Slashdot Mirror


Do You Still Find Amateur Radio Interesting?

Marcos Eliziario asks: "Soon, I'll be taking the exams for a Brazilian, Class-D, Ham Radio license (Equivalent to an American Technician License) and, as I was reading about the subject, I wondered what today's geek thinks about amateur radio. In the past, Ham Radio was very popular among nerds, however with the Internet boom it seems that interest on radio, among the younger generations, is becoming dimmer each day. A lot of cool things can be done with radio, like building your own equipment, digital modes (btw, few people know that Packet Radio was born on the amateur's rank), and long distance contacts. The gear is cool, there's a lot of things to be learned about propagation, and today's Hams even use satellites to talk. Do you think that we could see a renaissance of Ham Radio among 21st century techies?"

205 comments

  1. Yes. by lothos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm studying for my amateur licence. It still has its uses in this day and age of the internet.

    1. Re:Yes. by Pandora's+Vox · · Score: 1

      when you get it, head on over to hamsexy.com. where all the cool hams hang out :)

      73s de VE3HYP

    2. Re:Yes. by harmgsn · · Score: 2, Funny

      LOL. Sure... the "cool" people ;) 73 N0RSE

      --
      Harm
    3. Re:Yes. by Phreakiture · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The way I see it, there are five classes of individuals who have historically been interested in ham radio. These four classes are not mutually exclusive, and I am in all five of them.

      First, there are folks who want to meet people and chat. These folks now have the internet, and have gradually withdrawn from ham radio.

      Second, there are folks who want to be able to make phone calls away from a landline. Traditionally, this has been done via a phone patch. Cell phones are now dirt cheap, so these folks have gradually withdrawn from ham radio. As a result, there are also fewer phone patches than there used to be.

      Third, there are folks who want some form of intra-family communications. These folks would get their entire household licenced historically. Now these folks either get cell phones, or FRS or GMRS radios, or in some rare cases, MURS or CB radios, and so these folks have (need I say it?) gradually withdrawn from ham radio.

      Fourth, there are folks who generally love radio. These folks will never leave ham radio because playing with radios is fun (which is the real answer to your question).

      Fifth and finally, there are the ever-prepared crowd. These folks will do whatever they feel they need to in order to make themselves stable and useful in the event that social order breaks down for some reason or other.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    4. Re:Yes. by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      I am still not sure if Hamsexy is taking the piss out of the antenna farms or if it is supporting it... I sometimes wander over there to have a look at the hilarous mobile setups.

    5. Re:Yes. by no_opinion · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I live in Socal, where someone joked our seasons are fire, riot, flood, and earthquake. The recent Katrina disaster prompted me to get a license (I'm in category 5) and I picked up a hand-held radio, but in reality I haven't spoken to a single person. Why? I feel like I need someone to show me the ropes, but I haven't really found anyone I can relate to (e.g. in my age group). I looked into some clubs, but they're mostly older people (like 50+) or they seem to be on hiatus.

      Just looking at the pictures in the ham radio books demonstrates that this hobby's high point passed back in the 70s. Read some QST magazines: yawn. So until I stumble upon someone local who's roughly my age (30s), I'm unlikely to actively participate. Back in the day the geeks were into radios, but now they're into the internet, so I predict ham radio will continue it's slow decline.

    6. Re:Yes. by M1FCJ · · Score: 1
      Some people don't like to talk, I don't. I have a very low number of QSOs in the log book but I tend to listen a lot. One can argue that I should have stayed a short wave listener (SWL) but that's only the half of the fun. Probably once I get out of this apartment and manage to put up some antennas I'll be talking on the mike more often.

      It is true that most of the radio amateurs are old smelly men but there are occassional young geeks (unfortunately, still smelly!)... I've only met one lady radio amateur in my life so it's also useless for dating scene! No change there, the usual geekdom but older average age.

    7. Re:Yes. by Phreakiture · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just looking at the pictures in the ham radio books demonstrates that this hobby's high point passed back in the 70s. Read some QST magazines: yawn. So until I stumble upon someone local who's roughly my age (30s), I'm unlikely to actively participate. Back in the day the geeks were into radios, but now they're into the internet, so I predict ham radio will continue it's slow decline.

      Well, I'm in my mid-30s and I don't let the age difference get in my way. There are at least two hams under 20 that I know of and talk with from time to time (one of them actually seeks me out at every hamfest.... he lives about 100 miles from me and so we don't get to eyball much), and several in my area who are mid-to-late 30s.

      The trick is to find a club that has not calcified. I am the treasurer of the Schenectady Museum Amateur Radio Association, a club with about 50 members (52, actually, last I checked the records), and yes, we do have some geezers in the club, but all of the club officers are currently in our 30s, except for our VP, who is in his late 20s. The active core of the club ranges from age 25 to 40, averaging probably in the high 30s. We operate two repeaters, one of which participates in a New York State-wide network, and an eQSO link (W2IR/L, usually on room 101-English). We have a permanent station in the basement of the Schenectady Museum featuring an Icom 746Pro HF transceiver and several 6m/2m/440 transceivers, all of which are available to any club member in good standing (competence test required) during Museum hours.

      Our club is also open to other types of radio hobbyists, such as scannists and SWLs. We try to nurture and cross-pollinate these different radio hobbies.

      On the other hand, there is a rival club also in our fair city, which club has indeed calcified. Last year, their field day operation was out of commision for all but about 8 hours due to a lack of participants. Ours went on the air at the start and stayed on the full 24 hours.

      Another local ham activity is the Capital District Commuter Net, every morning on the 146.94 repeater. It's kind of an informal net, and is used to exchange traffic conditions throughout the Albany/Schenectady/Troy area. It puts ham radio to a specific purpose, and often puts traffic conditions in front of you before the broadcast radio does.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
  2. Nope, my license lapsed by Soong · · Score: 2, Funny

    Once upon a time I learned morse and passed the novice, tech and tech plus tests. Then I got into computers and the internet and a zillion other things. It probably would have been easy for me to renew my license to as good or better status given the easing of the tests, but I never got around to it. I still have my radios but the batteries are dead and probably won't even hold a charge anymore. Radio is still a curiosity, but not something I've chosen to spend time on.

    --
    Start Running Better Polls
    1. Re:Nope, my license lapsed by Delphinios · · Score: 1

      Why don't you ship those old radios over to me? :D
      I'll put them to good use!

      73's.

    2. Re:Nope, my license lapsed by Blimey85 · · Score: 1

      Would have been very easy to renew considering all you have to do is fill out a form. I don't recall if they charge for renewals or not but you don't have to retest.

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    3. Re:Nope, my license lapsed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mods are still on crack! Why are so many serious answers for this question getting modded as funny?

  3. Depends... by Opusnbill7 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Depends.... Some of us might find that stuff interesting, but don't know who to turn to to "try it out". That, and the cost of entry is so high (equipment, putting up an antenna [which you can't even do if you have an apt. probably]) that it really is hard to "get started". As unfortunate as it may be, Ham radio may be in a bit of a downward spiral unless it can figure out a way to make it accessible and seem relevant to the younger generation.

    1. Re:Depends... by nincehelser · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's neither hard nor expensive to get started. Just get your license and go on the air with a handy-talky. I bought my first one for less than $200. No big antennas or investmens are necessary.

      This assumes you live close enough to a population center with folks to talk to, but that isn't a big deal in most areas. From there you can decide if you want to branch out into longer-distance communications.

    2. Re:Depends... by MagikSlinger · · Score: 1
      t's neither hard nor expensive to get started. Just get your license and go on the air with a handy-talky. I bought my first one for less than $200. No big antennas or investmens are necessary.

      I see licensing requirements have radically changed since 1990, esp. in Canada. Before it was such a pain in the ass. Learn to send & receive morse code (which isn't trivial, but not super hard either), study like hell for the tests, pay the test fee and hope you pass the first time, then get to spend your first year restricted to CW bands and having your logs checked by an accredited official (for what reason I have no idea!!). Now it's just a single test, thank goodness.

      But I see there's still a big study test and paying $200 for great that amounts to a walkie-talkie. What is the draw anymore when people these days have cell phones and the internet?

      --
      The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    3. Re:Depends... by nincehelser · · Score: 1

      >But I see there's still a big study test and paying $200 for great
      >that amounts to a walkie-talkie. What is the draw anymore when
      >people these days have cell phones and the internet?

      It's far more than a walkie-talking (or even GMRS/FMRS). More power, greater range, repeaters, etc.

      The problem with cell phones is you can't broadcast a request for assistance if necessary. The internet isn't so hot for that either.

      Try coordinating a large activity with cell phones. It's not easy. Ever try to coordinate the cell phone numbers of bunch of volunteers?

      When some task needs to be done, it's a heck of a lot easier to broadcast via radios than to individually dial people and ask for assistance.

      Each technology has its place.

    4. Re:Depends... by MagikSlinger · · Score: 1
      Try coordinating a large activity with cell phones. It's not easy. Ever try to coordinate the cell phone numbers of bunch of volunteers?

      I should have been more specific. There are now cell phones with walkie-talkie like features including the ability to connect a group of cell phone users in to a single walkie-talkie "frequency". The commercials for that feature up here in Canada are hilarious.

      The point is that commercial off-the-shelf technology is taking over the features that ham analog has always had. In a later post, I did suggest maybe ham's future could be encouraging computer users to explore digital radio.

      --
      The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
  4. Radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Afraid the only radio I deal with these days is wireless internet access. I managed a "Tech Plus" license at one point (it was my first license, and I passed the written exam for the next class up, but wasn't able to copy down Morse code quickly enough).

    Unfortunately, I never got a rig, so... let's just say that my callsign won't appear in too many logbooks, sorry :) That said, I did learn quite a bit about electronics, so it's not like I'm sorry I did it. I managed to do quite a bit of soldering/desoldering, too, although I never really got anything very useful working.

    1. Re:Radio? by heptapod · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, that sounds a lot like everyone's experience with Linux.

    2. Re:Radio? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Of course, with an amateur licence, you can use an unholy EIRP on 2.4GHz - technically 2.4GHz wifi is in the ISM band *but* since that is slap bang in the middle of the UK 2.4GHz band, it's ok. You can use AO-40 antennas to seriously improve your wifi. That's a good thing, 'cos you sure as hell can't hear Oscar over the noise of all the cordless phones, baby alarms and misconfigured wifi networks any more...

    3. Re:Radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The previous comment is supposed to be modded as "funny", not "interesting".

  5. the listening's the issue by EggyToast · · Score: 0
    Unlike the internet, you need specialized equipment in order to even listen to ham radio. You can't just turn to the station on the dial in the car, which is where most people listen to the radio. And despite the complexity, it's much easier to get into using a computer compared to taking a leap into ham radio, especially since figuring out what exactly you're going to listen to is such an issue.

    It seems that if you have something worthwhile to spread, a podcast that allows people to listen when they want is both more efficient and easier to set up, and even if it's unpopular you're likely to get more listeners. While there have been some important aspects to ham radio, including some of the first responders for Katrina, the Sri Lankan tsunami, and "9/11", the fact that they were so limited in who could listen in seems to be the most drastic problem. Most people don't even know they still exist.

    1. Re:the listening's the issue by shawngarringer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Do you even realize what Ham radio is? Its not a one-way broadcast... its two way. To compare ham radio to a podcast is. Perhaps IRC would be much clearer.

      That being said, I'm a licensed (Tech +) ham, and I havn't touched anything ham related in a few years. Yes, HF is cool, talking to people around the world, morse code, using 5W to talk to Russia... but the fact of the matter is those things take a) time b) money and c) space. It used to be kids who got interested in things like that and then grew up involved with it at the local level. Except, now, kids have ohther things to do and community things are non existant.

      Ham raido is dying for a number of reasons. Weaker feelings of community. Quicker easier alternate forms of communication. Less and less people can mount antennas on their homes/condos/apartments, etc...

    2. Re:the listening's the issue by Mike_ya · · Score: 2, Informative

      Specialized equipment in order to listen? Just because Wal-Mart doesn't carry radio scanners (Radio Shack does, maybe Wal-Mart does I don't know) doesn't mean the equipment is specialized. One could listen to hams and also police, fire, EMT, businesses, and cell/cordless phones if you have the right models. You also don't need any sort of license to purchase one of these scanners.
      You won't pick up all the frequencies that hams broadcast on, but you will hear plenty of local traffic. One can't just turn to an Internet station dial in the car either to listen to a podcast. Sure it's easier to use a computer than getting into ham. You don't need a license to legally use a computer or pass a test (which sometimes I think should be required) and the reasons for using each are much different. The typical person uses the computer to email familiars and to look up information plus entertainment. While people get into ham radio for the science of it. To use radio technology to talk with people basically around the world independent of phone lines or networks except for maybe a repeater.

      If you have 'something worthwhile to spread' then ham isn't the technology to use. Ham shouldn't be looked on as like setting up a radio station. Its about 2 way communication, I believe broadcasting just to broadcast isn't allowed. Ham radio isn't about broadcasting to the public things to do in a disaster situation, it's about providing coordination thru communications for whoever is in charge of managing the disaster when traditional communication technologies fail.

    3. Re:the listening's the issue by supasam · · Score: 0

      Really, what is the point? If you want to talk to someone, you can use the phone, right? I just don't see the draw in ham radio.

      --


      Suck a lemon?
    4. Re:the listening's the issue by Sepper · · Score: 1
      Radio Shack
      is gone in Canada... They changed to "The Source/La Source"... The only store in Montreal that still sells anything close to Ham stuff is Active...

      So the idea of buying a scanner, while a good idea, is almost impossible here... I haven't seen any in my entire life (except in auctions or HAM conventions)
      --
      I live in Soviet Canuckistan you insensitive clod!
    5. Re:the listening's the issue by shawngarringer · · Score: 1

      And that is pretty much the point of this discussion. Thanks for sharing.

    6. Re:the listening's the issue by supasam · · Score: 0

      No problem! It's always nice to join in the discussion, eh? Thank god you had something insightful to say, eh?

      --


      Suck a lemon?
    7. Re:the listening's the issue by hubie · · Score: 1
      Unlike the internet, you need specialized equipment in order to even listen to ham radio
      I'm curious as to how you get on the internet. Is there any special equipment involved, or do you just plug some wires into your ears? I understand that equipment can be rather pricey as well.
  6. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.

    1. Re:no by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Conversations on Ham Radio are only what you make of them. If all you did was talk about your rigs, then that's all the imagination you had. Tough to admit, but true.

      Conversations around here run the gamut from Politics, to computers, to spaceflight, to yeah... rigs.

      You're right, many hams do only talk about boring things -- just like in a crowded Christmas party, you're bound to find some people talking about boring things, and if you're like me -- you'll gravitate away to a more interesting discussion.

      --
      +++OK ATH
  7. Amateur radio interesting by ve3id · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yes I certainly do! It is still a sandbox for trying things out that will become either part of the common practice or a failed experiment to add to your experience! Right now hams are experimenting wioth new ways to communicate, satellites, digital modes, rig control, repeater stations and VoIP. there is lots of room for experimentation and in the upper levels of qualification you don;t have to buy type-approved equipment. You can experiment on the air without going through a commercial approval process, which can cost tens of thousands for a commefcial piece opf equipment. Amateur radio is the original open-source community, with a tradition of sharing techniques and technology dating back a century. With wireless becoming more important to the computer community, there is lots of room for people whpo pass the exams to do real and beneficial experimentation on the air, and maybe even invent something worthwile for humanity without a million-dollafr lab! Right now in Toronto we are working on a new generation of VHF/UHF repeater controller (search for TorontoRepeaterController on yahoo groups) which will be all open-source, hardware and software. It not only will congtrol repeaters, but link into VoIP nets, remote control rigs, and provide a gateway for analog radio users into the new digital voice modes. Even buying commercial off-the-shelf mobiles help the cause, because what is the use of developing stuff without intelligent users to test it! The next few years will see an multifold improvement in progagation as we reahc the peak of the sunspot cycle for those who just like to communicate. Two cycles ago I had no problem working Europe with ten watts from the mobile on 30MHz! Amateur radio is alive and well - but don;t tell too many people. We like to keep its wonders to ourselves! 73, Nigel, VE3ID and G4AJQ

    1. Re:Amateur radio interesting by DaveCrim · · Score: 1

      > Amateur radio is the original open-source community

      While I agree that it is for hardware, it is unfortunate that many of the of the current software projects are closed source. Free for download, but no chance to look at the code.

      Ham radio and open-source seem like a natural fit. I just don't get why so many hams deny other hams the chance to improve the existing code.

      There are some projects for Linux. We need more hams to jump on the Linux/Open Source band wagon and get them as good or better that the closed source alternatives.

      I have submitted a couple of small patches to the LinPSK project. I'm using Octave now to get a better feel for how Psk31 works. Psk31, SSTV and other modes that can be generated with a sound card seem like an ideal place for hams with an interest in Linux to merge their interests.

      Dave
      KE9WE

  8. Do You Still Find Amateur Radio Interesting? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1
    "Do You Still Find Amateur Radio Interesting?"

    No. Most Slashdotters are under fifty, I think.

    Next week's topic: Are Star Wars references still cool?

    1. Re: Do You Still Find Amateur Radio Interesting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>"No. Most Slashdotters are under fifty, I think."

      Possibly, but at 51, I'll chime in, and I've been here since /. was black 'n white, how about you (or were you born yet?).

      73

      KE6EBZ

    2. Re: Do You Still Find Amateur Radio Interesting? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      No. Most Slashdotters are under fifty, I think.

      LoL But not all of us. Personally I think most technology is cool. EM theory is fun, and the buzzword coefficient is pretty high (how many of you know what a directional discontinuity ring radiator is? How many of you know it's too big to be a sex toy?) and antenna theory is monstorously cool. But I thought that the Intel 4004 was cool too, because you could express a hex digit all at once. Spacecraft are cool. Varactors are cool. Longwires are definitely cool. Learned it all from one of the original LGP-30 drum computer programmers. He's no longer with us, but some of you might remember W6QBN for the uber nerd he was.

      Oh yes, I think mini-ATX format computers are cool, and any flavour of Linux, or VMS, or Windows, or ...dang it I'm bonding with inanimate objects again ... sorry, I'm better now.

      Off to Norrath then to cool off...

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    3. Re: Do You Still Find Amateur Radio Interesting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, he was born at that point, but he was still suckin' his mama's titty...

    4. Re: Do You Still Find Amateur Radio Interesting? by The_Unforgiven · · Score: 1

      I got my Tech class when I was 16, and was a ARRL member and a member of the Motor City Radio Club. I'm 22 now and still (rarely, I admit, but then I ahve a job and am a college student...) get on the 2 meter repeater around here now and then.

      I know I'm a minority in ham radio, but I'm not the only one. I've known people younger than me in it. It's now dying out any time soon.

      --
      http://wsulug.org
    5. Re: Do You Still Find Amateur Radio Interesting? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      Varactors are cool.

      I have to disagree with you on this one. They are far too high noise for interesting receiving circuits (unless I've missed newer low noise ones). Give me a nice big set of plates any day. Now, I'll be the first to admit that the semiconductor theory behind them is cool and the ability to make VCF's and other circuits out of them is pretty neat - but as a serious device? Unless you're going for miniturization, they suck.

      --
      That is all.
    6. Re: Do You Still Find Amateur Radio Interesting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, fine. PLL-stabilized varactor oscillators are cool. Better?

  9. daditdada di ditditdit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ditdit / dida dada / ditdadadit dadada ditditdit da ditdit dadit dadadit / da ditditditdit ditdit ditditdit / ditdada ditdit da ditditditdit / dada dadada ditdadit ditditdit dit / daditdadit dadada daditdit dit / ditditdadaditdit / NO CARRIER

    1. Re:daditdada di ditditdit by acxr+is+wasted · · Score: 1

      I am posting this with morse code? NO CARRIER

      --
      "Come on, let's go drink till we can't feel feelings anymore."
    2. Re:daditdada di ditditdit by darkrowan · · Score: 1

      Bonus points for having been all ditdahs

      --
      AccountKiller
  10. Amateur Radio and satellites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yes, amateur radio is still relevant. Where else do you get to play with satellites? Amateur radio is one of the few places (outside of NASA) where you can experiment with radio links through real satellites in orbit around the Earth. That's not something you can do over the Internet. The upcoming Phase 5A (P5A) launch will be a mission to Mars. You can't do *THAT* over the Internet. See http://www.go-mars.org/ (It's German. Use the fish!). More info on amateur radio and satellites is available at AMSAT's web site at http://www.amsat.org./

    1. Re:Amateur Radio and satellites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks to amateur radio I can use my rig to sent signals to satellites in orbit. I can communicate with people ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PLANET, you can't do *THAT* over the Internet, can you?

    2. Re:Amateur Radio and satellites by Gonarat · · Score: 1

      It is not what you do, but how you do it. Anyone can talk to someone on the other side of the Planet through the internet, but the challenge of Amateur Radio is communicating half way around the world through radio (be it 20M, 40M, 80M, satellite, whatever). I'm not saying that Amateur Radio is for everyone, but the fun is in the challenge, not just the results.


      DE WB3IZT


      --
      Beware of Sleestak
  11. When all else fails... by wildzontor · · Score: 5, Informative

    My friends and I use ham radio because our cell phones drop all the time. As long as we're a hundred miles or so from our local repeater we're good. The entry price wasn't too much for me. $180 for a 2-meter mobile and $170 for a dual-band ht.

    1. Re:When all else fails... by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My friends and I use ham radio because our cell phones drop all the time.

      Yep, I ragchew all the time to/from work. I have a 45 minute commute. The time on the road (and time in traffic jams) generally breezes by. The topics vary, but it's always interesting conversation.

      For those who say: "I can do the same thing on my cell phone", let me ask you this? How much does your 1800 minute per month plan cost? Mine costs $0. Plus, I'm usually chatting (rountable style) with more than three people. I never heard of Four or Five Way Calling on a cell phone plan.

      73 and I'm QRT

    2. Re:When all else fails... by Myself · · Score: 1

      Ragchewing on the road is what 11-meter is for. Cheaper radios, no licensing costs, and you're reasonably likely to talk to other people on the same road who can advise you of traffic problems, emergency vehicles, road conditions, and the occasional overzealous ticketwriter.

      Of course it's also stocked with an alarming population of idiots. If the ham community took some of that RDF experience and tracked down a few of those echo-mic-wielding morons with the kilowatt amps, the band would be a lot more useful for everyone. Just imagine, a foxhunt with a purpose! Which is why it'll never happen...

      Seriously though, the reason most geeks aren't interested in ham radio is that we can't run crypto. The regulation makes sense to make it easy to enforce the noncommercial requirements, but seriously. Here's a communications medium that's vastly more capable in many respects than what you've been playing with, except you can't do the really important stuff on it. Oops!

    3. Re:When all else fails... by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean. And I appreciate your want/need to use 11-Meter. I used to use 11-meter A LOT before I got my license. And I'll carry a portable one on long Interstate trips. I rarely get on the highway much anymore, where the ticket writers and traffic problems are spotted a lot easier, preferring back roads to go to work. But the idiot population, as you say, got extremely dense before I jumped ship to HAM radio. Besides, my radio training in the Army helped me pass the tests. It was an easy transition.

      As for licensing costs, I only spent $15 total for any and all testing fees in my HAM career and a $14 one time fee to be able to pick a Vanity Callsign.

      Items I don't miss from 11-Meter days: Limited ranges and the long antennas to get any decent performance. I drive a low profile car. A decent CB antenna on it would make me look like a bumper car trying to reach up for the top electric grid panel. That's why I also don't run 10-Meter and HF in the car (or 6-Meter for that matter) Plus, AM modulation is very noisy. I rarely do Shortwave HF. When I do, it's primarily for listening. I can do that in the HAM shack at a low enough volume where the static is less irritating and I can focus my attention on the signal coming through. In a car, I'll have to turn things up just to hear the chatter and deal with static plus traffic.

      And yes, echo-mics suck big time....

  12. YES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How else will we communicate after civilisation collapses back to the level of 1905?

    1. Re:YES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will ride my pony.

    2. Re:YES by 0racle · · Score: 1

      The same way they did in 1905.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    3. Re:YES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG! Ponies!!11

  13. No. by sharkb8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are far more geeky things to do. Wny bother talikning to someone on the other side of the world via ham when I can just use my cellphone? Is it the random encounters with people you don't know?

    It's more fun to frag someone in Quake then drop some smack in context.

    My uncle had all his ham licenses when I was a kid. I was 9 and didn't see why it was fun then either. Looking back, it kind of seems like lame social networking for geeks.

  14. no by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I hate to say it, but no. When I got my license as a teenager around 1979, it was a cool way to talk for free to my father, who was divorced from my mother. In that era, long-distance phone calls were really expensive, and e-mail and the internet didn't exist. I could talk to people in other countries, like Japan, ... and Japan, and ... Japan. But seriously, that was very cool in an era when a long-distance call to Japan would have been an obscene amount of money.

    Things are totally different now. Not only is the internet a free way to communicate (free as in zero dollars per minute), but you can actually communicate with people on the internet about -- get this -- anything you like! In other words, you're not just having these stilted, stylized conversations about what your rig is.

    --KB6ZD

  15. Yes! by SaDan · · Score: 2, Funny

    I still find amatuer... Oh, wait. RADIO. Not pr0n.

  16. Probably not by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One thing to keep in mind about geeks is that you can't pigeonhole them. Some like games and never bathe. Others like to program and stay up days consuming only Taco Bell and Mountain Dew. Others like to plug computers together and twiddle their fingers waiting for their kernels to finish compiling. Even others like to jack off to Sailor Moon and other Japanese cartoons.

    On the outskirts of geekdom, you have people like yourself who are interested in ham radios or model trains or paper airplanes. These will pretty much always be niche geek markets because they just don't have the glamour that and visibility that the mainstream geek lifestyle provides.

    Which is not to say that there aren't merits to these peripheral geek lifestyles. Ham radios, in particular, are very useful in times of crisis and crises rely on people with a sense of responsibility and social acuity. Typical geeks, if that is who you are trying to interest, are the exact opposite type of people to bring into the ham radio flock.

    But be sure that what you are interested in is non-mainstream geekery. Just because something requires technical ability, it does not follow that it requires a geek to manage it. Somethings are just technically difficult and not geeky at all.

    Ham radio is definitely geeky, though.

    1. Re:Probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to esr, the majority of 'hackers' enjoy amateur radio.

    2. Re:Probably not by CycleMan · · Score: 1

      Mainstream geekery? Is this some insider's club of outsiders that I wasn't informed of? I reject the supposition that geekery is some well-defined essence with outskirts and mainstreams, or that ham radio is on the outskirts. Hams are contributing daily to our safety and security, in a semi-obscure technical way which creates great rewards for those who thrive on hard work, long hours, and being often misunderstood. I say that's completely mainstream geekiness.

    3. Re:Probably not by wwahammy · · Score: 1

      the GLAMOUR of geekdom? Geez this is something new to me :)

    4. Re:Probably not by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      glamour that and visibility that the mainstream geek lifestyle provides

      There is no such thing as a mainstream geek lifestyle until Ikea comes up with a furniture collection to match it. I'll keep a lookout for the Gïk line of products. The instructions for these are probably written in Klingon.

    5. Re:Probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't take any statistics from a mongoloid with a gun fetish.

    6. Re:Probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how you stopped at the supposed "jack off to Sailor Moon" geeks and forgot to leave out your own social group -- Slashdot trolls, who are actually considered to be lower on the evolutionary ladder.

      In other words, that'd make you one of the guys jacking off the Sailor Moon fans, and that doesn't really say much good about your personality...

    7. Re:Probably not by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      Your logic is about par for the course here on /.

      Too bad you couldn't reply while people were still reading this article.

  17. Not strictly Ham, but I sue CBs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The great thing is that since everybody else has abandoned them for cellular telephones, CB radios are ultra inexpensive and you have the air to yourself, like owning 40 private channels. My wife and I have been using them between our house and my private observatory (at 6,200') and in that time we've only heard other users once.

    Not long ago I was required to 'rescue' a technician at a nearby cellular site (on the same range as my observatory). He'd gone up late to repair a fault with the repeater and his vehicle became stuck in deep snow. The fun thing was that the local S&R, fire and police departments had no common radio links, and their cellphones were out due to the repeater fault. If it weren't for the CB radios they'd previously mocked we'd have had no comms.

  18. ob mst3k reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mike: Hi, folks. Mike Nelson here. Crow and Servo are about to help me with the annual Satellite of Love safety check. You guys ready?
    Crow: Roger.
    Servo: Ramjet.
    Mike: All right, fire extinguishers?
    Servo: Empty.
    Crow: Shot them off in your face. Next.
    Mike: Okay. Flare gun?
    Servo: Ibid.
    Crow: Shot them off in your face. Next.
    Mike: Right. First aid kit?
    Servo: Used it to treat your flare burns.
    Mike: Right. Parachute?
    Crow: Gym class.
    Mike: Okay, life vest?
    Servo: Falsies.
    Mike: HAM radio?
    Crow: Mistook it for an actual ham.
    Mike: There. The Satellite of Love is completely unsafe. Hey, does anything work at all?
    Servo: Yeah, the toaster oven. We used it to bake the HAM radio.
    Crow: Mmm.
    Mike: Okay, well then, we're dead. We'll be right dead.
    Crow: C'mon, Mike. We're gonna go stick our heads in the towel dispenser!
    Servo: Whee!

  19. Hell yes! by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

    I've been a ham for 35 years now. (Damn, I'm an old fart.) I'm still active, and am looking seriously at the Icom D-Star networked digital radio technology as the next big thing.

    Get the ticket. There's a lot out there. ...de K5ZC

    --
    Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
    1. Re:Hell yes! by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

      Don't believe everything you read about the Texas VHF-FM Society at the site you linked to. The whole story is at the Gang of Three site. Put simply, the bylaws amendment to allow vote by mail was adopted in violation of the Society's bylaws and Robert's Rules of Order, and was invalid; the Board merely recognized that fact.

      What does all that show? Like every other kind of group of people, there are politics and infighting. Big surprise.

      As for my behavior after the special meeting in Austin, I've already recognized that I was out of line, and apologized publicly for it.

      No, I don't shoot people who don't threaten my life. You're just posting anonymously so you can make accusations without standing behind them.

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
  20. Someday... by slack-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wish i had the bankroll to get into HAM. I live in the woods and another way to communicate would be nice. Plus I predict that after the US government is done raping and pillaging the internet, IP over HAM might take off among those who know how, and want to keep a free internet.

    1. Re:Someday... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1
      HAM might take off among those who know how, and want to keep a free internet.

      lol man, people will rather use PGP encryption with 2048 bit keys for everything they do rather than use ham radio. ham radio users are like Atari 2600 players, there will always be some but there will never be more.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  21. My Story by MBCook · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I have a Technician's license. My call sign is KC0QBP. I have a HT that I've used on and off to listen to the local repeater and such. I kind of lost interest in that part. After all, 2m and such mostly lets you talk to local hams.

    That said, I've been learning morse code since Christmas and I intend to take the code test next month (the next time my local club offers the test). I'm going to order an Elecraft K2 and I'm quite excited. CW is so much more interesting than FM Voice. It takes skill, it has a challenge, and you I can hear letters and words in the series of beeps. Plus you can use it to talk to people all over the world. I'm especially excited because the K2 is a big electronics kit. The fact is once you get past a few blinking LED kits and such there are just no electronic kits to build that take any skill.

    I find it kind of interesting, but I can see why some people don't think it's terribly interesting. Many of the things that used to make ham radio so interesting (being able to talk to people across the country or the world for free) are no longer unique (thanks to the internet and basically free long-distance calling).

    It's too bad eHam has been down for 2 days (at least). I've wanted to post on their message board but I can't (since... it's down). I don't suppose anyone knows why?

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:My Story by MBCook · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I should note... I just thought of an experience that kind of shows why I'm excited.

      If you look up last Sunday's Fox Trot comic strip, you'll see Jason tap dancing. In the last panel he is telling his friend Marcus that he didn't get into the talent show because one of the judges knew morse code. It was so cool for me to be able to figure out what the message was ("Some day I will rule you all") without having to go to a translator program on the internet.

      Lots of people know Spanish, or French, or other such things. Morse code is a true geek language.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:My Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Morse code isn't a language, it's an encoding, and a simplistic one at that.

      Lisp is a true geek language, while QAM256 is a true geek encoding. :P

      -K

    3. Re:My Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Have you ever used morse code? It is it's own language. There are so many abbreviations and prosigns that you can communicate through it if you don't share a common language with the guy on the other end.

    4. Re:My Story by eflanery · · Score: 1

      What is a language if not an encoding of concepts? Just where would you draw the line?

      Morse code isn't a simple 1 to 1 encoding of the latin alphabet; it is considerably more complex than that, largely designed for efficency.

      I'll agree on the Lisp and QAM bits, though. One does need to be a true geek to understand either.

    5. Re:My Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's too bad eHam has been down for 2 days (at least). I've wanted to post on their message board but I can't (since... it's down). I don't suppose anyone knows why?"

      Database trouble. Lost a drive in the RAID, a replacement is on the way.

    6. Re:My Story by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      5 years ago I didn't have HF priviledges but the HF bands were completely full. Now the laws have been relaxed in UK, I have HF priviledges but HF (compared to 2000 summer) is dead, dead dead. Worse, scientists forecast the next sun maximum to be the most quiet one. By the time we have favourable conditions again, every amateur will be dead and radios will be long used as boat anchors... This week's optimum MUF is 19MHz! Nineteeen! And we're almost completely into the summer. 24-28MHz is completely dead, if you are luck 14MHz is open. All that remains is 7MHz and it is already too small and too crowded. I am just so unlucky... If only I was born 20 years earlier - but then I wouldn't have access to cheap and good quality radios I now have.

    7. Re:My Story by oblivionboy · · Score: 1

      If you're really motivated you could check out the end of http://galaxy4girl.blogspot.com/

  22. hams are more important now than ever before by Yonder+Way · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I got my license this year and I think there is quite a lot in amateur radio to hold interest.

    I've learned more in the last 6 months about RF theory than I did in my previous 33 years of life combined. And looking ahead I see I still have quite a lot to learn.

    Once I've broken in my soldering iron learning to make a few different kinds of antennas for my radio, I'm looking forward to buidling a couple of APRS rigs. One for my car, the other for my All Terrain Vehicle. I might even put one in my backpack for when I'm out backpacking in the mountains and my family is worried about me being alone in the wilderness. They will be able to follow my progress.

    I find out about severe weather conditions before the mass media can report it. Indeed, it is radio amateurs that provide the weather service with early warnings of approaching dangerous weather patterns. Living in the hurricane belt, and an area not unknown for springtime tornadoes, this is valuable to me.

    Of course when the storms hit, and the public infrastructure goes down (including internet, cell phones, land lines) I can still communicate with people in and out of my immediate area.

    As our world becomes more and more dependent on technological infrastructure, I think it is that much more important to preserve and grow the amateur radio service to be there as a fallback for when all of those other communications mediums fail (and they do, frighteningly often). During 9/11 attacks it was radio amateurs providing communications capabilities to the first responders in Manhatten. During the major power blackout in the northeastern US a few years back, it was radio amateurs that passed emergency communications reliably. During the rescue efforts following hurricanes Katrina and Rita, it was radio amateurs coordinating emergency communications between all of the different rescue groups involved. Despite all of this newfangled technology we enjoy today, it only works when things are going well. When things aren't going well, we still need radio.

    1. Re:hams are more important now than ever before by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      Having a backup for emergency situations is a great reason to become a radio amateur but it shouldn't be the only one. I got into it because of radio astronomy, probably that's why I rarely pick the mic up.

    2. Re:hams are more important now than ever before by Yonder+Way · · Score: 1

      There are myriad reasons to get the amateur radio license. It's not just about talking to people or helping with emergencies, as you've pointed out. Covering all of the relevant uses would have crushed the /. editor, methinks.

  23. The Intial Obvious First Draw is Gone by nincehelser · · Score: 1

    With the internet and cell phones, it is no longer a big deal to communicate around the world.

    However, there's a lot of other interesting stuff to do. For example, building a wireless LAN that works over extreme distances is just an offshoot of the Ham mind-set...it just doesn't require a license.

    There's a lot of cool Ham stuff you might do, but unlike the internet, you can't use it for commercial gain. This does put a damper on innovation.

    The biggest draw for me is weather related...storm tracking, emergency communications, and stuff like that. The internet and cell phones just don't work well in those situations.

    K5GDN

  24. it still gets some use by bonezed · · Score: 1

    people in remote areas, land and water, still use HF

    --
    ---- Put Sig here:
  25. Remote antenna use via the net? by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

    Hey,

    Not being able to put up an apartment was referred to above. This got me thinking. Does equipment and services exist that would allow a HAM to use a remotely located antenna over the internet? For example, they would have all the typical gear at home and just not have the antenna. A bridge-like device would packetize the signal and transmit it to the antenna location where a like device would convert it back for broadcast.

    Later,
    -Slashdot Junky

    --
    .
    Landfill Mining Co.
    Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
    1. Re:Remote antenna use via the net? by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Not quite. IRLP allows a ham radio operators to talk to a repeater which talks to another repeater over the internet which in turn talks to another ham operator, but you can't tap into the internet side directly (not allowed by regulation, there is no technical problem with doing so).

    2. Re:Remote antenna use via the net? by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

      Regulation or not... It seems like a DIY hack waiting to happen. I could see a friend with an antenna allowing his neighbor across the street or friend on the other side of town to use it. It would be open to the public, of course.

      -Slashdot Junky

      --
      .
      Landfill Mining Co.
      Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
    3. Re:Remote antenna use via the net? by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Hidden antennas for apartment complexes has a long and treasured history in ham radio. The most obvious is the "patriotic ham" that has a flag pole. There have been a few "rain gutter" radiators. Then there is the obvious invisible "small guage wire" antenna that might run accross the roof line. If it was me I would (if someone hasn't done it already) pursue a "dish network" modification. There have been many articles and some books written about apartment antennas.

      You will want to run a low powered rig to prevent RFI. But don't let the fact that you are in an apartment stop you from enjoying ham radio.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    4. Re:Remote antenna use via the net? by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      You can't really have a remote antanna, per se, because you still have to generate the power (not just the signal) to send it. What I have seen is computer-controlled rigs that have software the present the complete control panel on-screen, and can route the audio through the sound card. So what you'd have is a complete transceiver/antenna setup somewhere, then access it remotely across the internet. One such set-up demonstrated at a local ham radio club meeting even had a little diagram showing which way the beam antenna was pointing, overlaid on a map of the world which showed what countries were along the beam's path.

      It's especially nice if you have a vacation home in a place where you can put up a Big Honkin' Antenna (tm), then access it from your desk at home. I'd like to do it just so I could operate during lunch here at the office, but I like old tube rigs, and they weren't making computer-controlled transceivers back in the 1960s...

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
  26. Not particularly. by scumdamn · · Score: 2, Informative

    KC5UVV. I have no idea when it lapses. It's just not useful for anything anymore and I don't even have equipment.

    1. Re:Not particularly. by MBCook · · Score: 1
      GLOVER, ANDERSON B, KC5UVV (Technician)
      (address removed by me for privacy reasons)
      Issue Date: Jun 05, 1996
      Expire Date: Jun 05, 2006
      Date of last Change: Jun 05, 1996

      Nothing like the fun of public databases! Looks like you have less than 2 weeks before your license runs out.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Not particularly. by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Do not take a short view on things. Download the form and renew your license. It will only take a moment.

      You spent the effort to take the tests and get the license. You should respect the work you did in the past. While you may have found that your interest in ham radio has waned, there is no telling what the future may bring where it might be useful or interesting to you again.

      I have been a ham for 25 years. The technical knowledge I have gleaned has stayed with me and opened a few unexpected doors for me. I too lost interest (and don't have a working station) esp. with the internet, but I recently wanted to remote control a distant observatory I want to build and even though there is wireless internet, ham radio still gives me better flexibility/performance/cost options to implement a solution.

      So renew, you'll be glad that you did in the future.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    3. Re:Not particularly. by Blimey85 · · Score: 1
      If this is you:
      KC5UVV 2006-06-05 ANDERSON B GLOVER, WACO, TX
      then it expires next month on the 5th.

      To renew you just have to complete a form and maybe pay a bit of cash... it's been a couple years since I renewed and I don't recall if there was a charge but I doubt they would do anything for free so most likely there is.

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    4. Re:Not particularly. by Br._Fjordhr · · Score: 1
      Thanks, the responses to your thread inspired me to check and see when my license expires. I have until 2012. I really don't even remember having renewed it, but I must have.

      KD6EVH

  27. Yes it is by pvt_medic · · Score: 1

    I think that it is still relevant but the interest has dwindled a little. The value and importance of it is larger now than I think ever before because of many different new areas that are developing. Specifically the data possibilities. And having been involved in emergency work their value there is beyond anything I can describe. They have so much capabilities and the resources.

    The challenge is that people dont have the time or interest for the learning curve necessary.

    --
    30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
    Score:5, Troll
  28. Well... by Flimzy · · Score: 0

    I think it's cool that I own a 2400 baud hamm radio modem for a commodore 64. I've never used it--don't have a license. And never will (can't imagine I'll bother plugging in the C64 again). But it's cool I have one! :)

  29. Do you want to talk or learn about electronics? by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    My experience, and I've had a technician's license for about 15 years, is that nowdays most amateur radio operators just want to talk. There's very little interest in electronics, building your own rigs and antennas and any sort of technical stuff. Most amateurs either want to talk or contest, things which aren't particularly interesting to most hardcore geeks.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:Do you want to talk or learn about electronics? by John+Miles · · Score: 1

      My experience, and I've had a technician's license for about 15 years, is that nowdays most amateur radio operators just want to talk. There's very little interest in electronics, building your own rigs and antennas and any sort of technical stuff.

      Not necessarily true. There's a lot of interest, but it's widely-dispersed. You may not hear people talking about designing a homemade spectrum analyzer on your local 2M repeater, but that doesn't mean they're not out there.

      And somebody must be building all those K2s you hear on HF, right?

      Look past the repeaters and the contests. That's not where the fun stuff is happening.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
  30. gnuradio by thule · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hoping that gnuradio gets some more momentum. Think of all the possibilities! I think things could get very interesting with experimental digital modulation. I haven't played around much with gnuradio since I don't have a USRP. It seems to me that the software is a little hard to use. I keep my eye on the project hoping that things will continue to move along and get easier to use.

    Once things move along it would be nice to have a portable gnuradio hardware that could interface to a PDA for HT uses.

  31. The Short Answer by Phat_Tony · · Score: 1

    Mu

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
  32. Yes, but for different reasons than most hams by finkployd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As far as a serious hobby with real applicability? Probably not unless you are into emergency communication type stuff. I used to command a sheriff's office search and rescue team and got into ham radio then. Since I don't do that anymore (since moving, I'm probably going to get into it again some day), I do not really use ham radio for anything real other than just messing around. The Internet is a much better day to day long distance communication medium.

    Having said that, what keeps me involved is building my own gear. While you can spend thousands of dollars on stuff to get on the air, it is much more fun for me to grab the old soldering iron and make my own low power transmitters and receivers. Great way to keep up with electronics, radio theory, and all that fun stuff. There is even some neat work going on with software defined radios (mixing DIY radio building with Linux and programming :)

    I find your average slashdotter tends to dislike ham radio as too old school and REALLY does not like the thought that ham radio is holding back BPL (along with a lot less vocal but more influential opponents like police, coast guard, FAA, etc). But hey, they also bought hook line and sinker into the hype that BPL is actually a viable broadband contender and not a snake-oil product.

    Really though, if you get into it, and avoid (1) the elitist pricks who got their license back in the day and hate everyone newer then themselves, (2) the mindless cliques that form on most local repeaters (Pittsburgh being a nice exception), and (3) the losers who live on eham and qrz and attack basically everyone, you will enjoy it. I tend to stick with the build it yourself qrp stuff and the more interesting microwave band projects out there. There is a ton of non-obvious and not all that publicized things you can get into with ham radio that does not involve just trying to work all 50 states or 100 countries for no particular reason.

  33. HAM by mikers · · Score: 1

    I am a Ham, but I've been out of hamming for a few years.

    Let me answer some questions that weren't specifically in the title article, but that I went through in the same process (as I was getting ready to get rid of radio gear I hadn't used in years).

    Practical use?
    - Commmunications when commercial options are non-existent, suck or unavailable, such as major storms, hurricanes, terrorist attacks, the boonies. These darn radios will work fine during nasty storms, over hundreds of miles no problem. You'd be pretty shocked at the distance you can get even from a basic hand-held fraction-of-a-watt power transceiver. And at VHF frequencies, you don't even need line of site, it goes around hills somewhat.
    - Stand-by option at best in more civilized and populated areas.

    Cost?
    - Low to none. Study, write exam, get license ($50-60), buy transceiver (used for $100, new and fancy $200 up to thousands). Here in Canada they did away with needing to renew your basic ham license in 2002 (? +/- a year or two) -- used to be it cost $20/year to have one. If you want to use a repeater, you should become a member with the group that runs the repeaters, but they won't mind if you try it out for a while as a beginner.

    Why use ham, learn ham?
    - Talk to friends
    - Hobby, satillite comms, radio interest, general knowledge
    - Backup reliable communication method

    Downsides?
    - Cannot discuss personal, business or non-public info over ham. Everything has to be clean. This, to me, limits its usefulness majorly. Everything can be heard by anyone (completely legal in these frequencies), and there is no expectation of privacy. Cannot encrypt any data traffic while using HAM frequencies.
    - Can be kindof boring unless you have friends on HAM as well
    - Personally, I don't care for 'chewing the rag', or BSing because you can. Talking for hours about nothing with people on the radio just because, and you aren't even allowed to gosip or swear. Better alternatives are IM, email or VOIP now-a-days.
    - Not many women using it, just guys (same as early internet)

    Upsides?
    - Cheap
    - If you like to talk and BS, you will find lots friends

    1. Re:HAM by Tragek · · Score: 1

      Question from a non-hammer: - Is the no encryption of data over HAM just polite, or legally mandated? - The data, I assume is something like packet radio. Can you possibly tell me; is there some sort of adressing, along the lines of IP, or is it a free for all? (I sort of intend to say can more than one data stream travel at any one time)

    2. Re:HAM by kg4czo · · Score: 1

      It's FCC mandated illegal to encrypt data over HAM operations. There are ways to connect vi TCP/IP over HAM, but I never got into it. I might look into it some day, but not today.

    3. Re:HAM by flynns · · Score: 1

      It's legally mandated by the FCC in the US. However, that doesn't mean you can't use data modes; the standard just has to be published.

      The line between encryption and compression on-air is very subtle. :)

      -Sean KI4IIB

      --
      'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
  34. In a word, no. by Animats · · Score: 1
    The "you can talk to random people far away" thing isn't as exciting as it used to be. You have to be a really good electronic engineer to build anything half as good as off-the-shelf gear.

    There are a small number of hams doing interesting stuff, like working on optimal modulation strategies for data over HF, but there aren't many. And the ones that do that typically are designing cell phones as their day job.

  35. I'd say "yes," conditionally... by John+Miles · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a lot of people have mentioned (some more politely than others), ham radio's appeal as a general-purpose communications service is pretty limited these days due to the sheer number of alternatives. It's still unbeatable in emergencies, but if emergency support isn't your thing, you may be left wondering what the point is.

    That's a shame, because there is still some really-interesting stuff happening on the fringes. For the technically inclined, eBay has made it possible to obtain equipment and components for Amateur "homebrewing" that major military/commercial labs were damned lucky to have in the 70s and 80s. It is hard to overemphasize how cool that is. Even most hams don't realize that they can own better RF equipment and components than NASA had when they launched Voyager and Pioneer.

    Ham radio gives you a great framework for engagement with every technology from software-defined radio to microwave communications to precision timekeeping. Build that DC-to-daylight receiver you've always wanted... the one the Feds won't let you buy off the shelf. Run your own "Amateur Deep Space Network" receiver site, or communicate with other people all over the world by bouncing your signal off the Moon. There is still more cool stuff to learn and do in Amateur Radio than you will ever have time to tackle... if you don't fall into the trap of thinking it's all a bunch of old farts carrying walkie-talkies around for no good reason. Like lawyers, 98% of hams give the rest a bad name.

    There are a few links on my site (in the comment header) to various homebrew/experimental projects, but most of them are broken at the moment due to a hosting move that's taking way longer than it was supposed to. Anyone interested in the technical side of things is welcome to email me for advice and indoctrination. :-P

    In short: some parts of ham radio have benefitted tremendously from the advent of the Internet; but yeah, it's also true that many of the other aspects are less relevant than ever. You get out of the hobby what you're willing to put into it.

    --
    Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    1. Re:I'd say "yes," conditionally... by adolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Warning: I work with hams on a daily basis as part of my job, and have for some time. I am, therefore, rather biased.

      Ham radio is dead. It is not cutting-edge. It is not exciting. It is not a viable or useful communications medium except in a state of emergency, where despite everyone's best efforts, government communication falls on its face during a disaster.

      And the ONLY reason that the government systems still fall on their face is that, even with expensive plug-boards like the JPS ACU-1000, they're STILL reliant on a commercial vendor (whom they can't reach, because Things Are Fucked) to program the bloody Motorola radios and make sense of the frequencies, PL tones, and integration issues between sites and formats.

      So, government employees don't know how to program a radio. What a loser of a reason for hams to exist.

      Most of the times, I see hams talking on their radios more about being hams than about anything useful. Such-and-such repeater is acting up, So-and-so's ratty homebuilt antenna took damage in yesterday's wind, would you please show up early and make the coffee for the weekly radio club meeting this Thursday, I'm standing in the park in $towntwentymilesaway talking into an HT HOW DO I SOUND?

      These conversations are point-to-point in subject, and also pointedly boring. But they are (unfortunately) shared with everyone.

      IM, or even SMS would be better for this sort of banter, but of course, since the IM systems typically Actually Work, then there'd not be so much to talk about, much less any need for a club (often with real property, even) to exist to talk about just how cool Jabber is to use.

      See, these days, I don't need to build a high-power low-frequency Yagi to talk to Europe from Ohio. I just pick up my Vonage phone and dial. It's free, as in I don't pay anything extra to do so, so why not? Give it a year or two, and the same thing will happen for cell phones, making the whole game completely wireless, and far lighter than a 5-Watt portable.

      Satellite? I just sent a file to Germany that was over 100 megabytes, and it only took a few minutes on my residential broadband. Isn't "satellite" just another term for "fickle, expensive, and slow"?

      And Pioneer? Voyager? Dude: I carry more technology than that in my fucking wristwatch. I should -hope- that amateur radio has advanced similarly...but that doesn't make it fun, or exciting. It just makes it more advanced than it used to be. (Duh.)

      Ham radio was, I thought, supposed to be about communicating in ways which otherwise weren't possible with people who otherwise were unreachable. It used to be high-tech. It used to be cutting-edge.

      That time is past.

    2. Re:I'd say "yes," conditionally... by John+Miles · · Score: 1

      And Pioneer? Voyager? Dude: I carry more technology than that in my fucking wristwatch. I should -hope- that amateur radio has advanced similarly...but that doesn't make it fun, or exciting. It just makes it more advanced than it used to be. (Duh.) Ham radio was, I thought, supposed to be about communicating in ways which otherwise weren't possible with people who otherwise were unreachable. It used to be high-tech. It used to be cutting-edge. That time is past.

      Definitely some valid points; I won't defend the hobby against most of the criticisms you posted. We were originally charged with the advancement of the radio art. Now that radio is a solved problem, there's only the public-service mission, and the related one of maintaining a reserve corps of skilled operators, to fall back on. Instead, like you're saying, the average ham acts like the local repeater is his own personal cell site. That's not a sustainable situation when the VHF/UHF spectrum he's using is so valuable to commercial and government interests.

      Still: do you really want to delegate the maintenance of all of your monitoring and communications options to third-party interests? The day may come when the FCC strikes Part 97 from its rulebook and orders all Amateur equipment turned in at the nearest Verizon reseller.... and my skills and experience, along with whatever gear I can squirrel away, will only become more valuable to me if that happens.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    3. Re:I'd say "yes," conditionally... by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      Nice rant....

      But in all that posting, you didn't even lead the reader to think that you even TRIED using HAM radio for more than a couple minutes.

      Most of the times, I see hams talking on their radios more about being hams than about anything useful. Such-and-such repeater is acting up, So-and-so's ratty homebuilt antenna took damage in yesterday's wind, would you please show up early and make the coffee for the weekly radio club meeting this Thursday, I'm standing in the park in $towntwentymilesaway talking into an HT HOW DO I SOUND?

      It's a hobby also. People in the HOBBY will probably talk about the HOBBY a lot. Gather a bunch of model railroaders or geocachers together and try to figure out what they talk about. I'll bet the hot topic isn't about sports or something. Personally, I don't do a lot of hobby chat myself. But I talk a lot about current events and politics.

      That $towntwentymilesaway person may sound annoying to you, but they ask the question for a reason. They are learning the limits of their equipment when they ask how they sound so far away. Unless you listened further, you might not have heard them follow up with the specs of their HT. It could have been at 600mw where 20 miles is a very good acheivement depending on terrain. And cell phones are not immune to the method of equipment checking like that HT guy. "Can you hear me now?"

      On another level, I'd trust my kids to chat with any other hams around the world (to strangers) before I'd let them IM, SMS, or chatroom with strangers on the Internet.

      The free calling argument is flawed, because it's NOT truly free. Actually, your statement was flawed on two levels. First, Hams don't pay $24.95 per month for the privilege of talking overseas. Second, part of the hobby is the challenge of not using a high powered transmitter. There are a lot of active and successful attempts at communicating around the world on less than 5W of power. When you're listening to the HAMs around you, listen for the letters QRP.

    4. Re:I'd say "yes," conditionally... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I think HAM radio is interesting but it does have some real big issues. In a way it reminds me of Model Airplanes.
      Back in the day kids where into model airplanes. You had a many kids flying free flight and later control line models. Now you can fly carbon fiber jets! Well you can if you have $10,000 to spend. The nice thing is that now there are some inexpensive RC planes comming on the market. Maybe that will help get young people interested again.

      Take a look at the cost of some of the high end HAM rigs? Yea you can get great equipment for the cost of a small car. The really cheap stuff is not available to technicians since it is all HF. Back in the 1950s and even 1960s there was a lot of cheap WWII suplus gear that you could get really cheap. The cost of entry was low.

      Then let's talk about the code requirements. The become a real HAM you have to learn Morse code. That is an elitist barrier to entry. RTTY will work just as well doing QRP. I have to wonder what cool new modes might be created if you could do HF without the code requirements. How many little QRP rigs would you see on Hack a day or Make?
      I will probably still get my technicians license and try and learn code just because.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:I'd say "yes," conditionally... by adolf · · Score: 1

      Ok. I'll buy that: Ham operators do it because it's a challenge.

      Just like amateur football/tennis/baseball players play football/tennis/baseball without compensation: Because it challenges them.

      But simply being challenging does not make it useful or productive, does it? Of course not.

      Thank you for playing. It's been challenging.

    6. Re:I'd say "yes," conditionally... by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      Forget about public service, there's still a lot to investigate and play with...

    7. Re:I'd say "yes," conditionally... by unFKNreal · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree in full with the above. If you can get past the fact that a large majority of amateur radio operators are either old and bitter grouches, or smelly morbidly obese shut-ins, there is some REALLY cool stuff to discover. Alot of us ARE normal (honest!), and I continue to be amazed at the number of really intelligent people in the hobby.

      A few interesting modes to research on google if you have any doubts:

      APRS: A radio and a GPS somewhere, and maps on a computer screen somewhere else... real time location tracking.

      Hinternet: Basically 802.11, but legal with much higher power and some real antennas. Wireless internet from miles away.

      Moonbounce: Earth-Moon-Earth, or EME, bounce your signal off the surface of the moon.

      Satellites: AMSAT, Lots of amateur radio satellites up there, including the space station which usually has a few amateur operators abord.

      VOIP over RF: IRLP and Echolink. Repeaters linked via VOIP and the internet. Yes, I know you can pick up your cellphone and call someone in japan or new zealand, but it just ain't the same.

      Digital modes: PSK31, SSTV, RTTY, etc are all great fun. It never ceases to amaze me when I can contact someone who's signal is so weak my ears CAN NOT hear it, yet a computer has no problem displaying the text.

      Morse Code: Yea its old, it's outdated, it's a lost art. Thats what makes it so great.

      73 de VA3***

      http://www.ve3rix.ca/

  36. Amateur Radio interesting by PiratePTG · · Score: 1
    Is Amateur Radio still interesting?

    Good question. As someone who is a HAM radio operator, and has been around computers for longer than I have held a HAM license, I would have to say YES. In many ways HAM radio is more interesting to me than computers are.

    I am not a gamer, or a programmer. I use computers as a tool in my profession, but am not so enamored over them as to let them consume my free time. I used to do a lot of hardware hacking, on older mainframes and then minis (DECs, Data General Novas, Honeywells, etc), but really found it limiting. As far as games, other than an occasional game of Majongg or Freecell, one of the last games I played ON the computer was probably StarTrek (from Creative Computing). My days of hacking my old BBS system are long gone, so I would have to take a serious C refresher course.

    HAM radio, on the other hand, provides SO many variations of intellectual stimulation. I can design and build antennas from scratch one day, build up a transmitter in an Altoids box the next day. I can use any number of frequency bands to interact with people all over the world. I can work satellites, moonbounce, meteor showers... I can, and have, talked to the International Space Station! Oh, and I have talked with MIR and 4 of the shuttle flights, too.

    There are so many modes of operation for Amateur Radio... CW, voice, a dozen or more digital modes... I can use equipment that I build myself, or as modern as my wallet would allow...

    It's actually hard to sit down and describe the myriad of activities one can enjoy with Amateur Radio. Yes, there are a lot of fun things to do with a computer, too, and I don't put that down to those who enjoy computers, but for my buck, Amateur Radio wins out.

    Just my nickle's worth!

    73 de Paul, KC4YDY

    --
    The number 1 problem of working in a cubicle - 23 power cords, 1 outlet...
  37. Your *non-lame* suggestion is...? by Doug+Merritt · · Score: 1
    My uncle had all his ham licenses when I was a kid. I was 9 and didn't see why it was fun then either. Looking back, it kind of seems like lame social networking for geeks.

    Keywords: "geeks", "lame social networking"...there's another kind? Something non-lame like myspace or IRC or texting or FPS taunting post-frag or masquerading as a female in a chat room or...?

    ;-)

    --
    Professional Wild-Eyed Visionary
    1. Re:Your *non-lame* suggestion is...? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1
      Something non-lame like myspace or IRC or texting

      Since when is myspace or texting geeky? It's more OMGPONIES!!!11111-ish.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  38. Amateur radio still has its uses by hausmaus · · Score: 1

    As a licensed amateur radio operator myself (my callsign is KD5COL - I've been licensed since 1997), I can honestly say that amateur radio still has its place in this world. Besides what people think of hams (i.e. ragchewing, emergency communications), not all hams are geeks. My wife just recently became a ham herself and both of my parents (both near their sixties) are, as well as my biological father. Amateur radio presents unique opportunities that computers alone cannot offer.

    It's the fascination of learning and enjoying something you built yourself ... it's the camradarie of your friends and people you've never met sharing a similar hobby ... it's the uniqueness of having a call sign that identifies you amongst everyone else in the world ... it's the knowledge that your hobby is also a public service.

    Something else very cool also. In the state of Tennessee where I live, amateur radio operators have the privildge of obtaining emergency license plates for their automobiles. This allows the ham to be on the same level as police, fire, EMS, et al. You work with public officials in times of emergency to provide communications where nothing else is possible.

    I enjoy the public service aspect of the hobby - I am frequently at public events providing communications for race officials, EMT, et cetera. People are always asking me questions, looking at my car's setup, checking out my HT (handie-talkie) and they seem to be genuinely interested.

    Unfortunately, many of you don't have enough exposure to amateur radio to understand its usefulness and how we hams have advanced technology by experimentation.

    A very good site to look at is http://www.hello-world.org/ Hello World - it explains a lot about amateur radio and how it's used.

    As for the original author: get your license and enjoy it. Maybe we'll meet on 20 meters sometime!

    ENJOY ES 73 KD5COL

    --
    Your email has been returned due to insufficent voltage.
  39. Amateur radio interesting? by blindseer · · Score: 1

    The most interesting thing to me right now is reading all the old guys lament the FCC dropping the last of the Morse code tests to get a ham license on QRZ.com.

    I don't have a license yet but will once the FCC proposal to end Morse code testing becomes law. I don't think I'll do much talking at first. Right now I'm more interested in shortwave listening, digital communication, and weather spotting. None of those interests require a ham radio license but it would be reqired to transmit if I wish.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    1. Re:Amateur radio interesting? by flynns · · Score: 1

      Suggestion: Get your technician's license now. It hasn't required code for years. That way you can get into it and get into the weather spotting part ;)

      73 de Sean KI4IIB
      Okaloosa County, FL SKYWARN coordinator

      --
      'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
  40. Old form no/new form yes by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    The true missionof Amateur Radio has naver changed...it was always supposed to be a service that would provide communications during a disaster. Ths disaster focus is more the focus today more then ever. With meager resources, I can setup a communications station that will work on a minimum of power and is capable of worldwide communications. The old focus used to be on the rag chew...case in point, in the 50's through the 70's how cool was it to talk to someone in Germany, Japan or Australia?? That's almost commonplace now, but the need for communicators still exists. Innovation still happens in Amateur Radio too. Digital Voice Modes (VoIP like protocols) are just now being deployed. Because there's always a need for straight analog FM transcievers, the digital modes are not taking off as fast but that's mostly because analog FM WORKS! IN any case, June 20th is Bring your HT to work day and I am going to try to get a new HT for it.....a Yaesu VX-2R. This radio is about the size of a recent cell phone and is very capable rig. Sure, it's not a high powered station but how cool is having a complete ham station that fits in your pocket??? HF rigs ain't going to get people interested....micro transcievers and digital modes will.

    --

    Gorkman

  41. Slightly off topic, But... by The+Slashdolt · · Score: 1

    I think I'm kinda weird but I love listening to the air traffic control channel when flying on planes. I am not really interested in getting into amateur radio but I'd love to be able to listen in from my home. Every time I have looked into doing this it seems to require a lot of knowledge of radio. Can a radio expert explain a bit about listening in on air traffic control or some links about it? In particular I'd just like to listen into air traffic control stations.

    --
    mp3's are only for those with bad memories
    1. Re:Slightly off topic, But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming you're in the US, just find a Radio Shack store and ask them about a scanner with aircraft-band coverage. It's not a particularly-exotic or expensive piece of gear.

  42. Nope by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    I used to, but not anymore:

    1) No practical use.
    2) Redundant in emergencies
    3) Taking up valuable bandwidth
    4) User complains slowing down adoption of actual useful technologies like BPL
    5) For hobby, there are tons of free internet solutions. Skype anyone?

    Now, I'll admit that I'm taking a wild stab at #2. I assume that in actual emergencies, emergency personnel rely on other radio equipment than HAM, but I'm just taking a guess. But I think the other ones are pretty solid (save number one if number two is false).

    1. Re:Nope by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      4) User complains slowing down adoption of actual useful technologies like BPL

      You mis-spelled "fucking retarded and useless technology which will never work properly no matter how much money is pissed away on it".

      Hope this helps, have a nice day.

  43. Police Radio by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1

    St. Louis County Police Department - KAA519 - 155.1300MHz Be kind and try not to slashdot this guy's website too badly. http://myweb.accessus.net/~090/scan/stlfreq.html

    --
    The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  44. Maybe a new amateur mode is needed? by MagikSlinger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The idea of simply communicating with people without wires is so banal I doubt you could get anyone under the age of 30 to think it cool. And talking to people in far away places? Internet. But I notice some talk in the comments about what could bring people back.

    IP over radio. I mean, sure, we have wi-fi repeaters, etc., but there are so many other cool things to do with IP over radio. And considering the fun (and interest) people have in hacking wi-fi, it reminds me of the fun ham operators had. Maybe it's time to create a pure digital license? Create a low-cost digital packet radio that some one could build at home for a $100 worth of parts or less.

    When the corporations start locking down the Internet, IP-Ham could become the next big thing for geeks. Heh, makes the idea of getting SPAM over an IP-Ham connection sound even funnier. :-)

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Maybe a new amateur mode is needed? by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

      Check out the Icom D-Star system. It's a digital voice and data communications sysem that is routable across the Internet. It's built on open protiocols, and anyone can hack on it.

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
    2. Re:Maybe a new amateur mode is needed? by linvir · · Score: 1

      As amazing as that would be, it'd also be too easy and hilarious to 'disconnect' people at will. Radio is really vulnerable to DoS attacks, and my understanding is that the ham scene gets by on etiquette.

    3. Re:Maybe a new amateur mode is needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When it comes to IP traffic over radio, HAM radio got left behind for two main reasons:

          1- No encrypted communications except for controlling satellites.
          2- No traffic of a commercial nature.

      By the letter of the license, downloading a website with a commercial advertizer's image in it is in violation. Using SSH is in violation. Opening an HTTP SSL session to your online bank most certainly is.

      Until this changes, my license will remain pretty much unused.

  45. Sure do! by Vskye · · Score: 1

    I received my tech license back in 2001. (kc9aae) My friend and I both took the test together and passed, it was alot of fun. We studied for the test using online resources like: http://www.qrz.com/p/testing.pl
    I enjoy all the different things you can do, like building antennas, aprs, weather stations, etc. Fun hobby, but it can get expensive.

    --
    Life was hell, then I discovered Linux...
  46. Interesting, but of questionable relevance by wahmuk · · Score: 1

    I've been a licensed Ham since 1977, currently a General Class (finally upgraded from Tech+ last year). My wife has been licensed for almost three years, and my Dad (who got me into it in the first place) has only had two callsigns in the fifty-odd years he's been playing with radios.

    The three of us use rigs in our cars for local communications, and that's about it. For me, it's a gas-powered radio that I can use to talk to certain friends without running down the battery in my cellphone. I'm sure that my dad still has some HF gear that has been gathering dust for many years, but he's planning to retire soon and may find himself getting back into it.

    So I guess Ham Radio is still interesting, to people who like electronics and just want to do something different. But with so many alternatives available, particularly the internet, most kids and teenagers with an interest in technology get into computers and such because it's easier and cheaper and because so many of their friends already play with the stuff. It's much easier to find someone to teach you the basics and get you started with some used parts. And although the hobby has always encouraged experimentation, someone has already pointed out that you can buy gear off the shelf that's cheaper, smaller and easier to use.

    Sadly, for most people Ham Radio only becomes relevant when there's a storm or a power outage and they can't use the communications methods that they're used to. Even police departments ask Hams for help in these situations. Our local club operates a station from inside the county's 911 center during emergencies.

    --
    You can't take the sky from me!
  47. Packet got me going! by jbarr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I got my Technician license (N9ONL) back in the early 90's in the Chicago area, and and was immediately enamored with packet radio. Interestingly, I actually hated TALKING over the radio--conversing via packet really did it for me. Hopping from nodes to node locally and around the world through "wormholes" and such was very cool stuff at 1200 baud, especially considering that 2400 baud modems were about as good as it got at the time. Connecting to BBS's was obviously the hot topic in the early 90's, but the idea of being able to connect simultaneously to multiple nodes on the same channel was just mind-blowing.

    I got really interested in KA9Q TCP/IP packet operation, including variants like JNOS, and it's what probably launched me in understanding TCP/IP networking--obviously very useful today. I always waited and waited for native Windows TCP/IP packet drivers. You know, install a driver, hook up a serial-connected TNC, configure the settings, and voila, packet-based networking. Problem is that it never happened--(at least I don't think it did. Does anyone know of native Windows drivers (XP, preferably) that would facilitate TCP/IP packet connectivity?)

    Though TCP/IP was considered the "icing" on the preverbial cake, interestingly, setting up simple digipeaters, local nodes, and packet BBS's were so simple and very fun. It was just amazing to be able to wirelessly connect to other computers in the area.

    Probably the most exciting event was actually hearing a packet station in space! I honestly can't remember if it was MIR or a shuttle mission, but I do remember getting an copying the ID text. Very exciting!

    I always hoped that someone would market a multi-band handheld HT that incorporated a TNC with a keyboard that would let me have a truely portable packet radio system. I think Kenwood still has a model or two with an integrated TNC, but it's quite pricy, and I don't know how input works....

    Anyway, Ham radio filled a technological niche for me at a time when I was ripe for wireless data communication. Unfortunatly, the Internet reared it's head, and my packet radio days eventually faded. I still have my 2m HT, TNC, and software. I've been thinking lately of setting it up again to see what it'll do.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    1. Re:Packet got me going! by pe1chl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure, packet radio learned me a lot about TCP/IP and networking in general, something that became very useful lateron.

      SV2AGW wrote something that does what you were interested in. I have not personally looked at it, but I hear it works.

      It seems like more of the software-homebrewing amateurs were active in the Linux world, where it is easier to create something like this. Packet radio is a part of the Linux kernel, although it seems to be non-maintained for a long time and could drop out.

  48. Why didnt packet radio progress ? by JohnnyCanuck · · Score: 1

    A more interesting question would be why packet radio dint progress? i realize that the bandwidth was limited (9600 baud max? but i remember seend 1200 and 2400 more commonly). My understandingwas that it was basically a wireless mesh that covered the USA even if it was speed limited. I never understood why the HAMS and other gEEk's never looked at remaking the network with something more like wifi? The telco's would certainly have to smarten up and rethink if there was "another" net out there.

    1. Re:Why didnt packet radio progress ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of it was because the sysops played political games like and would limit connections from other sysops if they didn't like them. Also, the software from ak1a (packet-cluster) had major issues with network loops. In other words it wasn't designed well and forced people to cut off links to fix a sotware issue that the software author wouldn't address since he was just using the hams to beta test a commercial application.

  49. One of these days, Cell Phones will be hacked. by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    The old analog Cell Phones were able to be hacked to use as a low-power two-way duplex tranceiver that didn't use the cell tower. Near the band (at that time) was the Amateur Radio jockeys.

    The modern Cell Phones are all digitall and encrypted, so perhaps we'll see a revival of two-way line of sight communication that also features some encryption of a sort. All the news today is about some people getting pre-paid phone service, and then discovering that the pre-paid metre is logged locally on the Cell Phone with proven success to demurr that count.

    --
    without prejudice
  50. It's still fun.... by kg4czo · · Score: 1

    I'm a Technician, and the only reason why is because I have a really hard time learning morse (not sure why, I've tried several ways with no luck). For that reason I hope they go "no code" on all licenses soon (yeah yeah, I know all the arguements to keep it. Call me selfish ;).

    Currently, I don't have an HT or rig because of money issues, but when I did, it was hella fun. I guess my interest got peeked when my friends and I got into CB radio in highschool. Funny, out of all of them, I was the only one who took it past the CB. Oh well, I enjoy it although the whole station id check and no slang is kind of annoying.

  51. Net access in the middle of nowhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With packet radio and a laptop, is it possible to get net access in the middle of nowhere? Or do "no encryption" etc rules of amateur bands seriously limit the usefullness?

  52. Re:No. by NateTech · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nah, like any good hobby, it's about the people you meet.

    If it weren't for Amateur Radio, I would have never met Bdale Garbee, prior to his becoming the Debian Project Leader, or any of the other great folks who are Hams.

    --
    +++OK ATH
  53. Very much alive and well by coastwalker · · Score: 1

    Theres plenty of deep geekery going on still in Ham radio. Software defined radio for a start

    http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuradio/

    Not to mention all the GHz experimental work, digital modes experimentation, Earth Moon Earth transmission and you can still do new fundamental research into ELF natural phenomenon, build your own radio telescope - all done with gear developed by and for radio amateurs.

    Of course the mainstream is more like stamp collecting by cb radio - a competition to work two way communications with as many different countries as possible.

    But make no mistake theres lots of cutting edge geekery still to be found in radio.

    --
    Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  54. Sure! by dawszy · · Score: 1

    Indeed! :)
    I am an active QRP operator;)

    VY 73 de SQ6EMM

  55. Packet by Dougthebug · · Score: 1

    Well I sort of got dragged into Ham Radio last year through school. I was working on a senior engineering design project and we were looking for an easy way to get data from a weather balloon to a ground station. It turns out there are some fancy amature radios available with 9600 baud modems built in, which made our life easier. So a few of my colleges and I got our Tech class licences one weekend and were totaly into the whole ham thing for about 2 months. Then we finished the project and I haven't touched my $200 radio since... -KG6YZK

  56. I'll start learning ham radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if I can send and download at leat 10Mbits per second reliably for 1000 miles. Other than that, what the hell for? sending a dot and a dah doesnt do much nowadays with a file somewhere between 2.5G and 4G bytes.

  57. Which well-known geeks are/were hams? by ivi · · Score: 1


      I know I've heard a few famous geeks mention their early Amateur Radio
      interests and/or activities, eg, on some of the talks that are archived
      at:

                        http://itconversations.com/

      I don't remember them all, but one of Cliff Stoll's MP3's (on that site)
      goes into a bit of detail on his using Ham Radio skills to build a hand-
      held radar-based speed-gun (after speeding cars run down a little girl's
      cat or puppy, earlier in the story...)

      I think Kevin Mitnick had a license (but may have lost it - when it was
      needing to be renewed - as part of the consequences he got for releasing
      his Internet worm, some years ago.

      So, who ELSE is/was a ham, who also does/did more general geeky things?

      ---

      Radio Hams & Open Sourcerers have a lot in common - helpful natures,
      sharing ideas (src), exploring technologies of interest to themselves
      & building up extentions to some of it, that does what they want done

      ---

      My neighbor was a Ham as a kid; I could only see a 15m Dipole antenna
      on his house, but it was a home-built one. He did the usual things...
      converted ex-WW2 radios for Amateur bands (this is an old story...)

      He went on to become a Doctor, who was able to build medical gear that
      hadn't been invented when he needed it.

      ---

      Most of the kids I knew as fellow-hams have done pretty well in techie
      fields, so - even if it desn't top today's list of geeky hobbies, may-
      be it should, at least for those who are aiming for jobs in engineer'g
      and/or electronics.

  58. Yes, Ham Radio is Fun and interesting by speedlaw · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been a ham for the last four years or so. I have the Technician class licence, which most slashdotters could pass with a little study. The internet does not replace ham radio..the net is infrastructure heavy, and everything must work. Ham radio needs an antenna and power source, which is why ham radio "reappears" after every major disaster. I have a ham radio in the car, which covers 1.8 mhz up to 470 mhz. Last night on the way home from work, I listened to Radio Austraila, the highway patrol, and truckers on channel 19. This radio (Icom 706) is my secret weapon traffic avoiding device. I chatted with some hams on 2 meters, too ! I've also found myself in the middle of a running road Rally, as a radio op for the Rally organizers, clearing stages for competition. Since this rally is over public roads, they must be closed prior to running-I'm a motorsport nut too, but ham radio literally got me on the course. Ham radio is a great vector to meet interesting people. Our secret geekdom comes from all over...had a good talk with my oil delivery guy, a fellow hammy. Eventually, morse code requirements will be dropped in the US, as they have been almost everywhere else in the world, and the technically inclined will be able to avoid the "hazing ritual" that is morse code. The amount of knowledge ham radio gives, from knowing how radio really works (WiFi is only a small part of radio...very small), to the people you meet, makes it a lot of fun. The cost is up to you...a used transceiver for HF, $400, a basic 2m rig and antenna for the car, new, $350, and it lasts forever. Ignore the flame wars on eham and QRZ.com, they don't represent real hamming. for a laugh, check out hamsexy.com ! Casey K2FIX

  59. CW by tooth · · Score: 1

    I've been going the other way and trying to learn high speed morse... it's frustrating but worth it, as I enjoy having a skill that few other people have.

  60. Unfortunately no by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

    I have to admit I let my licence slip this year, after having not used it for several. It's one of those social things that needs a critical mass of people to be interesting, and despite living in a fairly densely propulated area of the UK, I found very few people my age (at that time ~17) to talk to. The internet provided a much greater population density... so i went there.

    From a techincal perspective it's still cool, but if you want to talk to people it's easier to go on the net... ...Carl (ex 2E1FNC)

  61. Emergency Communications by ananamouse · · Score: 0

    During the wait for Hurricane Rita I got all my old CB gear out of the shed where it had been collecting dust since 80's and figured out SWR etc.

    There is a ham store in the strip mall beside IH45 at the end of my neighborhood where we would go to gawk at the traffic that was not moving. As it started to sink in what we might be in for I went into the store and bought a 2 meter hand held partly because I always wanted to play with it, I had several days to kill, and I might need it. I enjoyed using it as a scanner during the event. I got my liscence a few weeks later. I listen from time to time. I talk on it every once in a while to make sure it still works. I use it on trips. I will be getting a multi-band for the vacation this year and I look forward to trying to broadcast at a gigahertz!

  62. The real question: by xusr · · Score: 1
    do you still find commercial radio interesting?

    I would have to say no.

  63. Yes but...... by pa3gvr · · Score: 1

    It totally depends. There is still a lot of experimentation going on in Amateur Radio. The problem as I see it in the US is that there are a lot of "islands" of activity. Most US Hams I come across are too involved in their own world and will take a long time to accept outsiders.

    For example here in Palm Beach County, FL. There is a reasonable active packet group but most of the equipment still runs on 1200 baud and some links are on 9600 baud. In Europe 76K2 Baud is almost the norm with some links even running as fast as 1M5 baud!
    I suggested experimenting with higher speeds but no one here wants to help.

    Another great opportunity for experimentation is Digital Amateur Television. Again in Europe there have been several D-ATV repeaters that have been active for years while here in the US D-ATV is just starting.

    In conclusion:
    Do I still find Amateur Radio interesting? Yes, but it depends on where you live and what other Amateur Radio operators are doing around you.

    Sjaak, W4RIS, ex-PA3GVR

  64. The need of ham operators by bananaendian · · Score: 1

    what today's geek thinks about amateur radio? ... Do you think that we could see a renaissance of Ham Radio among 21st century techies?

    Well such renaissance is already happening with Wifi: people doing COTS ad-hoc networks, wardriving etc. Many of these people are radio amateurs and the opening of the ISM band has just made it much cheaper to buy the equipment. The experimental frontier spirit is still strong. More traditional RA stuff has also benefited from the internet. People are hooking up VHF/UHF repeaters via IP over long distances, even worldwide.

    If there's a downside, its the deterioration of the traditional ham. Before people had to take an interest in electronics and build a lot of stuff by themselves. And as people move to digi-modes or even start their hobby from them and the old ham skills, morse and SSB, will be forgotten. When disaster strikes, radio amateurs are the ones left standing. They're able to quickly setup flexible efficient communications networks from whatever equipment is at hand. However what you still need is experienced operators who are able to handle such communications and you cannot learn that by just sitting on your computer.

    For example here in Finland we have a close-knit relationship between hams and the authorities, both emergency and the military. Time and time again we have demonstrated that in the absence of any support or infrastructure, hams are able to independently organize, setup and operate a nationwide communications network and provide the authorities with all the communications services they need.

    What we need are geeks who are interested in everything, not just a narrow peak of the latest technology.

    oh3gpj

    --
    www.tribalnetworks.org - helping tribal people around the world to own their own means of high-tech communications
  65. Yes, even when I don't work on the "bleeding edge" by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    My involvement in ham radio is the occasional QSO or contest (Field Day, SS), using so called "boatanchors", or vacuum tube equipment I have restored or built from scratch. The only solid state rig I own is my 2 meter HT.

    While there is plenty of fun to be had playing around with digital modes and microwaves (and I played a lot with packet in the early 90s), I spend my whole workweek dealing with modern electronics and digital doodads, and I find great enjoyment in working with the technologies of the past. The warm glow of a chassis full of tubes has a "soul" that boards full of silicon never did and never will.

    So I'm hardly on the "cutting edge" of the hobby, but I still enjoy it nonetheless.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  66. Still find it interesting by jvschwarz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    About four years ago I was getting bored with my computer hobby (and occupation), and I had been going to hamfests for years getting computer equipment. I decided to look into getting a ham license, and I am glad I did. I have always had an interest in electronics, and being able to experiment with a lot of bands and modes of communication has kept me in the hobby. There are lots of ham clubs across the country, and several good ones around my area (Milwaukee, WI, USA).

    There are lots of sub groups to the hobby, specializing in areas like contesting, VHF/UHF/SHF weak signal work, public service events like bike rides, walks, digital (computer) modes, software radios, and lots more.

    There will always be naysayers who say the hobby is dying, to me it just seems like it is evolving.

    If you are interested in it, go for it, if you don't like it, move on to something else!

    --
    ... if that's your best, your best won't do... - Twisted Sister
  67. Interesting? No. Important? Yes. by WgT2 · · Score: 1

    While I personally do find it appealing, I do think it is important that someone find it appealing.

    One reason I think it important is the usefulness of Morse code: it was used to blink out the word torture by one of our Vietnam POWs during a filmed interview where he was required to pretend everything was hunky dory in the Hanoi Hilton. While this use it extreme, I think Morse code would be as quick a means of communicating as text messaging via cell phone. That is, the implementation and mastery of Morse code into a cell phone could/would be just as quick and effective means of communication as today's text messaging.

    I'd actually pursue Morse code if I didn't think my atrocious (took a while to get that word) spelling would be a hinderance. But, if I found out it might actually help my spelling, I might then spend some time on it. I say some, because having learned Spanish and the Dvorak keyboard layout, I know what it takes to learn another language: time and attention.

    So, thanks for being one of those people.

    1. Re:Interesting? No. Important? Yes. by MaggieL · · Score: 1

      I'd actually pursue Morse code if I didn't think my atrocious (took a while to get that word) spelling would be a hinderance.
      Obviously you've never seen actual on-air Morse copy. Spelling is no more an issue on CW than it is in txting. :-)
      JST SND GUD CPY ES EVRYTHING WILL OK HI HI

        73 DE K3XS

      --
      -=Maggie Leber=-
  68. Re:Which well-known geeks ... ? CORRECTION by ivi · · Score: 1

    Oops!

    Cliff Stoll's talks didn't come from ItConversations.com...

    rather from (now defunct) TechNatCast.com, which preceded it.

    "How soon we forget..."

  69. Exactly! by LinuxGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been around Hams for twenty years and the tech has usually stayed interesting. During the late 80's packet radio was starting out. When most people were calling bbs's using modems, hams were sending wireless data. Check out Phil Karn's site. He has a lot of wireless experience as both ham and engineer responsible for much of the CDMA standard.

    Want to start with some small radios and learn more about electronics at the same time? There are many interesting kits around if you look. You certainly don't have to spend huge amounts on radios to get started. I paid ~$120US for my VX-2R when they were first introduced. It makes a great general purpose scanner too.

    Newer modes like PSK31 are incredibly efficient. A couple of watts of power and 31Hz of radio spectrum and you have error free world wide digital communication at 50wpm. It is difficult to audibly detect the signal while listening, even when you know it is there.

    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Exactly! by magetoo · · Score: 1
      During the late 80's packet radio was starting out. When most people were calling bbs's using modems, hams were sending wireless data.
      And some were doing both. There was a BBS around here that ran a node off packet radio, at 1200 and/or 9600 bps. (This was back when the expensive modems were doing 14400 bps, by the way.) I thought it was really cool at the time, especially with the prospect of not having to pay the phone company for downloading files and mail. They even had some people getting their Fidonet fix via radio, if I'm not mistaken. The Fidonet bit was probably technically illegal, if nothing else because a law prohibiting "redistributing radio communications".

      I came pretty close to getting a technical license so I could run packet, but lost interest when I realized the regulations pretty much disallowed anything "fun", or things that didn't fit the traditional view of what ham radio was supposed to be.

  70. yeah, I'm getting back in by swschrad · · Score: 1

    as soon as I finish rebuilding a signal one, I'm testing back in, and former WN0CBZ will be torturing stray electrons again. it was a neat goal in 1969, and with all the natural disasters about, it's still relevant.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  71. Why don't you ask this about Sailing, etc? by ivi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know, some of the folks doing Ham Radio
    are a bit like folks who sail.

    They're doing something that has roots way back in time.

    Eg, using Morse Code (radiotelegraphy = CW mode) on radio
    is akin to sailing without an engine...
    both "modes" depend on technologies developed years ago.

    Now, who ever asks folks who sail
    whether Sailing is "still" interesting?
    (It must be; otherwise, sailboat, etc. would never sell...)

    Why should this article's question be asked ONLY of Radio Hams' hobby?

    Perhaps telecoms or other [would-be] big spectrum users
    would like to push Hams from their allocated frequencies.

    1. Re:Why don't you ask this about Sailing, etc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good points.

    2. Re:Why don't you ask this about Sailing, etc? by ThinkingGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      An excellent point. Here are the rhetorical questions I use to try to explain the appeal of amateur radio to non-hams:

      "Why does anyone spend huge amounts of money on a fishing boats and fishing equipment, when they can just buy a fish at the grocery store?"

      "Why do people go horseback riding, when a car would get them where they want to go, faster and more comfortably?"

      Amateur radio is a hobby. Like most hobbies, it's not meant to be practical (though it can sometimes come in handy during emergencies).

  72. To be honest - sort of by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

    I've been ham for 15 years now and I have an Extra class license - and its fun as long as you have friends who are into it. Far too often it seems like there are operators who have an elitest attitude that makes it hard to get involved locally.

    For example - there are extra class hams who don't like other extra class hams because of the 5 wpm requirement. There are still hams who don't like or will not talk to no-code techs. What drives me nuts is these guys seem to be the most active so your more likely to run into these people online.

    So for that I really haven't done much with it in a while.

  73. Rep still sterling, but relevant activities change by bshensky · · Score: 1

    As a 10-year old, I followed my dad's footsteps and became KA8JRN, then later N8FSR. It was a great way to stay in contact with him thru my parent's divorce back in the early 80s.

    Late in high school, the interest faded a bit, but the underlying love of technology persisted. Teens and college students being social creatures, I wanted a pool of friends that were not middle-aged 40-meter ragchewers. So I started a campus broadcast radio station. Problem solved.

    I credit the W1YK Amateur Radio club at Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Massachusetts for providing me a renewed interest in Ham Radio and smoothing what would have been a much harder college experience I had briefly at that institution. W1YK showed me that there was still a place for young kids in the hobby.

    18 years later, I'm still proud of my hobby, happy to sport my Ham license place on the family minivan. The convenience of the Internet makes setting aside time for Packet or Satellite that much more difficult. And, sorry guys, forget ragchewing, the ultimate timewaster, when I'd rather be playing with my 3-year-old.

    But the spirit of experimentation that fuels my interest in the hobby each day carries over to my experiences on the Internet and in my job. Heck, it differentiates me in a sea of lookalike IT consultants and gives me the edge I need in the market. I'm proud to be the one They call to hack and slash to success when the others are stopped cold.

    I habitually take my 3-year-old to the local Swap-n-Shops, part flea market, part inspiration. We love 'em.

    I'll defend this hobby to the death, but mostly for the things it gives back to me indirectly rather than directly. And, hey, I still reserve the right to ragchew on 40 meters if the mood arises!

    73s/TTFN...

    --
    Makin' money, makin' friends, makin' whoopee and wearin' Depends
  74. Sad, but true by pestie · · Score: 1

    I only wish I could honestly claim that was a myth and that amateur radio was full of vibrant young geeks. But I'm 34 and I'm the youngest guy in the local radio club by a good 10 years, easily. That's OK, though - I still love everything about amateur radio. The FCC is poised to drop the Morse code requirement altogether, yet I still want to achieve proficiency in code just because it's fun. And while it's not strictly amateur radio, I still like listening to the nutjobs on the shortwave broadcast stations, too.

  75. Somewhat by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1

    Yes and no.

    No in that I don't really care to chat on VHF/UHF repeaters or 80 meter nets. When I go to a hamfest, I'd say that 80% of the hams there are people I really am not interested in knowing or being associated with. I'm not a big fan of the ARRL and hate the way that so many hams insist that "the league" is the hobby.

    Yes in that I really enjoy some aspects. I have a great local ham club where I can go to a meeting and see 20+ people that I'm proud to associate with. The whole room isn't filled with olfactory challenging old white men. I used to regularly participate in public service events, from walks and bike rides to large scale disaster exercises, which was a thrill to do at the time and as the years pass I'm amazed how many people never do anything like that. I enjoy the technical side too, building kits and the occasional homebrew item. I think portable QRP and HFPack is exciting and if I had the time to get back into backpacking, I'd certainly be hauling some sort of radio along. Today I only really get on the air for disaster work (drills or real events) and some HF DX work on PSK.

    I often get people that tell me that they could easily just get online and talk to someone in Brazil or Austria. I always answer with "well, have you?" Of course not. When is the last time your neighbor took his Nextel and participated in a mock airliner crash? Does your cousin take his CB with him when he goes backpacking?

    I don't ever expect the hobby to be what it once was in the U.S. All the OM hams that got into the hobby after WW2 are leaving us. The excitement of just talking on a radio is almost completely gone. But there's plenty of excitement left.

  76. it's because you can be a stand-alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can pick about any semi recent natural disaster around the world and do some research on it and see where HAM radio was extremely useful. The single biggest advantage of HAM is that it requires ZERO in the way of middleman connectivity or middleman electrical power functionality.

  77. In short by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

    To summarize, yes, there are still interesting things you can do with ham, but you can't just fire up a radio set and start running anymore; you need to be prepared to dump gobs of money and time into esoteric antenna arrays (and you'd better be landed, get proper permits, not piss off the neighborhood assoc) that can send signals into orbital space or modulate into arcane digital transmission modes.

    In other words, if you want to do anything *really* interesting with ham, don't plan to have time to do or buy anything else except (a little) work and food.

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  78. Encoding vs. Language by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 1
    Have you ever used morse code? It is it's own language. There are so many abbreviations and prosigns that you can communicate through it if you don't share a common language with the guy on the other end.

    I have used morse code, since 1990 in fact. But strictly speaking, Morse code is just an encoding. Here, watch this:

    FB OM UR 599 HR ES TX FER FB QSO K

    There is no morse code there. There are no dots and dashes. What you are looking at is ASCII encoding of a lot of prosigns and abbreviations that are commonly used on CW.

    Note there is nothing stopping you from sending, using Morse Code:

    OK FRIEND I GOT ALL THAT, YOUR SIGNAL REPORT IS 599 HERE, AND THANK YOU FOR THE NICE CONVERSATION, OVER TO YOU

    ...except that the person on the other end would get impatient.

    Anyway, that's the difference between encoding and language. The confusion arises because the language of Q prosigns and abbreviations are mostly used while doing Morse code.

    Note that people do use many of those same prosigns and abbreviations while using RTTY or PSK31, and there is obviously no Morse Code involved there at all.

  79. Wish I understood the tech by mattr · · Score: 1
    Not having a liscense or even having ever used ham equipment I cannot tell you. But I sure would like to know things like antenna design and analog/digital electronics.. because I have always wondered about how much amateur radio astronomy could be done on the ultra cheap with a minimum of hardware and a pc. I have an 8 in. telescope but live in a very overcast and light drenched city, so I think about that a lot. Also have often been intrigued by digital circuit design and it would seem that is also part of the modern ham. So I often pick up a qx magazine and look at the pretty pictures!


    On a side track I wonder if anyone could tell me, is it possible to do imaging of planetary circuits with a standard size amateur dish? Also is it even possible to do radio astronomy with something like a foil fresnel lens you could unfold and lay on the ground with a vertical pole at the center. neat faq here. I have wondered about how to image with a radio telescope, but perhaps if you caused the pole to vibrate, or perhaps put the lens on a vibrating (scanning) platform? Well thanks for the info and pick up the license, why not?

    1. Re:Wish I understood the tech by mattr · · Score: 1
      P.S. responding to my own post, the radiosky.com site did provide a couple of answers. It definitely IS a good idea to get a ham license, and being a ham is closely linked to radio astronomy and also to being able to build circuits. So definitely I was on track with this wish of mine, maybe I should get cracking on the books!


      Second, the same site has a simple description of a radio telescope. It notes that while you basically get an amplitude graph by pointing at the same direction in the sky as the Earth turns under you, you can image the sky two dimensionally by doing that for 24 hours, then tilting the telescope 5 degrees down, doing it another day, and so on, building up strips. Of course 5 degrees is big. You can apparently do "radio astronomy" with lots of kinds of antennas, like a Yagi for instance, but the question seems to be how good the resolution and how appropriate for astronomy.

  80. Yes, it's still interesting by N7DR · · Score: 1
    There's nothing like a CW QSO with someone who doesn't speak the same language as yourself, or a long CW ragchew with an old timer, or breaking a pile-up while knowing that you are weaker than many other signals in the pile-up. I rarely get on SSB, but CW is most definitely still fun.

    But it is sadly true that in the US interest in CW has declined precipitously. If I tune across the CW end of 20 metres during a work day, there will usually be only one or two signals from the US (at least that's all I hear here in Colorado). Fortunately, CW still seems to be going quite strong in the rest of the world. Although in Colorado conditions need to be fairly decent for us to hear them.

  81. ham radio limitations by michaelredux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Personally, my main problem with Ham radio has been the "no commerce" and "no encryption" rules.

    Even if you had the license and radio to make a call throught the "phone patch", you couldn't order a pizza, it would be technically illegal, along with anything that could be considered "commerce". And "no encryption" meant not being able to use "packet radio" for something as simple as personal email without literally broadcasting it publicly. No thanks.

    If a few channels of Amateur bandwidth were liberated from these two regulatory relics, I think we would see see the same interest we see in WI-FI excite Amateur radio as well. A few small slivers of "long range wi-fi" bandwidth could spark an Amateur radio renaissance, and amazing tech advances, as in the past.

    I'm not holding my breath, though. Giving Americans more freedom, especially for private long-distance communication, would probably not be too fashionable in Washington these days. Pray for peace, and better days to come.

    1. Re:ham radio limitations by jrmcferren · · Score: 0

      The FCC has lightened up on the commerce rules a bit. While, I'm not an operator I have read books about ham radio. Here is an example of legal/illegal commerce communications:

      Legal:
      Calling for Pizza
      Calling a tow truck.
      Purchasing /selling Ham Equipment (as long as it is not a habit)

      Illegal:
      Calling your boss and telling him/her you will be late
      Accepting money or any payment (this include sexual favors) for operating
      Selling non-radio equipment.

      --
      sudo mod me up
    2. Re:ham radio limitations by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Even if you had the license and radio to make a call throught the "phone patch", you couldn't order a pizza, it would be technically illegal, along with anything that could be considered "commerce". And "no encryption" meant not being able to use "packet radio" for something as simple as personal email without literally broadcasting it publicly. No thanks.

      Since you can do both of those using a commercial cell-phone and SMS, why would you want to take away amateur radio bandwith to duplicate what you can already do using a cell-phone?

    3. Re:ham radio limitations by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to use Linux when there's Windows? Why would you want to use Firefox when there's IE?

      Answer: because you get something out of it that you want. That's why.

      Anyway, the solution to the no encryption rule is to use steganography to hide your crypto. It sounds like you're just chatting, but in the background that "noise" you hear is calling Al Queda to action... or whatever :)

      --
      My other car is first.
  82. LPG-30 by MattGWU · · Score: 1

    Did you call him Mel, because that was his name?

    --
    "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
  83. IRLP by r2q2 · · Score: 1

    How can you not be excited when you have IRLP? The fusion of the internet and radio.

    --
    My UID is prime is yours?
  84. Onerous licensing by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who thinks that applying for a ham license nowadays is the equivalent to holding up a sign "investigate me" sign, or calling the NSA 800 number and saying "please open a file on me!" ?

    I'm tempted by ham now and then, but I don't think I'd ever get a license. If Ham is the last means of communication out there, you can be DAMN sure its monitored by Uncle Sam.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  85. Experimenters by everphilski · · Score: 1

    You missed the part about experimenters. The guys that do autonomous GPS tracking of high power rockets. The guys that launch amateur satellites. Autonomous robots using packet radio. All sorts of interesting, experimental projects that are out there if there weren't amateur bands available (and no, 100mW on 49.1 is not enough for any of those projects)

    1. Re:Experimenters by adolf · · Score: 1

      I didn't miss them. They're just not even on my map.

      See, I don't care about satellites. I can get from A to B faster, and with lower latency, and for fewer dollars, by almost ANY modern electronic method than I can with an amateur satellite.

      And while 100mW on 49.1MHz may not be enough for the things that you've listed, 1 Watt of 900MHz ought to be, and it's probably cheaper, and lighter, and more reliable that way, anyhow.

      FWIW, so on, so forth.

    2. Re:Experimenters by everphilski · · Score: 1

      900 MHz is too congested. You are competing with corless headsets, baby monitors, RC devices, cell phones, etc.

      There are a lot of very interesting projects with high power / experimental rocketry and robotics itegrating packet radio. Autonomous rockets that "phone home" with GPS coords, etc. Or have passive guidance. All sorts of interesting things. I can get a cheap old radio less for $179.99 quoted, way less. There are no COTS systems to do things like these, which is why amateur radio is still relevant and interesting.

      And no, 1 watt isn't enough for some applications.

  86. Very interesting AND useful by pilot-programmer · · Score: 1

    If you think it is not interesting, just try chatting with an astronaut onboard the ISS. People have been saying ham radio is outdated since the 1950s when long distance became available to almost everybody. Yet the number of licensed amateurs in the US continually increased to a peak in 2003. And I would be very surprised if there is not more growth in the future. Merging computers and radio, I enjoy writing my own PSK-31 software. People say CW is outdated and useless. I have been in areas with severe thunderstorms where the static crashes made everything but CW unusable. And it sounds like many of the people replying to this list are incredibly short sighted. After a minor earthquake telephones, cell and landline, are useless as everybody is trying to ask everybody they know "Did you feel it?" When power goes out I do not have enough battery backup to operate my computer and cable modem for one hour, but I could operate my radio for days. VoIP is much more reliable than 20 or 40 meter communications, but in a disaster ham radio is far more reliable than internet or phone. And it has been very easy for me to find somebody out of the disaster area to pass a message to relatives about my situation.

  87. Personal View by leighklotz · · Score: 1

    I think that many computer applications, and to some extent certain kind of programming, are a little too much like watching TV, and harm your brain rather than enhancing it. Of what's going on today, I think the Make-magazine stuff is probably the most exciting and most likely to provoke actual thought... Kids doing robotics is pretty close to what kids doing ham radio was when I was young. Below is a meandering story of how I got from a 5 year old ham to today, back into ham radio, and reading Slashdot too.

    In kindergarten, I remember bringing electrician's hot-side testing screwdrivers to show-and-tell ("Now you just stick this screwdriver into the electric socket and the neon bulb will light if it's the hot side"), and rigging up telephone networks with old handsets and batteries. After having learned morse code at age 5 and gotten on the air under my father's call (he got his license in response to my interest), I finally learned enough to read the whole test and got my license at age 7. Now my kids are about the same age, and found learning morse code to be fun; they talk to each other, and recently had a poster accepted at a peer-reviewed conference, comparing speed and errors in Morse code and typing! (Ok, it was the 2nd grade science fair.)

    Soon I got interested in computers, but there weren't any actual ones to distract me; well, there was one in town, and it used punched cards. It was a Honeywell Special 200, the first IBM Clone, though it was a clone of an IBM 1401... Then there were the PDP-8's that were connected to Stanford via phone line for one of the first "computer-aided instruction" projects. I met the guys who maintained the Model 28 teletypes for them and they got their ham licenses after my father and I got ours...

    When two-meter FM became popular, I helped establish the first local repeater, probably the only one within 100 miles. We had to do HAAT testing and I learned about altimeters, topographic maps, and government forms... By the time I graduated from high school and went to MIT, I found other pursuits -- PDP-10's, Lisp, classes... I pretty much got off the air. But ham radio gave me an entre into an entire world that wasn't available when I was growing up.

    After a few years spent exploring 4x5" photography, I started doing some wireless mobile device work, and poor signal strength led me to get up on the roof and install a 1.9Ghz repeater. I felt a strange familiar feeling, and when my wife said, "I don't care how many antennas you put on the roof," I filed the fact away. When a co-worker shows up with a Yaesu VX-2 two-meter and 70cm handitalki that receives DC-to-daylight and said it was $120, I went ahead and bought it. I'd kept my ham license renewed, and used it once or twice in the intervening 20 years, but I had to re-learn lots of stuff. I wore the HT on my belt (along with two calculators and a slide rule, a hiptop, and a blinking LED pen) for the Halloween party at PARC and won what can best be described as the five-sigma prize...

    A bit of web surfing led me to QRZ.com, EHam.net, and of course ARRL, and I found out about a local club meeting taking place that night. So I went with the co-worker, and found a bunch of pleasant nerds, schoolteachers and librarians, firefighters, electronics designers, computer scientists, and other random people.

    At the club meeting, a satellite communications engineer told me about recent developments in DSP-based communications that used a PC sound card to modulate and demodulate; my extensive 20-year stint in programming made me think this might be interesting, so I bought a

  88. Re:No. by The+Blue+Knight · · Score: 1

    Nor I.

    --N0QXW

    --
    TIAVAS HS ENI I RNG S YO Y I N G
  89. Ham Radio is slowly dying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even the biggest of ham fests have gotten smaller, and the age range has skewed older...
    It'll be years and years but the computer age killed the radio (star).

  90. I want it to be interesting by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We are surrounded, indeed, inundated with technology, but for the vast majority of people, their only interest is to consume it. They don't care how it works. Hams care how things work.

    You can do some incredibly cool things with ham radio, and my ham background (VE7LDH) has served me well in my work (telecommunications). But as an active ham? I haven't attended a ham club meeting in years. The same old grey haired people (almost all men), the same old cliques, the same old conversations (many of which were more about computers than ham radio anyway). Too many throwbacks stuck in the Good Old Days of the 1950s. Transistors? DSP? What's that?

    AMSAT has enormous geek potential, but in my entire involvement with ham radio (since 1993) the party line has been "give us more money and maybe some day we'll launch the super-duper satellite of your dreams". They launched one, all-but-bankrupted the organization doing it, it worked for a while, then it partially stopped working, then it packed up completely. Now they're back in Give Us Money mode.

    I want ham radio to be interesting. I think it's a great incubator for techies. Real in-depth geeks, not techie-as-fashion-statement. But at the moment, I'm not finding it as interesting as I'd like to. I think that's a shame. I wonder what happened.

    ...laura

  91. The game is over. by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

    I have been a radio amateur for more than twenty years, but this year I gave back my license and sold out everything. Why ?

    Well, I entered into ham radio when I was 15 years old, because it was a very exciting hobby: plenty of thinghs to learn about radio, antennas, propagation, lot of fun with ham radio friends (at that time we set up a very strong group who took part to contests, field days, DXpeditions, and some nice girls joined us as well ;-) ).

    I spent lot of time contesting, making difficult contacts in HF and VHF bands. Then computers arrived: and so go on with packet radio, signal processing, computer controlled receivers, adding fun to fun. I also had a lot of fun writing some software for ham radio, and internet added just more fun to the fun.

    But unfortunately during these very last years thinghs changed dramatically: no more funny people around (the average radio amateur now is a 70-something years old, and usually very, very ugly), girls disappeared entirely, and what is worst, it became apparent that people involved into ham radio were more interested into spending money into new shiny rigs to show up around, rather than into learning how to get the most out from current equipment. Radio contacts became also very boring, all the contacts now look the same ("you're 59, QSL 73 bye bye"). Packet clusters finally killed the fun of chasing rare stations.

    Is all this worth the time and money ?!? I decided it wasn't, so I gave up.

    IMHO I see no more reasons for ham radio to exist, nowadays. And please do not tell me about technichal advancements reached by radio amateurs! New technologies used by radio amateurs are actually developed by a very small number of people, and they cannot be exactly be called "advanced", if compared with what industry is doing. What has enough market potential is lobbied by ARRL and other ham radio organizations, and finally big firms jump into the market to make out some profit. Packet radio, APRS, and now SDR are some clear examples of this process: the average radio amateur simply puts some money out from his pocket, and here it is the new technology, ready for use!. What do you learn from this (apart wasting money) ?!?

    To defend ham radio it remains maybe the help that amateurs can provide during emergencies, but I believe that organizations like Red Cross, Emergency, and so on could (and should) develop their own emergency networks (and I think that some frequencies currently assigned to ham radio should rather be used for this purpose).
    As you can see, the game is really over.

  92. Interested, but only for niche technologies... by lpangelrob · · Score: 1

    I intend to stay on as a storm spotter for the National Weather Service, so someday that might involve ham radios when the next F5 tornado pulls down half the cell phone towers in a given area. But that would really be the extent of what my ham usage would be.

  93. memories by denidoom · · Score: 1
    As a kid in the 70's-80's I would visit my dad in his HAM shack late at night while he talked with people all over the world. He had old 1940's Collins vacuum tube radios that he kept in pristine condition up until 2004 when my parents lost their house to Hurricane Ivan.

    I have many fond memories of those times. We moved around quite a bit as my parents worked for the Navy. Every time we moved we knew we were settled in to "home" when dad would put up his tower (I suppose it was a 30' tower you could climb). The HAM shack smelled of metal, dust, and ozone - much like the pilot's shack we shared when taking flying lessons. There's a distinct smell of things that are painted Government Issue gray.

    The things I appreciated about HAM radio are probably different than other people. I appreciated there was a formality an etiquette you do not find in Internet communications. There really wasn't anything like "flaming" on the radio; everyone was courteous and so excited to make a contact. I learned about phonetic alphabet just from listening in and use it still this day when I am on the phone and have to read off letters to someone. Mostly, and these are memories of a kid, I loved the wall filled with QSL cards.

    I think if I did HAM radio today I would do it just to collect QSL cards. They are beautiful and a tangible "proof" of a contact. There are some things like that on the Internet (like Postsecret I suppose) but there's something cool about getting a acknowledgement that we spoke together and made contact. They would have exotic stamps from other countries and interesting art on the front with the sender's handwriting, often in highly stylized scrawl, on the back.

    All my dad's QSL cards are washed away in the lagoon or bay somewhere and I'm saddened by that. As an artist, these are the things I learned from HAM radio.

    --
    Lane Myer: I have great fear of tools. I once made a birdhouse in woodshop and the fair housing committee condemned it.
    1. Re:memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell of a sad tale. One can only imagine how your dad felt. :-(

  94. Hang out with other Hams, your interest will GO UP by Ponga · · Score: 1

    Go to Hamfests! Join you local RA! Participate in nets!

    After meeting many interesting people, you would be amazed what you can learn and how it builds your interest in the subject!!

  95. Sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure. "The Internet" or portions thereof could be shut down tomorrow, either nationally or internationally for regulatory or other reasons (it always amazes me how many people don't understand this). Worse, if the telcos get their way, we'll have to pay for decent performance. Since, in spite of pleas by folks like Berners-Lee, I believe this will happen, a lot of 'net geeks like me may start thinking about an alternative infrastructure. Yes, I know spectrum is also controlled, but it takes a little more time to get through the bureaucracy...

    Just my two cents.

  96. PSK31 & sound cards by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 2, Informative

    Remember all the excitement over PSK31? It was the first taste of what people could do with a sound card and the processing power of even a crummy computer. I first ran it on a Pentium 233MMX (my 486/66 couldn't quite do it). With Linux, of course. :-)

    People have now built stripped down little radios that plug in to a sound card and use software to make all sorts of interesting noises.

    I'd be surprised if even one ham in 1000 could tell you exactly how PSK31 works, but that's other matter...

    ...laura

  97. Amateur Radio is viable, useful, and necessary... by joeyloman · · Score: 1

    Ive been a ham for awhile, KB0ATG, and found amateur radio to be very viable, especially as a free access communications service. Like in passing messages during Katrina, or doing emergency civil work like stormspotting or helping with a charity walk event. although the spectrum freedoms are still shrinking, there is still alot of research that can be done in the areas of radio based communication and networking, like Zigbee and other radio based networks. Im proud to be a ham, it has its own class, much like private pilots; Not everyone gets to be one without some qualification.

  98. Yes, Amateur Radio still rocks by brindafella · · Score: 1

    I recently put an older-generation 'rock' (crystal oscillator) -based VHF Amateur radio into my car. This 30+ year old radio still functions well; it is still completely inter-operable with equipment bought yesterday (using various techniques in ICs) or any time between, and actually is interoperable with 60 year old equipment.

    I can use this equipment to talk via repeaters to folk all along the eastern seaboard of Australia, or via IRLP with people all over the world.

    Hands up anyone with even a 10 year old mobile phone in everyday use.

    de Peter in VK1

    --
    Looking at space, radio, science and computing from a 'down-under' amateur enthusiast perspective.
  99. Headed elsewhere... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Do you think that we could see a renaissance of Ham Radio among 21st century techies?

    Actually, limiting the question to "Ham Radio" is too specific. The HF frequency has been historically the most interesting, because of it's unique propogation. These days, that worldwide propogation simply isn't as desirable as it used-to be.

    OTOH, communications in other frequencies have skyrocketed. Digital Satellite TV/Radio/Internet cover most of the planet. Cell towers are going up everywhere. Wireless communications with 802.11 is incredibly popular, and some cities are being fully covered. Digital terrestrial TV/Radio promise to seriously increase the number of people recieving transmissions via the airwaves. et al.

    So, while voice communications over HF seem to be declining, I expect you'll see most people refocusing their efforts in higher frequency digital communications. 802.11 certainly has the potential to bring the same kind of community aspect (and do-it-yourself improvents) as Ham has, except it will be digital content of every kind, including music and high-def videos, not just voice communications.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  100. Girls prefer radio nerds to computer nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At an electronics sale I overheard two old men in flat caps sadly discussing the death of their hobby. "The problem is that the type of person who would have been interested in ham radio when we were younger, has the internet now" one remarked sadly to the other. "They just don't see any point in amateur radio any more."

    The really strange thing is that when I tell this story to girls, they almost always say "Oh, how sweet!" or words to that effect.

  101. "We like to keep its wonders to ourselves!" by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    I really, really feel that's a bad attitude which is really hurting the hobby.

    73, Jarett
    KC2KOA

    --

    +++ATH0
  102. yuck!!! by ChilyWily · · Score: 1

    Why is the popularity waning?

    Ask yourself this;

        - Would you like to be called '21st century techies'?
        - Who is on the other side?

    yuck.