What do you mean Bush should oppose what China is doing?
He is probably taking notes, like "Hmm, that is a good idea, that is a tad bit too far for now, that another good idea"
We already have RFID chips in our passports. The government is engaging in warrantless wiretaps, the National Security Letter is a blatant violation of the first amendment, Gitmo, War on Drugs, etc...
You don't need to look further than Washington to see "nonsense-ical human rights violations"
The Department said that the policies prevented consumers from receiving the full benefits of competition, discouraged discounting, and threatened to lock in outmoded business models.
Apparently the Realtors didn't pay enough to their lobbiests and lawyers. Just look at how the MAFIAA has done at getting policies and laws to lock in a outmoded business model.
Is there a way to execute SQL queries on wikipedia without having to actually download the entire database? I asked google, but was presented with the SQL page on wikipedia....
If there was a way to do that, it would be through a SQL injection hack.
I tried DD-WRT, and in my situation, where I am using WDS along with QOS on one of my 3 wifi routers, Tomato was much more stable than OpenWRT and DD-WRT.
If you find DD-WRT to be stable (enough) for you, then I would suggest not changing.
I was going to suggest a pair of WRT54GLs running Tomato with some 15dBi antennas, but ethernet like that is going to be a much more reliable solution, if a bit harder to install.
There are 2 separate issues here. I agree that it could be argued that some kinds of speech should legitimately be restricted, but any restriction on speech should be a hard thing to accomplish.
But, I don't see how those restrictions can be reconciled with the first amendment, as it is currently written. "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech" seems to be pretty unambiguous to me.
All I am saying is that if people want to limit rights, they should have to change the constitutional amendments, not have a judge insert "meaning" into the amendments, like has been done for almost all of them.
I wasn't referring to virus checkers for a list of "good software", I was thinking about the package manager used by many Linux distributions. I don't know how that would work in Windows, but it generally works pretty well in Ubuntu, with the advantage that you can quickly add a set of applications.
Enumerating the bad is usually a bad idea, since it is to easy to change what is "bad". We enumerate the good with firewalls, why should software security be any different? Distro repository + corperate repository should cover all software necessary, right?
Will we now see true evolution of software viruses?
Slashdot Mirror
What do you mean Bush should oppose what China is doing?
He is probably taking notes, like "Hmm, that is a good idea, that is a tad bit too far for now, that another good idea"
We already have RFID chips in our passports. The government is engaging in warrantless wiretaps, the National Security Letter is a blatant violation of the first amendment, Gitmo, War on Drugs, etc...
You don't need to look further than Washington to see "nonsense-ical human rights violations"
Apparently the Realtors didn't pay enough to their lobbiests and lawyers. Just look at how the MAFIAA has done at getting policies and laws to lock in a outmoded business model.
They are only "locked" if people don't record the analog output from the computer.
How many people really want music that can only be played from the internet? For some people this would work, sure.
Apparently they don't think many people like iPods and other portable music players.
If there was a way to do that, it would be through a SQL injection hack.
So, hopefully not.
And how exactly does that allow a treaty to remove a part of the constitution? (Crappy politicians defining words however the hell they want aside)
See also Reid v. Covert
Sweet, now there are even more kinds of "illegal data" out there.
Under-age porn, "terrorist" material, DRM removing software, MAFIAA products, etc...
They would be useful to me if the nearest bus stop to my house wasn't 5 miles away and buses ran more often than every 2 hours.
It is normal, for many Americans, as you just said. Efficient? Environmentally conscious? Maybe not, but it is pretty normal.
Add Natalie Portman as the spokesperson, and that would indeed be quite a test of new hardware.
Or install Tomato and go to the QOS tab. It is pretty simple to get QOS going on Tomato
I tried DD-WRT, and in my situation, where I am using WDS along with QOS on one of my 3 wifi routers, Tomato was much more stable than OpenWRT and DD-WRT.
If you find DD-WRT to be stable (enough) for you, then I would suggest not changing.
I was going to suggest a pair of WRT54GLs running Tomato with some 15dBi antennas, but ethernet like that is going to be a much more reliable solution, if a bit harder to install.
Yeah, if it was a torrent of a crack, that wouldn't be good.
I am kind of surprised they just posted a link to a 200MB file without having a torrent version be an option.
I didn't see a torrent of the MacOS version of the demo.
That you for your well-written explanation.
... abridging the freedom of speech" seems to be pretty unambiguous to me.
There are 2 separate issues here. I agree that it could be argued that some kinds of speech should legitimately be restricted, but any restriction on speech should be a hard thing to accomplish.
But, I don't see how those restrictions can be reconciled with the first amendment, as it is currently written. "Congress shall make no law
All I am saying is that if people want to limit rights, they should have to change the constitutional amendments, not have a judge insert "meaning" into the amendments, like has been done for almost all of them.
Here are the torrents for the Windows and Linux versions of the demo.
And where is that exception in the first amendment?
If you can insert "little changes" into the amendment without actually amending it, then it can be changed to say anything.
Jack Thompson is a lawyer who has made a bunch of lawsuits against several game manufacturers.
Basically, he hates the 1st Amendment, and isn't afraid to make a ridicules lawsuit to try and censor people.
Um, hate to break this to you, but everyone already has a gravity field.
Getting more massive would indeed make that gravity field more intense.
And a replaceable monitor.
That was my first thought as well,
"Do they make a spherical version"?
I wasn't referring to virus checkers for a list of "good software", I was thinking about the package manager used by many Linux distributions.
I don't know how that would work in Windows, but it generally works pretty well in Ubuntu, with the advantage that you can quickly add a set of applications.
It is a clever plan to get people to RTFA. Now people will stop bothering to read the fine summary.
Enumerating the bad is usually a bad idea, since it is to easy to change what is "bad". We enumerate the good with firewalls, why should software security be any different? Distro repository + corperate repository should cover all software necessary, right?
Will we now see true evolution of software viruses?
This is pretty much #1 and #2 in this list of The Six Dumbest Ideas in Computer Security.
Are you trying to make it sound like MS hemoraging money is a bad thing?
If they keep trying to break in to the Japanese dominated console market and keep failing, losing tons of money, all I can say is "Good for them".
I read the title to mean that MS would stop making 360s.
What the article said is that there isn't going to be a slim version of the 360 or a 360 with a Blu-Ray drive.
Quite a big difference, I think.