Slashdot Mirror


Bangalore Beats Silicon Valley

An anonymous reader writes "The inevitable has happened. Bangalore, which grew under the shadow of America 's Silicon Valley over the last two decades, has finally overtaken its parent. Today, Bangalore stands ahead of Bay Area, San Francisco and California, with a lead of 20,000 techies, while employing a total number of 1.5 lakh engineers."

779 comments

  1. Lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1.5 lakh engineers.

    What's a lakh, and why do they need engineers?

    1. Re:Lakh? by jazzyseth · · Score: 5, Informative

      One entry found for lakh.

      Main Entry: lakh
      Pronunciation: 'lak, 'lak
      Function: noun
      Etymology: Hindi lAkh
      Date: 1599
      1 : one hundred thousand
      2 : a great number
      - lakh adjective

    2. Re:Lakh? by tommck · · Score: 2
      a lakh is 100,000.

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    3. Re:Lakh? by Tirel · · Score: 4, Informative

      magic% dict lakh
      3 definitions found

      From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]:

      Lac \Lac\, Lakh \Lakh\, n. [Hind. lak, l[=a]kh, l[=a]ksh, Skr.
      laksha a mark, sign, lakh.]
      One hundred thousand; also, a vaguely great number; as, a lac
      of rupees. [Written also {lack}.] [East Indies]

      From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]:

      Lakh \Lakh\, n.
      Same as {Lac}, one hundred thousand.

      From WordNet (r) 2.0 [wn]:

      lakh
      n : the cardinal number that is the fifth power of ten [syn: {hundred
      thousand}, {100000}]

    4. Re:Lakh? by xstein · · Score: 0, Redundant

      A lakh is 100,000, a measure of quantity.

      1.5 lakh is 150,000.

    5. Re:Lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's the Indian way to say it. 1.5 lakhs is much easier to say than 1,500,000 in case u dint notice

    6. Re:Lakh? by tommck · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What's wrong with saying "1,500,000 engineers?"


      Well, that would be wrong! ;-)
      1.5 * 100,000 = 150,000...

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    7. Re:Lakh? by Snover · · Score: 1

      You mean, aside from the fact that 1.5 x 100,000 is 150,000, not 1,500,000? Nothing, I suppose.

      --

      [insert witty comment here]
    8. Re:Lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hope you actually realize that 1.5 times a hundred thousand is 150,000..
      and on slashdot.. :\

    9. Re:Lakh? by danormsby · · Score: 1
      According to The Handbook of World Stock, Derivatives and Commodity Exchanges a lakh equates to 100,000.

      Why not just say 100,000?!??!

      --
      Omnis amans amens
    10. Re:Lakh? by tommck · · Score: 2, Funny
      Can't wait to get marked Redundant since I had to wait 2 minutes to post again... grr...

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    11. Re:Lakh? by Achoi77 · · Score: 1

      Ah, a lakh is a compltely obscure number - it means "hundred thousand."

      What's wrong with saying "1,500,000 engineers?"


      Because it's off by 1,350,000?

    12. Re:Lakh? by mpath · · Score: 1
      What's wrong with saying "1,500,000 engineers?"

      Resisting the urges to be more sarcastic ;)
      1.5 * 100,000 != 1,500,000
      1.5 * 100,000 == 150,000

      --
      I'm not sure what the secret to success is, but the secret to failure lies in trying to please everyone -Bill Cosby
    13. Re:Lakh? by Chilles · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with saying "1,500,000 engineers". However, that number isn't really relevant when you're talking about the 150,000 engineers that are meant by 1.5 lakh.
      other than that you're free to say "1,500,000 engineers" as often as you like.
      shout it out loud if you want, maybe you'll wake your co-workers out of their day-dream and they'll start counting for full engineers again :-)

    14. Re:Lakh? by KoolDude · · Score: 2, Funny


      those lakhy engineers !!!

      --
      getSexySig(); /* returns sexy signature */
    15. Re:Lakh? by mgs1000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your post also could have been done much cheaper by an Indian engineer.

    16. Re:Lakh? by dash2 · · Score: 1

      It's not obscure if you're Indian. And judging by those figures, soon most Slashdot readers will be.

    17. Re:Lakh? by Viking+Coder · · Score: 0

      OKAY, YES, WE GET IT. I fat-fingered it. Okay, damn, those commas really give me away, don't they? =) I screwed up.

      I appreciate the 0.00008 lakh replies from people pointing out that I'm an idiot, though. Thanks. =)

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    18. Re:Lakh? by AnonymousNoMore · · Score: 1

      There are more of them now. All others must begin to adopt their language.

    19. Re:Lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One hundred thousand; also, a vaguely great number; as, a lac of rupees. [Written also {lack}

      So, therefore, a lack of rupees would not really be a lack of rupees?

      This makes my head hurt!

    20. Re:Lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lakh - a little used term meaning 100,000. Using it is guaranteed to generate a fortnight's worth of discussion and a stones' worth of bullshit!

    21. Re:Lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why not just say 100,000?!??!
      Because the original article is Indian. I guess they'll stop using lakhs when you stop using pounds and inches.
    22. Re:Lakh? by itwerx · · Score: 1


      Ah lakh it lakh that...! :)

    23. Re:Lakh? by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 2, Funny
      1 : one hundred thousand
      2 : a great number

      It can mean either?

      Oh, great; precison engineering.

      --

      Java is the blue pill
      Choose the red pill
    24. Re:Lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it must be some kind of conversion factor: american-engineer = LAKH * indian-engineer;

    25. Re:Lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Admitting it is half the battle...

    26. Re:Lakh? by TomV · · Score: 1

      One Lakh is one hundredth of a Crore.

      That's not too hard, is it?

    27. Re:Lakh? by fastidious+edward · · Score: 1

      Is it binary?

      --

      karma karma karma karma karma chameleon, you come and go, you come and go.
    28. Re:Lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what the exchange rate is, but a lack of rupees probably doesn't take you as far as a lack of (formerly) greenbacks. Even with the current big player devaluing of the buck. (Remember when Soros crashed the pound, same thing here. He's a democrat.)

    29. Re:Lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Why not just say 100,000?!??!

      you mean say "one-zero-zero-comma-zero-zero-zero"?? gee! thats too long.

    30. Re:Lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What ever i say cannot convince you dumb americans . But let me try.
      You better realise as to why intellect, intelligence and indians have their letters in common.
      You and your president...atleast once a while bring your brains from the dead storage...if you have one.

    31. Re:Lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Whatever I say cannot convince you dumb americans"

      Strike one. If you cannot convince us, then you are an idiot for even speaking.

      "You better realize[sic] as to why intellect, intelligence, and indians have their letters in common."

      Strike two. Yeah we better realize. But wait, you arent making a point except to show you are an idiot. Idiot, indians.. I think I see their letters in common!

      "You and your president..."

      Dear god, what about me and my president? Does the fact that he's a cowboy who has to do things himself because the UN is too much of a pussy to act have anything to do with him being an idiot? Does the fact that he hasnt been impeached mean anything? Sour grapes permiate the air, like a wet fart in here.

      "at least[sic] once a while bring our brains from the dead storage.. if you have one"

      Dude, realize what you are doing. You are spouting crap on the internet about issues no one cares about. Welcome to that club of brainless idiots that you so despise! Its a win-win!

    32. Re:Lakh? by ccp · · Score: 1


      Why funny?

      It's Insightful.

      Cheers,

  2. Swinging back to a balance by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's amazing that during an election year that I've yet to hear one thing from Dean or Bush about this. Is everyone bought and paid for?

    I honestly think that a lot of the current commentators are dead on when they say that this is a "fad" and this will eventually balance itself out. Wait until some corporations get a gut full of having their code halfway across the globe. Most companies aren't willing to let you work at home and yet they're willing to hire hoards of people they'll never meet to write their code? Heh. This will right itself eventually.

    1. Re:Swinging back to a balance by squaretorus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wait until some corporations get a gut full of having their code halfway across the globe

      Yeah - they'll move to India too. You can get a seriously big house there, great food, and your kitchen staff won't be a: Expensive, or b: Illegal.

      I'm guessing the tax advantages are pretty significant too. And you get to watch elephant polo!!!

    2. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I had mod points today...

    3. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Puls4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you may be operating under the illusion that this is something that Bush is against. I'm sorry, but his party and his political views support free trade. India and other Asian countries are simply doing what Mexico, Taiwan, and China have been doing for years in other markets. Why do you think it's suddenly so earth shattering? It's a natural progression of a commodity to move to markets with lower overhead costs. Like pay rates.

    4. Re:Swinging back to a balance by RoboOp · · Score: 2

      Maybe it is a cycle, but the question is, how long will the cycle take to correct itself? Five years, fifteen, fifty? I'm sure their are those in England still waiting for their jobs to return after being shipped to the US fifty years ago. You don't really think the Indians are going to be as stupid as the US Congress by offering corporations incentives to move offshore do you? But don't worry. The experts have assured us that only the low quality jobs leave our shores. So whether you are saying "Biggie Size", "Welcome to Walmart" or "May I see your ID?" keep your head up - you are driving the economy!

      --
      "First you get the Linux, then you get the power, THEN you get the women"
    5. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Pionar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Dean has often commented on this. One of his main slogans is, "We should be exporting American products, not American jobs." and has often stated that his plan of including workers' rights policies in trade pacts will stem the tide of the unethical offshoring of labor at pennies on the dollar.

    6. Re:Swinging back to a balance by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 2, Informative

      The gub-ment could provide tax incentives to keep employees in the states, etc. There are things that could be done.

      I noticed that Consumer Confidence index went down noticably the last month. It's in gub-ments OWN interests to try and help keep jobs in the US. If most white collar jobs go to India, that's going to have a monstrous effect on the tax base.

      Folks, this is NOT just IT, it's:
      - Accountants
      - Radiologists
      - R&D

    7. Re:Swinging back to a balance by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      I just read an article where IBM is still selling rates at the traditional rates while using Chinese labor. That's unethical. If they are offshoring to be competitive, their rates should reflect that. ...and I just became a Dean supporter!

    8. Re:Swinging back to a balance by arvindn · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yeah - they'll move to India too. You can get a seriously big house there,

      Hello, where did you pull that out of? India has over a billion people with far less the area of the US. There aren't any big houses here except for 100 year old bungalows. Few people have houses with more than 2 or 3 rooms with barely enough space to put a couple of beds.

      great food,

      I'm with you :)

      and your kitchen staff won't be a: Expensive, or b: Illegal.

      Aren't you forgetting c: Unethical?

      I'm guessing the tax advantages are pretty significant too.

      Somewhat. We don't have a stupid health care system that fleeces you off. But still tax will eat about 30%, at least for IT types.

      And you get to watch elephant polo!!!

      No idea what you're talking about. My guess is you were trying to be insulting.

    9. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feel free to back up that last statement with any kind of fact, if you can.

      Oh wait, sorry. Your kind isn't used to using facts. My bad.

    10. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah - they'll move to India too. You can get a seriously big house there, great food, and your kitchen staff won't be a: Expensive, or b: Illegal.

      In no-foreign-work-visa India, YOU are illegal.

    11. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hello, where did you pull that out of? India has over a billion people with far less the area of the US.

      True, but a typical American CEO can find enough money to buy & bulldoze an entire Indian neighborhood for his new mansion, just by fishing out the change in his sofa. Return his empty beer bottles, and he'll also have enough to hire all the people he displaced as servants, too!

    12. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      Maybe that is true? If you are mowing yards for $20 dollars but making only $10 due to tough market conditions/expenses and you figure out you can buy a faster mower to do it in half the time, are you going to lower your bill in half?

      You charge what people will pay not what it costs you to make/do.

      --Joey

    13. Re:Swinging back to a balance by larry+bagina · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Not only are you a fucking idiot, you're self-contradicting.


      You say it's bad for CAlifornia to have too much government, good for India to have a small government, but bad for the US to have a small government (as if).


      Why don't you go to your pro-sadaam/anti-war protest and leave us alone.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    14. Re:Swinging back to a balance by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      But if you tell everyone you're getting a faster mower to stay competitive, it leaves everyone with the impression that the fee will be lowered.

    15. Re:Swinging back to a balance by glenrm · · Score: 3, Informative

      You also have to hire some armed guards, at least that is what I saw in a show about the people making money in the Indian film industry.

    16. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Puls4r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And of course those are somehow more important than: Steel Workers Automotive Industry Consumer Electronics High End Electronics Don't you folks get it? This has happened to dozens of industries already. Just because it's finally happening to the tech industry doesn't mean it's any more important than the dozens of other times it's happened. You shouldn't expect the government to react any differently now than they have in the past to the dozens of lost industries.

    17. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Glock27 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It's amazing that during an election year that I've yet to hear one thing from Dean or Bush about this. Is everyone bought and paid for?

      Sadly, this appears to fall into the "globalization" groupthink. It's a "free market economy" therefore it must be good...right?

      Since we've lost all kinds of other industries overseas (for instance, steel production) this latest trend is taken as simply the latest incarnation. No one seems to be thinking "gee, we were supposed to lose the manufacturing jobs while the high tech jobs stayed here".

      There are many stupid things about outsourcing IT jobs. First of all, 50% of all software projects failed before outsourcing became prevalent. I'm personally sure that percentage will be significantly higher with outsourced work. Second, U.S. companies are paying to train large foreign workforces to compete with them down the road. Third, the lack of high-paying tech jobs here in America will ultimately hurt the economy, as well as causing many skilled tech workers to move to non-tech positions. One wonders if this new "lack of tech workers" will be used to justify new H1-B visa bills as the economy heats up again.

      In my opinion, the whole debacle arose from executives being annoyed over the high cost of tech labor - they didn't understand that tech is hard, requires lots of education, and should be compensated accordingly. It's sad that contract software rates have fallen to about 50% of their level of a few years ago. It also looks like permanent position salaries have been impacted.

      I'd like to see a few executive teams outsourced to India...then we'd see some real screaming about the practice.

      This will right itself eventually.

      I'd like to think so, but we'll have to see...

      In the meantime, classified government work looks like the best bet as far as job security goes - that will never be outsourced.

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    18. Re:Swinging back to a balance by eric76 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I think it is elephant soccer, not polo.

      But the elephant soccer is in Thailand. At least, some elephant soccer is played in Thailand.

      There was an article about this a few years ago in a Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue.

      A google search for elephant soccer also produces some hits.

      For example, from The Surin elephant roundup:

      Hundreds of elephants attend the traditional yearly roundup in November; most are related, so it?s a big family reunion. They no longer work at logging, so many are employed as performers. It was a field day for man and elephant, and included elephant soccer, basketball, and talent shows, and elephant rides. WK was distressed to learn that elephants often cheat at soccer; they grab the ball with their trunks, run it close to the goal, then drop-kick it. Actually, think about that for a minute.
    19. Re:Swinging back to a balance by dnoyeb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, but what is balance? Note that America has an abundance of the world's wealth, and India's region has an abundance of its poverty.

      Balance will be when much of the wealth in America is shifted to India and the like. I know this is the right thing to do. However, the problem is the wealth shift will be removed from the middle class in the US, and as usual the Rich have well protected themselves and will still grow richer...

    20. Re:Swinging back to a balance by rifter · · Score: 3, Informative

      I honestly think that a lot of the current commentators are dead on when they say that this is a "fad" and this will eventually balance itself out. Wait until some corporations get a gut full of having their code halfway across the globe. Most companies aren't willing to let you work at home and yet they're willing to hire hoards of people they'll never meet to write their code? Heh. This will right itself eventually.

      You'd better hope so, buddy. Personally I am pretty worried; perhaps I should brush up on my Hindi. Bollywood just beat Hollywood in production and also has announced that it will allow people online to market their products for free whereas Jack Valenti has decided he does not want such help. Now Bangalore has surpassed Silicon Valley in number of jobs but NEVER in cost of living. With even US firms shipping jobs to India like mad, all that is left to light this match is a batch of new Indian software products to compete with US products.

      Meanwhile our IP laws mean that it is very undesirable to work on new tech in the US because it will either be shelved, owned by a corporation, or some other company with a patent will make sure you can never do it. But these problems do not exist in India. Neither do they put people in jail for developing crypto software and revere engineering for interoperability. Free Software has no stigma in India and is used where practical unlike in the US where we would rather waste money than do it right.

      India is a mixed economy and I've never known an Indian to be afraid of being called a Communist, or for that matter to use the term as a pejorative. Again, collective or community economy is used where practical and private industry is used where it makes more sense. None of this business of endangering the electric power infrastructure in the name of corporate profits.

      If there is anything holding India back now, it is government corruption, civil strife, and the struggle with Pakistan. But who knows, maybe they will get that all down to a low simmer so it does not disrupt their blossoming economy. Remember, they only won their independance less than 60 years ago. These things take time.

    21. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Wait until some corporations get a gut full of having their code halfway across the globe. ...
      > Heh. This will right itself eventually.

      Well, if you're in IT you already know the dirty little secret nobody in C-level world can accept. Fact is, the substantial success of any modern company is based on the fact IT has encoded the business logic behind the company into it's software.

      IT "knows" the business -- ALL of the business. Fact is, it's one of those heretical thoughts they can't grok. The notion that their C-level greatness doesn't hold a candle compared to a minority of the technical grunts they hold enslaved in the depths of their IT department.

      So, even if the Corporations do arrive at the realization this is a "fad", maybe they can pull their software back. Or, at least get one or more copies of it.

      But they will have forever lost all the free "how-to compete with me" business training they're giving away in the process.

      Programmers change companies. Programmers often take copies of their work, and related projects, with them. Some are not above, um, refering to those works to further their career with new employers.

      Knowledge is power -- that's what's being exported -- and it cannot be recalled.

    22. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Khazunga · · Score: 1

      You're under the illusion that prices are based on production costs rather than market conditions. Goods and services are always sold at the most efficient price supported by the market. When the most efficient price has negative efficiency, companies lose money and products/services die. When a company cuts costs, there's no pressure to deflate prices. The only possible pressure is dictated by buyers (the market).

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    23. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Discoflamingo13 · · Score: 1

      his party and his political views support free trade.

      Which explains why he has closed off all trade with Burma, right?

      I think his party only cares about certain kinds of free trade, and only when it is convenient.

    24. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's cool about the whole thing is that you, too, will lose your job. Regardless how often you masturbate to the flag wearing your 4-star general's uniform.

    25. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello, where did you pull that out of? India has over a billion people with far less the area of the US. There aren't any big houses here except for 100 year old bungalows. Few people have houses with more than 2 or 3 rooms with barely enough space to put a couple of beds.

      Obviously you haven't visited India and know nothing about it.

      There is plenty of land to build a huge house, and it'll be cheap. I know one Indian who moved to the U.S., made a lot of money, and moved back and built a huge (and I mean huge) house on a huge plot of land and hired a full staff of servants (about 5 of them) and even built a little house for them.

      Oh, and in some of the cities in India, the houses are big even if you aren't wealthy. That is because of the extended family. So you have 10 story houses with a huge family living it. A 3-5 story house is typical in these kinds of areas.

      Aren't you forgetting c: Unethical?

      Everyone who has even a little bit of money can afford servants to at least clean every day. How is it unethical to hire people who are so poor, that they are lucky to even have work to do? People gotta make ends meet you know.

      Oh wait, you actually live in India? Wow, you're not even aware of what's going on in your own country. You should do some travelling instead of staying in that one city you've been in.

      BTW, my savings from last year alone will last me 10 years in your country if I live modestly. And yes I am an Indian who was born in the U.S. I could retire at age 30 if I moved to India.

    26. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, they will bust a cap in your ass. The Indian film industry is no joke, they are fucking criminal.

    27. Re:Swinging back to a balance by perly-king-69 · · Score: 1

      Surely this is what free trade is all about though?
      You can't expect developing countries to open up their market without some reciprocation?

      --

      --
      This sig is inoffensive.

    28. Re:Swinging back to a balance by DeepStream · · Score: 1

      There is most certainly elephant polo (in Thailand as well, actually, but very likely elsewhere as well). I saw an article on it in the in-flight magazine on a recent Northwest Airlines flight).

    29. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Oggust · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The gub-ment could provide tax incentives to keep employees in the states, etc. There are things that could be done.

      Tax incentives? You want other people to be forced to subsidize your paycheck?

      In what way is that better than the utterly immoral subsidies some other industries (steel, textile etc) get? I'm talking about the specialty steel tariffs and so on.

      If you can't compete with the indians, tough luck, get another job. That's how capitalism works. That's how it's supposed to work. That means better prices on the products for everyone.

      Lowering the overall tax rate is the only good tax incentive, I've had it up to here with whining special interest whom are all uniquely deserving of other people's money in their own heads.

      /August.

      --
      "An object declared as type _Bool is large enough to store the values 0 and 1." -- 6.1.2.5, C99 standard.
    30. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And while you're in India, you can ritually purify yourself by washing in the Ganges river. MMM-MMM Good. I love the smell of feces in the morning.

    31. Re:Swinging back to a balance by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Being a "techie" never was and never will be a significant percentage of the population. As such why should any politicians devote any attention to techie issues?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    32. Re:Swinging back to a balance by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually, I think it is elephant soccer, not polo.

      Elephant Polo is now played in Nepal, Sri Lanka and Thailand (and in India in colonial times). The players ride on elephants (directed my mahouts) and hit the ball with a (very long) mallet.

    33. Re:Swinging back to a balance by squaretorus · · Score: 1

      And you get to watch elephant polo!!!

      No idea what you're talking about. My guess is you were trying to be insulting.


      Elephant polo comes from the old 'days of the Raj' films we used to see but seem to have disappeared. Its polo with elephants instead of horses. Its like saying 'watch the kaber tossing' about Scotland.

      One of my posh mates took a house in India a few years back with 3 staff for about a grand a month. Amazing.

    34. Re:Swinging back to a balance by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 0

      Tech may or may not be hard but thats no excuse for the quality of the product sucking so much. If its going to suck we might as well not pay top dollar for it, hence outsourcing.

      Everytime you encounter a bug in a program you use that ought to knock off a quarter from the hourly wage of US programmers. After a while you discover they SHOULDNT BE PAID AT ALL.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    35. Re:Swinging back to a balance by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Which explains why he has closed off all trade with Burma, right?

      That is the single foreign policy thing he's done that I agree with. Even though it's more likely due to the Burmese junta's close connections with the heroin trade rather than their repressive and genocidal policies.

    36. Re:Swinging back to a balance by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      Wow. I hope you enjoy paying grossly higher taxes after the bulk of white collar jobs are in India.

      You didn't realize that? Oh! Yeah, the gub-ment will need to crank up the tax rates to offset the huge loss of taxes.

      Capitolism is great but the effect on our country can't be ignored either. The tax rates may be spending a dime to get a dollar. Think about that!

    37. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Dick+Faze · · Score: 1

      Actually, the tax base issue makes this different. Skilled, High-salary workers pay almost all of the taxes in this country (the top 10% in income pay 64% of the income tax to be exact).

    38. Re:Swinging back to a balance by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      Awww...poor wittle baby doesn't make $150/hour doing "web programming" any more? It's all those dirty foreigners' fault.

      Web programming is hard!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    39. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Puls4r · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you don't think hourly line workers in the automotive industry who make WELL into 6 digit salarys are a significant portion of this tax base, then you've never seen the UAW treat their reps to a week in Vegas for a "Solidarity" conference. I hate to tell you this, but the average line worker in an automotive facility makes far more than the average engineer working "up front", especially when you factor in their far superior benefits.

    40. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Puls4r · · Score: 1

      I'll try to break this to you gently. The top 10% of money earners in this country are hardly IT professionals. They're company and corporate CEO's and owners.

    41. Re:Swinging back to a balance by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      his party and his political views support free trade

      Then explain why he imposed huge Steel Tariffs? Or why his party passed the largest government-subsidized Farm Bill ever seen in the history of industrial society. Or why it imposed tariffs on imported Candian Lumber?

      This adminstration is about as Free Trade as the AFL-CIO is.


    42. Re:Swinging back to a balance by RetroGeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      political views support free trade

      Bull.

      They support protectionism at every opportunity. Just check out the Canada Softwood Lumber Dispute. Time after time International agencies have condemmed US actions, yet they continue imposing unilateral duties. This has dragged on for twenty-two years

      Here are other disputes.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    43. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Necrobruiser · · Score: 1

      Tax incentives? You want other people to be forced to subsidize your paycheck?

      Yes. In the same way I am forced to subsidize the sick, lame, and lazy with my paycheck, and my taxes. I want to be on the receiving end of some subsidizing for once.

      --
      "I planned within my means and got a fixed rate mortgage, so where's MY bailout?" -cafepress
    44. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Svartalf · · Score: 1
      "n the meantime, classified government work looks like the best bet as far as job security goes - that will never be outsourced."


      Indeed, it won't because it really can't. Now, having said this, it's very hard to get into that sort of work right now. Currently they're only really hiring 6-24 month contracts and you have to have an active security clearance of Secret or Higher in order to be seriously considered. The market's so damn saturated with people that they're being excessively picky- even in that area of work. If someone goes and whines about a lack of High-Tech workers and asking for more H1B's, I'm going to have words with them and they're not going to be at all nice ones...
      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    45. Re:Swinging back to a balance by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      so when everyone in the western world is unemployed, who's going to buy the shit that all these third world fucks crank out?

    46. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Jamaica? More like Argentina, perhaps, that, at one time, was one of the world's wealthiest nations.


      However, after a few decades of fiscal mismanagement and political instability inspired by decades of fiscal mismanagement, became what it is today

    47. Re:Swinging back to a balance by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Nope. I saw the writing on the wall long ago and have been investing my extra cash in various securities (REITs, MLPs, oil/gas trusts, stocks, bonds, etc, US and foreign). I plan to live off investment income within 5 years.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    48. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dreamer...

    49. Re:Swinging back to a balance by bob_jenkins · · Score: 1

      Yep. Indian salaries will rise, Indian companies will form, and eventually the entire top-notch companies will be in India. It won't pay for any company to outsource tech jobs. But will American software be at the forefront, or Indian? Or European, or Russian, or Chinese, or Japanese, or Israeli? I really have no idea.

    50. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Discoflamingo13 · · Score: 1

      Although drawing the line on free trade at "forced labor" is about the same move politically as saying "I'll be tough on crime" or "save the future for our children" - it's a political no-brainer. Which is why I won't herald it as brilliant or earth-shattering.

      It's not like the US imports a great deal from Burma as it is.

    51. Re:Swinging back to a balance by cluckshot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This will never right itself until Americans wake up and realize that the "Trade War" is not with India but with their own Congress and President. The United States Congress in giving "Trade Promotion Authority" to the President and subsequent to that ratifiying the deals he brings home is doing this to us.

      The same level Indian Post about the house/Elephant Polo etc... is quite right about the current reality. However; he has no idea what is causing this.

      It is just this simple: The US Congress and President maintain policies that make American Workers have to markup their labor more than 150% in order to pay the taxes. In addition they maintain taxes on US Corporation Income that has a break point at 2.25:1 where if an employee earns more than 2.25 times the freight cost to import his product from overseas, there is a tax advantage to exporting the job. Consider that Software has no "Freight" charge on import.

      With this situation should you be lucky enough to make your boss a ton of money, you just destroyed your prospects. If you just cost money, surely the world is full of untaxed people who can do your work cheaper. This has outlawed earning a living in the USA and all the ignorance to this fact to the contrary not withstanding, it is a fact and it will continue to accelerate the decline of the USA until fixed!

      The internal effects of what Economists call the Multiplier Effect on the US Tax system make what I have said here worse by about one order of magnitude. This is unique to the US Tax Code Design. This is why the WTO etc has not a clue as to what is actually a Trade war or just a compensation for internal function. This is why Zero Tariff levels are INSANE for the US Tax system. They have debased the tax system and are threatening to debase the dollar. The economic facts on this speak for themselves. Check out the IRS Website for Social Security Tax Collections and see how this has begun to reverse the total income of the country. The Collections are in trouble for the first time in US History.

      For all the Supporters of GWB (Prez USA) out there you might just wake up! He is accelerating this as his highest priority. Of course this is no "ringing endorsement" of the Dumbocrats out there either.

      This is a Trade War Against Americans by the leadership of both parties.(I call them Republicrats) Make no mistake about it. It is also the most racist and bigoted one possible. If what those who justify this vile policy say were simply altered a bit you would see it in all of its glory.

      Take the claim that Americans are to Lazy to work. ~~ "Blacks are too lazy to work." "Women are too Lazy to work." Making these claims as an employer would get you prosecuted in the USA but do it about everyone and it is suddenly honorable! How about those "Unqualified" or "Unskilled" or etc??? This is profoundly Anti-American in its basis.

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    52. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > In my opinion, the whole debacle arose from executives being annoyed over the high cost of tech labor

      No. The Corporate Machine, so to speak, is driven by Wall Street. Investment banks flat out set the rules, in detail that would scare you, else they will "analyse" you and your silly company into a lower investment risk. Share prices hand in the balance, one word from a key analyst and your C-level retirement fund, and maybe your career, is in the crapper. It doesn't take much to pursuade.

      Any management without a degree, or degrees from the "proper" schools? Bad risk.

      IT department not organized according to "plan"? Bad risk.

      Not buying, or selling, from the "right" other companies? Bad risk.

      This list is endless.

      Simply , Investment banks control the money, the money controls Coporate America.

      Now, ok, what is the one, only, sole, and complete point to being an Investment Bank? Well, to make money, as much money as possible, using every means available. Means is limited strictly in the business sense, it can be legal or not, ethical or not, as long as "the deal" will net an appropriate risk adjusted profit.

      Next, how are the greatest profits made? Growth - only growth - buy low, sell high. What better than to educate India, invest in the non-existant economy for peanuts, and wait for the soon to be self-sufficent economy to grow, and ride that triple digit growth story without competition from the little guys like you and me.

      You CANNOT get that kind of profit from investing in large, established, (western) corporations.

      Kill the US Economy in the process? No problem.

      How do I know this? 1) I've been there; 2) the "tell" is - always is - the amazing little fact that EVERYONE seems to get the same "idea" at the same time; and 3) implementation is so remarkably aggressive as to appear mindless.

      Always remember, you can justify anything. Those of you setting IT direction know this well. In the case of off-shoring the investment banks simply say this...

      "If you aren't willing to cut your expenses by off-shoring, expenses we KNOW can be cut in so doing, then other companies will and they're obviously better investment options than you."

      Done. You find your IT department off-shored the very next day.

    53. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I've yet to hear one thing from Dean or Bush

      Well, you haven't been listening, have you? Bush is of course evil and I wouldn't defend him if you put a gun to my head, but Dean has brought this issue up. In several speeches, he has laid out a clear plan to stop the flow of jobs out of America by exporting our labor laws, environmental codes, health and safety and unions. This would have the effect of increasing the pay and safety of the formerly exploited, therefore not just creating a middle class abroad, but also making it much more expensive to export jobs. Until economic parity is achieved not just for corporations but people internationally, we'll never have worldwide economic stability and full employment. The long boom is almost here (again) if we can adjust our heads and follow a rational leader - Dr. Howard Dean.

    54. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so when everyone in the western world is unemployed, who's going to buy the shit that all these third world fucks crank out?

      Word.

    55. Re:Swinging back to a balance by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but until California becomes a swing state, or the IT industry moves to a swing state, don't expect any protectionism. Your Republican governor was the first step, the second is to have a closer vote, you can still give your EC votes to the Dem's just not by so large a margin. It's only those states that either went or could go either way that get benefits.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    56. Re:Swinging back to a balance by pantycrickets · · Score: 1

      But if you tell everyone you're getting a faster mower to stay competitive, it leaves everyone with the impression that the fee will be lowered.

      Well, obviously not everyone if they continue to pay the same rates, huh?

    57. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That means better prices on the products for everyone."

      Too bad that:
      a) in case you haven't noticed most prices are just the same as they were when the products/services were made here

      and

      b) better?! most stuff from most 3rd world countries makes me wonder if they've even heard of the concept of quality...

    58. Re:Swinging back to a balance by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      Sadly, this appears to fall into the "globalization" groupthink. It's a "free market economy" therefore it must be good...right?

      Speaking of groupthink, let the managers and the consumers make their own individual decisions. Will they make mistakes? Sure, some of them will. We're all humans afterall. But what you're advocating is groupthink, anti-globalization is nothing but a group wanting to override the decisions made by each individual consumer and each individual manager.

    59. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 1
      Hello, where did you pull that out of? India has over a billion people with far less the area of the US.

      Just about every country in the world has a higher population density than the US, except maybe Canada, Russia and Greenland (the icy places). We manage.

      It's also one of the main reasons why people elsewhere are less obese - you can actually walk to most places you might need to get to, so people do, and don't just get in the car. Saves petrol too.

    60. Re:Swinging back to a balance by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      Nope. First of all why tell them you have a faster mower, you most likely bought it so you could do more jobs in the same amount of time, not to tell folks it'll be faster so they will get charged less. You are charging for the amount of yard cut, not the time involved.

      Following your rational,UPS would charge less for their overnight service than their ground service because it's faster. Doesn't make any sense once you think about the costs involved does it? UPS has to spend more $/pound to ship by air. You had to pay money for that faster mower.

      If you were to brag about the faster mower, it would just be in the way of "We will only annoy your neighbors with loud noise for 30 minutes rather than 45 like our competitors", "The kids will be able to play on the lawn sooner", etc.

    61. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Glock27 · · Score: 1
      Awww...poor wittle baby doesn't make $150/hour doing "web programming" any more? It's all those dirty foreigners' fault.

      I don't recall saying anything about "web programming" or "$150/hour". Please cite.

      Web programming is hard!

      It certainly can be (at least as far as technology selection, design and the 'full software lifecycle' goes). However, there seems to be quite a surplus of talent in all software development areas, not just "web programming".

      Further, if people were being paid $150/hour for the work, it certainly follows that it wasn't that easy...otherwise lower-level talent such as yourself could have done it. ;-)

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    62. Re:Swinging back to a balance by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Since when is the US budget at all affected by not having enough income? See, the way things work here is that they decide how much they want to spend and what they think is a good tax rate, and leave worrying about the deficit to the someone else. Preferably someone who can't do anything about how much they're spending.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    63. Re:Swinging back to a balance by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Although drawing the line on free trade at "forced labor" ... it's a political no-brainer. Which is why I won't herald it as brilliant or earth-shattering.

      However, the US hasn't "drawn a line" against forced labour in many other countries, as long as they were supportive of US policies. As the Burmese junta isn't, Bush had nothing to lose, but it nevertheless was the right thing to do.

    64. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      some elephant soccer is played in Thailand.
      There was an article about this a few years ago in a Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue.

      Gosh, I hope the elephants were not the only ones in swimsuit!

    65. Re:Swinging back to a balance by be-fan · · Score: 1

      There aren't any big houses here except for 100 year old bungalows. Few people have houses with more than 2 or 3 rooms with barely enough space to put a couple of beds.
      -----------
      What parts of the country have you been in? I lived in Bangladesh (poorer than India, certainly) until I was five, and I knew lots of people with big houses that were less than 100 years old. There are several parts of the country composed of people who are quite well-off, especially in the cities (Dhaka) and certain towns.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    66. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      If there is anything holding India back now, it is government corruption, civil strife, and the struggle with Pakistan.

      Most of what is holding India back is lack of capital. Look at how well the micro-loan programs are working there. Fortunately (for them) the tech industry is doing a massive infusion of capital.

      The eventual outcome is that they cut out the middleman and work for themselves. Expect large businesses to be created that serve the needs of the growing Asian markets, and that don't expect their customers to learn English.

      If you think this is a temporary fad, just go try to buy a US-made TV.

    67. Re:Swinging back to a balance by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      Your Republican governor was the first step

      FYI - My Governor is a Democrat. I live in Pennsylvania. If you couldn't guess by my post, I am a Free Trade Advocate. IMHO, there are no benefits to Steel Tariffs (or protectionism of any kind). Only higher prices to consumers. Oh, and my family used to work in the Steel mills, at least until that industry went into the same sort of overseas job-transfers that we see in IT today.


    68. Re:Swinging back to a balance by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Please learn about capitalism before spouting off. You seem to have no idea how it works, beyond the basic indoctrination all Americans get.

      This is econ 101 folks, c'mon!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    69. Re:Swinging back to a balance by pizpot · · Score: 1

      Newsflash: The companies doing outsourcing (be it production of goods, or programming) can sell their product outside the US once the US economy has been shipped over seas as well. The only way this cylcle can end is if the workers world-wide make the same wages and have the same skills. To see where this is headed, just figure out what the world average salary is and get used to it.

    70. Re:Swinging back to a balance by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      Hello, where did you pull that out of? India has over a billion people with far less the area of the US. There aren't any big houses here except for 100 year old bungalows. Few people have houses with more than 2 or 3 rooms with barely enough space to put a couple of beds.

      Well, this may be due to the disparity in wealth or the disparity in population density, but I have an Indian friend in the US who's talking about possibly retiring to India in a big Mansion with servants. Is he full of shit?

      Aren't you forgetting c: Unethical?

      What's unethical about hiring help for the house? Are you going to offer them better jobs? Would you rather they live on government welfare checks instead?

    71. Re:Swinging back to a balance by be-fan · · Score: 1

      *Cough* steel tarrif *cough*

      In theory Republicans should support free trade, but he has to follow the votes, like everyone else.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    72. Re:Swinging back to a balance by earlytime · · Score: 1
      I think you've got it wrong....

      The people in the top 10% for "earned" income are more likely to be mid-large cap corporate executives and other folks with just a whole lot of money. The IRS says that the breakpoint for top 10 [adjusted gross]income earners is $92,764/year. For the top 1%, it's $292,913. I'd love to see what the median is for that group. That's the equivalent of 4.8 mil in the bank earning 6%.
      I'd wager that a "skilled, high salary" worker tops out at around 150K. After that, you're talking about salespeople on commission, or executives on contract. I don't consider those people to be "workers", just as when you say iron worker, or factory worker, you aren't talking about the suits, you're talking about the folks who get dirty.

      --

    73. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please dont call it petrol.

      Its fucking gay, and makes the editors long for your virgin anus.

      Thanks.

    74. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 1

      I have a Sanyo TV that was manufactured in the US, in Arkansas no less!

    75. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bollywood just beat Hollywood in production and also has announced that it will allow people online to market their products for free whereas Jack Valenti has decided he does not want such help."

      Bollywood has ALWAYS cranked out more crap than hollywood. That doesn't mean that any of it is quality, nor does it mean that it makes *nearly* as much money as Hollywood. Who really needs to worry about Bollywood?

    76. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err thats John Edwards.
      http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=na vclient&ie =UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=We+should+be+exporting+American+ products%2C+not+American+jobs%2E

    77. Re:Swinging back to a balance by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


      Wait, so "corporations" and "wealthy corporate executives" are completely interchangeable?

      Sure, the execs could live the high life in India... but if the entire company up and moves across the ocean, they can kiss the North American market goodbye. No sales means no company means the gravy train comes to an end.

    78. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because, of course, refering to a liquid as gas makes complete sense, you fucking over-sensitive, obese, retard.

      Please don't call around here again with your un-virgin anus. Thanks!

    79. Re:Swinging back to a balance by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "And of course those are somehow more important than: Steel Workers Automotive Industry Consumer Electronics High End Electronics Don't you folks get it?"

      Well, with IT and technology/science in general, it can't be considered JUST a commodity...because you lose that industry, you also lose the valuable intangibles...the creativity and ingenuity that goes with this. If you move the technology/scientific jobs away...there is not going to be the working base here to innovate and invent. THAT is where we lose our edge we've had in the world for a long time....

      Yes..just about anyone without much education can make steel or work in an assembly factory. But, not everyone can invent the next new thing that will change the world or revolutionize an industry.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    80. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Politburo · · Score: 1

      India has a billion people. The US has about 300 million. Why is it any surprise that their movie production has surpassed ours?

    81. Re:Swinging back to a balance by shokk · · Score: 1

      Wait until thousands of Indians are canned as the US comes out of the recession. Better have that code locked up in a third country so you can cut off those pissed engineers before they toss the code onto the Internet in retaliation. Seriously, the "no work at home" but "here ya go India" attitude is bass-ackwards. Think of how much money some of these places could have saved by rolling out some VPN software and closing some offices. The reduction in productivity can't be worse than the crappy quality of work coming out of these third world countries. I don't think we are as tolerant of this in our software products as we are in our barbies and sneakers. This will definitely right itself.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    82. Re:Swinging back to a balance by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Well....I don't think the US should be the only Free Trade country out there...

      Its not like we're playing on a fair field in other countries. Look at how China is flooding the market here with seafood..in many cases being sold at a loss to drive out domestic manufactureres. Other countries have huge barriers to US companies and products..and subsidize industries that we do not. But, if we try to even things out a little these days...everyone cries FOUL!

      I think its a good thing if the govt. starts looking out for our citizen's interests MORE against other countries in this area....and provide some incentives for our 'sell-out' corporations to keep industry and jobs at home. It will be of a benefit for them in the long run..which is something they do not currently consider.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    83. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Mosasaurus_Maximus · · Score: 1
      I honestly think that a lot of the current commentators are dead on when they say that this is a "fad" and this will eventually balance itself out.

      I am not a fad. I've been professionally developing for years and I've put a ton of people out of work. That's why people hire programmers; because we produce programs which do jobs so that corps. don't have to PAY A HUMAN to do them. When I do my job well I've produced great software. A great reporting package means the company spends less money on retaining old reports, hiring "gurus" to figure out custom reports, etc. My actions have put a ton of people out of work, programmers included.
      People need to get over the "my job went to India and it's not fair" crap. America was outsourced (slave / indentured servant) labor for centuries. It's just how things work. If you lost your job maybe you should get your skills up and find something else; nobody wants to hear it.

    84. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Ryosen · · Score: 1

      How is this any different from people in the American film industry having to hire armed guards?

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    85. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Wait until the markets crash or something... of course, you can hedge it but I doubt you are...

      I'm not wishing ill will but markets aren't exactly predictable...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    86. Re:Swinging back to a balance by enjo13 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think your wrong.

      Your falling into the trap of thinking that wealth is finite, or at least constrained at its current levels. This is simply not true. The amount of wealth in the world can (and does) grow. In terms of overall 'wealth' (see a good economics text for a description of what exactly wealth is:) ) there is many many times more wealth today than just 100 years ago. The same will likely hold true moving forward (there is likely some limit to how far this can grow, but no economists can even begin to agree on what that limit is).

      The point of this is that as India becomes more wealthy, they will begin to contribute more and more in terms of innovation and products back into the overall economy. This will do two very important things. 1) Create new markets for companies (including those in the US). After all, the workers in India will have more wealth and will begin buying more products. 2)Create demand for more services within India itself (once again, more wealth to spread around) which will drive the costs of employment up towards U.S. levels. In the end, the amount of overall wealth has increased, and the amount of wealth within the United States is at worst basically unaffected and more likely actually increased because of the new markets that have been opened up.

      There are ways to defeat this. Closed trade policies are the quickest. By adopting protectionist policies the U.S. can effectively isolate itself from these new markets, likewise India could do the same in an effort to protect it's new found wealth. The governments role SHOULD be to protect equal OPPORTUNITIES for trade between India and the U.S. (thus encouraging growth in both countries), rather than attempting to protect the RESULTS of that trade.

      This is one case where everyone can hope to win, rather than having exactly 1 winner and a bunch of losers.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    87. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      That's a misleading view. First of all, one is salaried and the other is not. Salaried people are better overall because they are not as vulnerable to market shocks. For example, a wage earner (which is what most factor workers are) will get laid off as soon as demand drops.

      Second, what's the point of comparing AVERAGE factory worker to ENTRY-LEVEL professional? That's like comparing ENTRY-LEVEL management to average professional (I would guess that the entry-level manager makes less than an average professional).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    88. Re:Swinging back to a balance by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 3, Informative
      One of the main reason for this is the indian film/music industry is not syndicated by big studios like hollywood.

      And therefore the money required to make big budget movies is often put in by underworld mafia. Ofcourse this is all covered up and the money is shown as comming from big time industrialists and stock brokers, but even a kid in india knows the real truth.

      And when you involve underworld, they want a hugh piece of the pie, and sometimes entire pie. Whenever there is a financial dispute between the producers and director/actors etc. it is often setteled by mafia. Mafia in turn gets (demands) hugh amount of money from the big shots for what it calls protection money.

      There have been incidents where rival direcots/actors/music composers have hired the mafia to threaten/beatup or even kill their counter parts.

      The history of mafia's association with bollywood is not older than 30 years. Around the 70s time, when bombay (the core of indian movie industry), was the hottest thing for real estate development. There was a lot of money to be had in urbanization and construction builders often used local mafia (small time crooks) for dirty works , such as forecd labour, evicting tenants , suppressing any kind of opposition. etc.

      But the maifa was very disorganised back then, and the construction company owners were the ones who called the shots. But soon the indian maifa much like the turn of the century american mafia , organised and turned crime in to a syndicate. This gave rise to some really notorious gangs in bombay and some fierce gang wars.

      By mid 80s the , crime syndicate turned their attention to the movie industry (Although they were always associated with bollywood since the 70s). Initially the relationship between the movie industry and maifa was a win-win situation for both, but soon maifa wanted more and more . It got progressively worse in 90s, where there were a lot of incidents of movie people being threatend/shot at by maifa. By then the mafia had shifted its base from bombay to outside of india. But a large supply of unemployed youths in the country ment a continuing domination of the maifa , even when the strings were pulled from outside the country.

      Bombay police which were once considered second best only to scotland yard, earned a lot of bad reputaion in this time for their incapability to stop the crime waves. This led to the encounter era, where the police were on a city cleansing mission. Lots of small time gangsters and gang members were arrested, and then shot by the police in a staged escape. Police claimed the culprits were trying to escape while the human rights organisation screamed murder.

      Currently it looks like there has been some equilibrium between the maifa , the film industry and the police. Also lot of film makers are shifting away from bombay to other places.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    89. Re:Swinging back to a balance by fastidious+edward · · Score: 1

      I'm sure their are those in England still waiting for their jobs to return after being shipped to the US fifty years ago.

      Jobs in England were not shipped to the US 50 years ago, where did you dream that up?!?!?! UK unemployment is low by historical standard, the UK has a welfare state and a free health service. The thing that hurt the UK the most in the last 50 years was protectionism and unionism in industry (protecting heavy industry, coal mining, widespread closed-shop government ownership) and a lack of investment in R+D and management skill. However since the 80s (when these 'old' industries were effectively crushed by Thatcher) the UK has managed to become a world leader (punching well above its weight) in Biotech, Oil and Finance, all 'new' industris.

      Compare this to the US at present, over the next 50 years would you like to protect the programming, steel and textile industry so people would do the same jobs then as now, or would you like to free the production of these goods/service so other countries can produce these things (essential for the US), while US citizens go on to use its education/skill head-start to create greater, better technology/industry/services?

      There is no 'cycle' in this process it is a constant transition. (BTW a 5/10 year cycle usually refers to the business cycle, the time from boom to bust to boom. There is growing evidence of a 50-150 year cycle in terms of global boom, which in the case of a 50 year cycle we are just passing the bottom turning point.)

      --

      karma karma karma karma karma chameleon, you come and go, you come and go.
    90. Re:Swinging back to a balance by HiThere · · Score: 1

      It will swing back into balance...but the new position will be very likely to be quite different from the old one. Don't assume that balance is anywhere near as good as the unstable equilibrium that was occupied for awhile.

      "It will right itself eventually" is literally correct, but assumes that when it has righted, things will be as they once were. They won't. Ever. See if you can get into nanotech, it's probably to late to work yourself into the basic of the approaching biotech revolution (that will probably involve a realtively small number of players), but nanotech is both just starting, and potentially involves a huge number of players. You'll need to brush up on you chemistry and quantuum mechanics, and other solid-state physics. Someday those may not be needed, but for now it's still the early days, when people hand edited the i-nodes with magnets. (Think computers around 1948, but advancing much more quickly than computer science ever did.)

      And don't forget...the technological singularity is rushing towards us. Everyone else will be feeling the same feeling of shock that you feel. In somewhere between 5 and 25 years human skill levels will be superceded by those of computers. (5 seems quite unlikely, beyond 25 seems plausibly arguable, but I don't believe the arguments...not without a MAJOR war.)

      Before you make any long term plans, read "The Spike" (a book) or "Staring into the Singularity" http://yudkowsky.net/singularity.html

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    91. Re:Swinging back to a balance by couchslayer · · Score: 1

      Yes. In the same way I am forced to subsidize the sick, lame, and lazy with my paycheck, and my taxes. I want to be on the receiving end of some subsidizing for once.

      So, you never drive on a public road? You have an agreement set up where the police won't come when you're raped, the fire department will let your house burn down and the paramedics won't bother you when something happens? Good to hear.

      You've never voted? You've never gone to the library, or a park? Good to hear that, should you go swimming, the lifeguards know to let you drown. I, for one, am happy that when your boat starts to sink, you've made the appropriate people aware that your sorry ass is going down with it, cap'n.

      I subsidize the sorry asses of morons like you every day. Why? Because, I may pay a lot in taxes, but I get a lot out in the form of a civil society where there exist things to help everyone, myself included.

      'course, if you don't like it, you could leave. But, as you've never been to school nor a museum, or done anything else we've subsidized to educate your ignorant self, I bet you never thought of that, did you?

      --
      If a woodchuck could, would it be too lazy to?
    92. Re:Swinging back to a balance by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Balance will be when much of the wealth in America is shifted to India and the like.

      The problem with thinking of this sort is the assumption that economics is a zero sum game. It isn't. Despite the movement of manufacturing jobs offshore and all the hand-wringing about it the fact is that the US economy had continued to grow pretty well during this offshoring.

      Another falacy is that job loss to developing economies is a one way street and that these job losses are permanent. No such thing. Do you know what country had the biggest percentage loss in manufacturing jobs last year? China, that's who. They had a 15% loss in manufacturing jobs last year. Do you you know who gained manufacturing jobs? Canada. The basic reason is that China's investment in infrastructure has been poor, wages have gone up, and automation in other, higher wage countries have made China an expensive place to manufacture compared to countries who have made infrastructure investments.

      The problem is that during these changes there will be people who are dislocated. Governments need to deal with these dislocations with training and so on. Subsidies and interference with free trade is the wrong approach because you are trying to delay the inevetable rather than take advantage of the changes.

    93. Re:Swinging back to a balance by baby_face · · Score: 1

      You are a professional/Engineer. Dont go for cheap shots. And certainly dont make fun of something you dont understand and have knowledge of. Ganges is a Holy river for a lot of people.

      --
      Black holes are where GOD divided by zero --someone
    94. Re:Swinging back to a balance by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I'm all for free trade too, I agree that Bush is quite a bit more protectionist than he should have been or campaigned to be. Mostly my point was that since the IT industry is not in a state that has little chance of being a battle ground state, they won't get any protectionist policies, as they almost all have favored industries with ties to those states that were very close in the last election. No one panders to the states that are largely republican or democrat, because it doesn't help them in the next election.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    95. Re:Swinging back to a balance by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

      So, farmer joe should be forced off of his land and not be able to have a decent job or earn the things he wants because someone else can do it better? Sounds an auful lot like stupidity to me. I'm all for other countries developing themselves in any way they want, but for christ sakes we don't need globalisation screwing us or them over because greedy assholes at the top of the corperate ladder want to make their investors happy. I refuse to work against someone in india, I'd rather work with them. Call me a hippy if you must, but I absolutely hate it when people tell me that the x years of education I put in won't pay enough to repay the debt on that education much less live above the poverty line. I won't accept that I'v got to accept less and work harder because some investor or CEO wants to make more money. They can go fsck themselves.

    96. Re:Swinging back to a balance by fastidious+edward · · Score: 1


      It is not unethical to give the Chinese work and the Chinese willing accept such work, particuraly where the Chinese would likely be paid more than they'd make in a factory or a farm. It is not unethical for you to freely pay for a service, if you didn't want the service you'd not use it.

      I think you are trying to get as much use from IBM paying as little as possible. Is that unethical to their workers and shareholders who could get paid more if you didn't do that?




      '``sword` ` ```.-"`````"-. '' ' 8'` GNAA & trollkore suck gay ass
      |``skull` ` ``/```sword```\ ' ' 7'` GNAA & trollkore suck gay ass
      '``sword` ` `|````skull````| ' '6'` GNAA & trollkore suck gay ass
      |``skull` ` `|,``.-. .-.``,| ' '5'` GNAA & trollkore suck gay ass
      '``sword` ` `| )(__/ \__)( | ' '4'` GNAA & trollkore suck gay ass
      |``skull` ` `|/````/ \````\| ' '3'` GNAA & trollkore suck gay ass
      '````(@_` ` `(_````^ ^````_) ' '2'` GNAA & trollkore suck gay ass
      |' .... )`\___\__|IIIII|__/___ ____ ____ _____ blood of trollkore
      ' ( )@8@{ {____|-\IIIII/-|____ ____ ____ _____> and CLIT and GNAA
      | ````` )_/````\``GNAA```/ ' ' ' ' 'GNAA & trollkore suck gay ass
      ' clit (@`` kore ``---`---`` ` ' ' 'GNAA & trollkore suck gay ass

      --

      karma karma karma karma karma chameleon, you come and go, you come and go.
    97. Re:Swinging back to a balance by JimboOmega · · Score: 1

      Well, for that matter, why don't they just move out of California. They can pay a programmer half as much if he lives on the other end of the country. A quiick peek at The Salary Calculator reveals that making $100K in Palo Alto, CA is the same as making $47 K here in (relatively affluent, close in DC suburb) Vienna, VA. And it only gets cheaper as one gets further out from downtown. Out where AOL is (What I would call Ashburn) the number is $37K. I'm sure if you looked at more undeveloped locations that number would be lower still. Moral is, they should be relocating OUT OF CALIFORNIA, where taxes are absurd, and land values are worse. They used to say, for people moving out there, half the house for twice the price. Seems to be only a slight exaggeration.

    98. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You seem to have no idea how it works, beyond the basic indoctrination all Americans get."

      Would you expect someone who can't even *spell* capitalism to be any sort of authority?

    99. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      Actually it *shouldn't* be that bad... when you offshore a product a company should be able to pass the savings on to consumers. As a matter of fact, they will have to as lowering salaries will result in people being able to afford less things.

      There will be a revolution in the US and the West if our salaries are lowered to third world standards. Expect to see massive protectionism.

    100. Re:Swinging back to a balance by deepvoid · · Score: 1

      Wait unitl the companies which paid the Indian firms discover the inevitable: Those outsourcing firms will stop delivering product to their US parents, but instead will deliver product directly to customers. Think about it: These companies have the customer lists (through IT and helpdesk support contracts), they have the product technology (through programmer outsourcing), and they have the legal system (through supporters like Kennedy and Gephardt). They have all of the peices of the puzzle nescessary to bypass the managers in the US firms and suffer few setbacks. Who did it to the American engineer? MBA graduates who operate on short-term, proactive principles, and not people who have the training and skills to KNOW what it takes to keep a company in green more than a few years. It's only a matter of time until the whole thing plays out.

      The Indian and Chinese government actively lobbies US congessmen for policies which help the outsourcing firms and hurt the US derived corporations. It's time we fired those moles and get back to doing what is good for our country.

      --
      Fast machines, powerfull AI, impulsive invention,... All I lack is a good espresso machine!
    101. Re:Swinging back to a balance by dewke · · Score: 1

      If you can't compete with the indians, tough luck, get another job. That's how capitalism works. That's how it's supposed to work. That means better prices on the products for everyone.

      That would be fine and dandy if we could compete. If I could go to India and get a job that would be great. That is how capitalism works. You move to where the job is. The reality is, I cannot simply up and move to another country to work. India has no H1B visa program. I'm welcome to visit, but good luck if i want to move there.

      --
      Oderint dum metuant
    102. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Forge · · Score: 1

      Ahh. the 1st clueful response.
      And from an AC at that :).

      Thomas Jefferson wrote what many of us regard as the best definition of Government in the US declaration of independence. I.e. It's basically there to protect the citizen's right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Economic prosperity, Social stability and credible justice system are all just means to that higher end.

      There is no such thing as too little government or too much government. The Netherlands for instance has a huge government but it works efficiently and keeps the citizens free. Barbados has a tiny government but that works too.

      When you have a government that is not doing what Jefferson describes as the reason for government to exist, you have an oppressive regime. Not a government.

      Jamaica is right now the most indebted country on earth. If you measure it as debt to GDP. (150%. Argentina was only at 60% when it collapsed).

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    103. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can consider the elimination of trade with countries like Burma, Cuba, Iran, Syria, and others are protectionist measures. Those embargoes are realpolitik. Essentially any country that does not yield to US imperialism gets cut off. Even many of the capitalists (except the Libertarian types) are in favour of that. Reading the Wall Street Journal and the neoconservative opinions will show that they support embargoes to serve imperialist pursuits.

      So, even though that seems like a protectionist measures against free trade, it really isn't. I really wouldn't mix that with things like lumber tariffs. They are two different things. The capitalists themselves say so.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    104. Re:Swinging back to a balance by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      EXACTLY!

      The people who really benefit from this high-profit-at-the-cost-of-a-sustainable-economy are not "your average" Westerner.

      These people will pick up and abandon our communities -- because they have the resources. Things looking a little grim and dicey in Seattle? Move to India. Long-term-outlook a little shakey in Atlanta? Get a 10,000' home in Vietnam.

      I dont begrudge these other places becoming less impoverished, its that -- ONCE AGAIN -- the public is being taken for a ride by the greedheads while selling them a bill of goods.... who is going to pay the US National debt when everyone is A) Unemployed and B) broke?

    105. Re:Swinging back to a balance by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      Your falling into the trap of thinking that wealth is finite, or at least constrained at its current levels. This is simply not true. The amount of wealth in the world can (and does) grow.
      Ah yes, the infinte growth idea.

      If you think the planet can feed, clothe, house and entertain the rest of the planet like Americans do now you're sadly mistaken.

      This "EverGrowth" idea, born of cold-war Consumerist thinking is going to run us into a very serious ecological brick wall.

      it might me pollution, it might be natural resources, it might be water, it might be global dimmming, it might be alot of things but the kind of Capitalist Consumer Society required to build this "EverGrowth" scenario is, frankly, a fucking disaster-waiting-to-happen.

      There are ways to defeat this. Closed trade policies are the quickest. By adopting protectionist policies the U.S. can effectively isolate itself from these new markets, likewise India could do the same in an effort to protect it's new found wealth. The governments role SHOULD be to protect equal OPPORTUNITIES for trade between India and the U.S. (thus encouraging growth in both countries), rather than attempting to protect the RESULTS of that trade.

      Well, if "equal OPPORTUNITIES" also means the free-flow of people (as capital at present), equal labour standards, equal environmental standards, equal infrastrucutre, equal governmental-support/subsidy/regulation, etc etc etc then maybe you might be dealing with some "equal opportunities".

      Unless youve got some basic world-wide standards for the things that the Economy exists *within* then youve got an unequal situation. As long as the greedmongers are able to keep these considerations *out of the scenario* then youve got the opportunity for them to be priced-out.... if you think that turning the world's future over to the profiteers is going to Raise the Underdeveloped nations out of poverty and into our level of consumption, you are very very very misguided.

      If the US public wasnt so snowed over the absolute infallibility of Capitalism (the product of cold-war Capitalist Propaganda) then maybe you might consider that an absolutely uncontrolled Plutocratic government might be selling you a bill-of-goods.

    106. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Probashi · · Score: 1


      Wrong! US has all sorts of trade barriers with the rest of the world (just like any other country). Tarrifs and subsidies to the local business nothing new to US.

    107. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are u nuts or plain dumb? Did you even try to get a work visa to India before making the ill-informed statement? It is possible to get a work visa to India if a company sponsors you. And in capitalism and you can't just 'go' and get a job. You need to follow certain procedures. For example no one can just walk into the US and get tech jobs or study there.

    108. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not called H1B. But you can definitely move there to work.

    109. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those of us working in the US on work visas get taxed coming and going, and of course we'll never see any of that social security.

    110. Re:Swinging back to a balance by jitenpai · · Score: 2, Informative
      No, your friend means it.

      Just because India has over a billion people and is 1/3rd the size of the US doesn't mean that people have occupied every square inch of the country. There is land available!

      So it becomes a simple case of supply and demand.

      Up until the early/mid 90s, there were no jobs as high paying as IT is now in India. So no one could afford big houses (the ones that stand apart) in crowded cities.

      With the IT revolution, there is this new "upper middle" class yuppies who have lots of cash to burn. These folks can afford the big mansions that your friend talks about.

      Sure, there are 100 year old bungalows from the British times - I have live in one for over 5 years during my childhood in India. But, believe me those "bungalows" look like shacks when compared to the houses that the rich techies are now building.

      What's unethical about hiring help for the house?

      The double negative gotcha! I think the parent's parent poster wanted to say that it's not unethical either :)

      --
      ____

      Sometimes the voices in my head speak over each other. This is one of those times.

    111. Re:Swinging back to a balance by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying we don't, or that we shouldn't. I'm saying we should not be dropping ours, till other countries we trade with drop theirs and make it a totally equal playing field...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    112. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silicon Valley is holy to some people too.

      That doesn't change the fact that half-decayed corpses and worse float down that river, right next to where people bathe, drink, etc.

    113. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Necrobruiser · · Score: 1

      Subsidy: Monetary assistance granted by a government to a person or group in support of an enterprise regarded as being in the public interest.

      So, you never drive on a public road? You have an agreement set up where the police won't come when you're raped, the fire department will let your house burn down and the paramedics won't bother you when something happens?

      Since when is maintaining the public infrastructure a subsidy? When the government builds roads with our tax dollars, it's not a subsidy, it's what is required by the Constitution that has been ratified and accepted by that particular state. And I don't know where you live, but if I call the paramedics in my town, they send me a bill for their services.

      You've never voted?

      What does whether or not I vote have to do with subsidies?

      Good to hear that, should you go swimming, the lifeguards know to let you drown.

      The lifeguards at my pool aren't subsidized, they are paid by the owners of the pool for services performed. See above for definition of subsidy.

      I subsidize the sorry asses of morons like you every day.

      I must have missed that check in the mail today.

      I never said that taxes don't pay for a lot of useful services, or that I don't benefit from those services, but I have yet to receive a subsidy check from the government. However, since I pay taxes, I do pay for the sick, lame and lazy who do receive subsidy checks.

      And what the hell do you know about being part of a civil society? The best part of your argument was when you called me a moron. I guess I learned my lesson.

      --
      "I planned within my means and got a fixed rate mortgage, so where's MY bailout?" -cafepress
    114. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Giro+d'Italia · · Score: 1

      Clark once said, "let them do the software in India." Or words to that effect. To be fair, I think he meant that the US will find other high tech areas in which to prosper in the future. Still, his attitude is unfortunate.

    115. Re:Swinging back to a balance by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

      ...all that is left to light this match is a batch of new Indian software products to compete with US products. That's what really doesn't exist today, and is really the key to setting off protectionist legislation. When you start seeing "Grand Theft Auto: Kashmir" and it's a best seller, or SOE decides to fire all those people in San Diego working on Star Wars Galaxies and moves the development to Hyderabad, well then... there will be some Congresspeople chalking up some new bills on the hill. Remember of you will (can't find a good link to old story) that Bill Gates openly threatened the US Government with moving vast numbers of jobs to India and closing entire sections of the Redmond campus when the Justice Department was right up at his throat with anti trust. This threat resonated in Washington, both the city and the state. If anybody has any links to stories that have his quotes, they wern't veiled threats, they were openly stated that his R&D would be better spent overseas.

    116. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your wrong.
      Your falling into the trap of thinking that wealth is finite


      I think you are wrong. Your falling into the trap of thinking that poulation is frozen while the wealth increases. Not so. When population increases faster than wealth, per capita we get poorer. Not to mention that the Indian population dwarfs that of the US. The balance therefore will be well bellow the current US level and just a litle bit above the current India level. In one word we all, Indians and Americans will be poor. Simple math for those who know the numbers...

    117. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So who is going to afford the products when all the good paying jobs have moved offshore? Why don't people like you take the shitty paying jobs and see how well you can live on $5/6 an hour. I'll bet you'd be singing a different tune really quick.

    118. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. So, you never drive on a public road? You have an agreement set up where the police won't come when you're raped, the fire department will let your house burn down and the paramedics won't bother you when something happens? Good to hear.

      (a) I live in Eugene OR. Today it is a balmy 26 degrees. We have had an unusually severe winter storm for the area, leaving the roads covered with ice and almost impassable. The cities response is "we can't afford plows or sanding, it wasn't in the budget." People have died, but it wasn't in the budget. Several million dollars for "downtown reclimation and rehabilitation" was in the budget though.

      (b) I live in one of the poorer districts of town (fondly known as felony flats). You can have the police here in no time at all if you are dealing drugs (or they think you are - damn, can't find the link now, just discovered my local newspaper will only let you search the last 7 days), but they used a small TANK to intimidate people, many of which have yet to have charges filed against them; but rape?, that's a domestic violence issue and they don't really have time for that.

      {c} the fire department will probably do their job. They're actually pretty good at what they do, even if they are severly handicapped by "budget restrictions." Having needed them a few years ago, I have only praise for their dedication to duty (lived in a rural area, it was a VOLUNTEER department that responded to my call, but their equipment had to come from somewhere).

      (d) paramedics are mostly with the fire department in this town, unless you are a member of one of the local, private (www.firemed.org/home.html) services. Your best hope is that they can fix everything, because if you can't pass a credit check and present a major credit card, insurance card, or Oregon Health Card (insurance welfare for the poor), you don't get treated in our emergency rooms.

      (2) You've never voted? You've never gone to the library, or a park? Good to hear that, should you go swimming, the lifeguards know to let you drown. I, for one, am happy that when your boat starts to sink, you've made the appropriate people aware that your sorry ass is going down with it, cap'n.

      (a) Yeah, I vote. Always for the party that thinks they don't need MORE taxes. (One of our local city council members actually said on the radio that he would never pass up a taxable opportunity. And he STILL got re-elected.)

      (b) Our local library is a joke. After twenty years of trying to get a new one, we finally did. It has the same books as the old one, is four times larger, cost many millions of dollars, but has Great Atmosphere. (I have been to Scranton PA one more time in my life than I would like, but the children's library there is twice the size and has 10 time the number of books as our "Great New Library.") And we will pay for it for at least ten more years. So much for social benifits.

      (c) Life guards? (by the way, I can't swim for shit, but like going to pools and swimming places ;-) so they are of interest to me) You mean the chick who is always on her cell phone and can't be bothered unless someone actually dies? (but here in oregon, where there is a lot of water inland, not just the ocean, if you go down with your boat, it's suicide, not accidental drowning.)

      I am making what is considered to be BELOW poverty level income. Approx. 30% of my income goes out in taxes, for which I might receive the sevice of good roads (if it's in the budget). The taxes I pay for the connection I'm using to post this are 47% of my phone bill. I'm benefiting so much from that ( my primary phone is a cell, I only have this hook-up for dsl, and I made myself give up smoking to afford that). I haven't seen my doctor in two years, because I haven't had health insurance through my employment, and I make too much money to qualify for the Oregon Health Plan.

      I, for one, am more than ready to say - FUCK the handouts to other people. If I weren't taxed so much,

    119. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A subsidy is NOT a tax incentive. A subsidy is DIRECT GOVERNMENT FUNDING, like with US agriculture.

      By your book, the US is subsidizing the raising of all of the children of this country.

      A better answer here is to introduce a tax structure for businesses with offshore workers, taxing the company for each overseas person they employ as a function of the wages paid to that person.

    120. Re:Swinging back to a balance by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
      Most of my investments are boring, dividend paying (4-8%) ones... REITs, banks, utlities, bonds, bond funds, Master Limited Partnerships, oil and natural gas trusts, preferred stock etc. Obviously, individual companies can (and do) miss quarterly earnings, go bankrupt, etc, but most of them are immune from the general market activity.

      Of cours, I haven't quit my day job yet, either :)

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    121. Re:Swinging back to a balance by JanneM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Easy to say to export stuff, not jobs. But what will those export markets do when they find that they are welcome to buy american stuff, but are heavily taxed, or even forbidden, when trying to export stuff into the US?

      Don't forget that for many of the very largest companies, their home market - no matter which country they reside in - is not their largest. If push comes to shove, IBM would likely rather lose US contracts than all non-US ones.

      Oh, and workers rights? What will the US do when Europe insists that it should include comprehensive health care, paid vcation time and guaranteed pensions for all, employed or not? Like many ideas, this one sounds very good from 30.000ft, but becomes very messy (and more or less unworkable) once you're on the ground.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    122. Re:Swinging back to a balance by AtomicBomb · · Score: 1

      There is one major difference: moving out service based industry won't benefit the US economy. Many people think that importing huge amount of manufactured goods from China, Mexico and Taiwan is bad for US. But, they overlook that these growing manufacturing bases acutally spend a lot in terms of infrastructure. For example, China needs to buy 1-2 1000MW nuclear power for each year in the next 20 yrs to keep up with the growing electricity demand.. . Whenever new manufacturing technology comes out (0.25->0.18->0.10 um), Taiwan fabs need to spend big money in upgrading... Raw material also costs a lot of money. Most of these money go back to US. Well, not in the case of the Chinese nuclear reactors... Due to the stupid embargo, all these trade go to your friend in Europe: France...

      You cannot see something like that when outsourcing programming/call center/research. (How much does that cost for 150,000 PCs?) While the money transfered to these service centers are not that much, the retaining profit is much higher than manufacturing.... Also, US transfer a lot of know-hows offshore for free.... It is weird from the point of view of a non-American.

    123. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever watched a Bollywood movie?

      Ok, the wet sari scene is easy on the eyes, but what's with the "dances with trees" bit?

      or the 15 costume changes within the same dance number?

    124. Re:Swinging back to a balance by iCat · · Score: 1

      Hi Sivaram, Just wondering out of an Indian population of 1 (possibly 1.5) billion, how many people are likely to go by your nomenclature? Just curious.

    125. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In the meantime, classified government work looks like the best bet as far as job security goes - that will never be outsourced.
      That's what I'm doing for job security. Can't be outsourced overseas or given to an H1-B or L visa holder here.
    126. Re:Swinging back to a balance by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Hello, where did you pull that out of? India has over a billion people with far less the area of the US. There aren't any big houses here except for 100 year old bungalows. Few people have houses with more than 2 or 3 rooms with barely enough space to put a couple of beds.
      And you sir, from where did YOU pull this off? :-)

      As shortages go, only urban Bombay has a real problem on its hands, and mostly because of its shape and its outdated rent control laws; other so-called Tier 2 cities such as Pune, Chandigarh, NOIDA and Hyderabad have excess capacity at the moment. In fact, for all the hype associated with the FDI flowing in there, Hyderabad's property market is actually in a slump now; a lot of vacant office-space and high-value residential property out there.

      Elephant polo.. well, I'll admit, I laughed at it. I mean, you will need, ah, rather loooooong sticks to reach the ball. :-D

    127. Re:Swinging back to a balance by rifter · · Score: 1

      ...all that is left to light this match is a batch of new Indian software products to compete with US products. That's what really doesn't exist today, and is really the key to setting off protectionist legislation. When you start seeing "Grand Theft Auto: Kashmir" and it's a best seller, or SOE decides to fire all those people in San Diego working on Star Wars Galaxies and moves the development to Hyderabad, well then... there will be some Congresspeople chalking up some new bills on the hill. Remember of you will (can't find a good link to old story) that Bill Gates openly threatened the US Government with moving vast numbers of jobs to India and closing entire sections of the Redmond campus when the Justice Department was right up at his throat with anti trust. This threat resonated in Washington, both the city and the state. If anybody has any links to stories that have his quotes, they wern't veiled threats, they were openly stated that his R&D would be better spent overseas.

      IIRC the threat was that Microsoft would move its headquarters to Vancouver, BC (which is in Canada). Also that the stock market would crash if Microsoft was hurt. Hmm, the second one happened, sorta...

    128. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bull$hit!
      indians are imbec1les, it's just a new trend because nobody cares about quality.
      If you worked for a big company you might notice that there are hordes of them doing nothing or producing low quality crap in a best case.

      There is no chance to compete, project taken and project given, decisions are made on CEO level.

      I would like to see you getting another job.

      I dont like cheap shit produced in china and other damn countries but do I have other options???
      The same applies to software. MS will make sure that WS is used everywhere.

    129. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an election year in India too.

    130. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it might me pollution, it might be natural resources, it might be water, it might be global dimmming,

      The global WHO?!?

    131. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto -- it's called "Capitalism". If you are a business owner, Bush is on your side. If you are a worker, he ain't. This is nothing new -- same politics as ever. Repubs = party of rich business owners, demos = party of workers, unions, workers, middle america. Only thing that has been getting confused lately is that "middle america" is under the illusion that being "For the U.S. = being for the U.S. people"...nope. What's good for the war machines and big business is cheap labor -- it's irrelevent if it is slave labor, child labor, minority labor, new-college-hire labor, h1b-visa-wage- limited labor....as long as its lower a lower "cost" it's attractive.

      Bush is looking out for US businesses (whether they are owned by foreign interests or not). That and continuing to raise military power and budget and "control" over the people to fight the "War on "freedom of religion", "freedom to trade hemp" (war of 1812); war on mexico, warn on japan war on hitler war communism, korea, vietnam, then....ohmigosh... no war...start war on american people, war on drugs, war on people wanting to live alone (various cults and freedom fighers killed as "dangerous", remember Wacko, TX, Ok City..."oops, sorry, didn't know the match was lit...", war on people again, war on oil, war on iran, iraq, columbia...etc...war on poverty? (cancelled when war on democracy was won by Bush),now we have war on free speech, war on terrorists, war on anyone who's different, and then wome....isn't that' what the US is about? Making war?

      All that has to happen is Bush gets all of America pissed enough at all the foreigners who've taken their jobs...then Bush can use the anti-foreign sentiment of the unemployed middle america to give him another election that he'll fund with another tax cut for the wealthy who will give us many new seasons of simpsons and sequels to dumb, dumber, and dumbest, until economic depression and the torture of bad TV and movies will force another war... we just have to find another target... hey, if we declare war on indo-chinese continent, then we'll all have jobs again since US businesses won't be able to hire enemy nations....or will that be a violation of the UN and the World Trade Organisation's treaties....might be illegal to discriminate against a country just because you are at war with them. Bush better be careful, he might violate WTO policy....eh...what the heck....declare war on them too. It's time for a new dictator...

      You know though, this Bush isn't too bright....if all of our products are coming from china, it'd be a bit of a pain to not comply with any of their wishes -- in fact, enforcing IP laws in China might hurt american businesses....so, like pharmaceuticals, only americans will be charged full price of software -- everywhere else it will be 1/5th to 1/100th as much...because we can afford it with all the money we save on labor costs...besides...we better not be bad-mouthing foreigners....that's "hate speech"....you nationalistic racist type you!!! (feigning mock indignation to "censor" these talks on the truth)...

      What was it said about our culture: "violent and paranoid"?...or is that the whole human race?

    132. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I'm Canadian.. but anyway, what nomenclature? The seperation of realpolitik and protectionist measures? I don't know. It's hard to say. There is one person for sure: me :) Other than that, I would guess maybe 30% of the population would probably agree with me.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    133. Re:Swinging back to a balance by d_i_r_t_y · · Score: 1

      i think your grammar sucks.

      you're -- abbreviation of "you are".
      your -- 2nd person possessive adjective

    134. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Pionar · · Score: 1

      Who's talking about imports? There's nothing wrong with importing things. The problem is that manufacturing so-called "American" goods in other countries constitutes a "reimportation" of those goods. I have no problem with buying a Japanese or Chinese tv, but I do have a problem with RCA and GE tvs because they purposely send manufacturing to China and Mexico just for cheaper labor, then claim it lowers prices.

      I don't know about GE, but two years after RCA moved its manufacturing to Mexico, I compared the price on a certain model that used to be manufactured in my state (It was a 27" tv) and the price went down about $50 in thos two years and was still higher than most all other brands. I attribute that $50 to better and bigger models coming out, not cheaper labor. That means that the company just kept the extra profits. If they're going to claim it's good for consumers, prove it and then pass the savings on to us. If you keep it, that's called being greedy and unethical.

      It exploits the workers in those other countries too. A good way to control a population is to keep them poor. Just ask the Soviets.

      And it's interesting that you mention comprehensive health care, as Dean and most other Democratic candidates are very much for comprehensive health care for all.

      We already have guaranteed pensions for all, albeit not a very good system, in Social Security. And it's interesting to note that the same people that are all over the "free trade" movement actually want to destroy any form of guaranteed pensioning and comprehensive health care.

    135. Re:Swinging back to a balance by shibboleth · · Score: 1

      Are you prepared to say that, as long as it saves the employer costs, then outsourcing every non-on-site-req'd job is a net good? Have you considered that technology, by enabling doing this, has undermined an assumption or two supporting free trade?

      Read this (if it fails hit refresh). I've skimmed alot of /. discussions on the topic and read all the recent NY Times op-eds pieces on the subject and this info was new to me.

      --
      "Be thankful you are not my student. You would not get a high grade for such a design :-)" - Minix pro
    136. Re:Swinging back to a balance by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      Global Dimming do some googling.

    137. Re:Swinging back to a balance by ccp · · Score: 1

      The gub-ment could provide tax incentives to keep employees in the states, etc.

      And who will supply the money for the tax incentives, the martians?

      Folks, you're just learning what the rest of us have known for a long time: there's no easy way out.

      Welcome to reality.

      Signed: the rest of the World.

      Cheers,

    138. Re:Swinging back to a balance by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      The problem with thinking of this sort is the assumption that economics is a zero sum game. It isn't. Despite the movement of manufacturing jobs offshore and all the hand-wringing about it the fact is that the US economy had continued to grow pretty well during this offshoring.

      But this is not what I suggested. I did leave room for growth. "The rich continue to get richer." Furthermore, growth of the economy does not equal wealth for the masses.

      Another falacy is that job loss to developing economies is a one way street and that these job losses are permanent

      Name some that have returned to their place/country of origin? Mexico is loosing jobs to China as we speak, so I don't know how Canada can gain jobs that Mexico can't even hold onto.

      The problem is that during these changes there will be people who are dislocated. Governments need to deal with these dislocations with training and so on. Subsidies and interference with free trade is the wrong approach because you are trying to delay the inevetable rather than take advantage of the changes.

      Both replies to my post went on the attack against subsidies and protectionism, but I never suggested those would be viable options. If their is protectionism, it should be on a finer grained level, such as protecting the wealth of those who do not have enough wealth to protect it themselves. And not just moving the government to the benefit of huge corporations and rich folk.

    139. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like h1bs are not a subsidy. What a joke you are.

    140. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is unfortunate that the information in the article is new to you. The points outlined apply equally well to the movement of manufacturing off shore as well as the movement of factories to southern states that we have seen before. These topics seem to always bring out those who will chide that this is all just econ 101. I wish that more economists would speak up and point out that the situation is much more complex.

    141. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      who is going to pay the US National debt when everyone is A) Unemployed and B) broke?

      Seriously? Nanotechnology.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    142. Re:Swinging back to a balance by Dick+Faze · · Score: 1

      I believe the cutoff for "top 10%" is around US$90k. In the northeast, this includes about 40% of "IT Professionals"

      Thanks for being gentle though.

  3. But will it last? by TheWart · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It will be interesting to see how long it can sustain its growth to prevent the same kind of retraction that hit Silicon Valley.

    1. Re:But will it last? by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Managed Economy, India does much to keep their wages low..

      --
    2. Re:But will it last? by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just read that the average wage JUST went from $10 to $25. Supply and Demand is at work peeps.

    3. Re:But will it last? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As long as the wages are low and the quality of code is at least acceptable (and, these people DO do good work), India will continue to get the jobs. Remember: The PRIME responsibility of the board of directors for a publicly traded company is to MAKE MONEY for it's stock holders.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    4. Re:But will it last? by Pionar · · Score: 1

      Especially when shareholders realize that the long-term costs in quality, logistics, and security that working across the globe like this raises far outweigh any short-term benefits.

      When one goes overseas for labor, one must also take into account the added costs of doing business in those countries, not just the salary savings.

    5. Re:But will it last? by arvindn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As an Indian I can tell you that a Bangalore version of the dot bomb is unlikely to happen because Indian entrepreneurs are considerably more conservative/cautious than their American counterparts.

    6. Re:But will it last? by andy1307 · · Score: 1
      Especially when shareholders realize that the long-term costs in quality, logistics, and security that working across the globe like this raises far outweigh any short-term benefits.

      Is that why most semiconductor products are made in Taiwan/Japan/China?

    7. Re:But will it last? by jxs2151 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Managed Economy, India does much to keep their wages low..

      Slavery, India does much to keep their wages low.

    8. Re:But will it last? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It will be interesting to see how long it can sustain its growth to prevent the same kind of retraction that hit Silicon Valley.

      There are 250 Million people living in the US. There are a limited number of IT people. Hence, higher wages and the extensive use of H1B Visas.

      There are over 1 Billion people living in India. And, according to my Indian-born Co-workers, they have more college educated IT workers than any other Country in the world. Hence, the supply of skilled workers is much higher. Although the salaries will increase, I don't think they will explode to our level any time soon.

      In other words, if you are waiting for an Indian version of the Dot-Bomb, don't hold your breath.


    9. Re:But will it last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Enron and Worldcom and ..

    10. Re:But will it last? by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link thats kind of what I was getting at..

      --
    11. Re:But will it last? by Thud457 · · Score: 0
      "Especially when shareholders realize that the long-term costs in quality, logistics, and security that working across the globe like this raises far outweigh any short-term benefits."

      Yeah, like when the average wage across their society gets to the point where people aren't pissed off enough to blow themselves up to kill Americans.

      Oh, wait, that's not what you meant...

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    12. Re:But will it last? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      Like Enron and Worldcom

      Oh, please. For every Enron and Worldcom, there are thousands upon thousands of companies that are legitimate. The primary interest of these legitimate companies is in making money the right and honest way.

      Oh, hell, I'm beginning to sound more and more like a stinking Republican Capitalist. The end is near.


    13. Re:But will it last? by miu · · Score: 2, Interesting
      As an Indian I can tell you that a Bangalore version of the dot bomb is unlikely to happen because Indian entrepreneurs are considerably more conservative/cautious than their American counterparts.

      That attitude is part of the reason America is so much better at creating wealth than the rest of the world. Non-Americans love to point at our crashes and failures, but we have so much energy and try so many things (and plenty of the things we try are extremely stupid) that we almost can't help but have a large number of successes.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    14. Re:But will it last? by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      Indian entrepreneurs are considerably more conservative/cautious than their American counterparts.

      Which does limit the chances for having a Dot Bomb, but it also can lead to limiting innovation and invention. A true entrepreneur is not conservative. They are, almost by definition, a risk-taker. And, I would not necessarily classify an entrepreneur as the same as being a developer or customer support specialist. The latter two are job skills. The former is a state of mind.

      Let me state that, for the record, I am not opposed to sending development work to India. If it is more cost-effective for a company to do this, then go for it.


    15. Re:But will it last? by Pionar · · Score: 1

      There's a difference there. Manufacturing does not require the attention to detail that designing the products does. Once a product is designed, it can be made virtually anywhere by an unskilled labor force. I'm talking about skilled labor, such as software (or even hardware) design. All I can say is, you get what you pay for.

    16. Re:But will it last? by andy1307 · · Score: 1

      Translation: Only your job requires skill.

    17. Re:But will it last? by Pionar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't try to translate English to English. I'd be the first to admit that many people overseas could do my job, but while the quality would not be be an issue, logistics (getting things from here to there and there to here) and security (involves maintaining many many passwords and sensitive HIPAA-protected info) rules out outsourcing me overseas. So I have no reason to fear outsourcing. I'm just pointing out that outsourcing overseas is only a temporary band-aid to larger problems.

    18. Re:But will it last? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Republican Capitalist.
      ------------
      Hey, you don't have to be Republican to be Capitalist :)

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    19. Re:But will it last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ==> "the quality of code is at least acceptable (and, these people DO do good work),"

      Maybe you meant dodo work?

      There are good and bad programmers of every race creed color and sex. I just completed a Masters program in CS and I was in a graduating class with 16 Indians, 2 Chinese, and 2 White males. I must say that I was not impressed with the Indians at all. Intellectually they were mediocre at best (from their participation and what I saw in the classes where we did projects together). Ethically they were the worst students I've ever seen. They seemed to work as a group to defraud the system in any way they could. I saw plagiarism (two Indian students were expelled because they downloaded a report directly from the internet and turned it in unmodified. The two used the same report yet!), blatant use of crib notes on tests, even the use of previous students code for classes with programming tasks. I know it's never good to assume behavior of a large group based on that of a tiny group and I'm not trying to do that here. However, IF most Indian programmers perform the way this group did the offshore trend won't last long. Of course there's always China....

    20. Re:But will it last? by michael_cain · · Score: 1
      Remember: The PRIME responsibility of the board of directors for a publicly traded company is to MAKE MONEY for it's stock holders.

      With all due respect, I have to disagree at least somewhat. At least, I have to say that while the prime responsibility within "the game" may be to make money for the share holders, there are other considerations in terms of the field on which the game is played. A company incorporated in the US receives a number of benefits that do not show up in any quarterly or annual statement. Strong property rights, the rule of law to enforce them, and little probability of change in that situation. Ability to move capital freely. Little or no civil unrest. A stable government with sufficient authority to help protect the company's overseas interests.

      Unfortunately, these benefits apply to all companies equally. So the standard economic problem arises -- if one company finds a way to avoid the costs of these obligations, that firm benefits. However, if all companies succeed in avoiding their obligations -- well, the "tragedy of the commons" problem is one of the oldest in economics, and it occurs with monotonous regularity. There is an implicit obligation on each company to maintain the stability of the beneficial environment in which they operate. The hard policy questions involve decisions about restrictions that should be imposed on companies in order to enforce that obligation.

    21. Re:But will it last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be interesting to see how was your university placed in terms of ranking. Again, ..."I know it's never good to assume behavior of a large group based on that of a tiny group", but if you consider any of the top 30-40 universities, the top graduating students in the class are either Indians or Chinese. Just pick up any of the top conference proceedings - soda, stoc and more than 50% of the papers would be by Indians.

    22. Re:But will it last? by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Yes, because half of the worlds population is Chinese and Indian. Makes sense, then, that half the papers would be theirs.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    23. Re:But will it last? by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      That's fucking sick. They are truely disgusting people.

      And WTF is with the WTO making it illegal to ban an import based on the workin conditions used to produce it? And WTF is the USA listening to the WTO anyway? An unneeded evil organization attempting to enslave us all...

    24. Re:But will it last? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I have heard assertions before, in a different context, that there was a cultural bias in India in favor of falsification of evidence. The prior assertion was in the context of a fakir's slight of hand being accepted as a miracle, even though he was a clumsy stage magician, and the tricks were easy to see through.

      I'm not sure how widely true this generalization is, or within what range of contexts it applies. If the culture doesn't regard plagarism as unethical, then people who are caught plagarizing may well consider that you are making much ado about nothing. So they wouldn't be following *your* ethics, but they might very well be quite ethical within the context of what their culture considered important.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    25. Re:But will it last? by thayner · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think for entrepreneurs India and other places around the world with affordable software engineers are great. It allows us to utilize relatively inexpensive workers to make our visions reality without resorting to venture capitalists (at least too early on).

    26. Re:But will it last? by Ummagumma · · Score: 1

      That sounds about right to me. The company I work for just outsourced 30 jobs to India, at $25/hr each. C++ coding.

      --
      "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." - Thomas Jefferson
    27. Re:But will it last? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      As long as the wages are low and the quality of code is at least acceptable..., India will continue to get the jobs.

      But how long are wages going to stay low? And how long until all the good and experienced Indian programmers are employed, leaving the bad and inexperienced available for hire?

      My company was late in the "offshoring" fad. All of the experienced developers were unavailable, so we ended up with 90% of our Indian workforce coming from straight out of college with no experience. And then there's our US worker who originally came from India. He got laid off through offshoring, so he decided to apply for his replacement position in India. He came back with the news that we were paying paltry wages there. It turns out that the wages for developers in India are starting to skyrocket with the increased demand. Basic economics our managers overlooked.

      The offshoring craze is just that, a craze. Corporations are like teenagers. They do what they do because all the other corporations are doing it. They're going to learn the hard way that local experienced workers are more valuable than remote inexperienced workers. But I fear by that time that they will have created their own replacements.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    28. Re:But will it last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm currently a graduate student at a private college in Bergen County New Jersey [start your search engines], and the demographics are almost the same. Like 90% Indian, 5% Asian, the rest of mixed between white, black and latino American kids.

      I just completed my first semester there, and I was really appalled. I had previously gone to a university in the South [mit of the south], where the majority of students where whites and blacks. Foreigners were definitely a small minority, but they all worked so damn hard, and were really intelligent. I got to work with a lot of foreigners in a research lab, and I was really impressed overall. Great people, and smart.

      However, in the school I'm in, the foreigners have no respect for academia. No respect for other students. The cheating is so visible, its disgusting. They walk out of class when they finish their presentation, and other students still need to go, is disrespectful, and this happened in each class I had.

      These kids also apply for some kind of document that let them work in the US for some period of time, and they all get it. These [not so few] cheating disrespectful fuckers. Granted its not every Indian in my school, but a large majority of them are a bunch of cheaters.

      I have two best friends I made from my undergraduate years that are Indian, born in the US, but to think that these people I sit next to class are part of the same heritage is a vulgar comparison to say the least.

      Its shit like this that pisses me off when I think about offshoring/out-sourcing. How different is the percentage of people over in India, who are currently working and studying over there, cheating and lying to get any work they have done. Why are my countrymen, Americans [even the so called lazy un-intelligent ones], losing their jobs to what can be a large percentage of cheating deceitful people. Its just infuriating, and also insulting.

      But this is not India as a whole, and its unfair to say or imply it is. I hope someone from India, and the US, can see my point. It's so damn frustrating, and its so hard to not act human in these times.

      To be quite honest. Its the baby boomer CEO's who are fucking [young] America over, not dishonest foreign students. That generation needs to go.

    29. Re:But will it last? by pottymouth · · Score: 1

      "But this is not India as a whole, and its unfair to say or imply it is. I hope someone from India, and the US, can see my point. It's so ---- frustrating, and its so hard to not act human in these times.

      To be quite honest. Its the baby boomer CEO's who are ------- [young] America over, not dishonest foreign students. That generation needs to go."

      I agree 100%. This is not an Indian (or Mexican or Chinese...) issue. It's an issue with how the US has opened it's borders and economy to the world for the sake of business (should be a 4 letter word) and profits. We've been sold out by politians and businessmen and it's time "We The People" did something about it!!! The engineers and artists and teachers and anyone that creates something (other than money!) in the US are what have made us the country we were. Love of our work makes us easy prey for those that would exploit us. It's time to take back what we've built and force the money grubbing users back into the cubicles where they belong. Crouched over spreadsheets under florescent lights in a noisy room with 100 other accounting drones. Adding up columns of number for the rest of their lives. I can't think of a better punishment.

    30. Re:But will it last? by pottymouth · · Score: 1

      "If the culture doesn't regard plagarism as unethical, then people who are caught plagarizing may well consider that you are making much ado about nothing. So they wouldn't be following *your* ethics, but they might very well be quite ethical within the context of what their culture considered important."

      Couldn't care less what their culture considers ethical. Plagarism consitutes acedemic fraud and it's unethical. Right and wrong don't slide with culture no matter what we've been trying to teach our children for 30 years. If right and wrong are relative there is no right and wrong and we may as well just get out the guns and start taking what we want. To heck with this society thingy.

    31. Re:But will it last? by pottymouth · · Score: 1

      Give me a break will ya. I'm sure Harvard has much more ethical Indians than say "Soho Community College". I've attended 3 universities, 2 of which were in the top 10 for their programs (electrical engineering and computer science) at the time. The biggest difference I've seen is that in the last 20 years American universities appear to have been overrun with foreign students taking advantage (and I don't blame them in the least) of foolish immigration policies on the part of the US.At the same time American's seem to be so busy watching "American Idol" and "The Real World" they're getting left behind. When I got my BS (1986) my class was mostly white males with a smattering of Asians, 1 or 2 Blacks, 1 or 2 Hispanics. I don't even remember any Indians though there had to be some (this was and is the biggest university in the US folks). In finishing my Masters in CS I was one of two white males in the class. Everyone else was from outside the US. What's happening to us as Americans? Why isn't knowledge considered a profitable pursuit anymore?

    32. Re:But will it last? by miu · · Score: 1
      Why do you call immigration policies that encourage smart people to come to the US to get an education (and maybe become citizens) foolish?

      Even Bush seems to have broken with the party line and recognized that we need immigration to keep growing. (Racialy motivated distrust disguised as tough immigration policy plays well with a sizeable portion of both parties, but seems to be dearer to the Republicans).

      I'm a little sad that many Americans don't value learning and knowledge, but I'm glad that people from other nations are coming here to continue the tradition.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  4. I thought Bangalore's by CompWerks · · Score: 1, Funny

    Were those things in the 5th Element.

    --
    If you can read this sig - the bitch fell off.
    1. Re:I thought Bangalore's by JPelorat · · Score: 0

      Those are Mangalores

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    2. Re:I thought Bangalore's by CompWerks · · Score: 1

      You are correct sir! Thanks

      --
      If you can read this sig - the bitch fell off.
    3. Re:I thought Bangalore's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh look, another asshole moderator. Thanks, asshole.

  5. Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would want to live there? At least California is pretty.

  6. For those who are too lazy to search... by mesozoic · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...a lakh is 100,000.

    1. Re:For those who are too lazy to search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should we search for such a retarded, cryptic, useless abbreviation? Why is the author too lazy to type 105,000? lakh? Give me a friggin break!

    2. Re:For those who are too lazy to search... by asdfasdfasdfasdf · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...a lakh is 100,000.

      You see, this is why they are beating us. For us to say "One hundred Thousand" it takes five syllables, for them at most two.

      Efficiancy, Folks, Efficiancy.

      Uh, no, it has nothing to do with the fact that I'm posting on Slashdot instead of working.

    3. Re:For those who are too lazy to search... by Snover · · Score: 1

      The more important question is, why would they use such an obscure (to us) unit of measurement in an article for us?

      --

      [insert witty comment here]
    4. Re:For those who are too lazy to search... by JDevers · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe it also has something to do with you not being able to spell "efficiency"...

    5. Re:For those who are too lazy to search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Think you mean 150,000, not 105,000.

      "Lakh" is used in India in a way analogous to how "million" is used in the U.S. A reporter here would write "2 million jobs lost during the recession", not "2,000,000 jobs lost". Same idea.

    6. Re:For those who are too lazy to search... by Leto2 · · Score: 1

      You mean 1,00,000 :)

      --
      <grub> Reading /. at -1 is like driving through Cracktown in a convertible that is stuck in 1st
    7. Re:For those who are too lazy to search... by Space_Nerd · · Score: 1

      Google is your friend

      Google

      --
      Everybody has a purpose in life, maybe mine is to lurk in slashdot.
    8. Re:For those who are too lazy to search... by asdfasdfasdfasdf · · Score: 1

      I should have spelled it effissshensy for the joke to have been really good. :-)

    9. Re:For those who are too lazy to search... by misterpies · · Score: 1


      and very bizarrely, the "lakh" derives from the same word as "lox" (both come from the indo-european word for fish, "*lakhs"). I guess our ancestors must have consumed a heck of a lot of bagels in their time.

      --
      The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
    10. Re:For those who are too lazy to search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sig is hilarious....

    11. Re:For those who are too lazy to search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it also has something to do with your not preceding your gerund with a possessive pronoun. :)

    12. Re:For those who are too lazy to search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word is "efficiency"

      Spell checking folks, spell checking.

    13. Re:For those who are too lazy to search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but we make it up by having shorter names like bob, or jim, instead of 6-syllable ones.

    14. Re:For those who are too lazy to search... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      The more important question is, why would they use such an obscure (to us) unit of measurement in an article for us?

      Because it wasn't written for "us". If you'd RTFA (which is only a few paragraphs), you might have noticed it was in The Economic Times, part of the India Times.

    15. Re:For those who are too lazy to search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, a lakh is 1,00,000 not 100,000 and a core is 100,00,000. No million.

    16. Re:For those who are too lazy to search... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      No, he means 100,000.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    17. Re:For those who are too lazy to search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Your not being able," not "you not being able," would be correct.

      Duh, it's a gerund, dunderhead.

  7. Lakh by pheared · · Score: 1

    1.5 lakh, so 150,000?

    1. Re:Lakh by lithiumfox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First of all, the reason they said "Lakh" instead of "Hundred Thousand" is becasue the article was in an Indain based newspaper. Lakh (Hundred Thousand) and Crore "Ten Million) are indian finacial jargon that has been used for many decades. People also use it when they talk about numerical values other then money. My father still uses Lakh's when he speaks about numerical values and not Hundred Thousand. It part of their culture.

    2. Re:Lakh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and second of all, if you'd read the previous postings, you'd have seen that lakh, crore, and the article's origins had already been explained.

  8. 1.5 Engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Bangalore stands ahead of Bay Area, San Francisco and California, with a lead of 20,000 techies, while employing a total number of 1.5 lakh engineers."

    1.5 engineers hey. Always wondered where that 0.5 kid from the average 2.5 family got to. Engineering.

  9. Re:I thought Bangalores by tommck · · Score: 1
    Hehe... you're right! I just watched that yesterday while I was home sick! :-)

    --
    ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
  10. Last? by andy1307 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Name 5 great software products to have come out of Bangalore. Last!! It hasn't begun.

    1. Re:Last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name 5 great software products to have come out of Bangalore

      but how will you know ?
      does software come with a "made in India" sticker ?

    2. Re:Last? by slamb · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Name 5 great software products to have come out of Bangalore.

      Name five great software products that you're sure haven't come out of Bangalore.

      The companies aren't based there, but enough of the work is actually done there that you need to put some actual thought into answering that question...

      On the other hand, I don't have a high opinion of Bangalore-as-Silicon-Valley, either. I just don't think you'll get anything really remarkable out of people under those conditions. And if there's one thing the world doesn't need, it's more mediocre programming...

    3. Re:Last? by grub · · Score: 1


      Name 5 great software products to have come out of Bangalore.

      You assume that the product will come with a "Made in India" sticker on the shrinkwrap. Much of the software on the shelves is, at least partially, written by geeks in India. Much more custom and vertical market apps too.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:Last? by andy1307 · · Score: 0, Troll
      I don't have a high opinion of Bangalore-as-Silicon-Valley

      Me neither..and i've worked in Bangalore. Such news gets posted on /. because of two reasons

      Insecure American techies

      Bragging Indian techies.

    5. Re:Last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >Name five great software products that you're sure haven't come out of Bangalore.

      linux - Finland
      mplayer - Hungary
      decss - Norway
      gnome - Mexico
      kde - Germany

    6. Re:Last? by metlin · · Score: 1

      Bangalore (and India, in general) has been more of a source catering to the Software Services Industry, rather than the products side.

      Its simply because its easier and cheaper in the services side, and there is sustained income.

      On the other hand, products necessiates a higher initial investment and a whole lot more of hardwork, something that a lot of companies in India are not willing to invest in, given the uncertainty and delay in terms of returns.

      Do you really think that all of the "engineers" in India are really worth it? Most of them are from really bad schools, and have degrees in arcane areas of which they themselves have no idea about. All it takes is a degree, an aptitude test and the ability to be a drone and you're easily in into a services company full of drones like this one. There is really no need to innovate when you can hire a few hundred dumb engineers to do the mundane, who will work for cheap wages without a question. And companies from the west are happy outsourcing to these places, purely because of the cost factor involved.

      And those companies that really do product development, still have their offices in either Silicon Valley or parts of Europe. Ofcourse, there still are a few companies that do products, but they're just a handful.

    7. Re:Last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      # Insecure American techies
      # Bragging Indian techies.

      And who smell worse? It's a close call...

    8. Re:Last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The request was for great software products.

      Mplayer, Gnome, KDE: Not really great

      DeCSS: Not really software

      Linux: Not really a product

    9. Re:Last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said "great". However, you do make a good point. I'm not aware of any open source software that comes from India, etc.

    10. Re:Last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      linux is teh ghey, not great

    11. Re:Last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >you do make a good point. I'm not aware of any open source software that comes from India, etc.

      Maybe the Indian programmers are busy working to feed their families?

    12. Re:Last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Software products are a minor part of the software industry. Most of the work is project based for use by only a few groups.

    13. Re:Last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      # Insecure American techies
      # Bragging Indian techies.

      And who smell worse? It's a close call...

      Indians for sure. Ask an Indian if he uses toilet paper, odds are he considers it barbaric and disgusting - those guys stink.

    14. Re:Last? by zungu · · Score: 1

      Recent story NY Times said that Banglore based US companies outifits have filed about 1,000 patents for the research done there. Major companies doing research there are GE, Texas Instruments (since last 20 years), Intel, Microsoft, HP, and others. So there is some cool work being done there for sure...

    15. Re:Last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      does software come with a "made in India" sticker ?

      You can pick up the nasty stench of curry on the CD.

    16. Re:Last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TROLL

      Thank you.

    17. Re:Last? by claud9999 · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are reasons for this...Mostly having to do with very very complex government regulations that make starting a business (esp. a tech business) an expensive and difficult proposition. Many Indians came to the US just to start their company. (Don't know if that is still the case, it was in recent years.)

      There have also (in previous years) been severe infrastructure problems in the country, I'm sure searching back in /. will find you articles about power problems and network problems in Bangalore.

      Needless to say, there are more people with tech degrees in India than tech jobs in the U.S. Don't pin your hopes on their labor costs going up due to demand any time soon!

      Interesting related article: http://www.business-standard.com/ice/story.asp?Men u=7&story=30970

    18. Re:Last? by slamb · · Score: 1
      I said: Name five great software products that you're sure haven't come out of Bangalore.

      An AC replied:
      linux - Finland
      mplayer - Hungary
      decss - Norway
      gnome - Mexico
      kde - Germany

      I don't buy it. Linux didn't come out of Finland. Sure, its original creator was from there. But so many people all over the world have put so much effort into it that there's no way you can say it came from Finland. Likewise the other OSS projects, to a lesser extent. I'll bet someone from Bangalore has contributed to at least linux, gnome, and kde. If I cared more, I'd look through the public ChangeLogs and prove it.

    19. Re:Last? by pantycrickets · · Score: 1

      Gnome & Linux both have developers in India.. so, no, try again.

    20. Re:Last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some that I know.

      Bangalore :
      HPs C/C++ compiler.
      IBM's Rational Software Suite.
      IBM's Purify tool.

      Hyderabad :
      Microsoft's SFU (Services for Unix, NFS Server etc)

      Pune :
      Virtually all of Veritas' products are developed
      for the most part India.
      Vxfs, Vxvol, NetBackup etc. etc.

      Delhi :
      IBM research lab. They develop extensions or
      modifications for DB2 ocassionally.

    21. Re:Last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I don't buy it. Linux didn't come out of Finland. Sure, its original creator was from there. But so many people all over the world have put so much effort into it that there's no way you can say it came from Finland.

      It's original creator was in Finland when he created it, ergo it C A M E from Finland. QED

    22. Re:Last? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Here's some from the IT minister (he erroneously classifies them as 'hardware', which of course they aren't):-
      The Philips DVD video codec; the Apple iPod audio codec; the Texas Instruments' OMAP; Microsoft's JSharp; the Adobe reader for Palm and iPaq; Intel's "start up" utility; Cisco's IOS core components; Hewlett Packard's ux; the OpenView kernel; components of Oracle's Pro-c; (...)
      MS' IndiaDev center is developing some more apps, if you are interested.

      Hardcore app development wasn't India's biggest forte initially, but we're getting there.

  11. Show of hands: Language Barrier? by zrk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How many of you have dealt with these Asian techies and have been on the phone longer due to a misunderstanding between yourself and a techie?

    Rather Frustrating!

    Maybe there's a learning curve, but if I had my druthers, I wouldn't put up with it.

  12. Sand Hill Road by bstil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is this an New Year's/April's Fool article?

    I don't see the folks on Sand Hill Road moving to India very soon.

    Also, the article is from India Times, so expect some bias.

    1. Re:Sand Hill Road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not moving to India - they're funding those who will.

    2. Re:Sand Hill Road by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      Gonna have to agree with this sentiment.

      Also, would you rather have well paid, comfortable Californians working on your projects, or underpaid resentful Indians? (Who are prolly saving to move to America) Just because they have more men on their payroll says nothing about how they do business.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    3. Re:Sand Hill Road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see the folks on Sand Hill Road moving to India very soon.

      Right. The people won't move. Only their jobs.

  13. What is a lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with a lead of 20,000 techies, while employing a total number of 1.5 lakh engineers

    What unit of measure is a lakh or what is a lakh and how come they only need 1.5 engineers for 20,000 techies.

    1. Re:What is a lakh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why is a K sometimes 1000 and sometimes 1024?

  14. Re:I'm a Republican! (A poem) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this meant to be sung to the tune of Monty Python's "He's a lumberjack" ???

  15. Re:I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, except you are likley to find bugs crawling around in it. true story.

  16. What an irony! by arvindn · · Score: 1
    Bangalore happened at lightning speed because of the Y2K problem, where America chose to depend on India as it was thought to be a one-off situation.

    With the result that Bangalore took off with a bang. Y2K went out with a whimper.

    1. Re:What an irony! by elf-fire · · Score: 1

      Not sure about that... I was in Bangalore back in 1996, and at the time all large software companies had regular representives in Bangalore's booming night-life already... And no: They were not on holiday ;)

    2. Re:What an irony! by toofanx · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is an interesting irony, but a misleading statement. The Y2K projects might have helped some Bangalore based software companies put their foot in the door of some large companies, but the technical skills were already there.

      Bangalore happened because of the national university and research organisations based here (IISc, ISRO, LRDE, NAL, HAL, etc.). This is basically the same as what happened around the world - SF bay area is based around UC Berkeley and Stanford (and many other organisations who's names I've forgotten).

  17. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

    IBM's own support is just banging your head against a wall. Most of the people I speak with sound like they have a mouth full of marbles.

    I refuse to call IBM tech support anymore. I'd rather deal with JBoss than Websphere. At least I can get answers.

  18. 20k techies and 150k engineers . . . by palutke · · Score: 1, Funny

    . . . with a total payroll of what? about $50k?

    --
    'I ain't a liar, baby, and I ain't proud I just want what I'm not allowed.' -- Violent Femmes, 36-24-36
  19. A: Bangalore! by Thud457 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Q: What does Tascha Yar do when she's drunk and horney and can't find Mr. Data?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:A: Bangalore! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back under your rock!

  20. Japan beats detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    lets see how USA is losing

    Steel, Textiles, Computing, Cars and Trucks, Electronics, Shrimps (yeah really)

    so what do you do again ?

    1. Re:Japan beats detroit by necrognome · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We protect you from your nuclear neighbors to the west and north, and in doing so, supply your freedom. International shipping, which any exporting nation needs, exists at the discretion of the United States. Nations are free to compete via trade, since the military competition has already concluded.

      --


      Let's get drunk and delete production data!
    2. Re:Japan beats detroit by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      so what do you do again ?

      That's the cool part. We don't really do much of anything anymore.

      We've somehow convinced the rest of the world to send us all their stuff in exchange for IOUs that will never be repaid. We're living high off the hog at others' expense. Thanks for all the stuff!

  21. The Ring of Power? by shad0w47 · · Score: 2, Funny

    which grew under the shadow...

    India is Mordor??

    --
    "I did this cuz Linux gives me a woody"
    1. Re:The Ring of Power? by Ph34rPhact0r · · Score: 0

      lol

    2. Re:The Ring of Power? by simetra · · Score: 1

      No, More Dorks.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  22. And for those who aren't too lazy to search... by Pingular · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    --

    When anger rises, think of the consequences.
    Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
  23. Interesting... by pubjames · · Score: 5, Insightful


    A couple of years ago on a train journey to Mumbai I had a long conversation with an Indian software engineer. Once he'd got his University degree he got a job in Silicon Valley, but only stayed a couple of years because he realised that although salaries are lower in India he would actually be a lot better off in India because your dollar goes a lot further there. In India he could actually afford servants - a maid, cook etc. as well as a big house with a swimming pool and car. So if you read this type of story and think of hundreds of poorly paid Indians in sweatshops hacking out code, think again.

    1. Re:Interesting... by Metaldsa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So all I need to do is move to India and I can have my own maids, cooks, and other servants? I'm getting my plane ticket right now! :)

      Seriously, it would be interesting to see average income in both areas because it would shed a lot of light. Not your friend's pay or some millionaire in Silicon valley but the county's average income.

    2. Re:Interesting... by pubjames · · Score: 1

      Seriously, it would be interesting to see average income in both areas because it would shed a lot of light.

      I understand an experienced software engineer would get about one third of the salary he would expect to receive in the USA, so $40k a year rather than $120, for instance.

    3. Re:Interesting... by TheSync · · Score: 4, Interesting

      All of my "middle class" relatives in El Salvador have at least one live-in maid, some have several as well as a driver and gardener. Interestingly enough, some of my relatives there work in the computer industry.

    4. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      a big house with a swimming pool and car

      He's so rich, even his house has its own car!

    5. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes I like to ride a bicycle.

    6. Re:Interesting... by egriebel · · Score: 1
      I understand an experienced software engineer would get about one third of the salary he would expect to receive in the USA, so $40k a year rather than $120, for instance.

      What part of the USA are you in? I would love to go there and make 120k writing code. I'm an experienced coder (since 1992) and neither I nor my peers make anywhere close to that. Shoot, you sure you're not talkin' bout 1999?

      Actually, $40k in India doesn't sound half bad!!

      --
      ACHTUNG! Das computermachine ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen.
    7. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $40k in India? Sounds more like UK wages.

    8. Re:Interesting... by pubjames · · Score: 1

      Shoot, you sure you're not talkin' bout 1999?

      Actually, yes, I was in India in 1999. Well spotted.

    9. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      He may have felt that way but I rather doubt that it's true. I'm building a development team in India and can tell you the following (all below in US $):

      1. Wages range from $5 to $10 per hour for developers, senior developers, and architects.
      2. Stuff from India is cheap (e.g. maid = $100/month) but foreign stuff is just as expensive as elsewhere. For example, a Compaq computer is still about $1,000. A low-end Toyota is still over $10,000. There is however an India made car that's around $5,000. (Based on Bangalore newpaper ads in December.)
      3. A three bedroom tract home in a gated community will still cost about $150,000. The home is nice though with granite floors and counters. (I personally visited such a community outside Bangalore last month.)

      The materialistic hope for most IT workers is to simply own their own car. A home and maids are still largely beyond reach.

    10. Re:Interesting... by ashayh · · Score: 3, Informative

      A maid and a cook is good for you.
      But do you know how much the maid/cook will get paid? In a big city, where wages are higher, you would pay them Rs 500 to 1000 .. thats 10-20$. If the maid works many hours in 3-4 places, she'll get 60-80$ a month if shes lucky. At this rate, when does her son get schooling, decent college, University etc and become an engineer ?
      So while the dollar does go further, it doesent do the vast majority of Indians who are farmers, labourers, servants, etc. ANY good.
      When will the maids son even think of becoming an engineer and getting his own big house with pool? I think its when wages for everyone go up .. so that when the maid wants 100, and people can afford to give it.
      As an Indian, I like the fact that many people in US, even well off ones HAVE to do their own laundry, cooking etc. Because that means that there arent a lot of poor people left to become maids/cooks.
      I do not know why you say "a big house with a pool". Although I havent counted, I am willing to bet that the number of s/w engineers in India with a house(not apartment) with a pool is way, way less than you imagine. Hell, the number of total pools in India is less that you imagine.

    11. Re:Interesting... by ashayh · · Score: 1

      Actually its more like 20000 RS a month, thats @400$ = 4800$ a year. This is a above average salary.

    12. Re:Interesting... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Back in the day, one way of comparing different economies was to calculate how long you'd have to work in order to buy a big mac in both places. I wonder how san fran and Bangalore comprare in that regard? Of course, I suppose it would be a veggie burger in India.

    13. Re:Interesting... by synergy3000 · · Score: 1

      Their labor pool is evolving as we speak. Before you could smack your servants around in India and yell at them for the smallest thing. Now the servants come to your house and watch TV for an hour before they do anything. You yell at them they don't come back the next day. The improvements India is experiencing is just like the US in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Soon servants over there will only be for the extreme rich.

    14. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In India he could actually afford servants - a maid, cook etc. as well as a big house with a swimming pool and car.

      And he flies to work in a helicopter and has fine cakes and biscuits for brunch. In India, the perfect society. That's India, folks.

      Meanwhile back in what remains of the U.S. economy, Joe Programmer, recent Master's Degree graduate, digs himself out from under 500 lbs. of fresh shit to begin his day working in the salt mines...

    15. Re:Interesting... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      ....a big house with a swimming pool and car. So if you read this type of story and think of hundreds of poorly paid Indians in sweatshops hacking out code, think again.

      I do think of that, it is just that it is us U.S. techies in sweatshops, not them this time.

    16. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they hiring? I wouldn't mind living in Central America.

      Hmmm, pupusas.

    17. Re:Interesting... by wkitchen · · Score: 1

      I think Silicon Valley is destined to lose jobs and businesses regardless of where it loses them to. I've recently been checking into a job opening in San Diego, but the cost of living there is so much higher than here (Dallas area), that I figure it would take a 60% pay raise just to break even, so it would have to be an extraordinary offer to make it worthwhile at all.

      The bulk of the cost difference is in the cost of real estate. The real estate business is an economic parasite. It consumes what other economic activities create, increasing it's own consumption without a corresponding increase in value created, sucking the life out of an otherwise healthy economy.

      I know SD is not in Silicon Valley, but the principle is still valid. Areas with exhorbitant cost of living just cannont stay competitive outside of very high-value specialized niches. So regardless of whether it's Bangalore or Texas, either way Silicon Valley is destined to lose to some place.

    18. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've wondered if it would be possible for an American to relocate to India. It would be nice to be able to live reasonably. Perhaps even in a somewhat naturalized area, around fairly liberal-minded people. Someplace where you won't feel like an utter misfit if you practice buddhism or smoke marijuana or require a vegetarian diet.

      Instead of resenting India for taking our jobs, couldn't we be staging a mass exodus? I don't know, maybe India really does suck, economically, socially, politically. But occasionally you see a post like the parent's, that makes it sound not so bad. Live more on a lot less. Works for me.

    19. Re:Interesting... by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      One of our domestic software managers is spending a two year stint in India setting up our offshored operation. He's still getting his US salary of $100K+. He's got a mansion, five servants, and a chauffeur. This is a low level manager, not an executive.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    20. Re:Interesting... by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Yes, they are hiring, here is a company my cousin runs, it is a Central American tech employment site.

    21. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "At this rate, when does her son get schooling, decent college, University etc and become an engineer ?"

      You don't need that much money to go to college in India, do you?

    22. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd better look into the tax rules too -- you will pay taxes in the US as well as in the country of residence. You could end up strapped.

    23. Re:Interesting... by tigga · · Score: 1
      What part of the USA are you in? I would love to go there and make 120k writing code.

      Some people in Silicon Valley have it.

    24. Re:Interesting... by harisheldon · · Score: 1

      For Rs 1000 the maid will work for 1hr for 5 days in Mumbai. She can easily earn Rs5000 a month working 5hrs a day. Government subsidized schools (std 1-10) are about Rs 50 a month. Engineering colleges cost Rs5000-Rs10000 per year. In India parents don't save for retirement (mine didn't). Their kids are their retirement. So, assuming the worst case that there are no savings when her kid is going to engineering school, she is spending ~17% of her income on education. This may be considered hardship in other parts of the world but parents routinely do that in India. Here we are not even taking into account help from relatives and scholarships from foundations etc. To claim that IT will not solve India's problems is knocking down a strawman. India's problems will be solved through free markets that allow the citizenry to employ their skills to the their own maximum benefit, a central government that only focuses on infrastructure, education, basic research and defense, and competing state governments trying to out do each other in attracting businesses. Thankfully, things are moving in exactly that direction.

    25. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Are they hiring? I wouldn't mind living in Central America.

      Yes, there is always need of good maids and servants.

    26. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect you are talking about the Big-Mac index, which is used to examine purchasing power parity, or lack thereof.

  24. so what? by Dionysus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but so what?

    I'm not an American (Norwegian if you must know), but I have worked in Silicon Valley. Like the saying goes, it's not the size, but the quality. Yes, the best engineers in India is probably comparable to the best in the US and the rest of the world, but I find that the average engineer in India is worse than the average in the US.

    --
    Je ne parle pas francais.
    1. Re:so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and very soon...the average engineer in the USA will be lucky to afford a one bedroom apartment anywhere in the US while the average Indian engineer will be able to easily have a palace with servents. And while an Indian engineer can easily move to the good ol USA to steal yet another job from us NO American engineer can move to India and find a job there. Yes the World Economy hard at work. This isn't just about the tech sector it's about the entire middle class in America and other developed countries and shit is just about to hit the fan...of course I could be wrong and we will continue to let the upper class (investors/management/CEOs) continue to drive everyone out of a job just so they can afford two Jaguars instead of one...perhaps it's time we realize an economy based on ever increasing profits isn't exactly a good idea.

  25. Inevitablity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the sign of inevitablity !! No point grumbling about it anymore.

  26. I'm afraid I don't care by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And I care because... why? At its height, Silicon Valley/San Fran contained thousands of individuals hoping to get rich quick by pretending to be techies. Now India has thousands of individuals hoping to have a better life by pretending to be techies. There's nothing new here. Move along.

    1. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by Ph34rPhact0r · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I am curious to know how many 'engineers' they truely have. Just because sudha the housewife decides to take a few classes on java coding, an engineer she is not! I think in end, everyone will get what they pay for. Yeah.. save a few buck on labor, but it is not like they are reducing the prices of the products they are selling, right? So... with cheaper 'manufacturing' you will inevitably have product faults and failures that will result in some kind of remidation by the company. They're betting on that will never happen and stuff won't break...

    2. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by supersnail · · Score: 1

      They probably really are counting only those with computer related degrees!

      Since the '70s an IT qualfication was seen as a ticket to a well paying job in the west, and, the Indian universities expanded the number of courses to meet the demand so there is now a considerable production line.

      Experience tells me that there is no direct correlation between programming/design skills and qualifications, but, the mix of geniuses, plodders and deadbeats is about the same as in most western computer shops. But when they are good they are very good!

      I suspect most of the derogatory comments on there skills are chauvanistic or plain racist in origon.

      --
      Old COBOL programmers never die. They just code in C.
    3. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by avi33 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The difference is, our 'pretenders' were mostly liberal-arts-educated, self-taught-html types, and in India, they're more likely to be C coding, exposed to methodology, CS-degreed folks. Unlike the dot-com bubble, you can't get a decent programming job there without a CS degree. Some Indians I've met said that they couldn't even get interviews until they at least had a Master's.

      I'm not trying to flame anyone, as I have worked with a number of skilled American and Indian programmers and engineers. I'm not talking about American 'software engineers,' just comparing the dot-com overnight 'hey look I learned cold fusion last weekend' kids to your average India-educated programmer.

      By and large, the Indians I've worked with had been exposed to a wider range of technologies: working on projects involving lahks of lines of C, teams of programmers working in parallel, regression testing, meticulous project planning, etc. In short, a fairly solid CS background, not unlike American CS degrees. Sure, there were other differences, cultural, communication, etc. and I think often a discrete difference when it came to 'just play it by ear and get the whole thing launched/compiled/shipped and iron out the issues later.' But I think that sums up a lot about how American business drives projects over here, for better or worse.

      For the record (not to flame anyone, big generalizations coming), from what I've heard about rigorous CS programs, I've heard the American Master's CS students were the least likely to cheat or borrow code on the whole. Chinese and Indian programmers were known to have a 'pack' mentality, in which the top 1-3 programmers did the hard work, and the rest were content to pass it around via floppy, with varying attempts at even changing function names. I've heard this has been overlooked at some highly regarded schools (Stanford for one), with the logic that 'we would alienate and possibly expel 80% of the students if we rigorously enforced this.' Of course this is hearsay based on what I've heard from people in a few schools, and I'm not suggesting that all Indian or Chinese programmers fake their degrees. (Did I PCify that enough for everyone's tastes?)

    4. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The truth is that an education does not make you what you are educated in. In my experience, having a degree has very little to do with being a good programmer. Good programmers have a drive that pushes them to master their trade. "Pretend" programmers may learn the concepts behind programming, and even understand how to make code work. However, they lack a true understanding of what the code is doing and why. They have no concept that the data structures and OS design courses they took, have a real purpose and are not just background.

      For the record, I do not have a CS degree myself. It worked out that obtaining actual experience in the field got in the way of getting a degree. I started with a very high opinion of those who had CS degrees, but as I gained real-world experience, I learned that a CS degree really doesn't mean much. In the hands of someone who has coding in their blood, it tempers them like a good sword. In the hands of a "wannabe", it is as useless as a fifth wheel.

      What's really interesting though, is that programmers who wish to become true masters, will not let the lack of a degree stand in their way. While not all of them have the opportunity like myself to read college level texts as children, those that don't will seek out these materials as soon as they feel a need. And in the end, you can hold an amazingly coherent technical conversation with degreed and non-degreed coders. The only ones who feel left out are the ones who saw their degrees as a way to make money.

    5. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by ashayh · · Score: 1

      Chinese and Indian programmers were known to have a 'pack' mentality, in which the top 1-3 programmers did the hard work, and the rest were content to pass it around via floppy, with varying attempts at even changing function names.I've heard this has been overlooked at some highly regarded schools (Stanford for one), with the logic that 'we would alienate and possibly expel 80% of the students if we rigorously enforced this.
      Hehe... so true in my Univ.

    6. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I suspect most of the derogatory comments on there skills are chauvanistic or plain racist in origon.

      Dude, you were doing so well right up to that last line. Had you left it off, you probably would have gotten a +5 Insightful. But your apparent need to bury your opponent under a minefield of political correctness may get you a -1 Troll. And rightfully so. No intelligent argument should ever contain such blatant insults unless the speaker is willing to provide evidence of the alleged crime.

      I know that this tack has become exceedingly popular, but it has the effect of killing the very progress you profess to desire. Not to mention that it is very cruel to the supposed victims, as they are never given the opportunity to show their capabilities instead of being coddled as if they were wounded in the crossfire.

      In short, save the insults for those who deserve them.

    7. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by betis70 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >>What's really interesting though, is that programmers who wish to become true masters, will not let the lack of a degree stand in their way.

      I'm a self-taught Liberal Arts type (well a pseudo-Science like Archaeology, but still a BA degree) who has been coding since the Apple IIe (BASIC, C, VB, Python, Java plus lots o' sql/database/GIS/GPS). But compared to most other archies, I was pretty heavily computer-centric before I made the career switch--working on CMS and Unix for my arch. projects, dealing with set-theory for GIS, that sort of thing.

      One thing that a CS degree would have given me is a leg-up on my learning curve. For basic things like data structures I had to pore over books or articles on my own rather than in a classroom environment.

      Maybe I had more "Ah-Ha" moments than the typical CS major, since I had to figure it out myself, but there are certain things that probably would have been quicker to learn with a quality teacher. Still, I take night classes as often as my schedule allows, and am constantly trying to learn new aspects of programming and software development.

      Still, my lack of a CS degree has definitely held me back, career-wise. But it certainly hasn't stood in my way of continuing to learn. Besides programming is fun.

      --
      I forget...are we at war with Eurasia or East Asia?
    8. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is, our 'pretenders' were mostly liberal-arts-educated, self-taught-html types, and in India, they're more likely to be C coding, exposed to methodology, CS-degreed folks.

      We all suck...

      They all rule...

      We all suck...

      They all rule...

      Come on everyone! Sing along!

      We all suck...

    9. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by be-fan · · Score: 1

      In short, save the insults for those who deserve them.
      ---------
      There are a *lot* of people here who deserve them, and frankly, a lot of us are getting a bit tired of dragging out economic theory to beat them down every few articles. I think the OP was just more frustated than anything else.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    10. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      What do you want to use coding for? If you simply wish to have a career in coding, than a masters (even if you don't need it) will help you get that interview. If you set your sights at a slightly different goal (i.e. attempting to change the world through new ideas and coding practices) you may be able to make a name for yourself in the industry. So far, the later tack has paid off for me, and has unlimited potential for growth. But that's probably because I don't want to go where the former tack leads: business management.

      Both tacks have the opportunity for earning large amounts of money. The actual choice in a path for your life very much depends on how you want to spend it and who you want your peers to be. Neither is actually "better" than the other, but they will require very different goals and self-development. Since I always learned on my own faster than in a classroom, my choice was obvious. For others, they may wish to use a degree (as I said before) to temper themselves like a good sword. It can be very effective, but isn't a requirement for this industry. :-)

    11. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I think the OP was just more frustated than anything else.

      Remember the saying, "If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all?"

      Now I'm as guilty as anyone for venting on occasion, but using explosive terms such as "racial" is exactly the wrong way to do it.

      Another point, is that the OP fell into the trap of, "if the parent didn't explicitly make a statement, he must not believe it to be true." In this particular case, the statement that the parent failed to make was, "There are good Indian programmers." Thus the OP set out to correct him on a point the parent never addressed. While I normally would have been fine with that (it often encourages discussion), his apparent need to vent, devalued his entire contribution. Had he simply vented with no other comment, no harm would have been done. Had he stated his opinion without venting, no harm would have been done. He did neither and that has caused irreparable harm to the discussion.

    12. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some Indians I've met said that they couldn't even get interviews until they at least had a Master's.

      Considering the project I just worked on, I find that hard to believe. 7 offshore programmers, 3 of whom should never have graduated from a 200-level class in programming. And, according to the director who hired them personally, these were the best 7 developers money could buy.

      FWIW, there was one guy with a PhD, but for some reason he decided he had to use VB style hungarian notation for all his variable names. oHashtable this and oVector that -- boy, there sure are a lot of objects in Java!

    13. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      This is just one opinion, but I wholeheartedly despite this sort of attitude. Sure, it holds some truth, but many of US were doing (or do) technology because we love technology. When I started studying CS nearly 8 years ago I did it because I thought computers were interesting. I stayed in CS because I liked computers and technology. Yes, the job market was a good motivator, but what kept me in the program was the love of bits, compilers, cpus and algorithms. Did I get a job that paid a shitload of money when I graduated? Of course. It wasn't like I was selling out (as in selling my blood or my soul or cheating people out of millions). I worked at a job that had a bunch of friends at a company where the baseline CS degree came from Berkeley so I got to work with a bunch of smart people. I learned much and got paid well doing it. So while there were some who just went into it for the money, many of us were there because we loved technology. Don't fault us for liking what we do because that's sheer stupidity and pure evil imo. The prospects of getting rich were there and definitely were desirable but don't mistake effect with cause.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    14. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I think you're highly confused. Of course there are programmers out there who both love computers and are looking for financial incentive. I should know, I'm one of them. But I also had an opportunity during the boom to see Silicon Valley first hand. To say that we acquired most of our useful technology staff while temporarily based in Chicago would be an understatement. Once we got to California, the quality of tech workers dropped like a rock. A few examples:

      1. A guy who had multiple Masters degrees in programming and economics, was unable to code a single line. I spent a great deal of time trying to teach him, but he ended up trying to get me to do his work for him. He left just before he was about to be fired.

      2. A guy who previously worked on Sun's website, came in at noon, left at three, spent most of his time in the gym, and only "pretended" to code. When we checked his work, we found he spent 3 weeks to make the wrong change to one line of code. He also left just before he was canned.

      3. An Indian guy (sorry people) was hired without my knowledge, and showed up one day. The only project I think he got the time to work on, resulted in him stumbling on writing the debug statement "<% System.out.println(myvariable); %>". He kept asking how to do this time and time again, and I would tell him time and time again. My manager observed this, and the other manager who hired the guy fired him within a few days.

      Get the picture?

      If there are 150K tech workers in Bangalore, then there's a good chance that many of them are not much better. When you add the non-directional management aspect of outsourcing like this, one quickly realizes the poor quality of work that is most likely being done over there.

    15. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should probably be fair and point out the race of examples 1 and 2. Number 1 was a naturalized Indian. Number 2 was a "buff" white guy. We had more examples, but most were white or Indian. Surprisingly, I can't think of any completely incompetent Asians or Europeans. We did have a Ukrainian guy who was not a team player and made life hard for the rest of us, but at least he could code. Amusingly, we did find a very competent female Indian programmer. She tended to follow the flow a little too much, but she knew her stuff. Last I heard, she was going for her Masters.

    16. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      Ok. Let's be fair. How can you call me confused when you point out 3 examples out of the hundreds of thousands of tech workers that exist in the Sillicon Valley? I don't doubt that there were many more like you described but you're experiences with a handful of people do not qualify as:

      "At its height, Silicon Valley/San Fran contained thousands of individuals hoping to get rich quick by pretending to be techies. "

      Perhaps you can recognize that deduction from your experiences with a handful of people to the theory that thousands of individuals simply did it to get rich quick is quite a leap. If not, then whatever.

      That said, your reference to race is odd at best. I don't see the point and, if anything, just indicates that you have issues with race. (Anyway..)

      The fact is I don't doubt your experience are real. I currently work with a bunch of people who are supposed to have 2x (at least) more experience one of them even having a PhD. Most of the time I feel like I work with a bunch of idiots for legitime, intellectual and technical reasons. I am not confused.

      But MY POINT was that many of us were doing tech because we loved it (whether we were underqualified or overqualified). You paint the picture that we were bunch of money-hungry bastards and I, personally, reject that notion. I'm sure there were plenty of people (not just techies but business types too) that DID do it for the wealth. Stock options were appealing but that's now why I chose to do CS or technology.

      Anyway, your remarks about the quality of programmers of SV compared to Chicago is dubious at best. I'm sure there are a bunch of shitty-ass programmer out here (I know, I work with many of them) but many of the engineers out here are UC Berkeley or Stanford graduates. Companies like Google, Yahoo, E-bay, and biotech companies didn't just sprout out of nowhere. Perhaps you can tell me what sort of technology that is in Chicago that is cutting edge and requires some actual brain power.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    17. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      Did I PCify that enough for everyone's tastes?

      No.

      You would've been better off having not written that last paragraph period. At best it makes you sound ignorant and somewhat racist. I know that wasn't the intention and I'm actually aware (and might agree) of what you were saying.

      At Berkeley, they've devised a program that will study the compiled structure of a program and identify plagiarism to some level of accuracy (so even if you change variable names it won't mean shit). I wouldn't be surprised if Stanford turned their heads since 1) didn't they do away with the F grade and the lowest a person can get is a D, 2) I'm a Cal Alumn so, by nature, I must be against Stanford (esp. the CS dept since I was in the CS dept at Cal :)).

      Lastly, I wouldn't doubt the skills of IIT CS grads and their ability. My guess is that many of the lower-level cheapo programmers are less trained, though, as IIT is supposed to be ultra-competitive right?

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    18. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sorry but in my experience the non-technical (non-CS) degree programmers tend to be bad programmers. I'm sure there are a few gems out there but very, very far and few between. Yes, there are bad programmers with degrees but if we were playing a percentage game I bet you the % of good programmers holding CS degrees compared to those that don't wouldn't even be close.

      Another thing one should note is the difference between knowing concepts and knowing programming. Take any CS PhD out there and you're likely to find a bad programmer. But the rub is that they are highly educated in concepts. This is usually because programmers who spend all their time programming have a better chance of honing their skills as opposed to those who keep their nose in books.

      BUT, with that said, theoretical knowledge should not be discounted. Just because some dude knows how to start a thread doens't mean he knows the difference between a process and a thread and when threads should be used and when processes should be used. Nor does it mean that they have any idea what shared memory, stacks or heaps are. Unless you're doing some straightforward programming, or re-programming something, conceptual knowledge is very important.

      But a point I might agree on is that desire to learn concepts is more important than a degree earned. I work with a bunch of programmers with degrees and I'm quite surprised and how poor programmers they are CONCEPTUALLY and in practice.

      Oh yeah, on a final note, I think people like you who say that education doesn't matter are full of it. THe truth is if you want to survive CS programs are GOOD CS schools you either have to 1) know your stuff and be smart or 2) cheat. So a degree does, to some level, guarantee some degree of expertise.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    19. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Sir, you are indeed confused as you keep trying to claim I painted a picture that I did not. We'll go through your points together:

      How can you call me confused when you point out 3 examples out of the hundreds of thousands of tech workers that exist in the Sillicon Valley?

      Very simple. I gave three of the worst examples out of the hundreds I saw. Many were able to do a decent job (e.g. Anderson Consulting employees), but were hardly good programmer material. Others simply applied only what they'd learned and refused to learn anything new. In fact, there were *so many* "get rich quick" programmers in the valley, that it was nigh impossible to find the good ones.

      That said, your reference to race is odd at best. I don't see the point and, if anything, just indicates that you have issues with race.

      There are a couple of camps that have come forward:

      1. Indians can do the job better.
      2. Indians can't do jack.
      3. Americans good, foreigners bad.

      My point was only to show that they are all the same. Each race has good programmers, and each race has bad programmers. Such is the nature of things. I'm also attempting to show that from my experience, there is little to support the idea that the thousands of programmers in Bangalore are any different than the thousands of programmers who were in the Valley during the boom.

      Most of the time I feel like I work with a bunch of idiots for legitime, intellectual and technical reasons. I am not confused.

      And here you make my point. Most individuals in the tech industry don't belong there. Things would get done much better if we were left with only those who enjoy what they do. Unfortunately, money is a motivating factor for non-geeks to pretend.

      You paint the picture that we were bunch of money-hungry bastards and I, personally, reject that notion.

      I never said such a thing, nor would I. I have said that many individuals who exist in the field, are there for the money alone. That doesn't mean that all people are in the field just for money.

      The difference I painted between the Valley and Bangalore is that many who came to the Valley could get decent paying jobs, but wanted to get stinking rich. Those who come to Bangalore just want a better life. There's nothing wrong with that, but it doesn't automatically make them all good programmers.

      Anyway, your remarks about the quality of programmers of SV compared to Chicago is dubious at best.

      Why? While in Chicago, we had an easier time separating the wheat from the chaff. Once we got to California, the overriding number of poor programmers made it difficult to near impossible to find decent programmers.

      I'm sure there are a bunch of shitty-ass programmer out here [in Chicago]

      There are. My company had to fire a few of them during recent downsizings. (I didn't say I was still in CA, did I?)

      but many of the engineers out here are UC Berkeley or Stanford graduates.
      Putting my original point that degrees have very little influence on the quality of a programmer aside, neither Berkley or Stanford could put out anywhere near the number of "programmers" required to produce the bubble. All those "programmers" came from across the nation and abroad looking to get rich.

      Companies like Google, Yahoo, E-bay, and biotech companies didn't just sprout out of nowhere.

      Yahoo was pre-bubble, but the same thing applies to them. These companies hired SMART PEOPLE AND PROGRAMMERS WHO LIKE TO PROGRAM. Most Dot-Bombs hired anyone who could compile "Hello World" because of the severe shortage. When you have 200+ programmers working on a project, you know there's something wrong.

      BTW, where are you at in Chicago?

    20. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think people like you who say that education doesn't matter are full of it.

      Education matters, degrees don't. Please don't confuse the two. An education is something that can be obtained at a school or with other resources (such as industry research). A degree is someone else certifying that you supposedly know something. I have an education. I know and understand more than 90% of the CS PhDs you'll find. If you want to ask how did I do that, you should ask how did the founders of the computer science field did it. Or for that matter, how did the professors who teach Comp Sci do it?

      Computers in their modern form (i.e. mainframes forward), have only been around for a few decades. Think about it.

      THe truth is if you want to survive CS programs are GOOD CS schools you either have to 1) know your stuff and be smart or 2) cheat. So a degree does, to some level, guarantee some degree of expertise.

      Does it? Are you SURE about that? If you are, perhaps you'd like to explain the number of people I've met who've passed through the masters program, without even an idea on how to code Pong, much less an operating system? Companies have put a great deal of pressure on Universities to put out programmers that could "code in the popular languages". The Universities have been bowing to this pressure and dumbing down their ciriculum.

      I can't even tell you how horrified I am when I see textbooks that say, "We'll teach you C/Java because it's the most popular thing on the market right now." NO! They should teach EVERYTHING! Core concepts. Everything from how the computer does it (aseembly) through the evolution of procedural to functional to OO language and design. And if the students can't handle it, they should flunk until they can.

    21. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      You know, you're sounding awefully insecure about your education. Maybe you need to talk to CalTech's shrink department? That is, assuming Cal *has* a shrink department...

    22. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      Education matters, degrees don't. Please don't confuse the two.

      Sorry, but to me it looks liek you're just playing with semantics. I think having a degree implies having an education. I do agree, though, that you can educate yourself. But that's not the point. I think there's a difference between being taught methodologies, approaches to problems, working with smart lab partners, etc compared to taking just some technical classes are you local CC, using a "Learn ___ programming in 21 days", etc.

      Does it? Are you SURE about that? If you are, perhaps you'd like to explain the number of people I've met who've passed through the masters program, without even an idea on how to code Pong, much less an operating system? Companies have put a great deal of pressure on Universities to put out programmers that could "code in the popular languages". The Universities have been bowing to this pressure and dumbing down their ciriculum.

      True. Very true. This is what separates the good CS schools from the bad ones. Where did those ppl get their masters/phd from? I've met several engineers with masters/phd from schools that traditionally don't have strong CS programs and it's like you said: they were taught today's technology so they would be relevant and it made me question how much theory they knew.

      Secondly, with regard to smart people who program bad, it's like i said in my other post. I think it's pretty well-known that PhDs (the smart ones) make bad programmers. I think it's because they use programming more as a tool than a trade as other career programmers do. It doesn't make me doubt their intelligence, but I'd certainly hire someone else as the software architect/programmer.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    23. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      Uh ok.

      If you were refering to: " 2) I'm a Cal Alumn so, by nature, I must be against Stanford (esp. the CS dept since I was in the CS dept at Cal :))." you should know the following.

      1) Cal == UC Berkeley not Cal Tech

      2) I was saying I "must be against Stanford" because they are our school rival (in terms of sports). It seems like you didn't know that.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    24. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but to me it looks liek you're just playing with semantics. I think having a degree implies having an education. I do agree, though, that you can educate yourself.

      Having a degree implies you attended an educational institute and where able to pass the courses. It does not actually certify that you are educated. An educated individual learns and retains what he knows. The problem with traditional school settings is that most students aren't interested in the subject until they're *out* of school. They then reattend school at a later date to pick up what they missed. They fail to realize that a little research in the subject they are interested in would produce much more plentiful fruits.

      But that's not the point. I think there's a difference between being taught methodologies, approaches to problems, working with smart lab partners, etc compared to taking just some technical classes are you local CC, using a "Learn ___ programming in 21 days", etc.

      And I think there is a difference between "Learn X in 21 days" and reading "Operating System Design", "Practical Data Structures", "BeOS File System Design", "Tricks of the Game Programming Gurus" (Sorry, I just REALLY love this book), "Intel x86 Architecture Reference", "Intel x86 Instruction Reference", "Sparc V Architecture Reference", etc. Reading "How-To for Dummies" will help you become what the title says. Reading the books, papers, and history that made the industry what it is today can make you an expert in your field.

      To sum things up: If you aren't learning on your own, you don't stand a chance of mastering your chosen profession. That applies whether you chose traditional schooling or self-teaching.

      P.S. A positive benefit of self-teaching is that you can become educated enough to be conversant in fields that would have otherwise left you at a loss. While I'm no expert, I'm conversant in history, language semantics, nuclear physics, quantum and relativistic physics, Naval history, and several other subjects I'm probably forgetting. While I'll probably never enter these fields as a worker, they fascinate me and cause me to want to learn more. Besides, you'll never know when information from another field will help you solve a problem in your chosen field. That's why liberal arts degrees are required. (Although I'm not entirely sure I agree with the requirement.)

    25. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Cal == UC Berkeley not Cal Tech

      How strange. I've never heard Berkley referred to as "Cal", I've always referred to it as "Berkley". Where does this tradition come from? Is it simply a shortening of "California"?

      I was saying I "must be against Stanford" because they are our school rival (in terms of sports). It seems like you didn't know that.

      As it would seem. Pretty hard when you misinterpret the first reference. :-)

      BTW, I should probably mention that I believe that Berkley has historically been a wonderful school. Computer Science has been significantly furthered at that school and to ignore the situation would be foolish. However, I think that many have lost sight of what institutes of higher education are for.

      Their original purpose was not so you could get a degree and hit the job market running. Instead, these institutes exist as a gathering place for some of the best minds in the country. A place where research can be discussed, arts can be presents, and experiments performed. As any good scientist can tell you, there is nothing more powerful than peer review. Going to one of these schools was an attempt to enter the world of intellectuals.

      But why should an expert share his wisdom with just one apprentice? Thus, the classroom was born. Anywhere from 10 to a hundred students of art or science could listen and absorb the wisdom and knowledge of their superiors.

      In addition, these institutes offered great libraries with information on any subject. Everything produced by the greatest minds in history was there to absorb. You may not be able to talk with Isaac Newton, but you could take a journey inside his thoughts to understand his concepts and how he came to his conclusions.

      Now let me ask you. Which do you think is more true to that original vision: Self-learners who converse intelligently in worldwide public forums, or the number of degreed individuals who are in the job market today?

    26. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      I see your point and I used to feel as strongly about it the way you used to but the truth is everyone has a right to live their own lives the way they wanted to.

      I used to despise all the people in our classes who did CS simply because they thought it would find them a job after school. I despised them because they just wanted to get paid. I think I was more idealistic back then.

      The truth is that there's nothing wrong with going into a field of work because you think there is stable or good pay. People need to eat, feed their families, etc. I understand your rennaissance-era view of knowledge, sharing of knowledge, etc. but there's nothing wrong with being a bit practical about things.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    27. Re:I'm afraid I don't care by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I can't say I despise the ones who can do a decent job. After all, architects and engineers have to work with construction workers. Programming is not necessarily all that different. The primary difference is that construction workers don't spend time getting masters degrees for their jobs and schools don't dumb down their courses so that just about anyone can become an engineer.

      Unfortunately, there are quite a few people who shouldn't be in programming in the first place. They have zero interest in what they're doing, and it shows. Not to mention that there has to be a balance between your architects, engineers, and construction workers.

      Architects design something. These guys are rare. Engineers compensate for reality in the design. These guys are more common. Then you have about 10-12 construction workers per engineer to actually build the thing (with constant supervision and help from the engineers of course).

      In programming, companies want lots and lots of construction workers and really don't want to pay for architects and engineers. Thus quality suffers, and products are much slower to implement. Companies think that they need more construction workers, so they hire more. Well, that's too expensive, so let's farm it out to somewhere where they'll have even less direction than we've already given.

      See where I'm going with this? I really don't care that Bangalore has 150K tech workers, because they are a highly ineffective force. They were made that way by poor management decisions which were based on the idea that hundreds of tech workers costs less than an architect, a few engineers and a dozen or less construction workers.

      Hmm... You know, I think that explaination may be one of the better one's I've given. Maybe I should write a dissertation on this...

  27. Wow, the math ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. 150,000 engineers.

    Must cost all of half a million dollars to pay all of them those excellent offshore wages.

  28. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're joking right? Getting answers from the JBoss crowd is like pulling teeth with chopsticks - bloody hard work and painful when you finally get there. OTOH, maybe you're paying them...

  29. 10^5 by troon · · Score: 1

    The Indians sometimes write as at 1,00,000. If I remember rightly, there's also the crore, which is 100 lakh (or 10^7).

    --
    Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
    1. Re:10^5 by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Well, lakh me!
      Real computer technicians would use 2^17 (131072)

      Regards,
      --
      *Art

  30. No way. by YanceyAI · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'm sure that textile and factory workers felt the same for awhile. I hate to sound like a Marxist, but welcome to market driven, capitalist America. They're cheaper, they work longer, they demand less.

    Those jobs aren't ever coming back and neither will these.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
    1. Re:No way. by Joey7F · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You forget one thing though...they aren't cheaper. A 20k salary in India is pretty damn good (Some friends tell me it is like six figures over here), well, eventually the disparity will disappear and they will demand more salary. With US programming jobs disappearing and starting salaries coming down, at some point companies will have to say "Wait, how much are we saving exactly?" It has happened with call centers...

      --Joey

    2. Re:No way. by GnuDiff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course. Except that do you think it's going to happen fast? Do you think you'll live to see it? I wouldn't think living standards and expenses are going to skyrocket in India that fast.

    3. Re:No way. by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Of course, most of the textile mills required no real skills (by which, I define the need of several years of study).

      Despite the serious trade barriers to textiles, the mills are still closing in North Carolina. Perhaps if they didn't spend so many years depending on the textile quotas to keep them afloat, they could have gone to college so they could work in the massive biotech campuses of Research Triangle.

    4. Re:No way. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Having been sent to China as I am, and dealing with Chinese factories, I must say I'm rather surprised that there are ANY factories still left in America, of any type.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:No way. by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Disclaimer: I live in a textile town. Three mills have closed here so far, and the local college is now FLOODED with older people looking for a new vocation.

      You are misinformed. The people hurting the most from mill closures are older men and women who have been in textiles all their lives from getting a job in the mill at age 18 to help the family out. In many cases college wasn't even an option, let alone a viable choice because it would require not only cutting a source of income but also putting out massive amounts of money for several years.

      If you think working in a mill requires no skills, I'd love to see YOU go do it. There is no college degree required because on-site-training is the name of the game.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    6. Re:No way. by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      It only took the US a few years to inflate Silicone Valley salaries to millions... and only a few more years to inflate Silicone Valley unemployment equally. There is still hope for American techies.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    7. Re:No way. by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      But the cheap T-shirts and the cheap software will be coming back.

    8. Re:No way. by Gareman · · Score: 1

      It's relative, but Silicon Valley salaries were generally about 20% higher than San Francisco, which was about 20% higher than the SF Bay Area in general. I remember having to make those choices....

    9. Re:No way. by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Insightful
      No, then the companies will just move to the next low-wage country, lather, rinse and repeat, leaving tens of thousands of indian programmers out of a job.

      Most of the IT industry is no longer about doing cool things with computers. It's no longer about understanding the customer's business needs and making the computers do what he needs them to do. It's all about the money and too many people are in it just for the money, bringing no understanding of the industry with them. Oh they make noises like they know what they're doing, but they don't.

      Start a company that avoids all this management masturbation, gives its people the power to solve problems without having to go through 14 layers of buerocracy and that actually understands its customers business needs and you'll end up owning the market, whether or not you're operating from the USA, India or from East Outer Mongolia. And incidentally you might make a buck or two at it.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    10. Re:No way. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      eventually the disparity will disappear and they will demand more salary.

      Not. As the country of India becomes more wealthier, the lower classes will then have the opportunity to enter into IT and will be hungry and willing to bend over backward. We have only seen the tip of the iceburg.

    11. Re:No way. by gathas · · Score: 1

      // begin sarcasm No it will will be really slow like in Japan where they still build cheap small cars with low wage workers. One day maybe they're economy will be more like ours and they will start building luxury products and demand higher wages. // end sarcams

    12. Re:No way. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I hate to tell you this, but compared to many other jobs, belching out Java code doesn't require any skills either...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    13. Re:No way. by CatGrep · · Score: 1

      With US programming jobs disappearing and starting salaries coming down, at some point companies will have to say "Wait, how much are we saving exactly?" It has happened with call centers...

      More likely there won't be anyone left in the US with the required skillsets in a few years. Most engineers build their skills and experience on the job and if they're out of a job for a year or two they've lost out on learning the latest 'in demand' skills. This may not be as big of a problem for software engineers (after all you can participate in an open source project and keep your skills up), but for hardware engineers it's a different story: there's no way you can go out and buy hardware design software which costs $50K for use at home.

      We're not only seeing the export of some very good paying jobs out of the US (likely never to return) and the effect that will have on our economy, we're also seeing the export of knowledge and skills to other countries... in the longrun, that could be worse.

    14. Re:No way. by YanceyAI · · Score: 1
      Start a company that avoids all this management masturbation, gives its people the power to solve problems without having to go through 14 layers of buerocracy and that actually understands its customers business needs and you'll end up owning the market, whether or not you're operating from the USA, India or from East Outer Mongolia. And incidentally you might make a buck or two at it.

      So what's stopping us? Let's do it.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    15. Re:No way. by enjo13 · · Score: 1

      They could you explain to me why American auto industry growth has been extremely high over the last 5 years. Numerous new automotive plants have been opened throughout the country.

      It turns out that it's cheaper for Honda/Toyota/etc.. to simply build the cars over here rather than import them.

      But I guess that doesn't count as 'coming back'.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    16. Re:No way. by BeerSlurpy · · Score: 1

      This perception is the other problem with outsourcing.

      My company has hundreds of ukranian programmers belching out java code as we speak. Unfortunately, only about 3 of them know what they are doing. Actually, make that 2, since one quit for better money (imagine that, more than 100 a week!). Yes, the good ones are the hardest to retain in ANY country.

      It has taken this horde of programmers nearly a year and a half to produce a single decent product, under the heavy supervision of the remaining 2 good programmers there. There are still some odd design flaws and stupid architectural decisions made despite their supervision, but at least it finally runs and doesnt crash half the computers in the company anymore.

      Do you see where I'm going? Anyone can belch out code in any language. It takes actual skill to do so in a way that doesnt require it to be completely rewritten every 6-12 months.

      I have seen other companies in silicon valley that employeed entirely indian or entirely chinese staff with one intermediary who spoke both languages (not speaky mucha engrish). What if your intermediary has mediocre project management skills? What if your intermediary isnt accurately judging the quality of the code that your serfs produce? What if they are only giving you the $20k worth that you are paying them? Gosh, you might have a very buggy product after 3 years of development! Can you say "loss of potential sales followed by loss of your third round of VC funding?"

      And no, I'm not telling you what company this is so you can sell your stock.

    17. Re:No way. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 2, Informative

      Auto industry is "special". It has traditionally had massive protectionism. There have been MASSIVE tariffs placed on foreing imports. This is why Japanese companies built factories in USA and Canada in the first place (in 80's)--to overcome the tariffs. They have been removing the tariffs but I think they are still there. I think the auto industry is still more protected than others (I am not 100% sure though).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    18. Re:No way. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      My point was this it is arrogant for the OP to say that his profession requires skills while naming certain other professions that "don't." Compared to many of the academic professions (mathematics, physics, even literature) where people who have just gotten their phd are relatively low-level post-docs, many programming jobs (Java-type back-end stuff) are "unskilled professions."

      Don't get pissed because your job is low-level enough to get sent overseas, while looking down at others to whom this has already happened and trying to distinguish yourself by saying that yours is a skilled profession and theirs is not.

      As for your example, its not a problem with outsourcing, but simply with hiring bad people.

      My main gripe is with fucktards like the one that posted on the AMD thread that we shouldn't support AMD because it is outsourcing. How do we know the type of people they hired? If they hired bad people, then they'll lose more than they gain, and they'll have to change their business strategy. This happened with Dell, who had to move their tech support back to the US because customers complained too much. Over time, the situation will balance things out until companies find the right mix of product quality vs cost.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    19. Re:No way. by rodgerd · · Score: 1

      No, it happened with the call centres because American customers disliked dealing with Indian call centre staff.

      The jobs going now won't come back to the US. They'll go, if India gets too expensive, to Bangladesh or Vietnam or former Soviet republics. The only way they'll come back to the US is if the US gets so poor it can compete with sub-third world countries like Bangladesh.

      But, hey, cheer up! Larry Ellison will be richer than ever. So it will all have been worth it.

      (Until the US consumer market collapses and drags the broader international economy with it, but guys like Larry can just emulate the wealthy of Central America and hire death squads to deal with the dissatisfied poor).

    20. Re:No way. by rodgerd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, it turns out that since the Japanese made serious inroads into the US in the 1980s, the US government has threatened massive trade barriers unless the Japanese assemble cars in the US. This is called a "gentlemen's agreement", but I fail to see why.

      It is indicitive of where the problems with US companies lay that many of the same auto workers seem to be able to produce much better (more reliable) cosumer cars with nothing more than a change of management.

    21. Re:No way. by TheSync · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there are all kinds of skills needed in textile mills, but there is a big difference between a few months of on-the-job training and, for instance, knowing organic chemistry.

      The textile quotas kept a false sense of security for these jobs. They should have left the country about 30 years ago. It put off the inevitable, leaving a population ill-prepared for the modern American information, business, and service economy.

    22. Re:No way. by TheSync · · Score: 1

      The main value-add of software technology is in the business process analysis done before any code is written. That is, knowing how to use technology to achieve business results and efficiency.

      Once you have planned a technological transition, the actual coding is often not that tough. Some experience is needed to do it well, non-buggy, and secure. But there isn't a need in most business software development to know some super-efficient algorithm.

      That said, there are some kinds of software (scientific, massive modeling, high-performance servers, etc.) where you do need to really be a "computer scientist" and not a "coder." These are rare, especially in the age of nearly limitless amounts of CPU, RAM, and HD.

    23. Re:No way. by dasunt · · Score: 1

      I am told that other countries are losing manufacturing jobs as well[1]. China has lost more factory jobs then it has gained lately.

      China's loss isn't to other countries, but to itself. As automation becomes cheap and more common, the efficiency of the works increase, and thus less workers are needed for the same output.

      [1] At least, according to NPR.

    24. Re:No way. by Joey7F · · Score: 1
      No, it happened with the call centres because American customers disliked dealing with Indian call centre staff.


      No doubt there, but had the difference in payment been much larger, you would keep the jobs there. Indians are hard to understand (I am an engineer in training so I have gotten used to them) which frustrates users. They could get Indians that sound more british but that would cost more so they determined it is better to bring back jobs to the US.

      Probably a good decision...

      --Joey
  31. Re:Petition by palutke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now would be a good time to put together a petition and send it to the various candidates and demand that there be some restrictions to all the tech jobs going overseas.

    Good luck. Unless you accompany your petition with big sacks full of money, don't expect any results (other than a polite letter -- maybe). Those same candidates/elected officals didn't act when manufacturing jobs went offshore, why would they act now?

    --
    'I ain't a liar, baby, and I ain't proud I just want what I'm not allowed.' -- Violent Femmes, 36-24-36
  32. Re:Ok, stupid question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A City in India ("Garden City of India").

    http://www.mapsofindia.com/maps/india/india-poli ti cal-map.htm

    (remove the space)

    Look straight up from the southern tip about 200-250 miles north.

  33. Salary? by jerkychew · · Score: 1

    If you quantify Bangalore's 'takeover' of Silicon Valley solely based on the number of techs, then yes, Bangalore looks to be in the lead. But if you quantify it in dollar amounts (average salary per tech x number of techs), I'd bet that The Valley still has a pretty sizeable lead.

    1. Re:Salary? by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      But if you factor in standard of living, The Valley is very expensive, and those high salaries won't go as far.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
  34. Overlords by Frequanaut · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new Indian techie overlords.

    (oh and the new Chinese manufacturing overlords too)

    1. Re:Overlords by jea6 · · Score: 1

      Did you hear the new one? China is losing manufacturing jobs to Vietnam!

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    2. Re:Overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I for one welcome our new Indian techie overlords.

      You must be nuts.

    3. Re:Overlords by szo · · Score: 1

      realistic, I would say. Finally, one "I for one..." joke, that is not joke.

      Szo

      --
      Red Leader Standing By!
  35. From the second page: "And, Indians learned a lot about the applications they were helping to fix"

    That, my friends, is why you never send your strategic assets/software to out-sourcers!
    Sue, you say? HA! If you actually win, try enforcing it - especially in a third world country!

    --

    There is no spoon or sig.

  36. Of course, by TheVidiot · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new Indian masters!

    1. Re:Of course, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit. There's nothing to show that a meme based off of a TV quote is out of date than when someone who has obviously never seen the original source tries to make the same joke and fucks up the quote. It's "overlords", not "masters."

      YOU FAIL IT.

    2. Re:Of course, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for taking 2 minutes out of your life to point that out, asswipe.

  37. No wonder, Bangalore is just like Silicon Valley. by foxtrot · · Score: 1

    With the wages they get paid in Bangalore, a computer professional there can't afford a house, either.

  38. We just need to get their productivity lower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like here in the US: Introduce websites like Slashdot and Fark in Hindi. ;)

    1. Re:We just need to get their productivity lower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint: English is the language that the largest number of people can read in India.

  39. show of hands.. by andy1307 · · Score: 2, Informative

    How many people know the difference between tech support and IT?

  40. gotta love free trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Thanks Mr Bush! Lets take lot of jobs and move them overseas so that big companies can flurish here in the U.S. at the expense of the American worker.

    Yes probably flamebait, but sometimes people are labelled that because they speak the truth.

    1. Re:gotta love free trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You voted for him, remember? At least he makes you feel proud of the great US military, eh?

      You prick only get what you deserve.

    2. Re:gotta love free trade by avi33 · · Score: 1

      Believe me, there's a lot to hate him for, but you're just ignant if you try and lay this at his feet.

      It's pretty basic global economy theory. Tariffs and protectionist barriers are not highly regarded by economists. You sound like a textile worker in the 60's or an auto worker in the 80's. Free trade is good, despite what you may think.

      Consider this, if the global economy improves, then the welfare of all humans improve. If nascent countries have viable economies, then perhaps it wouldn't be so easy to round up a bunch of kids and give them machine guns, bombs, and suicidal ideologies.

      America, in general, excels at adapting and innovating, but that's not to the exclusion of anyone else doing so. There are plenty of reasons to keep close watch on our corporate masters, so they don't swindle us out of medical coverage and retirement benefits, but in the long run, protectionist legislation will just turn us into an overburdened economic island.

      In an extreme example, it could get to the point where your beloved protections screw you. Want that japanese TV? Sorry, the government has slapped a 100% tax on it to protect US jobs. The problem is, the American TV manufacturer no longer needs to innovate so strongly, so you get a shitty TV that costs 50% more than it has to. The more protectionist barriers we construct, the more we'll need down the road.

    3. Re:gotta love free trade by michael_cain · · Score: 1
      It's pretty basic global economy theory. Tariffs and protectionist barriers are not highly regarded by economists. You sound like a textile worker in the 60's or an auto worker in the 80's. Free trade is good, despite what you may think.

      Of course, there's Wynne Godley's (who's certainly entitled to have an opinion on the subject) take:

      It is a well kept secret that the theory of international trade -- the entire story about the benefits every country can gain by exchanging goods with other countries -- depends upon the assumptions: A) that trade between countries is balanced and B) that trade does not alter the level of employment or unemployment.

      Certainly the first condition is not currently satisfied, at least in terms of goods and services. There is a convincing argument that the rest of the world has, in fact, been "loaning" us the difference in the trade balance by using their excess dollars to buy US government and private debt. As to the second, if offshoring results in countries like China and India "exporting" their own unemployment and underemployment problems to the US, then the US does not necessarily see a net benefit from trade. If exporting that type of macroeconomic variable is possible, the US has a serious problem -- estimates of unemployment in China run as high as 150M people, almost as many as are employed in the US. The manufacturing jobs that went overseas were replaced, at least in part, by knowledge-based jobs in the service sector. If these jobs are gone permenantly, it remains to be seen if we can replace them with something else of comparable value.

  41. Re:I beat Bangalore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India. What is it all about... is it good, or is it whack?

  42. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by Tom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So how many of their languages do you speak?

    Which puts you in exactly what position complaining about other peoples foreign language skills?

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  43. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by pete-classic · · Score: 1

    They speak English in India.

    See the CIA factbook entry on India.

    -Peter

  44. Re:I'm a Republican! (A poem) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I'm gonna have those words stuck in my head all day.

  45. Re:Petition by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1
    Those same candidates/elected officals didn't act when manufacturing jobs went offshore, why would they act now?


    There is a difference. The "carrot" was that America was going High Tech and that was our future. Now that ALL white collar jobs are under assault, what is the "carrot"?
  46. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by Malc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Show of hands please: how many of you have had to deal with these American techies (managers?). Is it possible to understand those "real nice" redneck boys down in the deep south? Very frustrating! I spend too much time on the phone because of them.

    Interesting point that keeps cropping up in my meetings with Americans: tabling something in a meeting means exactly the opposite there. I guess we all have to learn how to communicate better with each other.

  47. Dont worry, Bush will let 'em come here ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not for long !!! Our President will fix
    the problem ...

    http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/mexico/200401 06 -0511-bush-immigration.html

    WASHINGTON - President Bush is proposing to let foreign workers who have U.S. jobs waiting for them enter America

    1. Re:Dont worry, Bush will let 'em come here ... by catherder_finleyd · · Score: 1

      That measure will be DOA, if we act. I am writing my Congress-Critters. I suggest others do likewise. If you don't have addresses (e-mail, snail mail) you can go to http://www.congress.org.

  48. Great news for the economy by dada21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With the ability to get cheaper labor off short in the tech world, the prices for certain tech consumer goods (from software to DVDs to car computer brains) will fall, allowing prices to fall as well.

    This will allow the average consumer to spend more of their money on other items, including entertainment, debt reduction, maybe even more money towards a mortgage or a new car. Jobs moving to other countries is only good news -- I can only hope we see more of it as it will allow people here in the States to find new things to do with their overpriced labor.

    Maybe we'll even see that we don't deserve as much as we earn, and that we're not so special.

    Tibor Machan has a great article on Job Security and why this phrase is false. If you can not produce a desired product at a price that the buyers are willing to pay, you are not really producing anything but waste. American techs are paid way too much for what really has become a blue collar job in many cases.

    Just like tariffs on imported steel and imported sugar have destroyed jobs in this country (by making cars here too expensive, and even Fannie Mae chocolates has closed down today because sugar is too expensive), putting tariffs on imported tech software will do the same. Allow consumers of technology to decide what they are willing to pay. U.S. firms can even promote a "Buy American" program if people really care.

    I know I don't. I want to see prices fall on technology so I can focus my spending on other areas -- more dinners are local restaurants, maybe more concerts or theatre.

    Remember, the Living Wage is a MYTH.

    1. Re:Great news for the economy by catherder_finleyd · · Score: 1

      You, like a lot of free traders, assume that the benefits of free trade will flow to everyone. The problem is that those benefits may not flow to everyone. If the benefits flow to just the CEOs and Plutocrats, as is apparently happening, the average joe loses out in every way!

    2. Re:Great news for the economy by dada21 · · Score: 1

      Why is the average Joe not working harder? If they are average, they should expect the average pay as the average people in other countries do. Why is average Joe American worth more than average Joe Indian?

      Here's a simple explanation of it all:

      Gene Callahan, author of Economics for Real People has written a great story explaining the realities of how government is at fault for job losses, not foreign competition. It is a really easy read, and puts in simple terms why we shouldn't shun job losses to other nations, but support them.

    3. Re:Great news for the economy by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1
      This will allow the average consumer to spend more of their money on other items, including entertainment, debt reduction, maybe even more money towards a mortgage or a new car. Jobs moving to other countries is only good news

      Unless your unemployed, what good is cheap stuff if you can't buy it!

      Mortgage or a new car? Real good let's add more debt! If the average american weren't in hock up to butt already, let's add some more.

    4. Re:Great news for the economy by dada21 · · Score: 1

      Unless your unemployed, what good is cheap stuff if you can't buy it!

      Ok, so you are telling me that if you could purchase a light bulb from Taiwan for $1, or an identical American one for $6, you would pick the American one? How about the TV you own? Or the CD player?

      You pay as much as you think an item is worth. If you make CD players, and someone says they can make them cheaper in another country, you may end up being un-employed in the CD player manufacturing job you had. Making sure you are prepared to change jobs is not something you should fear -- if you did a good job making CD players, it means you are intelligent enough to find another job in a similar field, or move to one of the fields where consumers can now spend more money on since they are spending less on CD players.

      You have no right to earn a living worth more than another. I have no desire to spend more money just to keep you happy, I'd rather focus my spending on me.

    5. Re:Great news for the economy by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >Ok, so you are telling me that if you could purchase a light bulb from Taiwan for $1, or an identical American one for $6, you would pick the American one? How about the TV you own? Or the CD player?

      I think you missed his point. If I was unemployeed, I would by neither because I can't afford it. I rather spend my money on food rather than a TV (or cable).

      >You pay as much as you think an item is worth.

      IF you decide to pay for it. If I dont' pay for it, I don't spend. I don't spend that is bad for the economy.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    6. Re:Great news for the economy by dada21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is no reason to be unemployed in any economy. If you can not make ends meet because your tech job was moved overseas, you can bide the time by working one or two jobs at a restaurant or a retail store. Intelligent hard working people will not stay unemployed long. I have friends who were techs during the dot com boom, and after they lost their jobs they moved back home with their parents. Some got jobs right away (working retail or even a new tech job). Others continued to try to live the lavish lifestyle they used to, much to the ruin of their credit and financial future.

      There is no reason to be unemployed today. If your skills are no longer paying the bills, it is time to find new skills.

    7. Re:Great news for the economy by Khazunga · · Score: 2, Insightful
      With the ability to get cheaper labor off short in the tech world, the prices for certain tech consumer goods (from software to DVDs to car computer brains) will fall, allowing prices to fall as well.
      You're wrongly assuming that the price of goods is in any way dependant on the manufacturing cost. Price is dictated by market -- supply and demand. The only constraint is: if your manufacturing costs exceed the price, your profit margin is negative and your product is dead.

      There are a whole lot of products that have gigantic profit margins, proving my statement. Think about the production cost of a Ferrari. Think about the production cost of a good Porto. Think about the production cost of designer clothing. Examples are everywhere...

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    8. Re:Great news for the economy by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      There is no other possible explanation for prosperity than free trade. Whenever it is absent, people are poor. Whenever it is present, people prosper. Yes, I agree with you that I cannot show that specific people have benefitted by specific trades. That's the nature of the beast.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    9. Re:Great news for the economy by dada21 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it is wrong to assume that the long term price of goods is connected to manufacturing cost. Short term, you want to make your product visible and desired through marketing and distribution, as well as R&D. Once your product is picked up by the resellers and retailers, you will hope to recoup the initial costs you spent to produce and market the product.

      Should your competition provide the product cheaper to retail, the stores will love to sell the cheaper product for near the same price as your more expensive initial one. Consumers will decide what they want to pay for each product (supply and demand). If consumers are willing to pay a little less for the cheaper one, your more expensive product will not be rebought by retail stores. If various stores sell your product, competition will bring the profit margins down, and supply and demand will once again dictate how much the product should cost to produce.

      I don't see how manufacturing costs can not be related to price in the long run. When we're discussing jobs moving to other countries, of course it starts with profit margin, but in the long run it is producing similar product quality for a cheaper price.

    10. Re:Great news for the economy by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's a tough sell to someone who just just spent their life savings (or debt) earning a now- worthless tech degree.

      Finding new skills costs money. It's quite scary when your skills are rendered obsolete faster than your ability to pay off the debt earned to acquire such skills.

    11. Re:Great news for the economy by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      "I don't spend that is bad for the economy."

      Oh? What happens to your money if you don't spend it? Follow the thought to its conclusion. If you don't spend your money but instead leave it in a bank, the bank borrows it from you, and lends it to someone *else* to spend. They make money from renting your money to someone else, and your money is put to good productive use.

      The ideas that not spending is bad for the economy is a damnfool idea promulgated by people who call themselves economists.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    12. Re:Great news for the economy by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >There is no reason to be unemployed in any economy.

      Regardless of what you believe in or what you THINK should be the case, there ARE people who are unemployeed. I think the unemployement rate is 6% in the US.

      And these 6% are people who will not buy that $100 TV set because they can't afford it. That hurts the economy.

      >If your skills are no longer paying the bills, it is time to find new skills.

      Or its time to reduce or eliminate the bills.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    13. Re:Great news for the economy by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      No, you don't understand. For certain tech consumer goods, the price over time falls to the cost of manufacturing. What you're missing is that the cost of manufacturing a Ferrari includes the price of (in essence) licensing the Ferrari name. For designer clothing (certainly not "certain tech consumer goods", but I'll run with it anyway), the clothing never stays on the market long enough for competition to reduce the price. In essence, the designer is always making a very high entrepreneurial profit.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    14. Re:Great news for the economy by dada21 · · Score: 1

      Unemployment is made worse by minimum wage laws, as well as by excessive regulation caused by tariffs, taxes, and other hidden costs to running a business. We need to get government out of the economy and the labor market, and allow businesses to run more efficiently. Tossing the minimum wage laws out will allow more unskilled workers to get entry level jobs and work hard to get the skills they need to move up.

      As for the 6% unemployment rate, if any of the unemployed people I know are in that figure, they are unemployed because they're asking for more money than they are worth. I see "Help Wanted" signs all over even my small town in the boonies -- I'm sure that big cities have numerous jobs available for those who are too proud to get real jobs.

      On top of that, welfare and mandatory unemployment insurance make it even harder to rehire these people or give them incentive to find work.

    15. Re:Great news for the economy by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >They make money from renting your money to someone else, and your money is put to good productive use.

      And who do they lend it out to?

      People who will make things that I will not buy?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    16. Re:Great news for the economy by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      Well, it's not true that we should prefer job losses to other nations. Instead, people should always seek the greatest profit on each and every trade, modulo the transaction cost of doing so.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    17. Re:Great news for the economy by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed. On the other hand, many jobs are open to people who simply have a four-year college degrees. So your degree is not "worthless" but is instead worth less.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    18. Re:Great news for the economy by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      They lend it to someone who sees an opportunity to be productive, that is, to create things that you WILL buy. Note that there's a time delay between them spending money on something, and selling it. That's what makes it capital spending.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    19. Re:Great news for the economy by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I want to see prices fall on technology so I can focus my spending on other areas -- more dinners at local restaurants...

      Served to you by ex-programmers.

    20. Re:Great news for the economy by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Stop providing loaded, biased links to support your claims. It's like someone saying Linux sucks and then giving you a link at microsoft.com to 'prove' it.

    21. Re:Great news for the economy by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      Like what the other guys were saying, in essence, is that you're only right in the cases of luxury products (Ferrari cars, gucci clothing, prada bags). There's no such equivalent in software/IT/tech operations.

      That being the case, the glut of supply (from entrepeneurial US and Indian companies) will most definitely bring the price down. You were right in saying price is determing by demand/supply.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    22. Re:Great news for the economy by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      No, you don't understand. For certain tech consumer goods, the price over time falls to the cost of manufacturing.

      That is a very small percentage of the tech good market. For example a so called 'commodity' PC as sold by Best Buy has many components in it whose cost is much greater than the manufacturing cost. The disk drive has Winchester technologies licensed from IBM. Intel gets a 62% gross margin on it's CPUs. Microsoft gets an 80+% margin on the OS. Phillips gets something for that CD logo. Best Buy itself makes a profit on everything it sells.

      Get out your Econ 101 book. Price is determined by the intersection of the supply and demand curves. The supply curve is a plot of supply vs. price and time. When a new tech product hits the market the supply/price curve is high. With time it drops as manufacturing techniques improve. That doesn't make price equivalent to manufacturing cost though - there are many many other factors involved.

      If companies overbuild capacity price can drop below manufacturing cost (like what has happened with DRAM several times).

      If we had a frictionless market system where nobody wanted to make a profit, capital costs were zero, time to build a factory was zero, there were no cartels, no taxes, no patents, no subsidies, no tariffs etc. THEN maybe we could have a situation where price and manufacturing cost were directly related. But we don't have that. So price and manufacturing cost can't be directly correlated.

    23. Re:Great news for the economy by Khazunga · · Score: 1
      I don't see how manufacturing costs can not be related to price in the long run. When we're discussing jobs moving to other countries, of course it starts with profit margin, but in the long run it is producing similar product quality for a cheaper price.
      It's very easy for the manufacturing cost not to have a significant effect on price, even in the long run. You just have to make it for the price to be a minor decision factor for the consumer. This is especially true for luxury items, such as fashion clothing, luxury travel or collectible items. Quality, style, fashion, rarity are all factors that may supercede price when it comes to choose a product or service.
      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    24. Re:Great news for the economy by Khazunga · · Score: 1
      Like what the other guys were saying, in essence, is that you're only right in the cases of luxury products (Ferrari cars, gucci clothing, prada bags). There's no such equivalent in software/IT/tech operations.
      Luxury goods are one example of items where price is not a significant factor in the purchase decision. In tech products, the only factor that I can see may supercede price is (perceived) quality/brand name. For Joe Consumer, brand names mean a lot, and this alone may sustain a price higher than would be dictated by competition (see B&O products or Sony consumer goods).
      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
  49. How many times should we say... by shri · · Score: 1, Funny

    Its not the size that matters... its how you use it.

  50. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by TopShelf · · Score: 1

    He is in the perfect position to complain, as a customer requesting technical support. He shouldn't have to learn a foreign language just to get help reviving an ailing system.

    That said, I've had very good experiences in the past with "follow the sun" tech support from HP when I was a night-shift HP3000 operator. I suspect that widely used platforms requiring more support staff would be tougher to handle well.

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  51. Re:Petition by catherder_finleyd · · Score: 1

    If the petition is backed up with a LOT of letters to Congressional and State Representatives, it may get somewhere. We did roll back H1B to 65,000 from 195,000 last fall. The fact that the middle class is getting affected has greatly increased the number of people concerned with this issue. The representatives HAVE to notice, if they want to keep their jobs!

  52. Economist article by Infonaut · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The Economist, as usual, has the goods. This article lays it out pretty clearly. Things are rapidly changing in India, but for only a small percentage of people.

    What I find most curious is the incredibly rapid turnaround in opinion seen on Slashdot. During the dot-com boom, everyone was happy to see Open Source, a truly global phenomenon, bloooming. But now I see this strange bifurcation of views. Open Source software created by people from all over the globe is still good. On the other hand global commerce, in which the lowest-cost providers of goods and services win, is being villified.

    So when a Chinese company (operating in non-democratic government) manufactures the inexpensive hardware that powers your gaming PC, that's fine. But when Indian programmers (operating in a democratic society) start beating out American programmers for jobs, there are some sort of insidious forces at work?

    When principals butt up against pocketbooks is the time when you see what people truly believe.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Economist article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You my friend are as illiterate as you are misguided.

    2. Re:Economist article by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      I don't know if villification of out-sourcing is linked to open source. There are plenty of closed source projects that been out-sourced to the four winds.

      The slow out-source/in-house cycle has been going on for decades. It'll be interesting when the tide changes this time.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Economist article by Night+Goat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wouldn't call it a turnaround in opinion, just another facet of the "Slashdot hive-mind" that you didn't notice before. It's not like people on Slashdot were cheering before when their jobs were just starting to go to India. Open-source is totally different than international outsourcing.

    4. Re:Economist article by Neil+Watson · · Score: 1

      Out sourcing and Open Source are different. Open Source represents many people in many countires producing code that we can all use. Out sourcing represents enhancing the wealth of a small group of people. Really they are at opposite ends of the political spectrum.

    5. Re:Economist article by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What does Open Source software have to do with our (in the average case) closed-source programming jobs going overseas to people who will write closed-source code for our former companies for less money? Open Source is good. At least if I lose my job to OSS, I know that I have full (and free) access to what replaced me and I know that on the balance the world has been done good by making a quality product available for less and with more eyes capable of scrutinizing it for bugs. If I lose my job to outsourcing, I can see that the customer is unlikely to see a reduction in price (or bugs) for the product, and the market is favoring poorer labor conditions. Overall, the world has not benefitted by my loss, so why should I like it? In this latter case, my principles and my pocketbook are both in agreement that this is a bad thing.

      By the way, if you're of the opinion that Slashdot readers are fine with what makes Chinese hardware inexpensive, then you haven't paid attention to the articles on the failure of cheap parts, the hidden costs of poor labor practices, and the environmental impact of computing articles on Slashdot. I'd buy non-Second/Third World goods if I could, but there's honestly many place where you simply can't get an alternative.

      (Thanks for the article, though.)

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    6. Re:Economist article by Tsu-na-mi · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's the fact that there are a growing number of programmers in India that is the problem. What people see is the problem is American Boards of Directors cutting jobs and sending them to India with little forethought to the consequences. Their rationale may be that they're saving the company money and helping stockholders, but that's false. Their actions may bump the stock price in the short term, but they hurt the long-term ability of the company to function. Their motivation is simple: fat bonuses and stock options linked to short-term performance. And if they screw up, they still have golden parachutes.

      --
      I've built up so much character I have an alter-ego
    7. Re:Economist article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's still modded up further than anyone else who knows what s/he's talking about. How sad, and all too common.

    8. Re:Economist article by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I certainly don't have a problem with a globalized economy. That's not the issue. The issue is that local experienced workers are being replaced by remote inexperienced workers. It's the same dot.bomb stupidity where seasoned software engineers with more than a decade of experience were replaced by junior college dropouts who managed to have taken a summer class in Java.

      The current fad is to ship off the core innovative work to people with absolutely no stake in company. It would be like Ford and GM outsourcing their automotive design work to Mexico instead of just the manufacturing. Software engineering is not manufacturing, it's engineering.

      The problem is that companies really don't understand what software is. They think it's a manufactured product, so their Harvard MBA playbook says to ship off manufacturing elsewhere.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    9. Re:Economist article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got a mess in your head about outsourcing: ANY loss of Amercan jobs is bad. China produces cheap goods, India writes cheap code, but people in the US are the consumers! When enough of us get on Welfare or move to a low-wage non-tech jobs, even these cheap items will become unaffordable. And in case of a war, America will not have a thing called STRATEGIC BASE: professional workers and specialists plus manufacturing facilities. And that is bad.

    10. Re:Economist article by Merk · · Score: 1

      Interesting choice of phrase: "Their jobs". Who says the jobs are theirs? The jobs belong to whoever managers decide to give them to. The managers often make shortsighted decisions, sure, but that's life. If your salary requirements, low as they may be, have priced you out of a job... fight it, or accept it and move on. Most of the world either works at jobs they hate, or jobs that barely pay them enough to get by. Geeks were lucky to avoid that for a while, but maybe that time is over. *shrug* Learn new skills, move, live more cheaply, deal with it.

    11. Re:Economist article by DrCode · · Score: 1

      They're not "beating out American programmers", because the companies that are outsourcing aren't giving Americans a chance. I'm fortunate to still be employed, and to still be getting a good salary. But I'd be willing to work at 1/4 of my current rate if the alternative was being on unemployment, or serving burgers and fries.

      Do you know any out-of-work software developers, or have you looked for work lately? People aren't even getting phone interviews, regardless of what's on their resumes.

    12. Re:Economist article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least if I lose my job to OSS, I know that [...] and I know that on the balance the world has been done good by making a quality product available for less [...].

      But yet your job loss that creates 5 jobs in India, 2 of them pulling someone out of poverty does not give you a similar "feel good" sensation? Maybe you should revise the priority of your values.

      Note: Statistics are that 10 jobs are actually created in third world cty for each job loss here, but it's probably less in India with the salaries getting so high and all...

  53. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? WORSE by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

    What is worse is when the language barrier isn't as bad, but they have absolutely no pride or care in their work. I recently called my company's help desk, which appears to be 100% outsourced to India. They give their employees great stage names like "Jason" and "Robert".

    I called them regarding a problem with the LDAP server. They looked it up in their cookbook... there is no such thing as an LDAP server. The company doesn't have one! Surprise, surprise. (Yes, they flat out told me that the company didn't have one.) So I tell them (because I happen to know) that it is managed by the same people who do the exchange servers. I ask to speak to a back-line engineer.

    They say that they cannot give this issue to a back line engineer because there is no escalation path for this issue. Because there is no escalation path, they can't do anything with the problem. So it isn't their issue.

    About as far as I got was to convince them to give me to a second line engineer, unfortuantely, also from Indea. He at least had some vauge knowledge of what an LDAP server was.

    In the end, I just hung up on them. They waste my time with their ignorance. I emailed a manager's address I found in the messaging group, and got real help from there.

  54. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by Shisha · · Score: 1

    Why on Earth is this insightful? This has nothing to do with Banglore.

    Fact one Banglore is more than call centres. Call centres are not R&D. Fact two, you get a lot of Asian techies who work directly in the UK and US. Fact three when an Indian is speaking to an Indian they don't have trouble understanding each other because of accent. Fact four: hell, understanding Americans is sometimes so difficult, because their words have a different meaning then they do here (UK). Try: "damn mate, my car got nicked last night!" Totally different meaning. So much for misunderstanding.

    The reason why Banglore is on its way up is that software development is becoming, in a sense, more "labour intensive" than manufacturing (you need programs to drive robots). Nowadays an OS, database and one custom application does not cut it any more. You have dozens of custom apps. They have to integrate with several databases well. They all have to interact with each other, not to mention customers. Result: a _lot_ of people needed for bugfixing, support etc. They don't have to be rocket scientists, just clever and quick.

    On the other hand Silicon Valley is on its way down, because companies don't have as much money to invest into research as they used to have. Besides a lot of R&D has been done in the 90s, now it there is a lot to be reaped just from polishing things.

  55. Definition of a Lakh by orblee · · Score: 1

    A Lakh is 100,000 and a crore is 10,000,000 (hundred thousand and ten million respectively).

    Wages are low in India, but so is the cost of living. They have a serious class distinction there so the people who build, maintain, and produce and distribute food are paid just enough to keep them alive (and they're often living in slum accomodation and so pay little or no rent). This means that a an Indidan developer might not be able to afford much, but they should be able to pay the rent on their flats/apparments (especially if the company helps them out there).

    $1 is about 50 rupees and you can buy a good meal for two in a standard restaurant/cafe for that price. You can get some clothes for that price too. The more tech jobs that move out there, especially with any assisted education that the government might have to help with to help fuel the growth will mean that it won't always be so cheap to employ Indians over there.

    This is a side-effect of global trade. Us in wealthy countries get the benefit of cheap products and labour, but eventually as more of us use the labour in India, they get wealthier and demand more and so India will be a proper first world economy and will start importing its developers and workers from poorer countries (like malaysia or indonesia perhaps).

    1. Re:Definition of a Lakh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Malaysia isn't a poor country compared to India. GDP/population is almost 4 times higher in Malaysia.

      Don't forget that 100% of AMD CPUs are assembled in Malaysia.

    2. Re:Definition of a Lakh by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1


      And a fine day it'll be when they need to start hiring engineers from western countries for solutions to the y2l problem.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  56. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by horatio · · Score: 1

    aye. That was one of my first thoughts reading the summary - how fed up I am with American companies hiring techs to support their American customers, but the techs don't know English. I've dealt with Indian, Asian, native speakers etc and its incredibly frustrating.

    I'm wondering if this isn't part of a plan on behalf of the companies to build in planned obselense. How many calls does joe average consumer have to make to tech support before he gives up and buys another computer/etc, figuring (or being told by the tech) the computer/etc must not be fixable? Planned obselense (intentionally designing products to fail, in order to force the customer to purchase another) was outlawed in the US a while ago, but this seems like perhaps a back door to the same thing?

    --
    There is very little future in being right when your boss is wrong.
  57. Won't somebody think of our future by GreenCrackBaby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've always wanted to post this in an "offshoring" /. article, but have always arrived late to the game.

    Firstly, a disclaimer: good on India. I hold nothing against them for accepting, with open arms, North American tech jobs as fast as CEOs rush to send them over.

    That being said, I believe we (ie. North Americans) are being fucking morons about this. We are willingly shipping them high skilled jobs so Mr. CEO can report a quick profit the next quarter. In the mean time, we are losing an entire generation of "junior" positions. I believe that will spell the end of software development in North America.

    My current job is that of a software architect. It is a high-skill job requiring very specialised knowledge in the area where we make software. I got to my current job by starting as a junior programmer at this company. After 3 years I was bumped up to "intermediate" developer. After 3 more it was a bump to "senior" developer. Now they think I know enough to design the systems I build.

    Two years ago my company opened an office in Bangalore (we have offices across the globe). All new hiring has been through that office, and they ship the programmers from India to various other offices for training on projects. In another years time, programmers in that India office will have performed enough implimentations to be considered "intermediate" developers. In a few more years they'll be senior, and in a few more they'll be in my position.

    As this is going on in India, all our own new grads will be working at Starbucks serving lattes, and will be left out of the loop.

    All for the sake of a quick stock boost. Good on India, shame on us!

    --

    "The market alone cannot provide sufficient constraints on corporation's penchant to cause harm." -- Joel Bakan
    1. Re:Won't somebody think of our future by DigitalGodBoy · · Score: 1

      "...all our own new grads will be working at Starbucks serving lattes..."

      What I wonder is how much coffee all those CEOs/execs will have to drink to keep those grads in a job.

      --
      "liberty and justice for all those who can afford it"
    2. Re:Won't somebody think of our future by Faramir · · Score: 1

      Interesting observation. I was wondering how it is that there are absolutely no entry level jobs in Austin. This might help explain it. I should also look to the consulting/staffing companies, who are probably filling most entry-level positions. Hm. I suppose this just makes me more depressed at the prospect of me ever getting a meaningful job. At least I have one though =).

      <soapbox>
      And no, they won't think of the future. I'm tired of all the generalizations about offshoring and everything else, without any facts to back them up most of the time. But I'll make one anyway: it will take a serious paradigm shift in the USA for Americans (me) to start thinking about the future and holding those responsible for it accountable to it.
      </soapbox>

    3. Re:Won't somebody think of our future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You where close...I'm working at Wal-Mart and graduated a year ago...

    4. Re:Won't somebody think of our future by ShadyG · · Score: 1
      We are willingly shipping them high skilled jobs so Mr. CEO can report a quick profit the next quarter.

      No, actually Mr. CEO is shipping them high skilled jobs, and "we" support his freedom to determine whom he does and does not hire.
    5. Re:Won't somebody think of our future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...all our own new grads will be working at Starbucks serving lattes...

      - Have you looked at the demography of grad students at top-ranked US universities - half of them are Indians and the rest Chinese. So you don't really have to worry about it :)

    6. Re:Won't somebody think of our future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I wonder is how much coffee all those CEOs/execs will have to drink to keep those grads in a job.

      No..the question should be, "How many coffees are those executives going to have to drink to keep those grad students from going postal and shooting the execs because they are poor, frustrated and pissed?"

    7. Re:Won't somebody think of our future by synergy3000 · · Score: 1

      Actually its not just about Mr CEO and MR and Mrs Shareholder. It is about YOU too! You want cheaper software and cheaper goods? Well than shutup because you just encouraged Company X to send jobs to cheaper countries.

    8. Re:Won't somebody think of our future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll also support his freedom to have his sphincter tighten to the point where it emits a constant low hum. This will be about the moment he realizes the entire technical industry has been shipped elsewhere, and that industry announces 10,000% price increases.

    9. Re:Won't somebody think of our future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      considering your spelling of "were", I can see why you work for Wal Mart.

    10. Re:Won't somebody think of our future by HiThere · · Score: 1

      The key point of your was this:
      and holding those responsible for it accountable to it

      Things have been very carefully manipulated so that there is little practical way to do this. Outside of highly illegal means, that is.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    11. Re:Won't somebody think of our future by HiThere · · Score: 1

      What products do you suggest that we buy which WOULDN'T send jobs to cheaper countries?

      When I can, I buy locally. When I can't... does it make that much difference to me whether the jobs go to Japan or India or China? or even Britain (though I can't think of any examples)?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    12. Re:Won't somebody think of our future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats like asking what should they have done to prevent the titanic from sinking. Its done already sunk.

    13. Re:Won't somebody think of our future by Nept · · Score: 1

      We are willingly shipping them high skilled jobs so Mr. CEO

      We? More like a small minority of corporate owners are shipping out a large majority of American jobs. Don't know where the 'we' comes in, unless you are part of the corporate clique.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    14. Re:Won't somebody think of our future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Graduated from ITT Tech?

  58. Re:Silly foreigner... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RULED

    enjoy unemployment

  59. I don't know if by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Funny
    anybody should be celebrating that they have more nerds than another place. It's like posting up a big sign that says:

    "Attractive Women: Stay away. Nerd Crossing"

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:I don't know if by pkphilip · · Score: 1

      Incidentally one curious fact that I have noticed about the Indian programmers is this - at least 30 percent of them are women, which I believe is an higher ratio than in most other parts of the world. This is primarily because IT jobs are one of the most women-friendly occupations in India.

    2. Re:I don't know if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like posting up a big sign that says: "Attractive Women: Stay away. Nerd Crossing"

      How depressing. First no women, and now no job. How long before a US techie goes postal and takes out an Indian eatery?

    3. Re:I don't know if by ajagci · · Score: 1

      Maybe Indian women aren't as shallow. Maybe there are enough that don't go for the biggest pecs and most expensive car but are actually happy dating someone with a steady, well-paying job who they can have a conversation with.

    4. Re:I don't know if by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Nope. Geeks making $$$ seem to be attractive, and there are plenty of geek girls here as well.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  60. So What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big deal. What do they call an engenner over there? I put my money with a someone who knows what they are doing here in the states instead of some lacky who thinks he knows what he is doing. These dumb asses think just because some 3rd rate school over there hands them a degree they can call themselves engeneer. Sorry it dont work that way.

  61. Republicans have struck deals to postpone layoffs by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you think times are bad, just wait till the election is over. The Republicans have struck deals with several dozens of corporations to postpone their outsourcing decisions till the 2004 elections are over. Expect to see wave after wave of US layoffs in the wake of the elections... especially if Bush wins again.

    There was an article in the WSJ last month about exactly this. Apparantly, huge companies like IBM and Microsoft are keeping a low profile in India. MS has gone so far as to remove their names from the buses that they use in India to ferry programmers back and forth to work.

    Magnus.

  62. Re:Saving private ryan by CompWerks · · Score: 1
    You are also correct

    As indicated here (It's the first paragraph)

    --
    If you can read this sig - the bitch fell off.
  63. Sensationalism by toofanx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    True, the numbers seem huge, but they are quite meaningless. Quantity does not imply quality. I have seen projects with 100+ programmers being *completely* scrapped. I regularly interview candidates who can't write a simple program, in whatever language, but call themselves "Software Engineers". I have seen resumes of "MS Word Programmers".

    Frankly, I think this is nothing great - I am surprised it happened so recently. Like many other articles, this is yet another sensational article from the Times of India Group. Can't understand why Slashdot keeps posting from this paper.

    1. Re:Sensationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "..Quantity does not imply quality"
      Really, there is only so much of ingenuity and expertise that you require to write some program for some GUI, or design some website. And, the jobs that we are talking about mostly involve some low level stuff like this. These are not jobs involving writing code for programming a robot from LA to Vega s. Any bloke with an average IQ and a month's training can do the job. So, there is no use of cribbing about it. If they were not being able to do the job, they would have been phased out. The fact that they are still there speaks volumes.
      As regards high level programmers, you may be interested to look at the demography of Grad students in top US universities. If the percentage of US students doesn't go up, soon even the "high level" programming will jobs will be gone.

  64. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
    How many of you have dealt with these Asian techies and have been on the phone longer due to a misunderstanding between yourself and a techie?

    I always complain when I am on a tech support call with someone whose primary language is not American English. I may be an asshole for doing it but a number of customer complaints is what caused Dell to move jobs back from India.

    Unless and until India starts playing by the same rules the US plays by, anything is fair in this battle.

  65. The real winners in globalization by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 4, Insightful
    In the rush to globalization, the US has export most of it's manufacturing capabilities. Count how many products in your home are made in the USA.

    When we no longer produce anything of value here, what do we have to trade? One thing we can do is educate people, foriegn students continue to come to the US in greater numbers to learn. Another is tourism. How many Indian's want to vacation in Detroit? Our college costs keep rising to the point that it is becoming more and more difficult for the middle and lower middle class to get an education here. The middle and lower middle classes make up almost 70 percent of our population. Another thing we have is money lots of it. Not you or I, but the ones really pushing for globalization. The 1 percent of are population that controls most of the worlds wealth and now wants more. These people find a service economy great for them, the lower classes have and always will bow to their every need. In fact, if the cost of service employees gets to high, then they can always push for more immigration, it is especially easy to get haitian or mexican labor to replace those high priced citizenry. It helps to give them a california drivers license. Most of these individuals were born into their position. Do not think for a minute Bill Gates was born into a low or middle class family in the suburbs.

    By moving to a service economy where most of everything is imported, the middle class is left to struggle to maintain their status. More and more that is done with debt, easy credit for a good life now. Pay the rich forever.

    Globalization is great for up and coming economies, it was great for Japan, but they are now losing to Korea, Indonesia, India etc.

    The rich 1 percent would have you believe that this is all for the benefit of poor countries, ignoring the fact that when the labor costs and living standards rise in those countries, they'll be in the same boat. It will be a long time till we see programmers whose native language is Tutsi. But eventually they'll be a source of cheap labor too.

    So what we have in effect is the very rich deciding the middle class is not dependant enough so they have decided to take from the middle and give to the poor.

    Not exactly what Robin Hood advocated.

    1. Re:The real winners in globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make "moving to a service economy" sound like it's the next step. Simply put a service economy CANNOT sustain itself. I think the US is already on the downward spiral in moving dangerouly close to a service economy - after that comes the big crash. Probably the only thing really sustaining the U.S. is the ammount of people globally who invest in the dollar. It's probably only a matter of time before people decide to go with the euro instead, and then we're all screwed big time.

    2. Re:The real winners in globalization by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

      Exactly, we have seen a huge rise in the service sector and an equally large, if not bigger decline in manufacturing. Our college educational system has been getting more and more costly. The states in many cases have been severly cutting funding to state colleges. The dollar is the lowest it's been in decades. While foriegn currancies especially the euro continue to rise. The Bush administration wants to let mexicans work here legally if they have a job waiting. Would you as a businessman pay a legal US citizen $40,000 + benifits (401k, health insurance etc.) or offer a job to a mexican for $20,000 + (maybe health insurance it's required by law). We are shooting ourselves in the foot. But the only reason that it's happening is it profitable to those who are already filthy rich. And the more the US middle class is screwed, the richer they get.

    3. Re:The real winners in globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey is posting this comment going to become a daily thing for you now?

    4. Re:The real winners in globalization by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

      Good catch! But no, I am looking to discuss this and if nobody wants to seriously look at it, that's cool too. I only decided to use yesterdays post because it was so far down the queue nobody read it. (except I guess you)

    5. Re:The real winners in globalization by donutello · · Score: 1

      What a load of crap!

      Globalization is the great equalizer. It provides the opportunity for someone born in India or Africa or Indonesia to compete with people in so-called advanced countries on a more equal footing. Americans who have learned valuable skills have no problem keeping their jobs. Those with marginal skills are being replaced by more dedicated workers.

      It's very ironic that the same people who would like to see greater mobility between the classes and hate the idea of the "rich" always being "rich" and the "poor" always being "poor", at the same time have no compunctions about putting rules in place so that those in poor countries stay poor while those in rich countries stay rich.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    6. Re:The real winners in globalization by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      When we no longer produce anything of value here, what do we have to trade?

      How about food?

      The United States has more acres of farmland than most countries have acres, period. All the manufacturing jobs in the world can migrate out of the US, but if the people working at them have to trade with the US in order to eat, America will always have bargaining power.

      The 1 percent of are population that controls most of the worlds wealth and now wants more.

      They CONTROL it. In most cases they don't OWN it. The CEO of Sony, for example, may control billions of dollars, but can't do whatever he likes with it. The benefits of having those assets are shared by every single employee of Sony worldwide.

      There's a difference between influence exerted by corporations, and influence exerted by individuals. People need to understand this.

    7. Re:The real winners in globalization by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1
      I have no problem with a country creating their own economy. What I have a problem with is exporting ours.

      Globalization is the great equalizer. It provides the opportunity for someone born in India or Africa or Indonesia to compete with people in so-called advanced countries on a more equal footing.

      Explain how our companies and their board of directors who enjoy the benefits of being here, and retain all the profits are allowing the poor workers to compete equally! Especially when they don't have to provide health care, retirement or a decent wage to these people.

      What they are doing is selling out the employees that got them where they are. There was a time when employers cared about their employees fellow citizens

      Those with marginal skills are being replaced by more dedicated workers.

      You are very naive if you think that marginal workers are the only ones being replaced! Whole industries are being replaced, remember when we actually manufactered things in this country? Do you really think you cannot be replaced? Go tell 8% percent of this nation, (the latest unemployment figures) they are marginal.That's 24 million out of the 300 million legal US citizens.

      If these other nations are so greatful to globalization, why is it they riot at WTO summits?

    8. Re:The real winners in globalization by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1
      Are you a farmer? Less and less people are, comanies like Monsanto now own the majority of farms and migrant labor from mexico and puerto rico are a major source of their labor. How does an agricultural based economy support 300 million people here?

      They CONTROL it. In most cases they don't OWN it. The CEO of Sony, for example, may control billions of dollars, but can't do whatever he likes with it. The benefits of having those assets are shared by every single employee of Sony worldwide.

      Funny you should choose a foriegn company! I never said CEO's. I was refering to the ones that own most of the stock. The ones controlling the CEO's. The ones who pay big bonuses to CEO's for selling out the employees. The ones who don't like to get their hands dirty. Or their names in the media. There are a handful of people who have controlling interests in several companies and many, many banks. These are people whose income exceeds 10 Billion, most of these people inherited their wealth, and it is a large mystery how much they really have because it's diverified across industries and overseas accounts. In fact quite a few don't show up on forbes list because most the money is tied to a foundation trust. 5 of these people have the last name Walton, each has over 20 billion, and together that family is twice as rich as Bill Gates at his peak. BTW, Bill Gates was born very rich, he's not the geek turned rich, he would have you believe.

      There's a difference between influence exerted by corporations, and influence exerted by individuals. People need to understand this.

      I do understand, the individuals I'm refering too are the ones who are pulling the companies strings.

    9. Re:The real winners in globalization by donutello · · Score: 1

      You need to educate yourself on some facts.

      I have no problem with a country creating their own economy. What I have a problem with is exporting ours.

      There's no such thing. The US economy depends upon exporting goods and services to other countries and importing other goods and services which are produced more efficiently elsewhere. The economies of other countries depend on exporting goods and services to other countries and likewise importing goods and services. The US didn't get where it is by closing off its doors to the rest of the world. Some countries, like India for most of the past 50 years, did and paid for it with ruined economies.

      Explain how our companies and their board of directors who enjoy the benefits of being here, and retain all the profits are allowing the poor workers to compete equally! Especially when they don't have to provide health care, retirement or a decent wage to these people.

      First, they are competing equally. What that means is you can't just sit on your behind in San Francisco and expect to be paid 10 times what someone who works just as hard as you and is just as skilled as you makes in Bangalore. Secondly, you are really stupid if you think the average worker in Bangalore is not receiving adequate health care, retirement or a decent wage. Those people live very richly there. We are not talking about 10-year-old sweatshop workers in dangerous working conditions - we are talking about highly educated, highly skilled people who earn a salary in the top 10% of their country and are able to live a very good lifestyle.

      You are very naive if you think that marginal workers are the only ones being replaced! Whole industries are being replaced, remember when we actually manufactered things in this country? Do you really think you cannot be replaced? Go tell 8% percent of this nation, (the latest unemployment figures) they are marginal.That's 24 million out of the 300 million legal US citizens.

      Do you know why Japanese and German cars are much more reliable than US-made cars? Because Japanese and German workers are more highly skilled and parts are manufactured at a much higher tolerance there. American workers, in general, are less skilled and it will cost significantly more to pay a worker in Detroit to manufacture parts to the same tolerances. American workers will need to beef up their skills to compete and that's good for everyone concerned.

      If these other nations are so greatful to globalization, why is it they riot at WTO summits?

      They don't, in general. Most of the people who riot at WTO summits are stoned teenagers fighting "the man" and European farmers who like their nice subsidies which pay them to not produce food so food prices stay up. Membership to the WTO is entirely voluntary. A nation can choose not to join the WTO and maintain status quo with existing trade agreements if it chooses to. However, almost every country in the world realizes that while the WTO forces it to open up its own markets, it also enables that country to export to other markets which is in its interests.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
  66. Netcraft confirms it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    U$A is dying....

    Laugh - it's funny ;)

  67. My experience in Bangalore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work in Silicon Valley for a very large tech company, and in December 02 I spent a month flying hither and yon throughout India visiting all the major tech companies, so I think I can reasonably compare the two tech cultures.

    Firstly, the big tech titans over there are ALL dependent upon the US economy. WiPro, TCS, Zensar, Infosys, etc. are all oriented towards the export market. The managers over there pay way more attention to the health of the US economy than to the economy there in India.

    India has an amazing infrastructure for developing engineers. The IIT system, for example, is easily comparable to the best universities in the United States or elsewhere in the west.

    My colleagues in India make significantly less than I do, yet they do live in quite comfortable middle-class-land. Yes, they do have servants, but in India, this is pretty common and not limited to techies.

    The eagerness, drive and overall "geekness" of the technical people I worked with would be instantly recognized on /. - the geek drive seems to know no language or culture boundary.

    Currently, the average work experience of the Indian engineers I'd been working with was pretty low - they were all in their early-to-mid twenties. What this meant was that most of the architecture and design work (and hence the "innovation") was created in the States, and then shipped overseas for the implementation. But they're very hungry, and very driven (as I said earlier) - I suspect that we'll start to see a lot more original development and design in the next 5-10 years as the tech base matures and gets some experience under its belt.

    This is why those export companies (like Infosys) are now eager to not just position themselves as implementors but designers and innovators as well - they want to move up the tech "food chain" because there are about a dozen countries (in Eastern Europe, China, etc) that want to occupy that place in the Food Chain where India now sits.

    The thing is that this offshoring business is actually possible because of the success of the Internet. I often work from my local coffeehouse when I'm not in the office, or telecommuting from home. If all I'm doing is slinging bits, does it really matter where I am? Often the answer is no...my saving grace (thus far) is that I don't work in an easily commoditized discipline.

    1. Re:My experience in Bangalore... by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here here!
      An excellent post in a sea of xenophobia. I for one would like to congratulate Bangalore on this triumph. I think this kind of thing should be spread to other places around the world, to raise the standard of living and make the more empoverished peoples of the world self-sufficient. It doesn't matter where you are from as long as you do good work. We are all humans, perhaps we should be happy that our brothers and sisters in India (and China and Russia) have been able to find this kind of economic boost that doesn't involve bending over so the IMF can screw them.

      Keep it up India!

      --
      Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
    2. Re:My experience in Bangalore... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I'd cheer them only if India accepted foreign workers. While the jobs are mobile and the work force isn't, I see no reason to cheer.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:My experience in Bangalore... by MaximusTheGreat · · Score: 1

      who says they don't? when was the last time you went to bangalore? You will be surprised to see the number of non-Indians working there. The only thing is that they don't work at entery level, because the salary at entery level at about $300/month is too low.

    4. Re:My experience in Bangalore... by halosfan · · Score: 1
      The thing is that this offshoring business is actually possible because of the success of the Internet. I often work from my local coffeehouse when I'm not in the office, or telecommuting from home. If all I'm doing is slinging bits, does it really matter where I am? Often the answer is no...

      Actually, telecommuting is different from outsourcing (whether offshore or not) in that, for a business, a telecommuter is still an employee. The business has control over its own employees, but not over its supplier's employees. You may not necessarily see the telecommuter in the office every day, but you can switch him from one project to another, you can send him to a training, you can fire him, you can minimize the chances of him working for your competitor at night-time, you can prevent him from outsourcing his job to somebody else, and most importantly, it is you who gets to hire him. Once you outsource a job, you trust somebody else to do all of this.

      --
      My only problem with Microsoft is the severity of bugs in their software.
    5. Re:My experience in Bangalore... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      OK. Then cheers to them. I was earlier told that India had a policy of not issuing work permits for immigrants.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    6. Re:My experience in Bangalore... by gnalle · · Score: 1

      I was in Bangalore in the spring (doing physics). In order to get a working visa that lasts for more than 6 months you have to be invited by an indian employer. I had a feeling that once you have this invitation, the rest was a formality, but I am not sure. (I ended up going on a turist visa)

    7. Re:My experience in Bangalore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of all the web pages I have been to (and it has been many) your post is the most informative of all. The solution to this problem is farily simple. Ultimately the fate of programmers lies within the control of the programmers. I am not a programmer. I know there are many of you on here who are, so correct me if I am wrong, but most of the technology the world uses today for software development was all born in the US. Was it not? So really, it is up to you, the Engineer, the Programmer, the Designer...to take us to the next level. Be the innovator. That is the key to keeping your position within the technology industry. Nothing really WOW is coming out of the tech sector at all right now. It hasn't for three or four years. Thats no longer an acceptable time frame for innovation. With new innovation, the world will be behind once again. India will be out of the loop selling yesterday while you are mastering today. It is due to the lack of innovation in the tech sector that India is even able to compete.

    8. Re:My experience in Bangalore... by vijay-slashdot · · Score: 1

      Wake up buddy. What do you mean by 'lack of innovation'?. Indian as well as the multinationals here(intels, ciscos, HPs, Sonys, TIs..you name it) are developing next gen stuff. Imagine buying a PDA with handwriting recognisition (several local languages...not just english) with built in phone, web browser and coming with a detachable printer, all for about 50$. And the best part, the hardware architeture is 'opensource' to foster development. That's just one of the products we developed, besides several wireless and multimedia microprocessors in the pipeline. Wanna learn more about India before you sing the old song?.

    9. Re:My experience in Bangalore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I am not a programmer. I know there are many of you on here who are, so correct me if I am wrong, but most of the technology the world uses today for software development was all born in the US. Was it not? So really, it is up to you, the Engineer, the Programmer, the Designer...to take us to the next level. Be the innovator. That is the key to keeping your position within the technology industry. Nothing really WOW is coming out of the tech sector at all right now. It hasn't for three or four years."

      But you said yourself that you're not an engineer, a programmer, or a designer. Just because it doesn't make YOU say "wow", doesn't mean that there aren't innovations going on. It just means that the consumer gee-whiz factor isn't getting triggered. Most of the things that trigger that aren't really technological advances, anyway. Just repackaging and marketing effort. Many great innovations are killed because the consumer's too into that "wow", and not into researching the innovation that's *actually happening*.

  68. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
    but with a funny accent!

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  69. I know one by nnnneedles · · Score: 4, Insightful

    hotmail.com

    At least it was an indian guy who created it. Sold it to microsoft for $400 million..

    Bash it all you want, hotmail was pretty revolutionary and is probably used by hundreds of millions of people..

    --
    Will code a sig generator for food
    1. Re:I know one by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      You think a WEBSITE is a valid example?

  70. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by zrk · · Score: 1

    That's not the point! The issue here is with upper management in the US, Canada, and England seeing that to outsource something to India will be "cheaper", and therefore they just blindly choose to do so. These people don't take into account any differences in the English language locally and over there. They don't take into account the time lost due to such miscommunication. It is an unknown to many management 'cost-cutters' who just see themselves aving (currency-units).

    Relatively Recently, my friend's company finally decided to upgrade their DOS-based (yes, recently) financial package into one that was Windows-gui-based. They made the choice to use a programming shop from Bangalore. The project was delayed initially due to working out communications issues, and that took 2-3 months. After other delays and problems, the product was obsoleted by the time it was ready, but that's not at issue.

    My biggest problem is the people making the choices before weighing ALL the factors. I have nothing against quality techies anywhere. My complaint is more against quick-draw decisions where such things are NOT even considered.

    I've worked at several organizations with a multicultural atmosphere, and I actually prefer it. However, someone has to decide how the communication will transpire. Sometimes I've questioned whether the decision makers have thought that through enough for things to work. In many cases, it hasn't.

  71. For some reason... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    That's the funniest thing I've read all week! Thanks!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  72. Re:Republicans have struck deals to postpone layof by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This brought to you by Tin, which in its foil for is the perfect hat to use when reading this drivil..

    --
  73. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? WORSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is worse is when...they have absolutely no pride or care in their work
    ...
    unfortuantely, also from Indea. He at least had some vauge

    You have absolutely no pride or care in your spelling - you're wasting my time with your ignorance.

  74. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    I DISAGREE! I work on pSeries machiens and the folks down in Austin (YES AUSTIN, TX!) are very understandable and knowledgable. I don't have to explain things to them. I usually feed them the correct info and a snap report and they usually determine in quick order what I need. IBM's support (at least the pSeries machines and mainframe's) is top notch. Xerox support on the other hand just makes me scream....and they are all in the US! :)

    --

    Gorkman

  75. HAHAHA! GRABOULOUS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, because he's quoting grub bitching about trolls!!!

  76. It will swing back to balance... by jordandeamattson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My observations below come from my experience managing a distributed software engineering organization with presence in San Jose, CA and Delhi, India. I have a total of about 25 people working for me with have in the US and have in India (think of that poor guy who is split between the two countries - that must be me with all of my travel between the two!).

    Let's face it will swing back to balance over time.

    Right now, there is an incredible head-count cost advantage to moving a project to India, with many companies doing. The drive to offshore to India is driving demand there heavily. It is difficult to hire quality people, wages are going up quickly, people are jumping between companies, and it is much like things were in Silicon Valley during the bubble years.

    What we will see, is that the head-count cost advantage, over time, will narrow and the other costs of going off-shore will come into play (coordination, latency, frequent travel, etc.). As this happens people will become more and more selective about what goes and what stays.

    In the long-term, I think "offshore outsourcing" will fade to a degree, while "internal offshoring" (building distributed development teams within your company. I believe that the trend towards distributed deveopment organizations that take advantage of cost differntials and cherry pick the best talent in various geographies (as hard as it might be to believe, not everyone wants to live in Silicon Valley or the US for that matter, I have an excellent manager, with US Citizenship, orginally from India who moved back) will continue and accelerate.

    What does this mean for us in the US? It means that we will have to go up the "software value stack" and work at a higher level. If a task can be done somewhere else for less cost, it wll be. This mans that we have to be constantly working to be at the cutting edge and have the breadth and depth to add significant value and coordinate project in these distributed teams. In a sense we each have to take the role in our projects that Linus has in driving the development of Linux.

    If it is any comfort, realize that we aren't the only ones feeling threatened. My friends in India are all worried and looking over their shoulders at places like China, Vietnam, Ukraine, etc. wondering how they will move to higher and higher value-add activities over time.

    1. Re:It will swing back to balance... by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
      The greatest threat to U.S. programmers isn't foreign programmers. The biggest threat comes from U.S. corporate management. Essentially, it's U.S. citizen of one skillset pitted against U.S. citizen of another skillset. All in order to appease the appetite for returns demanded by stockholders who are made up of...programmers and management and clerks and cashiers and secretaries and truck drivers and let's not forget the independently wealthy (filthy rich)...etc.

      But, at the front lines, it comes down to the decision makers (management) and the doers (programmers). Management concern over programming labor costs, salaries and rates that dared to nearly approach their own at the height of the bubble, has given many of them cause to support terrible Visa-abuse (H1B, L-something or other...etc), and now massive offshoring of our future's brainshare, skills, and technical experience for short-term gains and long-term losses.

      The result is clear if the course continues. When manufacturing jobs left the U.S., never to return, white-collar workers didn't speak up. Economists, in corporate pockets, wrote articles about how this was natural progression towards some bizarre form of economic evolution. Those people would go into the service sector. We would go from the world's premier nation of manufactures, creating the goods that the world would buy, to the premier nation of service providers, offering services that the world couldn't live without. Now that elected and purchased officials are allowing the mass migration of service jobs out of the U.S., what are the laborers, the largest consumers, in the U.S. to do for a living? Consume? Currently, U.S. and foreign corporations want nothing more than to bang down our doors to sell us the best goods they can manufacture. This is because of the fact that we have the incomes to spend money on their wares. What do you think will happen when that income drops to nothing as we end up in low-paying jobs servicing each other because all the high-paying service jobs have long fled, never to return?

      There are inherent dangers in outsourcing which will bite first-timers in the ass. This is a natural deterrent, but not an permanent obstacle. Outside of putting in donations to purchase key politicians, there are only two and half things I can think of that can help slow down, and maybe even turn the tide against this bleeding of our technical edge.

      One suggestion is obvious. Unionize. Read this and join here. The collective who holds the plug to the data-center in its hand has some bargaining power. The individual who doesn't, is ignored.

      If you like the fact that you have two day weekends, you can thank Unions for it. If you like the fact that you no longer are required to work 16-19 hour days, you can thank Unions for it. Support all Unions during their weakest point in history and stop crossing the line. The person with the sign is your neighbor and helps make your community strong. The manager and scabs flown in from out of state are not your neighbors, and will fly out to the next place their corporate masters tell them to. They weaken your community.

      A second suggestion requires the understanding that management needs programmers. This is why they're going to India. If they had the skills to actually get something done, they'd do it themselves. Programmers don't need managers. They can get all the management services they can stand from contracting companies (i.e. headhunters). In addition, Indian management services exist to provide low cost management services as well. However, the basic idea is that all programmers have to do is partner together (for those with irrational fears of Unions), and undercut cost of providing services by removing the prohibitive costs of having to support useless management and executive jets. Programmers don't need managers. They need administrators to get the

  77. Racism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What Is Racism?

    The 'racist' double standard: how Whites are made to feel guilty and "hateful" for loving their own people and culture.

    by Thomas Jackson

    There is surely no nation in the world that holds "racism" in greater horror than does the United States. Compared to other kinds of offenses, it is thought to be somehow more reprehensible. The press and public have become so used to tales of murder, rape, robbery, and arson, that any but the most spectacular crimes are shrugged off as part of the inevitable texture of American life. "Racism" is never shrugged off. For example, when a White Georgetown Law School student reported earlier this year that black students are not as qualified as White students, it set off a booming, national controversy about "racism." If the student had merely murdered someone he would have attracted far less attention and criticism.

    Racism is, indeed, the national obsession. Universities are on full alert for it, newspapers and politicians denounce it, churches preach against it, America is said to be racked with it, but just what is racism?

    Dictionaries are not much help in understanding what is meant by the word. They usually define it as the belief that one's own ethnic stock is superior to others, or as the belief that culture and behavior are rooted in race. When Americans speak of racism they mean a great deal more than this. Nevertheless, the dictionary definition of racism is a clue to understanding what Americans do mean. A peculiarly American meaning derives from the current dogma that all ethnic stocks are equal. Despite clear evidence to the contrary, all races have been declared to be equally talented and hard- working, and anyone who questions the dogma is thought to be not merely wrong but evil.

    The dogma has logical consequences that are profoundly important. If blacks, for example, are equal to Whites in every way, what accounts for their poverty, criminality, and dissipation? Since any theory of racial differences has been outlawed, the only possible explanation for black failure is White racism. And since blacks are markedly poor, crime-prone, and dissipated, America must be racked with pervasive racism. Nothing else could be keeping them in such an abject state.

    All public discourse on race today is locked into this rigid logic. Any explanation for black failure that does not depend on White wickedness threatens to veer off into the forbidden territory of racial differences. Thus, even if today's Whites can find in their hearts no desire to oppress blacks, yesterday's Whites must have oppressed them. If Whites do not consciously oppress blacks, they must oppress them Unconsciously. If no obviously racist individuals can be identified, then societal institutions must be racist. Or, since blacks are failing so terribly in America, there simply must be millions of White people we do not know about, who are working day and night to keep blacks in misery. The dogma of racial equality leaves no room for an explanation of black failure that is not, in some fashion, an indictment of White people.

    The logical consequences of this are clear. Since we are required to believe that the only explanation for non-White failure is White racism, every time a non-White is poor, commits a crime, goes on welfare, or takes drugs, White society stands accused of yet another act of racism. All failure or misbehavior by non-Whites is standing proof that White society is riddled with hatred and bigotry. For precisely so long as non-Whites fail to succeed in life at exactly the same level as Whites, Whites will be, by definition, thwarting and oppressing them. This obligatory pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. First of all, racism is a sin that is thought to be committed almost exclusively by White people. Indeed, a black congressman from Chicago, Gus Savage, and Coleman Young, the black mayor of Detroit, have argued that only White people can be racist. Likewise, in 1987, the affirmative action officer of the State In

  78. Students going thru grinder too fast by leoaugust · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The number of engineering colleges is slated to grow 50 per cent, to nearly 1,600, over the next four years.

    I am not sure if this is a wonderful thing. As it is there are too many sub-standard colleges, and basic equipment and teaching staff is lacking in many. Such hypergrowth, in my opinion can cause nothing but trouble. I don't think the basic systems and infrastructure are there to support such an endeavor. Yes there are currently very good institutions but they are very few in the top tier. Most just dispatch their students with a "token" degree.

    Frankly, I think this insane growth in the engineering colleges, is just too much of herd mentality. - not unlike the dot com mania. And instead of treating a college as a social cause or obligation, most of the "engineering" and "medical" colleges are nothing but commercial enterprises. They are run purely as businesses, even to the extent, that many are called "donation colleges." You pay a huge huge amount of money and you get in - even in medical colleges !! Just imagine one of those doctors operating on you. It happens in India all the time !

    --
    To see a world in a grain of sand, and then to step back and see the beach where the sand lies ...
  79. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by herrvinny · · Score: 1

    I hear that. I had to return a Dell laptop a few months ago; I called them up and got shuttled to "engineer" to "sales representative", etc, basically to hell and back. And they were incredibly pushy for me to keep the laptop. Finally I managed to extract an RMA number from them. Hopefully Dell support will get better when they bring it back home to the USA.

  80. Re:No wonder, Bangalore is just like Silicon Valle by EmCeeHawking · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    With the wages they get paid in Bangalore, a computer professional there can't afford a house, either.

    Allow me to clear up a misunderstanding about housing costs in Silicon Valley. You generally would learn this in Econ 101, but most people slept through it anyway, so here's a refresher:

    When environmental and subsidized housing zealots push through ridiculous development restrictions legislation, scarcity ensues, and scarcity causes prices to rise, expecially in a place where demand is very high.

    Bangalore doesn't have rich white liberals demanding that the spotted california shit-eating sucker fish be "protected" by cordoning off hundreds of thousands of acres of perfectly good land. Bangalore doesn't have rich white liberals demanding that all tenants have a "right" to a giant lawn. Bangalore doesn't have rich white liberals screaming for price controls for the poor.

  81. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by adept256 · · Score: 1

    "According to researches made in the 1980s about one-third of Indians study or studied in schools, which have English as medium of instruction. This number has gone up in the 1990s. For these people, English is in many senses their first language and it is easier for them to read, write and even communicate in English than in their own Indian languages. This makes India the second largest English speaking country in the world after USA."

    Source: http://adaniel.tripod.com/education.htm

    --

    I ran a benchmark on my quantum computer, now I can't find it anywhere!
  82. about indian salaries and purchasing power by alphakappa · · Score: 1

    When a post about outsourcing to India comes up, there's the inevitable discussion about the workplace in India being a sweatshop and how they are poorly paid. I've posted a few comments about this in earlier discussions, but right now I'm in a better position to comment on it since I have had first-hand exposure to the workplace out here. (I'm an Indian studying in the US, currently vacationing in India) What I have to say is both good and bad.

    I have plenty of former classmates and friends who are working in Bangalore and a list of the companies they work in are pretty impressive - from GE to Texas Instruments and all the outsourcing contractors such as Wipro and Infosys. I also had a friend working in a Dell call center.

    About the work they do: Bangalore is not just about call centers and code monkeys. My friend works in GE and she works on PET scan machines and cyclotrons and their workplace is just as impressive as the best labs I've seen in the US. Her supervisor is a guy in his late twenties who already holds four patents and is expecting a fifth one soon. I already mentioned the friend in the call center, so the point I'm trying to make is that the work being done in Bangalore ranges from the inane call handling to the super techy fundamental research. (And yes, there are those amazing pharma companies who are making new drugs which are ultra cheap compared to the American ones due to.. I'm assuming this.. the low cost of research).

    Now that that's out of the way, let's look at the amount of money they make. Most of the slashdotters are right - they don't make much. My friend who has been working in Wipro for exactly a year now gets just over $250 a month after all the deductions for numerous stuff. Now if you take into account purchasing power parity (PPP), 1USD ~= Rs. 8 (compared to the exchange rate of 1USD ~= Rs 50). So let's multiply $250 by 6 to get a closer approximation of the real worth in terms of purchasing power - that gies us $1500 a month which is no big shakes.
    That of course, is not the case with everyone - if you makes something like Rs. 50,000 a month (which many of them with a few years of experience do), it's the equivalent of $1000 (in current exchange rate terms) and $6000 per month in real purchasing power terms. Which is a very comfortable amount - a little does go a very long way in India. Then there are the guys who work in India, but come to the US for onsite projects lasting a couple of years. They don't spend much in the US, and since they are paid by the client, most contractors (like Tata) give them their usual pay in India - that's like getting paid in India and the US, so when the return home, they go back with something like $15,000 in savings(which is a large sum in rupees) and they have a years worth of salary waitinf ror them. Of course, it doesn't happen to everyone, but these guys (I know one person who's a VLSI engineer who can come to the US pretty often) have the best of both worlds.

    Lastly, about work conditions : Most good companies have excellent work conditions which I've seen - posh offices, gyms, every facility you can think of. Contractors such as Wipro and Infosys have campuses to die for. The work hours are killers though. My friends go to work at around 8 and rarely ever come back before 9 even though the official work hours are from 8-5. On top of that they go to work on weekends so that project deadlines can be kept. However, if I was running a company, I'd be happy to get employees who are willing to work their asses off to get the work done compared to employees who stick to the clock.

    All in all, work hours are extremely long, workplaces are good, pay is low, and the work ranges from the inane to extremely high tech.

    --
    "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
    1. Re:about indian salaries and purchasing power by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      And yes, there are those amazing pharma companies who are making new drugs which are ultra cheap compared to the American ones due to.. I'm assuming this.. the low cost of research

      I am kind of curious about how this can be - the main cost of making a new drug is the FDA approval process, which has to be done in the US.

    2. Re:about indian salaries and purchasing power by Sayan · · Score: 1

      True the FDA process may be long but things like clinical trials are the most expensive. and these trials can be done for a fraction of the cost in india add that to the low cost of Indian PhD holders. voila! you have the perfect receipe for making pharma products which are just as good if not better than the west and cheaper too.

      --
      resurrect my .sig
    3. Re:about indian salaries and purchasing power by alphakappa · · Score: 1

      ya, I was guessing.... but think about it.. even though the FDA process would cost the same, the research would cost much less since the cost of setting up and maintaining infrastructure is much less, and the salaries of the scientists is just a fraction... I'm sure that over time, it represents a significant cost saving. Still, just a guess, but I think it's a reasonable one.

      --
      "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
  83. Election issue by ToasterTester · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This hemoraging of jobs overseas has to become a prime election issue.

    There was a good article on this topic in the Sunday L.A. Times pointing out it isn't only the Tech industry losing jobs overseas. All job levels and industries are sending services jobs overseas.

    The Corporate CEO's and politicians they have in their back pockets only see improved operating costs, what they aren't seeing is they U.S. customers losing their jobs and won't be able to afford their products as time goes on.

    Back when Alvin Tofler wrote _The Third Wave_ and said losing our manufactuing industry overseas isn't a problem, because America will become a Services based economy. Now we are losing our Services economy, but their isn't anything to replace it. The CEOs and politicians that cater to them need to open there eyes.

    Outsourcing jobs overseas NEEDS to become a major issue in the upcoming elections. Every canidate needs to be informed of the issues and asked how they stand on it.

    1. Re:Election issue by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

      If you're a CEO, you're looking forward to this.

      Cash up and cash out NOW, and then when prices fall to evil levels and you can literally buy that pretty little girl to be your love slave, you'll live like an emperor.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    2. Re:Election issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because a few cows cant find jobs as code monkeys in the US, the politicians are not going to lose sleep.

  84. Re:Silly foreigner... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enjoy our complimentary smart bombs with high-explosive payload at no extra charge!

  85. Congratulations America! by kevlar · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    You have once again successfully screwed your fellow citizen. I commend you!

  86. Bangalore outsourcing by Unknown+Kadath · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The company I work for, while incorporated in the US (for tax benefits and defense contracts, y'know), has the bulk of its employees in Bangalore. I, fortunately, have not had to work with the Bangalore office, since my work export control, meaning that foreign nationals can't work on it without special permission from the State Department. My coworkers on civilian projects, however, dread having to work with India. I'm not certain how much of it can be blamed on the Indian engineers themselves, and how much is the fault of poor communication, but all I ever hear about Bangalore is how often work needs to be sent back to be redone, and how inconvenient the time difference is.

    Do the company savings on salary and benefits make up for having to redraw a set of design prints five or six times? I don't know. I do know it runs the American engineers ragged and frustrates our customers when there's a schedule delay. The interface between the US and India is the real rough spot, I think. I know that purely internal work in both countries goes smoothly, but not being able to use our huge labor pool in India is hurting the American side of the business. Maybe I'm able to look at things dispassionately because my job isn't going overseas, but I *want* international outsourcing to work...and it's a rough start for my company. We need to overcome language and cultural barriers (any American who thinks Indian English and American English are the same dialect has never spoken to an Indian) and establish some actual communication between the continents, instead of throwing a set of design requirements into the ether and expecting the Magic Overseas Engineers to sprinkle some pixie dust and suddenly have a working set of engineering drawings.

    Is it different for IT work? I don't think coming up with design requirements for a program and then implementing them is a fundamentally different process than for a jet engine. ...I had a point when I started writing this.

    On the other hand, the broken English of the company newsletter is occasionally hilarious.

    -Carolyn

    --
    Like Daddy always said: if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
    1. Re:Bangalore outsourcing by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      any American who thinks Indian English and American English are the same dialect has never spoken to an Indian

      Yeah, in India, "fag" means cigarette!

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
  87. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by pete-classic · · Score: 1

    They say the same thing about you ;-)

    I find Indians' English to be generally intelligible. (Far more so than Australians'.) I also find the Indian accent very pleasing to the ear.

    But that's just my taste.

    -Peter

  88. My Understanding Also... by Black-Man · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Indian friends I have, have told me that were shocked to discover after they arrived in the US that we did not have servants and cooks.

    Of course, we *know* who the servants and cooks are in India and *their* standard of living.

    Maybe India will get more than they bargained for... all they need is a class-based revolt.

    1. Re:My Understanding Also... by ambar1073 · · Score: 1

      The white-trash ignorance of Slashdotters is truly amazing! Are all of you hillbillies from the trailer park?

      You probably haven't looked up an economic statistic lately, but you DO realize that 1/4 of all American children grow up in poverty, don't you?

      I know it's "fashionable" to bash on the poor people in India and use it as an excuse, but first you should look at home, don't you think?

    2. Re:My Understanding Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm maybe thats the ticket to employment - Americans can move to India to become servants and cooks! Reminds me of some TV show (The Critic?) where they go to the middle east, and discover that all the cab drivers there are Americans.

    3. Re:My Understanding Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>1/4 of all American children grow up in poverty, don't you?

      You do realize that poverty in the US is not the same as poverty in other countries, don't you? There is no safety net (like welfare, school breakfast/lunch programs) in most other countries like there is here. Kids regularly STARVE to death in other countries. That is a VERY rare occurrence here.

      Get your head out your Marxist text book and learn about the world. Have you ever seen a cardboard shanty town in person? There are a few in the US, but visit Rio or Mexico City and tell me poverty there is the same as here.

      There is NO comparison. And you are ignorant to think so.

    4. Re:My Understanding Also... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      What do you know about servants and cooks in India and their standard of living?

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    5. Re:My Understanding Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We know that the Indians have the most racist class-based system in the World.

    6. Re:My Understanding Also... by Knetzar · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can quite compare the levels of poverty in India to those in America. Having been to both Bombay, India and New York City multiple times it seems to me that the poor in India are MUCH worse off then those in America. And look at the economic statistics for India also, I bet you that more people there live a lifestyle that Americans would consider impoverished.

    7. Re:My Understanding Also... by ambar1073 · · Score: 1

      "There is NO comparison. And you are ignorant to think so."

      This is usually how this conversation degenerates on /.

      My point is in response to the usual argument that "well, what right does India have? they have starving people! they are all poor! they should focus on their problems at home rather than stealing everyone else's jobs!" And, specifically in response to the comment: "Of course, we *know* who the servants and cooks are in India and *their* standard of living.". From that perspective, there IS a comparison. Why should India "focus on their poverty only and leave the high tech to Americans"? How many high tech workers in the US have their hotel rooms vacuumed and cleaned by poor Mexican immigrants when they travel? Every country has problems, and poverty. To suggest that India should "just focus on their poverty and their poor" and not do something that elevates the economy and competitiveness of their society in general is ridiculous and insulting.

      To suggest there is NO comparison is silly and stupid. My point is exactly that -- there are comparisons to be made. Should Intel shut down shop and go home, because there are still people starving in some backwater in Mississippi?

      And, yes, I have actually been to slums in Bombay, Mexico City, AND Rio. And some truly appalling ones in the ghettos of Houston and Los Angeles and Harlem as well. Have you ever heard of an anti-hunger organization named "Share Our Strength" founded by Bill Shores? He wanted to help the starving people in Ethiopia 20 years ago, but realized that there are FAR more starving people in the US who could use his help. And I volunteer at a food bank here in Seattle. Yet, somehow, despite all these starving people here in the US, we still have a thriving high tech industry... Argue away, Slashdotters...

    8. Re:My Understanding Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You probably haven't looked up an economic statistic lately, but you DO realize that 1/4 of all American children grow up in poverty, don't you?
      I look up economic statistics rather frequently, and I don't think that I have seen the one to which you are referring. I suspect that you simply made it up, but there are many different ways to define poverty, so I suppose it is possible that for one of them your statement is accurate. Of course, there are also numerous ways to "lie with statistics". Anyways, you can check the "Poverty in the United States: 2002" publication from the US Census Bureau to get accurate numbers. Looking at it now, page 5 figure 2 shows that 16.7 of those under age 18 in the US were living in poverty at the end of 2002. Note that this uses the definition of poverty as explained in the same publication.
    9. Re:My Understanding Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      white-trash ignorance

      "White trash"? Shut up, Asian nigger!

      Of course, you're going to be offended now as it's okay for you to be racist, isn't it?

  89. General Motors didn't worry about Japan until '80s by barfomar · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The Big Three didn't worry about Toyota and Honda until the 1980's because of the low priced foreign competition. They rested on their laurels turning out mediocre cars at best.

    They almost didn't survive. The result was A Good Thing for the consumer.

    Now Japan has to worry about China, Korea and Taiwan doing the same thing to them.

    It pays to go to work every day thinking it may be your last day there.

  90. Not only the USA where its happening by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Here in the UK programming jobs are slowly disappearing down the sink and emerging somewhere
    in india. I suspect its less of a problem elsewhere
    in europe because I doubt many indians speak german or polish etc and its always easier to deal with workers who speak your language and code
    using naming conventions in your language too, but I suspect if the cost reductions become hard to resist it won't be long before young Ranjit & friends in Bangalore are
    sent on a Learn Polish in 21 Days course.

  91. What the USA Does Best by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Entertainment.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:What the USA Does Best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go and watch a good bollywood flick
      The next wave of outsourcing will be media outsourcing.
      They make better films at half the cost of a hollywood film (and their actresses don't need to get laid for it).

    2. Re:What the USA Does Best by the+Infamous+Brad · · Score: 1
      I thought it was "movies, microcode, and 30-minute pizza delivery?"

      I've been having this discussion a lot lately. I jumped ship from the IT industry a long time ago, about seven and a half years, having had my fill of working for managers who had no idea what I was doing for a living. Seven and a half years later, I'm still trying to find a comfortable career.

      Now the dot-com bubble has burst, and all of the people I knew who thought they could make good money writing plain HTML and doing simple graphics in Photoshop are unemployed or making about what a cashier makes at WalMart.

      And among the real programmers and network engineers I still know, this outsourcing thing is scaring the heck out of them. It's also scaring not a few accountants I know - for over a year now, at least one of the famous tax accounting companies has been outsourcing nearly all of their work to India, as well. And everybody I knew "knew" that if all else failed, they could fall back on telemarketing or call center work ... hah hah. Those jobs started going over to India long before the real jobs did.

      So people keep asking me at parties (as if I knew) what jobs there are in the US that are going to stay in the US and still pay a decent wage? I can only come up with a few:

      • Amateur Pornography. What can I say? The whole world is crazy about American amateur and semi-pro pornography. Even the Taliban guys were trading cheepo DVDs like trading cards.

      • Home Repair. My late father kept telling me I'd be better off as a plumber or a locksmith. I wish I'd listened to him. "No matter how the economy turns out, no matter what gets invented, people are still going to stop up their toilets and they are still going to lock themselves out of their cars."

      • Military. No matter what the cost advantages, for as long as the US is still enthused about invading other countries, we're not going to outsource those invasions. On the contrary, as the Saudis and Kuwaitis did during Gulf War I, we're the country that other countries outsource their wars to.
      I can't think of another one yet, though.
    3. Re:What the USA Does Best by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

      I thought it was "movies, microcode, and 30-minute pizza delivery?"

      The exact phrase, from Snowcrash:

      * Music
      * Movies
      * Microcode (software)
      * High-speed pizza delivery


      I was, in fact, thinking of the above phrase when I wrote "entertainment". However, I lump movies and music together under entertainment; American software has a doubtful future, these days; and pizza delivery isn't something we necessarily do best -- it simply can't be outsourced.

      -kgj

      --
      -kgj
  92. Quality, not Quantity by emerge-ant · · Score: 1

    Oh, please. * Wrong metric, this one actually supports growth in the valley * You can't throw people at every problem * The valley is as much about marketing as it is engineering, a retained competency no other cluster can and will match Bonus Link: Peter Drucker on India vs. China and how the US has focused on the wrong emerging superpower

  93. I thought the article was in English , not Hindi by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    If its english they should use english. Or alternatively 150K would have been just as clear
    as writing it longhand. Who the hell has ever heard
    of a "lakh"??

  94. Wild speculation by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

    Who would want to live there? At least California is pretty.

    Maybe some places that aren't California are pretty.

    Maybe some people live there happily.

    1. Re:Wild speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some places other than California are pretty, and people live there happily. However, Bangalore is not one of those places.

  95. math and science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    QUOTE
    it is found out that the Americans are shying away from the challenges of math and science
    UNQUOTE

    Then they must be shying toward burger flipping.

  96. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by Dr.+Hok · · Score: 1

    It happened to me a lakh times... It took us some time to persuade them not to use the term lakh in design specs ("the alarm database must be able to keep at least 2 lakh alarm instances").

    --
    Say out loud: I'm an Aspie and I'm somewhat proud, I guess. Uh. Can I write an email in all caps instead? Hm...
  97. Its like a crore, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but only 100 times smaller.

  98. Ah, that explains it. by artemis67 · · Score: 1

    I wasn't sure what a lakh was, but something about 1.5 engineers didn't sound so impressive.

    "You American engineers are so smug! Me and my half-carcass here will take all of you on!"

  99. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fact #1: Indian's don't use deodarant.
    Fact #2: Indian's don't use toilet tissue (they wipe their ass with their hand using water)
    Fact #3: India itself smells like poop with the cow dung everywhere and all...

  100. Legislation and other forms of protectionism by MaximusTheGreat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whenever this issue comes up I always see somebody or the other clamoring for legislation or other forms of protectionism. But in doing this they make some serious assumptions, that are wrong --
    a)American companies can be better off without any offshore development... No.
    Reason 1... Not enough americans are getting into the engineering disciplines, and those that are do not get the grad degrees etc. Have you seen the university graduate school departments for Masters/Phd. lately? How many americans do you see? India already produces vastly larger number of Engineers/computer science degrees then USA. It had at the last count about 1200-1500 engineering schools.
    Reason 2: Offshore/onshore combination development is a model that Indian companies have perfected as an art form, with the result that companies like Wipro, Infosys etc. are directly bidding for the contracts that US companies were outsourcing to them, because of lower costs. In fact IBM lists the Indian company Wipro as one of its most formidable competiters in future for its core services business. So, either US companies need to perfect the model, or start loosing contracts especially internationally
    b) Stoping outsourcing for govt. contracts using legislation will help. False It would probably slow things down, but it would only mean taxing the common citizen more to pay another US citizen, i.e. redistribution of wealth, and not any creation of wealth. On the other hand outsourcing means more dollars in the hands of Indians, and what do they do with those dollars? they can do only one of the 2 things, i.e. either buy US products or invest back in US, and they do both. At the same time more wealth is created in US, because some customers save money,and the money that went out, came back again and bought more products creating even more jobs.
    c) Indian companies are not creating any products.
    False. Subsidiaries of US companies in India are creating complete products. See previous stories in slashdot. But even besides that India has been getting the largest amount of VC capital in Asia for last couple of years, and you will se products out soon. Some products are already there. For e.g. iflex In FY03, International Banking Systems (IBS) has ranked Flexcube as the number one selling universal banking solution in the world. Represented in over 50 countries through more than 30 corporate business partners, i-flex has gained the recognition of the first company in the world to cross the 100-installations mark for its product in less than 5 years. And there are other success stories.

    1. Re:Legislation and other forms of protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You must be an economist, because your thinking is horribly flawed.

      a)American companies can be better off without any offshore development... No. Yes.
      There is no shortage of engineers in North America.
      In fact, more engineers have become unemployed since the bust. Plus all the inconveniences in communication/language/timezone will quickly drive down the quality of work, making NA's engineers not look as expensive.

      b) Stoping outsourcing for govt. contracts using legislation will help. False True.
      Creation of wealth? What are you smoking? This is not a local economy any more, it has merged into the global economic system. You cannot create wealth out of nothing. Wealth is still being redistributed, except that it flows from the american/canadian taxpayer to India. What are the chances of that welath flowing back? 0.0000001%, because India will invest into its own country and its own industry.

      c) Indian companies are not creating any products. False
      I will have to agree with you there, but how is that relevant to the outsorcing issue? European companies are creating products too.

    2. Re:Legislation and other forms of protectionism by MaximusTheGreat · · Score: 1

      For a) The reason for unemployment is mainly the bust and not outsourcing. Outsourcing is allowing some of the American companies to survive where they would not have because of the bust.

      For b) I guess you did not understand me. US companies pay the offshored programmers in dollars. The dollars go into the foreign govt. reserves, but finally they have to be spent someday, and then the dollars have to come back as they have to be spent/invested in the US finally. For example of the $100 billion that Indian govt. holds, $57billion has been invested back in US treasury bills.

      c) is relevant, because this implies that if US companies do not use offshore model, the products that are made here won't be able to sompete with the cheaper ones in India, resulting in even lesser jobs.

    3. Re:Legislation and other forms of protectionism by BlueQuark · · Score: 1

      In Reply to C)

      What exactly do we make in this country, besides movies..

    4. Re:Legislation and other forms of protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because of unemployment, we have more engineers, not less, that's what I was trying to say.

      for b), what makes you think that the money invested in India by the outsourcers will end up in US eventually? It will go to Russia to buy more military equipment, and in Russia, it will stay in a bank of some Oligarch collecting interest till he goes to prison. From then, the money will be invested in Russia by its government. I don't see it returning to the US....

      Sure there are ways for US/Canadian money to go back to its owner, but the chances of that money taking a different way are far greater.

    5. Re:Legislation and other forms of protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok I see you did not get the logic. Forget outsourcing, think of importing cars. Let us say that US imports 100 cars form Japan for $10,000 each. Now what is Japan going to do with these dollars? It may spend it somewhere else as you say, but it eventually has to come back to US, because it is US currency. If it does not, then US just got itself, some free cars for the cost of printing paper. This is so because unless Japan uses those $10,000X100 to buy something back from US it just gave away its wealth for free. Now replace cars with importing service skills, and Japan with India.

    6. Re:Legislation and other forms of protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Planes, Cars, Software, weapons, medicine, high end semiconductors etc.etc.

    7. Re:Legislation and other forms of protectionism by mikebelrose · · Score: 1

      This only works with a strong dollar, else they'll want to get paid in rupees. The strength of the dollar is based on how much people want to buy from the US, like manufatured goods, software, etc. Now, how exactly is a "service-based economy" supposed to strengthen the dollar?

    8. Re:Legislation and other forms of protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the dollar gets weaker, it will be useless to move jobs to India, as the price differential will reduce. Also, more stuff would be manufacture in US and exported, creating even more jobs, but they would be at a lower level then what would have been created if dollar remained strong.

    9. Re:Legislation and other forms of protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ok I see you did not get the logic. Forget outsourcing, think of importing cars. Let us say that US imports 100 cars form Japan for $10,000 each. Now what is Japan going to do with these dollars? It may spend it somewhere else as you say, but it eventually has to come back to US, because it is US currency. If it does not, then US just got itself, some free cars for the cost of printing paper."

      That's stupid. Japan will just convert the dollars to yen, and not necessarily spend the money on American goods. There's no requirement to further trade past the initial.

    10. Re:Legislation and other forms of protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a genius! In your post you just proved that North America will eventually plunge into the 'Third World' if outsourcing continues. You see, the more jobs are moved out of USA, the less buying potential USA will have. The less buying potential USA has, the less it buys from 'itself', i. e. domestic manufacturers. The less it buys from domestic manufacturing, the less will be manufactured. The less will be manufactured, the weaker the dollar will be. The weaker the dollar will be... well, as you said in your post... we will all be paid peanuts and live close to poverty.

  101. Re:Silly foreigner... by cprice · · Score: 1

    Allow me to refer to you a wonderful book; "The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire". Please take time to read carefully and extrapolate events in Roman times to modern times.

  102. So all I need to do is move to India and I can... by dpilot · · Score: 1

    This came up a while back.

    Maybe you can move to India, but you can't work there. They're not eagerly handing out H1Bs, or any sort of equivalent. The old, "Then move to India, where the jobs are," argument has been raised numerous times, and finally someone (presumably knowledgable) posted this little tidbit.

    From what I can tell, these emerging 3rd world countries want these jobs to improve their countries, not to enable American expats to exploit their lower cost of living. (I suspect they're happy to let you spend your dollars there, just not earn them.)

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  103. Re:Republicans have struck deals to postpone layof by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 1

    Which part are you accusing of being "drivil" (sic)?

    The first part, about layoffs being postponed till after the elections, or the second, about buses in Bangalore?

    Both of these are facts, and have been documented by multiple sources in the MAINSTREAM media, including republican-friendly Wall Street Journal.

    Magnus.

  104. Heal thyself... by gosand · · Score: 1
    How many of you have dealt with these Asian techies and have been on the phone longer due to a misunderstanding between yourself and a techie? Rather Frustrating! Maybe there's a learning curve, but if I had my druthers, I wouldn't put up with it.

    Perhaps once they have the majority of the programming jobs, they won't put up with you, and will only speak in a different language.

    I don't speak any other languages either, but I am not ignorant enough to think that everyone must speak my native language flawlessly. This is the kind of attitude that is going to bury the US someday. You are a short-sighted fool if you think it can't happen.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Heal thyself... by alizard · · Score: 1
      I don't speak any other languages either, but I am not ignorant enough to think that everyone must speak my native language flawlessly. This is the kind of attitude that is going to bury the US someday. You are a short-sighted fool if you think it can't happen.

      Ever heard the saying "The customer is always right?" If you sell a product somewhere, your choices are to support the product in the customer's native language or find the customer won't be buying from you a second time. Anyone who doesn't get this won't have to wait until the overall US economy goes down to get buried.

      Dell found out about this the hard way, when American customers of an American company couldn't understand the allegedly English-speaking tech support. Why did they only bring back corporate tech support? Because they don't give a fuck about small/individual customers.

  105. article about this a few years ago in a Sports Ill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You READ it? You mean there are ARTICLES in it? I tought it was just full of pictures.

  106. Re:No wonder, Bangalore is just like Silicon Valle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It isn't just the rich white liberal behind these restrictions. Us rich white conservatives that alreay own our home support them as well. It makes our home value rise. Sad but true...

  107. It's time to outsource executives by number6.3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Think about it. An Indian or a Pak executive will work for a lot less...and they certainly won't screw up^h^h^h^h^h^h^hmanage the company any better or worse than their overpaid American counterparts. Anyone interested in starting an executive outsourcing company with me? :)

  108. I blame walmart for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went into one near me yesterday that i was last in after it opened a couple of years ago. I swear the place hasn't been cleaned since it opened and this was in a upper-income suburb. Moral of this? You get what you pay for so remember that all you idiots driving into your local walmart to buy your cheap crap. So in 50 years once 90% of America resembles India of today will a Indian be sitting around saying great there goes our programming jobs to cheap Americans? And thats why it pays to be a creative person not a programmer, programmers are monkies creative people are unique.

  109. Think of your own future by DaveWhite99 · · Score: 1

    At least you recognize the change in the winds. Go back to school and get something like an MBA. That's what I'm doing.

    --
    Biodiesel : domestic, renewable, clean, and in the fuel tank of my bone stock 2002 New Beetle TDI
    1. Re:Think of your own future by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      At least you recognize the change in the winds. Go back to school and get something like an MBA. That's what I'm doing.

      An NBA is only useful if you have decent people skills to begin with. Those with techy minds are Fucked. The US is becoming a nation of marketers and Walmart clerks. We don't make or do anything real anymore. Even Hollywood is moving to Canada and movie computer simulations managed in Asia.

    2. Re:Think of your own future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pity the future of the USA if what you say is true. Eventually the economy will completely collapse. Similar things are happening here in Australia.

  110. living standards and expenses are going to skyrock by dpilot · · Score: 1

    To watch tech salaries rise, you don't have to raise the standard of living of the whole country. You just have to raise the expectations of those people capable of fitting into the tech sector, as well as their economic neighborhoods.

    This will lead to terrible unrest in India, as poor people flock to Banglador (and the like) in search of jobs. Not tech jobs, since they're not qualified, but Starbucks jobs, servant jobs, etc. There was an article in the past few weeks about people being beaten who tried to move into an area to apply for a railroad job.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  111. Hotmail was a typical Silicon Valley product by Gorimek · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hotmail was created in Silicon Valley. Here's an article about it.

    It was a typical Valley product with people from the entire planet working on it. In my expereience the teams are about equal parts Indian, Chinese, European and American.

    1. Re:Hotmail was a typical Silicon Valley product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US profited from the great brain drain from India, there was no indian slashdot for indians to whine like you do now, but sure they must feel a lot of pain about most of their brilliant students educated at a great expense leaving for the US. But now India is taking your jobs and profiting from them so you whine. hypocrisy anyone?

  112. The Deliverator says... by Valdrax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    so what do you do again ?

    "This is America. People do whatever the fuck they feel like doing, you got a problem with that? Because they have a right to. And because they have guns and no one can fucking stop them. As a result, this country has one of the worst economies in the world. When it gets down to it--we're talking trade balances here--once we've brain-drained all our technology into other countries, once things have evened out, they're making cars in Bolivia and microwaves in Tadzhikistan and selling them here--once our edge in natural resources has been made irrelevant by giant Hong Kong ships and dirigibles that can ship North Dakota all the way to New Zealand for a nickel--once the Invisible Hand has taken all those historical inequities and smeared them out into a broad global layer of what a Pakistani bricklayer would consider to be prosperity--y'know what? There's only four things we do better than anyone else

    music
    movies
    microcode (software)
    high-speed pizza delivery"

    (From Snow Crash.)

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  113. Perhaps you should practice what you preach... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    For each mistake of ANY kind you make, you should knock a quarter off of your hourly wage. Don't make any mistakes? BULLSHIT.

    Grow up. That's my advice to you. Grow up.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Perhaps you should practice what you preach... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My advice to you is wake up. Hardware engineers get their asses busted for *single* mistakes yet you software weenies should just glide through life?
      Wake up. That's my advice to you. Wake up.

    2. Re:Perhaps you should practice what you preach... by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I get busted all the time for my mistakes. Embedded systems don't play by the same rules as the desktop world stuff. A single mistake can go out to thousands of machines. In the case some of the systems I develop, a single mistake can KILL people. I do my level best not to make mistakes- just like those Hardware engineers you refer to. Keep that in mind the next time you think that all the software world is like frigging Microsoft or an apps vendor where people keep buying their broken crap.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  114. "Those damn Pakis are stealing all of our jobs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's so much Amero-centric ignorance in this forum. Perfect example of intolerance and fear.

    Who's stealing the jobs? Do the Indians come marching into America, and put guns to the heads of IBM, Dell and Microsoft and tell them to move the jobs over?

    HELL NO!

    These companies only move the jobs over to make MORE profit (read that as greed). To increase their bottom line. To line the pockets of investors (ever buy a mutual fund?), buy fancy cars, that suck up cruddy oil, which come from Arab countries, that Bush ends up bombin cause his daddy had no balls.

    When Ignorant People are threatened, they blame everyone else and never take responsiblity. They blame the funny looking people down the street with their funny accents, they blame migrant workers, they blame foriegners, they blame immigrants, they blame other countries...

    Poor xenophobic bastards. Blame blame blame, and never take responsibility.

    Of "The Man" is blamless.

    1. Re:"Those damn Pakis are stealing all of our jobs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats a Lakh?

    2. Re:"Those damn Pakis are stealing all of our jobs" by aderusha · · Score: 1

      i was wondering the same thing. according to dictionary.com, a lakh is 100,000. that makes 150,000 engineers in bangalore.

    3. Re:"Those damn Pakis are stealing all of our jobs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      An Indian != a Paki.
      Never ever make that mistake

    4. Re:"Those damn Pakis are stealing all of our jobs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eh, its an easy mistake. they all look the same and sound the same when they speak.

    5. Re:"Those damn Pakis are stealing all of our jobs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bloody brits, stealing indian doctors
      jeez, this globalistaion works both ways....

      i'm sure there are many indian doctors in USA hospitals too....

      http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/4 06 885.cms

      if u r an IT worker in USA, then why don't u just sell everything u got and move to india and live like a raja? u can probably get a job in a call centre to help pay the bills!

    6. Re:"Those damn Pakis are stealing all of our jobs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you are missing ( and which matters most anyway) is we don't THINK alike.

  115. Re:Republicans have struck deals to postpone layof by b!arg · · Score: 1

    Got a link to any of these mainstream sources?

    Thanks

    --

    Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
  116. My two cents... by 0x1337 · · Score: 1

    I just don't understand fellow U.S. tech-industry slashdotters creaming their pants about this. Because of the our industry's corruption and willingness to employ multitudinous/cheap but crappy labor forces from the third world instead of qualified Americans - we will,eventually, all be sweeping floors at McDee's.

    I don't know how about you - but is sure pisses me off to know that the tech industry would rather have an Engrish-speaking sweatshop slave they can pay $1 per day than a fully qualified Software Engineer they would actually have to treat like a human being.

    1. Re:My two cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new Hindu McD's Manager overlords. Do you want fries with that?

  117. Yeah, Tax incentives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    >> Tax incentives? You want other people to be forced to subsidize your paycheck?

    As opposed to other people being forced to subsidize that paycheck being taken away, hell yeah, I do. As it stands, corporations get a tax incentive to outsource to the third world. Therefore all unemployed people obviously are unemployed by their own choice and preference, right? right?

    >> If you can't compete with the indians, tough luck, get another job. That's how capitalism works. That's how it's supposed to work.

    Yeah, to hell with all those lazy b*stards in Flint MI, and those stupid pillotex people. Dammit, just because theres not enough jobs for everone is no excuse not to go have a job. Obviously if your GED isn't getting you a job, it's you're fault that the world economic trend has screwed you over. After all, you could have stolen a presidential election, or leveraged junk bonds to a hostile takeover. Phbt. Only stupid people are poor, and Capitalism is referenced over 8800 times in the King James Bible.

    >> That means better prices on the products for everyone.

    Especially people who can't feed their families anymore. They benefit a whole lot.

    Listen you conservative dingus - Capitalism is neither inherently good OR bad. What IS bad is people who use loaded words and tricks to ram their agenda past all cogent discussion for their own benefit. WITHOUT DEBATE THERE IS NO DEMOCRACY. THAT'S why I am so disgusted with the conserative party. You're destroying this county for the benefit of the highest bidder/buyer.

    >> Lowering the overall tax rate is the only good tax incentive
    Define "good"... you're obviously using it in some way other than the dictionary.

    >> I've had it up to here with whining special interest whom are all uniquely deserving of other people's money in their own heads

    Then Stop Corporate Welfare A-hole!

    1. Re:Yeah, Tax incentives by Avihson · · Score: 1

      What makes YOUR work worth more than the same quality work from India? The fact that you are an American?

      Corporations do not get tax incentives for outsourcing, they get a better return on their costs of labor. No bullshit with unions, no messy healthcare, no worries about ADA, OSHA, EEOC, Afirmitave action, etc. Those are the incentives to work offshore. Why work here and not be able to compete with the other companies that outsource? They are in business to make money, not provide you with a job.

      Will you reward the All American corporation for their patriotism? Or will you scorn them and buy from the cheaper competition? Walmart, Toyota, Masda, Sony, etc prove that patriotism and loyalty stop at the wallet. It is a cruel, cold, world out there; you are going to have to compete in it, or die. It is a buyers market when it comes to labor. The low bidder wins. That's economic law, you can't repeal it because it is "unfair."

      Why just stop Corporate Welfare, when you can stop ALL Welfare! Without "Corporate Welfare" of reasonable taxation, the Corps will go overseas. Then the tax burden will fall on the "Filty Rich" who will emigrate to someplace with reasonable taxes. The "working class" and the poor will finaly have to start paying thier fair share of taxes to support their way of life. There will be no more greedy capitalists left to subsidize your welfare way of life.

      No one owes you a living. No one owes you a living wage. The accident of your birth does not grant you a right to the fruits of my labor. Nor does the fact that you are my neighbor require me to buy your products.

    2. Re:Yeah, Tax incentives by Ryosen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Corporations do not get tax incentives for outsourcing

      Wrong.

      Corporations are not required to pay labor/payroll tax on workers who are nationals of other countries.

      Corporations are allowed to deduct the cost of outsourcing off of their reported earned income, thereby reducing their tax liability.

      These are very strong, cost-saving incentives for a company to outsource to another country. The loss in tax revenue is made up by the rest of the citizenry.

      No bullshit with unions
      There are no IT unions in the US.

      no messy healthcare
      While the healthcare system in the US might need some work, an employers relationship is limited to paying the premiums.

      no worries about ADA, OSHA, EEOC, Afirmitave action
      Yes, protecting the rights of an indivudual from discrimination and harrassment is just plain wrong. Until you become that individual. Perhaps you're too young to remember such agencies as TaTa and others and the disgusting manner in which they treated their employees, sent to the US and elsewhere as endentured servants. If you think that regulatory agencies are the primary motivating factors for outsourcing, you really are not understanding how corporations work.
      And OSHA?? What does the Occupational Safety and Health Administration have to do with IT?

      Why just stop Corporate Welfare, when you can stop ALL Welfare!
      This is an asinine statement, to be sure. But just in case you truly don't understand the reason for welfare, just know that there are still some people in this world that feel they have a responsibility to help their fellow man. Beyond that, there are very compelling reasons for providing public assistance in any society.

      Without "Corporate Welfare" of reasonable taxation, the Corps will go overseas.
      Again, nonsense. Companies have been operating in the US for over 300 years. While there have always been deals, favors, and preferential treatment afforded to corporations, I cannot think of a single instance where a major corporation packed up their operations and moved overseas. I'm sure there has to have been a couple, but they obviously did not have much of an impact. Ford might be making cars in Mexico, but the bulk of their operations is in the US.

      The "working class" and the poor will finaly have to start paying thier fair share of taxes to support their way of life
      Let me assure you, they already do. They may not pay the same dollar amount but, percentage-wise, they pay the same, if not more. In fact, most poor people do not have the financial means to obtain the majority of tax deductions that higher income families do. But if you insist on sticking with your ill-conceived opinion that they are not "paying their fair share", consider the fact that its the poorer people who are doing the jobs that you don't want to.

      There will be no more greedy capitalists left to subsidize your welfare way of life.
      Wow, you really do have a lot of disdain for lower-income people, don't you?

      What makes YOUR work worth more than the same quality work from India? The fact that you are an American?
      Historically? American corporate history is rife with examples of the failures of outsourcing. Many industry watchers regard outsourcing as a bad idea. Not just for the displaced workers but for the companyies themselves. Maybe someday people will learn that cheaper does not equal better.

      No one owes you a living. No one owes you a living wage. The accident of your birth does not grant you a right to the fruits of my labor. Nor does the fact that you are my neighbor require me to buy your products.
      No one is "owed" anything and no one is claiming that here. While American IT workers are affected by outsourcing, it is a short-term problem. Some salary adjustments have to be made, it's more difficult to find work, might have to move, but it can be done.

      The bigger concern is the shortsidedness of cor

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    3. Re:Yeah, Tax incentives by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      USA and Canada will be better off without the rich capitalists. While you are at it, you can take your corporations with you too. We can always start from scratch. I mean, most of the settlers in Canada and USA ran away from the oppressive wealthy elites in Europe. Back then it was the monarchs but now it is the capitalists... oh wait.. who is going to do the dirty work for the rich? I mean, how many people in the military are wealthy? Let's see how good the wealthy crowd gets along without the lower classes protecting them. And who is going to pick up the garbage off your street?

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    4. Re:Yeah, Tax incentives by Oggust · · Score: 1
      As it stands, corporations get a tax incentive to outsource to the third world.

      If there really is a tax incentive on offshoring then that's just as bad as protectionism "the other way" and I'd fully support repealing that. Unless what you mean is that the taxes abroad are lower and that somehow would constitute a tax incentive. That's just normal competition between countries, and that's proper and good.

      Yeah, to hell with all those lazy b*stards in Flint MI, and those stupid pillotex people. Dammit, just because theres not enough jobs for everone is no excuse not to go have a job. Obviously if your GED isn't getting you a job, it's you're fault that the world economic trend has screwed you over.

      I'm not familiar with pillotex, but a quick googling suggests they were just another manufacturing company that got outcompeted. It's tough to compete against low-overhead countries on low-skill labor.

      After all, you could have stolen a presidential election, or leveraged junk bonds to a hostile takeover. Phbt. Only stupid people are poor, and Capitalism is referenced over 8800 times in the King James Bible.

      Ok, that was weird...

      Listen you conservative dingus - Capitalism is neither inherently good OR bad.

      It works, and it's fair. It doesn't care about junk bonds, hostile takeovers or the bible. That makes it good, I guess.

      What IS bad is people who use loaded words and tricks to ram their agenda past all cogent discussion for their own benefit. WITHOUT DEBATE THERE IS NO DEMOCRACY. THAT'S why I am so disgusted with the conserative party. You're destroying this county for the benefit of the highest bidder/buyer.

      I'm not a conservative, I'm a libertarian. I won't vote for the donkey or the elephant.

      >> I've had it up to here with whining special interest whom are all uniquely deserving of other people's money in their own heads

      Then Stop Corporate Welfare A-hole!

      Exactly, that's what I'm saying. What is special steel tariffs, subsidies and protectionism if not Corporate Welfare? It's keeping nonproductive companies alive on the expense of viable businesses and the rest of society.

      /August

      --
      "An object declared as type _Bool is large enough to store the values 0 and 1." -- 6.1.2.5, C99 standard.
    5. Re:Yeah, Tax incentives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Companies have been operating in the US for over 300 years

      uhm... what corporations were operating in the United States of America in 1704? I was under the impression that the U.S. declaration of independence was ratified on 4, July, 1776, made public on 8, July, 1776.

      The Treaty of Paris (the one which immediately followed the American Revolutionary War and, arguably marks the formal recognition of America as a sovereign nation) was signed 3, Sept, 1783.

      Did I pull a Rip VanWinkle -- Loose a century, or something? -- Or are you thinking of a different "US"

    6. Re:Yeah, Tax incentives by alienw · · Score: 1

      While the healthcare system in the US might need some work, an employers relationship is limited to paying the premiums.

      You are forgetting the fact that those premiums have more than doubled in the last year. Not to mention the fact that the employer needs to deal with the actual insurance company, which is A LOT of paperwork. Very expensive stuff. he US healthcare system is a complete and utter wreck.

      Ford might be making cars in Mexico, but the bulk of their operations is in the US.

      The fact that they closed several plants in the US, laid off thousands of workers, and keep moving more and more jobs overseas doesn't tell you anything? Guess what, offshoring is not just an IT phenomenon.

      You are missing the big picture. There are competent IT professionals living in India. There is absolutely no reason for American and other companies not to employ them. That's globalization for you.

      As to the whole "Indian programmers are inferior" thing: that is mostly plain old racism. If you don't believe me, go to almost any U.S. university and look at who teaches computer science there. You're almost guaranteed to find a few Indian professors.

    7. Re:Yeah, Tax incentives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, he comes from the future.

      Oh wait, you're just being a fucking retard about it.

      Get a clue. Of course he was talking about North America.

      But hey, if you want to make snide comments, Im sure Fark.com would love to have you.

    8. Re:Yeah, Tax incentives by Ryosen · · Score: 1

      Here's an interesting history lesson for ya. The United States, tho while not in name, did exist in body prior to 1776. As did the corporations and their influence over the local politics.

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    9. Re:Yeah, Tax incentives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with most of your comments a few things could be added.

      Corporations are not required to pay labor/payroll tax on workers who are nationals of other countries.

      True. My job went oversee for ~250$ per week. For my old business this is just expenses like buying a computer. No health care, no unemployment and no papers to fill with them, not even to the numerous government papers for tax purpose. The 2000$ per week I got meant an actual expense of nearly 3000$, so they actually save 2750$ per week!

      But just in case you truly don't understand the reason for welfare, just know that there are still some people in this world that feel they have a responsibility to help their fellow man.

      Well, the reasons are more complicated, and the original poster has no clue about it.

      In good economical time you see all the abusers of welfare; they are the only one not working for the entire period, often not even looking. So we get the impression "all welfare are lazy scum bags" since all the one we see are!

      In bad times (recession), then it's something else. We still bitch and moan, but the welfare checks permit a minimum of the economy to survive. Instead of priests making soup on the street corners (1929) you get jobs for the cashier at the grocery store, the farmer where the produce comes from, and all the chain in between, like truck drivers, security guard at the store, the janitor, the truck repair shop, the bank to run all these businesses ... and all these workers eat and move around pushing the economy further.

      Welfare was created to avoid the snowball effect of the job lost in a recession. If you make 100$ you buy bread. Less 10% tax going to the government the store is left with 90$ to buy gas for the delivery truck. Less 10% tax the gas station have 81$ left to pay for cleaning products ... and so on until all the money goes to the government, is re-invested or stays in a bank account.

      At the end your 100$ salary injected almost 1000$ in the economy, if you loose your job the economy looses that 1000$.

      So welfare helps minimizing that effect by injecting a little money, but a big impact!

      This is ALSO the biggest danger of outsourcing, 1 million high tech jobs is not only 50-100$ billions less salary in the economy, its many thousands of Billions not circulating to numerous stores, restaurants and all kind of services.

      When it becomes a trend, every single company is affected by less business and everyone is affected by salary freeze or cuts!

      [ The "working class" and the poor will finaly have to start paying thier fair share of taxes to support their way of life] Let me assure you, they already do. They may not pay the same dollar amount but, percentage-wise, they pay the same, if not more.

      The burden of paying tax is harder on the "poor", and more often than not the tax they pay goes back in the economy pretty fast!

      This being said, in the US the top 2% wealthiest pays for 24% of the expenses of all level of government (federal, state, city, schools, ...). And that big payment changes nothing to their way of living, while the 15-20% tax of the working single mother mean less food, clothing and bad health care. A tax cut for these "poor" would go back directly in the economy, the millionaire just buys more retirement funds.

      A final note: since globalization started (in the 70's) each job lost in a "western economy" because of the market forces of globalization, 10 jobs are created in a less favored (mostly third world) country.

      So yes, globalization is hard, but in the long run (200 years?) it should be very good, and hopefully the best way to promote democracy and freedom of speech since they are a near must for a well run economy (proof by old soviet corruption and black market).

      The problem is that our current "free trade" created rules to protect investments of the businesses (the money is safe), but NOT the security of the worker. No job is safe, not the one left here or the one created elsewhere. The jobs asks for more work, pays less and are less safe.

      Wooo this was a bigger reply than intended!!!

  118. Get rid of the minimum wage laws... RIIIGHT. by Svartalf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you have any idea of the HISTORY behind such laws? It's because employers would pay below subsistence wages to unskilled workers (as in not even really enough to live off of...) so that they'd have to work 12 or more hours in a day just to make enough money to barely live.

    Not a pretty sight, really.

    Now they're exporting that misery to the third world countries because they can and it nets a profit short-term for the businesses.

    It amazes me how many "get a job" people are so clueless- because they're NOT IN THE SITUATION AND NEVER HAVE BEEN IN THE FIRST PLACE. They don't understand that many of these people that are "too good to work a real job" (By the way, define "real job" for me... If it's manual labor, then you don't understand what many actually did in the Tech fields- not all of them were "web developers" that got laid off, etc. Many of the people that got laid off had "real" jobs that were worth what they were getting paid for them until the Great Downsizing...) actually have obligations like houses and the such that many of what you'd consider "real" jobs won't even pay for an efficiency, let alone the obligations like car payments, insurance, etc.

    If you've not been there, PLEASE do everyone a favor and shut the fuck up.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Get rid of the minimum wage laws... RIIIGHT. by vandegraff · · Score: 1

      Thank you for explaining this so well!!! I would Mod this up if I could

      --
      Confucius say: I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand.
    2. Re:Get rid of the minimum wage laws... RIIIGHT. by speby · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify some additional details about minimum wage jobs. As it has been shown by numerous studies, one cannot even live comfortably in the United States making minimum wage. If someone is earning minimum wage, they still have an annual income that is below the poverty line. In addition, minimum wage sets the lowest possible wage which ultimately increases the cost of goods and services for everyone in the end, including the people earning minimum wage. If the government decided to push minimum wage up to, say $20/hour, what do you think would happen then?

      Do you think movie tickets would still be their ultra-low prices of $8-$10? How about those delicious, healthy, volumptuous cheeseburgers at McDonald's? Still $1.00 or whatever the current rate is?

      The answer is NO WAY. Minimum wage serves a few purposes. One indirect benefit is the belief that people actually think of when they feel that there is a 'protection' for people who are poor. Gee, well at least they can earn a set minimum!

      Sorry, but minimum wage has tons of speculation and rarely any clarification.

  119. link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Try this one you republican bi-tatch.

    Traditional republican tactics-
    1)Lie out the ass.
    2)when confronted with a counter argument, imply that the source is unreliable because it is not conservative enough.
    3)when confronted with mainstream sources, imply that they do not exist because they're not on your lap in a silver platter.
    4)when you're confronted with the raw facts in your lap, wave off the whole discussion as "no longer relevant" or "old news" then make up a new lie.
    5)Steal an election, tear up the constitution and wipe your ass on the flag. Then salute the confederate flag and export jobs to the 3rd world.
    6)No profit, but you already own everything so who cares as long as you keep your powerbase intact.
    7)Kill babies.

    1. Re:link by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2
      Kill babies.

      No that would be NOW and the democrats...

      --
    2. Re:link by b!arg · · Score: 1

      Maybe I should have been more clear. A link to one of these mainstream new sources outlining those arguments, you coward troll. And believe me, I am far from a Republican, bi-atch.

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    3. Re:link by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 1

      OK, here is a link to the "bus" story.

      http://business-times.asia1.com.sg/story/0,4567, 10 3575,00.html

      The other story (deal b/w republican campaign and major corporations) is in the Wall Street Journal in December. Unfortunately, their archives are not online. I'll try to dig up the date from the library and post it here.

      Magnus.

    4. Re:link by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

      Right. And right-wingers like to kill grown women, as well as people who are different in religion and/or color.

      Your fucking ideas kill people.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    5. Re:link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would love to see this article. I hope you
      can post it. We should send it to everyone we
      know. JP Morgan Chase was going to do their
      offshoring in December and waited until yesterday,
      so I believe this could be true. It should be
      investigated if it's true, if you ask me. (which noone did, I know.)

    6. Re:link by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      Like the idea of abortion? save the wales kill the babies gotta love the color of the sky in a liberals world..

      --
    7. Re:link by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

      Why not make the point that right-wingers build concentration camps? It'd be an equivalent statment. You're a moron if you think that environmentalis == liberalism.

      You're a moron. Period.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    8. Re:link by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      YOuve mde that point many times, so I guess were even you twit..

      --
    9. Re:link by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 0, Troll

      You forgot at least two pieces of punctuation in your response. You also misformed your ellipsis. The spelling errors are your homework assignment.

      I've pointed out your terrible grasp of the language many times in the past. You think you're so smart, but when it comes right down to it, the evidence of your miseducation and ill-disciplined mind is bountiful.

      I guess there's just no way to help someone who has stated that the US Constitution is no better than a dish rag. As a human being, you're a miserable failure. Why anyone would be your ally is a mystery.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    10. Re:link by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1
      You dont get it do you? You can say I 'stated that the US Constitution is no better than a dish rag' but it just is not so. If youre to stupid to understand revolutionay Liberalism vs modern Liberalsim, and read into a post that nowhere said I hated either set of ideas its no my problem. Im done playing petty little name calling games with you.

      Youre either too stupid to see the difference, or just an ass trying to pick a fight Ill let the other reading the forum decide..

      --
    11. Re:link by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 0, Troll

      Who is more likely to misunderstand what words mean? Me? I write my posts with exceptionally good grammar. You on the other hand cannot form a coherent sentence, nor can you be trusted to put an apostrophe in the right place. You're a moron who ranted against liberalism without understanding what liberalism is. When you get your definitions from Ann Coulter, you're going to be embarassed.

      Also, you're an idiot if you don't like the abuse you signed up for. If you don't want a relationship of any kind with me, then why did you click the little button to initiate the relationship? As you heartless right-wingers like to say: nobody to blame but your own damn stupid self.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    12. Re:link by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      Yawn... Sorry I don't obsess about grammar on slashdot. The only thing that makes one more of a loser than doing being a spelling Nazi is doning it in a post that had embarrassed misspelled. I could have been worse you could have ended sentences in prepositions like 'for' that would just be retarded of you thank God that would never happen. I hit the a$$hole button on you becuase I want your crap to have a lower with my settings score so I wont see it.

      --
    13. Re:link by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's just how right-wingers are. If they don't agree with it, they just put their fingers in their ears and hum real loud.

      See my latest journal entry, which is exactly about GW Bush doing this.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    14. Re:link by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      You mean like calling someone a Nazi, and saying they hate the constitution without any evidance? Do you mean like insulting someone because they dont parse before the post on slashdot and in the post haing a grammar and spelling error? That kind of 3rd grade behavior....

      --
    15. Re:link by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 0, Troll

      So, are you going to reverse your position and start claiming that you are not a Nazi?

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
  120. Try this on for size... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    What if your resume is legitimately miles long (i.e. 4-5 pages...)?

    Unless you've been working fast food or retail jobs all that time, they're going to wonder WHY you're applying for the position- and think that with all those skills that you're going to leave at the first opportunity- AND NOT GIVE YOU THE JOB. The same goes for a lot of the tech positions out there. And not revealing your qualifications will lose you the job if they find out you omitted things on your application.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Try this on for size... by dada21 · · Score: 1

      People with legitimately long resumes will not have problems finding jobs. They may have problems finding jobs paying what they used to pay, but such is the market. Things change. What used to be coveted is no longer wanted. What do horseshoers to today? What do streetlamp lighters do? Jobs come, jobs go. If you're ill prepared and spend a fortune on a skill that may not be able to pay for the debt of education, you should not tax me to pay for your mistakes!

      Life is a gamble. You have no right to happiness.

  121. a great number for lakh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my god, people in India are getting richer, but people in US are getting poorer or may eat shit someday if our government administration don't take actions on job offshoring and outsourcing issues, etc.

    1. Re:a great number for lakh.... by los+furtive · · Score: 1

      Time and time again state imposed job protectionism has been shown to actually hurt a country's economy as a whole more than the benefits gained by a few jobs saved. Invariably the protectionism is dropped.

      /me tips his hat to the steel workers in Michigan.

      Job protectionism is simply a political lever used to gain short term political support

      /me tips his hat to George Bush, visiting Michigan just days before he removed the steel tariffs.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    2. Re:a great number for lakh.... by shokk · · Score: 1

      India's state imposed job protectionism is that no one may emigrate to India for work unless they are Indian. Let's hope they hurt greatly for it. Think that one will get dropped?

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    3. Re:a great number for lakh.... by los+furtive · · Score: 1

      I should have been more accurate and meant to say trade tarrifs (e.g. those imposed on foreign steel by the US) or employee handouts (e.g. those given to US farmers) and not job protectionism as a whole.

      But in regards to your argument, you are wrong. Visas for working in India exist, and the beaurocratic process is not much different that working in England, Canada, or the US. You are confusing sovereignty with protectionism.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

  122. Good riddance to Silicon Valley! by swordgeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OK this might upset some people, but that's too bad.

    As a Very Large Company(tm), we outsourced our help desk a few years back. It was a painful running joke in the office that if you wanted to do no work done, you'd "phone India" with a problem.

    The joke stopped justover half a year ago. Our India helpdesk is incredibly efficient at fixing problems, the staff are polite, and there's no bad attitude. I don't care how much money the company has saved--they have improved the quality of their internal support, and that's something pretty damned valuable.

    So before everyone whines about 'cheap but crappy outsourcing,' make sure that it really is crappy. I'd wager that for all but the most highly skilled jobs, the overseas work is as good as anything locally.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:Good riddance to Silicon Valley! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May you smother in curry you anti-American asshole.

  123. Re:Petition by BESTouff · · Score: 1
    Now would be a good time to put together a petition and send it to the various candidates and demand that there be some restrictions to all the tech jobs going overseas.

    Yeaaah ! The US are aggressively promoting free market when it suits its needs (e.g. selling GMO all over the place) but don't want to loose when other countries are cheaper ? I think you don't represent enough electors to matter to your congressman. That's too bad.

  124. Re:No wonder, Bangalore is just like Silicon Valle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>rich white liberals

    You could probably have left off the 'white liberal' part.

    All the haves in this area (White, Chinese, Indian, Mexican, Black) want housing shortages so their property increases in value. That way they can sell their poorly-built house from the 1950s for 1/2 million+ and make about 450K on the deal.

    That is a lot of prescription drugs.

    And condos and high-rise apartment buildings ruin the 'aesthetic environment' of the area, so people fight tooth-and-nail against them--like in Mtn View, where I live.

  125. As Long as We Have the Nukes! by rocker_wannabe · · Score: 1

    India is hungry for U.S. dollars now but one day they'll want to call the shots. Even though India has nuclear weapons it's doubtful they have enough to overcome our newly developed, wiz-bang, handy-dandy, anti-ballistic missle defense system so we can bully them too when the time comes. I'm sure they have at least 3 or 4 terrorists living in India we could use as a pretext for invading them. That'll teach them not to mess with the Big Dog.

    See our government is thinking ahead! We just don't give them enough credit sometimes.

    Political Science

    by Randy Newman

    No one likes us-I don't know why
    We may not be perfect, but heaven knows we try
    But all around, even our old friends put us down
    Let's drop the big one and see what happens

    We give them money-but are they grateful?
    No, they're spiteful and they're hateful
    They don't respect us-so let's surprise them
    We'll drop the big one and pulverize them

    Asia's crowded and Europe's too old
    Africa is far too hot
    And Canada's too cold
    And South America stole our name
    Let's drop the big one
    There'll be no one left to blame us

    We'll save Australia
    Don't wanna hurt no kangaroo
    We'll build an All American amusement park there
    They got surfin', too

    Boom goes London and boom Paree
    More room for you and more room for me
    And every city the whole world round
    Will just be another American town
    Oh, how peaceful it will be
    We'll set everybody free
    You'll wear a Japanese kimono
    And there'll be Italian shoes for me

    They all hate us anyhow
    So let's drop the big one now
    Let's drop the big one now

    --
    "Meaningless!, Meaningless!" says the Teacher. "Utterly meaningless!"
  126. Re:Republicans have struck deals to postpone layof by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1
    The Republicans have struck deals with several dozens of corporations to postpone their outsourcing decisions till the 2004 elections are over

    That part..

    --
  127. Re:Won't someone think of our future? by jorjun · · Score: 1

    Smaller CEOs that recognise that outsourcing is a long term investment probably will never do it.
    It will take at least a decade to produce the expertise that some of the over-optimistic hope to replace.
    Outsourcing infotech in that sense is a fad.

    And though it feels like I have had my livelihood stolen, all that has happened is that good will has been run down for short term gains. When I get back to business, my rate is going to be much more punishing, I feel.

    There is no doubt about the need for quality infotech delivery, so why does industry try and cheat?
    Excellent return on their investment can already be made in the West by those with a clue - and a personnel rather than a human resource department.
    There is understandable hysteria concerning the subject of offshoring by IT professionals in the West, but I think that things should settle down soon and allow the phenomenon to be seen in it's true perspective : as a way of separating and lowering fixed labour costs.

    The problem looks worse currently, because there seems to be a blanket resolve by industry not to release development budgets. I would say that there has been a record level of under-investment in infotech for a variety of reasons.

    Perhaps clients hoped to create a frosty climate that would kill off some of the more frivolous infotech players. If so, they have now bitten down to the bone and the lack of investment must be starting to hurt by now.

  128. Bubble Risk by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It has proven problematic time and time again to put all our economic eggs in one basket. India should diversify. It is a big country in need of a lot of different home-grown services. Being a parasite of the US economy has caused problems for a lot of other asian countries when China outcompeted them in manufacturing. If a lower bidder comes along once India grows a bit, they might be in a similar position.

    1. Re:Bubble Risk by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It has proven problematic time and time again to put all our economic eggs in one basket.

      Correction, should be "your", not "our"

  129. Re:Republicans have struck deals to postpone layof by randall_burns · · Score: 1

    There is also the new H-1b for everybody initiative. I doubt the effects here will be noticed till after the election.

  130. Counterproof by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    An empirical counterproof:

    A. The US is the most free trade country in the world, at least among major countries.

    B. The average American Joe is better off than any other country's.

    If A and B are true, it disproves what you say is "apprently happening". Remember, appearences can be very misleading.

    1. Re:Counterproof by catherder_finleyd · · Score: 1

      Actually, the "average Joe" is not better off. The tendency has been for falling incomes since 1973. What has happened is that the gains are not being spread out to everyone. Increasingly, it's only the richest that get all the gains in national income.

    2. Re:Counterproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your so-called proof is invalid because it is not at all comprehensive. To cite a major omission, you forgot:

      C. The average American Joe has a soaring debt load.

      Appearances can be very misleading, and we're living on borrowed time.

    3. Re:Counterproof by Khazunga · · Score: 1

      Wrong on both accounts. Northern European countries, namely Sweden and the Netherlands have better quality of life than the USA. Even Canadians live better than US citizens. As for free trade, the US is about on par with the EU, but actively trying to protect itself more -- see current Euro<->Dollar exhange rates and recent steel import taxes.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    4. Re:Counterproof by Gorimek · · Score: 1

      As a Swede living in the US, my opinion is that that is way off. If Sweden was a US state, it would be the poorest, by far. Most Swedes can't even afford a car, while US "poor" complain about having to drive theirs less.

      I'd say the bottom 10-20% in the US do have it worse than in Sweden, and the top 50-60% have it better. I hear average income is about 50% higher in the US, and we were talking about the average Joe.

      I don't have any good sources to point you to, but my clear impression is that the US, while being a two timing hypocrite whore in the matter, does still have a lot less tariffs than EU. EU doesn't even have it's internal market barriers fully cleared up yet.

  131. Just like metal manufacturing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Working at a coffee shop pays more than being a machinist in many cases.

  132. Lower prices for products? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    Or bigger bonuses for executives?

    That's what irks me. The benefit of outsourcing to India is being put directly into the company's bottom line, not passed on to the consumer (who now has no job).

    Globalization would make me so much happier -- it does have the potential to even out gross economic disparities -- if I didn't see the whole process being manipulated by the wealthy for their own benefit.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:Lower prices for products? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      So-called Globalization (i.e. neo-liberal economics) will NOT even out economic disparities. The reason is pretty simple: capitalism is elitist and hence it will always be like that.

      Just to show you why it won't work, consider this. What happens when wages in India, or China, or whatever rise? Well, the companies will move to another country that is even poorer and hence the people are willing to put up with lower wages. This is what has happened in other industries to other countries. For example, how come Latin America is WORSE off now than ever? They were on the receiving end of many jobs during the 70's, 80's and 90's. Yet they haven't improved much. This Globalization thingie isn't something new. It has been happening since the world switched to capitalism (actually, it was occurring under merchantilism too but that's another story). Or how about some African countries who saw foreign investment yet haven't really shown anything?

      The reason the world for not equalizing is pretty simple. The benefits of trade can accrue to one party, the other, or to both. Right now, it accrues to one party: the multinational corporations.

      Having said this, I believe India and more importantly China are playing the Great Capitalist Game perfectly. That is to say, preach capitalism but ensure that the country is self-sufficient. So these two countries may gain something out of it. I'm not so sure about the hundreads of others that have signed themselves up to it.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    2. Re:Lower prices for products? by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

      Offshoring will inevitably pass the savings onto software consumers. Hell the PC market has been in deflation for several years now.

      Same thing for manufacturing. Wonder why you can get a 30 dollar DVD player at Walmart? Made in China.

    3. Re:Lower prices for products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Same thing for manufacturing. Wonder why you can get a 30 dollar DVD player at Walmart? Made in China.
      Yes, and do you think the quality of that player is likely to be like? Just for comparison, I now treat computer DVD drives as disposable and keep a spare in my house for when one fails. This is because I cannot find any manufacturer that produces quality DVD drives anymore. Hard drive quality is starting to be shit as well, and it looks like I am going to have to start running RAID on all of my computers and start treating hard drives as disposables too. I have trouble seeing this as a good thing.
    4. Re:Lower prices for products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What happens when wages in India, or China, or whatever rise? Well, the companies will move to another country that is even poorer and hence the people are willing to put up with lower wages.
      Depending on the size, wealth, and power that the company possesses it is possible for them to exert enough pressure to force wages back down, or rather to keep them from going up in the first place. Although, this seems rather unlikely in the examples you gave of India and China, it has already happened in smaller nations.
  133. No h1b & no outsourcing ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US has already cut down on H1 visas to 65000 - and already there is demand for getting that number down to zero. Add to that - there is demand for stopping the outsourcing. Guess what - if both these things US will become like China.. on its way to a closed economy

  134. If it wasn't for nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We'd have no spears, no clothing, and living in trees as apes.

    Attraction is important when "having more babies" is the answer to everything.

  135. Re:General Motors didn't worry about Japan until ' by Malc · · Score: 1

    They didn't really survive. The goverment threw them a temporary lifeline with protectionist laws. No, the Japanese companies have built non-unionized factories in the southern states. They're beating the big 3 in cars and are now turning to trucks. Why do you think the big 3 are focusing on cars at this year's Detroit car show? To be frank though, the Detroit car show isn't even the biggest or most important anymore. If the big 3 don't pull something out of their hats soon, they'll be up the crapper again looking for more support from the US government. They can't even afford to lay people off as they cost too much in retirement! I expect they'll start trying to screw their ex-employees out of their pensions soon - which are already believed to cost $1,000 per car at retail more than their US-built Japanese competitors.

  136. That's some nice statistics there sparky... by voodoo1man · · Score: 1
    A recent National Science Foundation Study reveals a 5 per cent decline in the overall doctoral candidates in the US over the last five years. The India side story: India produces 3.1 million college graduates a year, which is expected to be doubled by 2010. The number of engineering colleges is slated to grow 50 per cent, to nearly 1,600, over the next four years.
    How can they expect to compare the rate of growth of PhDs handed out in the states* to the number of college graduates* in India to the expected growth of engineering "colleges" in India and have it make any sense?

    * - Note that the degree major is unspecified.

    --

    In the great CONS chain of life, you can either be the CAR or be in the CDR.

    1. Re:That's some nice statistics there sparky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course it doesn't make any sense. Indians have something of a national inferiority complex and so you regularly see this sort of bragging in their newspapers where several non-sequiturs are strung together to make some bogus claim about India catching up with/overtaking the United States.

      It's like the Indian hypersonic plane article from last week. The article submitter frantically hyperlinks every other word in his story and even throws in an completely meaningless tidbit about how India's cruise missles are faster (there's a reason for this) in order to stir Indian pride. Of course all the non-Indian newspaper links don't even mention India as seriously involved in scramjet research.

      So basically I now know to discount all claims made in Indian newspapers about the state of scientific research or industry in that country. India is a free nation with a free press (unlike China, for example), but theirs newspapers are hyperbolic, to say the least. Of course this raises the question of why Slashdot "editors" post such news items unfiltered. Couldn't have anything to do with the volume of posts (and ad views) a good ol' flag-waving, my country-is-better-than-yours pissing competition generates, could it?

  137. Free Trade vs. Open Borders by randall_burns · · Score: 1
    What I find most curious is the incredibly rapid turnaround in opinion seen on Slashdot. During the dot-com boom, everyone was happy to see Open Source, a truly global phenomenon, bloooming. But now I see this strange bifurcation of views. Open Source software created by people from all over the globe is still good. On the other hand global commerce, in which the lowest-cost providers of goods and services win, is being villified.


    I can easily imagine how someone might be in favor of free trade(free movement of goods accross international borders) but oppose open borders(and stuff like H-1b). I like Open Source. I don't approve of an the H-1b expansion(I think it was way too much and has been greatly abused). I also don't like the huge trade deficits and government borrowing facilitated by dropping of tariffs. Those may be symptomatic that the US tax structure is _seriously_ out of wack. What I'd really like to see personally is imposition of tariffs just sufficient to close the trade gap, a balancing of the US budget and a move to revamp the US tax system so US export products would be moer competitive and tariffs-particularly with countries like Japan and the EU could gradually be lowered. The only reason IMHO for running a big trade deficit is stuff like rebuilding a country after a war. This current trade deficit is just propping up bad government policies.

  138. The rewarding of crap production ends here. by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have grown up. Its time for software engineers, programmers, program developers whatever the fairies want to call themselves to grow up.

    EVERY other type of engineer has to go thru some sort of a certifying process to instill the base levels of competence except for software engineers. Its ridiculous. And we're supposed to just put up with it.

    I'm not asking for programmers to be perfect. But to earn anything over $20 an hour for creating the type of software we all use today is a crime in my mind. From Windows to Mozilla to Real Player to Adobe Acrobat, to corporate web apps such as online banking software IT SUCKS.

    It all sucks. There's no excuse, no fucking excuse. Building bridges is hard. But its done right. Building planes is hard but its done right. Wiring homes, constructing sewer systems....etc its ALL HARD but it gets done the proper way. Otherwise people don't get paid or at the very least are sued for their money back. But software engineers? The little princes who sit in cubicles and think their fecal matter smells pleasant because they type on friggin keyboards...oh no critisize not these precious souls lest you rouse their ire! They just keep pumping out crap after crap after crap and hardly if ever suffer any negative consequences.

    So now we're seeing a situation where people in another country are going to get paid 1/5th to 1/6th the salary as a US programmer to produce the same quality work and I AM GLAD. I can't wait until only the absolute cream of the crop western coders earn anything above $20/hour. Plumbers, carpenters, mechanics, chimney sweeps shall make more than you and somehow you fucks you losers who spent tens of thousands of dollars and 4 years of your life on a "Computer Science" degree will either have to accept your new lower wages or find another line of work and actually become GOOD AT SOMETHING for a change.

    I know my comments have been sacriligeous here on Slashdot but I just can't pretend that the overwhelming majority of software produced today is very substandard.

    Do with my statement what you will.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:The rewarding of crap production ends here. by Politburo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A lot of people make comparisions between engineering and computer programming. I happen to work in an engineering firm, but have a degree in CS, so I am very aware of both sides of the analogy.

      The analogy sucks.

      The reason the analogy doesn't work is mainly because engineering deals with real-life physical problems. Also, engineering takes place in a realm of (generally) fixed possibilities.

      You don't have to design a building to withstand 1,000 mi/h of wind because you know that will never happen. However, your program, to be anywhere near 'bug-free' (which can rarely be proven, of course) must be hardened against every combination of inputs. The effects of wind, and the behaviors of steel, etc. are very well known. You simply don't have this kind of data in programming, because you are almost always designing one-of-a-kind logic.

      You make the implication that engineers don't make mistakes. That is far from the truth. The main reason why you don't hear about engineering mistakes is because of the massive QC effort that goes on. Most projects have at least 3 milestone levels, where plans are reviewed by the engineer's internal QC process, and then reviewed by the client's QC process. When you submit for jobs, part of your submission must document your QC process. No QC, no job.

      If software companies put in anywhere near the same amount of effort on QC, you would see a definite improvement in software quality. However, it would be very difficult for software companies to achieve this. This is because the use of standards in engineering saves QC time by minimizing the amount of work that the reviewer must actually check. While many software companies do have internal standards and practices, the lack of industry-wide standards hinders the QC process. Libraries can assist here, but there is still a lot of unique logic being written for programs that simply isn't checked well enough.

      People bitch about the costs of engineering (like the Big Dig), but fail to realize that more than 50% of the time is spent checking the work. A lot of money is spent to ensure that these things are safe. If you want a Mozilla or a Real Player that doesn't crash, I hope you're prepared to pay for it.

      I don't know where your bitterness against programmers comes from, but you need to chill out (and it sounds like you could stand to learn a lot from a software engineering course).

      Note: Many of my comments are in the context of public engineering projects. For private projects, plans are reviewed (in New Jersey) by the local Planning Board, as well as the Department of Community Affairs, a state agency.

    2. Re:The rewarding of crap production ends here. by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I really liked your analogy especially when you point out: "..If you want a Mozilla or a Real Player that doesn't crash...". But perhaps you're analogy could be improved.

      In all fairness, I think it's wrong to compare an engineering project as complex as the Big Dig to a relatively small (and relatively unimportant) piece of software like Real Player. Perhaps you can compare the Big Dig to the software that runs the recently landed Mars explorer Spirit. They put several hundreds of million dollars into that thing and they probably followed it with a more comparable level of quality control.

      Perhaps the proper analogy would be comparing a Sony Laptop/Wega TV to an Apex or other lesser brand name company. With Sony you're pretty much guaranteed a solid product that works well and has all the advanced features. With the Apex you'll get a product that works decent with a few bugs and few advanced features. In this analogy Sony represents companies that have strict QC measures and pride themselves on quality whereas Apex represents your cheap software, slap-it-together shops.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    3. Re:The rewarding of crap production ends here. by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Nit:

      At least as far as my experience goes, Apex players tend to have more features. They were the first to play MP3, ignore regions, disable macrovision, etc. However, they are a bit buggy, and are of lesser quality (both output and construction). Again from my experience, the bugs were not reproducible, and a reset of the machine cleared any problem.

    4. Re:The rewarding of crap production ends here. by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      True, they do have those features. I guess I'm talking about the "more advanced features" (something along the lines of progressive scanning.. in truth I haven't really done a side-by-side comparison).

      My 2 year-old, barely-used Apex DVD player is beginning to break down. I think it's dust on the laser but, anyway, I'm getting packet loss from DVDs. Sux. I bet a sony wouldn't do that in 5 years.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    5. Re:The rewarding of crap production ends here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not engineers -- just the "spineless ones" who let the product ship with bugs in it. Who didn't say no to the manager. Who lied about the project
      taking 2 weeks when it would really take 20. It's the spineless managers
      who don't say no to marketeers or directors or sales people -- you can have
      expert code, or cheap code. Pick 1. People have gotten the false idea that you have a 3-item set: schedule, cost, & quality. It really doesn't
      matter how much you money you through at most projects. A baby really
      does take 9 months. Brain-power is not linearly additive. Engineering
      brains vary by an order of magnitude. Some engineers are builts for fast
      throw-away products. Some are slow builders because every little bit
      of code has to be "just so", because that's the most defensive way to write
      that routine that is also efficient. Take the other code -- it's good for
      a demo, but then it has to be thrown away. Can't be productized. Other's
      attention deficit problems...get distracted on every detail of the code so
      that every bit of the code is explored and made modular and efficient
      where possible. No duplications.

      When I started SWeng, I fit very well...because quality was very important --
      service was included with products. Now, service can be sent to India and
      speed and cheap are important. Service is now very cheap because nothing
      is really done about it -- they just listen to customers -- like talking
      to a therapist, but it doesn't actually cause the software to be fixed, or
      any change to the development process to make sure it won't happen again --
      because no one cares about quality or the customer -- they will buy it
      anyway because they have to.

      Maybe someday they will care about quality in products again, but no one here will be able to do it anymore -- it will have been trained out of everyone
      who wasn't forced out of the field. My master told me that "it's not a bug unless a customer with a service contract finds it and reports it and pays enough for it to be entered into the bug database." He was in charge of the companies "trusted" government security product. If only terrorists were smart enough to use buggy software to create terror -- let that happen a few times. Force companies to include free, unlimited support and fixes for a year. Things would change.

      Also, you can't generalize about abilities between Indians and Americans...
      there are good, excellent and then there are call center types who only
      know [barely] how to read a problem script -- and usually can't seem to get
      past "please reformat your system and reinstall the OS" ....sorry that's
      what my script says to do now...can't help you anymore unless you do
      that...sorry. bye.

      bye.

    6. Re:The rewarding of crap production ends here. by Politburo · · Score: 1

      I use a Sony TV. From 1988. Works great and still has a crisper picture than many newer TVs (trinitron, of course).

  139. what is wrong with you people? by ignatus · · Score: 0
    First the Western coutries are compaining about all others doing unfair trade and not having an open market en promoting globalism so multinationals can flood their markets. And when they do, the start whining about outsourcement and the others being cheaper and successful

    Where's the common sense in that?

    --
    - Never underestimate the power of human stupidity.
  140. better say 150k, dude ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It can be understand internationaly and is not "indian centric" ;-)

    k = kilo = 1 000 = 10e3
    M = mega = 1 000 000 = 10e6 .....

    See the list of all size expresion 10 power of ...

    See the list of expresion 2 power of ...

    For instance you can use k$ or M$ ;-)
    OR better, k$/s which is a way michael dell is counting on his retail site :o)

  141. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by rfmobile · · Score: 1

    Well ... (insert thoughtful southern pause) ... Us real nice redneck boys don't have any problem understanding one another. Maybe you could take a language course like Pimsleur or Berlitz. Wonder if they offer "Southern" ...

    (and, no - "tabling" something means to drop it down here too)

    -rick
  142. Bush has already commented by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He had india doing his and the republican parties' phone fund raising.

    Bush falsely offered protection for the steel workers knowing full well that EU/Japan/UN would force him to obey our agreements from the 80's. He had nothing to lose.

    I would guess that Dean will not comment until he realizes that he has to say something. That may be interesting to hear. Do you argue for an overall world economy that will ultimatly help you or do you try to protect local high-end jobs?
    I strikes me that our leaders will take easy ways out rather than do the right thing. Time to set direction for our nation the way that India did.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  143. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by pla · · Score: 1

    Is it possible to understand those "real nice" redneck boys down in the deep south?

    Not entirely on topic, but I agree completely.

    A hint for people working in tech support, or really any job where you need to talk to the public. First of all, speak at a reasonable pace, and ENUNCIATE!!!.

    Two days ago, I called a few places to find out it they had a particular hard-to-find product in stock. One fellow, who appeared to speak English, I could not understand whatsoever.

    I asked him to repeat what he said - Tip #2, when someone asks you to repeat something, don't use the same rapid, clipped, poorly-enunciated style as the first time.

    I repeated this twice more, same response each time, then just hung up in disgust. I still have no idea what he said. For all I know, he said they had the product I wanted in stock, for some obscenely low price. But I'll never know, because he couldn't take the damned marbles out of his mouth.

    I realize that losing a single $1500 sale doesn't mean all that much to most companies, but in my experience, salespeople like that count as the rule, not the exception.

  144. Re:Silly foreigner... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We drink water from lead cups?

  145. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by Malc · · Score: 1

    You made my point for me very nicely thanks ;)

    In Canada (although that could be changing) and the UK, tabling an item at a meeting means to introduce and start talking about it, not drop it for later and move on to the next topic.

    I did a Google search, and this was the first item I came across. It's rather cheesy, but it makes this point at the end of the second paragraph:

    http://www.apics-redwood.org/article/art9910CS.htm

  146. Let's get real by JustAnotherReader · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'd like to see some management jobs outsourced

    The answer to that statement is "That's just silly. To a manager cost cutting means cutting YOUR job, not his. Havn't you been paying attention?"

    It's amazing that during an election year that I've yet to hear one thing from Dean or Bush about this. Is everyone bought and paid for?

    The answer to that question is "Of course they are, havn't you been paying attention?"

    Sadly, this appears to fall into the "globalization" groupthink. It's a "free market economy" therefore it must be good...right?

    The answer to the last statement is more complex. The plain truth is that our government has done this to us on purpose. Rather than cutting back on spending they simply spend more and more and more. How do we pay for that? Well, last week Greenspan printed another $5 Billion in fiat money that has no gold or assets to back it up. In the same week the Fed issued an addition $17 Billion in debt. And that's just one week! How about a month of $17 billion weeks? Think about a year of $17 billion weeks. How about a decade of $17 billion weeks. What will that do to our economy? Throw in ridiculusly low interest rates and it's a recipie for disaster. Allow me to elaborate:

    Here in Southern California we have 15% of the jobs and 10% of the nation's population. If you count Southern California and the San Fransisco/San Jose are we have nearly 15% of the population of the entire country AND a bit more than 20% of the jobs. (This data comes from Claritas, a demographics company that I use to work for)

    People need to live where the jobs are. Yes, you can say "Go live in Indiana where you can buy a house on 2 acres of land for $200k" but then reality sets in and you realize that in general, you must live where the jobs are. People need to buy houses where they live. The artificially low interest rates have made it far too easy to get cheap money in the form of home loans. This access to easy money has artificially increased the price (not the value, but the price) of homes. In Mission Viejo in Orange County a house next door to my niece sold for $440k 4 years ago. It sold last month for $1.2 million. In my area of San Diego our home prices have doubled in 5 years.

    So how do people pay for that house? They need higher wages. Now follow along because this is an important concept: To purchase the same house they could have had 4 years ago they need almost twice as much money. In other words It takes more money to purchase the same amount of stuff That ladies and gentlemen is the very definition of inflation. That is the inflation that Allan Greenspan says does not exist

    So our government has made it far too easy to get money which has caused housing prices in the areas where the jobs exist to skyrocket. In the mean time they are printing money like maniacs which also deflats the value of all the existing dollars AND they're going deeper and deeper into debt at a such a rate that they seem determined to utterly destroy the country and it's entire economy at the fastest rate possible.

    Our government does not represent us, the middle class. Republicans, Democrats, it doesn't matter. We don't need an election, we need a revolution.

    Now are you paying attention?

    1. Re:Let's get real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >recipie for disaster

      Ok, so bring on the disaster already. Life in the US is still too damned good, and the average reasonable person is still satisfied.

      Let's have that disaster, so that we can become outraged enough to fucking change it, otherwise you need a new theory.

  147. I don't think so . .. by scarolan · · Score: 1

    There's no nerd stigma in India like here in the USA. Indian women would love to land a highly paid software programmer as a husband, pocket protector and all.

  148. Unions Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is said by some that the loss of manufacturing jobs despite unions is evidence that unions don't work. However, much of the loss is due to attrition, not existing people losing their jobs. Unions tend to protect existing members. Entry into the field may be tough, but existing people are protected. This would give us techies a "soft landing". As long as schools discurage new citizen techies, attrition alone will take care of the offshoring difference.

  149. Semi-Skilled Labor? by notreallynas · · Score: 1
    In an editorial today, the Wall Street Journal claims in regards to IT jobs in India, "At the bottom end, some coding has become comparable to semi-skilled labor; some training is required but not a lot of brain power. These are the jobs moving to India."

    By the tone of most of the replies in this thread, it seems to me that this statement is patently untrue. Of course the WSJ doesn't provide any source to back up their point. Is there any truth in their statement, or is this just another example of this newspaper's racist tendencies? I imagine if I was an Indian programmer doing high-level project management, I would be pretty offended by this claim.

    Most likely, I imagine this is another means for the right to maintain their foothold with the middle and upper middle class by convincing them that while manufacturing jobs may be disapearing from the US, there is no reason the believe that more skilled positions will follow.

    1. Re:Semi-Skilled Labor? by pavkb · · Score: 1

      It all depends on the definition of "Semi-Skilled". Is programming in VB like creating a form & writting code snippets for Various events "Semi_Skilled"??
      Is a Web Designer "Semi-Skilled"??

      Is a guy working to write financial back-office trading systems or the guy writting compilers & stuff more important than the above??

      Most indian companies / IT people fall under the first category. Say 10% of them work on stuff for companies like intel which may be usefull tomorrow.
      I would say this is the same ratio here in the US or any other country.

      Given the above i would say the WSJ statement is infact TRUE.

  150. Herd capitalism by Yogs · · Score: 1

    Fairly evocative of the stock market, and so why should it be surprising that the corresponding companies act in the same way? Unless the CEO and top management are highly courageous, and actually knows they're doing it's difficult not to buckle to fashion and shareholder fears. Who's to say that they'll survive in their post long enough to be shown correct anyway? (And that assumes they even know what they're doing in the first place) When lacking vision, the mantra is reduce costs at all cost.

    For example, shed whole divisions of your company. Layoff experienced workers esp. if they're nearing pension (if that exists), hire young (or just stop hiring). Move operations to India, China, Russia, wherever. Curtail most benefits. Replace offices with cubes, cubes with benches, benches with shared space or work at home. Banish most office supplies and guard the rest jealously.

    Sadly, many who rise through the CEO ranks to bigger and bigger companies are the "courageous" ones who slash and burn everything they don't see paying off in 18 months (or 12 or even 6 depending).

    It's not that some of these things aren't necessary under certain circumstances, but they are not without negative consequences and huge risks. IMHO, the thing to do here is similar to good investing strategy: play the contrarian. Keep experienced people around, they know things, can do things, and elevate the productivity of those around them. Hire on some of the zillions of unemployed or under-employed techies in the states. You can have your pick at the some of the best, or if you don't need quite that and if you want to do something more short term, you can get good people right now on the very, very cheap. Innovate, release products. Even if the market isn't ready yet, being ahead of the game will pay off later. Having kept good people on board and treated them with respect will pay off when they don't jump ship when things get better.

    Now, how many companies are actually doing this?

  151. Sorry Dude by TTL0 · · Score: 1
    I think more than a headcount, what defines Silicon Valley is the innovation, and the leaders that led that invation, that has come out of there in the past few decades.

    When India starts producing people like Bill Hewlett, Bill Joy, Steve Jobs, etc... or making things like the mouse, gui, the PC, or ATARI game machines, etc... or has institutions like Stanford or Xerox Parc,etc... then post an article.

    Till then there is not much of a story

    --
    Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind. -- Mark Harrold
    1. Re:Sorry Dude by pavkb · · Score: 1

      I pretty much agree. and i am an indian.
      Most work in india is done for American companies like GE, microsoft. So the real talent even if its there never gets used to create anything new of their own.
      Hope this changes.

  152. Exporting knowledge and skills by Colonel+Panic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Moreover, it is found out that the Americans are shying away from the challenges of math and science. A recent National Science Foundation Study reveals a 5 per cent decline in the overall doctoral candidates in the US over the last five years.

    One way to look at this is that we Americans are just lazy compared to Indians, Chinese, etc (and there is probably some truth to that). But from another perspective, why should we Americans bother to get advanced degrees in Math and Sciences when we're constantly bombarded with the message that we won't be doing the sorts of jobs here which require those degrees?

    This gets me to my main point: we're not only witnessing the export of good paying jobs from the US to various 3rd world countries (and the associated economic effects), we're also witnessing a huge transfer of skills and knowlege out of the US.

    As there are fewer tech jobs in the US it means that fewer engineers will be employed. When an engineer has no work for a year or two their skills will stagnate. Most engineers pick up new skills 'on the job' and without a job, they won't be picking up newer, in-demand skills.

    Of course this has a ripple effect: your nephew Johnny who is in highschool wanted to follow in your footsteps and get into engineering, but now he sees that you've been out of work for a couple of years and you're considering a different field altogether. You sit down with him at Thanksgiving and tell him to go into dentistry or auto repair so that he can have a steady, decent-paying profession... Well, you get the picture. Whereas math and science education is already pretty poor in many parts of the US, this trend will not encourage it to get any better. No, we'll be offering pre-law classes in highschool instead of calculus soon.

  153. Use the right term, guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's so politically incorrect to call them "Indians".

    They are "Native Americans"

    Sheesh.

  154. global jobs market? by dpuu · · Score: 1
    What are the immigration rules like for India?

    Will I be able to get a job over there after the next round of layoffs -- do they have an equivalent of an H1B program? Are there any WTO rules that ensure that the job market really is global? (Has the US argued against such rules, as a form a protectionism?)

    --
    Opinions my own, statements of fact may contain errors
    1. Re:global jobs market? by pavkb · · Score: 1

      To my knowledge there is no such program like H1B in india. I would say it would be almost impossible to get a temp visa/job in india unless the company already has a presense in say both in US & india like GE or Oracle.
      Again, this should be changed for good & most of the changes should occur on indian side. And the pressure should be from the US & EU.

  155. Does the world benefit? by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    Good points, Valdrax. In particular your comment about Chinese-supplied hardware makes sense to me. You seem to have thought through these issues in depth, more so than most posters.

    But I still wonder about a couple of things.

    1) Readers may not be fine with what makes Chinese hardware inexpensive, but they're still very eager to buy it. I have yet to see indignant reaction to news of a spiffy new high-capacity, super-cheap drive manufactured in China by an American company and sold for 1/2 the price of its predecessor. If people really believe that lower prices are not worth the side effects of doing business with mainland China, then why aren't techies everywhere boycotting?

    2) You noted: If I lose my job to outsourcing, I can see that the customer is unlikely to see a reduction in price (or bugs) for the product, and the market is favoring poorer labor conditions. Overall, the world has not benefitted by my loss, so why should I like it?

    I mean you no disrespect, but pricing pressures are the very thing that has driven American companies to outsource overseas. In order to keep prices down in a cutthroat market, the companies that provide high-quality goods and services more cheaply win. It's that simple. Consumers demand lower prices, and companies can only offer lower prices if their overhead is reduced.

    I would also argue that there is benefit to the people of India. If a new strata of well-educated, well-paid (quality of life for a programmer in Bangalore may exceed that of a programmer working in the rat cage that is Silicon Valley) young Indians becomes the leading edge of a transformation in Indian society, the largest democracy on earth could lift all of its people out of "developing nation" status. Not only would that be good for India, it would be a great source of inspiration for other nations.

    Finally I would add that my point about the comparison between the globalism of Open Source software and the globalism of international business was intended to call attention to the notion that once you open the door, you can't easily go back. Trade promotes progress. It's been proven over and over again throughout history.

    My feeling is that Americans need to stop thinking about ways to stop the growth of India's outsourcing industry, and start thinking about how to improve our education system and create new technology markets.

    Between our paranoia about physical security and our paranoia about economic dominance, it's difficult to remember that we're by far the most powerful nation on earth.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  156. Re: So all I need to do is move to India and I can by stephanruby · · Score: 1

    That's not true. I was part of an international internship exchange program and we had so many few students willing to go to developing countries, it wasn't a problem getting them visas to work there. Usually, there is the principle of reciprocity at work here. The US government was willing to allocate us more US work visas if we could send more American citizens abroad as well.

  157. Me too, me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn right. You got my sentiments spot on... nothing to add, just couldn't not agree.

  158. Re:Republicans have struck deals to postpone layof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    "In India, some technology companies have adopted lower profiles. Microsoft has been removing its name from mini-buses used to ferry engineers on overnight shifts."

    http://business-times.asia1.com.sg/story/0,4567,10 3575,00.html

  159. Given the choice that seems better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as they are going to take the jobs they might as well take them in the US and keep the money local.

  160. But, doesn't India NEED reduced population growth? by alispguru · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I couldn't resist...

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  161. Skinny people drive, too by Ryosen · · Score: 1

    Having a car has little to do with obesity in America. Less excercise, yes, but not diet. General obesity (that is, non-genetic) is caused primarily by three things: 1) easy access to food, 2) excessive portion sizes (Super-Mega-Size those fries, for ya?) and 3) Americans eat more crap per capita than any other country. Without pinning the entire responsibility on any one fast food chain in particular, the amount of "fast" prepared, processed and fat-laden food available combined with the percentage of the average diet that is represented by said junk, is what makes us overweight. Also, our society (dietarily-speaking) seems to place a greater emphasis on meat rather than vegetables (no, I'm not a vegan).

    For a very interesting, albeit disturbing treatment on the decline and fallout of the American diet, check out Fast Food Nation by Eric Schlosser.

    --

    Ryosen
    One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    1. Re:Skinny people drive, too by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 1
      Speaking of the fast food industry in America, I had a professor last semester who loves the spotlight and is trying to do to the fast food industry what has been finally successful against big tobacco. He apparently was involved against big tobacco since the early days several decades ago. As such, I guess the campaign against "big fat" may take a while, but it is certainly underway.

      His website is gaudy, and therefor kindof funny, but does summarize the legal fight against the fast food restaurants.

  162. low female birth rate in India by peter303 · · Score: 1

    So thats one way to deal with the lack of women in India. Sons have always been strongly favored. With new medical technology- mainly ultrascan abortions- this dream has been realized. The male:female ratio in some villages is approaching 3:2.
    On the oher hand, if anyone one is going to get a women, its going to be a smart, rich guy in Bangalore.

  163. Lets just send more jobs overseas. by NickRuisi · · Score: 1

    When I read statistics like this, and I think about how some of the major US development shops are offshoring labor, I feel like writing another letter to my congressperson demanding something be done about this. Tax penalties, for instance. Some incentive to keep the high-tech jobs in the US maybe. Otherwise, all of those who talk about the brain drain here in the US will see it get even worse. Maybe someone should start a registry of companies who offshore development labor, as the starting point for a boycott against this practice by those in the field. I know joe consumer isn't going to give a rat's ass either way if his latest version of whatever was coded here or overseas (by a company that is allegedly a US company.. IBM anyone?), but joe user doesn't buy the high-end software usually.

    Imagine the stink if this was auto manufacturing or steel production or whatnot. The labor unions would be screaming for blood.

    1. Re:Lets just send more jobs overseas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I feel like writing another letter to my congressperson demanding something be done about this. "

      Writing a letter?

      You don't feel like assassinating a large number of political officials and putting your party in control? Things aren't bad enough yet, and they will continue to get worse, until people actually are forced to take action.

      You find yourself able to live another day under the status quo. You aren't in any danger of literally starving to death or being summarily executed for your beliefs. As long as that's true for just about everybody, the status quo prevails.

  164. At last, some sanity in Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very true, very true...

    Other Slashdot readers always see through a 'self glorified' smoke screen, when it comes to commenting on outsourcing...

    But this comment is the only genuine exception..

  165. And what happens next? by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

    You fail to see the consequences.

    1. American economy shifts overseas to reduce costs.

    2. Foreign economies boom, American economy slows.

    3. Foreign currencies boom, American currency tanks.

    4. American currency becomes cheaper than foreign currencies.

    5. Work flows back to America.

    Meanwhile, standards of living across the world start to level out as nations like India and Pakistan become more prosperous.

  166. Maybe we are to blame? by JThaddeus · · Score: 1

    I groan at one reason cited near the end of the article--that U.S. students are shying away from math and science. Does that mean we'll get stuck with all the lawyers and M.B.A.s? We got only ourselves (meaning, our citizens) to blame.

    --
    "Love is a familiar; Love is a devil: there is no evil angel but Love." --William Shakespeare ('Love's Labors Lost')
  167. Re:Republicans have struck deals to postpone layof by HiThere · · Score: 2, Informative

    While I find this plausible, I find no easily locatable sources for it. It wasn't in the first 3 pages of links from Google under what I thought a plausible set of search links.

    Now I don't follow the WSJ, so I would probably not have seen it if it were there. OTOH my default assumption would be that some reference would have shown up in Google. So an appropriate link to the story would be appreciated. (And no, lexis doesn't count as an appropriate link.)

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  168. Sorry, you're very wrong. by dada21 · · Score: 1

    Minimum wage laws did nothing to raise the minimum wages of the poor. What they did is basically create a law saying that you can't hire someone worth less than $x per hour. If you have to pay a person $5 minimum, why would you hire someone that is only worth $3 per hour and has no skills? People never work at the minimum wage long -- once they have gained skills, their worth goes up. If you don't pay them more, your competition will.

    The funny fact is that the average wage of unskilled workers has always been higher than the minimum wage. The minimum wage laws basically make it hard for the youth and the minorities to get jobs. Restaurants would love to hire 2 busboys at $3 an hour (a job that you don't stay at long once you have proven your ability to show up on time and work hard), but with minimum wage laws, they can only afford one worker at $6.

    Here are some great links to minimum wage ideas:

    http://www.mises.org/econsense/ch36.asp
    http:// www.mises.org/efandi/ch13.asp
    http://www.mises.or g/freemarket_detail.asp?control =174&sortorder=title

    If you believe what Svartalf says, you've fallen victim to the Keynesian / Welfarists who believe that you have to help the poor instead of allowing the best of the poor to rise above the masses of people who care not to work, but only care to live on the backs of others.

  169. Sauce, Goose, Gander. by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

    Yup. It's easy to pontificate on the joys of globalism when you think you're riding the "long boom". It's different when your boom pops, but the other guys' doesn't.

    Personally, I like to think I have enough integrity to take the long view: cycles come, cycles go, this to shall pass. Of course, I still have a job.

  170. In related news ... by Dukael_Mikakis · · Score: 1

    Bombay Beats Washington, D.C.
    from the only-a-matter-of-time dept.
    Dukael_Mikakis write "The inevitable has happened. Americans have now resorted to outsourcing their political positions to India, making Bombay (or 'Mumbai', the new Washington, D.C. A proponent was cited, saying, 'Most politicians are out of touch with their constituents anyway, so whether they're in D.C. or by the Indian Sea, it probably won't have too much of an impact' in response to concerns over the responsiveness of Indian politicians.

    'And, as a cost-cutting measure, it only makes sense,' the same source continued, 'because Indian politicians are corrupt for substantially less money than their American counterparts. And, while Americans are no slouches, Indian politicians are very familiar with rolling over at a corporate beck and call. This is a glorious achievement for American business.'

    Opponents have also raised national security concerns over having an Indian president operating out of India, but these were also dismissed. 'Indians are loyal, hard-working, and will only be corrupt to the advantage of America. They wouldn't possibly shirk their duties. And with today's communication technology, it will almost be as if the politicians are in our living rooms. Trust me, there is nothing to worry about, unless you are an American politician.'

    Exxon and Halliburton executives seemed enthusiastic about the idea, saying, 'I wonder if they've got much oil.'"

  171. Tell me why I don't know what I'm talking about by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    instead of hiding behind a content-free post, AC.

    Argue my points instead of resorting to name-calling. I know you can do it. Deep within you there is some sort of articulate response just waiting to be posted on Slashdot.

    Listen to your Inner Voice and tell me specifically what you think is wrong about my post. That applies to the parent of your post as well.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  172. So what now? by dannyh · · Score: 1

    Ok, so all this is pointing towards the fact that i'm never going to get a job in the US tech industry. So what does a low 20's guy with a CS degree and little experience do now? Do we just give up and get a job in management? Do we have to go back to school and start over? How long will most tech jobs stick around here before being outsourced? Is it safe to say that the smaller business arn't big enough to bother with outsourcing overseas going to have jobs for us to fill? The competition for these will be rediculous. Do we go to grad school? What about the IT Management Programs that Uni's offer... I'm not going to cry and eat icecream on the couch, but i would like some advice as to what we're supposed to do now...

  173. of a lot more interest here by alizard · · Score: 1

    What's India's organized crime involvement with the financing of IT outsourcing in Bangalore?

  174. dollar's decline by bigpat · · Score: 1

    This is a matter of the relative value of currency. With the dollar going down in relative value it doesn't seem likely that the savings of employing people on the other side of the world with the associated overhead will make as much sense as it once did.

  175. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? WORSE by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

    You have absolutely no pride in the thoughts you express. You are writing as an anonymous coward. You're wasting my time with words you don't feel worthy of putting your name to.

    But, yes, I really fudged that sentence.

  176. Are you sure?? by serutan · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's a typo for " Latka engineers."

  177. Why not just tariff the code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we can tax imports of cargo and goods, why can't we do the same with code? This has a two fold effect of saving jobs, and raising revenue for the US.

  178. Just like ICs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same thing happened with ICs and Asia. At first the grunt work was outsourced, then some low level design, and now all of it. American IC designers used to think their jobs were safe because they could 'do the hard stuff' and leave the rest to outsourcing.

    Now they're all Java/.NET developers.

  179. What's stopping you? by alizard · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The VCs will not fund you. They, too believe in the outsourcing fad. And will keep believing in it until their jobs go to Bangalore, too.

    Anybody can start a storefront white box operation... but making it scale to a national level can't be done without external funding and may not be possible even with it.

    While I labeled outsourcing as a management fad, there is no reason to believe that the fad won't last long enough to destroy most technology industry in the USA or persuade kids going into college now NOT to get degrees in technology-related fields.

    Without tech industries in America, welcome to the Third World. You've presumably read SnowCrash. It's predicated on a "race to the bottom".

  180. Productivity differences... by slykens · · Score: 1

    Having been involved in the operation of several call centers in India and working with a few software engineers there I would suggest that even though Bangalore has 20,000 more "engineers" that overall productivity is somewhat lower than the smaller number of workers in the US.

    In our experience we found that dependent on the job we needed 2.5 to 5 Indian employees to match the productivty of a US employee. At $1/hr or thereabouts it is still cheaper to hire five Indians in place of one American, however.

  181. This ain't really capitalism, folks. by ariux · · Score: 1

    India is winning because it has:

    1. Cheap currency
    2. Strongly subsidized technical education

    We are losing because we have:

    1. Expensive currency (strong dollar)
    2. Weakly subsidized technical education

    These things are not neutral capitalist market forces - they are intentional, market-distorting government policies. Higher education subsidizes employers by increasing the supply of labor. A weak currency supports exporters (of labor or whatever) by making their products more competitive in world markets. Eventually a critical mass builds up and industrial leadership is captured.

    In fact, as long as governments anywhere offer education and print money, it's useless to talk about "pure free markets," because you don't really have them. What you have is regulated markets that are currently being commanded to someone else's benefit and to your detriment. There's no shame in it if this spurs you to political action.

    But then, what should that action be?

    Well, individual wealthy investors love a strong dollar because it increases their international spending power and influence, and they love foreign educational subsidies because the cheap labor so created multiplies the value of their foreign investments. The problem is that, once too much industrial production is gone from the US, the dollar becomes unsustainable and finally collapses (because there aren't enough US products to buy with it) and the whole country - packed with suddenly worthless dollars but vacant of the industrial capital needed to actually produce anything of value - goes down the tubes (military commitments and all).

    So what policies should you support to prevent this scenario?

    Well, you should want a weaker dollar and cheaper, more aggressively subsidized technical education. This combo can make US industry competitive again in world markets.

    Bush has it half right - he's letting the dollar gradually and progressively weaken. Every cent it falls makes your labor more competitive against your foes in Bangalore.

    But it's also necessary to drastically correct and reorient public higher education. No more basket weaving classes and tuition hikes. We need to aggressively educate America's kids with real technical skills, or our industrial competitiveness and ultimately the country's future are going to bleed to death.

    Get out there and organize! Recap of platform:

    1. A weaker dollar
    2. Strong focus on publically funded technical education
  182. The answer to why? by sameerdesai · · Score: 3, Insightful

    India is a cheap country to live in and I know it because I lived there. Yes you can say that you get very less pay than what you get in US but then you should also look at expenses. You spend more than half of your salary into taxes, rents, and payments of other kinds which is not the case in India. The saving there are tremendous. And you can end up saving more than here. The reason jobs keep on moving to India are significantly many some of which are: 1) 1 US Dollar = 50 Indian Rupees (approx) 2) You have to pay there much less than here in US. As for e.g. If I get paid here in US 5000 bucks a month, this translates to nearly 250,000 Indian Rupees. A salary of more than 25,000 Indian Rupees a month is considered more than excellent. 3) Excellent cheap labor. There are many educated people there whose primary language is English and can effectively deliver the goods. The economic condition is improving drastically and it does not surprise me why companies want to move jobs to countries like India and China with the very reason why we are seeing such a jump into Jobs @ Bangalore.

  183. You, sir, are a clueless idiot. by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    I didn't turn down anything that was actually offered to me in the form of "real work". It took me TWO FRIGGING YEARS to find a 6 month gig that I'm now two months into. Every place I talked to used the line "overqualified" quite a bit. You don't see device driver developers and client/server systems developers, getting VB coding jobs (which is what a lot of the positions out there have been for the past two years...).

    And, if you must know, just before I got this gig, I was trying to scrape up the cash to get HVAC technician certifications so I could get a journeyman job doing that (since everybody, including businesses have to have that sort of thing these days...). Lots of money in that trade, I'm already knowlegeable and skilled at it having done it as a side business growing up, and I don't mind doing the work. But, I had to come up with the cash all the same so that I can be allowed by the Federal government to service HVAC systems- there's official training and tests to be taken for handling CFC's and HCFC's, etc.

    If you've never been in the position these people are/have been in, you're hardly qualified or knowlegeable about commenting on the subject. Like I said to you in an earlier post, do EVERYONE else a favor and be quiet, will you?

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:You, sir, are a clueless idiot. by dada21 · · Score: 1

      You decided to become a device driver developer and handle client/server systems. Why should I (or any part of society) be held responsible for your choice? I'm sure when you went to school for it, you thought you'd make money, pay the bills, etc. You made a bad decision, but yet I'll have to pay out of my paycheck to keep you fed. Ludicrous.

      As for trying to scrape up cash to become an HVAC tech, did you work 2 jobs? How about 3? I've worked 3 jobs before in order to save up money to start a business. I didn't spend much money on wasted items. I saved. It took years, but I did it.

      And as for the government licensing, that is another thing I am against. Why do you have to be licensed? The government is preventing you from offering services that others want.

      I won't be quiet. Liberals (both democrat and republican) have destroyed any hope for freedom in this country, and it is my job to make sure people learn that the lies many preach are just that -- lies.

    2. Re:You, sir, are a clueless idiot. by Khazunga · · Score: 1
      You decided to become a device driver developer and handle client/server systems. Why should I (or any part of society) be held responsible for your choice? I'm sure when you went to school for it, you thought you'd make money, pay the bills, etc. You made a bad decision, but yet I'll have to pay out of my paycheck to keep you fed. Ludicrous.
      In other words: Don't you ever ever spend 3-5 years (5% of your lifetime) specializing in anything. Specializing is a risk, and you are the one running that risk. Only you pick the profit of specialization, so only you carry the burden of failure if evolution makes your abilities obsolete. Let's have a nation of farmers and stone artisans. Those trades will never get obsolete.

      Duh!

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
  184. Re:Republicans have struck deals to postpone layof by JamochasWitness · · Score: 1
    Expect to see wave after wave of US layoffs in the wake of the elections... especially if Bush wins again.


    I have this strange feeling that a month or two before election day, Osama Bin Laden will get "caught". Bush's ratings will skyrocket and he will win in a landslide! ;-)

    Perhaps, I've seen "Wag the Dog" one too many times!
  185. Re:Republicans have struck deals to postpone layof by Dick+Faze · · Score: 1
    The Republicans have struck deals with several dozens of corporations to postpone their outsourcing decisions till the 2004 elections are over.

    OK, lets see your source on this. Oh, do you have inside information and can't reveal it? Oh, no? You made it up? That's what I thought.

    Expect to see wave after wave of US layoffs in the wake of the elections...

    And the election will have affected this how?

    especially if Bush wins again.

    If? Have you read a newspaper or watched TV lately? Without Hillary the question is not "If".

  186. Re:Economist article-- Free Trade is a MYTH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Infonaut seems to hold the "religous" belief that free trade is good for a nation.

    But free trade really doesn't exist. Just look at the last WTO meeting. The third world walked out because the first world is still blocking their agricultural exports. Nations know the ideal is talk Free Trade for your exports and block imports any way you can get away with.
    History is full of this kind of behavior.

    Another example: If the jobs are moving to somewhere else, can't I simply move there to work? Usually no, most nations have laws limiting that.

    Finally, lets take it to its logical conclusion, (as Western Rome did) we could hire cheap mercenary soldiers from other countries to form the majority of our military force. As a former military man, even Infonaut should see the danger here. And isn't a good deal of our current military effectiveness due to computerized technology? What will be the long term result of us losing our edge in technology?

    As a side note: Those who say the dollars we ship overseas in foreign jobs have to come back to buy things here, overlook the fact that they can be used to buy real estate here. Thus driving up the price. So not only does your job disappear, your rent goes up too.

  187. morons.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the zero came out of India.. so hehehe... what do u say for that? India is the inventor of all mathematics.

    1. Re:morons.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grammar came out of India too :)

  188. Re:General Motors didn't worry about Japan until ' by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    The Big Three didn't worry about Toyota and Honda until the 1980's because of the low priced foreign competition. They rested on their laurels turning out mediocre cars at best.

    The feedback from the Japanese executives regarding their eventual siting of plants in the US is rather interesting - the success they had was due to the poor quality of American management rather than the American worker whom they thought was much better than the Japanese worker.

    I wonder if the same sort of thing will eventually turn out to be true in the IT areas. If so it would suggest that the combination of American management and offshored programmer would be very vulnerable to foreign managed companies using American programmers.

    This is similar to the concept that what really should be offshored is American management - these are the guys who are really making a lot more than the workers, are more likely to be corrupt and so on.

    If I were a VC or somebody with a good looking business plan I would be very interested in bypassing the whole American management system and implementing a reverse structure like the Japanese currently have.

  189. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I find Indians' English to be generally intelligible.

    Yeah, like words vednesday or upgradation.

  190. Re: So all I need to do is move to India and I can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Internship" isn't what you're after -- you want a career, the right to own property, sufferage under the political system, etc. Try to visualize the difference between a wave of emigration and a few students doing a semester of foreign work study. It is very difficult for someone in mid-career to emigrate from the US.

    The "America: Love it or Leave it" crowd have never seriously contemplated how difficult the latter option really is. And they won't, until they themselves are part of the class that does not "Love it" anymore.

    Opportunities, in the rare cases when they present themselves, are usually not sufficient for emigration.

  191. Commodity? by DrCode · · Score: 1

    Do you really think software development is a "commodity"?

    Do you also think other professions are commodities, like medicine or law? If you need surgery, or are accused of a crime, will you hire the cheapest doctor or lawyer available?

  192. Re:I thought the article was in English , not Hind by Probashi · · Score: 1


    More than a billion people! And, as someone else has already pointed, the article was written in a Indian rag (India Times) which means the target readers would know the word 'lakh'.

  193. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

    A bit funny coming from the yankees.

    Now i dont speak eton either but atleast my accent isnt a bastardized amalgation of italian,german and irish accents.

    OK the above is a flamebait but for a reason.Indians speak with an indian accent and americans with american.Doesnt make either accent wrong or right.

    Anyway the right accent would be from the english departments of Cambridge and Oxford.

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
  194. CS isn't really engineering by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, engineering is an industrial approximation of science. Ohm's Law isn't exact. It fails in the extreme. The engineer doesn't usually need a detailed understanding of quantum mechanics or GTR when working with electrical components. Computer Science IS math. Church's Thesis states this. It's as exact as mathematics itself. That's the difference. It's like comparing apples and oranges.

    However, one could make the point that both engineering and CS require extensive project management and time management skills, a healthy dose of vendor documentation, and elaborate design.

    The problem is that the line between advanced IT and engineering has grown thinner over the last 10 years. Sure, there's a big difference between writing a device driver and a creating a large scale enterprise application. However, I've seen guys who have done both. I've seen my share of guys with EE degrees working in what I term advanced IT (IT on a large scale with more sophisticated architectures). Of course, now that advanced math (combinatorics, algebra, and logic beyond discrete math) has been removed from most CS programs and CS has been moved to the engineering side of the house, this trend will continue. I understand the professional reasons. I respect them. However, I'd like to point out that Donald Knuth, Marvin Minsky, Dennis Ritchie, Martin Davis all have PhDs in math. I'm sure the list of prominent CS people with math degrees is extensive and on the theoretical side of the house it's all math anyway (once again, church's thesis).

    I've always balked at people who say they like programming but can't stand mathematics. It just doesn't make sense. Either you haven't really studied mathematics or Alonzo Church is wrong. CS will always be an open and interdisciplinary field. AI is as much biophysics as it is engineering, and certainly requires an intimate knowledge of foundational mathematics as well. The computer program is mathematics, and fields like bioinfomatics, digital physics, and computational linguistics prove this.

    --
    What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
  195. History repeats by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    This hue and cry goes up every few years. It just takes different forms:

    2000s: India (Russia, et. al.) are taking our programming jobs! We'll never be able to recover!

    1990s: China is going to kick our ass! It's OK to export to China, but let's not import from China, or we'll see the American Way of Life crumble!

    1980s: The Japanese are kicking our asses! Stop Japanese steel! Don't buy Japanse cars!

    People all over the globe buy China's cheap goods (which will not be cheap forever, as China becomes more and more prosperous) and India's cheap code (which is already under threat from cheaper competitors).

    But job loss is not the same thing as job displacement. The jobs that go elsewhere are replaced with other jobs. Throughout the 20th Century in the United States, as the country became less and less rural and more urbanized, the farm population dwindled. More efficient means of production meant less need for workers in most farm industries (I do understand that migrant farm labor is a factor here, but the migrant labor pool is no where near as large as the labor pool displaced by technology).

    So where did all of those farm workers go? They lost their farm jobs but became steelworkers, factory workers, white collar workers, etc. America's very agile labor market was able to shift into new, growing arenas.

    American workers may be hurt in the long run by the rise of outsourcing, but I don't think it will be from outsourcing per se. We live in a nation where many states teach the Theory of Creationism along with the Theory of Evolution. Our K-12 education system is in complete disarray in almost every large urban area. Our teachers are underpaid, overworked, and expected to perform parenting functions along with the Reading, Writing, and Arithmetic.

    We need to get our shit together and realize that sitting dumb and comfy, arguing that Americans are inherently more skilled at high-tech tasks is a recipie for disaster. If we can keep creating the new high-tech jobs of the future, we have nothing to fear. If we continue to pay short shrift to the underpinnings of our current success, we will not be able to displace jobs to new industries, and we will suffer.

    Protecting weak industries won't help us - creating the industries of tomorrow will. This stuff hurts. I know from personal experience. But it's the way capitalism works. We can't crow about how we espouse capitalism, then duck behind protectionism when that same capitalism doesn't work to our favor.

    As for the strategic base, I agree with you wholeheartedly. That's why we need to get off our asses and develop a work force that is educated for the 21st Century instead of the 20th.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  196. Are you sure you're showing the lies... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    ...for what they are, or are you just telling different ones yourself. I didn't ask to be helped in my situation, I'm my own person and I managed to make it all work out, but to say that anyone can just "easily" get a job right now is also LYING just as much as the people you're trying to expose.

    Your message would be much better recieved (and believed by all) if you got off your damned high horse yourself.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  197. True Free Trade is a Good Goal by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    Infonaut seems to hold the "religous" belief that free trade is good for a nation.

    I hold the belief that trade should be as free as possible, and that the freer the trade, the more benefits to everyone involved.

    But free trade really doesn't exist. Just look at the last WTO meeting. The third world walked out because the first world is still blocking their agricultural exports. Nations know the ideal is talk Free Trade for your exports and block imports any way you can get away with.

    History is full of this kind of behavior.

    I agree. It's the worst form of hypocracy for Europe and the United States to press the developing nations to open up their trade while simultaneously protecting our own (agriculture, which is now run by huge conglomerates for the most part, in particular).

    Another example: If the jobs are moving to somewhere else, can't I simply move there to work? Usually no, most nations have laws limiting that.

    Unless you're inside the EU.

    Finally, lets take it to its logical conclusion, (as Western Rome did) we could hire cheap mercenary soldiers from other countries to form the majority of our military force. As a former military man, even Infonaut should see the danger here. And isn't a good deal of our current military effectiveness due to computerized technology? What will be the long term result of us losing our edge in technology?

    You're assuming that the outsourcing of computerized technology represents the demise of American technology know-how. Even during the 1980s when America was getting spanked by the Japanese in the automobile market, nobody would argue that America had lost its ability to manufacture sophisticated manufactured goods.

    But the real issue here is that we will only lose our technology edge if we continue to protect industries that are bloated, inefficient, and noncompetitive. If the American computer industry is in need of restructuring in order to remain competitive, let's do that restructuring NOW rather than later. Look at the Japanese. Their economy was screwed up for a decade because while America went through painful restructuring, the Japanese refused to do so. Putting our heads in the sand will not make the competitiveness of Indian and other programmers go away.

    Just remember what the US automobile industry did during the 1970s and 1980s as Japan became better and better at building cars. First we belittled them and said their cars sucked. Then the tune changed and we accused them of dumping. Finally, we had to bail out Crystler because they and their cohorts in Detroit had been sitting on their asses.

    As a side note: Those who say the dollars we ship overseas in foreign jobs have to come back to buy things here, overlook the fact that they can be used to buy real estate here. Thus driving up the price. So not only does your job disappear, your rent goes up too.

    I see no correlation. Why does the price automatically go up if a foreign buyer purchases land? Many large Japanese companies bought up a lot of U.S. real estate in the early 1990s, only to sell it off a few years later at large losses.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  198. Looks like they need to catch up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I started looking around to see more about balgalore, and this popped up in google.

    http://www.virtualbangalore.com/Ent/index.php

    The site has been hacked.

  199. Indian girls seem smart AND interested in tech/IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When even the Indian girls are supersmart AND interested in tech/IT education, as it seems from:
    http://www.linuxjournal.com//article.php?si d=7341
    the West will have to shapen up a bit, so go help your kids with their math homework :-)

  200. The problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the way I see stuff in the larger picture. These issues are way beyond Dean/Bush IMO.

    1. The west beleives in equality. The rest of the world not necessarily so. eg. The cast system. Thus, you become 1/5Billion = 0.

    2. Some do not want the world to be ruled by 1 power. Thus, they prop other nations up by exporting technology.

    3. With many different counteries there is a defacto free market. Entities will use this to violate national rules to their own advantage.

    The best place to be is probably in security or some tech company that has a geographic priority in certain areas. Otherwise, your job will be eliminated. Of course, there is a solution to all this: the tariff. But I guess thats why the targeted all the manufacturing jobs first. I dont know how you apply it to information.

    I could go on and on but thats my 2 cents for now.

  201. DENNIS KUCINICH is not bought and paid for by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    Kucinich is very well known for having a serious grudge against corporate power. He actively dislikes entrenched corporate power. Check him out; he is running for President!

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  202. And then... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... the Riders of Armaggedon rode the Earth and we will be judged for our sins.

    Give me a brake, The US economy is in mild recovery, unemplyment is low and people are still whining.

    Argh....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  203. Correction. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Bush was forced to back track on the steel tariffs due to a WTO ruling.

    Nothing to do with the UN.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Correction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush was not Forced. He knew that it was against agreements with WTO, E.U., japan, etc. He made the deal knowing that in under a year he would back down, but he could blame others.

  204. Bollocks. Bush does not set the dollar value. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The US goverment has not done so for some time.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  205. Re:Interesting...But by batlike · · Score: 1

    If he could also afford a car, what then was he doing riding the train?

  206. Go Bangalore! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of miles to go before you sleep!
    Bravo!

  207. Mod parent up? by RoboProg · · Score: 1

    Good job on the numbers, assuming they are accurate. I've been wording what the @#$%^&() has been going on with the national debt the last few years, myself (not the "derivative"/"slope" deficit, the actual amount, the debg). We seem destined to screw ourselves at the national financial level in the next 5 to 10 years.

    And nobody cares...

    --
    Yow! I'm supposed to have a plan?
    1. Re:Mod parent up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >And nobody cares...

      People care, but the people who really care, understand macroeconomics a little better.

      We've been "destined" to demolition for the last 50 years. In your 5-10 years, it'll be pretty much the same as the last 5-10 years.

  208. Almost forgot by RoboProg · · Score: 1

    According to stuff I read (read, who does that?!?) in the paper, the US consumer price index does NOT include housing and fuel, because their prices are "too volatile". Never mind that they are among your biggest, most relevant, expenses.

    This is one trick to hide exactly what you are pointing out (denial of big, big, inflation).

    --
    Yow! I'm supposed to have a plan?
  209. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by rfmobile · · Score: 1

    Hey, thanks Malc ... I learned something.

    -rick
  210. Desperate Povery in India by Punctuated_Equilibri · · Score: 1

    The thing that gets me -- According to the World Bank, 35% of the population of India subsists on $1 a day or less. That's 350 million people. 80% subsist on $2 a day or less (800 million people). That's real poverty. How can I begrudge them a tech job? Particularly if they do it well.

    --
    In group behavior: 'because they're evil/morons/sheep/crazy' is not 'insightful' it's 'oversimplified'
    1. Re:Desperate Povery in India by NatZi · · Score: 1

      These figures are behind my drive to stop the fraudulent and extortionary rates charged by Indian outsourcers.

      The mean income rates are around US$8 per day in Indian. Fine. If Indian wants to be the world's outsourcing headquarters, then US companies that outsource should be expecting to pay US$1-$2 per hour for programming resources -- certainly no more than US$5 per hour. However, Indian firms continue to praise the low rates of US$40 per hour. In other words, US companies that outsource are paying eight times the going rate for labor.

      I have no problem with Indian or any other third and fourth world country being an IT outsourcer. However, US companies need to be more firm in brining rates in India in line with reality. Paying at least eight times the going indigenous labor rate is simply absurd -- and is why this infomation is never included in US corporate reports. Comparing the overinflated Indian rates to US rates is simply wrong. The rates should reflect the indigenous labor costs -- not external costs.

      I think if Indian "programmers" were paid their true rates, there would be far less pressure against US jobs anfd the IT industry would begin growing again -- how will it ever grow with Indian labor?

    2. Re:Desperate Povery in India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The thing that gets me -- According to the World Bank, 35% of the population of India subsists on $1 a day or less. That's 350 million people. 80% subsist on $2 a day or less (800 million people). That's real poverty. How can I begrudge them a tech job? Particularly if they do it well."

      Great, you can offer them *your* job.

  211. Re:living standards and expenses are going to skyr by vijay-slashdot · · Score: 1

    Wakeup buddy. Its just like saying there's unrest in US cos for the last few centuries people all over the world have been flocking there for a better life?.

  212. No comments? by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    I'd have thought you'd have some 'witty' riposte for me by now. No substance and all rhetoric. Just like all the other "Libertarians" I've yet to meet up with. Your first clue about what I am should have been the tagline- that's a Libertarian sentiment, through and through. And, I do believe that much of what we got going on is a mess and is wrong- I just find that your answers aren't much better either.

    There's historical reasons why some of the things we have going on are there and in place- and if you know nothing of the history you shouldn't be gainsaying it in the first place. Some of the laws in place are there because of abuses made by business people and there's no changing that fact- nice stories telling you that all it does is ensure that teenagers, etc. get a guaranteed amount of money not withstanding, it's still a fact that there were exploitative people and the government stepped in to prevent the exploitation. If the minimum wage doesn't fix the problem, then suggest something else that WILL fix the problem- otherwise keep quiet because that something is actually better than nothing.

    The same goes for many of the other laws on the books. Now, things like Social Security, there's no good rationale for those- there really wasn't much of a real problem for the government to step in and fix there. But, that's different than the child labor laws and minimum wage laws.

    Each of those laws should be weighed on their merits and whether or not government has a business in the situation or not (in the case of Child Labor Laws, it does...)- not an utterly simplistic view that there should be no government whatsoever ("Anarchistic Capitalism" is the statement you make in your tagline, I believe- that would be no government whatsoever, letting the businesses run everything. Bad Idea, really. Businesses, if not checked, would actually go about killing people if it made a profit.).

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  213. Why India is more competative by roe1352 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm.... I can't imagine why a place like the Bay Area where houses start at half a million dollars isn't competative with a place like India. Actually, I can't belive that the Bay Area is competative with anywhere is the world. If the damn tree-huggers in the Bay Area would allow high density growth which would lead to more affordable housing, the Bay Area could continue as the high tech center of the world.

    1. Re:Why India is more competative by Sayan · · Score: 1
      you really want to know why india is more competitive?

      This is better answered with an example. and the best example I can find is our president Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam. He is one of India's foremost scientists, accomplished poet in several languages and a gifted musician. Above all he is a teacher par excellence and proponent of non-violence . Not to mention he is web-savvy and is known to reply to mails himself and often gives presentations from his laptop. He is also a big supporter of the Open Source movement. Not to brag- how does Mr. Bush compare? I will leave the readers to judge for themselves.

      --
      resurrect my .sig
  214. Re:True Free Trade a Good Goal-just not pragmatic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ---
    You're assuming that the outsourcing of computerized technology represents
    the demise of American technology know-how.
    But the real issue here is that we will only lose our technology edge if we continue to protect industries that are bloated, inefficient, and
    noncompetitive.
    ---

    It's the workers that are being replaced, not the industries. I don't believe the american tech worker is bloated, inefficient, and noncompetitive. American CEOs, yes. I do believe it's the price differential in LAND that's driving this trend. No amount of extra schooling for americans will reverse it.

    And you don't really believe we should out source the majority of our military personnel do you?

    I am sure China would be interested in the contract.

    ---
    I see no correlation. Why does the price automatically go up if a foreign buyer purchases land?
    ---

    Capital does not have to be invested in ways that produce goods or services or jobs. It can be just sunk into land. Most business booms are closely shadowed by booms in land prices. Look at the valley. CEOs have to turn those stock options into something solid before everyone finds out what they are really worth.
    I am not saying that's what foreigners will automatically do. Maybe they will buy a lot of designer jeans instead.

    Free trade would benefit every nation, if it existed. But since one-sided trade benefits the nations that engage in it (they enjoy fuller employment), it's in their self interest to continue to engage in it.

    Markets encourage cheating,
    it's the tragedy of the commons.

  215. I'm not so sure .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just don't think you'll get anything really remarkable out of people under those conditions. [In India]

    Yep, one thing silicone valley proved to the world is that the best way to make coders work hard is to giveaway Boxters once a month, full flexible hours, free lunch, lattes sodas and snacks. Some even paid for rent.

    This is directly responsible for the most incredible software ever created and so businesses that made billions in IPO money. And the fact that 98% of them does not exists anymore has nothing to do with the employees, the market was just not ready yet.

    Seriously, I wonder if looking out the window of the train and see 100 million people living in shacks with no running water or electricity is not a better motivator than free soda cans and meals in the freezer. Personally I always preferred to pay for my own stuff, but avoid the "evil eye" if I go back home after "only" 8 to 10 hours of hard work.

  216. minor patriotic nitpick by d_i_r_t_y · · Score: 1

    we were schooled to believe that australia was, in addition to the largest island on earth, the least densely population nation on earth, which, according to this reference, would be about right, since the others aren't really ccountries by themselves.

    by comparison, the US is about in the middle, world-wise.

  217. wtf??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the hell is this troll / offtopic? It was a perfectly honest, relevent question! Please metamod as "unfair".

  218. Management by MudDude · · Score: 1

    I would like to hear some stuff about management. Do companies just send an email with teh documents containing the requiremetns that the outsourced people have to adhere to?

    Is that even possible?

    Do you need a local presence to lead everything in proper paths?

    --
    You don't need to see my .sig. This isn't the .sig you're looking for...
  219. BangU vs MIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would love to see a highly technical test given to an MIT tech graduate and a "BangU" ("Bangalore University") graduate. Not to point fingers, but just as a matter of interest. I think it might be an eye-opener, whatever the results.
    PS - I realize there mV6eot be a BU - that's why I put it quotes.

    1. Re:BangU vs MIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A colleauge of mine who has recently finished his masters at MIT reports some disturbing news. It's not so much better than a regular state university. You still get lectures with inexperienced grad students, and it's luck-of-the-draw if they're any good. It sounds like MIT has suffered from the same effects as all the other schools.

  220. it's evolution, baby by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    if you don't have the gut to rush the system and cheat like your advanced peers appear to be doing, then why do you think you are in any way better than they are? you are afraid to take a risk for whatever (ethical) reason, so you feel that others should not take this risk either. You are the weak!! you are growing nearer the chaff! you will be cut off and left to dry in the sun with me and the rest of the rest of the garbage awaiting extinction, who are incapable of cheating.

    standard anonymous american coward, completely devoid in the bravery and resolute that formed the country you so easily defend.

    if you are frusterated, be frusterated at yourself, for you are expending more effort for the same results, whereas you could be doing better things with your effort-time.

    or better yet disregard my words, be defeated. I don't care.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    1. Re:it's evolution, baby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "if you don't have the gut to rush the system and cheat like your advanced peers appear to be doing, then why do you think you are in any way better than they are?"
      It is rarely necessary to sink to the level of your enemy in order to defeat him. You could always expose the cheaters, blackmail them, set them up, kill them in their sleep, etc.

  221. Re:I thought the article was in English , not Hind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "3 entries found for lakh.
    lakh

    Lac \Lac\, Lakh \Lakh\, n. [Hind. lak, l[=a]kh, l[=a]ksh, Skr. laksha a mark, sign, lakh.] One hundred thousand; also, a vaguely great number; as, a lac of rupees. [Written also lack.] [East Indies]

    Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, (C) 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc.

    lakh

    \Lakh\, n. Same as Lac, one hundred thousand.

    Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, (C) 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc.

    lakh

    n : the cardinal number that is the fifth power of ten [syn: hundred thousand, 100000]"

    source: www.dictionary.com. Its "English" english
    you know

  222. Re:Republicans have struck deals to postpone layof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I have this strange feeling that a month or two before election day, Osama Bin Laden will get "caught". Bush's ratings will skyrocket and he will win in a landslide! ;-)

    Perhaps, I've seen "Wag the Dog" one too many times!"

    Perhaps you've ripped off the same tired line people have been spewing since Saddam was caught. Trying to pass that off as an original idea at this point in time? Really.

  223. Great Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hope you register. Posting anon because I don't want to sign in as I am on a non-secure public machine. =P

  224. I Agree With You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't let other people get you down. Some people argueing with you here are in the upper class of people who have their heads in the ground. You make a lot of good points.

  225. Re:Show of hands: Language Barrier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    obselense??? i think you meant obsolescence....in English, that is..