By definition, to disturb balance in one direction, you do not need a significant increase on the "emission" end. You just need enough to be more than "absorption" part. No altering of any other patterns is necessary.
I don't dispute this but I question why you think it lends validity to the stupid original post, that called anything the poster didn't like FUD
The greenhouse effect is not what makes a greenhouse work. Don't believe me ? How well do you think a greenhouse with just a roof and no walls would work.
If you can't actually think for yourself
Here's a firm that trains people how to operate greenhouses
I post these because I know many people can only appear to reason and can't actually accept a fact unless it's conveyed by someone in the proper robes and religious gear.
Dude you totally overlooked the heat generated by all the anti-wind-turbine protesters. That is transferred without fluid motion or conductors, as they can transfer their anger over the internet.
Lol it's offset by the cold fury of environmentalists that think they are saving the world. Hell if they weren't saving the world, they would have to admit they are useless losers.
Sure, you are totally right... and venus is a paradise, with its 400C air temperature (higher than mercury) because CO2 do not generate greenhouse effect and heat a planet
Venus has 90 times the atmosphere we do, and mercury has none but is roughly 1/3rd the destance from the Sun we are.
You have no idea how any of this works do you ? Thank you for demonstrating that you can be deeply religious without even realizing it.
Global mean temperature of the Earth without wind turbines is ~ exactly the same as today.
And the bulk of that is from water vapor, hmm why didn't link mention water except for cooling ? hmmmmmm
"Water vapor is the most important greenhouse gas. It controls the Earth's temperature.” It's true that water vapor is the largest contributor to the Earth's greenhouse effect. On average, it probably accounts for about 60% of the warming effect
It's always funny when someone who clearly doesn't know how greenhouse gases work complains about "climate doom people". A greenhouse works because it stops conduction and convection. Greenhouse gases have an impact by raising the height in the atmosphere where infrared radiation is emitted into space. This means the effective temperature of the Earth for radiation emission is lower.
Always funny when a greenie proves not only don't they understand physics but also can't read
"BTW a greenhouse works not so much because it stops radiation but because it prevents conduction and convection."
Marketing or Politics wise, giving money to an organization who's primary purpose is killing children is not a plus. People who are buying for a little one don't want to think about them being killed.
It never ceases to amaze me how the climate doom people never understand the most basic concepts about heat transport.
There three ways heat moves through a non uniform fluid
1. Physical motion of the fluid ( Convection and any other source of velocity) 2. Conduction (hot areas heating cooler areas by being in physical contact) 3. Radiation a gas molecule emits a photon and it's absorbed by another molecule, in the case of the earth you can include the planet as a heat source)
If you think CO2 is enough to change that balance, then you better believe altering the patterns of motion and conduction are as well.
BTW a greenhouse works not so much because it stops radiation but because it prevents conduction and convection.
Go figure what's more they can easily figure it out, when a service has one series they actually want to watch and a bunch of crap you couldn't pay them to view.
Toss in the fact that so much of Hollywood is considered to be little more than greedy scumbags by the general population, yeah it makes it that much easier to download that movie.
"The patent describes how a laser diode can be configured to emit pulses of laser light using a circuit that includes an inductor and a gallium nitride transistor."
Every time I read stuff like this, I can only think I spent my life doing it wrong. I should of been figuring out how to get patents on stuff everybody knew about and was using anyway. Wow when a laser diode goes forward biased it will drain the stored energy from an inductor SMH.
Is "misogynist" the new word for "people who are OK with having a penis?" As the United States saw on Thursday, there is a real war against men in this nation, and I can't imagine that doesn't extend to the entire world. It's quite frankly scary. These types of "codes of conduct" are being used to crush men and male behavior, all in order to "let women feel safe" which is, quite frankly, ridiculous in an online context. If a woman wants to submit code, she can, there's no need for all the men in the world to walk on egg shells just because her delicate womanly emotions might be offended. Oh, except claiming women have delicate womanly emotions is misogynistic, claim the very same people who demand that we not offend them, in a wonderful example of the type of double-think required to believe that merit is bad.
There is actually no way to determine if a particular contributor is male, female or a technically proficient aardvark unless they volunteer the information. So as long as they don't bring their genitals to the list the environment is at baseline no more or less welcoming for women than men, or people who can't figure out the difference.
What this is working towards is having an environment that women like. Which is fine, they should go build their own let the best one win.
This is a kernel mailing list. Nobody wants to hear your personal opinions. Why would such things even need to be discussed?
Very true, but begs the question why isn't the code of conduct explicitly limited to the mailing list, but instead explicitly extends into meatspace and is deliberately vague
+This Code of Conduct applies both within project spaces and in public spaces +when an individual is representing the project or its community. Examples of +representing a project or community include using an official project e-mail +address, posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed +representative at an online or offline event. Representation of a project may be +further defined and clarified by project maintainers.
Particularly loved the last line. might as well write it as " I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further. "
Problem is described in your own post. "Balance".
By definition, to disturb balance in one direction, you do not need a significant increase on the "emission" end. You just need enough to be more than "absorption" part. No altering of any other patterns is necessary.
I don't dispute this but I question why you think it lends validity to the stupid original post, that called anything the poster didn't like FUD
The greenhouse effect is not what makes a greenhouse work. Don't believe me ? How well do you think a greenhouse with just a roof and no walls would work.
If you can't actually think for yourself
Here's a firm that trains people how to operate greenhouses
https://www.pthorticulture.com...
And before you go BBBBBBUt CO2
Water vapor the American Chemical society disagrees with you
https://www.acs.org/content/ac...
I post these because I know many people can only appear to reason and can't actually accept a fact unless it's conveyed by someone in the proper robes and religious gear.
Dude you totally overlooked the heat generated by all the anti-wind-turbine protesters. That is transferred without fluid motion or conductors, as they can transfer their anger over the internet.
Lol it's offset by the cold fury of environmentalists that think they are saving the world. Hell if they weren't saving the world, they would have to admit they are useless losers.
Sure, you are totally right... and venus is a paradise, with its 400C air temperature (higher than mercury) because CO2 do not generate greenhouse effect and heat a planet
Venus has 90 times the atmosphere we do, and mercury has none but is roughly 1/3rd the destance from the Sun we are.
You have no idea how any of this works do you ? Thank you for demonstrating that you can be deeply religious without even realizing it.
What part of greenhouse effect is not applicable to how a windmill affects heat transport but how a greenhouse works is can't you understand ?
Seriously at least when I talk to a fundamentalist about the age of the earth they know their beliefs are religious.
Uh... no. You may be thinking of the kind of greenhouse that's made out of glass
Speaking of not being able to read, I said greenhouse not greenhouse effect. You should at least know the terms of what you are talking about.
"I'm not sure why you think that climate scientists don't understand this. "
I am not sure why you can't read
vs what I said
"It never ceases to amaze me how the climate doom people never understand the most basic concepts about heat transport."
vs what I was replying to which is so many ways wrong it's not even funny
"Windpower does not add heat to the atmosphere of Earth, it just mixes around where it's hot and where it's cold.
Greenhouse gases add heat energy (and thus average temperature) to the Earth's global atmosphere."
If you think CO2 is enough to change that balance, then you better believe altering the patterns of motion and conduction are as well.
Global mean temperature of the Earth without greenhouse gasses is ~ 33C cooler than today.
Global mean temperature of the Earth without wind turbines is ~ exactly the same as today.
And the bulk of that is from water vapor, hmm why didn't link mention water except for cooling ? hmmmmmm
"Water vapor is the most important greenhouse gas. It controls the Earth's temperature.” It's true that water vapor is the largest contributor to the Earth's greenhouse effect. On average, it probably accounts for about 60% of the warming effect
https://www.acs.org/content/ac..."
It's always funny when someone who clearly doesn't know how greenhouse gases work complains about "climate doom people". A greenhouse works because it stops conduction and convection. Greenhouse gases have an impact by raising the height in the atmosphere where infrared radiation is emitted into space. This means the effective temperature of the Earth for radiation emission is lower.
Always funny when a greenie proves not only don't they understand physics but also can't read
"BTW a greenhouse works not so much because it stops radiation but because it prevents conduction and convection."
Yeah that 100 parts per million is murder.
Marketing or Politics wise, giving money to an organization who's primary purpose is killing children is not a plus. People who are buying for a little one don't want to think about them being killed.
It never ceases to amaze me how the climate doom people never understand the most basic concepts about heat transport.
There three ways heat moves through a non uniform fluid
1. Physical motion of the fluid ( Convection and any other source of velocity)
2. Conduction (hot areas heating cooler areas by being in physical contact)
3. Radiation a gas molecule emits a photon and it's absorbed by another molecule, in the case of the earth you can include the planet as a heat source)
If you think CO2 is enough to change that balance, then you better believe altering the patterns of motion and conduction are as well.
BTW a greenhouse works not so much because it stops radiation but because it prevents conduction and convection.
Don't donate to planned parenthood this time.
Go figure what's more they can easily figure it out, when a service has one series they actually want to watch and a bunch of crap you couldn't pay them to view.
Toss in the fact that so much of Hollywood is considered to be little more than greedy scumbags by the general population, yeah it makes it that much easier to download that movie.
There is no meaningful difference between these. The one is just a contraction of the other.
Once again almost correct but that is still wrong. Tell me did you have rough potty training ? You seem rather anal.
Coal is slowly becoming uneconomical for electricity production but it is absolutely essential for primary steelmaking in a blast furnace.
If you are making good steel you are using electricity you need finer control of carbon content.
Your article comes from CoalSwarm.
Says the man who quoted an article quoting a report from IRENA
the international renewable agency ?
Yeah coal is so uneconomical
https://qz.com/1404934/chinas-...
https://www.chinadialogue.net/...
Oh apparently you are just as knowledgeable about the profitability of mining coal
https://www.montelnews.com/en/...
U.S. Exports expected to be up 60% in 2018 go figure.
You actually should have been learning the difference between "have" and "of".
Shame you are almost correct, a little more thought an you wouldn't be wrong. That would be should've vs should have.
Yeah the people burning wood apparently haven't heard your sage words
https://www.acs.org/content/ac...
Nor has China which is still building new coal plants
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0...
Hey please don't let reality interfere with your fantasy
"The patent describes how a laser diode can be configured to emit pulses of laser light using a circuit that includes an inductor and a gallium nitride transistor."
Every time I read stuff like this, I can only think I spent my life doing it wrong. I should of been figuring out how to get patents on stuff everybody knew about and was using anyway. Wow when a laser diode goes forward biased it will drain the stored energy from an inductor SMH.
Really should check before you post something so easily refuted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Is "misogynist" the new word for "people who are OK with having a penis?" As the United States saw on Thursday, there is a real war against men in this nation, and I can't imagine that doesn't extend to the entire world. It's quite frankly scary. These types of "codes of conduct" are being used to crush men and male behavior, all in order to "let women feel safe" which is, quite frankly, ridiculous in an online context. If a woman wants to submit code, she can, there's no need for all the men in the world to walk on egg shells just because her delicate womanly emotions might be offended. Oh, except claiming women have delicate womanly emotions is misogynistic, claim the very same people who demand that we not offend them, in a wonderful example of the type of double-think required to believe that merit is bad.
There is actually no way to determine if a particular contributor is male, female or a technically proficient aardvark unless they volunteer the information. So as long as they don't bring their genitals to the list the environment is at baseline no more or less welcoming for women than men, or people who can't figure out the difference.
What this is working towards is having an environment that women like. Which is fine, they should go build their own let the best one win.
This is a kernel mailing list. Nobody wants to hear your personal opinions. Why would such things even need to be discussed?
Very true, but begs the question why isn't the code of conduct explicitly limited to the mailing list, but instead explicitly extends into meatspace and is deliberately vague
+This Code of Conduct applies both within project spaces and in public spaces
+when an individual is representing the project or its community. Examples of
+representing a project or community include using an official project e-mail
+address, posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed
+representative at an online or offline event. Representation of a project may be
+further defined and clarified by project maintainers.
Particularly loved the last line. might as well write it as " I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further. "
Ahhh someone else who believes that the Power Fairy provides free grid stabilization to the countries that virtue signal the hardest.