Especially a business where you're effectively a civil servant and the only difference is a baroque mechanism for how you get paid. You don't pay too much taxes - other people's taxes pay you.
You completely fail to offset the job 'losses' you mention with the significant job gains in people needed to manufacture the new technology.
You completely fail to comprehend that if the direct job losses weren't greater than the indirect gains there'd be no cost savings from automation, and therefore it wouldn't happen.
Slashdot Mirror
Q: What's the difference between a comic and a graphic novel?
A: About 20 bucks.
TY,IHAW,TTSP
Well, at least you're original. Most idiots make the mistake the other way round.
Did you read it? It's right there on page 97:
38.a.14.xiii
The Donald gets first dibs.
You know what they say about men with small hands, don't you?
tl;dr version: picking fruit is not hard; monkeys can do it.
Some people love it, others hate it.
Especially a business where you're effectively a civil servant and the only difference is a baroque mechanism for how you get paid. You don't pay too much taxes - other people's taxes pay you.
He didn't use it at all, dumbass. He wrote "per say".
Better not ask the man himself, then.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Clearly you're the expert on all things linguistic.
Yes. Their function is to watch out in case somebody gets some.
By somebody I mean the plebs, of course.
There was this guy in my town who died of thought. He was an electrician and he thought he'd pulled the master fuse out.
From what I heard on the TV they gave them prior warning. They'll have scrubbed anything incriminating by now.
It's not a perfectly normal phrase. A perfectly normal phrase would be "in itself".
People sprinkle foreign phrases around in order to appear intelligent and erudite; he failed because he's neither.
It's one of those things you should do properly or not at all, like skydiving, invading Russia and creating init systems.
Yes they are, though they use words so I can see why you're confused.
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki...
http://kfgo.com/blogs/ask-a-tr...
http://l7.alamy.com/zooms/e889...
You mean your mom's taxes, unless you have one heck of a paper round.
Have you tried walking into Area 51 or a nuclear sub base using the same logic?
You completely fail to comprehend that if the direct job losses weren't greater than the indirect gains there'd be no cost savings from automation, and therefore it wouldn't happen.
Shadow? There's a dragon eating it!
The takeaway: no matter how wrong you think nutters are, they know they're right.
She's old, but I doubt she predates mammals.
Except systemd, of course.
Burn the heretic! Why do hate LBGWT^3 people so much?
Bullshit. I have a copy of FAR/AIM from before mainstream drones were a thing and there's the "inverted wedding cake" of exclusion zones in it.
Not true. A road can be designated as "No through route" or "access only" even if it's physically possible to exit at a different point to the entry.
One, it's not a lense, it's a lens.
Two, it changes shape to focus.
The problem isn't about hands, it's about attention. Yerkes-Dodson, google it.
And Dunning-Krueger, while you're at it.
Not as low as my opinion of your reading comprehension & statistics skills.