All facebook users agree to NOT Share their password when they access or use Facebook.
So basically, to work at that correctional facility you MUST show that you are ready, willing and able to break past agreements that you have made and will continue to make in the future (every time you access Facebook).
Nice to see that they want honest people guarding those who are incarcerated.:P
This Statement of Rights and Responsibilities ("Statement") derives from the Facebook Principles, and governs our relationship with users and others who interact with Facebook. By using or accessing Facebook, you agree to this Statement.
# Registration and Account Security
Facebook users provide their real names and information, and we need your help to keep it that way. Here are some commitments you make to us relating to registering and maintaining the security of your account:
1. You will not provide any false personal information on Facebook, or create an account for anyone other than yourself without permission.
2. You will not create more than one personal profile.
3. If we disable your account, you will not create another one without our permission.
4. You will not use your personal profile for your own commercial gain (such as selling your status update to an advertiser).
5. You will not use Facebook if you are under 13.
6. You will not use Facebook if you are a convicted sex offender.
7. You will keep your contact information accurate and up-to-date.
8. You will not share your password, (or in the case of developers, your secret key), let anyone else access your account, or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account.
9. You will not transfer your account (including any page or application you administer) to anyone without first getting our written permission.
10. If you select a username for your account we reserve the right to remove or reclaim it if we believe appropriate (such as when a trademark owner complains about a username that does not closely relate to a user's actual name).
You cannot kill Anonymous because Anonymous is like a hive of bees.
Since bee colonies are collapsing all over the world you may wish to reconsider them when you are comparing something you are claiming won't collapse....
So can someone "incorporate" a business, pay the $100 yearly fee that your city charges......and then put up a webpage reviewing movies and music, all the while downloading the content via torrents? If you get "caught" with any pirated material you can just close the business and be on with your life. The Corporation did it........not you........
As long as you didn't make much money you could use their strategy of self protection to protect yourself and your $100 a year licence from the city to pirate all day, every day?
Step 1) Be a retailer, or get a job for a retailer, selling lottery tickets. This would get past your "there is no real way to get only the winners" Step 2) Take all the scratched tickets that people throw away onsite, and scan them for hints as to how to pick winners. Step 3) Buy a bunch of probable winners to see how accurate you are, and if you are accurate, profit.
Now a few things come to mind. Many people like to buy the "new" tickets as they seem to "win" more often. This would be normal if took a few weeks for retailers to get a handle on how to pick the winners. You win more often when "chance" is in play, and less often when the probably winners have been weeded out.
It would also explain how retailers cash a high percentage of winners, in Canada at least, were this has been in the news for the past few years. Here is one such article, and note, this has led to changes in Canada. Seemingly not good enough. http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/story.html?id=4be28910-9cec-4785-b471-f37849a29008&k=17633
Ford uses Ford Engines and Parts when they manufacturer. But I have the right to add whatever spark plugs, lifters, tires or exhaust system I want.
There are federal laws governing this in both the US and in Canada. I change parts and my warranty still stands.
What Apple does is akin to saying "You must use Chevron gasoline, Michelin tires, you must use elecrical parts from Bosch. If you use anything else you lose your warranty." First off, it would be illegal for them to do, secondly, there would be a huge outcry.
No one cares what Apple does or what Apple puts on it before they sell it to me. But people should care what Apple does after I OWN it.
And they will enjoy the no more "Santa Claus" or "Easter Bunny" or any other "inaccurate" societal figures like God. Or is that Mohammed? Or Jehovah? Fox News will be banned in the UK?
David Wilcox, a prominent Canadian blues artist from the 80's was not allowed to use his name when he toured the US, or sold albums in the US, as someone else had already trademarked the name David Wilcox (an American musician).
It is interesting to see the argument "perhaps a more careful examination process would be in order before shouting denigrations to the media. The whole case has been handled rather poorly by the swedish justice system, when it was clear from the start that a modicum of tact would be required" made on behalf of Assange.
Of course, his only claim to fame, and the only reason we are talking about him, is because he strikes to make non public information public.
That is affairs have been made public might be something he applauds. Unless of course, he feels he deserves more then those he posts leaks about.
As someone who has been reading Wikileaks for many years, many of the leaks that have been posted over the years have been posted about specific prominent people (usually political, but it is hard to argue that that leaks on Wikileaks aren't of a political nature).
When your job is over that does not mean that legal obligations end.
I suppose my boss could invite me out for lunch, fire me, and then keep my car, which is parked on company property and accessible via a locked gate with a keycard. My keycard would no longer work, and he'd be under no obligation to do anything for me, a non-employee. Heck, my iPod in my desk drawer. Gone.
The law is rarely black and white and this case is no exception.
Child's went to lenghts to ensure that no one else had the passwords and to ensure that only HE could access the networks. Read some of the juror comments from the trial. This was not a black and white case.
1) outright lying for emphasis 2) not from Canada OR 3) from Toronto where you think that all of Canada = anywhere you can drive to in 30 minutes.
From Sault Ste Marie west there is virtually no Rogers. The half way point of Canada lies within 40 miles of Sault Ste Marie. So the west half has virtually no Rogers. Shaw Cable and Telus (dsl) are in Canada western half and Shaw is currently Canada's largest cable company.
Videotron is the largest cable provider in Quebec, Canada's 2nd largest province and home of almost 25% of the country.
Per Digitalhome.ca (non clickable link - http://www.digitalhome.ca/2009/11/canadas-largest-digital-service-providers/)
By my math the top 3 Cable companies have 4420735 subscribers, with Rogers pulling 36%. Or in your words "monopoly across virtually all of Canada" And with DSL thrown in they service 18.7% of the 8515417 subsribers served by the top 6. Not even 1 in 5.
While I'm not applauding the recent move they made, to call them a virtual monopoly with less then 20% of the market is a bit much. Valid arguments ring truer when real facts are used.
You mean to say that the police are going to get a search warrant to search my home when for all they know my neighbour is accessing my wireless? Didn't the slashdot community advise the RIAA how unreliable using an IP address is?
While it sucks for the OP to be so close to his device, but to be stymied, could you image if the internet provider passed on the IP info to him as he requested? Could you imagine him knocking on a door and saying "I want my laptop back" and the home owner saying "go away, I don't have your laptop". Then what?
I laughed when I read this. I would guess they get paid by phone book delivered. Your 'refusal' would mean they would have to deliver and take it back (twice as much work for no pay).
But in all seriousness, my telephone provide (Shaw) here in Canada offers free 411. If my phone company decided NOT to provide me with a phone book AND STILL charged me for 411 calls I'm not sure I'd be happy. I'm guessing, however, that will be the norm - 411 calls are still chargeable with most phone providers here.
As it is, I cannot remember the last time I used a phone book to look up a number - excluding businesses. I think this is a good step.
The point of system restore is to ensure that if you mess up your computer with recent updates or changes you have an easy restoration option. So, on a typical new PC with 1TB you would have 150GB. Per the grandparent, a typical restore was taking 555mb for him. You do the math.
Now to assume that a user will be prompted on every single boot or system change after the limit is pretty silly when this will almost only ever affect someone who has changed from the default value. Users who leave this setting to default will never suffer this fate.
It seems that the submitter of the article has "tweaked" his machine so much that he only saves 1 restore point and therefore waits EVERY boot for the system restore to do what it should do.
There is much truth to what you say. Even though you are modded plus 5 Funny.
Much of what makes Apple cool is the Elitist attitude.
They have traditionally been the BMW of computers.
If a BMW where the same price as a Hyundai I am sure some of that desire to have a BMW would wane. This is not to say the product isn't good. But because it is a product that your poor uncool friends can't afford, whilst you can, makes the purchase even better.
Slashdot Mirror
And so I publicly state that you, Bitztream, are a child molester, the hour before your interview as a school teacher...........
You still feel the same way?
Hours before an election someone lies about an opponent hoping some won't vote for the opponent. That is clearly libel.
Well. I fail at linking.
Thank you for the link correction.
Should have logged out to test it.
All facebook users agree to NOT Share their password when they access or use Facebook.
:P
So basically, to work at that correctional facility you MUST show that you are ready, willing and able to break past agreements that you have made and will continue to make in the future (every time you access Facebook).
Nice to see that they want honest people guarding those who are incarcerated.
http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=101063233083&topic=15948&post=110792#!/terms.php
Statement of Rights and Responsibilities
This Statement of Rights and Responsibilities ("Statement") derives from the Facebook Principles, and governs our relationship with users and others who interact with Facebook. By using or accessing Facebook, you agree to this Statement.
# Registration and Account Security
Facebook users provide their real names and information, and we need your help to keep it that way. Here are some commitments you make to us relating to registering and maintaining the security of your account:
1. You will not provide any false personal information on Facebook, or create an account for anyone other than yourself without permission.
2. You will not create more than one personal profile.
3. If we disable your account, you will not create another one without our permission.
4. You will not use your personal profile for your own commercial gain (such as selling your status update to an advertiser).
5. You will not use Facebook if you are under 13.
6. You will not use Facebook if you are a convicted sex offender.
7. You will keep your contact information accurate and up-to-date.
8. You will not share your password, (or in the case of developers, your secret key), let anyone else access your account, or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account.
9. You will not transfer your account (including any page or application you administer) to anyone without first getting our written permission.
10. If you select a username for your account we reserve the right to remove or reclaim it if we believe appropriate (such as when a trademark owner complains about a username that does not closely relate to a user's actual name).
"I can also predict a winner in the final with 50% accuracy using my new simulation called the "coin""
Pray tell how you could have picked the winner with 50% accuracy with a coin when there are 32 teams.
There were, after all, 32 teams in September when the accurate simulation was done.
Great analogy.
You cannot kill Anonymous because Anonymous is like a hive of bees.
Since bee colonies are collapsing all over the world you may wish to reconsider them when you are comparing something you are claiming won't collapse....
http://www.google.ca/search?q=bees&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a#sclient=psy&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB%3Aofficial&tbs=nws:1&q=bee+collapse&aq=f&aqi=&aql=f&oq=&pbx=1&fp=2863d4523d094cf3
So can someone "incorporate" a business, pay the $100 yearly fee that your city charges......and then put up a webpage reviewing movies and music, all the while downloading the content via torrents? If you get "caught" with any pirated material you can just close the business and be on with your life. The Corporation did it........not you........
As long as you didn't make much money you could use their strategy of self protection to protect yourself and your $100 a year licence from the city to pirate all day, every day?
So:
Step 1) Be a retailer, or get a job for a retailer, selling lottery tickets. This would get past your "there is no real way to get only the winners"
Step 2) Take all the scratched tickets that people throw away onsite, and scan them for hints as to how to pick winners.
Step 3) Buy a bunch of probable winners to see how accurate you are, and if you are accurate, profit.
Now a few things come to mind.
Many people like to buy the "new" tickets as they seem to "win" more often. This would be normal if took a few weeks for retailers to get a handle on how to pick the winners. You win more often when "chance" is in play, and less often when the probably winners have been weeded out.
It would also explain how retailers cash a high percentage of winners, in Canada at least, were this has been in the news for the past few years.
Here is one such article, and note, this has led to changes in Canada. Seemingly not good enough.
http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/story.html?id=4be28910-9cec-4785-b471-f37849a29008&k=17633
Surprise surprise.....
We heard an udder one!!!
Are we only going to here that nice pair of jokes or are people going to keep milking this one?
You are so right.
Ford uses Ford Engines and Parts when they manufacturer. But I have the right to add whatever spark plugs, lifters, tires or exhaust system I want.
There are federal laws governing this in both the US and in Canada. I change parts and my warranty still stands.
What Apple does is akin to saying "You must use Chevron gasoline, Michelin tires, you must use elecrical parts from Bosch. If you use anything else you lose your warranty."
First off, it would be illegal for them to do, secondly, there would be a huge outcry.
No one cares what Apple does or what Apple puts on it before they sell it to me. But people should care what Apple does after I OWN it.
iFace are screwed!
Stuck between an apple and book......
http://iface.com/
I agree. Protect the kids.
And they will enjoy the no more "Santa Claus" or "Easter Bunny" or any other "inaccurate" societal figures like God. Or is that Mohammed? Or Jehovah? Fox News will be banned in the UK?
Who decides what is an inacurrate fact?
You do it from within Firefox.
about:config and add the string.
Put whatever you want in it.
You can find instructions online by googling changing firefox user agent string.
No, someone needs to change their browsers user agent string to a EULA.....
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0b4) Gecko/20100818 Firefox/4.0b4
to
Mozilla/5.0 (EULA; By allowing me to browse your website you agree to allow me to browse your website for free)
It works just fine.
If they allow you to browse then they are agreeing to your license agreement AS MUCH AS you are agreeing to theirs.
Heck, just for fun, add a charge for your viewing the ads on their webpage and bill them.
David Wilcox, a prominent Canadian blues artist from the 80's was not allowed to use his name when he toured the US, or sold albums in the US, as someone else had already trademarked the name David Wilcox (an American musician).
And before I had to throw away or try to sell my old chip when upgrading. Now I just upgrade.
I really don't see why this is a bad thing...
It is interesting to see the argument "perhaps a more careful examination process would be in order before shouting denigrations to the media. The whole case has been handled rather poorly by the swedish justice system, when it was clear from the start that a modicum of tact would be required" made on behalf of Assange.
Of course, his only claim to fame, and the only reason we are talking about him, is because he strikes to make non public information public.
That is affairs have been made public might be something he applauds. Unless of course, he feels he deserves more then those he posts leaks about.
As someone who has been reading Wikileaks for many years, many of the leaks that have been posted over the years have been posted about specific prominent people (usually political, but it is hard to argue that that leaks on Wikileaks aren't of a political nature).
In a black and white world maybe.
But both you and OP are being silly.
When your job is over that does not mean that legal obligations end.
I suppose my boss could invite me out for lunch, fire me, and then keep my car, which is parked on company property and accessible via a locked gate with a keycard. My keycard would no longer work, and he'd be under no obligation to do anything for me, a non-employee. Heck, my iPod in my desk drawer. Gone.
The law is rarely black and white and this case is no exception.
Child's went to lenghts to ensure that no one else had the passwords and to ensure that only HE could access the networks. Read some of the juror comments from the trial. This was not a black and white case.
You are either:
1) outright lying for emphasis
2) not from Canada
OR
3) from Toronto where you think that all of Canada = anywhere you can drive to in 30 minutes.
From Sault Ste Marie west there is virtually no Rogers. The half way point of Canada lies within 40 miles of Sault Ste Marie. So the west half has virtually no Rogers. Shaw Cable and Telus (dsl) are in Canada western half and Shaw is currently Canada's largest cable company.
Videotron is the largest cable provider in Quebec, Canada's 2nd largest province and home of almost 25% of the country.
Per Digitalhome.ca (non clickable link - http://www.digitalhome.ca/2009/11/canadas-largest-digital-service-providers/)
1. Bell – 2,084,000
2. Shaw – 1,678,335
3. Rogers – 1,597,000
4. Telus – 1,213,000
5. Videotron – 1,145,400
6. Bell Aliant – 797,682
By my math the top 3 Cable companies have 4420735 subscribers, with Rogers pulling 36%. Or in your words "monopoly across virtually all of Canada"
And with DSL thrown in they service 18.7% of the 8515417 subsribers served by the top 6. Not even 1 in 5.
While I'm not applauding the recent move they made, to call them a virtual monopoly with less then 20% of the market is a bit much. Valid arguments ring truer when real facts are used.
You mean to say that the police are going to get a search warrant to search my home when for all they know my neighbour is accessing my wireless? Didn't the slashdot community advise the RIAA how unreliable using an IP address is?
While it sucks for the OP to be so close to his device, but to be stymied, could you image if the internet provider passed on the IP info to him as he requested? Could you imagine him knocking on a door and saying "I want my laptop back" and the home owner saying "go away, I don't have your laptop". Then what?
Ever heard of Youtube?
For starters
Tiananmen Square was 20 years ago.
Kent State was only twice as long ago and happened in the US.
I laughed when I read this. I would guess they get paid by phone book delivered. Your 'refusal' would mean they would have to deliver and take it back (twice as much work for no pay).
But in all seriousness, my telephone provide (Shaw) here in Canada offers free 411. If my phone company decided NOT to provide me with a phone book AND STILL charged me for 411 calls I'm not sure I'd be happy. I'm guessing, however, that will be the norm - 411 calls are still chargeable with most phone providers here.
As it is, I cannot remember the last time I used a phone book to look up a number - excluding businesses. I think this is a good step.
15% of disk space is the default size.
The point of system restore is to ensure that if you mess up your computer with recent updates or changes you have an easy restoration option. So, on a typical new PC with 1TB you would have 150GB. Per the grandparent, a typical restore was taking 555mb for him. You do the math.
Now to assume that a user will be prompted on every single boot or system change after the limit is pretty silly when this will almost only ever affect someone who has changed from the default value. Users who leave this setting to default will never suffer this fate.
It seems that the submitter of the article has "tweaked" his machine so much that he only saves 1 restore point and therefore waits EVERY boot for the system restore to do what it should do.
There is much truth to what you say.
Even though you are modded plus 5 Funny.
Much of what makes Apple cool is the Elitist attitude.
They have traditionally been the BMW of computers.
If a BMW where the same price as a Hyundai I am sure some of that desire to have a BMW would wane.
This is not to say the product isn't good. But because it is a product that your poor uncool friends can't afford, whilst you can, makes the purchase even better.