This looks to me like a small local story being talked up to a level of importance it simply doesn't warrant in order to make the author seem more important or insightful.
This follows on the exhibition of "1001 Inventions" that toured the UK last year which claimed such 'Islamic inventions' as "flying with wings and rocket flying." It's part of a drive to show Islam as a progressive force.
The variations between the examples you give are small and in any case doctrinally relatively trivial. I'd be more interested in seeing the various translations of things like 3:118, the gist of which is: "Do not be friends with unbelievers. They all hate you."
Khalifa: O you who believe, do not befriend outsiders who never cease to wish you harm; they even wish to see you suffer.
Pickthall: O ye who believe! Take not for intimates others than your own folk, who would spare no pains to ruin you; they love to hamper you.
Shakir: O you who believe! do not take for intimate friends from among others than your own people; they do not fall short of inflicting loss upon you; they love what distresses you...
Sher Ali: O ye who believe! take not others than your own people as intimate friends; they will spare no pains to ruin you.
Yusuf Ali: O ye who believe! Take not into your intimacy those outside your ranks: They will not fail to corrupt you. They only desire your ruin...
English-language translations of the Quran vary so widely that Islam doesn't accept them as translations, they are all regarded as paraphrases. You should read this short article to get a feel for how the various translations make errors.
Here are some other translations of that same verse (Al-Qasas 28:62):
Khalifa: The day will come when He calls upon them, saying, "Where are those idols you had set up beside Me?"
Pickthall: On the day when He will call unto them and say: Where are My partners whom ye imagined?
Shakir: And on the day when He will call them and say: Where are those whom you deemed to be My associates?
Sher Ali: And on that day HE will call to them, and say, `Where are those whom you allege to be my associates?'
Yusuf Ali: That Day (God) will call to them, and say "Where are my 'partners'?- whom ye imagined (to be such)?"
What is that supposed to mean? Did they lose a battle and flee to china rather than facing their superiors? Did they lose their sense of direction? (How can you mistake east for west?)
Look at a map. If they were captured by the Parthians and after a period of captivity in Parthia, if they escaped to the east or were released/expelled/sold to the east, the way back home to Rome in the west would have been blocked by the Indian Ocean to the south, Parthia itself (Iran) in the center, and the Caspian Sea and the Hun Empire to the north. I can easily imagine them deciding to follow Alexander the Great's legacy and move eastward.
I have to agree. When I taught classes and tested using a Scantron we had the problem of people marking the bubbles incorrectly. Does circling the bubble count? Does circling the candidates name but not the bubble count? Does underlining the bubble count? If putting an x in a bubble counts instead of filling it in completely, then what happens when someone changes their mind and x'es out a bubble? Which x counts, the smaller one or the larger one they x'ed over multiple times? Does the x count or the filled-in bubble?
All of that doubt is removed if you allow only the machine to mark the ballot and let the person personally check it after it has been marked (by the machine) prior to placing it in the optical scanner. If the touch-screen marked the ballot incorrectly by having a complex interface confusing Buchanan and Gore the voter will see this when examining the paper ballot and can rip it up and start over until the ballot is marked as they wish. It's then put into an optical scanner for an immediate count and is available in a box for later hand counts if needed.
Anyway, the BBC is (at least on paper) a public enterprise oned (in heory) by the British Public and paid for via the TV Tax. Much like the Voice of America is a service funded by the American Public. As such shouldn't the content produced by the Beeb be freely available
The flaw in that argument is that people in the United States are forbidden from listening to the Voice of America and even transcripts of its programs are not available to ordinary citizens under the FOIA. Public Law 402:
information produced by VOA for audiences outside the United States shall not be disseminated within the United States... but, on request, shall be available in the English language at VOA, at all reasonable times following its release as information abroad, for examination only by representatives of United States press associations, newspapers, magazines, radio systems, and stations, and by research students and scholars, and, on request, shall be made available for examination only to Members of Congress.
If it is such a good idea, then why don't webmasters use xxx instead of www in their URLs? It would allow for all the filtering that a top-level domain name would. Just label a site something like "xxx.pr0n.com" instead of "www.pr0n.com". Simple.
Or is it simply about the registrars making more money off of a new TLD?
Not only did they wash away 22 years ago. They washed away because the islands used to be covered in a forest of mangrove trees which were completely clear cut away to provide a place for human settlement as they had been uninhabited before. Then, golly gee, after all the trees on a sand bar in a river delta were cut away, the sand bar suffered major erosion over the next few decades and is now no longer above water. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GLOBAL WARMING AND RISING SEAS. It is an ecological problem, but to blame it on CO2 emissions is to totally miss the point. The problem here was loss of forest, loss of vegetation, overpopulation, and clear-cutting instead of proper management of the flora. Even if the earth were cooling and the seas were falling, and given the same ecological problems in the area, THIS island would have disappeared anyway.
You mean other than putting airport security services on heightened alert so that no one actually got away with their plan?
What do you mean "no one actually got away with their plan"? Dude, the plan suceeded. Where were you on Sept 11th, 2001? The fact that they only alerted NYC airports shows how little they cared. There were no long term efforts undertaken. They refused to allow military action against Bin Laden in Afghanistan lest a nearby mosque be damaged.
You mean other than upping border security so that a guy having explosives was stopped at the border?
What does that have to do with hijacking a plane and using it as a weapon? That's what the border patrol and customs does everyday. It's like you want to claim credit for busting a stoner with a joint when queried about what you are doing about international narco-trafficking.
You mean other than telling the CIA at that point that Bin Laden was their number one priority?
You don't call off attacks on your "number one priority" for fear of damaging a mosque. You don't fail to neutralize him using tribal resources if he's your "number one priority." You don't steal classified briefing notes from the National Archives and shred them at your kitchen table if they proved you called Bin Laden your "number one priority." You do do those things though if you did nothing and are trying to rewrite history and cover your @ss instead.
Yeah. Nothing... Right. And you wonder why people call you guys (right-) wing-nuts.
Yes, NOTHING. Sec of State Rice most famously called it "swatting at flies" as that was all it was. Lobbing multi-million dollar cruise missiles at a set of monkey bars in the desert is swatting at flies. Bombing an aspiring factory is swatting at flies. Alerting the NYC airports of a long-term threat that wasn't to materialize until three years later and expecting them to take care of it so your @ss is covered is swatting at flies. Arresting a dude with a bomb at the border (like they would have let him in had Clinton not "taken action" LOL!) who has nothing to do with hijacking airplanes is swatting at flies.
Clinton was warned of Bin Laden's intention to use hijacked aircraft as weapons against the US in December 1998 in a different more specific PDB. He took no action.
Deep in the recesses of the National Archives in Washington, D.C., hidden for nearly four decades lie thousands of pages of yellowing and dusty documents stamped "Top Secret". These documents, now declassified, are the plans for Operation Downfall, the invasion of Japan during World War II. Only a few Americans in 1945 were aware of the elaborate plans that had been prepared for the Allied Invasion of the Japanese home islands. Even fewer today are aware of the defenses the Japanese had prepared to counter the invasion had it been launched. Operation Downfall was finalized during the spring and summer of 1945. It called for two massive military undertakings to be carried out in succession and aimed at the heart of the Japanese Empire.
In the first invasion - code named Operation Olympic - American combat troops would land on Japan by amphibious assault during the early morning hours of November 1, 1945 - 50 years ago. Fourteen combat divisions of soldiers and Marines would land on heavily fortified and defended Kyushu, the southernmost of the Japanese home islands, after an unprecedented naval and aerial bombardment. The second invasion on March 1, 1946 - code named Operation Coronet - would send at least 22 divisions against 1 million Japanese defenders on the main island of Honshu and the Tokyo Plain. It's goal: the unconditional surrender of Japan. With the exception of a part of the British Pacific Fleet, Operation Downfall was to be a strictly American operation. It called for using the entire Marine Corps, the entire Pacific Navy, elements of the 7th Army Air Force, the 8 Air Force (recently redeployed from Europe), 10th Air Force and the American Far Eastern Air Force. More than 1.5 million combat soldiers, with 3 million more in support or more than 40% of all servicemen still in uniform in 1945 - would be directly involved in the two amphibious assaults. Casualties were expected to be extremely heavy.
Admiral William Leahy estimated that there would be more than 250,000 Americans killed or wounded on Kyushu alone. General Charles Willoughby, chief of intelligence for General Douglas MacArthur, the Supreme Commander of the Southwest Pacific, estimated American casualties would be one million men by the fall of 1946. Willoughby's own intelligence staff considered this to be a conservative estimate.
During the summer of 1945, America had little time to prepare for such an endeavor, but top military leaders were in almost unanimous agreement that an invasion was necessary.
While naval blockade and strategic bombing of Japan was considered to be useful, General MacArthur, for instance, did not believe a blockade would bring about an unconditional surrender. The advocates for invasion agreed that while a naval blockade chokes, it does not kill; and though strategic bombing might destroy cities, it leaves whole armies intact.
So on May 25, 1945, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, after extensive deliberation, issued to General MacArthur, Admiral Chester Nimitz, and Army Air Force General Henry Arnold, the top secret directive to proceed with the invasion of Kyushu. The target date was after the typhoon season.
President Truman approved the plans for the invasions July 24. Two days later, the United Nations issued the Potsdam Proclamation, which called upon Japan to surrender unconditionally or face total destruction. Three days later, the Japanese governmental news agency broadcast to the world that Japan would ignore the proclamation and would refuse to surrender. During this sane period it was learned -- via monitoring Japanese radio broadcasts -- that Japan had closed all schools and mobilized its schoolchildren, was arming its civilian population and was fortifying caves and building underground defenses.
Operation Olympic called for a four pronged assault on Kyushu. Its purpose was to seize and control the southern one-third of that island and establish naval and air bases, to tighten the nava
Since the soundtrack is the heart of the animation, and the animation secondary, perhaps in the future they can remake the animated series using the old soundtrack with new 3D CGI recreating the animation scene for scene? The animated series has all the original actors doing the voices along with Roddenberry's direction, good writing, original sound effects, and original background music. All we need is to CGI in some new animation now that CGI can look as good as photography (as in the all-CGI Davy Jones in Pirates of the Caribbean).
He made reptiles respectable
on
Steve Irwin Dead
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
I always preferred Sir David Attenborough. That is someone who truly loves and respects nature.
I agree about Sir David Attenborough greatness, but the difference is how thay handled reptiles. After watching Sir David Attenborough, if I found a snake in the back yard I would still chop off its head with a hoe. After watching Steve Irwin, I would think twice and maybe call someone to take it away. Steve changed the image of reptiles from nasty creatures that you kill on sight to animals that should be respected the same as the furry cute ones.
Even if you had the license and radio to make a call throught the "phone patch", you couldn't order a pizza, it would be technically illegal, along with anything that could be considered "commerce". And "no encryption" meant not being able to use "packet radio" for something as simple as personal email without literally broadcasting it publicly. No thanks.
Since you can do both of those using a commercial cell-phone and SMS, why would you want to take away amateur radio bandwith to duplicate what you can already do using a cell-phone?
Call me when Google becomes a monopoly and is degrading the rights of people around the world.
Ring. Ring. Ring.
Ask someone living in China if Google is degrading their rights. It is blocking certain information and sites from being searchable in Google in China at the request of the Chinese government. Then ask yourself if your rights be impaired if Google blocked certain information and sites from users in the US at the request of the US government?
I asked if any were based in Cuba. From your link, the Tu-95 was based there from 1970. But it's described as anti-submarine, not a strategic bomber.
According to this page three pairs of TU-95 Strategic Bombers operated from a base in Cuba while Soviet Navy ships were deployed there beginning in 1970. So clearly by 1972 and 1973 the Air National Guard along the Gulf Coast would have been tasked with countering the Soviet operations in Cuba.
Missiles, yes of course, briefly. Bombers? Were there ever any? I'm pretty sure no strategic weapons were based in Cuba after October 1962. Do you have any sources stating otherwise?
Were there any? You're kidding. What do they teach in school nowadays?
In the 50's both sides built fleets of thousands of intercontinental range nuclear bombers. The Russians still fly these to this day. Just a few of years ago they flew a loop around Iceland (a NATO country). During the 60s and 70s they flew a regular mission from Russia to Cuba along the East Coast of the US. Sometimes daily. The Air Force and the National Guard sent up "escorts" to fly alongside them so that the USAF fighter would be between the Russian bomber and American territory. ICBMs only became a major force in the mid-60s. It would take decades before they superceded the bomber fleet.
Slashdot Mirror
This looks to me like a small local story being talked up to a level of importance it simply doesn't warrant in order to make the author seem more important or insightful.
This follows on the exhibition of "1001 Inventions" that toured the UK last year which claimed such 'Islamic inventions' as "flying with wings and rocket flying." It's part of a drive to show Islam as a progressive force.
The variations between the examples you give are small and in any case doctrinally relatively trivial. I'd be more interested in seeing the various translations of things like 3:118, the gist of which is: "Do not be friends with unbelievers. They all hate you."
...
...
Khalifa: O you who believe, do not befriend outsiders who never cease to wish you harm; they even wish to see you suffer.
Pickthall: O ye who believe! Take not for intimates others than your own folk, who would spare no pains to ruin you; they love to hamper you.
Shakir: O you who believe! do not take for intimate friends from among others than your own people; they do not fall short of inflicting loss upon you; they love what distresses you
Sher Ali: O ye who believe! take not others than your own people as intimate friends; they will spare no pains to ruin you.
Yusuf Ali: O ye who believe! Take not into your intimacy those outside your ranks: They will not fail to corrupt you. They only desire your ruin
English-language translations of the Quran vary so widely that Islam doesn't accept them as translations, they are all regarded as paraphrases. You should read this short article to get a feel for how the various translations make errors.
Here are some other translations of that same verse (Al-Qasas 28:62):
Khalifa: The day will come when He calls upon them, saying, "Where are those idols you had set up beside Me?"
Pickthall: On the day when He will call unto them and say: Where are My partners whom ye imagined?
Shakir: And on the day when He will call them and say: Where are those whom you deemed to be My associates?
Sher Ali: And on that day HE will call to them, and say, `Where are those whom you allege to be my associates?'
Yusuf Ali: That Day (God) will call to them, and say "Where are my 'partners'?- whom ye imagined (to be such)?"
Transliteration: Wayawma yunadeehim fayaqoolu ayna shuraka-iya allatheena kuntum tazAAumoona
What is that supposed to mean? Did they lose a battle and flee to china rather than facing their superiors? Did they lose their sense of direction? (How can you mistake east for west?)
Look at a map. If they were captured by the Parthians and after a period of captivity in Parthia, if they escaped to the east or were released/expelled/sold to the east, the way back home to Rome in the west would have been blocked by the Indian Ocean to the south, Parthia itself (Iran) in the center, and the Caspian Sea and the Hun Empire to the north. I can easily imagine them deciding to follow Alexander the Great's legacy and move eastward.
I have to agree. When I taught classes and tested using a Scantron we had the problem of people marking the bubbles incorrectly. Does circling the bubble count? Does circling the candidates name but not the bubble count? Does underlining the bubble count? If putting an x in a bubble counts instead of filling it in completely, then what happens when someone changes their mind and x'es out a bubble? Which x counts, the smaller one or the larger one they x'ed over multiple times? Does the x count or the filled-in bubble?
All of that doubt is removed if you allow only the machine to mark the ballot and let the person personally check it after it has been marked (by the machine) prior to placing it in the optical scanner. If the touch-screen marked the ballot incorrectly by having a complex interface confusing Buchanan and Gore the voter will see this when examining the paper ballot and can rip it up and start over until the ballot is marked as they wish. It's then put into an optical scanner for an immediate count and is available in a box for later hand counts if needed.
The flaw in that argument is that people in the United States are forbidden from listening to the Voice of America and even transcripts of its programs are not available to ordinary citizens under the FOIA. Public Law 402:
If it is such a good idea, then why don't webmasters use xxx instead of www in their URLs? It would allow for all the filtering that a top-level domain name would. Just label a site something like "xxx.pr0n.com" instead of "www.pr0n.com". Simple.
Or is it simply about the registrars making more money off of a new TLD?
"Unvarnished Bullshit" it is. http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/07-01-17.html
Not only did they wash away 22 years ago. They washed away because the islands used to be covered in a forest of mangrove trees which were completely clear cut away to provide a place for human settlement as they had been uninhabited before. Then, golly gee, after all the trees on a sand bar in a river delta were cut away, the sand bar suffered major erosion over the next few decades and is now no longer above water. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GLOBAL WARMING AND RISING SEAS. It is an ecological problem, but to blame it on CO2 emissions is to totally miss the point. The problem here was loss of forest, loss of vegetation, overpopulation, and clear-cutting instead of proper management of the flora. Even if the earth were cooling and the seas were falling, and given the same ecological problems in the area, THIS island would have disappeared anyway.
In almost every city code and certainly in every HOA rules, having a clothesline in your backyard is strictly forbidden.
Let me re-state that then. Paying a service bureau for drum-scanner service is extraordinarily expensive.
Drum scanners are extraordinarily expensive. Much less expensive to use a flat bed scanner that has back illumination. Good discussion here: http://photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0 032D0&tag=
Microtek has several good models out.
I use a gift card. Is that tracked like the credit card sales?
"The old days" is the Clinton presidency 1993-2001.
What do you mean "no one actually got away with their plan"? Dude, the plan suceeded. Where were you on Sept 11th, 2001? The fact that they only alerted NYC airports shows how little they cared. There were no long term efforts undertaken. They refused to allow military action against Bin Laden in Afghanistan lest a nearby mosque be damaged.
You mean other than upping border security so that a guy having explosives was stopped at the border?
What does that have to do with hijacking a plane and using it as a weapon? That's what the border patrol and customs does everyday. It's like you want to claim credit for busting a stoner with a joint when queried about what you are doing about international narco-trafficking.
You mean other than telling the CIA at that point that Bin Laden was their number one priority?
You don't call off attacks on your "number one priority" for fear of damaging a mosque. You don't fail to neutralize him using tribal resources if he's your "number one priority." You don't steal classified briefing notes from the National Archives and shred them at your kitchen table if they proved you called Bin Laden your "number one priority." You do do those things though if you did nothing and are trying to rewrite history and cover your @ss instead.
Yeah. Nothing... Right. And you wonder why people call you guys (right-) wing-nuts.
Yes, NOTHING. Sec of State Rice most famously called it "swatting at flies" as that was all it was. Lobbing multi-million dollar cruise missiles at a set of monkey bars in the desert is swatting at flies. Bombing an aspiring factory is swatting at flies. Alerting the NYC airports of a long-term threat that wasn't to materialize until three years later and expecting them to take care of it so your @ss is covered is swatting at flies. Arresting a dude with a bomb at the border (like they would have let him in had Clinton not "taken action" LOL!) who has nothing to do with hijacking airplanes is swatting at flies.
Clinton was warned of Bin Laden's intention to use hijacked aircraft as weapons against the US in December 1998 in a different more specific PDB. He took no action.
An Invasion Not Found in the History Books
by James Martin Davis
Deep in the recesses of the National Archives in Washington, D.C., hidden for nearly four decades lie thousands of pages of yellowing and dusty documents stamped "Top Secret". These documents, now declassified, are the plans for Operation Downfall, the invasion of Japan during World War II. Only a few Americans in 1945 were aware of the elaborate plans that had been prepared for the Allied Invasion of the Japanese home islands. Even fewer today are aware of the defenses the Japanese had prepared to counter the invasion had it been launched. Operation Downfall was finalized during the spring and summer of 1945. It called for two massive military undertakings to be carried out in succession and aimed at the heart of the Japanese Empire.
In the first invasion - code named Operation Olympic - American combat troops would land on Japan by amphibious assault during the early morning hours of November 1, 1945 - 50 years ago. Fourteen combat divisions of soldiers and Marines would land on heavily fortified and defended Kyushu, the southernmost of the Japanese home islands, after an unprecedented naval and aerial bombardment.
The second invasion on March 1, 1946 - code named Operation Coronet - would send at least 22 divisions against 1 million Japanese defenders on the main island of Honshu and the Tokyo Plain. It's goal: the unconditional surrender of Japan. With the exception of a part of the British Pacific Fleet, Operation Downfall was to be a strictly American operation. It called for using the entire Marine Corps, the entire Pacific Navy, elements of the 7th Army Air Force, the 8 Air Force (recently redeployed from Europe), 10th Air Force and the American Far Eastern Air Force. More than 1.5 million combat soldiers, with 3 million more in support or more than 40% of all servicemen still in uniform in 1945 - would be directly involved in the two amphibious assaults. Casualties were expected to be extremely heavy.
Admiral William Leahy estimated that there would be more than 250,000 Americans killed or wounded on Kyushu alone. General Charles Willoughby, chief of intelligence for General Douglas MacArthur, the Supreme Commander of the Southwest Pacific, estimated American casualties would be one million men by the fall of 1946. Willoughby's own intelligence staff considered this to be a conservative estimate.
During the summer of 1945, America had little time to prepare for such an endeavor, but top military leaders were in almost unanimous agreement that an invasion was necessary.
While naval blockade and strategic bombing of Japan was considered to be useful, General MacArthur, for instance, did not believe a blockade would bring about an unconditional surrender. The advocates for invasion agreed that while a naval blockade chokes, it does not kill; and though strategic bombing might destroy cities, it leaves whole armies intact.
So on May 25, 1945, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, after extensive deliberation, issued to General MacArthur, Admiral Chester Nimitz, and Army Air Force General Henry Arnold, the top secret directive to proceed with the invasion of Kyushu. The target date was after the typhoon season.
President Truman approved the plans for the invasions July 24. Two days later, the United Nations issued the Potsdam Proclamation, which called upon Japan to surrender unconditionally or face total destruction. Three days later, the Japanese governmental news agency broadcast to the world that Japan would ignore the proclamation and would refuse to surrender. During this sane period it was learned -- via monitoring Japanese radio broadcasts -- that Japan had closed all schools and mobilized its schoolchildren, was arming its civilian population and was fortifying caves and building underground defenses.
Operation Olympic called for a four pronged assault on Kyushu. Its purpose was to seize and control the southern one-third of that island and establish naval and air bases, to tighten the nava
Since the soundtrack is the heart of the animation, and the animation secondary, perhaps in the future they can remake the animated series using the old soundtrack with new 3D CGI recreating the animation scene for scene? The animated series has all the original actors doing the voices along with Roddenberry's direction, good writing, original sound effects, and original background music. All we need is to CGI in some new animation now that CGI can look as good as photography (as in the all-CGI Davy Jones in Pirates of the Caribbean).
I always preferred Sir David Attenborough. That is someone who truly loves and respects nature.
I agree about Sir David Attenborough greatness, but the difference is how thay handled reptiles. After watching Sir David Attenborough, if I found a snake in the back yard I would still chop off its head with a hoe. After watching Steve Irwin, I would think twice and maybe call someone to take it away. Steve changed the image of reptiles from nasty creatures that you kill on sight to animals that should be respected the same as the furry cute ones.
So why aren't we building a dozen more of these and sending them up there if they are so proven? The next NASA lander won't even be mobile.
Since you can do both of those using a commercial cell-phone and SMS, why would you want to take away amateur radio bandwith to duplicate what you can already do using a cell-phone?
Ring. Ring. Ring.
Ask someone living in China if Google is degrading their rights. It is blocking certain information and sites from being searchable in Google in China at the request of the Chinese government. Then ask yourself if your rights be impaired if Google blocked certain information and sites from users in the US at the request of the US government?
Ummm, dude, they do.
Read this: Northern/Southern Hemisphere corrections and adjustments
Careful whom you call a "dumbass" for they could be the one who is correct and you the one who is wrong.
According to this page three pairs of TU-95 Strategic Bombers operated from a base in Cuba while Soviet Navy ships were deployed there beginning in 1970. So clearly by 1972 and 1973 the Air National Guard along the Gulf Coast would have been tasked with countering the Soviet operations in Cuba.
Were there any? You're kidding. What do they teach in school nowadays?
In the 50's both sides built fleets of thousands of intercontinental range nuclear bombers. The Russians still fly these to this day. Just a few of years ago they flew a loop around Iceland (a NATO country). During the 60s and 70s they flew a regular mission from Russia to Cuba along the East Coast of the US. Sometimes daily. The Air Force and the National Guard sent up "escorts" to fly alongside them so that the USAF fighter would be between the Russian bomber and American territory. ICBMs only became a major force in the mid-60s. It would take decades before they superceded the bomber fleet.
This stuff is easily Googlable.