Yeah, because I'm sure that we don't have highway planners here in the USA. And I'm sure that proper planning requires a huge, overreaching monolithic government. It must be due to the republican form of government that when these older highways were designed that not every considering was made for safety and growth. Protip: local, state, AND federal government are responsible for roads here. It's not "private money".
I'm sure that you can be on time for your appointment that's 100 miles away by leaving just five minutes early to account for knuckleheads driving fearfully. Please just admit you're wrong and cut your losses.
So you think overweight vehicles should all drive proportionally slower? Let's do that with tractor trailers going 30 MPH on an interstate. Let me know how you like it.
How is anyone supposed to see stoplights blocks away? Around a curve? Over a hill? In a complicated intersection with turn arrows? You're speaking nonsense that has nothing to do with traffic law or safety and just sounds like old wives' tales being handed down. You should be keeping your eyes on the conditions around you, not on stoplights 2/10 of a mile away.
In New Jersey, they make women get ultrasounds on the pain of having her child kidnapped by DYFS. It's not to discourage abortions; it's just plain old progressive nonsense.
I hope you weren't trying to respond to me, because what you have said makes absolutely no sense. Don't be encouraged by the slob who modded you "insightful". Protip: having a low UID doesn't mean you get to spout random prose and insults.
Implying that three-quarters of generals were dumb sons of bitches, and being offended by MacArthur's hat? Truman earned his terrible approval rating at the time. I don't understand the fawning Truman cult that later arose.
My first cell phone was one of the early digital Nokia phones with the stubby antenna (5190?). Too chunky to put in a pocket, so I had to have the belt holster. Engineers worked long hours to bring us the original RAZR-- smaller than Captain Kirk's communicator-- and now we're back to clunky phones. I don't really want to go back to that. As it is, My LG E-970 is on the edge of being too big. We'll find out once I've had it a few more months whether its fate is to snap in half when I bend over to tie my shoelaces.
Even if violence against women were the most important issue today, this resolution is lacking some sort of reference to actual SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE that pornography is the cause. For years, people have been blaming games, movies, and TV for everything with no actual reasoning behind it.
Slashdot Mirror
Nope. When we had federal speed limits, the limit was 55 EVERYWHERE.
Yeah, because I'm sure that we don't have highway planners here in the USA. And I'm sure that proper planning requires a huge, overreaching monolithic government. It must be due to the republican form of government that when these older highways were designed that not every considering was made for safety and growth. Protip: local, state, AND federal government are responsible for roads here. It's not "private money".
I'm sure that you can be on time for your appointment that's 100 miles away by leaving just five minutes early to account for knuckleheads driving fearfully. Please just admit you're wrong and cut your losses.
Weight transfer of their loads.
So you think overweight vehicles should all drive proportionally slower? Let's do that with tractor trailers going 30 MPH on an interstate. Let me know how you like it.
Slippery slope.
How is anyone supposed to see stoplights blocks away? Around a curve? Over a hill? In a complicated intersection with turn arrows? You're speaking nonsense that has nothing to do with traffic law or safety and just sounds like old wives' tales being handed down. You should be keeping your eyes on the conditions around you, not on stoplights 2/10 of a mile away.
OK, then life begins when the child learns to speak. Anyone down with that?
Suddenly killing is OK as long as we save money.
This post deserves 100 mod points.
In New Jersey, they make women get ultrasounds on the pain of having her child kidnapped by DYFS. It's not to discourage abortions; it's just plain old progressive nonsense.
I hope you weren't trying to respond to me, because what you have said makes absolutely no sense. Don't be encouraged by the slob who modded you "insightful". Protip: having a low UID doesn't mean you get to spout random prose and insults.
I'm sure that, every time you go on vacation, it's exactly what you'd wanted to experience.
I'm sure that, every time you go to the store, you're able to buy exactly what you wanted to buy.
I'm sure that, every time you go to a movie or a play, it's exactly what you'd hoped it would be.
And I'm sure that, every time you go to sleep, your dreams are totally awesome because of the hard psychoactive drugs you're on.
Implying that three-quarters of generals were dumb sons of bitches, and being offended by MacArthur's hat? Truman earned his terrible approval rating at the time. I don't understand the fawning Truman cult that later arose.
My first cell phone was one of the early digital Nokia phones with the stubby antenna (5190?). Too chunky to put in a pocket, so I had to have the belt holster. Engineers worked long hours to bring us the original RAZR-- smaller than Captain Kirk's communicator-- and now we're back to clunky phones. I don't really want to go back to that. As it is, My LG E-970 is on the edge of being too big. We'll find out once I've had it a few more months whether its fate is to snap in half when I bend over to tie my shoelaces.
Your fist still has one finger sticking up... oh.
So then advertising porn would be banned. Sounds like the slow march of censorship.
Whatever you feel about circumcision, religious freedom is not "bullshit".
Because "feelings" are what we want to base legislation on. [insert old-fashioned chauvinist joke about women's emotions here]
Maybe you should consider what freedom actually means instead of attaching labels to individual issues.
We can finally actually punch someone in the face over the internet!
Even if violence against women were the most important issue today, this resolution is lacking some sort of reference to actual SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE that pornography is the cause. For years, people have been blaming games, movies, and TV for everything with no actual reasoning behind it.
I thought that was because we were a bunch of prudish Puritans here.
The resolution says "pornography in the media". Yup, it's banning porn.
Says who? Oh, you. And them. I'm sure that your personal opinion is not censorship.