I mean really attacking someones phrasing, well using ergo may may not have done him any good but you're not having anything to say certainly hasn't done you any good.
Of course it's to be expected from someone that projects their sex fantasies onto this conversation
Pretty sure the U.S. government wouldn't look too kindly on what would essentially be the creation of a trust to monopolize a market, or maybe they would times aren't what they used to be. You still have the research alliances working on greater miniaturization, but if the profit of hitting a new node isn't enough to payback the cost we just won't see it unless governments fund the production. I could easily see the U.S. or Chinese military wanting superior electronics.
Wow you really don't know what happened with Brexit do you. It's quite astonishing how you think Boris Johnson and Reese-Mogg's plan was "the people's choice".
I have to ask on that other thread why are you promoting pedophilia again ? Seriously no one wants to know what you do to small boys
This isn’t to say the road to this point has been easy or straightforward, and the road ahead is even less solid. Intel has continually moved the public bar on 10nm back, incrementally, while singing a different song internally. In their Q1/2018 earnings call they moved the timetables and spun it in a curious way but were telling partners a different story.
Nothing however tops the masterful “Hyperscaling” stunt where Intel brought in press and analysts to a ‘manufacturing day’ in early 2017 to explain how the crippling slide of 10nm was not actually a slide, it was a good thing and not a delay at all. SemiAccurate laughed and stopped just short of calling Intel liars.
The company redefined terms well past the breaking point to show that scaling was ‘on track’ even if node cadence was ‘intentionally’ longer. As you can see from the above graph, all was good publicly, internally SemiAccurate was hearing a very different story. (Note: Intel was on track to miss that graph by 1+ year and sliding before 10nm was killed.)
Now lately in the news we see a lot of people getting put in jail or in general trouble for what they did when they were much younger. However they are not being repentant about it, just defiant about it. Thus not getting our sympathy.
B.S. if anything that's just people deciding that the inquisition and witch hunts are fine things if they get to do them and pick the targets Linus was targeted because he had a no nonsense style in running the project that bears his name.
And which side are our betters? The Eton toffs who wanted to remain or the Eton toffs who wanted us to leave? Is David Cameron the real man of the people or is Reese-Mogg?
Interesting that you feel the need to polarize this when most people would object to anyone trying to restrict what they can see and hear.
Not sure why you credit the paper by Turco, Toon, Ackerman, Pollack, and Sagan to just "Sagan". Since you don't seem to even know who wrote the paper, I can scarcely pay much attention to your other opinions on it.
It was an interesting paper. Turns out it was a bit optimistic about the amount of ash that can be injected into the stratosphere by firestorms, but I don't think you could call it "fudged"-- it was an interesting analysis.
Really, maybe it's because Sagan was the only author making the national news at the time pushing an agenda ? Reasonable people might think the person pushing a political cause with science owned the distortions that came with it.
Anyway, you must have a real hard time with people that refer to the Calculus of Newton or Leibniz, Einstein's relativity must have you positively up in arms.
Your problem is that you are using logic in what is clearly meant to be an emotional argument. "GUNZ" should trigger everybody to want more laws without even bothering to think rationally.
Bingo, don't forget about funding people to make sure they are properly controlled.
They weren't microdots, which are silver-halide film technology from WWII/cold war. They were Omron dots, a.k.a. EURion Constellation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EURion_constellation) dots. But yes, 3-D printers could lay down patterns in a similar manner, and makers might well be urged to do so very soon now.
Great, that will work really well with all the build it yourself printers that run on open source software. I suppose lazy not particularly bright criminals will stick with the old tried and true method of stealing/ buying a gun and getting rid of it when done with it.
Anyone can build their own unregistered fire arm right now. They don't even have to put a serial number on it, if they have no intention of selling it.
As to building a lowcost cheap gun, anyone who has a pair of hands and some basic plumbing equipment can do it any time they like.
Are you going to require a license to have a pipe wrench, to buy a length of pipe, a nail ?
Well one did you read the union of concerned scientists "Debunking" ? It's embarrassing that they call pointing out obvious errors in the way data were adjusted "Cherry Picking"
Anyway the research report gives you their source data, their methods and their results. If you can't debunk it yourself even with help from people on the internet, you really aren't engaging in discussion, you are engaged in tribalism
Want some idea of what the upper bound is by size volume
Take a Table Spoon of salt (15 ml) dissolve thoroughly in a cup of water in a good quality glass (pref overnight) give it a shake Hold up to sunlight. The Tyndall effect will let you see suspended particles in the solution.
If you want more you can take out your handy dandy 20 micron filter (That's a coffee filter) filter the solution through it. See whats left behind.
Bonus points do this with whatever water you plan to use without the salt, to establish a baseline.
I'll guess you have something other than plastic in your salt to be angry about when you are done.
When it gets too hot just have a few Tsar bomba go off in Siberia and you will have a nuclear winer. Problem solved
Turns out not. The "nuclear winter" scenario assumed over a hundred city firestorms lifting ash into the stratosphere. I'm not sure how flammable Siberia is, but you probably couldn't get enough burning to sustain the kind of massive firestorm needed.
What you mean is the nuclear winter scenario used a rigged model that Sagan fudged to support his politics. It's a nice little allegory about the dangers of thinking because you do one thing well, your expertise extends to everything.
Slashdot Mirror
You could at least do better than just restating my comment
From what getting full speed out of my ISP ?
When TOR isn't enough you really think someone's for profit VPN service will be ?
Oh you really must be having a tough time of it.
I mean really attacking someones phrasing, well using ergo may may not have done him any good but you're not having anything to say certainly hasn't done you any good.
Of course it's to be expected from someone that projects their sex fantasies onto this conversation
https://slashdot.org/comments....
weaponized CoCs rammed down the [...] throats
Not sure if grievance or sex fantasy.
weaponized CoCs rammed down the [...] throats
Not sure if grievance or sex fantasy.
So you have fantasies about having things rammed down your throat ?
I suppose it goes well with your pedophilia.
Pretty sure the U.S. government wouldn't look too kindly on what would essentially be the creation of a trust to monopolize a market, or maybe they would times aren't what they used to be. You still have the research alliances working on greater miniaturization, but if the profit of hitting a new node isn't enough to payback the cost we just won't see it unless governments fund the production. I could easily see the U.S. or Chinese military wanting superior electronics.
If the truth isn't in your favor resort to libel
No wonder your a pedophile
Thanks but sad to know that leaves just TSMC and Samsung.
TSMC and Global Foundries are already moving to the 7nm node.
So far all Intel has managed with their 10nm process is delays. It was supposed to be out in 16 and now they are talking about holiday 19
Wow you really don't know what happened with Brexit do you. It's quite astonishing how you think Boris Johnson and Reese-Mogg's plan was "the people's choice".
I have to ask on that other thread why are you promoting pedophilia again ? Seriously no one wants to know what you do to small boys
If what the report says is correct
This isn’t to say the road to this point has been easy or straightforward, and the road ahead is even less solid. Intel has continually moved the public bar on 10nm back, incrementally, while singing a different song internally. In their Q1/2018 earnings call they moved the timetables and spun it in a curious way but were telling partners a different story.
Nothing however tops the masterful “Hyperscaling” stunt where Intel brought in press and analysts to a ‘manufacturing day’ in early 2017 to explain how the crippling slide of 10nm was not actually a slide, it was a good thing and not a delay at all. SemiAccurate laughed and stopped just short of calling Intel liars.
The company redefined terms well past the breaking point to show that scaling was ‘on track’ even if node cadence was ‘intentionally’ longer. As you can see from the above graph, all was good publicly, internally SemiAccurate was hearing a very different story. (Note: Intel was on track to miss that graph by 1+ year and sliding before 10nm was killed.)
Be interesting to see how this plays out.
Now lately in the news we see a lot of people getting put in jail or in general trouble for what they did when they were much younger. However they are not being repentant about it, just defiant about it. Thus not getting our sympathy.
B.S. if anything that's just people deciding that the inquisition and witch hunts are fine things if they get to do them and pick the targets Linus was targeted because he had a no nonsense style in running the project that bears his name.
Step 3 Name names, force the roaches that tried to pull this into the light so they don't have as easy a time with their next target.
Imagine people actually able to see differing points of view. They might just decide they don't like what their betters have planned for them
vs
Interesting that you feel the need to bang on the "muh freeze peach" drum no matter how irreverent it is to the comment you're replying you.
Try to keep up
And which side are our betters? The Eton toffs who wanted to remain or the Eton toffs who wanted us to leave? Is David Cameron the real man of the people or is Reese-Mogg?
Interesting that you feel the need to polarize this when most people would object to anyone trying to restrict what they can see and hear.
Imagine people actually able to see differing points of view. They might just decide they don't like what their betters have planned for them
This if anyone was cheating it was the people reporting the temperature data.
Not sure why you credit the paper by Turco, Toon, Ackerman, Pollack, and Sagan to just "Sagan". Since you don't seem to even know who wrote the paper, I can scarcely pay much attention to your other opinions on it.
It was an interesting paper. Turns out it was a bit optimistic about the amount of ash that can be injected into the stratosphere by firestorms, but I don't think you could call it "fudged"-- it was an interesting analysis.
Really, maybe it's because Sagan was the only author making the national news at the time pushing an agenda ? Reasonable people might think the person pushing a political cause with science owned the distortions that came with it.
Anyway, you must have a real hard time with people that refer to the Calculus of Newton or Leibniz, Einstein's relativity must have you positively up in arms.
Yep, gun grabbers in general think they are clever for coming up with the idea "we wouldn't have gun crime if there were no guns"
Once they get that i'm special feeling, there's no pointing out to them we would have to repeal most of civilization to make that happen
Your problem is that you are using logic in what is clearly meant to be an emotional argument. "GUNZ" should trigger everybody to want more laws without even bothering to think rationally.
Bingo, don't forget about funding people to make sure they are properly controlled.
They weren't microdots, which are silver-halide film technology from WWII/cold war. They were Omron dots, a.k.a. EURion Constellation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EURion_constellation) dots. But yes, 3-D printers could lay down patterns in a similar manner, and makers might well be urged to do so very soon now.
Great, that will work really well with all the build it yourself printers that run on open source software. I suppose lazy not particularly bright criminals will stick with the old tried and true method of stealing/ buying a gun and getting rid of it when done with it.
Looks easier than a revolver
https://www.thefirearmblog.com...
Because you don't understand the underlying issue at hand.
This is the best write-up I've seen as to the reasoning: https://www.wired.com/story/de...
And now you understand even less.
Anyone can build their own unregistered fire arm right now. They don't even have to put a serial number on it, if they have no intention of selling it.
As to building a lowcost cheap gun, anyone who has a pair of hands and some basic plumbing equipment can do it any time they like.
Are you going to require a license to have a pipe wrench, to buy a length of pipe, a nail ?
Well one did you read the union of concerned scientists "Debunking" ? It's embarrassing that they call pointing out obvious errors in the way data were adjusted "Cherry Picking"
Anyway the research report gives you their source data, their methods and their results. If you can't debunk it yourself even with help from people on the internet, you really aren't engaging in discussion, you are engaged in tribalism
Want some idea of what the upper bound is by size volume
Take a Table Spoon of salt (15 ml) dissolve thoroughly in a cup of water in a good quality glass (pref overnight)
give it a shake
Hold up to sunlight.
The Tyndall effect will let you see suspended particles in the solution.
If you want more you can take out your handy dandy 20 micron filter (That's a coffee filter)
filter the solution through it.
See whats left behind.
Bonus points do this with whatever water you plan to use without the salt, to establish a baseline.
I'll guess you have something other than plastic in your salt to be angry about when you are done.
When it gets too hot just have a few Tsar bomba go off in Siberia and you will have a nuclear winer. Problem solved
Turns out not. The "nuclear winter" scenario assumed over a hundred city firestorms lifting ash into the stratosphere. I'm not sure how flammable Siberia is, but you probably couldn't get enough burning to sustain the kind of massive firestorm needed.
What you mean is the nuclear winter scenario used a rigged model that Sagan fudged to support his politics.
It's a nice little allegory about the dangers of thinking because you do one thing well, your expertise extends to everything.