Slashdot Mirror
Google Unveils Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL With No Headphone Jack (venturebeat.com)
From a report: Google product chief Mario Queiroz today unveiled two new Android 8.1 Oreo smartphones at the company's annual hardware event: the Pixel 2 and the Pixel 2 XL. The smaller Pixel 2 sports a 5-inch, 1080p display, with a 16:9 aspect ratio that was until this year the standard on Android flagships. The larger Pixel 2 XL, meanwhile, has a 6-inch, QHD+ display in an 18:9 aspect ratio, in line with 2017's flagship smartphones. The Pixel 2 thus still has a large bezel while the Pixel XL 2 has a noticeably reduced bezel profile, although certainly not the smallest we've seen. As always, smartphone size also dictates battery capacity: 2700 mAh for the Pixel 2 and 3520 mAh for the Pixel 2 XL. Here's the rundown: Snapdragon 835 chipset, 4GB of RAM, either 64GB or 128GB of storage, an 8-megapixel front-facing camera, a 12-megapixel rear camera, front stereo speakers, a fingerprint scanner on the back, a USB-C port on the bottom, and no headphone jack. "Use your existing analog headphones with the included adapter," Queiroz said. [...] The HTC-manufactured Pixel 2 will be available in Just Black, Clearly White, and Kinda Blue on October 19. The LG-manufactured Pixel 2 XL will ship in Just Black and Black & White on November 15. The Pixel 2 will be available for $649 (64GB) and $749 (128GB) while the Pixel 2 XL will come in $849 (64GB) and $949 (128GB) flavors.
Fi-licia.
"You dont need SD cards, put it all in the cloud! Oh by the way, data is $10/GB"
Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
I didn't want to listen to reliably music anyways.
Go on. Do the opposite of what you did when Apple decided to leave out the headphone jack.
Do they have an ugly notch at the top of the screen as well?
#DeleteChrome
In the beginning I really thought I would be bothered by the next gen Pixel not having a headphone jack, but all my connected devices are bluetooth (Bose and Jabbra). I currently own the Pixel XL and I haven't used the headphone jack once since i picked it up.
Google, please, we need AFFORDABLE Android phones! And by "affordable" we don't mean trashy third-world shit phones, either.
All we want is the next generation of what the Nexus 4 and Nexus 5 phones were. Give us reasonably sized phones that have reasonably good displays and reasonably good performance with reasonably good cameras and with reasonably good quality at a reasonably good price.
We don't need top-end everything, but nor do we want bottom-end shit, either. Give us a good middle-of-the-road phone.
It's not even really about finding the money. Many of us can come up with $700 without any problem. The problem is that we don't want to drop that much money on a top-end phone. We'd rather spend $300 to $400, and get something in the middle. The problem is that we don't find anything like that these days, when in the past we did with the Nexus 4 and Nexus 5 phones.
It's dumb to pay $700 or even $1000 for a phone that can be so easily damaged or lost, or worse, become artificially "obsolete" after only 3 years.
Google, give us something like the Nexus 4 and the Nexus 5 were!
I didn't want to listen to reliably music anyways.
Like Apple, wired is still an option with Google using an included adapter.
3 point 5 mm jacks sold separately at participating stores. Must be 18 or older.
Two tone Municipal Blue and black? It's like they gave up and let a committee design it.
Oh, and good job missing a huge opportunity with the headphone jack; they could have stood out as consumer friendly, but instead they've just perpetuated the iPhone-wannabe aspect.
Decline is the accumulation of many small failures. Google exhibits this more with each day.
Music while working in the garage, plug into the stereo.
Music on the train, plug in the cheap headphones that never need an adaptor, or a charge.
Break my headphones on the road, pick up a cheap replacement set anywhere.
Nope, I am not ready to give up the headphone jack for something worse.
First law of people: People are generally stupid.
Don't regret buying a Note 8 based on those stats.
Given that the original Pixel is absolutely horrible at playing back music via Bluetooth I'd call this a pretty ballsy move. Google doesn't appear to have any idea how to fix the problem on the Pixel either. Mine will start skipping during music so bad you'd think I was listening to a CD player in 1994 going down a gravel road.
Use your existing analog headphones with the included adapter ...
Which is a separate Bluetooth-enabled feature phone, with a headphone jack.
It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
I know what phones I won't be buying
They already exist. In fact, I don't know why the marketing department decide to sell it as "killing off the 3.5 mm jack" when "the jack is moving to a common accessory" would have prevented most complaints/arguments.
For a device that starts at $600+, I expect a minimum of 6GB RAM. You get 4GB in devices in the $200 ballpark. Plus, these Pixel phones do not take SD cards. Thanks but, no, thanks.
The lack of a headphone jack gets all the attention. I think Google left off the headphone jack as a distraction. The real story is that Clips camera. It decides when to take pictures of what is "interesting"? How is that done? Does everything potentially interesting get streamed to the mother ship so that Google's algorithm can determine if it is "interesting" or not? And what exactly is the definition of "interesting"?
Maybe Google has two different "interesting" filters. One that the consumer sees the results of. And one that Google privately keeps the results of.
But not to worry. It's all okay. Google says it's not evil. And you can trust Google to tell you the truth. Because Google is not evil. I know Google is not evil because Google says so. And I can trust Google's statement because Google is not evil.
I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
...Even with a 10ft pole.
And that because of one reason: The lack of that 3.5mm headphone jack.
and $15-$20/meg roaming!
Even my flip phone had a screen with more than 2 pixels. I don't care if they are XL sized pixels. You can;t even write an ascii charcter with that. let me know when they reach VGA quality
Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
Google unveils $159 Pixel Buds, its answer to Apple AirPods
How did I already know that?
They'd have to include a sleeve that includes the jack in a more proper place, or sell it at nominal cost.
"Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
So there's a bit of background first.
Have you noticed that Apple has stopped trying to remove all of the Google related things from them? Apple made their version of a map app, started poorly but got better and ultimately didn't matter. Google was and remains so far ahead that catching up isn't feasible w/o expending a supreme amount of resources. It didn't matter what Apple tried. Unverifying the app only alienated their customer base. Dropping it from the store only saw articles on how to sideload it proliferate. And making it run poorly in the native web browser saw Chrome for iOS get downloaded more. Apple lost that battle.
This resulted in a shift of strategy for Android. No longer did Google need it to run everywhere in order for people to get a taste, it now needed to run well. At first, Google tried to get manufacturers on board with this plan. High-end, premium experience phones were pushed. However, Google ran face first into the carrier profit centers, something the handset makers were already well aligned with. Google could care less how often you switch and I would guess they'd rather you'd keep the same phone for several years since it makes it all the easier to track and data-mine you. But the carriers and handset makers are not Google. Not yet, anyways.
So instead of backing off, Google went whole hog. As a company they only want the best experience for much the same reason as Apple does. It makes them look good. It makes people want to stick around.
Having a mid-price phone is the choice of people without the same sort of brand loyalty they're looking to groom. Yes, groom is the correct term here. Right now, Google is all about creating a digital monopoly. To get there, they need people to stick with them and keep sticking with them well past the point it makes sense to.
If you're looking for options, look elsewhere. The smartphones are heading for stagnation.
Apple is going to make money on forced accessories, what on fucking planet earth is motivation for google????
... make one that magnetically docks onto the phone (ergonomically, not like the Apple Pencil shit that sticks out of the device by several inches), and which charges whenever the phone itself is being charged so that I never have to worry about charging the earpiece separately.
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
Anyone try to listen to Bluetooth headphones in a crowded place?
My BT headphones will start chopping sometimes in subway or at crowded intersections. I'm assuming the airwaves will get more and more saturated as adoption increases.
Must be nice in spacious region of Silicon Valley, but us urbanites will be first to actually suffer.
Sorry, but Apple Maps is superior to Google Maps now, and has been for a while. I'm curious in what way you consider it to be way beyond what Apple offers...
Apple Maps is more readable, and still give better directions (though Google has tried to keep up there).
The only area Google still leads in is Street View, but that's not as necessary as good directions.
However you are right that Apple is still working happily with Google in some areas still - especially search.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
How original of them. I see they have AirPods, er, *Google* pods, now too. They are a sad, sad excuse for a technology company. :/
Apple leads the world in defective-by-design crippled devices! The iPhone XI, (or the X+, or the XX, or the XXX or whatever stupid, confusing name they'll give the iPhone after the X) or iPhone Phone Edition, maybe, will surely also have some other important feature removed...
I'm guessing for the next generation of iPhone, it will be so slim you'll be able to put it in your wallet, which will be a good place to keep it since it won't have A DISPLAY!
Instead, Apple will sell Bluetooth displays that LINK to your iPhone much the way their stupid, overpriced earIpods or whatever, do today. When asked why they would do something so colossally stupid, the dick in charge will say, "Resilience" or give some other inappropriate, and equally idiotic response.
Or maybe he'll say, "Courage +." Or maybe "Courage ][." Or perhaps "Courage //e"
And the display shall be unveiled and hailed as a giant leap forward in design bravery, they'll call it "iDisplay."
That's right... they'll split what used to be a single iPhone, like the venerable old 5S, into a bunch of easy to lose parts that all need to be charged separately, and will only be SOLD separately; the iPhone will fit it your wallet, the screen COULD but you'll carry that part around in your hip pocket, or perhaps have it strapped to your wrist... (OHHHH...! maybe the iWatch in the future will act as the iPhone's SCREEN!) and be able to interface with IT without needing the rest of the phone, allowing IT to be even THINNER... the screen will have its own battery, of course, and to charge all these things, they'll sell a little Apple Charge Tower or something, which will have SLOTS to insert all your now wirelessly charging (but of course, they'll only charge fully or quickly on Apple's proprietary charger which will use Apple's soon-to-be-patented Pentalobe iMagnetism to convey iEnergy, naturally,) and will look like one of those Aluminum Wallets they tried to sell on TV that basically looked like a fat version of a makeup compact, but held all your 50 credit cards which is funny since most people don't HAVE 50 different cards... but anyway.
So why I'm talking about Apple and their assholeism in an article about Google? Because...
Google. Will. Follow. SUIT!
Google is going to pull the same basic shit. Watch.
Does it make sense to buy the Pixel 1 XL 128GB now that it has come down in price? It still comes with the headphone jack and Google's OS updates. The Pixel 2's lack of headphone jack is a no-go for me. The USB-C headphone adapter is too fragile. Hunting for good sounding Bluetooth earbuds is unappealing to me (plus expensive, plus the battery charging and relatively quick failure..).
My current Nexus phone is starting crack a little and such, and I was just thinking whether I should get a new one (A pixel) or something else.
The lack of headphone jack has made that really an easy decision for me, no pixel for me.
What I don't get is the emphasis on the Google Assistant. Always available, even when the phone is locked.
Does anyone care? I have never heard anyone using it. It's one of the first things I disable. Why is this supposed to be a feature?
Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
As I've said before, it did take Courage take take on all the initial Nerd Rage generated by removing an ancient obsolete port that the Nerd Hipsters all love and want to keep forever.
Even when we are beings of pure energy they will manifest a physical ear and one audio jack specifically so they can use a wired headset and feel superior.
It has nothing to do with "nerd rage" and everything to do with usability. I have multiple pairs of headphones that I often use (work, office, bedroom, etc), plus I regularly plug my phone into various line-level inputs. The lack of a 1/8" jack means I would either have to 1) always carry a dongle around with my phone or 2) keep a dongle with every device I *might* connect to.
Audio exists outside the realm of cell phones, and analog audio isn't going anywhere. Removal of built-in analog out on phones is a definite hindrance.
Apple Maps is entirely useless. The map data they have is old and incomplete.
So does Google Maps depending on where you are.
There is no way to submit updated information for this, so the bad maps just persist.
Totally false, you can submit feedback about a location to Apple through Apple Maps. But unlike Google, they actually fix issues - usually within a few days, for the errors I have reported to date. I never ever heard from Google and errors never got fixed so I stopped submitting corrections.
Apple only just (last month!) added lane data to their maps. So far the only times I've triggered it, it was wrong. The majority of times it just doesn't display any lane data whatsoever.
Not sure where you live but I seem to remember having lane data for some time, and I've driven across much of the U.S.
Google Maps remains the gold standard for phone-based maps. Period.
I have it loaded on my iPhone but since Apple Maps has been better in every case I've tried, I just keep using it. "Gold standard", I do not think that term means what you think it does.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Traded in my Nexus 6P (busted, on Fi) for the Motorola X4 because..... IT HAS A HEADPHONE JACK. That literally decided my purchase over the Pixel. DO YOU HEAR ME GOOGLE!
It has nothing to do with "nerd rage" and everything to do with usability. I have multiple pairs of headphones that I often use
All of which can use a simple, and included (or extremely cheap), adaptor...
But fuck the fact that the problem is not actually a problem at all with ten seconds of effort because you have a use case that does not apply to 99.9999999999999999999999999999999% of the population and despite having multiple expensive headphones cannot spare $10 for several adaptors - time for NERD RAGE!!!!
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Seems like you don't know who the nerd hipsters are, or you're just disingenuously projecting. Perhaps you've been called one too much for being too willing to accept whatever your tech fashion overlords dictate? If the former, here's a clue: nerd hipsters are the ones who will not hesitate to throw out what still works because the next version is out, and will spend hundreds on a record player that only has USB-C out because they are "cool" right now.
People want a headphone jack because their headphones and PC speakers, which they like and which still work, can connect to their PC, their music player, other mobile devices, their car (AUX IN) and everything else with speakers. Furthermore, almost none of said speaker-having things have a USB-C port at all. Replacing everything to suit one new thing is grossly impractical. A complacent "dongle here dongle there" attitude quickly turns into needing to bring a bag around for everything which is also grossly impractical. USB-C ain't so universal.
Even when every type of device has a USB-C port and not a headphone jack, suddenly every old pair of headphones is relegated to the landfill or requires the production of even more unnecessary and otherwise useless dongles which would double what gets added to landfills later.
Then you have the unpleasant DRM/"smart" aspect of USB-C which definitely won't be used against the public when head office/government decides pirated or politically unpleasant content just won't play.
And lastly you have the problem of it being the only port on the device, meaning you can't multi-task without yet another dongle.
I don't know why I'm bothering to reply though. Morons refuse to listen to reason.
They already exist. In fact, I don't know why the marketing department decide to sell it as "killing off the 3.5 mm jack" when "the jack is moving to a common accessory" would have prevented most complaints/arguments.
If there were two usb-c/lightening ports, then that would be almost fine.
But there's only one. So as with the iPhone, if you want to charge and listen at the same time with the accessories available the last time I went into an Apple store, you need two accessories. A port doubler (two lightenings in the case of apple) and a 3.5 jack adaptor. This is a major mess compared to what went before which was one port for charging and a jack for listening. I have yet to see a usb-c 3.5 jack+charging adaptor in any store.
So I have a decent job, I can afford whatever phone I want and I travel on planes. I've already hit the dongle hell on my last transatlantic trip with an iPhone7+. The headphone jack has become a buy/no-buy issue for me through direct experience of living without one.
Any change in marketing verbiage wouldn't alter this.
I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
... I'll definitely not be buying another Google phone, Pixel or otherwise. The Nexus 4 was working great, no problems at all then out of the blue it just died. I tried reflashing it, factory resetting it, to no avail. I treated the phone well, then 1.75 years into its lifespan, game over.
I replaced this phone with a 6P, which was a really good phone until it started boot looping about 3 weeks ago. Same thing as the 4, I had no issues or warning it was on its way out, then it got stuck it boot loop land after I reset it. I cannot do a factory reset and Google (who I bought the phone from directly) told me to contact Huawei. Yeah, that isn't going to happen as I've heard they will more than likely tell you to piss off or blame Google, from what I've read in forums. This one died after about a year and 10 months of ownership.
I treat my phones very well, both are still in great shape but apparently that isn't good enough to keep a Google branded phone from "expiring" less than two years after owning one. YMMV of course, but my recommendation is to stay far away from Google phones unless you want to buy a new phone in less than 2 years.
better camera? I haven't used the cameras on my moto G in a year. People running about taking selfies is kind of weird. I use the camera to gather data then come home and do price comparisons. ... wow that is a game changer; not. It is bad enough I can't stop Amazon music downloading pictures, now I got a second product that wants to do it too.
No head jack, I use bluetooth and the wasting my of bandwidth and cell time to identify the song playing, all the time
There is nothing in the Pixel that is making me buy one; hell offered one I'd say no thank you. It looks like Google just reinvent a Microsoft Phone.
Well, that's two more phones on my list of phones that I refuse to buy.
I fucking hate dongles and adapters. I use my phone for music like 50x more often than I use it for phone calls. In fact, get rid of the phone calling, I just want an LTE-enabled computer/media player.
All of which can use a simple, and included (or extremely cheap), adaptor...
Easy enough if you only ever connect to one device. Not so easy if you connect to multiple devices, especially when they aren't yours, at your home, etc. In such cases, buying a dongle for each device is not only not feasible, it's impossible. Which leads back to carrying a dongle everywhere.
That dongles for Apple and Android devices are not interchangeable only adds to the problem.
I still prefer not to have to charge my damn headphones when I want to use them.
I'll be absolutely thrilled to see the headphone jack go when there's a better alternative to it. The problem is that right now, there isn't.
when "the jack is moving to a common accessory" would have prevented most complaints/arguments.
Maybe it would, but in my view, this is the same as "killing off the headphone jack". I don't use a case, and don't want a case. I think even a dongle would be less objectionable than being forced to use a case.
Why does any sort of physical contact have to be part of the equation? Wireless charging has been a thing for several years at this point.
There have been technologies which charge bluetooth devices wirelessly from several feet away demonstrated at CES in 2015.
There are even people working on AA batteries which charge wirelessly.
Even Apple is on the wireless charging bandwagon, including their AirPods which charge wirelessly.
-- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
Apple's Maps is far better on an iPhone just for the iPhone integration alone.
And there you go, you just gave up the truth: Apple Maps is only "better" because they block other mapping software from integrating with the system. If Google Maps could do the same tight integration with the rest of the OS that Apple lets Apple Maps do, it would blow Apple Maps out of the water.
But it can't, not due to any true technical limitation, but rather because Apple actively forbids it from doing so. If we lived in a world where antitrust laws mattered, iOS would be illegal.
The lack of a 1/8" jack means I would either have to 1) always carry a dongle around with my phone or 2) keep a dongle with every device I *might* connect to.
Or option 3 (which can be mixed with options 1 and 2): switch to wireless. All of the stereos in my house have Chromecast Audio devices connected to them. That cost a few bucks, but it's very nice. Not only can I play music on any one of them, I have also set up a few different groups of devices. And I can do it without having to plug or unplug anything, in fact I usually do it just with my voice, without even bothering to pick up my phone. "OK Google, play <artist / album/ genre / song / whatever> on home group" starts playing throughout the entire house.
I normally use bluetooth headphones anwyay, so that's no big deal. I have one set of high-end Sennheiser over-the-ear headphones that uses the 3.5mm jack, and I also use the audio jack in my car (my truck has BT), so I'll probably buy a pair of dongles to attach to those.
Note that I'm not saying this is the right solution for everyone. The Chromecast Audio costs $35 from Google, $27 from Wal-mart, so buying a half dozen of them costs a little money. And lots of BT audio devices suck (BT audio does not inherently suck, BTW, it depends on the codecs used, which are negotiated between phone and headphone/speaker/whatever). But you can get good ones.
Note that I've been using a Pixel 2 XL as my daily driver (I work for Google, on Android) for about three months now, so I've been dealing with the reality of this problem. It hasn't actually been much of a problem. I already had the Chromecasts.
I'd say that if you're going to buy one of these phones, you're already looking at spending $700-$900 on the device, so you should just plan on spending another hundred or so on the "audio problem". Add that to the purchase price when you decide whether to buy.
Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
Either a device has an audio jack, or it does not... how many variants of adapters are you talking about here realistically??????????
At this point you are looking at an adaptor for your phone, and then you can unplug the adaptor to use it with other devices.
Also I find it amusing you claim "OH I have headphones at various fixed locations so I cannot be bothered to transport an adaptor around all over" then in the next breath claim you need a single pair of headphones to work everywhere you go. Problem is still easily solved either way by simply one-time application of adaptors.
The problem ALREADY EXISTED in anyway for things like large stereo jacks so the iPhone (and now other devices) are adding nothing new apart from one more adaptor. Suck it up and spend $10 (or $0 if you just need one adaptor) to fix the problem forever.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Now let's see what the "world" will decide about the missing features.
Irrelevant news and morons using moderation to mod down what they disagree on. 2018 resolution: so long.
The magnetic docking would be a nice-to-have for when the earpiece is not being used, but it is conveniently available whenever needed, and by virtue of its physical contact would be less likely to get lost,
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
You're obviously too slow to hear how pixellated your music sounds when it's Chromecast.
Why kill headphone jacks? They worked beautiful, there's a colossal range of existing hardware on the market. Making it wireless means additional power considerations for the wireless headphones. .
This is like saying "Windscreens have been transparent for way too long, so the future is 'opaque'". It gives it a futuristic feel. Yes, you do lose some basic features - but we feel this will be better in the long term. Just cus.
I'd say that if you're going to buy one of these phones, you're already looking at spending $700-$900 on the device, so you should just plan on spending another hundred or so on the "audio problem". Add that to the purchase price when you decide whether to buy.
The additional cost is annoying, but the main issue is still having to deal with adapters where they otherwise wouldn't be necessary. 1/8" plugs and jacks are ubiquitous. Lightning and USB-C, not so much. I use Bluetooth for certain things, but there are applications where it isn't a reasonable solution.
I'd say that if you're going to buy one of these phones, you're already looking at spending $700-$900 on the device, so you should just plan on spending another hundred or so on the "audio problem". Add that to the purchase price when you decide whether to buy.
The additional cost is annoying, but the main issue is still having to deal with adapters where they otherwise wouldn't be necessary. 1/8" plugs and jacks are ubiquitous. Lightning and USB-C, not so much. I use Bluetooth for certain things, but there are applications where it isn't a reasonable solution.
Well, my experience is that it hasn't been a big problem for me. YMMV, of course.
Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
"Use your existing headphones with the included adapter."
Oh. Unless you want to use your existing headphones and charge your phone at the same time. Sorry (not sorry).
Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
No buy
Users gunna be losers and lap it up, while slashdots gunna hate.
These phones will sell like hotcakes to not only loyalists but the general pubs.
They have the data to back it up, obviously.
Progression through regression.
It's the only way to be sure.
6 inch long and they still didn't have space for the audio Jack.
No headphone jack = no purchase
You might be living in a household with another adult and multiple kids. AirPods or EarBuds or whatever are like a $700 investment at this point. Now, if someone needs to listen to stuff on a phone without disturbing others, what are the chances of them being able to find their own headphones or re-pair others to a correct cell phone?
Of course designers of these products have never left the basement and so are not aware of the problems...
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Perhaps you are expecting too much from your smart device?
There has already been the debate about whether the camera is as good as a DLSR (it's not) but either way, your phone camera is good enough for most people. I have a DLSR but I've taken more pictures with my phone cams in the last 5 years than I have in my whole life.
It's the same with audio on the move - sure you can get better quality from 3.5mm but using an adapter is as good for most people and using bluetooth is acceptable for the rest. It might be appreciably better with BT 5.0 (or the same, but not likely worse).
If you use your phone for audio at home you are not much of an audiophile or you haven't invested in the appropriate equipment to which you wish to fling your audio stream.
New technology will always replace old and there will always be that point in time when it is difficult to let go. Now is that time for the 3.5mm socket. In a couple of years time we might be lamenting the demise of the fingerprint sensor over face recognition...
I have an Alcatel with an enabled FM radio chip. The audio jack is used for an antenna, usually provided by the wire on the earbuds/headphones you have plugged in. However I can also use an male-male standard audio cable in the jack as an antenna while directing the audio stream to a Bluetooth speaker.
So the removal of the audio jack removes this radio functionality as well as all of the other uses that have been noted.
Perhaps you are expecting too much from your smart device?
Is expecting that they will perform as well as older models expecting too much?
If you use your phone for audio at home
I don't. I have a real sound system for home use. (And I'm not an audiophile.)
Now is that time for the 3.5mm socket.
Not yet, it's not. Most smartphones still have them, and they will likely be available for a few years yet. If they aren't available when the time comes to replace my phone, and if nobody's come up with a system that can adequately replace the jack, then I'll have to start carrying a separate device for music. It just seems wrong that we'd have to go back to how we we did things a decade ago and start carrying multiple devices.
In a couple of years time we might be lamenting the demise of the fingerprint sensor over face recognition...
I won't, because those features aren't appealing to me in the first place and I don't use them.
A long time ago, I had a Nokia smartphones (E72 and E6) with the following features, that I used alot:
- (minijack) one port for audio / headset / video and audio output depending on accessory
- (microusb) one port for USB host functionality and charging
- (dc) one port for charging
this allowed me to use headset or headphones and listen to songs from USB stick, while charging the phone at the same time...
every other phone since then has had only minijack and microusb for charging...
I want a modern android phone with 2 micro usb plugs, a microhdmi plug and a minijack plug
Yeah! While I hate the loss of the 3.5mm jack, it looks like that is the way of the future and it is not the end of the world since more and more BT headphones are available and quality is getting good (but prices stratospheric). It is still bad for the other types of accessories like card readers and other gadgets that have no BT equivalent. However, I really applaud the front facing stereo speakers because when you have lousy sound like all Apple products (and I know, I have an iPad with beautiful video but terrible sound due to the side facing speakers), there is no fix for it other than yet another accessory.
You were the guy complaining about the end of floppy disks right?
So what? I have a basement full of devices and connectors that aren't compatible with anything anymore, and you don't see me crying about it like a baby. Technology progresses and the world moves on. You'd better get used to it because this is going to keep happening every 5-10 years for the rest of time.
So what? I have a basement full of devices and connectors that aren't compatible with anything anymore, and you don't see me crying about it like a baby. Technology progresses and the world moves on. You'd better get used to it because this is going to keep happening every 5-10 years for the rest of time.
It's not an issue of technology progressing and moving on. Headphones and AUX inputs exist beyond the world of cell phones and aren't going anywhere. 1/8" connectors have been in use for over 60 years, and the larger 1/4" connectors have been in use since the 19th century. There's no technological progression that makes those connectors obsolete.
Wrong, it is objectively BETTER because Apple Maps can get you out of a subway stop through the correct exit (which I used to great effect in NYC), which Google Maps absolutely cannot do. The iPhone integration is nice but that only means it's the default for apps that do not provide Google Maps support, which many do... there's nothing stopping my from using Google Maps on an iPhone just as conveniently as Apple Maps, I use Apple Maps not because of the integration but because after many tries of both pole Maps is simply better in all regards.
By the way to report a road closed or changed or new, you can simply long-press to drop a point of interest anywhere on the map, select "report an issue" at the very bottom of the scroll area, then select "other" to mention the road is closed or changed or new. Not that hard dude.
Possibly Google has improved update speed but I am HIGHLY doubtful, I've updated several things in Apple Maps with good results whereas like I said I had submitted a number of things to Google Maps in the past with zero feedback or changes after days.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley