I don't understand why. I was recently asked to interface with a 30 year old DOS based system. It's running just fine in its intended environment. Why should there be a risk of either crash or failure on a single tasking, single use machine?
Doesn't matter to the motivation of the people who are anti-GMO. Most of what they're afraid of can't happen, but economics is not what they are worried about.
The most common replanted tree clone, Weyerhouser Supertrees, take 30 years to mature. You're also an idiot to plant monocultures of any tree, even Bamboo, which takes a few short months to mature. The reason is evolution and disease. Your chance of having those trees reach maturity is very low.
Oregon's done a lot since the "plant three for every one you take" rule came into effect; we now have forest fires instead of clear cuts. I am assuming the ecoterrorists like Tre Arrow actually prefer fires.
Not quite the same argument- the ship's captains records from 1750 can only track storms their ships observed. My argument is that until *very* recently, there were many areas of the remote ocean that were simply not monitored, thus the claim of "3 major hurricanes at once for the first time on record" means very little given the fact that we don't know what was happening in remote parts of the globe in 1750, only what was happening in the shipping lanes. And even then, the type of instruments used to detect global warming today are many orders of magnitude more accurate than those from 1750.
Spotty recordkeeping existed before the 1890s, true, but complete recordkeeping had to wait for satellite data.
" "Historic central/eastern Pacific outbreak- 3 major hurricanes at once for the first time on record!""
Yep, ON RECORD. But since the records barely go back more than 120 years, and the sats needed to spot storms that form so far from any habitable area have only been in geostationary orbit for about 50 years, the record is extremely short and says NOTHING about global warming.
A long time ago, when I was a RCG (recent college graduate) I worked for a small software company that actually changed from using Borland Delphi to Visual Basic 3 for that reason. Plenty of people in different skillsets, but not enough at the price we could afford for Borland Delphi.
I came in having coded in neither, that was a steep learning curve.
$200,000 a year and you can get anybody you need. If you cannot pay that, you have want, not need.
Luckily, your average McMansion has 5-8 bedrooms, and thus, can easily house a small assistd living center.
That's only step 2. Step 3 is load it with dynamite and fly it into the White House.
Dang kids, get off the lawn.
I was coding in Basic in 1978.
And it was a well-established language even then- about 15-20 years old at that point I think.
Might it be the insistence on a monotheistic objective value system?
Finally. I was wondering when Open Source Geekry was going to grow up.
That's why I've learned to hum in Gregorian Chant. It is the only music I can be sure is free of copyright.
When has a treaty ever been deemed unconstitutional?
Only if you live in it.
That's what you get for an engineered demographic collapse.
Ok, I'm not usually this, well, liberal. But I'm a lumberjack and I'm OK, I work all night and I sleep all day.
I don't understand why. I was recently asked to interface with a 30 year old DOS based system. It's running just fine in its intended environment. Why should there be a risk of either crash or failure on a single tasking, single use machine?
Only hire women and other URMs?
Given this article, he may be on Windows 10 next Wednesday.....
You're paying $7 for 128MB? I just paid $7 for 16GB sticks in packs of 10.
Doesn't matter to the motivation of the people who are anti-GMO. Most of what they're afraid of can't happen, but economics is not what they are worried about.
experiments with genetics have a tendency to get loose and crossbreed with other stocks.
"Most anti-GMO people are against it because they view it as a quick way to save a buck"
Have you ever read a Michael Chriton novel at all? I'd have to say most people against GMO are really against using the wild for laboratory accidents.
The most common replanted tree clone, Weyerhouser Supertrees, take 30 years to mature. You're also an idiot to plant monocultures of any tree, even Bamboo, which takes a few short months to mature. The reason is evolution and disease. Your chance of having those trees reach maturity is very low.
Oregon's done a lot since the "plant three for every one you take" rule came into effect; we now have forest fires instead of clear cuts. I am assuming the ecoterrorists like Tre Arrow actually prefer fires.
Or better yet, just institute the Oregon Protocol as international law: plant three trees for every one you cut down.
Not quite the same argument- the ship's captains records from 1750 can only track storms their ships observed. My argument is that until *very* recently, there were many areas of the remote ocean that were simply not monitored, thus the claim of "3 major hurricanes at once for the first time on record" means very little given the fact that we don't know what was happening in remote parts of the globe in 1750, only what was happening in the shipping lanes. And even then, the type of instruments used to detect global warming today are many orders of magnitude more accurate than those from 1750.
Spotty recordkeeping existed before the 1890s, true, but complete recordkeeping had to wait for satellite data.
" "Historic central/eastern Pacific outbreak- 3 major hurricanes at once for the first time on record!""
Yep, ON RECORD. But since the records barely go back more than 120 years, and the sats needed to spot storms that form so far from any habitable area have only been in geostationary orbit for about 50 years, the record is extremely short and says NOTHING about global warming.
Possibly- which is why I'm generally against free trade.
A long time ago, when I was a RCG (recent college graduate) I worked for a small software company that actually changed from using Borland Delphi to Visual Basic 3 for that reason. Plenty of people in different skillsets, but not enough at the price we could afford for Borland Delphi.
I came in having coded in neither, that was a steep learning curve.
"Companies say they can't find enough qualified candidates. "
Law of supply and demand affects salaries. Companies that have not learned this, can't find qualified candidates, because they're not paying enough.