They deserve to fail and die for not only choosing a common word for their name, but also choosing a name that's in common use in something closely related.
Can you propose a mechanism for how that would work?
Funny bit of trivia: there are baking ingredients like certain flavours that, if aersolized into the mouth, will skew that breathalizer test.
These flavours wouldn't happen to be solutions in... alcohol... would they? Do you regularly drive along the road sipping artificial lemon essence?
I noticed that a good defense attorney would be able to defeat such a test easily, by simply questioning the validity of the assumptions about a correlation between the amount of alcohol in someone's breath and the amount of alcohol in his or her blood.
I suspect it's been tried before, and thrown out as utter bollocks. In any case, in sensible place there is a followup blood test.
I'm surprised there was even a breath test. I thought in the US they used "roadside sobriety tests" which means you have to stand on one leg while rubbing your stomach and patting your head.
That's because you're a racist who hates Arabs (or is it the Chinese? -Ed). Anyway, in the spirit of exclusivity you should read equally in all directions.
IQ scores are, because they're normalised (in technical terms "frigged") to do so. The raw scores do not.
So be careful about drawing conclusions on that as if it reflects some underlying reality: so would anything else if the same transformation was applied.
When Feb 29 rolls around the subject will drift to lead seconds, and there'll be wave of whing and ill-informed nuttery from drometards who rolled their own half-assed date/time libraries and don't know what TAI is.
Slashdot Mirror
Protip: use your own hand.
They deserve to fail and die for not only choosing a common word for their name, but also choosing a name that's in common use in something closely related.
In former and possibly future Soviet Russia frosty piss gets YOU
No, you say "I don't bloody know, something's blocking the camera". That something will probably be the butter.
Welcome to the IoaYTGS - Internet of all Your Things Got Stolen.
I'd go for two thin glass doors with a gap between, but I'm a bit strange.
I don't waste any energy by opening the door - I treat it as an opportunity to take a beer out.
I see the nutbags in the Middle East and I think there's no hope for humanity.
I see useless trinkety shite like this and I know it for sure.
Can you propose a mechanism for how that would work?
These flavours wouldn't happen to be solutions in ... alcohol ... would they? Do you regularly drive along the road sipping artificial lemon essence?
I suspect it's been tried before, and thrown out as utter bollocks. In any case, in sensible place there is a followup blood test.
Seriously though. The purchasing power of wages could fall, taking the workers' standard of living with it.
It stands to reason that if adding people to a project makes it later then taking them away makes it earlier.
That's why I is a manijer and you isn't.
Getting behind the wheel is a voluntary act. If you'd bothered to read the link he provided you'd know that.
I'm surprised there was even a breath test. I thought in the US they used "roadside sobriety tests" which means you have to stand on one leg while rubbing your stomach and patting your head.
I can barely do any of those things on its own.
Epileptics are generally considered unfit to drive. But one could still pass the test if he didn't have a fit in the middle of it.
You're always waiting for the other shoe to drop.
That's because you're a racist who hates Arabs (or is it the Chinese? -Ed). Anyway, in the spirit of exclusivity you should read equally in all directions.
It's not supposed to be flexible both ways! That will lead to death panels and compulsory gay marriage to Mexican rapists.
Don't be so quick to judge. He might be wearing a sort of corset thing.
IQ scores are, because they're normalised (in technical terms "frigged") to do so. The raw scores do not.
So be careful about drawing conclusions on that as if it reflects some underlying reality: so would anything else if the same transformation was applied.
One byte, to be interpreted as per ISO/IEC 8859-1.
It was good enough for Homer, Jesus Christ and Shakespeare. So unless you're writing something überspecial It's good enough for you.
If you want to scribble goddam pictures, use a png.
Mr Trump, I think we found one!
Pledge schmedge already. Privacy policies certainly aren't enforcable when a business is taken over, so why would these be?
It looks like they're trying to patent experiments.
You missed the other error. Unfortunately fighting with the submission system is somewhat distracting.
When Feb 29 rolls around the subject will drift to lead seconds, and there'll be wave of whing and ill-informed nuttery from drometards who rolled their own half-assed date/time libraries and don't know what TAI is.