Slashdot Mirror


YouTube Kids Has Videos on How Reptilians Rule the World, Moon Landing Was Fake (gizmodo.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: YouTube Kids, the supposedly child-friendly version of YouTube that's been shown to often play host to troves of slop content and disturbing videos, apparently was showing videos from British conspiracy theorist David Icke, a guy who believes reptilian aliens secretly control the world and are responsible for the Holocaust. According to a Saturday report in Business Insider, searching for the term "UFO" on YouTube kids turned up a video purporting "to show a UFO shooting at a chemtrail." The suggested followups for that video featured a number of Icke's clips, including a nearly five-hour lecture on how aliens built the pyramids and secretly run the planet through a ruling class extraterrestrial-human hybrids. The video also delves into a number of other conspiracy theories, including claims Freemasons indulge in human sacrifice and President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by his own government.

According to Business Insider, "Two other conspiracy theory videos by Icke appeared in the related videos, meaning it was easy for children to quickly go from watching relatively innocent videos about toys to conspiracy content." Searching for the term "moon landing" also resulted in a number of conspiratorial videos emerging, including one making the claim that CERN's Large Hadron Collider had opened a portal to another world that an unfortunate employee then vanished in.

258 comments

  1. Demonetization by SmaryJerry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought YouTube had already turned their whole website into YouTube Kids by demonetizing anything for adults.

    1. Re:Demonetization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It may come as a surprise to you, but a 'log' of adults are interested in things besides the progressive-left's neo-marxist propaganda.

    2. Re:Demonetization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It may come as a surprise to OP+1 but demonetizing content makes it cheaper to buy ad space and one can always monetize later

    3. Re: Demonetization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It may come as a surprise to you that they demonetize mostly videos that have nothing to do with politics.

    4. Re:Demonetization by Z00L00K · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Especially the gun related channels - even if most of them are actually pretty informative, like "forgotten weapons".

      Another channel that I do follow is bosnianbill.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    5. Re: Demonetization by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Yes, the videos that I've noticed demonetised the most are music theory educational videos who use a 61 second excerpt of some obscure jazz record from the 50s.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    6. Re:Demonetization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids ain't stupid, we all know that the moon landing was filmed by stanley kubrik in a studio so why pretending it wasn't?

    7. Re:Demonetization by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      That one has been very weird, considering that some advertisers were reporting that they were unable to advertise even through they wanted to.

    8. Re: Demonetization by Lanthanide · · Score: 1

      I believe under US copyright law you can only use up to 2 seconds of any sound clip under fair use.

      This is often held to be 30 seconds but a quick google shows there is no basis in law for 30 seconds. I can't find anything for 2 seconds, but it was on a youtube video by someone mocking copyright law and the concept of fair use and how it's mostly useless. I assume they did the research.

    9. Re:Demonetization by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Funny

      Did YouTube demonetize them or did advertisers ask not to be on gun related channels? The advertisers are the ones driving this. After a serious of scandals they want to protect their brands and are quite conservative.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Demonetization by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      I'd have to guess demonetization or that YouTube's ability for advertisers to pick which channels they want to target are severely lacking. Otherwise you're basically telling me that there aren't any companies that want to advertise to gun owners, which given the number of NRA ads I've seen on YouTube recently seems patently absurd.

      They're really screwing themselves over with it as well as channels are going to start reading some ad copy before videos similar to how many podcasts support themselves financially. Why bother with a YouTube middle man that takes a cut when they'll continue to give away that platform at no cost to the people who upload videos when you can get sponsors to pay your directly? If they wanted to be serious about making money with YouTube they'd be finding a way to get advertisers on every channel, even the idiot neo-nazi ones. Presumably those people are going to need to buy their tiki torches somewhere, so YouTube may as well make a buck. Make it so easy for everyone to get paid just a little bit that no one thinks about skipping out on the YouTube ads and contacting advertisers directly.

    11. Re: Demonetization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe under US copyright law you can only use up to 2 seconds of any sound clip under fair use.

      US copyright law doesn't hard code such things. The real situation is that Youtube has decided to let content makers (mostly content publishers in the case of music) set their own standards on what gets flagged/blocked and Youtube does the searching for them with sound fingerprinting. This was done mostly to avoid the whole hassle of the DMCA and potentially numerous lawsuits. The point, then, is the standards vary greatly and have little to do with copyright law directly. If copyright law were actually being invoked directly, it'd be in a court of law and each youtuber would get to argue that their usage (be it 2 seconds or 2 hours) was fair use. Also, if that were going on Youtube wouldn't be auto-scanning everything, so odds are good the copyright holder wouldn't get involved over 50s jazz music because they wouldn't even realize they own the music or you're posting it.

    12. Re: Demonetization by Falos · · Score: 1

      Messages [1]

      Notice: Your post has been found to match content produced and owned by Lanthanide (4982283).

    13. Re: Demonetization by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Why should it be "fair use" to use some others work for 2 seconds in your own "commercial use"?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    14. Re: Demonetization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite owning at least three advertising agencies, Alphabet has yet to demonstrate that Youtube knows how to apply offline advertising principles.

      Any advertiser saying that sorting through 5,000,000b channels is "too difficult" either does not know their target market, or is lazy

    15. Re: Demonetization by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      First let's take a step back - why should anything be protected by copyright in the first place? The answer is of course that we want to encourage people to create things. All the rules should pretty much follow from there: will this usage impact the incentive to create in some significant way? As an example, creating a video where you compare the beats in two songs, playing a small sample from each song, has zero commercial impact one way or another on the value of the two songs. The creators will continue to create.

      So don't ask, "Why should x be allowed to use x's work?"

      Ask, "Why should our government expend time and money protecting x's work?"

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    16. Re: Demonetization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government does not expend time and money protecting x's work.
      x must search for "their" registered to find infringement. The government does not notify x that their work has been infringed. The government allows x to bring evidence that y has infringed their work and that the instance does not constitute "fair use".

      The government provides a process to x to get paid for their creative work. Copyright infringement cases only allow for "real" damages to be paid out IF x has registered the work. If the work is not registered, then the Lawyers will not take up the case as Federal cases are way too expensive for anything less than 30K USD. There is an current act before congress to have SOME - note the word SOME - cases come into small claims court, which is NOT Federal. As of today - all Copyright cases are heard in Federal Court.

    17. Re: Demonetization by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      The government does not expend time and money protecting x's work.

      They most certainly do - there are criminal as well as civil aspects to copyright law. But even if there were no criminal cases, without the government there would be no such thing as IP at all. We as a society spend a lot of time and money dealing with IP. You can argue cost-benefit, but you can't argue that we don't spend a fortune on it.

      But that's all a tangent - my point was that the GP had it backwards... the person with active government support is the one that needs to justify that support, not the other way around.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    18. Re: Demonetization by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Let's take a step back and get on topic. Clearly YouTube for kids is just a google marketing scam, this is all they care about https://support.google.com/you.... So Google you pack of privacy invasive democracy hacks, who vets you ads to make sure they are kid safe and not harmful, or is it just higher bidder to target a captured audience. I also note zero mention of whether they monitor you children's activity and push specifically targeted manipulative ads at them. Why would anyone trust a for profit known corporate manipulator with this.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    19. Re: Demonetization by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      The government does not expend time and money protecting x's work.

      Unlike the tides and the seasons, laws and legal systems are human constructs. In the USA this involves branches of the government to create and maintain.

    20. Re:Demonetization by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      "Mr. President, we can't allow a fake moon landing gap!"

    21. Re:Demonetization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YouTube demonetises any video that even contains language that they consider to be "bad". How a sound can be bad is anyone's guess, but it's quite childish and xenophobic on YouTube's part.

    22. Re:Demonetization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are advertisers, like hunting equipment stores, that WANT to advertise there. However, while I can get ads for hunting blinds one my anime music videos, I can't get them on the channels discussing guns or hunting itself.

    23. Re:Demonetization by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I'd have to guess demonetization or that YouTube's ability for advertisers to pick which channels they want to target are severely lacking. Otherwise you're basically telling me that there aren't any companies that want to advertise to gun owners, which given the number of NRA ads I've seen on YouTube recently seems patently absurd.

      They're really screwing themselves over with it as well as channels are going to start reading some ad copy before videos similar to how many podcasts support themselves financially. Why bother with a YouTube middle man that takes a cut when they'll continue to give away that platform at no cost to the people who upload videos when you can get sponsors to pay your directly? If they wanted to be serious about making money with YouTube they'd be finding a way to get advertisers on every channel, even the idiot neo-nazi ones. Presumably those people are going to need to buy their tiki torches somewhere, so YouTube may as well make a buck. Make it so easy for everyone to get paid just a little bit that no one thinks about skipping out on the YouTube ads and contacting advertisers directly.

      Well, YouTube probably wouldn't give advertisers a chance to pick which channels they would sponsor, because this would mean everyone else gets demonetized. Unless you have a big channel with lots of followers and is super well known, you're not going to get any money if advertisers simply picked and chose their channels. While YouTube requires a minimum view count of videos first before monetization (to counter a disturbing habit of scammers to upload popular videos to catch an odd click), anyone with a small but decent channel can be monetized, but if your channel doesn't make it big beyond a small group of people, no advertiser will sponsor you directly, so YouTube's general sponsorship can be the only way to get some money out of it.

      And channels DO put ads in their videos. It's really annoying. YouTube I believe doesn't care, because they're not going to make good tools for skipping those ads, so channels that do it to bypass YouTube's monetization scheme have to carefully balance annoying their audience with what is an unskippable ad, as well as basically only being paid once for that video - YouTube does not allow you to edit out the ad and replace it if you get a new sponsor, so if your sponsorship deal goes south, you either have to remove, re-edit, and re-upload as new videos all the old content (and reset all the view counts, break all the video links, etc) or leave the video up with the old sponsor information up until time immemorial. Either way, you're making a ton of work for yourself, having to go out, find a sponsor, get paid, and then worry when that sponsor leaves/gets acquired/goes bankrupt/etc.

      Think about it - the sponsor paid you for 100 videos, then you split from them because you don't like them anymore. Do you really go through and remove those 100 video and re-upload them (losing view counts, comments, and breaking links) or do you grin and bear it, knowing those old videos will be advertising something you no longer support?

      (Videos with no monetization also do not show up as high in the searches, for obvious reasons).

      I say YouTube knows what they're doing, and if you wish to hard-code ads into your video, you're free to do so given viewers cannot easily skip the ads (the unskippable 30 second ad was rated the most annoying), and content producers cannot edit the ad out if things go south, so it's either put up with it, or put up with losing it all.

    24. Re: Demonetization by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      Itâ(TM)s a lot more complicated than that. 2 seconds applies to sampling. However researchers, educators and critics can use arbitrarily larger segments within reason. Musics a complicated case because of the separation between performance vs publishing rights , but a 20-30 second excerpt to analyse chord structure or scale use is permissible for sure

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    25. Re:Demonetization by darth.hunterix · · Score: 1

      It may come as a surprise to you, but experimental archaeology has nothing to do with alt-right, nazis or propaganda... https://www.change.org/p/googl... This time they were forced to reinstate it, but what if they ban all such channels at once next time, and they won't have a chance to rally their supporters?

      --
      What is best in life? Hot water, good dentishtry and shoft lavatory paper.
    26. Re: Demonetization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may come as a surprise to you that the moonlanding was achieved by fake reptilians (they were not reptilians at all, hence they were fake reptilians)

    27. Re:Demonetization by butzwonker · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. Why would demonetization make the videos more suitable for children? AFAIK, it just leads to less clickbait.

    28. Re:Demonetization by butzwonker · · Score: 1

      I think the OP wanted to say (or should have said) is that almost nobody is interested in either propaganda, whether "progressive-left neo marxist" or "alt-right neo-nazi" and that it's totally okay for the vast majority of people on earth when neither progressive-left neo-marxists nor alt-right neo-nazis make money from advertisement on their channel.

      Note that demonetization doesn't mean that the propaganda is removed.

      That being said, I'm personally also fine with remove all this trash. I have watched ISIS videos on Youtube, for instance, but they are not really illuminating or informative in the end. The same for alt-right neo-nazi videos or "progressive-left neo-marxist propaganda". Nothing of value is lost by sending this trash to the digital nirvana where it belongs.

    29. Re: Demonetization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 million billion.

    30. Re: Demonetization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's GOOGLE. Nobody calls it "awfabet", GOOGLE doesn't call it "awfabet", does it say "An alphabet company" on YouTube? No, it doesn't. Stop being a contratian.

    31. Re: Demonetization by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      It may come as a surprise to you that they demonetize mostly videos that have nothing to do with politics.

      Really? Did they take down all the videos where Elsa and Spiderman poop, get drunk, and inject each other with needles...? No. But they have to take down conspiracy theory videos. Just make sure you believe it's "for the children".

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    32. Re: Demonetization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government does not expend time and money protecting x's work.

      x must search for "their" registered to find infringement. The government does not notify x that their work has been infringed. The government allows x to bring evidence that y has infringed their work and that the instance does not constitute "fair use".

      Then could you please explain this? That is exactly what government is used to extend the copyright life time (in the US).

    33. Re: Demonetization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Dimitri, I'm not happy about it either, why do you think I'm calling you."

      "Of course I like to talk to you"

    34. Re: Demonetization by doccus · · Score: 1

      I read your link to the wikipedia page.. I knew that terms had been extended, but reading it literally made me sick. Who needs a hundred years after they die? Who is this protecting, exactly, other than the publishers, but what right do they have to milk all these dead authors for almost a hundred years? The opposition to the 1998 bill would have been enough to sink any other bill, but some poweful bodies must have wanted this passed, and had some cooperating insider member also. Well, looks as tho Sonny was the perfect choice, the record companies and the unsuccessful (IMHO) musician ... "You and me babe.. " surre....)

    35. Re:Demonetization by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      "neo-marxist"?
      as in "Healthcare for Americans shut out of the financial sector profits"?
      This is why they invented 1 D 10 T

    36. Re: Demonetization by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      My governmet is not spending any time or money to protect X's work.

      X has himself to go to court to protect his work or demand compensations ...

      Regarding comparing two songs in a video and only sampling a few seconds: that is completely legal.

      So: no idea what your point is.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    37. Re: Demonetization by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      My governmet

      I don't know what government that is - in the US, there are criminal copyright laws and even an entire government body.

      X has himself to go to court to protect his work or demand compensations ...

      And who pays for these courts? The only reason they have any protection of their work at all is the government. And of course we the people need to spend money on lawyers to make sure everything is above board or to defend ourselves in court - all expenses that would not exist if not for copyright law.

      Regarding comparing two songs in a video and only sampling a few seconds: that is completely legal.

      I never said otherwise. It's an example of fair use.

      So: no idea what your point is.

      You wrote: 'Why should it be "fair use" to use some others work for 2 seconds in your own "commercial use"?'

      I was directly addressing your question. My points are: (a) it's already fair use to use excerpts - you seem to agree now but did not in the post I originally responded to, and (b) it's backwards to ask "why should I be allowed to..." when you should be asking "why shouldn't I be allowed to" as the default state of things is that there is no such thing as IP. Anyone who uses IP to make a living is basically getting a huge-ass subsidy from the government, and like all governmental actions we need to constantly examine whether or not it benefits society.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    38. Re: Demonetization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some poweful bodies must have wanted this passed

      *cough* Disney *cough*

    39. Re: Demonetization by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      And who pays for these courts?
      The one who loses the case.

      Anyone who uses IP to make a living is basically getting a huge-ass subsidy from the government
      So is everyone who owns land and uses it to build a house on top of it to rent it to poor blokes who are to poor to own such lands themselves and live in their own house.

      Or so is everyone who owns some land and farms it and lives from the fruits he farms.

      Or so is everyone who rented some land from the government and has a exploiting/mining license and mines some resources.

      IP rights got introduced a few hundred years ago, when people realized that "stuff in your mind" has/should have the same value as tangible goods. And right so in my opinion.

      Now we have the internet and lots of IP is digital and just because it is more easy to copy you demand less protection?

      At the times of Gutenberg there was at least still real labour involved to copy something ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    40. Re: Demonetization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IP rights got introduced a few hundred years ago, when people realized that "stuff in your mind" has/should have the same value as tangible goods.

      No, it got introduced when people realized making a copy was now relatively easy.

      It used to be you had to laboriously copy a book by hand, but once the printing press became common you could reproduce hundreds or thousands of copies with very little effort.

      It was competition with the original author in producing tangible goods - books - that inspired copyright laws.

    41. Re: Demonetization by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      The one who loses the case.

      Not in the US. The courts are taxpayer funded. Criminal courts are entirely taxpayer funded.

      So is everyone who owns land and uses it to build a house on top of it to rent it to poor blokes who are to poor to own such lands themselves and live in their own house.

      Yes, and those lucky bastards get to pay property tax, which in this country funds all of the roads, schools, and often infrastructure like sewer lines.

      But you are correct in pointing out other beneficiaries of government subsidy - all of those need to be justified. You would never argue "Why should you have a right to hike on valuable mineral lands?" You instead would ask, "Why should we let this company mine this great hiking area?"

      IP rights got introduced a few hundred years ago

      Yes, I'm aware of this. And the reason is an incentive to create, not some moral reasoning.

      Now we have the internet and lots of IP is digital and just because it is more easy to copy you demand less protection?

      I've been demanding less protection for a long time. Lifesaving drugs get less protection than nearly century-old Mickey Mouse short films. You can not provide incentive to a creator who is long dead - copyright durations should look a lot more like patents. But no, I'm not demanding less protection in this particular conversation - I was directly responding to your 2-second clip comment, which you yourself point out is a perfectly legal use. As it should be, since it does nothing to the commercial value of the original work.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    42. Re: Demonetization by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Not in the US. The courts are taxpayer funded. Criminal courts are entirely taxpayer funded.
      A "normal" copyright infringement case, is a civil case.

      Yes, I'm aware of this. And the reason is an incentive to create, not some moral reasoning.
      In your country, not in mine.

      I was directly responding to your 2-second clip comment, which you yourself point out is a perfectly legal use.
      Depends what you do with those 2 seconds. If it a "sample" of a song, and you use it as background rhythm for a new song, then it is an infringement.

      As it should be, since it does nothing to the commercial value of the original work.
      And the "commercial value of the original work" has absolutely nothing to do with the topic.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    43. Re: Demonetization by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      A "normal" copyright infringement case, is a civil case.

      If you'd like to define it as such, sure. I don't know why criminal cases aren't "normal", but I don't want to argue semantics. In any case, the courts are still operated by the government. Maybe your country has a different arrangement... it doesn't really matter whether your government pays or the litigants pay - the central point is that the existence of copyright is not free. Money - lots of money - is spent on IP, so a cost-benefit analysis is appropriate.

      In your country, not in mine.

      If your country is the UK, then the origins of copyright have something to do with the establishment protecting book publishers when the press was invented. Does that really make a difference? The point is that we have copyright not for moral reasons, but because we want a system to reward people to create stuff so that they will create more stuff.

      If it a "sample" of a song, and you use it as background rhythm for a new song, then it is an infringement.

      I'm aware of this. Are we going to redefine fair use in this thread now? The original comment you made was in reply to someone making educational videos about jazz musical theory. I don't think you can make a case that this use impacted the commercial viability of those ancient jazz recordings. If anything they should generate some interest.

      And the "commercial value of the original work" has absolutely nothing to do with the topic.

      It has everything to do with the topic. It's the whole point of copyright.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    44. Re: Demonetization by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      And the "commercial value of the original work" has absolutely nothing to do with the topic.

      It has everything to do with the topic. It's the whole point of copyright.

      No it has not, if you copy my work and redistribute it, it is a cooyright infringement. Regardless if you make money from it or if I lose money by it. Most countries have no 'fair use clauses' anyway.

      In the US you have the idea that copyright exists to give authors an incentive to create more works, beccause that is how it is written in the constitution. In Europe the incentive simply us to protect the work.

      The court costs are irrelevant, you need the courts anyway. I doubt I would pay a noticeable less amount of tax money if we would get rid of copyright (which is only going to happen when we turn away from 'capitalism')

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    45. Re: Demonetization by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      In the US you have the idea that copyright exists to give authors an incentive to create more works, beccause that is how it is written in the constitution. In Europe the incentive simply us to protect the work.

      OK? I'm in the US - that's our justification for copyright.

      The court costs are irrelevant, you need the courts anyway.

      Surely that isn't your real argument? You don't think there are marginal costs associated with adding more cases? More judges, more staff, more courtrooms to handle the caseload?

      noticeable less amount of tax money

      You are very hung up on tax money. Societal cost (in dollars) of a law is more than just tax money. Obamacare, for instance, used tax money - but it also required people to purchase private health insurance with their own dollars. It's a law that costs people thousands of dollars per year, despite not increasing their taxes very much. Copyright (and IP in general) is like that - everyone pays more for everything, and not the trivial amount you are dismissing. A cost-benefit analysis is worth doing with just about any law, so I'm not sure why you are elevating copyright to some religious untouchable status. Even in Europe you are constantly fiddling with it.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    46. Re: Demonetization by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      We actually don't 'fiddle' with it.
      We got forced by the US to implement some thing like the DMCA.
      And Germany had a slight copyright reform strengthening the rights of creators (e.g. mandatory financial compensation if a new way to reuse a work is exploited by the 'labels')
      That basically is it. Besides that the copyright in Germany is basically the same as 150 years ago.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    47. Re: Demonetization by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I think we are down to semantics. It's not static, even if you consider the changes minor. I used the word "fiddle" because I feel it implies minor change. So I think we agree on this point.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  2. Trump will go to prison for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But other things also, to be sure.

  3. Reptilians did the holocaust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    David Icke, a guy who believes reptilian aliens secretly control the world and are responsible for the Holocaust.

    What a moron. Everyone knows the Holocaust didn't happen.

    1. Re:Reptilians did the holocaust? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      So Nazi Germany never happened?

      Are you from Blight Insular 1 by any chance?

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Reptilians did the holocaust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot.

      I personally wish you would stop using the internet and spreading that behavior. Kids could see this shit, grow up a bunch of sensitive panzies who are afraid to say the wrong thing and then next thing you know we have troves of SJWs.

    3. Re: Reptilians did the holocaust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I've been misinformed all this time. Thanks for clearing this up. I always thought it was because the Jews discovered Hitler was a lizard.

    4. Re:Reptilians did the holocaust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Faggots like you can't have kids, lol precious snowflake conservative homos.

    5. Re: Reptilians did the holocaust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure it was Hitler who discovered the Zionist/lizardman conspiracy.

    6. Re:Reptilians did the holocaust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know, in many countries, saying bad things about certain religious figures is also illegal.
      In certain countries, saying bad things about the leader (and/or king depending) is also illegal.

      So, what exactly do you think your point was again? You think 'the internet' should follow the maximum possible interpretation of all laws in all states that it touches?
      Good luck with that.

    7. Re:Reptilians did the holocaust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too soon?

    8. Re:Reptilians did the holocaust? by Z80a · · Score: 1

      Most of the holocaust deniers say that the prisoners died out of hunger rather than being systematically eliminated, due the lack of resources due the war etc..
      But i don't think that makes it any better, as now we have a scenario where the nazi just sat and watched everyone starve to death, instead of just surrendering em to the allies etc..

    9. Re:Reptilians did the holocaust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seriously are comparing dictatorships and other almost-totalitarian regimes to a modern democracy?

      Freedom of speech does not equal the privilege to insult others at will. Those are two fundamental different ways of expression. There is such thing as a mature discussion. Trolling the internet like a bunch of cybercowboys is not mature, even if it is your `right` to do so.

    10. Re:Reptilians did the holocaust? by butchersong · · Score: 1

      I think revisionist is a better label than denier which is something of a pejorative. While it may still be offensive, many of their positions seem to be along the lines of "this building couldn't have been used for a gas chamber". Stuff like that. These are things we should be able to debate in the light of day.

    11. Re:Reptilians did the holocaust? by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You seriously are comparing dictatorships and other almost-totalitarian regimes to a modern democracy?

      Which one is the democracy?

      Freedom of speech does not equal the privilege to insult others at will.

      That's pretty much exactly what the fuck it is. Dumbass. No, really. The first amendment exists because King George didn't like colonists talking smack about him, and used military force to suppress opinions. Maybe you think that political speech is different than calling you a dumbass. That's because you're a dumbass. King Dumbass, in fact..... And I don't quite like the royal decrees you've made concerning what I may or may not say.

      There is such thing as a mature discussion.

      You're new to the Internets, I see.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    12. Re: Reptilians did the holocaust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cut it out.
      Stop crapflooding.

    13. Re:Reptilians did the holocaust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying they deny that building could have been used as a gas chamber. Got it.

    14. Re:Reptilians did the holocaust? by sexconker · · Score: 2

      Freedom of speech does not equal the privilege to insult others at will.

      Yes it does, you fuckstain.

    15. Re:Reptilians did the holocaust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Freedom of speech does not equal the privilege to insult others at will.

      It doesn't equal it, but it includes it. And it's not a privilege, it's a right. You have no right to tell me what I can and can't say, even if you find it insulting.

    16. Re: Reptilians did the holocaust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IKR? But just try adding a simple fact like that to Wikipedia and they scream for a citation. Google it, people!

    17. Re:Reptilians did the holocaust? by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      First amendment protections is just something we use to soothe our denial about the takeover by profit driven institutions of the public square. Your right to speech on the internet is limited to what corporations are willing to tolerate, not what is considered legal under the constitution.

      If you don't like it, feel free to start your own platform, isp, domain registrar, and data exchange. If you manage to get that far, watch out for someone to nail you for 'hate speech' violations, or failing to censor thereof. Good luck.

    18. Re:Reptilians did the holocaust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.

      Historical revisionists have dis-proven the official holocaust story for decades. Not out of hate or "anti-semitism" but out of a desire to find the real truth. In fact, most revisionists approach the holocaust story with the intention of validating it - not disproving it.
       
      The problem is that 1+1 does not equal 6.72 no matter how loud you cry bloody murder.

      And as for it being offensive to question a historical event using logic, reasoning and common sense - well that is just ridiculous.

      What is offensive is being called racist, anti-semitic, nazi, hater, etc. for daring to even question a story as ridiculous and unsubstantiated as the official holocaust story.

      Real education means being able to question everything and validate the facts by using the scientific method.
       
      A modern civilized society should never bow down to a bunch of fanatical zealots who continually shove bullshit in your face and expect you not to be offended by it's foul stench.

  4. Next they will be denying GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's OK.

    1. Re:Next they will be denying GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't deny which does not exist. You can however deny its *existence*.

    2. Re:Next they will be denying GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, yes it should be OK... denying any bald faced lie like that should be the first choice of a thinking people.

  5. The Internet - the meme machine by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the 90's I once heard someone boast that the Internet is the place where religions go to die...

    Little did he know that the Internet is where even more bizarre and unsustainable ideas such as Flat Earth and Lizard rulers go to get new life and willing meme hosts.

    1. Re:The Internet - the meme machine by asavage · · Score: 2

      I also thought in the early 90's the internet could bring enlightenment as everyone in the world would have access human knowledge. Unfortunately in reality people have just sought out like minded individuals.

  6. Some of these YouTube videos are ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a nice sensible documentary:

    Shrek saves children from Auschwitz - a Documentary

  7. And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Santa Claus. Everyone chooses their own lies to tell children. It is a very important aspect of properly raising youth. From an early age it teaches them that everyone will lie to you. After all, studies show most people lie more than they tell the truth.

    1. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh boy, i'm sorry Santa didn't bring you that pedal car you wanted.

    2. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a red rider BB gun that I wanted you insensitive clod.

    3. Re: And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll shoot your eye out.

  8. Reptilians Rule the World? I'd buy that. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    ... Reptilians Rule the World ...

    Have you seen photos of our World Leaders and Corporate Overlords? Many of them probably keep really young spouses hostage so they can leech youth from them while they sleep.

    Of course, like all reptiles, they love their sunshine.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Reptilians Rule the World? I'd buy that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grew up in the Reagan/Thatcher years, so at the time it would have seemed a plausible hypothesis. Now amphibians, maybe?

    2. Re:Reptilians Rule the World? I'd buy that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I agree! Has anyone ever tried to negotiate with an alligator? They ignore your offers and the only counter-offer is biting down hard on you and rapidly spinning. Your body parts come off and they eat you. End of negotiations.

    3. Re:Reptilians Rule the World? I'd buy that. by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      I have seen a picture of Macron's wife, yes.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    4. Re:Reptilians Rule the World? I'd buy that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen photos of our World Leaders and Corporate Overlords? Many of them probably keep really young spouses hostage so they can leech youth from them while they sleep.
      Of course, like all reptiles, they love their sunshine

      Desiccated bodies, no human emotions left, draining the life force of young women, exercising their power and control over massively large hoards of an unthinking fighting force...

      Clearly this describes a lich of some type, much more so than a reptile.

      Plus I saw a youtube video offering pretty convincing evidence the ruling class stores their phylacteries in a secure location at Area 51 to protect their ever lasting souls.

      You should give it a watch, you can easily find it trending on youtube kids!

    5. Re:Reptilians Rule the World? I'd buy that. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      She's old, but I doubt she predates mammals.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  9. That's Icke by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The difference between the "alternative" and conspiracy media in the UK and the US outlets like Infowars is that David Icke actually challenges the prevailing political power structure, where Infowars supports and is used by the prevailing political power structure.

    This is a complete reversal for conspiracy media in the United States. Until very recently, it was always hostile to those in power. Today, it is the tool of those in power.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re: That's Icke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's retarded. I suppose you think the world has only existed for a little over a year then?

    2. Re: That's Icke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lolwhut? Do you think he's talking about Trump for some reason? HAHAHAHAH

    3. Re: That's Icke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disregard the above message I suck cock HAHA

  10. Please don't take these down by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 3, Insightful

    they are very entertaining. The best(worst) are the contrail conspiracies.

    1. Re:Please don't take these down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes quite ridiculous to suggest anyone could do this. Damn conspiracy theorists!

      https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2002/apr/21/uk.medicalscience

    2. Re:Please don't take these down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, this sort of shit is *WHY* we watch youtube. Not because it is has good stuff (it does). But because you have fun watching crazy shit.

      If Google thinks YT should be some bastion of wholesome vetted content that they like they bought the wrong platform. That ship sailed long ago. This is going over as well as when they did that 'real name' crap. That was a minor change in the platform compared to this filtering they are doing. YT will be around in 10 years? Probably. Will the YT user of today recognize it? Probably not so much.

    3. Re: Please don't take these down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey now, those chemtrails are legit. They combat depression by dispensing nitrous oxide, so that people laugh whenever they see/hear about a chemtrails.

      (/j)

    4. Re:Please don't take these down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Please don't take these down by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In 10 years, they may be the only service around anymore. Copyright holders are pushing to overturn the DMCA stuff that lets services not be held responsible for copyright violations as long as they take down such when notified, in a timely manner.

      This helped the Internet and its companies grow explosively in the US. Only the giants will be able to provide anymore if this is repealed.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    6. Re:Please don't take these down by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's a really tricky one because children don't have the mental tools to realize that these videos are outlandish conspiracy theories and not credible. The marketplace of ideas is great but only if the buyers are informed and capable of making good decisions.

      That's why religions put so much emphasis on indoctrinating kids. Try convincing an adult that there is an invisible man pulling all the strings who will torture you for eternity if you don't obey his seemingly arbitrary rules.

      Someone will probably blame the parents, which is valid but also impractical. Like TV, YouTube is probably going to have to be the responsible babysitter.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Please don't take these down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they are very entertaining. The best(worst) are the contrail conspiracies.

      It’s funny until you meet or work with someone who believes in chem trails. Those callers, on late night conspiracy radio programs you laugh at, they ARE out there.

    8. Re:Please don't take these down by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      That is an extremely simplified view.

      When people started to tell me about "christian god" it was clear to me it was a phantasy.

      When Europe (and south america) got Christianized most converts were adults.

      The point is some people think/believe there are super natural beings. And they simply switch from the inferiour one to the superiour one.

      And then again, most kids understand quite perfectly that the cartoon character dropping down into a ravine should be dead instead of plugging a 10 yard deep hole fitting his outer frame.

      No idea about outer space invaders, but for me as a 6 year old it was pretty clear that vampires are only "fictional characters".

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    9. Re: Please don't take these down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is she serious? Is she serious? ...

    10. Re:Please don't take these down by sad_ · · Score: 1

      isn't that right? i mean, maybe this Icke guy is just a joker. who can tell the difference between the onion and real news anymore these days?

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    11. Re:Please don't take these down by butchersong · · Score: 1
      Every culture tells their children stories -indoctrinates them.

      I am not a practicing christian or anything but Christianity has grown more appealing to me with age rather than less. A child might read the bible and take away the simplistic (a little snide) interpretation of hell you outlined... An adult might read it and decide it is a metaphor. Alternatively, if taken as true, they might decide that hell is a separation from god in the afterlife and that sheol or hades is where all spirits used to go but now you have a place in gods house. The existence in sheol then becomes hell only due to the absence of god and all the godly people who are now in heaven. What is left is the horrors other souls and spirits inflict on one another.. something like that like I said I'm not really an expert on Christianity.

    12. Re: Please don't take these down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or your mother-in-law is one.

      I have to leave the house when she visits because after 12 years of marriage I can't be civil when she spouts her bullshit anymore.

    13. Re:Please don't take these down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean all the patents that back it as fact?

    14. Re: Please don't take these down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife believes the moon landing was faked. Yet she is a huge fan of Star Trek TNG. There is a lot of stuff we agree simply not to discuss.

  11. Adam Conover already proved the moon landing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was real.

    At the time, the technology to fake the moon landing didn't even exist.

    That, and can you really ask 300-400,000 employees to keep something secret? No.

    1. Re:Adam Conover already proved the moon landing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      was real.

      Moon Landings: real
      Photographs and video/film from Moon: maybe not all real

      Clue: The USA required propaganda material, and NASA were under particular pressure to 'perform'. With the need for decent quality publicity material, the temptation to 'fudge' said material was strong...Ah fuck it, they couldn't use the film/camera footage they shot on the moon as every other frame had either a saucer or a Selenite on it...

      At the time, the technology to fake the moon landing didn't even exist.

      You forget, Roswell, reverse engineering...

      That, and can you really ask 300-400,000 employees to keep something secret? No.

      Yes, you just tell them to keep quiet or they'll end up 'visiting' the installation under Dulce...

  12. Kids search for term, get videos by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why shouldn't the kids see these videos? It's not like it's porn or bloody murder. So they get to see a kook, and their parents get a lot of questions for a week.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    1. Re:Kids search for term, get videos by Lanthanide · · Score: 1

      Kids are very suggestable. Even if they can identify a lot of it is garbage, there may be some parts that they internalise and later come to believe as the truth, just through distorted memories and "hearing from someone once". Doesn't take much for 1 kid to tell another kid about this "truth", and the 2nd kid believes it and repeats it everywhere.

      Also I doubt a kid is going to watch a 5 hour lecture, but they might watch the first 5 minutes and take whatever is said away.

    2. Re:Kids search for term, get videos by sheramil · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't the kids see these videos?

      Indeed! And someone has to tell the kids about Slenderman. It's better than having them find out the hard way.

    3. Re:Kids search for term, get videos by chihowa · · Score: 2

      So we agree that kids are very suggestible and we (as a society) have come to the conclusion that massive advertising agencies with teams of people that are trained in psychological manipulation can have access to children (for profit), but children can't even be accidentally exposed to crackpots because something might be repeated to another kid.

      Actually, it is't we as a society that have come to this conclusion but Alphabet, the largest advertising company in the world.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    4. Re:Kids search for term, get videos by butchersong · · Score: 1

      So.. who determines what is "wrong think"? Does this mean all christian, jewish, islamic, buddhist and mythological content is out of bounds? Assuming Ike isn't going into sex cults and any of his more adult oriented video content should he really be excluded?

    5. Re:Kids search for term, get videos by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      Ironically, one of the things my son has internalized is that everything is marketing (Thanks, Adam Conover!). Now when he sees somebody who probably doesn't have an agenda, his first instinct is to assume they have a profit motive and are lying. Kind of sad for him to lose that innocence, but good for him to be aware. I wish I had had a little less naivety growing up. Would have saved me a lot of trouble (and money).

  13. Greedy Google by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Google needs to stop being greedy and spend money on staff to vet EVERY video. After all, that service isn't free.

    1. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that you were talking about 400 pounds and I did a double take, that's funny CROFLOL!

      Jesus Christ just when I get bored of the whole creimer soap opera, a fucking loller like that one shows up and makes it all worth it!

    2. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      creimer confuses his Slashdot signature and homepage link with advertisement animated gifs and he changes them several times a day with the help of creimer python script.

      --
      Balena!

    3. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stan Lee will not appear at comic con?

      FTTY - His "management team" cancelled Wizard World in Cleveland and St. Louis, ComicCon Asia in Manila, and now Silicon Valley Comic Con (announcement on Monday).

      P.S., Creimer's Stan Lee videos are taking off this weekend.

      P.P.S., Creimer didn't post his YouTube link on Slashdot. Think about that for a moment.

    4. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Chris, with your missing teeth and speech impediment, it's Stan Wee. Wemembew, youw a 48 year old wirbin!

      "Creimer's Stan Lee videos are taking off this weekend."

      Oh yes, almost 12 views!

      " Creimer didn't post his YouTube link on Slashdot. Think about that for a moment."

      Thanks Chris! You're giving us a break from your lip-munching (what an odd-looking tic, women must be viscerally repulsed by that) spittle-smacking audio, ham-fisted editing, and overly loud background music.

    5. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you heard, Ivan? Slashdot management had IP banned creimer from posting anonymous comments.

    6. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stan Lee will not appear at comic con?

      FTTY - His "management team" cancelled Wizard World in Cleveland and St. Louis, ComicCon Asia in Manila, and now Silicon Valley Comic Con (announcement on Monday).

      Then, why does creimer say "Stan Wee" in creimer's videos?

      I sure hope Team Creimer "management team" cancelled creimer as well...

      P.S., Creimer's Stan Lee videos are taking off this weekend.

      Sure you lunatic, 25+ views sure means that you are on your way to be the next Casey Neistat!

      P.P.S., Creimer didn't post his YouTube link on Slashdot. Think about that for a moment.

      To late for that you digital nuisance. We have sleeping cells active on YouTube, ready to squish you like a bug, you ain't seen nothing yet!

    7. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Slashdot management had IP banned creimer from posting anonymous comments"

      Sure, Chris.... (eyeroll). Your mongoloid crammar is a dead giveaway that we're dealing with Christopher Dale Reimer, Hanes Underwear Stress-Tester.

      So, they "had" banned you, err him, but now they don't? How exactly does that crammar work out? What verb tense are you trying to use? We need a fucking time machine to understand your sentences, Always Chris (AC).

    8. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chris, I see two Stan Lee videos and they total less than a hundred views. That's not really "taking off."

      You shouldn't have announced the banning through one of your sock puppets. If you could also fix your grammar and stop taking your Youtube account seriously, people might actually believe it. Or maybe not?

    9. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you lunatic, 25+ views sure means that you are on your way to be the next Casey Neistat!

      Well, creimy has been to the Moon! See video here:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    10. Re:Greedy Google by iprayfatcashewd · · Score: 0

      Always Clueless!

    11. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you are shit posting with yet another fake account, you revenue stream hogging disgusting fat sexist tube of lard, Christopher Dale Reimer!

      You can be sure I will be watching this fake account too. I know this is you because you told me you were working on your freepass 11 file server and you are so dumb that you can't even masquerade yourself properly.

      Now, I told you I was out of meds last week and you didn't even care to contact me you lazy fucker.

      How many times do I have to express the emergency of the situation??????

      The python click script you wrote for my pheromone revenue stream web site suddenly stopped to work!!!!!!

      You fucking incompetent python script writer!!!

      When it works, I get 4000+ clicks a day on my pheromone revenue stream web site but only 5 or 6 without it!!!!

      Now, it seems like you dont care and that you have abandoned me you heartless fucking pig!

      Bonus:
      Here is a story that creimer told me when convincing me what a hard life he had:

      The tree was him and the tree knot was his butt hole!

      So, his uncle packed his fat ass with lard and with his cock! Not that it makes much of a difference but anyway, there it is!

      Signed:
      Ethell, The girl that used to love you and now hates you, burn in hell where you belong you sexist pig!

    12. Re:Greedy Google by iprayfatcashewd · · Score: 0

      You have shitty math skills. I count 136 views between the two videos. Both videos should have 100+ views each next week.

    13. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck did this fat weasel manage to get that sock pocket's karma up?

      MOD THIS MOTHERFUCKING SHIT-MOTH DOWN!!!!

    14. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you are again posting spamming amazon and youtube affiliate links with yet another fake account, you revenue stream hogging disgusting fat sexist tube of lard, Christopher Dale Reimer!

      You can be sure I will be watching this fake account too. I know this is you because you told me you were working on your freepass 11 file server and you are so dumb that you can't even masquerade yourself properly.

      Now, I told you I was out of meds last week and you didn't even care to contact me you lazy fucker.

      How many times do I have to express the emergency of the situation??????

      The python click script you wrote for my pheromone revenue stream web site suddenly stopped to work!!!!!!

      You fucking incompetent python script writer!!!

      When it works, I get 4000+ clicks a day on my pheromone revenue stream web site but only 5 or 6 without it!!!!

      Now, it seems like you dont care and that you have abandoned me you heartless fucking pig!

      Bonus:
      Here is a story that creimer told me when convincing me what a hard life he had:

      The tree was him and the tree knot was his butt hole!

      So, his uncle packed his fat ass with lard and with his cock! Not that it makes much of a difference but anyway, there it is!

      Signed:
      Ethell, The girl that used to love you and now hates you, burn in hell where you belong you sexist pig!

    15. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of "shitty math", how many hours did you plow into your latest nonsense, and what did you get out of it, Chris?

      What else could you have done with that time instead?

      And most importantly, how much do you weigh now? Did they install a zoo-grade scale at The Grove?

    16. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember when I said you were good for a week and after a few months I'd leave you alone. Your use of sockpuppets pretty much tossed that in the shitcan my friend.

    17. Re:Greedy Google by iprayfatcashewd · · Score: 0

      You're not being trolled by creimer. You're being trolled by Anonymous Cashews and her sockpuppets. So stop being a whiny little bitch and man up, stupid fuck.

    18. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, Chris. You've never been within 35 feet of a living human female. Suddenly a 30 year "girl" who knew you "back in the day" (I guess in the days of you pedo-trolling child parks) and happens to own a home computer older than her is leaping to your defense?

      I'd sooner believe you lost weight, or finished a project ("Unemployable" haiku, publication date postponed indefinitely), or made a video without continuous jump cuts and saliva in the audio.

    19. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you pick up Chris' favorite expressions while he kept you chained in the basement for 10 years?

      Because you sound just like him! Stockholm Syndrome?

    20. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chris, you and I both know you'll never leave this place. It feeds that malignant fungal ego of yours when people pay attention to you.

      You're like a digital woodlouse, or shit-moth. No matter how hard we work to get rid of you, we lift a piece of dead wood and we see your foul soft white belly scurrying around.

      We think we got every last larva and suddenly we see a big, fat shit-moth fluttering around.

    21. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you are trolling with yet another fake account, you revenue stream hogging disgusting fat sexist tube of lard, Christopher Dale Reimer!

      You can be sure I will be watching this fake account too. I know this is you because you told me you were working on your freepass 11 file server and you are so dumb that you can't even masquerade yourself properly.

      Now, I told you I was out of meds last week and you didn't even care to contact me you lazy fucker.

      How many times do I have to express the emergency of the situation??????

      The python click script you wrote for my pheromone revenue stream web site suddenly stopped to work!!!!!!

      You fucking incompetent python script writer!!!

      When it works, I get 4000+ clicks a day on my pheromone revenue stream web site but only 5 or 6 without it!!!!

      Now, it seems like you dont care and that you have abandoned me you heartless fucking pig!

      Bonus:
      Here is a story that creimer told me when convincing me what a hard life he had:

      The tree was him and the tree knot was his butt hole!

      So, his uncle packed his fat ass with lard and with his cock! Not that it makes much of a difference but anyway, there it is!

      Signed:
      Ethell, The girl that used to love you and now hates you, burn in hell where you belong you sexist pig!

    22. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you are again trolling with yet another fake account, you revenue stream hogging disgusting fat sexist tube of lard, Christopher Dale Reimer!

      You can be sure I will be watching this fake account too. I know this is you because you told me you were working on your freepass 11 file server and you are so dumb that you can't even masquerade yourself properly.

      Now, I told you I was out of meds last week and you didn't even care to contact me you lazy fucker.

      How many times do I have to express the emergency of the situation??????

      The python click script you wrote for my pheromone revenue stream web site suddenly stopped to work!!!!!!

      You fucking incompetent python script writer!!!

      When it works, I get 4000+ clicks a day on my pheromone revenue stream web site but only 5 or 6 without it!!!!

      Now, it seems like you dont care and that you have abandoned me you heartless fucking pig!

      Bonus:
      Here is a story that creimer told me when convincing me what a hard life he had:

      The tree was him and the tree knot was his butt hole!

      So, his uncle packed his fat ass with lard and with his cock! Not that it makes much of a difference but anyway, there it is!

      Signed:
      Ethell, The girl that used to love you and now hates you, burn in hell where you belong you sexist pig!

    23. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you are again and again, shit posting with yet another fake account, you revenue stream hogging disgusting fat sexist tube of lard, Christopher Dale Reimer!

      You can be sure I will be watching this fake account too. I know this is you because you told me you were working on your freepass 11 file server and you are so dumb that you can't even masquerade yourself properly.

      Now, I told you I was out of meds last week and you didn't even care to contact me you lazy fucker.

      How many times do I have to express the emergency of the situation??????

      The python click script you wrote for my pheromone revenue stream web site suddenly stopped to work!!!!!!

      You fucking incompetent python script writer!!!

      When it works, I get 4000+ clicks a day on my pheromone revenue stream web site but only 5 or 6 without it!!!!

      Now, it seems like you dont care and that you have abandoned me you heartless fucking pig!

      Bonus:
      Here is a story that creimer told me when convincing me what a hard life he had:

      The tree was him and the tree knot was his butt hole!

      So, his uncle packed his fat ass with lard and with his cock! Not that it makes much of a difference but anyway, there it is!

      Signed:
      Ethell, The girl that used to love you and now hates you, burn in hell where you belong you sexist pig!

    24. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is more believable:

      You're still sock-puppeting (you've forgotten to click the "post anonymous" button a few times)

      A 30 year old woman who was raised on antique computer systems and lives across the country has come to Slashdot for no reason other than to involve herself in your pointless AC posting.

    25. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...so you're a 30 year old girl in New York City, and your favorite expression is "you sound bitter, stupid fuck"?

      Strange, I've watched Broad City and never once heard that expression, Chris. You also don't look a thing like Ilana Glazer. You do have larger breasts.

      Maybe you can make a YouTube series called "Broad City" but in your case it's about the size of your office chair?

      CROFLOL!!!

    26. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD THIS MEANINGLESS KARMA WHORING COMMENT DOWN!!!

      Look at the list of unfair behavior sock puppet accounts given for free in GP! He uses his sock puppets more lately because he says slashdot barred AC posts from his IPs. We are close! Barring his IPs completely should be the next logical step!
      https://slashdot.org/comments....
      https://slashdot.org/comments....

      Christopher Dale Reimer, aka cdreimer, aka creimer, aka cashews, is a well-known toxic bachelor and serial digital pest!

      Do not allow this tiresome dullard to copy and paste his own Cryptofeces Reimerium back on here to collect karma points!

      We just went through the whole process of getting him contained at -1 like medical waste in a BFI container.
      Hey creimer!

      creimer confuses his Slashdot signature and homepage link with advertisement animated gifs and he changes them several times a day with the help of his python script.

      --
      Balena!

    27. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD THIS MEANINGLESS KARMA WHORING COMMENT DOWN!!!

      Look at the list of unfair behavior sock puppet accounts given for free in GP! He uses his sock puppets more lately because he says slashdot barred AC posts from his IPs. We are close! Barring his IPs completely should be the next logical step!
      https://slashdot.org/comments....
      https://slashdot.org/comments....

      Christopher Dale Reimer, aka cdreimer, aka creimer, aka cashews, is a well-known toxic bachelor and serial digital pest!

      Do not allow this tiresome dullard to copy and paste his own Cryptofeces Reimerium back on here to collect karma points!

      We just went through the whole process of getting him contained at -1 like medical waste in a BFI container.
      Hey creimer!

      creimer confuses his Slashdot signature and homepage link with advertisement animated gifs and he changes them several times a day with the help of his python script.

      --
      Balena!

    28. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You lying fat fuck!

      MOD THIS MEANINGLESS KARMA WHORING COMMENT DOWN!!!

      Look at the list of unfair behavior sock puppet accounts given for free in GP! He uses his sock puppets more lately because he says slashdot barred AC posts from his IPs. We are close! Barring his IPs completely should be the next logical step!
      https://slashdot.org/comments....
      https://slashdot.org/comments....

      Christopher Dale Reimer, aka cdreimer, aka creimer, aka cashews, is a well-known toxic bachelor and serial digital pest!

      Do not allow this tiresome dullard to copy and paste his own Cryptofeces Reimerium back on here to collect karma points!

      We just went through the whole process of getting him contained at -1 like medical waste in a BFI container.
      Hey creimer!

      creimer confuses his Slashdot signature and homepage link with advertisement animated gifs and he changes them several times a day with the help of his python script.

      --
      Balena!

    29. Re:Greedy Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creimer the Woodloouse hasn't come close to a woman in 48 years... CROFL!!

  14. So what? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    We have "Trump is a Russian Agent" stories 24/7, and people screeching about "millions of people will die" from the sea level going up by an inch over a hundred years. Those are precisely as plausible and responsible as David Ickes lizard people, yet we are intentionally indoctrinating kids about it on a daily basis as a matter of policy

    1. Re:So what? by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Climate change could easily turn parts of the Middle East from dry to a high humidity. The difference is if it's high humidity you can't sweat and die in the shade even if young and healthy. Suddenly vast areas become uninhabitable, and nuclear powers like Pakistan and India are at high risk. No, a bit of ocean rise won't kill people, but turning a nuclear power into a wasteland that then needs to chose between invading other countries or die off, or even just the changing regions that supply food, is almost guaranteed to cause hundreds of thousands or millions of deaths. It could even start a nuclear war. That's why the military has been taking this seriously as a real cause of instability for the last 30 years.

    2. Re:So what? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Even been to Houston in August?

  15. assassinated by his own government. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, that one is true, or just as likely, assassinated by the mob.... Presidents aren't just randomly assassinated by random individuals. This 'lone wolf' conspiracy theory that you people float is no more valid than any of the other conspiracy theories. You have to at least go with what is plausible if you expect to be taken seriously.

    1. Re: assassinated by his own government. by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Presidents aren't just assassinated by random individuals.....except for McKinley, Garfield, Lincoln(can argue that's technically not random,but it was no great conspiracy), and the attempt on Reagan. So yes, Kennedy most likely was just an assassination by a random, crazy indiviual.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re: assassinated by his own government. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Hinkley family are long and true friends of Prescott Bush.

      And dont get me started on the actor Booth... acty act act

    3. Re: assassinated by his own government. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only was Lincoln technically not random, it specifically was the result of a conspiracy. As a matter of fact the conspiracy was suppose to also kill the vice president, but they messed up the times and Johnson was spared.
      Of course what makes Kennedy's assassination so ripe for conspiracy theorists is that fact that his assassin was himself assassinated, by someone with known underworld connections, who also died while his case was still under appeal.
      It looks suspicious and messy so of course people want to make it neat and tidy by creating a conspiracy.

  16. people is stupid, we must save you from videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This idea that childen, people are stupid and we have to protect them is bullshit. The only stupid people are stupid people and you sure as hell ain't gonna stop them from being stupid.

    Let the majority enjoy the idiot videos, they are fun and entertaining, some of them are like a good schlocky b-movie

    1. Re:people is stupid, we must save you from videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We do it with religion, which is just as ludicrous as snake aliens controlling people through chemtrails and chlorinated water, so either take down all the religious content as well or fucking grow a pair and leave it all up.

  17. And everything we see isn't... by gabrieltss · · Score: 0

    And videos on how Liberals want to save us everything they see as evil is a conspiracy? And videos on how conservatives have our best interests in mind on the economy isn't a conspiracy? Holy SHIT! Everything you see in video is a conspiracy theory? Hell even HILLARY was into conspiracy theories - remember "it's a right wing conspiracy!"

    Hell how do we know David Icke isn't right? How do we know Trump is REALLY president and not someone else? Heck even the sun shining is a conspiracy theory! You just THINK it is, but it isn't.

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
    1. Re:And everything we see isn't... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      One gets around this with actual measurements on the quality and length of life.

      It's getting better, and, as long as people are economically free to solve problems, they will be solved faster than they become serious, and conditions will continue to improve.

      The error in the so-called Chicken Little warnings was refusing to recognize this process works, and so well you can make predictions with it on the quality and length of life, price of commodities, and so on.

      Actual measurements.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re: And everything we see isn't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound poorly educated.

      America is SAD.

    3. Re: And everything we see isn't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like you have the #MeToo sheep coming after you.

  18. Exactly as the CIA wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans are cattle: easy distracted stupid herd animals.

  19. Icke = anti-War, pro-Human... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The problem with Icke is that he constantly speads an ANTI-WAR agenda, with well considered pro-Humanist arguments. The exact opposite of team Blair/Clinton/Merkel/Macron etc.

    David Icke is the enemy of all Fabian (named as Ingsoc in Orwell's 1984) organisations, especially the BBC and Guardian newspaper (both of which were at the forefront of pushing Blair's Iraq WMD lies to the planet).

    Icke's books are remarkable when you ignore the 10% of colourful fantasy all such thinkers seem to include. But it is the commonplace tactic of the state to ensure this 10% gets all the attention.

    Meanwhile Google, the owner of Youtube, has purchased all available military robot design and manufacturing facilities, and is busy on a trillion dollar project to design and build the tank drone forces that are commonly refered to as "teminator-style genocide machines". In other words Icke and Google are on exact opposite sides of the moral spectrum- Google being (as it always has been) pure evil.

    On google's 'child friendly' youtube, children are told that Hillary Clinton's holocaust of Libya was a "good thing". Letting you kids access the child-friendly version of youtube is like allowing them to spend time alone with a catholic priest.

  20. Really? by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 5, Informative

    You have underestimated the power of... stupid.

    I know several Flat Earthers and there is no evidence you can supply them to convince them otherwise. They go so far as to Thank Jesus for revealing the Truth to them.

    1. Re:Really? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They could do the same thing the ancient Greeks did to prove the world was round -- observe the shadow of the Earth on the moon during a lunar eclipse is always round. The only object that projects a round shadow regardless of its angle is a ball.

      Then if they like, they could measure the angle of a stick's shadow at noon on the same day, in two places hundreds of miles away, north and south. They will be different angles and you can calculate the size of tbe Earth-as-ball.

      Then, knowing how big the Earth is, they can calculate the size of the moon based on Earth's shadow.

      Then, knowing how big the moon is, they can calculate how far away it is.

      This will catch them all up to the ancient Greeks, who did this hundreds of years before Jesus was born.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They could do the same thing the ancient Greeks did to prove the world was round ...

      Logic and reason are useless against invincible ignorance. Witness buying religions from someone who wrote "the way to get rich is to start a religion" and politics from someone who wrote the art of the deal is to "tell people what they want to hear."

    3. Re:Really? by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 2

      You're making the mistake of assuming they want to discover the truth. What most want to do is rewrite the 'facts' to fit better into their personal world view (which is generally something more spiritual with mankind at the centre of the universe).

    4. Re:Really? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      People tend to "believe" what they "learned" first.

      So if your parents had told you at age of 4 that the earth is flat, you would be convinced, too, that the earth is flat.

      No idea why the question if the earth is flat or not is relevant on /. since a year so much.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:Really? by butchersong · · Score: 1

      Are you very sure you were debating flat earthers and not just accomplished trolls? I'm not entirely convinced there are that many online that actually believe the earth to be flat.

    6. Re:Really? by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      But to what end? I have yet to understand WHY flat-earthers even exist. What could they possibly gain by not even attempting to disprove their own crazy-ass theories? There's no financial motive. There's no power motive. And how did the belief become so deep-seated in the first place? It can't just be stupidity. Do they really know the truth, and it's all a big joke? That would at least make some sense. A humor motive is better than no motive.

    7. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know several Flat Earthers and there is no evidence you can supply them to convince them otherwise.

      Just offer to fly them around the Earth. Let them pick the route.

    8. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They go so far as to Thank Jesus for revealing the Truth to them.

      I'm pretty sure Jesus never said the Earth was flat. They must be referring to "the other Jesus" manifesting as a voice in their head.

    9. Re:Really? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      observe the shadow of the Earth on the moon during a lunar eclipse

      Shadow? There's a dragon eating it!

      The takeaway: no matter how wrong you think nutters are, they know they're right.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:Really? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      I know several Flat Earthers and there is no evidence you can supply them to convince them otherwise.

      I don't know any flat-earthers, but I find it hard that anyone sincerely believes it is true. I think they're just trolls trying to annoy people who get annoyed by such things. That's why you just ignore the trolls instead of feeding them.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    11. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just video call someone in another timezone at sunset and ask that person to go outside.

    12. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have underestimated the power of... stupid.

      I know several Flat Earthers and there is no evidence you can supply them to convince them otherwise. They go so far as to Thank Jesus for revealing the Truth to them.

      I'd be interested to hear what evidence you've tried providing. In my experience, as someone that does not believe in the flat earth theory but knows how to argue it, I've never found someone manage to actually debunk the theory without looking for help online.

      It is true that the Earth is round, but most people simply adopt this belief from those around them. This approach is fine (we can't all be experts at everything) but, if you don't know how to argue for a round Earth over a flat one, you're not in a position to deride Flat Earthers for their views.

    13. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My belief has always been that flat earthers absolutely know the earth is round. It just satisfies some need in them to convince others to waste their time trying to prove the earth is not flat. Often it is the case that those trying to defend the spherical earth actually have no logical basis for their beliefs. The flat earthers are basically laughing at the people who take them seriously.

  21. Silly Human, YouTube's not for kids by newbie_fantod · · Score: 1

    It seems that just mentioning YouTube in a story automatically conjures up a 15 point drop in the average IQ of its commenters.

  22. It might be a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody has to get the tots up to speed on how things are done on the internet. I see it as inoculation instead of indoctrination.

  23. wut? wut? by gDLL · · Score: 1

    >> The difference is if it's high humidity you can't sweat and die in the shade even if young and healthy.
    Erm, you mean like a... jungle? Aka the place where you can grow crops/fruit with great productivity ? So ppl have not been living in jungles for milions of years ? And also ever heard of air conditioning?

    1. Re:wut? wut? by burtosis · · Score: 1

      This is the same humidity as a jungle - which is 85-95 degrees F, but instead is 120F. Death occurs in a matter of hours even in healthy people.

    2. Re:wut? wut? by Lanthanide · · Score: 1

      People living in shacks tend not to have air conditioning. The traditional forms of construction have relied on it being dry heat.

      It's not very sensible to assume that the amenities you find commonplace are the same all over the world in every country.

    3. Re:wut? wut? by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

      When I landed in Qatar it was 117 with 100% humidity. I adjusted to it pretty quickly after the WTF shock. I don't think you know what you're talking about.

    4. Re:wut? wut? by gDLL · · Score: 0

      People living in shacks can dig a sellar and keep cool.

      PS: I don't even use A/C at home. I won't even mention a simple room fan b'cos you're gonna tell me they don't even have electricity.

    5. Re:wut? wut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why I know you are fibbing:

      Avg Humidity is closer to 50% in Quatar.
      100% humidity equals rain, which is rare there.

    6. Re:wut? wut? by burtosis · · Score: 1

      100% humidity dosent mean rain. A sauna can be 120F and 100% humidity. Get locked in one for 6 hours and it can easily be a death sentence.

    7. Re:wut? wut? by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Ok, so you are in your "sellar". Water is low, food is gone. Now what? Lol

  24. No kids in the house by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    But could someone check if there are some good videos of Jesus riding a dinosaur in the kids section?

    I pretty mush only use youtube for (free) movies, music videos and Russian Car Crash videos.

    1. Re:No kids in the house by PeterGM · · Score: 1

      If you're not watching Steve eat a 30 year old MRE then the only person missing out is you my friend.

      Nice.

      --
      There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
    2. Re:No kids in the house by bejiitas_wrath · · Score: 1

      No hiss.

      --
      liberare massarum ex ignorantia, clausa descendit molestie.
    3. Re:No kids in the house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice!

  25. At last! by PeterGM · · Score: 1

    Good to see legitimately educational videos being made easily available to kids online. It's like vaccination: expose them to just enough stupid for them to build up a sufficient tolerance.

    --
    There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
  26. Time Honored Tradition by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Funny

    Instead of removing the conspiracy videos, we need MORE of them.

    Remember the Calvin & Hobbes comics, where the dad would make up nonsense about the past - like the world being in black & white until 1950 or so? Well Dads (and uncles) across time have reserved the right to feed kids the most outlandish nonsense about how the universe is or works.

    Besides the LOLs, it provides great practical value for the kids as they learn to question EVERYTHING. I just see conspiracy videos playing into that grad tradition.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Time Honored Tradition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it provides great practical value for the kids as they learn to question EVERYTHING.

      Yeah, but the lizard fuckers at the top of the food chain don't want that.

    2. Re:Time Honored Tradition by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      That's my favorite C+H strip of all time! "A lot of great artists were insane."

    3. Re:Time Honored Tradition by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'd forgotten just how great that strip really was - "because they were color pictures of a black and white world". Awesome.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  27. Please, to censor it for well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These things did carry me to the psychiatric center and take anti-psychotic medicines.

    I'm ill for the rest of my life.

  28. nationalism vs globalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In America, some of the alternative media is nationalistic, and anti globalist. Trump happens to fit their views, so they support him.

  29. 'Kids'? by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    Kids TV and conspiracy theories are perfect viewing for stoners. Are they screwing up the algorithms?!

    1. Re:'Kids'? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Nope, they're as far as I can tell the target audience. At least I know no kids that are boring enough to watch "Kids TV".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  30. Global warming = more food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Global warming" = more CO2 = more food.

    I love global warming, because I like people getting enough food and not dying of malnutrition (like in communist Venezuela).

    1. Re:Global warming = more food by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Even if it means more food, changing weather will change where it grows. Once prosperous regions can go infertile, and arid regions fertile. This will cause mass refugee problems and or outright war. That's where the real risk is and why the US millitary has been taking it seriously for 30 years now.

  31. Reptilians you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YouTubeKids has episodes of G.I.Joe? Sick!

  32. Terrible! by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    They should only allow content from respectable people like Louis Farrakhan!

    1. Re: Terrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >muh norities!

      Very brave of you. BIGLY.

    2. Re: Terrible! by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      You just proved my point. His rantings are exactly as insane as reptilian whatever, but we have to pretend that his content is respectable.

  33. Obviousssssly by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It issss abssssssolutely a ssssstupid thing to believe.

    1. Re:Obviousssssly by LesFerg · · Score: 1

      Sure, as soon as the reptilians saw that we are educating the children about reality, they want to take those vids down.
      Now the children will only hear about this stuff through rumor and gossip, so they won't possibly find it believable.

      --
      If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
  34. Critical Thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This should be a great way to teach kids critical thinking skills. Get them to ask questions, learn about motivations behind videos, maybe even begin to question advertising efforts in the future, etc... Instead, we'll probably see more censorship as the industry continues work to dumb-ify the next generation and control the narrative.

  35. Censors R Us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only a pea-brain would want to censor youtube in any way, shape, or form. You might think that Reptilian Overlords are utter nonsense. I might think that most government propag, er, information is bollocks. Caveat Emptor.

  36. Kids certainly shouldn't be subjected to the truth by BrookSmith · · Score: 1

    Kids certainly shouldn't be subjected to the truth about the moon landings.

  37. Some truth in there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is some truth in there. I agree with the part about Kennedy being taken out by our own government. And also that the pyramids and other structures around the world were built with the help of aliens (humans using borrowed alien tools to do the actual work on behalf of what they perceived as gods). I dunno about the other stuff, especially the Freemasons. There are, no doubt, some aliens walking among us but I don't think they are doing anything more than zoological studies here.

    1. Re: Some truth in there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah no way those brown people made the pyramids bro!

      You're fucking pathetic.

  38. Re:That's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "When I was a kid"

    Mentally you still are. Ever been married or have grown up kids now? No? You're a child.

  39. Re:That's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a kid, "First Men in The Moon," was an excellent documentary about insects inside the Moon that the local TV station ran on Saturday afternoons in the 1970's.
    --
    MODS! Make Slashdot great again!! DOWN MOD any creimer-fixated comments!!!

    Well, I only had one mod point left so I modded down the above comment. Thanks for the advice Team Creimer!

  40. Re:That's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mentally you still are. Ever been married or have grown up kids now? No? You're a child.

    I have a friend who is on his fourth marriage and fourth set of kids. I guess that would make him a mature adult.

  41. Re:That's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More than you, Chris. You know what AC stands for? Always Chris!

  42. It's all Children's Stories by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    I don't know why this is particularly worrying. There are lots of children's stories that are more horrific and less believable: Hansel and Gretel, Little Red Riding Hood, Jack and the Beanstalk etc. That's providing you look at the originals and not the heavily sanitized Disney versions.

    Most kids are smart enough to realize that the world is not run by reptilian aliens in the same way that they don't worry about running into an evil witch who eats children and lives in a gingerbread house every time they go into a forest. As for the few that are not perhaps it is worth exposing them to this sort of thing while there is an adult around to point out that it is just a fairy story so they can learn that not everything they hear is true.

  43. Re:That's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since you assume everyone is Chris, maybe AC should be "Always Clueless!"

  44. The Reptillians.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....invented Youtube Kids to brainwash them!

  45. Re:That's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's only fair, Chris, you assume everyone is Creimertard! BTW, I think that's a pretty funny word, I wonder if you came up with by yourself?

  46. Never send a machine to do a man's job. by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 0

    YouTube Kids, the supposedly child-friendly version of YouTube that's been shown to often play host to troves of slop content and disturbing videos, apparently was showing videos from British conspiracy theorist David Icke, a guy who believes reptilian aliens secretly control the world and are responsible for the Holocaust. According to a Saturday report in Business Insider, searching for the term "UFO" on YouTube kids turned up a video purporting "to show a UFO shooting at a chemtrail." The suggested followups for that video featured a number of Icke's clips, including a nearly five-hour lecture on how aliens built the pyramids and secretly run the planet through a ruling class extraterrestrial-human hybrids. The video also delves into a number of other conspiracy theories, including claims Freemasons indulge in human sacrifice and President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by his own government. According to Business Insider, "Two other conspiracy theory videos by Icke appeared in the related videos, meaning it was easy for children to quickly go from watching relatively innocent videos about toys to conspiracy content." Searching for the term "moon landing" also resulted in a number of conspiratorial videos emerging, including one making the claim that CERN's Large Hadron Collider had opened a portal to another world that an unfortunate employee then vanished in.

    I have to wonder if this has anything to do with Google engineers thinking they're more clever than they really are, when it comes to trusting their precious algorithms. Unless of course, someone's doing this stuff manually. But just in case this is the feature and not a bug, that someone at Google / YouTube WANTS kids seeing this kind of stuff, it asks to be answered, and so I shall on a completely unrelated website in the form of a humorous musing:

    Reptilians DID rule the Earth, until about 65 million years ago, when the entire planet's population of mega-fauna, a kind of reptile-oid known as the dinosaurs, ran smack right into something we used to call the K-T Boundary, (not sure what they call it now, I think it's been renamed to something else,) a moment in time when the surface of the earth became, ironically, frozen in time, by becoming briefly very hot. The K-T Boundary is also a location in space, in a sense. Though it's all over the planet, in places left untouched by geological action (not subducted into the Earth,) or erosion, forming a thin geological stratum (so a location in terms of where it's deposited vertically in the layers of the Earth,) as a function of time itself. Since then, anyway, reptilians have taken a back-seat to mammals, who have come to dominate the dry parts of the world, at the scale we are ourselves most familiar with.

    As for UFOs, there are LOTS of UFOs; I saw one the other day. It was an airplane, but I can't tell you what kind. It was very high up. I certainly couldn't even tell you what company made it, or what company, group, or individual operated it. I can say unequivocally that it was unidentified, at least by me. Probably lots of other people also could not identify it. But I'm pretty sure the men and/or women on board or who paid for its fuel knew EXACTLY what it was, as likely did also, Air Traffic Control, SOMEWHERE. Now as for what most people actually mean when they say "UFO," as in a saucer or other oddly-shaped flying object from some other planet, that's a bit of a laugh. First, let's debunk the "it HAD to be ALIENS" nonsense in a sentence or two. One, just because you can't think of a way for something to happen without "aliens," such as the invention of the magnetron at the heart of a microwave oven, doesn't constitute proof of extra-terrestrial aliens, let alone their coming here at some point, if, that is, you do in fact think that; all it proves is you lack imagination, and are prone to falling for weak arguments. If you learn how things work, you'll find very quickly that humans could EASILY have invented it, withou

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
  47. LHC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "including one making the claim that CERN's Large Hadron Collider had opened a portal to another world that an unfortunate employee then vanished in."

    A bearded, mute employee?

    1. Re:LHC by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It was Father.

      Power cut out as they approached 40 TeV, the room got super cold, and when power was restored Father was gone. In the chair were Father's clothes and effects. If you don't know who "Father" was, or what the LHC is actually doing, you need to wake the fuck up. Remember the recent explosions at the LHC?

      I know you clowns won't go look into it, and will instead wallow in your ignorance, so I'll offer you the quickest summary possible:
      The people in control of the LHC and CERN are basically replicating Doom (the video game).

    2. Re:LHC by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      Looks clean shaven, possibly mute though.
      Security footage here

  48. Internet nanny can fail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's almost as if it would be irresponsible to give your child unmoderated access to the internet

  49. Relax by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Psychologists all over the world agree that kids need fairy tales.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Relax by OzoneLad · · Score: 1

      I was exposed to lots of fairy tales as a kid. No one swore up and down that they were *real*, though. It was always clear (to me, at least), that they were make-believe and meant either as entertainment or lessons. When fairy tales are presented as *fact*, we have a problem.

    2. Re:Relax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When fairy tales are presented as *fact*, we have a problem.

      So... like the bible?

    3. Re:Relax by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So your parents never tried to convince you of Santa and the Easter Bunny being real?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  50. The moon landing WAS fake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The moon landing WAS fake - Joe Rogan said so! Are you calling Joe Rogan a liar?

  51. Good by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

    They need to understand from a very young age that there is a lot of false information on the internet. If they end up watching these videos it's in large parts because they're interested in it. When they find out a few things they've been shown are false, they'll be more likely to start digging deeper for answers.

    Stop trying to cover stuff; it only adds credibility to the lie.

    --
    I tend to rant.
  52. The MSM is worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is that any worse than the entirety of the mainstream media teaching kids that the NRA kills people?

  53. They also have an awful lot of porn and violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But this is what offends you. Moon bullshit.

  54. Re:Slashdot: crazier than Icke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Commies = anti russian. lol.

    You Ivanbots are making it too fucking obvious. I see your Dear Leader was 're-elected' lol. Good on you. A trumph for democracy. Cowards.

  55. YouTube is on the way out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like other libtard sites.

    Freedom is popular!

  56. Doesn't sound any crazier than... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't sound any crazier than videos of people telling kids that they are born in the wrong bodies and that it can be "corrected" through hormones and cosmetic surgery. I'm looking at you "Queer Kids".

  57. Stop the War on Christianity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will you Silicon Valley liberals ever stop your war on Christianity?

    We believe in baby Jesus, our personal lord and savior, who, along with his Father, created the Earth in six days, roughly 5,500 years ago, and made it flat so we wouldn't fall off of it. His reptilian angels watch over and protect the righteous from the heathen masses, such as yourselves.

    As for the moon landing. How can anyone "land" on a painting in the sky?

    Praise his name!

  58. Not a new theory; remember "V"...? by martinfb · · Score: 1

    This reptilian aliens theme is not a new theory; remember "V"

    I'd like to propose another hypothesis: Mr Icke, or those promoting his claims, have actually watched that Sci Fi series "V" way back when it ran.
    And, this hypothesis further proposes that Icke was intoxicated somehow, so as to suppress his memory of it being a TV series.


    The world is actually a simulation based in a computer matrix! ;-)

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  59. Re:Slashdot: crazier than Icke by doccus · · Score: 1

    I thought we already had our "Trumph" for democracy. And as far as "democracy" goes.. well, hey it really did go. Far far away. But that's OK.. Kids can amuse themselves with David Uckey and his invisible reptilian friends while Trumph keeps "draining the swamp". So which is the bigger pile if steaming bull droppings, anyways? If i had to choose i think I'd rather show my kids Yuckey than Trumpet.. Now the moon thing, though...

  60. Re: That's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You root for a man he thinks sleeping with children is fine. Nice.

  61. Re: That's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You root for a man he thinks"

    Chris, what kind of word salad is this?

  62. Half by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Half of this thread is Creimer talking to himself lol. He's the new APK.

  63. So...Dr. Daniel Jackson and Gordon Freeman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "including a nearly five-hour lecture on how aliens built the pyramids and secretly run the planet through a ruling class extraterrestrial-human hybrids", which is far less time than it takes to watch all 10 seasons of SG-1. Dr. Daniel Jackson would be proud.

    "CERN's Large Hadron Collider had opened a portal to another world that an unfortunate employee then vanished in." Hopefully Gordon Freeman remembered his crowbar this time.

  64. Are you sure it wasn't Blck Mesa? by Chaset · · Score: 1

    > the claim that CERN's Large Hadron Collider had opened a portal to another world that an unfortunate employee then vanished in.

    Was his name, per chance, Gordon Freeman?

    --
    -- "This world is a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who feel."
  65. But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reptiians DO rule the world and moon landing was faked!