Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith

HaloZero writes "The title was publicly revealed today in a special presentation to a packed audience of Star Wars fans at Comic-Con International in San Diego, California. The title wasn't the only surprise for those in attendance at the presentation. Click here for news about even more Star Wars DVDs in 2004 and 2005, surprise celebrity guests, new planets in Episode III, and more."

537 comments

  1. A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by Real+Troll+Talk · · Score: 5, Informative

    A USA Today reporter guessed this title over a month ago! We can't believe it.

    Listen up, this is a true story!

    Last month we were reading this USA Today article at http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2004-06-14-aid s-benefit_x.htm.

    We forgot we had read it, but just now we went back to the article and remembered the final few paragraphs of the reporter interviewing Lucas at a gay AIDS banquet:

    "We caught George Lucas wandering around the grounds with his daughter, Katie. The director said the title of Star Wars: Episode III won't officially be announced until November, when the first trailer hits theaters.

    But he conceded that fans on Web sites already have guessed correctly. So we threw a couple of rumored titles at him: Rise of the Empire? "No, that's not it," Lucas said. How about Revenge of the Sith?

    With that, Lucas smiled knowingly, backed away and teased, "That's a possibility. Lots of titles out there ...""


    Can you believe THAT?! He basically gave it away over a month ago and no one said anything for the most part!

    Anyway, that's awesome, but we have some other suggestions. We just don't care for the title that Lucas picked.

    Here. Here's a poll for your favorite GOOD Star Wars title.

    Pick from the following and reply to this post with your favorite:

    Star Wars Episode III: Dawn of the Empire
    Star Wars Episode III: Final Strike
    Star Wars Episode III: The Fallen Jedi
    Star Wars Episode III: The Lost Prophecy
    Star Wars Episode III: The Deception
    Star Wars Episode III: Hope Lost
    Star Wars Episode III: The Lost one

    --

    If you liked my post,
    1. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i like dawn of the empire and the fallen jedi.

    2. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by y2imm · · Score: 1

      Star Wars Episode III: Dawn of the Empire

    3. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 5, Funny

      Star Wars Episode III: Some Damn Fool Idealistic Crusade

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    4. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny
      This one should have the same title that both episodes I and II should have: Star Wars Episode n: The Search for More Money.

      "I see you have the ring, and your schwartz is as big as mine..."

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by SteveXE · · Score: 1

      Dawn of the Empire...all the others suck
      Fall of the Jedi would have been a good option to have =P

    6. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I like this one better:

      Star Wars Ep III: The Death of Jar-Jar

    7. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by quetzalc0atl · · Score: 1

      any one of those titles would have been better than "revenge of the sith".

      sounds like the name of a porn movie or something "revenge of the slippyfist"

    8. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      Star Wars Episode III: The Last Big Money Grab

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    9. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 2, Funny

      how about Star Wars Episode III: Death of Jar Jar
      I can still dream right?

      --
      Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
    10. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by boy_afraid · · Score: 0

      Star Wars Episode III: Dawn of the Empire

    11. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by molrak · · Score: 1

      Revenge of the Sith isn't that surprising of a name for Episode 3. Return of the Jedi was originally titled Revenge of the Jedi--I think the very first teaser posters bore this name on them. Sadly, this contradictory title went unnoticed for months before it was finally corrected, when someone within the Lucasfilm juggernaut suggested that revenge would probably be incompatible with the Jedi code.

      --
      You're only as smart as your brain.
    12. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by linzeal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Star Wars Episode III: We are the Sith, you will know us by our Hot Pants.

    13. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you believe THAT?! He basically gave it away over a month ago and no one said anything for the most part!

      Probably because nobody other then Star Wars fan-boyz considers it to be newsworthy.

      Episode 3 would have to get abso-fucking-lutely fantastic reviews in order for me to bother going and paying for a ticket.

    14. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by glitch! · · Score: 5, Funny

      Star Wars Ep III: The Death of Jar-Jar

      Someone else posted an even better one: "The Passion of Jar-Jar". It's just two hours of Jar-Jar getting beaten.

      --
      A dingo ate my sig...
    15. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by factgirl · · Score: 1

      Brilliant. Personally, though, I think "From Anakin to Vader: Bitch is Crazy!" would have worked as well.

    16. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Sweet

    17. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It went out on more than posters.. When I was about 10 (shortly before the film came out), I had the "Revenge of the Jedi" sheets on my twin bed...

    18. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by LuSiDe · · Score: 1

      How about: "Star Wars Episode III: The Lost Title"

      Who cares about a title anyway...

      --
      WE DON'T NEED NO BLOG CONTROL.
    19. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Interesting

      how about

      Rise of the Sith

      at least it sounds better than the lame meaningless [mockingly creepy voice] Revenge of the Sith!!! [/mockingly creepy voice]

      I mean really, what are they getting revenge for?

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    20. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about this one

      We just don't care

    21. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Birth of an Empire -- Best choice, no question.

    22. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by gamgee5273 · · Score: 3, Informative
      If you need to ask what the Sith are getting revenge for then you don't know the story.

      Back around the time of the Knights of the Old Republic videogames, the Jedi beat the Sith down brutally and to the point where the Jedi think there are no Sith left. But, unknown to the Jedi, there is one left. He takes an apprentice and sets the Rule of Two (one Sith master, one Sith apprentice). And so it goes for thousands of years, until Darth Sidious and his apprentices.

      Think about what Darth Maul said on Coruscant and Yoda said at Qui-gon's funeral in TPM. Then, when you also remember that ROTJ was originally Revenge of the Jedi (and then Lucas decided that Jedi do not take revenge), the title choice makes even more sense. The title has been obvious for years - you only needed to pay attention.

    23. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      Pick from the following and reply to this post with your favorite:,?i>

      I like:
      "Star Wars Episode III: You are still nerds, and you will still die alone."

      (or, alternatively: "Star Wars Episode III: You will never use your 'lightsaber' with any woman not a comic book character."

      (With apologies to Triumph the Insult Comic Dog and Robert Smigel.)

    24. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by klui · · Score: 1

      Can't resist: All your light sabers are belong to us!

    25. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Star Wars Episode III: Fall of the Republic

      Some fan actually wrote a script and made movie posters with this name years ago, just after Episode I had been released.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    26. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by AC5398 · · Score: 1

      I like "Rise of the Sith" better than "Revenge of the Sith." And it should have been "Revenge of the Jedi," not "Return of the Jedi."

      I have always had this gut instinct that "Revenge of the Jedi" would have not had Ewoks and the storyline would have been deeper and darker and lot more satisfying.

    27. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by kantai · · Score: 1

      Hahahaha, oh god, you are so funny. I don't think anyone has ever told that joke here before.

    28. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Balgosa, is that you?

    29. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is more good info on Starwars Episode III here: http://www.audioholics.com/forums/showthread.php?p =17977#post17977/

    30. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three words, dude: Get A Life

    31. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1
      I like Star Wars Episode III: The Prevenge of Porkins

      After seeing what GL can do with a story line, I'm certain it's not outside the realm of possible plot twists anymore.

      --
      If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
    32. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1
      I honestly hope he does something like Rosencrantz and Gildenstern with the final installment.

      "Whole story through the eyes of some minor character with comic relief" would go down a lot better than the essence of the last two did.

      --
      If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
    33. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your titles suck. And nobody wants to hear about what George Lucas was doing with a bunch of sick fags at some "banquet."

    34. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... you're using a video game for source material. That isn't going to help anyone else understand what the title is about.
      I hope you get AIDS from a black man in prison.

    35. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by iNetRunner · · Score: 1

      No, no.. You should say: Lucas "came up" with this title about a Month ago.. ;)

      --
      Store with salt
    36. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      Star Wars Episode III: Another Lucas Hack-job

      I can't wait to see if he's going to sink lower than my already low expectations for the third movie.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    37. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1

      I hope you grow some balls and learn how to post under a real handle.

    38. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I can't believe nobody so far has picked: Star Wars III: Natalie Portman Porn

      I mean, hundreds of comments and not one single comment, even though every other Star Wars story since EP1 was made-up of nothing BUT! I just don't get it. The /. filters must be doing an incredibly good job on this thread for some reason...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    39. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by snap-hiss · · Score: 1

      Star Wars Episode VI: Watto's Wackey Wack Shack Featuring Jar Jar and the Freaky Fun-Town Gang !snap

      --


      "Yeah, a shrink ray! Just like that time on Muppet Babies!"
    40. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Wars Episode III: It is finally all over...or is it?

    41. Re:A REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Wars Episode III: It is finally over..or is it?

  2. How about "Revenge of the Children's Merchandise" by Enlarge+Your+Penis · · Score: 2, Funny

    A far more honest title

  3. Damn it, damn it, damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I promised myself I wasn't going to get excited by Episode III, but that's a really good, appropriate title! Here's the AICN story with the logo, and here's the mirrored text:

    Aside from the long-awaited revelation of the title of Episode III, fans had lots of Star Wars news to absorb and be excited about at the Star Wars Spectacular presentation at Comic-Con. Steve Sansweet, Head of Fan Relations for Lucasfilm, hosted the two-hour long panel, full of exclusive video clips and a number of surprise guests.

    Much of the news centered around three simple letters: DVD. 2004 is the year to substantially expand your Star Wars DVD collection. While the Star Wars Trilogy is the biggest news for Force-fan videophiles, Sansweet announced the fall debut of Ewoks and Droids adventures on DVD. 20th Century Fox Home Video will release these animated adventures as well as the pair of made-for-television Ewok live action movies (The Ewok Adventure and Ewoks: The Battle for Endor) this November and December.

    September 21, of course, is the release date for the Star Wars Trilogy on DVD. The presentation included clips of some of the bonus material found in the boxed set, as well as a first look at the animated menus that organize the wealth of information and options within. Jim Ward, Vice President of Marketing for Lucasfilm and Executive Producer of the DVDs spoke about the upcoming release, and announced that the epic feature-length documentary, Empire of Dreams: The Story of the Star Wars Trilogy, would appear as a special edited-for-television edition on the A&E network this fall.

    In other DVD news, Sansweet confirmed a projected release date for the much-asked-about Star Wars: Clone Wars DVDs. The incredibly successful 20 chapters of the Cartoon Network animated shorts will be making their home video debut next spring, around the same time as the airdate for the final batch of Clone Wars shorts from Genndy Tartakovsky and Paul Rudish.

    But before that, an essential George Lucas film will make its DVD debut. Sansweet took the opportunity to screen the theatrical trailer to THX 1138: The George Lucas Director's Cut , as well as premiere an all-new trailer to the Comic-Con audience. This video will soon make its way to the official THX 1138 website, which will soon be posting a theater list for the select cities that will be exhibiting the film prior to its DVD release.

    On the Episode III front, the biggest news was the confirmation of the Episode III title, and the availability of a shirt with said title at StarWarsShop.com. Sansweet also welcomed two very special Revenge of the Sith guests: Producer Rick McCallum, and the Chosen One himself, Hayden Christensen.

    [ Comic-Con International 2004 ]Fans in attendance also got a first look at Hasbro's forthcoming packaging design for Episode III product. The stylized visage of Darth Vader looms large over a chaotic field of molten lava.

    Star Wars Spectacular debuted an advance look at two pieces of Episode III-related video that will be found as bonus material in the Star Wars Trilogy DVD set. "Episode III: Making the Game" went behind-the-scenes on LucasArts' forthcoming tie-in video game. An edited version of "The Return of Darth Vader" revealed the gleaming Darth Vader armor from Episode III and showed Christensen donning the armor for the Dark Lord's debut.

    For an in-depth account of the presentation, including exclusive imagery and select video, check out the expanded coverage available only to members of Hyperspace: The Official Star Wars Fan Club.

    1. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      ... and now, the annoying part is that Vader will be in, what was it said, only the last 5 minutes or so?

      I would be more excited if the actual transformation took place somewhere in the middle of the movie and we actually saw the effects of Darth Vader rising to power, but so far I haven't seen anything telling this.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by rppp01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think this is the draw for me, with regards to the franchise.

      I loved the evil evil person that darth vader was. He scared me. His empire scared me. And there was this small group of people fighting this monolith of evil.

      The prequels have been about 'nobility' as it slowly falls to this rise of this evil. But it hasn't done anything to make me feel like the 'evil' side of things did in the first 3.

      And I just watched them 2 weeks ago. I saw them as a kid, and Vader still is 'the man' when it comes to bad guys. No amount of R2D2, or Boba Fett or Yoda will change that.

      --
      They stuck me in an institution, said it was the only solution, to...protect me from the enemy, myself
    3. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      That depends on your "point of view". It's been speculated (and hinted at through Lucasfilm) that Anakin assumes the title of Darth Vader and Sith Apprentice sometime midfilm. However, we won't see the Vader costume that we know and love until the end.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    4. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, the only reason they didn't call it "The Search For More Money" is because that was taken?

    5. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Ah, I hadn't heard about that speculation and only thought that he assumed the role at the end. Since I'm not just looking for a black costume, that would be good enough for me if true. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    6. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      Actually, the navbar on the Official Ep3 Page shows some concept art of Anakin/Vader before the mask. Pretty impressive. I assume paid subscribers have already seen Hayden in this costume.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    7. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by lavar78 · · Score: 2, Funny
      I saw them as a kid, and Vader still is 'the man' when it comes to bad guys. No amount of R2D2, or Boba Fett or Yoda will change that.
      Well, taking off that helmet had quite an effect.
      --
      "Dave, I stand still--the conclusions jump to me!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
    8. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by deeblite · · Score: 1

      Is it too much to ask that one of those numerous DVDs include a decent copy of the Star Wars Holiday Special?

    9. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by __aatgod8309 · · Score: 2, Funny

      But isn't 'decent copy of the Holiday Special' an oxymoron?

    10. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by crucini · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree. As 12 year old, I wanted to be Vader and to kill Luke. But Han Solo was pretty cool.

      Vader is a well-done incarnation of the Jungian "evil father" archetype. The ideas flowed from Jung through Joseph Campbell to Lucas.

      Watching the movie again ("ep 4") I'm annoyed that Vader's voice is not as deep as I remembered.

    11. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by croddy · · Score: 1
      well...

      I'm still confused as to why Lucas is attempting to "bury" the original theatrical versions of the films. as a kid, i grew up watching the original trilogy, and the presence of late-90's computer graphics in the so-called "special editions" is just distracting.

      thankfully, I managed to pull the pre-special-edition laserdisc rips off of bittorrent a few weeks ago.

      i'd have happily shelled out for a nice, restored print of the films as they were originally shown. Lucas won't provide them, but at least the vast pirate underworld of the internet will.

      cmr

    12. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple. When you were 15, you didn't like authority. Your father probably opressed you, as mine did, and we started loving Star Wars. All the same with Luke.

      Now you're 40 and you like to develop software, but the idiotic Republic and Jedi are damn bad at building bridges.

      The tendancy is totally the opposite but the nice touches of humor in 4/5 (soooo many funny aspects, even part 6 might count for some though i didn't find it as funny. 5 was pretty dark too) are blown up with idiots like Jar Jar. :(

    13. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      it probably has to do with the fact that you saw the first 3 movies before you saw the prequels and you knew what to expect.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    14. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      well lets see....

      a little kid whines and cries

      a rebellious Teenager Whines and Bitches because he thinks he knows more than the others

      so I would say that you have a beef if in this next film Anikin is not, as one of Mace Whindue's Alter Egos would say, "One Bad Ass Motha Fucka"

      just be glad Lucas did not pick what's his name from Titanic to be Anikin.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    15. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by dosius · · Score: 1

      TORRENT?!! WHERE?!!!!!!!! *dies* MUST HAVE !!! *dies again*

      These ruos are the last vestiges of hope for those of us who believe the pure, unadulterated form of the trilogy, as evidenced by pre-1995 releases, is the One True Version. Forget about the Special Edition; it's good, but it's not as good as the real deal.

      Moll.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    16. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by ultranova · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm still confused as to why Lucas is attempting to "bury" the original theatrical versions of the films.

      Propably because he thinks that the new versions are better and wants to be remembered by his best work ?

      "Forget the buggy beta, this is the final release !"

      as a kid, i grew up watching the original trilogy, and the presence of late-90's computer graphics in the so-called "special editions" is just distracting.

      Forget the computer graphics. What I found really distracting is that in ESB, they've added more dialogue for Vader ("Bring my shuttle" - after Luke jumps to the rift - Lukes scream is a bad addition too, IMHO silent falling worked better) . Well, that's all fine and good, but the voice is different. I'd propably not had noticed if I didn't have the rest of Vaders scenes to compare to, but now it leaves me wondering if Luke didn't hit him where it hurts ;).

      thankfully, I managed to pull the pre-special-edition laserdisc rips off of bittorrent a few weeks ago.

      Carefull ! You never know when copyright infringement is retroactively made into a death penalty offense !

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    17. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It's much worse than that. The prequels have revealed that the Empire was actually an significant improvement over the old republic, and that the Jedi were completely amoral.

      Episode 1 has Jedi sending a slave child to fight for his life in an arena. Most of the pilots in the podrace died, like any good colluseum race. Afterwards, they free him because of his genetics (anyone who doesn't match the Jedi genotype is considered worthless.) In the republic, we see slavery is common and death is cheap; under the empire, we know of no slaves, and we know there is upward mobility (Luke, a simple rural farmboy, had the chance at higher education) Jabba went from public death spectacles in the Republic to hiding from the empire. The Republic slaughters primitive natives on Naboo, while the Empire allowed them to live in peace right next to a major military base on Endor.

      The only people who speak ill of the Empire are people known to be Rebels; the non-aligned people we see are Owen and Beru, who are strongly anti-rebel. The only major atrocity commited by the Empire is the destructioon of Alderaan- but the only person claiming it's a peaceful planet is Leia, who is very clearly lying throught that scene. Diplomatic Mission, indeed.

      The Jedi are trying to train people to be amoral. What sort of person would leave his mother in slavery? What sort of evil guardian would condemn someone for attempting to rescue his own mother from slavery? Evil, Evil people. In some ways it is worse than that, they're teaching that no one without a high mitochondria^Wmidicholorian count is worthwhile.

      In fact, the Sith's motives are rather opaque except that they oppose the Republic. Considering how evil the Republic is, no real temptation is needed, Vader may just decide that he doens't want to work for the evil "light" Jedi any more, and work to build a better future under an Empire.

      The only problem is that this rather makes the end of RotJ a sad thing- the galaxy is now back to anarchy.

    18. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by techwolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heh... he said helmet.

      --
      I don't do this for karma, I do it for cash. It's much better.
    19. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please mod parent up.

    20. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The prequels have revealed that the Empire was actually an significant improvement over the old republic, and that the Jedi were completely amoral.


      TAGGE: That's impossible! How will the Emperor maintain control without the bureaucracy?

      TARKIN: The regional governors now have direct control over territories. Fear will keep the local systems in line. Fear of this battle station.


      In the republic, we see slavery is common and death is cheap; under the empire, we know of no slaves, and we know there is upward mobility (Luke, a simple rural farmboy, had the chance at higher education)


      From the movies we only know of 2 slaves- on Tatoonine which was controlled by the Hutts, not the Republic. We don't know of any slavery in the empire but it was never mentioned that the empire "abolished" it either; there was simply no need/use of slaves to advance the storyline. Luke's chance of "higher education" was to join the Imperial Acadamy.


      Jabba went from public death spectacles in the Republic to hiding from the empire.

      We don't have enough information from the last 3 movies to say this with any real certainty. If the empire wanted to destroy the Hutts they certainly could have long before the rebellion occurred. We don't know that the pod races stopped; they were simply no longer important to the storyline.


      The Republic slaughters primitive natives on Naboo, while the Empire allowed them to live in peace right next to a major military base on Endor.


      There was the slaughter of Jawa on Tatooine that lead to the deaths of Owen and Beru.


      the non-aligned people we see are Owen and Beru, who are strongly anti-rebel.


      They didn't want him to joint the academy, which was the Imperial academy.

      The Republic is a corrupt, ineffective institution, unable to do anything about anything of real importance- rather than immediately put a stop to the blockade of Naboo, the Senate was content with simply setting up comittees and negotiations rather than end the conflict and mete out justice. The Empire ruled its territories by fear.

      We know that "spice" was illegal during the Imperial days.

    21. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by The+Benefactor · · Score: 1

      This is what the old Tie Fighter games were trying to say in the short story in the manual. The sping on the story was that the Empire were the good guys and the Rebels were a bunch of terrorists.

      --
      To err is human, to arr is pirate.
    22. Re:Damn it, damn it, damn it by mink · · Score: 1

      There are 3 LD versions I am aware of.
      The first version is as it was originally released.
      The second version is the THX one where they cleaned up the ship overlays and lucas started adding small experamental clips of CGI (obvious droids in Mos Eisly, and some other stuff). This is the version I own.
      And the third version the so called "special edition".

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  4. Forget Star Wars... by SilentChris · · Score: 3, Funny

    Where's Indiana Jones?

    1. Re:Forget Star Wars... by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

      Oh, probably off galavanting in some jungle I presume. Why do you ask?

      Sorry, too easy.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    2. Re:Forget Star Wars... by molrak · · Score: 1

      Geriatric Jones is more like it.

      In one article on the on-again, off-again sequel, I thought I had read Harrison Ford is actually older today than Sean Connery was when they shot Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. Besides, even (or maybe especially) among the geek community, I would think that John Rhys-Davies has more star power than does Harrison Ford.

      --
      You're only as smart as your brain.
    3. Re:Forget Star Wars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's coming in your mom's hair right now
      You can hear them through the wall behind you.

  5. I know it's trendy to mock Lucas's titles lately by jbellis · · Score: 1

    but man, it's sad that TPM was the best title of the prequel trio.

  6. Name change to come.. by arkham6 · · Score: 5, Funny

    50 bucks says that revenge will sound too violent, and they movie will be renamed 'Return of the Jedi ^H^H^H^HSith' soon.

    1. Re:Name change to come.. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      actually, most of the complaints about the name were on the basis that Jedi wouldn't take revenge.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Name change to come.. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Funny, I thought it was because it was too similar to "The Revenge of Khan" (which was changed to "The Wrath of Khan")

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Name change to come.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that i finally understand this "^H^H" stuff, let me ask you this: why not use ^W (erase last word)?

    4. Re:Name change to come.. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Because Control-H is older

      --
      Orignal, Fun Palm games by the Lead Designer of Majesty!
      http://www.arcanejourneys.com/

    5. Re:Name change to come.. by SEE · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you've never hit your computer's backspace key when your client program is designed to send them as ^H but the server's code doesn't recognize any form of backspace. You'd actually get things like teh^H^Hhe appearing in people's text.

    6. Re:Name change to come.. by tuffy · · Score: 4, Informative
      Funny, I thought it was because it was too similar to "The Revenge of Khan" (which was changed to "The Wrath of Khan")

      "The Wrath of Khan" was originally "the Vengeance of Khan" but changed because it sounded too similar to the supposed "Revenge of the Jedi". And before it was "the Vengeance of Khan", it was "the Undiscovered Country". According the Leonard Nimoy's autobiography.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    7. Re:Name change to come.. by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      >>Funny, I thought it was because it was too similar to "The Revenge of Khan" (which was changed to "The Wrath of Khan")

      Revenge of Khan was changed because the guys at paramount were worried about colliding with Revenge of The Jedi. Paramount changed first, then Lucasfilm changed because of the "jedi's dont take revenge" flak.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    8. Re:Name change to come.. by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      Also happens if you use something that logs console I/O so that you can remember what you did later (e.g. what configure options you used when installing a program). Instead of showing the final result, it shows with the mistake, the control characters, and the correction, just like your teh^H^Hhe example.

    9. Re:Name change to come.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct. I use windows, and telnet/ssh are for faggots so not really an issue. GOD, LINUX SUCKS ASS. 20 YEARS AND STILL CANT FIX CTRL+H. OMG OMG.

    10. Re:Name change to come.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20 YEARS AND STILL CANT FIX CTRL+H

      1. this is "fixed". and why didn't you just set your backspace key if yours wasn't?

      I use windows, and telnet/ssh are for faggots so not really an issue

      2. yeah. not being able to connect to your so called "server" remotely at all must be a great alternative.

    11. Re:Name change to come.. by glitch! · · Score: 1

      I like to call it "The Wrath of Roarke". He sure did look good in that (surprisingly affordable) rich Corinthian leather.

      --
      A dingo ate my sig...
    12. Re:Name change to come.. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Darn, you're right: "Vengeance," not "Revenge" -- I remember now.

      I bow to your superior Trek knowledge.

      By the way, was that I Am Not Spock or I Am Spock? I've read the second one, but the first is out of print...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    13. Re:Name change to come.. by Decaff · · Score: 1

      It worked both ways too. Rejected Star Wars titles included:

      Star Wars: Generations (would have made sense)

      Star Wars: Name Of Sith

      Star Wars: The One Tower (did you notice the Jedi HQ?)

    14. Re:Name change to come.. by tuffy · · Score: 1
      By the way, was that I Am Not Spock or I Am Spock? I've read the second one, but the first is out of print...

      It's in the second one: I am Spock. It's a fascinating and surprisingly well-written book. I'd recommend it to anyone who wants to understand the whole Star Trek phenomenon from an actor's point of view.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  7. This film will be more like a funeral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll go just to see the burial of the franchise

    1. Re:This film will be more like a funeral by darth_MALL · · Score: 2

      How about making a real statement and not see it at all. Leave it for the fans like me who appreciate these for what they are. ENTERTAINING MOVIES! I don't think this franchise is anything to martyr thyself for. If you think it's that bad...Don't See It. They are for entertainment purposes Only. ;)

  8. Re:I know it's trendy to mock Lucas's titles latel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with this title? It's the perfect mirror for Return of the Jedi.

  9. Revenge of the Nerds.... er Sith by SalMoriarty · · Score: 5, Funny

    The plot:

    The Sith get kicked out of their house by the Jedi and have to move into the gym. They get mad, find a sponsor, then move in to beat the Jedi in the annual Corsucant fair and talent show.

    The Sith reign supreme from then on.

    1. Re:Revenge of the Nerds.... er Sith by higuy48 · · Score: 1

      Is that the plot of Revenge of the Nerds? DAMN! Dodgeball SO ripped off of them!

      I think Lance Armstrong should have a cameo as young Grand Moff Tarkin. Or something.

      --
      And now, for a sig that's a complete copout.
    2. Re:Revenge of the Nerds.... er Sith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robot Houuuuuuuuuuseeee!

    3. Re:Revenge of the Nerds.... er Sith by petra13 · · Score: 4, Funny
      The dialogue:

      Obi-Wan: You must not give in to the Dark Side
      Anakin: Damnit, Obi-Wan, I'm a bad actor, not a Jedi.

    4. Re:Revenge of the Nerds.... er Sith by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1

      It stars a Singing John Travolta, right?

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
    5. Re:Revenge of the Nerds.... er Sith by stor · · Score: 1

      If the Sith set up hidden cameras around Armadala's Palace I'm so there. ;)

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  10. completely forgot by dncsky1530 · · Score: 1

    When episode one first came out i was very excited, waited in line, and cheer when it started. How ever it was not nearly as good as I hoped, and many people probably feel the same way. When episode 2 rolled around i didn't bother waiting line, just saw it a week after it came out, still disappointed. I'm not trying to troll here but i don't know if i'll even go see episode 3, or just wait to rent it from blockbuster. Just hope they clean up there act.

    1. Re:completely forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto.

    2. Re:completely forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean you're still planning on seeing it? I've already decided to spend the money I would have spent on Episode 3 to pay somebody to give me a swift kick in the nuts. It'll be a lot less painful.

    3. Re:completely forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the love of God, don't support Blockbuster!! They are all about censorship (and I'm not talking about porn).

      I tried to rent "The Last Temptation of Christ" from them 2 years ago, and discovered that the whole chain refuses to carry it. I tore up my membership cards that day.

      I went and bought the movie instead (it's not that good).

    4. Re:completely forgot by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      that movie was boring anyway

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    5. Re:completely forgot by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, I haven't seen any of these in the theaters... very disappointing, all around. I don't understand why everyone is so hyped up about them.

      I was one of the biggest fans of the original trilogy, too.

      After the first prequel, I really tried to give it a chance... "ok, let's see where he's going with this..." but the second one was just horrible.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  11. That title isn't surprising by Eudial · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The renvenge of the teletubbies" would sure surprise me 100% more.

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    1. Re: That title isn't surprising by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny


      > "The renvenge of the teletubbies" would sure surprise me 100% more.

      Ah, yes. Young Annakin throws himself into a volcano upon learning that his father is none other than the notorious Tinkie Skywinkie. After being maliciously rescued by a wandering band of Ewok jongleurs he dedicates his life to the destruction of all that is good and gold and gay, starting with his own droid C3PO.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:That title isn't surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? That would only be twice as surprising? Talk about jaded...

    3. Re:That title isn't surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree typo's in a title are very surprising.

  12. How about more plot coherrence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After a first episode with a plot that resembled a sunday morning cartoon and a second episode that only the most hard core Star Wars fans could follow, how about something good this time?

    Yeah, would be nice.

    1. Re:How about more plot coherrence by slavetrade55 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dunno how much the plot of the first episode resembled a sunday morning cartoon (maybe the characters did)...Seriously, what do kids know about trade sanctions, diplomatic engagements and senate politics? Except that they make for a boring setup for a movie that's supposed to be an exciting epic space opera.

      Still, I liked it more than Ep.2.

  13. How about: by AgentPhunk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Star Wars III: Return of the Suckage

    1. Re:How about: by Gunnery+Sgt.+Hartman · · Score: 1

      or Same Shit, Another Movie

      --
      [ ]
  14. Fake title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But surely anyone who really knows about the ways of the Sith will know that revenge just isn't in their nature...

    This must be a fake title to throw unlicensed merchandisers off the scent.

  15. Great title! by dutt · · Score: 0

    A good choice. I like the title. It could have been much worse: Star Wars: Episode III Revenge of Jar Jar

  16. One has to wonder by Savet+Hegar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    how much more continuity Lucas is going to flush down the toilet with this film. He gives the book writers creative license but makes them follow a pre-determined origin and fate with the characters, and then totally pisses on them with the movies. Boba Fett is a prime example. In the books, he was Jaster Mareel before he was Boba Fett. His ship was custom made, not a stolen prison ship. The ship part was taken from the Bounty Hunter video game. It was a good game, but still didn't do a good job of repairing the Bobba/Jango/Jaster thing. LOL....I guess this post proves I have no life.

    --
    Mod points are pointless when you browse at -1.
    1. Re:One has to wonder by Rallion · · Score: 1

      It is kind of upsetting. The Boba Fett described in the novels is a hell of a character. Strong values and sense of morality. Respect for authority, no matter who has it. Uncommon traits for a bounty hunter.

      The person he's turned into in the movies is just your everyday bounty hunter. Those bounty hunters in Chronicles of Riddick have better characters than this guy.

      We can lack lives together.

    2. Re:One has to wonder by shokk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Who's to say Jaster isn't a cover he has to pick up somewhere along the way to go into hiding for committed as a youthful indiscretion. Besides, since Boba won't be more than 10 in this movie, his younger days can still be left up to the writers.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    3. Re:One has to wonder by Libertarian001 · · Score: 1

      There's a toy magazine from waaaaaaaaaaay back that has a 1 page story about Boba Fett and his (Mandalorian) armor. The Mandalorians were a super-elite commando team (~250 of them). They were causing lots of problems, so the Jedi united and put them down. All of them, except Fett (who also happened to be the commander). Explains why Fett hates the Jedi so much.

      I personally liked this story more than the books, comic books or now the movies, but I understand why it was changed.

    4. Re:One has to wonder by Moofie · · Score: 1

      You would go ABSOLUTELY MAD trying to reconcile manga storylines with the anime that follow (or precede) them.

      Different universes. Get over it. Continuity should take a back seat to good storytelling.

      Now, if Lucas would just put some good storytelling in the prequels, we'd be fine... /me mutters under his breath about fucking Greedo shooting first...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    5. Re:One has to wonder by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      Boba was about 12 in AOTC, so he'll be around 15 for ROTS. That is if we even see him. Temura Morrison (Jango Fett) will be returning to give his face to the aged clone troopers, but it is still up in the air if the Boba character will be returning. Even if he does, I doubt it will be a significant part.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    6. Re:One has to wonder by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      hmm, well explain to me how the movies turned him into something other than a bounty hunter? the MOVIES came out FIRST. and how the hell do you know anything about him when he had all of what, 1 line in episode 5 and 6 put together and it consisted of "ahhhhhhhhh"

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    7. Re:One has to wonder by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      IF you go back to the top of the thread, you'll probably be ble to easily ascertain that the books cover Boba Fett pretty well.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    8. Re:One has to wonder by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      yeah thanks, but again, explain to me Mighty mind how the movies which PRECEDED the books could mess up the continuity of boba fett

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  17. Re:I know it's trendy to mock Lucas's titles latel by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's even a better mirror when you consider that the original title of Jedi was "Revenge of the Jedi" (good nerds have drooled over the poster).

    -B

  18. he just had to have revenge by geekoid · · Score: 1, Interesting

    in the title.
    He wanted 'Revenge of the Jedi' but people prtested that Jedis do not seek revenge.

    So now they have 'Revenge od the Sith'. Fine Sith is all about revenge, but what is it a revenge of? did a Jedi knock up palpatines sister and Now he wnats to get even? Did Obi-One park in the 'Sith of the months' parking spot?

    Unfortuantly I have high hopes for this movie, becasue I know how he cold fit it all together...everything.
    He won't.

    Best case scenerio: He does fot it all together, and it is different than how I see it can come together...at they get someone who can act to play Anakin.

    Interesting, the actor that play anakin can't act..and the actor who play's his son also can't act. hmmmmm

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:he just had to have revenge by Limburgher · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not to flame, but is there something wrong with your keyboard? :)

      --

      You are not the customer.

    2. Re:he just had to have revenge by GuyMannDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So now they have 'Revenge od the Sith'. Fine Sith is all about revenge, but what is it a revenge of? did a Jedi knock up palpatines sister and Now he wnats to get even? Did Obi-One park in the 'Sith of the months' parking spot?

      I know you're just joking around, but I think you're making a good point here. At no point have we seen any motivation for why the Sith are the way they are. I think this signficantly detracts from the movies. If Lucas decides to explain the source of the Sith's hatred in this final film, I would definitely appreciate the effort (as long as he doesn't reduce it to something as stupid as mitochlorians).

      In the 2-on-1 lightsabre duel from Epsiode I there is a moment where the fighting has ceased. Gui-Con and Darth Maul are separated by a plasma wall and Obi-won is even further away. Maul walks around like a caged tiger while Gui-Con just sits there meditating. This is not exciting! This does not build suspense! This does not move the story foward! I couldn't believe that they would just sit there like that. That was the perfect opportunity for a short conversation between warriors to take place and give the audience insight into the conflict! Doesn't Maul have anything to say? Doesn't he even want to mock the jedi? Is Gui-Con so dead to the world that he's not even remotely curious why this guy has appeared out of nowhere to kill him?

      I, too, would like to know what this "revenge" the Sith want is all about. Here's hoping that Lucas will finally answer this question in the new film. Otherwise, it just becomes a stupid white hats vs. black hats space western. Aren't we a little old for that?

      GMD

    3. Re:he just had to have revenge by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I take issue with your statement that there's no explanation as to why the sith are the way they are. We've been beaten over the head with it through the entire series, or put another way, through two series (the one movie yet to be released notwithstanding) and that reason is simply that they are the dark side. The dark side is about everything bad in the world, evil, destruction, violence, hatred. Just as the Jedi strive to embody the opposites of these ideals, the Sith represent them. There is great power in the dark side, but of course the whole point of the movies is that good triumphs over evil because evil is focused on destruction or something like that. Maybe I kind of missed the point though, I thought I almost had it in the third movie, but then a bunch of muppets showed up, and then they put carrie fisher in a bronze bikini and I totally lost my train of thought.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:he just had to have revenge by Maul · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, the Revenge of the Jedi title influenced the name of Star Trek 2.

      Originally Star Trek 2 was supposed to be titled Revenge of Khan, but they changed it so it didn't sound like they were copying Star Wars.

      --

      "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    5. Re:he just had to have revenge by sg3000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > At no point have we seen any motivation for why the Sith are
      > the way they are

      My understanding is that Star Wars canon says that the Jedi wiped out the Sith 1000 years before TPM. There may have been something later than that, but Darth Maul did say in TPM, "At last we'll reveal ourselves to the Jedi. At last we'll have our revenge." Too bad for Darth Maul the actual revenge didn't happen until Episode III when Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader kills almost all the Jedi (presumably). Thus the "Revenge of the Sith" title. Good job to Lucas on the title, BTW.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    6. Re:he just had to have revenge by Zaranne · · Score: 1

      At least someone was paying attention. I had hoped I could have pointed out the above, but sg3000 nailed it. Mace Windu also mentioned about the Sith having been extinct for a very long time. Sounds like the Jedi kicking the Sith's butts big time to me...leading up to Maul's revenge comment. So the title is perfect.

      It's better than "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes"...er...uh, I mean "Clones".

      --
      So when is the Hawkeye movie coming out?
    7. Re:he just had to have revenge by bckrispi · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The novelization of TPM explains it. The sith used to number in the thousands. Because of the corrupting nature of the Dark Side, infighting was common. This division of their forces allowed the Jedi to wipe the Sith threat from the galaxy. Only one Sith, Darth Bane, survived. Learning from the mistakes of the past, he enacted the doctorine of only two sith at a time - Master and Apprentice. Yes, the film could have delved into this, but I think any reasonable viewer, after hearing Darth Maul say "At last we will reveal ourselves to the Jedi. At last we will have revenge!", could easily draw the conclusion that there is hella bad blood between the Jedi & the Sith.

      W.R.T your comments on the TPM lightsaber battle, I can't help but disagree. What Lucas lacks in ability to pen effective dialog, he *more* than makes up for in visuals. At the point when the three were seperated by the laser fields, you were able to gain great insight into each of the character's motives. You're right, Maul was pacing "like a caged animal". There's no better way to describe this. His whole purpose in Palpatine's plan is to be an assassin and enforcer. At this point, his entire focus was on his blind hatred of the Jedi. Qui-gon, knowing he was overmatched, took a moment to meditate. The simple act of him closing his eyes at this moment gives the most revealing insight into his character: He has total trust in the Force. Even when faced with the most fearsome opponent of his life, and every instinct in his human nature should be telling him not to take his eyes off of Maul, he is able to resist, control his fear, and put his total faith in the Force guiding his actions. Obi-wan, seperated from his master is torn between the two, unsure of what his next move should be. His inexperience and immature knowledge of the force are now painfully obvious. In one shot, he looks at the barrier as though he is trying to will it open, but to no avail. This scene was brilliant, and to add dialog to it would have ruined the moment.

      And as far as your White Hat/Black hat western comment. Well, sorry, that's what you're gonna get. If you look at the OT, it doesn't get any more good guys vs. bad guys than the Rebels vs. the Empire, and that aspect isn't gonna change. Lucas has said since the 70's that this was his goal: to make a "space western" in the flavor of the saturday sci-fi serials that he grew up with.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    8. Re:he just had to have revenge by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Star Wars has always been formulaic -- it's a classic epic, complete with an epic hero. One thing that page forgets to mention is that an epic hero has to go through a life-changing "trial". For Odysseus, it was a decent into hell; for Luke Skywalker, it was losing his hand, and for Anakin it was retrieving his mother.

      Star Wars has never been, or tried to be, more than a "stupid white hats vs. black hats" kind of thing -- the only thing innovative about it is special effects. Beyond that, it's just The Odyssey in space.

      <flamebait>
      Of course, this is what those stupid kids failed to understand back in elementary school, when people made fun of me for not liking Star Wars, and being a Trekkie instead. This is precisely the reason Trek is more interesting -- it's actually sci-fi* instead of fantasy(see "other" under "types of science fiction")
      </flamebait>

      * it appears wikipedia disagrees with me, and classifies Trek as a "Space Opera." While not of the same caliber as 1984 or Stranger in a Strange Land, it does use a sci-fi setting to explore the human condition -- compare Star Trek 6 (1989) to the collapse of the Soviet Union, and take a look at many episodes of TNG (the series with the highest "real sci-fi" ratio, in my opinion).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:he just had to have revenge by n8_f · · Score: 5, Funny

      At no point have we seen any motivation for why the Sith are the way they are.

      The Sith hate the Jedi because they love freedom. ...and they tried to kill off all the Sith. But mainly it's the freedom thing.

    10. Re:he just had to have revenge by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Maul walks around like a caged tiger while Gui-Con just sits there meditating"

      I liked that scene a lot. However, you bring up an excellent point. It would have been an excellent opportunity to learn a little more about the history of their conflict.

      Apparently, I need to spend hundereds of dollars in Star Wars books to understand the movie. Bah

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:he just had to have revenge by GuyMannDude · · Score: 1

      The novelization of TPM explains it. The sith used to number in the thousands. Because of the corrupting nature of the Dark Side, infighting was common. This division of their forces allowed the Jedi to wipe the Sith threat from the galaxy. Only one Sith, Darth Bane, survived. Learning from the mistakes of the past, he enacted the doctorine of only two sith at a time - Master and Apprentice.

      Interesting. Thanks for letting us know. That makes the story much more interesting.

      Yes, the film could have delved into this, but I think any reasonable viewer, after hearing Darth Maul say "At last we will reveal ourselves to the Jedi. At last we will have revenge!", could easily draw the conclusion that there is hella bad blood between the Jedi & the Sith.

      Oh, I caught the part about the Sith not liking the Jedi very much. What was missing was all the stuff you wrote above, namely, "why". I think the film *should* have delved into the motivations of the characters a bit more. Leaving it the way it was made the movie just one big videogame. Maybe Lucas filmed the scene describing the history of the Sith you laid out above but it ended up on the cutting-room floor to make room for the scene where Jar-Jar gets his tongue stunned by the plasma beams of the pod-racer's engines.

      W.R.T your comments on the TPM lightsaber battle, I can't help but disagree....This scene was brilliant, and to add dialog to it would have ruined the moment.

      Interesting way to look at it. I hadn't thought of that. It seemed like a wasted opportunity to move the story along. If, however, Qui-Gon was already aware of the backstory between the Jedi and the Sith, then you're absolutely right that there is no need for dialog. Unfortunately, because Lucas chose not to let *us* in on the secret, having characters just stand there in silence was a bit baffling.

      Anyhow, thanks for the explanation. I'm interested to hear a bit more about how the Sith fell apart but I'm not going to purchase a Star Wars product just so I can find out. Lucas should have included that in my ticket price.

      GMD

    12. Re:he just had to have revenge by wfberg · · Score: 1

      The novelization of TPM explains it.

      Yes. Because when I buy a ticket to go to a movie, I expect no plot at all. No siree, the makers saved that part for the novelization. No better way to enhance your enjoyment of a movie than to strip out the entire plot and file it away under "merchandising".

      I just like my films better without any of that "plot" or "storyline" getting in the way of good special effects and bad acting.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    13. Re:he just had to have revenge by Kesh · · Score: 1
      Had you considered that, just maybe, he'll explain the whole thing in the new movie?

      Heck, that's what I'd expect to be Palpatine's speech to Anakin: the Jedi are arrogant, they don't care about the good of the people, they're just interested in power but won't admit it, and the Sith taught personal power. The Jedi just wiped out the Sith to solidify their authority over others! ;)

    14. Re:he just had to have revenge by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      Maul walks around like a caged tiger while Gui-Con just sits there meditating. This is not exciting! This does not build suspense!

      Actually, that was one of the *better* dramatic moments in the film. It would not have been enhanced in anyway by one liners or any other sort of dialog. It spelled out each character in full without anyone uttering a single word. It was a suprisingly sophisticated moment in an otherwise poor film, making me suspect it was an accident. ;-)

      That was the perfect opportunity for a short conversation between warriors to take place and give the audience insight into the conflict! Doesn't Maul have anything to say? Doesn't he even want to mock the jedi? Is Gui-Con so dead to the world that he's not even remotely curious why this guy has appeared out of nowhere to kill him?

      This is immature. Would the Seven Samauri have been improved if the samurai and the bandits tried to discuss their differences? The Sith know what the Jedi are, and the Jedi know what the Sith are. The audience, if they have been paying attention, also understand this. Words become extraneous. In the silence of the scene hangs the history of these two groups. The time for reasoning and discussion is generations past. But, again, I suspect this effect was accidental.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    15. Re:he just had to have revenge by Dylan2000 · · Score: 1

      Mods, that was funny. Ironic social comedy which nobody got. I laughed.

      --
      Build your own website - full service homepage system your m
    16. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Lucas decides to explain the source of the Sith's hatred in this final film, I would definitely appreciate the effort (as long as he doesn't reduce it to something as stupid as mitochlorians).

      Had you considered that, just maybe, he'll explain the whole thing in the new movie?

      you deserve to get modded down for that, pal. you didn't even read his post, you just wanted to insult him.

    17. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What Lucas lacks in ability to pen effective dialog, he *more* than makes up for in visuals."

      Unfortunately, his ability to create overly cute, completely tangential product-placement creatures fills all with despair.

    18. Re:he just had to have revenge by ansible · · Score: 1

      the doctorine of only two sith at a time - Master and Apprentice.

      Well, that's all great. Of course, it is contradicted by the 2nd movie and the animated series on Cartoon Network.

      Because there were more Sith. Like Count Doku. I find it hard to believe he was only converted to the dark side after the demise of Darth Maul. The Clone War was a long time in preparation.

      Dunno. Maybe he wasn't officially Sith. Like he didn't complete the paperwork or something.

      And then, in the cartoon series, Doku is recruiting his own apprentice (the freaky bald chick). And in the mean time, Palpatine is recruiting Skywalker. The series, BTW, is supposed to be occuring in between Ep2 and Ep3.

      Or maybe Palpatine said "screw it, I need more Sith".

      Your comments on the LS battle with QG, OK and DM was quite interesting and insightful.

      I have mixed feelings about the entire series. Loved eps 4,5,6 as a kid. Eps 1 and 2 have been hit-and-miss to my adult eyes.

      Some bits were really cool. It wasn't communicated that well in 4,5,6 how bad-ass the jedi are/were. You really got to see that in Ep1. And I liked Palpatine's "I lost but I still won" planning. That's exactly what I'd expect from someone able to take over an entire empire. But Jar Jar, the midicloridians, and stuff like that turned me off.

    19. Re:he just had to have revenge by dont_think_twice · · Score: 0

      I take issue with your statement that there's no explanation as to why the sith are the way they are. ... that reason is simply that they are the dark side

      That is not a reason, it is a load of BS. It simply leads to a restatement of the question: Why have the sith embraced the dark side? What do they get out of it? What are their goals? What do they stand for? Perhaps more imporantly, what exactly is the Dark Side? Why does it exist? What is the goal of the dark side?

      Excuse me for going off topic, but this leads to an interesting parallel: George Bush and his simple breakdown of terrorism: "the terrorists (pronounced terrace) hate us because of our freedoms" and the black and white distinction that you are either with us (the good guys) or you are with them (the bad guys). If you are with them, you are an evildoer. If you are with us, you are good (even if you are a autocratic dictator who represses your people (Mubarak or Musharraf)).

    20. Re:he just had to have revenge by bckrispi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Because there were more Sith. Like Count Doku. I find it hard to believe he was only converted to the dark side after the demise of Darth Maul. The Clone War was a long time in preparation.

      Like who?? And why can't you believe he didn't succumb to the dark side after Maul's fall?? There were 10 years between the two prequels. Dooku was an "idealist". Like his apprentice, Qui-gon, he had misgivings about the senate. At some point (presumably between ep1 & 2), this drove him away from the Jedi order and the republic. At some point, Dooku meets Sidious. His political idealism is corrupted by his lust for the power the Dark Side offers. So he becomes the apprentice to Sidious.

      Dunno. Maybe he wasn't officially Sith. Like he didn't complete the paperwork or something.

      Just because you have a tendancy to use the Dark Side doesn't make you a sith lord, any more than the ability to shoot a rifle makes you a Marine.

      And then, in the cartoon series, Doku is recruiting his own apprentice (the freaky bald chick). And in the mean time, Palpatine is recruiting Skywalker. The series, BTW, is supposed to be occuring in between Ep2 and Ep3.

      Grrrrphhh. I'm sorry, but I am really tired of people calling events like this a contradiction. You're educated people; read between the lines already! Vader tried recruting Luke. Why?? So, as his Apprentice, Vader would be the Sith Master, and together, they would overthrow palpatine/sidious. Two Sith: no more, no less. Palpatine tried to recruit Luke as his apprentice. Why? Because Vader had become too powerful and ambitious and had revealed his desire to become the Master. He even explains this in the film: Now, fulfil your destiny, and take your father's place at my side!. Again, exactly two sith! What I think is totally brilliant (if not accidental) is the scene in ESB where Vader is in contact with Palpatine, discussing Luke. With what we know now, both Vader and Palp knew what was going to happen. Luke needed to be turned; as a Jedi, he would be a risk that could undo all of their schemes. They could simply kill him, but they both know that he may be worth more to each of their personal agendas alive. They know that one of the three of them will have to die. The Apprentice will always try to take the place of his master, and the Master will need to eliminate his apprentice before he gains enough power and ambition to do so. We see this in AOTC as well, as Dooku, ready to give himself a promotion, tries luring Obi-wan to the Dark side with the pretence of "Destroying the sith". He does this again in the CN series. Meanwhile, Palpatine has had Anakin on deck for over a decade ready to take Dooku's place.

      Please explain how any of this is a contradition?

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    21. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George Bush and his simple breakdown of terrorism: "the terrorists (pronounced terrace) hate us because of our freedoms"

      Well, he solved that now, didn't he?

    22. Re:he just had to have revenge by Wister285 · · Score: 1

      You don't even have to buy a Star Wars product to know most of the storylines in the Star Wars universe. So long as you have an Internet connection, you can read the Star Wars Databank.

    23. Re:he just had to have revenge by Soothh · · Score: 0

      Think of the Sith as democrats, power hungry and wanting to kill all in their way :)
      that should explain the "Why" part.
      Nah, in reality, they want revenge for the jedi killing them all off 1000 years before.

      --
      We have seen that living things are too improbable and too beautifully "designed" to have come into existence by chance.
    24. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the *fark* is 'Gui-con'? Did you perhaps mean Qui-Gon?

      As for 'insight into the conflict', did you miss the fact that Maul is a Sith Lord? Do you expect a Jedi to say, 'Whoa pal, whaddaya say you holster that thing and we sit down and talk out our differences over a cup of Corellian tea, hmmm?'

    25. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Bin Laden thought: the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Because he hates the American people, he thought: lets make those Americans proprietary by scaring of their leader. It worked. And now, the intelligence people are forced to share their information, while the people aren't allowed to share their opinion.

      Make no mistake! Bin Laden never saw Star Wars. He saw Dr. Strangelove.

    26. Re:he just had to have revenge by JoeNotCharles · · Score: 1

      I've seen people complain about that scene quite a bit, which is strange, since that's my single favourite scene in the first movie. (There are only three or four scenes I like *at all* in the first movie, but that one and Palpatine's final line are the only two worth mentioning.) I thought it was a great way to show the difference between the two traditions without distracting dialogue (seriously, based on the rest of the script, how good do you think the dialogue would have been, anyway?)

    27. Re:he just had to have revenge by Shimmer · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree. This scene was the highlight of the movie. The lightsaber battle was the only one of the three end-of-movie "threads" that I enjoyed.

      --
      The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
    28. Re:he just had to have revenge by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      Doesn't Maul have anything to say? Doesn't he even want to mock the jedi?

      Darth Maul's voice is overdubbed. He only has about 8 spoken words in the film. The reason is that he was chosen on his athletic prowess *only*. In order to get someone who could do that fight, they looked for a professional dancer, with years of jazz-tap and so forth training.

      This is why he so completely outclasses Qui-gon Gen in that battle - you wonder how Darth Maul ever could possibly lose, because he outfights the Jedi at all possible points.

      Unfortunately, to get someone this agile and diciplined in the arts of, well, basically dancing, they ended up with a gay guy. If you ever hear him talk, he has a high voice and a lisp. It's like Christopher Lowell being the arch-nemisis of the galaxy.

      So, they tried to keep his speaking down to a minimum, and keep it simplistic, since they had to overdub the whole 9 yards.

      ~Wx

      --
      sig?
    29. Re:he just had to have revenge by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1
      Somebody mod this up?

      If you bear this in mind, then the conversation between Vader and Palpatine about turning Luke instead of killing him takes on new meaning. During the entire exchange, both was planning on turning Luke and then using him to help supplant the other, and both of them knew it. Palpatine originally wanted Vader to kill Luke and Vader couldn't _not_ do it, so he had to risk letting Palpatine get his hands on him in order to keep him alive long enough for Vader to turn him instead. Makes me wonder what Vader had in mind if he'd actually gotten Luke into the carbonite...

      It _also_ suggests that during the 20 years or so between Episodes 3 and 4, Vader probably had to fend off an assassination attempt by Palpatine and another would-be apprentice. Or one of his own attempts had gone awry and he was stuck being low man on the totem pole until he could train up another one? Might explain why he was in such a bad mood at the start of Ep4?

      It also totally explains why Republic Jedi (both New and Old) recruited like Scientologists, but even after decades in power, the Empire still only had the two Sith.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    30. Re:he just had to have revenge by RdsArts · · Score: 1
      If Lucas decides to explain the source of the Sith's hatred in this final film, I would definitely appreciate the effort (as long as he doesn't reduce it to something as stupid as mitochlorians).


      Obi-Wan (standing over a fallen Sith): My God. I've never seen such high levels of "hater-aide" before...

      (music dramatically swells)
    31. Re:he just had to have revenge by ansible · · Score: 1

      Because Vader had become too powerful and ambitious and had revealed his desire to become the Master.

      I really didn't get that impression from 4,5,6. The only time Vader showed any backbone w.r.t. Palpatine was at the very, very end. Sure, he talks to Luke about offing Palpatine at the end of 5, but we didn't see any other concrete plans to get rid of Palpatine.

      Vader was showing some incompetence in dispatching the rebels: lost the Death Star I, let the rebels escape (yeah, wasn't really his fault, but still), couldn't ever find their base, etc.. By this point he seemed to be getting soft. That would have been a more plausible reason for Palpatine to get rid of Vader.

      Unless, of course, playing the rebels against Palpatine was part of Vader's plan... And he was going to co-opt them later or something. Which could have been why they always "escaped". He needed a constant threat to keep Palpatine always a little off balance. Have Palpatine reacting to events, when he thought he was acting decisively (setting up the ambush at Death Star II). I now wonder if Vader was responsible for replacing the "crack troops" on Endor with the bunch of losers who had their asses kicked by a bunch of neolithic furballs.

      They could simply kill him, but they both know that he may be worth more to each of their personal agendas alive. They know that one of the three of them will have to die.

      I'm not saying you're wrong, but that's seriously wacky. "Hey you, I need you to go out and train your replacement. Oh, and that retirement home by the beach you were looking to buy on Naboo... don't bother."

      Meanwhile, Palpatine has had Anakin on deck for over a decade ready to take Dooku's place.

      So you're saying Doku really wanted freaky bald chick to kill Skywalker? That this wasn't part of the plan to turn Skywalker to the dark side in the process of defeating her? I was under the impression that Doku recruiting freaky bald chick was under Palpatine's direction. But it has been a while since I've seen the series.

      I took the "there is always a master and an apprentice" to mean the Sith came in pairs. The hard limit of two Sith in all the universe was news to me today. It will take me a little time to get used to the idea.

      I still don't buy the desire for revenge as a motivation for Darth Maul. The Sith are not some grand institution stretching through time, they're just two guys. There is no "you killed my father, prepare to die" thing going on here. Or at least, there wasn't one in Ep1.

      The Sith had plenty of reasons for wanting to destroy the Jedi, but I didn't really think revenge was a part of it.

      Huh. Just when you think you know something inside and out, you can learn something new.

    32. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please explain how any of this is a contradition?

      There is none. I just learned why SM and 3somes are Bad Things.

    33. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't explain why Vader defended Palpetine when Luke tried to strike him after he was seduced to grab his lightsaber in "Our Most Depeserate Moment" at the end of ROTJ. I'd just let Luke kill the asshole, set a cup of tea, and then discuss the new hierarchy.

    34. Re:he just had to have revenge by LuSiDe · · Score: 1

      Palpetine actually had a covert ops Dark Jedi among him who secured him, did stealth operations, did intelligence ops, and eventually fell in love with Luke: Mara Jade. So there wasn't only 2 Siths, unless she wasn't a Sith and i don't really get the difference between a Dark Jedi and a Sith.

      In the CCG she has force 4 or something.

      There are some amateur Star Wars movies floating around on the Internet (some are truelly fun, though most are short) and in one she's featuring. Damn hot, whew!

      [Anyone interested in buying CCG (the _old_ game) cards with various main characters???]

      --
      WE DON'T NEED NO BLOG CONTROL.
    35. Re:he just had to have revenge by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Gee, an out-of-touch professor protected from the real world by tenure flake like Stallman posting anti-Republican propaganda. Academia far-left never-have-to-get-a-real-job elitist pseudo-intellectual arrogant pompous ignorant professors are a dime a dozen.

      Much better list:
      Things Democrats Believe

    36. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actor who play's his son

      "plays".

      (The other typos were probably unintentional.)

    37. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You manage to turn a discussion about a sinking entertainment franchise into a discussion about George Bush???
      Can a discussion about Nazis be far behind?
      If Godwin were dead (and buried instead of cremated), he'd be spinning in his grave about now.

    38. Re:he just had to have revenge by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    39. Re:he just had to have revenge by Kesh · · Score: 1

      This coming from an AC.

      Yes, I read his post. No, I didn't want to insult him. But apparently, he wanted the whole thing spelled out from the beginning, instead of considering that maybe it would be answered in the film that's actually about the subject.

    40. Re:he just had to have revenge by KanSer · · Score: 1

      Let them eat Freedom-Fried Womprat...

      --
      • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
    41. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Not to flame, but is there something wrong with your keyboard? :)"

      Watch it. Some of us aren't as adept at

      typing one-handed as

      others.

    42. Re:he just had to have revenge by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      did you even bother reading this entire thread?

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    43. Re:he just had to have revenge by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      hmm, lets see....

      perhaps because of the fact that all Luke did at that point was to get really pissed off and strike out of rage.

      that is pretty dangerous stuff and if Luke killed the Emperor in one blow, then Vader would have been the next target and would have been forced to wiipe the floor with Luke rather than recruit him. recall the amount of tempering that took place after they got his steel hot? that was important because it was shaping the rage and directing it, besides, the Emperor did not need Vader to stop the blade, he could have Force pushed Luke away and achieved the same effect.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    44. Re:he just had to have revenge by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      does Dark Jedi sound like Sith? no? well then they are not the same thing.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    45. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks.

      "that is pretty dangerous stuff and if Luke killed the Emperor in one blow, then Vader would have been the next target and would have been forced to wiipe the floor with Luke rather than recruit him."

      Okay, i accept it as possibility, but they've thought it through then however then the Emperor knew what Vader was up to because Vader can read what Luke thinks (Leia) then the Emperor can surely as well even more because he had more people (like Jade) next to him which he trusted more. Now, if Vader knew what he was going to do right away then why did he hesitated to throw the emperor under?

      "besides, the Emperor did not need Vader to stop the blade, he could have Force pushed Luke away and achieved the same effect."

      Excuse me, but when you're expecting someone to defend you while you have much less than 1 second available to respond to something totally unexpected then you fail to respond. And he'd be dead.

      Vader did not hesitate. I basically think Vader tried the father & son trick back at ESB. It didn't work out, then he became loyal again to the Emperor. But when Luke capitalated Vader didn't try to bargain for a 2 on 1 against the Emperor, and at the fight nothing like that turned out either. Instead Vader saw his son as a rebel and only in the very end he was convinced. That's what i think of as of now thanks for helping clearing up my mind :)

    46. Re:he just had to have revenge by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Jar-Jar was a bane onto humanity, but what's wrong with midiclorians? You need an explanation for why a energy force which goes through all things can only be manipulated by the select few, (training alone won't do it, you have to be born with the talent) and midiclorians fits the bill quite nicely.

      And you still can get all the Zen stuff without leaving The Force in the domain of magic elves. A theory I worked out was that although midiclorians manipulate the force for you, manipulating the midiclorians ain't easy and it involves midiclorians responding to the stimuli of your endocrine and nervous systems. Thusly, in order to control the midiclorians, you need to be in control of yourself.

      Although the idea of Anakin being concieved by midiclorians was just stupid.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    47. Re:he just had to have revenge by archivis · · Score: 1

      Sith and jedi are schools of force training, like styles of martial arts. If you're a jedi who uses the dark side of the force, that doesn't mean you've been trained and taught as a Sith, just like holding a black belt in karate and knowing a few aikido throws doesn't mean you're actually qualified on the subject of aikido.

      --
      In July O7, I got a mac pro. There's no punchline. Just endless joy and wonder.
    48. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as far as your White Hat/Black hat western comment. Well, sorry, that's what you're gonna get. If you look at the OT, it doesn't get any more good guys vs. bad guys than the Rebels vs. the Empire, and that aspect isn't gonna change. So it's pretty much like the Democrats and the Republicans?

    49. Re:he just had to have revenge by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Well, sure, except that Democrats tend to be sissies when facing anyone other than another Democrat. Dukakis is a perfect example of this.

    50. Re:he just had to have revenge by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      couldn't ever find their base

      What are you talking about? He pegged Hoth the instant he saw the photos.

    51. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So now they have 'Revenge od the Sith'.

      er. I think you misspelled 'Shit'

    52. Re:he just had to have revenge by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Palpetine actually had a covert ops Dark Jedi among him who secured him, did stealth operations, did intelligence ops, and eventually fell in love with Luke: Mara Jade.

      While Mara Jade *was* a covert op, the "Emperor's Hand", she wasn't a jedi at the time, not even an apprentice. She did have a lot of latent jedi ability, mainly manifested in her ability to hear the Emperor through the force, no matter where she was in the galaxy.

      Besides, I'm there have been dark jedi running around who *weren't* sith.

    53. Re:he just had to have revenge by balloonpup · · Score: 1

      Apparently, I need to spend hundereds of dollars in Star Wars books to understand the movie.

      ...or you could just read /.

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    54. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or you could just read /.

      And acquire at least seventy three mutually incompatible understandings, without paying a single dollar.

    55. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you expect a Jedi to say, 'Whoa pal, whaddaya say you holster that thing and we sit down and talk out our differences over a cup of Corellian tea, hmmm?'

      Of course not, a true Jedi would be far too bigoted to expect a Sith to have anything worth saying.

    56. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering how well watched these films are by a lot of Slashdotters and considering that most Slashdotters are smarter than the average bear, I am personally very worried that we can't figure out or agree on what the plot might actually be.

    57. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you're typing one-handed on slashdot, you've got bigger issues than a broken keyboard. :-P

    58. Re:he just had to have revenge by Yoda's+Mum · · Score: 1

      The problem with midiclorians is that the whole concept goes against everything that has already been established in the movies and books about the force. Plus, the force was far cooler when it was just a mystical energy field that could be tapped into by Jedi and Sith. By partially defining how it functions limits its usage in future Star Wars novels. Personally, I take the whole mediclorians thing as being "Qui-Gon was on crack at the time". Incidentally, I think of the whole prequel trilogy in a similar way - "this is someone's drugged out memory of what actually happened in the Star Wars world (with most of the gaps made up to get a semi-coherant story)".

    59. Re:he just had to have revenge by xSauronx · · Score: 1

      i thought the sith were goths and the jedis thought they were teh suck

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    60. Re:he just had to have revenge by coaxial · · Score: 1

      In the 2-on-1 lightsabre duel from Epsiode I there is a moment where the fighting has ceased. Gui-Con and Darth Maul are separated by a plasma wall and Obi-won is even further away. Maul walks around like a caged tiger while Gui-Con just sits there meditating. This is not exciting! This does not build suspense! This does not move the story foward! I couldn't believe that they would just sit there like that. That was the perfect opportunity for a short conversation between warriors to take place and give the audience insight into the conflict! Doesn't Maul have anything to say? Doesn't he even want to mock the jedi? Is Gui-Con so dead to the world that he's not even remotely curious why this guy has appeared out of nowhere to kill him?

      First, it's Qui-Gon.

      When I first saw the movie and Qui-Gon and Maul get seperated, I thought they were going to use the force to rip the walls apart and beat each other senseless. Alas, that didn't happen. I still think it should have. Afterall, the fight must continue!

      However, looking back at it I understand the scene more now. They're both gathering their stength for the battle. The Sith gain their power from hate and destruction, while the Jedi gain theirs from peace. (If this was DBZ this is where they would be making fists and screaming at the ground.) Here you see the differences between the Light and Dark sides of the Force. If you look at the scene like that, then it works.

    61. Re:he just had to have revenge by coaxial · · Score: 1

      they were teh suck

      It's "teh s uck".

      FREE HOCKEY CHICKEN!!!!!

    62. Re:he just had to have revenge by WillWare · · Score: 1
      At no point have we seen any motivation for why the Sith are the way they are.

      You're right about that. I dimly recall once being at a bookstore and browsing thru some of the extra-canonical novelizations and seeing something about this, but the movies haven't touched it.

      In the ...lightsabre duel from Epsiode I there is a moment where the fighting has ceased... Maul walks around like a caged tiger while Gui-Con just sits there meditating... This does not move the story foward!

      I found that a really effective scene. It didn't explain the Sith, but it was a great piece of character exposition, and it shows how far the two systems of thinking have diverged, and also that the Force by itself is morality-neutral. The Force didn't coerce the Jedi into their way of thinking, they chose it.

      Both guys are archetypal for their organizations. Sith work to keep themselves pumped up and angry and adrenaline-driven. Jedis work to maintain their orientation within their spiritual framework. Maul's caged tiger was some of the best acting the franchise has ever seen.

      --
      WWJD for a Klondike Bar?
    63. Re:he just had to have revenge by Illusionmi · · Score: 1

      Isn't the Sith in this movie going to be Anakin? I expect this movie to show anakin learning from the emperor and becoming Darth Vader.

    64. Re:he just had to have revenge by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 1

      Interesting point re black hat vs. white hat.

      That is indeed mostly the way of the Star Wars movies, as has been pointed out by other people here, and was always the intention of them.

      However given that in Revenge of the Sith we'll see the Republic (who were after all the good guys) transform into the Empire it's not all that straight forward. Sure, we have the Jedi as the good guys, and Sith as the evil, but the wider universe is not as simple. We also have the transformation of a Jedi (Anakin) into a Sith (Vader) going on in this film too.

      Whilst the polarity thing is still there in the series this episode has to be, by its very nature, an exploration of the grey area between the two.

      Also don't forget that Return of the Jedi also contained some grey, since there was the transformation of Vader back into Anakin.

    65. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a story about a democracy whose leader hypes up a minor threat so that can can build an empire.

    66. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Democrats face the same problem as Luke: Can they defeat evil without actually becoming evil?

    67. Re:he just had to have revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh. So you must watch a lot of porn then.

    68. Re:he just had to have revenge by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Jar-Jar was a bane onto humanity, but what's wrong with midiclorians? You need an explanation for why a energy force which goes through all things can only be manipulated by the select few, (training alone won't do it, you have to be born with the talent) and midiclorians fits the bill quite nicely.

      So how much do you think midiclorian injections would cost on Ebay ?-)

      If the ability to manipulate the Force is dependent of a physical trait, then anyone can use them after undergoing some surgery. If, on the other hand, it's based on mental traits, then it propably cannot be artificially reproduced. Therefore midiclorians don't fit the bill at all.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    69. Re:he just had to have revenge by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      What is the difference between a physical and mental trait? The latter depends on the capacity of your brain, so it is physical after all.

      There is plenty of way why midiclorian injection would not work. It would make you a jedi for a day or two while the count was high and then they would die off, but you wouldn't have the training to take advantage of them. You would need a constant supply.

    70. Re:he just had to have revenge by RogueOne · · Score: 1
      In the 2-on-1 lightsabre duel from Epsiode I there is a moment where the fighting has ceased. Gui-Con and Darth Maul are separated by a plasma wall and Obi-won is even further away. Maul walks around like a caged tiger while Gui-Con just sits there meditating. This is not exciting! This does not build suspense! This does not move the story foward! I couldn't believe that they would just sit there like that. That was the perfect opportunity for a short conversation between warriors to take place and give the audience insight into the conflict! Doesn't Maul have anything to say? Doesn't he even want to mock the jedi? Is Gui-Con so dead to the world that he's not even remotely curious why this guy has appeared out of nowhere to kill him?

      You hit yourself over ther head with the point and still missed it...

      Maul is quite literally a caged tiger, he is the assasin of Sidious, a pet to be loosed on the Jedi as required, all he can do is follow the instructions of his master, this does not require him to converse with the Jedi.
      Qui-Gon-Jin knows that this is a sith warrior (who else could it be...) and that the only course of action left to him at this point is to battle him to the enivitable outcome. To this end he takes a moment to still himself, clear out those thoughts which may cloud his mind such as anger or agression in preparation for the comming encounter

      The point is not to build suspense, it's not needed now, everyone knows that there is going to be an allmighty rumble, but to illustrate how different the jedi and the sith are. The jedi calm and at peace with what will be. The sith powerhungry, eager for violence and death

    71. Re:he just had to have revenge by ultranova · · Score: 1

      What is the difference between a physical and mental trait? The latter depends on the capacity of your brain, so it is physical after all.

      Sure, but it's much harder to show what physical trait leads to which mental trait, especially since there isn't neccessary any 1-on-1 mapping between them.

      Physical traits of your brain are like computer hardware, and mental traits are like software. It's kinda difficult to tell which physical trait of the computer leads to using the @-marks as separator for e-mail messages, isn't it ?-)

      Especially since several different computer architechtures (species) can use the same e-mail format (Force). Add in the fact that the Jedis don't neccessarily have any idea what mental traits, excatly speaking, allow one to use Force, and giving it to people who haven't been born with it becomes nigh-impossible.

      There is plenty of way why midiclorian injection would not work. It would make you a jedi for a day or two while the count was high and then they would die off, but you wouldn't have the training to take advantage of them. You would need a constant supply.

      Hmm... I sense a plot device emerging. Jedi vampires, who drink the blood of Jedis to gain Force powers for a few days (or months - would make for more dangerous enemy when some passing Jedis notice a downed whip on an otherwise empty planet, and it turned out that Something Survived ;).

      Maybe they were former Jedi whos midiclorians started dying off for some reason ? Or maybe they were ordinary people who tried this nice new drug which makes you one with the universe - literally ?-)

      Oh well, it would make for a good plot nonetheless.

      On the other hand, once you learned to use the Force, why couldn't you simply use it to keep a few subcellular life forms alive ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    72. Re:he just had to have revenge by miller701 · · Score: 1

      No, the elephants and the donkeys are both black hats.

  19. What's better than owning a Stormtooper suit? by Enlarge+Your+Penis · · Score: 1

    Getting laid

    1. Re:What's better than owning a Stormtooper suit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      or getting laid in your own stormtrooper suit

    2. Re:What's better than owning a Stormtooper suit? by plasm4 · · Score: 1

      "getting laid in your own stormtrooper suit"

      hopefully the wookie's hair won't catch in the armor.

  20. Family Guy Scene? by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    Is this where we will see Anakin's son grow up, being an eye surgeon.

    Luke: Ok just stay calm and
    Obi-Wan: Luke. Use the force
    Luke: Are you sure? cause
    Obi-Wan: Just just use the force
    Luke: ok fine
    *woooin.... DZZZZZZZZZZZZZ* ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH *thru the eye*
    Luke: Are you happy?
    Obi-Wan: I've never been happy

    Then obi decides to get on a board and fight luke's father on lava while surfin?!

    1. Re:Family Guy Scene? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhmmm... no. As your quote shows, that Family Guy is referring to Luke. I believe that was the Family Guy episode that was banned in America: "When you wish upon a Weinstein" - true classic.

    2. Re:Family Guy Scene? by Exiler · · Score: 1

      What do you mean no? I'm not even a Star Wars fan and I know that Luke is Anakin's son.

      --
      Banaaaana!
  21. Bring out the acronym by Mephie · · Score: 5, Funny
    Can't wait for the shortned form:

    Star Wars Episode III: ROTS.

    Yeah, that's likely pretty accurate.

    1. Re:Bring out the acronym by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you'd think they would've taken that acronym into account. And maybe they'd consider changing the name.

      This reminds me of the time when here in Canada, two politcal political parties, the Conservative party, and the Reform party, were plaaning to merge. They originally called the part the Canadian Conservative Reform Alliance Party. But then they realized that that spells "CCRAP" and so reversed the words "reform" and "conservative."

    2. Re:Bring out the acronym by Pinkoir · · Score: 1

      ROTS does indeed make a lot of sense but if you look closely at the title you will also find a clue as to the quality of the upcoming film...

      "Revenge of the Sith"...

      Try anagramming "Sith" and you will quickly see what we can look forward to.

      -Pinkoir

    3. Re:Bring out the acronym by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hits? this?

    4. Re:Bring out the acronym by Pinkoir · · Score: 1

      Try shifting the letter "h" in "Sith" two characters to the left....

      -Pinkoir

    5. Re:Bring out the acronym by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was hoping for Rise Of The Triad myself.

  22. The real revenge of the Sith... by Dutchmaan · · Score: 3, Funny

    The whole prequel series has been the revenge of the Sith on Star Wars fans.

    This is the dark side of the trilogy!

  23. Revenge? by Nurgled · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What exactly are the Sith "avenging"? I can't think of anything the "good guys" have done so far that wasn't provoked by the "bad guys", so as far as I can see there's no revenge here -- just business as usual for the bad guys.

    1. Re:Revenge? by jomas1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "What exactly are the Sith "avenging"? I can't think of anything the "good guys" have done so far that wasn't provoked by the "bad guys", so as far as I can see there's no revenge here -- just business as usual for the bad guys."

      There are what 2 Sith left? The Jedi thought they eradicated the Sith. Now the Sith will eradicate the Jedi except for Yoda and Obi Wan. This seems kind of straight forward.

    2. Re:Revenge? by demaria · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well there was that little genocide of the Sith about a thousand years before Episode 1 takes place, where the Jedi kill off almost all Sith. I think that pissed them off a bit.

    3. Re:Revenge? by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm... But for something like a movie title, you'd think they referred to something happening in the movies. All the other 5 titles do.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:Revenge? by JamesKPolk · · Score: 1

      Yes, what takes place in the movie is the revenge.

      The title doesn't say "Attack of the Jedi," it says "Revenge of the Sith." The Sith now, in Episode III, complete their revenge on the Jedi.

    5. Re:Revenge? by lavar78 · · Score: 1

      Let's just cut the crap and call it Star Wars Episode III: The Big Payback. Then they can have James Brown sing the theme.

      --
      "Dave, I stand still--the conclusions jump to me!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
    6. Re:Revenge? by Shky · · Score: 1

      None of the titles have really been all that applicable to the films.

      A New Hope: Wasn't all that new, and there appeared to be very little hope anyway. Luke was a whiny brat, and wasn't all that crucial in the final attack on the Death Star. Lucky shot, I say.

      The Empire Strikes Back: It does? It seemed to me that they'd been fighting fairly consistently. Plus, one attack on one planet and only blowing up a few power generators doesn't get them back for destroying a massive weapon like the Death Star.

      Return of the Jedi: Luke was never gone, and the Jedi as a whole hadn't completely gone either. No one returned. Revenge of the Jedi made more sense, but Jedi don't take revenge...

      The Phantom Menace: No one finds Jake Lloyd menacing.

      Attack of the Clones: Seemed like the clones did more defending than attacking. They blew up a few Trade Federation ships, but that's nothing spectacular.

      --
      CC Licensed Serialized Story and Podcast: Ingenioustries
    7. Re:Revenge? by MixmastaKooz · · Score: 1

      Return of the Jedi refers to Anakin and not Luke. It was Vader/Anakins redemption that the title describes. In effect, Darth Vader died and Anakin the Jedi returned.

    8. Re:Revenge? by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      You have to keep in mind that A New Hope was tacked on later when Lucas started this whole fucked up mess it was *not* there in 1977 and I should know cause I was.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    9. Re:Revenge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Revenge usually has a cause, that's what revenge is all about. This cause doesn't happen in any of the movies, though. Return of the Jedi - the Jedi are returning, after being exterminated. That happened in a movie (or will, next year). The Empire Strikes Back, after the destruction of the Death Star. A New Hope - Luke comes along to facilitate the return of the Jedi, and motivate Vader into fulfilling the prophecy. The Phantom Menace, well, that's fairly self-explanatory. Some dude is threatening the Republic. Attack of the Clones, those laffy, daffy clones. That's a bunch of clones attacking, to save a bunch of Jedi, who were set up by the Phantom Menace of the prequel.

      But why oh why are the Sith getting revenge? That's not covered. We just know they're
      a) perverts ("At last, we shall reveal ourselves to the Jedi...")
      b) getting revenge.

    10. Re:Revenge? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      This confuses me a bit... if they thought the Sith were wiped out, why does Yoda say "Always there are two..."

      Of course, how Qui-Gon (aside: Hey, continuity! *squish of balls being kicked*) could think balancing the force was a GOOD thing (Hmm... Many light side, two dark side... how could this be balanced...?) is another matter entirely.

    11. Re:Revenge? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Obviously, they are avenging the reluctance of american consumers to buy into the entire merchandising gearup of TPM. My god, Lucas sold the entire fast food plastic cup rights to KFC/Pizza Hut, and those restaurants didn't see their marketshare or short-term revenue go up 100fold at all!. Fuck, they didn't even quadruple. What was wrong with people? Where were the ravening hordes of foaming at the mouth plastic cup collectors that just had to have 62 copies of the Jaba the Hut Anus cups (week 11)? Where were they? Were their basements full from all the collecting they did during the 70s and 80s? Unlikely. Besides, storage space is easily available, often for less than $200 a month for the 40' x 40' that the modest Star Wars fans require.

      You people let George Lucas down. All of you.

    12. Re:Revenge? by clontzman · · Score: 1

      Of course, how Qui-Gon (aside: Hey, continuity! *squish of balls being kicked*) could think balancing the force was a GOOD thing (Hmm... Many light side, two dark side... how could this be balanced...?) is another matter entirely.

      I think it has to do with the fact that the light side Jedi aren't so much about being "good" as they are about maintaining justice (ergo, balance). Having all-powerful evil in the universe throws the ability to maintain justice out of balance, so by eradicating all the bad guys, you're left with basically a bunch of peacekeeping knights.

      That's how I figure it; who knows what the real story is.

    13. Re:Revenge? by nyseal · · Score: 1

      So much for the mob I guess; just business as usual. Why do the bad guys always need a reason to be bad? Maybe they just hate their lives like the rest of us.

      --
      [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
    14. Re:Revenge? by ticklemeozmo · · Score: 1

      Hmm... But for something like a movie title, you'd think they referred to something happening in the movies. All the other 5 titles do.

      You pretty much answered your own question. All of the other 5 titles reference things that happen in its referenced movie!

      The first one was titled "The Phantom Menace" and you had no idea what/who that was, until you say the first one. The second, "Attack of the Clones", showed the attack of the clones at the end, not before it. Continue on, follow the pattern. "Return of the Jedi", showed their return...

      So, this is a long shot here, but I'm guessing you'll have to see the 3rd movie to see why its called "Revenge of the Sith". It probably explains why they need to take revenge, and how they do it.

      --
      When modding "Informative", please make sure it both has a source and IS actually informative.
    15. Re:Revenge? by KanSer · · Score: 1

      You'd think so, but hey, you never know, in the movie they haven't finished shooting yet, the Sith just might exact some form of revenge.

      Can you see the sarcasm shooting out of my ass?

      --
      • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
    16. Re:Revenge? by rking · · Score: 1

      Of course, how Qui-Gon (aside: Hey, continuity! *squish of balls being kicked*) could think balancing the force was a GOOD thing (Hmm... Many light side, two dark side... how could this be balanced...?) is another matter entirely.

      Perhaps he thinks it's possible to actually end up with one group of reasonable people instead of two groups of arrogant zealots at each other's throats?

    17. Re:Revenge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch Phantom Menace again, and this time instead of laughing at the Jar Jar fart jokes, listen to the conversations (fleetingly brief, unfortunately) between Sidious and Maul.

  24. This will be as crap as the Matrix sequels by Enlarge+Your+Penis · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    But at least it won't have the crude racial propaganda

  25. Critics now have the title of their movie review! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty bold move by Lucas, using an anagram of "shit" in the movie title. You just KNOW that in media outlets that allow it, displeased reviewers will call this movie "Revenge of the Shit."

    For that matter, this opens up great possibilities for movie poster defacement.

  26. Wow... by nathanblazted · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. Re:Wow... by ajservo · · Score: 1

      First guy guaranteed to not get laid all this weekend.

    2. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Early screenplay leak: A long time ago in a BB far away, I took possession of an early draft of a screenplay for SWIV:ANH in a text doc. Luke was "Anakin Starkiller". Still have it on a floppy somewhere (yes, it fit. The movie is not the screenplay). And no, I'm not posting it. And yes, I ticked the "Post Anonymously" link on this one purposely.

  27. Damn, I was hoping for... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...Stoned Beaver

    No, seriously, this sounds *so* kewl. I wonder if it will have Ewoks in it?

    1. Re:Damn, I was hoping for... by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Sith Ewoks: not just kicking you in the shins any more.

  28. The title... by KoshClassic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't care if he calls it Gigli Part 2, just so long as the movie is actually good this time.

    --
    Understanding is a three edged sword. - Ambassador Kosh Naranek, Babylon 5
  29. Vader by mfh · · Score: 1

    If you remember, the lead nerd of RotN was wearing a Vader mask when he screwed the jock's gf. HAHAHA

    How appropriate is that connection?

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  30. With the unfortunate acronym... by Geckoman · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...Star Wars: ROTS

    Gee...I hope that's not an omen.

    1. Re:With the unfortunate acronym... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I thought an omen predicted the future... Since TPM I think it's been rather clear that it is, in fact, the case.

    2. Re:With the unfortunate acronym... by mothz · · Score: 1

      The best part is, Parent was modded 30% redundant. "Of course Star Wars rots. We've known that for years!"

    3. Re:With the unfortunate acronym... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's as corny as the previous two movies I'll be calling it, "Star Wars III: ROTFLMAO"

  31. The hidious burning death of Jar Jar... by OneDeeTenTee · · Score: 0

    ...would have been a far better title.

    --
    Stop the world; I need to get off.
  32. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuckin gay nigger skywalker

    ^--- Proof that flamers lack a brain.

  33. Indiana Jones? by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh yeah, I think they got a new one:

    Indiana Jones IV: The Nursing Home Adventures

    Watch an aging Indy in a wheelchair fight off seniale ex-Nazis in a search for the bathroom so he doesn't have to use that bedpan any more. Yet when he gets there, a seniale ex-Nazi has the last roll of toliet paper! Watch as they battle it out with canes, and pause many times to take a breather and adjust their bifocal glasses.

    See Indy wonder were Shortround is, and why he had him committed to the nursing home.

    Watch as Indy trys to make a break and sneak past Nurses readying trashy novels during the night time hours.

    Watch the drama that unfolds during the Bingo game.

    Uh, yeah, right, whatever. That's another one I am not going to see. :)

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Indiana Jones? by TheShadowHawk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sounds a little like the plot for Bubba-Hotep.

      --
      Friends don't let Friends use Internet Explorer.
    2. Re:Indiana Jones? by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      "Hubba-Hotep, Hubba-Hotep. Guys, look in your notes. Anyone see a Hubba-Hotep?" -- paraphrase of the incredible MST3K

    3. Re:Indiana Jones? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      An Indy in his 60s would be what, the mid 1950s? You'd have him fighting commies, which are almost as evil as nazis. Soviet commies, not the laughable chinese ones. Besides, Harrison Ford is still cool, and there is nothing cooler than watching an old but weak hero outsmart the strong young guys. Done right, it has potential.

    4. Re:Indiana Jones? by flupps · · Score: 1

      Din't they already do that movie in Bubba Hotep?

    5. Re:Indiana Jones? by Oloryn · · Score: 1

      Indiana Jones IV: The Nursing Home Adventures

      Watch an aging Indy in a wheelchair fight off seniale ex-Nazis in a search for the bathroom so he doesn't have to use that bedpan any more. Yet when he gets there, a seniale ex-Nazi has the last roll of toliet paper! Watch as they battle it out with canes, and pause many times to take a breather and adjust their bifocal glasses.

      Didn't Bruce Campbell already do this, sorta?

    6. Re:Indiana Jones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude HOW do you do that with your Indy? Mine currently runs IRIX 6.2 but i've never been able to install it on a wheelchair, nor getting it fighting seniale ex-Nazis.

    7. Re:Indiana Jones? by Mechanik · · Score: 1

      Watch an aging Indy in a wheelchair fight off seniale ex-Nazis in a search for the bathroom so he doesn't have to use that bedpan any more. Yet when he gets there, a seniale ex-Nazi has the last roll of toliet paper! Watch as they battle it out with canes, and pause many times to take a breather and adjust their bifocal glasses.

      Someone call Bruce Campbell... I think we have our plot for Bubba Ho-Tep II...


      Mechanik

    8. Re:Indiana Jones? by localman · · Score: 1

      Watch an aging Indy in a wheelchair fight off seniale ex-Nazis in a search for the bathroom so he doesn't have to use that bedpan any more.

      For some reason this reminds me of Bubba Ho-Tep. Great Bruce Campbell... fighting off undead again... this time from a nursing home.

      Anyways.

    9. Re:Indiana Jones? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know what movie you're talking about, that's the worst movie ever shown. I had thought about leaving the movie theater within the first five minutes, but I relented and I've regretted this decision ever since.

    10. Re:Indiana Jones? by TheShadowHawk · · Score: 1

      Yeah I have to admit, I found it rather underwhelming too.

      Luckily I only borrowed the DVD from a friend, so it didn't cost me any money, apart from 2 hours of my life I will never get back. :P

      --
      Friends don't let Friends use Internet Explorer.
    11. Re:Indiana Jones? by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1

      It's not the Nazis this time. Because this takes place in the 1950s they've changed it to the Commies according to AICN.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    12. Re:Indiana Jones? by daniel_yokomiso · · Score: 1

      Yeah, movies about old people in nursing homes are really lame.

      --
      Disclaimer: If I disagree with you I'm probably trolling...
  34. Why "Revenge". by readpunk · · Score: 1

    I'm not even a fan boy and I know that the Sith were beaten back (read: killed) from dominance in the galaxy by the Jedi. One of the reasons for the whole one master, one apprentice, live in secrecy yada yada yada....

    --

    ./revolution
  35. Re:More like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OH! You nailed that one! SNAP! dizam....

  36. Mr. Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Mr. Lucas,

    If you must post here, please sign up to a Slashdot user account so we at least know it's you. Otherwise people will get the impression that someone really gives a crap about your stupid franchise anymore.

    Kind Regards,
    Boba Fett

    1. Re:Mr. Lucas by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, you're just bitter 'cause he killed your dad.

    2. Re:Mr. Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sneaky Fuckin' Russian

    3. Re:Mr. Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hi Boba,

      How are you?

      I notice you are enjoying the WiFi connection i set up at Sarlac's pit. Sorry for the recent packetloss some friend of mine DDoSed our only uplink satelite with photon torpedo's.

      Oh btw, Doom3 will soon be available on the usual address! *wink* *wink*

      Kind Regards,
      A scriptkiddie disguised as Dengar

    4. Re:Mr. Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      No contest.

      You are the biggest faggot that I have ever heard of.

  37. Yes! by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

    Thank God, it's almost over. Soon we'll be able to leave these prequels behind us.

    1. Re:Yes! by NTmatter · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are making the faulty assumption that Prequels and Sequels are a subset of Natural Numbers (I, II, III) when they are in fact a subset of Real Numbers. I Refer you to Lion King 1 1/2. This could mean that we'll be forced to endure a perpetual (infinite) series of Star Wars sequels and prequels. Imagine it now... Star Wars PI: Circle of Hatred. Oh, the horror, the horror. Jar Jar wages war upon the Ewoks to capture their stockpiles of collectible trading cards and plush dolls. Stop the madness!

    2. Re:Yes! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      the only worry is, what if lucas was lying when he said he was only going to make one more trilogy? We know that the outline for episodes 7-9 exists, and it only takes a small dent in his pocketbook before he decides it's time to go on another merchandising run...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Yes! by Proc6 · · Score: 1

      Well, until he "updates" the prequel in a couple years, adding the scenes "he always intended, but technology didn't exist to let him realize", which can then be subsequently released as various new box-sets, director's cuts and collector's editions.

      --

      I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    4. Re:Yes! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Funny
      before he decides it's time to go on...

      Even if he dies, his family will probably hire the 'Police Academy' people to pimp, er, pump out a few more golden kernels. And with the Sonny 'Look Out For That Tree!' Bono Perpetual Copyright Act, it will be a never ending gravy train. Let's face it: like herpes, Star Wars will be around for a long, long time.

    5. Re:Yes! by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Not to mention The Naked Gun 2 & 1/2 and The Naked Gun 33 & 1/3

    6. Re:Yes! by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

      These are only subsets of the rationals. For the Reals you'd have to count "PI". The only movies IMDB turns up with "square root" with them are Square Root of Zero and Square Root of Negative 3.

      How about Anna to the Infinite Power?

    7. Re:Yes! by nyseal · · Score: 1

      Star Wars was always (and has been) a depiction of the original book series. The fact that Lucas started the whole thing with episode 4 does not detract from the obvious conclusion of that series; regardless of the quality of his directing.

      --
      [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
    8. Re:Yes! by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1
      Jar Jar wages war upon the Ewoks to capture their stockpiles of collectible trading cards and plush dolls.

      And their walkie-talkies.

    9. Re:Yes! by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      isnt there actually a stroy placed between 2 of the original 3 movies....

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    10. Re:Yes! by o0zi · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find they're a subset of Rational Numbers (set Q) :)

      Yes, I'm slightly mathematically-oriented...

    11. Re:Yes! by DannyO152 · · Score: 1

      The number in Lion KIng 1-1/2 could be a rational number. How about "A Beautiful Mind e: Transcending the Game"?

    12. Re:Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I know is if they make "Star Wars Episode 18 + 43i" I'll probably still watch it.

  38. How about "Return of Star Trek"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Science fiction is a lagging franchise. George Lucas could revive interest in it by tying together two major science-fiction themes: Star Wars and Star Trek. In Star Wars III, the Jedis briefly encounter a Vulcan spacecraft on their way to do battle with the Dark Force.

    This brief encounter could become the basis of interesting plots in Star Wars 7, 8, and 9.

    Let's face the harsh reality. After the triple blockbusters of Star Wars 4, 5, and 6, the audience for Star Wars has declined significantly, partially due to the declining talents of George Lucas. As for Star Trek, consider "Enterprise". Need I say more?

    1. Re:How about "Return of Star Trek"? by casuist99 · · Score: 2, Informative

      But the Vulcans are supposedly from our own galaxy, not a galaxy far, far away. Oh, and vulcan space travel would be occurring now or in the future vs. a long time ago as Star Wars supposedly took place.

  39. The Old "Making of..." Documentaries by GuyMannDude · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Jim Ward, Vice President of Marketing for Lucasfilm and Executive Producer of the DVDs spoke about the upcoming release, and announced that the epic feature-length documentary, Empire of Dreams: The Story of the Star Wars Trilogy, would appear as a special edited-for-television edition on the A&E network this fall.

    Okay, so this question isn't exactly about Episode III. Bear with me, please.

    Does anyone know if this 'Empire of Dreams' documentary is going to include all the stuff from the "Making of..." specials they showed on TV in the 80s? Even though I was a kid at the time, I thought those things were fascinating. And I think today, after being innundated with all those "Making of..." featurettes on DVD which just feature some pasty-faced geek typing away at a computer, watching how spfx were done before computers would really be exciting to see again.

    Does anyone know if that stuff is going to be included? Or is this new documentary just going to be a bunch of interviews with cast and crew, reminiscing about the good old days? Something tells me that Lucas would be hard-pressed to let people see the "archaic" (read: non-computer) means they used for spfx in the original trilogy.

    GMD

    1. Re:The Old "Making of..." Documentaries by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The special effects in the original were state of their art for their time, just as the effects in the prequel trilogy are theoretically state of the art for their time. (They really botched the compositing of several of their CG effects into episode I, hence the theoretically.)

      As such, Lucas might get a giggle out of a "then and now" comparison. I know I would...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:The Old "Making of..." Documentaries by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
      the "Making of..." specials they showed on TV in the 80s? [...] watching how spfx were done before computers would really be exciting to see again.

      The StarWars Making Of ran on TV when the first movie was released and later appeared on VHS cassettes. I would love to see that again.

    3. Re:The Old "Making of..." Documentaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "Making Of" documentary is a lot more interesting when it involves high-speed cameras, models, costumes, and blue-screens.

      Who wants to see a movie about a guy sitting at a computer and poking his mouse around?

  40. Why not "Rise of the Sith"? by jkc120 · · Score: 1

    Since we're all wondering what "revenge" the Sith would be making in this film, why not "Rise of the Sith"? The title makes more sense than Revense of the Sith, and still has the implicit darkness about it. Oh well.

    --
    "I drank what?" -Socrates
    1. Re:Why not "Rise of the Sith"? by Exiler · · Score: 1

      Because there are no female Sith left, and they already did one about Clones. A race can't do any Rising if it can't reproduce.

      --
      Banaaaana!
    2. Re:Why not "Rise of the Sith"? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      The Sith are not a race, they're an order like the Jedi. Darth Maul was just a freaky alien Sith lord, not representative of their entire makeup.

    3. Re:Why not "Rise of the Sith"? by Rallion · · Score: 1

      That implies that they become numerous. They don't, see. There's still just two. What they do is take revenge on the Jedi Order that wiped them out, by...well, wiping them out. It's quite fitting.

    4. Re:Why not "Rise of the Sith"? by kfx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Sith were a race, but died out/intermingled with exiled dark Jedi thousands of years ago. At this point in the story though, the last remnants Sith bloodlines have been long since terminated--the "sith" are now just dark Jedi who follow of the Sith ideals. Sepcies-wise, Darth Maul was a Zabrak, not a Sith.

    5. Re:Why not "Rise of the Sith"? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      I concede you're more knowledgeable than I regarding Star Wars mythos. Good info. :)

    6. Re:Why not "Rise of the Sith"? by LuSiDe · · Score: 1

      Mara Jade continues to impress me. She's about the same age as Luke, so she was born at the same time. She has been Palpetine's left hand for quite some time although i don't know since when. Does anyone know this?

      --
      WE DON'T NEED NO BLOG CONTROL.
  41. Insanity by astrashe · · Score: 5, Funny

    They say that one definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different outcome.

    But this new movie is going to be good. Really, it will. I have a very good feeling about it -- you can tell from the logo.

    1. Re:Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They say that one definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different outcome.

      I've never really gotten this quote.

      Lots of times doing the same thing over and over again is HOW you get a different outcome, whether it's working on your golf swing or digging a tunnel out of prison.

      Sure, there are some situations where doing the same thing over and over again won't change things, but it doesn't seem like enough to make a general rule.

    2. Re:Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're being too specific. If you're working on your golf swing, you're making changes to it in order to improve, so technically you're not doing the same thing over and over. The quote applies in a more general sense, like jumping off a bridge and flapping your arms to fly. If you keep trying it, you'll keep failing.

      Also the quote should be "one definition of stupidity", not insanity.

    3. Re:Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So installing Windows over and over again and actually GETTING a different outcome is sanity???

    4. Re:Insanity by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Episode Two was better than Episode One. If this trend continues, Episode Three should be near RotJ in quality.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    5. Re:Insanity by anti-trojan · · Score: 1

      You know you've been hacking too long when...

      ...you test a program, and it fails, so you jump into the editor, look at it, jump out, recompile and test (without making changes) and it still doesn't work, so you jump ........ and it still doesn't work ...... recompile without any changes........

    6. Re:Insanity by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      I have a very good feeling about it ...

      Yeah? Well, I have a bad feeling about this...

  42. Lucas and his forced parallels by Streiff · · Score: 1

    Lucas seams to be forcing the prequeals to be similar to the orginal movies. Too much so for my liking. After all, the title for Return of the Jedi was originally Revenge of the Jedi, but was changed later. There was even a trailer produced under that title.

    1. Re:Lucas and his forced parallels by bckrispi · · Score: 1
      Lucas seams to be forcing the prequeals to be similar to the orginal movies.

      I think we can file that one under "Duuuuh". Of course he is intentionally making the two trilogies similar. Lucas has said ad nauseum that the themes in these films repeat themselves. It helps to build continuity and is just damn good storytelling.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  43. not very interesting, but... by K. · · Score: 1

    The original title of Episode VI was "Revenge of the Jedi", so a bit of symmetry there.

    (Apparently some of the crew all got t-shirts with that title on them, which are worth decent money now.)

    --
    -- Proud descendant of semi-nomadic cattle-herders.
  44. Revenge ... Return by Khanar · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't that be Star Wars Episode III: Return of the Sith.

    Can't wait for the Ewok battle.

  45. Slashdot: all advertising, all the time by sakusha · · Score: 1

    This is two stories in just a few hours pushing the usual boring media hype about movies and games. How much is the slashdot crew making under the table for product placement?

    1. Re:Slashdot: all advertising, all the time by JamesKPolk · · Score: 1

      There's no deception. The readership loves this stuff. Why do you think they whine so much about the awesome power of the MPAA and RIAA? The Slashdot readership is under their spell.

    2. Re:Slashdot: all advertising, all the time by shokk · · Score: 1

      So what do you want, more of the same "New Icons for GNOME 2!!!" crap? This is better than a re-post of an old story.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  46. Shouldn't that be Episode III: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Pile of Sith

    An oldie but a goodie

    1. Re:Shouldn't that be Episode III: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer Star Wars Episode III: Sith Happens.

      I'm sorry, I couldn't resist.

  47. Hope Lost by Wind_Walker · · Score: 4, Funny
    Star Wars Episode III: Hope Lost

    Well, that describes my attitude towards the movie, anyways.

    </karmawhore>

    1. Re:Hope Lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      </karmawhore>

      To get karma, being funny helps not.

    2. Re:Hope Lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clearly

  48. Easy explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Interesting, the actor that play anakin can't act..and the actor who play's his son also can't act. hmmmmm "

    Maybe it's genetic.

  49. I might read the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if I thought it would contain nude pictures of Natalie Portman

    1. Re:I might read the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and HOT GRITS!

    2. Re:I might read the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out www.autopr0n.com!

  50. Re:ROTS by Zaranne · · Score: 1

    Okay, I can't stop laughing at that one...that's flipping hiliarious!!!

    --
    So when is the Hawkeye movie coming out?
  51. Slashback by HedonismBot · · Score: 1
    A couple of comments on this previous report:

    • Birth of the Empire, huh? In your face, The Sun!
    • Ugh, lava. Seems there's gonna be some surfin' action indeed. - IMHO, Cameron Diaz was more pleasing to the eye in Charlie's Angels 2....
    --
    Sailors. Oh man!
  52. bees/halo2 t-shirt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    http://www.cafeshops.com/ilovebees.12518390?zoom =y es#zoom

  53. I thought there was going to be NINE movies? by glowfish · · Score: 1

    Why are they calling this the *final* star wars movie? I thought Lucas had originally planned nine stories? Did something change?

    1. Re:I thought there was going to be NINE movies? by Tsugumi · · Score: 1

      Here's hoping that if there are 3 sequels to the original, Lucas isn't involved...

    2. Re:I thought there was going to be NINE movies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please, don't remind him! have we not suffered enough at the hands of lucas without encouraging him to torture us more?

  54. One master, one apprentice explained by queenofthe1ring · · Score: 1

    Because there were so many Sith, all with agendas of evil and domination, they inevitably clashed. After a big fight amoung the Sith, they decided that they should go with one master and one apprentice to avoid the internal fighting so that they could focus on combating their real enemies, the Jedi order.

    --

    ~*~ ~*~ ~*~

    yes, girls read /. too...

  55. Lacking details by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    It just goes on and on about DVDs, t-shirts, masters and evil and crap. I don't give a shit, all I want to know about is Natalie Portman, and maybe some wet t-shirts. Can anyone fill me in?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  56. Where's the Firefly update? by NormanEinstein · · Score: 1, Insightful

    News about the Firefly movie is what I'm waiting to hear about from Comic-Con. I simply can't get excited about Star Wars anymore after the last movie. *sigh*

    1. Re:Where's the Firefly update? by BoyHowdyAAF · · Score: 1, Informative

      Joss Whedon doesn't talk until Sunday. :)

  57. Oh man by fizban · · Score: 1

    This must be someone's inside joke, right? Star Wars ROTS?

    Oh, and rearrange the letters of "Sith" and see what you get. My sentiments exactly.

    "Revenge of the SH***"

    --

    +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

    1. Re:Oh man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, Revenge of the HITS
      They'll probably ROFL when they see their bank account a week after the movie hit the street.

  58. Those poor, poor sperm by noewun · · Score: 4, Funny
    Hyperspace: The Official Star Wars Fan Club.

    That's a lot of DNA which will never get passed on.

    --
    I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    1. Re:Those poor, poor sperm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hyperspace: The Official Star Wars Fan Club.
      That's a lot of DNA which will never get passed on.

      Think of all the midchlorians going to waste!

    2. Re:Those poor, poor sperm by noewun · · Score: 1
      Think of all the midchlorians going to waste!

      Crap! What a time not to be able to think of a Natalie Portman joke!

      --
      I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    3. Re:Those poor, poor sperm by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      DNA passed on two years ago, and I'm sure the Godfather of Hoop will pass by again before the end of the universe.

    4. Re:Those poor, poor sperm by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
      [Hyperspace: The Official Star Wars Fan Club.] That's a lot of DNA which will never get passed on.

      Phew ... Thank god.

    5. Re:Those poor, poor sperm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does get passed on, on ebay. One limited edition first run figurine, slightly sticky.

      Ewok plush, mint! mmmmmf unnngh....damn, not anymore.

  59. Important Question by Monkey-Man2000 · · Score: 1

    So, the important question: is the DVD trilogy going to be the special edition or the untainted versions?

    --
    This post was generated by a Cadre of Uber Monkeys for Monkey-Man2000 (603495).
  60. Re:How about "Revenge of the Children's Merchandis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rise of the Empire or Fall of the Republic are titles that're better. It only took me thirty seconds to best Lucas, and I wouldn't have made Jar Jar, either. I should *so* become a director.

  61. Lucas cancelled the 3rd triologie by CharonX · · Score: 1

    Well, at the beginning George Lucas planned a Triologie of Triologies (and, for some odd reason started with the 2nd Triologie... oh well)
    But since Starwars 1 & 2 was met with rather lukewarm reception, he decided to call off the 3rd Triologie (for now)

    --
    +++ MELON MELON MELON +++ Out of Cheese Error +++ redo from start +++
    1. Re:Lucas cancelled the 3rd triologie by lavar78 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't exactly call the reception lukewarm -- Star Wars I and II are currently the fourth and 17th highest-grossing films of all time, respectively. The Phantom Menace will be fifth in a few weeks though.

      --
      "Dave, I stand still--the conclusions jump to me!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
    2. Re:Lucas cancelled the 3rd triologie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they weren't exactly critically acclaimed... this might surprise you, but money isn't everything.

      To the grandparent: trilogy. t-r-i-l-o-g-y.

    3. Re:Lucas cancelled the 3rd triologie by lavar78 · · Score: 1
      Well, they weren't exactly critically acclaimed... this might surprise you, but money isn't everything.
      It appears money matters more to Lucas than critical acclaim. I can find a release, re-release, or special edition somewhere to prove it.
      --
      "Dave, I stand still--the conclusions jump to me!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
    4. Re:Lucas cancelled the 3rd triologie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love to see a ranking in normalized
      dollars... it seems the list is quite
      polluted with newer flicks only because the
      dollar is worth less these days.

    5. Re:Lucas cancelled the 3rd triologie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, he said that there were only six movies in interviews leading up to The Phantom Menace. If this represented a change of plans (and it's not clear that it did), it had nothing to do with the reception of the movies, critical or otherwise.

  62. Who cares? by solios · · Score: 1

    The article completely fails to mention rather or not the Original Trilogy DVDs include the original theatrical releases, or if it's the Special (special like the "short bus") Editions only.

    If it's SE only, no sale. I'm not interested.

    I WANT THE THEATRICAL CUTS DANGIT.

    1. Re:Who cares? by bckrispi · · Score: 3, Informative

      This question was answered Months ago and numerous times . The DVD will only be of the Special Editions.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    2. Re:Who cares? by |/|/||| · · Score: 1
      Yeah, everybody knows that. But some people also keep hoping Lucas will get his head out of his ass. Not much chance, I know, but some people are just optimists.

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
    3. Re:Who cares? by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      Personally, I don't particularly give a flying fuck whether the un-altered version is avalable. I'm waiting for Lucas to put the scene on Tatooine between Biggs and Luke back in. Having the scene back in, in addition with the scene added on Yavin in the Special Edition (one of the few scenes that I think many of the /.ers wouldn't complain too much about being put in the Special Edition) would definatly add weight to Biggs death at the Death Star.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    4. Re:Who cares? by clontzman · · Score: 1

      According to the Digital Bits, the DVD versions will actually be a little bit different. Han will again shoot first, some effects will be tweaked and a few shots will be restored. Take it with a grain of salt, but they seemed pretty convinced of it.

      Here's the writeup:

      "We've been saying for months now that there were going to be changes made to these films for DVD, and while many believed us, a number of Star Wars fans have e-mailed to say we must be on crack. Nevertheless, believe it or not, we know for a FACT that several more changes are being made to these films. Trust us on this - our contacts are in positions to know. Like it or not, the films we will get on DVD on 9/21 are NOT going to be the original theatrical versions and they're not going to be the 1997 special editions either. Even Lucasfilm's Steve Sansweet has confirmed this, saying at the recent WonderCon convention that the films contained on the discs would be the incarnations of the films "as George Lucas sees them today."

    5. Re:Who cares? by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1

      Revised special edition, not just the SE from 1997. There are some significant changes coming on the DVDs...

    6. Re:Who cares? by solios · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, that tears that.

      I'm buying either laserdiscs or clean, good quality VHS THX remasters and transferring them to DVD using the hardware I have access to myself.

      I don't want the EX Plus Alpha II Special Champion Edition Star Wars. I want Han Shooting first. I want the goddamned seedy bar band, NOT the broadway mupped production number.

      And it looks like I'll have to make it myself.

      So be it!

  63. Well Slashdot.... I'd never say "I Told you So" by bckrispi · · Score: 1
    --
    Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    1. Re:Well Slashdot.... I'd never say "I Told you So" by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I checked your old post, hoping to find out that you had predicted the title would be "Revenge of the Sith." I was disappointed, and you're not entitled to do the i-told-you-so dance.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Well Slashdot.... I'd never say "I Told you So" by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      No, it was my comment that the title wouldn't come first from some trash tabloid like the Sun. Actually I did call the title as being "Revenge of the Sith" about a year or so ago. Unfortunately, I don't think I have a record of that, so you'll just have to trust me :)

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  64. Starwars VII - RotRotSo Jar-Jar Part 2 by CharonX · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yes, while thousands of fans (i.e. all that remain) celebrate Starwars III: Revenge of the Sh^Hith, truely enlightened fans prepear for the upcoming SEQUEL - Starwars VII Return of the Revenge of the Son of Jar-Jar (Part II) (Part I will be show as a Perquel at a later point)
    Follow the exiting, universe-spaning adventures of the Clone of Jar-Jar's illegimate Son, trying to find his true destiny - and possibly a souvenier shop that gives credit.
    Cry in emotion with him when he finally discovers that he truly is the Son of Jar-Jar and Luke Skywalker (rumors say, the heart-moving background story will be shown in Part I)
    Feel joy when you leave the cineman and finally be sure - SW:Episode 1 and Clone Wars are no longer the worst movies in the SW universe.
    Coming to a theater near you:Starwars VII Return of the Revenge of the Son of Jar-Jar (Part II)

    --
    +++ MELON MELON MELON +++ Out of Cheese Error +++ redo from start +++
  65. I'd prefer "The Fall of the Jedi"... by lavar78 · · Score: 1

    since that's what I really want to see. I admit it's a little amusing that the only Jedi who survive are the ones whose Padowan learners embraced the dark side.

    --
    "Dave, I stand still--the conclusions jump to me!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
  66. You Guys Didn't Know That? by lofi-rev · · Score: 1

    I downloaded the movie 2 weeks ago, got sued for it, sued Bram Cohen for inducing me to do it, and finally gave up and took Orrin Hatch out for ice cream.

  67. OT: LaserDisc - DVD Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are the legal implications of making a DVD copy of the LaserDisc versions of the first three movies (Epis 4-6)? I own them on both LD and VHS, is this "space-shifting" or piracy?

    It is SO choice to see it on a decent quality (LD to DV via RCA cables (not the best, I know, but adequate) and then via DVD Studio Pro to DVD) and see the version where HAN SHOOTS FIRST!

  68. FX tech by zerocircle · · Score: 1
    ...watching how spfx were done before computers would really be exciting to see again.

    Before computers? Before realistic computer graphics, you mean. The motion-controlled miniature-effects cameras were mind-blowing new technology, and they certainly were operated by computer programs -- they could run the camera through precisely the same motion sequence, take after take, to photograph different elements in a shot to be composited later.

    I certainly remember the "Making of" specials, and I'm dying to see them again. Hell, they may be the only reason I'll buy the IV-VI trilogy set when it comes out...I'd be more enthusiastic if I knew Greedo wasn't going to fire first.

    1. Re:FX tech by Brendor · · Score: 1
      One of the best of these videos was called From Star Wars to Jedi: The Making of a Saga.

      It shows a brief survey of the making of all three films, creation of key characters and particularly interesting footage of the creation of ROTJ. I had a VHS from the 1983 TV broadcast that I watched way too many times as a kid.

      And yes, as zerocircle pointed out, computer controlled motion technology was THE lynchpin to many of the original trilogy's most innovative sequences and all the outer-space shots. The traveling matte compositing in the original films didn't look like other space films of the time because of the complex camera moves the computer made feasible. And this tech is still used for much of the newer trilogy, the lord of the rings etc. It's still a useful tool. the only difference is that digital compositing allows more elements to be blended together.

    2. Re:FX tech by zerocircle · · Score: 1
      The traveling matte compositing in the original films didn't look like other space films of the time [...] the only difference is that digital compositing allows more elements to be blended together.

      And it isolates the elements more cleanly than the handmade mattes did, especially in space scenes. Some of the old matte-composited footage that was beautiful in the theater looks dreadful on a good TV -- from the difference in black levels, you can see the outer edges of the mattes.

  69. T-SHIRT FOR SALE, GET YA T-SHIRTS HEE-YAAARRR! by Gannoc · · Score: 1

    And they didn't waste more than SEVEN SECONDS before starting the merchandising after announcing the title.

    Goddamn! That rises to new levels of evil.

  70. One master, one apprentice? Waaa? by Gannoc · · Score: 1

    Wait, what about KOTOR when there were lots of sith?

    You mean two sith kill all the jedi?

    Wait.

    HEY, I know. MAYBE LUCAS IS MAKING THIS SHIT UP AS HE GOES ALONG??!???

    Fanbois, i'm not saying you can't love star wars, just please stop loving George Lucas. He is taking advantage of you.

  71. Has anyone noticed? by Savet+Hegar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The new first 2 movies follow the general flow of the original first two?

    Episode 1 & 4:

    They are being chased/hunted, making several escapes, narrowly escaping defeat. Each movie ends with a very clear ending and a large ceremony celebrating the victory.

    Episode 2 & 5:

    This episode tells a story with family ties. In the 5th episode, we find out that Vader is really Anakin. In the 2nd episode, we see anakin falling in love with Padme. Both episodes end in a continuation type ending, leaving more questions than answers, with no real closure.

    Episode 3 & 6? Will 3 follow the layout of episode 6?

    Does it seem like Lucas is using the cookie cutter approach?

    if ($works_first_time)
    {
    $do_again = 1;
    }

    --
    Mod points are pointless when you browse at -1.
    1. Re:Has anyone noticed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm sure alot of people have. however, from my point of view, he's not copying himself, but rather following a tried and true framework for trilogies. just look at godfather, matrix, and lord of the rings.

    2. Re:Has anyone noticed? by AceCaseOR · · Score: 3, Funny
      Episode 3 & 6? Will 3 follow the layout of episode 6?

      Does it seem like Lucas is using the cookie cutter approach?

      Hopefully in Episode 3, instead of the "cute" (to George Lucas) creatures (which would be, in this case, the Gungans) triumphing, they will be instead driven to extinction by Empire rendering Naboo uninhabitable. Jar-Jar gets a magnificently prolonged death scene where, due to his stupidity, he believes Anakin is still a good guy throughout the course of the film, but finally figures it out when Anakin Force Chokes Jar-Jar to death in a magnificent death scene that takes 5 minutes for Jar Jar to die agonizingly in great physical and psychological pain.

      And finally, as Jar-Jar expels his last breath and slumps to the ground, the audience will rise as one... in a standing ovation, for the most hated and reviled one is dead. ^_^

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    3. Re:Has anyone noticed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it seems like you're overanalyzing. It's summer, man. Get some sun!!

    4. Re:Has anyone noticed? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      A related topic

      Regarding that SuperShadow site, I've heard that it's mostly just bogus info and he's faking his identity as a friend of George Lucas etc. So take all info there with a grain of salt. However, the link above for the Star Wars movie formula is solid info and kind of funny/interesting.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    5. Re:Has anyone noticed? by slittle · · Score: 1

      if { ($_language->over::punctuated); }
      import python
      };

      --
      Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
    6. Re:Has anyone noticed? by therealseadawg · · Score: 1

      This formula isn't just common to Star Wars. Its the old 3 Act play formula. In very general terms:

      Act 1: Good guys win (happy)
      Act 2: Good guys lose (sad and/or suspensful)
      Act 3: Good guys win (happily concluded)

      This is just how it works. I won't go into what would happen if the formula were changed, but just think about how repetitive all happy endings would be, or how depressing a sad ending would be after 3 movies.

    7. Re:Has anyone noticed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      if (incoherent(Language.model(language, semantic))):
      import Ruby
    8. Re:Has anyone noticed? by QEDog · · Score: 1

      I remember reading and interview to Lucas, before EpiII, where he said how he wanted the movies to "rhyme", just like you describe it.

      --
      "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
    9. Re:Has anyone noticed? by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
      In the 5th episode, we find out that Vader is really Anakin.

      Gee, now you totally spoiled the surprise.

      Will 3 follow the layout of episode 6?

      As in being an episode 4 rip-off?

    10. Re:Has anyone noticed? by cuiousyellow · · Score: 1
      I think you are giving our chubby bearded nemisis far too much credit. The trilogy architecture is guided by something of an open standard: Aristotelian Three Act Structure

      The simplest description of Three Act Structure is Act I - You get your protagonist into a Tree, Act II - You throw rocks at him (or her), Act III - You get him (or her) down.
    11. Re:Has anyone noticed? by Klync · · Score: 1
      Yes it's a standard dramatic format, but also something else, especially in terms of it being a trilogy x2: it's symmtery. This whole story is about a simple, ultimate good vs. evil battle that cycles in perpetuity. So, natch, the episodes mirror each other as the force goes 'round.


      Duh.

      --

      ----
      Not to be confused with Col.
  72. Forget the title... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... How are they going to explain how the Star Wars Universe shifts from the overwrought CGI of Episode II to 70's-era blue screens, models and burned-in-film light sabers of Episode IV?

  73. The surprise planet is "Uranus" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Because if history provides any indication, this movie is going to be a turd.

    Geez, that's got to be the only appropriate use of a "Uranus" joke I've ever come up with....

  74. Amen, brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole Star Wars thing was barely above being lame until Lucas trotted out the Ninja teddy bears. From the moment the first Ewok appeared on the screen, I knew the whole Star Wars saga was destined for the toilet. Sorry, George, but your masterpiece sucks total ass. It's a shame your pioneering effects had to be wasted on such a pathetic effort.

    1. Re:Amen, brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell it bro - I was an impressionable 13 year old when the first film came out, saw it many times. Ditto for the second.

      Saw the third film once - what a load of crap. Never did understand the die-hards who couldn't see how stupid it had become.

    2. Re:Amen, brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, I couldn't understand why anyone liked the movies at all. I slogged through the first three movies in one sitting and I decided I hate Star Wars.

  75. Re:How about "Revenge of the Children's Merchandis by ergo98 · · Score: 1

    Hell I'm surprized this franchise is still going on - I was sure that number III came and went a few years ago. What a dud of a series.

  76. My guess was by drgroove · · Score: 1

    The Fall of the Jedi

    The original 6th episode title was Revenge of the Jedi; it was changed to 'return', as jedi are supposed to be the good guys, and therefore wouldn't seek revenge.

    I still think the Fall of the Jedi is a better name... brings more of a connection between the two trilogies IMHO.

  77. dark side versus evil by debrain · · Score: 1

    I haven't bought the singular dark-side=evil argument. Even Obi-wan stated that 'many of the truths you cling to depend upon a certain point of view', or something to that effect. There should be depth to these characters; even the most heinous of creatures in history have been motivated by a particularly breed of truth.

    We are never really presented with the perspective of the dark side that can be rationalized. There's innuendo to some sort of quicker gratification through the dark side of the force, that it is more seductive, but we never see why people who fall to the dark side are bound to it. For conscious creatures to be bound to the dark side, they must rationalize their actions, and cling to a particular truth, so to speak. You'd go nuts, otherwise, eh?

    I'm not sure I've seen this, in all of the Star Wars pictures; the dark side is still a shallow artistic license that begs for depth, that could have been eloquently explored in the prior two movies. I think we'll just get more muppets this time, though. Lucas's brain seems to have melted around the same time as the bronze bikini, too.

    1. Re:dark side versus evil by nine-times · · Score: 2, Interesting
      We are never really presented with the perspective of the dark side that can be rationalized. There's innuendo to some sort of quicker gratification through the dark side of the force, that it is more seductive, but we never see why people who fall to the dark side are bound to it.

      I don't even want to talk about the new movies. If they did try to 'explore' the dark side, it would probably be explained that "the Sith have Meta bad ians". Oh, if only Joseph Campell were alive to tell Lucas how to write movies again.

      But as to how people are lured to the Dark side, we're tol in the movie, for one, that it's easier. Like- you want to be a bad-ass with a lightsaber? Well, to be a Jedi is hard. It requires training and discipline. Join the Sith, and you can start kicking butt right away. You want to fight battles and be a glorious hero? You want to be king of the universe, or at least the king's general? Be a Sith. Jedis live like monks. Which sounds more seductive to you?

      Of course, there's more. There are a number of metaphors floating around in the original 3. But asking why people are seduced by the dark side is (literally) asking why people do "bad things".

    2. Re:dark side versus evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But asking why people are seduced by the dark side is (literally) asking why people do "bad things"

      Right - that's what makes for an interesting movie. The Japanese in particular are really good at this - look at the conflicts in something like "Princess Mononoke" or "Spirited Away". There are characters whom you might dislike, who might do "bad things", but they usually have a coherent worldview and backstory where there actions make sense and where they might even be able, in their own eyes, to be the "good guy".

      This is a particular part of narrative where American movies often (not always!) fall flat - there's a silly desire to portray "good" versus "evil" conflicts, which sounds great when you're seven buy adults might like something a bit meatier.

    3. Re:dark side versus evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a particular part of narrative where American movies often (not always!) fall flat - there's a silly desire to portray "good" versus "evil" conflicts, which sounds great when you're seven buy adults might like something a bit meatier.

      Strange -- i thought police series are to be watched by adults. Some people never grow up though.

    4. Re:dark side versus evil by ultranova · · Score: 1

      We are never really presented with the perspective of the dark side that can be rationalized. There's innuendo to some sort of quicker gratification through the dark side of the force, that it is more seductive, but we never see why people who fall to the dark side are bound to it.

      People who choose the dark side in real life are usually bound to it pretty tight. From Nazis to Mafia, once you pass certain limits, the chances are that you'll never come back.

      For Darth Whatever to turn from the Dark Side he would have to consciously reject it. Why would he do so ? Why would he give up its power ? What's in it for him ? As a Dark Jedi, he has power and no limits in how he can use it. If he wants something, he takes it; why would he not take it ?

      Remember, Vader killed without hesitation; he had killed so many that killing had become perfectly normal for him. It was only when he'd had to cross a new line, watch his own son get killed, when he turned. Before that he simply didn't have any reason to reject the darkness.

      For conscious creatures to be bound to the dark side, they must rationalize their actions, and cling to a particular truth, so to speak. You'd go nuts, otherwise, eh?

      Neither Vader or Palpatine ever seemed shining examples of mental health to me ;).

      And people only need to rationalize things if they matter to them. If a Sith literally doesn't care about the lifes he takes, then he needs no rationalizations for taking them - you don't rationalize killing annoying insects, do you ?

      Both the Jedi and the Sith seemed extremely arrogant to me, always presuming that they know better than anyone else. The difference is that the Jedis have turned their attention inwards, to reach enlightenment, unity with the Force or something like that, and only deal with the world in a limited manner, whereas the Sith want to rule directly.

      The Jedi are warrior monks in a monastery, whereas the Sith, tired of the ramblings of the old masters, have ventured out and found a wide world.

      I'm not sure I've seen this, in all of the Star Wars pictures; the dark side is still a shallow artistic license that begs for depth, that could have been eloquently explored in the prior two movies. I think we'll just get more muppets this time, though. Lucas's brain seems to have melted around the same time as the bronze bikini, too.

      Play "Knights of the Old Republic", it explores the Dark Side with more depth. It also has a much better plot than Episodes 1 and 2 :).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    5. Re:dark side versus evil by nine-times · · Score: 1
      This is a particular part of narrative where American movies often (not always!) fall flat - there's a silly desire to portray "good" versus "evil" conflicts, which sounds great when you're seven buy adults might like something a bit meatier.

      Somewhat true, but sometimes the justification of 'evil' gets to be just as silly, overly-simplistic, cliched and cheesy. "He's not evil, he's just misunderstood!" or worse yet, "Awwwwwe.... he's not evil, he just misses his mommy!"

      Much more sophisticated are stories which display that there are, of course, reasons why people do the things they do, but those reasons don't seem to be sufficient to really explain "why". Why did Hitler become the man he did? OK, maybe he was abused as a kid, but other people have been abused as a kid, and not all of them have become Hitler. More to the point, couldn't Hitler have chosen differently? It's not all that clear.

      We know Vadar craves power, and that he values order. We know there is some great pain in his past, but that there is some 'good' in Vadar that only Luke can see. We do see reasons for his behavior, but there's also a sort of mystery in "What makes him evil?" And I find that more sophisticated than the idea that "there is no evil. Just little boys who miss their mommies."

    6. Re:dark side versus evil by nine-times · · Score: 1
      People who choose the dark side in real life are usually bound to it pretty tight. From Nazis to Mafia, once you pass certain limits, the chances are that you'll never come back.

      Yeah. Redemption is hard. "Once you turn to the dark side, forever will it dominate your destiny." Now, this doesn't mean that you can never be good again, but it aint easy, and your evil days will haunt you. Want a simple real-life example? Try cheating on your significant other. There's a very good chance that relationship is over. And yeah, you might somehow salvage the relationship, but that one act will have quite an impact for years to come, and it's not clear it'll ever be totally forgiven. Good luck on going back to "the way things were".

      Now, there are a lot of things like this. You do a "really bad thing", and you can't undo it. Since you can't undo it, you can never quite be the same person you were before you did it. And what's worse, a lot of people take this fact, that you can't regress to your former, innocent state, as an indication that there's no point in living a "good life" after that. You're screwed up, or you're damned, and maybe people even know, and they blame you. Redemption is hard, and when you're a "bad guy", it's hard to see that it's even possible.

    7. Re:dark side versus evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as for most "good" people I find this Nietzsche quote quite appropriate,
      "I laughed at the weak who thought themselves good because they lacked claws."

    8. Re:dark side versus evil by nine-times · · Score: 1
      as for most "good" people I find this Nietzsche quote quite appropriate, "I laughed at the weak who thought themselves good because they lacked claws."

      Good quote. Beware of taking Nietzsche too literally, however. Like all good philosophers, he's tricky, and often doesn't mean what he says, at least not in the way you might think.

    9. Re:dark side versus evil by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > There's innuendo to some sort of quicker gratification through the dark side of the force, that it is more seductive, but we never see why people who fall to the dark side are bound to it.

      Not to try explaining Lucas, but perhaps it's addictive gratification, like a drug? Feeling of power -- nearly ultimate power, no less -- can be very addictive.

  78. Return of the Sith by ScriptGuru · · Score: 1

    Originally the plan was to call it "Return of the Sith", but it was too non-violent so they changed it to Revenge.

    --
    Yet another signature that refers to itself. The irony and humor is dead.
    1. Re:Return of the Sith by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should call it "Wrath of the Sith" or something. That way it won't be referred to as Star Wars ROTS . . .

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    2. Re:Return of the Sith by onosendai · · Score: 1

      You've got the wrong film and the wrong way around.

      Originally, Episode 6 - "Return of the Jedi" was to be called "Revenge of the Jedi" but it was renamed for two reasons,
      1) Revenge isn't an emotion a Jedi would express and therefore doesn't fit the story-arc
      2) Originally "ST:Wrath Of Khan" was to be called "ST:Revenge of Khan" studio was concerned that the names would cause confusion, hence Return of the Jedi.

      Knowing this, "Revenge of the Sith" should be of no real surprise to a SW fan

      --
      <? include ('signature.inc'); ?>
  79. Does this mean the Holiday Special will be on DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been waiting decades to see it again...

    For some reason. Mr. Lucas doesn't seem to want to release it. Or remember it...

  80. I just ebayed the original trilogy on LaserDisc by maynard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The new original trilogy Star Wars DVDs are going to contain further changes beyond what was in the 'Special Edition' releases. Rumors are that Christian Haydensen will be digitally added in, replacing the original actor for Darth Vader (whose name I don't know and won't bother to look up). I'm sure there will be more changes. Whatever Lucas releases, it won't be what I saw as a nine year old child in 1977. Star Wars is an important cultural phenomenon which radically affected the late seventies. I remember seeing the film something like ten times with all my friends that summer, bugging our parents 'til they absolutely hated the movie. Empire was just as big, and I remember seeing that a bunch of times with friends too. None of us much liked Return of the Jedi though.

    Lucas refuses to release his originals, as if by removing them from market they will cease to exist. A filmmaker who destroyed his own work in a Quixotic search for the continuing perfection of his one significant piece; without any new ideas, paths, or art to express. What about future historians who wish to research the cultural shifts the movie set in force or effects technology of that era? Lets hope there's a 35mm print somewhere in the Library of Congress somewhere safe. Yeah, he owns it. It's his copyrighted work. He should have every right to change it as he sees fit. But he shouldn't have the right to revoke history in the process. Yet another example of IP trampling culture.

    So I bought the original trilogy in widescreen on Laserdisc. It's not anamorphic DVD, so I suppose it could look better. But it's what I remember as a kid. Cheesy model effects, the Guido murder Han, and all. Wonder if these old LDs will be worth something soon...

    --Maynard

    1. Re:I just ebayed the original trilogy on LaserDisc by SemperUbi · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "Lucas refuses to release his originals, as if by removing them from market they will cease to exist."

      This felt so unfair to me at first. I've still got the original VHS tapes of the original movies. I thought, wow, how lucky I am to have something that will probably never make it out onto DVD.

      But then I came to my senses. Lucas knows full well how many people want to own the original films on DVD. I predict that after the altered original trilogy goes on sale, the REAL originals will too, after a few years, and probably in 2007, just in time for the first movie's 30th anniversary.

      This would squeeze the maximum amount of money out of us fans. So, it MUST be true!

    2. Re:I just ebayed the original trilogy on LaserDisc by maynard · · Score: 1

      But then I came to my senses. Lucas knows full well how many people want to own the original films on DVD. I predict that after the altered original trilogy goes on sale, the REAL originals will too, after a few years, and probably in 2007, just in time for the first movie's 30th anniversary.

      Could be. Lord knows he's released enough versions and variations of versions on tape and LD. One more time with the unaltered copy for a special price might suck a bit more out of a gullible public. But it's still a shame he didn't do the right thing with this release though. He could have just made a DVD with both sets of scenes and let the viewers decide. Most annoying.

      Can't say I'm much of a Star Wars fan these days. Loved it as a kid, and a recent viewing of SW and ESB was fun. Couldn't make it all the way through ROJ though. It just got too boring. Still glad I bought the LDs though, 'cause I know some of my friends will want to watch the unaltered originals again. It's good rainy day party fodder. --M

    3. Re:I just ebayed the original trilogy on LaserDisc by bmantz65 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he owns it. It's his copyrighted work. He should have every right to change it as he sees fit. But he shouldn't have the right to revoke history in the process.
      Its still his creation. Ever think he wanted to change these things twenty years ago but couldn't due to technology constraints?

    4. Re:I just ebayed the original trilogy on LaserDisc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      It's not a rumor. The upcoming DVD was leaked and an XViD encode of Return of the Jedi was released by ViTE on 2004-07-23, just two days ago. I personally confirm that Hayden indeed replaces Sebastian Shaw at the end (in the scene with Yoda and Obi-Wan). The helmet removing scene (still at Death Star 2) hasn't been changed, though.

      Feel free not to trust an AC, but you'll see it for yourself in September. Or right now, if you know where to look.

    5. Re:I just ebayed the original trilogy on LaserDisc by AC5398 · · Score: 1

      I bought the original series on VCD from Ebay for the same reason -- I liked the original series without all of the extra scenes, cgi-ed characters.

      If Lucas released the second version of the films -- no extra scenes/cgi-ed characters, but the special effects were cleaned up (no boxes around the X-Wings, etc.) I'd be a happy camper.

      The news that Lucas will mess around with the movies *yet again* does not fill me with joy. And I have no faith that Revenge of the Sith will be worth the price of a dvd rental.

    6. Re:I just ebayed the original trilogy on LaserDisc by klui · · Score: 1

      The version I saw in 1977 is different that what's on video: there is no "Episode IV".

      And I could have sworn that the scene where the stormtroopers chasing Han and Chewie went like this:
      1. "close the blast doors, close the blast doors." on radio
      2. Han and Chewie make it through
      3. "open the blast doors, open the blast doors." on radio

      Video versions (all 3 LD versions that I own) don't have 1 and yet that's not I remember.

    7. Re:I just ebayed the original trilogy on LaserDisc by colmore · · Score: 1

      History isn't what he "wanted" to do but what he did.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    8. Re:I just ebayed the original trilogy on LaserDisc by maynard · · Score: 1

      I don't remember that change. But it wouldn't surprise me. Lucas has been retroactively changing SW since at least 1980, when he changed the title for the SW re-release right before ESB. I, like all my friends, saw SW in '80 again several times before ESB was released and while I don't think I noticed the title change I definitely remember people talking about it. And the whole thing about Lucas making three trilogies total, and how he had the whole thing planned and already written (obviously not). Whatever, that was almost twenty five years ago.

      I saw TPM when it came out and was so dissapointed that I didn't bother going to see AOTC, and didn't even see that until it hit HBO. Even then I was dissapointed, yet again. Unless Lucas turns about face and releases a spectacular finale tying up all those loose plot points in a coherent whole (instead of just another effects spectacle) I won't bother seeing SW III. Give me another City of Lost Children, or Brazil. Bah. Double Bah. ROTJ really sucked, we all knew it, and Lucas hasn't even one-upped that POS these last two films. Bah again! --M

  81. Why not both? by IcEMaN252 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Am I the only one who doesn't really see the difference in special effects between the original and the SEs? DVDs don't make it that hard to have multiple chapter sequences. There aren't that many differences between the two, so I'm sure one DVD could hold both versions with just a little extra video.

    --
    CitrusTV (http://www.citrustv.net): the Nation's Oldest & Largest Entirely Student-Run Television Station
  82. What we really need is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mel Brooks to bring back Spaceballs to deliver us from suckage. Call it Space Balls Episode 2: Suck This Schwartz.

  83. Re:One master, one apprentice? Waaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note for anyone else only vaugly familiar with star wars. Wading through google showed that KOTOR=Knights of the old republic.

  84. I Don't Get It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is Sith George Lucas's nickname or something??

  85. Who the Hell gives a crap anymore? by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    Didn't Lucas lose the inertia on his "epic" some thirty/forty years ago when he didn't invest in doing the follow-ups in a remotely timely fashion?

  86. Re:One master, one apprentice? Waaa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Wait, what about KOTOR when there were lots of sith?

    What about it?

    > You mean two sith kill all the jedi?

    Sure, why not? Two people could kill the entire US Army if they went about it in the right way.

    > Wait.

    For what? A brilliant revelation from you? I won't hold my breath.

    > HEY, I know. MAYBE LUCAS IS MAKING THIS SHIT UP AS HE GOES ALONG??!???

    Holy crap! An author is making stuff up? I'm glad you're here to tell us this stuff! Otherwise, we might never have realised!

    > Fanbois, i'm not saying you can't love star wars, just please stop loving George Lucas. He is
    > taking advantage of you.

    Boy has a y in it, not an i.

    Most of us don't love George Lucas. Some of us even think he's an ass.

  87. Wow... by Asahi+Super+Dry · · Score: 1

    Last year sometime I recieved a Word doc from a friend entitled StarWarsEP3_FirstDraft. I read a bit of it; it came across as pretty authentic but I always assumed it was a piece of well-done fan fiction. But the title is the same.... Maybe it's the real thing? Anyone else aware of a screenplay leak?

  88. Don't Buy the DVD's by irving47 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't buy the special edition DVD's and make a point of it to let them know why. Greedo does NOT FIRE FIRST!

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
  89. I Sense... by Titchski · · Score: 4, Funny

    A great disturbance in the Force, as if a million FanBoys cried out as one and then rushed out to queue up for Episode 3...

  90. For all the Geeked out haters by ITR81 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    SW's will keep going on and on with or without all of your snide comments.

    If everything followed the novels then everything would be too predictable in my opinion. If I recall Spiderman nor LOTR followed everything that happened in the comics or novels. But did this make the films less enjoyable? No, they didn't.

    When Peter Jackson makes another sequel and it doesn't match up(which he will) will you be little him as well.

    Atleast GL makes entertaining films for all ages not just SW fans which I give him credit for. Unlike LOTR most kids won't stay the 3 hrs to watch it. But they will for SW. Sometimes I think most forget that SW was designed more for kids and teenagers not some old adult. Remember critics and adults back in the late 70's said the orig. SW wouldn't make any money but it did, because it was written for the kids not the adults in mind.

    You know your Geek when you complain about movie franchise continuity over the net

    1. Re:For all the Geeked out haters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "When Peter Jackson makes another sequel and it doesn't match up(which he will) will you be little him as well."

      ...be little him? You mean, "Little Peter"? Mini Pete? The mind boggles.

      I won't grow up.

    2. Re:For all the Geeked out haters by ITR81 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      So I'm 15 yr old wannabe thug. Last time I check I was atleast 25 yrs old.

      Maybe my grammar sucked that night but atleast I don't have to say "F" this and "F" that in every sentence.

  91. IIRC... by example42 · · Score: 1

    If I recall correctly, "Return of the Jedi" was known during production as "Revenge of the Jedi" lest someone figure out the "surprise ending". Maybe Lucas is pulling another bait and switch?

    1. Re:IIRC... by smash · · Score: 1
      Because of course, we have no idea this time around what the set up is for episode 4 :D

      smash.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    2. Re:IIRC... by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      I still have no idea which Jedi returned in Return of the Jedi. Luke: okay, but he wasn't exactly gone. Obi Wan: dead. Vader: dead. Yoda: dead. Leia: isn't a Jedi. Hm.

    3. Re:IIRC... by rdean400 · · Score: 1

      The title is multi-meaninged, but it's really about Jedi bouncing back from apparent annhilation:

      The Jedi (as in Order) return from apparent oblivion.

      Darth Vader is destroyed and replaced by Anakin Skywalker, Jedi, in the same sense that Obi-Wan told Luke that Darth Vader betrayed and murdered Anakin.

    4. Re:IIRC... by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I... uh, I feel like an idiot -- that should have been so obvious.

  92. I submitted a poll but it was rejected... by stecoop · · Score: 1

    Story Submittions: Pole
    Starwars Episode III title guessing - 07:19 AM March 12th, 2004 - Rejected

    1) Revenge of the Sith
    2) Revenge of the Empire
    3) She Bangs

    Eh. Whatcha gona do...

  93. I got this last November by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Here's what I can tell you about Episode 3.

    As you know, primary filming is complete.

    Definitely dead before the end of the film are Dooku, Mace Windu and Padme. Dooku gets killed by Anakin, perhaps with Palpatine watching; Mace may die in a duel with Palpatine or with Palpatine and Anakin [this may be when Anakin falls to the dark side]; Padme... well, stay tuned. What else may happen is that Yoda and Palpatine will have a fight.

    So what everyone wants to know about is the final duel. Since this will be (supposedly) the last lightsabre duel Lucas ever films, he wanted to go all out on it. Sadly, the Ep I duel will probably go down as the most spectacular one, while the one in Ep 4 is the best one technically.

    It begins with Padme (very pregnant) coming to visit Anakin. At this point, Anakin has already allied himself with Palpatine and is even more resentful of Obi-Wan than in Ep 2. Padme has brought Obi-Wan with her - the Jedi Temple on Coruscant has been attacked and many Jedi have been slaughtered. Anakin sees Obi-Wan and accuses Padme of betraying both his location and their marriage.

    (Trivia: the line "Luke, *I* am your father." in Empire was originally, "Luke, Obi-Wan *was* your father." It was overdubbed in post.)

    Anakin then draws his saber (the one Luke will inherit in Ep 4) and...

    (Apparently, "Duel of the Fates" is not going to be used here, surprisingly enough, given its appearance in Ep2 during the desert chase sequence: perhaps it was used earlier during whatever went on with Mace Windu and now that Anakin has fallen, there is no more Duel of the Fates; the Darkness has won. If they can come up with something better, I'll be duly impressed.)

    Here there were at least two different versions, and both or parts of both might have been made into the final version. I'll try to show both versions as coherently as I can:

    1 Anakin attacks Obi-Wan. Obi-Wan defends himself. This probably looks a lot like
    1 the Vader/Luke duel in 5 - Obi-Wan is not really trying to hurt Anakin. Padme
    1 calls to Anakin to stop, he looks over to her - and in that moment of distraction,
    1 Obi-Wan pulls Anakin's sabre out of his hands and it clatters away.

    Both Enraged by Padme's seeming betrayal, Anakin Force-chokes or -throws her. She crumples,
    Both severely injured, as...

    (I think it's more likely here that he uses the force-throw; it's been suggested (see http://www.theforce.net/swtc/injuries.html ) that Vader's frequent use of the choke was a result of "[his] own helplessness under his permanent" breathing difficulties. Also, (different source) "Vader never was powerful enough in the Sith so as to use the Sith lightning, just as he was never powerful enough to regenerate his wounds. Indeed, he could never fully renounce the Light, because he had known love, first for his mother, then for Obi-Wan, then for Padme.")

    2 Obi-Wan lights his sabre and the duel begins.

    1 Anakin pulls out a second sabre - the Vader one - and lights it. Red blade. Obi-Wan's
    1 shoulders slump, understanding. "You have betrayed us. You have betrayed us all."
    1 "The Jedi betrayed me!" And the duel continues.

    Both The duel covers several areas. Possibly, Anakin loses an arm (and continues to fight
    Both one-handed) and/or loses a leg (and floats in midair by the power of the Force)
    Both but Obi-Wan is better (and less wild) and drives him back to the edge of a volcano
    Both or a lava pit.

    2 Obi-Wan disarms Anakin (perhaps by slicing off his hand), deactivates his sabre,
    2 and extends his hand. Anakin sneers and *steps backward off of the edge*, falling
    2 into the lava. (Again, resonating very strongly with the scene at the end of Empire
    2 with Vader/Luke)

    1 Obi-Wan drives Anakin back into the lava, either by forcing Anakin back with his sabre
    1 or Forcing him back with a force-push.

    Both Obi-Wan briefly looks after Anakin (we hear

  94. What if... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    Someday computers are powerful enough, smart enough, that I could just render an entire movie myself in an afternoon or two, no actors? I give the computer broad outlines, it fills in details (maybe it comes up with a boner every once and awhile, so I bitch at it, "not like that!"). Think of all the movies that could be retold, so much better by the fanfic losers. I know, I know, 99.999% of them are retards, but even so, we could finally see something worth watching, and even worst case scenario, can it be any worse, any more laughable?

    What if The Jedi council "removes" (though not necessarily assassinates) Anakin's mother? I mean, think of it as playing dirty in a custody dispute kind of thing. Anakin only learns of it as an adult... maybe they interfere, he never gets to speak to her before she dies. They could be all righteous, "we're doing it for the good of the universe, you'll be the most powerful, good Jedi ever" blahblahblah. Maybe they interfere with him and Amidala too... even in the first trilogy, they imply that he doesn't know he has children. We could do alot of things that are both plausible and would piss him off so much, make him hate so much, that Palpatine finds his opening to Anakin's heart. And we could even do it with a minimum of cheesiness. Cheesiness is for macaroni, not masterpiece movies. (Note: Anyone ever gets a chance to speak with Lucas, do me a favor and pass that bit of wisdom on, would you?)

    We could have some intrigue, we could have more than a few factions (with the Jedi forced into the middle, like the guy trying to break up a barroom brawl) actually doing things. I mean damn. Even the UN isn't as worthless as the Galactic Senate, or whatever they call it. Instead of Jar-Jar and friends trying to save the planet, we can have interveners (who aren't hardly doing it out of the goodness of their hearts) saving Naboo. We could even add in real reasons the Trade Federation is doing the blockade, other than the Nabooian monopoly of the enviable Gungan demographic.

    We could give Yoda the fight we really wanted to see. Instead of bouncing around like a toy you'd find outside of Kaybee's in the mall, Yoda hobbles up to the few dozen Sith, opens up his robe, and 4 or 5 hundred light-sabers fly out, all controlled by the force, spinning like sawmill blades and mowing down sith like wheat at the harvest. He doesn't even break a sweat. The Sith masters fighting to even stay alive, and maybe escape. Maybe the goddamn muppet can even have some doubts at the moral ambiguity that we'd paint into the Jedi picture. Maybe that's why he acts so silly in the first trilogy, he's an old man who can't bring himself to face what he has unleashed.

    We can have more arms being chopped off.

    The point is, that someday, we may actually be able to ignore garbage shoveled at us by pricks like lucas. So don't despair.

    1. Re:What if... by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1
      I completely agree with you and have thought that as well. Sort of like blogging only in short films, re-edits of films, or feature length films. You can actually do it now at home, you just have to learn the software.

      The only thing which may prevent it is Hollywood having some law passed that prevents the general public from owning the terabyte hard drives you need for that kind of film. It won't be banned because they don't want home movies, it'll be banned because they think they'll all be used by pirates (hence the ipod banning law thats up now in the US).

      Back on topic, I've done some of the 3D animation, and its amazing. You are right, in a few years when we can reneder a realistic person in seconds on screen, then we might see a proper prequal film.

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
  95. He's got one more chance. by xmorg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Darth Vader says: Dont fail me again.... Lucas.

  96. Through the looking glass by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

    Aside from the long-awaited revelation of the title of Episode III, fans had lots of Star Wars news to absorb and be excited about at the Star Wars Spectacular presentation at Comic-Con. Steve Sansweet, Head of Fan Relations for Lucasfilm, hosted the two-hour long panel, full of exclusive video clips and a number of surprise guests.

    Much of the news centered around three simple letters: DVD. 2004 is the year to substantially expand your Star Wars DVD collection. Fans are clamouring to get these DVDs. There have been numerous instances of fans -- in a blind, consumption-driven rage -- killing families in the mall to collect enough money for the pending release. If the reader has any doubt about the massive, pent up demand for this most tremendous release, he should have her his head examined. It is expected that the marketplace will reward this fall's most attentive consumers with this fine reward, miss this and you will wallow in the shallow, unfulfilled morass of the have-nots.


    War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ride, Sally ride.

  97. Great. by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Lucas has finally realized that a) he can't write dialogue and b) fight scenes require no dialogue*. Also c) sabrefights are flashy and expensive and people like them. Therefore d) look for lots of sabrefights.

    He's also realized that e) the great majority of his audience were fans of the originals and f) repeating yourself requries no creativity therefore g) he'll throw in as many references to the originals as possible. (Tatooine, the bots, Jabba, Chewbacca...)

    (*: however, the right dialogue can greatly improve a fight scene, especially a duel. See "I want my father back, you son of a bitch! ")

    --
    if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    1. Re:Great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You seem a decent fellow, I hate to kill you."
      "You seem a decent fellow, I hate to die."

    2. Re:Great. by rdean400 · · Score: 1

      "I am not left-handed."
      "I am not left-handed, either."

    3. Re:Great. by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      [Luke] I have a secret. I am not left handed.
      * Vader slashes off Luke's right hand.
      [Vader] Better learn to be.

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
  98. Episode III: Ashcroft Assumes Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the resemblence to the emporer is uncanny

  99. Ewoks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OooUUuu yah! the entire ewok tv saga on DVD and 2 movies on another whoopiee!
    Hehheheh Im suprised no-one noticed this underwhelming news.

  100. Re:One master, one apprentice? Waaa? by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 1

    Not that I should care, but...

    KOTOR happens just about 1k years before the events in the prequels. Siths were abundant them. And in ep. III they're supposed to take their revenge. I am the only one that thinks TPM was a much worse title? Revenge of the Sith seems no worse than Return of the Jedi for me.

    --
    Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
  101. I have to say this by Soothh · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I know alot of people thought EP2 sucked, I, personally liked it, yea it had some weak points, and true to the whole series, the main "actor" isnt much of an actor, BUT, I also read the EP2 book before the movie came out, and the book is killer, there are many things left out of the movie i think should have made it, and vice versa. But check out the books, its worth while even if you didnt care for the movies.

    --
    We have seen that living things are too improbable and too beautifully "designed" to have come into existence by chance.
    1. Re:I have to say this by Maserati · · Score: 1

      There's a very simple way to improve EP2: fast forward through the whole "frolicking" sequence. Putting some of the deleted scenes back in, like the Jedi library or Anakin and Padme's trial by the Separatists would help too; but just cut that one scene and the worst is gone and the pacing is almost back to what you'd find in a good movie.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    2. Re:I have to say this by voltron_leadr · · Score: 1

      this is way off topic, maserati, but ive been trying to track down this Quake3 freetag hook n rail player named maserati who never spoke. there was an enormous discussion over whether he was a bot (some c designed AI type bot)and i always wondered how i could communicate with this maserati...and empirically prove if he was a human player with his UI and console turned off, or if he was a clever AI project. maserati played on the Glenridge Q3 servers over the past year on a regular basis. is this you?

  102. ahhh, but, can you handle it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only one person would dare give me the rasberry...

  103. Re:At REPORTER GUESSED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Star Wars III: "After This, It's Back to Howard the Duck"

  104. Wrong... by NineNine · · Score: 1

    You have to keep in mind that A New Hope was tacked on later when Lucas started this whole fucked up mess it was *not* there in 1977 and I should know cause I was.

    It actually is. The very first line in the scrolling text at the beginning says, "Episode IV: A New Hope"

    1. Re:Wrong... by Yoda's+Mum · · Score: 1

      Actually, it wasn't. That was later added into the beginning text with subsequent re-releases. The original cinema version was just called "Star Wars"

  105. Ask... by lavar78 · · Score: 1
    --
    "Dave, I stand still--the conclusions jump to me!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
  106. Good! Now i have a movie to not see next year! by Lisandro · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Seriously. I like Lucas, but he fooled me twice already.

  107. How much money do you have? by MacFury · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It depends...would you consider yourself rich? If you are poor (or black) then it's illegal for you. If you are rich, then they will look the other way.

  108. While we're talking about age... by kikta · · Score: 1

    John Rhys-Davies is less than two years younger than Harrison Ford.

    That being said, Sean Connery was ~59 when Last Crusade was released. Harrison Ford just turned 62 a few weeks ago. That blows my fucking mind...

    1. Re:While we're talking about age... by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

      Harrison Ford just turned 62 a few weeks ago.

      Anyone else notice how this guy just aged overnight? I mean, he played thirtysomethings for twenty years, and then one day you see him on TV and he's ready for Metamucil and Depends. Scary.

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
  109. Should've Called It "Where Jar Jar Dies In Pain" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That'd get quite a few people to go.

  110. "...interviewing Lucas at a gay AIDS banquet." by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hmmm, that's funny. I read the USA Today article, and I didn't read anything about the banquet being exclusively for afflicted homosexuals (such as yourself).

    Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Trolls

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  111. They Download Torrents, Don't They? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    Just download the torrent of the laser disc of the original trilogy. It comes complete with menus, extras and is ready to burn on a dvd. No fuss, no muss. There's a needless Blink 182 video easter egg that got tacked on after the fact but it's the best free copy of the original Star Wars that you can see. And you can muck with it all and make your own menus and stuff. You people know who you are.

    And if you think that's stealing, you can go fuck yourself. George Lucas released a film in 1977 and he doesn't get to retract that from the world. If it were officially released, i'd pay what he wanted, but the special editions are just that. It's an older man looking back on his work and wondering what could have been. It's petty and it's wrong.

    Star Wars is a piece of art. In its original incarnation. That's what we were shown for 25 years and sold for over half our lives. Now that we've made an empire, we get to live under its rule?

    I'm not saying all files should be free. I'm not saying you should rob artists blind, but George Lucas is a billionare and Star Wars is a landmark film in American Cinema.

    It's not only stupid to deny it to the public, it's impossible

  112. WHO THE HELL CARES? by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    He's ten times the man Connery will ever be. Indy pwnzs.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  113. Return of the Jedi by BadDream · · Score: 1

    Wasn't Return of the Jedi supposed to be called Revenge of the Jedi? I seem to remember, as a kid, seeing someone really excited about having a movie poster with the wrong name on it... If so, can we expect this to be released as "Return of the Sith"?

    --
    No matter how subtle the wizard, a knife between the shoulder blades will seriously cramp his style.
    1. Re:Return of the Jedi by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      Wasn't Return of the Jedi supposed to be called Revenge of the Jedi?
      Even if it was, it would have been a very bad choice for the movie's name - manly because vengence is not very Jedi-like.

    2. Re:Return of the Jedi by Hassman · · Score: 1

      Yup. It used to be called Revenge of the Jedi...then Lucas changed the title because Jedi aren't suppose to take revenge. At any rate, by that time several movie posters (and such) were made, so they are pretty big collectables now.

      I doubt this title will change, as revenge is a quality of the Sith.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  114. nobody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gives a shit

    Most people over the age of 12 haven't seen episodes I and II.

    We certainly don't care about episode III.

  115. The whole thing depresses me by crucini · · Score: 1

    Because I liked the first movie. Accepted the next two. Abhorred the subsequent ones. Resent Lucas's retroactive tampering with the one good movie - calling it "Episode 4" and adding show-off effects that don't fit.

    When people try to determine the "facts" of the Star Wars universe, they demean themselves by sifting through this cynically cranked-out junk as if it were penned by Tolkien or Asimov. The people who hacked together these scripts must be laughing their asses off watching fanboys argue about how lightsabers work or whatever. I'm sure the scriptwriters knew less than the average fanboy about such things. They just pulled the script out of their nether regions.

    1. Re:The whole thing depresses me by BelugaParty · · Score: 1
      "When people try to determine the "facts" ... by sifting through ... cynically cranked-out junk..."


      They are deemed nerds, then, left to themselves. Until the internet. And Slashdot.

    2. Re:The whole thing depresses me by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2, Informative
      The title of "Episode IV: A New Hope" was added in the fall re-release in 1977, not during the 1997 SE re-releases. I was there, I remember it and it is far from the "retroactive tampering" you are whining about.

      Also, you're in the minority on ANH being the best film - ESB is considered to be, by far, the best of the movies. The original (and the others) is severely lacking when it comes to 1) acting; 2) plot; 3) direction; and 4) emotion. However, when you consider the Leigh Brackett (who, by the way, was a better writer than Asimov any day) was one of the screenwriters for ESB and the Irwin Kirschner was the director, you can see why. I highly suggest viewing both movies with an open mind and you'll see why ESB is clearly the stronger film out of the two.

      There have been many of us in the fanbase asking for Lucas to bring Kirschner back for the prequels but: 1) Lucas is quoted as telling Kirschner "You're ruining my movie!" during the filming of ESB; and 2) Kirschner has said he would never work for Lucas again.

      And, finally, some constructive criticism: don't try to assume that all of the fans are placing SW on the same level as Asimov or Tolkien. Lucas definitely doesn't. SW is FANTASY, not science fiction. It has never pretended to be science fiction (just because there are lasers and spaceships and robots does not make it SF). Stop trying to compare it to something it was never meant to be compared to. If you want to be academic then go read Harlan Ellison.

      Oh, well. I enjoy the movies for what they are: popcorn fare and some fun storytelling. And, yes, I will be sitting in a showing on opening day. :p

    3. Re:The whole thing depresses me by klui · · Score: 1

      I think you mean its re-release in 1981.

    4. Re:The whole thing depresses me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, finally, some constructive criticism: don't try to assume that all of the fans are placing SW on the same level as Asimov or Tolkien. Lucas definitely doesn't. SW is FANTASY, not science fiction. It has never pretended to be science fiction (just because there are lasers and spaceships and robots does not make it SF). Stop trying to compare it to something it was never meant to be compared to.

      I know this is going to come as a shock to you, but Tolien's work wasn't science fiction either.

    5. Re:The whole thing depresses me by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1

      No, I'm pretty sure it was 1977. The site says that the main SW site doesn't say when the re-release was. An, by the time of fall 1977, Lucas knew there would be a sequel.

    6. Re:The whole thing depresses me by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1
      According to Sir Steve the change was made for the 1981 re-release; the Lucasfilm film archivist found reels of the actual elements used to make the revised shot, dated late 1980.

      Yeah, I hate it when my memory plays tricks on me like that too!

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    7. Re:The whole thing depresses me by crucini · · Score: 1
      I was able to watch most of ESB after reading your comment. Hmm. Things I liked:
      1. Vader has a better voice than in the first movie.
      2. Yoda, before he admits his identity.
      3. Cloud City and Lando
      4. Luke confonting Vader in the "tunnel of the unconscious".
      5. All the Imperial interiors, with their cold lighting, grates, and cool features on the walls.
      6. "I am your father." Even Luke's acting is good in this scene.
      Things I didn't like:
      1. The elevated status of our heroes. "Commander Skywalker" (WTF? One lucky shot does not make you a military officer.) Military dudes taking order from Han Solo. It would have been wiser to show the inevitable tensions between this freewheeling mercenary and the idealistic rebels.
      2. Everything before Luke gets to Yoda-land seems like filler.
      3. Luke's petulant, immature, self-indulgent approach to training with Yoda. I know it's part of his character, but I think it's exaggerated beyond credibility.
      4. The vulgarization of the Force. I see now that it starts in ESB. Where the Force was elegant and subtle in Star Wars, suddenly it's a bunch of comic book tricks like lifting a multi-ton chunk of metal out of a swamp. And suddenly it's emphasized that prowess in these telekinetic stunts comes not from enlightenment but from effort and yearning. We've gone from a zenlike stance to complete anti-zen.
      5. Adding insult to the above injury is the lazy and whining Luke's rapid ascent to the big league of tossing spaceships around. I could accept that after a lifetime of study Ben Kenobi could convince some troopers that those weren't the droids they were looking for. I can't accept that after a crash course in force-ology Luke is now the human dredging machine.
      Things I'm ambivalent about:
      1. Vader's efforts to recruit Luke. Maybe he's blinded by love of his son, but you'd think a smart guy like Vader would come up with a better plan.
  116. It's better than "Attack of the Clones" by crashnbur · · Score: 1

    Therefore I like it.

    (The "attack" of the clones was barely even an attack until the post-film cartoons, and it had very little to do with the purpose of the second film in the trilogy. Then again, "Attack of the Clones" is better than "Send in the Clones", and it echoes the cheesiness of past Star Wars films that we've come to expect, and considering the equally goofy name "Star Wars" in the first place, we should have little room to complain. Therefore I like it.)

  117. Leaked screenplay? by Asahi+Super+Dry · · Score: 1

    I got a word doc from a friend months ago, a screenplay that appeared to be for EP3. I assumed it was a fake, although it was a very good one. Thing is, the title is "Revenge of the Sith." Maybe it's the real thing?

    1. Re:Leaked screenplay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to share it?

    2. Re:Leaked screenplay? by juiceCake · · Score: 1

      I assumed it was a fake, although it was a very good one.

      If it's very good than it has to be fake I'd say. It's been nonsense since episode 6 so...

  118. I said it once before by nedder · · Score: 1

    Star Wars Episode III: Droids Gone Wild

  119. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  120. Revenge Of The What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sure reads like Revenge of the Shit . It kind of reminds me of those FCUK signs for French Connection UK.

  121. blech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [user gspawn, forgot password, slow email...]

    1)Title = death. Revenge of the Sith? Even worse than "Attack of the Clones". The title of this movie would have been "Fall of the Republic" if it had turned out well. Since it didn't, he named it appropriately.

    2)Animated and live-action Ewok adventures. There's the end of the story. Lucas has admitted to knowing how much ep3 will bomb right there. The franchise is so far gone, he's getting his losses back the only way he knows how anymore- make something even MORE ridiculous than Jar-Jar, that way at least you get enough media coverage to pay the bills.

    I'm not seeing ep3, and neither should you.

  122. Revenge? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    Revenge for what? so far we have see the Sith playing in the background on both sides of the fight and even got the Jedis to fight along side the Sith Army of clones!!!

    seems to me that the Sith are in need of anything but revenge.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  123. Dont you dare believe him! by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Funny

    The real title will be the Return of the Sith.

  124. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sun is dying!

  125. The return of Jar-Jar Binks by herraukuli2061 · · Score: 0

    My suggestions:

    1) The return of Jar-Jar Binks
    2) The return of the Ewoks
    3) The return of the Ewoks AND Jar-Jar Binks
    4) How Luke and Leia were made

    Proposal number four might be entertaining to some Natalie Portman fans.

    Proposal number four might also feature other interesting things such as whatever those pink nymphomaniacs in the Star Wars comic magazines were. They also were actually visible in the Episode IV Mos Eisley cantina scene... Actually there were some kind of funny samurai-spirited Goths in the Star Wars comics of the eighties as well... Anybody remember these things?

  126. Question to Star Wars geeks by LuSiDe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If Sidious is Palpetine (which i assumed from PM) then who is the Dark Jedi Master who Yoda killed on Dagobah who's force is still present on the Dagobah cave as seen in ep 5 and which force made Yoda's presence unsensable?

    --
    WE DON'T NEED NO BLOG CONTROL.
    1. Re:Question to Star Wars geeks by Qetu · · Score: 1

      Who else has a red lightsaber? Count Dooku (Darth Tyranus)!

    2. Re:Question to Star Wars geeks by archivis · · Score: 1

      Jar Jar!

      --
      In July O7, I got a mac pro. There's no punchline. Just endless joy and wonder.
    3. Re:Question to Star Wars geeks by snap-hiss · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume anyone was killed on Dagoba? That's not canon. !snap

      --


      "Yeah, a shrink ray! Just like that time on Muppet Babies!"
  127. I was there! by Mr.+Spleen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I went to the Comic-Con today for the sole purpose of seeing the Sin City panel... for the sole purpose of seeing Jessica Alba in person. (Hey, can you really blame me? =)

    Anyway, the Sin City panel was to take place immediately after the Star Wars thing (in the same hall). So I went in early and sat in on the last half hour of the Star Wars bit. This turned out to be just in time to see them show some preview stuff, and announce the name. Then Hayden came out, and there were questions from the audience. It was a very cool thing to be there for.

    On another note, Sin City (based on the graphic novels by Frank Miller) looks as though it is going to be one of THE BEST movies of next year. Director Robert Rodriguez insisted on doing a translation of the stories (instead of an adaptation), and the preview they showed was amazing (it should be released online in about 3 weeks).

    And yes, Jessica Alba was unbelievably stunning, drop-dead gorgeous, and every other synonym for beautiful that there is. I don't care what anyone says, she is the most perfect female specimen possible. =D

    Mr. Spleen

    1. Re:I was there! by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1
      And yes, Jessica Alba was unbelievably stunning, drop-dead gorgeous, and every other synonym for beautiful that there is. I don't care what anyone says, she is the most perfect female specimen possible. =D

      Funny. That alone immediately suggested to me that I'd probably disagree. *looks her up*... yes. It's that kind of beauty. Not that I'd say no to looking like that, but nah, doesn't tickle me. No offense intended, of course; you can like whatever you want - I'm just being a rebel against mainstream aesthetics or something. Maybe it's the hair, makeup, general style... and maybe I need to associate a voice, an attitude, a mode of behaviour with a person to think beautiful. Okay, no idea where that little rant came from... sorry.

  128. The dark side... by herraukuli2061 · · Score: 0

    What about Indy on the dark side? In the context of the Indiana Jones movies this would mean Indy joining the... Nazis.

    After all, fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering, suffering leads to the dark side. Or maybe Indy just gets fascinated by the black uniforms and blonde ladies.

    If this has to happen in the fifties maybe the escaped lead nazi has decided that there should be only two nazis, a master and an apprentice.

  129. Yet Another Alternate title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently there's another storyline. that has something to do with a recurring bout of indigestion...

  130. Re:One master, one apprentice? Waaa? by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
    No, the Clone Wars kill a bunch of Jedi and then Vader comes in and cleans house. We've already seen Jedi die in AOTC and even more die in the animated Clone Wars series.

    Check out the main Star Wars site. It has a picture of Vader before the helmet and the respirator.

    Or did you think Anakin only decided to become Palpatine's apprentice after Obi-wan dumps him in the lava?

    It's Lucas's story - let him tell it the way he wants to. If you don't like it, fine. But it is still his story to tell - we, the viewers, don't make those decisions. We can only decide whether we like something or not - that's it.

  131. KAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHNNNNN! by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    n/t :P

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  132. Has anyone else noticed? by Razzak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He gets ripped for making things different in Ep 1-3, and gets ripped for making them the same as well?

    They're movies. The first series was great because of its special effects at the time and people still like them because of their Coke-like qualities (familiarity, reminds us of childhood, etc).

    The new ones are just sci-fi movies in a time where there are too many sci-fi movies. I like'em, but they're not amazing. The bar was set too high.

  133. You should... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Go buy or rent Knights of the Old Replublic, and/or pick some of the Tales of the Jedi graphic novels, possibly avalible at your local library. Good back story on the sith and their beef with the jedi.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  134. Laserdiscs - DVD? by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if anyone with access to the the LaserDisc versions of the original trilogy and/or THX 1138 ever bothered to make an MPEG2 release to burn on DVDs? And to release that on any P2P?

    1. Re:Laserdiscs - DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, they did :)

      You'd be wanting to go to TorrentSearch and query for
      star wars pre se ld
      You'd then want to use a BitTorrent client,
      such as the excellent ABC Client to grab them.

      Sadly though, they're illegal to download in my country.

      Damm.
  135. The Artist != The Art by esoterus · · Score: 1

    Its still his creation. Ever think he wanted to change these things twenty years ago but couldn't due to technology constraints?

    There is a time when a work of art ceases to belong solely to the artist, and becomes its own independent entity. The movies that he made and released back in the 70s and 80s have passed far beyond his ability to control their destiny, how they are loved/hated, and the what they mean to people. To do so it a completely vain exercise.

    Imagine Beethoven going back years later, after his music had been played and circulated widely, and touching up his symphonies - telling people to essentially ignore his previous drafts. It would just degrade the artwork, and it starts to chip away at the work's original integrity and feeling. If Lucas wasn't satisfied with what he had to work with, he shouldn't have made the movies at that time. The Special Edition's shouldn't have been made, but even if he decided to make them he shouldn't try to wipe away signs of the previous work. He needs to show it the respect it deserves.

    --
    Not only does God definitely play dice, but He sometimes confuses us by throwing them where they can't be seen. -Hawking
    1. Re:The Artist != The Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, quite a number of composers did this--Stravinsky comes immediately to mind. People argue over which versions are superior and why he made the changes he did, but he certainly did not "deface" his previous work by creating versions that, to him, were more perfect. In fact, looking at the changes is one of the best ways of gaining understanding into his artistic priorities.

      Without equating Lucas with Stravinsky, I think the same principle applies here. Lucas may change and we may debate. But in the end, the authoritative version is that designated as such by Lucas. The artist *always* controls the art.

    2. Re:The Artist != The Art by lavar78 · · Score: 1
      The artist *always* controls the art.
      Thanks in no small part to the fucked-up copyright system.
      --
      "Dave, I stand still--the conclusions jump to me!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
    3. Re:The Artist != The Art by esoterus · · Score: 1

      The artist *always* controls the art.

      Well, I for one believe that art and its value is solely based upon human interaction with the work (ie. someone goes and makes a painting, I go look at it, and then decide whether or not it means anything to me).

      The artist is in control of the creative germination only. After that, the artist has no control over his art.

      I'm sorry to say that Lucas will never have the right to go into my brain and alter which version I prefer. I now have the artwork in my head, and it's now just as much mine, in that sense, than it is his.

      The artist is human, and very rarely is aware of the full impact or meaning of his/her art. Therefore, for him/her to never reliquish a work to stand on its own, artistically though not necessarily copyright-wise (different debate), the artist *will* mangle it. Where is the end once you start to pick at it? You will pick it to death. And to me that is *exactly* what happened in those Special Editions. Is he legally afforded the right to make those changes? Absolutely. But it's a damn shame he did it.

      --
      Not only does God definitely play dice, but He sometimes confuses us by throwing them where they can't be seen. -Hawking
  136. Internal working title by MemoryDragon · · Score: 2, Funny

    The passion of jar jar. Contents: Jar jar being tortured for almost three hours by the emperor....

  137. No amount of hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is going to make me watch this abortion of a franchise. Fucking die Lucas you are as creative as a brain damaged cabbage.

  138. What it's really about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's not about whether or not the title makes sense. It's about whether anybody at Lucasfilm is able to tell George when his shit smells. Everybody there knows that this film will suck -- with one important exception.

    My sources there tell me he still doesn't understand why nobody likes Jar Jar!

  139. Survival of the geekest? by michaeldot · · Score: 2, Funny
    >> "Official Star Wars Fan Club."

    > That's a lot of DNA which will never get passed on.

    Posting that comment on Slashdot? Hello pot, kettle on line two!

  140. Empire Of Dreams by payndz · · Score: 1
    I've seen parts of the new documentary (I was at the UK press launch for the DVDs some weeks ago) and while the bits I saw (about 20-25 minutes'-worth) had lots of archive material, it wasn't (from memory, anyway) the same as the 'Making Of...' specials.

    There is, regrettably, also some revisionism from Lucas about various things. "It was always about these twins, a brother and a sister." Um, not in the early drafts when it was still *The* Star Wars, it wasn't. And Vader wasn't always Luke's father, either, since in the first draft Vader was just one of several evil generals who got blown up at the end. Hell, in the first draft Luke Skywalker was an old man!

    But now that Lucas is a billionaire he can change history however he wants, I suppose. Apparently Greedo *still* shoots first in the DVDs...

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  141. WHAT?!?! No Holiday Special DVD? by Ath · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I cannot even believe they refuse to release this piece of work. Or piece of something.

    Nothing says Star Wars like Bea Arthur and Art Carney.

    Don't know about the Star Wars Holiday Special? Google for it. You won't be disappointed.

    1. Re:WHAT?!?! No Holiday Special DVD? by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I saw half of that turkey. It starts of so-bad-it's-funny, but soon becomes so painfully terrible that I just couldn't watch it any more.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    2. Re:WHAT?!?! No Holiday Special DVD? by Sux2BU · · Score: 1

      I watched most of that POS with my VCR on fast forward. There is no redeeming quality in that special whatsoever, but I had to see just how horrible it was.

  142. fuck it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SW1 sucked. SW2 sucked even more. SW3 will suck beyond any kind of measure. I refuse to see that crap.

  143. Put me down for a copy by Quizo69 · · Score: 1

    I'm not buying the new DVD set. I have the original trilogy on bootleg DVD, purchased overseas. They're not great quality, but they are widescreen and have been pulled from the original trilogy Laserdiscs by the looks of them.

    I also owned the VHS trilogy at one point, as well as the Special Edition Laserdisc trilogy when they came out.

    Since Lucas has told everyone the original trilogy is dead, and since I have shelled out more than once for them, I figure it's carte blanche to copy them onto DVD for future generations to have a good quality record of how the originals looked.

    I for one fervently hope that someone such as yourself who has the original trilogy on Laserdisc or better, and has high grade digital restoration equipment, can re-encode the original trilogy on DVD for all those of us who consider them to be much better than the new editions.

    Create a DVDR set with just the movies and DD5.1 sound (with new digitally created subtitles for alien voices etc) and put them up on BitTorrent, and I guarantee you'll be famous among a large proportion of Star Wars fans (of the originals) and can sleep at night knowing you have preserved one of the most influential trilogies ever produced from being consigned to the dustbin of history.

    1. Re:Put me down for a copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's already been done. I have 13 gigs of 'Pre Special Edition LD Rips', obtained via bittorrent, just waiting for me to get a DVD burner. So he shouldn't bother, really.

  144. ObSlashdot by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    Oh...

    He must be new here...

  145. I -HATE- surprise celebrity guests by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "surprise celebrity guests"

    One of the things that put me off Star Wars : THe phantom menace, was those 'celebrities' playing roles, that totally f*cked over the Universe.

    Come on, Samuel L. Jackson as one of the wise guys... Seriously...

  146. They switched the merchandising efforts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amusingly, the cartoon effort this time, Clone Wars, was much better than the movies. Clearly the suckage is in the wrong spot.

  147. name change by talaphid · · Score: 1

    We're now calling it "The Freedom", and Palpatine is a "Freedom Lord"...

  148. Extra Lean Ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  149. Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely you mean: "the tortuous, painful demise of all Gungan, especailly Jar-Jar"? :)

  150. Ha ha, God that's pathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything is about when you were a kid. When you were a kid this, when you were a kid that. Is this some sort of irregular fixation that you have? Who gives a shit besides your nerd fanboys and their ilk? Oh, and would you do me a favour hun? I'd appreciate it if you didn't use so many acronyms. It's getting your gay all over my retinas.

  151. ++informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This is right on the money.

  152. You wish... by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

    There's still VII, VIII and IX to go, which will, no doubt, not only be in the "New Lucas" style, but will primarilly feature the offspring of Solo and Leia, no doubt having lots of kookie adventures involving both ewoks and Jar-jars great grand-tadpole...

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  153. Episode N: The Search For... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Episode I: The Search for Anakin
    Episode II: The Search for Shmi
    Episode III: The Search for Padme
    Episode IV: The Search for Droids
    Episode V: The Search for Luke, Han, C-3PO, and the Millennium Falcon
    Episode VI: The Search for Han, Leia, and Anakin

  154. Does anyone really care anymore? by nwbvt · · Score: 1

    I know for the last two, we had hundreds of nerds camping out in front of movie theaters to get it. The first because they loved the first 3 movies and the second because they were all convinced that the phantom menace was a abnormally. But after two crappy movies (3 if you count Return of the Jedi, though that wasn't nearly as bad), does anyone really want to see the third? Does anyone really think Lucas will be able to recover?

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  155. Aleady been done by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    please watch "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom", they put a spell on him that turned him bad, but Shortround broke it.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  156. Bubba Ho-tep by Bonewalker · · Score: 1

    I saw that movie already. It was called Bubbe Ho-tep. Only it was an elderly Elvis and a black JFK fighting a mummy. Otherwise, basically the same.

  157. Good counter-example by maynard · · Score: 1

    Wow, that's a really interesting comment. Thanks for a good counter-example to the arguments against Lucas retroactively changing his work. However, Stravinsky wasn't in a position to alter prior copies of his original work like Lucas can do by letting deteriorating 35mm prints and videocassette fade to oblivion and expressly forbidding new copies of the old work. Stravinsky would have to have changed his prior work and then actively removed access to the originals to better compare - and in such a scenerio future filmmakers would be unable to learn from Lucas's changes as composers currently learn by analysing Stravinsky's updates.

    Thanks again,
    --Maynard

  158. Dumb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dumb dumb dumb. That shit belongs to George Lucas. It doesn't belong to "society" yet. He could edit in aliens that look like penises if he chose to do so. You have a pretty twisted idea of what Intellectual Property is, by all accounts.

  159. Was that one or two? by Daetrin · · Score: 1
    he Jedi beat the Sith down brutally and to the point where the Jedi think there are no Sith left. But, unknown to the Jedi, there is one left. He takes an apprentice and sets the Rule of Two (one Sith master, one Sith apprentice).

    I like that theory, in that it dismises the "jedi can't count to two" thing.

    The only problem is, if the surviving sith made the rule _after_ the jedi thought they had destroyed all the sith, how do the jedi know about the rule? If they heard about the rule at all after that point, believing it to be true would presupose believing there were sith around to make the new rule, which would contradict their belief that they had already killed all the sith.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  160. More suggestions by initialE · · Score: 1

    Star Wars 3: Dude, Where's my Jedi?

    Star Wars: Revolutions

    Star Wars 3: Pretty boys and red-hot lava

    --
    Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
  161. ESB by taradfong · · Score: 1

    I dunno...in my memories ESB seems like a great movie, but whenever I actually *watch* it I feel differently. The Hoth and asteroid scenes are great, but a lot of the rest seems to drag on when I actually watch it.

    I think that if the Ewoks weren't such an easy target for hatred, people would love RoTJ. I loved the intercutting of the Ewok battle/space battle/emporer battle as much as anything in the trilogy.

    --
    Does it hurt to hear them lying? Was this the only world you had?
  162. Oblig Simpsons Reference by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    They showed it at a comics convention? I can hear the Comic Book Store Guy now, "Worst sequal EVER!"

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  163. obviously by snap-hiss · · Score: 1

    Everyone knew it. I've known this would be the title for over a year. Not officially of course, but it's the obvious choice. Think about it. !snap

    --


    "Yeah, a shrink ray! Just like that time on Muppet Babies!"
    1. Re:obviously by snap-hiss · · Score: 1

      I can find posts made by myself and others from late 2002 in which many chose and stuck with this title. !snap

      --


      "Yeah, a shrink ray! Just like that time on Muppet Babies!"
  164. General Grievous by snap-hiss · · Score: 1

    He will take over this film. Unfortunatly he will meet a weak ending. !snap

    --


    "Yeah, a shrink ray! Just like that time on Muppet Babies!"
  165. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what about episode 3: sith happens...

    Slow Down Cowboy!

    Slashdot requires you to wait 20 seconds between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.

    It's been 14 seconds since you hit 'reply'.

    Chances are, you're behind a firewall or proxy, or clicked the Back button to accidentally reuse a form. Please try again. If the problem persists, and all other options have been tried, contact the site administrator.