Who is more likely to misunderstand what words mean? Me? I write my posts with exceptionally good grammar. You on the other hand cannot form a coherent sentence, nor can you be trusted to put an apostrophe in the right place. You're a moron who ranted against liberalism without understanding what liberalism is. When you get your definitions from Ann Coulter, you're going to be embarassed.
Also, you're an idiot if you don't like the abuse you signed up for. If you don't want a relationship of any kind with me, then why did you click the little button to initiate the relationship? As you heartless right-wingers like to say: nobody to blame but your own damn stupid self.
You forgot at least two pieces of punctuation in your response. You also misformed your ellipsis. The spelling errors are your homework assignment.
I've pointed out your terrible grasp of the language many times in the past. You think you're so smart, but when it comes right down to it, the evidence of your miseducation and ill-disciplined mind is bountiful.
I guess there's just no way to help someone who has stated that the US Constitution is no better than a dish rag. As a human being, you're a miserable failure. Why anyone would be your ally is a mystery.
Why not make the point that right-wingers build concentration camps? It'd be an equivalent statment. You're a moron if you think that environmentalis == liberalism.
Democrat is spelled with a 'D'. Liberal is spelled with an 'L'. The words do not look alike, nor do they mean alike. I spend a lot of time pointing that out politely to most, and viciously to some. One of my favorite things to do is get a right-winger frothing at the mouth, then ask him if he likes anything at all that is liberal. When he says no, I point out that the US Constitution is pure liberalism. That usually makes them furious, but there's a real point there. When right-wingers rant about evil liberalism, it's clear that they don't know what liberalism is, and their political spectrum was handed to them. The definition of liberalism is being re-written by those who have their own purposes.
you've already admitted that logic and reason is not the purpose of the "Uma Thurman" posts.;)
I bet you cringed when it was a liberal administration
It's a made up definition of liberal, provided by people like Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter. And if you buy into that definition, you're being fooled.
The actual definition of liberal is easily available to anyone, and I can only surmise that if someone doesn't know it, they must be uneducated, or willfully malicious.
Also, I'm not ragging on "people". I'm ragging on the demonic right-wing swine that signed up for my abuse list. I'm polite to everyone else (those not in my freaks list.)
I like my software with lots of Irish in it thank you very much.
Re:I'm not uncomfortable with speaking my mind
on
What You Can't Say
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
Are you all out of your own ideas? Conservatives always need someone to tell them what to think. All the oxycontin in the world won't give you an original thought.
Re:Best examples of heresy I can think of
on
What You Can't Say
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
Don't pay attention to this man. He wants to make you comfortable around him. You'll invite him over, he'll get comfortable. He'll pretend to be your friend, and might even let on that he has some modern ideas about drug use.
And then, you'll offer him a joint, which he'll accept. Then, he'll pretend to go to the bathroom, but he'll really call the police on you, then leave you to your fate. And, he'll say that you deserved it too.
Not to jump in, but it's obvious that for you, being a fuckwit is an independent variable.
Re:Best examples of heresy I can think of
on
What You Can't Say
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
That position on the drugs is just about the best thinking of the 14th century that I have ever heard. Thanks, you jerk, for being part of the problem. Sort of like your buddy Rush.
And so we call all see that the true colors of a right winger is to implement prohibition. Didn't work for alcohol, or drugs. So why do you think it'll work for a computer game? Idiocy.
You're right. I meant it to be the best of the year, because it would have saved me frustration. Not to mention, the skin off my knuckles from pulling ribbon cables off drives in a box with sharp edges all around.
Isn't a European car that gets good mileage the wrong car for a right-winger to own? Perhaps you make up for it by fueling it with freshly squeezed kitten oil.
It could be possible, because the dust doesn't need to follow the same orbit as the comet itself. There are very tiny forces that can act over time to alter the path of a dust trail. Also, it is very common, and more likely in this case,for a comet to have its orbit altered by the gravity of Jupiter over time.
SATA isn't perfect, but it's a lot better than the ribbon cables. Most people don't need more than 2 ports, and those who do might want to use SCSI instead. Or, they can add a card with more ports on it. The old way of trying to get a single cable onto two drives wasn't working very well. Combine that with the problems of putting a slow or old CD-ROM onto the same cable as a new fast disk, plus the hassles of trying to get a cable all the way from the motherboard to a drive in the top of a large case, and SATA seems like it offers incredible luxury.
First the article says that it was an ancient star that exploded, and at the end it says that it was an ancient comet that exploded.
Meteors are pieces of asteroids or comets that are visible when they intercept the Earth's atmosphere.
It's absolutely preposterous that a star that exploded 500 million years ago could:
Throw a rock into Earth's orbit. Any supernova within a few dozen light years would have destroyed life on Earth at the time. Any supernova would have pulverized a chunk of rock too. And even if a rock somehow came from a distant supernova, we'd never be able to figure it out a half-billion years after the fact.
I attribute the complete absurdity of this article to a science writer who doesn't know anything about science. Or, it could have been an incompetent editor who screwed up the article. Anyway, it completely sucks.
What they did in fact discover is that a particular asteroid is the parent of the meteor stream. This is interesting to know, but hard to dig out of that ill-written article.
Slashdot Mirror
That's just how right-wingers are. If they don't agree with it, they just put their fingers in their ears and hum real loud.
See my latest journal entry, which is exactly about GW Bush doing this.
Who is more likely to misunderstand what words mean? Me? I write my posts with exceptionally good grammar. You on the other hand cannot form a coherent sentence, nor can you be trusted to put an apostrophe in the right place. You're a moron who ranted against liberalism without understanding what liberalism is. When you get your definitions from Ann Coulter, you're going to be embarassed.
Also, you're an idiot if you don't like the abuse you signed up for. If you don't want a relationship of any kind with me, then why did you click the little button to initiate the relationship? As you heartless right-wingers like to say: nobody to blame but your own damn stupid self.
You forgot at least two pieces of punctuation in your response. You also misformed your ellipsis. The spelling errors are your homework assignment.
I've pointed out your terrible grasp of the language many times in the past. You think you're so smart, but when it comes right down to it, the evidence of your miseducation and ill-disciplined mind is bountiful.
I guess there's just no way to help someone who has stated that the US Constitution is no better than a dish rag. As a human being, you're a miserable failure. Why anyone would be your ally is a mystery.
Which picture is the trademarked/copyrighted one?
Why not make the point that right-wingers build concentration camps? It'd be an equivalent statment. You're a moron if you think that environmentalis == liberalism.
You're a moron. Period.
That's the OBVIOUS solution. To fix all our problems, all we need is more guns. Even a moron could see it.
Moronic right-wingers suck.
Right. And right-wingers like to kill grown women, as well as people who are different in religion and/or color.
Your fucking ideas kill people.
Remember, your foes list is my freaks list. That's the sure way to guarantee that I'll be abusive to you in the future.
If you want to have no relationship with me, then do not have a relationship with me.
I don't see the "foe" indicator at this time, which is why this reply is polite.
He's also a Democrat.
;)
Democrat is spelled with a 'D'. Liberal is spelled with an 'L'. The words do not look alike, nor do they mean alike. I spend a lot of time pointing that out politely to most, and viciously to some. One of my favorite things to do is get a right-winger frothing at the mouth, then ask him if he likes anything at all that is liberal. When he says no, I point out that the US Constitution is pure liberalism. That usually makes them furious, but there's a real point there. When right-wingers rant about evil liberalism, it's clear that they don't know what liberalism is, and their political spectrum was handed to them. The definition of liberalism is being re-written by those who have their own purposes.
you've already admitted that logic and reason is not the purpose of the "Uma Thurman" posts.
Yep, I think you've got it surrounded.
You don't understand the service I provide. I provide abuse in the form of impersonations of Ann Coulter (if she were a liberal).
Facts and logic don't play any part in the real Ann Coulter's writings, and they don't play any part in mine either.
I bet you cringed when it was a liberal administration
It's a made up definition of liberal, provided by people like Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter. And if you buy into that definition, you're being fooled.
The actual definition of liberal is easily available to anyone, and I can only surmise that if someone doesn't know it, they must be uneducated, or willfully malicious.
Also, I'm not ragging on "people". I'm ragging on the demonic right-wing swine that signed up for my abuse list. I'm polite to everyone else (those not in my freaks list.)
It's your fault, because you conservative idiots take money from the schools and use it to line your own pockets. Selfish bastard.
I like my software with lots of Irish in it thank you very much.
Are you all out of your own ideas? Conservatives always need someone to tell them what to think. All the oxycontin in the world won't give you an original thought.
Don't pay attention to this man. He wants to make you comfortable around him. You'll invite him over, he'll get comfortable. He'll pretend to be your friend, and might even let on that he has some modern ideas about drug use.
And then, you'll offer him a joint, which he'll accept. Then, he'll pretend to go to the bathroom, but he'll really call the police on you, then leave you to your fate. And, he'll say that you deserved it too.
This is the hypocrisy of the right wing.
Not to jump in, but it's obvious that for you, being a fuckwit is an independent variable.
That position on the drugs is just about the best thinking of the 14th century that I have ever heard. Thanks, you jerk, for being part of the problem. Sort of like your buddy Rush.
Don't laugh at him. Not everyone can afford oxycontin like all the famous conservatives.
Learn to read, ignoramus.
And so we call all see that the true colors of a right winger is to implement prohibition. Didn't work for alcohol, or drugs. So why do you think it'll work for a computer game? Idiocy.
You're right. I meant it to be the best of the year, because it would have saved me frustration. Not to mention, the skin off my knuckles from pulling ribbon cables off drives in a box with sharp edges all around.
Isn't a European car that gets good mileage the wrong car for a right-winger to own? Perhaps you make up for it by fueling it with freshly squeezed kitten oil.
It could be possible, because the dust doesn't need to follow the same orbit as the comet itself. There are very tiny forces that can act over time to alter the path of a dust trail. Also, it is very common, and more likely in this case,for a comet to have its orbit altered by the gravity of Jupiter over time.
SATA isn't perfect, but it's a lot better than the ribbon cables. Most people don't need more than 2 ports, and those who do might want to use SCSI instead. Or, they can add a card with more ports on it. The old way of trying to get a single cable onto two drives wasn't working very well. Combine that with the problems of putting a slow or old CD-ROM onto the same cable as a new fast disk, plus the hassles of trying to get a cable all the way from the motherboard to a drive in the top of a large case, and SATA seems like it offers incredible luxury.
First the article says that it was an ancient star that exploded, and at the end it says that it was an ancient comet that exploded.
Meteors are pieces of asteroids or comets that are visible when they intercept the Earth's atmosphere.
It's absolutely preposterous that a star that exploded 500 million years ago could:
Throw a rock into Earth's orbit. Any supernova within a few dozen light years would have destroyed life on Earth at the time. Any supernova would have pulverized a chunk of rock too. And even if a rock somehow came from a distant supernova, we'd never be able to figure it out a half-billion years after the fact.
I attribute the complete absurdity of this article to a science writer who doesn't know anything about science. Or, it could have been an incompetent editor who screwed up the article. Anyway, it completely sucks.
What they did in fact discover is that a particular asteroid is the parent of the meteor stream. This is interesting to know, but hard to dig out of that ill-written article.