Most of his ideas have proven themselves out over time. I'm willing to give it the benefit of the doubt that he actually had a decent idea. (I said most, not all of his ideas)
The vast majority of shows and companies are aimed at women. Just because there are a few exceptions does not mean that the industry as a whole is not woman-centric. Not to mention that male fashion does not change very fast at all. Today's suits are not significantly different from the ones 25 years ago. Women's fashion on the other hand changes each season.
Yeah. Idioms are apparently confusing to a lot of people, especially if they heard them wrong initially and run with it. Had an ex that refused to believe that it was a "temper tantrum" and not a "tantertantrum." Or the more mainstream moo point.
...really? Some of us play games on the GPUs, too. Or *gasp* do actual work with them! And the more expensive ones are faster. Because that's how technology works. No, not everyone needs an F1 car. Most people would be fine with a Corolla. And the cheaper cards generally give you much more value for your money. But if you can't see where some people would be more concerned about absolute performance than pure economy, then you're stupid.
This is not a slashvertisement. This is simply tech journalism. Or is Car & Driver just a big advertisement? Is ANY special-interest magazine or site "just an advertisement"?
soldier [sohl-jer] Show IPA –noun 1. a person who serves in an army; a person engaged in military service. 2. an enlisted man or woman, as distinguished from a commissioned officer: the soldiers' mess and the officers' mess. 3. a person of military skill or experience: George Washington was a great soldier.
Just because you don't like it and use it as a way to disrespect your fellow servicemen doesn't mean we all have to follow your lead.
No, the $70 million is the research and the technology. It would be like saying Intel spent $2 billion on a new chip fabrication factory, and you're only looking at the first processor off the line and calling it a waste. This has much wider applications, and will be much cheaper on a per-treatment basis. You can't equate the research cost and the treatment cost.
Too bad the US networks don't give you full service. There's no competition, so your service speeds are limited by the frequencies your phone can receive.
Just because it's biased doesn't mean it's not right. You're succumbing to the Fox effect... that there are "two sides" to everything, and both have equal validity.
Because that would cost more than just claiming it against insurance. Those ships run 24x7... they would lose more money from downtime than they would ever make it worthwhile in keeping that shit on deck. Picture perfect example of the tragedy of the commons colliding with unregulated capitalism.
Hmmm... one is a charge that's shunted around the outside of the aircraft, and the other is minutely vibrating but powerful enough electric fields interfering with other minutely vibrating electric fields in unpredictable ways, possibly causing the pilot to think things are safe when they're not.
Yeah, totally the same things. I hear Physics 101 has some open seats. Electrical discharge like a lightning strike is not the same as electro-magnetic radiation.
It's not just Obama. It started under Bush. That got Congress properly scared so the Executive branch could work autonomously outside of the checks and balances of our government. Obama's just taking Bush's ball and running with it.
THIS IS NOT A PARTISAN DEBATE. This is the "upper-class" declaring war on the "lower-class", and using partisan politics to divide us so we don't notice. Stop playing their game.
They can stop you and check your registration and license, but checking your sobriety is a 4th amendment thing. Unless you give them reason to suspect you (no, just driving late at night is not a reason), DUI checkpoints shouldn't stand up to constitutional scrutiny. But given that our Supreme Court doesn't have sense of morality or knowledge of America and it's ideals and laws, I don't see a constitutional complaint going very far.
We're guilty until proven innocent because, you know, think of the children. Don't they deserve to live in a rubber society where they can never get hurt or even feel bad?
Arabs, Persians... they're all the same because they have the same skin color, right? I mean, Germans and the French may as well be the same, too... they're both the same skin color and from a geographically close area...
The thing is, you are putting your website out on a street that is KNOWN to have people randomly shot by (let's be a little nicer here) paintballs. That's the Internet, and it's what the Internet has been for decades now. It costs a little bit, but it's relatively easy to have very tough to defeat body armor. Sony went out onto that street in it's underwear, and is now complaining that jerks are shooting them with paintballs. Legally, Sony is completely right. Morally... Sony deserves every ass-welt they get for being jerks and parading around in their underwear online.
That was my point. Thank you for making it for me. He said that bitcoins are worth $.50 and not $20, but that still says he thinks they're worth something for some reason. My point is that them being worth $20 is the exact same as them being worth $0.50. It's the market at work.
Slashdot Mirror
Most of his ideas have proven themselves out over time. I'm willing to give it the benefit of the doubt that he actually had a decent idea. (I said most, not all of his ideas)
The vast majority of shows and companies are aimed at women. Just because there are a few exceptions does not mean that the industry as a whole is not woman-centric. Not to mention that male fashion does not change very fast at all. Today's suits are not significantly different from the ones 25 years ago. Women's fashion on the other hand changes each season.
Statistics... HOW DOES THEY WORK?!!!$?
Yeah. Idioms are apparently confusing to a lot of people, especially if they heard them wrong initially and run with it. Had an ex that refused to believe that it was a "temper tantrum" and not a "tantertantrum." Or the more mainstream moo point.
...really? Some of us play games on the GPUs, too. Or *gasp* do actual work with them! And the more expensive ones are faster. Because that's how technology works. No, not everyone needs an F1 car. Most people would be fine with a Corolla. And the cheaper cards generally give you much more value for your money. But if you can't see where some people would be more concerned about absolute performance than pure economy, then you're stupid.
This is not a slashvertisement. This is simply tech journalism. Or is Car & Driver just a big advertisement? Is ANY special-interest magazine or site "just an advertisement"?
Just because you don't like it and use it as a way to disrespect your fellow servicemen doesn't mean we all have to follow your lead.
No, the $70 million is the research and the technology. It would be like saying Intel spent $2 billion on a new chip fabrication factory, and you're only looking at the first processor off the line and calling it a waste. This has much wider applications, and will be much cheaper on a per-treatment basis. You can't equate the research cost and the treatment cost.
If you have an ATI/AMD GPU, it will only take a couple days for you to mine a coin or two of your own by joining a pool.
Shit. Posting to undo my modding. Meant to hit funny, accidentally hit overrated :(
So... coding should be left to the experts? I wholeheartedly agree ;)
I thought this was common knowledge. Did anyone ever doubt that?
Too bad the US networks don't give you full service. There's no competition, so your service speeds are limited by the frequencies your phone can receive.
Just because it's biased doesn't mean it's not right. You're succumbing to the Fox effect... that there are "two sides" to everything, and both have equal validity.
Because that would cost more than just claiming it against insurance. Those ships run 24x7... they would lose more money from downtime than they would ever make it worthwhile in keeping that shit on deck. Picture perfect example of the tragedy of the commons colliding with unregulated capitalism.
Why don't you use dude@example.com or nospam@example.org? Almost no sites filter it, and there's no chance of it causing spam for anyone.
You were just younger. The fact that you're bragging about it now means you're still just as nerdy, if not more so ;)
Hmmm... one is a charge that's shunted around the outside of the aircraft, and the other is minutely vibrating but powerful enough electric fields interfering with other minutely vibrating electric fields in unpredictable ways, possibly causing the pilot to think things are safe when they're not.
Yeah, totally the same things. I hear Physics 101 has some open seats. Electrical discharge like a lightning strike is not the same as electro-magnetic radiation.
micro-cell anyone? It's a solved problem.
Proofreading fail. By "That" I meant the events of 9/11 that happened under Bush's watch.
It's not just Obama. It started under Bush. That got Congress properly scared so the Executive branch could work autonomously outside of the checks and balances of our government. Obama's just taking Bush's ball and running with it.
THIS IS NOT A PARTISAN DEBATE. This is the "upper-class" declaring war on the "lower-class", and using partisan politics to divide us so we don't notice. Stop playing their game.
They can stop you and check your registration and license, but checking your sobriety is a 4th amendment thing. Unless you give them reason to suspect you (no, just driving late at night is not a reason), DUI checkpoints shouldn't stand up to constitutional scrutiny. But given that our Supreme Court doesn't have sense of morality or knowledge of America and it's ideals and laws, I don't see a constitutional complaint going very far.
We're guilty until proven innocent because, you know, think of the children. Don't they deserve to live in a rubber society where they can never get hurt or even feel bad?
Arabs, Persians... they're all the same because they have the same skin color, right? I mean, Germans and the French may as well be the same, too... they're both the same skin color and from a geographically close area...
The thing is, you are putting your website out on a street that is KNOWN to have people randomly shot by (let's be a little nicer here) paintballs. That's the Internet, and it's what the Internet has been for decades now. It costs a little bit, but it's relatively easy to have very tough to defeat body armor. Sony went out onto that street in it's underwear, and is now complaining that jerks are shooting them with paintballs. Legally, Sony is completely right. Morally... Sony deserves every ass-welt they get for being jerks and parading around in their underwear online.
That was my point. Thank you for making it for me. He said that bitcoins are worth $.50 and not $20, but that still says he thinks they're worth something for some reason. My point is that them being worth $20 is the exact same as them being worth $0.50. It's the market at work.
Why do you think it's worth $.50 at all? It's like you don't actually understand economics in the slightest...