Slashdot Mirror
Mozilla Is Reportedly Going To Sell VPN Subscriptions Within Firefox (trustedreviews.com)
Mozilla is reportedly preparing to offer a VPN service for Firefox users to help protect them when surfing the web. According to Trusted Reviews, Mozilla has partnered with the ProtonVPN service, "with a new notification piping-up when the browser detects an unsecured connection, or in a scenario when VPN might be preferable to users." From the report: However, it appears Firefox users will have to pay for the privilege. Austrian site Soeren-hentzschel reports the premium VPN service will be $10 a month, which is what ProtonVPN charges its users. Users will receive a "Firefox Recommends" pop-up when browsing an unsecured wireless network. The pop-up says the VPN service will provide a "private and secure' internet connection. According to the reports, a subset of Firefox 62 users in the United States will begin receiving the pop-up from today. Mozilla will reportedly get a cut of any subscription fee handed over by users to access the VPN service. MSPowerUser points out that this will be the first advertised service that costs money for Firefox users.
How do I disable this popup?
Where do I get the adblock for this shit? j/k, who tf uses firefox.
But they can keep their overpriced VPN ads to themselves.
Also, ProtonVPN charges their customers $8/month, so the summary is wrong.
Seriously, can the Mozilla people stop fucking up the browser by filling it full of shit that has very little to do with you know, web browsing.
Seriously, what browsers are left that aren't full of some stupid crap, some political vendetta against third parties, or some such nonsense. My web browser is supposed to have exactly one function, render webpages...
I'm so sick of this crap.
That supposedly kept no logs? https://www.zdnet.com/article/hacker-uses-protonmail-vpn-hacker-ddoses-protonmail-hacker-gets-arrested/
IAmUsingAnAdblockerYouTonedeafTwirps=true
If your a home user you probably don't need a VPN and if your using your PC at work then you probably can't use it, and unless your a traveler where this might be somewhat useful. This just sounds like a plan by Mozilla to scare Firefox users into paying for something they don't need.
Technically, they also had ads for Mr. Robot, which is a "paid service".
My first program:
Hell Segmentation fault
Don't link me to some one-guy-in-a-basement fork of the big ones. They are all a bad joke.
Opera's had free VPN service built in for over a year now..
We're in dire need of an alternative to Mozilla.
finding new ways to make the community dislike them more..
Well, in fact, it's just no trust for Mozilla.
Uninstall Firefox, move to something better.
Pale Moon is okay but lagging in development. It's got the old performance issues that Firefox used to have. Chromium maybe, at least it's open source although building it yourself is hard work.
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
Opera private browsing automatically uses a VPN, and traffic from the output is anonymized. Of course, all VPN collect your IP at the VPN so don't be stupid.
it's not over yet? remaining members are joining with the megaslothian bandwidth bandits investigations... mining btc was one of the allegations put forward in regards to the massive bandwidth heists.. + substituting product placement for news of actual events.. wheww?
From what getting full speed out of my ISP ?
When TOR isn't enough you really think someone's for profit VPN service will be ?
as long as they put a checkbox in that popup to 'never show this again', i'm OK with it.
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
Probably not even going to happen, but if so I will also be tweaking about:config to turn it off , even though it would only appear if I browsed an unsecured wireless network, which I never do. Firefox is still the best browser overall and they have to try and earn some money somehow. Pale Moon? Really?
shin phantomflanflinger
And Mozilla, every time I open Firefox please popup a big annoying message to buy your VPN and subscribe to your fucking newsletter.
Can anyone translate:
"pop-up when browsing an unsecured wireless network" into English?
Because this makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. How the hell would a web browser client program know that the destination URL is served by a server that is connected to the internet by an unsecured (whatever that means) wireless network?
Furthermore, of what possible use would a CLIENT POXY be in that instance?
It's OK, this feature wasn't for you anyway.
Seamonkey?
Why would people use VPN with a web browser which is leaking tons of information and makes your fingerprint totally unique even if you're browsing in incognito mode? Changing your IP address in this case is simply futile and inconsequential.
Maybe for Netflix/Hulu? But they've long implemented technical measures which makes using them via VPN impossible. I can only think of pr0n/shady websites you don't want your ISP to know about but that's less than 0.1% of people in the world. And those will most likely use Tor browser with VPN.
Users: 'Oh this new chrome thing looks sharp' *users migrate to chrome* Mozilla: 'shit shit shit, people like the new X, quick transform into new X aswell' Users: 'hmm I no longer like new X and want to go back to old X' Mozilla: 'no way josé' Users: gg
Isn't this a little bit similar to the case about Microsoft bundling Internet Explorer with Windows?
#DeleteFacebook
My small and collaborative ISP offers a VPN to its subscribers, that I have to activate and deactivate by hand.
It would be very nice if Mozilla's detection mechanism allowed autoconnecting through *my* VPN, not just the recommended one... (Even if the recommended is preset by default, which would allow some revenue to Moz...)
Herve S.
No, not at all. Mozilla doesn't hold a monopoly in anything, which was the premise of that case.
I am sick of all these monthly fees. And turning Goods (like software) into services.
Let me pay $2000 for Creative Suite, and I can have the software on my system for as long as I wan't vs charging me $70+ per month.
Sure the monthly fee is cheaper if I wanted to keep up to date. However I may not need all the features they are currently offering, and the new features I don't need anyways. For that $2000 I could use the software for 8 years before upgrading (Making it worth $20 a month for me).
There is pride of ownership, not pride monthly service.
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
No, because they're not abusing a position of dominance in the market to gain an unfair advantage over their competitors. Same reason why Apple didn't get into legal hot water for doing exactly the same thing as Microsoft at the same time (IIRC they had about 5-10% of the desktop market share at the time); not being a near monopoly gives you a lot more latitude in what you are able to do or, conversely, why Google is being pressured into allowing Android device makers to optionally unbundle Google's own apps, even if it is for a fee, because they currently have about 75% of the mobile device OS market.
UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
How do I disable this popup?
I don't know, but in the screenshot in the article the popup seems - it's a bit hard to read - to have a "Don't tell me about this again" checkbox. If I ever see the popup, that's what I'll try.
Uninstalled.
Yeah there are a lot of free FPNs out there so $8 a month seems outrageous. Thos people offering the free ones must be losing a lot of money if it really costs $8 a month. I wonder how they can afford it.
When you consider WHY you even want a VPN, then paying for it can seem like a good idea.
But if you actually are trying to protect yourself from various attacks, people scavenging your browsing patterns, targeted ads linked to your IP, hinkey wifi eavesdropping, certain types of man-in-the-middle attacks or people snooping your messages then a trustworthy VPN seems like a good idea
But how do you know which one is trustworthy. You might guess from the price. But an endorsement from firefox, and a well known name like proton is probably the best you can do yourself to find a good one.
If all you are trying to do is violate your employers security firewall blocking you from shopping online during work then a free VPN is a great deal.
Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
How does Firefox 'detect' you are on an unsecured wifi? I guess its now poking around in new system locations where a traditional browser should not be poking its nose....
You can get a perfectly serviceable VPN attached to the Opera browser for free. Why would I pay Mozilla for this one?
It's not like mommy was gonna let you use her credit csrd to buy this anyway so it's no big loss to anyone.
I know Slashdot has a pretty low opinion of cloud services, but with AWS and a little automation you can have your own OpenVPN setup for as little as $3.50 / month.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/run-your-own-vpn-less-than-5-month-andy-rosen
So is Mozilla now an adware driven business? What has the world come to.
Mozilla, which has kicked out its co-founder for personal political activities which some disagree with, is looking to instill people with privacy. I guess they know better than most that you can't trust people to behave responsibly when others do things they disagree with.
Probably not even going to happen, but if so I will also be tweaking about:config to turn it off , even though it would only appear if I browsed an unsecured wireless network, which I never do. Firefox is still the best browser overall and they have to try and earn some money somehow. Pale Moon? Really?
What's wrong with Pale Moon?
The dev is a bit of a douche. It's why it isn't part of OpenBSD.
You __must__ be able to trust your VPN provider. They are like your ISP, but are not governed by the laws that keep ISPs from doing shady things. It can be very bad, as well. HolaVPN, for example, was caught re-selling subscriber bandwidth.
A good list of trustworthy VPNs is available here:
https://restoreprivacy.com/best-vpn/
Yeah mine too. I already have a bunch of shit turned off, and a patch I use to stop videos from autoplaying just because they don't have sound.
I'll find a way to compile this out too if I can't just disable it.
Dammit Mozilla, use them and stop building shit I don't care about into the fucking browser.
Isn't this a little bit similar to the case about Microsoft bundling Internet Explorer with Windows?
No, not even close and you have to be completely retarded to even try and compare the two situations.
I could see it actually be a net benefit if the Ad was a simple button in the configuration settings or privacy settings called "Get Private VPN" that loaded their partner page. That would be useful: A lot of people may have heard about what a VPN is but don't know exactly how to get it or set it up and if they have that menu opened up they can probably follow instructions to use it.
However, with Mozilla's track record, it will be some popup on the address bar that will show up every time you visit an unencrypted http site or one with a weak cypher or cert problem or financial site.
In summary, use Palemoon.
I've been shopping for a decent -honest- VPN. I've found a couple that I like, and they're cheaper than $10/month. I'd also consider Mozilla's VPN, but NOT for ten bucks. I might pay 5, 4v4n 6, but no more. If they're partnering with Proton, thus giving Proton a lot of potential new users, Proton needs to relax their price. I'm not inclined to pay $10 for the same service I can get from other reliable, honest VPN services for half that.
Sorry, Moe Zilla, I support you, been a user since the first Netscrape. But.
While I'm all for Mozilla trying to make money to stay afloat, I think this feature will lead to scam opportunities.
I can see it now - other "looks like" VPN services will offer fake popups tricking people to switch. "Firefox recommends VPN for Ru" with a Scooby snack on it.
It'll probably be a notification subscription scam.
I'm just trying not to be a moran. Please forgive me.
I also thought there would be more debate about this topic.
#DeleteFacebook
The whole VPN thing has grown out of a mistrust in gov't and ISPs. But are the VPNs trustworthy? That's the big assumption.
Is the public really that foolish ? use a TOR browser. No need to pay for a subscription.
There is no try...
Time to start shopping around for either a fork of Firefox... "FireFORK?" or some other alternative browser.
Any thoughts, slashdot, on the best version of Firefox that works well, is properly maintained, and isn't out to screw the user out of their money with a supposedly FL/OSS web browser product?
Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
buggy, insecure, unstable, sounds like chrome.
Linux is a douche, is that why he's not part of Linux now?