This time - and it's probably a fluke - Joe_Dragon is right. Can is a transitive verb. As in "We've got a bumper pea harvest, I think I'll can some". And it's short for shitcan, which means to dismiss or dispose of something or someone.
And do you think someone should get a prize for inventing rounded corners or doing something that already existed - but on teh interwebses? Because if there was one, it would be shitcocks like them who win it.
It turns out that the child safety covers can be turned upside down and inserted with just the earth pin to expose the other pins quite easily
I've never seen one where that would be possible. The earth hole is too far from the edge so the other two prongs would hit the plate and stop it going even half way in.
Admission of new countries requires unanimity. Many other things don't..
Also, assuming Spain is desperate for something which can be vetoed that could only be exercised by an existing member. Why would they? What the fuck do you think France or Italy could gain by doing so?
I sometimes wonder if you could even point to Europe on a map.
"The US will give credit for foreign taxes paid, however, they will only give credit against income up to the amount of taxes you would pay for US tax purposes."
While I'm sure it's more complicated than that (especially if you have income from property and stuff), it looks like you pay UK tax if that's higher. If UK tax was lower the US would tax you the difference.
If there are a sufficient number of individuals among 'The People' who share a common opinion/view that the SCOTUS is getting it wrong and should be abolished, they can amend the Constitution and disband the SCOTUS.
Oh come on. They've done that three times this week already.
Slashdot Mirror
Check on the bottom. I lost one so it could be mine.
You're only considering half[1] of the range, but even then I think your performance ratio is low.
[1] Yeah, I know what mean, median, mode & skew are.
This time - and it's probably a fluke - Joe_Dragon is right. Can is a transitive verb. As in "We've got a bumper pea harvest, I think I'll can some". And it's short for shitcan, which means to dismiss or dispose of something or someone.
Which is a pity, because you'd like totally want to.
Misleading settings are bad - period. A thing should say what it does and do what it says.
The submitter, or maybe the editors.
The word doesn't appear in the linked foxbusiness.com article.
If the other treatment was already available they'd be using it, wouldn't they?
So you're looking at where notGoodDrug comes out the week before excellentDrug drug. Bit of an edge case.
It does? So tell us what it means, then. Write it out in full, no contractions - and no adding other words.
Because technology is a vague and nebulous term.
And do you think someone should get a prize for inventing rounded corners or doing something that already existed - but on teh interwebses? Because if there was one, it would be shitcocks like them who win it.
I thought the big banks and management consultancies already did that for years.
It's exactly the same principle, stop being a cunt.
Nobody is.
They're recruiting a lot of people. Is that really disruption? I thought that meant doing something radically different and new.
Several? A few old ones. Others might if you enable developer mode, slaughter a goat and pass three consecutive Dex rolls.
They'd do it while what? While you were sleeping? While Rome burns? While I was going over the far-famed Kerry mountains?
I've never seen one where that would be possible. The earth hole is too far from the edge so the other two prongs would hit the plate and stop it going even half way in.
Not my interpretation, but there you go.
You can get an exemption on the first 100k. Hardly low wage.
https://www.taxesforexpats.com...
But we can send all the Polacks and Roma home. We'll bring Indians in instead, that'll stick it to the Frogs and Krauts!
Admission of new countries requires unanimity. Many other things don't..
Also, assuming Spain is desperate for something which can be vetoed that could only be exercised by an existing member. Why would they? What the fuck do you think France or Italy could gain by doing so?
I sometimes wonder if you could even point to Europe on a map.
The EU doesn't levy any taxes. Fail.
You sure about that?
http://www.ustaxfs.com/individ...
"The US will give credit for foreign taxes paid, however, they will only give credit against income up to the amount of taxes you would pay for US tax purposes."
While I'm sure it's more complicated than that (especially if you have income from property and stuff), it looks like you pay UK tax if that's higher. If UK tax was lower the US would tax you the difference.
I suspect it's the same for most other countries.
Could it possibly be because tO is taking the piss out of all that crap, rather than forcing it down our throats for real?
Oh come on. They've done that three times this week already.
Oh wait, they haven't. Ever.
It's not like that. It's more like this: I can speak all I like, but not if I'm wearing a paper bag over my head.
Get a proper computer instead of a fashion accessory, you feckless nonces.
"It just works", ROFLMA.