I've never known any who weren't- on either side of that statement. All feminists are most certainly SJW snowflakes (having abortions turns women into one) and yes, after reading Moira Greyland's recently released biography, I understand the role of pedastery in creating homosexuals much better.
Sexual preference, as much as it exists (it's really more of a myth than a reality) is strongly linked to strength. Only a weakling who did NOT want to pass on his genes would be stupid enough to desire a sexual relationship with other males.
Likewise, only women who don't want children and just want servants pick weak and effeminate males.
The strong survive. The weak die out. Strength is measured in the number of children you have.
Would it not make more sense to say, make it "Free electricity night" and instead of sending out rebates, buy batteries to solve the problem once and for all? Don't dump the energy, save it for lower production days.
However, the Islamics get most of their stupid suicide squads from poor young men unable to afford wives. China has a similar problem due to sex-selective abortion. Men without women are brutes, and violent brutes at that.
I'm sure long before that happens, hackers will realize that if they can cut off external communication to a store, then an employeeless store at 3am represents a day's worth of cash taking.....
To be exact, it took a salary to turn me from a marxist to a capitalist, then loss of a salary to turn me back to a marxist, then 10 years of hourly wage to turn me into a distributist. Perhaps, when I go back to being on a large salary next year, I'll be back to being a capitalist, but I doubt it. The problem with capitalism is the same as the problem with Marxism: it's a pyramid scheme. The tiny minority at the top live in luxury and don't do a whole lot of useful work, while everybody below them toils for peanuts. Centralized economy is evil, whether governed from Wall Street, K Street, Bejing or the Kremlin, it's all the same to the poor schlubs who actually dig the ditches.
Oh, and everybody's in it for themselves, is the other lesson I've learned in the past 25 years.
Slashdot Mirror
Actually, I'm quite well studied- but I don't believe that people using appeals to authority and circle jerks of confirmation bias are doing science.
I've never known any who weren't- on either side of that statement. All feminists are most certainly SJW snowflakes (having abortions turns women into one) and yes, after reading Moira Greyland's recently released biography, I understand the role of pedastery in creating homosexuals much better.
Either that or you are dirt poor.
Yep, I've got the same thing. For the privilege of paying $1200/month in premiums.
A man who can't even be bothered to "flatten" the photoshopped birth certificate he posted.
More like a bunch of gay whimps tried to rape me. I cut them up good.
Preference isn't real. It's imaginary. It is no more real than the software I write.
Sexual preference is for predators- who can I rape today.
Oh, I'm aware of the Epigenetics lie.
Sexual preference, as much as it exists (it's really more of a myth than a reality) is strongly linked to strength. Only a weakling who did NOT want to pass on his genes would be stupid enough to desire a sexual relationship with other males.
Likewise, only women who don't want children and just want servants pick weak and effeminate males.
The strong survive. The weak die out. Strength is measured in the number of children you have.
Violence is limited to people? That's a new one on me.
And yes, I like most people with even a little bit of testosterone in our bloodstream, are violent.
I still fail to see your point, since homosexuality is only a delusion and does not exist.
Would it not make more sense to say, make it "Free electricity night" and instead of sending out rebates, buy batteries to solve the problem once and for all? Don't dump the energy, save it for lower production days.
Last I saw, MGTOW was into collecting guns and going hunting. Not exactly non-violent.
Or 72 grapes. The Arabic is rather unclear.
When was that again?
Yep. That is exactly right
"Lack of testosterone doesn't make men gay, it makes them weak and effeminate. "
I fail to see your point. What is the difference?
If I had mod points, I'd mod you up.
However, the Islamics get most of their stupid suicide squads from poor young men unable to afford wives. China has a similar problem due to sex-selective abortion. Men without women are brutes, and violent brutes at that.
The perfect rejoinder is not violence, but merely "Yes, the days are Holy, Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!"
Forget about moral arguments. Make this *CHEAPER* than beef, but taste close to the same, it'll take over 90% of the market overnight.
Yes.
I'm sure long before that happens, hackers will realize that if they can cut off external communication to a store, then an employeeless store at 3am represents a day's worth of cash taking.....
To be exact, it took a salary to turn me from a marxist to a capitalist, then loss of a salary to turn me back to a marxist, then 10 years of hourly wage to turn me into a distributist. Perhaps, when I go back to being on a large salary next year, I'll be back to being a capitalist, but I doubt it. The problem with capitalism is the same as the problem with Marxism: it's a pyramid scheme. The tiny minority at the top live in luxury and don't do a whole lot of useful work, while everybody below them toils for peanuts. Centralized economy is evil, whether governed from Wall Street, K Street, Bejing or the Kremlin, it's all the same to the poor schlubs who actually dig the ditches.
Oh, and everybody's in it for themselves, is the other lesson I've learned in the past 25 years.
Good. People who still believe in communism and are making over $100k/year are largely worthless paper desk jockies.
And I say that as a worthless desk jockey.
I'm well aware that most of what I do, has zero real world value.