Slashdot Mirror


Gyroscope Gives CellPhones 'Tilt Control'

Paul Stamatiou writes "You can now control cellphone activities by simply tilting it. "If you have a game involving keeping a car on the road, you do that by tilting," says company spokesman Jan Ahrenbring. The tilting technique can also be used to sweep large virtual pages across the phone's screen, which acts as window on the information."

213 comments

  1. Obligatory, marketable by Empiric · · Score: 0, Funny

    ...can you rock me now? Good...

    --
    ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
  2. It is still... by chipster · · Score: 2

    going to be a distraction while driving...no matter what.

    1. Re:It is still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you have a game involving keeping a car on the road, you do that by tilting," Gee, I thought that the game involving keeping the car on the road meant putting the goddamn phone down, both hands on the wheel, and concentrating on driving!

    2. Re:It is still... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 3, Funny
      Indeed, that's true... but another thing struck me: the notion that the "...technique can also be used to sweep large virtual pages across the phone's screen".

      If the phone is anything like my Motorola T720, if I tilted it in any way, I wouldn't be able to see anything on the screen.

    3. Re:It is still... by iainl · · Score: 1

      And...

      What on God's Green Earth does this have to do with the story? The only car referenced is one in a computer game. For that matter, I don't recommend trying to play Halo while driving either.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  3. Another feature I don't want/need. by vasqzr · · Score: 5, Insightful


    How about 3 day battery life with 6 hours talk time?

    How about good, clear calls?

    How about not magically losing signal when I walk in to another room?

    1. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by heironymouscoward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Perhaps you're living in the wrong country. My Nokia GSM has more than 6 hours' talk time, the battery runs for ten days or so, and reception is crystal clear everywhere I go.

      All it is really missing is motion control. That way I can answer the phone simply by picking it up, hold a call by putting the phone down, and scroll through my address list by shaking the phone like a lunatic instead of clicking those damn arrow keys.

      My guess is: if the rocker control is cheap and easy to hook up to the UI, it will be a natural and useful extension to the way we use phones.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature
    2. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by tempest303 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, well, some of us live in the US, where we like to Let the Market Decide(TM), and we apparently Decided to get Screwed with crap like CDMA instead of the pre-existing global fucking standard of GSM. Hooray for free market capitalism! :-P

    3. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by bob670 · · Score: 1

      Preach on brother, preach on. I drop calls when I am a mile from my home, I get no connection to the network for 1/4 mile, then it magically comes back. Fix that and keep the games.

    4. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're blaming 3Com when your cable modem connection lags?

      If you have no connection to the network then your service provider is to blame. Hardware manufacturer has nothing to do with that.

    5. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      How about 3 day battery life with 6 hours talk time?

      Try the Nokia 6310i. It may be black and white but it's got Bluetooth, GPRS, HSCSD, Triband, Java and has impressive battery life (both idle and talking). Not to mention the easy to use UI and support for syncing to and from Outlook (tasks, calendar and, most importantly, contacts).

      How about good, clear calls?
      How about not magically losing signal when I walk in to another room?

      If you're in Europe, this sounds like a network provider problem rather than a handset issue. If you aren't, then this is probably better answered by someone else.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    6. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by aflat362 · · Score: 1
      So you're blaming 3Com when your cable modem connection lags?

      If you have no connection to the network then your service provider is to blame. Hardware manufacturer has nothing to do with that.

      Funny you say that. I bought a 3Com cable modem and my signal kept dropping. Then I replaced it with a Motorola and haven't had a problem since!

      --

      Conserve Oil, Recycle, Boycott Walmart

    7. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by ufoo · · Score: 1

      mini fuel cells will take care of one of the issues. Without putting a tower every place, I don't think there's a way to resolve 2), 3 is probably a function of the frequencies used being blocked by things like water or tinted glass or something. Probably there are physical limitations.

      --

      --
      Annotateit at Annotateit.com
    8. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by torpor · · Score: 0

      So move.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    9. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed... when they can complete a call 100 times out of 100, then let them try to sell me extra features and services.

    10. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      My Ericsson T68i has 300 hours stand by time and 11 hours talk time. Ha!
      Seriously though, why is the difference so big? I mean, is it because differences between the phone networks or do all american product come with weak batteries?

      --
      Martin
    11. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      How about good, clear calls?

      I suggest NOT calling poor conversationalists, and dumping Sprint.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    12. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by namemattersnot · · Score: 1

      uh, you can't find a GSM provider in the USA? i know you guys sell T68i from Ericsson that has 11 hours of talk time and clear reception.

      here in Canada we have CDMA, GSM and whatever else you can fancy.

    13. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by GiMP · · Score: 1

      T-mobile and Cingular are the only GSM providers in the USA.. unfortunately, the GSM networks are very good and you don't get nearly the quality that you get from a CDMA provider.

    14. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by bendawg · · Score: 1

      AT&T also does GSM in the US, at least in my area. A few people at work have switched over to AT&T GSM.

    15. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by gpinzone · · Score: 4, Informative

      Get educated. CDMA is much more advanced than the TDMA technology that's in the GSM standard. Besides, you want GSM? Get T-Mobile. You see how easy that is when you have a choice?

    16. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by bob670 · · Score: 1

      Yep, I will blame the handset, since it never happened with my cheap ass old phone. Of course my new phone will do about 409 more useless things than the old one did, and while overall a better phone, I would have gladly traded the ability to download games in order to insure no dropped calls.

    17. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMEN, Brotha!!

      My old nokia 6190 from voicestream(t-mobile) had great sound but only about an hour talk time and 1 day standby(with extended battery). My new sanyo 4900 from sprint (work provided) has probably 6 hours talk time and a week standby with a standard battery, but the sound quality sucks.

      It also came with all the bells and whistles (internet, java games and apps, voice recorder, speakerphone....) which were cool for a couple weeks, but now are useless, especially because using the internet on it is so slow it's like pulling teeth. The only good feature about it is that it has a USB cable that I can plug into a laptop and connect to the internet from anywhere (and connecting that way is at least faster than dialup).

    18. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know T-Mobile was GSM, but I do know that their sound quality is a hell-ova-lot better than Sprint.

    19. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing wrong with CDMA, and nothing wrong with the free market.

    20. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by OlaL · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not that familiar with CDMA, so I cannot comment on it being more advanced, but GSM is a combination of FDMA and TDMA, not only TDMA.

    21. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what happens when you bend over to pick something up or turn your head the wrong way and your cell phone not only hangs up on whomever you were talking to, but also scrolls through your call list and dials 911?

      lol sorry, Im just a bit skeptical.

    22. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to clarify, you do live in the right country. Whatever your country is, it's positively scattered with GSM sites - probably hidden in steeples, billboards, and atop buildings between the towers you *can* see. It's impossible to wrangle a GSM deployment without a lot of radios.

      The US is big. GSM's flaws show up more easily here, even when the networks are trying. Maybe our complainer is a Cingular or T-Mobile customer? (Of course, the CDMA carriers screw up their networks, too. When you can get by with fewer cells, you still try to shave off those last few, or put the extra distance between them that soft-handoff doesn't work.)

    23. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, well, some of us live in the US, where we like to Let the Market Decide(TM), and we apparently Decided to get Screwed with crap like CDMA instead of the pre-existing global fucking standard of GSM. Hooray for free market capitalism! :-P"

      GSM has a 16km hard cell-size limit. CDMA cells can be 4 times as large and handle 2 times as many calls. Oh, and it has lower-latency, higher bandwidth data service. And better voice quality.

      Hmmm, so we have a better, more economical, easier to deploy technology, or a less good, more expensive, harder to deploy technology. Is it any wonder why the US cellular industry chose CDMA.

      By the way, there is GSM service in the US. Three major providers: AT&T, Cingular, T-Mobile.

    24. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by dlosey · · Score: 1

      Why would I want to answer the phone as soon as I pick it up? I always like to check the caller ID first, to see if it is someone I want to talk to. Very rarely will I want to answer the call as soon as I grab the phone.

    25. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by donutello · · Score: 1

      Not sure if this is a troll but I'll respond anyway.

      How about 3 day battery life with 6 hours talk time?

      I have more than that on my Sprint PCS LG phone that I bought 2 years ago.

      How about good, clear calls?

      Again, I'm on Sprint PCS and am not sure what you're talking about.

      How about not magically losing signal when I walk in to another room?

      Ask your cellphone provider to boost the coverage/signal in your area.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    26. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 1
      My Ericsson T68i has 300 hours stand by time and 11 hours talk time. Ha!
      Seriously though, why is the difference so big? I mean, is it because differences between the phone networks or do all american product come with weak batteries?


      Two words: Population Density. Europe's is about twice that of the US. This makes it more economical to put up more towers, more towers mean that digital phones are closer and thus broadcast at a lower power than they would if they were just barely on the edge of reception. Plus, as has been noted elsewhere above, CDMA allows for larger cells with more phones per cell, so once again you may be farther from the tower.

      As a handy example, Germany is roughly the size of Minnesota + Wisconsin, if I recall correctly. A quick google indicates Germany has a population of about 82 million people. Minnesota is about 5 million, roughly half of which live in the Twin cities metro area. Wisconsin is about 5.4. So basically, a place like Germany would have 8 times the population density, making it more economical to put up a much denser network of cellphone towers so that your phone can broadcast at lower power. Hence, longer battery life.

      Personally, I have a Motorola V60 and currently reside in North Dakota, which means I see the big old A for Analog Only on a pretty regular basis, and suddenly I get more like 20 minutes of talk time instead of several hours.

      --
      Why?
    27. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile's coverage area will fit in a bee's butt and there will still be room left over for what I know about differential equations.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    28. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's probably based on a MEMS accelerometer. I'll spare them a direct link (because I'm lazy) but Analog Devices sells 2G and 10G MEMS accelerometers. If you fill out a webform you can get them to send you two or three samples of each.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    29. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by jquirke · · Score: 1

      He's definitely not in Europe. There's only 1 place he could possibly be with an attitude like that, and mobile phones that are 10 years behind the rest of the world.

  4. Driving on Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "If you have a game involving keeping a car on the road, you do that by tilting,"

    How about you try keeping your car on the road by NOT talking while driving?

    1. Re:Driving on Cell Phones by chmod000 · · Score: 0

      Hear, hear!

      Hey, idiot!

      Is that a car or a PHONE BOOTH!

      --
      Aptal soru yoktur; sadece merakli aptallar vardir.
    2. Re:Driving on Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're talking on the phone while driving, why not steer the car by tilting the phone? That frees up some attention for your conversation. Then, you could signal the car to stop by slamming your head against the windshield.

    3. Re:Driving on Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're talking on the phone while driving, why not steer the car by tilting the phone?

      Yeah, and that way when your girlfriend calls you (while you're driving) to tell you she's pregnant, you can drop the phone in surprise and your car will flip itself over, saving you the trouble of learning to tie a noose-knot.

  5. yippee! by mschoolbus · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It will probably work just like the damn joystick on my phone... Or the Service (T-Mobile)...

    The way I see it, this whole cell phone thing is really starting to suck.

    1. Re:yippee! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having had one on the desk next to me for a while, I've found it quite intuitive really.

      You don't toggle the tilt mode, there's a button you keep held to enable tilt response. Let go and everything locks in place. You have 2 modes in the browser for zooming or scrolling.

      It's a damn site better than anything else I've tried for web page navigation on a device of that sort of size.

    2. Re:yippee! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, what's the point of a mobile phone that you leave on your desk? :)

  6. Cue article... by Channard · · Score: 2, Funny

    .. about a guy whose car went off the road while he was tilting his mobile trying to keep a virtual car on the road.

  7. Ok now I am REALLY scared to drive in a car... by 1arkhaine · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...just talking on a phone is difficult enough for some people, let alone waving your hands around like a madman.

  8. Too literal, perhapse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A game keeping a car on the road...How disturbing.

    I thought that's what hands-free kits were for.

  9. Palm! by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Didn't Palm (sorry, Pa1m!) have a patent a year or so ago about this moving-a-window-on-a-bigger-virtual-screen thing?

    1. Re:Palm! by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure, but if you read the previous Slashdot article about this technology, you might find an answer. Sigh.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:Palm! by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, I don't know about patenting, but there's been hardware and software to do tilt sensing on a Palm for a while. Sure, it's not exactly common, but it's out there. There's even a game or two that use it.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    3. Re:Palm! by yourruinreverse · · Score: 1

      Hey, you got my mod points there!

      --
      JeR
  10. low viewing angle by SirLanse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah tilt it and you cannot read it anymore. That won't cause more frustration on the highway.

  11. Er... by Nexum · · Score: 1

    Which 'company spokesman'?

    --

    This sig has been deprecated.
  12. Give me a break by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's a Cell Phone...
    No, it's a camera...
    No, it's a video game...
    No, it's a breakfast cerial...

    When I thought of digital convergence, this isn't what I had in mind...

    --

    To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

    1. Re:Give me a break by sharkey · · Score: 1
      No, it's a breakfast cerial...

      Still no spell-check, though.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  13. Drunk by zeth · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then I guess using it while being drunk is out of the question.

    1. Re:Drunk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I guess using it while being drunk is out of the question.

      Yes, just as playing need for speed or any other driving game while drunk is strictly prohibited...

  14. Not all that new by chamenos · · Score: 3, Informative

    the technology used in this case might be more advanced (gyroscope), but the idea of tilting the phone to activate a function or control something isn't new. i had a casio watch many years back that would automatically turn on the backlight for a few seconds if you lifted up your wrist to look at it. i'm not sure this is a good thing though...just one more thing to keep drivers who shouldn't be on the road in the first place distracted.

    1. Re:Not all that new by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Old stuff indeed, the Microsoft Freestyle Pro gamepad is five years old and has a very similar feature, but instead of a gyro, it uses an acceleration sensor (ADXL202) to sense the angle of the controller relative to the earth's gravitational field. A gyro is actually not a good idea for this kind of control because it can only sense relative rotation angles (i.e. you have no zero point).

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    2. Re:Not all that new by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I've never seen that. Wouldn't the sensor turn on the backlight during the day too? Also, wouldn't it randomly turn it on as you moved around? I would think that such a feature would run the battery down pretty quickly.

    3. Re:Not all that new by chamenos · · Score: 1

      nope....basically you have to lift up your wrists in a particular way in order to trigger the backlight. it does come on once in a while inadvertently, but it didn't happen very often. in any case i usually left the feature disabled because it did turn on once in a while, often enough to bug me.

  15. It's also been done.. by Channard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... with a Gameboy Advance game, Kirby's Pinball - you put the cart in, moved the GBA abound and the onscreen character reacted appropriately.

    1. Re:It's also been done.. by Talez · · Score: 1

      Logitech have also had a gamepad with it. The Logitech Wingman Gamepad Extreme. I've had it for years and its a nice little toy. Like one of the first USB devices I ever bought.

  16. Cellphone Game by gykh · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If you have a game involving keeping a car on the road
    Thank you but I've had it with people, cell phones and keeping their cars on roads.

    Gits.
  17. To turn it off... by PiscoX · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... just tilt it vigorously against a wall.

    1. Re:To turn it off... by Talinom · · Score: 1

      ... just tilt it vigorously against a wall.

      Yes, that is one option that could work. What I want to know is if the phone is in your pocket and detects that it is spinning will it automatically call 911 for help? Also, if it detects that it is twirling through the air after having just left your hand, does it automatically message your carrier of their inferior service?

      --
      "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
  18. You WILL like this by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But he adds that consumers will have to be convinced that the technology is useful.

    How about stop all the crap 'features' that people have to be convinced are useful, and just get the damn things to work...

    (blissfully, I don't really care, because I remain cellphone anchor-free)

    1. Re:You WILL like this by Serapth · · Score: 1

      My dog, how did you manage to dog that bullet?!?!

      As much as I hate the damned things... I don't really see how you can be part of the professional world, without carrying a cell phone, a pager or any other such communication device?

      Most professions of a greater scale than say... burger flippers, require anytime anwhere access... to some degree anyways. Granted, as an employee thats a pretty crappy thing... but heh... it aint a strong job market right now, so put up or shut up eh? ;)

      That said, cell phones do have one good point... they are a nice piece of mind device... so if your car breaks down, you get abducted by UFO's, or attacked by a yeti... you can call for help. Granted... when you need the damned things... they never seem to work. Hell, during the East Coast blackout a few weeks back... the sheer call volume killed the network around my area.

    2. Re:You WILL like this by jridley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why? As a programmer, what the HELL could they want you for that wouldn't wait until tomorrow? Yes, if you're a sysadmin and something breaks, or if you're in charge of something online, they may need you now. But if the boss decides to address bug #132203 that's been on the books for two months, I think he can wait until tomorrow.

      I finally bought a cell phone for my wife and I to keep in contact easier. I tried to give it to my boss (I'm a programmer with some responsibility for an on-line service) but he refused to take it, saying that nothing was that important that it couldn't wait until tomorrow. He did take it eventually when I went on a 2 week vacation but he never called it, even when there was trouble; he found someone else to deal with it, even though he knew I could have handled it faster.

    3. Re:You WILL like this by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 0


      > Most professions of a greater scale than say...
      > burger flippers, require anytime anwhere access...

      Ahem. They sometimes need to call us burger-flippers because half the time the no-hoper/loser types don't show up to their shifts, so we get drafted in to take over.
      I wonder how they manage to keep their jobs.

      (No, this isn't my career - I'm not going to stay a burger-flipper forever (I hope).)

    4. Re:You WILL like this by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      I don't really see how you can be part of the professional world, without carrying a cell phone, a pager or any other such communication device?

      You need to broaden your thoughts, my son. As a developer, WTF does it matter if I fix the bug tommorrow instead of 0 dark thirty tonight?

      And you know the way to minimize work-stopping bugs?
      Design, code, TEST. Test some more. Fix the things you find. Then test again. Build applications correctly from the start, and you won't GET those 2 AM calls.

      Granted... when you need the damned things... they never seem to work.

      Then why bother?

    5. Re:You WILL like this by Serapth · · Score: 1

      I suppose it would depend on the type of systems you program for, and your importance to the projects themselves. I gaurantee, at some level in your development world, there is *somebody* on call... I have yet to have a programming position where in their wasnt somebody on call. Actually, almost every job ive been involved in, I have required a cell phone, although I wasnt always called frequently.

      Although, I suppose if you are developing systems that dont need 24/7 uptime, or are sold in shrink wrap... there is less of a need to be available... although, around release time, I imagine you have to make yourselve more available then normal. There are some bugs out there, in almost every piece of software, that have to be fixed *NOW*!

      That said, im in more a designer/manager type position now... which makes the need to carry a cell phone even greater. Although, even now... I still dont get that many calls. Your right, good design and tight code reduce the need to be on call a great deal... but some problems always slip through the cracks.

    6. Re:You WILL like this by Serapth · · Score: 1

      No intention of slighting the noble profession of burger flipping. You fulfill a very required and appreciated role... namingly keeping me fed and unhealthy! ;)

    7. Re:You WILL like this by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      I gaurantee, at some level in your development world, there is *somebody* on call

      Actually, not really. Of our small section of 7 developers, the only one 'on call' is the director of development.

      The DBA (Oracle and SQLServer), the network director, the Linux admin, the Windows admin, and the general helpdesk guy are on call, but none of the developers. And yes, we do have several customer facing, 24/7 applications running.

  19. that's not what *i* read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first time i saw that headline, i read "Gyroscope Gives CellPhones 'Tit Control'.

    1. Re:that's not what *i* read... by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1

      LOL, I didn't see the 'l' either.
      It summoned up images of Motorola and Gainax forming a partnership, let me tell you.
      On the whole, I don't think that would be a bad thing.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  20. Cell phone to park themselves! by quartzzk · · Score: 1

    What next, self-parking cell phones? More games, more on positioning (Cell towers can already triangulate where the cell phone is, why not provide GPS already!!!) new cameras give me a break is it a phone, or ( gameboy | television | handheld PC | camera ) Give me a break I am so sick and tired of hearing about new things that are added to phones, so that they may charge more and more for them, tilting a phone, what! Seriously sounds cool, but what if you live on a hill does it take in to account calibration! -Holla

    1. Re:Cell phone to park themselves! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They still have baseline phones without the extra frills. You don't have to use one of these things.

      But then, "baseline" includes caller ID and SMS text messaging, but only if you subscribe.

  21. Usefull feature? Hmmm by ultraw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is is only me, but I'm surpised every time some company comes up with some new feature for a cellphone, and they demonstrate it by saying it might come in handy when playing a game? Every new phone is marketeered by saying how much games it has, how much ringtones, how easily you can change the cover,...

    I can't think of a good thing I can do with a phone with a gyroscope in it right now. I assume that anyone can come up with some basic telephone feature that is still missing. One I can come up with is "if busy, present a callback function (Call back in 30 seconds? Yes/No)". Another one is "answer and delete message".

    Oh boy, if only I would design phones...

    1. Re:Usefull feature? Hmmm by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      "if busy, present a callback function (Call back in 30 seconds? Yes/No)"

      Don't most phones already do this? My old Ericsson did it automatically, and on a Nokia I think it's under Call settings - Automatic redial

    2. Re:Usefull feature? Hmmm by arcanumas · · Score: 1
      The "callback" you refer to is present on any Ericsson phone i've had. When the phone is busy it asks you "User busy. Retry?" and keeps on retrying until it gets a normal signal. It then rings to notify you that a call is being made..

      As for the Gyro.. well it would make a nice McGyver episode, where McGyver uses the cellphone's gyroscope to navigate a broken airplane thus saving hundreds of lives...

      --
      Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
    3. Re:Usefull feature? Hmmm by Sphere1952 · · Score: 1

      How about "give the boss a good story for being late"?

      --
      Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
    4. Re:Usefull feature? Hmmm by ultraw · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my nokia also has this, but it calls back right away... it just hangs up and calls again. What is the chance that the other person is allready of the phone by then...

      Mind the 30 seconds i mentioned, and even the, it should notice me in 30 seconds by some small beep or vibration that it is time to call back (some sort of "snooze function" for a call you are making)...

    5. Re:Usefull feature? Hmmm by gr66nman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The average cell phone is already more "usefull" than the average house phone. Cell phone marketers are trying to get those crazy teens with expendable cash to buy their gadgets. They want games! They want pretty colors! They want ringtones! Heck, if I was a teen right now, I'd buy one! (I spent $500 on a discman when I was 16 cuz I thought it was cool. To think, I could've put that in a mutual fund!)

    6. Re:Usefull feature? Hmmm by MoP030 · · Score: 1

      just for the record, my siemens phone does that, too. (see above for ericson fanboys)

      --
      the most sexp i get is my paren-mode.
    7. Re:Usefull feature? Hmmm by jargoone · · Score: 2, Funny

      I spent $500 on a discman when I was 16 cuz I thought it was cool. To think, I could've put that in a mutual fund!

      If you still have it, sell the discman on eBay. You'll probably get more than the mutual fund would be worth today.

    8. Re:Usefull feature? Hmmm by Tintivilus · · Score: 1

      One I can come up with is "if busy, present a callback function (Call back in 30 seconds? Yes/No)"

      Every Motorola phone I've used (v.60, 280i, T720, v70, A830, others) have a "retry?" prompt when a call fails (line busy, network issues, etc). if you select "yes," the phone will do its own little redial thing and sound your call alert when it's successful.

      So... if the line you're calling is busy, just hit retry and put the phone back in your pocket. The next time it rings/vibrates its the call you tried to make earlier connecting.

    9. Re:Usefull feature? Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... a phone you can shake - think etch-a-sketch... a call from the boss man, just pick up the phone and shake it and the call will go away.

      Call from the bill collector, pick it up and shake it...

      Call from Slashdot for too many posts ---....

      it may be useful in some games and "special" phone services also...

  22. Been done before - quick patent it by sr180 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Is it like this or this or this And this goes back to 1999. Ahh but its on a phone now. Quick, I'd better patent it before someone else does. Bah.. Old idea. Just a new application.

    --
    In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
  23. The Register by muirhead · · Score: 1
    Saw this on The Register last summer here, here, and here.

  24. A solution in search of a problem by Nutcase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They keep trying to use this "tilt" technology somewhere. I first saw it at PC Expo several years ago (but before it became "techxNY" or whatever) - It was a SD card add on for a palm V. They were making a big deal out of scrolling maps with it. I demoed it, and tried to be polite about it, but the fact is that it is useless.

    There is much less control in tilting a palm while trying to watch the screen scroll, and then tilting it to level again to read the map - and once you tilt it level, you have to switch the toggle to stop it scrolling if you tilt it up to look at it.

    It reminds me of those games where you have a marble and have to make it fall in the hole in the middle of a big plate - you always overshoot the hole and end up on the other end.

    It's a dumb way to solve a problem that has already been solved via scroll bars and/or buttons.

    1. Re:A solution in search of a problem by twaltari · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. This might be cool technology but in this case it definitily does not solve any relevant real world problem. Can't really say before trying one these myself, but I'd suspect this is a lot worse user interface than plain old arrow keys... This concept has been out there quite some time already and I always thought: What a brain dead idea.

    2. Re:A solution in search of a problem by in7ane · · Score: 1

      "It reminds me of those games where you have a marble and have to make it fall in the hole in the middle of a big plate - you always overshoot the hole and end up on the other end."

      See, you've come up with a game application yourself! The phones will have an electronic 'marble' game.

      Seriously, I don't see why they suggested the car driving game - the marble game simulator is clearly a better example.

    3. Re:A solution in search of a problem by Nutcase · · Score: 1

      +1 Funny.

      Well done. Course, at least in the real world marble game you can see the ball and the hole at the same time. In the Cell Phone virtual one, you can use the large "virtual screen" to see a high resolution recreation of the play area... the fact that you dont know where the hole is half the time only adds to the challenge. :)

    4. Re:A solution in search of a problem by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Microsoft did this years ago with the Sidewinder Freestyle Gamepad. They bundled it with Motocross Madness, probably because it was the only game that played decently with a tilt controller. So maybe they'll make some Java games for that phone that'll play well with a tilt controller or maybe it'll just be the fad that it was on PCs.

    5. Re:A solution in search of a problem by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      Now I can finally play Marble Madness on my cell phone!!

  25. Bah... by KrunZ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bah no news... My girlfriend has been tilting the control on our PlayStation for many years now when she do an extra sharp turn in SSX...

    1. Re:Bah... by polyp2000 · · Score: 0

      You've have a girlfriend that plays Playstation,.. and you've had her for years ... amazing...

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    2. Re:Bah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was hoping someone would bring this up! I've noticed women seem to be more inclined to use controls that don't exist. Does this somehow help them with other motor controls? Is this approach really more commonly used by women? Anyone know of any studies, etc?

  26. What I really want.... by Crash42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    is a $20 phone with a 200 hours batterylife for making phonecalls. I don't want a $2000 mp3 playing, fm radio, camera, tilt controlled gamecosole, pda, alarmclock thingy wich btw can also be used (if you ever might want to) to make phonecalls...

    --


    ....Excuse me, but ... ah, forget it...
    1. Re:What I really want.... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      I don't want a $2000 mp3 playing, fm radio, camera, tilt controlled gamecosole, pda, alarmclock thingy...

      Yeah, and you'd still have a separate pager...

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    2. Re:What I really want.... by stud9920 · · Score: 1

      No one will sell you a 20$ cell phone (without a subscription). When the value of a cell phone hits 20$, it has been retired for some two years.

    3. Re:What I really want.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because you probably have a CD changer in the trunk of your SUV and few friends to call or snap photos of...but as someone who lives in Tokyo, where the majority of people commute by train and subway, we don't want to carry a digital camera and a phone and a cd player and a gameboy with us. That is why the MiniDisc was a hit in Japan but a flop at home: because when you are commuting by train and subway, the difference in size between a CD and an MD is significant. Seems like so few people understand that there are specific cultural differences which influence the success of certain products in the marketplace. Docomo is prototyping a phone which reads your lips so you can silently communication without bothering others in a crowded train, but that probably sounds just useless in America where there is no such regard for the strangers around you.
      maxhodges

    4. Re:What I really want.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the deal with subsidizing the phones anyway? It seems that no matter what happens after I pay the money, if I pay $20 for a $300 phone, then that phone is really worth $20, despite what the manufacturer would lead me to believe...

  27. News from the future by BenjyD · · Score: 1

    I knew New Scientist covered cutting edge technology, but now they're reporting technology from the future? The date stamp at the top of that article is:

    16:12 18 July 04

    Eddies in the space time continuum again?

  28. More features I'll never use by Brahmastra · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Here's what I use my cellphone for : Making phone calls. I don't particularly care for playing games with shitty graphics, using awkward controls. I don't particularly care for sending pictures of my beautiful face using a cellphone webcam.. Maybe I talk only from the bathroom. I'm sick of all the features they keep adding to the cellphones. How about giving cellphones a better antenna by default instead?

    1. Re:More features I'll never use by dagbrown · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh how nice. You just use your cellphone to make calls.

      Thank you for your input. I DON'T CARE.

      I don't even know why the vast batallions of people who insist on saying "Hi! I only use my phone for making calls!" think they're saying anything new or original.

      If all you care about is making phone calls, there are lots of good, cheap phones which just do that. The VTech A700 comes right to mind--it's cheap, weighs nearly nothing, and just to keep all these people who insist on mentioning that they don't want their phones to do anything fun, has NO FEATURES. (Oh wait, I lied, it can send text messages. Sorry if that's too overwhelming a proliferation of features for y'all.)

      If you don't like gadgets that do cool stuff...what the heck are you doing on Slashdot?!

      And for the dude who bitches that all he wants is a few days of battery life and clear audio--hey, perhaps you should get rid of that 1989-standard brick and spend the twenty bucks to get a phone made this century! I've enjoyed crystal-clear audio and nice long battery life with every phone I've bought since 2000.

      In the meantime, I'll just enjoy my own phone--it has a color display, polyphonic ringers, a web browser with freakin' Java, a built-in FM radio, a speakerphone, and it's tiny and weighs 83 grams (that's less than 3oz for the American readers). Oh yeah, and it can go for a week between charges and I can talk for hours on it.

    2. Re:More features I'll never use by Compact+Dick · · Score: 1
      I don't even know why the vast batallions of people who insist on saying "Hi! I only use my phone for making calls!" think they're saying anything new or original.
      Apparently you aren't in the U.S.
      ...it's tiny and weighs 83 grams (that's less than 3oz for the American readers).
      Ding!

  29. pro and con by jpellino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    pros:
    - my seimens phone is now so small I can't reliably grasp it and press keys.. need somethign else to control now (or just return the phones to hand sized)
    - it could standardize some controls (think t9) as opposed to a new set of buttons to think about on every brand

    cons:
    - we have enough gesturing while driving

    - you can't reliably track something that's in motion (try reading a book thaqt you're waving back and forth, then try reading when the book ist still and your head is moving - big difference)

    - i don't want the gyroscopic effect when i'l trying to wrestle with the phone (ok, they'll likely be small) or the dam thing precessing while on my driver's seat...

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  30. Nintendo beat them to it by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Kirby Tilt and Tumble for Game Boy Color used a tilt sensor to control a pink puffball that rolled around on the screen. (It's one of the few games that won't work well on the SP or on the Game Boy Player.)

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  31. Tilting pie menus by SimHacker · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Here's a cool research paper from Sony's Computer Science Labs, about "tilting pie menus". I love it! I can't wait till all cell phones can sense tilt. Tilt control rocks!

    Tilting Operations for Small Screen Interfaces (Tech Note)
    By Jun Rekimoto, Sony Computer Science Laboratory, Inc. www.csl.sony.co.jp/person/rekimoto/papers/uist96.p df

    HTML version from google:

    http://216.239.53.104/search?q=cache:xf0Rxikgk34J: www.csl.sony.co.jp/person/rekimoto/papers/uist96.p df+tilt+pie+menu&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

    -Don

    --
    Take a look and feel free: http://www.PieMenu.com
  32. Pinball by jabbadabbadoo · · Score: 1

    Tilting? I guess there'll be an interesting version available for this cellphone's Pinball game!

  33. just imagine the phonesex possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can just picture it now:

    "oh yes... rock me harder... oh tilt me a little... hmm... yes thats it... yesssss"

  34. A technology so good by Rogerborg · · Score: 1
    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  35. The downside of tilt control by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So every time someone bumps into me on the train or it jerks on the tracks I'm going to lose my place in a document?

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  36. hmmm.... by motardo · · Score: 1

    worst gadget idea, ever

  37. Ob qoute... by gykh · · Score: 1

    "How did this happen?"

    "Eddies in the space-time continuum."

    "What??!?"

    "Eddies in the space-time continuum."

    "My God! Eddie! Eddie! Get out of there!"

  38. Mercury switch vs Gyroscope? by Koos+Baster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IMHO even a very small gyroscope seems pretty impractical wrt. (innertial) forces, size and battery life. How about simply using mercury switches to measure/estimate the cell phone's position?

    1. Re:Mercury switch vs Gyroscope? by sharkey · · Score: 1
      How about simply using mercury switches to measure/estimate the cell phone's position?

      Because mercenaries use them in bombs. Then you'd have Riggs and Murtaugh after you, and you certainly don't want that!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:Mercury switch vs Gyroscope? by SkiItIfYouCan · · Score: 1

      I assume this phone is using the MEMS gyros made by Analog Devices. These things are pretty damn cool.

      http://www.analog.com/Analog_Root/sitePage/mainS ec tionHome/0,2130,level4%253D%25252D1%2526level1%253 D212%2526level2%253D213%2526level3%253D%25252D1,00 .html

    3. Re:Mercury switch vs Gyroscope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riggs and Murtaugh are REAL cool dudes, maan! Just watch their hip haircuts... and they were in 'Nam, weren't they?! Wow.

    4. Re:Mercury switch vs Gyroscope? by jsternbe · · Score: 1

      Hasn't this already been done, basically using a mercury switch? I remember the game Korokoro Kirby(Kirby's Tilt 'N Tumble in the US) for the gameboy color which used an interface like that. You made him move around the screen by tilting the gameboy and made him jump over things by shaking it. No gyroscopes were used (as far as I could tell).

    5. Re:Mercury switch vs Gyroscope? by njh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Firstly, do we really want to be putting more mercury into the environment, even in its safer metallic form?

      More importantly though, you can make an accelerometer using a single silicon chip. At last year's UIST I saw a tilt keyboard which used the standard silicon accelerometer.

  39. Marble Madness! by grub · · Score: 1


    This would be fantastic for a game such as the 1984 classic Marble Madness

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  40. Anyone remember the itsy by SirFlakey · · Score: 1

    The itsy had one of those a while back one of those Compaq/HP research PDA's that features the "rock'n'scroll" control. Much the same and now quite old.

    --
    Jon - TheSpork
  41. Why super-duper first by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    When the obvious is to offer a pick-up feature that doesn't involve pressing buttons?

    OK that's harder than you might think. Especially during roller-coaster rides.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  42. Why not a mercury switch? by Ex+Machina · · Score: 1

    n/t

  43. geez by mOoZik · · Score: 1

    I'm convinced a cell phone with mind reading abilities will exist before something useful and integrated is introduced into these devices. What a scam!

  44. Drinking and Phoning by handy_vandal · · Score: 1, Funny


    If it's a powerful gyroscope, I can drink enough to fall over, yet stand upright while making a phone call -- !

    --
    -kgj
  45. Rotation by rf0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Also from this months Stuff Magazine there is a perview of this phone on the inside back cover. One other funky thing it can do is that if you rotate it 90 degrees it will actually flip the screen orientation

    Rus

  46. Pseudo/alternate GPS use? by Channard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Could this perhaps be used as a pseudo GPS system? Rather than determining your position by a GPS signal, could have data on gradients of an area and have the PDA in your car in some sort of cradle to hold it flat. Then the PDA would detect when you were going up a hill (the software would have to discount speed bumps) and update your shown position. Provided you kept to the roads, by checking your car's angle it could determine your exact position, at worst it could be used to show were on a contour map you were.

    1. Re:Pseudo/alternate GPS use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's one of the most ridiculous ideas I've ever heard. Doing it like that will probably never ever be practical/possible.

    2. Re:Pseudo/alternate GPS use? by Channard · · Score: 1

      And since when has an idea not being practical ever put off those who regularly grace Slashdot's front page?

    3. Re:Pseudo/alternate GPS use? by NullSpaceKid · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it could be used in addition to GPS and a compass on a picturephone, so you could print timestamps, coordinates, direction and elevation on your photos. That's what I'd like to see.

    4. Re:Pseudo/alternate GPS use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah - the problem is that accelerations/decelerations would get interpreted as climbs and drops. Rush hour traffic would look like a very bumpy trip, indeed. Having an actual alitmeter instead would be work for this purpose.

  47. Prior Art to Palm's tilt? by yourruinreverse · · Score: 1

    I don't think a patent is likely as there would be (homemade) prior art.

    --
    JeR
  48. On a boat? by cjcormack · · Score: 0

    Can see it being an annoyance on a boat

  49. Etch-a-Sketch technique! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So to clear the screen can you shake it like an Etch-a-Sketch?! LoL

  50. The market by heironymouscoward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For some reason you Americans (though eminently logical in most areas) persist in believing that you live in a free market. A free market is one where government does not choose the winners but defines the rules and allows any player to compete. The USA just does not work like this: most significant industries are incredibly regulated, and telecoms is one of these. Energy is another.
    The USA's "free market" is anything but. For a really free market in telecoms, you have to look to countries where there is no anti-competitive parastate monopoly.
    Amazingly, also the countries with the cheapest and often best mobile phone services.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:The market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some reason you Americans (though eminently logical in most areas) persist in believing that you live in a free market. A free market is one where government does not choose the winners but defines the rules and allows any player to compete. The USA just does not work like this: most significant industries are incredibly regulated, and telecoms is one of these. Energy is another.

      I am amazed and disappointed how few people (both American and European) understand what the heck is going on in the US as regards cellphone service.

      No, our problems here, such as they are, do not stem from regulation or state sponsorship of monopoly. They *do* stem from a laissez-faire concept of deregulation. Nobody mandated a single cellphone standard, allowing CDMA (IS-95, and later specs) to compete with GSM (now moving to 'physical' CDMA modulation of its own, but Qualcomm's 'proprietary' protocols were ahead here for a number of years), analog AMPS, and some of the other forgotten technologies. Since the dawn of the 'PCS' or 'digital' phone era, we've had both GSM and CDMA services available.

      Now, quite honestly, this aspect was a good thing. It's a big country, there's room for a little anarchy, and CDMA (the 'physical' technology) has proved itself in a number of ways. When I got my Sprint phone back in 2000, I was specifically looking for an all-CDMA carrier, and I was quite pleased with the quality of service in the areas cells were deployed. (Customer service proved another matter, but we've heard amusing tales of BT, too.) Now, you could argue we favored the incumbent telecoms - lack of a 'standard' forced each to deploy their own sites - but this 1. gives us a lot of capacity in our networks (a plain GSM site can only support so many calls at once); yes, some things fell down during the blackout, but look how many calls were placed and *got through*; and 2. those telecoms had a lot of money, and it would only have been equally ridiculous to subsidize a technique where they could share sites and continue to profit without any 'deployment.' As I understand it, today many towers have been erected on land leased by third parties, and often multiple providers' stations end up on these (though sharing of the actual radio and signal-processing hardware at each can/does occur between vendors on the same protocols; even Sprint offered fallback to analog - hardware mostly deployed by Verizon and CellularOne - at a 'reduced rate' through a contract they cut).

      Even with all that, today, two of the most up-and-coming services - Cingular and T-Mobile - are GSM (though I don't know if they're even thinking of rolling out the 'new' CDMA GSM hardware you guys in Europe are starting to get), because people *are* beginning to value some of GSM_the_network's strengths over the proprietary services. People don't care about things like CDMA's soft-handoff for reliability during their voice calls (especially because they don't realize it exists), or power modulation that conceivably reduces whatever vague risk of cancer there is from cellphone diathermy, but they do want to start SMSing their friends.

      In the '90s, OmniPoint was the most obvious GSM provider here, to the point of actually offering SIM cards (not that there were other services to trade to), and they had coverage even more meager than Sprint's (which was always a bit constrained). Cingular (being owned by SBC, itself a merger of all the 'Baby Bell' halves of AT&T, and so a pretty hefty incumbent/'monopoly' in a sense) has made a big push to deploy GSM, now giving coverage that's probably better than Sprint's (provided the 16? or 32?-caller limit of GSM isn't reached on the cell you're trying to use), but they've also taken the SIM cards out of the phones.

      GSM-the-technology is no great benefit; GSM-the-political-animal is. *If* we had regulations for SIM cards - or even better, regulations that reduced the costs of switching *whether or not* the network technology is the same, then the 'free market' could do a much

    2. Re:The market by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The USA just does not work like this: most significant industries are incredibly regulated, and telecoms is one of these. Energy is another."

      Energy and telecoms are regulated out of necessity. It makes sense for one company to run power lines and one company to run phone lines. Having 10 companies compete would be nice, but it is not likely to happen. So regulation is how the industry is kept from price-gouging. The power blackout in New York was caused by a (British owned) power company that neglected upgrades and maintenence - this happened because of deregulation, not because of regulation.

      Wireless telecoms don't work the same way. That's why they are much less regulated in the US.

      And, frankly, we have the best, cheapest mobile phone services. Yes, we have the odd "recieving party pays", and we pay a monthly fee. But for my $40 a month ($30 without the data), I get:

      - Unlimited calling on nights, weekends, and to other phones on the same network
      - 600 minutes to use anytime else
      - Unlimited SMS and 1xRTT (144kbit data), not billed by the messege or the kilobyte
      - Free roaming in a country roughly 3x the size and with as many people as the EU
      - Free long-distance, anwhere within the same area

      My friends all have the same provider, so I can call them whenever I want, for as long as I want, wherever I am in the country. Now, is coverage as good as it is in Europe? No. But all the major roads are covered, as well as all towns and cities with more than a couple of thousand people. And it's CDMA, too. I thought that my GSM phone sounded good until I got CDMA. No static, no wierd artifacts, no hiss. And data service with 3x the bandwidth and 1/2 the latency of GPRS.

      Prefer GSM? Fine. T-Mobile, AT&T, or Cingular will be happy to have your business. They even have roaming agreements so you can roam (free, of course) onto other GSM networks in the US. Prefer CDMA? Verizon and Sprint will be happy to give you service.

      Look at the progression of the US wireless industry:

      1983: First (analog) cellular service in US begins
      1992: First GSM service in Europe
      1995: First GSM service in USA, First CDMA service in US
      1999: First "No Roaming, No Long Distance" promotion (AT&T OneRate)
      2000: First "Free Nights/Weekends" Promotion (Verizon), First "Others on the same network" promotion
      2001: AT&T Goes GSM
      2002: LEAP introduces Cricket, $32 unlimited calling, but only works in your home area.
      2002: Sprint introduces unlimited 1xRTT
      2003: Cingular introduces "rollover", lets you keep unused minutes for 1 year after they are (not) used.
      2003: Free Nights/Weekends, Free Roaming, Free Long Distance, Same network promotions are the standard. So is unlimited data.

      So, are we really that far behind? CDMA, GSM, 1xRTT? Our wireless system works differently. Yes, the person recieving the call pays (with plan minutes (or with unlim. night/wknd/same service), but the person calling doesn't pay (no $0.25 per minute; it's just another local call, or, if the cellphone number is in a different area code, it's $0.03 a minute). It's partially because the US had cellphones in 1983. It's not "worse" just because it doesn't work like the European system.

    3. Re:The market by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Excellent summary on the state of cellular in the U.S. Very informative and to the point!

      As for the "free market" comments, in general, though - I think the biggest problem comes about when technology begins rendering the old assumptions about industries requiring regulation obsolete.

      Right now, I think the U.S. is in sort of a strange place, where some of the traditionally "unquestioned" regulated monopolies are subject to new questions.

      Telcos were the first to feel this. (The old concept that it just didn't make sense to have multiple competitors stringing wires everyplace loses some of its value when people are offering the same service without using the wires.)

      The cable companies are subject to similar questioning, because frankly - they aren't providing a service essential to basic living (as your water or sewer company does), and other technologies (such as satellite TV) accomplish the same thing they do, again, without the wires. Furthermore, I don't think we're even so sure it's such a big deal having multiple competitors for cable TV each stringing their own lines. Much of it goes underground and out of the way, and there's not the need of *everything* in the country interconnecting, like telcos required.

      I don't think we're quite ready to turn electric power generation over to the "free market" just yet - but it's only a matter of time before we can. One of these days, the technology will become readily available for the typical consumer to generate his/her own power - instead of having to sap it off of a public grid. (Maybe hydrogen fuel cell tech. will lead to this? Who knows?) There's a lot of energy loss just from pushing the generated power all over the place, before it reaches its destination. In that respect, it's an inherently bad idea to handle power generation the way we do today.

    4. Re:The market by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      I do agree with your points - the old concepts of cable/telecom being regulated are on their way out. Indeed, I can get my telecom service from 3 different companies (through the same wires). Ironically, it works this way with my power as well. I still think that power should be regulated because the reliability of the service is paramout (lives can be lost when it fails) and because otherwise crucial maintenence would not be done (cutting corners to cut costs). That is why there are consumer regulations, airline regulations, auto regulations, environmental regulations, and other regulations - these are all ways in which the government disrupts the "free market", but they are crucial ones as they set minimums that corporations must meet and prevent the abuse of customers and the environment.

      "In that respect, it's an inherently bad idea to handle power generation the way we do today."

      Actually, today, it's quite a good idea. Power loss in the system is minimized by having substations and transformers. One estimate I heard put it at around 3% of used capacity. Since larger generators are usually more efficent, perhaps a centralized approach isn't so bad.

  51. Halleluja, finally the Labyrinth game by russotto · · Score: 1

    Finally, I can get that 'Labyrinth' game on my cell phone. It's just what I've been waiting for all these years, a computerized version of 'Labyrinth'. My journey is now complete.

  52. Non-glare wide-angle screen? by Speare · · Score: 1

    I can imagine that tilting the phone would be quite annoying in many lighting conditions. I tend to hold an electronic device in the rare position which doesn't produce glare or reflections, yet fits within a useful reading angle.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  53. Very Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very Cool!

    Analog devices (<a href="http://www.analogdevices.com/">http://www.an alogdevices.com/</a> -> MEMS) makes some super-tiny not too expensive Accelerometers and Gyroscopes. The cell phone is probably using accelerometers to detect <i>linear acceleration</i> (like picking the phone up, and putting it down), where as things like Kirby's Pinball (a game boy advance game, mentionned earlier) probably uses a gyroscope, which detects <i>rotation acceleration</i>.

    This is kinda silly if it was developed solely for use in games, but it seems like it should be able to increase the functionality of the phone effectively for "normal uses" (well, the traditionally normal use of phone).

  54. How about... navigation use by neodymium · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now, if the phone would use a 2-axis or even better 3-axis gyro, it could be used for navigation, even in GPS-uncovered areas (buildings...). It's the same principle they use in planes for the so called INS - inertial nav system.

    Just imagine the possibilities of such a navigation system. Finally, there's no more excuse for not finding the office of your PHB in a new building .

    1. Re:How about... navigation use by hussar · · Score: 1

      I thought sooner or later someone would suggest this.

      Of course, you are right. Gyros are used in inertial navigation systems in aircraft. The US Army's AH-1 Cobra anti-tank helicopter was/is one such aircraft. The system had some problems, however, that had to do with gyroscopic precession and the frequency of hard banking maneuvers when flying close to the ground in nap-of-the-earth flight. Similar problems are likely to crop up using a gyro for inertial navigation in a small hand-held device.

      I was an aeroscout back in the '80s flying tactical helicopter training missions in Germany. It was our job to find attack positions for the Cobras to shoot from and then lead them up to their firing points. Due to differences in loiter times, the aeroscout and the Cobras would leave the assembly area separately to fly forward to a pre-arranged meeting point. It often happened that the Cobra pilots would rely on their inertial navigation units to navigate to the point, but flying nap-of-the-earth and making many sharp turns and changes in altitude would cause the gyros to precess. The Cobra pilots would not notice the precession and would end up lost, kilometers away from the pre-arranged meeting points.

      The Cobra pilots called it the inertial navigation system. The aeroscouts called it the "inert navigation system."

      --

      Bureaucracy loves company.
  55. Absolutely brilliant - in principle by DriftingDutchman · · Score: 1

    Think motion patterns, rather than absolute grids. Apparently, everyone has a distictive way to make that figure-8. The combination may even provide a medium-grade access control. This is even more useful when phones and wallets are combined. We need to think beyond buttons and their 2.01 - D rendering on screens. Just like previous generations did have to learn to deal with buttons. Motion patterns are closer to normal human infrastructure anyway. Think learning to play a musical instrument. Or even to learn to talk. Especially in the latter is no real "grid" precision. Motion recognition would enable a very wide range of options without having to step through tedious menu hierarchies. And without dozens of buttons. So all the "(phone) real estate" can be spent on display.

    1. Re:Absolutely brilliant - in principle by Nutcase · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a guitar player, I can understand the nuances involved in motion patterns, control, differentiation of player/user, etc. But in practice, tilt control provides no real value. It requires you to change the orientation of the device to provide input, even though your primary method of feedback is dependant on the orientation of the device.

      Imagine if you typed into your word processor by placing your hands in the middle of the document on your screen and typing on a virtual keyboard - you can't see what you are typing until you stop, look, and then you have to fix mistakes blind as well. It just doesn't work, even though a virtual on screen keyboard has instant geek appeal.

      Besides, the nuances you are talking about don't really apply to the cell phone/pda market - that is about getting information into and out of the device as quickly and accurately as possible. subtle wrist flicks and tilting are not the way to do that. I can't actually think of an application (except perhaps security/authentication) that would benefit from nuanced control in this medium. Maybe if they created a virtual theramin or something... but talk about a niche market. ;)

      If you want to spend your phone real estate on a screen, do two things:

      1) Voice dialing. When done right, this is a killer feature.

      2) Touch Screen. Scroll maps and such by simply placing your finger (thumb?) on the screen and "pulling" it.

      the physical orientation of the device in the real world should have no bearing on the behavior of the systems software.

  56. Why a gyroscope? by pesc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most modern phones have a camera. Why not just activate it and perform some image processing. Now you can determine how you tilt the phone just by looking through the camera.

    Another nifty thing you could do; if the camera is on the back-side of your phone, you should be able to activate it and use the phone as an optical mouse. Just slide the phone on your desk, and the mouse pointer on the phone screen moves. Cute eh?

    Maybe I should patent this and get rich?
    But now I have already written about it on slashdot. Too late. Damned slashdot, hindering innovation like this!

    --

    )9TSS
    1. Re:Why a gyroscope? by mercx · · Score: 1

      > Why not just activate it and perform some image processing. ...a short guess would be that any kind of heavy processing drains battery life... sometimes by a significant amount...

      case in point, a rogue program in our office P800 once left a thread running; it reduced battery life from the normal 100 hours to just around 10 hours :S

    2. Re:Why a gyroscope? by Experiment+626 · · Score: 1

      Actually the camera would probably benefit from the gyroscope in the camera as much or more than the user interface does. Some of Canon's better lenses use gyros built into the lenzes to act as Image Stabilizers, basically compensating for any motion and shaking of the camera during exposure to improve the picture quality.

    3. Re:Why a gyroscope? by sahala · · Score: 1
      Most modern phones have a camera. Why not just activate it and perform some image processing. Now you can determine how you tilt the phone just by looking through the camera.

      Get back to me when you have a demo.

    4. Re:Why a gyroscope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoulda stuck with nethack.

    5. Re:Why a gyroscope? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Neither would work as a pure software solution, camera doesn't send pictures anywhere fast enough for "optical mouse" thingie and the smallish CPU on the other hand doesn't have even near the required power for that kind of image processing in realtime...

      Add some dedicated hardware and you might be on to something, though only assuming this whole "tilt control" wouldn't suck, which it unfortunately does.

      On the other part there might be need for phone based remotes (with bt, you could control laptop and your oh-so-multimedia presentation from some distance), but if you're bouncing like a clown on a stage then you want something that can be used on one hand without a table, not mouse.

  57. Unforseen side effects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it possible that the gyroscope could go haywire and it's momentum would keep you from turning the phone upright? How about just creating enough inertial like those workout gyroscopes to build wrist strength? That could actually be a addition feature.

  58. Obvious pr0n industry application... by glassesmonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ..can't you see the interactive applications of tilt/movement of portable devices that also have a vibrating ringtone function.

    I'm just saying it seems the sex trades are the first to jump into new technology. (I'm still waiting for the multi-camera function of DVDs to appear in anything but adult entertainment)

    Did I mention they also have cameras??

  59. I can see it now ... by (void*) · · Score: 1
    "Bobby, shaking at damn cellphone when it does not work will not solve any problem."


    "Hey old man, this cell's got a gyro. What do you know?"

  60. Been done before by redNuht · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nintendo had a similar engine in Kirby's Tilt 'n' Tumble for the Gameboy Color, where the player had to tilt the Gameboy to make Kirby roll. And the gyroscope thing was inside the game cartridge too.

    Too bad the GBA SP loads the cartridges from below, making the game unplayable. :)

  61. grammar nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    cause you're car

    That's "cause you to be a car", you simpleton!

    1. Re:grammar nazi by Capt_Troy · · Score: 1

      true enough. I mis-typed. Please accept my apologies regarding you're comment....

      DAMN! I did it again.

  62. GyroScope vs. Accelerometer by msheppard · · Score: 1

    I think this technology is different than the stuff they've been doing with Palms for a decade now.

    The Palm stuff has all been Accelerometers, which are cheap becuase you need them to control airbags. They can detect change in orientation, but don't really know the orientation of the device, so you tilt and come back to level and have to tell the device it is level again. It might be able to do an OKAY job of knowing it's tilt at a given time, but the sampling rate will eventually make it necessary to hit that button telling it where straight and level is.

    The Gyroscope stuff is different, I assume it always knows which way is up, like avionics do. It's probably got a much higher degree of accuracy as well. Maybe it could do navigation? Maybe some games would be really fun? Maybe you could invent some new way of input (i.e. phyical graffitti)?

    But bottom line, I have yet to hear of a great application for this technology either. Any ideas I have would be solved by an electric compas.

    M@

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
  63. yes... games, ummmm how can I say this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    but I personally have not been impressed with the interactive capabilities of most cell phones to date. While there are many great games that you can put on that don't require fast responses I don't see how an orientation/motion detecting device can be useful due to the latency of input to process to output.

    Now on some of the PDA's, the gameboy and a very select few of the fanciest and most expensive phones then yes there is potential there.

    Not to slam the idea, but the article makes it sound like it is cell phones that are the main target. As long as there is sufficient input delay (and proper state recording) there might not be a problem.

    What I foresee is frustration in that for example in that racing game you tilt to the left, only to notice that your car visibly delays in actually trying to move. By the time it starts, the tilt system no longer registers the move or at least as much of the move. The usual alternative to this is to simply sample input over time and put in a buffer. PLEASE DON'T DO THIS. Not if you don't want those handhelds being dashed against rocks and thrown in lakes. Bad input buffering (what is most often seen, sadly) leads to this. You lean left to avoid a rock in the road. By the time the system decides to actually process your input you need to either straighten out or actually move to the left to avoid a car that just appeared in your lane. Sorry, you can expect now to both hit the rock and the car... possibly even slamming into something on your right as the ancient command you gave to avoid the left lane car is executed.

  64. The gyro is too small... by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want a cell phone with a big honking gyro that resists any attempt to change its orientation in space. When I put it on my belt clip and try to turn a corner, I want it to precess, fall off my belt, hit the ground with the antenna downward, and slowly rotates around in a cone-shaped evolute. I want it to exercise my wrist muscles when I pick it up and clip it on again.

    It would be JUST as useful as that silly tilt control, and a lot cooler.

    I also want it to have flip-out accessories for clipping nails, opening cans, and extracting stones from horse's hooves.

    I've given up on the things ever being reliable ways to make telephone calls.

    1. Re:The gyro is too small... by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, with tilt control, we can probably rig it up with some lasers, tack it to a wall and have an easy to use guide for putting up shelves and pictures etc. ;-)

      Jonathan

  65. Gyroscope? by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While this could be done with a gyroscope, that would be an incredible waste of energy (motor+cellphonebatteries=BAD). What I hope they mean is a simple spherical mercury switch.

    1. Re:Gyroscope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New MEMS technology doesn't need a motor. All sensing is done with tiny plastic and ceramic bits (for accelerometers anyway, which is probably what the cell phone has). All they do is flex back and forth inside the IC.

      Gyroscopes don't require motors either. A mass connected to four springs can serve as a gyroscope - I'm sure there are more practical ways of doing this inside integrated circuitry.

    2. Re:Gyroscope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely, they mean a solid-state device. There are a number of them on the market, and these "gyro" IC's typically contain a small mass and some strain sensors. Tilt the chip, the mass moves to push on the sensor, and the chip registers tilt.

      I'd agree that tilting to control a cell-phone based game is pretty mundane. But if you put x-, y-, and z-axis accelerometers in a cell phone or PDA, you could imagine the thing learning to certain gestures. It might turn on when you pull it out of your pocket, turn off when you put it in your pocket, and sync with the nearest desktop computer when it feels the jolt of landing on your desk.

      It might also be able to track its own position by dead reckoning, which might be particularly useful in conjunction with cell tower triangulation.

  66. German vocabulary by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

    Reading about this story makes one German word in particular spring to mind (no babelfish required either):

    Schadenfreude

  67. uh oh by gordlea · · Score: 1

    "If you have a game involving keeping a car on the road, you do that by tilting,"

    Oh great, so now we're gonna have morons driving down the road, trying to keep their car on the road while using their cellphone to play a game, where they try to keep their car the on road.

    --

    Choose yer poison: Prophets or Profits

  68. Shake the phone to erase the message? by khaine · · Score: 1

    The tilting technique can also be used to sweep large virtual pages across the phone's screen

    Why did an Etch-a-sketch spring to mind when I read that?

  69. haha by geekoid · · Score: 1

    "If you have a game involving keeping a car on the road..."
    could they make it easier?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  70. Think of the practical applications! by yellowstone · · Score: 1

    It looks like your plane is crashing. Would you like to call someone and make a dying utterance?

    --
    150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for slashdot.sig (129323052 bytes).
  71. Is this useless in a moving vehicle? by name_already_taken · · Score: 1
    This thing senses movement of the phone...

    Have you ever been on a train or in any other type of vehicle? They move! Sometimes not very smoothly.

    What's to stop the phone from sensing every pothole in the road or expansion joint in the train tracks as user input?

    This really seems useless in a real-world application.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  72. That's crap.. by codework · · Score: 1

    that's all really..

  73. another case of SO by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    why bother...I've yet to find any decent games that I wanted to play on my 2' phone screeen thanks.....Heck I can barely use that miniscule screeen to dial much less play a video game....

    So much technology, so many idiots, and still the kids starve in the streets.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  74. might be redundant, but, this has been done. by Kurayamino-X · · Score: 1

    and better too.

    they have had -solid state- tilt sensors for a while, in fact they had them in Palms with this nifty tilt game that was like those old marble puzzles.

    well technicaly, they dident have them in palms, it envolved opening the palm and soldering the sensor in, tho there was a dongle version in development like, four, five years ago...

    --
    ...I got nothing.
  75. Car on the road LOL!! by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    Thats funny.. "Keep the car on the road by tilting the phone", how about putting the damn phone down and keeping your car on the road by using the steering wheel instead of chatting about what jimmy said to janey, or playing tilting games...

    --
    meh
  76. They're reinvented Etch-A-Sketch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 bucks says the way to erase the phone memory will be to hold it upside down and shake it vigorously.

  77. Etch-a-Sketch by dspyder · · Score: 1

    To reboot the phone, hold in over your head and shake it back and forth???

    --D

  78. Back in high school... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 0

    Somebody in my electronic shop class in high school, oh probably 15 years ago, now, made a joystick for a Commodore 64 like this. It was this black box, with 4 mercury switches inside, so that tilting the box as you were holding it would result in your character/ship/car/pixels moving that way.

    The advantage really came when you were playing some kind of a racing game. Because the accelerator is inevitably up on the joystick, just tip the thing forward until you're looking at the bottom of the box. Your accelerator is flat to the floor for the whole game, and you can steer the car by turning the box left or right, just like a steering wheel.

    Pole Position II was never so much fun! :)

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  79. Much more advanced... by heironymouscoward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This may be true but it's close to meaningless when it comes to the market and quality of coverage. The great debate over CDMA/TDMA/whatever is fun for telco engineers but the public wants to know only:

    1. does it work in my area?
    2. is it reasonably reliable?
    3. is it economical?

    And most of the mobile networks in the USA fail on these grounds for reasons that have nothing whatsoever to do with technology. I remember trying to use my GSM in the States, frustrated to find that outside the airports and a few major cities, nothing worked.

    Mobile telecoms in the US are handicapped by the regulations surrounding fixed lines: in most European countries mobile phones outstrip fixed lines because they are as cheap and much more useful. In the US, the "local calls are basically free" regulations mean mobile phones can't compete fairly.

    This kind of issue is much, much more important than the relative merits of CDMA, TDMA and their variants.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:Much more advanced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, so you Europeans are pissed that we straightened out *our* fixed-line monopolies?

      Hate to say it, but it *is* possible to have competition - and thus market pressure - for fixed lines. How is mandating open racks and fair rates for CLECs worse than mandating GSM?

    2. Re:Much more advanced... by heironymouscoward · · Score: 1

      Ah, so you Europeans are pissed that we straightened out *our* fixed-line monopolies?

      Got that right, bro. :) It's not so much the regulation that seems to mess up the US markets, as the half-assed deregulation. In Europe most of the state telcos were simply sold off, and now have to compete in the open market. GSM was defined as a standard but each country sold licenses as it liked, so arbitrary companies were able to implement it.

      It has seemed to work, so far.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature
    3. Re:Much more advanced... by gpinzone · · Score: 1

      The answer to all three questions you posed is directly affected by the technology chosen. "My coverage stinks! Why don't they add more cell sites?!" The answer could be that the cell sites are already overloaded due to limitations in the GSM standard. Then again, maybe it's just the bean counters trying to find the sweet spot between getting just enough calls through without you getting so fustrated that you cancel your service. We consumers don't know why they don't add more coverage, but that doesn't negate the fact that the Europeans painted themselves into a corner by mandating GSM.

    4. Re:Much more advanced... by donutello · · Score: 1

      Europe has a population density of about 200 ppl/sq. km while the US is about 20/sq. km. It makes a big difference.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    5. Re:Much more advanced... by jakuaii · · Score: 1

      No reason to get pissed. I am just slightly amused, as a European, that the oh-so-advanced US has petty coverage problems with their cellphones. It seems to me that the real innovations in this sector happen first in Japan and the Southeast Asian countries, then in Europe, and then (maybe) in the US...

    6. Re:Much more advanced... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      There is obviously no Europe in population density or phone network sense, each country still has their own. And probably will, for some time. Sure, there are plenty of nations with huge population crowded on very small surface area, but there are also quite a few of relatively empty ones.

      US population density is more like 30 than 20 (around 26-27).

      Finland has population density of 17 ppl/sq. km, with at least two GSM networks having very good coverage in almost whole country.

    7. Re:Much more advanced... by csteinle · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I'm so upset that I can use my phone on any network in the UK by simply buying a 5 SIM card (which typically comes with 5 phone credit). I'm so upset that I've been able to use my phone in every country I've taken it to. I feel so limited. Damn us stinking Europeans for picking a standard and making people stick to it.

  80. Accidental tilting by Happosai · · Score: 1
    "If you have a game involving keeping a car on the road, you do that by tilting,"

    What if you're the passenger in a real car driving down a bumpy road...how do you keep the virtual car on the road then?

    What if you're driving a real car down a bumpy road...how do you keep either of the cars on the road then?

    [Happosai]
  81. META/MOD: +1 funny, -1 overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you think some comment is not funny, leave it that way; don't mod it down. You're punishing the poster instead of the moderator, and you're doing it cowardly if you mod it overrated.

    Because funny moderations don't give you karma but negative moderations do burn your karma, you're taking away karma from the people who posted the comment.

    Proposal for future slashcode: run an automatic metamod bot that takes away moderator privileges from people who abuse the underrated/overrated options. I think everyone who spends more than 40% of his modpoints on underrated/overrated moderations should be banned from moderating. After all, if you don't want to be metamoderated, you should not have the privilege of moderating.

    Moderating +1 funny als overrated is double abuse because of the karma-imbalance. It is simply scary how much new users are posting at 0 because of this kind of moderating. They're not being trolls and they're not posting flamebait, but they end up having negative karma because moderators disagree on their posts being funny or not. That's a bloody shame.

  82. An exciting rehash of 80's technology by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

    From Antic Magazine (December 1982):
    Until recently, no really satisfactory substitute for the Atari joystick has been available. The first alternative was "Le Stick" from DataSoft. Billed as a onehanded joystick, it has internal mercury switches which detect the angle at which it is being held. The "fire" button is mounted on top. Some people like Le Stick, but most find that it is very hard to keep the stick perfectly upright, a position often needed to keep the cursor from moving. A squeezetrigger in Le Stick is supposed to freeze the cursor, but my hand gets tired and it is hard to adjust to the joystick action. Also, the uncertainty of directional response makes this stick unsuitable for very fast action games. Datasoft. $39.95 (1982 dollars.)

    Now, if you can stand to look at this, uh, unusually shaped creation, here it is.

    Why do I have a feeling one of the trolls is going to enjoy this post?

  83. Everything old is new again... by dynayellow · · Score: 1

    Great... now we can have crappy control mechanisms on our cell phones. To wit:

    "I love the powerglove... it's so bad!"

  84. Didn't Compaq do this first? by class_A · · Score: 1

    What about CRL's "Rock n' Scroll" interface?

  85. I like the old game better... by volkerdi · · Score: 2, Funny

    "If you have a game involving keeping a car on the road, you do that by tilting," says company spokesman Jan Ahrenbring.

    It's hard enough to keep my car on the road while blathering on the cellphone, but now I have to tilt, too?

  86. Dude, be happy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that your boss does not want to call you for every little thing that goes wrong and even for some of the larger things. Where I work people need to be on call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and will get calls from the office when on vacation, taking a personal day, off sick, etc. We even have people semi-permanently tethered to home computers on the weekend in case there is some problem that needs taking care of. One poor bloke was successful to get wireless internet for use with a notebook or PDA so he can actually leave the house on weekends.
    Dude, when you are off - especially on vacation just enjoy the time away while you have it...

    after all, no one laments not spending just one more day at the office when they are on the death bed.

  87. I, for one... by kdsolutions · · Score: 0

    ...welcome our new gyro-phone overlords...

    Please, master!?!?!? Don't tiltme!!!!

    --
    Error 666 - Satanic SCO code found in your Linux kernel.
  88. If you have a game involving keeping a car on road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have a game involving keeping a car on the road

    Hell, there appears to be lots of people playing the "game" of keeping their car on the road while using their cell phone. Any many of them are barely pulling it off!

  89. Battery Life Differences are Radio-based by billstewart · · Score: 1
    The batteries are generally the same for the equivalent US and GSM models of phones. The main difference is the amount of power the radio takes.
    • Straight GSM doesn't use much power. Maybe that's related to the population density argument that Rasta Prefect brings up, or that the radio parameters were designed for it, and some of it is the protocol design for keeping track of where users are.
    • The US had Analog cell phones for a decade before GSM was deployed, so the technology is much clunkier and burns a lot of power. Since it was deployed first, it's everywhere.
    • TDMA is a lot less than analog, but I don't know how it compares to GSM.
    • CDMA is much more flexible about power consumption, so it can be pretty low depending on how close you are to a cell, but the population density thing means that on the average, US users are farther away from a cell site than Europeans are.
    • Most US phones have at least two technologies - either TDMA or CDMA, with fallback to analog, and maybe more than one band for the TDMA or CDMA. So if you're somewhere that your primary digital provider works, then great, it's pretty low power. But if you're driving around the mountains, like I was this weekend, your phone may keep broadcasting its presence on the TDMA and analog networks at the same time, hoping that _something_ will answer, and it's more likely to be analog because it carries farther. I normally get about 1-2 weeks of standby depending on how much talk time I use, but I was getting 1-2 days of standby depending on which side of the mountains I was on, and even then half the time there was only marginally enough analog roaming signal to talk.
    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  90. The Itsy had this by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    The Itsy (Linux pre-cursor to the IPaq) had an accelerometer hooked to the UI. You could "flip" pages with a flick of the wrist etc.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  91. Small gyroscopes by phliar · · Score: 1
    The article doesn't have any details of the mini-gyroscope... any links that prove it's not just a tilt switch, instead of a full-fledged gyro?

    If it's a gyro, then the killer application would be as an inertial reference for aircraft navigation. The AH (artificial horizon) in light airplanes is usually a vacuum-powered mechanical device, which is expensive (precision mechanical device, no way you can get a new one for around a hundred dollars) and fragile/inconvenient (needs vacuum source, filtered air etc.) Electric gyros are available, but even more expensive. A no-moving-parts attitude reference -- like the ring laser "gyro" systems that airliners use, but cheap -- is the holy grail.

    --
    Unlimited growth == Cancer.
  92. Kirby by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

    Does this remind anyone of "Kirby's Tilt and Tumble"? It was a Game Boy game where you tilted the entire system to move Kirby, and flicked the system up to jump. Very cool.

  93. Jesus by Paranatural · · Score: 1

    I agree with some of the others here. How about a useful feature for once? I don't want games. I don't want web browsing. I don't want text messaging. I don't want 50 ring tones I don't want it to frigging glow blue. I want to be able to run down the street, habe it fall onto the concrete, and not shatter like a delicate glass figurine. I want it to work inside, underground, and in my car. I want a volume that goves above 'soft whisper'. I want a vibration function that is actually strong enough to sense. I want a ringer that I can hear in a crowded toom. I do not need it to weigh less than a peice of paper. a 1-lb phone is perfectly acceptable. Who needs it to be lighter than that? Who cannot carry 1 lb around?

  94. For those of you who want it in a Palm-based phone by korielgraculus · · Score: 1

    Take a look at here where they have a "build your own solution" for tilting Palms

  95. Careful, though... by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1

    If you hold the phone upside down and shake it, it erases the phone's memory.

    --
    Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  96. SUV-Tilt by formfeed · · Score: 1

    So, if your car rolls over the cell phone will shut off automatically?

  97. Those were the days by smzala · · Score: 1

    I recall developed countries used to stop the sale of Gyro or gyro fluid to developing countries, suspecting, they might use the gyros to make ICBMs. Satellite launch and ICBMs are not treated differently when it comes to embargo. and look at it today, Segaway HT has a gyro, even some kiddy toys have gyros, may be not high quality, but still. Today Developed countries are controlling the Nuke technology, I hope it doesnot, go the same way.