Work or starve is life putting up barriers. There's no one who made that law. The only way you can avoid starving is to make food, trade for it, beg for it, or steal for it.
Your post reminds me of a joke that used to go round usenet as a response to pie-in-the-sky ideas. It was like a form with a load of reasons why something wouldn't work. The unions won't allow it, the government won't allow it, IBM won't allow it. You ticked the ones that applied.
Slashdot Mirror
Didn't know anybody still used that. Hosers!
Clippy is reborn.
Tell that to Aneurin Bevan.
Unless a robot makes it for you.
The fact that it works better in almost every country that has it (which is pretty much everywhere they have plumbing) is a pretty strong hint.
SHITCOCK!
Maybe he was thinking of this.
https://hywelsbiglog.wordpress...
I know the first time I tasted it I went "Jeeeeesus Christ!!!"
That's a cutting remark!
Perhaps they're being eaten by an Aloxotyl?
CGAT. Started at the age of -9 months.
And the CPUs, lan/wifi cards and so on?
The claim was that cases are as difficult, if not more so, than the electronics. To make, not to scavenge.
As the proverb goes, one lesbian's bug is another transgender's feature.
Of course it is. Say hello to Mrs Merkel for me.
Because it's much easier with Perl.
Yeah, had a Sinclair Spectrum. BASIC comes up as the shell.
Also used BASIC on a RM-380 something at school.
Dabbled with assembler on both, didn't really get very far.
Wasn't it still called Natural Philosophy then - and taught in Latin?
Good advice. Pity you didn't follow it, Lennart.
Me, back on RH 6 or 7, once. That's RH, not RHEL.
It's so long ago I found the answer I needed in an actual paper book.
Make those corners really pointy, just to be on the safe sued^H side.
Everyone who could build a motherboard or CPU at home put their hands up.
[nobody]
And now everyone who could build a case, albeit one that's susceptible to termites.
[me].
Hmm. Are you talking about gedit?
It's called a joke. Possibly inspired by this: http://www.goodreads.com/quote...
Your post reminds me of a joke that used to go round usenet as a response to pie-in-the-sky ideas. It was like a form with a load of reasons why something wouldn't work. The unions won't allow it, the government won't allow it, IBM won't allow it. You ticked the ones that applied.
Damned if I can find the thing now.
I was going to joke that maybe he got a negative reaction because adding emoji support to LaTeX was a bad idea.
But it seems somebody thought it was a good idea.
Human eyes aren't digital cameras, you pillock.