's true, the followup question is what do the do with the remains of the study rats?

    31. Re:whoo hoo? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Yes, but there have been 150 *human* deaths (so far) from vCJD due to the BSE outbreak here in Britain.

      On the other hand, people typically consume several kilograms of beef each year. Further, many of the cases linked to BSE involve people who work closely with cattle and beef products.

      If the researchers were wading around knee deep in mouse carcasses, butchering them for sale, or eating the diseased mice--yes, there would be cause for concern. The grandparent post is right--vCJD/BSE/scrapie/etc. just don't count as 'highly contagious'.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    32. Re:whoo hoo? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      I'm sure. How many labs are reading it and beginning similar experiments of their own? Other labs should be able to duplicate the results, or not. And if independent results do not show prion disease sooner in the innoculated mice than the controls, then this paper looks foolish.

      The problem is that the important time points are at six hundred or so days--this is an experiment that will take two years to run, even after the months soaked up getting approvals for the animal work and acquiring the proteins and miscellany to carry out the protocol. Allow a few months lead time for peer review and publication, and it will be three years or more before a repeat of the experiment can be reported. That's one of the catches of the scientific method--although in principle others can repeat a published experiment to verify results, often it's too expensive or inconvenient. Nobody wants to invest years verifying someone else's result, because in the likely case that the work is confirmed, there's very little to publish (think "me too!" comments on Slashdot.)

      On the other hand, I imagine that similar studies are underway in other models with related prion proteins. Actually, that's more interesting anyway--if we can see a general pattern of results rather than just a one-off specific case of (likely) prion disease.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    33. Re:whoo hoo? by MarkGriz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Meanwhile, Tom has sworn off mouse sandwiches and has become a vegetarian. He and Jerry are quite good pals now.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    34. Re:whoo hoo? by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Informative
      That burying cattle for instance, leaves these proteins in the ground and that they don't ever break down. Is that true?

      The prion proteins tend to be fairly durable, but extended exposure to high temperatures or harsh chemicals will eventually degrade or digest them. (Hospital guidelines for decontaminating instruments exposed to prions involve autoclaving at >130 degrees Celsius or soaking in 1.0 N sodium hydroxide. Hospitals tend to be pretty conservative, however.) Full-strength bleach or fairly concentrated hydrogen peroxide would probably also take care of mild prion contamination.

      If you've got time to spare, prions will break down on their own. Exposure to open air and sunshine will do it. I would expect that soil microbes would be able to digest the stuff, albeit slowly. Sure, they'll remain the ground for a little while, but they're by no means indestructible. Formalin-formic acid treatment will also inactivate prions; I believe this is what is usually done with tissue samples.

      Your body can probably cope with a small exposure to prions--your cells have mechanisms that are designed to recognize and digest misfolded proteins. (It happens fairly regularly; if the body couldn't cope with the occasional oops we'd *all* have CJD. My own area of study is a family of so-called protein chaperones which carry out these folding, refolding, and disposal tasks.)

      If that's true, the followup question is what do the do with the remains of the study rats?

      In general, I would expect the study rats to be disposed of in the same way as most other experimental animals: incineration. It gives you a nice, clean, essentially guaranteed destruction of pathogens, including prions. My understanding is that a lot of the cattle corpses in the UK and elsewhere were actually burned, rather than buried.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    35. Re:whoo hoo? by Sgt+York · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Does anyone else read these things critically?

      Well, seeing as that it's in Science, it probably was reviewed. RML is a purifed prion preparation (made by Rocky Mountain Labs), and is a common positive control in prion studies. To the grandparent: the scientists that still dismiss prion disease are few and far between. The majority of the scientific community accepts the prion mechanism of transmission now. This was not the case a few years ago, but it's an accepted mechanism now.

      All that said, I do think it's a bit of a stretch to call these "synthetic prions". I only skimmed the paper so far, but as far as I can tell, they state that these are only infectious in mice that already overexpress an aberrant protein (16 fold!) in the CNS.

      The big thing that gets me is the lack of controls. This is a Science paper; where is the CD1 mouse infected with the 'synthetic prion'? My guess is that it didn't get disease, so they excluded the data. Fig 1C starts to show this a little, but still lacks proper controls. Here, they show that brain homogenate from 9949 mice hit with seeded protein can induce disease in normal (FVB) mice. They still don't do complete controls, though. Where is the homogenate + CD1 mouse? The FVB + vehicle mouse? Heck, where are the loading controls? Come on, a Science paper without loading controls???? It's not exactly the kind of thing that belongs in "unpublished data".

      The positive side is that they seem to have confirmed the role of beta-rich regions in prion disease, and the importance of crystal/amyloid formation (which has been downplayed recently due to gross pathologic findings; this suggests that micro-plaques will also cause disease). Hammering out the structural domains responsible for disease is an important step.

      --

      There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

    36. Re:whoo hoo? by BK425 · · Score: 1

      Slashdot rocks. tnx Idarubicin.

    37. Re:whoo hoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... scrapies (the sheep/goat-based version of BSE) has been around "in the wild" for quite some time.

      The fact that one actually has to ingest infected meat leads me to think that it's not a significant risk, even if it does, to people. Maybe to coyotes, foxes and cats, but not to people.

      Have these mice people also tried to infect some coyotes or cats by having them eat the infected mice?

    38. Re:whoo hoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but the US does not have a stringent system for testing cattle, so it is likely far more common that one or two cases. Hardly any cattle is ever tested. Ignorance is the best policy as far as meat producers are concerned. If they implemented testing schemes and discovered cases, everyone would freak like they did in Europe, and the market for beef would dry up. Schlosser has a long discussion of all this in Fast Food Nation. He also notes that some evidence suggests that BSE can lie dormant in the brain (of humans or cattle) for decades before causing symptoms.

      So call me in 20 years when my brain is rotting.

    39. Re:whoo hoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Understanding the mechanism will often help in understanding a cure/solution. In my opinion of course.

    40. Re:whoo hoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think these manufactured prions can reproduce. They were shaken into their folded state (and not stirred, so all is well).

    41. Re:whoo hoo? by Chucklz · · Score: 1

      Presumably the mice are housed in BSL2-4 conditions. Especially if they are in a Level 3 or 4 lab, you can rest easy at night. Given proper attention by the animal handlers/workers who care for the mice, they won't be in the wild any time soon.

    42. Re:whoo hoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are making a slight mistake. There is a benign form of prion (PPc), and it might have some role on memory (recent article in SciAm...). There are always a few bad prions (PPsc, sc=Scrapie), and the body does have some ability to flush them out. The problem is that there are some individuals or genetic traits (sheep can and are genetically tested now, supposedly a PQ or QQ sheep is "scrapies resistant", and PP is not) that might predispose animals to have an impaired ability to do flush PPsc out, so the PPsc eventually takes over.

      The PP/PQ/QQ stuff has not really been tested fully, and there are some doubts about its efficacy. At least for sheep, it is really being worked on in Great Britain.

      In the US, it is really more a marketing gimmick right now, imho. Although all sheep (and goats. Goats and sheep in the US are supposed to be entered into either of the two scrapies registration programs in the US before they are sold, as well for many fairs.)

      Much like I won't bother getting my shetland sheep genotyped for their coloring predisposition, (because there seems to be no breeding pattern for getting certain color types in shetlands), I probably won't bother getting my other sheep genotyped for Scrapies resistance, unless I maybe have a special breeding ram or two.

      Much like vaccinating for orf (or soremouth, as it's called in the US), it's one of those things that you generally don't deal with much unless you've had it once before on your farm.

      BTW, Midway Meats, on I-5 in Washington, appears to be closed. The big white letters on it have been painted over. And the farm in Mabton, WA, that had the BSE cow? It and its cows are still under quarantine...

    43. Re:whoo hoo? by maximilln · · Score: 1

      Here, they show that brain homogenate from 9949 mice hit with seeded protein can induce disease in normal (FVB) mice

      I missed that. Thanks for pointing it out. I believed that even the second group were still transgenic.

      Where is the homogenate + CD1 mouse? The FVB + vehicle mouse?

      I'd like to see the transgenic mouse + (E. coli sans MoPrP) extract. Unless it's covered in the references it's possible that the ill effects are due to an extract from E. coli, regardless of the particular E. coli strain engineered to produce MoPrP(89-230).

      The positive side is that they seem to have confirmed the role of beta-rich regions in prion disease

      As you pointed out to start the majority of the scientific community really doesn't argue that beta-amyloid deposits lead to CNS dysfunction which is the diagnostic symptom of Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, and prion diseases. There are different mechanisms: the beta-amyloid deposits themselves inhibit neurological activity and/or the immune system, recruited to remove the deposits, begins to misidentify neurons producing normal PrPa as producers of misfolded PrPb. As with everything it's probably a partial contribution from both pathways that leads to the downward spiral.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    44. Re:whoo hoo? by tyler_larson · · Score: 2, Informative
      It seems to me that creating a new version of a highly contagious disease is a dubious way to go about trying to cure it. What happens if the new disease escapes into the wild? The plague was carried by mice and their flees after all.

      Am I way off base here?

      Completely.

      Prions are proteins that are found (in at least their harmless, unfolded, flexible state) in most (if not all) plants and animals on the planet. If the harmful (folded and rigid) prions are introduced into an organism, they either (a) convert existing harmless prions into the harmful type, or (b) force the body to produce the harmful type instead of harmless type by blocking or modifying the body's normal metabolic pathway. We're not entirely sure which.

      These researchers have shown that you can actually create the harmful prions by simply "shaking up" the harmless ones and getting them to deform.

      They didn't "create a new disease" -- the disease was already there. They just proved that the disease is as simple as some had theorized it was. Some scientists had though that the prions where just a byproduct of some traditional infection, which would explain how it spreads. This research shows that is definately not the case.

      There is actually no "disease" involved in the classic sense. No bacteria, no virus, no microbes of any sort. Nothing with any sort of RNA or DNA. Just a piece of protein. That's what these researchers have proved. Note that "prion infection" is completely unlike any other contageous condition ever discovered, which is why some scientists have been so slow to accept the idea. This research is a sort of wake-up call to the scientific community.

      Now we know that sterilization (cooking, burining, chemicals, etc.) can't protect you because there's nothing to kill. Your immune system won't protect you because it's lived with (harmless) prions all your life, and sees no threat.

      This reasearch helps in the search for a cure because it shows *where* you have to look. They've shown that traditional methods can't help you because this isn't a traditional disease. Instead, you have to try to somehow denature these proteins without killing the patient. Either that, or somehow stop the harmful prions from being produced.

      Make no mistake, this discovery is a major step in the right direction.

      --
      "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea...."
      RFC 1925
    45. Re:whoo hoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, if the researchers can get bacteria to produce the incorrectly folded version directly...

      They'll have a mechanism capable of wiping neuronal life (i.e., animals more complex than nematodes) completely from the Earth.

      Peachy.

    46. Re:whoo hoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, I can't have burgers without worrying about mad cow disease when I have a burger, and now I gotta worry about Mad Rat disease every time I eat at Mark Pi's?? Like the MSG wasn't bad enough....

    47. Re:whoo hoo? by Sgt+York · · Score: 1
      Checking the supplementary data, they did mass spec on the extracts. IT came out pretty pure, so I wouldn't think contamination would be much of an issue. If it doesn't show up on mass spec, there can't be much of it there.

      As for the amyloid, there has been some recent work (referenced in the paper) stating that amyloid deposits on histology are not necessary for disease. This has made some people think that they are just another symptom. Personally, I think that the deposits are stil there, just far too small to be seen by gross histology. This (the seeded vs unseeded) data seems to support the idea that deposition of amyloid is needed for the disease to progress. We just may not be able to detect it with these methods. I don't know if immunogold has ever been done, but it might be worth a shot.

      --

      There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

    48. Re:whoo hoo? by maximilln · · Score: 1

      Checking the supplementary data, they did mass spec on the extracts. IT came out pretty pure

      Are you trying to kid me? :) The supplementary material states that the MW was determined by laser desorption and ESI. There is no purity determined. Back to my original point though there is no comparison with a MoPrP(88-230) negative E. coli extract. There's no proof that the ESI signature is really a MoPrP fingerprint or if every E. coli broth, extracted by their method, would look the same.

      I'm not being aggressive. I'm nudging you with my elbow.

      Personally, I think that the deposits are stil there, just far too small to be seen by gross histology

      I agree. I've heard similar reports about the absence of deposits and feel that they're touted highly by people who are interested in tracking down PrP regardless of it being alpha-helical or beta-amyloid. It would be much easier to get a diagnostic kit on the market and PROFIT if they don't have to worry about the being specific for the insoluble PrPb form.

      Last post for a while. I'm actually tending a silica gel column here in lab because my employer is too cheap to buy a Biotage Flash40i, a high-flow UV detector, and an autocollector for me. My product should be coming off soon.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    49. Re:whoo hoo? by Colazar · · Score: 1
      Even among cattle, where it is *most* common, it is still rare. The entire North American herd has only had, I believe, 2 confirmed cases of BSE in something close to 50 years. I would hardly call that common.

      True, though to be fair, there hasn't really been much *testing* of the North American herd.

      The Dept of Agriculture is still trying to figure out what the criteria for testing should be, so it isn't really being done at all systematically yet.

      And remember, the cow here in Washington state that was found to be BSE positive, was essentially tested by accident. It was not a "downer cow" as originally reported. The person who slaughtered it had just been a hurry, and killed it outside the slaughterhouse proper for his own convenience. If not for that, it would have never been tested at all.

      I have no opinion on whether any of the meat is actually dangerous to humans. But the testing regime is a joke, that is just designed to make people feel better, not to actually catch anything.

      --
      He decided to just watch the government, and kind of scale it down to size, and run his life that way. --Laurie Anderson
    50. Re:whoo hoo? by babybird · · Score: 1

      We gave mice mad cow disease! Yay!

      This is the first step, I'm sure, to giving it to politicians.


      Well I mean really, how much difference *is* there between a mouse and a rat?

      --
      Keith D.
    51. Re:whoo hoo? by FreezerJam · · Score: 1

      Your immune system won't protect you because it's lived with (harmless) prions all your life, and sees no threat.

      Perhaps not, though. Your immune system does not do a detailed analysis of a protein - it simply is checking for markers that it has been trained to recognize. When you refold a protein, you may hide the original markers ("good protein") and expose different markers which allow immune system to tell the difference ("bad protein").

      Protein folding is on the road to suggesting that geometry plays a notable role in protein interactions, and a refolded prion changes the geometry of the protein in question.

    52. Re:whoo hoo? by mikehuntstinks · · Score: 0

      And I thought most of them already did have mad cow disease.

    53. Re:whoo hoo? by tbjw · · Score: 1

      And how many people have had their lives shortened by a lack of protein in the diet? On average, it seems to me, eating meat is probably better for you than not eating meat. Avoid beef if you want, but why should lamb/mutton be any safer? In the end, what should make the news are vitamin deficiencies, fatty diets, lack of protein, obesity, alcoholism, smoking, anemia etc. Not some disease that kills 150 people over 10 years, no matter how terrible the symptoms are.

    54. Re:whoo hoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You couldn't be more wrong. Tests in the late 90's showed that even prions subjected to high levels of radiation were not destroyed, much less by subjecting them to heat or antiseptics.

    55. Re:whoo hoo? by exhilaration · · Score: 1
      Slashdot rocks. tnx Idarubicin.

      Totally. These are some of the best user posts I've seen on any website.

    56. Re:whoo hoo? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      If they couldn't reproduce, there wouldn't be any disease. Sorry.

      If this was supposed to be a joke, then I appoligize for not "getting it".

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    57. Re:whoo hoo? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      And, if I recall correctly, one of the cases was a man who had been a vegan for over a decade.

      It makes me wonder what causes the susceptibility. It seem like it must require more than mere exposure. And yet before BSE there was Kuru, so canibalism is definitely a factor...a strong factor. But cross-species transmission seems...unusual.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    58. Re:whoo hoo? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      But AFAIK scrapie isn't transferred to people. And we've known about it for a long time.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    59. Re:whoo hoo? by codex79 · · Score: 1
      where is the CD1 mouse infected with the 'synthetic prion'? My guess is that it didn't get disease, so they excluded the data.

      It probably didn't get the disease, and the authors probably expected that as well. Here's the text in the summary article accompanying the paper:

      "This might also explain why no one has yet accomplished the gold-standard experiment: infecting normal mice, not transgenic ones, with pure prion proteins."

      I'm not an expert in the field, but my understanding is that only mice overexpressing the wild-type (not aberrant) MoPrP can be induced to display neurologic disease.

    60. Re:whoo hoo? by nwbvt · · Score: 1
      Way off base.

      Basically the only way to spread prion-related diseases is either through the consumption of tainted tissue (and since these diseases do not usually cross species that well, that generally would require cannibalism) or through genetics.

      Also this research is vital to the understanding of diseases like CJD. For starters it validates the theory that misshaped prions can cause diseases like CJD or BSE, something that has been controversial since the theory was first thought up.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    61. Re:whoo hoo? by mrfunnypants · · Score: 1

      "This isn't _that_ huge."

      I would of course disagree.

      The argument in the scientific community was that prions could not cause disease, it was argued, just two weeks ago for me, that a chemical experiment had not proven that prions were able to spread the disease, this paper proofs this conclusively for the first time. If you believe that this is not the case by all means provide me with a link or author/title in a journal were these experiments had been done before.

      Uhmm you do realize that only Tg9949 mice, Tg4053 mice, and FVB mice where used in this paper, NOT Tg196. Tg196 mice were used as foregoing findings which convinced them to express recMoPrP(89-230) in E. coli and then innnoculate them into Tg9949 mice. Tg9949 mice are not TG196 mice. The innoculation helped to resolve the debate which I have mentioned above. They took Tg9949 mice and transmitted MoSP1 (mouse synthetic prion strain 1) into Tg4053 mice which then expressed the same disease. This was a chemical experiment which proved that protein and only protein caused the disease.

      --
      "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" -Confucius
    62. Re:whoo hoo? by RodRandom · · Score: 1

      To summarize: we shouldn't go prion into matters that don't concern us.

    63. Re:whoo hoo? by shobadobs · · Score: 1

      Just because nobody has been killed in a nuclear war yet does not mean that we shouldn't worry about it.

    64. Re:whoo hoo? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      And how many people have had their lives shortened by a lack of protein in the diet?

      Outside of famine-stricken areas, very few, since it's hard to eat a diet with a reasonable caloric intake and a variety of foods that is protein deficient.

      On average, it seems to me, eating meat is probably better for you than not eating meat.

      Given the higher disease transmissions from flesh foods, not to mention the increased risks of heart disease, stroke, cancer, osteoporosis, and higher exposure to pesticides and other pollutants that come from eating flesh foods, meat should be eaten sparingly or not at all.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  2. Half way there! by homeobocks · · Score: 1

    They've found a way to infect creatures with the brain-eating protein . . . I guess that's just as good as curing a disease that threatens the mind of this generation.

    --
    MOUNT TAPE U1439 ON B3, NO RING
    1. Re:Half way there! by Stopmotioncleaverman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...threatens the minds of this generation? 6 billion people worldwide, 167 confirmed cases ever worldwide. Whatever your statistical thinking, I doubt many logical, non-scare-hype-submitting people would call that a threat. It's a shame, though, that most people DO appear to feel threatened by this and fail to stop and think about the actual risks involved.

    2. Re:Half way there! by KnarfO · · Score: 1

      The threat to me, at least, is that the disease is still very much not understood. There is no good way of early diagnosis. That coupled with the fact that a large proportion of the world's population has been eating meat from cattle that have had their diets artificially altered, leaves a lot of room for one to conceive that there may be millions of latent, as-yet-undiagnosed cases of vCJ Disease out there.

      --


      "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams
  3. the bottom line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't eat the beef that comes from those experimental mice.

    1. Re:the bottom line by servognome · · Score: 1

      MICE, it's what's for dinner

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    2. Re:the bottom line by druhol · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd be more concerned with the fact that it's BEEF coming from a MOUSE.

      --
      WWD4D?
    3. Re:the bottom line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remind me not to eat at Mr. Chau's chinese fast food...

    4. Re:the bottom line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all of the above post are pretty fuckin funny...or could it be the drunkenness talking?

    5. Re:the bottom line by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Mice: The other weird meat!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:the bottom line by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      Nor should you drink any mouse shakes.

  4. mandatory by captnitro · · Score: 1, Funny

    If I had unhealthy prions injected into me, I'd be pretty pissed too.

  5. Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why did I first read that as "Artificial Pron" now ? My eyes !

    1. Re:Ugh by Canberra+Bob · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You are not the only one!

      So what exactly would artificial pron be? The mind boggles!

    2. Re:Ugh by DocMax · · Score: 1
      So what exactly would artificial pron be?

      I think you start by putting S1m0ne and Aki Ross (from "Final Fantasy") in bikinis.

    3. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would probably be some of that 3D animated fake crap, or (also fake) anime pron.

    4. Re:Ugh by Twilight1 · · Score: 1

      So what exactly would artificial pron be? The mind boggles!

      MMmmmm... hentai...

      . o (Oh crap... was that my outside voice again?)

      -Twilight1

    5. Re:Ugh by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sadly I read it as that too. This _is_ slashdot, and "pron" comes up a lot more than "prion", so it's just your brain's BPU doing it's best to keep your pipeline full :)

      --
      My other car is first.
    6. Re:Ugh by clean_stoner · · Score: 1

      I beat you both, my brain over-processing it into straight-up "porn."

      --

      Sigs are for the weak.

  6. two years?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    they should get an award just for keeping mice alive for two years. When I was a kid my pet mice lasted like two months and I kept good care of them too. I'm not as interested in the mad cow/mice disease as I am in the mouse longevity.

    1. Re:two years?? by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 1

      yeah, that two years thing makes me question the credibility. Not because they were able to keep them alive that long, but because it took that long for the "disease" to come about. I hope they had other mice without this prion that were taken care of the exact same way that did not show symptoms. Otherwise I'm guessing that the thing they injected had nothing to do with it.

    2. Re:two years?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I'm sure these scientists don't understand the necessity of a control group. They probably think their drug causes aging and death too.

    3. Re:two years?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The disease takes at least 2 years to manifest in other animals as well. It's part of the insidious nature of all BSE / Kuru related diseases. Kuru is a human form of this disease which was researched in the 50s and 60s by Carlton Gadjusek, who won the Nobel Prize in medicine for showing that a disease can incubate in an otherwise healthy / asymptomatic animal for several years before acute onset of symptoms. He (with collaborators) inoculated many different species with the brain tissue of dead kuru victims, and waited to see if they would develop symptoms. The study found the human form of the disease could infect chimps and that there was no sign at all of infection until the extremely rapid onset of symptoms several years after exposure to the human form. Pretty interesting guy I might add. He was truly a genius, but had some quite odd personal habits. (Many of which I feel were picked up as he assimilated into the native new guinien culture to study this disease in that population.) Spencer

    4. Re:two years?? by I_am_jsking · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry about posting this again, I wan't logged in before *noob*

      The disease takes at least 2 years to manifest in other animals as well. It's part of the insidious nature of all BSE / Kuru related diseases.

      Kuru is a human form of this disease which was researched in the 50s and 60s by Carlton Gadjusek, who won the Nobel Prize in medicine for showing that a disease can incubate in an otherwise healthy / asymptomatic animal for several years before acute onset of symptoms.

      He (with collaborators) inoculated many different species with the brain tissue of dead kuru victims, and waited to see if they would develop symptoms. The study found the human form of the disease could infect chimps and that there was no sign at all of infection until the extremely rapid onset of symptoms several years after exposure to the human form.

      Pretty interesting guy I might add. He was truly a genius, but had some quite odd personal habits. (Many of which I feel were picked up as he assimilated into the native new guinien culture to study this disease in that population.)

      Cheers, Spencer
    5. Re:two years?? by adpowers · · Score: 1

      If you are interested about mouse longevity, then you should check out the Methuselah Mouse Prize. The purpose of this contest is to promote longevity research and life extension, by using a mouse as an example. Here is some information on how the prize is distributed to winners (the contest is indefinite, it will never run out of money).

    6. Re:two years?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, in my view that prize has some serious problems. Lab mice that are inbred have shorter lifespans than outbred strains, but I'm unsure if they actually treat the two different sets of mouse strains differently.

      Plus, when you have related mouse species to mus musculus that can live for 4-5 years on average (comparable to what the longest lab mouse is approaching), I'm unsure what exactly this prize will tell us.

      I did my PhD thesis in oxidative radical damage on ageing in rats, and after reviewing the literature, I just wish there was more focus on the long-lived high metabolism species like bats or birds. Comparing those to animals with much shorter lifespans like rats and mice (that have similar body sizes/metabolisms) would be much more enlightening IMHO.

      I can't wait till the genomic sequencing becomes fast and cheap enough (say 10 years?) to do full genomic analyses of loads of these species (Then the proteomes!). The next decade or two's going to be exciting times for ageing research!

    7. Re:two years?? by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'm not as interested in the mad cow/mice disease as I am in the mouse longevity.
      Your spam filter must be set too high, I've been getting M.o-USsC-Le L0-N.G.eEVi-T.yY offers via email for several years now...
      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    8. Re:two years?? by TheCyko1 · · Score: 1

      They probably think their drug causes aging and death too.

      I'm pretty sure science has attributed that to time.

      --
      This message was brought to you by the death of 30 brain cells.
    9. Re:two years?? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      Why you're right! I bet those scientists have never thought of seeing what happens to untreated mice!

      Wait a minute. Those are a basic point of any experiment. They are called 'controls'. You can't get a paper published in a peer-reviewed journal without them. And this paper was published in 'Science' one of the premier scientific journals in the world. So the top scientists in the field looked over this paper before it was allowed to be published. Did you read the research article? Didn't think so. So, you really think that you, probably some snot-nosed 14-year old, are going to instantly spot a hole in some scientific research that real researchers who spend years thinking about the study aren't going to spot? And that the other top researchers in the field who reviewed the actual scientific paper didn't spot? Egotistical twit.

    10. Re:two years?? by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      Not to defend the grandparent, but isn't spotting holes one of the main reasons for publication? Peer review is not infallible. I agree that our mouse killing poster probably will not be the one to spot any irregularities, but it is possible.

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    11. Re:two years?? by maximilln · · Score: 1
      Did you read the research article? Didn't think so

      I did. You obviously didn't and you're being an ass.

      On page 673 they state explicitly

      About 30% of Tg196 mice develop spontaneous illnessat ~550 days of age.
      (emphasis mine)
      The researchers were using mice who were KNOWN TO GET SICK. All they did was antagonize the condition by injecting the purified product of that transgenic defect.
      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    12. Re:two years?? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is. But in order to spot holes you have to actually read the friggin paper. Not just blindly speculate from some 3 paragraph snippit about it in another journal.

    13. Re:two years?? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      I did as well, and yes, they did the controls.

    14. Re:two years?? by HokieJP · · Score: 1

      From a New Scientist article about the research:

      Control mice that received a brain injection without the lab-made prions did not develop prion disease after 670 days. But animals that received the synthetic prions started showing the wobbly gait, ungroomed fur and rigid tails that are the clinical signs of rodent prion disease after 380 days.

      Extracts from the brains of those diseased animals were injected into normal mice which started getting sick after, on average, only 154 days. That suggested the starting number of synthetic prions was low, but improved after one cycle of replication in a mouse brain, says Legname.


      As another poster has already pointed out, long incubation periods are a feature of prion diseases. That's part of what makes them so difficult to study.

    15. Re:two years?? by maximilln · · Score: 4, Informative

      Control mice that received a brain injection without the lab-made prions did not develop prion disease after 670 days

      Is that "all control mice" or just "some control mice"? The original publication doesn't say. The authors note that the transgenic mice that they use are known to develop spontaneous CNS dysfunction at about 30% of the population ~550 days. The difference between the 550 d empirical timepoint and the 670 d endpoint is 120, or about 20%. Given that the variation for the animals which were injected was about between 25-35% (380-600 d for unseeded and 500-660 d for seeded) I don't find there lack of CNS dysfunction in the control group to be statistically significant at 670 days.

      To summarize:

      -Control mice are historically known to be 30% dysfunctional at 550 d.
      -Some/few/all control mice in this study were functional at 670 d. This fact is insignificant in that it deviates from the known behavior of this strain of mice AND in that it doesn't statistically quantify the control group.
      -At 550 d, mice which received a purified form of a malevolent protein were about 60% dysfunctional. At best this shows that administering a toxin to a strain known to be susceptible will antagonize the toxic effect.
      -At 670 d, all mice which had received the malevolent protein were CNS dysfunctional. Some/none/few of the control mice were CNS dysfunctional.

      Why are the statistics for the control group not in the publication? If we assume that the control mice all stayed completely healthy then why are they not exhibiting the expected 30% spontaneous illness rate?

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    16. Re:two years?? by Sgt+York · · Score: 1
      Actually, it's fairly common for experienced scientists to omit controls for many reasons. I did go over the paper, and I am used to going over papers like this critically. They did omit some controls (see my other post) that were pretty key, IMO.

      Assuming that papers are published solely on merit is a bit naive. They are considered for timeliness, context, author, institution, and even current events. Especially in the top-teir journals like Science, Nature, and Cell. I have seen many papers in Science that I didn't think deserved to be there, based on the data shown. This is one of them.

      --

      There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

    17. Re:two years?? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      I'm well aware of that. I've published a decent bit. Often some controls are done and don't appear in the journal due to space issues (especially true in Science in Nature). The controls sometimes get submitted to reviewers as additional material. I've often had to find related papers by the authors in other journals to find additional data and controls that I thought should have appeared in the original article in the top-tier journal. It would be nice to see them all togeather, but too often the papers aren't consisdered quite high-profile enough to rate the extra space in those top tier journals. Reports only get ~3 pages (4 figures), and Research Articles ~5 pages (6 figures). Some papers really require more space than that, but that's a restriction you have to realize is there as both an author and a reader of those journals.

    18. Re:two years?? by Sgt+York · · Score: 1
      I know all about the space limitations, believe me. I hate them. You'd think that since you have to pay the publication costs, you could have more space.....(I know, I know. I'm really just bitching. I understand the reasoning)

      The controls they omitted are pretty crucial, I think. Come on, no loading control on an immunoblot? That's pretty basic, and it doesn't take a lot of room. They could have easily scaled those images down slightly and done a cut & paste of a subsequent blot. They also skip around, using CD1 mice for some controls, then FVBs for another. I'm not accusing them of not doing the controls, I'm sure they did. They could have very easily omitted the FVB+extract data and sustituted CD1+extract. I know the reason they did it, I work on some immunology related stuff; we pick and chose models all the time. We get criticized for it, though. And justly so. When data gets that selective, I see little red flags.

      It's interesting stuff, just not very conclusive. There is very little that is said definitively, even for the scientific world.

      --

      There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

    19. Re:two years?? by HokieJP · · Score: 1

      I don't find there lack of CNS dysfunction in the control group to be statistically significant at 670 days.

      It's 'their'. And unfortunately, what you consider 'significant' doesn't really matter. The very term 'statistically significant' implies that the determination is made with statistics, not your personal judgement.

      From the paper text:
      Brain extracts prepared from these Tg mice transmit prion disease to Tg mice expressing low levels of MoPrP(P101L), designated Tg196 mice (5). About 30% of Tg196 mice develop spontaneous illness at ~550 days of age.

      What you're missing is that the Tg196 mice were NOT the control group. Both the experimental and controls were mice called "Tg9949", or just "Tg", which express a HIGH level of MoPrP(P101L). The Tg196 mice (which express a LOW level of it) were used to test the infectivity of the brain extracts from the experimental group. This was done to satisfy Koch's 3rd postulate.

      As for statistics about the control group, check the bottom of the leftmost column of p. 674. You'll find:

      In the study reported here, Tg9949 mice were healthy at ~670 days of age and failed to show any signs of disease at 620 days after inoculation with PBS

      PBS being the control solution. I would interpret that to mean ALL control mice. Apparently there's also a table (S1) with more info, but it's only available on-line. Check the top of the article for the URL.

    20. Re:two years?? by maximilln · · Score: 1

      What you're missing is that the Tg196 mice were NOT the control group. Both the experimental and controls were mice called "Tg9949", or just "Tg"

      I tried to figure out why they bothered to include the statistics about the Tg196 mice if they weren't actually using them. You say that Tg9949 mice express HIGH levels of MoPrP(P101L). Did you miss the beginning of the introduction which stated that the P101L mutation is the critical mutation thought to be responsible for the formation of b-amyloid deposits? We're back to the same question: How did the control group manage to remain perfectly healthy when a group of mice, known to express the P101L mutated prion, become spontaneously sick at 550 days?

      I'm not going to say that the researchers are fraudulent. They probably put lots of quality time and effort into their lab work. What's fraudulent is the subsequent hype on this experiement. Nature should take the heat for this as their byline claims that researchers show that a single protein is all that's necessary to initiate a prion disease. Nature forgot to add the caveat,"in a mouse model known to be susceptible to the prion."

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    21. Re:two years?? by HokieJP · · Score: 1

      I agree with you 100% that this has been overhyped by the media, as is their way. Even the science press shows a poor understanding of concepts like uncertainty, and tends to over-generalize results. I suppose that is their way of trying to make science interesting to the general public.

      There is a great article in Science about the questions this leaves unanswered, and the work left to be done. I think it's called "An end to the prion debate? don't count on it" or something similar.

      As for their claim none of the control mice show any CNS dysfunction, I am bit dubious too. Obviously, we all (or at least most) have PrP in our CNS matter right now, but unless it misfolds, we are not going to get CJD. So it is possible that the Tg9949 mice had a much lower (or zero) incidence of misfolding in their MoPrP than the Tg196 mice (due to differences in their genomes or whatever).

      Personally, I think this whole debate won't be entirely resolved until we have better techniques for observing the conformations of real proteins.

    22. Re:two years?? by maximilln · · Score: 1

      So it is possible that the Tg9949 mice had a much lower (or zero) incidence of misfolding in their MoPrP than the Tg196 mice (due to differences in their genomes or whatever).

      This is the hitch that raises the red flag for me. The authors note that the Tg196 mice are susceptible. They then go on to use Tg9949 mice, which they give a technical description for based upon nonexpression of some other protein (0/0). But they _do_ say that the Tg9949 mice express PrP(P101L) at a level 16 times greater than some other mouse (Bavarian? Hungarian? Was it SHA? I left the article at work). It's in the same paragraph that describes the Tg9949 mice. Leftmost column, second or third paragraph on the page with the immunoblots.

      Regardless. The peer review process has obviously failed us on this one as the researchers obfuscate the levels at which the Tg9949 mice express the misfolded MoPrP(P101L) in relation to other mouse strains.

      Personally, I think this whole debate won't be entirely resolved until we have better techniques for observing the conformations of real proteins

      X-ray crystallography is bringing us a long way, as is SAR-by-NMR. There's an obvious question involved with both, though,"How do we know that the tertiary/quaternary configuration observed experimentally are the same as the configurations in vivo when we know that pH, ion identity, solvent identity, and environment play just as much role in determination as the secondary structure of the amino acid chain?"

      I was systematically shouldered aside and shouted down when I would ask that question at a major pharmaceutical company in Chicago.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
  7. What's the point again? by MrRTFM · · Score: 0

    I thought the idea was to make things healthier - not simulate diseases.

    And even though I didnt read the article, I thought I'd shoot my mouth off anyway :)

    --
    You can't expect to wield supreme executive power, just because some watery tart threw a sword at you
    1. Re:What's the point again? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      You gotta know how the thing you're trying to cure/repair/remove works before you can do anything.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:What's the point again? by sinner0423 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you check out the wiki for the prion, it states this :

      Though their exact mechanisms of action and reproduction are still unknown, it is now commonly accepted that they are responsible for a number of previously known but little-understood diseases generally classified under transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSEs) diseases

      IANAMB(I am not a microbiologist) but I'm assuming if scientists can replicate how something works, they can counter that process and develop a cure. Pretty neat stuff.

    3. Re:What's the point again? by winterlens · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that often the way we find cures is to make people sick. Vaccines, after all, are just weakened diseases.

    4. Re:What's the point again? by zalas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not exactly. It all depends on how they learn to perform the forward process. For example, if scientists "discover" that they can shatter glass by throwing a hard object at it, all it tells them is that they need to keep glass away from hard objects. However, if scientists "discover" a weak-spot in this supposedly shatter-proof glass, then they'll have something they can concentrate on fixing to make it less shatter-prone.

      It seems to me that the scientists figured out a way to develop a prion and show that it causes disease, but it wasn't concentrated on finding out which parts of mice were susceptible.

    5. Re:What's the point again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like that you wrote that acronym and explained what it stood for, because I never would have gotten it.

    6. Re:What's the point again? by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be IANAM, or are you suggesting you are not a very small biologist?

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    7. Re:What's the point again? by zymano · · Score: 1

      it shows they are on the right path and now don't have to waste time on other theories.

      let me preface, I didn't read the article yet.

  8. Artificial Beef Patties? by Billobob · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Turn mice into gigantic mad cows 2. ??? 3. Profit!!

    --
    If you have to ask, you'll never know.
    1. Re:Artificial Beef Patties? by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      It's probably more like:
      1. Find out how to create BSE.
      2. Figure out how to weaponize it.
      3. Taint foriegn beef.
      4. Profit.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  9. this is truely scary by airbie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    because prions are more basic and fundamental than even germs/viruses. most modern methods of treating diseases and fighting virus involve disrupting the replication process of the virus/germs, usually by the means of inhibiting certain proteins. however prions themselves are malformed proteins that malform other good proteins. this mechanism is quite hard to stop because it is so simple, there is no complicated repoduction chain to disrupt like a virus. there is only one way to stop this chain, which is to basically burn the protein to a crisp.

    --
    They couldn't fix my brakes, so they made my horn louder.
    1. Re:this is truely scary by BigHungryJoe · · Score: 1

      It sounds like ice-nine from that Vonnegut book Cat's Cradle.

    2. Re:this is truely scary by Sir_Real · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that prions could not be denatured by heat.

    3. Re:this is truely scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not by cooking heat, no, but you can destroy *any* material given enough heat.

      The problem is that if you apply enough heat to destroy the prions you also destroy any nutrition in the food (Thus, the "crisp" comment).

    4. Re:this is truely scary by Isauq · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem of course is that, as TheWordOfB (696275) noted, the Prion is an extremely stable molecule. There is no standard method for destruction. At best there are approved disposal methods http://www.ehrs.upenn.edu/protocols/sa_destruct.ht ml#prions The protein PrPC which is the normal protein has, at this time, an undefined function as explained here:http://www.portfolio.mvm.ed.ac.uk/studentwebs /session1/group42/prion_index.htm. The signifigance of artificially creating a prion is that it may now be possible to put the reaction under heavy restriction to see exactly what happens between PrPC and a Prion that causes this metamorphosis.

      --
      RTFM
    5. Re:this is truely scary by xombo · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can't even burn prions to a crisp. You have to either take them out or break them into bits (the later would allow potential recombinations).

    6. Re:this is truely scary by staticx0085 · · Score: 1

      No one has managed to denature them yet using even extremely high amounts of heat. They are also resistant to irradiation, all types of alcohol, and many other methods of destroying most proteins that I forgot.

    7. Re:this is truely scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      caveat:
      IANABiologist -- but IAAChemist/Materials Scientist...

      yes, and no. there's a fix in the pipeline... sorta'

      there's almost certainly a way to design an artificial enzyme which will only fit around the 'malformed' ('improperly' folded) prion, and take it apart. steriochemistry and stoichiometry are coming together with modern 'nano-tech'. custom enzymes are the way to go, with something like this (IMHO).

      how long it takes for researchers to focus in this direction, how long it takes (from there) to come up with viable results, and how long it takes (after that) for clinical trials, i won't even [officially] speculate on, however [est. ~7yrs to animal testing].

      -Anonymous Mouse

    8. Re:this is truely scary by maximilln · · Score: 1

      how long it takes for researchers to focus in this direction, how long it takes (from there) to come up with viable results

      Researchers in the pharmaceutical industry have been working on small molecule design for quite some time. The biggest hurdle is specificity.

      Lately we've been hearing about monoclonal antibodies which are more specific due to their larger size and custom design. These are performing a little better in clinical trial.

      The production and testing of a even a small enzyme, however, is a monolithic task. Protein crystallographers can tell you all about it. Any protein of even small size (50-100 residues) starts to take on different tertiary and quaternary configurations depending not only on pH, but the composition of the surrounding molecules and the identity of any ions present. A protein which has a desirable configuration at physiological pH in the buffer which they use to obtain the crystal from which they determine the configuration may have a completely different configuration at the same pH in the cellular environment.

      Not to say that we're not working on it but, as with anything, it's much easier said than done.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
  10. Fake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Artificial pri0n?! wouldn't realdoll be prior art?

  11. protein folding! by TheWordOfB · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've not read the article.. but a little synopse of how BSE works... Everyone already has the protein for BSE in their brain. Except in its natural form in the brain.. its meta-table.. Meaning it can unfold and refold into its original shape. The interesting thing about BSE is its super-stable fold of the protein. What makes this dangerous is proteins can learn new and unique ways of folding.. so if in contact with a BSE protein it'll learn to fold the BSE way. Meaning.. it'll learn to fold superstable.. which is basically a knot you can't untie. Proteins are the messengers of the body.. and if they can't unfold to be read.. its basically dead weight. After a couple years too many proteins have been retrained, leading to loss of cognitive abilities.. tada... your cow has the mad shakes!

    1. Re:protein folding! by femto · · Score: 1

      How does a molecule 'learn'? Is there some permanent rearrangement of the molecules in the protein? Is it the case that the energy of the molecule has several local minima, and the process of 'learning' is actually making the protein jump into a new 'energy valley'? I'm curious.

    2. Re:protein folding! by mnelson · · Score: 2, Informative

      and if they can't unfold to be read.. its basically dead weight

      Close, but backwards... Proteins have many functions, and their folded shape is what helps determine their funtion. The way a protein folds creates areas that like water (hydrophilic) and don't like water(hydrophobic), etc. These regions help determine which chemical compounds are structurally compatible with the protein, and lead to all kinds of reactions...
      Check out Folding@home http://www.stanford.edu/group/pandegroup/folding/s cience.html for more info

      --

      "Just another damned fool idealistic crusader..."

    3. Re:protein folding! by JanneM · · Score: 4, Informative

      IANABC. The "molecules" or parts (a protein is all one molecule, really) don't move around of course; they sit in the same sequence in the chain as always. But, as you say, since a protein tends to be a pretty complex thing, there is usually more than one minimum in the energy landscape for it. Our eyes depend on this, for instance: there's a protein in our vision cells that will jump into another (somewhat unstable) minimum when prodded with energy (=light). In its new shape, it will tend to catalyst a reaction that it otherwise doesn't, and the product of this reaction in turn triggers a nerve signal. This local minimum is not very stable though (it is "shallow"), so after a short while, the protein will revert back to its normal shape, ready to react again when light strikes.

      In the case of prions, it seems they can act as templates for each other. As they bump into each other, they will tend to act as a mold, effectively lowering the barrier between the two states. The new state is "narrower" but "deeper", so it is easier for one of the normal prions to slip over to the rouge state when molded than the other way around.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:protein folding! by TheWordOfB · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I may have stuff a little backwards. I read about BSE many months ago when there was a scare in Canada. Either way, to fully understand this I'd bet we'd all need to go take a class in proteomics. :)

    5. Re:protein folding! by RandomCoil · · Score: 1

      IAMABC, or at least a variation on the BC theme, and your explanation is right on. You might throw in the word "template" instead of mold and sprinkle a "catalyze" in there, but close enough.

      Someone needs to mod your comment up. Hopefully my "+1" will help.

    6. Re:protein folding! by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Well, OK, I am a computational neuroscientist (or a roboticist, depending on how you see it), so I'm not utterly lost, but it's certainly not close to my field either. Better to be clear and upfront about things like that.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    7. Re:protein folding! by RandomCoil · · Score: 1
      Well, OK, I am a computational neuroscientist

      Ah hah! You were cheating! I'm just thrilled to have a topic on Slashdot in which I get to "play expert".
    8. Re:protein folding! by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      From left field, is this at all related to the human taboo against cannibalism?
      If something comes in and never leaves, very slight traces eventually become a cumulative poison.

    9. Re:protein folding! by femto · · Score: 1

      What's a computational neuroscientist do? Does the field aim to create a complete computer simulation of a brain, or is it more in the area of applying biological/neural techniquies to man made machines?

    10. Re:protein folding! by jd0g85 · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is incorrect. It is the shape of proteins that allows them to function. Their shape is specific for what they do. They are not "read" in the sense that DNA and RNA are read. Once the amino acid string is translated from RNA, it assumes it's folded form. In general, proteins cannot refold once they are denatured (unfolded). It is true that infections prions cause their normally healthy counterparts to fold incorrectly. Once this happens, they are dead weight b/c they do not interact correctly with other molecules in the cell.

      --
      There is no belief, however foolish, that will not gather its faithful adherents who will defend it to the death.-Asimov
    11. Re:protein folding! by Stephen+H-B · · Score: 2, Informative

      While not directly related this does support the taboo. Cannibalism tends to concentrate any species-specific toxins in the body (in the same way as drinking your urine in emergencies). One of the theories for the spread of Kuru in PNG was by cannibalism, esp brain tissue. The brains of those who had died of Kuru were considered delicacies. OOPS!

      --
      Sick of WoW? Try the thinking man's MMORPG: EVE Online
    12. Re:protein folding! by Grrr · · Score: 1

      RC - is there anything to the speculation of some that prions might not always be harmful?

      "Scientists have discovered a new process for how memories are stored. And a key player in the process is a protein from the same class of prions that include the deadly agents that spawn diseases of brain deterioration, such as mad cow disease.

      Their study, published [19 Dec 2003 ?] in two papers in the journal Cell, suggests that proteins in a mishapen or prion state are not always up to no good in the brain.

      'For a while we've known quite a bit about how memory works, but we've had no clear concept of what the key storage device is,' said Susan Lindquist, director of the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research in Cambridge, Mass., and co-author of the study with Eric Kandel of Columbia University. ..."


      thanks

      <grrr>

    13. Re:protein folding! by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Ok, off-topic, so please mod down as required. That said, at least in my case, I am working on computer modeling of parts of the brain, as a way to determine the validity of the models that we have of the functionality. Take a model of part of the brain (the amygdala-OFC-Hippocampus system, just to take something completely out of the blue), implement, and run simulations designed to be functionally similar to behavioral or nurological experiments done on real animals. If the model can replicate the results, good. If not (the normal case), we need better models, and the way it fails can tell us something about what kind of change to look for.

      My background is mainly in CS, but during my graduate studies I ended up studying a lot of neurology and neuroanatomy.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    14. Re:protein folding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am not a biophysicist, but this is what I gathered from staphys conferences. I am not sure if ecerybody agrees in the following, but at least some people do:

      Proteins are governed by thermodynamics. However some of the proteins in our body are not at thermodynamic equilibrium. The reason is that it takes a long time for the protein to find the equilibrium state. This is a good thing, because some proteins are only useful when they are out of equilibrium.

      Sometimes the equilibrium state is a bundle of many similar proteins that are glues together. The formation of such a bundle is very slow, because the bundle is only stable when it has reached a certain size. However once the bundle has formed then it will gradually grow, and at some point it may even split into two halves.

      If the above theory is correct, then a prion is a bundle of similar proteins glued together. This bundle will act as a catalyst creating more bundles of it's own kind.

      Regarding your question. A protein does not have a memory, so the state of a protein is fully described by the positions of the atoms. In other words protein folding si a Markov process.

    15. Re:protein folding! by fadunk · · Score: 1

      Actually, the reaction in your eyes works different: when you close them, or the lights go out, THAT is when your brain is getting a signal. Light actually causes that signal to NOT get sent--probably an evolutionary way of freeing up "computing power" when you're awake.

      At least I think that's what they told me in biochemistry 4 years ago...it could be a dream though, biochem will do that.

  12. Ok so now... by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

    We know how to create it I assume its easier to cure it?? Or create a vaccine? I'm not sure?
    Was it a problem trying to replicate it in a lab or was it too costly to have a lab full of mad cows, just easier with mice?

    of course the Mad cow Link

    --
    This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    1. Re:Ok so now... by StuckInSyrup · · Score: 1

      The point of this research is, that now it is 100% sure, that the prions cause the spongiform encephalitis.
      There were theories, that spongiform encephalities are caused by some kind of a virus or bacteria, and the prion is just a byproduct of the pathologic process. Last month, some japanese research team produced knockouted mice, that had no copy of the PrPC gene, that is responsible for the cellular (normal folded) prion protein. Theese mice could not develop spongiform encephlaitis, even if injected with prion proteins.
      As for creating a vaccine, I think this is not going to happen. The healthy prion protein is located on the outer membrane of the neuron cell (its function is still unclear). The infectious prion is basicaly the same protein (it has the same primary structure, the same aminoacid sequence), only its tercial (3D) structure has the wrong twist. This makes the protein resistent to proteases, enzymes that destroy unneeded or redundant proteins. Also, this new structure is energeticaly stable, so the protein tends to remain in that state. And, and this is the most important part, in this infectious state sticks to healthy prion proteins and converts them to the infectious state. This results in ladder like structures, that in the final stage fill out the entire neuron and kill it.
      My point is, that an immunisation with the infectious prion protein would result in antibodies attacking the neuron cells, having the healthy prion protein on their surface. And this would be not very helpful.

      --
      Ni.
  13. Re:WMD by brainstyle · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Great, now we have yet another form of weapon of mass destruction.

    That seems to suggest there were other WMDs. Coulda sworn they haven't found any...

    Terrorists don't need weapons of mass descruction. The States has been mired in fear for the past three years and all the terrorists had were box cutters.

    --
    "Why can't everyone just be straight with me?"
    "Because we live in a bendy world, dear."
  14. OFMG!!!!! ...oh wait...nevermind. by Mastadex · · Score: 0, Redundant

    For a second there I thought the title said Artificial Pr0n Created....damn...

    --
    A morning without coffee is like something without something else.
  15. Re:WMD by icekillis · · Score: 0

    what's wrong with malarya, or other deseases like aids. They could just have someone with aids bleed to death in the "water supply". Poison is not the probelm, guarding and monitoring the supply is. Its a step forward though, they more they know about it, the more they know how to stop it.

  16. You do realize what this means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If we shake up a prion, it morphs into the type that causes mad cow disease.

    If we shake up a pop singer, it morphs into the type that causes property damage.

    Connection, anyone?

    1. Re:You do realize what this means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm more concerned now with products sporting labels that read: "Shake Well Before Using".

  17. Explanation by telstar · · Score: 1
    "Perhaps someone who is more familiar with this field of research would care to fill us in on the details as the article was rather light."
    • Okay ... Think of prion like television. You can watch a little and it's got a negligeble effect. You can mix it up ... change the channel, no big deal. Now consider changing the channel to the WB. There's no plot ... no recognizable actors ... people are speaking in words you've never heard of. That's like shaking up prion and injecting it into your brain. The only fix is to block the WB and make damn sure your TiVo doesn't know that channel exists. That, and the weather channel. Somehow my TiVo thought I'd like 3 hours of weather on the 8's. Hope that clears things up for you guys.

    1. Re:Explanation by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, prions are more like reality television. Normally, you have regular functioning TV shows being produced constantly by your big networks. However, the introduction of reality TV is dangerous because, due to its very low cost of production (you don't have to pay your actors anymore, since they are now "contestants"), it starts changing every other show on TV into a reality TV show. Over time, these reality shows aggregate throughout prime-time until eventually you have nothing but a hideous brain-destroying mass of crap.

    2. Re:Explanation by maximilln · · Score: 1
      Here's my analysis of the key shortcomings of the scientific article.


      About 30% of Tg196 mice develop spontaneous illness at ~550 days of age.

      The transgenic mice being studied are already susceptible to this genetic defect and the researchers antagonized it by adding the purified product of the genetic defect. Is there any surprise that more mice became more sick more quickly?

      Additionally one must look closely at the graphs on page 674. I can't locate in the article what "RML" is, but apparently administering RML caused conditions and antagonized the CNS of the mice even more than the purified MoPrP(89-231). 100% of the RML group experienced CNS dysfunction after less than 200 days. On top of that the researchers haven't proven that there's a clear prion effect. Immunoblot analysis of a brain tissue puree is hardly a characteristic identifier of MoPrP(P101L). The RML and PBS lanes are nearly identical to the lanes of mice which received the bacterial broth.

      The authors acknowledge that 30% of their mice will develop spontaneous disease at ~550 days but they try to pooh-pooh that fact when they begin to discuss their findings

      In earlier studies, uninoculated Tg9949 mice lived for more than 500 days without any signs of neurologic dysfunction... In the study reported here, Tg9949 mice were healthy at ~670 days of age and failed to show any signs of disease at 620 days after inoculation or 525 days with SHa Sc237 prions.

      Then, on page 675

      When the healthy Tg9949 mice inoculated with the Sc237 prions were killed at 525 days after inoculation, five of the seven Tg9949 mice inoculated with the seeded amyloid were already ill.

      That's probably because Sc237 is the prion protein for sheep scrapie. While Europe was busy killing ever cow in sight, sane scientists were trying to tell them that the chance of a prion crossing the interspecies barrier is minimal. Conveniently, there is no immunoblot of the Sc237 inoculated mice. I wouldn't be surprised if it looks the same as the 9949 and RML lanes.

      Does anyone else read these things critically?
      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    3. Re:Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, how can we frighten the politicans into outlawing reality TV before it destroys any more minds?

  18. Artificial pr0n created?? by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Um, artificial pr0n has been being created for a LONG time! Do some Googling next time:

    http://www.google.com/search?q=fake+celebrity+porn

    Oh...wait...the title is Artificial Prion Created. NM, carry on ;P

  19. Re:WMD by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 1

    To be fair, we've apparently had them for two years!

    --
    "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

    - Seneca
  20. When thing it will show... by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    is that we have more of a problem then previously realized. Here in colorado, we are heavily infected with Chronic wasting disease in our elk and deer. The first problem is that these deer/elk are intermingling with cattle to obtain water and grain (we are in a severe drought). About 3 year ago (pre 9/11), the state went after funding to research more of CWD/MCD/CJD/Scappies/etc. The GWB admin shot it down and then last year allocated the same program at UT to research the problem here. Amazing.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:When thing it will show... by killjoe · · Score: 1

      In montana there is the same problem. Deer and Elk are getting CWD. The state is not too interested in the problem though. They are more worried about brucelosis so they shoot the buffalo that wander out of the park.

      The odd thing is that there has never been a documented case of brucellosis being transmitted from buffalo to cows but there is scientific data that shows CWD can be transmitted from elk and deer to cows.

      In the end it's more acceptable for the citizens of montana for their govt to shoot buffalo then to shoot the elk. Why I don't know, those people in Montana are kind of weird anyway I guess.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    2. Re:When thing it will show... by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1
      The GWB admin shot it down and then last year allocated the same program at UT to research the problem here.
      In other words, next time the current administration accuses John Kerry of being a "flip-flopper," there's now yet another cogent, clear, and provable counterargument?

      I'd be interested in more details about the UT study and its political history.
      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    3. Re:When thing it will show... by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here in Manitoba we also have had cases of CWD in our Elk population.

      Its below the radar when its only common amongst wild animals and only hunters are at risk, but get a case of BSE in a cow and its a political nightmare that transcends borders.

      Maybe the idea of terrorists creating thier own will spur them to action :-\

    4. Re:When thing it will show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not flip-flopping, just good, honest, nepotism

    5. Re:When thing it will show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The elk and deer population already have the desease here in the U.S. so how could it be an issue for us? The U.S. supposidly hasn't had a case of BSE so it makes sense for caution.

  21. artificial pr0n by jwdeff · · Score: 0, Redundant

    When I first read this, I thought it said "artificial pr0n".

    1. Re:artificial pr0n by evilviper · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ooooooo... Another "When I first read this" joke on slashdot... How incredibly original. How do you come up with this stuff?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  22. Mad cow acceptable level of risk to big businesses by kaoshin · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "the U.S. government has refused to support widespread testing of the nation's cattle herds."
    "Those representing the U.S. meat industry say the U.S. government's testing program is more than adequate."
    -CNN

    One more reason to stop eating meat

  23. Re:Important because by aka-ed · · Score: 1

    "This increases the likelyhood that disease is transmissible by prion," is what I menat to say. Sorry, was thinking about my Mickey D stock.

    --
    I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
  24. Haliburton Weaponized Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can hardly wait for the Haliburton weaponized version of said prion.

  25. Re:WMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Nope. Something like this is a long term thing. Terrorists are after short term inciting of fear and panic. Case in point: the anthrax scares resulted in fairly prompt fear relating to powder in envelopes, that sort of thing.

    You're only likely to see prions dumped in water or food supplies if somebody is looking for quiet destruction over the long term. Maybe al Qaeda(sp?) would be happy with this, but I suspect not -- they'd probably prefer to trumpet their triumphs to the world, and that means they want immediate glory, for propaganda purposes.

  26. Link to abstract by A1kmm · · Score: 3, Informative

    The abstract for the original Science article is here. However, you need to register(free to see abstracts) first. You can also pay to see the fulltext.

    --
    X-Has-Sig: yes
  27. 2 yrs later? That's when mice get Alzheimer's... by pepax · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know people have been struggling to show that a synthetic prion can cause a disease, thereby proving beyond any doubt that it really is the prion protein (no virus, no bacterium) that causes the disease, and this may be the proof. But at 2 years of age mice are usually about to die, so this doesn't seem that convincing... It will depend on the details. Btw., there is a lot of other evidence that prions cause the mad cow disease and the human variant Creutzfeld-Jakob's disease, but if this report is true, that really nails it. Another btw.: the original paper was published in Science, Nature only refers to the Science article.

  28. Wrong university...butu you've got it mostly right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This was done at UCSF, not UCSD. Read the article

    There are still a few people the dis-believe the prion theory of disease put forward by Pruisner. For those who aren't familiar with the subject, prions are essentially misfolded proteins that can induce their mis-folding by interacting with copies of themselves. So, if protein A become randomly misfolded into A', it can bump into other copies of A and induce them to form A'. In many of the disease cases, these misfolded proteins can form plaques or tangles which then disrupt or rupture and kill cells.

    While Pruisner's evidence for such a mechanism is more or less overwhelming there were still a couple people who didn't buy the story. The experiment talked about here (and I haven't seen the actual paper yet, but look forward to reading it) is rather difficult to do and is pretty much the last nail in the coffin of those disagreeing with prion theory. They do complain that the protein activities of the mutants were really low and that the mice used were not of the ideal strain buut this is missing the forest through the trees. As far as all of us whose opinions matter are concerned, the case is no more than closed and the pro-Pruisner side has won.

    BTW, I've heard Pruisner say that a lot of neurological diseases are really prion based...but that case is far from being closed...so keep your ears open for such discussions in the future.

    -Devon (who should disclose that he's a neuro grad student at UCSF, but works on neurogenetic diseases and not prions)

  29. A brief lesson on prions... by theluckyleper · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, I am a microbiologist, and I've done research on prions.

    Basically, prions are proteins which are able to act upon other proteins and thereby create functional copies of themselves (identical copies are not needed). BSE (mad cow disease) and CJD (essentially the human version) are caused by 'rogue' prions which destroy tissue by converting large quantities of protein into more prions. Prions are basically the most elementary form of an infectious disease (as they are simply protein, no genetic material required).

    Now, what these researchers have done is to prove that prions can spontaneously develop, without the need for viral or bacterial infection. Random changes in protein structure MAY result in prion creation. You needn't eat some mad cow (nor cannibalize some CJD gray matter) to contract CJD or some other prion-induced malady. Nor is a viral/bacterial infection required; the disease may develop spontaneously.

    Hopefully this makes sense... I've had a few too many Schooners (beer).

    --
    Visit the Game Programming Wiki!
    1. Re:A brief lesson on prions... by SpootFinallyRegister · · Score: 1

      doesnt this make prions more of a poison than a disease?

    2. Re:A brief lesson on prions... by forkboy · · Score: 1

      It's a very gray area, but I'm on the camp that considers it more of a poison. (i.e. substance with harmful effect on the body) Since prions aren't organisms, calling BSE/CJD/whatever an infectious disease is not entirely correct, even though it MAY be possible that consuming prion-contaminated proteins can "infect" you. The mechanism of how an ingested prion can be incorporated into nervous tissue, if at all, isn't well understood. Note that they were injecting prions directly into the brain of these mice, not feeding it to them.

      However, poison isn't entirely correct either as poisons have a measurable dose/response effect and right now no one really knows how many prions it takes to cause prion-related illness in humans. It might just be one, it might be thousands.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    3. Re:A brief lesson on prions... by RandomCoil · · Score: 3, Informative

      Prions aren't a disease, but there are a few diseases caused by them (BSE, scrapie...).

      HIV isn't a disease either, but AIDS is.

    4. Re:A brief lesson on prions... by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      This research shows that prion molecules/complexes begat more prion molecules/compexes. *Most* poisonous molecules don't initiate the formation of more of themselves.

      This study doesn't explain why prions don't denature when they are cooked, but being able to make them means that that kind of study becomes much easier.

      Indirectly, the study also strengthens the theory that prions act like crystals, where regular protiens remain useful/soluable like water molecules in clouds until something (prion) becomes a nucleus for the formation of insoluble hailstones. Prion 'crystals' could be expected to both be more stable under cooking and enzymatic digestion than loose protiens, and be able to initiate disease.

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    5. Re:A brief lesson on prions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I am not a microbiologist, I am just a lowly student that has to bow down to microbiologist profs.

      By understanding how the creation of prions (may) happen, prevention methods may be found out. For instance, if an overload of chemical A over chemical B in a cell causes protein C to fold a certain way, one might either reduce chemical A levels, keep chemical B levels up, prevent chemical A from getting to protein C, or simply reversing the fold before protein C gets to protein D.

      Minority Report shows a sort of example of this: stop the disease by fully understanding it and stopping before it happens. This may involve a lot of science (which may include the horrid bad science ), but it does look promising and more research into it is very exciting.

      There are many spectulated culprits ( randomness, heredities and free radicals ), but I believe I am going to be one of those graduate students doing 1000s of hours of expirments and research on this. Or maybe I will write a bash script for it instead (bash 3.0 released!)

    6. Re:A brief lesson on prions... by klui · · Score: 1

      The article states that the researchers created rogue prions by shaking them. Does this mean that prolonged contact w/ machines that shake, tremble, vibrate will cause rogue prions in people, animals?

    7. Re:A brief lesson on prions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The difference, of course, is with any otherr poisons, the poison doesn't trick your body into helping it reproduce by manufacturing more of the same poison.

      "Since prions aren't organisms" - well, that's the grey area. They reproduce with the help of cells (not unlike a virus).

    8. Re:A brief lesson on prions... by Stephen+H-B · · Score: 1

      The 'shaking' here is on a molecular scale so no, a vibrating machine will not give you CJD/BSE etc.

      --
      Sick of WoW? Try the thinking man's MMORPG: EVE Online
    9. Re:A brief lesson on prions... by klui · · Score: 1

      But what's the difference between the molecular shaking done by the researchers versus something we experience?

    10. Re:A brief lesson on prions... by staticx0085 · · Score: 1

      A prion infection is never the result of a viral or bacterial infection. The prion itself is spread directly from animal to animal (and I'm including humans as animals here). Now if you want to ask how the first prion was created, that would be more of a "chicken-or-the-egg" debate.

    11. Re:A brief lesson on prions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a couple of gigahertz

    12. Re:A brief lesson on prions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pity we can't develop 'anti-prions' for them, which go about converting the proteins back to normal?

      That or just something harmless to us that would bond with the prions and deactivate them.

      Or a prion that deactivates the prions... hmmm...

    13. Re:A brief lesson on prions... by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      HIV is a disease, it just has no real effects. AIDS is hiv that is strong enough to be noticed.

      --
      Not a sentence!
  30. CDC's BSE Page by CompSurfer · · Score: 1
    Interesting. Scary. I hope it's a step toward something that combat BSE and CJD.

    Here is the US CDC's page about BSE (aka "mad cow") and CJD (it's human cousin).

    And call me paranoid, but I haven't had beef in seven months. (I live in the US and seven months ago was the first confirmed case of BSE in the USA)

    1. Re:CDC's BSE Page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there's only a small subset of the population believed to be susceptible to developing vCJD. I can't remember the allele of PrP, but the people developing vCJD were homozygous for one allele, and it looks like if you're heterozygous for it, or don't have that specific allele, you aren't susceptible to vCJD in your lifetime.

      Of course, without doing widespread testing, nobody knows who's susceptible, so maybe it's advisable to stop eating beef -but realise they do feed ground-up meat to chickens, pigs and sheep as well. Could be worth moving to fish only (as long as you don't mind the heavy metal pollution) :)

  31. Oh, you said 'Prion'... by shigelojoe · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Everyone that read the headline as "Artificial Pron Created" raise their hand.

    *raises hand*

  32. What's withe the fake pron? by icekillis · · Score: 0

    There is a wave of comments, all pointing out that " I READ IT AS ARTIFICAL PRON" Slashdot moderators should keep in mind, useless information should be banned so should information that SEEMS useless. I'll start a paypal account... people need lasik.

  33. It's important because... by goodgenes · · Score: 1

    Basically, there is controversy over whether the "mutated" prions actually are the cause of CJ/BSE. This paper provides strong supporting evidence that the modified prions are the causative agent.

    1. Re:It's important because... by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      Except for some typos, that's exactly what I said 10 minutes after the story was first posted, while all the other posters were going "duh" and making "pron" jokes. Yet someone modded me down for trolling!

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
  34. You know you're on the internet too much when... by kcorporation · · Score: 1, Redundant

    ...you read that as "artificial pr0n created".

  35. This answers a major question by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This resolves a major argument in biology - can prions, all by themselves, transmit a disease? A few years ago, most biologists would have agreed that disease transmission by prions alone was impossible - they're simple protein molecules, not even alive. One can argue over whether viruses are alive, too, but proteins are even lower level. They have no DNA or RNA at all. Biologists are still arguing over this.

    So direct synthesis of a prion, and demonstrating that it was disease-causing, was a useful research project. Now we know.

  36. No more amusement park rides for me! by FFFish · · Score: 1

    They then shook these proteins until they resembled the tangled structure of an unhealthy prion.

    Right. Won't catch me dead on this protein-shaking carnie ride, then: The Zipper+Roller Coaster. Sweet jesus, you'd be sure to develop mad cow disease!

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  37. Re:WMD by iamacat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You will not catch AIDS by drinking water, but prions might do the trick, given how they survive cooking and even burning.

  38. Only nukes are true WMDs by tepples · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great, now we have yet another form of weapon of mass destruction.

    Artificial prions are chemical weapons, just like VX, sarin, and other nerve agents. Unlike nuclear weapons, chemical weapons are technically not weapons of mass destruction because only a nuclear reaction can destroy mass.

    1. Re:Only nukes are true WMDs by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      Uh, I'm not a physics major, but I thought mass COULDN'T be destroyed, no matter what. Even if a nuke-u-lar bomb went off, splitting atoms, that mass is still conserved, just in the form of 2 lighter atoms, and a huge release of energy, which burns things and blows stuff up, which causes tons of destruction, but the mass is still preserved. Stuff burns, but there's ash and smoke totaling up to the same mass as before.

    2. Re:Only nukes are true WMDs by name773 · · Score: 1

      only a nuclear reaction can destroy mass

      i do believe you meant: convert it to energy;
      mass cannot be destroyed.

    3. Re:Only nukes are true WMDs by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 1

      how would you classify a neutron bomb?

      --
      Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
    4. Re:Only nukes are true WMDs by billwie · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought that very little matter was actually destroyed by a nuclear weapon, it just spreads it around more. (see parent post for reference).

    5. Re:Only nukes are true WMDs by daft_one · · Score: 1

      I don't know... A nice, ripping fart from a pew in the back can fsck up a mass pretty darn well. *ba da bum*

    6. Re:Only nukes are true WMDs by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1

      Unlike nuclear weapons, chemical weapons are technically not weapons of mass destruction because only a nuclear reaction can destroy mass.

      What about exothermic and endothermic chemical reactions? Where does the energy come from and go to? Is it all just about shifting electrons around or does a small amount of mass to energy conversion occur?

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    7. Re:Only nukes are true WMDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      weapons of mass destruction have nothing do do with destroying mass. they're called weapons of mass destruction because they cause mass (i.e. lots of) destruction. Chemical and Bio weapons CAN be WMD, but not all are. The difference lies in how much damage they cause.

      numbnut.

    8. Re:Only nukes are true WMDs by ca1v1n · · Score: 1

      Actually, the energy released by exothermic chemical reactions can be measured as a change in mass, albeit a truly miniscule one compared to nuclear reactions. Of course, chemical and biological weapons are not by themselves inherently exothermic. The only exothermic reactions are the ones that happen as the corpses decay.

  39. Re:Important because by fpga_guy · · Score: 1
    It may be adviseable to sell your Mickey D stock.

    Or more germanely, it may be advisable not to inject your next Big Mac straight into your brain...

  40. Original jokes on Slashdot by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    You're fairly new here, aren't you? On /. we make beowulf clusters with old jokes.

  41. Paraphrase of abstract by A1kmm · · Score: 1

    For those who don't want to register, here is my paraphrase(I tried to remove highly technical terms as well)...

    1) Ordinary mouse prion protein was cloned by recombinant DNA technology in
    E. coli. The recombinant protein was polymerised into amyloid fibrils(the
    same stuff that forms in Alzheimer's disease etc...). The fibrils were put
    into a mouse brain. The mice used were transgenically modified to express
    larger amounts of normal prion protein when compared to wild-type mice.
    2) After 380-660 days, the mice got a neurological disorder.
    3) Prion protein that was resistant to protease(i.e. a protein which cuts up
    another protein) activity was found in the mice brains when the proteins
    in the cell were analysed on a Western blot.
    4) These protease resistant prion protein extracts caused disease in 150-90
    days if put into the brain of either a wild-type or the transgenic mice
    in part 1.
    5) This suggests that the researchers managed to create a new prion.
    6) This helps to prove that prions are infectious proteins.

    --
    X-Has-Sig: yes
  42. Did anyone else read that headline as... by stonedonkey · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Artificial Pr0n"?

    God, I need a girlfriend.

  43. artificial pr0n by PGNUTA · · Score: 0, Redundant

    raise your hand if you didn't read the rest of the comments before posting the 100th comment about artificial pr0n........

  44. The TRUE source of Mad Cow Disease? by CodeBuster · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are some rumors that the prions which cause mad cow disease were developed as part of the extensive biological and chemical weapons programs of the former Soviet Union. Agencies such as: Biopreparat, the FSB (formerly the KGB), and the Soviet Military were all involved.

    In another chilling development, Vozrozhdeniye Island in the Aral Sea, where much testing of biological agents including anthrax, bubonic plague, glanders, and other extremely infectious agents occurred supposedly contains massive amounts of anthrax hastily buried by Russian scientists amidst the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989. More fodder for the conspiracy theorists out there...

    1. Re:The TRUE source of Mad Cow Disease? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's no reason to suspect the involvement of the Soviet (or any other) bioweapons program. The prion disease scrapie has existed in sheep for many decades (see www.ag.state.co.us/animals/livestock_disease/scrap ie.html), and is presumed to be the source of the infection that started the mad cow epidemic.

      And even before BSE, it was known through the work of Carleton Gajdusek and others (www.nobel.se/medicine/laureates/1976/gajdusek-lec ture.html)
      that the prion disease kuru in humans could be transmitted by eating infected tissue.

      So it's all natural, in a sense. Which doesn't make it any less scary.

      Kluge

    2. Re:The TRUE source of Mad Cow Disease? by value_added · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe if we'd consider the crazy idea that in nature, herbivores don't eat other herbivores, but when fed a regular diet made up of their friends and family, weird shit might happen?

    3. Re:The TRUE source of Mad Cow Disease? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are reports that a tribe in Indonesia had a custom of eating their dead. They developed symptoms similar to mad cow disease. The cannabalization of their dead caused the disease to spread from person to person and a lot of people were infected. A western doctor told them that they needed to stop eating their dead and the disease vanished. If this truely was mad cow disease, then this existed all the way back in the 1950s (when this tribe was getting mad cow disease). I seriously doubt the Russian biological weapons division was capable of building this sort of thing before DNA was even discovered.

    4. Re:The TRUE source of Mad Cow Disease? by hoofie · · Score: 1

      There is an island of the north west coast of Scotland called Gruinard Island. In 1942 the Governent carried out Anthrax Tests there. In 1990 it was 'declared safe' but I wouldnt be in a hurry to visit it.

    5. Re:The TRUE source of Mad Cow Disease? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't necessarily stop transmission though - the elk and deer population in the US has an endemic case of prion disease (some form of scrapie?), and that appears to spread by food infected by deer droppings.

    6. Re:The TRUE source of Mad Cow Disease? by statusbar · · Score: 1
      I agree, but that apparently is not enough. Herbivores in nature who don't eat other herbivores are also suspect:

      This article shows that:

      ...a recent cluster of five CJD cases in Kentucky, reported in August by neurologist Joseph Berger of the University of Kentucky in Lexington, is providing cause for concern. These five people had a dietary choice in common: they ate squirrel brains.

      --jeff++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    7. Re:The TRUE source of Mad Cow Disease? by Johan+Veenstra · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The same thing was known in kanabalistic tribes, if you eat to many brains, you go crazy.

      Those prions are nothing special, they have always been there, but not in enough quantity to do any (as far as we know) harm. Those species at the end of the food chain receive some more prions through their diet, but still not in hazardess quantities.

      When we started feeding cows to cows(yes, money makes prople do strange things), we created a loop in the food chain, in effect stretching the food chain infinitly. The species in the loop (cows) and those at the end of the food chain developed a new disease because of the overdose of prions.

    8. Re:The TRUE source of Mad Cow Disease? by Troed · · Score: 1

      I'm out of modpoints, which is sad because your post has the best executive summary of this issue of all the ones in this thread.

    9. Re:The TRUE source of Mad Cow Disease? by wrecked · · Score: 2, Informative
      The cannibalism disease that you refer to is kuru, another type of spongiform encephelopathy. As RandomCoil has posted earlier, kuru, BSE/Creutzfeldt-Jakob and Alzheimer's all belong to a family of diseases called amyloid diseases.

      You can find a good article on amyloid diseases at Wikipedia. Basically, amyloids are structural "plaques" composed of proteoglycans and misfolded or truncated proteins.

      I believe that only the spongiform encephelopathies are contagious, however. The protein involved in Alzheimer's, beta-A4, is not a prion.

      IUTBABCBNIAAL (I used to be a biochemist but now I am a lawyer).

  45. A solution ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you'd just stop felching them they would live longer. "ARMAGEDDON!"

  46. Re:Yeah only box cutters...and bombs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just hope they don't behead people with box cutter ...

  47. Re:2 yrs later? That's when mice get Alzheimer's.. by A1kmm · · Score: 1

    It took 1 to 2 years to *create* the prion. After that, it could be passed on to other normal mice in 90+ days.

    --
    X-Has-Sig: yes
  48. Probably not realistic but... by einer · · Score: 1

    I'm curious.

    Does this have the potential to develop into a weapon?

    1. Re:Probably not realistic but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe. But it doesn't really matter, since there are already plenty of poisons/bacteria/viruses out there that you could use to kill someone.

    2. Re:Probably not realistic but... by Sir_Real · · Score: 1

      Possibly. But then you'd have to wait for several years until the target died. That doesn't disqualify it of course.

    3. Re:Probably not realistic but... by fpga_guy · · Score: 1
      Does this have the potential to develop into a weapon?

      Sure does. All they gotta do is strap you down, inject it into your brain, then wait a couple of years for your brain to degenerate..

      What a weapon!

      Oh no, now wait for the War on Prions FUD to begin.

    4. Re:Probably not realistic but... by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 1

      The War on Prions FUD has already begun. The USA considers prions a possible bioweapon. At least one prion scientist i know had problems getting a visum for the USA...
      Going paranoid for a moment, prions could make an interesting bioweapon. You wouldn't need to target people, but rather cattle. The economic impact of a full-scale BSE epidemic in a beef-producing country would be quite impressive.

      --
      This comment does not exist.
    5. Re:Probably not realistic but... by Stephen+H-B · · Score: 1

      You'd need a long-sighted terrorist though since the BSE crisis in the UK took decades to build up with regular exposure via bone meal etc in feed stocks. You would have to contaminate the feed and/or directly inject thousands of animals dozens of times over months/years and even then it might not work. There are easier, faster and cheaper ways to fuck a nations economy (a DDoS on the banks/stock market springs to mind)

      --
      Sick of WoW? Try the thinking man's MMORPG: EVE Online
  49. Re:Mad cow acceptable level of risk to big busines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    One more reason to stop eating meat

    I quit 12 years ago. Being vegan is for wimps. Real men go raw foodist. :D

  50. Zombie Proteins by silentbozo · · Score: 4, Funny

    The analogy I like to use is that prions are the protein version of "The Living Dead". One zombie protein will convert any healthy proteins it comes into contact with, those newly created zombie proteins will convert other ones, etc., until there aren't any healthy proteins left. It doesn't hurt that the analogy involves brains...

    1. Re:Zombie Proteins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BRANES... tasty, tasty BRANES!

    2. Re:Zombie Proteins by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      Prions = Half Life

      "Now it all makes sense!"

    3. Re:Zombie Proteins by kimota · · Score: 1

      To completely derail the thread (for which I will apologize in adavnce), do any of the prose or comics works set in the Romero zombieverse explain the thermodynamics of zombieism (I mean that's a lot of energy expended to consume only brains, right? Or was the brains-only thing in the other guy's zombieverse?) Or what about kuru and zombies?

      --Kimota!, gets most of his science fiction from talking with his friends rather than reading it....

      --
      Who moderates the meta-moderators?
  51. One thing it will show? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Maybe the Administration is trying to cover up GW's own case of brain wasting disease? you might mod this flamebait, but sometimes I wonder just how advanced Reagan's alzheimer's might have been toward the end of his Presidency ((shudder))

    1. Re:One thing it will show? by Lars+T. · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      He certainly couldn't remember anything about the Iran-Contra mess.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    2. Re:One thing it will show? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe not, but Reagan with half a brain was still a better man than any of his critics...

    3. Re:One thing it will show? by Lars+T. · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Not even his film critics.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  52. A possible cure..? by hshana · · Score: 1

    Do prions misfold in a consistent manner? If so, now that they have more or less been established as the culprit for these types of diseases, shouldn't we be able to develop antibodies to them? That would seem like the logical next step to me.

    1. Re:A possible cure..? by WOV · · Score: 1

      No dice, in the near term. Designing something that bonded to the prion but not its (useful and extremely similar) parent brain protein would be a formidable piece of atom-by-atom engineering.

      Then, since your immune system isn't set up to hit anything as small as an individual protein, you can't do the vaccine trick of "programming" an immune response; you'd have to actually drop in this antibody in a more or less one-for-one mix to the prion.

      I think....

  53. carbs by tiredwired · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That's taking the low-carb craze a little too far.

  54. This just in ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... 38% of Slashdot readers cannot read.

  55. Like Ice-Nine by tritone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The way in which a prion can influence a protein to mis-fold and become a prion is oddly reminiscent of the way an Ice-Nine molecule could make ordinary water molecules crystallize into a form which was solid at room temperature. To clarify: Ice-Nine was a fictional concept described in Kurt Vonnegut's novel "Cats Cradle." I wonder if it could have had any influence in real science, as opped to science fiction.

    1. Re:Like Ice-Nine by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Well, crystalizing room temperature water is a little hard to swallow, (water's too simple a chemical to do much to it) but you have to realize that the ultimate Ice-Nine is a little feller by the name of DNA. DNA may influence nearby nucleotides to polymerize into other DNA molecule.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    2. Re:Like Ice-Nine by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 1

      Well, crystalizing room temperature water is a little hard to swallow, (water's too simple a chemical to do much to it)


      Do a little research on ice two, ice three and ice four and you might find ice nine more palitable.
      (maybe check out this site.)

      Ice two, three and four can form under pressure.
      But the weird thing is that some of the higher ices can form in conditions where they normally wouldn't if you introduce a breeder crystal.

      Ice nine is science fiction, but it is science fiction.

      -- less is better.
    3. Re:Like Ice-Nine by palad1 · · Score: 1

      Or read french novelist Barjavel, which described it as hot ice.

  56. Shaking by wsherman · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Back when I was doing research on how individual proteins clump together to form the "amyloid" type of deposits found in diseases like Alzheimer's and diabetes, I had results from looking at the deposit formation in test tubes suggesting that deposit formation was promoted by shaking.

    The guy in charge of the project wasn't interested in pursuing the results because the intersection of protein dynamics and hydrodynamics wasn't somewhere he wanted to go.

    It will be interesting to see if they can develop anything more than handwaving explanations for how the shaking is causing the prions to change structure. Standard molecular dynamics simulations of proteins don't model mixing behavior of the water molecules surrounding the protein. Part of this may be due to the different time scales of the two phenomena.

    1. Re:Shaking by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Very thanks for the explanation! Now I have a really scientific reason to avoid dancing, action sports and other non-geek activities: shaking is so dangerous to mental health...

      --
      There you are, staring at me again.
    2. Re:Shaking by forkboy · · Score: 1

      That would make for a great computational study... looking at aberrant ways a protein can be refolded from its original conformation. AFAIK most protein-folding simulations start from denaturized state and work from there.

      Does anyone know if prions are quaternary structure protiens? i.e. complexes of tertiary folded proteins, for instance hemoglobin.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    3. Re:Shaking by RandomCoil · · Score: 1

      Isn't it more likely that shaking simply improves the likelihood of soluble proteins coming into contact with the aggregated clumps? I think this it is less an issue of protein- and hydro-dynamics and more one speeding diffusion.

      Kind of the opposite of dissolving sugar, but a similar root cause.

    4. Re:Shaking by wsherman · · Score: 1
      Isn't it more likely that shaking simply improves the likelihood of soluble proteins coming into contact with the aggregated clumps? I think this it is less an issue of protein- and hydro-dynamics and more one speeding diffusion.

      Kind of the opposite of dissolving sugar, but a similar root cause.

      I've wondered about the idea of mixing increasing the number of protein-protein interactions. With dissolving sugar, the disolved sugar molecules have to get away from the solid sugar particals where they originate to the far reaches of the solvent. The micro-currents created by mixing carry them much faster than they would diffuse.

      On the other hand, in a protein solution that is starting to form aggregated clumps, the individual proteins will be evenly distributed unless the formation of the aggregated clumps is so fast that individual proteins are depleted in the vicinity of the clumps faster that they can be replaced by diffusion (the reverse of suger dissolving).

      For the systems of "amyloid" protein aggregates that I studied, the aggregated clumps of protein formed on a time scale of days so I always assumed that diffusion maintained a uniform concentration of unaggregated individual proteins. It would be interesting, though, if the formation of the agregated clumps was actually limited in some cases by the rate at which the individual proteins could diffuse to the clumps.

    5. Re:Shaking by RandomCoil · · Score: 1
      For the systems of "amyloid" protein aggregates that I studied, the aggregated clumps of protein formed on a time scale of days so I always assumed that diffusion maintained a uniform concentration of unaggregated individual proteins.

      That sounds reasonable. Have you considered a 'surface area' argument? If the aggregate settled, you'd have far fewer sites for aggregate extension than if it were suspended (or possibly broken into smaller clumps) by shaking.
    6. Re:Shaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My grandmother had alzheimer and everyone around her insisted it was triggered by a bicycle accident.
      She got shook pretty badly there ... hmmm

    7. Re:Shaking by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 1
      1.) The cellular prion protein PrP(C) is no complex, just a single chain of 231 amino acid residues. The misfolded form PrP(Sc) aggregates into large complexes. Up to now it is unknown if there is only one single pathological conformation. Details of the aggregate structure are also unknown, except for low-resolution electron crystallography data (at about 7 angstrom resolution), which suggests a triangular beta-helical structure of the misfolded form.

      2. Modelling the structural conversion of PrP(C)->PrP(Sc) in a molecular dynamics simulation is not feasible at the moment. The spontaneous refolding of prions is apparently a very slow process, suggesting a large energy barrier for the conversion reaction. This leads to prohibitively long simulation times needed. I've done some unfolding simulations of prion structures, which, up to now, gave no hint on a possible path for refolding.

      --
      This comment does not exist.
    8. Re:Shaking by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 1

      Surface area is definitely a good point. In the case of prion protein, aggregation in vitro can be significantly enhanced by regular ultrasound treatment which breaks up existing aggregates, thereby increasing the number of reactive sites.

      --
      This comment does not exist.
    9. Re:Shaking by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      This leads to prohibitively long simulation times

      I think the parent was hinting at some distributed computation effort. Would this be a problem that could be massively distributed?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    10. Re:Shaking by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 1

      You want to simulate the motions of the protein over time. This is a sequential problem which can't be parallelized very well. Calculations for every time step are possible in parallel, but these are to small units to make a distributed calculation useful. In addition, most current molecular dynamics systems don't scale to well on parallel systems. AMBER for example doesn't gain significant performance if run on more than 64 nodes.

      --
      This comment does not exist.
    11. Re:Shaking by shpoffo · · Score: 1

      Research the work of Masaru Emoto, who did research with motion of water and its ability to crystalize when frozen. With the kind of shaking I envision happening in a lab (rapid EM motor device) I'll extrapolate here that the motion and EM was non-conducive to liquid crystallization, which by Emoto's findings would promote biological dysfunction.

      .
      -shpoffo

    12. Re:Shaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll need a turbine heart, too.

    13. Re:Shaking by babybird · · Score: 1

      Isn't Masaru Emoto the guy featured in What The Bleep?

      --
      Keith D.
  57. Re:Yeah only box cutters...and bombs by brainstyle · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...and as far as I know, none of those bombs you're referring to are WMDs.

    Besides, that's not what I was suggesting; clearly terrorists have weapons that go beyond box cutters. But the point of terrorism is to inflict terror - and you don't need to have weapons of mass destruction to do that. You don't even have to kill that many people to create an undue amount of fear.

    And yes, there is a real threat, but it's probably not big enough for most people to worry about it: the odds aren't really anything to get worked up over. (This isn't to say that you shouldn't be worried about terrorism, but it's wise to be rational about it.)

    But back to the original point, you don't need WMDs to be a successful terrorist. It's much easier to build a bomb than to build and harvest prions and successfully introduce those into a population, so terrorism is more likely to be carried out through low-tech means.

    --
    "Why can't everyone just be straight with me?"
    "Because we live in a bendy world, dear."
  58. Re:2 yrs later? That's when mice get Alzheimer's.. by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 1
    Read the article carefully. This is what it says:

    The mice developed BSE-like symptoms one to two years later, the team report in Science1. They became weak and shaky, and post-mortem analysis revealed that their brains were full of holes and rogue prion proteins.

    Critically, when the mouse brains were ground up and injected into healthy rodents, they too became ill. This is the acid test for any prion disease, says Legname.

    Note that the mice didn't just die. They developed BSE-like symptoms and their brains showed BSE-like degeneration. And the ground up brain material was capable of passing on the disease to other mice. Assuming that the research was properly controlled and it can be reproduced by other labs, it pretty much nails the issue.

  59. Great! by dj245 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The solution to this problem lies not with preventing prions, but with containing their spread and reversing them. Now that they can create them artificially, they can experiment with tecniques to stop their spread and reverse their overtaking of the normal proteins.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  60. unoriginal jokes on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or maybe we make jokes out of old beowulf clusters? Of course in Soviet Russia, the beowulf clusters makes old jokes out of you!

  61. Prion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...isn't that the new hybrid-power Toyota?

  62. Headline: "Artificial porn created" by notyou2 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Umm, I can't POSSIBLY be the only one who read it that way at first glance...?

  63. I'm gonna lie on a hill and thumb my nose at God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, maybe we could end the world with the nasty prions!

  64. Ice 9? by Flexagon · · Score: 1

    so if in contact with a BSE protein it'll learn to fold the BSE way.

    So this sounds very close to an Ice 9 like scenario, with this particular molecule in a brain. Is that the kind of model you're describing?

    1. Re:Ice 9? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Basically, yes.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  65. So... by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    Have scientists now just created [prion] life from scratch[protein], or am I just confused?

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    1. Re:So... by forkboy · · Score: 1

      You're confused. Prions are no more alive than any other single protein. It's debated whether viruses are even organisms and prions are far less complex.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    2. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Each are about as alive as a frozen sperm cell. None of the three accomplish much on their own, but with the help of other cells, they do reproduce.

    3. Re:So... by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

      I do consider frozen sperm cells alive, so then the answer to my question would be in the affirmative.

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  66. Nuclear reaction vs. chemical reaction by tepples · · Score: 1

    I thought mass COULDN'T be destroyed, no matter what.

    The products of a uranium or plutonium fission reaction have less mass than the reactant. The reaction converts some of the mass to heat, that is, it destroys matter and creates an equal amount of heat energy, preserving mass-energy according to Einstein's formula E = m*c^2.

    Stuff burns, but there's ash and smoke totaling up to the same mass as before.

    This is true of trinitrotoluene (TNT) and other explosives that depend on chemical reactions, which liberate energy from the high-potential-energy configuration of electrons in the explosive. Nuclear reactions, on the other hand, are much more powerful because they convert a significant amount of matter to heat energy.

    1. Re:Nuclear reaction vs. chemical reaction by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      Stuff burns, but there's ash and smoke totaling up to the same mass as before. This is true of trinitrotoluene (TNT) and other explosives that depend on chemical reactions, which liberate energy from the high-potential-energy configuration of electrons in the explosive. Nuclear reactions, on the other hand, are much more powerful because they convert a significant amount of matter to heat energy. That's what I was wondering about. But I meant stuff burning from the intense heat that the reaction produces.

  67. An off-the-wall theory? by WOV · · Score: 3, Informative

    As has been hinted at in other entries here, a prion is an alternate, stable, but nonworking and here's the kicker *infectious* conformation of a normal brain protein.

    Proteins fold and twist, combine, etc., into little functional specially-shaped nuggets, sheets, strands, etc. What's strangely intuitive about functional proteins is how many of them function based on their shape. No obscure chemsistry or quantum effects here; they make little socket wrenches, funnels, motors, lock-and-key assemblies, etc.

    However, that's not to say that because their core function doesn't have to do with their electronic properties, that these aren't important. Since their individual atoms do still have charge effects, they can be deformed, ("denatured",) reshaped, etc. They can also do this to each other. E.g. certain enzymes have two "sockets": the one that would normally work on a target molecule is bent out of shape and inactive until some other "cofactor" atom or molecule snicks into the back of the enzyme, bending it differently and opening up the active area.

    So proteins are a little flexible, and can affect each other's shapes if they're close enough. As previously mentioned, the kicker: you can take certain sheet-like molecules in the brain and mutate them so that not only do they no longer work right, but they generate a charge field around themselves that will eff up other, similar molecules that encounter them, *and so on*

    So you end up with this Night of Living Dead effect where as soon as you make a legit molecule of this kind, it goes off all peppily into the brain, doing its deal, until it encounters a zombie prion, and hey, you don't look right...but...somehow..seductive...yes! I will join you in your plaque pile! I must tell others! So you get scrapie or CWD or mad cow or some others.

    What I have always thought strange is that no one seems to have looked at prions as a possible cause of Alzheimers', another poorly-understood neurological disease marked by pileups of nonfunctional protein plaques in the brain.

    The reason this is significant? Folks, I thought this was one of your core beliefs! The only way to really truly understand something complex (a cake, a compiler, a neuropathic protein) is to build one that works.

    1. Re:An off-the-wall theory? by RandomCoil · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm sorry to say this, but yours is not one of the better descriptions of prions and proteins that has been posted in response to this article.

      There's more than enough chemistry and quantum mechanics in the folding of proteins. Hydrogen bonds, the sharing of electrons between electron-rich atoms and electron-poor hydrogens, is the key element holding proteins together. Actually, 'forcing' them together is rather more accurate since the "hydrophobic effect" that is the reason most proteins collapse into a structure is really just due water preferring to interact with itself rather than non-polar portions of a protein, thus forcing those portions to, in-effect, "hide" from the solvent.

      That proteins denature or deform has more to do with subtlety of their arrnagement than to the "charge effets" of "individual atoms" that you refer to. Proteins may be denatured (unfolded) in a variety of ways: by heat, (which induces so much kinetic energy that stabilizing structures are overcome), by polar salts (which screen stabilizing charge interactions), by using a different proteins (some large proteins are thought to help 'fix' misfolded proteins by engulfing them and exposing them to a non-polar environment), or even by pressure.

      That they "generate a charge field around themselves" is an especially worrisome comment. A better description of the way a prion protein could cause another to misfold is that it presents a surface with a series of hydrophobic and charged patches that the 'healthy' protein could interact with and catalyze the formation of its misfolded state.

      As for the relation to Alzheimer's, the curiousity of prions is less that they form amyloid plaques in the brain and more that they act as an infectious agent for this type of disease. I'm not aware of any evidence of Alzheimer's spreading like a communicable disease, making the need to find an infectious agent minimal. That said, any treatment designed to block or reverse plaque formation in the brain will likely be able to treat Alzheimer's or prion-induced diseases.

    2. Re:An off-the-wall theory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No obscure chemsistry or quantum effects here; they make little socket wrenches, funnels, motors, lock-and-key assemblies, etc.

      Dude, have you taken a bchem related pchem course? It's essentially all qchem. MO theory, etc. The mechanism by which proteins fold, bond, and function is all quantum in nature and terribly complex.

      The socket wrenches analogy is cool, but not particularly accurate.

    3. Re:An off-the-wall theory? by WOV · · Score: 1

      I don't think you are sorry to say it; in fact, I think you took a bit of delight in a pedantic reply that was more than slightly off-base.

      Read carefully - the *function* of proteins is frequently, largely due to their conformation. A conformation which, yes, arises from their (to anthropomorphize) attempts to "conceal" hydrophobic areas from their aqueous environment. during the folding process.

      However, i am particularly "worried" by your dismissing charge effects in favor of polarity, hydrophobicity, and hydrogen bonding. Polarity = having a net structural *charge* detectable across a structural axis of a molecule? Hydrophobicity = repulsion from the *charge envelope* of polar water molecules? Hydrogen bonding = bonding due to the mutual induction of *charge* and subsequent attraction in hydrogen atom components of other molecules?

      All of these interactions are in fact similar to the (proximate but not bonded, if I understand correctly) interactions that allow prion infection. Arising from the charge cloud, charge field, what have you. I really don't think it's a catalytic reaction

      Hey, at the atom by atom level, it's all electric. So I don't think a pop science description of this kind, especially targeted at a pretty electronics-intensive crowd, earned this patronization.

      While we're down here in the pit, BSE hardly counts as an infectious disease within cattle populations, when you consider the means of transmission - namely EATING EACH OTHER'S NERVE TISSUE. For all the grotesquery of considering it, eating the brain or spinal tissue of an Alzheimer's-infected patient might well make it infectious. Also, apparently from reading other comments, this is a theory that is being taken seriously in other circles. Interesting.

    4. Re:An off-the-wall theory? by WOV · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I seem to remember taking 6 or 8 bchem courses.

      It just isn't that quantum; at the timescale of protein functional interactions, you can treat the envelope of the invovled atoms as a deformable but contiguous charge cloud; otherwise projects like Folding@home would never work.

      People overmystify proteins; they can be very profitably thought of as near-mechanical widgets in their functional interaction. It's like if I said "In this discussion, let's treat car as a box that you get in that makes you go places; you don't have to think about a lot of chemistry or physics" and a bunch of people jumped on me to say ""You're such an idiot! Take a mechanical engineering course sometime like I did, once! Cars are built in a process that involves thousands of steps, and the combustion physics of their engines alone could fill a textbook!

    5. Re:An off-the-wall theory? by Negadecimal · · Score: 1

      Well said, WOV.

      I agreed with your original post too, in that I've been surprised at how often the mere shape of a protein defines its function, or at least its active site, rather than bond interation with a substrate. Neat stuff.

    6. Re:An off-the-wall theory? by RandomCoil · · Score: 1

      I actually was sorry to say it, because your post was very enthusiastic and I quite enjoyed the zombie sections, however I thought your description of the science was misleading.

      I'm not sure why you don't like prion formation being a catalytic reaction: the original misfolded protein causes correctly-folded proteins to convert to the disease-state and isn't detroyed in the process.

      I would argue that BSE is an infectious disease within domesticated cattle populations: it passes from one infected animal to others, though I clearly can't blame the cows for this. Amyloid plaque diseases have been infectious diseases in humans: Kuru was the cause of an epidemic in the cannibals of New Guinea. It would be interesting to know if Alzheimer's could be spread in the same way. I imagine volunteers would be scarce for that particular study.

    7. Re:An off-the-wall theory? by WOV · · Score: 1

      (Sorry, was out of town.) The prion is disqualified as a catalyst because its presence alone in an otherwise unremarkable environment induces the reaction - viz. it isn't facilitating some other reactant's interactions, it's just prion + functional molecule = two prions. The stoichiometry is entirely dependent on the prion and nothing else; that's not catalytic.

      I was just completely wrong about it being infectious in cattle; I was thinking of the initial transmission into the population, which I think there's wide agreement was from nervous tissue consumption...but kuru is not a good example...again, we're talking people that were directly eating the brain tissue of infected individuals. "Cannibals" is a key phrase there.

    8. Re:An off-the-wall theory? by RandomCoil · · Score: 1

      Regarding the 'catalysis', your argument requires it to be impossible for a protein to convert into the disease state without the aid of a prion. I'd argue that there is a finite probability for the conversion of the global fold from the native to disease state; a prion is simply able to lower the energy barrier for the conversion. Really, this is splitting hairs though.

      I think kuru's an excellent example of an infectious disease. It spreads through a normal (for cannibals...) activity in which the spreading of the disease is not the intent. It's just a CTD (cannibalistcally?) instead of an STD.

    9. Re:An off-the-wall theory? by WOV · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, Ahhh, the scourge of CTDs; there really should be a public service campaign. Though I'm not sure what media would be appropriate.

      My point, really, was that in our society, we can generally treat these things as though they are not contagious (though they are infectious), because we don't have so much contact with each other's nervous tissue.

  68. Re:protein folding!-I forget. by RandomCoil · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Sounds like the cause of Alzheimers.

    This is not a 'troll' despite its rating and that it was posted by an AC. Prion diseases are actually quite similar to Alzheimer's in that both are caused by aggregation of proteins in the brain, resulting amyloid plaque formation.
  69. I hope these don't get in the wild by SphereOfDestiny · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hadn't heard about mice having the syndrome before. Are these novel prions? i.e. are they creating a new thing that's similar to mad cow, but differnt and never before seen? Since these things can be transmitted from one group of animals to another, (i believe it's sheep and cows that can trade it, and cows and humans that can trade it, but not humans and sheep directly (is that right?)) I'm just hoping that there careful not to contract it to a new animal population in the wild. It might come back to us through a animal other then cows.

    1. Re:I hope these don't get in the wild by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, there's already a few of them out there, so i don't think one more will hurt. that, and if i were to choose between a beef farmer and a biologist to keep this from spreading, i'd choose the latter.

    2. Re:I hope these don't get in the wild by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 1

      They are not novel. Up to now, mice could only be infected using brain homogenate from already infected animals. For the first time the group of Prusiner succeeded in creating infectious material de novo from purified prion protein generated by transgenic bacteria.

      --
      This comment does not exist.
  70. More fun way to make prions.... by servognome · · Score: 2, Funny

    Inject the protein into the mice first, then shake them until they become twisted.
    Hmm anybody want to fund my experiment, just need $80 for some mice, a paint can, and a paint mixer.

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  71. anybody else read 'Artificial prison created'? by silence535 · · Score: 2, Funny

    and I thought: Wow! But how do they keep the people there?

    -silence

    --
    Dyslectics of the world, untie!
    1. Re:anybody else read 'Artificial prison created'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny part is trying to guess what's different in this guy's mind that made him read prisons instead of pr0n.

    2. Re:anybody else read 'Artificial prison created'? by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      and I thought: Wow! But how do they keep the people there?

      I read it as "artificial pr0n" and I thought: Mmm, Aki Ross...

  72. koch's postulates & why this study is cool by wilgamesh · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Koch's postulates are the classic rules by which causative agents of diseases can be determined. although the molecular bases of many modern diseases no longer fit the implicit requirements of Koch's postulates (e.g. no microorganisms are implicated in certain cancers), the spirit and basic framework of the postulates can still be applied to dissect the causes of diseases.

    That being said, in this prion story, we have an some example of postulates 2-4. The Prusiner team synthesized an artificial agent that's implicated in disease, and used it to infect and create new diseased organisms. This is a scientific step forward. Previously, the prion agent itself correlative with disease, but as to whether it is the causative agent, it was unclear.

    The brief criticisms in the NY Times articles may have some merit though. It's still possible that the disease has some other underlying cause, and the artificial prion only hastened onset. This is an important point, because the signs of aggregate prions (the amyloid plaques) are found in BOTH healthy and diseased animals, thereby violating the first Koch postulate in some sense. However, I warn the reader that my knowledge is deficient here. Perhaps the amyloid plaques are composed of misfolded variants of other proteins also.

    This is a rough summary of what I know. I hope I haven't offended any experts who know the details. Please feel free to correct what I'm sure are numerous mistakes.

    1. Re:koch's postulates & why this study is cool by staticx0085 · · Score: 1

      If the rogue proteins are found in a "healthy" person, they will definitley get CJD ("Mad Cow disease" in humans) eventually. There is a long incubation period for this disease, upwards of 15 or 20 years. Until enough good protein is converted into rogue protein, and the rogue protein starts to form plaques in the brain, the patient will not show any signs or symptoms of the disease. Then it will start slowly and progress to total dimentia and loss of function. By the way, if anyone is interested, a very good book that explains this whole thing is called "Deadly Feasts" by Richard Rhodes, highly recommended.

  73. Weapons by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like this will be used as a biological weapon. Such a thing could cause a "prion holocaust" in a country, killing huge numbers, with total plausible deniability.

    Vegetarian diets sound like a better idea all the time.

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
  74. More scary by Joe+'Nova' · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Somewhere else in thread, someone asks if this is a first step to a cure. Not wanting to sound alarmist, but I will anyway.

    Suppose some not-so-nice people find a way to medicate the symptoms away(needing injections/pills/treatments) to make you functional, do you think they(he-who-would-profit) would create a cure? Look at diabetes. Nasty. If there was money in a cure, nobody would need insulin shots. Truth is, cutting down on sugar intake is a better preventative.
    This(BSE) however, is insidious. It takes years to manifest, and by that time, you could be done for. Another worst case-if you have a treatment for the condition, if you displease someone who wants you gone, all it takes is for them to MAKE the prion fold wrong(tampering with the treatment to cause it) instead of mitigate the bad folded ones, you would be none the wiser, and it wouldn't show for years. Not saying that Pharmas have ethical problems...*cough*
    I see it as a tool, and how this tool will be used will determine what the outcome is.
    And a short blurb about Alzheimers. It appears some of the people diagnosed with it actually have CJD(human equivalent). I'll leave it up to newsies/linker types to Google it.
    Oh, FYI-the prion 'dies' at around 1000 C. You'd kill any patient you try to 'clean'. Perhaps it resonates at a different frequency than the normal folded sequence. Detection(absorption) and irradication(more power) might be possible.
    Yeah, it creeps me way out. Appologies for bad grammar, spelling-it's late. Sweet dreams...

    --
    This mind intentionally left blank.
    The KKK a bunch of sheetheads? You decide!
    1. Re:More scary by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      If someone wants you gone, they fucking shoot you in the face with a shotgun. They don't inject you with some shit and then hope that sometime, 2-5 years from now, you get kind of sick and maybe die a few years after that. Seriously dude, that's some pretty fucking stupid stuff.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    2. Re:More scary by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Mafia put Uranium pellets in some guy's desk and he died 6 months or so later. Sometimes people just want your ass to suffer with no real trace back to them. No need for off-the-wall, knee-jerk posts like that.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    3. Re:More scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you're just wrong. From Hussein putting aflatoxin in Kurdish water supplies to the American "pioneers" handing out contaminated blankets to the natives, lots of really evil people DO take the long view about such things.

    4. Re:More scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh, FYI-the prion 'dies' at around 1000 C. You'd kill any patient you try to 'clean'.

      And unless you have a damned hot BBQ, never try to eat your patients.

    5. Re:More scary by Doctor+Beavis · · Score: 2, Informative
      One minor clarification, if I may.

      There are 2 types of diabetes (called type 1 and type 2 - clever, huh?). Cutting down on sugar intake has nothing to do with the development of type 1 diabetes - this is caused when someone's immune system attacks the cells in their pancreas that make insulin. In type 2 diabetes, cutting down on sugar would be beneficial only if it reduces your caloric intake and you don't get overweight. Maintaining a healthy body weight and moderate physical activity are probably the best ways to reduce your risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Once you *have* it, eating a consistent amount of carbohydrates (such as sugar) will make it easier to control your disease.

      If you have type 1 diabetes, you can eat as much sugar as you want - BUT then you need to use more insulin. Many people find that it is easier to not gorge on candy bars and then have to chase it with extra shots, but there is no physiologic reason that either group needs to avoid sugar or that doing so in the first place has any impact on the development of the disease.

    6. Re:More scary by elecuanime · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you want information on a conspiracy related to Prusiner, the following link is just the ticket:
      http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/ CarolASTh ompson/prions.htm
      Prusiner's comment that he is "flabbergasted" that it has taken people 22 years to accept his hypothesis, makes me wonder why it has taken so long to get convincing results, if that's what they are. Just because you have synthesized a protein, unless it is chemically and not biologically synthesized, does not mean that the problem of contamination with RNA and DNA is solved.

    7. Re:More scary by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Informative
      Oh, FYI-the prion 'dies' at around 1000 C. You'd kill any patient you try to 'clean'. Perhaps it resonates at a different frequency than the normal folded sequence. Detection(absorption) and irradication(more power) might be possible.

      It doesn't take a thousand degrees to eliminate a protein. Diamond will ignite at less than that temperature.

      Extended autoclaving at 135 C or immersion in 1.0 N sodium hydroxide will positively disinfect prion-contaminated objects. Granted, those conditions would also kill a patient, but let's not go overboard.

      It's bloody difficult to eradicate--we don't have any techniques to do so yet. Perhaps something antibody based would work--something that will recognize the uniquely misfolded prion. I can also see this being a potential application for gene therapy. Regardless, it's a tough nut to crack. On the other hand, it is by no means alone in being an incurable, progressive, degenerative illness. Are the drug companies actually suppressing cures for all of cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer's, MS, ALS, etc.?

      I'll leave the full debunking of the conspiracy theories to someone else. The notion of a pharmaceutical company deliberately murdering people to quiet them is appealing, but this is a dumb way to go about it. If you're trying to silence someone, you don't give them a disease that takes years to manifest--you hire a hit man. They'd also need to get your physician on side, unless you're in the habit of accepting injections from random individuals.

      Incidentally, one of the symptoms of CJD can be paranoia. Hm.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    8. Re:More scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Horse shit. Refined sugar (i.e. not in a whole food) is a drug. It causes hallucinations in people who have never had it before.

      It does really really bad things to your adrenals.

      It leeches vitamins and minerals out of your body (because those vitamins and minerals are required to metabolize it, and table sugar is nearly perfectly empty of nutrients).

      It's *huge* business, and has been for centuries. Just look at how much of the British Empire was paid for with sugar.

      As for the diabetes, people with type one diabetes who eat whole foods and lay off the refined stuff find they need far less insulin than before they changed their diets.

      But hey, sugar and fast food are big businesses too. Look how long it took to get the tobacco companies busted, in spite of all the evidence.

    9. Re:More scary by HiThere · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between saying they are suppressing cures, and saying that they aren't choosing to work on cures.

      I suspect the second is true. We have certain knowledge that it's difficult to get the pharma companies to work on vaccines, so why should a cure for cancer be different?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  75. Thank you Captain Bringdown by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    sure, go ahead, ruin all the fun with your fancy physics.

  76. Proposed Prion "cure" by VernonNemitz · · Score: 1
  77. wonderful, what the world needs! by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    more and newer biological warfare agents!

    And look! Its being researched in the US of A!

    yeah yeah troll, flamebait, whatever. The USA has a long history of using WMDs against civilian populations, mod me as you will.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    1. Re:wonderful, what the world needs! by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Yeah, let's spread some shit that might maybe one day in a few years make four or five people sick. Fucking FUCK I wish I could stab dipshits like you in the throat over the internet.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
  78. MOD PARENT +5 INSIGHTFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YES, IDIOT, DESPITE THE FACT THAT HALF OF THE COMMENTS BEFORE YOURS SAID THE SAME THING, YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE.

    Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.
    Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.
    Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.
    Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.

  79. Oddly enough, Mice are banned because... by CygnusXII · · Score: 1

    (Insert Mice Banned Country XXX Joke Here)

    "You Insesitive Clod, Mad Cows...Ummmm Mice, have feelings Too!"

    --
    My cat's picked up a Hammer. HEY! Put down that Hammer. Put Down that Hamm...THUNK!
  80. Re:Mad cow acceptable level of risk to big busines by blincoln · · Score: 3, Informative

    One more reason to stop eating meat

    If you want to avoid food that contains beef by-products, you'll need to stop eating more than just meat. For example, most cheese is made with animal-based rennet. Its source is the stomach linings of mammals like cows.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  81. Not Conclusive Evidence, but still interesting by Salis · · Score: 1


    Here is the hypothesis of prion-induced disease:

    A prion is a protein that, when misfolded, can [i]induce[/i] the misfolding of another protein of the same sequence. Once one prion protein becomes misfolded (the scientists here use urea and vinegar to denature the protein) then it can effectively _produce_ more prions. What you get is a positive-feedback loop where more misfolded proteins induce the misfolding of even more misfolded proteins and so forth. The misfolded proteins can't be properly degraded by cells and so the proteins start to clump together into fibers which then cause damage.

    The experiment they performed was to artificially create a prion protein, inject it into mice, and watch whether the mice became sick.

    One other possibility is...

    -- The protein they injected is actually a regulatory protein for gene expression. The activation or repression of specific genes then causes the disease. This same regulatory protein are also expressed by these genes and so the disease may be transmitted by the transferral of these regulatory proteins. Note that gene expression is still the cause of the sickness, but the regulatory proteins cause the genes to turn on/off.

    So the evidence is interesting because their hypothesis is not disproved. But I still think they need to eliminate the other possibility.

    --
    Favorite /. tagline: "On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN." And it was good.
    1. Re:Not Conclusive Evidence, but still interesting by Salis · · Score: 1

      Now where is that edit button? Right, there is none.

      +HTML tags

      -are / +is, yay grammar

      --
      Favorite /. tagline: "On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN." And it was good.
  82. Artificial What? by ReVeR5408 · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one here that mistook the heading for: "Artificial Pr0n" ? Mod me down, i dare you!

  83. But how is it transmitted? by OmegaGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Interesting. Let's outline the process here:
    • Flesh of creature A, including malformed protein, is consumed by creature B. (Consumption is apparently part of the mechanism of infection.)
    • Malformed protein avoids chemical breakdown in digestive system
    • Malformed protein is absorbed in whole into the bloodstream (proof of this alone would require radical rethinking of our understanding of digestion)
    • Malformed protein manages to get past blood-brain barrier
    • Malformed protein in brain causes other proteins to become malformed, causing neural disorder. This is what the experiment showed was happening, so they have shown that once there are malformed proteins in the brain, they can be the mechanism for progression of the disease.
    • ... uh, profit? Nope, I guess that doesn't work here.
    All they've really shown is that the presence of malformed proteins can provide a mechanism for the disease, but not how they get there in the first place. Until someone threatens to inject cow brain extract into my head, I'm not worried. And until a mechanism for transmission is shown, I still think that prions are bunk!!
    --
    Even heroes have the right to dream
    1. Re:But how is it transmitted? by NerveGas · · Score: 3, Informative


      Well, your line of thinking isn't all that unsound. But here's what we do know:

      1. Prions do exist, and do infect the nervous tissue of cows (and a lot of other animals, actually.)

      2. Prions are rarely (if ever) able to be found outside of the nervous tissues.

      3. Consuming infected nervous tissue does appear (quite strongly, in fact) to infect the consumer.

      So, our classical line of thinking about digestion and protein absorbtion doesn't quite fit what we're seeing. What does that mean, class? That's right, we'll have to keep researching both what's really going on with the digestion (or lack thereof) of prions, and the absorbtion/transmission.

      Note that while BSE doesn't appeaar to be transmissible in cattle without the cannibalistic ingestion that results from human intervention, there are other related prion diseases such as CWD and scrapie that do appear to be transmitted through environmental factors. In fact, in scrapie epidemics, it has been shown that scrapie agents may remain in the local environment for years after the outbreak.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    2. Re:But how is it transmitted? by reverseengineer · · Score: 4, Informative
      Try this pathway:

      -Flesh of creature A, including malformed protein, is consumed by creature B. (Consumption is apparently part of the mechanism of infection.)

      -Malformed protein avoids chemical breakdown in digestive system. This is quite possible as prions are acid and protease resistant.

      -Malformed protein is taken up by Peyer's patches, sites of lymphoid tissue in the intestinal lining (Heppner, et al. in Nature Medicine, Transepithelial prion transport by M cells.) These patches normally "sample" substances from the intestinal lumen, and are instrumental in triggering an immune response if you eat something you shouldn't.

      -However, your immune system doesn't find the malformed protein too threatening, possibly because it mistakes it for the very similar properly folded protein hanging out on GPI anchors all over your body's neurons. If it were recognized as dangerous, the usual method of dealing with a misfolded protein, degradation in a lysosome, wouldn't work, once again on account of prions being highly resistant to the sort of enviroment that disintegrates most proteins.

      -The misfolded protein is taken up by the vagus nerve, which ennervates the gut (and does many other important things). Now, the vagus nerve may be familiar to some of you as the Tenth Cranial Nerve. So the prion rides up the long axons of the vagus to the brain.

      -The prion gets to the brain, bad stuff happens and you die in a horrible manner.

      Now, I can't completely assure you this is the mechanism by which prion uptake occurs, it is currently the Best Idea We Have, and I think there is evidence that it certainly could happen this way, though no guarantee that it actually does. I just wanted to mention that the gut isn't exactly an impenetrable barrier for antigens, and that it's quite possible for stuff you eat to make its way to the brain surprisingly intact. Also, how exactly do you believe the South Fore and those Britons contracted spongiform encephalopathy? They didn't stick syringes of brain matter into their heads, you know. Even a "slow virus" theory of TSE would have to take oral transmissibility into account. The studies of the Fore, for instance, note that only those who took part in funeral feasts, and then only those who ate certain parts, contracted kuru. When the feasts ended, so did the disease. Likewise, the bans and herd destructions were accompanied by a sharp dropoff in vCJD cases.

      I understand that correlation does not imply causation, but I see tremendous circumstantial evidence that something these people orally ingested gave them a TSE- I mean, the natural rate for CJD is about one in a million, and then there was this sudden outbreak among people half the usual age for victims, whose only commonality was the consumption of beef, beef from cows which had consumed sheep offal...- and this experiment offers highly suggestive evidence that the agent in question was a prion.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    3. Re:But how is it transmitted? by voixderaison · · Score: 1

      You seem to be assuming that each of these steps are unusual, difficult or impossible.

      If you have ever looked at your poop, you've probably seen chunks of undigested material. The phrase corn in your/my/the poop is almost a cliche.

      I don't know much about toxicology, but I seem to recall that certain types of food poisoning are caused by ingestion of toxins - proteins - manufactured by bacteria in spoiled food. These proteins are absorbed by the body from ingested material and circulate through the bloodstream. (Hang on while I Google an example... )

      Botulinum toxin is a protein which happens also to be a neurotoxin. In children less than a year old the bacteria that produces it can live in the gut and produce the toxin, but in adults it's typically absorbed by eating contaminated food. The toxin itself is absorbed and circulates through the blood, eventually stopping the heart and lungs. (In this type of food poisoning, it's the high level of toxin in the contaminated food that makes one sick, not the ingestion of the bacteria.)

      The entire posited improbability chain in your argument is refuted by ample evidence to support the theory that ingesting prion infected material can cause prion disease to manifest in a subject animal or person. The canonical example of Kuru has been mentioned by others here. Kuru affects those who engaged in ritual cannibalism by eating infected brain tissue of deceased relatives, and this pattern of infection contrasts nicely with the statistics on spontaneous prion disease like human CJD which apparently occurs at a rate of about one in a million individuals, randomly distributed throughout the global population regardless of diet or ethnicity. This line of statistical evidence (and much other evidence) supports the potential threat to humans from prion contaminated food regardless of whether one believes there is an as-yet-undiscoverd virus associated with prion disease (which appears less likely now.)

      Certainly the entire picture of prion disease hasn't been painted, but we are well past the time when declaring them "bunk" is a rational response to the serious threat of prions in our food chain.

      --
      Things should be made as simple as possible, but not any simpler. -- Albert Einstein
    4. Re:But how is it transmitted? by ankhank · · Score: 1

      Great.

      I wonder if inhalation is going to be concern, given that the stuff can be produced artificially. There's an even shorter route to the brain than via the gut. I suppose if inhalation were a grossly risky pathway, British slaughterhouse workers who work in a mist of bone and blood without respirators would have been among the infected population -- but that would have been a very low concentration of prions in a whole lot of other material suitable for inducing coughing and otherwise making the body defend itself.

  84. Some points that a lot of people miss by enginuitor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Remembering how everyone reacted to the whole mad cow disease scare, I think it is important that people realize the following:
    (1) There has not been a single proven case of a human becoming infected with a TSE (transmissible spongiform encephalopathy) from eating TSE-infected beef.
    (2) There is no proof that bovine spongiform encephalopathy ("Mad Cow Disease") can be transmitted to humans from cows; in fact, it is rather unlikely, as the cow proteins are likely dissimilar enough to our proteins that the self-replicating effect would not occur.

    1. Re:Some points that a lot of people miss by Johan+Veenstra · · Score: 1

      - Where are cows fed to cows?
      - Where are cows going mad?
      + Hmm same answer, coincidence?

      - Where are those mad cows being eaten?
      - Where are human getting sick?
      + Hmm same answer, coincidence?

      I know it's not absolute proof, but still something to think about.
      By the way, in case you're wondering, what if people ate other people, would the same happen? The answer is yes, it is known from the folklore of kanabalistic tribes, that if you eat too many brains, you go mad...

    2. Re:Some points that a lot of people miss by NerveGas · · Score: 1


      (1) There has not been a single proven case of your skull being smashed by me hitting it with a mallet.

      Just the same, we're reasonably sure that a smashed skull would result.

      There are enough cases of spongiform encephalies being transmitted between species through ingestion of infected nervous tissue that your argument is a non-starter. In fact, if you look into the spread of prion-caused spongiform encephalies, you'll find that there are variants that don't require consumption of the infected animal at all.

      One case in point being CWD and scrapie. Merely the presence of excrement from infected animals has been shown sufficient to infect other animals. To make it better, the prion agents remain in the environment (and infections) even after two years without any animals in the region at all.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    3. Re:Some points that a lot of people miss by NerveGas · · Score: 4, Informative


      One more thing that you've missed is that the variant that does appear very strongly to be transmitted through the consumption of cows is not the classical CJD, but a new variant called (uninterestingly) vCJD.

      The new variant occurs at a MUCH higher rate than normal CJD, and strikes much younger people. The median age for CJD is around 68, the median age for vCJD is around 28.

      Furthermore, of all diagnosed vCJD to date, virtually all of had multi-year expose in Britain during the peak of the BSE epidemic.

      There has never been a single vCJD case in a country where cows did not have BSE.

      It's not like there's one single prion disease. There are a lot of them. And what's more, even within one prion disease, there are many different variants. Within scrapie alone, there are at least 15 different variations.

      vCJD is a little worrisome in that it does appear (very strongly!) to jump from cattle to humans. On the other hand, it appears to require direct consumption of the infected animal. Stop eating beef, problem completely solved.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    4. Re:Some points that a lot of people miss by mikael · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the UK, mad cow Disease only started becoming prevalent when the government at the time relaxed the centuries old bye-laws preventing the re-use of nervous tissue (cow brains). This was all part of the program to "cut the red-tape of beauracracy".

      Once a ban was put back in place, the number of new cases in people started to decline (although a great many people also stopped eating beef), although nobody is sure if there is going to be a epidemic in the future or not.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    5. Re:Some points that a lot of people miss by enginuitor · · Score: 1

      Whew! I surrender!
      You all certainly have made a lot of very valid points here.

  85. Congratulations! by enginuitor · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'd like to extend my congratulations to our country's brilliant scientists for coming up with yet another way to torture and kill lab mice. Keep it up!

    P.S.: Try the microwave oven too

  86. Not really. by Tim · · Score: 4, Informative

    What makes this dangerous is proteins can learn new and unique ways of folding.. so if in contact with a BSE protein it'll learn to fold the BSE way. Meaning.. it'll learn to fold superstable.. which is basically a knot you can't untie. Proteins are the messengers of the body.. and if they can't unfold to be read.. its basically dead weight.

    I'm not sure what you think you mean by "messengers of the body", but proteins are not information storage devices. They are products of genes, which are encoded by DNA, which is the information-carrying molecule of living organisms.

    Proteins are functional or structural objects -- they act as scaffolding, motors and chemical reaction centers. They can be modified in ways that allow the transmission of information (e.g. phosphorylation), but that's a secondary responsibility.

    That said, your description of BSE is incorrect. Proteins are not unfolded for "reading." They fold to assume their functional shape, and unfolding destroys their function. It's not something that happens to healthy, useful proteins. In fact, the cell has mechanisms to hunt down and destroy unfolded proteins, lest they do some sort of damage.

    BSE is the result of a rarity in the protein universe -- a protein that has two stable folds. Most proteins have only a single, naturally stable conformation, but the protein responsible for BSE has another. What's more, this oddball protein fold can actually catalyze the folding of other proteins into it's own shape, thus destroying their previous function. What ultimately causes the disease, however, is the propensity of these misfolded proteins to aggregate, forming solid clumps that kill the cells in which they accumulate.

    BSE has nothing to do with proteins "learning" of new ways to fold. Proteins don't learn. Proteins fold correctly, or they don't -- and in this case, failing to fold correctly has a nasty consequence.

    --
    Let's try not to let fact interfere with our speculation here, OK?
    1. Re:Not really. by asobala · · Score: 1

      Proteins are functional or structural objects -- they act as scaffolding, motors and chemical reaction centers. They can be modified in ways that allow the transmission of information (e.g. phosphorylation), but that's a secondary responsibility.

      See hormones. Some proteins definitely have a primary responsibility of information transfer.

      OTOH, you're right about proteins not being unfolded for reading - there's no dynamic change required to read a protein. However, a protein that is manufactured mis-folded won't be "read", or recognised by target cells, because any mis-folded protein loses its functionality.

      That brings us to the really exciting bit about this research; for various reasons protein folding pathways are critical to every level of cell and organismal biology, but we hardly know anything about them. Prions disrupt folding pathways and cause refolding, so they will probably become key tools in protein folding research. The ability to artificially manufacture them - and hence manufacture similar but different prions and observe the differences in their effects - will tell us how they adjust protein folding pathways, which is a) interesting in itself and b) the first step to a cure.

    2. Re:Not really. by Tim · · Score: 1

      Sigh. Look -- I wasn't saying that proteins can't act as signalling molecules. I was pointing out that the poster's interpretation of the "reading" of proteins is incorrect. Proteins aren't "read," except in the most strained interpretation of the word.

      --
      Let's try not to let fact interfere with our speculation here, OK?
    3. Re:Not really. by pappin · · Score: 1

      From a laymans point of view, you just said the same thing as the fellow your flaming.

    4. Re:Not really. by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      If that is the case...

      Could we just manufacture quantities of the properly folded protein and periodically inject the patient with it to keep them healthy.

      Yes the prions will eventually convert them to unsuable state, but as long as we kept an influx of usuable proteins could we not keep the person healthy?

      I am sure pharms would love life-long treatment contracts....LOL

  87. Re:WMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and mace (but most people seem to think the hijackers only had box cutters).

  88. don't worry by dekeji · · Score: 1

    Prions are hard to transmit, and that's no accident: naked proteins don't make it to your brain very easily.

    The precursor proteins to prions appear to have important functions in your brain. The fact that they sometimes can harm you should be no more mysterious or scary than the fact that occasionally even a safety belt or air bag may be responsible for your death. On balance, you are still far better off with them.

    1. Re:don't worry by staticx0085 · · Score: 1

      Actually no one knows what the precursor protein does in the brain. they have genetically engineered mice to lack this protein, and there were absolutley no adverse side effects. But if it's there, it probably does something, stuff usually doesn't stick around through billions of years of evolution if it is useless.

    2. Re:don't worry by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      which is why human beings no longer have useless bodyparts like ie appendices....oh wait.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    3. Re:don't worry by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      People replying to my sig annoy me

      Wonder what Freud would say about that.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    4. Re:don't worry by dekeji · · Score: 1

      Actually no one knows what the precursor protein does in the brain.

      I didn't say people knew, I said that they appear to have important functions.

    5. Re:don't worry by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      something about my sig and my mother's sig, and he'd probably manage to bring sex into the equation somewhere on either or both sides.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    6. Re:don't worry by staticx0085 · · Score: 1

      Actually appendices were useful for our primitive ancestors and their very different diet. Tens of thousands of years isn't enough time for an organ to go away because it is no longer useful. You could also argue that humans are not really evolving anymore because the key to evolution is differential reproduction, but the most adapted members of our society do not have any reproductive advantage over the most useless anymore. P.S. I'm not trying to say that the "most adapted" people SHOULD have an advantage, that is a little too Hitler-esque.

  89. Re:Mad cow acceptable level of risk to big busines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Heh - it gets scarier.

    Do a google search on "downer cows". Check out what the US meat industry has been serving up to the world for years and years.

    (I'm not currently a vegetarian. But when the fish is polluted with heavy metals and PCBs, the meat is contaminated with who knows how much prion-infested caracsses, it really starts to look like an attractive option.)

  90. is it a disease? by veg_all · · Score: 1

    Isn't this more like a complex poison? Though it works on a fairly complex biochemical layer, is it propagating itself? No, it's just accidentally corrupting biological structures. It's malforming proteins at a subtle level, but that's different from just destroying them accidentally (with bodily trauma, a caustic agent, radiation, etc). It falls short of arbitrarily damaging them in the pursuit of propagation. There's no end, just a means. So it kind of falls between a real disease and mere poison.

    --
    grammar-lesson free since 1999. (rescinded - 2005)
  91. Re:Mad cow acceptable level of risk to big busines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what? It's almost impossible to get this disease from meat. Even if I DID eat meat from tainted cows, I'd be more likely to die from the chair spontaneously collapsing. And I'm only 200 pounds.

  92. Some background information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    For those of you who don't study biochemistry, here is some background information regarding the importance of this discovery:
    For starters, an enzyme is a protein which specializes in catalyzing a specific reaction (lowering the amount of energy input needed to allow a reaction to occur). Proteins/enzymes are synthesized from DNA/RNA templates. The synthesis occurs in a linear fashion producing a long chain of amino acids which will eventually fold to become the protein/enzyme. The structure is classified according to proximity (primary, secondary, tertiary, quaternary). The primary structure is the amino acid sequence. Secondary structure is folding that occurs over short distances due mostly to polar attractions; this includes alpha helices and beta barrels. Tertiary structure is more of the overall shape that results forming a subunit. Quaternary stucture is the association of the subunits to create the overall protein/enzyme. Hemoglobin, for example, consists of 2 alpha subunits and 2 beta subunits around a heme (iron) core to create the complete enzyme.
    The interesting thing about prions is that they are not malformed proteins due to a mutation in the primary structure as is seen in most diseases (sickle cell anemia, cancer). A prion has the exact same amino acid sequence as its healthy and properly formed counterpart; the prion simply folded in the incorrect way. When amino acid sequences are processed through molecular modelling programs to determine their final 3D conformation, often times there are multiple conformations which are thermodynamically equivalent.
    When a prion is present it causes enzymes with the same primary structure within proximity to adapt its misfolded shape, thus spreading itself. The concept is similar to "ice nine" that Kurt Vonnegut Jr. describes in "Cat's Cradle" where a single crystal of ice nine is the seed which causes all other water molecules to crystalize into ice.
    The significance of artificially creating a prion is that medicine may one day be able to create prions to correct enzymatic problems rather than create them. This could lead to a cure for vCJD/BSE and other undiagnosed disorders due to prions (although I do not know if it could ever correct primary structure mutations such as sickle cell anemia).
    Matt

  93. Why does this make me nervous? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    I mean, seriously. Prions are fastinating and terrifying at the same time. If one security protocol fails this thing could make it out into the wild and...um...I forget what I was going to say.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  94. Re:Mad cow acceptable level of risk to big busines by zzottt · · Score: 1

    its very easy to buy vegitarian cheese.

    Tillamook has a mild chedder
    Great stuff, its very easy to eat vegitarian stuff. most labels now contain a little blurp about what type of ingredients are in the product, like beef, eggs, wheat, soy... ect.

  95. That would have been an interesting read... by zeptic · · Score: 1

    Imagine my disappointment when I discovered the headline wasn't "Artificial Porn Created" as I first read it......

  96. Slashdotters rejoice! by TummyX · · Score: 1

    Oh, I thought it said Artificial Pr0n :(.

  97. Prions and "ice-9" by jd0g85 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone else noticed that prion diseases act like "ice-9" from Cat's Cradle by Kurt Vonnegut? All it seems to take is one super stable "seed crystal" and all the other proteins (or water molecules) conform to is shape (or crystal structure).

    --
    There is no belief, however foolish, that will not gather its faithful adherents who will defend it to the death.-Asimov
  98. Re:Mad cow acceptable level of risk to big busines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crazy terrorist PETA supporter! take your soviet salad eater propaganda and get the hell out of here!

  99. Feed Supplements by Detritus · · Score: 1

    I think it might be require more than not feeding dead cows to cows. Other species suffer from prion related diseases and there is a possibility of cross-species transmission.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Feed Supplements by grepistan · · Score: 2

      Indeed... apparently all sorts of animals are fed to cows, pigs and other animals in the form of *ahem* 'Animal meal'. Not pleasant to know that the steak you're eating could contain bits of pigs that contained small parts of another cow...

      --
      Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
      -- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather
    2. Re:Feed Supplements by torstenvl · · Score: 1

      Err... umm... not exactly.

      When meat is digested the protein is broken into the individual amino acids, iirc, which are then used to form protein specific to the animal doing the digesting.

      When X eats Y, X breaks down Y on the molecular level, and makes that bit of Y become something new and unique to X.

      It's not like the dogs who eat Purina have little chunks of horse tissue in their bodies. If that's how it worked, those little chunks would no doubt be rejected by the immune system.

    3. Re:Feed Supplements by gwalla · · Score: 1

      And those cows also ate grass which fed on meadow muffins. By your reasoning, beef is full of cow poop.

      --
      Oper on the Nightstar
  100. Re:WMD by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Funny
    Great, now we have yet another form of weapon of mass destruction. Terrorists could cook up a batch of prions and dump it in a water or food supply, thus killing off lots of people a short period of time later.

    Probably quicker to just grab a few mice and chuck them into the hopper at a McDonald's factory. After all, it's not as if anyone would notice the difference in taste... :-)

  101. Re:WMD by BrokenHalo · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Terrorists are after short term inciting of fear and panic.

    Something like, for instance, an attack calculated to "shock and awe", perhaps?

    G.W. Shrub fits most of the definitions of "terrorist" quite handily.

  102. Did somebody just quit smoking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck was that all about? Take your meds please before posting. Thank you.

  103. Unraveling the Mystery of Protein Folding by KidSock · · Score: 2, Informative

    Life at the molecular level is a very interesting topic. It's mysterious, it's a great unexplored frontier, and understanding it has direct consequences on our lives. I think you'll feel the same way if you read the following article. It's written specifically to be more accessible to the average reader but I assure you as a biochem major it is not a trivial explaination. You'll really understand what prions are and just how protein mis-folding is responsible for mad-cow and alzheimers.

    Unraveling the Mystery of Protein Folding by W. A. (Bill) Thomasson
    http://www.faseb.org/opar/protfold/protein.html

    Enjoy!

  104. RECOMMENDED COMMENT EOL by carldot67 · · Score: 1

    RECOMMENDED COMMENT EOL

    --
    I wish at was Friday, but I dont want to wish my life away. So I wish it was last Friday.
  105. As I understand it... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

    I could be completely wrong( I probobly am) as my only information was gleaned from two paragraphs in a 500 page medical book which most doctors uses for consultation. I just glanced at it.

    In short Mad Cow Disease isn't a virus, bacteria, or a fungus. It's also not a regular chemical poisoning. Now you see why it was so difficult to research.
    By my understanding, the prion is malformed in such an unusual way, that when it collides with a brain cell( maybe not just brain), a special reaction begins. The details were a little beyond me, but believe it or not, the final result of this reaction was a destroyed brain cell and another malformed prion. Not the same prion, a new one. The old one was destroyed in the reaction. I'm not actually sure if only one new prion, of more were created. I suppose it's a little like nuclear fission., with prions as the neutrons and brains cells as the Uranium. Lots of 'Plutonium' in your head after a while.

    I could be completely wrong on this, but that was my understanding anyway.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  106. A few things to remember.... by NerveGas · · Score: 4, Informative


    A lot of people have heard of "Mad Cow". Some of them have even heard of BSE or CFD. And most people don't realize that this is nothing novel, nothing new, and not at all limitted to cows.

    The result of these prions in the brain is spongiform encephaly - literally, holes being eaten in your brain by the prion's interaction. Not a very fun thing!

    Now, prion-caused sponfigorm encephalies have been found in a good number of animals. At a minimum, humans, goats, sheep, cows, squirrels, deer, elk, etc..

    In cows, the condition is called "BSE" ("Bovine Spongiform Encephaly"). In humans, it's usually called Creutzfelt-Jacob's Disease (I'm sure I murdered the spelling). Those are merely terms for the resultant condition from the prion infection.

    Now, the prion responsible for BSE isn't all that bad, as far as infectious prions go. First, it's not really transmissible in cows without the direct ingestion of infected nervous tissue. That means that if we just didn't feed cows ground up cows or ground up sheep, a very large part of the problem is solved.

    However, there are other prion agents that are a bit nastier. In the case of CWD and scrapie, the prions have been shown to be transmissible to other individuals through the environment if (a) a n infected carcass or (b) excreta from an infected animal is in the area. Even better, even after all of the animals have left the area, CWD and scrapie agents have been shown to remain and still be contagious to other individuals years later.

    Here's the good part: Researchers have already found genes that cause resistance to prion infections, or at least to certain types of them. The genes are found most commonly (and most heavily) in populations that practiced (or still practice) cannibalism. On the down side, it's not something as nice as getting infected and developping an immunity - we're talking about the cannibalistic societies being mostly wiped out by prion-based diseases, leaving only those (luckily) able to resist as the sole survivors, to pass along the genes to their offspring.

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  107. yeah. lets dont prevent aids, just find drugs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    brilliant. not.

  108. Folding @ Home? by Ritontor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you'd like to contribute to work studying the mysterious nature of protein folding, consider donating your spare CPU cycles to the Folding @ Home distributed project - a worthy project made even more relevant in the light of these new discoveries. I don't pretend to understand much about the biology behind it all, but this stuff fascinates me, and it looks like the more focus this field receives, the more humanity on the whole will benefit.

    --
    Perhaps the answer to the problem of teenagers dropping bricks from motorway and railway bridges is to sue Tetris.
    1. Re:Folding @ Home? by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 1

      I totally agree :) There's a nice video (Windows media unfortunately) of Vijay Pande who explains what the project is all about http://murlup.research.microsoft.com/asfroot2/vide os/xerox/Forum2004/pande_OnDemand_100_100K_320x240 .asf

      --
      Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
  109. stop eating meat? by StuckInSyrup · · Score: 1

    Actually, to stop eating meat doesn't save you from anything like a spongiform encephalopathy.
    By the latest research, milk is considered to be absolutely secure, meat as secure, inner organs like the liver or spleen as possibly risky and brain as risky. But even if you avoid eating cow meat at all, there are many cosmetic products that contain ingredients made from cow inner organs and brains.
    Cow brain protein is used to make perfumes, the collagen from cow ligaments is used to make gelatine that is used in lotions, body oils an various others cosmetic products.

    --
    Ni.
  110. Wow, that's useful by gilesjuk · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Scientists have created something that kills mice when injected into them. There's already thousands of things that can do that.

    If you want to eliminate CJD, BSE etc... you need to improve the conditions that animals are raised in. Allowing them to be raised in poor conditions and then expecting the scientists to cure them when they get ill is stupid. Not to mention all the animals that will have to die and suffer just to cure animals for cheap food.

    1. Re:Wow, that's useful by Wudbaer · · Score: 1

      Nothing against the poor animals (which treatment is a real shame), but the main point is finding a treatment for vCJD in men.

    2. Re:Wow, that's useful by gilesjuk · · Score: 0, Troll

      Don't eat cows, job done.

  111. Ah, the mandatory fscking stupid conspiracy theory by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wasn't feeling like /. without some idiotic conspiracy theory. And hey, look, it's the old favourite: those evil pharma corporations are all refusing to develop a cure.

    Never mind that:

    1. There _is_ money in a cure. If you had a cure for, say, Cancer and a 20 year patent on it, you could sell it for any sky-high amount of money you'd want to. It's the perfect extortion scheme. You pay up or you die a slow painful death.

    2. Lo and behold, they did make cures and vaccines for a metric buttload of diseases.

    3. Most importantly: there are doctors, pharmacists, managers at pharmaceuticals corporations, etc, who die of Cancer every year. Or have a bad case of diabetes. Or whose _child_ is dying of some disease.

    Now you're telling me no less than they'll rather patiently wait for their own death -- or the death of those they love -- rather than break the conspiracy oath and divulge the cure. Doesn't that strike you as a completely retarded idea? If _you_ could make a cure, and you'll _die_ if you don't, wouldn't you just make the stupid cure already?

    4. We're talking millions of doctors, pharmacists and researchers world wide. Some in countries where they don't even have private enterprise as you know it. (E.g., until recently the USSR and to some extent still China.) Or where it's not even easy to keep in touch with a western conspiracy. (E.g., the USSR block was pretty much isolated and guarded by a paranoid secret police.) And which invested hundreds of billions in researchs. (E.g., in developping their own nuclear weapons, sattellites, chemical weapons, biological weapons, ICBMs, etc.)

    Yet you'd want me to believe that _all_ those are part of the same global conspiracy to keep some diseases untreated.

    You know what? There's a medical name for that. It's called "Paranoia".

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  112. Re:2 yrs later? That's when mice get Alzheimer's.. by StuckInSyrup · · Score: 1

    The fact is, that the Mad Cow Disease and the Alzheimer are close relatives.
    The pathological mechanism of both diseases is almost the same. There is a protein (in cause of Alzheimer it is the Tau protein), which has 2 stable conformations. One of those conformations is the natural, healthy and useful one, the other is the bad one. It is capable of converting the healthy conformation into the infectious one. It is stable to proteases. It forms aggregates that kill the infected cell.
    The only difference is, that Alzheimer is not infectious. It cannot be transferred from one person to another by eating the infected ones brain. And, it is unclear, what causes the Tau protein co convert to the infectious form.

    --
    Ni.
  113. Another Brick For Bio Weaponary by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful



    As if the world isn't filled with mad people, the "artificial prion", no matter for whatever noble reason it was created, will eventually be used as yet another weapon for Bio Warfare.

    Think of it ... the prion is a PROTEIN, aminoacid, and it is LIFELESS. Not like bacteria, or viruses, which are pseudo lifeforms, PRION is something that YOU CAN NEVER KILL.

    Drop something like this, over a population, wait for 5 - 10 years, and you enemy will be infected, and become "mad".

    And btw, a protein isn't something that's included in any international convention regarding biowarfare agent. It isn't a toxic gas, nor germs/bacteria/viruses. Plus you can always argue that the thing occurs in the nature !

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Another Brick For Bio Weaponary by swv3752 · · Score: 2, Informative

      How long does a slab of luncheon meat last in the wild? Protiens degrade, troll.

      Besides, Toxins are already contraband, so a protein that causes a disease is by definition, toxic. You would get better results from dumping E. Coli into the food supply or dump soluble lead into the water supply.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    2. Re:Another Brick For Bio Weaponary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you imagine the percentage of those people affeted would take up arms against you, you'd not have a terrorist problem, you'd have a terroist epidemic which would make israil look like a game of cricket.

      But that aside the number of people to develop symptoms after the beef scare in the UK is still at a background level, the chance of infection is probably very low unless injected directly into the body.

    3. Re:Another Brick For Bio Weaponary by Metasquares · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Prions would make a poor choice for biological warfare because they only seem to spread via ingestion or direct contamination (such as via surgical supplies). You can't "drop" a prion on a population; you'd have to inject it into something and hope that people or other animals eat it.

    4. Re:Another Brick For Bio Weaponary by glorf · · Score: 1

      You know that chlorine gas is highly toxic right? And sodium is highly explosive when exposed to water. And NaCL is found in nature as well as on dinner tables everywhere. OMG! PANIC!

      A weapon that takes 5-10 years to work isn't very useful to anybody. As far as it being lifeless and impossible to kill, there are any number of poisonous substances that occur in nature that aren't regulated by biowarfare treaties that would be much more convenient to produce and much easier to deliver effectively.

    5. Re:Another Brick For Bio Weaponary by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but it takes a long time to die. Not much of a weapon if you have to find something else to do for two years while your enemy succumbs.

  114. Re:Ah, the mandatory fscking stupid conspiracy the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Uhm.. Not conspiracy theory, but business practice. The pharmas have done this in the past to wring every last dollar out of a prior product.

    I do not believe that it is a normal practice, so long as competition exists for whatever the product is (another problem made worse by lengthening of patent laws). But, it has been covered in many major journals (Nature, SA, JAMA,) and circulars (NYT, Wall Street, ...).

    Any corp, especially rich powerful ones, have their fill of *evil* people. And they do tend to gravitate to the controlling roles. If you ever have any question about the motive of any action, or the predicted course of any action of a company, remember in the end, it is only about profit. Either they do and stay in business, or they do not and the corp dies.

    InnerWeb

  115. kuru by circletimessquare · · Score: 1
    your standard issue paranoid schizophrenic conspiracy theory would be great except that human prion disease has been known in humans for decades having nothing whatsoever to do with herbivores. it's called kuru from papua new guinea and it's been known since the 1900s, reaching epidemic levels in the 1950s. do a gis. here's one result:
    What is Kuru?
    Kuru is a rare and fatal brain disorder that occurred at epidemic levels during the 1950s-60s among the Fore people in the highlands of New Guinea. The disease was the result of the practice of ritualistic cannibalism among the Fore, in which relatives prepared and consumed the tissues (including brain) of deceased family members. Brain tissue from individuals with kuru was highly infectious, and the disease was transmitted either through eating or by contact with open sores or wounds. Government discouragement of the practice of cannibalism led to a continuing decline in the disease, which has now mostly disappeared.

    some tribes of papua new guinea were known to dig up their recently deceased relatives and eat them, including their brains. this feed back cycle is the same feed back cycle that led to bce, the mad cow disease. farmer's thought "hey, all this brain matter from slaughter, we're just throwing it away, it's good protein! feed it back to the cows!" except it wasn't "good" protein. that is the source of mad cow disease. we gave it to cows so we could save a few bucks on cattle feed.

    the lesson folks: don't eat brains. not even from other species. i don't care how cool the dish is, you're encouraging yourself to get a prion disease.

    now if you were a soviet scientist investigating cool new infectious agents, wouldn't you start with kuru, which already works in humans?
    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  116. Donating blood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't donate blood here in NZ anymore since I happened to live in the UK between certain years and ate beef (ah, drunken burger stops on the way home from the pub). I hope they do figure out what causes this so 1. I know I don't have it and 2. I can once again feel the joy of having a needle stuck in me and the life blood drained out!

  117. eeeh! modern science by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

    They then shook these protiens.

    I want to get paid to shake protiens, sod real research though.

  118. Ok... by cdemon6 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Everybody (else) who read "pr0n" instead of prion, please sit down and think about what's going on in your life...

  119. Shaken not stirred. by Tony-A · · Score: 1

    Sorry about that.

    because the intersection of protein dynamics and hydrodynamics wasn't somewhere he wanted to go.

    Hydrodynamics at a molecular level has to be mean, real mean.
    The only thing I really know about hydrodynamics is that it's a very bad place to trust your intuition.
    If you have something on a balance-point, tiny input changes make big output changes. Balance the Washington Monument on its point and make it fall one way or the other with a feather.

  120. Re:Ah, the mandatory fscking stupid conspiracy the by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Greedy people, they sure have. Very greedy even. Some even evil.

    But people who'd die a slow painful death themselves for that greed? I really don't think so. I'll say that:

    - No amount of money in the world can make every single pharamaceuticals executive rather die of cancer than search for a cure. When you're dead, all the money in the world is no longer of any use.

    - No amount of money in the world can make all of them just watch their child or parents die a slow death, rather than search for a cure. Maybe one or two assholes, yeah. But all of them? No fscking way. Your average mother would probably rather die herself than watch her 5 year old in a casket.

    People, even politicians, have been known to make 180 degree turns when their loved ones are in danger. See the recent swing in stem cell research policy in the USA, when it looked like it could save a few rich old people.

    Some stuff turns around even a politician who got elected for bible-thumping and promising the exact opposite. So I'll go on a limb and say that if a cure is possible, something like this _will_ convince at least one doctor or pharma manager to search for it.

    I'll also say that for most diseases you don't have anything to gain from _not_ making a cure. Contrary to the popular conspiracy theory you just can't milk them of money for ever.

    E.g., someone with cancer typically dies within 3 years. Most even sooner. That's it. Whatever milking you're going to do, that's the deadline. You milk them of money, but then they die.

    If you could make a treatment which costs a lot for 3 years, and then they're _cured_, you'd have a lot more money to gain. Until the patent expires, everyone would want to pay for 3 years and _live_, as opposed to pay for 3 years and _die_. You could make them pay a helluva lot more.

    _Especially_ those "evil" greedy corporate types are very good at understanding that kind of logic. They're there to make money, and blimey, that's one cure which would bring in _tons_ of money.

    E.g., diabetes was mentioned. Well, you know, insuline isn't protected by patents or anything, and everyone produces it. It's a _commodity_. It does't bring in that much money. If someone could make a pill that just cures diabetes, and get a 20 year monopoly on it (via patents), they would. It would bring in far more money than being the 100'th company selling cheap insulin.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  121. Did anyone else....??? by ProppaT · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else misread this article as "Artificial pr0n created?" Hello....wake up call to 2004. Weird Science. That is all...

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
  122. Disease. Prions. Cheese. Other dairy products. by donsaklad · · Score: 1

    What prevents the disease prion from getting into cheese or other dairy products?...

    1. Re:Disease. Prions. Cheese. Other dairy products. by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I just failed immunology, but I think I can point you in the right direction.

      The protein that causes the scary, well-known vCJD in humans (as opposed to any other prion infections which can have different hosts) is found only in the nervous tissues of cattle. This is passed on to other cattle when cow carcasses are ground down and fed to other cattle. It used to be that any part of the cow not sold to humans was pulped, dried, and fed to other cattle. In one way it's an elegant way to reduce waste and add cheap protein to cattle-feed, but as a previous poster pointed out it introduces an unnatural loop into the food chain which, Gaia theories aside, tends to be a Bad Thing.

      As a human eating cow products, your main fear is brain and nerve tissue in your beef. Given the mechanisation of beef production, there is probably a significant risk of contamination, particularly in cheap ground beef/mince/hamburger.

      Note that prions are resistant to high temperatures, so unlike bacterial infections, thorough cooking will not lessen the risk of infection.

      As far as other cow-derived products go, unless you are very messy at milking cows, this should be OK.

      Rennet used to manufacture cheese etc shouldn't be bad either, as it is just a protein from the gut and therefore shouldn't have come in contact with nervous tissue. If you are worried, there's cheese available which uses rennet from other sources.

      Again, high temperatures as used in pasteurisation have neglligible impact on prions, but I would suggest that prions are not a good reason to annoy your friends and ruin restaurant outings by becoming Vegan just yet ;-)

  123. Re:Mad cow acceptable level of risk to big busines by Speed+Racer · · Score: 2, Funny

    For example, most cheese is made with animal-based rennet.

    I hear that they sometimes use animal-based milk as well.

    --
    Free Mac Mini. Yes, I'm
  124. Mice - It's whats for Dinner. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The current theory is that normal prions are cleared from the body, but the damaged (tangled up - misfolded) prions have different chemical properties. Even worse, when the damaged prions bump into normal prions, they have a catalytic behavior turning normal prions into bad prions.

    Instead of getting cleared from the body, the damaged prions clump together and precipitate out of solution.

    The clumps grow bigger and bigger, forming plaques in the brain, the areas around the plaque die. Over time the brain has holes in it where the dead tissue is / or was. (Thus the 'spongy' name - and not the funny square pants kind.)

    It is hard to cure because it is in the brain, and the brain has a blood / brain barrier.

    (The blood/brain barrier screens out drugs and other chemicals in order to protect the brain from the stuff floating around in your blood.)

    One concept is to develop some sort of vaccine to teach the immune system to detect and destroy the damaged prions before they turn into big clumps.

    The more you read about it, the less likely you'll want to go to the drive through window for a triple cheeseburger with XTRA-large fries and a 64 oz. drink!

  125. Nobody pays attention ... by porcorosso · · Score: 1

    Never, never, never shake a prion ...

    --

    Silpon Designs
    Scented Paper Products
  126. More details for you by Malc · · Score: 1

    "Afterwords, these prions were injected into the brains of mice who fell ill two years later."

    Yes, they used very strong words. I can't bring myself to say them here, but let's say they would make my mother blush.

  127. Prion propagation by dpilot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now you've brought up an interesting point. I'm probably ill-informed, but from what I've heard/read, prion diseases seem to be showing up in herbivores induced into unnatural diets. Domesticated animals get it through feed we give them.

    How do deer get it, because I've heard of it there, too.

    Why don't scavengers get it? It seems to me that it would be a rather normal cause of death, or at least normal to be found in early stages, at time of death.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Prion propagation by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Careful about implying that causing a herbivoire to eat meat is "unnatural".

      The real problem seems to be cannibalism of any form. There are a whole class of diseases which are strengthened by canibalism.

      Whether or not similar effects are felt among closely related animals, I have no idea. The definition of "species" is really arbitrary when it comes to these diseases. I suppose there are succeptable animals, carriers and unsuceptable animals for any disease.

      There's a theory out there that the disease can generate itself randomly and spontaneously, a protein mutation. If it weren't for canibalism, when the animal dies, the disease would normally die. So even with zero transmission, it would still appear in small amounts, but cannibalism amplifies the presence of the disease.

      Maybe the short life span of most scavengers in relation to prion-diseases slowly pulls them out of the food chain. I don't know... just speculating.

      ...but going back to "unnatural"... me, city-folk, I think it's awful to feed meat to a herbivoire.

      ...but I don't know a damned thing about farming, and there's the problem of "what else are you going to do with all the animal remains?"

      ...but I need more coffee.

    2. Re:Prion propagation by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1
      I think by definition feeding meat to a herbivore is unnatural. Otherwise it would be an omnivore, not a herbivore.

      You could argue that we have incorrectly categorized these animals as herbivores, but to argue that herbivores naturally eat meat is to argue against the definition of the word itself.

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    3. Re:Prion propagation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing is, it is perfectly natural for many female herbivores to eat their passed placentas after giving birth. It keeps it from lying around, attracting predators, and they certainly don't get hurt by getting back some of the nutrients in it. The more "primative" the breed, the more likely they are to do it.

    4. Re:Prion propagation by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > Careful about implying that causing a herbivoire to eat meat is "unnatural".

      Have you even *lived* on a farm, and raised cattle?!?!

      --
      You can sell your values,
      But you can't buy morals
      - _Michaelangelo_

    5. Re:Prion propagation by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Almost all herbivours will eat meat. The category refers to their predominant diet. Even cats will occasionally eat grass. The edges aren't hard and fast.

      A stallion is normally quite willing to use it's teeth to take a chunk out of anyone too incautious around it. Presumably this can be changed by training...but never depend on it.

      In biology even more than in most other fields of science, the rigid wall are put there by human conceptions. Categories help people to think about things, but they don't have any real existence, and can lead to silly, or tragic, mistakes.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    6. Re:Prion propagation by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1
      I don't disagree with your description of things, just the use of herbivore. If by definition a herbivore is a creature which eats only plants, then by definition it does not eat meat. That few such creatures exist does not change the definition.

      Also, I would challenge your statement about horses. They WILL bite, but rarely actually ingest the flesh after biting. It is more of an offensive/defensive action than a dietary act.

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    7. Re:Prion propagation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How do deer get it, because I've heard of it there, too."

      http://www.mdc.missouri.gov/hunt/cwd/facts.htm

    8. Re:Prion propagation by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Not at all. I've spent time around a few in a few different countries, but I certainly don't know anything about the workings of the farm. As I said:

      ...but going back to "unnatural"... me, city-folk, I think it's awful to feed meat to a herbivoire.

      ...but I don't know a damned thing about farming, and there's the problem of "what else are you going to do with all the animal remains?"

      My point regarding herbivoires is that if we observe cattle are built for eating vegetation and we call them herbivoires, it doesn't mean they can't get the same sustinence from meat. Words like "natural" don't fit into it...

      Humans are part of the equation. I'd buy statments like "nontraditional" or "we don't fully understand the consequences", but the animals will eat the meat products, and we fully understand the consequence of not feeding the meat to the animals... there's additional energy and environmental impact from disposing of the waste.

      If I were a farmer, I'd probably have no choice but to adhere to the practice. If I were a hobby-farmer, I don't have a clue what I would do... I'd probably pay somebody to haul off my animal remains... where they'll be rendered into feed anyways.

      It sounds like you might be trying to get to some kind of point, do you have a better idea as to how to dispose of the animal remains? (aside from the world suddenly changing their mind about meat)

      Pens of very fat vultures maybe? :-)

    9. Re:Prion propagation by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > My point regarding herbivoires is that if we observe cattle are built for eating vegetation and we call them herbivoires, it doesn't mean they can't get the same sustinence from meat.

      Yes it does mean exactly that. Take a look at Dr T. Campbell's studies. He is a bio-researcher for 40+ years, at Cornell.

      > Words like "natural" don't fit into it...
      Ugh, what do you think Cows have been eating for the past say, few million years?? They weren't cooking meat on the BBQ, mate.

      How do you think Mad Cow Disease spreads? When the dead cows are ground up, and fed to other cows. It's a little hard to get, when they don't eat other animals.

      > do you have a better idea as to how to dispose of the animal remains?
      We never had a lot of dead animals, since they were for the most part healthy. If you have a lot of dying cows, you got bigger problems to worry about.

      We usually buried them, so they could be natually broken down (bio-degradable), and replenish the soil.

      Peace

      --
      The evolution & "supposed" pre-ancient history of man is a crock.
      One of the many proofs that intelligent pre-historic civilizations existed long BEFORE man's civilizations...
      1. Progression of "apparent" history of "man" - Hominidae is 3 millions years old
      2. Geological Time Frames perspective
      3. A machined 3D relief map 120-million years old in a 1-ton stone, with inscriptions. WTF?!

  128. Prions? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I thought it said Psions. Sigh. Well, we can hope.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  129. Just what we need, artificial prions as a ... by MrJerryNormandinSir · · Score: 1

    bilogical weapon. This is scary stuff. Imagine some sick pysyco getting ahold of this and injecting the
    artifical prions into food. I've always believed that AIDS was a bioengineered virus. And to weaponize it someday who knows, it could be spiced with the common cold. Imagine how some sick bastard can weaponize an artificial prion. This is pretty damn scary if you ask me.

  130. shaking proteins until they go bad by dpilot · · Score: 1

    The Point: What effect might low-energe EM fields have on the folding process of newly-synthesized proteins? IIRC, all proteins are initially a linear strand coded by TRNA at the ribosome, and have to be carefully folded into their final form before they're ready to do their job.

    The article talked about 'shaking proteins', though didn't say how they shook them.

    Low energy EM fields...

    The tinfoil hatters have been going on and on about power lines, cellphone towers, and other sources of low energy EM fields. The business community has been going on and on about how the energy of the EM fields is too low to cause any ionization, the normal culprit in organic damage.

    But are the low energy EM fields sufficiently strong to disrupt the initial folding process?

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:shaking proteins until they go bad by shpoffo · · Score: 1

      Research the work of Masaru Emoto, who did research with motion of water and its ability to crystalize when frozen. With the kind of shaking I envision happening in a lab (rapid EM motor device) I'll extrapolate here that the motion and EM was non-conducive to liquid crystallization, which by Emoto's findings would promote biological dysfunction.

      Low energy is just as dangerous, if not more so, than high energy. The body's systems are not designed to use high energy, so there are filters to protect the system from it. Low energy is what the body runs on, so a 'lucky' piece of static can set bad things in motion. The curious may investigate LENR, which may catch on in our lifetimes.

      .
      -shpoffo

  131. Scientific problems with these results by a-aiyar · · Score: 3, Informative
    I couldn't respond yesterday, as I was stuck all day at meetings.

    Anyway, while these results from Prusiner and colleagues go a long way toward demonstrating the infectivity of prions, there are still some problems with the experiment before one can conclude that Koch's postulates have been satisfied.

    I've listed some of the problems (potential and real) with the experiment here:

    • The strain of mice used is a transgenic strain that expresses 16 times the normal level of the prion protein (PrP). There are some in the field who say that the high level of PrP expression in this strain makes them unusually sensitive to developing neurological disease to ANY environmental perturbation.
    • Prusiner's lab has many other prion strains. Laura Manuelidis, a neuropathologist at Yale, has said that the pathology of brain samples from these mice closely resemble RML scrapie. It is very important to eliminate the possibility that they developed disease by cross-contamination from another prion strain. Recall that the goal of the research is prove one of Koch's postulates that PrP is directly infectious, rather than any nucleic acid associated with a prion.
    • Finally, injection of the same recombinant (E. coli produced) PrP fragments into normal mice that do not produce 16 times the amount of PrP do not produce disease. Producing disease in normal mice would be the best demonstration of Koch's postulates.

    BTW, my scientific background is not in prions. I direct a lab that works on Epstein-Barr virus.

  132. wrong journal by juggledean · · Score: 1
    The actual article was published in Science http://www.sciencemag.org/

    The Nature reference is an editorial discussion, there is one in Science as well.

  133. miaow! by allowme · · Score: 1

    miaow!

  134. Re:Ah, the mandatory fscking stupid conspiracy the by mikers · · Score: 1

    What about stomach ulcers and Helicobacter pylori?

    In 1982 some scientist discovered that a large percentage of ulcers were linked to Helicobacter, and found that simple antibiotics would cure it. Of course, most doctors for the next 10-15 years left their patients on expensive acid blockers instead. More money in those than a cheap cure! So much for no conspiracy theory...

    I quote from link above:
    "Even after the National Institute of Health and the Food and Drug Administration recognized that ulcers could be cured, 90% of doctors continued to treat their patients with drugs which only controlled the acid, but did not cure the condition.

    According to a Fortune magazine article in 1997, ulcer expert Dr. Martin Blaser of Vanderbilt University concluded that there was no conspiracy, just no economic incentive for doctors to support Barry Marshall's great discovery. In 1980, Tagamet sales worldwide were "nearly $600 million.) It soon became the best selling drug on earth until it was replaced by Zantac in 1988. From 1992 to 1997 "Americans have spent nearly $25 Billion on drugs to slow the production of acid....Billions more have been spent on "visits" to doctors.

    In February 1996, Scientific American magazine noted that the cost of eradicating H. pylori bacteria and curing ulcers: "Less than $200 for a standard one-week therapy."


  135. Re:Mad cow acceptable level of risk to big busines by Drive42 · · Score: 0

    It's casein, which is a milk-derived protein. For packaged vegan cheeses...I'd reccomend not going there. They're all disgusting.

    Try mixing Nutritious Yeast with crushed sesame seeds and shake. Tastes like parmesan.

  136. Afterwords by Fizzl · · Score: 1
    Afterwords,

    Haha! You tpyoed! Learn to spill!
  137. one small step to even more questions ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i knew it all along.
    it's mad cow disease. some countries occupants
    are full of it, but since they get "dumber" they
    can't realize it.
    hey! maybe a great many cultures, say maya,
    inka, romans, greek, etc. have been made dumb by
    a disease like this ...
    what is interessting, it takes a while(two years
    or more) so it's difficult to notice for a sick
    person. a soar throat shows over night ...

    further more, it seems, once infected the
    original infecting prion can use "healty" prions
    to grow itself. like a crystel in a mine. with
    enough reactant and the right conditions, you
    can have 1 meter high crystals. only this
    crystal grows in your brain ...

    question: is the "defectiv" prion more stable
    then the "healty" one? since these are protein
    structures, it should not be difficult to find
    an enzym (or engineer one for that matter) that
    uses ATP or something else to "search and re-
    flip" anomalous prions in the brain or blood
    stream ...
    makes you wonder what would happens to a person
    treated with this enzym. maybe she/he losses all
    long term memories?

    i believe the beeff industry is not happy with
    this result. oh and where do you put the dead
    infected lab mice? a prion isn't alive so it
    can't die u know ...
    and i rcall an older /. articles that wolfes are
    immune to a BSE form in deer ...

    enzym enginner is the way to go ...

  138. A summary of the original report by soren.harward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thankfully, Nature provided the reference to the original report printed in Science. Since this thing's right up my alley (I'm a biochemist), and since I know few people will read the real article, and since I'm a karma whore anyway, here's a summary of the original report. It assumes you know a little about prion diseases (BSE, CJS, GSS) already -- see other posts in this thread, or Wikipedia, for more info.

    First: some background. There is a gene in mice that, if a certain mutation occurs, causes the mice to develop a neurodegenerative disease (hereafter abbreviated NDD) at an early age. If brain extracts from the diseased mice are transferred to healthy mice, the healthy mice contract the same disease. We're talking about an extant, previously-known prion-like disease in mice. Previous work by Kaneko, et al (see article if you really want the reference) took a short amino-acide sequence from the mouse protein believed to cause the NDD, and folded it into two different conformations: a non-beta-rich and a beta-rich (beta-rich structures are believed to be the NDD-operative part of other prion diseases such as BSE and CJD). They then injected the two different conformations into two different groups of mice. The non-beta-rich-protein group was fine, but the beta-rich-protein group developed the NDD anywhere between 1 and 2 years after injection. All this was work published previously, before the current paper in Science.

    Okay, now we get to what Legname's paper is about. Taking the previous knowledge into account, Legname, et al took a similar beta-rich segment of the possibly infectious protein (called MoPrP -- roughly moprion protein) and made two preparations of it: one MoPrP which was just separate strands (called "unseeded"), and one MoPrP which was clumped in amyloid fibrils (called "seeded" -- basically an abnormally polymerized clump of protein, the presence of which correlates with NDD's like BSE and Alzheimers). Note that the critical difference here between the current work and the previous work is that the previous work folded the MoPrP protein into a known beta-rich (infectious conformation), whereas the current work just polymerized it into an amyloid plaque. The former doesn't necessarily happen spontaneously in vivo, whereas the latter certainly can. Anyway, the two preparations, unseeded and seeded, were injected into mice. Two years later, the seeded mice had a much higher rate of NDD than did the unseeded mice.

    So, some of the conclusions that come from this:

    1. Strong evidence that prion diseases are in fact caused by misfolded proteins -- generally believed to be true, but some people thought otherwise.
    2. "amyloid fibrils harbor detectable levels of prion infectivity"
    3. "PrP [prion protein] is both necessary and suffienct for infectivity"
    4. "spontaneous formation of prions, which is thought to be responsible for sporadic forms of prion disease in livestock and humans, can occur in any mammal expressing PrPC" and "no exogenous agent is required for prions to form in any mammal" (though an exogenous agent can certainly help).
    My own conclusion from the last point: it's possible that Alzheimers is just like a prion disease, just one that starts spontaneously. The issue of infectivity (as far as we know, Alzheimers isn't communicable) is still unsolved, but Legname's work is an interesting addition to the prion work.
  139. Re:Ah, the mandatory fscking stupid conspiracy the by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    Umm... right. My grandmother had an ulcer. They tried acid blockers first, because it was more likely to be heartburn or acid reflux, which is not curable with antibiotics.

    After that didn't help, they took a look inside her stomach, a not inexpensive procedure. I had it done once to the tune of well over $1,000 USD(paid by my insurance company).

    Treatment doctors try is often more dictated by insurance companies than drug companies. Cheaper/easier treatment is always tried first.

    After diagnosing my grandmother as having an ulcer(and what type!), they gave her antibiotics.

    Of course, all that is not to say that a pharmaceutical company wouldn't try to keep people using their cash cow drug instead of getting cured...

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  140. Artificial pr0n created by Underholdning · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who read this as "Artificial pron"?

  141. two years later? by Daniel+Ellard · · Score: 1
    What's the natural lifespan of mice?

    From what I recall, having mice live for two years before falling ill might be an achievement in and of itself.

    On the other hand, we've now learned that a bunch of grad students with some time on their hands can synthesize an incurable, infectious, horrible disease. Yikes.

    --
    Disclaimer: I work for a company, but I don't speak for them.
    1. Re:two years later? by maximilln · · Score: 1

      What's the natural lifespan of mice?

      I've been having a field day pointing this out to those of you who aren't lucky enough to have access to the full-text articles.

      On page 673 of the scientific paper the others note that, for their research, they are using transgenic mice which are known to express low-levels of the mouse prion protein MoPrP(P101L). These mice, designated Tg196, are known to develop spontaneous illness at ~550 days of age for about 30% of the population. They then took this population, known to spontaneously develop illness, and injected EVEN MORE of the purified MoPrP(89-230) which is a slightly truncated form of MoPrP(P101L).

      So what's the surprise?

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
  142. Can the digestive tract destroy prions? by jeorgen · · Score: 1
    So, one posting here claims that you need 1000 degrees of heat to destroy a bad prion. But how well does the human digestive tract deal with them?

    There are enzymes that are supposed to deal with proteins in the gut (e.g. protease).

    Do these destroy the prions? Could people that come down with vCJD have been deficient in enzymes?

    1. Re:Can the digestive tract destroy prions? by mulescent · · Score: 1

      Short answer: No Longer answer: In reality, it takes high temperatures (about 300C) or very harsh chemical conditions to destroy misfolded prion protein. Conditions in the human gut are not harsh enough to do the job.

  143. Artificial Pr0n? by ntr0py · · Score: 3, Funny

    The only reason I clicked through to the comments is because I thought the headline said, "Artificial Pron Created"

  144. Artificial prion created by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    Paving the way for yet another biological weapon.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  145. you're right by Tangurena · · Score: 2, Informative
    >It's not very nice to watch. You are right. I had an uncle die of vCJD (mad cow disease when a person gets it) back in the early 80s. AIDS merely kills you, vCJD destroys what makes you human before it kills you. It basically destroys your brain bit by bit, until it finally destroys the part that controls your breathing and heartbeat (and you stop/forget breathing at that point).

    It is the most scary thing I have ever seen or experienced in my life. I've seen folks with advanced AIDS and other fatal diseases. We aren't really sure how he got it (they raised sheep, who get a version of BSE/vCJD called "scrapie"), but after seeing the effect, you wouldn't even want to be in the same building as him. It is very easy to understand the terror and fear folks had when AIDS first came out.

    Yes, scientists will need this kind of thing to understand how and why it works, as well as how and why a cure will work.

  146. Question by wizarddc · · Score: 1

    What could you inject into my brain that wouldn't cause me become ill within two years?

    --
    Th
  147. Re:Mad cow acceptable level of risk to big busines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yah, of course they did... otherwise whey would have to follow through on their free-trade agreements with Canada and stop destroying the Canadian beef industry. One lousy case in Canada received from US cattle and the US stops buying beef, while at the same time not wanting to test their own cattle... Hmm... I hate to tell you American folks, but your all going to go mad in a few years...

  148. Re:2 yrs later? That's when mice get Alzheimer's.. by maximilln · · Score: 1
    Note that the mice didn't just die. They developed BSE-like symptoms and their brains showed BSE-like degeneration

    They all do.

    About 30% of Tg196 mice develop spontaneous illness at ~550 days of age.

    The transgenic mice being studied are already susceptible to this genetic defect and the researchers antagonized it by adding the purified product of the genetic defect. Is there any surprise that more mice became more sick more quickly?

    And the ground up brain material was capable of passing on the disease to other mice

    That's because they're using transgenic mice which already known to be susceptible.

    Additionally one must look closely at the graphs on page 674. I can't locate in the article what "RML" is, but apparently administering RML caused conditions and antagonized the CNS of the mice even more than the purified MoPrP(89-231). 100% of the RML group experienced CNS dysfunction after less than 200 days. On top of that the researchers haven't proven that there's a clear prion effect. Immunoblot analysis of a brain tissue puree is hardly a characteristic identifier of MoPrP(P101L). The RML and PBS lanes are nearly identical to the lanes of mice which received the bacterial broth.

    The authors acknowledge that 30% of their mice will develop spontaneous disease at ~550 days but they try to pooh-pooh that fact when they begin to discuss their findings

    In earlier studies, uninoculated Tg9949 mice lived for more than 500 days without any signs of neurologic dysfunction... In the study reported here, Tg9949 mice were healthy at ~670 days of age and failed to show any signs of disease at 620 days after inoculation or 525 days with SHa Sc237 prions.

    Then, on page 675

    When the healthy Tg9949 mice inoculated with the Sc237 prions were killed at 525 days after inoculation, five of the seven Tg9949 mice inoculated with the seeded amyloid were already ill.

    That's probably because Sc237 is the prion protein for sheep scrapie. While Europe was busy killing ever cow in sight, sane scientists were trying to tell them that the chance of a prion crossing the interspecies barrier is minimal. Conveniently, there is no immunoblot of the Sc237 inoculated mice. I wouldn't be surprised if it looks the same as the 9949 and RML lanes.

    Does anyone else read these things critically?
    --
    +++ATHZ 99:5:80
  149. You Sir by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...are an idiot.

    Current research believes that 50% or more of Alzheimers patients are really a form of prion degredation of the brain. It has nothing to do with politics. It is not most common in cattle, it is most seen sheep. And the entire US herd has zero cases of BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy). Canada has had 1, and one is unconfirmed. This however is trival. BSE is already in the food supply, of this there is no doubt. Current testing ability cannot find BSE in low levels. The only question is - are you at risk? I dunno, but -

    Eat all the beef you want to, I only hope that you don't get an infected cow. A Neurosurgeon I heard speak(who has treated CJD personally) said it is the worst way to die he has ever seen - this from a guy that sees brain damage every day.

    Sera

    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    1. Re:You Sir by maximilln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The parent isn't an idiot. Yes, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's may be closely related to CJD.

      No... No one has ever conclusively demonstrated that you can take a prion from one species and use it to induce a prion state in another species. The current article fails to show any significant effect on mice using sheep scrapie Sc237 in mice. There have been one or two other research groups who have practically saturated one species with the prion of another and then claimed to find evidence of interspecies crossing. That research is dubious at best.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    2. Re:You Sir by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've seen worse ways to die than CJD. Yes, I read Stile Project and Consumption Junction.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    3. Re:You Sir by adoarns · · Score: 1

      It seems from the literature that the ability to cross-infect is taken for granted by prion researchers. In many cases the species barrier may make it extremely difficult, but even in cases where an animal doesn't manifest clinical illness, its nervous tissues remain infectious, and a second pass may result in clinical disease.

      Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies certainly aren't the biggest threat in the world right now. But unlike coconuts, whose threat is necessarily circumscribed, there is the biological possibility of a much more vast and devastating effect. Thank you, Darwin, Huxley, Morgan, and the rest.

      --
      Tenemus pyrobolos atqui jacimus cognitiones.
    4. Re:You Sir by maximilln · · Score: 2, Informative

      It seems from the literature that the ability to cross-infect is taken for granted by prion researchers

      Cross-infection is only taken for granted by those pitching it to politicians or who were in favor of the mass wholesale slaughter of every cow in UK and Europe several years ago.

      The vast majority of sane scientists hold out that cross-infection for prions is technically possible but yet to be clinically proven. Look even at the current article in question. They did subject some of their mice to Sc237, which is the sheep scrapie prion, and saw no ill effects.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    5. Re:You Sir by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There have been one or two other research groups who have practically saturated one species with the prion of another and then claimed to find evidence of interspecies crossing. That research is dubious at best.

      Hey, that's the same standard of proof we have for MDMA neurotoxicity.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:You Sir by gid-goo · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have done some personal MDMA neurotoxicity experiments which have demonstrated that it gets me incredibly high. And my jaw hurts the next day.

    7. Re:You Sir by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      Cross-infection is only taken for granted by those pitching it to politicians or who were in favor of the mass wholesale slaughter of every cow in UK and Europe several years ago.

      Well, at least they didn't follow the same procedure that was used by france. Personal, I think we have an historic moment where the politicians actually got something right ... although most likely for the wrong reasons.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    8. Re:You Sir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The odds of getting CJD are incredibly low even when infected cows do get into the food supply.

    9. Re:You Sir by nwbvt · · Score: 1
      No, there is no well accepted theory that Alzheimers is caused by any sort of proteinaceous infectious particle. Once in a while a case of CJD may be misdiagnosed as Altzheimers and the real condition will be discovered during the autopsy, but that is far from 50% of the time.

      Also, there is no evidence or even reason to believe that BSE has entered the US food supply.

      BTW, CJD and vCJD (mad cow disease) are two distinct diseases (along with scrapie, chronic wasting disease, and other diseases caused by prions). You don't get CJD from eating beef or any other meat (unless you are Hannibal Lector).

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  150. Artificial Porn? Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew they could reproduce it sooner or later with all that marvelous technology we've developed...

  151. fabulous bio-weapon by peter303 · · Score: 1
    Now I know scientists are mainly interested in curing this horrible human disease. However you have to consider what twisted minds would contemplate.

    Some interesting properties if you weaponized artifical prions:

    ***A slow, horrible death- these have a latency of years and decades. When they do act, you lose mind and body functions.

    ***Almost impossible to detect- You could continimate food supplies, drinking supplies, etc.

    ***Very hard to sterilize- you thought anthrax spores were nasty, but doing things like gassing buildings with chlorine neutralizes them. There was an inadvertant empedemic of CJK disease in Denver a decade back. A neurosurgeon dutifully sterilized his surgerical instruments in a super-heated autoclave after operatinfg on CJK patient. However, the prions lingered for months on the instruments and infect another five patients.

    ***No cure or vaccine- though I heard of posibilities.

    ***Very small particles- which makes it easy to disperse and evade various bio-filters.

  152. Re:Ah, the mandatory fscking stupid conspiracy the by SydShamino · · Score: 4, Funny

    >> You know what? There's a medical name for that. It's called "Paranoia".

    There are treatments for paranoia, but I know the world government is keeping the best of them hidden from us... ;p

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  153. Squirrel Brains by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    I will assume that he's not a connosieur of brains of any sort? In Kentucky, supposedly the danger comes from eating squirrel brains. I know I've seen sheep's brains on menus before, so I guess that couldn't be so far-fetched.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  154. Soon coming to a BigMac near you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PrionBionetics Inc. announced today a line of suppliments for employee food service operations. Fred Burger, Chief Scientist stated that their cafeteria food supplements were designed to survive at least 48 hours on the typical steam table and predicted that company revenue from employee retirement pension fund management operations should improve exponentially in the very near future.

  155. UC San Diego? Nope, UC San Francisco by ghamerly · · Score: 1

    According to the nature article, the researchers were from UC San Francisco, not UC San Diego as the post claims. No one else seems to have noticed, so I had to post.

    - UCSD alum

  156. Re:Ah, the mandatory fscking stupid conspiracy the by syukton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    preface: I'm from the US. "the country" / "the government" / etc = "the US [whatever]"

    1. There isn't money in a cure. 20 years of drug therapy and pills that cost $800/month = $192,000. Unless you can convince people and insurance companies to shell out $192K per patient cured, you can't sell the cure. Take into consideration again that a good number of the people who have cancer can barely afford their monthly medication, and unless medicare/social security/etc were willing to pay for curing people, the drug companies would not be able to make a buck on it. But the drugs, subsidized monthly with a small stipend from the government, are easily paid for. ISPs know this better than anyone: it's all about residual income. One-time fees, even if quite large, are nowhere near as essential to maintaining a business as is repeat business. So in short, I believe that you're incorrect.

    2. As stated in the article, Mad Cow isn't a viral or bacterial infection and therefore it cannot be fought with traditional weapons. Speaking of traditional, a very common treatment for a multitude of illnesses: penicillin comes from a mold. a MOLD. How expensive is it to culture mold? Well it'll cost you one moist loaf of bread. Ensuring that proteins don't become prions (much as normal cells don't become cancerous) is an all together different matter. The amount of money that goes into R&D wouldn't be realised if there was a simple cure like penicillin or some of the other inexpensive cures of the past. The only organization that would be able to back the creation of a cure for these complex and nontraditional ailments would be a financially stable government. Whether ours or theirs or somebody else's, government-backed research and government-backed vaccination regimens have more promise than corporate-backed ones. When the dominant ideal is that of survival and not the bottom line, then we'll see some real progress.

    3. no way to really respond to this. If there is a cure it's held close and is only known of by a few people. I bet their families don't get cancer either (ahem), which renders your point somewhat moot.

    4. There's only one thing investors like: a return on their investment. If we'll go to war (ie, put human lives at stake) over oil instead of biting the cost bullet and building a decent national electric infrastructure, then it should be made blatantly obvious to you that there ARE those who are willing to choose the almighty buck over the almighty human life. If we had a better power system here in the USA we could more-seriously consider things like, say, electric cars.

    --
    Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
  157. I wouldn't say prions are alive by theluckyleper · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't say prions are alive, but it really depends on your definition of life. Is something alive if it can reproduce itself? A prion can do that, but so can fire...

    Viruses aren't too much different, however, though some people class them as 'alive'. Viruses reproduce themselves, but they do so by hijacking a cell with some particularly coersive strand(s) of nucleic acid. The virus compels the cell to use its own internal mechanisms to build more virus particles.

    So, viruses at least require the presence of something that IS alive (a cell, and all of its protein and nucleic acid creation abilities) whereas a prion can reproduce itself in a simple solution of susceptible proteins. No life needed... just proteins to interact with.

    --
    Visit the Game Programming Wiki!
  158. Anti-cancer use of a manufactured prion. by Wargames · · Score: 1

    Two questions come to what's left of my brain:

    Can we build a cancer-prion to teach cancer cells to fold wrong? What would be the result in the body if we used them?

    --
    -- Each tock of the Planck clock is a new world and here we are still life. --
  159. mouse longevity by phyruxus · · Score: 1

    this has nothing to do with prions, but, re: mouse longevity, researchers discovered that mouse lifetimes can be extended ~ 18% by fiddling with insulin levels. This article refers to caloric reduction as well. The first time I heard about this they mentioned the removal of the gonads as a factor.

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
  160. Reasonable science, bad reporting by maximilln · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are technical hurdles to using mouse models to study prion diseases. Ideally a researcher would take a completely healthy mouse and induce a prion disease with the administration of a misfolded protein. Unfortunately for researchers most healthy mice don't have a lifespan long enough to develop a prion disease from scratch. The best that the researchers are able to do is take a transgenic strain of mice (Tg196), which are known to have a DNA defect which leads to prion related disease, and administer additional amounts of the prion in order to antagonize the disease state.

    The researchers in this case leave too many questions unanswered that could have been easily addressed.

    1>
    The Tg196 transgenic mice express a low level of MoPrP(P101L) which is said to cause the CNS dysfunction. The researchers brew E. coli to produce a large amount of MoPrP(89-230) which they will use to spike the mice. To ensure that the additional disease effects are really attributable to the E. coli produced MoPrP(89-230), why do they not use a control group of mice which receive an extract from an E. coli broth which does _not_ produce MoPrP(89-230)?

    2>
    I keep pointing this out and apparently there aren't enough scientists on /. who can answer it. The authors of the article note that Tg196 mice exhibit spontaneous disease in 30% of their population at ~550 d. The status of the control group is fairly glossed with only a single line which meantions that, as of 670 d, the control mice were still healthy. If that means _all_ the control mice why is there a deviation from the known standard? If that means _some_ of the control mice why did the peer reviewers not ask about it?

    3>
    The bottom line worry is that a prion disease in your cow or sheep will end up in your supermarket and cause a mass plague in humans. The researchers in this study did administer Sc237 (sheep scrapie prion) to some of their mice and saw no ill effects. Paranoid people and others with a political agenda need to give up on the hype.

    4>
    The results are statistically fuzzy. While the authors note that 30% of a population of Tg196 mice are known to be dysfunctional at ~550 days they don't have any expected dysfunctional population % for 670 days. Their own experimental groups have a range of 380-600 and 500-670 d for unseeded and seeded groups, respectively. Additionally, at the 550 d point, both experimental groups were exhibiting about 60% CNS dysfunction in the population. The researchers have shown that administering a prion, for which the mice are known to be susceptible, will hasten their illness. It may be a good bit of lab work but it's not a surprise.

    5>
    The immunoblots are pretty but don't say much. The control group lacks many of the spots that the test groups have, but even the experimental group which received nothing more than the extraction/folding broth (PBS? PBH? I left the PDF on my desk) shows some of the additional bands present in the animals which received actual prions. Additionally there's the RML group. I couldn't find the definition for RML in the paper but noticed that the RML group exhibited 100% population CNS dysfunction by about 180 days. Is this really a prion effect if "RML" is more effective than the prions? Finally, where are the immunoblots for the Sc237 subjects? Ideally they would look like the control group immunoblots since the Sc237 subjects did not exhibit CNS dysfunction. My better sense tells me that the immunoblots for the Sc237 subjects would look more like the mice that received the blank extraction/folding buffer or even closer to the 9949. This would raise some obvious questions about the specificity of the immunoblot for active, MoPrP and inactive PrP from another species. This ties in with <3>.

    6>
    The /. headline reads "Artificial prion created". That's true. The researchers brewed a batch of MoPrP(89-230) which is a truncated form of the natu

    --
    +++ATHZ 99:5:80
  161. WED: Weapon of Economic Destruction by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 1

    BSE is dangerous, even if it doesn't effect anybody. The fear caused by it can devestate beef-based economies. If you've seen what's happened to Alberta during the recent BSE scare, you'll see what can happen when something is blown out of proportion. What I truly fear is that someone gets a hold of this, infiltrates another country's beef supply, and sticks a couple cows with it. The end result: an economic crash.

  162. Like cottage cheese? by hraefn · · Score: 1

    The question remains... who first shook cow brains hard enough to create mad cow disease?

  163. Re:Ah, the mandatory fscking stupid conspiracy the by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    Good argument except maybe for #3.
    It was my understanding that corporations are designed to profit. Is there any evidence that the personal crises of their managers influence the drugs they bring to market?

    Maybe in a family owned business where a family member got sick, but I don't know of any family owned pharmaceutical companies offhand. If they exist, wouldn't they be pretty small.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  164. New Guinea Cannibals and Prions by 311Stylee · · Score: 1

    Here is a description of Kuru, a brain wasting disease in humans transmitted by the traditional eating the brains of the deceased.

    I am a biologist and I remember researching this when I was an undergrad:

    Studying Kuru is much easier for researchers, because they can simply ask people who were involved in the tradition about symptoms and the spread of the disease. They were able to figure out that there are several different alleles in the wild (sections of DNA that code for proteins; each human has 2 copies of DNA for each protein). They found some of the alleles encoded a protein that was more resistant to corruption by the prions than others. They also found that people who were heterozygous (have 2 different copies of the protein) would take much longer to die of the disease than those who were homozygous (have 2 of the same copies).

    Heterozygousity levels were high, as expected for those who had taken part and survived the old-fashioned (and now outlawed) practice of eating your dead relative's brains, because homozygotes were very susceptable to dying from this practice, and their levels would be somewhat lower due to selective pressure (ie death) in the past (but via genetics there would always be some homozygotes in each generation).

    This is all well and good, but the real slammer here is this:

    heterozygousity levels were also abnormally high in the general population around the world for this protein. This could have several meanings (i'll go into 2):
    1. We are the descendents of cannibals.
    2. Everyone dies of alzheimer's if they live to be old enough (ie they don't die of something else first).

    Cannibalism could explain the abnormally high rate of heterozygousity for this protein. Supposedly, archaeologists and those types have uncovered widespread (ie global) evidence of cannibalism, but also found that is relatively rare at any one time. If people were eating other people on a large enough scale, this could cause selection against homozygotes in the long run.

    Because of human family structure, old people (past breeding age) can still positively influence the fitness (reproductive cabability) of younger family members. This theoretically would produce selective pressure against homozygotes, although other factors might render it insignificant.

    In any case it is clear that brains are not quite perfect as of the latest release. Some other interesting tidbits are that heavy smokers and drinkers have a slightly lower incidence of alzheimer's. This could be because they die of other health problems earlier, but I believe the study adjusted for details like that. The mechanism for this could be the higher incidence of "shock proteins" and "chaperone proteins" in cells that are more used to being stressed by the nasty destructive chemicals in ciggarettes and booze.

    *takes a swig of beer*

    These chaperone proteins help to fold newly-made proteins the proper way. Shock proteins help to
    keep your proteins from getting messed up from exposure to heat, chemicals, other proteins, etc.

    Whew..there is some much to explain, I can't give much more than a brief overview. any questions?

  165. Re:Mad cow acceptable level of risk to big busines by kaoshin · · Score: 1
    And so what if I don't always look both ways on a one way street. The chances are so incredibly low that a car would happen to be driving the wrong way on the road at the exact time I cross.

    Risks that are taken may not be much of a risk by themselves, but the possibility that something bad will happen to you increases with the risks that you take. Imagine that.

  166. Nobel Idiots: why this is big news! by mulescent · · Score: 1
    One reason this story is big, big news is that it finally vindicates the Nobel Laureate Stanley Prusiner, who originally proposed the "prion only" hypothesis to explain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. His idea, that a protein alone could cause a transmissible disease (not a bacteria or virus) was revolutionary. Unfortunately, the Nobel committee acted prematurely in awarding the Prize, because its taken 7 years to actually prove the hypothesis. Of note is that the proof came from someone else's lab!

    In the end, this is news because it prevents a rather embarassing scandal involving the highest honor a scientist can recieve....

  167. Mass (not matter) defect by Tired_Blood · · Score: 1
    tepples writes: The products of a uranium or plutonium fission reaction have less mass than the reactant. The reaction converts some of the mass to heat, that is, it destroys matter and creates an equal amount of heat energy, preserving mass-energy according to Einstein's formula E = m*c^2.

    Since you're interchanging the two I should point out that there's a difference between matter and mass.
    • Matter is preserved. Both sides of the equation need the same material components (protons, neutrons, electrons).
    • Mass is not preserved. Mass is an observable quality in that a piece of matter will have different masses when at rest versus moving.
    If you can create a way to convert matter into energy, then that's something entirely different from fusion/fission nuclear reactions. My perspective is that altering a nuclear bond is just a step above altering a chemical bond and not something conceptually different (both have tangible items pushed together or pulled away from each other with only the energy bonds being converted from one form to another).

    Of course, IANANuclear Physicist.
    --
    This is not my sig.
  168. I hate to go off topic, by InferiorFloater · · Score: 1

    but a "vehicle mouse" sounds really freakin' cool.

    I can just picture that long-legged guy from "22 Short Films about Springfield" driving his vehicle mouse around and glaring at the people who laugh at him.

    --

    ---------
    Get back to me when my brain starts working.
  169. no Squirrels by Tangurena · · Score: 1
    Uncle Charlie was a marine biologist. His daughters were into 4H. He took care of the "prize winning" sheep that the daughters showed in fairs. His specialty was very deep water fishes, frequently snagging 3 of each species: one for the pickling jar, one for dissection, and one for dinner. Note: deep water fishes don't have air bladders, they store ammonia in their flesh for boyancy, and their flavor sucks.

    If it was up to me, all those sheep would have been buried the week he was diagnosed. It turned out that no one else in the family got vCJD (it would be over 10 years before it was admitted that the transmission of the disease was through eating tainted flesh), they (the aunt and 3 daughters) all died of female specific cancers within a few years of his death.

  170. Background Information on BSE/TSE/Prions by voixderaison · · Score: 1

    For those of you who are not a molecular biologist, there is a particularly well written and approachable source of background information on prion disease available. Deadly Feasts is an excellent primer on the subject of prion disease and the history of the prion as a medical research mystery. It's very well written, but don't read it if you want to keep eating beef.

    There is also an online interview with Richard Rhodes the author of that book, which comes with the same caveat.

    The book was written several years ago. More recent information about current research and such is available at New Scientist.

    --
    Things should be made as simple as possible, but not any simpler. -- Albert Einstein
  171. Re:You Sir are also an idiot by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1
    No one has ever conclusively demonstrated that you can take a prion from one species and use it to induce a prion state in another species.


    OK, then you and I and the next downer cow that we find are going to have a lovely steak dinner. And in 40 years we will see which of us posts to slashdot the results of our dinner and which of us is drooling in pain on a keyboard. If you believe in your position, then a little brain pudding shouldn't phase you at all

    Sera
    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  172. Possible Cures?? by ToAllPointsWest · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First off... FOLD http://www.stanford.edu/group/pandegroup/folding/! !! Now that Stanford project is more relevant than ever!! 1. If the structure of a prion can be determined it may be possible to bind them up with another protein until the immune system can remove it from the system 2. From the Halbaked http://www.halfbakery.com/idea/Prion_20Poison_20Pr evention#1062618359 site, enzymes might be able to remove them from the system as well, but it would destroy them in-place which may not be desirable

    --
    They came for the Communists, and I didn't object - For I wasn't a Communist; They came for the Socialists, and I didn'
  173. scary too by blooba · · Score: 1

    this is very cool, but also very scary: that scientists can artificially produce a nasty disease. if the good guys can do it, so can the bad guys, eventually.

  174. Sick for 2 Years before Detection? by nlindstrom · · Score: 1

    So the mice were sick for two years before it could be detected? Did this make anyone else think of what John Titor said about the incubation period in humans for mad cow disease?

  175. Re:You Sir are also an idiot by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1
    As I said before, they day you believe this is the day you volunteer to eat downer cattle. No? I thought so. And if you think downers are not part of the current beef market, you have never been to a slaughter house.
    You don't get CJD from eating beef or any other meat
    You Sir have no idea how prions work do you? I spend every day in a lab, part of which involves brain tissue. They are like terminators, they dont die. Ingesting a single one may do you no harm, but a lifetime will. You may not die of the disease, but it trancends normal defs of disease. Forgetful in your old age? Might be this beast, even if it isn't full blown CJD. (oh, and describing the difference between vCJD and CJD is pretentious and ill informed - it's called vCJD for a reason)

    It is 'ignorance with opinion' like yours that is helping everything from the Flat Eathers to the RIAA.

    Come back when you have a PhD to back up your "opinion"

    Sera
    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  176. Details? Chase down the references. by Paul+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You want details? The article refers to a study published in science. The citation is presented at the end of the article. Here it is:

    Legname G., et al. Science, 305. 673 - 676 (2004).

    Look for university libraries in your area. You don't need a library card to go to the current journals and photocopy pages. If you are at a university and your university has subscribed to the electronic journal, go to http://www.sciencemag.org and find the link.

    It is full of a lot of details that most of us (certainly not me) don't need. Read the abstract, the introduction, and the conclusion. If your interest is piqued, you might read the body and chase some references.

    I doubt that anybody will read this. The comment count has exceeded 400 (thanks to the WMD discussion--really people, they INJECTED IT INTO THE BRAINS OF THE MICE). I also like to shout at airplanes.

  177. Holy carp! by Atario · · Score: 1

    You just described Mad Culture Disease!

    Poor infected cultures -- staggering around, unable to support themselves properly, getting stupider and stupider...tsk, tsk.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  178. Re:You Sir are also an idiot by nwbvt · · Score: 1
    "And if you think downers are not part of the current beef market, you have never been to a slaughter house."

    Downers != Cattle killed by BSE. There are a lot of things that can kill cattle, most are not transmittable to humans through consumption.

    You see, the reason the UK has an outbreak of mad cow was because cattle in the UK were regularly fed cow byproducts (dead cow). That allowed one cow to infect dozens of others which infect others which infect humans. That is not the case in the US where soybean meal is common feed for cattle and where regulations prohibit feeding cattle meal back to cattle. Thus in order for the cow you eat at McDonald's to have BSE, it would have had to have gotten the mutated protein itself. The chance that your cow generated the mutated protein itself and then was slaughtered before showing obvious symptoms make being hit by lightning look like a sure thing. Hence why only one person in the US has ever been found to have acquired the disease (and most likely got it when she lived in Britain earlier in her life).

    "You Sir have no idea how prions work do you?"

    Yes I do. CJD does not come from cattle. It occurs randomly (and rarely) in the human population. It is in no way preventable but occurs very rarely and almost always kills late in the victim's life.

    "oh, and describing the difference between vCJD and CJD is pretentious and ill informed - it's called vCJD for a reason"

    They are two very different diseases. They have similar effects and are probably caused by the same basic mechanism (which is why BSE in humans was given the name variant CJD), but they are two very different diseases caused by two very different causes.

    By your logic differentiating between Ebola and AIDS is pretentious and ill informed.

    "Come back when you have a PhD to back up your "opinion""

    Where did you get your PhD microbiology? Las Vegas Mail Order Institute? Please. I do not need a PhD to read articles and books by leading researchers in the field. From that I have plenty to back up what you ignorantly label an "opinion".

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  179. Re:You Sir are also an idiot and a troll by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1
    I got my PhD from the U of MN, and at least one of us has one.
    Read all the articles and books you want - you are still a layman. I can read the entire linux kernel, it wont make me informed, a kernel programmer or able to have a real opinion about what it is, or where it needs to go.
    My micro lab deals with this on a daily basis. As I said - you eat a downer cow. - or - better, eat a BSE cow, it wont hurt you right?? So I urge you to eat the next one, please, my boss needs more reasearch examples.

    v=variant thus vCJD - it is not seperate, but a varient.
    By your logic differentiating between Ebola and AIDS is pretentious and ill informed.
    Wow, what a jump, proving you have no grasp of microbiology, or logic for that matter. We err on the side of caution, as real scientists do. But go ahead, eat all the beef you want, more research money is good for me.

    Sera
    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  180. Canadian cattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first Canadian case of BSE came from a cow imported from Britain (in 1987), but the 2003 case was from a Canadian-born animal.

    Extensive investigations suggest that the animal contracted the disease from feed imported from the UK just before a ban went into place in 1997.

    Details: http://www.usaha.org/speeches/speech03/s03evans.ht ml

  181. Re:You Sir are also an idiot and a troll by nwbvt · · Score: 1
    " I got my PhD from the U of MN, and at least one of us has one."

    In microbiology, specializing in prions? Ha, that tells me a lot about Minnesota's biology department.

    "I can read the entire linux kernel, it wont make me informed, a kernel programmer or able to have a real opinion about what it is, or where it needs to go."

    We are talking about science, not opinions. Need me to explain the difference?

    "v=variant thus vCJD - it is not seperate, but a varient."

    Vocabulary lesson.

    variant Audio pronunciation of "variant" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (vâr-nt, vr-) adj.
    1. Having or exhibiting variation; differing.

    " Wow, what a jump..."

    Both are caused by the same mechanism. Thats about all you have linking CJD and vCJD.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  182. Re:You Sir are also an idiot and a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, you trolls sure are out in force tonight. Got Karma burning a hole in your pocket?

    I still don't see you offering to eat a BSE cow. Somehow you're defending your opinion while refusing to backup your view with action. So were your balls cut off at birth or did you do it yourself later in life?

    BTW, I'm not the guy you're arguing with, I just hate seeing some little bitch whine about another's informed opinion because it contradicts what Bush & Co. want you to believe.

  183. Re:You Sir are also an idiot and a troll by nwbvt · · Score: 1
    "I still don't see you offering to eat a BSE cow."

    I never said I was willing to. I am saying that the chance of any given cow (especially one not showing obvious symptoms of BSE when slaughtered) is astronomically small. If that is a basis for someone not eating meat, they might as well never go outside for fear of getting struck by lightning. The only reason Britain had an outbreak was because of husbandry practices existed in pre-mad cow UK.

    "I just hate seeing some little bitch whine about another's informed opinion "

    For the last fucking time, science is not about opinions, science is about facts.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  184. "Shaken, Not Stirred!"? by rickshaf · · Score: 1

    See what happens when those biologists fail to follow directions?

  185. Re:You Sir are also an idiot and a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a neurologist and a nerd. I have seen and treated several patients with prion disease. Frankly, except for the auto-catalytic mechanism of proteins mentioned above, the majority of you have incorrect conceptions about the disease process.
    Unless you know what i mean by paroxysmal bitemporal epileptic discharges, unremitting myoclonus, and dementia you should spare your opinion...because your knowledge of prion disease is limited to textbooks or "Pipetman" experiments.
    Many of you have added valid knowledge, but at the same time many of you have wagged sad egos for all to see. I will review all of the above, including the primary literature, and run it by my peers and superiors in the academic medical system and give an opinion. I was a biochemical neuroscientist for years, and when PhD's try to go beyond their realm of expertise, which is certainly vast, but limited realtive to patients, I wince. I will post soon after conferring with mulitple academic researchers above me. I r still nub, but I have teh resources to provide truth ;).

    gg Jeremy is ma hero

  186. Excuse me by nwbvt · · Score: 1

    But since when in this thread were we discussing the disease process? We have been discussing the epidemiology of the disease, such as whether or not BSE is common in the US beef market and whether or not CJD and vCJD are the same thing.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  187. Re:Mad cow acceptable level of risk to big busines by blincoln · · Score: 1

    For packaged vegan cheeses...I'd reccomend not going there. They're all disgusting.

    I actually found one that isn't - Vegan Gourmet. It's hard to find (only one independent supermarket in the greater Seattle area carries it as far as I know), but if you melt their "mozzarella" on pizza or make macaroni and "cheese" with their "cheddar," it's really tasty.

    The rest are foul, though. VeganRella might as well be a giant chunk of crayon.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  188. Re:You Sir are also an idiot by mike3411 · · Score: 1

    You are missing the point. The parent is pointing out the unlikelyhood of such a transmission, but is not himself advocating a decrease in health regulation and safety measures. The post that you originally replied to did suggest such a change, and noted the improbability of cow -> human BSE. He was correct in the support of his argument, but I disagree with his conclusion, as might you. If you disagree with the facts, such as the likelihood of transmission, then post data relevent to such a claim. If you concede the facts, then essentially your argument is that the measures taken by the FDA etc. are worthwhile given the risk of infecting someone with a horrible and deadly disease. If that is your argument, then I would agree.

    --
    Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  189. No conspiracy needed by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    Basically, project get funded on the basis of "chance of success" times "expected reward on success".

    If a "cure" has a smaller expected reward than a "supresion of symptons", more money will be directed towards the later. It is not a conspiracy, just business economics.

    In any case, there is little money in either a cure or sympton supression for Creutzfeldt-Jakob, and no money on either for BSE, both are extremely rare, and for BSE you would want destroy the cattle in any case.

  190. Total recall .. by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

    I seem to recall that people have genes that make them targets for CJD. So I think the ability to cross-infect just might vary even within one species. Using a single strain of mice for such an experiment might severly reduce your chances of finding proof of crossinfection ability. Also mice != humans.

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  191. Re:Ah, the mandatory fscking stupid conspiracy the by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    In 1982 some scientist discovered that a large percentage of ulcers were linked to Helicobacter, and found that simple antibiotics would cure it. Of course, most doctors for the next 10-15 years left their patients on expensive acid blockers instead. More money in those than a cheap cure! So much for no conspiracy theory...

    How do you explain the current treatment of ulcers with antibiotics if there's a conspiracy theory in play? Was it defeated? How? Maybe there are some lessons to learn here.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  192. Re:Ah, the mandatory fscking stupid conspiracy the by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    3. Most importantly: there are doctors, pharmacists, managers at pharmaceuticals corporations, etc, who die of Cancer every year. Or have a bad case of diabetes.

    Fortunately, you're right, companies are working on a cure for diabetes, or at least very effective treatments, meaning ones that target the problem and don't wreck your liver in the process.

    Now, it is the smaller biotechs who tend to do these things, so there is some momentum problem in the larger pharma space.

    Gila monsters shut down their pancreas during hybernation, that's how these got started.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  193. Re:Yeah only box cutters...and bombs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you bitterr?