There's a very easy rebuttal to the Libertarian argument that government employees' personal lives shouldn't be regulated at least a little
yeah? I have a really easy rebuttal to your "rebuttal:" FUCK YOU.
Wouldn't you want the same policies applied to politicians to prevent them from developing relationships with that one nice guy who just so happens to be a lobbyist for a major kitten-puppy-bunny murder conglomerate?
Not only would his veto have done nothing, it would have also opened the door to attack ads about how he vetoed healthcare for wounded veterans, since that's also in the bill.
um, ok? the absurdity of this is just mind-boggling. so what you're suggesting is you support someone being in power for no other reason than their desire to be in power, while they do things antithetical to the health of the nation? please, cry me a river because your re-election campaign is ruined.
I'm sure you'll do an about face during your second term, right? why would I ever doubt you, dear leader?
you people are absolutely fucking perverted. you are nothing but an indoctrinated, state-worshipping lemming. I'm not even kidding. do some introspection and save yourself from this mind-numbing filth. you are actually coming out and saying that The President of the United States America has no obligation to do anything to better the circumstances of the nation he is representing, so long as whatever he may do is in discord with his ability to retain office.
I'm pretty sure that "falling on his sword to keep you happy," whatever that even means, is exactly what he should do. I think you have it backward. I don't give a fuck about being kept happy--that's your bag, because all this is to you is a popularity contest. it's partisan nonsense, and has no relevance to logic or truth. he should fall on his sword because he's damn near treasonous, shitting on the United States Constitution without abandon. I won't mind if you go down with him; it will happen eventually. it always does.
uh, I'm sure you're a troll and all, but it seems there are people who actually believe this nonsense. it's insane. you are suggesting that penalizing businesses makes them more likely to keep their business in the states? huh? what exactly goes on inside of your head?
Firefox will use more memory if the overall amount of memory you have is higher. it's proportional, as it ought to be. I doubt you have 32BG of memory. I have 8GB here, and currently have 230 tabs open, and Firefox is using ~2.4GB. as someone else mentioned, add-ons play a huge role in this as well. I've had Firebug disabled the majority of the time for this reason.
uh, what? my Firefox is using 2.4GB right now. and I love when these discussions start and some haughty POWER USER NERD feels it necessary to point out the fact that he has a whopping 10-20 tabs open. really? I have 230 open right now, and I just cleaned out about a hundred or so recently. what are you talking about?
If you're a guest in my home, you're welcome to use the bandwidth, along with the lights and water. Can you imagine visitig a friend only to be told, "Look, here's the PIN code to unlock the lights, and here's the key in case you want to wash your hands."
I can imagine it, yes, but only because I use a lot of drugs, and I've read Philip K. Dick, someone who also did a lot of drugs in his time.
actually, interleaved DSL is still only common in European markets, and other non-US markets around the world. fastpath is simply non-interleaved DSL. if you have access to a command-line interface or GUI on your DSL modem, you may be able to modify whether or not you use interleaving, but with some ILECs/CLECs this is not possible. just read the Wikipedia about interleaving. it's essentially just a method of error-checking and correction for lossy lines, as copper phone lines are pretty finicky, and DSL is heavily reliant upon clean signals. interleaving adds some 20-30ms or so of latency.
this doesn't show the same thing necessarily, as someone else said, some traceroute programs use UDP rather than ICMP. but additionally, this depends on how the receiving host handles TTL. they are not required to re-transmit using the same TTL value, and the reverse path is not necessarily the same as forward (and neither are necessarily static.)
Are you saying that you believe it is fair that there are some experiences in life that can never have because the number of zeros in your bank account is too small?
yeah, bro. I want a free Lamborghini. Obama owes me one. I hope you're ready to buy it for me. they're expensive.
you can argue that case, at least if the channel is dedicated to that one cause. but intent is thought, not action. are we prosecuting people for their thoughts? anybody can join an IRC channel, presuming it's not keyed or invite-only, and anybody could even be accidentally made an operator. that's probably not likely, but just because someone is an operator somewhere doesn't mean they condone something other people around them are doing.
should they make an active effort to stop them? I don't recall signing up to be a police officer.
well, this whole thing is a joke and all of these guys are a bunch of clueless newbies, no doubt. but proxies? really? you don't DoS with proxies. then again, you don't use stateful protocols either. this whole thing is laughable.
not true. it's really only the death cap that is deadly. all Amanitas are toxic, but most of them can be taken safely, and Amanita muscaria will cause delirium, but as any fungus, it's a really tricky issue to judge dosage and get the desired effect. granted, Amanitas aren't "shrooms," though. I hate seeing people make that mistake. they are mushrooms, but shrooms in this context refer to psilocybin mushrooms.
to you and the guy replying to you above, it's Vo0, not v0o and not Voo. CPMA is not the same thing as CPM. CPM is the gameplay type in the aforementioned czm game. czm was never a top CPM player, and Vo0 is nowhere near as good in VQ3 or QL.
also, neither czm nor Vo0 work for QLTV.. I'm not sure where you got this. oh, and it would be debatable to say "Vo0 is not as good as he once was," whatever that means. it's not as if he was ever very good at VQ3, but at CPM? well, he's easily the best ever, with the possible exception of fox. perhaps active CPMers could beat him now, but after he played for a few hours, I doubt it.
really just sounds like standard TCP behavior. if your upstream is saturated then the downstream transfer rate is going to scale back a bit. this is a problem with TCP in general but his specific case is probably just a result of an unoptimized TCP stack. check out speedguide.net and all that for tips on how to improve things (to the grandparent if he reads this).
Slashdot Mirror
lol.
um.. yea? I'm not a self-loathing guilt ridden "progressive" piece of shit.
yeah? I have a really easy rebuttal to your "rebuttal:" FUCK YOU.
no. stay the FUCK out of my life.
um, ok? the absurdity of this is just mind-boggling. so what you're suggesting is you support someone being in power for no other reason than their desire to be in power, while they do things antithetical to the health of the nation? please, cry me a river because your re-election campaign is ruined.
I'm sure you'll do an about face during your second term, right? why would I ever doubt you, dear leader?
you people are absolutely fucking perverted. you are nothing but an indoctrinated, state-worshipping lemming. I'm not even kidding. do some introspection and save yourself from this mind-numbing filth. you are actually coming out and saying that The President of the United States America has no obligation to do anything to better the circumstances of the nation he is representing, so long as whatever he may do is in discord with his ability to retain office.
I'm pretty sure that "falling on his sword to keep you happy," whatever that even means, is exactly what he should do. I think you have it backward. I don't give a fuck about being kept happy--that's your bag, because all this is to you is a popularity contest. it's partisan nonsense, and has no relevance to logic or truth. he should fall on his sword because he's damn near treasonous, shitting on the United States Constitution without abandon. I won't mind if you go down with him; it will happen eventually. it always does.
n/t
uh, I'm sure you're a troll and all, but it seems there are people who actually believe this nonsense. it's insane. you are suggesting that penalizing businesses makes them more likely to keep their business in the states? huh? what exactly goes on inside of your head?
just for the record, Slashdot does not allow posts from Tor exit nodes.
Firefox will use more memory if the overall amount of memory you have is higher. it's proportional, as it ought to be. I doubt you have 32BG of memory. I have 8GB here, and currently have 230 tabs open, and Firefox is using ~2.4GB. as someone else mentioned, add-ons play a huge role in this as well. I've had Firebug disabled the majority of the time for this reason.
uh, what? my Firefox is using 2.4GB right now. and I love when these discussions start and some haughty POWER USER NERD feels it necessary to point out the fact that he has a whopping 10-20 tabs open. really? I have 230 open right now, and I just cleaned out about a hundred or so recently. what are you talking about?
it will work--it just won't work very well. it becomes a race condition in this case, which can be intelligently gamed.
I can imagine it, yes, but only because I use a lot of drugs, and I've read Philip K. Dick, someone who also did a lot of drugs in his time.
actually, interleaved DSL is still only common in European markets, and other non-US markets around the world. fastpath is simply non-interleaved DSL. if you have access to a command-line interface or GUI on your DSL modem, you may be able to modify whether or not you use interleaving, but with some ILECs/CLECs this is not possible. just read the Wikipedia about interleaving. it's essentially just a method of error-checking and correction for lossy lines, as copper phone lines are pretty finicky, and DSL is heavily reliant upon clean signals. interleaving adds some 20-30ms or so of latency.
this doesn't show the same thing necessarily, as someone else said, some traceroute programs use UDP rather than ICMP. but additionally, this depends on how the receiving host handles TTL. they are not required to re-transmit using the same TTL value, and the reverse path is not necessarily the same as forward (and neither are necessarily static.)
yeah, bro. I want a free Lamborghini. Obama owes me one. I hope you're ready to buy it for me. they're expensive.
uh what? I get the context of your post, but why would anyone reward risk taking? then it wouldn't be very risky, would it?
you can argue that case, at least if the channel is dedicated to that one cause. but intent is thought, not action. are we prosecuting people for their thoughts? anybody can join an IRC channel, presuming it's not keyed or invite-only, and anybody could even be accidentally made an operator. that's probably not likely, but just because someone is an operator somewhere doesn't mean they condone something other people around them are doing.
should they make an active effort to stop them? I don't recall signing up to be a police officer.
everyone in this entire fucking article is a moron. a name cannot be "racist" or "anti-semitic," whatever that even means.
a "bigot" named this connection? how's that work? I thought they were still trying to figure who's responsible. I'd think that makes them the "bigot."
if you are shocked and harassed, perhaps you should grow the fuck up or kill yourself, because you're not fit for life.
the words are: Niggers and Jews, not N------ and J------.
well, this whole thing is a joke and all of these guys are a bunch of clueless newbies, no doubt. but proxies? really? you don't DoS with proxies. then again, you don't use stateful protocols either. this whole thing is laughable.
not true. it's really only the death cap that is deadly. all Amanitas are toxic, but most of them can be taken safely, and Amanita muscaria will cause delirium, but as any fungus, it's a really tricky issue to judge dosage and get the desired effect. granted, Amanitas aren't "shrooms," though. I hate seeing people make that mistake. they are mushrooms, but shrooms in this context refer to psilocybin mushrooms.
the possessive form of wives is wives'.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winchip
to you and the guy replying to you above, it's Vo0, not v0o and not Voo. CPMA is not the same thing as CPM. CPM is the gameplay type in the aforementioned czm game. czm was never a top CPM player, and Vo0 is nowhere near as good in VQ3 or QL.
also, neither czm nor Vo0 work for QLTV.. I'm not sure where you got this. oh, and it would be debatable to say "Vo0 is not as good as he once was," whatever that means. it's not as if he was ever very good at VQ3, but at CPM? well, he's easily the best ever, with the possible exception of fox. perhaps active CPMers could beat him now, but after he played for a few hours, I doubt it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deneb#Distance_and_physical_characteristics
really just sounds like standard TCP behavior. if your upstream is saturated then the downstream transfer rate is going to scale back a bit. this is a problem with TCP in general but his specific case is probably just a result of an unoptimized TCP stack. check out speedguide.net and all that for tips on how to improve things (to the grandparent if he reads this).
I hope you save this for last.