Slashdot Mirror


GPS Slowly Changing How Things Are Done

Hemos forwarded me a link to a story at Fast Company about how GPS is changing the way people do business. Several good examples are used, from farmers in Alabama to anti-theft devices. Some notes on GPS' military origins as well. Also worth noting is how GPS, like computers, wasn't adopted overnight, but rather over time as applications were found.

292 comments

  1. No really! by I+Like+Swords!!! · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I'm working late tonight, don't wait up..."

    "Oh really? Then how come your cell phone is in Joe's Tavern with your secretary's pager bobbing over your coordinates?"

    "...*dialtone*..."

    ..err, I meant to say, cool!

    --
    .unsigged
    1. Re:No really! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      +1 bobbing

    2. Re:No really! by bsharitt · · Score: 3, Funny

      How many Slashdotters do you think have to worry about that?

    3. Re:No really! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right pagers are so out of style. Besides would it really bob? Now cranial implants, those might cause some fun

    4. Re:No really! by philj · · Score: 5, Informative

      You laugh, but in England there's already a service that lets you locate mobile ("cell" in your 'Merkin lingo) phones without using GPS: http://www.fleetonline.net/

    5. Re:No really! by 56ker · · Score: 1

      There are some married slashdotters.... take CmdrTaco as one example....

    6. Re:No really! by marko123 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Merkin lingo?" I didn't know fake pubic hair could talk.
      Click here for definition

      --
      http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
    7. Re:No really! by uradu · · Score: 1

      He didn't disclose the genders of either participant in the bobbing.

    8. Re:No really! by PD · · Score: 2, Funny

      My cell phone is nailed to my desk. It's definitely not a mobile phone.

    9. Re:No really! by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      AT&T Wireless offers a similar service in the US that can locate you on a cell-level.

    10. Re:No really! by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      It's one of those Eurostyle fashion things...

  2. Love My GPS! by NetJunkie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have a Garmin GPS V and LOVE it. The turn-by-turn routing has been a huge help. We started looking to buy a house and would print out a ton of MLS listings. Without the GPS we'd have to spend a lot of time planning our route. With the GPS we just punch in the address of the next house and off we go. Very accurate.

    1. Re:Love My GPS! by product+byproduct · · Score: 1, Funny

      With the GPS we just punch in the address of the next house and off we go.

      People like you are killing the taxicab industry.

    2. Re:Love My GPS! by thynk · · Score: 3, Informative

      What you should of done was planned the route for all the houses at once, then fed that info into your palm/ppc/gps device, probably would of saved a few miles on your total route. Or maybe that's what you did and I misread it.

      I've always wanted to do this for garage sales back when the technology was out of sight for prices. Now that it's cheap, I no longer do the garage sale circuit.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    3. Re:Love My GPS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People like you are killing the taxicab industry.

      If anything is killing the taxicab industry, it's probably the smell.

    4. Re:Love My GPS! by Eminor · · Score: 1

      Ah yes. I remember, it was so much harder to look at a map and follow the road. What would we do without it?

    5. Re:Love My GPS! by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "The turn-by-turn routing has been a huge help. "

      My step mom has that feature built in too. My dad says the command recognition's a little off, tho.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Love My GPS! by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

      I assume you still handwrite all your messages to people. I prefer email since it's faster and easier....

      The GPS is easier and faster than tracking back through a map. Plus it's nice to let it tell me that my next turn is 5 miles away...instead of having to watch every street sign and guess.

    7. Re:Love My GPS! by Eminor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, your assumption is incorrect. I use email for correspondence. However, I have noticed that you get more responses from resumes if you print them off and mail them.

      It only takes a minute to look at a map and plan your route. I find yahoo maps work quite well. Sometimes i print a few off. Print one zoomed out to show the whole route. Print another with your destination zoomed in.

    8. Re:Love My GPS! by NetJunkie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's fine, assuming I know I'm going there before I leave. But sometimes plans change. Plus, doing this for 20 house listings would take significant time.

      Again, it's also nice to have the GPS tell me when to turn and how far away I am. Just some good peace of mind....

    9. Re:Love My GPS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's the corrupt plate system in most cities that diverts most of the money to the plate owners.

    10. Re:Love My GPS! by uradu · · Score: 1

      I don't see how you need GPS for most urban areas, especially ones that you're already partially familiar with. Maps OTOH--I love having Mapopolis and the local county map on my Clie, this tiny device replaces a whole lotta paper maps and books. Finding an unknown street just involves locating it on the map, to get the general idea of the neighborhood. If you've lived in town for any length of time you'd know how to get to any particular area anyway.

    11. Re:Love My GPS! by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      Handheld garmins can probably do this. However, 2 years ago, we were shopping for a car for my wife, who is a realtor. The factory-installed BMW GPS could do turn-by-turn directions, but only for 1 address at a time, and entering addresses was tedious.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    12. Re:Love My GPS! by Ezubaric · · Score: 1


      This is the TPS ... if you're going to visit more than a couple of houses, you're going to need some serious computational power to get the optimal path.

      --

      ----------
      I am an expert in electricity. My father held the chair of applied electricity at the state prision.
    13. Re:Love My GPS! by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

      You don't see the need for a GPS for urban areas, but you see the need for a PDA and software? What's the difference? They are both small devices that hold map data. I don't carry a PDA normally, so that is extra trouble for me. The GPS was designed for one thing and does it very well and easily.

      The only difference between your setup and mine is that mine can tell me exactly where I'm at plus give me specific directions for the best path to follow.

    14. Re:Love My GPS! by mosch · · Score: 1

      I have a GPS V, and it can indeed do that. You can enter every house as a waypoint in advance, and then plan the route accordingly. Though if you wanted, you could also just enter every single address along the way, really wouldn't be that bad.

    15. Re:Love My GPS! by mosch · · Score: 1
      Yeah, maps are the coolest. The other day I had car trouble, so I opened up my map and clicked on emergency/auto service and I got the names of the ten closest auto repair shops, and I called them and found one that was open, had a new alternator for my car in stock, and was able to do the repair for me that night.

      Oh wait, no, that was a GPS navigation system I was using, not a map.

    16. Re:Love My GPS! by Eminor · · Score: 1

      That's why I drive a Japanese car. I spent my money on a reliable car, rather than the latest techno gismos.

    17. Re:Love My GPS! by uradu · · Score: 1

      > You don't see the need for a GPS for urban areas, but you see
      > the need for a PDA and software? What's the difference?

      That a mapping GPS is a PDA+software+GPS, i.e. more hardware (and a lot more money). What's the point of having a moving arrow on the map constantly tell you that you're driving along Market Street, when you could just lift your eyes and obtain that same information from street signs? Mind you, when GPS is close to a zero-cost item both financially and in terms of power consumption, I certainly won't mind having it in my PDA. But while I have to pay $800 for that moving map, no thanks.

    18. Re:Love My GPS! by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between knowing that you have to turn left onto Foo Place and not knowing exactly how far Foo Place is, and knowing that you have to turn left on Foo Place with the knowledge of exactly how far away Foo Place is supposed to be.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    19. Re:Love My GPS! by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

      How much was your PDA + Software? My GPS w/ software was $300.

    20. Re:Love My GPS! by uradu · · Score: 1

      Around $100. But $300 isn't bad, except it's probably not a high resolution display. Don't care about color, but it must be high rez.

    21. Re:Love My GPS! by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

      I agree with that. The Garmin V has one of the highest resolution displays you can get. It was much more detailed than the color models, since they all use low res.

      It's surprising how hard true route planning is to find on a GPS. The V is the only hand-held GPS device that does it. Else you get in to the car mounted devices. I didn't go the PDA route due to battery use. A PocketPC battery doesn't last nearly as long as a GPS unit....though I would like the nice color screen on the PDA.

    22. Re:Love My GPS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      huh? it's called a "medallion". and, since owning the medallion entitles you to your slice of the cabfare pie, it's ignorant to say that "corruption" diverts the money.

      it is foolish to limit the number of medallions, as most cities do, and that system leads to higher fares, and is mostly driven by corruption.

    23. Re:Love My GPS! by mosch · · Score: 1
      Okay, then substitute the aforementioned situation with 'found myself driving a pregnant girl with a craving for mexican food', or 'suddenly felt too ill to drive and needed a hotel'.

      All are real scenarios that I've been in, and used GPS NAV to solve in the most expeditious possible fashion, while driving either my japanese or my german car.

  3. Could Help SCO by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe SCO can use GPS to locate *nix code in Linux. So far they sure don't seem to have found much of it otherwise.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Could Help SCO by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Maybe SCO can use GPS to locate *nix code in Linux. So far they sure don't seem to have found much of it otherwise. "

      Give the inspectors more time!!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Could Help SCO by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

      Give the inspectors more time!!

      Our intelligence reports say that Linux has *nix code theft program. It must be there!:P

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
    3. Re:Could Help SCO by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
      Our intelligence reports say that Linux has *nix code theft program.

      I though they were buying it from Niger.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  4. color moving map 12 channel magellan GPS less $199 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    search ebay for the visor prism, - color palm handspring unit - $150 with shipping - used - 65000 colors

    nice organizer with handspring expansion slot
    --------------------
    staples, etc. - handspring unit GPS magellan - 12 channel - $49 - new on clearance - software for moving map, location, speed, etc.

    -------
    this unit with good mapping software for $29 rivals dedicated color moving map GPS units costing thousands.

    ----

    get the spint phone module from ebay for $20 for the visor handspring and now it is a phone too.

  5. Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by Thinkit3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comparable to DirectTV (see slashdot article about them). The signals would be scrambled unless you paid $9.99 per month for a "license fee". They could use the stupidest encryption around, and anybody who broke it would be put in jail and fined. Scramblin it for a military purpose makes sense, but scrambling it to protect "intellectual property" is just stupid. Unit cost for one more person to use it is zero. Like America's Army game, an example of good use of government to keep things sane. A libertarian might argue for donation-based entities, but either way it gets done.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And if a corporation had set it up, they would have shouldered a huge installation cost that they'd then have to make back.

      But instead the government just spends our tax money so people can look for buried garbage in the woods.

      How much of the 1/3rd of my salary the feds take funds this? I'm thinking 9.99 a month sounds pretty nice. It's only free for mooching foreign nations who do nothing but whine about it.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by MBCook · · Score: 2, Interesting
      While your analogy has some merit, it's important to remember that DirecTV doesn't have any content of their own. They resell other people's content. As such, there is something to be stolen. If you steal DirecTV you're not hurting DirecTV. You're hurting them, and Showtime, and Starz, and Cinemax, and Blockbuster (who does all the PPV movies) and countless others who only get revenue through selling subscriptions (you could argue that it would actually BENEFIT the commerical networks like ABC, CBS, NBC, HGTV, Discovery, etc since they are showing more commercials). DirecTV is best thought of as a middle man, not the origionator of the service.

      That said, I think things would end up as they are eventually. Look at cellphones. It used to cost a fortune to make a local call, but it's gotten cheaper to the point of being nearly free. Long distance used to be horrendus, but it's to the point where it's nearly free. Since the infrastructure is there, they can just sell "access units" (phones, or in your case GPS recievers) and they still make money (since maintainc is nearly free, or at least is for GPS). So while it would have taken a while, things would have gotten to this point eventually. It's the natural conclusion of things (or at least it seems to be to me).

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      It is not theft as there is no tangible property involved. It might be a contract violation or copyright infringement. It is debateable how wrong it is to intercept the signals with your own equipement.

      About your second comment, it cost $10 bucks for cable, my cable bill is over $35 for the same service. Come again about the natural evolution is to become cheaper.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    4. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you could argue that it would actually BENEFIT the commerical networks like ABC, CBS, NBC, HGTV, Discovery, etc since they are showing more commercials

      They set their ad rates based on neilsen ratings. I don't think the people who steal cable are represented in those ratings.

    5. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The article says GPS cost about $9 billion over 30 years to field. The average US population over the past 30 years has been about 250 million (more now, less in 1970), or 1/4 billion. So that's about $36 per person, or about a dollar per American per year, not adjusted for inflation.

      Much as people love to whine about government waste, you've got to hand it to them--GPS has been a good deal for all of us.

    6. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I was thinking. Like I say, you "could argue." --MBCook, parrent of parrent

    7. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So that's about $36 per person"

      Too bad 45% of people over 18 pay no federal income tax, and another 24.7% are under 18, so only about 35% of Americans are actually paying federal income taxes. So it is more like $100 for us, and $0 for everyone else.

    8. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, don't forget that cable companies are near monopolies in most areas, and as such don't always follow the rules of free economies.

      Also, don't forget that it may only cost $10 to lay the cable or whatever, but that's a onetime fee (with slight maintence) and one cable carries the signal for many many people for the vast majority of it's length.

      If you're going to try to rationalize free cable to everyone else (which is a sign of guilt), you could at least try something that hodls a tiny bit of water (like "I only watch 2% of the channels, so why sould I pay for 100% of them?").

      Troll.

      --MBCook - parrent of parrent

    9. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This is soooo wrong on so many levels:
      But instead the government just spends our tax money so people can look for buried garbage in the woods.
      No, it was built for the military. Someone thought "Hey, if we're building this anyway, we might as well also make it available for civilian use". But it wasn't built for civilian use, it was built for defending the country.
      It's only free for mooching foreign nations who do nothing but whine about it.
      No, it isn't free for the countries "whining" about it. The countries "whining" about it are building their own system, rather than "mooching" off the US's.

      And the funny part of this is that the US government is pretty pissed they're doing that.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    10. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by TampaTim · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, GOD FORBID if the government spends a teensy little bit of your money on somethig that can benefit every PERSON and CORPORATION on the planet, and stimulate the economy (and not the bottom line of the one company that would own it if it were private). Look at Iridium. They shot themselves in the foot and almost had to destroy the whole system. I would NOT want GPS under the control of one company, no matter how well managed and intelligently run the company is. Furthermore the gov't doesnt try to profit off of GPS. A coorperation would not only wan to recoup their invesment but also would want to make money hand over fist.

      P.S. I think you are a troll!

    11. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by WizardX · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes they are. Neilsen ratings are based on a sample. Thus, based on the sample ("Neilsen households), X% watched this, Y% watched that, etc.

    12. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      It is not theft as there is no tangible property involved.

      No, it is theft. It's theft of services. Exactly as if you siphoned energy off the grid unmetered, or phreaked for phone calls.

      It's debatable how morally wrong it is, but legally it is theft.

    13. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      It's theft of services. Exactly as if you siphoned energy off the grid unmetered, or phreaked for phone calls.

      No, it's not.

      If you use energy off the grid, there is something taken. You used something that could have been sold to someone else had you not taken it. Same with use of a phone network, you are using a circuit that could have went to a paying customer.

      When you "steal" something that is broadcast, you aren't using any resource that could have been sold to someone else. You aren't "stealing" anything at all.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    14. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No, it isn't free for the countries "whining" about it."

      Yes, it is. You can easily use civilian GPS over in Europe, as in the US.

      Also, last I checked, most European countries whining also whined that their economies won't pick up due to the recession/standstill of the US economy. Our tax dollars went toward deployment of the GPS system, whether for military uses primarily and first or not, it doesn't matter. They have little substantial to no investment.

      "The countries "whining" about it are building their own system, rather than "mooching" off the US's.""

      Yes, they are building their own system. But in the meantime, they are mooching and have been for at least a decade. You're telling me no European government uses GPS? Hah

      "And the funny part of this is that the US government is pretty pissed they're doing that."

      I fail to see any humor whatsoever in this topic.

      Yes, the US government is annoyed. You seem to be trying to make a point here, but the reality is, the US gov has valid reasons to be annoyed, and it is not due to US centric reasoning, much to the chagrin of the EU.

      This is rather simple issue, but quite a bit more complex than you want it to sound. The US government doesn't see the EU's deployment as anything but an economic arm's race. The US government certainly sees a certain control factor in GPS uses, something they feel is deserved given the sanctity the Europeans gained from US intervention last century.

      OTOH, the Europeans, frankly, are fed up at hearing this, forgetting the 40s as well as the Cold War era. They are annoyed not due to crushing reminders but because it's simply there; the US basis, the US companies, the western US influenced culture, etc. With no USSR, people frequently like to see the "winner" fall.

      To that end, the EU views their GPS deployment not necessarily as better (it is, mainly due to a later deployment taking advantage of tech advancements and costs, not truly design (although they have some clever things there, like the signal riding)) although they certainly have pride in it, but really more to have an independent system from the US, reflecting their state of mind--it is the intent of the system rather than the reality of the system they want. (The US gov is worried about the reality of the system, it's ability to be abused, not able to turn it off during needed times.) There's also a bit of socialist economics in the EU's thinking, but nothing the US and the allies (much of Europe, Japan, etc.) hasn't done before (e.g. create projects in order to advance the state of the economy with jobs (money injected) and technology).

      In any case, GPS would not have come about due to a corporation. It's deployment would be similar to someone deploying nationwide broadband access via satellite only--there would be few adopters at this time as compared to the current system we have, deployed by the military. (There would be users of a commercial GPS system, but it would hardly be raking in cash.)

    15. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd argue that this is a valid way of looking at the situation; whether a person pays income tax directly or not, he or she does represent some fraction of overall government spending (which is funded from many sources). Money spent on this program was not spent on something else, thus the opportunity cost of the system stands about $1/yr per American.

      But if, as you state, only about 1/3 of people pay taxes, and we want to break down the cost per income tax payer, then fine--the figure is still only $3/yr. What a bargin! :)

    16. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by po_boy · · Score: 1

      Do you pay when you ride the bus? Even if there are other empty seats?

    17. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      In your example, I would be taking up a seat that could be sold to a paying customer, hence, I have stolen something. Taking the seat uses part of a finite resource, it reduces the amount of that resource that is available for sale. Tuning in a satellite broadcast does not use part of a finite resource, it does not reduce the amount of broadcast available for sale.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    18. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by LadyLucky · · Score: 1

      That's one paranoid puppy, right there.

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    19. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only free for mooching foreign nations who do nothing but whine about it.

      And I bet you still can't find them on a map.

    20. Re:Imagine if GPS were made by a corporation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Unless you took a flight there and used your GPS.

  6. Is business really ready? by Demodian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We worked on a turn-key project over a year ago (before matters got screwed by an acquisition), and one aspect of the product was to track GPS position and record it every so often with a few other real-time parameters, such as speed, direction, and average MPH. The project completed the first product phase of deployment, but actually using the GPS data (while recording WAS working) was slated for phase 2. Unfortunately, I think the whole thing got mothballed because the company receiving the product was not technically inclined one bit. Such a waste of effort. It would have helped cut their yearly expenses down a lot.

  7. I hope they don't run over the barn ... by basho3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a long-time sailor, I have heard more stories than I can count about vessels lost or damaged because skippers entered bad coordinates for a buoy or harbor entrance. Are rogue tractors next?

    "For the moment, they've managed to resist the hottest new GPS tool: tractors that steer themselves. The price is still too high, but the idea is appealing, because with an auto-steer tractor, they would be able to work at night."

    1. Re:I hope they don't run over the barn ... by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Better yet what part of GPS is jammable do people not understand? A ship is pretty safe it has a big margin of error. Now it's nice to use GPS to guide things what happens when the kid down the road starts messing up the system. Yes you can have a good inertial guidance as backup potentialy a good referance correction (DOT uses them plant a GPS on a known fixed point and tranmit how much it's off moment to moment to get sub centimeter accuracy)

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    2. Re:I hope they don't run over the barn ... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Well you have a simple failsafe that stops the tractor if it loses contact, or recieves irrational geodata.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:I hope they don't run over the barn ... by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think you are refering to DGPS?

      Conventional civillian GPS (which is not the same as Military GPS, even with SA turned off as it is now) is accurate to typically ~10m. You can enhance that a long way by doing phase matching as well as code matching - survey GPS devices can get down to a few cms (for a price!).

      DGPS works on the basis that for each satellite in the area the error arriving at two units within a couple of hundred miles is roughly the same. (Extra delay is caused by things like atmospheric conditions.) You put one reciever on a known point, and calculate the error for each satellite you can see. You then send all of the calculated corrections to the roaming reciever so it can remove the error in the signals it's getting before it calculates it's position. This is considerably cheaper than using a survey grade GPS, as well as faster, but unlike a survey grade GPS you need to have set up a nearby DGPS transmitter first. The (FAA?) have done this around US airports I believe, to allow autolanding systems to double check against DGPS data as well as ILS beacons.

      It's worth noting that to be able to use DGPS it's _not_ enough to calculate the error in your _position_ and transmit the correction to that as the roaming unit may be using different satellites to you - you have to transmit the error on each satellite signal. Some Garmin units let you extract this data using an undocumented API.

      --
      Beep beep.
    4. Re:I hope they don't run over the barn ... by PPGMD · · Score: 1
      WAAS was just "officially" turned on by the FAA, its accurate enough to replace the CAT I approach in the FAA's eyes, it's accurate enough for me.

      Another good feature that WAAS brings with it, is it has a way of transmitting if it detects irregularities in the GPS signal, and the WAAS satellites can be used as back up GPS satellites.

    5. Re:I hope they don't run over the barn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you are on land it is pretty easy to see where you are traveling. These are $$$millions pieces of equipment we are talking about, many with air condition, CD, etc.. I am sure that if they are riding around at night they have some decent flood lights projecting from the front, and at 5.5-6mph you can't accidentally get too far off course.

    6. Re:I hope they don't run over the barn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "what happens when the kid down the road starts messing up the system."

      Any links to the technology required to do blocking on that scale?

    7. Re:I hope they don't run over the barn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conventional civillian GPS (which is not the same as Military GPS, even with SA turned off as it is now) is accurate to typically ~10m. You can enhance that a long way by doing phase matching as well as code matching - survey GPS devices can get down to a few cms (for a price!).

      Yes, sampling the phases can, in principle, increase your accuracy down to however low you can sample the phases.
      However, the fundamental problem is that the inaccuracy is caused by weather conditions diracting the signal and affecting its arrival time. DGPS counters this by placing a reference point near the receiver which which is also affected by the weather but by the same amount. You still need to sample the phases to get sub-cm accuracy of your position relative to the reference transmitter.

      It's worth noting that to be able to use DGPS it's _not_ enough to calculate the error in your _position_ and transmit the correction to that as the roaming unit may be using different satellites to you

      I think you're a little confused. DGPS never calculates the "error in your position" - it never needs to know it.

    8. Re:I hope they don't run over the barn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, the FAA is working on 2 systems. WAAS - The Wide Area Augmentation System and the LAAS - Local Area Augmentation System. Both are essentially correction signals. WAAS signals are broadcast from satelites. LAAS are broadcast locally (much like DGPS). See http://gps.faa.gov/programs/index.htm

      WAAS correction signals were just enabled last week. No receivers on the market yet, but they will be there soon. Many GPS's already have a connector for adding a WAAS add-on.

      Although most people do much better, as the FAA measures guaranteed accuracy, current "vanilla" GPS accuracy is 100 meters. With WAAS, it's 3 meters. Don't know what the accuracy of LAAS is supposed to be.

    9. Re:I hope they don't run over the barn ... by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Jeesus, clueless anonymous wanker alert.

      In case you didn't actually read my last sentence I said that DGPS _doesnt_ calculate the error in your position - this however is a common mistake made by people who think that you can work out how much 'off' a hand held GPS is at one point and then just add or deduct that number at the next point. That's why I clarified it.

      I am also well aware that you need to code phase match to geet sub CM accuracy, but you can get pretty damn accurate without it when aided by DGPS error updates.

      --
      Beep beep.
    10. Re:I hope they don't run over the barn ... by wilddur · · Score: 1

      An incredible good point.

      It seems that tractors, ships and even cars that move by themselves could save a lot of money. But then there is a need o a great quality of service that gps won't give. During the war of Irk the precission was reduced... can you imagine a ship entering in the harbor with +/- 50 m... a bit of dangerous. Thats where Galileo is supoused to solve.

  8. When I can track my own stolen car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting



    without paying an outrageous monthly fee akin to protection money, or calling a company to do it for me for a fee, then gps will have arrived for me.

    One stolen car, recovered by my family, not police.
    One van, stolen twice, recovered by my family twice, not police.
    One 4x4, stolen, never recovered, $10,000 loss, insurance settlement was a joke after months of haggling and threatening to sue.

    1. Re:When I can track my own stolen car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like your problems have more to do with your low class upbringing and peers, to have had a vehicle stolen four times.

    2. Re:When I can track my own stolen car by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      Easy, I've done this with my boat.

      Get an old cheap laptop, gps pcmcia card, a GSM phone and a phone-pc cable. Hook it up to your mascot dc ac converter.

      Make a tiny script to send the coordinates and run it with "scheduled tasks" every 60 minutes or so.

      Easy, and very cheap (less than a dollar a day, if your sms charge is sane).

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    3. Re:When I can track my own stolen car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds to me you should invest in a garage door.

    4. Re:When I can track my own stolen car by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Funny

      After I read the parent post, but before I read yours, I was thinking along very similar lines. However, I was thinking of setting it up so that your computer would simply wait passively for a phone call on the line. Then if it gets a call, it hooks you up to the GPS reciever and you can track it. This avoids the problem of continuous outgoing messages (and associated charges). Of course I haven't actually built the system. So I'm just curious, what made you decide to do it the way you did it?

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    5. Re:When I can track my own stolen car by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      insurance settlement was a joke after months of haggling and threatening to sue.

      Perhaps it was the fact that you had two cars stolen previously that made them reluctant to pay! Where were they parked? Out in the street with the keys in the ignition and a big "STEAL ME" sign on the front?

      I live in Australia... but is that kind of theft normal where you live? It just boggles my mind - out of all the people and family I know, only one car has been stolen from them, and it was recovered the next day in the next suburb , with the thief's personal belongings still in it (bonus!)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    6. Re:When I can track my own stolen car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try this...
      1. Get your ham license
      2. install an APRS node in your car/truck/whatever
      You need a TinyTrak, a radio, and a GPS, don't forget cable, ant, etc. You also need an igate (APRS internet gateway) in your area.

      On low power the radio should go for MANY days sending GPS data when powered from the boat/car/etc. If your boat/car/etc goes missing, do a search online @ www.findu.com, call the police, and tell them where your boat/car/etc is. Using the scanner you are sure to aquire as a ham, listen to the police find your boat/car/whatever

    7. Re:When I can track my own stolen car by burns210 · · Score: 1

      "One 4x4, stolen, never recovered, $10,000 loss, insurance settlement was a joke after months of haggling and threatening to sue."

      I am sorry for you getting ripped off... But if it was such a joke of a settlement, then shouldn't you back up your threat and actually SUE them?

    8. Re:When I can track my own stolen car by Agent+R · · Score: 1

      I did something similar about 10 years ago when I was still an engineering student working for one of the biochemistry professors at a university I attended. It was a remote sensor designed to gather environmental information of ocean waters using a laptop linked into a battery of sensors and a mobile phone. Essentially you logged into it like a BBS.

      Only trouble was that the laptop tended to consumed quite a bit of power that drained even marine batteries fast. So unless you plan to change batteries on a regular basis.. consider using a solar array to help recharge it.

      --
      !@#$% whole-grain cereal. When I want fiber, I eat some wicker furniture. - G. Carlin
    9. Re:When I can track my own stolen car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We at www.g-inovasi.com sells the same GPS car tracking device and it only costs $300. You can operate the device by yourself, and it is already embedded with digital map. thus you can recover your own vehicle without any help from any 3rd party (you may still need to call the police to aprehend the bad guys though). There are no monthly fee since you operate this yourself. So you can track your own car now!

  9. Geocaching by IwannaCoke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My father and I use GPS receivers as often as possible. We are both Geocachers.

    For those of you that don't know what Geocaching is, here is a quote from the geocaching.com FAQ:

    "What is Geocaching?

    Geocaching is an entertaining adventure game for gps users. Participating in a cache hunt is a good way to take advantage of the wonderful features and capability of a gps unit. The basic idea is to have individuals and organizations set up caches all over the world and share the locations of these caches on the internet. GPS users can then use the location coordinates to find the caches. Once found, a cache may provide the visitor with a wide variety of rewards. All the visitor is asked to do is if they get something they should try to leave something for the cache. "

    1. Re:Geocaching by Fiveeight · · Score: 0, Troll

      You're [a troll] with a [net connection]

      "Oh no, I love [SlashDot], so when I leave a [post] full of garbage on the site, it's symbolic of my love for [discussion], not [trolling]".

      YOU MAKE ME [YAWN]

    2. Re:Geocaching by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny
      Just as a word of warning for inexperienced geo cachers there are a few things you should not put in your cache or the results might not be quite what you intended (unless you like being visited by lots of military grade explosive)
      1. Weapons of mass destruction
      2. Plans for gas centrifuge machines
      3. Middle aged paunchy men answering to the name Saddam
      4. Middle aged bearded men answering to the name Osama
      5. Any music recordings for which you cannot prove ownership
      6. Modded X-Boxes
      7. MS Source code
      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    3. Re:Geocaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geocaching is an entertaining adventure game? Man, you need a life. I love using GPS when sailing or flying, but the chances of me walking around using GPS to find stuff that has been placed for me to try and find is just ridiculus. GPS is a great tool, but geocaching is not an "adventure" game...

    4. Re:Geocaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why Not? You get to go outside and explore your area. You usually end up in places that you would not have known existed otherwise. Anyt activity that lets people be outside and exercising is a Good Thing.

  10. wardriving and computer security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wardriving is a perfect example of how GPS has changed the way we look at computer security, especially where wireless LANs are concerned.

    Check out wifimaps.com to see if your wlan has been scanned.

    1. Re:wardriving and computer security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hrm, you think your little old link caused their database machine to go down?

      Warning: pg_connect() [function.pg-connect]: Unable to connect to PostgreSQL server: could not connect to server: No route to host Is the server running on host 192.168.8.4 and accepting TCP/IP connections on port 5432? . in /mnt/hog/websites/wifimaps/public_html/modules/Fin d/search.php on line 239

  11. Cell Phones by Alan+Holman · · Score: 0

    I saw a headline about a GPS service for cell-phones; a cool toy! I read more, and was disillusioned by "for emergency purposes only." Turns out, the GPS information is only seen by emergency persons if you call 911. Sucks, eh?

    1. Re:Cell Phones by thynk · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It's there for 911 calls, but most of the ones I have seen allow you to access the GPS data without having to dial it. YMMV.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    2. Re:Cell Phones by MBCook · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would think most cellphones are (or at least will be) this way. GPS is something that is already there (due to the E911 thing), so why not make it available to the cellphone users so they can use it and you can claim it as a feature and say "our phone is better because theirs doesn't let you see where you are with our IntelliGPS HyperLocater technology." If it's not common now, I think it will be. I for one would prefer to buy a phone that would let me see the GPS data over one that wouldn't, all else being equal. Wouldn't you?

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:Cell Phones by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Informative

      FWIW, what cellphones use is generally not GPS, but good old fashioned triangulation. Which, interestingly, means it's probably more accurate than GPS too.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:Cell Phones by bobbozzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, as long as my wife can't use it to hunt me down. :)

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    5. Re:Cell Phones by bhimaji · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty confident that this is not true. Frequently the phones only include part of the GPS receiver, depending on the cell tower to do calculations and signal reception.

      More importantly, I've read every manual I could for phones with E911, and the only option you had was to allow non-911 services (ie: advertisers, or other as yet unknown services) to use it.

      If you want a phone with a GPS, Nextel is the only way to go. They have phones that run J2ME java stuff, and you can access the GPS via a Java API. Unfortunately, the price for their data service is too high, and you can't use bluetooth on any of their phones.

    6. Re:Cell Phones by kazad · · Score: 1

      not to nitpick, but GPS uses triangulation as well =)

    7. Re:Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to nitpick, but GPS uses 4 satellites. One for the time offset.

  12. Question by thomas536 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can someone enlighten me as to why a farmer driving a tractor would need to know their location to a 1' accuracy?

    1. Re:Question by randyest · · Score: 5, Informative

      so he can drive over the same tracks in his wheat field every year (I'm not kidding, read the fine article) and compress as little of his soil as possible

      --
      everything in moderation
    2. Re:Question by thomas536 · · Score: 1

      If it was a year to year problem that they're attempting to solve, it still doesn't make sense to me, as they will plow up the whole field at then end of the season anyway.

    3. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a tractor can be guided with such fine precision... who needs a farmer to do it?

    4. Re:Question by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      As expensive as that equipment is to run and maintain, and as thin as profit margins in farming are, it behooves any good farmer to harvest/plant/whatever as precisely as possible. Some of those combines will use more fuel in an afternoon than your car will all month.

      Going over the same path twice costs too much, and could damage crops if he was fertilizing or something like that that doesnt give you the visual feedback on where you've been (like mowing).

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    5. Re:Question by randyest · · Score: 2, Informative

      Regardless, the machines are heavy. They compress the soil that the wheels drive over. Roots grow less quickly in compacted soil. Driving anywhere each year (or whatever the crop change period is) will eventually compact large chunks of field which will have to be tilled/aerated before re-planting. Driving on the same tracks (more or less) every time minimized this.

      Hope that helps.

      --
      everything in moderation
    6. Re:Question by thmitch · · Score: 2, Informative

      My brother, who farms in Iowa, has been using GPS for a couple of years now. One use of GPS is he when he harvests the combine uses the GPS to map out the yields in small areas of the field instead of just knowing the yield for the whole field. Using this info and soils tests he can determine what areas have good amounts of nutrients and what areas do not. The next summer when he plants he feeds this info into the equipment and with the GPS it automatically adjusts the amount of fertilizer that each part of the field needs. Modern farming involes more high tech then many people realize and one the main reasons US farmers out produce any other farmers in the world.

    7. Re:Question by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of 'no-till'? Not everyone tills the soil after harversting each year.

      --
      What?
    8. Re:Question by thmitch · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually not all farmers plow up the whole fields now days with the various low tillage systems being used. My brother does what is called ridge tilling and only plows between the ridges where the corn or beens are planted. This reduces the amount of plowing and intern reduces the amount of soil erosion.

    9. Re:Question by heli0 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Agricultural GPS uses

      Yield Monitoring

      Chemical Application History

      Developing fertilizer application plans

      Tracking Soil Analysis Results

      Identification of "problem areas" on fields

      Finding the best locations for equipment

      Profit /Loss charts by field

      --
      Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    10. Re:Question by puetzc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here is a simpler example - With a 40 foot implement (what the tractor is pulling), an average driver may overlap the end of the implement 3 feet into the previous pass to be sure that he doesn't miss any soil. It is hard work to drive accurately enough to be closer than this. With GPS, the overlap can be cut to 1 foot. The tractor is now doing 5% more work (39 vs 37 feet) with the same fuel and wear and tear. This can quickly pay for the GPS.

    11. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was that much of a problem, I think I would simply put markers along the travel path.

      It this a new phenomenon or what?

    12. Re:question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm. They're up in space. Definately middle of nowhere but I hope there's not a dog tied to a tree up there.

    13. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soil compression mainly.

      I would also imagine that's it like cutting a large lawns. Some of the midwest farms are huge, conglomerating to save on costs as well as buying out neighboring farmers. They also have bigass pieces of equipment to help. When you have that much acreage, harvesting in a straight line, as well as reducing overlap in passes, saves several cleanup passes as well as being more efficient in reducing the number of passes per acre (further reducing soil compression, saves time, don't waste fuel).

      Plus, farmers due have some need to "survey" their land. 100 acres isn't much, but start talking thousands, and knowing what is where and what's planted can help map out what to plant the following year plus save on fertilization costs. Obviously, you can just look, but you can also correlate to growth rates, weather, etc.

      GPS could be important (not so much so now, given the logistics and how people harvest) if you harvest in a set pattern (not really done), since you could see what grew well based on the tonnage and weight. Maybe acre 110 was low, and you might locate a certain problem, like it's a high point, while acre 977 was high, showing that's getting more runoff than you thought. Farming efficiency tends to be a good thing.

    14. Re:question by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      The towers, not the satellites, they exist, I have seen them.

      --
      I hate sigs.
    15. Re:question by TampaTim · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why do you care?

    16. Re:question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are built by companies usually to get a closer aproximation of civilian gps.

      GPS is normaly satellites.

      You get a tower and know within 2inches of where that tower is on the planet. You can then use that tower with another one, plus the GPS to get you fairly close. Civilian GPS is only accurate to like 10-45 feet for a decent one. The really good ones usually use something like that to get it REALLY close with in a few inches.

    17. Re:Question by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "so he can drive over the same tracks in his wheat field every year (I'm not kidding, read the fine article) and compress as little of his soil as possible"

      As opposed to following the stupidly obvious tyre-tracks, marked by a 3-foot dip in crop height along the places you've driven before?

      C'mon, look at the photos and tell me you need a GPS to figure out where the last person drove their tractor?

    18. Re:Question by thunderbird46 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On my family's farm we use GPS for accuracy in chemical application. My father has a Case IH sprayer which he modified to be 105 feet wide. In the past, sprayers used foam dropped from the end of the boom to indicate where the end of the swath was, but on something this big moving about 15 MPH across a field it can be difficult to drive accurately using just a row of foam dots 52.5 feet away from yourself for guidance. The GPS system on the sprayer lets my dad just follow the lights on an indicator and know that he's not over or under applying pesticides. I've used a GPS system in a similar way while applying granular fertilizer -- without the GPS I had a terrible time keeping the tractor the correct distance from my previous track.

    19. Re:question by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      Basically, triangulation?

      --
      I hate sigs.
    20. Re:Question by mdielmann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've talked to clients in the agro business, and they mentioned GPS-mapped ariel surveys of their crop fields to determine where the weeds were growing (apparently they absorb - or don't - a specific IR range). This would be coupled with a GPS-equipped tractor, the data would be downloaded, and the GPS system would spray only the regions that showed as having a troublesome level of weeds. This may not have required 1-foot accuracy, but it was still GPS, and could reduce herbicide use to 1/3.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    21. Re:Question by himself · · Score: 1

      >
      > My father has a Case IH sprayer which he
      > modified to be 105 feet wide
      >
      Possibly the biggest case mod ever (har).
      My relatives have a farm in western Minnesota and we visited a couple of summers ago. Even the combines are cool, and those are pretty small compared to the really big stuff: my dad just visited a farm in Nebraska that has tractors pulling 60'-wide plows! Christ, I'd want mechanized control of something that big, too.

  13. Re:Someone Help US??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    It wouldn't help because there are still Bathe party loyalists using GPS jammers they bought from, uuh, Trinidad and Tobago. Yeah, that's the ticket. I knew you smart guys would understand.

    -Rummy

  14. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were too busy getting ready to spit on our troops after we liberated them (again)

  15. Privacy ignored ***again*** by Goonie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The mind boggles. How many people are going to accept a system that lets their insurance company track everywhere they drive? Yes, I'm surely more obsessive about this kind of thing than Joe Average, but surely you don't have to be a privacy nut to have some issues with this.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:Privacy ignored ***again*** by MBCook · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This will be market drivin, I think. There are some, probably a great many people who wouldn't mind this a bit if it caused their insurance rates to plummet. Everything is a tradeoff, and this is one that many people will be willing to take.

      There are many people who, like you, would be too worried about the big-brother aspect and would want different insurance. These people would flock to insurance companies that work like those today and would be covered.

      The only real problem would be if the government were to regulate that all insurace MUST function this was, but seeing as how this is the US (if you're not in the US, I don't know what will happen), you'll be fine. Here in the US just find other people like you (it shouldn't be to hard to find others who don't want to be locked into the system, or believe that people shouldn't have to be locked into it whether they personally like it or not) to be able to elect new people to abolish the rule.

      I really don't think you have too much to worry about.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Privacy ignored ***again*** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GPS itself CAN NOT send out ANY information. Another layer of technology and computer systems is needed for that. The additional technology would need to be a radio transponder or maybe a cellular-based system.

    3. Re:Privacy ignored ***again*** by sebmol · · Score: 1

      Thank you. And here I was afraid thinking that I'm the only who thought of this as a prviacy problem.

      --
      "Light is faster than sound." - "Is that why people tend to look bright until you hear them speak?"
    4. Re:Privacy ignored ***again*** by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " How many people are going to accept a system that lets their insurance company track everywhere they drive?"

      Oregon's been talking about installing GPS in all cars to track their movements within the state and tax proportionally. Lots of people saying "WTF?!"

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:Privacy ignored ***again*** by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      As always, one of the most liberal states is hard at work coming up with new uses of technology to track and tax.

    6. Re:Privacy ignored ***again*** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The japaneese tried this a few years ago (not sure if they used gps or radio towers though) but had to scrap it as too many people where discovered visting prostitues!

  16. Re:Someone Help US??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    haha so i lied , fooled you all !
    now if you will excuse me i must get back to making sure my family for generations to come never has to work again...ever

    oh wait you already did that for me

    regards
    G.W Bush

  17. Or maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    I just lived in one of the highest car theft regions of the nation, in a middle to upper middle class neighborhood. I believe for a few or more years, it was number one in the nation.

    I not aware of too many neighborhoods in the US where the average one and two family houses run in the neighborhood of $450,000 to $750,000 with individual houses on some streets running $1,000,000+ for a one family, and where a three bedroom apartment rents for $2,000+ a month in what is considered a suburban area.

    Very nice post though. Why don't you log on, and stand behind your words?

    And since you seem to have dificulty with reading comprehension, let's go over it again. One van, one car, one 4x4. And they were vehicles worth stealing, or they wouldn't have been stolen.

    1. Re:Or maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why dont you log in and stand behind YOUR WORDS? Hypocrite.

  18. $5000 GPS recievers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone has a bug up their ass about commercial entities.

    "Comparable to DirectTV (see slashdot article about them). The signals would be scrambled unless you paid $9.99 per month for a "license fee". "

    As compared to the US military who could have simply sayed no to commercial usage...

    "They could use the stupidest encryption around, and anybody who broke it would be put in jail and fined. Scramblin it for a military purpose makes sense, but scrambling it to protect "intellectual property" is just stupid. "

    and then throwing your ass in Leavenworth because you broke the encryption, and gave away plans to "enemy combatents".

    "Unit cost for one more person to use it is zero. Like America's Army game, an example of good use of government to keep things sane. "

    Unless they said no to commercial usage then you'd have to sing a different tune about how the evil government wouldn't let you do what you wanted with the signal you "paid for" with your tax money.

    BTW Even with the government saying yes to commercial use. It was commercialism that brought the cost down enough, we all can have a "/." story about it.

  19. Re:Why post anonymously then by k_herald · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not to shoot you down or anything but I work specifially with GPS. The GPS C/A code broadcast on L1 (1.57542 GHz) has never been encrypted. The military simply encoded ephemerides for the GPS satellites that were inprecise (this was called "Selective Ability") onto the L1 signal. This led to a user range error of ~30 meters. After this was turned off in 2001 the error went down to ~3 meters. There has always been the PPS ("Precise Positioning Service") P-code signal on the L2 frequency (1.22760 GHz). This is actually encrypted, and is what the military uses in its. Acurracy with this service can be in the range of centimeters (low dynamics case). Working with the L2 signal requires a security clearance and a bunch of goverment red-tape. In the next 10 years there is going to be an explosion of GPS tech. First off the EU is putting up Galileo, which will double the number of SV's orbiting the earth (more satellites in view = better positioning accuracy). Althought the signal structures are not the exact same, because they will be broadcasting at similar carrier frequencies designing a dual use receiver will be a piece of cake. Also GPS is being heavily upgraded. They are adding a third signal with M-code(L3), and adding C/A code on L2. There is also talk about increasing the signal strength, which is a great boon to indoor GPS and using the GPS signal for remote sensing applications. All in all it is a great industry to be in.

  20. Re:Question-Seeing eye tractor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Driving on the same tracks (more or less) every time minimized this. "

    And as a former farmer you don't need GPS to do this. Also we can drive at night just fine.

  21. Re:Why post anonymously then by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    which is a great boon to indoor GPS

    Fantastic !! I will always be able to locate the TV remote no matter where it hides on me. Now wheres that fscking GPS receiver.....

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  22. Re:Why post anonymously then by grennis · · Score: 1

    Where do you work?

  23. YHBT by usotsuki · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    YHL

    HAND

    -uso.

    --
    Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
  24. You don't want to violate the terms of the GPS. by Ignominious+Poltroon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's "GNU Public Slayings".

  25. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I am getting soooooo sick of the French bashing.

    Look, if it hadn't been for France bailing your asses out 250 years ago, you'd have continued to have your "country" run by some unelected idiot called George whose only qualification to the job was that his father did it.

    Thankfully the French were there to help you defeat King George III, and you avoided that situation.

  26. Re:Why post anonymously then by k_herald · · Score: 1

    NASA GSFC & Purdue University

  27. Re:Someone Help US??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're Russian, actually, if you read the news.

  28. How technology really evolves... by toupsie · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Ever notice that human technological evolution closely mirrors our desire to more efficiently kill our neighbor? Or at least take his stuff for less than the cost of taking his stuff. GPS is a major advance for economical, global force projection. Instead of a squadron of big, lumbering, gas guzzling bombers, you need one little black jet to hit a target. Kill more, spend less. With most military technological advances, they have civilian applications. GPS is a shining example. My favorite is the computer. It was first built to help calculate military equations so mankind could kick his fellow mankind in the ass faster.

    What will ever happen to human progress if we start all being nice to each other?

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:How technology really evolves... by Ruie · · Score: 1
      There is a good reason for this.


      Military technology is often an example of perfect intermediate product. Making something that explodes or works only for a short period of time is easier than something we can use in more everyday situations.


      A good example is thermonuclear synthesis. The bomb was made a long time ago, but the reactor is still being researched.


      Also, being nice will probably not stifle the force of military innovation. As long as people believe that there might be a bad guy out there somewhere they would want a better weapon.


      And, of course, a good way to prove existence of bad guys is to be one yourself, if only through imagination by watching a movie.

    2. Re:How technology really evolves... by Troll_Kamikaze · · Score: 0

      Instead of a squadron of big, lumbering, gas guzzling bombers, you need one little black jet to hit a target.

      So you'd rather see several city blocks heavily damaged to destroy a target (as in WWII) than two or three bombs taking out a single building? Yeah, the good old days.

      Kill more, spend less.

      In the example you cited (though certainly not in all weapon-oriented technologies), kill more, spend less is a blatant misrepresentation of motive. It's actually about killing less, spending less.

      What will ever happen to human progress if we start all being nice to each other?

      It's not going to happen. Humans will find inventive ways to kill each other as long as the species exists. In view of that fact, why not kill precisely rather than imprecisely?

    3. Re:How technology really evolves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      farming == more kids == bigger community == bigger group == kicks the shit out of the smaller group OR defend against getting kicked the shit out of

      Technology is. How we use and think about it, that's a different matter. There's always a multitude of uses--a knife cuts, kills, maims, injures, blows through Kevlar, etc. A knife is a weapon as well as a tool.

      To use your example of the computer, the mere fact that people that were threatened developed tools to fight the threat, why is that a surprise? They should roll over and get killed?

    4. Re:How technology really evolves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no sociologist, but it seems to me that all of history is driven by one of four things: War, wealth, women, or worship.

    5. Re:How technology really evolves... by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1
      What will ever happen to human progress if we start all being nice to each other?

      I don't know, we'll patent Ethical AI?!

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    6. Re:How technology really evolves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doomsday! Doomsday! They are coming after us!

      Run for your life child, free your soul!!!

    7. Re:How technology really evolves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and power???

    8. Re:How technology really evolves... by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Humans will find inventive ways to kill each other as long as the species exists. In view of that fact, why not kill precisely rather than imprecisely?

      Clearly, you aren't interested in iving up to your full potential as a human being. Start pulling your weight.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    9. Re:How technology really evolves... by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      What will ever happen to human progress if we start all being nice to each other?

      Who cares, we'll all be so happy ;)

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    10. Re:How technology really evolves... by Troll_Kamikaze · · Score: 1

      [[[Humans will find inventive ways to kill each other as long as the species exists. In view of that fact, why not kill precisely rather than imprecisely?]]]

      [Clearly, you aren't interested in iving up to your full potential as a human being. Start pulling your weight.]

      How do you know what *I* am interested in? I was making a generalized observation about human nature, not excusing myself of moral responsibility.

      If my statement was paranoid, yours is incredibly naive. Can you find *any* evidence in human history to counter my pessimism, or are you just philosophically masturbating? Do you *really* believe that one day, in the words of the OP, humans will "just start being nice to each other"?

    11. Re:How technology really evolves... by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      It's a joke. Precise killing will mean less deaths. If one of the pastimes of the human race is killing others, then an indicator of success would be killing more people. Hence, live up to your full potential by killing more people. I'll admit that it was pretty vague, and in bad taste (it's /. after all!), but I wasn't trying to make any grand statement.

      And the paranoid statement is my .sig, not a comment about you.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  29. Worth noting? by pixelgeek · · Score: 2, Funny
    Also worth noting is how GPS, like computers, wasn't adopted overnight, but rather over time as applications were found.

    I hate to sound pessimistic but since when is something this glaringly obvious considered "worth noting"?

    Or maybe, given the topic, my pessimistic little note should be restated to ask how accurate would your GPS unit have to be to measure the size of the rock you'd have to be living under to not know that GPS wasn't adopted overnight?

    Goodness. I'm starting to sound as biter as those people who post about the newsworthiness of new articles.

  30. Quite possibly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    I don't have an account?

    Unlike most of the posters here I would guess?

    And probably unlike the guy bringing class warfare into a gps statement/observation/wish?

    290 comment limit per day is enough for 29 usable ip addresses, with 10 per for ac's, don't you think?

    1. Re:Quite possibly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go anonymous coward!

    2. Re:Quite possibly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you asking the AC to log in if you dont have one too? How are you so sure that the AC does have an account?

    3. Re:Quite possibly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy: I know because I'm arrogant, condescending, and holier-than-thou, and despite the fact that I'm foolish enough to rise easily to flamebait and don't notice the irony of acting like being a slashdot regular is uncool while at the same time getting into a stupid extended argument on slashdot with an obvious troll, I'm still smart enough know that only I am cool enough to post to slashdot without having an account.

    4. Re:Quite possibly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn - fuckin - straight ;)

      oh and to the other guy - install a fucking kill switch for gods' sake, jesus christ - talk about more money than brains...

      t

    5. Re:Quite possibly... by jpu8086 · · Score: 0

      all this a/c talk is fuckin' confusing.

      i wonder if it is just some multiple personality slashdotter arguing with (him|her)self?

      --
      now supporting:
      cmdrTaco for president '04
      michael for oval office intern summer '05
  31. Re:color moving map 12 channel magellan GPS less $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    SPAM much?

    Now we're modding spam up?! My faith in intelligent moderators is now validated.

  32. Failed Econ 101 & Common sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It is not theft as there is no tangible property involved. "

    Yet in both cases you benifit without the exchange of money to those who make something worth "borrowing". Funny how life works.

    "About your second comment, it cost $10 bucks for cable, my cable bill is over $35 for the same service. Come again about the natural evolution is to become cheaper."

    Another failed student of Econ 101. It's natural behaviour is to gravitate to whatever people are willing to pay for it. Don't want to pay $35/month then don't. Enough do that and the price drops. Simple as that.

  33. GPS works well for locating stuff you bury by doormat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Like utility infrastructure. I work at a water company, and before a contractor burries pipeline, we use RTK (realtime kinematic) GPS to record its location down to 0.04' (or 1cm). So when line locators need to mark facilities its much more accurate. Normal GPS isnt that accurate, but we use base stations and radios to send correction data in real time out to the GPS collection devices.

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  34. And your point?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Score: -1, No content

    Dumb-ass moderators today

  35. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Look, if it hadn't been for France bailing your asses out 250 years ago, you'd have continued to have your "country" run by some unelected idiot called George whose only qualification to the job was that his father did it.

    Hmmm.... let's look at today

    unelected? check

    idiot? check

    called George? check

    his father did it? check

    Looks like we need France's help once again. LIBERATE US, FRANCE!

  36. Re:Why post anonymously then by Ignominious+Poltroon · · Score: 1
    First off the EU is putting up Galileo, which will double the number of SV's orbiting the earth

    I swear when I first read this, I thought it said it would double the number of SUV's orbiting the earth. I started to picture a bunch of Expeditions slowly spinning around in space (with the drivers inside talking on cell phones of course).

  37. Re:SOMTHING YOU MISSED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Kathleen Fent = THE KLAN FEETN'.

    Disturbing.

  38. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unelected? please explain. Either the fucking hole is punched or not. If you can't properly vote, then it doesn't count (And if THEY DID COUNT THE FUCKING BROKEN BALLOTS, HE STILL WOULD HAVE WON!).

    God, its almost 2004. Think ahead, not in the past people.

  39. Been used here for a while now. by Eminor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Several good examples are used, from farmers in Alabama to anti-theft devices.

    Up here in Canada, farmers have been using it to level their fields for years now. Canada is usually pretty quick to pick up new technologies.

  40. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not really, I saw the movie "The Patriot" with Mel Gibson (from "Braveheart") and in the movie, the French only bothered to show up after the war was basically over. SO THERE!

  41. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    No, he'd have lost.

    The recount that was done had Gore win in eight of the ten scenarios, including the all important "If they counted every vote". The two where Bush won were the way the vote was counted, and the scenario where Gore got only the three counties he wanted recounted recounted.

    This lead to certain newspapers putting up headlines of the "Gore would have lost anyway" variety. Which in turn has lead every freeper wingnut to claim that Gore lost the election even in the recounted version. BS.

  42. Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "...because with an auto-steer tractor, they would be able to work at night."

    Most tractors these days have headlights. Some of the larger tractors come with enough lights from the factory that it almost feels like daylight when they're all on.

    You're not going to see a lot of GPS guided tractors any time soon. There are too many random factors to consider, like random patches of soft soil (mud or sand), animals (my grandfather accidentally ran a lame deer through a combine once... Ick.), debris in the field (rocks, tree limbs, etc), etc.

    We'd need optical recognition systems to be good enough to steer around the junk you don't plan for using GPS. Also, some stuff you don't want to steer around, you want to remove it from your path.

    GPS is useful with farming, though. Plotting soil samples, and then using that data when applying fertilizer is faily nice.

  43. Re:SOMTHING YOU MISSED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kathleen Fent = KEN TH' ELEFANT.

    Please try to keep posts on topic.
    Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
    Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
    Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about

  44. Two Words: Yield Mapping by jstockdale · · Score: 3, Informative

    One of the principle uses of GPS which I have seen in farming is doing year to year yield mapping. Thats where you have sophisticated equipment on your harvester that does realtime yield analysis (ie. figures out how much corn/soy/etc. you are pulling off the specific patch of land you are harvesting) and associates that number with the GPS coordinates the harvester is currently at. That way not only does a farmer know their per acre yield but knows where each of their good/bad yield spots are quantitatively and can either cross reference that with soil maps or other data to determine the reason for the different yields and if possible increase yeilds.

    --
    **AA: a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes
  45. Favorite hack, plus a way to play by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One university's avionics department put a GPS receiver in each wingtip of an airplane and used them as a bank angle indicator. They just compared the altitude of one wingtip with the altitude of another wingtip.

    If you have a ham radio license, you can hook your GPS to a transmitter and experiment with tracking yourself and things. The telemetry standard used for this also allows flagging your position with status information (e.g. "on duty") and weather information. See http://www.findu.com to track hams who are doing this, or google for "APRS".

  46. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And the source of your information is... ? The Miami Herald? I love this "8 of 10 scenarios" bullshit.

    You can't seriously tell me you would want Gore running the war against terrorism? We would all be dead by now...

  47. Rewrite: How technology really evolves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever notice that human technological evolution closely mirrors our desire to more efficiently have sex with our neighbor? Or at least take her for a ride for less than the cost of taking her out? TGP [thumbnail gallery posts] is a major advance for economical, global hormone production. Instead of a nice car, fat wallet, good looks and flowers, you need one little quick click to get some happiness. Browse porn sites more, spend less. With most sexual technological advances, they have civilian applications. TGP is a shining example. My favorite is the web browser. It was first built to help college students share "information" so mankind could .... in the ass faster.

    What will ever happen to human progress if we get control of our raging hormones?

  48. It sure has changed desert ATV riding by norweigiantroll · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just mark your car, ride miles away, and when you're ready to go back, just follow the arrow. No parking near landmarks to remember where the car is.

    1. Re:It sure has changed desert ATV riding by grumling · · Score: 1
      Did this while hiking in the Grand Canyon last month. Walked down the Bright Angel trail for 3 hours. Got to the rest stop, put in a goto for the car waypoint. The GPS reported that I was only 3/4 of a mile away.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    2. Re:It sure has changed desert ATV riding by norweigiantroll · · Score: 1

      It's mainly useful in big desert Open Areas where cross-country riding is allowed.

  49. Cars with autopilot... autodriver? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of a contest the military is sponsoring. Basically they want a driverless ground vehicle. I thought GPS would solve the navigation part of the problem. But the military warns that GPS alone is insufficient for navigation. Can't remember the reason though.
    http://www.darpa.mil/grandchallenge/

    Considering the robot has to drive the car, avoid obstacles and find it's destination. I'll be very impressed if anyone succeeds.

    But then again a lot of work has already been done on this sort of thing.
    http://www.path.berkeley.edu/

  50. Taxpayer costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    For anyone griping about how much taxpayers have paid for GPS;

    30 _years_ of GPS development... $9B
    1 Iraq War... $100B

    Go figure.

    1. Re:Taxpayer costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The right to hang the terrorist Saddam -- Priceless

      (Ofcourse I'm being sarcastic -- ofcourse.. ofcourse... )

    2. Re:Taxpayer costs by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      wow, 100 billion. What a nice big round number. Care to back it up? Cause it just SCREAMS "Pulled out of thin air but looks impressive."

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    3. Re:Taxpayer costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      30 _more_years_ of GPS development = $100B

      Freedom in Iraq/Middle East = priceless

    4. Re:Taxpayer costs by Holi · · Score: 1

      How about this: ABC News

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    5. Re:Taxpayer costs by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      I do recall that 80 billion was allocated in the budget for this particular Iraq war.

      A google search confims this.

      Whether they've spent it all yet is a bit of a mystery.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    6. Re:Taxpayer costs by bj8rn · · Score: 1

      According to www.costofwar.com, the estimated cost so far is at the moment almost $68 billion, though quite a big part of it is the future interest payments. The cost of the occupation is $4 billion a month ($6 billion with all the interests included), as Rumsfeld stated in a reply to the Congress. The $100 billion line will be reached quite soon...

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    7. Re:Taxpayer costs by Matthew+Schultheis · · Score: 1

      Is that $9 Billion dollars in 2003 US$? If not, the GPS jumps up in price. I still would rather see money spent on GPS, than the EPA releasing a report reccomending how long our candle wicks should be.

  51. I wish you were kidding, dude by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    I'd laugh, if only that wasn't close to home. See, I had a GREAT cache hidden near the Sacramento International Airport, and then that whole 9/11 thing happened and the Sacramento County Sheriff department started patrolling the area around the airport.

    Imagine my surprise when cop cars & some guy in a black truck come rolling up on my ass all A-Team style when I pulled over and got out of my car to go check on the cache.

    After my heart jumped up into my throat, I showed them the cache, and while they agreed that it was a really neat hiding place, it was not a good idea to continue the cache in that location.

    Sad thing is that we used to go drinking in the exact same field years before. No longer. =/

  52. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by fuzzeli · · Score: 1

    I'm still shocked that the electoral college survived this debacle. I always remember hearing, "Well, if a candidate won the popular vote by a real margin but lost the electoral college, the obsolete electoral system would be abandoned due to the public outcry."
    Gore got 500,000 more votes than Dubya. Chads Schmads.

  53. The possible uses of GPS by devross · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Imagine," he says, "the end of property crime. Everything that has any value and could be stolen -- a car, a laptop, a piece of construction equipment" (not to mention every ship, plane, truck trailer, and toddler) -- "everything like that will know its location and be able to report it. We can go even further: You tell your laptop that it should only find itself at your office or your home. And if it finds itself in a car trunk, it wakes up, notices that it's in the wrong place, calls your cell phone, and says, 'Hi, this is your laptop. I'm at this location on this map you see. Is that okay?'"

    That instantly made me think of the Phrack article on the Low Cost and Portable GPS Jammer. Never know when that baby's going to come in handy.

    --


    If these walls could talk they'd probly still ignore me. --MF DOOM
    1. Re:The possible uses of GPS by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Car trucks are pretty effective Faraday cages.

      A little bit of sheet metal is a pretty effective GPS jammer.

  54. Plan B? by Detritus · · Score: 1

    What do you do when the GPS unit breaks or the batteries crap out? Become buzzard food?

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Plan B? by bobbozzo · · Score: 1
      What do you do when the GPS unit breaks or the batteries crap out? Become buzzard food?

      Gee, I suppose you could follow your tire tracks?

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    2. Re:Plan B? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in a wind swept desert. That's why he needs to use GPS or park near a landmark.

  55. Re:Question-Seeing eye tractor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hehe - i know - those new fangled incandescent lights and all...

    t (a current farmer)

  56. Re:Why post anonymously then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YHBT. KTHXBYE

  57. You can also do it with ATT Wireless GPS phones. by Kelmenson · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can add your "buddies", and then do things like "where is joe" (down to around 2 blocks) or "find nearest friend" amongst them all. Still haven't really found a practicle use for it, but I guess that's also part of the point of the article: Give users the option, and eventually they'll figure out innovative uses for it.

  58. question by Raven42rac · · Score: 0

    Why does it seem like to me that GPS transmitters (the BIG ones) are always in the butthole of nowhere. Like 1hr off the main road on a dirt road, make a right at the dog tied up to the tree? Interference? Some GPS guru please let me know.

    --
    I hate sigs.
  59. GPS kid locator commercial. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    got to love that GPS kid locator commercial.

  60. Could Farmer Bob patent that? by Kelmenson · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Patents seem to be so prevalent these days for minor advances to standard procedures by adding new technology, that I almost wonder if the first farmer to attach a GPS to his operation could get away with patenting it, and then stopping any other farmer from using the same methodology.

    It seems that more thought actually went into the GPS farming than into many recent computer patents, like Apple's "fast user switching" or any of the other process patents mentioned on Slashdot. Are farmers just not patenting because they aren't in technology? (Or is this process actually patented and it just wasn't mentioned...)

    1. Re:Could Farmer Bob patent that? by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      To patent something, you have to be a multinational, you must be greedy, you must think in terms of lawsuits, etc.

      Farmers probably don't fit that bill, at least not originally.

    2. Re:Could Farmer Bob patent that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GPS systems mentioned in the article are probably produced by the largest GPS manf in the world, Trimble Navigation. Farmer Ted didn't just strap on a hand-held GPS device to his tractor, this is high-dollar and high-precision equipment we're talking here. It's already patented.

  61. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Er, suddenly the consortium recount isn't good enough for you when you find out that it didn't say what you half remembered it as saying?

    And yes, I think Gore would have done a better job. I think there's a slightly better chance that the WTC attack might not have happened, given I doubt Gore would have closed the investigation into Bin Laden, and I know he took airport and airplane security seriously enough to doubt his usual pro-gun-control views would have lead him to, as Bush did, issue the order banning guns from cockpits.

    Clinton's government did, after all, head off a major attack on our airports on New Year's Eve 1999. Or did you forget that too?

  62. Re:You can also do it with ATT Wireless GPS phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a T68i that lets me do that, and it is most certainly not a GPS phone. It is a GSM phone, not sure if you're confusing your acronyms...

  63. Re:color moving map 12 channel magellan GPS less $ by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    Can one "stack" the phone module and the GPS module in the Handspring units, or must one be removed to use the other?

  64. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I think the puppet on the left represents my interests."

    "I think the puppet on the right is more my style."

    "Hey, one guy's running both puppets!"

    "Shaddup..."

    Apologies to Mr. Hicks on the planet Arcturus if I didn't hit the precise wording, but you get the idea. You assume the other guy would be better, and that is where you are wrong.

  65. Accuracy? by jonr · · Score: 1

    Can anybody explain to me why these farmers get 1 feet of accuracy while I have to struggle with 18 feet maxium accuracy?
    J.

    1. Re:Accuracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are probably using Differential GPS (DGPS) systems.

    2. Re:Accuracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you paid 200 for your gps while they probably paided thousands with a awsome antanna?

  66. Re:color moving map 12 channel magellan GPS less $ by uradu · · Score: 1

    I really think 160x160 screens suck for mapping, even in color. Moving up to 320x320, like on some of the Clies that can be had quite cheaply (esp. factory refurbs), adds so much more usability to the maps.

  67. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clinton's government did, after all, head off a major attack on our airports on New Year's Eve 1999. Or did you forget that too?

    He also used to turn away his CIA daily briefers.

    Don't forget the 1993 WTC bombing, 1996 barracks bombing, 1998 embassey bombings, 2000 USS Cole bombing, those small nutcase shootings (Empire State building and CIA entrance).

    Also, don't forget Sudan offered to turn over Osama to the US in 1997.

    He also invited a known terrorist, Yassir Arafat, to the White House.

  68. Qualcomm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I dont know how many people are aware of it but qualcomm has a suite of products that track trucks and report gps info, engine info, cargo info over satellite or terrestial networks, look for little white domes on the top of the truck cabs those are the receiver/broadcast units. This was recently featured on the history channel. They also have an emercency panic button that wills send an alert to a dispatch center and local law enforcement over satellite

    1. Re:Qualcomm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is a huge chunk of products to do this.

      qualcomm

      The dome ones are satellite (2 way), they also have ones that use the cell network.

      hehe 'terrestrial' youve GOT to work for qualcomm. surprised you didnt call it a tcu :)

  69. Re:The Standard Data Format is Amazing by Leeji · · Score: 2, Informative

    One of the things that I love about GPS data is that they've pretty much decided on a standard -- the NMEA data format. When I first got my Navman GPS for my iPAQ, I thought it was cool. I thought that the included navigation software was cool, and I thought that seeing my exact coordinates was cool. That could have been the end of it, and I would have been happy.

    However, most GPS devices dump their data out in a standard CSV format. This makes it very easy for 3rd party software developers to treat a GPS device as a commodity. Rather than dealing specifically with Garman / Navman / etc, they just read the standard. It's great.

    It also makes it trivial to write your own apps that interface with a saved data file. I wrote a really small app to overlay a car trip on a map, including red dots where I stopped. Now you can really say, "I'm serious -- look at how bad traffic was!" I've heard of other innovative programs, too, like correlating the timestamp on a picture from a digital camera with the GPS log to give you the coordinates where the picture was taken.

    The most useful GPS data is the "RMC" string:

    Recommended Minimum Specific GNSS Data (RMC)

    $GPRMC,<1>,<2>,<3>,<4>,<5>,<6>,<7>,<8>,&lt ;9 >,<10>,<11><CR><LF>

    1)&nbs p; UTC time of position fix, hhmmss.sss format.
    2) Status, A = data valid, V = data not valid.
    3) Latitude, ddmm.mmmm format.
    4) Latitude hemisphere, N or S.
    5) Longitude, dddmmm.mmmm format.
    6) Longitude hemisphere, E or W.
    7) Speed over ground, 0.0 to 1851.8 knots.
    8) Course over ground, 000.0 to 359.9 degrees, true.
    9) Date, ddmmyy format.
    10) Magnetic variation, 000.0 to 180.O.
    11) Degrees
    12) Checksum.

    If you're interested, the data format is here.

    --
    It all goes downhill from first post ...
  70. Re:Geocaching of MS Source Code by Leeji · · Score: 1

    There's a ton of MS source code geocached, you just need to visit the right websites to find it.
    Longitude: -122.13099913, Latitude: 47.63839512

    --
    It all goes downhill from first post ...
  71. A fool and his philosophy are soon parted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Tuning in a satellite broadcast does not use part of a finite resource, it does not reduce the amount of broadcast available for sale."

    Until the above thinking takes over like the disease it is. Then the companies can't make any money. Kind of hard to watch a "unlimited resource" that no longer exist because no money is coming in. Or were you under the impression that everything from the dollar signs back was also free to the company that's producing the product that's good enough to watch, but not to pay for?

    1. Re:A fool and his philosophy are soon parted. by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      So be it. If a company can't figure out a way to charge for their service, then they go out of business.

      You seem to have the impression I don't pay for satellite, I do, in fact my satellite bill was recently over $130 until I cut back and cancelled some of the premium channels. I use satellite Internet also.

      I pay for it, and yet see nothing wrong with tuning it in without paying. Ponder that one for a while.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  72. Umm, are you on drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GPS is a system of satellites. Those big towers in the middle of nowhere are probably high tension power. Maybe cell towers. Maybe just the alien signal transmitters, activating the servo implanted in your ignorant ass.

  73. PDA done right by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I want a PDA-like thingy with these features:

    1. Cell phone
    2. Runs Linux
    3. Instant messaging
    4. Computer (PDA, web browser)
    5. GPS-capable
    6. Easy link-up to desktop
    7. Under $500 because I know I will drop and sit on it on occasion.

    When will this be available for the huddled masses like me? I don't even need color.

    1. Re:PDA done right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and how about something which has a compact flash and/or pcmcia slot and usb so I can plug lots of nice peripherals in. For instance i'd like a pda I can add some extra memory too, plug in a gps and a webcam. Also which does everything mentioned in parent post.

    2. Re:PDA done right by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Good point: standard slot(s) for add-ons.

  74. Why when I was a youngin.... by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We had to pay $60,000 for a rack mount GPS unit for the research ship I was on. We only got 2 or 3 satellite fixes and even then that was for only a handful of hours a day because the constellation wasn't complete. But by cracky we loved it! It was good enough then and by god ... by god... what we wouldn't have done for one of those modern sub $200 contraptions. Oh yea and a full constellation of satellites.

    Navigation for scientific research (gravity & magnetic surveys) was interesting. We'd post process and combine a few hours of GPS a day, Transit Sat Nav (crude sat fixes + dead reconing), plus ARGO ranging navigation. The cool thing about ARGO was that it required shore stations where someone had to be by the transmitter for several weeks. And since the cruises were in the Carribean and off Brasil, sitting around a shore station (aka "the beach") for several weeks was pretttty fine.

  75. MTSO employees... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...are not to be messed with. Years ago one of the guys at a switch I worked at thought that his wife was messing around on him. He knew the name of the guy and found out that this fellow had a cell phone. From his company. And of course so did his wife.

    The switch tech agreed to help him out one night when she was "out with the girls." Now, there was no GPS at the time but they were able to track the two phones by judging the signal strength and the tower that the phones were registering on. Wifey wasn't were she was supposed to be, surprise, surprise...

    As they sat side by side in the restaurant both of their phones rang at the same time. When they answered the call was between their two phones. Not being rocket scientists it actually took a them a few minutes to figure out what had happened.

    That was years ago, imagine the power these guys have NOW with GPS!

    The moral of the story? DON'T PISS OFF A GEEK!!! They are more powerful than you could ever imagine... ;)

  76. Moderator on crack by HeghmoH · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I just looked at this post again, and it was modded Funny. Funny? It's a legitimate question! Oh well, I should know better than to expect rational moderations on slashdot.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  77. Re:Why post anonymously then by GileadGreene · · Score: 3, Insightful
    There has always been the PPS ("Precise Positioning Service") P-code signal on the L2 frequency (1.22760 GHz).

    Actually, the PPS transmits the P(Y) code on both L1 and L2. That's how the military gets better accuracy: the 2 different frequencies experience slightly different amounts of ionospheric delay, and by measuring this difference it's possible to correct for the delay.

    more satellites in view = better positioning accuracy

    This is not strictly true, since the position accuracy depends a lot on the relative position of the satellites you are taking a fix from (if they're all bunched up then you will experience significant dilution of precision). More satellites in view may increase the likelihood that you'll get a favorable geometric configuration. But it doesn't always, which is why the current GPS constellation is optimized to provide good geometric configurations, instead of to maximize the number of sats in view.

    To make matters worse, some cheaper GPS receivers just grab data from the first 4 satellites they detect, and satellites that are directly overhead will have (slightly) stronger signals than their counterparts near the horizon as a result of the smaller amount of propagation loss and atmospheric loss their signals will experience. So there's a good chance that a cheap GPS receiver will take a fix from a bunch of satellites directly overhead (particularly with many more satellites in the sky to form that bunch), even if a more favorable configuration is in view, and end up with a much lower accuracy than they should. That said, I believe that most newer receivers look at all of the satellites in view, and pick the best 4.

    Also GPS is being heavily upgraded. They are adding a third signal with M-code(L3), and adding C/A code on L2.

    This isn't entirely accurate. M-code will in fact be on transmitted on both the L1 and L2 frequencies, not on L3. You're correct about the extra civilian signal on L2 (designated L2C), although I'm not sure if it's identical to the L1 C/A code. There's also another civilian signal that will be broadcast on L5 - this one will be primarily for aviation use and "safety-of-life" applications. I don't remember what L3 is being used for, but I'm fairly sure it's not going to have any kind of navigation code on it. Check out this article in the Aerospace Corporation's online "Crosslink" magazine for a nice overview of GPS modernization.

  78. Apart from it running Windows CE by threaded · · Score: 1

    Have a look at the Gotive

    1. Re:Apart from it running Windows CE by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Have a look at the Gotive

      I am afraid to click on any link that is similar to goatcex :-)

      It seems a little large, and MS-Windows-based though.

  79. Re:Why post anonymously then by k_herald · · Score: 1

    Using more than 4 satellites does improve your position accuracy, this is generally called an "over determined solution". When SA was enabled, the benefits of this were nullified by the inaccuracies introduced by SA, but today that is not the case. Im sorry about screwing up the signal schedule, its late :). The L5 signal (what I should of said when saying L3) is going to be a long period PRN code without a data message modulated on top. Current C/A code has a period of 1ms with a 50Hz data message modulated atop of this. The unknown data message bits prevent a pre-detection integration time of 10ms, and a tracking integration time of 20ms. This limits the performance of low-level acquisition and tracking (ie indoor or space case). The L5 signal, with no data message eliminates this barrier. The new satellits going up are also going to have better atomic clocks, further improving user end accuracy. Finally C/A on L2 are going not going to be of the current Gold Code type, the details are not yet released publically.

  80. Re:Why post anonymously then by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
    Using more than 4 satellites does improve your position accuracy, this is generally called an "over determined solution".

    Yes, I'm familiar with the concept of an overdetermined solution. But you only get a benefit if those 4+ satellites are in a good geometrical configuration relative to each other. Making the assumption that just adding the Galileo sats will automatically improve position accuracy (as you did in your previous post) is incorrect. If you have, e.g., 5 satellites in view, but all are within 30 deg of each other and directly above you, you will get worse position accuracy than you would if you had just 4 sats that happened to have a near 90 deg separation. As I said before, that's why the current constellation is not optimized for number of sats in view. Initially they were planning on using a symmetric constellation, but found that the were getting bad dilution of precision, even with 6 sats in view, due to the relative position of those sats. That's why the current GPS constellation is a carefully designed asymmetric constellation - the slight offsets in the sat position from a symmetric constellation help to guarantee good geometric configurations. Just adding extra sats into something so carefully designed will not necessarily improve things.

  81. You can do this now by threaded · · Score: 1

    DanCar Autosikring

    The base units tracking software carries out conversations with the vehicles alarm unit (which contains a GPS module) over SMS and uses M$ MapPoint to display the current position. Also the state of things like tilt alarm, crash alarm, temperature, tire pressures, well it all depends on what other modules are plugged in really.

    It can be used to track several vehicles in real time (accepted the SMS message round trip being about 15 seconds usually if in country, and about a minute if the vehicle is in another country)

    It's been available for a few years now, it used to use AutoRoute but I got fed up with the SendKey nonsense so it uses MapPoint now.

  82. Re:Why post anonymously then by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
    "Hail, hail to old Purdue! All hail to our Old Gold and Black!"

    Go Boilers! :-)

  83. You can do this now by threaded · · Score: 1

    DanCar do a unit with your requirements.

    When an alarm is triggered it will phone up and a voice synth will tell you what is wrong, alternatively an SMS message, or both, to as many as ten different numbers.

    You can then use some pc software to follow the car in real time on a map.

  84. wasn't adopted overnight, but rather over time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was anything ever adopted overnight? Why? No software, users. Surely it makes sense to let `early adopters` waste cash on stuff and wait to see if it takes off.

  85. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Don't forget the 1993 WTC bombing, 1996 barracks bombing, 1998 embassey bombings, 2000 USS Cole bombing, those small nutcase shootings (Empire State building and CIA entrance).
    I haven't forgotten. The first is what put the Clinton administration on alert. Until then he'd been considered an ally by both the Clinton and Bush administrations. Subsequent successful attacks on the US can be categorized as either domestic terrorism, or terrorism against US-owned targets overseas. I'm not aware of a successful Al Qaida attack on US soil since the original WTC attack until 9/11.
    Also, don't forget Sudan offered to turn over Osama to the US in 1997.
    Not in any way recognizable to the US administration at the time, no.
    He also invited a known terrorist, Yassir Arafat, to the White House.
    It's called diplomacy and it's part of the process of defeating terrorism by undermining the root causes of terrorism. He also invited Gerry Adams and Nelson Mandela. You may have heard of the latter, he's one of the world's great statesmen now. And Clinton's invite of Adams was part of a largely successful attempt to promote peace in Northern Ireland. His invite of Arafat was a not quite as successful attempt to promote a similar process in Israel and the occupied territories - maybe it'd have been successful though if the sponsor of those talks hadn't been replaced by a right-wing jackass owned by the armegeddon-promoting "Christian"-right at the critical moment.
  86. Ooh, /me refers to my own old post by Pinguu · · Score: 1

    Also worth noting is how GPS, like computers, wasn't adopted overnight, but rather over time as applications were found.
    something I post a couple days ago

    --
    --
  87. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From memory: Just before the election there was a commonly promoted theory that if Gore won, it would be because of the college. Pre-election polls suggested that Bush had a slightly higher percentage of the vote, but that Gore would just about carry enough states to win.

    I seriously wonder if that had happened whether the Republicans would have taken it lying down in much the same way as the Democrats have. Most Dems have mixed feelings about the Florida thing, and have generally taken the call to "get over it" (and are shouted down if they don't) and the topic of electoral college vs electoral majority seems to come up almost as rarely as the flawed Florida vote.

    According to some articles I've read, the Republicans were actually in the process of creating a campaign against Gore just before the election for the exact eventuality above - where Gore loses the popular vote but wins the election anyway. And I don't doubt it. Screw the Repug's, I doubt the TV networks and the Talk Radio networks would have shut up about the issue.

    Ironically, what we got in the end was far, far, worse. One key state wasn't counted properly, and the Supreme Court intervened and demanded that the interim vote count be considered final. So Bush didn't win the popular vote, and he didn't get a chance to win the electoral college. Yet despite being the loser of the first, and there being no legitimate winner of the second, he's been pretty much given a free ride since. Tells you how "liberal" our media is really, doesn't it?

  88. Do you work for the mob? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your "family" seems amazingly well connected to the crimnal underworld. Perhaps because you spend a lot of time in the company of such people (and other dodgy areas) that your cars keep getting nicked?

  89. Re:color moving map 12 channel magellan GPS less $ by gr66nman · · Score: 1

    Handspring unit GPS magellan - 12 channel - $49
    Good mapping software for $29
    Sprint phone module from ebay for $20

    Calling your friends from a ditch because your GPS was wrong: priceless.

  90. ISO - values?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny talking about GPS, precition and other good stuff and still using feet and miles in his essay...

  91. Re:Why post anonymously then by F00F · · Score: 1

    You know, the only person I remember at Purdue who worked on GPS was a fellow named Jim Garrison. As I recall, he also worked at Goddard at one point, and his research involved measuring reflected GPS signals.

    You two should get together and chat. I imagine you'd have a lot to talk about.

  92. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by Mike1024 · · Score: 1

    I am getting soooooo sick of the French bashing.

    Too right! If it weren't for France, you'd all be speaking English right now!

    --
    "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
  93. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by wilddur · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can't seriously tell me you would want Gore running the war against terrorism? We would all be dead by now...

    May be we will be more successull finding the weapons of mass destruction. really think that We would all be dead by now...? Some soldiers may be alive. The US external image would be not so bad and US citizens may have keept the right to a judgement in cases of terrorism.

    I can't say that GORE would have been better, but I' sure that somewhere there must be a better president.

  94. Re:Why post anonymously then by k_herald · · Score: 1

    You seem to forget that the Galileo constellation, while utilizing nearly the same inclination as GPS, is going to consist of 3 totally different oribital planes. Being in different orbital planes, the probablity of having a GDOP conducive to a good solution is much better with 48 satellites in 7 different planes rather than 27 in just 4.

  95. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by wilddur · · Score: 1

    mmm you may start considering something called books.

  96. Re:Why post anonymously then by k_herald · · Score: 1

    Actually I work with Prof Garrison. I'm on his research team. How do you know him?

  97. EverTech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked on a video game called EverTech (yeah, obviously a rip). It was basicly a MUDD game, with a top down view of campus (or anywhere else in the world), and in order to play in the game you had to roam around using GPS. Of course we only worked on it for a semester and were never given any real support hardware wise...

    A bunch of people sounded interested in playing if we ever finished it.

  98. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So hollywood have convinced you of their "alternate history".

    France joined the war in 1778, Spain also helped and they joined in, in 1779. The war didn't end until 1783. I'd say the french joined nearer halfway.

    The French were the main supplier of American arms and several other countries (holland, sweeden, prussia ...) boycotted trade with britain and traded with america.

  99. Re:Why post anonymously then by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
    That's a good point. However, my argument was with your blanket generalization that "more sats in view = better position accuracy", which, as I said before, is not strictly true. Just adding more orbital planes will not necessarily lead to improved GDOP performance. It may, since, as you stated, it should increase the probability of a favorable configuration (which is the same thing I said in my original post). But in order to see any real improvement the phasing of the satellites within and across the planes is critical as well.

    I'd like to think that the Galileo developers have worked with the GPS planners to make sure the two constellations play well together. However, while the initial acrimony over Galileo seems to have abated, I'm not sure how much actual cooperation is going on.

    BTW, the GPS constellation consists of 6 planes, not 4.

  100. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
    And yes, I think Gore would have done a better job. I think there's a slightly better chance that the WTC attack might not have happened,

    Put your bias aside for a minute and realize that 9/11 didn't happen because of 8 months of the Bush presidency but an ongoing hatred of the United States that was evident back in the 1993 WTC attacks. Gore being president wouldn't have reduced the chance of 9/11 happening, the only question would have been our response.

    given I doubt Gore would have closed the investigation into Bin Laden

    The investigation had been going on for some time. You can argue theoreticals, but there's no particular reason to believe it would have been more successful in the 8 months leading up to 9/11 than the years prior. Plus, 9/11 apparently would have occurred even if Bin Laden had been captured since underlings were actually organizing and executing the attack. It's doubtful a Bin Laden capture in 2001 would have avoided the 9/11 attacks. A capture in 1995 or 1996 might have, though.

    Clinton's government did, after all, head off a major attack on our airports on New Year's Eve 1999. Or did you forget that too?

    9/11 wasn't planned, funded, and executed in the 8 months of the Bush presidency. So apparently Clinton's government succeeded at heading off the airport attack(s) [I had only heard about LAX, was unaware of other airports?], but they missed the upcoming WTC attack despite one having already occured back in 1993. They missed the Cole bombing as well as the two attacks on our embassies. 1 out of 4. They're batting 0.250.

  101. Could Farmer Bob patent that?-side-business. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Are farmers just not patenting because they aren't in technology? (Or is this process actually patented and it just wasn't mentioned...)"

    Despite the "other" response, as a former farmer the reason a regular farmer hasn't patented it. Is because we're in the farming business, not the patent business.

  102. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that Mel Gibson died on Braveheart? How could he have made this movie, The Patriot?

    I am confused :-/

  103. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by mildness · · Score: 1
    Brilliant.

    Thank you AC

    Bill

    --
    bamph
  104. Re:A fool and his philosophy are soon parted-II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So be it. If a company can't figure out a way to charge for their service, then they go out of business."

    Aside from the fact you missed the point (imagine that?). All you're saying is if companies can't overcome the publics carnal nature[1] then they deserve to go out of business. What a piss-poor world you're going to end up living in. Bad thing is you're going to be dragging the rest of us down with you.

    "I pay for it, and yet see nothing wrong with tuning it in without paying. Ponder that one for a while."

    Why should I ponder people excercising the worst side of themselves? People have been doing that since Cain killed Abel, and they've been going ever since.

    [1] Encryption is a form of this. People still don't get the hint. Up next a death ray that zero's in on "pirates". Wonder if anyone will get the hint?

  105. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by Q+Who · · Score: 1

    LMAO... I can't believe this joke is moderated as "Insightful". :)

  106. We�ve got that here in Venezuela.. by tit0.c · · Score: 1

    ..and its not that expensive.My dad used to have the service on a truck he sold some time ago.

    Its very common nowadays for people to hire this services down here.

    I guess its cheap because of high demand and because car robberies here are extremely common.

    So now the robbers are opting to kidnap you with your vehicle to prevent you calling the GPS company or the cops...

    Also some people have told me that the robbers can just take the car and quickly move it to an underground parking garage for a while or into a container to prevent location.Dont know the veracity of that though...

  107. Track my Nextel phone by asmithmd1 · · Score: 1

    You can download a Java App to track your cell phone at www.gadgeteer.org I have a free service running that recieves UDP packets sent by the phone and creates a web page with a link to mapquest showing your current location

    1. Re:Track my Nextel phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doom on an etch a sketch?

  108. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by Excarnate · · Score: 1

    Anonymous coward posts the obvious followup, stating "unelected? check"

    But of course, screwing that up. George Bush was elected. I mean, duh.

    Getting a majority of the votes cast nationwide is not the criteria for getting elected.

    All you monkeys stating otherwise are part of the problem. If you understood how our system worked maybe things would have been different. At least there would be less whining.

    The US is not a (pure) democracy, and speaking as someone who is a member of some minority groups, I'm glad it isn't. For those who aren't from the US, it is a constitutional republic, where a certain measure of power is left to each of the 50 states. This prevents, say, California (the granola state) from riding roughshod over, say, Kansas (the carry on my wayward son state).

    --
    .signature: No such file or directory
  109. Re:color moving map 12 channel magellan GPS less $ by Treacle+Treatment · · Score: 0

    What'd they do with the other 536 colors?

    --
    TT
  110. And I though the military was evil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I may have to rethink that since GPS is a great tool to make things cheaper, faster, and better and it came from the evil military budget.

    At least it's from the USA, and not from *cough*, *cough*, France.

  111. How much of your salary did the feds take? by serutan · · Score: 1

    You would know the answer if you bothered to read the article:

    The system has cost $9 billion to develop, launch, and sustain over 30 years... Today, the GPS industry in North America is estimated at $4 billion a year.

    Not a bad investment of your tax dollars and mine.

  112. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bush lost and was handed it all by his father's buddies in the supreme court. It's all well documented in The Best Democracy Money Can Buy . White voters were given the chance to correct their vote if they hadn't punched hard enough. This facility was disabled in the poor areas. This is after the bogus "purging" of the electoral rolls of thousands of individuals who shouldn't have been.

    I'm not pro-democrat either. A lot of democrats vote with the republicans when in power. I am a UK subject (no, we aren't citizens technically) and our system sucks too, but the way they do it here is by redrawing the electoral boundaries to make minorities even smaller. Our first past the post system means that a political party only needs to command 40% of the vote to have a huge majority.

    None of us live in a democracy and we should stop kidding ourselves.

  113. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by yelvington · · Score: 1

    Furthermore, the French sustained MORE losses than the (obviously much larger) United States in World War II, on the heels of devastating losses in World War I (in which the U.S. suffered relatively few casualties as a latecomer). And that doesn't count hundreds of thousands of civilian losses. Anyone who thinks the French folded easily and without losses is an ignoramus.

  114. Re:Boy, I Wish GPS Was Around During WW2 by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

    I am getting soooooo sick of the French bashing. Look, if it hadn't been for France bailing your asses out 250 years ago, you'd have continued to have your "country" run by some unelected idiot called George whose only qualification to the job was that his father did it. Thankfully the French were there to help you defeat King George III, and you avoided that situation.

    You have a very strange view of history.

    So exactly how many soldiers did France send over to the US to help out?

    Yeah, that's right.

    It was helpful that France was also at war with England, but it's not as though France sent a sizeable portion of their army over to help us. Besides, you could argue that France would have lost that war if it wasn't for us Americans :P The reality is that we both had a common enemy at the time, so we cooperated.

    It not like the US surrendered to England and the French had to come over here an save us.

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
  115. Re:Why post anonymously then by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

    That's a good point. However, my argument was with your blanket generalization that "more sats in view = better position accuracy", which, as I said before, is not strictly true. Just adding more orbital planes will not necessarily lead to improved GDOP performance.

    I wouldn't be so sure about that. It seems statistics come into play here. Even if you only have 3 satellites, having 5 measurements is going to be better than having 3 (the more measurements you have, the more random error you can remove). Say you had 5 satellites, but 2 of them were right next to other satellites, this could be treated as the situation above (somewhat). Correct?

    Technically, more satellites should always improve your accuracy, even if you were adding one right next to another.

    Perhaps that's not true from a positional point of view, but it's definately true from a timing point of view.

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
  116. Already here by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    http://www.aprs.org/

    http://www.aprs.net/ and http://www.findu.com/ have some neat APRS interfaces.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  117. Re:Why post anonymously then by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
    I wouldn't be so sure about that.

    I would be. Yes, more measurements allows you to average out statistical noise. But the position error we are talking about is what is known as Geometric Dilution of Precision (GDOP). That kind of error is caused by having the satellites in view in a non-ideal (i.e. non-orthogonal) configuration. The errors are not statistical, but inherent in the geometry - averaging or filtering will not help.

    Technically, more satellites should always improve your accuracy, even if you were adding one right next to another.

    Only if you are assuming the exact same geometric configuration, but with one extra satellite. Otherwise your statement is not true. If you have more sats, but in a worse configuration, your GDOP will be worse, and you'll get lower accuracy. If you go ahead and make the assumption that the sats are in "the same configuration with one extra sat" you have automatically invalidated the generality of statement "more sats in view = better position accuracy". Which has been my point from the get-go. Please go back and read my earlier posts - I never claimed that more sats will inevitably lead to worse position accuracy, only that the "more sats in view = better position accuracy" statement was not true in all cases.

    Perhaps that's not true from a positional point of view, but it's definately true from a timing point of view.

    If you will examine the previous posts you will find that we were talking specifically about position accuracy, which is where GDOP comes into play. Timing accuracy is a different issue.

  118. Re:Why post anonymously then by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

    If you go ahead and make the assumption that the sats are in "the same configuration with one extra sat" you have automatically invalidated the generality of statement "more sats in view = better position accuracy".

    I see your point now. You could have 5 sats with poor GDOP or 3 with better locations.

    While you valid have a point there, it seems like you're spiltting hairs. Yes, in some arbitrary math problem you could have more satellites, but less accuracy, but taking the current GPS constellation as a given, any additional satellites are going to improve your accuracy. I think it's reasonable to assume "same configuration with one extra sat" since they aren't planning on shooting any down.

    That said, you're right.

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
  119. risks of dependency? by MMHere · · Score: 1

    If your activities depend upon GPS (are not simply assisted or made more convenient by it) what happens when/if GPS fails?

    I.e., if 911 emergency services depend upon GPS and map/direction assist systems in order to find your burning house, what happens if GPS fails for some reason?

    I know GPS is built to be redundant, but business (or other activities) that _depend_ on GPS should have a "manual" backup when possible.

  120. Your world view is a hammer by ianscot · · Score: 1
    ...too bad all the world isn't a nail.

    First off, GPS is a military thing that civilians have piggybacked on.

    Secondly, those freeloading, "mooching" foreigners have started developing their own GPS systems, and the US has actually balked at this happening. Out of passing curiosity, why do you think that's happening? (Careful not to concentrate on this question too hard -- you don't want cognitive dissonance to blow any noggin gaskets.)

    Remind me to try to sell you something sometime. You've bought a world view that's based on ridiculously oversimple "government is bad!" rhetoric. I'd place money that you have no idea what your real, individual tax burden is, but that doesn't seem to keep you saying they take a third. You're offering ten bucks a month for GPS when, say, the whole of NASA very likely doesn't get that much of your tax dollar -- they take about $1 out of every $1000 in the federal budget, to give you some idea how that works out. That's one lavish GPS system. I'd love to be a used car salesman when you walk through the door...

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.