US companies generally don't want to set up shop in some foreign country.
They can just set up a branch office or subsidiary, mainly staffed with locals but with maybe one or two aspiring VPs to keep an eye on them and make sure they don't steal the furniture.
As I understand the proposed law, you CAN bring them in from Bangalore IF you can show you can't hire them in the US... AND you pay them a high enough wage.
That was the old law, it just wasn't enforced. Ever.
Name one quality 'beer' containing wheat, corn or rice?
Logic fail. I never claimed that it was a necessary or sufficient condition to be a quality beer.
However, Hoegaarden Grand Cru. If that tastes sour to you it's because you're a fat ponce.
If you were half as knowledgeable as you pretend to be you'd know that the original point of the law wasn't directly to do with beer at all - it was to ensure some cereals were reserved for bread so the poor wouldn't starve.
Slashdot Mirror
I agree. Recovery my ass.
Are you interpreting the message as "don't drink and drive, or we'll kill one of these disabled people"?
Not yet...
The old joke was that lead lifejackets were 1SO 9000 compliant ... as long as you write down that they're made of lead.
They can just set up a branch office or subsidiary, mainly staffed with locals but with maybe one or two aspiring VPs to keep an eye on them and make sure they don't steal the furniture.
Is it better in that respect than any other respin of Dead Rat 6?
Genuine question, posting this from CentOS.
Or another computer.
You appear to be confusing "what the company requires" with "what some shitcock from marketing wants".
That was the old law, it just wasn't enforced. Ever.
If I have one doubt about that I will revert the same.
You don't keep up with current affairs much, do you?
Don't get your hopes up. Remember the wall?
I doubt King Donald can tell one kind of wetback from another.
Clearly you're very knowledgeable about these matters.
It's not the most widely known language among people likely to be staying at a hotel in Canada though.
That's raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaascalist!!!!!!!!!!
Shouldn't it be Pac-Wumman, Pac-BeingOfWhatEverGenderHeSheOrItIdentifiesWith or something like that?
Why is that relevant? If they can't bluff or bully you into accepting changes they'll con you into it.
Hey, that's unfair. You left out Red Hat.
Logic fail. I never claimed that it was a necessary or sufficient condition to be a quality beer.
However, Hoegaarden Grand Cru. If that tastes sour to you it's because you're a fat ponce.
If you were half as knowledgeable as you pretend to be you'd know that the original point of the law wasn't directly to do with beer at all - it was to ensure some cereals were reserved for bread so the poor wouldn't starve.
Mind your head - shovel coming down.
Fuck, he must be after a continent. Watch it, Australia!
Maybe they're warning shots?
That's-terrible. If-I was-one of-them I-might go-out and-drink ten-beers.
Fuck that. He wants an island to moor it to.
The headline got truncated. There should be " - and nothing else" at the end.
If you don't know you're clearly a total cunt.
Judging by the rest of your post you weren't exactly decrepit when you gave up.