Slashdot Mirror


Parent-Friendly Wireless Bridge To Span 500 Meters?

GonnaBRichYeahYeah! writes "My dad lives down a dirt road 500 meters off the main road. The cable company will not put cable down his lane for any less than the ridiculous sum of $10,000. And he cannot get phone line DSL since he is so far away from the central terminal, so he relied on painful 22k/sec dial-up for access to the Internet. He got sick of it and relies on Hughes satellite Internet, at $60/month, but he still has to be connected to a phone line to upload to the Internet. It's not a good solution, but better than dial-up. His friend lives on the corner of the main drag with his lane and has cable, thus hi-speed Internet. I suggested that he get a wireless access point, and put it at his friend's house and then get a wireless card for access. The problem is that no wireless routers go that far (max range of -N is 200 feet) and WiMax is too complex for a 70-year old man. Any suggestions from Slashdot crowd would be helpful." Plenty of people make wireless links over longer distances, but often they're not suited for people who want simplicity and reliability. What's the best out there right now?

558 comments

  1. Consider the do it yourself way... by avronius · · Score: 5, Informative

    Supplies:
    Hoe (one per helper)
    500 meters of heavy duty conduit
    500 meters of cable (recommend that you lay fiber at the same time)

    Solution 1:
    1a: Dig a long trench from the cable termination point down the dirt road to your father's house
    1b: Dig a long trench from "the closest neighbour with cable internet" down the dirt road to your father's hose
          Ensure that the trench is at least 18 inches deep, roughly 8 inches wide

    2. Lay 500 meters of heavy duty conduit. Ensure that you are threading your cable through the conduit all the way along. Attempting to thread the cable AFTER the counduit has been completed may prove to be problematic.

    3a: Call the cable company to connect the cable to the cable termination point. Begin paying monthly subscription to cable internet provider.
    3b: If you've chosen to run the connection to your neighbhour's home, ensure that you don't piss him/her off. They are now your cable internet provider.

    4. Profit $$$

    1. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by avronius · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh yeah...
      Don't forget to fill the trench after you've installed the conduit!

      Failing to do so, may turn this solution into a bigger problem than simple "internet access"...

    2. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Supplies:
      Hoe (one per helper)


      For 500 meters?!?

      Christ on a cracker.. rent a ditch witch!
    3. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by David_Hart · · Score: 2

      Corollary: What he said.. only rent a backhoe to do your digging.

      David

    4. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by corsec67 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was going to suggest a pair of WRT54GLs running Tomato with some 15dBi antennas, but ethernet like that is going to be a much more reliable solution, if a bit harder to install.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    5. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 0

      He meant backhoe, although one per helper is a bit much.

    6. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by GateGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think you might be working too hard.

      Cable is considered low voltage, so in some states it does not have to be buried 18 inches. Also why would you dig a trench 8 inches wide? Rent a small trencher, it make about trench about 3-4 inches wide. Use a trench shovel to clear out the trench.

      Also, if you are using PVC, if you pull the line through as you are gluing the conduit together, you stand a great chance of gluing your pull string in place. Best thing to do is to shoot a mouse through the pipe (a mouse is a special plug that almost exactly fits a conduit that you attach a very light weight pull string to. On the other end you use a shop-vac to suck it out).

      I would also have a pull box installed every 100 meters. 500 meters would be one heck of a pull.

      --
      Maryland State Motto: If you can dream it, we can tax it.
    7. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You obviously have no idea what you are talking about. You don't run just normal RG6 cable 500 meters and you do not run the cable through the conduit as you are laying it. You run the cable through after the PVC cement has cured. You can't just dig a trench down the side of the road in a public Utility Easement.

    8. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Ok, the first thing that comes to mind are permits. And who's land is all of the conduit going under?

      The second thing is you're going to dig a half-kilometer ditch (5.5 football fields) with a hoe? Ditch-witch my friend.

      Wireless is much cheaper.

    9. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Holi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Forget the backhoe what he needs is a Ditch Witch. We had the same issue in Oregon, we lived on 280 acres and lived 1/2 a mile from the main road. It really is your only option if you are going to live in the boondocks.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    10. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      2. Lay 500 meters of heavy duty conduit. Ensure that you are threading your cable through the conduit all the way along. Attempting to thread the cable AFTER the counduit has been completed may prove to be problematic.

      nope. spool of string, a soft poofy to tie on then fo string that fits easily in conduit and a wet-dry vac. works great. I suggest pulling a string along with the wire so you can easily re-do it later or add another wire.

      BTW: 1500 feet of cat 5 does not work well for ethernet. get a pair of sdsl modems and put one at each end of the wire and you can go for 20 miles.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by bhima · · Score: 1

      I haven't done it in many, many years but you can rent a gas powered trencher for not a lot and and do that in an afternoon. You do need a vehicle with a trailer hitch though.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    12. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by maino82 · · Score: 4, Informative

      pullbox every 30m if you're a stickler for EIA/TIA/BiCSI standards

    13. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by t33jster · · Score: 1

      Interesting, but at what point do you need to install line amplification? I ask because I know that satellite signal over a long (100 meter) distance definately needs some help getting there. Depending on how low your low voltage cable signal is, this may not be so simple.

      --
      Take off every 'sig' for great justice.
    14. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hoe (one per helper)

      The mark of true friendship is helping you lay cable even when you don't hire them prostitutes in return.

    15. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by JonWan · · Score: 2, Informative

      But .....

      1. Make sure you have permission from the land owners to dig the trench and lay the line.

      2. Stay away from the state/city/county right of way, or the next time they work on something your line will be torn up.

      3. ???

      4. Profit

    16. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by avronius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree that digging this ditch 'the old fashioned way' would take a large amount of time.

      If it were me, I'd probably bring in a contractor to do it.

      If you do consider this route, get local utilities to locate underground services for you - so that you don't accidentally dig up power/water. You shouldn't - we're talking a foot and a half, but...

    17. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by char70ger · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why not just get an aircard? You can get wireless EVDO routers like this one from keyocera. http://www.evdoinfo.com/content/view/264/63/ Or even get a pci to pcmcia adapter, this will allow you to use one in your PC. They sell them at newegg for under $20.00. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815124021Y I used a Verizon air card for over a year and ran a 5 computer network off it. I had to use an external antenna as I had no signal with my pc on the floor in the corner of my room.It was made by Wilson they call it their "Trucker Cellular Antenna" http://www.wpsantennas.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=3 It cost me 100 bucks but was well worth the investment. It wasn't cable but it sure beat dial-up. I now have a wireless setup that uses Motorola Canopy technology that rocks!!!

    18. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You forgot get permits and right of way access to even begin doing this. Thats why people use wireless. Not to mention the cost (includes labor x your_time) of doing this would crazy compared to getting two directional wifi antennas and a couple of routers.

    19. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just buy direct-bury cable instead of messing with conduit. More expensive than regular cable but much cheaper than adding conduit, and WAY easier. That's what the cable company would do anyway. Have you ever seen them lay cable? Directly into the ground.

    20. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do believe that you left out the "???" step.

    21. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Christ on a cracker.. rent a ditch witch
      Is that a new slang term for immigrants that I'm not hip to yet?
    22. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      All those hoes could be expensive though. I mean I like watching chicks when I'm working too, but it's hardly conducive to keeping costs down when you're paying streetwalkers to distract your workers...

    23. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Thelasko · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Cable is considered low voltage, so in some states it does not have to be buried 18 inches. I've noticed here in Illinois the cable companies stopped burying cable all together. They just lay it along the ground.

      Just the other day I saw two geniuses from Comcast running cable through the lawn of my condo complex. I'm just waiting to see what happens when the landscapers come by to mow the lawn. I hope they don't charge $10k to do that.
      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    24. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's in a rural area. Permits and right of way access are either not on the books or not enforced in rural areas.

    25. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supplies:
      Hoe (one per helper) 1 hoe per helper, that's a bit costly. Get 1 hoe, then all your helpers can share as long as you pay her a little extra.

      ba-dum! thank you, and don't forget to tip the waitresses.
    26. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and a ho that can suck the chrome off a trailor hitch as you relax with a beer and blowjob after a hard day's work!

    27. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by spazdor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Witches and hoes.

      Aww yeah.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    28. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Interesting


        I just emailed him, but .... you're right.

          I actually did this before. It was with a pair of WAP11's (current at the time), a 24dBi parabolic, and a 19dBi panel. It was 100% reliable, except for a few circumstances.

          After a year, a bamboo tree grew up through the line of site.
          One end was in an office, and the WAP11 would overheat because the A/C was turned off on the weekends, and the cleaning crew would shut off the fan blowing on the AP.
          In one strong wind, I found I hadn't secured the antenna well enough, and it turned. :)

          They were all easy, obvious problems.

          In his case, an AP with a high gain antenna on one end, and a decent antenna on the distant end attached to his wireless device would be fine.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    29. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      The only problem I see with this solution is that the 500 meters between the user and his cable-connected neighbor may run across the property of others, who may not appreciate having a trench dug through their land.

      I seem to recall other people building their own low-cost, directional, wireless bridges using things like soda cans and the like. This might be a less obtrusive and easier-to-install solution.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    30. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by nfk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course the low tech solution would be to tie a string to a real mouse and put some cheese on the other end.

    31. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Informative

      I hope you understand (before digging) that the range limit for ethernet (even cat 6) is 100 metres. And 100BaseFx (ie fibre) is 400 metres.

      Howeverm if you lay multimode-fibre then you can get a length of 2km out of it. I have no idea what kind of routers you'd need to make that work, but I guess they'd be expensive.

    32. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
      As for point 2 - you can use compressed air to blow the cable through the hose. There are places where they just bury empty hoses/pipes and then use compressed air to blow optical fibres through the hose later.

      But you will need a good sized compressor. Maybe you can ask someone with a bulk transport truck to provide some blowing! :-) A different kind of blow-job!

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    33. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      http://www.nuspectra.com/pdf/otc/OTC-9DB_Wireless_Kit.pdf

      Use a wireless high powered directional outdoor antenna system like the one in the link provided. It can provided distances up to several miles, usually line of site without major obstructions. If you mount the antenna on your relatives house using a mast you should clear the trees. You could put a mast down at the street as well. Major problem I see is power. Putting a wifi access point on the pole isnt going to happen, no way they will give you free 110 power for the device. You would need to put it in a location where you have power way out down at the street in your property.

      Or, go the illegal way and put a pole at your friends house that has cable and act as a long range repeater.

    34. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Amouth · · Score: 3, Funny

      keep watching - aroudn where i am that is standard for the tech whom is reparing serivce.. they will run it on top and leave slack.. then a few days later a contractor will come by and bury it 2-3in with a (some odd looking tool)..

      but it allows them to get service up to you now and bank on you not mowing your lawn for a few days..

      what is fun is when that contractor never shows up.. and told the cable company he did..

      i had a similar issue with my power last year.. one of the 120v legs went bad.. so they slapped a transformer on the side of my house -next day techs came out and identified where the leg was bad.. ripped up part of my neighbors driveway to fix the cable.. told them a contractor would come by in a day or so to poor a new patch slab... two weeks later the neighbor is pissed and the power company says it has beenfixed.. all because a contractor never bothered to do the job and jsut said he did it...

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    35. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by richard.cs · · Score: 1

      The 100m limit is actually a problem with the delay from one end to the other messing with the collision detection rather than with signal strength. With a switch on each end (as opposed to a simple hub) you eliminate that problem (by eliminating any chance of a collision) and can stretch it further. Not sure if it'd make 500m though.

    36. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      When they did that with mine they cut the goddamn sprinkler line.

      Yee haw, quality control. I'm not saying what cable company it was, but they were a bunch of Cox.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    37. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pulling cable isn't as big a problem as you indicate. If he installs inch and a half conduit and pulls at 200 ft. it will be quite easy. The way it is done is to use a wet vacuum to pull a piece of cellophane called a mouse which has a string attached to it. Then that string is used to pull a rope which in turn pulls the cable. For the cable he is trying to pull a cord could be used instead of a rope. Two hundred feet is a federal standard for pulling much heavier cables and wires.But for internet cable you could even pull it further if you wished.

    38. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They are bonded. If they did damage, it's straightforward to make them pay for it.
      If they are not bonded, it's straightforward to make them pay for your house.

    39. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Informative

      "He's in a rural area. Permits and right of way access are either not on the books or not enforced in rural areas."

      Is this supposed to be a joke? Or do you really not know just how seriously people (and municipalities) in rural areas take things like property lines and rights of way? I do. I grew up on a farm, in a place where a property owner would have a right to shoot you if you started trenching on his land...

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    40. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by cabledaddy3 · · Score: 0

      This would be fine except for the fact that the cable signal won't make it 500 meters. That' if your planning on splitting off of neighbor's house. Even at 500 meters with mainline coax an amplifier or Line Extender is going to be needed. Those alone will cost more than the cable at about 2 grand each. If fiber is used, you probably won't need a repeater, but your gonna need a node at the end and that's an easy 5 grand too. The $10,000 might be a lot of money, and might be inflated a bit, but it's not that far off. I'd recommend using a cell phone connection if available. Should be able to get 1-3 meg via USB cable if there is service there. And unlimited access shouldn't cost much per month.

    41. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by DrOct · · Score: 1

      You could also use the same router and DD-WRT Which I've had a lot of luck using. I've actually never tried Tomato. What advantages does it have over something like DD-WRT?

    42. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by pla · · Score: 1

      You forgot get permits and right of way access to even begin doing this.

      From the fact that his father lives somewhere that cable doesn't go, I would guess that his father's property abuts the target neighbor's, thus making things like right-of-way irrelevant.

      As for permits... The sort of places where half a kilometer would only cross one property boundary also tend not to have insane zoning/building ordinances.



      Not to mention the cost (includes labor x your_time) of doing this

      Not a bad point - This will cost around $700 just for the conduit. Additionally, he can't just use ethernet at 500m, it has no shot of working that far (5x the spec'd max), so he'll also need to buy an ethernet extender (in the $300 range). And cable... Another $50-$100, oddly enough the cheapest part of this project.

    43. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by kargur · · Score: 2, Informative

      Something to consider is signal degradation over that distance. I worked a a high speed data cable technician for 3 years before my current job and we always avoided going over 1000 ft. While it is possible to reach 1500 ft, it is likely you would need a powered amp of some sort to make the distance. It is important to note that the amp would need to be at the termination point rather than the serviced house, otherwise you would just be amplifying noise. Also, and more importantly, you need a thick cable. RG6 (standard cable TV cable) will not cut it. You need RG11 and appropriate fittings. This would decrease the signal loss over the distance. Also note that every time you split a cable signal, you lose signal, so making the line strictly for HSD and keeping the TV on the satellite would also increase the chances of a good data connection

    44. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Christ? Cracker? Ditch? or Witch?

    45. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by corsec67 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I tried DD-WRT, and in my situation, where I am using WDS along with QOS on one of my 3 wifi routers, Tomato was much more stable than OpenWRT and DD-WRT.

      If you find DD-WRT to be stable (enough) for you, then I would suggest not changing.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    46. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2, Informative

      As the cat5 ethernet standard says 100 metres distance limitation, 5 times that length is not going to work.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    47. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Radtastic · · Score: 1

      Laying cable, or "Laying Pipe"?

      --
      You stereotypers are all the same...
    48. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by IdeaMan · · Score: 1

      And a match at the near end?

      --
      They ARE out to get you simply because They are in it for themselves and they don't care about you.
    49. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by DrOct · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I've actually had very few problems with DD-WRT but, I've generally been doing fairly simple things like using one as a wireless bridge to my basement for devices without wireless cards (like an XBox, or a roommate who refuses to get a wireless card for his laptop). I do know that as time has gone by DD-WRT has generally (in my experience) gotten more stable. I haven't upgraded to v24 yet, but... well I guess we'll see how stable it is! I may try Tomato out on my spare router (which is currently not being used for anything as my set up has changed) just to see what it's like and how I like it. Thanks for the info!

    50. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by thumostheos · · Score: 1

      Well, no surprises here. I figured the conversation would turn to BJs the minute someone started making comments about hoes and laying pipe.

    51. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I saw an article where a guy did that with his ferret. The food at the other end? Strawberry pop tarts.

    52. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by thogard · · Score: 2, Informative

      But the sprinkler pipe wasn't labeled on the dig plan was it? A solution to that problem is put some metal locater foil over the sprinkler pipe or just ignore the problem until it gets cut and go out and put a $2 joint over the two bits of pipe with the right glue. I'm guessing the leak is very close to where ground was cut.

    53. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why some cheese? Just scare it.

    54. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by nfk · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a good idea, so long as you don't burn the string. I had my own method for speeding up the mouse, but I figured it would be silly to make the conduit big enough to send a cat through.

    55. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Znork · · Score: 4, Informative

      For this type of installation it might be simpler and cheaper just getting two smartswitches with mini-gbic or built-in 1000base-LX port. Cheap, consumer-grade stuff with trivial configuration, good for 5km, and using fibre you avoid any possible grounding issues between the houses.

    56. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      BTW: 1500 feet of cat 5 does not work well for ethernet. get a pair of sdsl modems and put one at each end of the wire and you can go for 20 miles. That was said, and a solution was provided as well (rather than a simple "won't work") - that wasn't very helpful!
      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    57. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you do consider this route, get local utilities to locate underground services for you - so that you don't accidentally dig up power/water. You shouldn't - we're talking a foot and a half, but... On that same note, how does one go about registering their home made conduit with http://www.call811.com/ (which routes you to your State's "One Call" center)

      And they recommend calling before you do any digging.
      Better safe than sorry.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    58. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by cjb658 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One assumption you are all making is that he owns all 500 meters of the land between his place and his friend's place.


      If you want to go the wireless route, I've had good luck with the antenna "amplifier" I built from this site.

    59. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by 74nova · · Score: 1

      difficulty aside, pulling 500 meters puts you at risk of breaking the line, I would think. This is especially so if you have a few 90 degree angles. Also, instead of a mouse, a plastic bag tied with some air inside will do the trick.

      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    60. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.aeiwireless.com/

      Directional radio or laser is the way to solve this problem. If you build it right, you won't need to maintain it much - the only condition is if something breaks or moves. Again, once everything is sighted, lock it down - to the point of building a box around the thing with only the openings you require.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    61. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Thirdsin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hey sonny... Back in my day we dug trenches many miles long, uphill both ways, in the snow and tumultuous weather! Them days we were layin them there telegraph wires, but the lesson applies!

      --
      No words of wisedom here.
    62. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This example doesn't work if you use Opera!

    63. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by afidel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Probably not. When I worked at Cisco we tested a bunch of stuff out to 150m and most equipment worked even over cat3. However almost none worked at 200m even over cat5e.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    64. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by wkk2 · · Score: 1

      If you decide to place a conduit and pull fiber, include an insulated wire in the ditch. Then you can find it with a toner before doing future utility work. My vote is for wireless unless you really think you might want 1000BaseFX in a few years. If you need to cross a public right away, you will need a permit and maybe a bond.

    65. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have proof of that? because I have solid proof that it in fact does "work". do I get 100bps? no. but I DO get a connection and I do get data transfer. just not reliably. What the "spec" says and what happen in reality are two very different things.

      I have tried this on two seperate occasions. One worked decently (300m)Util humidity changes caused connection and data loss. Both situations dirt cheap used SDLS modems off ebay solved the issue. in fact one we used 4 SDsl modems and bonded them at the switches and got very close to 25mbps over 300meters.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    66. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by teknosapien · · Score: 1

      be sure to user RG-11 or greater cable so loss to attenuation isn't that great

      --
      no matter how good it is, it is human nature always wants to make things better
    67. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by BUL2294 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't forget to fill the trench after you've installed the conduit!
      Failing to do so, may turn this solution into a bigger problem than simple "internet access"...
      You sure about that? Having a moat would be cool!
      --
      Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
    68. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by cjb658 · · Score: 2, Informative

      What exactly was unreliable? Would it crash and have to be rebooted? Did it drop packets or introduce high latency?

      The only problem I have with it is that its QOS controls don't seem to work. When I run BitTorrent and eMule and play CS, my pings still go to shit. (And I've increased the maximum number of established connectios to 4096 so that's not the issue.)

    69. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by bendodge · · Score: 4, Informative

      500mW Signal Booster at both ends ($57 each)
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833130039

      Two 19 dBi directional outdoor antennas ($82 each)
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833980012

      Various Cabling:
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812146013
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833164143

      Two WRT54GL's ($60 each) to be equipped with Linux firmware (recommend DD-WRT)
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833124190

      I'm sure there will be all sorts of adapters (M to F and TNC to N-type) needed, so plan on making several batches of purchases before you go to the site. Also disable the unused antenna in DD-WRT.

      --
      The government can't save you.
    70. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Gerzel · · Score: 1

      Possible Problem: Does he own the 500m that is going to be crossed by the cable?

    71. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      Well, if the neighbour was willing to share the cable he might not have much of an issue with the trench.

    72. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by eu4ik · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a good idea, so long as you don't burn the string. I had my own method for speeding up the mouse, but I figured it would be silly to make the conduit big enough to send a cat through.

      Mouse, string, mouse, string; which do I want to play with now? I know, I'll take a nap!

    73. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't want to have to deal with sloppy seconds, do you?

    74. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by LehiNephi · · Score: 4, Informative

      A couple years ago I was looking to do something similar. A bit of research shows that it's actually fairly easy to do, and with remarkably long ranges. Pretty much anything roughly parabolic will do, and a satellite dish is a great way to start. Here's a post with several useful links: http://www.seattlewireless.net/pipermail/dev/2003-June/012784.html

      --
      Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    75. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by jetole · · Score: 1

      Yeah this is one way to do it. The other option and don't ask me for details because I have never set this up but some 4 years ago when I was a security consultant and auditing some bank in "end of mile" Kansas, I found that they had enabled a 802.11b from one branch to another at a distance of just under 25 miles. I spoke to the wireless tech the bank had hired and he stated that he rigged the switch to use more power then what the FCC had allowed but when I had to drive from one branch to another, a tractor was the closest thing I saw to life between the two so I don't think anyone would notice.

    76. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by pbaer · · Score: 1

      Well it's a 5gb cap with verizon aircard. Not sure if that's seperate for upload/download or both combined, but that's pretty small unless all you care about is email.

      --
      There are 11 types of people, those who know unary and those who don't.
    77. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by iamhassi · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wow this is getting expensive! Renting equipment, hiring contractors... just diy long distance wifi

      don't people google anymore before asking /.? This has even been on /. before.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    78. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by LehiNephi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What about this: run some electrical cable down the pipe in parallel with the signal cable (assuming ethernet/Cat5/6 here). Every 100m, install a cheap hub. Since each hub will only be drawing a few watts, the voltage drop, even over 500m, will be quite small (14AWG has a resistance of about 4Ohms over 500m). This would allow you to run ethernet the entire distance while keeping costs down.

      I know you're all about to scream "don't run power in parallel with data", but hear me out. I never said to use 120VAC. Why not run, say, 24VDC down 14AWG cable, with a DC-DC converter alongside each hub?

      --
      Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    79. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by LehiNephi · · Score: 1

      A cheaper/easier option might be to just use a shop-vac.

      --
      Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    80. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2. Lay 500 meters of heavy duty conduit. Ensure that you are threading your cable through the conduit all the way along. Attempting to thread the cable AFTER the counduit has been completed may prove to be problematic.

      Uh, not needed. String, a 'balloon' like thing. Tie the string to the balloon. Attach the shop vac to the opposite end of hte conduit where the balloon is. Suck the balloon.

      Alternate, use same balloon and string, but push the balloon with an air compressor. This is a blow job. Utilities use this all the time.

    81. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A plastic grocery bag attached to the pull string will work as well.

    82. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Harmotech · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't recommend the use of anything more than 200 feet of buried cable, simply because of RF attenuation. Most carrier frequencies for high speed data over cable are around 600+ mHz, which (depending on cable gauge) would drop off to near nothing over the distance being described. Simple house amplifiers may work to keep the signal high enough, but the gain on most amps would likely result in a terrible signal to noise ratio and as a result: spotty connection. The best option may be to dig the trench yourself (DitchWitch rental for the afternoon), lay the conduit (ask for the specs from the cable provider), and contact the cable company for the remainder. I can't imagine it would be 10K for simply the conduit push and cable. Make sure to follow power and phone to your property (easements) and GET LOCATES! You don't want to be the asshole who strikes power...

    83. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by meatspray · · Score: 2, Informative

      Single-mode is the long haul stuff, not multi-mode.

      You need:
      1. Power at both ends of the line
      2. a ditch with conduit
      3. a spool of single-mode
      4. a professional with the tools to terminate the ends of the fiber
      5. two single mode to ethernet media converters, http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=884092

    84. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that would be silly. That's why the professionals use a snake to move the mouse along, and of course a mongoose can be used to hurry the snake along.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    85. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by mrops · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think WRT54GL with a 500mW booster may do the trick.

      http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.12215

      Not sure if this is a gimmiky product or if it will really work.

    86. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by mrops · · Score: 1

      There is another product on Deal Extreme, Do not know what this is, but one of the product pictures with a leaflet has some text visible from the leaflet itself, it reads something like "...signals tramits to long distance". The word before signals is not visible in that picture.

      Maybe someone else knows what this device is http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.9310

    87. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...and don't forget to pull a spare length of pull-string with the cable!

      New capacity, repairs, new technology (fiber?), etc. There's not much more frustrating than having to completely redo a good cable run 10 years down the road because someone neglected to pull a spare strand of string.

      Also, responding to someone further up, just because you aren't required by code to bury your conduit 18" or more doesn't mean it's not a really good idea to do so. When someone decides to develop the acreage next door and the concrete trucks break up your cable in multiple spots, or it's so shallow that you dig into it planting trees, you won't be happy camper.

    88. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by carrett · · Score: 5, Funny

      I put on my robe and wizard hat..

      --
      I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
    89. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by spazdor · · Score: 1

      I actually saw a user named 'bloodninja' a minute ago.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    90. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by xappax · · Score: 1

      Amplifying wifi signals is pretty much always a bad idea, because the signal is two-way. It's like having a conversation with someone far away - if you have a megaphone they can hear you, but no matter how loud your megaphone is, you still won't be able to hear them.

      However, if you have a point-to-point wireless link with the same amplification on both ends, it can be useful. Don't overuse it though, as too much amplification will distort the signal, and disrupt other people's attempts to use nearby frequencies (even pretty far away).

    91. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      even better than buying all the fancy antennas: http://www.turnpoint.net/wireless/cantennahowto.html

    92. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by avronius · · Score: 1

      I have used (although I did not install it) a 600 meter cable run. I would recommend fiber over that distance, and I believe that I mentioned this in the original post.

      That cable, however, was not protected by conduit (although it was burried) and required replacement. I hired a contractor to bury fiber in conduit. As far as I know, it's still there [I don't work at the mine any longer]. I've never laid my own conduit.

      Permit acquisition is left as an exercise for the reader. There are lots of things that you "can't just do" without a permit. Like build a deck. Or a shed. Or a spare bedroom in the basement. Somehow, it doesn't stop it from happening...

      Fortunately, however, other posts have filled in the blanks about using a 'mouse' and 'pull boxes' to effectively draw the cable after the conduit cement has cured.

    93. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by dkh2 · · Score: 1

      Rent a gas powered trench digging tool for a weekend. Most places that have heavy tool rentals should have one, or know where to find one.

      --
      My office has been taken over by iPod people.
    94. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by gregbot9000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A day labour can trench about 50 ft. an hour by hand, which would be about 4 days, which would be about 800 dollars, check trencher rental prices. It will take another 3 days for laying the pipe and back filling which would probably cost you $600, less if you now how to pull wire(easy). PVC conduit is about $10 per 10 ft. so that would be about $1500. Odds and ends aside (insuriance j-boxes, fish-tape, you could probalby get it done for about 4k. That does not count the cost of data cable ($2 ft. plus sounds likely) and tech parts, and if you hired a Contractor they would want a cut too. In the end the utilitys companys 10k estimate doesn't seem to far off for a hardware install. You should just get a wave guide.

    95. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by avronius · · Score: 1

      Reading along further reminded me... There WAS an extender along the line at the midpoint.

      Sorta skews my note...

      Sorry for the misdirection...

    96. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by mrbooze · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just speaking for myself, when I was running DD-WRT it would lock up every few days requiring a reboot. I finally just put a scheduled daily reboot in cron and it worked mostly fine after that, though it did have one or two lockups still over the course of a couple months.

      I eventually switched to tomato for better QoS support and tomato has been rock solid.

      It also seemed like dd-wrt development wasn't progressing very much, as there hadn't been an update in quite a while. Though I do note now that they finally made v24 an official release just recently, so things may have improved since then.

      DD-WRT does have some features that tomato doesn't, though. If I needed any of those features I wouldn't hesitate using DD-WRT again. Though I might try OpenWRT first just because I haven't tried it yet.

    97. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      You could use coax like the cable company does and boost it wit something like this:

      distribution amp
      http://www.winegarddirect.com/viewitem.asp?p=HDA-100

      I think they make these for ethernet too.

      http://www.blackbox.com/Catalog/Detail.aspx?cid=425,1423,1424&mid=4965

      Someone here probably knows where to get thes things cheaper too, but with coax maybe they will let you put it on the telephone pole.

    98. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonym1ty · · Score: 2, Informative

      Amplifying wifi signals is pretty much always a bad idea, because the signal is two-way. It's like having a conversation with someone far away - if you have a megaphone they can hear you, but no matter how loud your megaphone is, you still won't be able to hear them.

      However, if you have a point-to-point wireless link with the same amplification on both ends, it can be useful. Don't overuse it though, as too much amplification will distort the signal, and disrupt other people's attempts to use nearby frequencies (even pretty far away). But if you put your megaphone up to your ear, you can hear them.... Hence the amplifiers are bi-directional
    99. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by ramon_omar · · Score: 1

      Good point. And to quote Caddyshack "The world needs ditch-diggers too."

    100. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by zaf · · Score: 1

      yeah and how are you going to get the mongoose out, smart guy?

    101. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I hope you understand (before digging) that the range limit for ethernet (even cat 6) is 100 metres"

      Not exactly. I am going about twice that with no real problems. Connect a gigabit switch to each end, (you might need more in the middle to go 500 meters...) and you are good to go. Yes, you will get some dropped packets, but even if you drop 90% of your packets running at a gigabit rate, your throughput is 100 Megabit, if you lose 99%, your throughput is 10 megabit, which is going to be more then you can get out of a cable modem anyway.

      All I can tell you is it works.

    102. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by zaf · · Score: 1

      or run fiber, which is getting almost as cheap as copper these days

    103. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Amplifying wifi signals is pretty much always a bad idea, because the signal is two-way. It's like having a conversation with someone far away - if you have a megaphone they can hear you, but no matter how loud your megaphone is, you still won't be able to hear them. Yes and no. Using a transmission amplifier alone will indeed lead to such problems. However there are reciever pre-amplifiers which go between antenna and reciever and will increase range from a weaker transmitter. To stay inside your analogy, when a transmission amplifier is a megaphone, then a reciever pre-amp is a parabolic microphone with amplifier.

      Don't overuse [amplification] though, as too much amplification will distort the signal, and disrupt other people's attempts to use nearby frequencies (even pretty far away). If you use a well built amplifier inside the power range it was built for then no, it won't distort anything. Only badly made amplifiers do that, and they will likely do it even below ther max power.

      However, one might indeed disturb users on the freuquency one uses and on neighbouring frequencies, as strong signal handling might not be that good in your average WiFi-reciever. But you can avoid problems simply by starting with zero amplification and then turning it up until a stable link is achieved and then maybe a bit more to be on the safe side, but no more than that. this will minimize interference with other users.

      An aside: If you bild setups with directional antenna and amplification than do familiarize yourself with microwafe safety precautions. A focused beam on 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz microwafes can severely hurt your eyes or even blind you if you look directly into it. (It prettymuch cooks the protein inside your eyes, just like a microwafe oven would). At the very least, mount it high enough that noone can stand in front of the antenna and look directly into it.
    104. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Informative
      The pressure that a shop vac can issue is limited by physics - you have a pressure of 1 atmosphere and a vacuum cleaner can only decrease that by a fraction.

      A compressor on the other hand that's blowing air has no problem blowing more than an atmosphere pressure. And in a 500m pipe that can make a huge difference.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    105. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Theoboley · · Score: 0

      Christ on a cracker refers to the wafers given out at communion in church. (if i remember right)

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    106. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by slim · · Score: 1

      In the museum by the Grand Coulee Dam, there's actually film footage of them tying string onto live mice and using a cat to scare them into carrying through conduit.

      Fact!

    107. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by willy_me · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cables are generally run using a "Ditch WItch" or some other piece of trenching equipment. You can rent them just about anywhere and they can finish a 500m job in a couple of hours.

    108. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      It would be much easier and cheaper to just rent a ditchwitch to run the length and use Gell filled or some underground rated cable instead. You can do both RG6 and Cat5 as well as various types of fiber and either bury. No need for conduit or anything besides a lightning surpressor at the demarcation points for anything with coper/metal in it. Run the path yourself and have them put a post in at the foot of the driveway right off the right of way. The owner will be responsible for repairs now but it will work.

      Check with the local cable company to see if RG6 is what they recommend using or not.

      A ditch witch can be rented from about any equipment rental place for less then $300 a day. IT should be more then able to get below the frost line if it is used in the same geographical area that it is rented in (northern climate need a slightly longer bar for a deeper frost line) Make sure to call the 1-800-dig lines to make sure your gas and electrical lines are marked and your not going to cut into them.

      A coupe of people and a case of beer should be able to finish 500 feet in a day or less. The rental machine is billed for by the hours it is running/worked. So don't let it idle while doing something else. Make sure it is working the entire time it is running or as close to it as possible. Just follow the drive and don't let your trench get too far away from the machine. Have someone unravel the cables as you go and another person filling the trench back in. Stop and help them catch up every once in a while.

    109. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by nfk · · Score: 1

      Drat, there goes my patent. That would be a fun one to file. "Process of cable laying by means of cat and mouse game".

    110. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by cluckshot · · Score: 1

      I have a 100 meter link using a wireless repeater. It would cost a bit but a lot less than a wire to go 500 meters with about 4 repeaters. Or you could try a laser link. That would work too.

      My Linksys wireless router plus a repeater would actually have a wireless range of at least 150 meters. I think it is safe to say that you can jump about 100 meters with it. Make sure you have no obstructions and set up using a solar powered UPS. Put the little toy under a water proof cover and set up a set of these in a line.

      Of course at that far out place cheating the FCC and using the pringles can trick might will be a workable solution. My network is shooting through a brick wall and a standard stud wall just to get out of the house. Going into the other building it is going through a wall too. I figure a few tricks here would be just fine.

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    111. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hardly anybody "trenches" cables into the ground nowadays. They are generally "plowed" in. Much cleaner and quicker and no backfilling needed. Even polyethylene gas lines are plowed in. If you rent a Ditch Witch, you *may* be able to get one with a plow, but I've never seen any for rent around these parts.

    112. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can get 2000 feet of cat 3 wire for less than $100.00US I can also get SDSL modems for $30.00 each. All of which are on Ebay and these are everyday normal guy prices.

      I'm betting you cant come in that cheap with a single or multimode fiber run and two transceivers.

      the ONLY advantage of fiber is that you dont have a nice big antenna for lightning strike voltage induction. but sdls modems have that supression built in and telco lightning supression is incredibly cheap as well.

    113. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using a directional antenna, I was able to receive a 802.11a signal over a distance of approx 6.3km on a clear dusk with some regular old card (OrinocoGold), at -90 dBm input strength.

    114. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did that at my place too, but about four days later they came back with a nifty lawnmower-like machine that buries the cable.

    115. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      [Citation needed] Wire is cheap, digging is free. vs wireless repeaters are not cheap, batteries for the repeaters are not free.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    116. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Crackez · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Screw digging a ditch.

      Lay zero cable:
      http://www.lightpointe.com/products/fl_100.cfm

    117. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by yabos · · Score: 1

      Tomato actually applies settings without dropping your pppoe session. Every time I make any little change even to the wireless network, dd-wrt drops my IP and I have to wait for it to re-log in and get an IP. In this day that shouldn't happen.

    118. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Thelasko · · Score: 3

      I came home tonight and guess what? They had started to bury the cable. So far it only goes as far as the sidewalk. Let's see what tomorrow brings.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    119. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      motorola sells some decent point-to-point wireless hardware in different flavors.
      10Mbps
      20Mbps and upwards
      you looking at least 1000 CDN but thats better than 10K and can easily be pointed or moved to another location.

      save yourself the digging =p

      setup is easy, Plug and play, works like a long ethernet cable.

      works really well in wind and temperatures, obsticles on the otherhand are really pesky is directly is LOS (line of sight) cheers.

    120. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW: 1500 feet of cat 5 does not work well for ethernet. get a pair of sdsl modems and put one at each end of the wire and you can go for 20 miles. Um, I suspect the parent actually means, coax cable, hence:

      Call the cable company to connect the cable to the cable termination point. Begin paying monthly subscription to cable internet provider. /quote)
    121. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Simple, just send a cat in after...uh, d'oh!

      I'll get back to you on that.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    122. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by conureman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Plowing, eh? Sounds efficient. Can't seem to get Spear&Jackson shovels here anymore. I guess 'murkins aren't supposed to dig trenches by hand. (I should move.) The standard for High Voltage is four feet deep, keeps it a bit safer than 18". Low Voltage or Fiber, the onus is on you. I did 400' of four-inch conduit four foot deep by hand once. Last time, I went with the ditch-witch. Found a sewer line with that. (I knew it was there but the contractor who buried it said it was too deep to worry about, and would not mark it for me. Schmuck.) Once you lay the conduit you can use a shop-vac to blow a cotton puff or a rag with a thread tied to it, to pull a fatter string, then your signal element through the conduit. IIRC Cat-5e is usable for 100 meters. Personally, I'd use fiber or try to engineer a wireless solution. If you run a 18 or 20 ga. copper wire alongside in your trench, the finder guy from the utilities can use it for his signal to mark the location for you. I think orange is the color code for communications, it doesn't matter much.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    123. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10Base2 ftw ;)

    124. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, i was going to help...but only for the hoes

    125. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by willy_me · · Score: 1

      That setup would be good for 20km - slightly overkill for 500m. I would suggest dropping the signal boosters - just another part to break. In my experience, it's the signal boosters that break first.

    126. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by WobindWonderdog · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dunno, 15 people with backhoes in a synchronous dance of digging would be kinda cool to watch...

    127. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      You can use direct burial cable too and save yourself a bunch of money. Think you could do this all for less than $2,000 + your time.

    128. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      1500M of cat5 doesn't work well because the spec is only good to 100M (obviously). Patton electronics makes some nice xDSL modems that I have had success with for distances of about 2 miles (haven't tested them any further than that).

    129. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He lives 500m down a dirt road. He's bound to know someone with access to a JCB (or whatever they call them wherever he comes from)...

    130. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comment got modded Funny, but some electricians have in fact trained rats to run pull strings through walls that would be tricky to get through otherwise.

    131. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Informative

      And.. with your extra-directional antenna and boosted signal, you fried someone?

      I mean.. You did consult the FCC tables for uncontrolled exposure at 2.4 GHz when setting up your little science project, right?

      Of course you did. Or they wouldn't have approved your license request to run an experimental, (i.e. modified to no longer be type-accepted), (and ERP>1W ) setup in the 2.4 GHz band.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    132. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      Rent

    133. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supplies:
      Hoe (one per helper) Most 'hoes are not gonna be very good at layin' pipe...

    134. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Flamebait? Huh?

    135. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by neomunk · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a coffee can antenna be orders of magnitude easier?

    136. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Cylix · · Score: 1

      I know it's definitely been here before.

      Somewhere on slashdot, I have notes on calculating the distance, line loss and dish gains.

      The only notable difference, I believe with directional antennas you can now do above one watt.

      It's all here, scattered,

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    137. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by bjverzal · · Score: 1

      I have Comcast. They did the same and later buried it for free.

    138. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Charter in SC started doing that a few years ago. It's cheaper to repair a cable strung across a yard a dozen times than a buried one once so they do it whenever they can get away with it. My cable is strung across a cul-de-sac. About twice a year Charter has to replace it from cars driving over it.

    139. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually you need a Line Ward cable trencher...

      It's like a cross between a tiny tank and a giant sewing machine that puts just about any heavy cable as deep as you want it. 3" - 20+" just walk it alone and it cuts a 1" slice, with the cable being injected into the slice at the bottom of the blade! (the blade is hollow and the cable flows through the blade as it cuts)

      Just watch out... One of these got loose and pinned me to a house once... my pelvis is still a lil achy... if no longer breaky.

    140. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Ernesto+Alvarez · · Score: 1

      All I can tell you is it works.


      Unless you're sending tcp segments on top of those packets. In that case TCP's congestion control algorithms will make sure your performance drops to the floor.

      I've been analyzing a 4 Mbps link recently with a 0.1% to 0.7% packet loss, and it does make a big difference. Having constant fast recoveries can convert a 4 Mbps link to a 400Kbps one real fast.
    141. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Informative

      dammit, I wrote a long reply, but my browser crashed. That's what I get for using Windows on occasion. :)

          Yes, I consulted the charts, and even did the math myself to confirm that the charts were right. :)

          a 20mw transmitter and 24dBi antenna puts it .5dBm below the FCC max for a point to multipoint application. Since this was point to point, they have higher tolerances, which still is fine.

          Now, my 200mw transmitter with the 24dBi antenna is a wee bit against FCC rules in theory, but with loss in the cables, it may just be at the limit.

          Since they were very directional antennas, it was a fairly safe bet they'd never notice anyways. Sitting behind either antenna, I could hear the signal (encrypted, of course). Standing on the ground immediately under the antenna, still with a clear view of the remote side, I couldn't detect it, nor anything at that particular frequency. I even did that with the 200mw transmitter and a 4.5dBi antenna. Only being maybe 15 feet or so below the real antenna was enough to be outside of the beam of the more diverse antenna.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    142. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by djohnso · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are some nice instructions on how to do this here: http://www.jawug.za.net/ just click on How-to's. It is well explained with pictures (for dummies like me)

    143. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Funny

      One assumption you are all making is that he owns all 500 meters of the land between his place and his friend's place.


      If you want to go the wireless route, I've had good luck with the antenna "amplifier" I built from this site.

      IAMALBISIIL* Just get some well armed men to occupy the 500m stretch and pay off a couple of households to recognize that it has always been yours but upto that date had been illegally occupied by foreign imperialists. Send more armed men to kill anyone who complains and confiscate their possesions are womenfolk. Pay academics to write papers that backup your territorial claim.

      You can pay me in slaves or loot.

      * I am a lawyer but I specialise in International Law
      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    144. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This seems to be your wireless solution... "FlightLite 100 - For Outdoor Wireless Connectivity PDF Download Datasheet The FlightLite 100 is the best-selling LightPointe Optical Wireless product for 100 Mbps of Enterprise connectivity for recommended distances up to 500 meters. The FlightLite 100 is the perfect alternative to T1/E1 leased lines or 802.11 outdoor LAN solutions. Highlights: * Shorter-range Enterprise LAN connectivity * Power over Ethernet * No electrical power source required * Full-duplex Fast Ethernet throughput * Immune to spectrum issues * License-free worldwide"

    145. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Nephrite · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you don't need any permission from the authorities to dig?

    146. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just what I needed! I have an estate that could make a lot of use of one of these.

      Tried the Ditch Witch URL

      Got a message saying 'This doesn't work with Opera'

      (Probably) one lost sale.

    147. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Giddy Giddy Goo.

    148. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by rjune · · Score: 1

      Most of the cable companies now contract out the burying part. Time Warner in southeast Wisconsin does it this way. I'm sure if you checked back in a few days, you would find that the cable was now buried. Another interesting fact that the cable guy told me: The phone company and the cable company constantly cut each other's lines. It was costing more to assess blame and pay each other for damages than it would just to fix their own cables.

    149. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by NapalmScatterBrain · · Score: 1

      ABSOLUTELY. The ditch witch is super easy to use. Leave it to a bunch of code geeks to try to tell somebody to use a hoe to lay cable for 500 frickin meters. They'll usually rent you a trailer too. They can go as deep as 3 feet, but you only need to go a foot or so. It's easiest to do it in sections, with a junction box every 250 feet or so.

    150. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "ditch witch" is good self-driving trench digger that can be rented for under $100 US/day around here including trailer. Look for this or similar.

    151. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to http://www.streakwave.com/Itemdesc.asp?ic=TR%2D5a%2D24f&eq=&Tp= and purchase 2 of these, configure so one is an AP and one is a IS, set them up, point them and you my friend have a 5.8 ghz microwave link capable of 56mbps to the friend's house down the road. One caveat is as it's 5.8, it needs clear Line of Sight. If clear LOS cannot be obtained, you can accomplish the same thing with a 900 mhz radio link, but the transfer rate will drop to 11mbps. I work for a WiSP , we use this gear all over the US to accomplish exactly what you are trying to do, but on a larger scale.

    152. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh huh. Then there's the little matter of getting the right-of-way. I don't imagine that all that 500 meters is on their property.

    153. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Call Before You Dig" means you can tell them what you're putting underground, as well as getting the utilities to come out and mark. I suspect that'll be the way to get it registered.

    154. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Since they were very directional antennas, it was a fairly safe bet they'd never notice anyways
      And after all, that's what it's all about... whether or not you get caught. :)

      Just curious as to how far your scoffing at the law goes... though this does seem like the most victimless violation ever :)
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    155. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by conureman · · Score: 1

      Old Indian Trick- hook the hose up to the exhaust on the shop vac & blow the line through. I doubt you could suck anything very far, I'd never even thought of that. Using 3/4" conduit, I've blown cottonballs with thread attached 150' or so, using my own breath. (The thread tickles the lips something fierce, but I didn't have to drag out the vacuum and hook it up.) At 500m maybe you need a leaf blower?

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    156. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      HAH! where i live, a day labor can trench about 50 ft in a week by hand. the round here is like trying to dig a hole in a parking lot with a garden trowel. don't make silly assumptions about terrain.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    157. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My thoughts exactly...

    158. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by xappax · · Score: 1

      Actually no, because if they're far away, their voice is lost in the general background noise of the area you're in. This is almost always the metaphorical problem with WiFi links - not a "quiet" signal, but a dirty one, with a lot of noise drowning out the signal. So you can turn the megaphone around and crank it up as loud as you want, but all you'll be amplifying is background noise.

    159. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately your plan requires the cable company to add hardware at the pole, you can't just tack 1/3 of a mile of cable onto the network and expect to get signal at the end. That additional effort on their part will cost you.

      My solution to this same problem, years ago, was to put the cable modem at the road, then run a single 1400ft line of 10B5 ethernet from the road to the house (no other inexpensive option had the range). And, regarding running either type of cable, why go to so much trouble? Lay it right on the ground and trust the housing to keep it safe. As of today, that cable has been sitting alongside the driveway for 7 years without suffering a failure. Some day, someone will drive something treaded across it and break it, and it will take ten minutes to terminate both broken ends and reconnect them.

    160. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Supplies:
      Hoe (one per helper)


      For 500 meters?!? Indeed. After digging a 500 meter trench by hand, I'm not gonna have enough energy for even one ho(e).

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    161. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by mzs · · Score: 1

      Yeah comcast broke a section of my fence when putting in cable a few years back. They did not put the cable in the right of way, it was to cross a stream in the backyard for a neighbor.

      When I called about them fixing it they told me it was not them that did it but a contractor that buries the cable and gave me a phone number to call. I called the number and it was disconnected.

      I just had to fix the fence myself, it was PVC so I have a few lengths spare, but at the time it really bugged me.

    162. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


          I'm not much of at breaking the law. Generally, if I can get caught, I will. I prefer freedom.

          The statement was that I *could* have. I was actually within the legal limits the whole time, so it didn't matter either way. When I did fire up the 200mw card, I was within the limits because of the lower gain antenna that I used with it.

          It's not terribly hard to go over the limits though. You *can* get power amplifiers. I did a quick search on Google, and found 20W amplifiers. The legal limit for the transmitter itself is 1W without a license. a 20W transmitter with a 30dBi antenna would be like waving a sign saying "come get me" when someone complains. The side lobes would give you away in a heart beat, unless of course, you're way out in the middle of nowhere.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    163. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      They just came through with the Ditch Witch and buried that cable. It took about 10 minutes.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    164. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that it's 1W ERP (effective radiated power), which takes gain into account. Not merely 1W PEP (peak envelope power).

      Further, those aren't the limits I was referring to. The FCC maintains tables (which I am too lazy atm to look up) that specify exposure limits at various distances and power levels. (this is based on ERP or PEP depending on the band. Microwave band would be ERP)

      Those limits are for health reasons, and understandably they're lower for bystanders than for operators (i.e. you can sit closer to the antenna because you can control whether it's transmitting, but since bystanders do not have control over it, you must keep them further away.) They're also lower than the "full power limit" for the band/license.

      And those are the tables I'd hoped you'd consulted. Because I know you don't want to give anyone burns.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    165. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100m is the point at which the signal begins to degrade, rather than a hard cable limit. Since signal degradation is considered a bad thing, and for some purposes completely unacceptable, the standard is to limit cable lengths to 100m.

    166. Re:Consider the do it yourself way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check out:

          http://www.cantenna.com/

  2. Just a thought... by armanox · · Score: 1

    WiFi by longshot?

    --
    I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    1. Re:Just a thought... by darkone · · Score: 2, Informative
  3. Proper Antenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just get a proper directional antenna to replace the one on the router. Do the same for your neighbor and link'em together I got one when I was living back Prague and connected with a 200kb/s link to an access point about 300 meters away (that was the speed of the connection - not the actual link). Actually, it's quite common for people to construct neighborhood networks that way (well at least in CZ)

    1. Re:Proper Antenna by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 5, Informative

      We've done 5 mile links with a pair of *old* wallmount AT&T Wavelan bridges and proper antennas on 915 Mhz. Those units were 400mw.
      Ticking along for years. 2 MBPS, faster than T1 speed. And proprietary FHSS, no freeloaders. Heh.

      You have to get the antenna up above the fresnel effect and any obstructions at the frequency in use, about 60' for 915 Mhz, more like 30' for 2.4 Ghz. Which is why 2.4 Ghz is easier. I would have no problem running that link at either frequency. It'll work fine.
      You can do it. No problems at all.
      Give good attention to the antennas, that's what you need to get it to work.

      --
      .
    2. Re:Proper Antenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out:

      http://www.freeantennas.com/

      A lot of these can be used to extend the wireless from your neighbor for little or no cost.

    3. Re:Proper Antenna by houstonbofh · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have done well over 500 yards many times. In one case obstrusted with masts, and over water. I used the wrt54gl with Thybor firmware, and Hawking a Antenna http://www.hawkingtech.com/products/productlist.php?CatID=32&FamID=58&ProdID=152 (no problem outside) and amplifier http://www.hawkingtech.com/products/productlist.php?CatID=32&FamID=72&ProdID=187 with no issues at all. Well under $400 and 1 hour of time.

    4. Re:Proper Antenna by Sique · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Zillertal Valley in Austria has a 54 MBit/sec WLAN network, that just uses WLAN-antennas on all the mountain tops. The antennas bridge up to 15 mls (25 km), even though they use classic WLAN, just focussed to a beam to the next mountain top. The antennas are mostly from Alvarion (ex BreezeCOM).

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    5. Re:Proper Antenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you POSSIBLY make so many wrong abreviations in a SINGLE post? And you call yourself Cisco guy?

      MHz. mW. Mbps/MBps. MHz. GHz.

      Have a nice day.

    6. Re:Proper Antenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      multipath propagation I don't think would be to much of a problem with a highly direction antenna i.e. a parabolic dish, you can get 70 to 100 dBi easy from the things.

  4. Did he lose his marbles? by pigiron · · Score: 5, Funny

    "WiMax is too complex for a 70-year old man." At what age does WiMax dementia set in?

    1. Re:Did he lose his marbles? by Stringer+Bell · · Score: 1

      At what age does WiMax dementia set in?

      35. Oh, I'm gonna be hating life next year.

    2. Re:Did he lose his marbles? by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 5, Funny

      If your folks can understand WiMax, you may want to mod your parents up

      [Ducks]

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    3. Re:Did he lose his marbles? by jeiler · · Score: 1

      No mod points, but please accept a +1 unofficial "Funny" mod.

      --

      If you haven't been down-modded lately, you aren't trying.

      Sacred cows make the best hamburger.

    4. Re:Did he lose his marbles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if only there was a +1 godawful joke mod

    5. Re:Did he lose his marbles? by Angostura · · Score: 1

      Serious point here, exactly how is WiMax toio complex, or rather, why can't the poster set it up?

  5. Get a long cord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why can't you just get a 500 meter long Ethernet cord? Is there a reason to insist on wireless for long distances?

    1. Re:Get a long cord by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      Um, like the 300ft rule?

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    2. Re:Get a long cord by mnslinky · · Score: 1

      There's a 100 meter limit to the Cat-5/6 spec with copper ethernet. You could run glass, but that gets really expensive with all the permits and such to bury said item within the Right-of-Way.

    3. Re:Get a long cord by Cerberus7 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh... that's a little out of spec for Ethernet. Would need a repeater. Or two. Or five.

      --
      I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
    4. Re:Get a long cord by mrbooze · · Score: 1

      Category 3, 5, and 6 UTP Ethernet cables are rated for a maximum of 100m for a single segment. Even if you for some reason used 5 100m cables with repeaters, I think you'd run into problems with the 5-4-3 rule once you factored in the end points of each connection. The cost would likely be way beyond what anyone would want to spend too. And regardless, by that point you are well beyond the "things most 70-year old men can implement and manage" threshold.

      I tend to agree that you might be able to do it with directional antennas, at least well enough to be better than dial-up. You could presumably do it with line-of-sight radio equipment but I don't know how affordable or easy to setup that is.

      What about ISDN? That should be possible just about anywhere with phone service, shouldn't it? I had my internet access via ISDN with SpeakEasy for several years when I lived in a no-dsl zone in Sunnyvale, CA.

    5. Re:Get a long cord by vtcodger · · Score: 1
      I don't think that any Unshielded Twisted Pair Ethernet will go 500m. At least not per spec. Losses, time delays, crosstalk or some combination thereof will probably cause trouble. Conceptually, you could put a few switches (repeaters) in the line and power them either via one of the power over ethernet technologies or a separate power line. I suspect a setup like that would be ugly to work with and failure prone. And I wouldn't wish an ethernet link that isn't working right on anyone.

      I think that thicknet (10base5) ethernet will go 500m. Lord knows where one would find Thicknet gear nowdays. And of course, it's on 10Mbps, but that's a hell of a lot faster than a phone line (in fact, it's several times faster that a T1 line).

      If there is line of sight, I think I'd go with wireless and directional antennae. You can get that going with the two ends of the link on the same table. Then you walk away with one end of the link and hope you can get to your cable access point before distance or whatever kills the link. At least that way, you know that both ends of the link are configured properly.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    6. Re:Get a long cord by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
      An optical fiber is the way to go for that distance then.

      But there are also optical "wireless" links that you can put up, usually works until a flock of birds passes by...

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    7. Re:Get a long cord by street+struttin' · · Score: 1

      Uh... that's a little out of spec for Ethernet. Would need a repeater. Or two. Or five. You could lay multi-mode fiber.
    8. Re:Get a long cord by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Actually, there's long-haul ethernet repeaters that would do that in a single hop. But you do give me an idea. You could do it with five cheap hubs. I'm envisioning them connected to solar lights :D

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Get a long cord by PAjamian · · Score: 1

      ummmm, probably because the maximum length of CAT 5/5e/6/6a cable is 100 meters?

      --
      Windows is a bonfire, Linux is the sun. Linux only looks smaller if you lack perspective.
  6. 2 or 3 APs with directional antennas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'd go with two APs with directional antennas configured as a wireless bridge. Hook up an ethernet cable to AP and its just like being connected to your friend's network. Albeit with a bit more latency.

    If he needs wireless at home, I'd get 3 APs. 2 for the direct bridge, and another to broadcast at home.

  7. From Engadget... by bagboy · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:From Engadget... by madsenj37 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Its the HD26200 from HD Communications Corp. I went to Engadget to find this myself. Its the $318, 5 mile solution that only requires a line of sight. The HD26200 is made up of two high performance Ubiquiti network radios with integrated 17dbi dual polarity antennas that are configured in wireless bridge mode. The HD26200 bridge is also powered over ethernet, so no RF cables are required, only an outdoor CAT5 cable to bring both data and power to the radios. HD Corp also has non-line of sight outdoor products.

      --
      Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
    2. Re:From Engadget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.wirelessnetworkproducts.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=1900
      If you got USD 700 to spare.

      www.seattlewireless.net
      have a few solutions.

      http://www.cantenna.com

      http://www.usbwifi.orconhosting.net.nz/
      For the poorest among us :-)

    3. Re:From Engadget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/22/318-wifi-network-bridge-connects-two-locations-up-to-5-miles-ap/ Current model requires LINE-OF-SIGHT
        they hope to address this issue by end of summer
  8. Repeaters and amplifiers by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Well, I suppose you could go out to your old man's place and install some high-power amplifiers, directional antennae, repeaters, etc. between your dad's friends place and his. Once the whole thing is setup, I've known it be fairly reliable

  9. Doable with 802.11g by rs6krox · · Score: 5, Informative

    500 meters is about 1,640 feet. I do that to my parents place now. I just got two Linksys routers running dd-wrt and two good outdoor antennas. With dd-wrt I cranked up the radio output a bit and have no problem getting full throughput over about that same distance.

    1. Re:Doable with 802.11g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add 2 directional PTP antennas to this setup and you probably won't even have to adjust from the default power output.

      This whole setup could probably be done for under $150 of new commercial equipment on all ends.

    2. Re:Doable with 802.11g by BlargIAmDead · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn. You parents have their basement 500 meters from the house? :)

    3. Re:Doable with 802.11g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Put a heatsink and a fan on those routers though. Otherwise they'll drop if you stream video (eg Netflix Watch it Now).

    4. Re:Doable with 802.11g by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Lasers. If you have direct line-of-sight and clear air, sighting lasers is both more efficient and safer.

      Reasoning:
      Powering a solid state laser is a lot cheaper than powering a radio mast of any kind. Radios will, even unidirectional, "shotgun" the signal a little. Also, it's hard to have interference problems with a laser.

      Of course, if it gets foggy... your screwed, unless it's the right wavelength laser.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:Doable with 802.11g by chill · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but unless he has a swimming pool, where does he keep the sharks?

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    6. Re:Doable with 802.11g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What outdoor antennas do you use?

    7. Re:Doable with 802.11g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Full throughput? Really? Are you sure about that? 500 meters adds at a minimum 1.67 microseconds for electromagnetic signals to go between the routers.

      That reduces the stated 54 Mbps on most routers by:

      0.000166962963% :)

  10. SuperNull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i would say hands down a ubiquity PowerStation or NanoStation if you can find it. They are dirt cheap for wireless links, very well built and have a great support forum. Configure once and walk away.

    -Joe
    Network Administrator for a medium Wireless ISP.

  11. Legislation? by dotancohen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Check local legislation. Where I live, the government must provide electricity, water, and telephone service to any legal building built, no matter how far into the boondocks it is built. I don't know if the law specifically applies to high-speed internet access, but I'm fairly confident that a good lawyer could make it seem that way.

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    1. Re:Legislation? by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      Not likely, but what we need here is NewYorkCountryLawyer (that is his handle, right?) for an opine.

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    2. Re:Legislation? by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

      Except that *good lawyer* will probably end up costing you well north of $10,000 when it's all said and done if it goes beyond mailing a threat.

    3. Re:Legislation? by BUL2294 · · Score: 1

      Where I live, the government must provide electricity, water, and telephone service to any legal building built, no matter how far into the boondocks it is built.
      Yes, that's true--for "essential services". At this point in time, however, Internet access is definitely not considered to be an essential service. The cable & phone/DSL companies are fighting tooth & nail to prevent Internet access from being considered as such.
      --
      Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
    4. Re:Legislation? by iroll · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Reeally? If you build a cabin in the woods, the gov't has to come dig you a well? Something tells me you haven't looked into this local legislation as deeply as you think you have.

      Where I live, if you don't live in town, you pay the electric company to plant poles to deliver the power. You pay the well digger to dig you a well. And you pay the telephone company to string some line along those electric co. poles. If you don't like the above, you sit in the dark and use an outhouse.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    5. Re:Legislation? by hostyle · · Score: 1

      And he cannot get phone line DSL since he is so far away from central terminal, so he relied on painful 22k/sec dial-up for access to Internet. Basic utilities may be a legal requirement but broadband certainly is not.
      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    6. Re:Legislation? by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Interesting

      read the question more carefully. In particular, the part about "cable company" and the part about him currently having phone service. However, cable companies are generally granted a monopoly in exchange for certain requirements, such as paying for the cable to be laid when population density exceeds xx% or the building is within xx feet of a main road.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    7. Re:Legislation? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Reeally? If you build a cabin in the woods, the gov't has to come dig you a well? Something tells me you haven't looked into this local legislation as deeply as you think you have. Yes, this is the case so far as I understand. I will ask about where to find English-language webpages that confirm and I'll post links. It won't be today, though.
      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    8. Re:Legislation? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's true--for "essential services". At this point in time, however, Internet access is definitely not considered to be an essential service. The cable & phone/DSL companies are fighting tooth & nail to prevent Internet access from being considered as such. That's where the 'good laywer' bit comes in. Especially if the government posts critical information online. Weather, tax information, crisis information, etc.
      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    9. Re:Legislation? by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      In most areas he is talking about living in town which is specified by a certain number of buildings within a certain distance of each other. The government hands our billions in subsidies to the big providers to provide you with essential services.

      You are correct that in some circumstances you do have to pay for all of that work if you live far enough out but you don't usually have to pay the full cost unless you're really far out and it would only benefit you. It all depends on how the land is zoned.

    10. Re:Legislation? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      That's where the 'good laywer' bit comes in. Especially if the government posts critical information online. Weather, tax information, crisis information, etc.
      And it would be argued that dial-up is 'good enough' for that. Broadband not required.
    11. Re:Legislation? by The-Blue-Clown · · Score: 1

      The government has to provide you utilities. Water, power and phone are utilities. They do not have to "provide" them, only provide you access. I built my house way way out and I still had the ability to tap into the county water. Of course it would be thousands of dollars for meter, tap in charge and then my bringing the water from the road to my house. But broadband is NOT A UTILITY so forget it.

    12. Re:Legislation? by eharvill · · Score: 1

      Check local legislation. Where I live, the government must provide electricity, water, and telephone service to any legal building built, no matter how far into the boondocks it is built. I don't know if the law specifically applies to high-speed internet access, but I'm fairly confident that a good lawyer could make it seem that way. They didn't refuse service. They simply wanted $10k for the installation. I'm pretty sure the other utilities weren't provided for free, but were built into the cost of the house at time of purchase.
      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    13. Re:Legislation? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Where I live, the government must provide electricity, water, and telephone service to any legal building built There's something similar in Norway for phones. But in no way does that cover anything more than dial-up, and I've never heard of any other country ever where that was a requirement either.
      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    14. Re:Legislation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...If you don't like the above,you sit in the dark and use an outhouse.

      Or, become one of those rare people that live "off the grid". Don't act like the *only* solutions are to fork over money to crooked bastards or poop in a hole and wipe your butt with leaves.

  12. You can use wireless by Exstatica · · Score: 5, Informative

    I live near lax, but my building has really old wiring and i can't get dsl at this location, but i'm a mile from the office and once on the roof i found i had line of sight. I bought two wireless access points from ascendance, I bought the heavy ones cause i wanted to use the high performance radios so i can get 100mbit. (i work for an isp and i was able to just bring it right into my colo. But if you get http://www.ascendance.net/storefront/detail.aspx?ID=788 that should work two, you need two of them. Configuration isn't difficult, you set one as an AP and the other as a client, set your encryption and static /30 ip. and aim them at eachother. All done. On average with the standard radio you can get 20mbits up and down, and its solid enough to put voip calls over. The max range is just under 5 miles, that should cover you. Hope that helps.

    1. Re:You can use wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yes, my mother-n-law has this technology running for them in Reno,NV.

      They love it as they seldom have bottle-necks and if your antennas are raised with great line-of-sight, then you should be good to go.

      They pay a distant neighbor 30/month for 100Mb connection.

      I have never used it personally, but they love it, and never complain about it.

  13. Directional High-Gain Antenna by 0p7imu5_P2im3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Linksys (I don't know about others) come with a standard antenna port. With a directional, high-gain antenna pointed at your dad's house from the neighbor's, you could probably make the connection. Worst case, you might need to get some custom firmware and turn up the transmission strength a tad. (I suggest Tomato.)

    Look up "coffee can wifi antennas" on google. This will make it cheap and "easy."

    --
    Resistance is futile. Your technological distinctiveness will be added to our own. You will become one with the morgue
    1. Re:Directional High-Gain Antenna by johneee · · Score: 4, Informative

      Linksys (I don't know about others) come with a standard antenna port

      Careful. Not ALL Linksys have antenna ports. Some do, some don't. I just bought one that doesn't. Not a concern for me, but don't buy one online without looking closely expecting them to have ports.

      --
      - ------- There are ten kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who... Huh?
    2. Re:Directional High-Gain Antenna by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Look up "coffee can wifi antennas" on google

      Just as an aside, the famous Rob Flickenger "Pringles Tube" antenna with all the washers up the inside sucks elephants through very fine gauze.

      The stopped waveguide "coffee can" antennas work much better, but finding a suitable 85mm diameter can might be tricky. There are a lot of simple patch antenna designs out there, too. Helicals are too much hassle, really.

      You might get good results with a couple of USB wifi sticks mounted in place of the LNB of some old satellite dishes.

  14. Cantenna? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can buy or build a cantenna. They're illegal. But with a bit of work and patience, they function well. I dunno if a simple can-based setup can handle half a kilometer (and if it can, it's going to need a good solid connection to the house to keep it aligned) but I do know that a cantenna operated at the focal point of a used satellite dish will work fine up into the several kilometer range.
    They're really cheap to build. You generally need to find reverse-polarity RF connectors to hook to the card in the computer. Digikey.com, newark.com, and mouser.com all sell reverse-polarity rf connectors. Traditionally people put n-type rf connectors on the antenna but that's a pain: I built mine using a bnc bulkhead connector on the can, and a rp-sma-to-bnc converter connector on my wireless adapter card, and just ran bnc cable from one to the other.

    Mine only runs 40 meters through a couple of walls. Hopefully other people will correct this if it's the wrong solution for 500 meters.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    1. Re:Cantenna? by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      I hear used Primestar dishes can be modified for long distance Wi-Fi. The old dishes are abundant here in The States. However, I noticed the author uses the metric system, suggesting he resides elsewhere. They will probably be more difficult to obtain in his location.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    2. Re:Cantenna? by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      Get a ham radio license. The first six channels or so of 802.11b fall into an amateur frequency allocation, and I think the power limit is 1 watt, with no EIRP limit - which means you can run it into a 12-foot dish, if you so desire. Yeah, you can't legally run encryption over it, but I think you're still on better legal footing than just ignoring the Part 15 rules.

    3. Re:Cantenna? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I don't think a cantenna is good enough.

      There is a cottage industry built around long-range WiFi. You can buy a 200mW WiFi "b" or "g" base station/bridge, a couple of 24dB parabolic dishes made for 2.4GHz and get a link that's good for a couple miles, assuming good line of sight. The connection should be plenty good enough to get high speed internet.

    4. Re:Cantenna? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      And you can get a lot more information from Wikipedia too!

      And if one can isn't enough you should be able to stack them, but that requires cable splitting and a fine hand.

      Yet another thing is that the cable between the antenna and the electronics has to be as short as possible to avoid losses in the cable, which means that you probably have to place the node/access point outdoors.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    5. Re:Cantenna? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can buy or build a cantenna. They're illegal... A Cantenna is as illegal as a toothbrush...it's all how you use it. There are two things you need to be aware of: FCC regulations on antenna power and Terms of service of the ISP providing the service.

      A Cantenna can hit 500 meters without exceeding FCC regulations and many ISPs allow connection sharing (a business level service plan may be required). Pay the neighbor the difference and you're Dad is set to go.

      Outwardly stating they are illegal is misleading and a disservice to the readers. Get your facts straight or I'll come after you with my toothbrush.
    6. Re:Cantenna? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not illegal.

    7. Re:Cantenna? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since when have cantenna's been illegal? Outside of pushing your transmit strength above the legal limit I've never heard of them being illegal...

    8. Re:Cantenna? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Funny

      1. I build flamethrowers for fun: I see your toothbrush and raise you 2000 degrees.

      2. It was my understanding that modifying the antenna on an FCC-licensed device was illegal. I may be wrong.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    9. Re:Cantenna? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are you on better legal footing? You're breaking the law either way.

    10. Re:Cantenna? by kg9ov · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How is ignoring the Part 97 rules any better than ignoring the Part 15 rules?

    11. Re:Cantenna? by ackior · · Score: 1

      Cantennas are perfectly legal- where does does idea of illegality come from? The only thing I could find is one cop who didn't know what the hell he was talking about.

    12. Re:Cantenna? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Why? You can already do 25+ miles with a 100mW radio and a 24dBi antenna without a HAM license. Cisco has a certified kit that they conservatively say will do 25 miles if you have a high enough tower (will probably require a zoning permit in most jurisdictions).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    13. Re:Cantenna? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes a cantenna illegal?

    14. Re:Cantenna? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you live that makes cantennas illegal?

    15. Re:Cantenna? by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Super Cantenna SCB10
      http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=2859

      The best homemade one according to this article is fabricated from a Nally chunky soup can.

      http://www.turnpoint.net/wireless/cantennahowto.html

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    16. Re:Cantenna? by evilgourmet · · Score: 1

      You can buy or build a cantenna. They're illegal. Where is the Cantenna illegal?
    17. Re:Cantenna? by VeriTea · · Score: 1

      The FCC limit for the 2.4GHz band is on EIRP (essentially Tx output power * antenna gain), not on Tx output power alone. Adding a high-gain antenna or boosting the Tx output power can both push you over the legal limit of 100mW EIRP.

      --
      --- There are two kinds of people, those who accept dogmas and know it, and those who accept dogmas and don't know it
  15. Hawking external antennas by drachenstern · · Score: 3, Informative

    Have you seen these? I think they would require LoS for maximum efficiency, but it's worth a peak. You could use two directional high gain antennas and point them at each other if LoS is nearly there... But bear in mind that nothing about their doc requires LoS, just that we all know it works better if there is.

    http://www.hawkingtech.com/products/productlist.php?CatID=32&FamID=58&ProdID=133

    --
    2^3 * 31 * 647
    1. Re:Hawking external antennas by Tteddo · · Score: 1

      I can vouch for Hawking products, that's what I hook people up with in this situation. I usually just use one antenna port on a Linksys router and point it at the building where I want Internet, then use a bridge in said building.

    2. Re:Hawking external antennas by Bloodoflethe · · Score: 1

      Yay for the Fresnel Zone~

      --
      "Little is much when little you need."
    3. Re:Hawking external antennas by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      I have used this indoor antenna outdoors by the ocean for years with never an issue. http://www.hawkingtech.com/products/productlist.php?CatID=32&FamID=58&ProdID=152 The signal booster as also very good.

    4. Re:Hawking external antennas by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      by chance have you installed a more powerful antenna on your laptop? I'm curious, as my folks are saying that they're getting poor performance in their house, and I was thinking of installing this very product in their library (that corner would serve the whole house rather well) but didn't want to give them something else for their laptop. Mom already forgets about enough tech as it is.

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    5. Re:Hawking external antennas by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      How does that work? On a linksys WRT54*, one antenna is transmit and the other is receive - either way, only one communication direction will span the distance to the other building.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    6. Re:Hawking external antennas by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      DD-WRT or Open-WRT or Tomato

      They let you reconfigure those options. Whoever said that the vendor knew best when it comes to the things they build obviously wasn't a hacker/MAKEr. (Go MAKE!!! Great mag)

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    7. Re:Hawking external antennas by Tteddo · · Score: 1

      I don't think it works that way. I use one to go to the Hawking, and in one case left the other for local use in that building. There was no way the local building could be using the Hawking Antenna as it was outside and pointed away. It's working in several places. I could be wrong and it's just dumb luck though!! Can you point to a source for one is transmit and one is receive? That would be interesting...

    8. Re:Hawking external antennas by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      I just use external cards. I have never had good luck with built in wireless.

  16. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Put old b mode and two directional antennas. I write this over such 11 mbps link over 3km distance

  17. ALL wireless routers go that far. by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I suggest learning about antennas.

    Wireless access point at each end, directional antennas, wifi goodness ensues.

    I've done 1000 meters with simple patch antennas and wrt54g routers running dd-wrt to create a wireless ethernet extension. Only heavy rain will drop the connection.

    Otherwise look up the laser types. there are hundreds of websites on how to do this simple and common task.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:ALL wireless routers go that far. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just some cardboard and tinfoil can make some deflectors for a regular router. I used a pair of these on a stock Linksys WRT54G, pointed them in the direction I wanted, and managed to pick up a signal a kilometer away on an unmodified Toshiba laptop. It wasn't the fastest connection in the world (about the same as dial-up, actually), but over shorter distances and with a bit of tweaking, you might be able to make this work relatively inexpensively.

  18. $318 WiFi network bridge connects two locations up by mnslinky · · Score: 5, Informative
    See if this works for you:

    There is an article at engadget about this sort of thing. It requires line-of-site, but I'm sure you could manage that.

    If you've tried every antenna and extender on the market today with subpar results, HD Communications is apt to become your new best friend. The outfit has just revealed its HD26200, a "complete outdoor wireless network bridge in the 802.11b/g unlicensed 2.4GHz band that sells for only $318." Said device bridges wireless internet between two locales up to 5 miles apart without requiring a single RF cable, being that both Ubiquiti network radios are powered over Ethernet. If you're looking for the catch, the bridge does require a direct line of sight between the two locations, but the firm is reportedly looking to expand its non-line of sight family by the summer's end.


    Link to the Article

    Hope this helps.

  19. DSL can work. by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

    Set up your own DSL.

    Buy two modems (a CO and a CPE), set them to bridge mode, and use the existing phone line to call your neighbors modem from your modem, which is then hooked up to his cable.

    Course there may be some phone line finagling, depending on the company.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:DSL can work. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      you cant "call" your neighbor with DSL. it's a point to point setup.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:DSL can work. by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I vaguely remember something about an unused leg in the phone wire used for alarm systems.. you can tap into this and do some level of networking using this wire.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:DSL can work. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Most homes come with four wires, only two are needed for a phone, so can ahve a second line. The second phone line is what is sued for alarms.

      Your networking ability would be limited, and it won't go directly to your neighbors house, so ti wouldn't be of any use for this.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  20. Use Mikrotik boards, which run Linux by transporter_ii · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm just about to the point where I hate wireless, but for a non-commercial shot like this, mikrotik should work well. You could get into it for 300.00 - 600.00 for a couple of units configured as a wireless bridge.

    I recommend using Ubiquity sR2 or SR5 mini-pci cards...and ground everything especially well.

    Mikrotik boards run Linux and are extremely roboust and feature rich. But you can follow this wiki and have a transparent bridge running in no time flat:

    http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Transparently_Bridge_two_Networks

    We use mikrotik a lot in a wireless WISP situation. If someone thinks they are going to throw a bunch of this stuff hundreds of feet in the air and make a lot of money doing wireless Internet, they are in for a wild ride...that ends somewhere between hairloss and a straight jacket...but I do something almost exactly like what you are wanting to do with your father using Mikrotik, and it has worked very well and wasn't super expensive.

    Again, ground everything as best you can, and use directional, not omni antennas (cheap omni antennas often have grounding issues than can pop the radio card really easy).

    See also: wisp-router.com

    Transporter_ii

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
    1. Re:Use Mikrotik boards, which run Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to chime in to suggest MikroTik as well. They're pretty inexpensive, too.

      http://www.mikrotik.com/pricelist.php?sect=3

    2. Re:Use Mikrotik boards, which run Linux by Jouster · · Score: 1

      Yep, stick a Routerboard 133c in a Rootenna, then do the following (semicolons to defeat linkbreaks): /ip address add address=192.168.0.1/24 interface=ether1 disabled=no

      ; /ip firewall nat add chain=srcnat src-address=192.168.0.0/24 action=masquerade

      ; /ip dhcp-client add interface=wlan1 add-default-route=yes use-peer-dns=yes disabled=no

      ; /interface wireless set wlan1 ssid= disabled=no

      ; /ip dhcp-server setup (set it up for ether1)


      All done. $150.

      --J

    3. Re:Use Mikrotik boards, which run Linux by cfryback · · Score: 1

      +1 for this. We have 13 remote sites connected via Mikrotik. 100% reliable - in running for two years have not had one link drop out. The other advantage is that the kit we are using is on the 5.8Ghz - so you don't have to worry about 2.4Ghz phones, microwave ovens, other people's wireless, etc. Over such a short distance the link would be 99.9999% reliable...And the other bonus is that MikroTik routers only talk to other MikroTik routers, so is much less likely that someone is going to snoop.

    4. Re:Use Mikrotik boards, which run Linux by transporter_ii · · Score: 1

      Actually, RouterOS is 802.11 a/b/g compliant. I've seen a Mikrotik AP have Deliberant and Ubiquity CPE clients, and have connected to an AP with my laptop. If you want them to only communicate between routerboards, you can use nstream, which is a proprietary protocol (or you could use something like a 3.6, 4.9, 900 Mhz radio card).

      I've also seen a Mikrotik board in 5.8 that kept dropping connection every 30 - 45 seconds or so. The reason? An 802.11a printer was attempting to connect to it...repeatedly. Turn off "default authenticate" and make an access list and it will solve this problem.

      transporter_ii

      --
      Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
  21. SMC 2891W by JumboMessiah · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know these look pricey, but they're worth it (aka: save yourself the trouble of cheap indoor access points in a box). They have everything you need, all in a rugged outdoor enclosure. And yes, they run Linux.

    SMC2891W-AG Wireless Outdoor Bridge

    Data Sheet

    Manual

  22. Novaroam stuff works well (900Mhz no license band) by VoxBoston · · Score: 4, Interesting
    http://novaroam.com/ - used by police, fire, etc. Good penetration through trees and foliage, unlike WiFi. Mesh networking capable if you need it (although your setup sounds like point-to-point).

    -Karl
    A rock record: http://www.instarmusic.com/

  23. WiFi Antennas anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a pair of gain antennas at WiFi frequencies should do the trick. (Gain antennas also keep the clutter down from nosy neighbors who discover the wifi channel and attempt to get their own free wifi.)
    Free / cheap construction articles are available on the web...

  24. Cantenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here are a couple links. The second link shows a test resulting in a wifi signal (although poor) going 1.2 miles.

    Coffee Can antenna
    Cantenna test

  25. Tin can tastic by tweekzilla · · Score: 1

    I've heard of people using Tin Cans at both ends as an antenna - really cheep with not too much work - Look at http://www.turnpoint.net/wireless/cantennahowto.html Have fun

    1. Re:Tin can tastic by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Back in the Seventies when HBO was being distributed over 2.3GHz links, loads of people built antennas that consisted of an aluminum snow saucer with a one-pound coffee can as the feedhorn, the latter supported on three pieces of aluminum rod. The antenna connection was a Type N female connector with a piece of brass rod 1.25 inches (1/4 wave) long, sticking radially in from the circumference of the can, 2.5 inches (1/2 wave) from the closed end.

      Of course the saucer was spherical, not parabolic, but the error was within the Rayleigh criterion of 1/8 wave, so it worked remarkably well. Rumor Has It (tm) that it could deliver a clear HBO signal over twenty miles from the Denver transmitter, in a neighborhood that HBO itself declined to serve because of intervening hills...

  26. Two Pringles cans by Steve1952 · · Score: 1

    Purchase two cans of Pringles (tm) chips. Eat chips. Insert Wifi antenna on each end into cans. Line up cans. Enjoy.

    1. Re:Two Pringles cans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Purchase two cans of Pringles (tm) chips. Eat chips. Insert Wifi antenna on each end into cans. Line up cans. Enjoy. actually, not a joke - http://www.turnpoint.net/wireless/has.html

  27. Line of sight? by geekmansworld · · Score: 1

    Regular Wi-Fi might still be an option. If you've got line of sight, grab a pair of wireless routers and attach directional antennas to them. Even 802.11 signals can go quite far if attached to correctly calibrated antennas, as shown by the now infamous "Cantenna".

  28. djacosta by djacosta · · Score: 1

    Buy an Access Point with a DETACHABLE antenna. Replace the antenna that comes with the access point with a directional flat panel antenna (14 dBi or so) On the client side: Buy a 802.11 card with DETACHABLE antenna, replace the antenna with a directional flat panel antenna (14 dBi or so)

  29. It would be nice.. by FamineMonk · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you gave a little more info. If you have line of sight then its no problem at all just buy 2 routers that can be flashed to DD-WRT. (I suggest the Asus WL-500G Premium or the Linksys WRT54GL I own both and they both work like a charm just make sure you buy the right connector Asus: rp-SMC/linksys: rp-TNC)

    After you figure that out go to http://www.hyperlinktech.com/familylist.aspx?id=146 or where ever you want to get an Antenna.

    my guess is your going to want to grab the 24db one seeing as how the 30 jumps quite a bit in price. after that mount them both with line of sight connect everything up and you should be good to go. If you don't have line of sight then its going to depend on whats in the way if its possible at all.

    1. Re:It would be nice.. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I thought that DDW-RT sucked and there are better alternatives.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:It would be nice.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here, here. WRT54GL loaded with DD-WRT at both ends. Turn up power to 175mW. Attach a HyperLink Tech HG2414P (14dBi panel antenna) to each router. 500 meters is nothing as you could do a few miles with this rig and total cost is about $175.

    3. Re:It would be nice.. by FamineMonk · · Score: 1

      I know of Tomato but when i was picking there were more guides for installing dd-wrt.

      As for the other business I had not read about that and well it seems like an issue i'll keep in mind i don't think it will make me change just yet i like the interface and know it too well to switch at the current moment.

      But if your just starting out Tomato seems like the best place to start but it still seems to be lacking features that dd-wrt has, but maybe i just don't know it well enough.

      Thanks for the heads up.

    4. Re:It would be nice.. by bonehead · · Score: 1

      If you don't have line of sight then its going to depend on whats in the way if its possible at all. Trees will be your biggest enemy. I've gone 200 yards, non-line of sight with a pair of WAP-11s. Worked great through several brick buildings. In the winter. Once spring came around and the trees leafed out, the link completely broke.

      Water does "bad things" to radio waves, and tree leaves are full of, you guessed it, lots of water.
    5. Re:It would be nice.. by Kirkoff · · Score: 1

      To be clear - it does "bad things" to SOME Radio waves. Water absorbs radiation at 2.4GHz remarkably well. That's why it is used in microwave ovens. At 900Mhz, you won't see nearly that much absorption. The same holds true going higher but the signal be much more likely to deflect the higher you go.

      In the end, it doesn't matter because you're only licensed to use so much and thus only so much gear is available.

      --
      There are exactly 42,935,718 letter sized sheets in a square mile.
  30. Doing it professionally for $10K by davidwr · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are companies out there who will do a professional job of installing fixed-wireless from point A to point B.

    You may want to pay your neighbor for a utilities easement to either run a cable down his property or install point A for fixed-wireless on his property. Then, pay the cable company as normal for them to connect Point A to their hookup. You will also need to get electrical service. The up-front costs won't be cheap but it will be a lot less than $10K.

    If there are several neighbors affected, you may want to form a co-op or contract with a company who will own the easement.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  31. Another DIY way by alexwcovington · · Score: 1

    Supplies:

    1 or 2 Satellite dish(es)
    Transmitter: A Wireless router at your house
    Receiver: A Wireless router or wireless card with external antenna at your dad's place
    A reasonable line of sight.

    Place the antenna of the receiver at the point of the satellite dish where the LNB would be (lashing the antenna onto the LNB should do for a test). Aim the dish toward the wireless router at your house.

    If you can't get a good signal, you can set up another dish at your house, with the antenna of the router mounted at the LNB, to point directly at the receiver.

    For the distances you're talking about, this should work with the half-metre mini-dishes commonly used for TV and Internet access. People with giant C-Band antennas have set WiFi transmission records with similar setups.

    --
    (It's never too late to join the Renaissance)
  32. Call Huges by SrJsignal · · Score: 2, Informative

    All of the new Hugesnet installs have bi-directional to the satelight, so then you don't have to use the phone line. I think the up is 64kbps.
    All of the Wifi sharing ideas are going to be against the TOS of the company that is being "shared"

    1. Re:Call Huges by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

      All of the Wifi sharing ideas are going to be against the TOS of the company that is being "shared" Not to be an ass, but so what?
      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    2. Re:Call Huges by johnsmith_12345 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Worst case scenario have your Grandfather upgrade his Huguesnet Equipment, Their new boxes are faster and have no need to be connected to a phone line. You will proabably also have to upgrade his dish which used to be in $300-$400 range. I used Hughesnet for years and if you are conservative with your bandwidth then they can be ok.

      (OK, they suck terribly but are only provider in many rural areas.)

    3. Re:Call Huges by Mousit · · Score: 1

      I was looking for someone to have said this. I second it.

      My father's in a similar situation: buried in the woods off a dirt road, with satellite as his only option (the phone system's so old out there, he can't even get caller ID. No, seriously). He's on Hughes as well, and used to have the satellite-down, phone-up, but no more. It did require hardware installation of a second dish, which cost some money ($300 I think) but that's a damn far cry from $10k.

      The speeds are quite acceptable, and I think these days they now get better than 64kbps up. I've used SSH and even VPN access from his place when I've needed to, and it's functioned well enough.

  33. 1.5km WiFi is doable by iiioxx · · Score: 1

    If you've got line-of-sight between the two locations (or can acheive line-of-sight by mounting antennas on a mast), there's no reason why a couple of off-the-shelf 802.11 APs couldn't be adapted to provide connectivity. What you will need is a yagi (directional) antenna on each end of the connection, to direct your signal towards the other location while deafening the transceiver to other interfering signals. Yagis aren't cheap to buy off the shelf, but homebrew yagis can be made at a fairly reasonable price with parts from your neighborhood Radio Shack. Relevant info here.

    You may only achieve 1-2Mbps rates, but it would be better than dial-up and satellite, and won't require the use of a phone line.

    1. Re:1.5km WiFi is doable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you have an interest in building and tuning antennas you might as well buy one. The antennas aren't that expensive.

      http://www.hyperlinktech.com/familylist.aspx?id=149

    2. Re:1.5km WiFi is doable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you have an interest in building and tuning antennas you might as well buy one. The antennas aren't that expensive.

      http://www.hyperlinktech.com/familylist.aspx?id=149

      Depends on your idea of expensive. Personally, when the antenna costs as much or more than the access point, I'd say it's too pricey. If you're paying US$60 for a Linksys WAP54G, it might sting to pay another US$60 for a prebuilt yagi. Especially when you can build a homemade can antenna for less than US$10, by following simple instructions.

  34. Just hook up some good antennas by jovetoo · · Score: 1

    If you have line of sight between the houses, just connect some good antennas to standard wireless accesspoints (dishes for example) and put the antennas on the roof. You should be able to cross those 500m. Outdoor units would indeed help.

    I did 1200m with two homemade can antennas (across a valley though). A few years ago, a suitable dish costs around $75.

  35. Cell Phone Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What about getting one of those 3G-type cards that blackberry/iphone owners have? That seems to be a pretty good solution to this problem.

  36. Wireless bridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    http://rftechnics.com/

    Or build your own out of a couple Linksys WRT54GLs a DD-WRT flash and a couple beefy antennas...

    Might save 10 to 20% of the cost that way, but this is weatherproofed and plug and play...

  37. wildblue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.wildblue.com

  38. 10BaseFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's 'old' technology (read: ebay), but for internet access, you could use two 10BaseT to 10BaseFL converters and a 500 meter run of fiber. The converter takes old 10 megabit ethernet and converts it to the optical medium and back.
    You would need something to house it unless the cable is rated for outdoor use, but it wouldn't have to be expensive metal electrical conduit. The two biggest gains here are reliability and avoidance of differential ground issues.
    The latter can be a killer in improper cable installations when thunderstorms cause the ground to get charged in different areas at several thousand volts with respect to each other. Equipment = zapped.

  39. Make your own antenna by tknd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Research satellite dish antennas or cantennas. Both are cheap directional antennas (buy someone's used satellite dish) and of course you will want direct line of sight between the two antennas.

  40. Proxim Tsunami by David_Hart · · Score: 1


    You could pick up a Proxim Tsunami QuickBridge 20. We use them on our campus, works great. They are good for up to 6 miles but do require line of site. You should be able to find on on eBay for less than $1000.

    David

  41. Yagi? by Smith55js · · Score: 1

    http://www.netscum.com/~clapp/wireless.html#results You could build yourself a directional antenna to span the distance...

    --
    ~smith55js
  42. Directional antennas by hpa · · Score: 1

    Ordinary Wifi can easily go for quite a few kilometers if equipped with directional antennas (usually Yagis, what most people think of as "TV antennas") at both ends. If you get custom firmware such as DD-WRT for ordinary access points you can usually crank up the power closer to 100 mW (WRT54GL tops out around 80 mW from what I've read.) The legal limit in the USA at least is 1 W, so if you can get your hands on an access point with an amplifier (Belkin used to make them.)

    The best of all is that the total solution ends up being pretty cheap. You *do* need line of sight between the antennas, however.

  43. 2 access points with yagi antennas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy two access points with external yagi antennas. Place one at pop's house and the other at the friends. Spend some time aligning the antennas. Secure the wireless connection using WPA. Start surfing.

    Also, pray that the cable/dsl provider at your friends doesnt find out because their terms of service include not offering bandwidth to other residences.

  44. Use 1000base-LX fiber by nelsonen · · Score: 1

    If all the neighbors are nice, run a 1000base-LX link. Get a couple of media converters, and you have 10km worth of distance available. Just be sure to get any grounding correct so a lightning strike at one end doesn't fry everything at the other end (some direct burial fiber has metallic cores for strength).

  45. Wireless by retro128 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I first moved to my city, DSL and cable were not available. 6 years ago I started a job located about 4 miles away from my home, and they had a T1. Turns out my condo had radio line of sight to work. What I did was set up two Linux boxes on peer to peer wireless using Orinico cards since they had the jack for an external antenna. To those I hooked up the appropriate pigtails and LMR-400 microwave cable to the parabolic grid antennas on the roof of each location. After configuring Linux to handle the routing, bam I was the first guy in my city with broadband. Actually, I'm still running on it though cable and DSL is now available.

    Now granted this was the old school way of doing it. The other problem was that I was using 75 feet of LMR-400 cable on each end to bring the signal from the antenna to my card. That's generally not a good idea since long runs of cable attenuate the signal, so it's always best to have your network equipment as close to the antenna as possible. But back then that type of stuff was hella expensive - Just between the grid antennas, the cards, the dongles, and the cables it came out to about $600. You don't even want to know what the network equipment would have cost, which is why I ran it on the cheap using Linux.

    But now this stuff practically grows on trees. There are kits around that let you do long distance point-to-point hookups, but I don't know where to get them off the top of my head since I haven't researched it in awhile. You might want to start with Radio Labs to get an idea of the type of equipment that's out there. Bottom line is that if I can get a decent wifi signal from four miles away with a non-optimal configuration, you should be able to do 500m as long as you have line of sight. I think you should be able to get away with it for around $500 or less.

    --
    -R
  46. On our farm by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    We have a farm with a satellite set up at one of the houses, and a microwave wireless connection connects the other house. The system is "line of sight", and the other house is about 1500 yards away. I can't seem to remember the set up being all that expensive - certainly less hassle than running a wire all the way to the other house.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  47. EVDO RevA by BravoZuluM · · Score: 1

    Sprint or Verizon offers it. I live in the country away from cable and DSL. I have a CradlePoint MBR1000 access point, a Novatel Express Card with EVDO Rev A and a directional antenna pointed at the nearest cell tower. Without the antenna, I get zero to 1 bars. With the antenna, I get 4 out of 5 bars. The house shares the connection and everyone downloads their YouTube videos and what not with no impact. The cost for unlimited with Sprint is $60 a month. I am EXTREMELY satisfied with the setup. An added bonus is that with a power inverter, I can take a road trip and power the MBR1000. Everyone in the car has high speed internet access while we drive. IT is an AWESOME solution.

  48. Pringles CAN Wifi to the MAX by y86 · · Score: 1

    Just use a pringles can to redirect the wireless signal.

    BAM. It works.

    http://www.g4tv.com/screensavers/features/40546/Pringles_Can_WiFi_Antenna.html

  49. Phone line for upload? by curiosity · · Score: 1

    With his current satellite setup, the "phone line for upload" thing hasn't been true for years unless he's on an ancient plan with ancient equipment. For the same monthly price he can upgrade to the newer 2-way system if that's the issue.

  50. Go Optical ? by Quietlife2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you have :-

    1) Clear line of sight.
    2) A soldering iron (and know how to use it *properly*)
    3) Basic metalwork skills.
    4) Spare time **LOTS**

    http://ronja.twibright.com/

    "Ronja is a free technology project for reliable optical data links with a current range of 1.4km and a communication speed of 10Mbps full duplex."

    10 Megabit free space optical complete with designs & pcb layouts.

    Can't get more DIY than this :-)

  51. if it's wireless: ask a HAM! by adnd74 · · Score: 0

    My first suggestion would be to contact your local armature radio club. Someone there will be familiar enough with 802.1x to help you. Directional antenna's shouldn't have an issue reaching that distance, especially if it's line of site. As far as building your own antenna, you can find many options out there on the internet. I would suggest the N-type connection over a BNC connector (less signal loss at that frequency =) ) I'd be happy to help as much as possible, if I you require more from me: feel free to message me... ~ 73 kd7tag

  52. Re:Are you serious? by Applekid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let A = cost of beers for able-bodied friends
    B = cost of equipment (free because you already have it? Power tool rental?)
    C = cost of submitting a request to the county
    D = cost of cables, conduits, etc that gets buried.

    If A + B + C + D $10,000 that the cable company is quoting, then it's a good deal. If it gets a permit and is all done to code there's nothing the cable company can sue about... especially since he'd just basically extended their infrastructure at no cost to them.

    There's always inviting a cell tower to be built on your property. In such a case the cell companies would wind up buring some kind of infrastructure anyway to support it. When that happens, call again and all of a sudden, wouldn't you know it, you've got cabling all up to practically your doorstep.

    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
  53. Use Commercial Grade Equipment instead of Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can buy a couple of Tranzeo TR-SL2-15 Radios for a little over $300 and be done. Range~3-5 Miles line-of-sight. Check out rflinx.com for some commercial radio options. It's where I buy all my stuff. Though, I also live only 30mins from them, so I can pick up to skip out on shipping charges.

  54. Use political trick (right of way) worked for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Use a political trick (right of way) worked for me!

    Cable companies need to cut across property sometimes that they have no municipal rights to do without compensation. Othertimes they desire to erect and maintain radio towers on land that they do not outright own.

    I had the SAME problem, 15,000 to 10,000 to run a line to one house in the middle of 40 unserved homes.

    But we knew the people that had a soon to expire lease that Comcast Cable in Michigan needed to renew and offered to PAY them to say "no, not unless you also run a line down that street"

    It worked!

    Nothing else would have worked.

  55. this may work... by Wornstrom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    maybe a verizon broadband access card? they sell it in usb format too... 5GB monthly cap is kinda small though so it might not suit your needs.

    1. Re:this may work... by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      The pricing is just stupid. $.01/MB for the first 5000 MB then .50 thereafter? WTF? That's some verizon math right there.

    2. Re:this may work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their terms of service also specifically bar it from being used as a replacement for a permanent internet connection.

  56. Tranzeo by rebelcan · · Score: 2, Informative

    https://tranzeo.com/

    For 500 meters, you can use the 802.11a or 802.11bg ( TR-5a series and TR-6000 series respectively ) without too many problems, as long as you have good line of sight. If there are a few trees, then the 900MHz stuff might be a better idea, but if there's a forest or a lot of buildings between your friend and your dad, you're boned. Just make sure that regardless of what kind of radio you get ( and regardless of what manufacturer you buy from ), use an antenna with as narrow beamwidth as you can get, ESPECIALLY for the 900MHz. For a point-to-point install, omni antennas are not your friend. Yagi or dish antennas might be a bitch to setup, but you'll have very little noise or interference.

    Disclaimer: yes, I work for this company, but I really don't give two hoots if you use our stuff. Just make sure you get the right equipment ( ie: NO OMNI ANTENNAS ). I can't believe how many people think that omni antennas are a good idea ( especially for 900Mhz, ouch ).

    --
    God is dead -- Nietzsche
    Nietzsche is dead -- God
    Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
  57. Q-Bridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out http://www.connexwireless.com/Q-Bridge/about/
    I've been using the Q-Bridge for over a year now without any issues. I use it to bring the internet to an outbuilding just over 1 mile from my house. It was very simple to set up.

  58. Trango Point-to-Point by allometry · · Score: 1

    If your Dad and his friend have line of sight and if your Dad is willing to spend a little money, I recommend Trango radio's. I worked for a company in town that did rural broadband with Trango radios and they are stable.

    http://www.trangobroadband.com/

    I would recommend getting in touch with Trango and talk about the hardware needed to pull off this job. I'm pretty sure, with the distance, you would need the Atlas FOX model radios.

    New radios can be pricey, so be sure to hit up EBAY.

    Good luck!

    --
    http://www.allometry.com
    1. Re:Trango Point-to-Point by smclean · · Score: 1

      I am a customer of a wireless ISP that uses Trango equipment for last-mile connectivity in our rural mountain town. The stuff works great, I was going to post the same reply that you did until I found that you already posted it.

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

  59. I Would Reply To This Article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but I can't even parse the first sentence.

    Does anyone proofread anymore?

  60. Linksys WRT54GLx2 + 2 14dBi directional antenna by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Get 2 Linksys WRT54GL rounters, one for each site, and replace an antenna on each with a Hawking [HAO14SDP] directional antenna, and align them to point at each other. Might be best to roof mount the antenna, but aligning them will be the hardest part. You might only need to buy one of the directionals and get an omni for the other antenna at the other site, and rely on the directional to make the connection. I own one of the directionals and it is in my "travel kit", i.e., whenever I go on the road, I have a laptop, a WRT54GL, and the 14dBi directional and do a quick scan around where-ever I am so I can get on the web for a quick fix if the hotel/friend/etc., doesn't have a network connection.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  61. my $0.02 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    build a small building at the edge of the property to house the dmarc from telco. use solar power and battery to run the dmarc router.
    bury fiber optic cable from the dmarc building to the house and run ethernet over the fiber. multimode should be fine.

    1. Re:my $0.02 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, and put the fiber into conduit and trench as needed... ABS pipe tubing (like for water) maybe good enough for this.. have to follow local zoning, if there is any.. just need the tubing to protect the fiber from being crushed / damaged.
      probably have run a string through the tube with a small cloth wad and shoot it through with a puff of compressed air, before pulling the fiber through.

    2. Re:my $0.02 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Bulk Fiber, Multimode, Duplex, 62.5 / 125, 2000' (Two Thousand continuous feet)

      http://store.sunwilltech.com/10f1-1112h.html

      verify the connector ends needed for the terminating equipment on each side.

  62. Do it like Cox. by gnutoo · · Score: 3, Informative

    The guy who serviced my house had what looked like a big pizza cutter on a stick. It buried the cable about two inches deep.

    Conduit is neither required nor used for cable and phone in a residential setting. If you break it you patch it. This is simple and low cost.

    1. Re:Do it like Cox. by gnutoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Have another line of coke, Ballmer, it will steady your nerves.

    2. Re:Do it like Cox. by wal9001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But finding where it's broken on a 500m cable is a pain in the ass. If you don't mind the initial investment, conduit does have benefits in the long run. Nobody wants to be replacing a long cable like that every few years, it's just another little thing to worry about.

    3. Re:Do it like Cox. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh-ho-ho, I get it. You are implying that Microsoft is stalking you personally on the internets! That's brilliant. What could be a better way to explain your failings vis-a-vis the Slashdot community, whose collective intelligence you have consistently insulted by pretending you are someone else, as opposed to the troll that everyone loves to hate.

      Clever. Yes, exceedingly clever. Maybe someone will actually fall for that!

    4. Re:Do it like Cox. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I thought he sniffed sawdust? (you know, from the broken chairs?)

    5. Re:Do it like Cox. by thogard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Finding it when it breaks means hooking it up to a device that every installer should have that will say the break is N feet or meters away.
      TDR and OTDR is great for that.

    6. Re:Do it like Cox. by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Expensive cable testers have some means of "bouncing" a signal down a conductor and measuring the return, using that along with knowing what the conductor is made of, they calculate the distance to the fault. It's quite neat, but unless you've dropped more than $500 on a tester you don't have that option.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    7. Re:Do it like Cox. by pestie · · Score: 1

      You do if you're an electronics geek and already have an oscilloscope. You can build something like this pretty easily.

    8. Re:Do it like Cox. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I used to have a $30 SWR meter that did that. No way $500 is anywhere near necessary for a simple line fault test.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    9. Re:Do it like Cox. by Sandbags · · Score: 2, Interesting

      500 meters? unless you're using fiber and a pair of switches that support FDDI tranceivers, you can't do it. No ethernet standard can go that far. You'd have to bury a repeater (at least 1) half way between the 2 points... and get power to that repeater. Of course, this is all dependent on you owning all the property betwrrn yours and his, and getting the apporpriate permits to drop the cable across a property line.

      Since cables, even fiber, don't come in 500 meter lengths (1000' is standard for a box. With fiber you can also buy a 5000 spool, but that's not only overkill, but then you're not just renting a ditch which, but a spool truck as well, and adding rediculous delivery fees for the cable.

      The only really managalbe solution is to use P2P wireless. You can get parabolic antaneas that are FCC licensed for those distances for a few hundred bucks each, and a pair of outdoor rated Cisco Aeronet APs. Your total would run you less than $2000, which is less than the fiber would cost (including someone with a splice kit to make the distance run feasable). You can find other products out there other than Cisco cheaper, but ourdoor rated units are hard to find, and antannea extenders to place an link outside for an inside located router would mitigate the cost difference.

      Your biggest issue will likely be latency across that distance, combined with a strict requirement for line of sight.

      On the other hand, your BEST option is likely cellular based broadband. Add a access card to your PC with a PCMCIA adapter and get an unlimited access account from your provider (should be less than $60/month) Use ICS in windows (I'd recomend linux, but this guy needed a SIMPLE solution, not a reliable and secure one...) to have multiple computers share the connection. Place the card in an el-cheapo PC that you don't use for anything else that runs quiet and green. For less than $400 in parts and the same per month rate, you can have decent speed internet (3G if you're licky, but even edge is better than nothing), at least until the FCC forces your cable company or phone company to hook you up, since the USF will eventually require it.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
  63. This might be exactly what you want... by sribe · · Score: 1

    The problem is that no wireless routers go that far...

    Talk about timing! This was announced today! Basically outdoor wireless access point with built-in hi-gain directional antenna. $358 is more than many people are willing to pay, but last I checked it was a lot less than $10,000 ;-)

  64. There is a product for this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or at least there used to be. Hawking used to sell a line-of-sight wireless bridge with a 1.5 mile range. I recall pricing it out at em around $300 to connect to a friend's home, but we never did it. They are about the size of a milk carton. Just connect them to a wireless router, and a range extender, and you are set.

  65. Antenna by confused+one · · Score: 1

    It's been said; but, just so that it rises above the noise... Get a couple of good directional antennas, and a couple of decent wireless routers and your set.

    1. Re:Antenna by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      Seconding this. When I managed an IT department at a manufacturer, we had a choice between running a T1 to a warehouse that was literally across the road (and would have been back to the provider, then back to us), or using directional antennas. The latter worked perfectly, cost less than a month's T1 fees to set up (i.e., less than $500), and provided LAN bandwidth.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    2. Re:Antenna by afidel · · Score: 1

      For that short a distance I would actually go for a multi-part patch antenna at just a few dB. The reason is that the higher the gain the smaller the target and hence the more failure prone the solution. Wind, rain and leaves are a lot more likely to mess up a solution with a 1m cone for a radiation pattern than they are a 10m field offered by a patch antenna. Also it's easier to fit a patch antenna under an overhang then it is a dish or yagi and so ice and corrosion from rain are less of a problem.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Antenna by afidel · · Score: 1

      Hate to reply to myself but I just re-found the Cisco antenna calculator and according to it you get fine signal quality at 620m using a 5.2dBi omni and only 10mW at the amp which even the crappiest of cards can handle. This is even assuming 20ft of standard loss cable at each end for inside mounting of the AP's. Bump it up to 50mW which is common for even cheap radios and you can get 1380m from the same setup, 100mw and it's good for 1,960m. Distances are multiplied by about 2.5x for a 9dBi patch.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  66. This wouldn't be on Cape Cod now would it? by notthepainter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe a 300 year old cottage? Just asking...

  67. Sever access points by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Just put several access points along the way, hook them up to a solar battery.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  68. WokFi by MarcoPon · · Score: 1

    ... is the answer. You could easily build a couple of directional reflectors with cheap USB WiFi dongles and common "cookware". Here's a link: http://exe64.com/mirror/wokfi/

    --

    SeqBox
  69. Have you checked for a Microwave Provider? by hyperz69 · · Score: 1

    I used microwave link style setup for almost 3 years and it worked rather well. The cost is rather reasonable usually. It was 25 a month for 1.5mbit/384kbit. Just might save the headache for you and the old man ;)

  70. Hughes has a bi-direction setup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hughes has a bi-directional setup. We bought and installed one at my parents' house during Christmas. I think it was $300-$400 for the equipment and is $59 a month.

    It seems to work fairly well (no tech calls from them since it was installed). They no longer have a regular phone line since it was only used for dialup.

    -JM

  71. Options by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1

    If you're going to pull 1500ft of cable as suggested by a few others, you can can get fairly cheap HomePlug powerline networking devices that can use that to carry a decent signal. I've connected 2 of the the old rev 1.1 devices through a pair of copper leads 400m long and they still had about 2/3 of their nominal throughput.

    Also, getting 2 wireless ethernet clients that support adhoc connectivity and connecting them to Yagi antennas pointed at each other would be fairly simple.

    If you have line of sight and you're one to tinker at all, there's also an optical link like RONJA

    For cost and ease of setup, I'd go with the wifi. The wireless ethernet clients can be found at various retailers as can the yagi antennas. I'd imagine you could get away with spending less than $100 at each end, and once configured you shouldn't have to mess with it again. ZCom makes a Marvell based ethernet/wifi adapter that is rebranded by many companies. Runs off 5v which you could probably sneak down the unused pairs of your ethernet if you were so inclined.

    --
    Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    1. Re:Options by WhiteDragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you have line of sight and you're one to tinker at all, there's also an optical link like RONJA I want to second this. RONJA seems like a perfect project if you have line of sight. The performance is apparently quite good, and the plans are totally open and free. I think that would be much better than trying to pull / blow 1km of cabling. There is more info on the project page or on wikipedia's article on RONJA
      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  72. Wireless bridging is not dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did this at my in-law's house. It involved running two Cisco Aironet 1410 wireless bridges (802.11a) with directional, parabolic dish antennae (21dB each.) The speed maxes around 54 Mbps, but that's more than enough for a DSL line.

  73. dd-wrt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dd-wrt running on WRT hardware (preferred buffalo WHR-G125)

    2x router devices
    directional antennas (point to point setup)
    external mounts if needed

    www.dd-wrt.com

    latency is going to suck (100-200ms)
    so you wont be able to get over 1000k a second, but definitely enough speed for any cable / dsl internet

  74. DIY vdsl/aerial cable by borcharc · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just run phone quality twisted pair (cat 3) if you have adjacent land or can get permission from any adjacent land owners. Just buy low cost VDSL Ethernet bridges, they can be obtained for less then $200. Also 2000 ft of cat 3 can be obtained for less then $200 (just bridge two 1000ft spools vdsl doesn't care).

    Then go aerial, affix the cat 3 to a wire (for support) and put a 10 ft pole every 10 meters or so. Aerial is most likely the easiest to install, maintain, and upgrade. It also allows for the running of coax for a future cable tv install that will require additional amplification to reach your fathers house.

    The nice thing about running cat 3 is vdsl has a nice upgrade path to 100 mbps and beyond.

    1. Re:DIY vdsl/aerial cable by number11 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then go aerial, affix the cat 3 to a wire (for support) and put a 10 ft pole every 10 meters or so.

      For 500 meters? Better have some good lightning protection, or things will get exciting first time a thunderstorm comes along.

  75. Run a string through it as well by bigtrike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you're running conduit, it makes sense to run a string through it at the same time. That way you can pull another cable (and another string) through later if needed.

  76. Cringley and his pringles cans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  77. Directional antenna and LMR-400 cable will do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I did this exact thing with my own dad (who is 92) and lives about a mile away, not exactly line-of-sight (some trees in the way), but still no issues with access. Purchased parabolic antenna and LMR-400 cable from Fleeman Anderson & Bird (www.fab-corp.com). They will also crimp the required connectors for you. Used DLink 2100's for each end of the bridge. Has worked without interruption (except for occasional power loss of course) for almost 4 years. I've used the DSL/Cable speed test from either end (he shares my cable connection) and there's no difference in download or upload speed. Cost about $800 at the time (2 antennas, 2 50ft cables with connectors, 4 2100APs -- I wanted wireless access on both ends for laptops), but he's covered the cost by now from a cable connection that he would only use occasionally. Oddly, the 2100APs as access points don't work that well (compatibility, and a microwave oven that killed 2 of them), but as bridge ends, they've worked perfectly (out in the garage in the cold, heat and dust) for years.

    K.

  78. Chinese cookware and a USB WiFi by BroncoInCalifornia · · Score: 1

    Chinese cookware and a USB WiFi will do the trick:
    http://www.usbwifi.orconhosting.net.nz/

    --

    Religion is the main cause of atheism.

  79. 30 miles WiFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get a Buffalo WHR-HP-G54, burn dd-wrt on it, and one of those antennas:
    http://www.hyperlinktech.com/productfamily.aspx?id=295

    (of course, to get 30 miles you need a pair)

  80. Wild Blue - two-way satellite for $50/month by Timoteo47 · · Score: 1

    You should look into Wild Blue satellite Internet access. It is a two-way satellite connection with 1.5Mbps download speed. Much better than one-way with dial return. http://www.wildblue.com/

  81. Cheap and easy if you have clear line of sight by jblakezachary · · Score: 1

    If you have line of sight from roof to roof or from a TV antenna mast on either side: Buy 2 old linksys WAP11 v2.2 on ebay, 2 RP-TNC to N pigtail adapters, 2 flat panel or yagi 2.4GHz antennae and some 1" PVC pipe and elbows. Set WAPs to bridge mode. Disable unused antenna port on each device and connect antennae. Use some 1" white PCV piping to construct a basic antenna mount for each house unless you have a mast of some sort. If you use flat panel antennae, make sure you pay attention to the polarity markings and orient them the same on each side. You should be able to do all of this for about 150 bucks and have a reliable link for up to a few miles if you have clear line of sight. The high gain directional antennae are the key. Binoculars are handy when adjusting the antennae. All this does is "extend the wire", so as long as you hook the link into the 'router' on the broadband side, your Dad's PC will be directly connected his friend's network. The bridging mode makes it transparent and keeps it simple.

  82. Cisco 1200 AP's and Ebay by isotope23 · · Score: 1

    Get a pair of cisco 1200's on ebay.
    (You should be able to get them under 60.00 each)
    Get a good pair of outdoor antennas.

    Should be good to go.

    --
    Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
  83. Double up by bobbonomo · · Score: 1

    Put in 2 cables while you are there. If the first breaks then you hav a second. More money up front but less if it breaks. Consider this as an insurance premium.

    1. Re:Double up by isfry · · Score: 1

      if you are doing it the cheap way some people have suggested by just putting the cable in the ground with the pizza cutter device you might want to run the 2nd cable another path just it case a lawn mower or something kills them both in one shot.

  84. Alternatives by jrmcdaniel · · Score: 1
    Been there, done it! I also live in the boonies.

    Firstly, Hughes no longer requires a phone line for upload -- I have HughesNet right now and use it for up/downloads.

    I tried extending my service to my neighbors -- I found that 900mHz radios worked better than the usual 802.11 frequencies but still had trouble penetrating trees and foliage at about 150yds let alone the claimed 1mile. Almost anything works fine if you truly have line-of-sight but otherwise look for 900mHz equipment. Good antennas help but are not a panacea.

    You can put in your own DSL link. The costs for the modems is much higher than for the usual telephone DSL but a lot less than $10,000. You can then use one- or two-pair wiring to make the connection. Another option is using coax.

  85. Re:Are you serious? by sjames · · Score: 1

    How can this be labeled INFORMATIVE? Come on, take a REALISTIC view of the situation. Costs for conduit and cable are expensive, there are probably zoning restrictions, I'm pretty sure the cable company would SUE you if they found out, and like the poster said, his dad is 70 YEARS OLD. Good luck finding friends to dig ditches so dad can look at naked ladies.

    Wh7y would the cable company sue? He said nothing about violating contracts by reselling access. One house, two connections. One just happens to go an extra 500 meters away, but that's on the customer side of the hookup. One contract, one household.

    The cable and conduit would carry some costs, but probably not $10,000.

  86. Basic AP + High Gain Antenna = Love by Bagheera · · Score: 1

    Doing a quick search for "2.4Ghz horn antenna" will turn up a number of inexpensive to buy, or -very- inexpensive to build horn antenna designs. For a fixed installation like this, a horn is a better bet than a Yagi and more effective than a Cantenna.

    For a 500M shot, a cheap access point and a good antenna should have you covered as long as you've got a reasonably clean line of sight.

    You can do it with a single antenna, or go for even better signal and use one at each end of the link. I've routinely been able to get decent link speeds with a .5M apperature horn across several miles to a standard AP. It just takes a wireless network card with an external antenna adapter.

    Total cost:

    Cheap AP - $50
    Built horn - $15 - $50 (each)
    Bought horn - $50 - $500 or more.

    Now, using a high gain antenna is technically against FCC regulations, but unless someone actually complains it won't matter. Given the situation, it's unlikely the FCC would do more than say "please take that down" even if they did get a complaint.

    Cheers,
    Bagheera

    --
    Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
  87. Start cheap - bent cardboard parabolic reflector by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

    A couple of WiFi access points. Make sure they have the little "rubber ducky" antennas.

    Build four of these:
    http://www.freeantennas.com/projects/template2/
    and apply to the antennas...note the increase in signal level when properly aligned!

    Important thing here is the parabolic shape and metal film (I used foamcore and aluminum foil)

    If that doesn't work well, the trench is a lot of work, but will be worth it in the end. Ditch Witch is the only way to go here. Conduit is good. 1500 feet is a long way to go for ethernet, but since you will be using full duplex, there won't be any collisions and you'll be fine.

  88. Line-of-sight + Wi-Fi + 2 cantennas by thesaintar · · Score: 0

    Just use a half decent router (a hacked linksys would be nice, so you can play with the xmit power settings), two can-tennas (buy for 20 bucks or make them yourself, no great skills necessary) and line-of-sight (could put the antennas on the rooftop, or up on a mast)

  89. Trango 900mHz radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A company called Trango Broadband manufactures radios that broadcast at 900mHz. These radios work very well for non line-of-sight wireless connections . I have personally seen these radios establish a solid non line-of-sight link at about 3 miles.

  90. rent them at Home Depot or Lowes.... by Hankapobe · · Score: 1

    least the stores that have tool rental.

  91. Use Mobile Network by opscure · · Score: 1

    Does he have cell phone service at his home? He could purchase a fixed wireless terminal and use the cell phone network to connect to the internet.
    Granted this won't be as quick as broadband, but it can reach speeds around 200kbps with a GSM/Edge based cell network, it's doubtful that he has 3G in his area yet.
    Then all he would have to do is get a SIM chip and pay the cell phone company for a plan that includes unlimited data transfers.

  92. hey, here's a unique and unexpected idea! by spazdor · · Score: 1

    has anyone suggested setting up a Cantenna yet?

    --
    DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
  93. Metric shibboleth by tepples · · Score: 1, Informative

    Primestar [...] dishes are abundant here in The States. However, I noticed the author uses the metric system, suggesting he resides elsewhere. Expressing a distance in "metres" means you live outside the States. "Meters", on the other hand, means you live in the States and have converted your measurement as a courtesy to those who live outside the States.
    1. Re:Metric shibboleth by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It just means you live anywhere outside the Commonwealth. Most non-native English speakers use AmE on the internet. Don't assume that only native speakers read Slashdot.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    2. Re:Metric shibboleth by dotancohen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In English I use "meter", not "metre", though I also use "colour" not "color". And I don't live in the US.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  94. Story: -1 redundant by Abattoir · · Score: 1

    Didn't we see a similar story recently?

    Yup, right there.

    I mean, I know this is slashdot, so the editors can't be asked to screen stories. But couldn't the audience do a little looking?

    To answer the question: Get an EVDO adapter. The speed is reasonable. If he can get Cable Modem access 500 meters away, chances are he's within a cell phone tower.

  95. fiber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    500m should be fine over single mode fiber. Not exactly the cheapest solution... but way cheaper than 10k.

  96. Look into commercial grade wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to do this for a living. Our longest stretch was about 11 miles. You need to have LoS (Line of Sight). If you don't there are other options too.

    For LoS: www.tranzeo.com - look at their 2.4GHz line

    With mild obstruction: www.tranzeo.com - looko at their 800Mhz line.

    Hope this helps.

  97. for a little more money, but better speeds by marros · · Score: 1

    Check out tranzeo or peplink, they do wonders. I have used tranzeo before, and it is one of the best, but peplink has some good equipment.

  98. I think using a cable makes the most sense by John+Sokol · · Score: 1

    Your Dad's out in the middle of know where.
    This cable is only going to be in place 5 maybe 10 years max.

    I'd just run it across the ground. To hell with the regulations, odd's are no one will ever know or care.

    I have also found that lawn mowers will pass right over an Ethernet cable, and lawns will absorb them so they sink into the ground a bit and after a year are almost completely vanished.

    And at a $150 replacement cost for the whole 500 Meter run (if you use good 100Mbps 8 Conductor Cat 5), who cares if it wears out or gets damaged.
      If you use 4 conductor 24 gauge phone wire for 10Mbps Ethernet it's more like $75 for 500 Meters.
    https://www.allelectronics.com/

    Although at 500 Meters your getting near the limit, you may need to put a router 1/2 way between and run 12v to it. To act as a signal repeater. The router could just be stuck in a paint bucket with brick on it.

    Hey it ain't pretty, but it will work.

    The old 50 Ohm Coax RG58/U 10Base2 cables also work great too for this sort of thing, back in the day we had the storm drains & fence lines wired up with the stuff bringing 10 Mbps internet across our neighborhood in 1987!

    --
    I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:I think using a cable makes the most sense by LarsG · · Score: 1
      If he has line of sight, I'd say to get two 802.11G access points that can be configured to bridge mode and use external antennas.

      Although at 500 Meters your getting near the limit Try five times the limit for twisted pair. 10/100/1000BaseT is specced to 100 meters. It might work, but you're running way outside spec.

      10Base2 coax "thinnet" is 185 meters.

      10Base5 coax "thicknet" is 500 meters.

      If he wants to drag some cable I'd recommend running some cat3 and get a couple vdsl bridges.

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
  99. Does it have to be wireless? by DdJ · · Score: 1

    Here's something I've always wanted to try, which I believe in theory should work, but I've never gotten around to testing.

    Step 1: Hit up some buddies or a college or a dumpster or something for old DLS modems from previous installs which nobody is using anymore. Get two of the same make/model.

    Step 2: Put one DSL modem somewhere with an ethernet connection, like plugged into a hub at a buddy's house.

    Step 3: Put the other DSL modem somewhere where you want an ethernet connection.

    Step 4: Run a plain-old low-tech copper pair from one location to the other, terminated the way a phone line is, and plug the two DSL modems into each other.

    Step 5: Power everything up and see what happens.

    As I understand it, you should have a low-budget homebrew point-to-point SDSL connection. But as I mentioned, this is all theorycraft, I have not actually tried it yet (though I have finished step 1).

    1. Re:Does it have to be wireless? by ledow · · Score: 1

      Er. No. That won't work at all.

      You could do it with the old-style analogue modems (only up to 28.8, though, I believe because above that needs special hardware on the ISP-end) but it won't work with DSL modems - what is on the other end (the exchange end) isn't a normal DSL modem as you know it.

    2. Re:Does it have to be wireless? by LarsG · · Score: 1

      Look into vdsl/vdsl2 bridges, they are designed to do exactly this thing.

      See f.ex. http://www.versatek.com/products/vx150.htm

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
  100. Just forget it by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    He's 70. If he's Republican, tell him terrorists deleted the Internet. If he's not Republican, tell him the Republicans did it.

    What? He's gonna argue with you?

  101. Alredy Suggested but here are links by ParanoiaBOTS · · Score: 1

    You CAN make reliable antennas that work well out of a pringle can. Here is the link http://www.oreillynet.com/cs/weblog/view/wlg/448 However be aware that these are FAR from weather proof. Weatherproofing them should be relatively cheap, and if you don't want to do it yourself then I would recommend a directional antenna.

  102. Try WISP equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would recommend (*)a pair of Lucaya M1214 wireless routers. About $250 total. They have a bridge option that should be pretty easy to configure, without using all the fancy StarOS routing features. I use this equipment in my WISP business, it is very good.

    http://www.staros.com/store/

    (*) my recommendation is based on assuming you have at least some LOS (line of sight) between the two spots. At 500 meters, a few trees should be OK. If it is dense woods, you would need 900MHz gear which costs more, and still might not work. (chainsaw?)

    Oh, and why even mention WiMax? You know all the wimax gear out so far is in licensed frequencies, so it isn't something a consumer can get into. Plus the fact that the base station side costs at least $10,000. Really the wifi gear is very good, unless you are trying to support hundreds of customers off one tower.

  103. Why not hoes? by Hankapobe · · Score: 1

    Supplies: Hoe (one per helper)
    For 500 meters?!? Christ on a cracker.. rent a ditch witch!

    Well, if each helper is getting a ho, the hoes might help dig if they're paid enough. It's hiring them that'll be the problem:

    Ho, "Wanna date?"

    you: "Well, yeah and help digging a ditch. How much for both?"

    If the ho is an undercover cop, though, it may be not only illegal, but a problem with the police union - so beware!

    Shit! It's hoe with an 'e'. Dammit, my reading comprehension has gone to shit!

    1. Re:Why not hoes? by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 4, Funny

      make sure they know you want to 'lay some pipe'

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  104. WiFi bridge easy to set up by AngusSF · · Score: 1

    I've done just this (wireless bridges about this length) several times for clients. I've used D-Link DWL-2100APs in bridge mode, and used D-Link ANT24-1400's mounted on masts on the roofs to provide the linkage. Unfortunately I don't think D-Link sells the ANT24-1400 any more, but it looks like NetGear has one that's functionally identical, see NETGEAR ANT24D18 ProSafe Indoor/Outdoor 14 dBi Patch Panel Directional Antenna http://www.provantage.com/netgear-ant24d18~7NETW01E.htm

    --
    "A gun is a tool, Marian. No better, no worse than any other tool. An axe, a shovel, or anything." Shane (1953)
  105. Long range wireless by osiris247 · · Score: 1

    Look into Motorola canopy. If you have line of sight, it's the best way to go. Little pricey, but the performance is worth it. Can get roughly 10 miles range if the LOS is clear.

  106. Line of sight? use two Yagi antennas and WRT54g by SimBuddha · · Score: 1

    Long ago I setup a two mile link between my work (a six story building) and my home using two 14db yagi antennas that look like two foot long by 3 inch PVC pipes with mounting brackets. These were connected to Lucent Orinoco Silver 802.11b cards setup in bridge mode through PCs. It worked GREAT.

    These days, there are a lot of solutions out there. One he could try is to setup a router at his friends house and aim a Wifi radio through a yagi at his house from his friends roof. At home he needs a PCI card with external antenna jack that can be placed not too far from a roof top mounted yagi pointed at his friends house. Even expensive coax will eat up the antenna db gains in cable losses so the radios really must be close to the antennas. His best option might be to buy commercial outdoor ethernet to WiFi bridges designed with hi power amps and which come with Yagis or flat Phase Array antennas that place the radio right next to the antenna.

    But for any of these options to work there must be line of sight between the two antennas with minimal foliage or buildings between them. If there are even a few large trees in the way or a large building, this will not work. If he doesn't have reasonable line of sight he could try 900mhz or 430mhz wireless radio links that better tolerate trees and buildings. Alternatively, he could use custom firmware on a few WRT54g's and have them form a mesh network where one of the routers is mid way between the two homes and all legs of the link have line of sight.

    There are many providers of antennas and equipment for long range WiFi as well as 900mhz and 430mhz radio links. Google around.

    Cheers,
    SimBuddha

  107. Alternative suggestions by transporter_ii · · Score: 1

    Get two Netgear WG602 v2 routers. Other models may work, but this is the exact model in use, so I know it works well. Take two and put them inside of some Rootenna outdoor enclosures. These routers will configure as a transparent bridge. We have two that are used as a backhaul between two hotels, and they have worked for several years without hardly a single glitch.

    Also, I have no idea how well they hold up, but look at the Ubiquity Nanostations. We have some deployed and they seem to work well, but we haven't used them long enough for me to get a good feel for them. I do know the price is right, as the retail price is supposed to be around 80.00 per unit. They should be able to do a wireless bridge with no problems, and have connectors for external antennas.

    Transporter_ii

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
  108. Powerstations and Nanostations for Easy Pointing. by belial · · Score: 1

    I know the Powerstation 2 has already been mentioned, but there's also the Powerstation 5 if you want to avoid interference from nearby 2.4Ghz networks.

    Both run linux and can do such a short distance really easily.

    Additionally, the Nanostation 2 can do this distance easily, is much smaller and easier to mount on a pole, has LEDs for pointing, and is only $79. If you want to see what's inside of one, Metrix took one apart and put it on the blog.

  109. Forgot Fiber by jrmcdaniel · · Score: 1

    Fiber optic is another possibility. Costs are about the same as for DSL but you don't have to worry about lightening!

  110. $318 WiFi network bridge by rptally · · Score: 2, Informative

    $318 WiFi network bridge (HD26200) connects two locations up to 5 miles apart http://www.wirelessnetworkproducts.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=1899&HS=1

  111. Obligatory Ken Jennings Jeopardy clip by Solandri · · Score: 2, Funny
  112. Wok-Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pick up wi-fi over absurdly long distances.

    Simple to setup.

    As below:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WokFi

  113. RADIOLABS FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.radiolabs.com has every antenna choice you would need. Combine that with the DD-WRT flashed routers to bridge the connection and you are good to go.

    If you prefer, Radio Labs also has high-powered APs - 500mw I believe.

    No need to get fancy, the answer is often the simple one.

  114. Re:Are you serious? by flattop100 · · Score: 1

    Uh, you misread the post. The OP is clearly describing two houses, one connection. I think Comcast et al tend to frown on that, and it would probably violate the ToS.

  115. How about a dry pair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.ethernetextender.com/

    Those devices run over dry pairs from the telephone co.

    You can lease a dry pair from the telco generally for less than $5 a month.

    A friend of mine installed for a shop that had cable that was outside of the 100M limit and it works well.

  116. Obligatory Chris Rock Joke Rewrite by wsanders · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ho: "For $20 I'll do anything you want."

    Dad: "Here's twenty bucks, lay 500 meters of conduit to my house, b****!"

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  117. We are doing this. by ACMENEWSLLC · · Score: 1

    We are doing this using Nortel 7230 to extend Internet to a farm around 3 miles out in the country.

    We are actually using 4 of these. We have one at the main office, one on top a barn that connects to another via wire, which connects to the farm. The farm is not line of site enough to make a direct hop.

    We get 54Mb/s data rate, which equals about 6Mb/s usable bandwidth. It varies with storms & requires a lot of maintenance in the form of lighting replacements, realignment, etc.

    Including UPS units, labor, running power, etc it cost us around $10,000 for this link.

    You can try low end stuff and do the same thing. These are called wireless bridges. Google knows of them.

  118. Omni antenna question by gobbo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a bunch of clients in a remote valley (self-generated hydro, radiophones/skype) who are sharing a satellite connection via 802.11b. The setup is simple enough, a vanilla buffalo router connected to a line amp and omni monopole antenna raised 35ft at the highest residence--and at one edge of the reception area. Great. Farthest client is about 2km away across the valley, reception with a small panel antenna OK; worst reception is under the antenna (no surprise) and down the hill towards the river. Nine households and low budget (so setting up 9 direct antenna links too costly).

    My question: would tipping the angle of the antenna towards the reception area improve the take-off angle enough to make a difference? No-one has given me a straight answer on this.

    Anyway, I was surprised at how well this !cheap! system works when they asked me to check it out. It just needs some minor reception adjustments.

    1. Re:Omni antenna question by rebelcan · · Score: 1

      Well, it really depends on how those nine houses are laid out. It's possible, use a sector antenna ( or two ). The FCC rules state that the more directional an antenna, the more powerful it's allowed to be ( or something to that effect ). So if you can use a sector antenna, you can tilt it down and not only get better coverage, you also don't have to worry about noise or interfernece from the area not covered by the sector antenna.

      That's really the biggest issue with omni antennas. Since they're not only broadcasting but receiving in a 360 radius from the antenna, they pick up more noise and interference that you'd see with a more directional antenna.

      Basically, unless you have no choice, go with a sector antenna. Even then, if you can, use a couple of sector antennas and you'll probably see some improvement. Of course, the only way to really be sure of what kind of improvement you'll see is to either try it, or to use a spectrum analyzer. You'd be surprised how easy it is to spot exactly what's causing trouble when you use one ( a spectrum analyzer ).

      --
      God is dead -- Nietzsche
      Nietzsche is dead -- God
      Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
    2. Re:Omni antenna question by Mr_Perl · · Score: 1

      At that height and frequency tilting it may very well change the pattern enough to provide better coverage below the antenna. You can easily model it using something like 4nec2 and find out for sure. http://home.ict.nl/~arivoors/

      --

      My poetry site welcomes the unusual.
    3. Re:Omni antenna question by gobbo · · Score: 1

      Well, it really depends on how those nine houses are laid out. It's possible, use a sector antenna ( or two ). ... So if you can use a sector antenna, you can tilt it down and not only get better coverage, you also don't have to worry about noise or interfernece from the area not covered by the sector antenna.

      That's really the biggest issue with omni antennas. Since they're not only broadcasting but receiving in a 360 radius from the antenna, they pick up more noise and interference that you'd see with a more directional antenna. That's the problem, the layout. The AP is at one edge of a 3.5 km circle. They need about 170deg of horizontal beamwidth and 30deg vertical -- sector antennas get about half that.

      I'm curious how much noise and interference you expect they'll get since they're up in the mountains and remote?
    4. Re:Omni antenna question by rebelcan · · Score: 1

      I'm curious how much noise and interference you expect they'll get since they're up in the mountains and remote? Well, see that's the thing. I didn't know that. And it's true that you'll probably have less noise and/or interference way out in a remote location, but you can never be sure. It's tripped people up in the past, believe me.

      They need about 170deg of horizontal beamwidth and 30deg vertical So use two 90 degree ( 90 deg horizontal, 30 deg vertial ) sectors. Or even the 180 degree ( 180 deg horizontal, 10 deg vertical ).

      --
      God is dead -- Nietzsche
      Nietzsche is dead -- God
      Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
    5. Re:Omni antenna question by gobbo · · Score: 1

      Well, see that's the thing. I didn't know that. And it's true that you'll probably have less noise and/or interference way out in a remote location, but you can never be sure. It's tripped people up in the past, believe me. First line of the post you originally replied to. Guess you missed it.

      But I'm still wondering what kind of interference to watch for... they don't have POTS, for instance, so no wireless handsets. Hand radios used by hunters...using 2.4 GHz? Stray satellite transmissions? These folks are in the BC interior mountains, nearest city is a long haul.

      So use two 90 degree ( 90 deg horizontal, 30 deg vertial ) sectors Good suggestion, looks affordable at $75 ea.
    6. Re:Omni antenna question by rebelcan · · Score: 1

      But I'm still wondering what kind of interference to watch for... they don't have POTS, for instance, so no wireless handsets. Hand radios used by hunters...using 2.4 GHz? Stray satellite transmissions? These folks are in the BC interior mountains, nearest city is a long haul. If you're providing houses with internet, then cordless phones, wifi routers they have, or even microwaves could be a source of noise/interference. It's hard to know until you actually go and setup your equipment. If you're using antennas with narrow beamwidths, chances are you won't have much to worry about, but even in remote areas there is a possibility that there is something that can trip you up.

      But you're most likely right, there probably isn't anything you need to worry about up there.
      --
      God is dead -- Nietzsche
      Nietzsche is dead -- God
      Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
  119. Re:$318 WiFi network bridge connects two locations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our company just set up a WiFi network with Ubiquiti's NanoStation 2 (2.4GHz) and RFXtreme technologies. After using Motorola's Canopy the NanoStations are a dream, they are cheap (~$80) and are very user friendly and have an RF meter built into the physical unit for aiming. With the NanoStations we are getting a signal of -75dBm through trees at a distance of 4.5miles. I'm sure that the poster could use two NanoStations and get a link working @550meters for under $200.

  120. Daisy chaining? by eleuthero · · Score: 1

    Though more expensive, if there is a problem with hills/forested areas between the two neighbors, a series of range extenders might be useful. Electrical cabling or solar power might be easier given the lay of the land.

  121. parabolic antennae by daithesong · · Score: 1

    I have a friend who did this very simply with standard 802.11 base stations and a pair of parabolic directional antennae

  122. Not as hard as you think by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

    Get two decent 802.11g access points that can be set up as a bridge, two high gain directional antennas, two 802.11 amplifiers, and whatever cabling and hardware you need to set them up. At 500m, you shouldn't have to work too hard to get the antennas pointed straight at each other.

  123. Line of Sight LED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember an open-source implementation of a system that communicated over long distancs using LEDs and optics. It consisted of a pair of tubes filled with LEDs and lens pointing each other connected to a network. I remember it worked very well and was very cheap, I do not remember the name of the project. Maybe someone knows what I'm talking about.

  124. Re:fiber (single mode, multi mode) by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1

    Multimode would be fine as well. Most multimode fiber setups are good for 2 km. Singlemode is good for 20-100 km (depending on the hardware at the ends) and supports much faster data rates, but the equipment at the ends tend to be more expensive. Cable costs about the same either way. The actual fiber is very cheap, it's all the cladding around it that's expensive. Direct-bury cable can cost over a dollar per linear foot, last I checked. You could use cheaper, less well-protected cable and take your chances if ~$1500 is a bit much to spend. (I haven't tried this myself, so I don't know how well it would work.)

    Old media converters that convert copper ethernet to fiber ethernet can be had for cheap on ebay; you would need one on each end, and then you can just treat it like a really long ethernet cable. One caveat: fiber ethernet isn't backwards compatible like copper ethernet. If you have a 10mbps media converter at one end, and a 100mbps converter at the other, they won't be able to communicate with each other.

    If there's line of sight, I would just go with a wireless solution, but fiber would be my second choice.

  125. Re:Novaroam stuff works well (900Mhz no license ba by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

    Novaroam is goddamned expensive though!

  126. Meraki by witherstaff · · Score: 1

    2 outdoor meraki units would be a cheap, reliable solution. The outdoor units come weatherproofed, POE, with 25 feet outdoor cat5 pre-attached.

    If it's clear line of site you'll get the range easy. Meraki has two basic equipment types - standard and pro. There's a $100 price difference. Basically standard lets you whitelist 5 mac addresses, pro lets you have as many as you want, along with other features.

    I have a half dozen meraki to do the 'last mile' to my house and for connecting some business clients. It's reliable and the range is impressive. I get about a half mile with my laptop to the nearest meraki - far longer ranges between meraki units. They're simple to setup, plug and play and a nice web admin.

    1. Re:Meraki by S1mmo+61 · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear. You beat me to it.

    2. Re:Meraki by WiFly · · Score: 1

      I've done this too over a slighty (apporx 600m) longer range, you'll need- 2 x Meraki Outdoor units (or open-mesh in a box)- $99 each (standard version) LMR-400 cable - $6 a meter approx 2 x Yagi 2.4Ghz 16dBi antennas - approx $60 each and there you have it problem solved if you have line of sight. There is a user forum that I'm a member of at www.merakeye.com /shamelessplug where there are guys doing this type of thing all the time.I'm sure someone can answer any further questions you have on this type of config if you decide to go with it.

  127. no, there is no right to broadband by swschrad · · Score: 1

    it is NOT a required service.

    some jurisdictions want to make it so.

    they are lobbied to the point of death by corporations that don't want to spend tens of thousands of dollars to service one guy and two woodchucks out in East Noplace.

    get two wireless routers and two external antennas, problem solved. pay your buddy's broadband bill.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  128. No problem. by Shaman · · Score: 1

    Hie you to the eBay and look up some cheap Tranzeo outdoor 5.2Ghz or 5.8Ghz radios. Get 11Mbps (around 6Mbps usable) no problem at several miles, if you have line of sight.

    Or for a really kick-ass system, find some used Trango Atlas radios with integrated antennas. 54Mbps signalling rate and I have two pair of them that are doing 20 mile (30km) links with external antennas.

    --
    ...Steve
  129. RONJA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At 1400 meters range with a basic setup, you could take a look at RONJA. Don't count on it during rain or snow, though. And you'll probably need to clean the spiders out of the tube hood every once in a while. :-)

  130. BRAVO!!! by Orig_Club_Soda · · Score: 1

    What kind of son is this guy??? If laying down wire was all my parents need for internet I'd do it in a heartbeat.

  131. Cake Walk by Requiem5 · · Score: 1

    This one is a cake walk, you spend around $2000 and get a simple PTP link installed in either 2.4ghz or 5.7. You can use 900mhz if you have a lot of obstruction but that setup would be more expensive.

  132. Cantenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a rather simple and relatively inexpensive "cantenna" to cover almost that distance with no problems. There are even DIY instructions using a Pringles can.
    http://www.cantenna.com/
              Cheers ......... RonC

  133. Do It Yourself Is The Wrong Way To Go by westlake · · Score: 1
    he got sick of it and relies on Hughes satellite Internet, at $60/month, but he still has to be connected to phone line to upload to the Internet

    WildBlue is two way. $250 installed. {To June 30th]

    No trenches. No cables. No conduits.

    No expensive legal muck-ups over easements and rights-of-way. I'm betting at some point there will be a conflict.

    When it comes time to lay new water and sewers lines.

    Widen the shoulder and dig a new drainage ditch for the county road.

    3b: If you've chosen to run the connection to your neighbhour's home, ensure that you don't piss him/her off. They are now your cable internet provider.

    Don't even think about it.

    There are ISPs which are agreeable to this sort of thing.

    But - sadly - the trencher that accidentally snags your line will probably belong to someone else. 500 to 1000 meters of undocumented fiber is going to look a lot like theft of services.

    1. Re:Do It Yourself Is The Wrong Way To Go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for Hughes. The HughesNet service is two way and has been for many years. I get very frustrated that people still believe this false idea that it requires dial-up. Heck, upgrade to the current version of HughesNet using their Ka band SPACEWAY satellite. It should work well if his needs are browsing web sites and reading e-mail.

  134. Such antennas are cheap and small. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Informative

    We've done 5 mile links with a pair of *old* wallmount AT&T Wavelan bridges and proper antennas on 915 Mhz. Those units were 400mw.

    Such antennas are cheap and small, too. Under $100 in singles at a number of companies with online ordering facilities.

    A 24db skeleton-parabola can get you miles of range even without a high-gain antenna on the other end, and is about the size of a UHF TV antenna. (I know one guy who war-scans the business district of San Francisco with one - from his apartment deck in Berkeley. B-) ) With antennas on both ends you should be able to go with the little lozenge types.

    To give you an idea of range: My Nevada house is about 5 miles from the cell tower where the local WiSP has its POP, with a directional antenna pointed generally my way. His customers normally use a lozenge antenna with built in AP mounted on an outside wall, and I'll probably do that when I sign up (because my computer room is on the far side of the house). But my picture window faces the tower and my laptop catches the ID beacon just fine sitting in my lap using the builtin antenna.

    So for a half-mile putting an AP in each attic and even a low-gain external antenna on the roof or outside wall should do the job just fine.

    Want a cheap do-it-yourself high-gain directional antenna? Get a big wok strainer (woks and their strainers are pretty good parabolas), put a USB-stick WiFI adapter on a USB extension cord, and mount it with its backside at the focus of the strainer. B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  135. Re:fiber (single mode, multi mode) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even new converters are cheap.
    http://www.neteon.net/prod.aspx?clvl=4&c1=1&c2=4&c3=22&p=181

    Fiber has many advantages over using copper.

  136. simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a wireless connection thats over 400ft between two houses with two buffalo routers.
    200ft is nothing....
    Contact me if you want to know how at cowsgonemadd3 @gmail.com
    Title is router or something like that.

  137. Use Wifi with directional antennas by SUNboy · · Score: 1

    Here in the planes of Colorado we use wifi with directional antennas for up to 40 miles.

  138. Slotted Waveguide by Inexile2002 · · Score: 1

    I've never used one but a friend of mine in Denmark did and he said he was getting good wifi signals upto a kilometer away. Google "Slotted waveguide" and check it out, easy to build, cheap and they supposedly work really well. I don't know what the tree cover is around there, but it's a cheap, quick solution to test, and you can build a working test version out of cardboard and aluminum foil. If it works, you build one for real, if it doesn't, you haven't wasted too much time, effort or money testing it out.

    Good luck.

  139. Wireless bridge... by digitalsolo · · Score: 1

    I've got several Cisco bridges with antennas pointed at each other shooting 500'+.

    You need amplifiers and all that good stuff, but it's certainly doable.

    Most likely, assuming there giant trees in between, you can roof mount both and shoot them at each other (two parabolic antennas) and you're ready to go. If there is no line of sight, you need some roof mounted towers to get high enough that there is.

    --
    Just another ignorant American.
  140. Link to a how-to that spanned 400 meters by Niel143 · · Score: 1

    My friend did this a few years ago spanning 400meters with Linksys routers and directional antennas. He wrote-up a nice little how-to that he hosts. Check it out here: http://www.sonicspike.net/projects/wap11bridge/

  141. Easy by doghouse41 · · Score: 1

    Easy solution is to run a standard phone line down the length of the dirt track, attach a suitable ADSL router/bridge at either end and you are on the net.

    Seriously, I did this 7 or 8 years ago to an outlying building where we had our office at the time. It worked a charm over existing standard telephone wiring. 8MB with no problems.

    At the time the two DSL bridges probably cost $1000. They probably give them away today,

  142. Inexpensive Bridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=11859

    Just "released", inexpensive bridge.

  143. Overthinking the whole thing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Y'all are hurting my brain. I have a friend who simply uses a mini satellite dish on a tripod on his patio for wifi, with no signal booster or anything at either end. And over approximately that same distance. If the antennas are good enough, it will work.

  144. Easy by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    This embedded system, this wifi card, this antenna, a >= 64 MB Compact Flash card, and Pyramid Linux should solve that problem for you.

  145. Linksys Wap-11 by fericyde · · Score: 1

    and a Pringles-can yagi -- you'll be fine. Possibly with good line of sight you might not even need the pringles can. Buy two, configure them to talk to each other -- wire one to the source home network with a static IP address, and hook the other up via a cross-over cable or a switch with down-link capability using a second static IP address (if the private space IP addresses for the first network are like 192.168.1.x, pick two IPs -- that's all it takes). Follow the instructions for the WAP 11 in bridge mode, in other words. On the switch or via the crossover cable on the down-side of the equation put a laptop or PC and configure yet another address (I'd opt for a third static IP, just to keep your network setup from failing due to dhcp requests not making their way back to the source). Test -- when working, transport the down-link WAP 11 to the final resting place and see if you can ping across the gap. If it doesn't work you may have to build the pringle's can into the mix. This all worked fine for me for years with two neighbors in the mix. Good luck, -=FeriCyde=-

    --
    -== FeriCyde Chat ==-
  146. WildBlue? by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 2, Informative

    Umm WildBlue is hardly a solution. 1200ms ping times...let me rephrase that 1.2 second ping times and low usage quotas (7.5GB/mo) make it a non-starter. Wireless to a neighbor's should be really easy with a pair or directional antennas- you could even throw a parabolic behind a rubber ducky and hit 300 meters at 11mbit- I've done it over 2km at 100mw tx power.

    You might have a look at Engenius's outdoor APs. A pair of EOC-3220s should work well. Cheaper than most outdoor gear, supports POE, stable (at least mine has been rock solid, I have the external antenna version). And it support bridging natively!

    Cheers,

    1. Re:WildBlue? by abedegno · · Score: 1

      We were looking at outdoor wireless bridging equipment and the EnGenius kit is stable and remarkably cheap, 1/5 of the price of CISCO outdoor panels. I've just installed two building to building bridges using a pair of of these NET-EL-EOC-3220PLUS16 and it is rock solid. The web interface is good and will show you the signal strength which helps with positioning - horizontal or vertical mounting makes a huge difference. They also come complete with PoE injectors which makes powering them easy.

    2. Re:WildBlue? by westlake · · Score: 1
      WildBlue is hardly a solution. 1.2 second ping times and low usage quotas...make it a non-starter. Wireless to a neighbor's should be really easy with a pair or directional antennas- you could even throw a parabolic behind a rubber ducky and hit 300 meters at 11mbit- I've done it over 2km at 100mw tx power.

      I know that for the geek satellite broadband is the last resort. But I can't be there to build and maintain a wireless solution for my father. To negotiate a cooperative solution with his neighbors.

  147. Brand new Inexpensive Wireless Bridge by centosfan · · Score: 1
  148. WiFi bridge links sites up to 5 miles apart by martinX · · Score: 1

    http://www.electronista.com/articles/08/05/22/bridge.links.wifi.for.5mi/

    HD Communications Corp has introduced a wireless network extender system that allows users to bridge a WiFi up to five miles. The $318 HD26200 system, which requires direct line of sight, is a complete outdoor wireless network bridge in the 802.11 b/g 2.4GHz band that uses two high performance Ubiquiti network radios with integrated 17dbi dual polarity antennas. The HD26200 bridge is powered over ethernet, allowing a single outdoor CAT5 cable to bring both data and power to the radios.
    "Since the introduction of WiFi radios people have tried to push the range of consumer level products by adding external antennas, RF cables, and WiFi amplifiers. The cost of those devices often totaled well over $500 and that was after they had already bought two D-Link or Linksys radios for $75 each," said Don Davis, President and CEO of HD Communications Corp. "Now they can have an FCC certified wireless bridge that will work better, look better, is easier to configure, and easier to install for less than $320."

    On its website, the company claims that WiFi links can be established over distances of 50km (30 miles) based on clear, unobstructed line of sight in ideal RF conditions, but that typical links were between five and eight miles, short of its 5 mile claim in the press release. In addition, it said the system can provide significantly increased throughput (up to 50+Mbps TCP/IP).

    The HD26200 does require a direct line of sight between the two locations; however, HD Communications says it has additional products for non-line of sight situations and promised to introduce additional wireless bridge solutions later this summer.

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  149. Uni-Directional Antennas and Cisco Wireless APs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do some searches for Cisco 1300 series wireless APs. These are meant for outdoor usage and will do exactly what you are asking.

    Do some searches on google for Cisco outdoor wireless bridge and also look around for cantenna designs on google (a lower cost alternative).

  150. You can do it yourself over a mile by mhollis · · Score: 1

    There are many documented accounts of the use of a Pringles can to construct a directional antenna. Rob Flickenger made one in 2001. Gregory Rehm did one in 2003 and was Slashdotted. G4 TV's Patrick Norton posted one in 2002 on The Screen Savers. Andrew S. Clapp has a lot of technical information on his website as well as several links to others. I wonder if he is, in any way, related to Eric Clapton.

    --
    Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
  151. Why not cellular internet? by cornellfOo · · Score: 1

    Why not use a cellular wireless internet card? All major carriers carry them. If he can get cell phone service, he can use them. (quick-googled)example: http://www.thetravelinsider.info/roadwarriorcontent/sierrawirelesscard.htm

  152. Pringles? by nautsch · · Score: 1

    Ever heard of this?

    http://www.oreillynet.com/cs/weblog/view/wlg/448

    This should work the desired distance. This is just a sample google hit. search for Pringles antenna or similar.

    --
    If you find a typo, you may keep it.
  153. Miles with 802.11g by madonnell · · Score: 1

    I don't have the details, but my dad did something similar to what you want, across an 8 mile span, and it works very reliably. In his case, he had clear line of sight due to being up on a hill and shooting to an access point he set up at a friends in the valley. He used a zzyyx router (cheap, has a bridge mode, and great support) at his end, some generic linksys or such at the other end, and a couple of directional antennas (dont remember the exact specs). Took a bit of tinkering to set up, but he gets better throughput than my cheaper DSL.

  154. Don't do wireless by cerberusss · · Score: 1

    The cable company will not put cable down is lane for any less than a ridiculous sum of $10,000.
    Wireless is probably the best solution, but an alternative would be to put a dog house at the road and install a cable modem there. Then, run a length of wire to the house yourself. I know it sounds silly, but it _is_ an alternative.
    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:Don't do wireless by wpiman · · Score: 1
      Wired ethernet caps out at 100 meters.

      Although, this theoretical limit has to do with collisions and retransmissions. If you ran switch ethernet- I imagine it would work-- any experience?

      Optical would work too. I am with you though- wireless isn't as nice as wired.

  155. bidirectional satellite? by AntEater · · Score: 1

    "..Hughes satellite Internet, at $60/month, but he still has to be connected to phone line to upload to the Internet."

    This is 2008, why would anyone have satellite service that requires a phone line? Why can't he get bidirectional sat. service? I'm somewhat in the same boat. I live waaay out in the boonies, no cable for many miles - not even TV, out a quarter mile long driveway so nobody is going to drag a line up to my house in the next decade (if ever). I've had sat. service (wildblue.com) for the past few years and am very happy with it. Much, much better than even 52k dialup. The latency is an issue but for most uses it is good. On-line gaming and skype don't fare so well.

    " I suggested that he get a wireless access point, and put it at his friends house and then get a wireless card for access."

    This would almost certainly violate the terms of service for his friend's ISP contract. You could spend a lot of time and money chasing the many technical solutions people have listed here only to have the ISP discover that there are two users on that connection and cancel his service.

    --
    Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
  156. two WRT 54g + dd wrt software + directional antena by mdvandam · · Score: 1

    1 Buy two wrt 54g routers and directional antenas 2 flash dd-wrt firmware to rise output power from 100mw to 300w (it allows 1w) 3 configure 1st router as acces point (your neghborhud) 4 configure 2nd router as reciver (you) view http://www.i-hacked.com/content/view/261/42/ Done !

  157. Wrong Mod. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of "funny" this should be rated Score:-1, Self-important Persecution Complex.

  158. Line of sight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ronja (http://ronja.twibright.com/) may be an option...

  159. AT&T Air card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the man can get a cellphone signal, why not get an air card. He can use pay by use or unlimited. It is easy to set up and use and he can access the internet wherever a cell signal is provided.

  160. Ubiquity by trippd6 · · Score: 1

    You want two of these:

    http://ubnt.com/products/ns2.php

    Out door rated, $79 a peice. They are powerful, outdoor, directional access points. You can mount one outside of each home and point them at each other. With line of sight, they will easily do 500 meters. They will plug in ethernet on each side of the connection.

    You may need to mount them high to get around trees and hills. It all depends. The higher you are, the better off you'll be.

    I have personaly used these devices. They are amazing for the price. I'd pay double if I had to. Nothing comes close.

    -Tripp

    1. Re:Ubiquity by drwho · · Score: 1

      Yes, these are amazing devices for little money. The problem is, they're hard to find in stock at the moment, because they're so popular. But a new batch is due in a couple of weeks.

      These things are almost overkill for 500 meters.

      If there's too much noise on 2.4 ghz, there's also the ns5 for 802.11a. But then, you have to be more line-of-sight.

  161. Hughes by bogidu · · Score: 0

    I thought they went to two-way satellite years ago?

  162. Re:Doing it professionally for $10K by Tomun · · Score: 4, Informative

    Or you can do it yourself for $318

  163. I do this everyday.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wireless. Two access points set in bridge mode with two small directional antennas or one larger directional antenna. I can fire 802.11G over many miles with two direction 14dB gain antennas, and having one 14dB or two smaller ones will more than suffice, if there is line of sight.

    If not, fiber that bitch. Make sure you can with regards to permits / easements. Get either an Outside Plant (OP) UV rated cable and bury it directly or ditch-witch you some conduit (1" will suffice) and you can run an Inside / Outside Plant fiber. Get at least a 4 strand and no more than a 6 strand fiber in case there are any problems. Buy two fiber media converters from Blackbox, http://www.blackbox.com/ item #LHC013A, pay a technian to terminate the fiber for you with a decent amount of service loop in case of a future move / service. Fiber will cost you $1,300, a tech and materials will cost you $275, ditch-witch rental and conduit will be $1,800, media converters will be a little under $400. I tech company can do it all for you but you will pay $75 an hour per man hour, probably around 25 hours or so.

    Ethernet is only rated up to 100 meters for 10/100.

    Last option: If the phone line running down there has a spare pair on it, use a couple of ethernet extenders or DSL modems.

  164. line-of-sight 5-mile range WiFi for US$318 by eyefish · · Score: 1

    What you need is the "HD26200" from "HD Communications". It costs US$318, an extends your WiFi range for up to 5 Miles.

    The only requirement is that you have line-of-sight between the two end-points. If you do, all you do is connect on of these boxes on your friend's end, and then another in your home, and you're set.

    See this link for details: http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20080521005391&newsLang=en

  165. Try the Ubiquity PS2 by techdavis · · Score: 1

    I work for a WISP, and we have been using the Ubiquity PowerStation 2 or PowerStation 5 (2.4 or 5 GHz, respectively) radios for some time. He can get a 2.4 or 5 GHz model, well, a pair of them, and set them up as access point and subscriber module. They work well, we have used them for shots of several miles. If he gets the 5GHz model, he can set it up so other people cannot just get his bandwidth. They are flat panel outdoor radios, designed to be easily installed and configured. Simple GUI interface, and best of all, they run about $169 each. www.ubnt.com

  166. Re:Powerstations and Nanostations for Easy Pointin by maokh · · Score: 1
    Mod up. This is the best comment i've seen on this article.

    We use this gear on our community wireless network (SeattleWireless) and I always recommend it. Don't waste your time with linksys hacks, non-waterproof cantennas that melt in the rain (believe me, i should know, it rains a lot), and cheap imitations.

    belial's idea is cheap, effective, and reliable. I'd recommend a pair of nanostations, as i think a powerstation would be overkill. Can't go wrong for $80 a pop.

  167. That's a lot of digging by teasea · · Score: 1

    So i'd recommend a nice trench digger. Not sure why it needs to be 18 inches deep. Seems like overkill. I know water and sewer lines should be below the frost line, but cable?
    Also, make sure you call the building department to make sure there are no important pipes/cables below already.

  168. Easy and reliable with out Line of Sight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    As an independent consultant, I have used the kit found here here to link 2 offices through aproximately 500 feet of thick underbrush in situations where right of ways could not be obtained for burying cable. Setup of the routers takes about 5 minutes.

  169. cantennas by treak007 · · Score: 1

    Obviously, you should use a bunch of cantennas to carry the wireless signal

    --
    Klingon Software is not released, it escapes, inflicting terrible damage onto the enemy as it does
  170. Well... by avronius · · Score: 1
    I grant that an extender would be needed for "cable".
    I did, however, recommend fiber. I said "at the same time", but I should have said "instead".

    From Wikipedia: Multimode fiber - typical trasnmission speeds are 100Mbit for up to 2km using 100BASE-FX As for the price of a fiber NIC:

    Form Lanshack: Unicom 100BaseFX Multimode FIber PCI Network Interface Card - Dual ST $108.50 each. Sure, it's not gibagit to the desktop, but it's not meant to be. It's to resolve an expensive problem with a relatively low-maintenance solution.
  171. long distance wifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look at the article from 'The Pulpit' from 2001.

    http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2001/pulpit_20010628_000421.html

    It cost him $1400 at that time, but things are much less expensive now.

  172. Cantenna link by chrylis · · Score: 1

    I actually wrote a report on this topic a few months ago. With a wire-in-Pringles-can antenna and stock WRT54G on one end, we were able to maintain usable (5.5Mbps) link at 550m (~13dB gain over the stock). A structured cantenna pair should get you u to 2-3km, and if you're interested the WRT's can run off a car battery+solar panel.

  173. Bi-Quad by Commandah+Keen! · · Score: 1

    You can build one of these things out of a sardine can, and if you hook them up to an old dish, you get a lot of gain. http://www.seattlewireless.net/index.cgi/SardineCanAntenna http://www.trevormarshall.com/biquad.htm

  174. Simple Wireless Bridge by morgandelra · · Score: 1

    Get 2 of these. EnGenius EOC-3220EXT

    Approx 140 a piece. Outdoor rated, comes with POE injector, and mount kits. Runs a 400mw with an external 5 db omni.

    Will work like a charm.

  175. Studio Sixty by Marillion · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that would be silly. That's why the professionals use a snake to move the mouse along, and of course a mongoose can be used to hurry the snake along.

    I'm suddenly having a flashback to an episode of Studio Sixty .... http://www.studio60-guide.com/113-harriet-dinner/.

    --
    This is a boring sig
  176. how deep by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

    If you are in a place like Minnesota or further north, things like this sometimes need to be ten feet or more down to avoid frost heave in the winter. In North Dakota and across the border in Manitoba, water lines and other infrastructure, are often 12 or more feet down. And on cold winters the lines can still be broken if the freeze goes deep enough. Nothing like a broken water or sewer line at 40 below to make your day.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  177. Free Space Optical Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We made this in our Intro to Optics course:

    http://www.bluehaze.com.au/modlight/

    They got this to work for 167 km. We tried it for about a mile; you could use an optical modulator to attach the coax cable:

    LED -> Modulator -> Focusing Optics -> (free space)

  178. I think we're forgetting the obvious..... by mwebbsc · · Score: 1

    What about the legal ramifications of your neighbor "sharing" his internet connction? I'm sure the ISP has something against that in their acceptable use policy. Not to mention what about if that neighbor moves. There goes your Internet connection.

  179. 2 options: by Bob-taro · · Score: 1

    I have no cable or dsl offerings where I live, and I have "wdsl", which is basically 802.11 equipment with antennas at my house and a small ISP about 3 mi away. It's not blazingly fast (512kbps down, and I think 128 up, which wasn't the fastest choice), but much better than dial up and decent upload and latency (unlike satellite). Even if there's no ISP offering that, it sounds like you could use the same equipment to "share" with a neighbor (don't know what the cable company would think of that).

    My in-laws are even farther out in the country, and they have one of those "unlimited" data plans through a cell company (I forget which one). They actually get better bandwidth than I do now.

    --
    Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
  180. $10 wok and a usb wifi later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you got line of sight? then try this

    http://www.usbwifi.orconhosting.net.nz/

  181. RONJA by wikinerd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What you need is RONJA, a free space optics link, with the technology being under your control (open source).

  182. Cantenna! Oh yeah! by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    There are dozens of home-made cantenna designs (the name coming from the originals made from fruit juice cans). Kits. Parts. Everthing.

    I think the current world record for stock wireless routers (and some very elaborate antennas, usually huge things salvaged or scrap built) is well over a hundred kilometers.

    500 steenking meters is no problem whatsoever.

    Google "cantenna", or (as one of the earlier messages said) get one of the commercial directional antennas already on the market. (Hint: it will NOT be a stick-shaped thingie. It'll most likely be parabolic, and probably several feet in diameter. And do NOT put it on top of the house / trailer, since they tend to be lightning magnets.)

  183. Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you need:

    (2) wifi bridges (I reccomend senao cb3's) in adhoc mode
    (2) Pacific Wireles 24 dbi parabolic antenna w/ N Female ends.
    (2) N-Male to RP-TNC Pigtails preferably LMR 400 (length dependant on application).
    (2) Roof Mounts (style dependant on application).

    Put it all together and you've got at least 5mbps of real throughput between homes, and it will be under $500.

    All of the above is available here.

  184. Wireless ISPs do this sort of link every day by Brett+Glass · · Score: 1

    I'm a wireless ISP (in fact, I was the first wireless ISP, started back in 1992), and do this sort of link nearly every day. I'll sell him a pair of LEGAL (not illegal, like the Cantenna) radios that will do the trick nicely for $400, including all accessories. Slightly more than an illegal link, but it'll last for decades and is FCC certified.

  185. Professional wireless gear... by crazy+al's · · Score: 1

    Get a pair of wireless radios like a tranzeo tr6000, or an Inscape pair, set one to be an ap and the other to infrastructure mode, and there you go. about 500 bucks, less on ebay maybe.... your range will be somewhat greater than 1/2 kilometer. look at bridge mode

    --
    Crazy Al's House of Intertubes - where we make up in volume what we lose per bit...
  186. 500m is nothing... what matters is line-of-sight by jurgen · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wireless links with plain old 802.11 have been done over FAR longer distances (over 10km is common and I've seen links over 40km) with simple directional antennas. What's much more important than distance is line-of-sight. Basically if you can see the other antenna without a telescope, you can connect to it. However, there must NOT be any trees in between, even if you can see the other antenna in the gaps of the foliage. Trees are very good radio-wave shields. (Actually, water is the shield, but like all living things, trees are full of water.)

    If you do not have line of sight from the ground, try the roof. If you still don't your next option would be to build a mast. You can make a mast up to 10 or 12m cheaply by telescoping several pieces of steel pipe and bracing the whole thing with 3 steel cables. I have a 9m mast like this that I built for about $100.

    Make sure to get a router with antennas that you can disconnect and replace (not all have those, but many do). Then connect a directional antenna... for 500m you don't need anything fancy, the cheapest directional antenna you can buy or a home-made "cantenna" will do just fine.

    Same for the other end of the connection... if you don't want to put a router on both ends, make sure your wifi card has an antenna connector. Or you can use a USB wifi adapter with a "stub" antenna, and stick that little stub directly into a "cantenna" type can (you'll need to calculate the position of the hole for the antenna... there are calculators for this on the net, google "cantenna calculator"). That will turn a little $25 USB dongle into a directional Wifi powerhouse, using nothing but a can with hole drilled in the right place! I've gotten a strong connection over 1km between two of those and I'm sure it could have gone much further but we didn't try because 1km was enough.

    For your short distance of 500m, given line of sight, you may even be able to get away with a directional antenna only on one end, and the regular omni antenna on the other. I.e. if you have window-to-window sight, you may be able to put an unmodified router on the windowsill of one house and a usb-dongle-cantenna on a windowsill of the other and have your link.

    Good luck! :j

  187. Re:Doing it professionally for $10K by really? · · Score: 1

    No mod points today, so I'll just have to reply.

    That is indeed a good price for what you get. Assuming it works as advertised, of course.

    I have set up WRT45Gs with high-gain antennas quite a few times and the cost was not that far from the one in the press release you linked to.

    I'll have to look at that for the next link I set up.

    Thanks

    --

    "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
  188. QoS conflict with Carrier Pidgeon protocol? by cheros · · Score: 1

    As it's optical I would assume it conflicts with carrier pigeons en route for a certain RFC? :-).

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  189. WokFi by TheDreadedGMan · · Score: 1

    Mentioned twice before in these comments (that I could see), but not modded up so here's another mention... Use a pair of woks or other parabolic kitchen implements... mesh is good for wind damage reduction... point one at the other and bingo, 3 to 10km range for the price of woks and 2 USB WiFi adaptors.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WokFi

    http://www.usbwifi.orconhosting.net.nz/

  190. Back in 2002... by shking · · Score: 1

    Back in 2002 Cringley found a solution to this very problem

    --
    -- "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1" -- PC Magazine, Nov. 1994
  191. Wi-Fi - Definately!!! by natx808 · · Score: 1

    Wi-Fi works great in a directional point to point environment. My friend in australia is doing this right now. His work (a school) is ~ 400 meters away and he has a 54meg connection on 802.11G. Actual thoroughput is around 25 Mbit/sec. You can sit there and ping the other side and get 1ms ping times all day long. They also use this for remote backups overnight :) Because you are bridging, all systems on the other end are a member of the same LAN as the main house so they have access to the same services. My friend is using line of sight and using 6db directional antennas. I'd suggest a Wi-Fi router capable of QoS for your VOIP traffic.

  192. Wifry: Less than $100 by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  193. This is what you need. by na1led · · Score: 1

    I've done this same setup for my inlaws and it worked perfectly. This is what you need:
    Purchase any decent wireless router, I prefer linksys wrt54g, they can be configured with third party firmware. Two directional cantennas, can be purchased on ebay. two wifi signal amplifiers (Hawking HSB2), and connect the output to the cantennas. One of the amplifiers will connect to the wireless router, the other to your PC's wifi card. Connect the linksys router to your neighbors internet or his router. Make sure both cantennas are facing each other at both ends. With a clear line of sight, you should get a signal up to 1 mile. With trees, it should easly reach 500ft. As I said, I've done this for my inlaws and it travels about 800ft through dense woods.

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
  194. Invest in Laptop by 6ame633k · · Score: 1

    I would suggest spending the money on a new laptop and a trip to Starbucks or some other place with Wireless...

    --
    You had me at merlot
  195. Where there's a dirt road... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... there's usually a barbed wire fence.

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?no_d2=1&sid=02/01/03/2039218

  196. Use DSL by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2, Informative
    I had a similar problem at a ski resort - The distance was too 'far' for CAT5, and Wireless / Fiber was too difficult due to weather and cost. I wound up using a couple of "Tut Systems" DSL ethernet bridge boxes, hooked together with about 750 meters of cat 5. Worked like a charm.

    Here's the kind of boxes I'm talking about:

    http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=190224334652

  197. There is a WiFi solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    an Israeli company named GO-Networks, which is now a sub-devision in Nextwave Wireless,
    has several WiFi solutions (a/b/g) for a radius of about one kilometer.

    you can check the products out at
    www.nextwave.com

  198. Metrix.net / Ubiquiti Powerstation by ejoe_mac · · Score: 1

    http://metrix.net/ubiquiti-powerstation-2-ps218v-p-109.html Get two, set them up, alignment LEDs are on the back. It doesn't get much easier.

  199. Either NanoStations or LigoAP 900 by KenDiPietro · · Score: 1

    As someone that has probably made every mistake that can possibly be made in this industry, I believe I might have some valuable insight. If you have LoS (Line of Sight) meaning that both antenna will be able to see each other without being obstructed by anything, the Ubiquiti NanoStations are an unbeatable solution. These radios cost $79.95/each (retail) and are reasonably easy to setup. http://www.microcom.us/ns2.html Online forum help is available here: http://forum.ubnt.com/forum/ Now, if you have a situation where trees or perhaps a house obscure your view between antennas you would be better served with a 900MHz solution. Deliberant is the place to pick those up at a reasonable (albeit higher) cost. http://www.deliberant.com/landing/ http://www.ligowave.com/?q=products/ligoap/ligoap-900 And just so we understand each other, I do not work for either company, I do not get any commission and you aren't going to get a better price by mentioning my name - I'm just trying to help out for all the help SlashDot have been to me over the years. In fact, it's nice to finally be able to give back.

  200. 500 meters? how about 304 km by IhuntCIA · · Score: 1

    304km link made by Italian radio amateurs.

    You can do a lot on 500 meters using homemade antennas (scroll down, check pdf's) . Or you can buy any with gain of 15 dB or more.
    1. Be sure to use routers that have external connections to avoid messy soldering. Anything with more than 17dbm is good enough.
    2. Put the damn routers in the the sealed boxes outside, in the shade, close to the antennas. Keep coaxial cables short, less than 5 meters is good enough. Use Power over ethernet to power the routers.
    3. Use uni-directional high gain low Q-factor antennas. Use coaxial cables suited for the GHz range frequencies. Use appropriate connectors and mounting to avoid boring repairs.
    4. If You are interested in an wireless community, the simplest way to start is to put Your e-mail, or some other contact data in radio name or something that people can see when scanning.
    I am using the wireless internet right now, with speed of more than 500 kilobytes per second at approximately 800 meters form the base access point.

  201. Digging is for suckers by SenorAmor · · Score: 1

    Here's what we use at work: http://www.microcom.us/eoc3220.html $140 each (one at each location). We've gone up to a mile with not so much as a glitch, though they're rated to 10 miles. They require a modicum of line of sight, so you might have to put them on tripods on each house, but for a total investment of under $400, you really can't go wrong.

  202. Wireless easy shot by pcjunky · · Score: 1

    A pair of Tranzeo radios would easy work of this provided you have near line of sight. A few trees should be ok. http://www.tranzeo.com/ If you are more adventurous you could buy a couple of used Cisco 1200 APs with the older 802.11b cards in them. These can be had for as little as $60 on Ebay. These have bridging capability as well as AP functionality. A couple of panel antennas (12db to 16db should fine). You will need a couple of cables with reverse TNC on one end a N connectors on the other.

  203. Just watch the trees. Water is your enemy. by Cryacin · · Score: 1

    Seriously. You should have clear line of sight between your two points. I had a point to point rig set up for a few years, until some pesky trees grew up. While it was dry, the network limped along, but when they got wet from rain, the connection would stay down for a significant period of time.

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    1. Re:Just watch the trees. Water is your enemy. by Sique · · Score: 1

      Luckily the mountain tops in the Zillertal valley are far above 6000 ft, so no pesky trees growing there anymore :)

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
  204. Use outdoor rated gear by Nkwe · · Score: 1

    If you want something that you don't have to maintain, be sure to get something that is rugged and won't fall apart from being outside in the elements. I would suggest something like: http://www.valuepointnet.com/products/ruggedap/550gia12.html They are rugged and outdoor / marine rated, use POE, and have internal antennas that would easily span the distance you need. The antennas with these are about 120 degree coverage so alignment can easily be eyeballed.

  205. It will Work.. by StrangerAtRandom · · Score: 1

    I used to have wireless access from over two blocks away using only a USB adapter G. What I did was to take a pan lid, A "Wok" lid made it stand up like a little satillite dish, and placed my reciever in front of it. With some fine tuneing, (aiming and positioning), I was able to find multiple options for connections from about 200 yards away through trees and a barn using only a G type adapter, So if you were to get the +N USB adapter and reciever you should be good to go? You can always return them if it dont work.. I also extended the length of the usb cord by about 25 feet to allow me to move the adapter to the back side of my house. I Soldered a old Cat5 cable to the middle of the original wire that came with the adapter.

  206. Product suggestion by Aragorn+DeLunar · · Score: 1

    I just saw this link today, and it looks like it might fit the bill. The range is up to 5 mi, and it's powered via the ethernet cable. The downside is the $318 price tag.

    --
    Cynicism, like dogmatism, can be an excuse for intellectual laziness. - Susan Shirk
  207. Hughesnet doesn't use dial-up by kesuki · · Score: 1

    "He got sick of it and relies on Hughes satellite Internet, at $60/month, but he still has to be connected to a phone line to upload to the Internet"

    I don't know where he got his hardware, but they haven't supported dial-up upload for the longest time... right on the site they tell you no phone line is used. back when they were part of direcTV long ago they had dial-up upload hardware, but that was almost 10 years ago! http://go.gethughesnet.com/

    hughsnet is the worst satelite provider, absolutely horrible FAP policies, it's really only useful for casual webbrowsing... there is an upstart company that uses dial-up/sat inet, and then wildblue which has a 30 day rolling fap, you can download, but if you do too much in one day you internet will only recover a little bit each day... but i don't think their fap is nearly as restrictive as hughesnets, hugesnet doesn't even increase their fap if you get a buisness account!!!!! wtf...

    there is a fourth satelite provider, that targets gas stations etc, for sending data to a central database, not sure what that companies fap is, but satelite internet is a crazy space with a lot of retarded FAPS...

    Wifi can easily go a lot further, with a few after-market antennas, this company which i think sells them, has a simple primer, depending on the style of directional antenna you get setup can be as simple as using a level, and pointing in the general compass direction.

    http://www.radiolabs.com/Articles/wifi-antenna.html

  208. Partially correct - ISDN *is* a mandate by Degrees · · Score: 1
    In other words, if GonnaBRichYeahYeah!'s dad ordered ISDN from the phone company, they have to provide it.

    Anything faster than that, no.

    After ISDN is in, his dad would get 128 Kbps. It would be charged per-minute, but if he didn't need .iso downloads, it would be OK. There's essentially zero connect time, too. Just be careful he doesn't install bittorrent.... ;-)

    If the cost of ISDN was too much, he could always cancel it later. Note that for the phone company to put in ISDN, they would have to upgrade equipment between him and the switch. That upgraded equipment likely wouldn't be pulled out, so his 22 Kpbs would probably peg at 56 Kbps afterwards.

    --
    "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
  209. axor1337@gmx.com by axor1337 · · Score: 1

    this is not too fare for a wifi conection what you needis 2 dd-wrt capable routers i recomend buffalo routers and 2 15 Dbi grid antenna's(kinda look like a parabolic dish) here is how you set it up you set up the first router and the friends house and aim it at your dads house then set up the other router as a wireless bridge ( it will receive the wifi signal from the other router and turn it into a wired connection. I worm for a Wireless ISP in Illinois i have setup 6 setups like this at distances of up to half a mile it works quite well but does have an additional latencies of about 6 ms

    --
    there are 10 types of people in this world, those who read binary and those who don't. which are you!
  210. Wireless will work by Shadow-isoHunt · · Score: 1

    Wireless will still work at that range if you invest in decent hardware, such as two 24dBi mesh antennas, and two awus036h(500mW USB 802.11g)s, one in softap and one as a client.

    --
    www.isoHunt.com
  211. Proven System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My friend/neighbor had exactly this same problem. The cable ended at my road and they quoted him the same $10,000 to run down the road to his house. Both of us lived too far out to get DSL.

    I signed up for cable internet service and we set up a link to his house. At my end we set up a WRT54G, one of the older ones, with HyperWRT firmware. It's WLAN port was fed from a LAN port on my home router. Set it up for only one antenna output but let the power setting alone. We put the router in a weather-proof box out under a raised deck with a line-of-site to his house. The active antenna was removed and a cable run from the antenna connector to a wifi circular polarized beam antenna with a gain of about 15.I don't remember the brand but it was white.

    We set up the same antenna at his house and fed it into a Linksys WET54G Ethernet Bridge. The antennas were pointed at each other. His computers were networked into the bridge and we were in business. I didn't keep track but the total cost was under $300. This system worked flawlessly for several years. His speed was only limited by the cable internet limit of about 6Mb.

  212. try a long range antenna to a regular wifi router by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i work in the marine industry and we install long range antennas on boats so customers can hit open hotspots on shore. there is an internet service on the west coast called broadband express that caters to marinas and boaters. they set up the hotspots, and boaters can log in from pretty much anywhere in the marina using their equipment.

    the wireless antennas work on regular services too, so if you are say within 1000 yards of a hotspot, you should be able to pick it up.

    the antenna kits can be found at http://www.bbxpress.net/ecom/default.asp

  213. Ubiquity Nanostation is the way to go by cmoss · · Score: 1

    Look at the ubiquity nanostation2. It is an access point/router with a built in directional antenna.
    Passive PoE.

    They are a relatively new product with great specs and price.

    http://ubnt.com/products/ns2.php

    I have a couple of these and as well as a ubiquity powerstation. The powerstation is a great device but is heavier and more difficult to mount than the nanostation.

    Retail is ~$80 each. 15km max range. ~1 lb. weight.

  214. Try EnGenius EOC-3220 by foobar77 · · Score: 1

    I use an EnGenius EOC-3220 for long range connections when traveling in my RV. It could be configured as a bridge to work in your case:
        http://www.engeniustech.com/datacom/products/details.aspx?id=171

    Includes a high powered transmitter, extra sensitive receiver and hi-gain antenna.

  215. High Power Infrared Lasers to the rescue by Alien54 · · Score: 1

    Laser building to building network links 100Mb to 1Gb - 10m to 5000m. www.laserbandwidth.com YMMV

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  216. Re:Novaroam stuff works well (900Mhz no license ba by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

    Gotta love companies that consider their stuff so 'elite' that they can't be bothered to put any pricing information on their website. You could call them, but of course its after business hours. They want you to give them your contact info so they can call you at their convenience. Pfft, not.

    I once actually took the time to call a company about some sort of networking kit, and was told that the units I was looking at were like 20k apiece. I told the guy to go back to smoking whatever he was before I called.

    Generally, if a company refuses to publish their pricing opening, its probably $toomuch or $outofthisworld. I'm sorry, but if you are afraid that the price is going to scare people away, what makes you think it isnt going to scare them away when they finally find out it (AFTER wasting their time to call you and/or wait around for you to call them back, pissing them off)

  217. Motorola Canopy by clarkn0va · · Score: 1
    I second the Moto Canopy vote. There's nothing more reliable; in fact, I'd call it overkill. Just make sure you choose the right frequency, i.e., you'll need the 900MHz if it's 500m of solid trees, but you'll get better throughput on the shorter wavelengths.

    Oh, and be ready to drop $1000+ for a pair of radios and possibly antennae.

    Kp>db

    --
    I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
  218. Remote broadband by jkirby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I lived on a remote mountain and was 100% off-grid. I used Starband (www.starband.com). I had it for six years and it was flawless. Up speeds were not awesome, but better than dial up. The service was the most reliable I have ever had. Down speeds were great (1+ meg). I had the SOHO plan. I ran a souce control server on it and an Exchange server. Worked awesome. Again, VSAT is a little different and you soon get use to the diferences. No phone line required.

    Also, I head from a friend that Wild Blue (www.wildblue.com) is also very good. I am going to get VSAT again (I moved) as a backup because it was very reliable. I have an RV082 and I know it works with VSAT on one of the WAN ports.

    This is probably going to be a more reliable mechanism than a long-haul wireless setup.

    Just my .02

    Jamey

    --
    Jamey Kirby
  219. pringles net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can easily go that far with a trivial antenna booster... I've heard of people extending their network over several miles!

    http://www.turnpoint.net/wireless/antennas/mypringles.html

    Or, just google 'pringles net' for more examples and alternative ideas.

  220. Re:Novaroam stuff works well (900Mhz no license ba by VoxBoston · · Score: 1

    Errrr... I personally have no connection w/ NovaRoam (just used a few of their boxes for prototyping something). Price per unit was @ $2K, I believe. You'd need two.

  221. Hardware Upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are in the process of ditching Hughes for reliability and performance reasons but we've never needed a phoneline for it, if your dad is happy with the service other than the dial-up requirement try asking Hughes for an updated set of equipment they should be able to get you bi-directional satellite

  222. Just how big are these meters? by sean4u · · Score: 1

    Are we talking like, parking meters? And are they side-by-side, or laid end-to-end?

  223. Use a couple of cans as antennas by mikhailitsky · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can boost the range of your wifi router/card by using an external antenna. The simplest option for you would be to construct a couple of antennas out of cans. The whole thing will cost you a couple of bucks and will be more than enough to cover 500 meters (I used such antennas for 3-km long links, and it worked like a charm). Hit Google with 'cantenna' to get more info on the subjet. If you decide to go this way, make sure your wifi card and router are equipped with detachable antennas so that you can hook an external one.

  224. options by Grogdor · · Score: 1

    If you have line of sight (or can bounce off a neighbor, tree, kitty...) WiFi is the quickest and easiest way. The cablemodem is probably 10dBmV, put the amp at your end. You can look up the signal strength and frequency on his modem, then calculate the splitters, cable loss etc. accordingly. With the amplification figures, make sure your modem will get at least -15dBmV (not more than +15dBmV) on the forward path, and ensure it won't have to transmit more than 55dBmV for return (lower is better here). The return frequency is quite low so should have less than 10dB of loss, just watch out for crossing any electrical as it will induce noise. You could lay it on the ground, risking damage to tha cable, or get direct-burial cable that will go bad in 10-15yrs. Best bet is conduit, even 1" stuff that comes with cable inside and can be put ~6" in the ground by a trencher pretty darn quick. Pay someone to put very good compression (not hex... outdoor style, even if indoor) crimps on the ends of the cable, if you do not have the tools.

  225. Ditches are so yesterday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rent a vibratory plow (Ditch Witch probably makes one), not a trencher. Assuming your working with moderate soil conditions you can install the conduit (the plow literally pulls the HDPE through the ground) in less than an afternoon without breaking a sweat.

  226. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,

    Put a wireless router on a location your provider is willing to connect to at a reasonable cost. Be sure to put it in a box that is weatherproof and vandalproof. Then, buy a can of pringles and some radio shack nuts and bolts and make yourself a Cantenna:

    http://www.oreillynet.com/cs/weblog/view/wlg/448

    It is said to have a range of at least .6 miles, which easily covers your problem.

  227. Try a pair of EOC3220s by ReginaldSlapknackers · · Score: 1

    I installed a pair of EOC3220s for my sister-in-law, who was in a similar position -- just out of range of ADSL but within line of sight of a friend who had it, and no cable for miles around in their case. The units are dead easy to install and configure, and have worked like a charm for the last nine months. Just one thing -- it was really handy to have a 9-pin serial null modem cable to reset one of the units, so I'd recommend picking one up just in case. The installation I did spans a distance of just over 1km, and seems to work in all weather without a problem.

  228. N1 by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    the maximum range of N1 is 425 meters, not too far off the 500 meters your dad requires, maybe you could make something work using N1 kit.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  229. Re:he'll be dead soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    best comment eva!

  230. Off the shelf solution! by Nakarti · · Score: 1

    I've recently done up a system for similar(100m in multiple directions) with a high-gain omni on the source, and small directionals for the others. All parts from wlanparts.com except the router and client cards, Asus from Newegg, got better signal than Linksys. Total cost to them for the whole setup was $500, minus the 400 for HughesNet(doesn't require phone anymore, btw) But, Hughnet's TOS allowed this setup as it was all the same company(farm) and your cable provider probably doesn't. So don't tell them.

  231. How about Q-Bridge? by GroovyBarber · · Score: 1

    I've been looking at Q-Bridge which seems like a pretty easy to set up option. For a relatively short distance like 500 meters I would think it would do the job even with some line of sight issues with trees.

  232. Why just don't use the mobile phone by poeidon1 · · Score: 1

    ...and use it as a modem to connect to internet Or get a standalone modem. I believe many mobile operators give you a free modem if you ask for one year contract.

    --
    They called me mad, and I called them mad, and damn them, they outvoted me. -Nathaniel Lee
  233. Re:Doing it professionally for $10K by Baljet · · Score: 1

    Winner.

  234. Try one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://gnswireless.com/

  235. Broadband Over Powerline (BPL) - an option by mdibiofuel · · Score: 1

    Instead of coaxial cable in the proposed buried conduit, and instead of CATx twisted-pair, what about a cheap powerline in the conduit with a BPL node on either end? It's less expensive than coax and certainly less expensive than CATx. It can be made relatively safe, but I admit it's a bit scary to run 120V on your own for long distances. Run the conduit with the cheapest household wiring = 3 conductor copper, energize the line with GFI and surge-protected 120VAC, and install Linksys BPL nodes on either end (PLE200). Ethernet on both sides, one side connected to a broadband router. 1) the PLE200s are not that expensive, under $100 per node 2) BPL might not be good for the entire solution, but might help you with a particularly troublesome leg. 3) household wiring can be less expensive than coax and CAT5, for me it worked out to 3 cents per foot for the wire

  236. why bury ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it have to be buried ? I also live in the boonies my phoe and power are above ground on poles . When cable became available we just used the existing utility poles . If no poles are. available trees work .

  237. 500M is not VERY far. by misterjava66 · · Score: 1

    500M is not VERY far.

    Try a 'high gain wireless antenna' at the send end. They typically have a 5-10 degree 'on' zone which would give you a 45-90m wide 'on' zone at the far end. Enough to cover the whole house and deal with some wind.

    You put it in, you point it, you done. :-)

  238. i've used these: by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

    http://www.motorola.com/business/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=20e284c606de6110VgnVCM1000008406b00aRCRD motorola canopy system. can do several mile hops. yes, the radios are expensive, but a LOT less than 10k. Thus, in relation to the cable company's solution, this is cheep and easy.

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  239. Cantenna could be illegal, depending where by I)_MaLaClYpSe_(I · · Score: 1
    Well, in the US the cantenna itself might be illegal:

    from 10 ways you might be breaking the law with your computer

    #5: "Tools of a crime" laws

    Some states have laws that make it a crime to possess a "criminal instrument" or the "tool of a crime." Depending on the wording of the law, this can be construed to mean any device that is designed or adapted for use in the commission of an offense. This means you could be arrested and prosecuted, for example, for constructing a high gain wireless antenna for the purpose of tapping into someone else's wi-fi network, even if you never did in fact access a network. Several years ago, a California sheriff's deputy made the news when he declared "Pringles can antennas" illegal under such a statute.

  240. Re:Are you serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    E. Stick the bill to big old ultraexpensive cable monopoly for extendir their network.

  241. SeanJC by SeanJC · · Score: 1

    I think the long distance wireless is a good option. As ling as you get a high gain aerial and the necessary permits everything will be fine. This woudl save a lot of digging or moat building. I also dont think that the cable company would even connect to your own cable. I suggest wireless

    --
    IT Strategist / Analyst working with AJAX, GIS, Web 2.0 specialist who enjoys outdoor pursuits.
  242. Check this out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.ubnt.com
    sub 100$ point to point wireless, very easy to connect. It is called the nano station, and is great for this type of application.

  243. Carrier Pigeons by silverpig · · Score: 1

    I vote for carrier pigeons. What other method is also edible?

  244. Use a wireless bridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Part No. UL-204 $325.00

    PI Micro
    PI Manufacturing Corp.

    909.598.3715 Telephone

    20732 Currier Road,
    Walnut
    California 91789

    Tom

  245. Father or you? by nikhilvgs · · Score: 1

    Is WiMax too complex for your father or for you?

  246. HD Communications HD26200 by reking2 · · Score: 1

    There is an article on DailyTech about a line of site solution for up to 5 miles. Look at http://www.dailytech.com/Inexpensive+80211bg+WiFi+Bridge+Connects+Locations+Five+Miles+Apart/article11859.htm for information.

  247. 500m wireless bridge by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 1

    Well, he did specify "wireless" so digging a ditch and laying a wire was not part of the question.

    As for wireless, I'm assuming tuned directional antennae would probably do the trick; they'd have to be LOS too.

    --
    Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
  248. I, anonymous coward, am... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....A Telecom Engineer. Hybrid fibre-coaxial to be exact.

    Hoe (one per helper) 500 meters of heavy duty conduit 500 meters of cable (recommend that you lay fiber at the same time)

    First, and foremost - NEVER DIG WITHOUT LOCATES. Second of all, NEVER DIG WITHOUT LOCATES. Third, NEVER DIG WITHOUT LOCATES. Now since the first THREE rules have been established, I will go more into detail towards them.

    What it means is, never dig anything (public or private property) without calling your utility locates authority. In most cases, it is illegal (talking about USA). In Illinois it is illegal to dig anything regardless of depth, unless JULIE is called prior (JULIE does the whole state except Chicago meto where DIGGER operates). JULIE is ran by The Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC). Missouri uses Dig Rite. A notification to dig must be requested by you, or the service provider. It must be done at least 48 hours, or two business days prior. They will CONTACT the utility companies (gas, water, sewage, cable, telephone, electric, fiber, etc) and request a locate. At this time the individual utilities will come out, and typically with spray paint, mark your yard from their distribution tap to the house. They will also stick in bury flags to indicate their company. Every utility that has a piece of their plant in your property will come out to do the locates. 48hr rule/2 business days must be honored. Why? If you FAIL to notify, and hit a utility YOU ARE 100% RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COST TO REPAIR THE PLANT. Typical cost to just bury cable under a street will range $15-50 a FOOT. That doesn't include line terminations which is quite costly as well. IF you do notify, and they do mark - if you end up hitting a "rogue" utility THEY are responsible for it and you will have no liability.

    Next topic. Since we are talking about just laying fiber in the conduit. What type of fiber? single mode? multi mode? LED? Laser? How many pairs? Aerial with messenger? Underground flooded? Buying expensive fiber, that most companies sell as "no return unless defective", and guessing what type is being used will just be a waste of money. RG-6 quad shield won't work, RG-11 quad shield won't work due to distance. Perhaps trunk (the very good reason why it will cost $10k).

    3a: Call the cable company to connect the cable to the cable termination point. Begin paying monthly subscription to cable internet provider.

    Without a nearby tap, one that can service RG-11 at the latest, they will never be servicable for any service. Regardless, even if the guess to choose the correct Fiber type is correct - they will still charge thousands to splice fiber to the plant. Maybe 50-75 meters they will be a node(a few more thousand), the node will connect to the coaxial plant, the plant will (at this example) have an self terminating tap splice in, RG-6/RG-11 will then be used to go to house. Hurray service!

    More than likley, the $10k will cover the cost to use trunk line (large diameter,very low loss coaxial cable) that will connect to coaxial plant. A line amplifier will then be used, and the system will be RF based. Let us not forget the cost to bury.

    3b: If you've chosen to run the connection to your neighbhour's home, ensure that you don't piss him/her off. They are now your cable internet provider.

    Might be, if it wasen't a breech of most TOS for ISPs. Guess we can dig another ditch down the street to the next neighbor ???

    Notice to all: I am just a bit annoyed. I got an emergency call at 9PM to fix an issue caused by someone not wanting to follow the state law on digging. I was off work for 5 hours when the call came in. The person hit a Fiber, they knocked a whole node down. 800 customers, down. TV, internet, phone (a life line) off line.

    To be helpfull, here are my suggestions:

    1. Have your dad talk to you local franchise authority. That authority, along with the FCC, hel

  249. My setup to get faster internet on HughesNet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey dudes, this is Dad speaking. My son's idea won't work. Neighbor won't be my 'cable supplier', I had to use dynamite just to get my phone line in since the ground is so rocky [exposed rock ledges, etc.], and there are mucho trees in the line of sight.
    Forget all that. Also, I do not have to use my phone line to upload as HughesNet has upgraded it's service, but it is slower than download on the HughesNet disk. I've got the disk installed and it works much better that the dialup so I'll stick with it.
    Next problem: I want a simple wifi LAN in my home. There are no buildings within 250 meter to steal my signal, but never set up such a LAN before. Sooooo

    I'm putting a simple wireless router on the Sat modem and my laptop is already wireless adapted. Now for the two desk tops. One is no big deal. It is a Dell with WinXP SP2 which is Ethernet connected to a Netgear Wireless switch that supports 4 computers and two printers. BUT, the second desktop is an old emachine with Win98 and only 128 Meg of RAM. It works fine for my wife's word processing needs but I want it to get the Sat signal also so she can cruise the net. I can't seem to get it to recognize the Netgear switch even though it has an Ethernet connector, NOR will it recognize my 2 gig USB flash drive [even though it has a few USB ports] which has worked fine to set up the network in the other two computers.
    Any ideas?
    Second 'problem', I want to enable my Skype account on my two land line phones through the HughesNet. Can't quite figure that one out with out spending mucho $$$ on stand alone equipment. ??? Thanks for any leads, but forget about ditches and 500 meter conduits.

  250. Re:Novaroam stuff works well (900Mhz no license ba by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

    So expensive as hell, and I bet not much bandwidth at 900Mhz, either. (Eg maybe 11Mbps) Lots of companies selling old 'expensive' solutions in this market, apparently. They dont want to admit that technology has bypassed them. Kinda like trying to sell 'business class' 300baud acoustic modems for $1000 each after everyone had 28.8's.

    I've got a pair of Netgear WNHDE111's doing 40M+ at about 800 ft, with only 'mostly' LOS. They might do 500m if there was 100% clear LOS. Oh, and they only cost $250 for a pair, not 2 grand each.