Slashdot Mirror


Notch Asks For Trial By Combat

Vrallis writes "As reported recently, Mojang AB, the creators of Minecraft, have been sued by Bethesda over the name of their latest project, Scrolls, citing a trademark infringement with their Elder Scrolls games. In his latest blog post, Notch, the founder of Mojang, has challenged Bethesda to a trial by combat. Specifically, a frag match in Quake 3."

205 comments

  1. Mods by operagost · · Score: 4, Funny

    I assume that, in the old dueling tradition, his opponent gets to choose the mod. I recommend INSTAGIB.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    1. Re:Mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, trial by combat is distinct from the later tradition of gentlemanly dueling. Weapons and armor were generally prescribed by custom, and specifics adjudicated by the court.

      And it's worthy of note that there's some reasonable claim that demanding a trial by (real-life) combat is still technically a legal option under US common law, since it was only abolished in England after the revolution and separation of US jurisprudence; if exercised by Mojang AB and permitted by the court, Bethesda would be compelled to appear or forfeit. (Of course, it's utterly improbable that a court would allow it, so kinda beside the point.)

      OTOH, settling a matter by the outcome of a computer game is definitely legal as a form of arbitration, provided both parties agree to be bound by the outcome.

      (IANAL, obviously.)

    2. Re:Mods by djdanlib · · Score: 1

      I am tremendously entertained by the possibility of this (A) happening and (B) being legally binding.

      Game on!

    3. Re:Mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Id choose v0o to act as their champion, and their choice of mod is CPMA duel. As his first map he'll be playing cpm3a. Have fun, notch.

      v0o vs. czm on cpm3a (who now does commentary for QLtv):
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atI5SyXD070

    4. Re:Mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I admit my knowledge of trial by combat is all but non-existent, but isn't the one being challenged allowed to choose a champion? So couldn't Bethesda acquire the services of any professional fps player to fight in their place? This challenge could be severely weighted against Notch.

    5. Re:Mods by networkBoy · · Score: 2

      Not at all.
      See, Notch will lose, and have to turn the name Scrolls loose to Bethesda Studios.*
      In the meantime he will have gained so much publicity that he could rename the game [to be] previously known as "Scrolls" to "Sacks of Donkey Poo" and people (those who matter) would buy it in a heartbeat.
      -nB

      *(sorry best I could do with the lose/loose issue)

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    6. Re:Mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends; some places/times only the interested party could fight, someplaces/times the right to a champion was universal, and someplaces/times it was only for the old/young/female/infirm. (The latter situation was sometimes extended/altered to permit refusal of combat entirely by those classes, settling the matter through the courts.)

    7. Re:Mods by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      And the people would call it Scrolls anyway, to the chagrin of Bethesda.

    8. Re:Mods by Narishma · · Score: 1

      Voo isn't as good as he used to be.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
    9. Re:Mods by kayditty · · Score: 0

      to you and the guy replying to you above, it's Vo0, not v0o and not Voo. CPMA is not the same thing as CPM. CPM is the gameplay type in the aforementioned czm game. czm was never a top CPM player, and Vo0 is nowhere near as good in VQ3 or QL.

      also, neither czm nor Vo0 work for QLTV.. I'm not sure where you got this. oh, and it would be debatable to say "Vo0 is not as good as he once was," whatever that means. it's not as if he was ever very good at VQ3, but at CPM? well, he's easily the best ever, with the possible exception of fox. perhaps active CPMers could beat him now, but after he played for a few hours, I doubt it.

    10. Re:Mods by morari · · Score: 1

      Instagib is fun and all, but Generations Arena is the only way to go with Quake3. :)

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    11. Re:Mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's ESReality and not QLtv, but I know czm does play-by-play for someone or other, because I'm fairly sure I remember him doing commentary either for Dreamhack or IEM5. Maybe they just brought him in as a guest commentator and I'm getting confused.

      Who cares about VQ3 or QL? I was specifically talking about CPM duel. If I'd wanted to make the joke with QL instead, I'd have name-checked rapha instead of vo0. I've been on a cpma/defrag kick lately though, so the first person I thought of in nostalgia when I saw this story was vo0. Way to derail a good joke with an epeen discussion about spelling a name wrong though! Exactly what I'd expect from someone in the Quake Live community.

      CAPTCHA: explains

    12. Re:Mods by That+Guy+From+Mrktng · · Score: 2

      Now this is scary, does that mean that /. is full of active QL players? Will everyone ragequit just before the thread ends?

    13. Re:Mods by GregC63 · · Score: 1

      I assume that, in the old dueling tradition, his opponent gets to choose the mod. I recommend INSTAGIB.

      My choice would be Heritic or Catch the Chicken...

    14. Re:Mods by tsalaroth · · Score: 1

      hahahahahahah

      ragequit

      sorry. I couldn't resist. please tell me that was on purpose.

    15. Re:Mods by FingerDemon · · Score: 1

      I don't know about buying it in a heartbeat. But I totally agree that this is a brilliant way to take a stupid copyright dispute that hurts both parties with legal bills and turns it into a great marketing opportunity for both companies. If I were on either side of this, I would hype it like crazy. Trash talking press conferences with nose to nose photo ops... the works. Is Don King still around? Gamers will eat this stuff up. Hard to say if it would translate directly into game sales, but they say any kind of publicity is good publicity. And gaming companies settling disputes with gaming contests just feels so right.

      --

      "Contrarily the lookaside buffer might not be the panacea... "
    16. Re:Mods by anonymov · · Score: 1

      Why not just go ahead and rename it to 'The Game Previously Known As "Scrolls"'?

    17. Re:Mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To win the thread you should have replied to my post with, "umad?" That gets the authentic Quake Live feel.

    18. Re:Mods by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I assume that, in the old dueling tradition, his opponent gets to choose the mod. I recommend INSTAGIB.

      Personally, I'd choose a fucking big rock to drop on the head of the person sitting at a computer thinking they were duelling.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    19. Re:Mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, he did it on purpose. It's quite a commonly used term in many videogame circles.

    20. Re:Mods by Ibn+al-Hazardous · · Score: 1

      They were sued in Swedish court (as can be seen in the Aug 5th blog entry), and we haven't had trial by combat for the last 700 years around here. Sorry!

      --
      Yes, I am a biological organism. All rumors to the contrary are just that, rumors.
    21. Re:Mods by That+Guy+From+Mrktng · · Score: 1

      I personally use

      U SORE?

      plenty of ragequit ensues. Not that I'm 1337 in QL anyway.

    22. Re:Mods by That+Guy+From+Mrktng · · Score: 1

      yes, just type /ragequit in console and you disconnect with style. Or use it in chat and confuse the nobs.

      That Guy From Marketing: ragequits

  2. Win-win i guess? by Daetrin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If he actually gets them to agree to this then even if he loses it ought to generate enough publicity to make up for having to change the name.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:Win-win i guess? by surefooted · · Score: 1

      Indeed. This is a great PR move. He knows he's probably going to have to change the name, so why not get some publicity out of it?

    2. Re:Win-win i guess? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, this may be a win-win situation. Bethesda keeps the 'Scrolls' name, while the new game gets a name that gets great PR.

      Bethesda also gets street cred for "getting it" if they go along with this.

    3. Re:Win-win i guess? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is viral marketing at its best. Every Gaming publication, and probably some mainstream publication will pick this up an run it.

      The amount of goodwill it will generate amongst gamers will be huge. Although Notch has lots of this already.

    4. Re:Win-win i guess? by drb226 · · Score: 1

      Heck, the publicity Scrolls (or whatever it may be called in the future) has gotten is already way more than it ever would have been had Bethesda not sued. Looks like a win-win already, and a live stream of this match would only be even more win-win regardless of the outcome.

    5. Re:Win-win i guess? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      It would also be fitting if, upon losing, he sued them for emotional distress or some other completely frivolous reason equivalent to saying you can't make a game with "scrolls" in the name.

    6. Re:Win-win i guess? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Yep. They should have the match refereed by Barbara Streisand.

    7. Re:Win-win i guess? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      He can then decide to call it "The Elder"

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    8. Re:Win-win i guess? by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      How about - Quarryform then sue himself?

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    9. Re:Win-win i guess? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps even "The Elder Rolls of Parchment"?

  3. Elder Scroll V sales dropping by Synerg1y · · Score: 0

    Set your binoculars on the pirate bay scallywags.

    1. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by dyingtolive · · Score: 2

      Eh? It's out? I'll have to keep an eye for it in the Steam $5.00 section in a few months hopefully. Bethesda hasn't made a game that impressed me (in a non graphics related fashion) since Morrowind. I actually was looking forward to Fallout 3, thinking to myself, "Well, all of Bethesda's other games are beautiful sprawling wastelands with little actual content in them, so maybe they'll get this right." Instead I got "OMG Daddy NO!".

      As far as the Quake 3 challenge, it's genius. Awesome rebuttal to a overreaction from a zealous legal department, and turning it down will just make Bethesda look bad.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    2. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by loufoque · · Score: 1

      It's going to be disappointing, but I'll be getting it anyway.

      From rlslog, of course.

    3. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by elrous0 · · Score: 0

      Wait, there are PC gamers who actually still *buy* games?!?!?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's crazy, it's almost as if there are some people who want companies to actually continue to make decent games for the PC or something.

      Don't come whining to me when everything on the PC is a Free-To-Pay MMO.

    5. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      I hate to have a fanboy reaction but, well, I already am. Please forgive me, I'll keep it civil.

      Fallout 3 didn't have enough content? I spent well over a hundred hours playing that game, more time than I spent playing new vegas. And that was before the DLC. Maybe beautiful, wide open, sandbox style games just aren't for you. I'd also advise you to also stay away from minecraft, as the plot there can be said to be weak to nonexistent.

    6. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent is trolling or joking or something, it's not out until 11/11

    7. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      Over a hundred hours... wandering a beautiful sprawling wasteland with little actual content! I joke...

    8. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked Fallout 3, for what it was. I did *not* like Fallout: New Vegas. It felt like a rambling monstrosity only thinly held together by some semblance of plot.

    9. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Parent is trolling or joking or something, it's not out until 11/11

      Parent was suggesting that people should plan on pirating Skyrim in retaliation for Bethesda/Zenimax's actions. Typical juvenile reaction.

      Anyway, it isn't like Bethesda is trying to sue Notch into the ground. They are suing him to change the name of his upcoming (not released) game. I don't exactly agree with them, but I think that there is enough to their claim not to reject out of hand the notion that a fantasy-themed computer game called "Scrolls" could potentially cause some amount of confusion with a long-running series of fantasy-themed computer games called "Elder Scrolls".

    10. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      How would you feel if a slashdot mod emailed you saying they now have a web story called demon hunter, and you could no longer use demonbug as a result?

      And it just so happens you posted several thousand times on that account and its what everybody knows you by, you don't see that as damaging?

      Most logos/brandings/names are worth more than what your well-above average equity, so saying its not a big deal is :(

      It is, and there's a lot of money involved in that name whether you can see it or not.

      Congrats on figuring out my one-liner, I forget this is slashdot, where nothing is read below the surface text.

    11. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      You definitely missed / forgot about Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion , i'd say i enjoyed it 90% of how much I enjoyed morrowind, which is easily one of my favorite games.

    12. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      Oh, I love Minecraft because it's not trying to pretend to be something it's not. Perhaps I could have felt the same way about Fallout 3 if it wasn't a Fallout game. To be fair, I suppose perhaps my attitude might be colored by fanboyism of the original Fallouts. It just didn't have the same feel. The ending annoyed me. I still spent plenty of time playing it, but I feel like they built this giant world for you to explore, and then when developing character construction and advancement, didn't take into account the fact that you'd actually explore it.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    13. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by Cwix · · Score: 1

      I still think new vegas was dlc for 3 that grew out of proportion.

      I'll prob still get fallout 4 (If they make it) Because I liked the game, but really hated the engine more then anything.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    14. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by Cwix · · Score: 1

      Yea, I hit up steam during sales, and end up with more games then I can reasonably play for around the same price as the latest blockbuster. Usually those games are last years blockbusters, so they run great on my computer built with last years hardware (Which is also easy on the wallet).

      Why do you assume that game pirating is rampant? I know at least 4 PC gamers, who do something similar to what I do. I don't know any that torrent games unless they are trying to rid a game they bought of DRM. (Offtopic aside: Windows Live Gaming blows, if you developers continue to use it, I wont buy any of your games even if they are only a dollar on steam. I just wont play the damn things, there are plenty of great games for cheap that dont harrass me.)

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    15. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Nice straw man, don't mind this match...WHOOSH! Ooops, he all burned up. your argument MIGHT have merit if anybody including Bethesda actually called their game scroll anything, but they don't and they NEVER have. it has ALWAYS been Morrowind, Oblivion, Arena, etc. Hell look up some of their past ads, they have the name once at the top and then for the rest of the ad its called by the last name.

      This is just as damned stupid as MSFT trying to claim the word WIndows for things other than OSes, or Apple trying to sue a grocery for having the logo of an apple. The only reason they are even being given ANY weight on thus dumb shit is because the US courts are so horribly broken that those with money usually win by default against those without. Still don't make it right or this shit not be dumb.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    16. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by ifrag · · Score: 2

      To be fair, I suppose perhaps my attitude might be colored by fanboyism of the original Fallouts. It just didn't have the same feel.

      The fanboyism of the original fallouts really never ceases to amaze me. Maybe other people had a different experience with it, but some sections of the game crash so often that getting through any piece without some exception being thrown was grounds for immediate saving. I probably had something like 5 rolling save files devoted just to creeping my way through the mutant base, trying not to trigger any broken scripts. Yes, I'll admit there are good parts to the game, plotlines and story is great, but the experience as a whole actually leaves a lot to be desired in the state it was left in. A friend of mine actually managed to get completely stuck in fallout 2 due to a glitch in the boxing ring by filling up all his saves and the quest bugging out and not completing. So I guess it's really all about story, and crashes be damned I can load the save, as far as most people are concerned (unless you accidentally line up all saves behind a major bug).

      And I'm not implying the newer Bethesda flavor is any better on that account. I had my fair share of bugs and crashes in Fallout 3. Stability was downright laughable until some patches arrived on the PC (although, I continued to crawl ahead anyway). I've actually only had a few problems so far in New Vegas where something has been downright broke. I've had Ed the robot get stuck inside terrain a few times, and same thing for a ghoul somewhere which was quest related, but it seems like the actual crashes have gone down. Maybe they just have a more graceful way of handling unexpected game states.

      I just don't understand why people are so forgiving of major bugs in those games, same goes for Oblivion and all that. Kinda depressing to see such high profile titles with such terrible stability. Maybe I'm setting the bar too high, and some unwanted loading and replay is par for the course. Hopefully the new engine in Skyrim won't be so broken, but I have a lot harder time looking on a title favorably when it feels like I'm walking on broken glass the whole time, the slightest misstep could be disaster, better do another quick save just in-case. This is where I hope Bethesda can really benefit from having id software under their umbrella, because id has a great track record as far as stability goes.

      --
      Fear is the mind killer.
    17. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      I hit a few bugs in the original Fallouts, sure, but I think Fallout 3 was far more glitchy for me. I also really liked Ultima 7, in spite of the fact that sneezing in real life at an unexpected time would result in a unwinnable situation. If the game is good enough, I will be more willing to overlook that it's glitchy. Broken scripts are annoying, but at least you can usually save in preparation for them. Spots on the terrain you can get trapped inside of with no way to escape (Fallout 3) is not.

      Did your friend have the patch for Fallout 2? I'm pretty sure that resolved the boxing ring issue, though I'm not 100% sure.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    18. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by f()rK()_Bomb · · Score: 1

      No he didnt, Morrowind was vastly superior to oblivion. In fact i recently played through morrowind again, for like the millionth time. The only fun I have in oblivion is the complex hassles of installing huge mods like FCOM :p Oblivion just feels like boring english countryside, theres no life to it at all, its like i just strolled down the road into the fields. Morrowind felt wierd, alien. Had an insanely good atomsphere. Morrowind also didnt have the insane stupid level creatures lists. That was the biggest killer of the game for me. At high levels even crappy random road bandits are wandering around in full ebony gear and shit? wtf. You could fix all this stuff with mods of course, but that is not the point. Shivering Isles captured some of what morrowind was at least. They have said they are gonna try get some of that old feel back into skyrim.

      --
      "The space elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing." - Arthur C. Clarke ~1980
    19. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>Hopefully the new engine in Skyrim won't be so broken

      Oh, your optimism is refreshing.

      Bethesda makes great, buggy, games.

      As much crap as Obsidian took for New Vegas, it was probably the least buggy of all the giant-sandbox RPGs made/published by Bethesda since they founded.

      I couldn't even get off the boat in Redguard. What boat? Oh, the one you START ON. Shortest game ever.

    20. Re:Elder Scroll V sales dropping by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 1

      the fact that fallout 3 didn't have the same feel as the predecessors is exactly why i liked it so much. to each his own, c'est la vie.

      --
      insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
  4. Someone's been watching too much Game of Thrones by barlevg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I do remember reading that, according to some interpretations, Trial by Combat *may indeed* be legal under the US legal system...

  5. What's more impressive? by pak9rabid · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't know what's more impressive, this article or the fact that it managed to make its way onto Slashdot the same day it was published.

    1. Re:What's more impressive? by Vrallis · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I'm a bit surprised. I think I submitted it less than three hours ago, too.

    2. Re:What's more impressive? by LearnToSpell · · Score: 1

      It'll be duped four times though, and then you'll be sick of it.

    3. Re:What's more impressive? by idontgno · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's OK, though. Someone will work Bitcoins into it and it'll be like braaaand new.

      At least for the first couple of times it's duped that way.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    4. Re:What's more impressive? by Duradin · · Score: 1

      What's impressive is that this made its way onto /. after, not before, it was published, given the hivemind's love of all things Notch.

  6. What a bunch of pricks. by Beelzebud · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bethesda really are being total assholes here. Suing a independent developer for the word "Scrolls"? Bethesda does not own that fucking word... If those corporate assholes actually agree to this I'll be totally shocked.

    1. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by billcopc · · Score: 2

      Correction: Bethesda's lawyers are being total assholes here.

      Nothing surprising, I'm sure most law firms reject any résumé that does not include "Being a stubborn asshole" in the first paragraph.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    2. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not like Bethesda's overlords haven't heard about this case by now, so it's not some rogue lawyer.

    3. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Well, unlike copyrights and patents, trademarks must always be fought for or they are lost.

    4. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 3

      Correction: Bethesda's lawyers are being total assholes here.

      Nope, they are just helping Bethesda defend their trademark (remember, if you dont defend it, you lose it, especially since Notch is also is also in the same gaming business).

    5. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by tecnico.hitos · · Score: 1

      Their trademark is "Elder Scrolls". While I think Mojang's "Scrolls", even as a fantasy game, is too generic to be trademarked, it is not violating Bethesda's trademark. They are claiming they own the individual words of their trademark, even though they are common english words, and that's clearly absurd.

      --
      The good, the evil and the vacuum tubes.
    6. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      Not being a lawyer, I fail to see the value in staking out a word like "Scrolls" and saying "MINE! ONLY ME CAN USE WORD!!!"

      The title of Notch's game doesn't contain the word "Elder." Are there other similarities I'm not aware of? How likely is it really that someone else would come along, make shovelware, slap an "Elder Scroll" title on it, and when challenged say "But they didn't sue that guy for using half the title, so they don't care!" If their lawyers are being too unrealistic and paranoid in "defending" the trademark, that would in fact qualify as being assholes.

    7. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter if they have a trademark on the specific word. If someone uses a mark that is similar to something you use and they are within the same industry you risk diluting your mark and losing it. Which is why Microsoft was basically required by law if they wanted to not lose their Microsoft trademark to sue the guy who started "Mike Rowe Soft".

    8. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by Barefoot+Monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nope, they are just helping Bethesda defend their trademark (remember, if you dont defend it, you lose it, especially since Notch is also is also in the same gaming business).

      They can't lose something that they have never had. Bethesda do not have "Scrolls" as a trademark for a computer game, and do not stand to lose "The Elder Scrolls" by doing nothing here. Furthermore, all Notch has done is apply for trademark on a name that he plans to use. There's nothing wrong with that - it's just diligence - and filing a suit about that is rather arbitrary. If Bethesda's representatives have an issue with that then they should just contest the application.

    9. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad analogy. A more correct analogy would be if they protected their Microsoft Windows trademark by going after anyone who used the word Windows

      "The rulings are a major victory for Lindows.com," Harris said in a statement. "Essentially, the Court's ruling confirms that a company, no matter how much money it spends, cannot buy a word out of the English language."

      Unless trademark law has changed since then Bethesda is just being assholes.
      If they want to have a trademark that they can protect then they should name their product something unique.
      Now if Notch were calling his game for "Bethesda" then they might have a case.

    10. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      The lack of aggressively defending your trademark can cause you to lose it in the future.
      That is at least part of why the Second Life lawyers granted a license to the getafirstlife guy.
      (a copy of the "cease and desist" letter is here: http://farmersreallysucks.com/editorialgetafirstlife.shtml)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    11. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by md65536 · · Score: 1

      Somehow, I don't think the Bethesda lawyers are going to be okay with a trial by combat, unless they can somehow extract an extra fee out of it.

    12. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by Majkow · · Score: 1

      Its because its similar to their title is why this has come about. here is an example of it happening in australia. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-08-03/mambo-drops-mabo-trademark-dispute/2822236 the Mambo CEO was unaware of the trademark dispute until it was brought up in the media. they apparently have a system in place that looks at new trademarks and if they are similar to their own they file a lawsuit/objection to get it changed.

    13. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Heeh, did that actually happen?

      On the current topic, however; look at it from the other side. If Mojang created 'Scrolls' a few years back, and then Bethesda published 'The Elder Scrolls', what would happen? From that angle, it would look a damn lot like a sequel, wouldn't it?

      It's not particularly nice of Bethesda, but I do see their point.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    14. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solution: Elder Scrolls

    15. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by Shrike82 · · Score: 1

      If Bethesda's representatives have an issue with that then they should just contest the application.

      This may be a stupid question, but isn't that accomplished by the lawsuit? Or are you implying that they should contest it in some other fashion? Contrary to popular opinion, a lawsuit is not always a middle finger extended to the accused. It can simply be a "we need to defend this and this is how the legal system dictates our defence should proceed".

      --
      You can advertise in this sig from as little as £99.99 a month!
    16. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by Barefoot+Monkey · · Score: 1

      This may be a stupid question, but isn't that accomplished by the lawsuit? Or are you implying that they should contest it in some other fashion? Contrary to popular opinion, a lawsuit is not always a middle finger extended to the accused. It can simply be a "we need to defend this and this is how the legal system dictates our defence should proceed".

      That's a fair point. I know nothing about Swedish civil law, but if they feel that their trademark should preclude Mojang's then I would imagine the appropriate thing to do would be to lodge an objection directly with the trademark office. If Bethesda's claim has merit then the application would be denied. Applying for trademark before using the mark is a prudent, diligent, and above-board way of doing things, and making Mojang withdraw their application or be forced to defend themselves in court strikes me as an denying Mojang access to due process. I'm not a lawyer and know very little about these matters, but Bethesda's course of action so far does not sit well with me. Still, I have a lot of respect for both parties and hope that they can work this out without bloodshed (unless it's in Quake, of course).

    17. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      Some even put it on their URL: http://www.mofo.com/

    18. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      If the game Scrolls is reasonably similar to Elder Scrolls, he has a big problem. If the games are unrelated in style, it's a harder road for Bethesda. Brand confusion is one of the main damages that win you a trademark suit I believe (IANAL). So if this were "Scrolls toilet paper" and had no chance of confusion a customer that is was related to Elder Scrolls, it would probably be dismissed summarily..

    19. Re:What a bunch of pricks. by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      But Bethesda mgmt might see a publicity opportunity that outweighs benefits of the law suit and brand protection (and still earn some brand protection from being active in their protection of the TM)..

  7. Finish Minecraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notch should stop fooling around and just finish Minecraft. I paid 15 bucks for it under the promise the game would be finished at some point. It's taking really long to add just bits of content and when you see what mods modders come up with you can only assume Notch spends 1 hour a week on Minecraft. Guess now that he's a millionaire he thinks he doesn't owe buyers anything. Sad.

    1. Re:Finish Minecraft by dyingtolive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Congrats, you're the reason why his lawyers made him stop guaranteeing free updates. Ass.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    2. Re:Finish Minecraft by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Did you get a time frame on completion before you handed over the cash?

      No? Well I guess you're a moron then.

      Heck there's a release date even, why would you expect it sooner? Or expect anything in the meantime?

    3. Re:Finish Minecraft by Mitchell314 · · Score: 2

      Uh, he's on a schedule. 1.8 is not scheduled for release until later this month IIRC. As a plugin dev for bukkit (a modded version of a MC server that handles plugins), I'm relieved that updates aren't jammed together. Updating also means downtime for many modded servers too.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    4. Re:Finish Minecraft by vranash · · Score: 2

      Eh, just convert to MineTest and enjoy a multiplayer GPL'd version of Minecraft done in C++ with cross platform support for Windows, linux, and OSX :) It may not be finished, but at least anyone can go and wrench on it. Also shouldn't he have referred to it as a 'Trial of Refusal'?

    5. Re:Finish Minecraft by djdanlib · · Score: 1

      Indeed, when there are a bunch of a.b.c releases, the server I play on is largely unusable during the entire flurry of updates due to client/server version incompatibilities. I like frequent updates, but I don't like being unable to play.

      BTW, Thanks for working on Bukkit.

    6. Re:Finish Minecraft by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Minecraft isn't finished? Amidst the exploration of the fantastic structures created across thousands of servers, and the investigations of the wealth of possibilities of the engine and gameplay, I really hadn't noticed.

      So I'm going to get more out of this for my 15 bucks. Best 15 bucks I ever spent.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
  8. Bizzaro Response: by dyingtolive · · Score: 0

    That's just typical Mojang: Try to sidestep a perfectly valid and not-at-all overreaching trademark suit by bringing VIDEO GAMES of all things into the equation. Nothing about this industry has anything to do with gaming.

    Of course, it's Bethesda. Thankfully, they're not in it for the GAMING, like some kind of video game developers. They're in it for the money, like a company ought to be. They'll do the right thing and make asses of themselves because the arrogantly assume they can own a word.

    Why does Notch expect them to sell-out their morals and instincts for a few fleeting moments of fun and chance to be the bigger person over something they're making a bigger deal about than necessary?

    --
    Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    1. Re:Bizzaro Response: by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why does Notch expect them to sell-out their morals and instincts for a few fleeting moments of fun and chance to be the bigger person over something they're making a bigger deal about than necessary?

      Because if they accept, they get tons of good press, way more than the current bad press they're getting for suing over a single word. In fact, I'd imagine it would turn out better for them than if they'd never sued at all.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    2. Re:Bizzaro Response: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit! Bethesda has morals?

    3. Re:Bizzaro Response: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, Bethesda owns id software now, so there's basically no way they could lose.

    4. Re:Bizzaro Response: by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      Yeah, really, it would be a win for both companies. I'd bet money against Bethesda actually doing it though. It will prove whether the suits or the devs run the company though.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    5. Re:Bizzaro Response: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that they are the owners of Id and Quake 3 Arena. They should totally do this. Its free advertising, and I'd love to see Notch try to take on Id at their own game.

    6. Re:Bizzaro Response: by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      Ideal solution is much like the Southwest vs Stevens Aviation trademark "trial by armwrestling".

      Play up the match for tons of good PR and geek cred, play for charity plus the rights to the trademark, then whoever wins immediately grants unlimited rights to the trademark to the losing party.

      Bethesda can say they defended their trademark, everyone gets good PR, charities get money, everyone is saved an expensive court case (that Bethesda probably can't win without spending loads of money on) and the world (via a bit of apparent insanity) becomes just a little more sane.

  9. He challenged Idthesda to an Idthesda game by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    I assume that, in the old dueling tradition, his opponent gets to choose the mod.

    According to the article, the sides alternate choosing levels. But seeing as Bethesda's parent company owns Id Software, three of Bethesda's best warriors might be people who actually developed Q3A. So in a sense, it already is on Bethesda's home turf.

    1. Re:He challenged Idthesda to an Idthesda game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But seeing as Bethesda's parent company owns Id Software, three of Bethesda's best warriors might be people who actually developed Q3A. So in a sense, it already is on Bethesda's home turf.

      Having developed a game does not mean you are any good at playing it.

    2. Re:He challenged Idthesda to an Idthesda game by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In my experience playing with coders and mappers: the people who make games are rarely star players.

    3. Re:He challenged Idthesda to an Idthesda game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless Bethesda gets to provide a "special" edition...

    4. Re:He challenged Idthesda to an Idthesda game by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      Just because you make a song, doesn't mean you can make the top score on it in Guitar Hero.

      Just because you make Q3A doesn't mean you can make top score in it. Video game developments and FPS game players develop different skill sets.

    5. Re:He challenged Idthesda to an Idthesda game by Scrameustache · · Score: 2

      If you want an employee that can play the game, you want a tester, not a developer.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    6. Re:He challenged Idthesda to an Idthesda game by tepples · · Score: 1

      Bingo. I wonder how long it'd take them to dig up the Quake Live test team's contact info.

    7. Re:He challenged Idthesda to an Idthesda game by morari · · Score: 1

      John Romero begs to differ... :P

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    8. Re:He challenged Idthesda to an Idthesda game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Testers tough....

    9. Re:He challenged Idthesda to an Idthesda game by Eraesr · · Score: 2

      Testing game software rarely involves just playing the game.
      If you want an employee that's good at playing the game, you want a gameplay designer. id Software has on more than one occasion worked together with professional Quake 3 players to create content that appeals to the wishes of the competitive player.

    10. Re:He challenged Idthesda to an Idthesda game by bedouin · · Score: 1

      I forget which documentary it was in, but there was an interview with Shigeru Miyamoto where he played a game of Donkey Kong and died on the first level.

    11. Re:He challenged Idthesda to an Idthesda game by TheCarp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And why would I listen to a head on a stick that talks backwards and I pelted with about 500 rockets?

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    12. Re:He challenged Idthesda to an Idthesda game by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      Makes me feel better. Could the creators of Ninja Gaiden (NES versions obviously) beat their damn games (or the Castlevania III creators)? ... Must have had Benny from Code Monkeys test the series. Assholes, I am suing for mental suffering and making me play RPGs which wasted even more of my time.

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    13. Re:He challenged Idthesda to an Idthesda game by shaitand · · Score: 1

      dunno about the creators but I beat Ninja Gaiden and I generally suck at games. Quit your bitchin!

    14. Re:He challenged Idthesda to an Idthesda game by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      Bitchin is old as games itself. google avgn ninja gaiden for a funnier take.

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    15. Re:He challenged Idthesda to an Idthesda game by snemarch · · Score: 2

      Ah, those were the days <3

      --
      Coffee-driven development.
    16. Re:He challenged Idthesda to an Idthesda game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm absolutely terrible at the game iOS Game my company just put out (Swamp Talk). I'm even the worst player among the developers.

  10. More information by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Notch just got married this weekend, and is officially away right now, for his honeymoon. This lawsuit came up at a terrible time, and this is the way that Notch handles such stuff.

    Notch seems to read and reply most to comments on the minecraft channel at reddit. The thread there would probably be the place to post if you want to volunteer as one of the representatives :)

    --
    Free unix account: freeshell.org
    1. Re:More information by gknoy · · Score: 1

      I think they should have to use actual employees, who have been employed before the challenge, to prevent them just hiring Q3 allstars.

    2. Re:More information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that Bethesda already has the Q3A devs as employees; *they* don't need to hire anyone new.

    3. Re:More information by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 1

      And, as far as I know, Mojang only has 3 employees.

      I don't think this is really about winning or losing the trademark battle anyway. It's a publicity stunt. If Bethesda agrees, they'll probably destroy whatever team Mojang assembles, but there will be plenty of good publicity to be shared between the two companies.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    4. Re:More information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Glad we have some minecraft fanboys in our mix to let us know what Notch's personal life is like

    5. Re:More information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would squash him like a bug with an army of lawyers.
      Here is a man who doesn't think he needs to play by the rules the real world runs on... That's someone dangerous to interact with unless you own them.

      The time for jokes went away when the first lawyer showed up in this situation. As this could (potentially) involve billions of dollars moving fwd.

      Also makes me wary of ever buying anything from him. Sure its just 'computer games'. But i still only like to deal with companies and people that are serious when it comes to MY money and stuff that *I* buy.

    6. Re:More information by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

      The way he bucks the system and refuses to just accept the absurdity of our modern legal code is fantastic. He should be applauded. Here's a man who points out how ridiculous this lawsuit is by issuing a challenge that is as valid as the lawsuit being brought against him, and has about as much connection to "justice" as any traditional course of action would have.

      I always cheer on the people who make their own rules, and refuse to roll over when bullies feel like they are entitled to always having things their way. Oppression of all kinds flows down, not up. If you're not on the very top of the heap, then you should be on the side of anyone fighting someone or something larger.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    7. Re:More information by pilott · · Score: 1

      billions huh? Has a website and an UNRELEASED game really caused Bethesda billions in damages?

  11. Re:Someone's been watching too much Game of Throne by Vrallis · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that's about as valid as other unusual laws that are, in theory, still on the books--can't play hopscotch on a Sunday, can't dress a donkey in a sundress in rainy weather, etc.

    And of course he's been watching Game of Thrones... he even said that in his blog post!

    (Off topic: This is probably the best book adaptation to film/tv I've ever seen, well beyond even Lord of the Rings or the Sci-Fi mini series version of Dune and Children of Dune. Those have been my yardsticks to measure other adaptations by for a while now. I do think that people who haven't read the books are at a serious disadvantage, though, as too much background is missing due to time constraints.)

  12. 2000yr antecedents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .... don't the Dead Sea Scrolls count as prior art?

  13. Quake 3, eh? by EnglishTim · · Score: 2

    So.... seeing as Bethesda and id Software are both now arms of Zenimax, can id Software employees be part of the Bethesda team?

    Shoulda stuck with counter-strike, Notch!

    1. Re:Quake 3, eh? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he wants a challenge? If id Software employees can be part of the team, that means he might get to get to play against Carmack, making for probably the best PR here and just an awesome experience to have, even if he loses.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:Quake 3, eh? by PRMan · · Score: 1

      In traditional duels, the person accepting the duel gets to choose a "home turf" as long as it is agreed to by a neutral third party or both parties in the duel. Notch is offering a "home turf" and pre-agreeing to it.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:Quake 3, eh? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that wasn't intentional? I read this as playing friendly on Notch's part "I'll even let you guys have the homecourt advantage." He said he assumed this was a misunderstanding. He's clearly not playing hardball here, that was obvious from issuing a videogame challenge rather than a countering lawsuit.

    4. Re:Quake 3, eh? by That+Guy+From+Mrktng · · Score: 1

      Do you know if Carmack is an active $quake player? I've been trying to find him and invite him to take a look on some q2 mod, I even remember visiting /. from the first time when I got the clue that he was an active poster here. Guess I'm doing it wrong. Any help appreciated.

    5. Re:Quake 3, eh? by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      Not only could they use this to promote "scrolls", Skyrim, and Oblivion. It's also a chance to promote Quake 3 and Rage. You couldn't ASK for a better PR event.

      --
      I do security
  14. Re:Someone's been watching too much Game of Throne by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I do remember reading that, according to some interpretations, Trial by Combat *may indeed* be legal under the US legal system...

    And there is a history of trademark disputes being settled this way.

    --
    Free unix account: freeshell.org
  15. Now that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is finally some news for nerds

  16. Like in Southpark s08e05 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's on.

  17. Map Choice by sjpadbury · · Score: 0

    Q3DM17, The Longest Yard, is almost mandatory, I would think...

    --
    We're all full up on Crazy here...
    1. Re:Map Choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      HAHAH! Aim bots? The map makes it trivial to snipe 40+% of the time.

      If you want a better match, try blood run map.

  18. I request a champion.... by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

    my brother, Fatal1ty.

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    1. Re:I request a champion.... by Abreu · · Score: 1

      But you'll have to settle for Bronn... Don't worry, he's your kind of fellow...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    2. Re:I request a champion.... by MRe_nl · · Score: 1
      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  19. Re:Someone's been watching too much Game of Throne by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    If they agree to it in a well-written contract, it's absolutely legal. This is a civil suit we're talking about, after all, and the contract doesn't involve anything illegal AFAIK. (IANAL)

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  20. Custom Avatars... by Chruisan · · Score: 1

    They should pick custom avatars with Majong as James T. Kirk and Bethusda as the Green Lizard Man...

  21. Mistake by mfh · · Score: 1

    If this was an episode of Damages (awesome show) Patty Hugues would instruct her client, Bethesda, to stick to their guns and sue the guy for all he has. Mojang AB has basically admitted by asking for a sporting contest decision that they cannot win on a point of law. A judge would be flagrantly out of his or her depth to overlook that and even be a little perturbed by it.

    All that said, it would be a great marketing campaign for both companies if they decided to do so. My guess is that Bethesda will take them up on their offer and have a live stream.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      u pretty much suck bro (real talk).

      how much did u pay for ur account again?

    2. Re:Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also take all my legal advice from television shows.

    3. Re:Mistake by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      Mojang AB has basically admitted by asking for a sporting contest decision that they cannot win on a point of law.

      Try "cannot win in a court of law" and you will hit closer to the mark.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Mistake by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      That's a typical sue-sick view.

      He's not saying "I can't win", he's saying "I'm not interested in a real fight". Subtle, but very very different.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    5. Re:Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even more accurate would be:
      "I can't *afford* to play (win or lose) in a court of law."

      Of course, this whole thing is happening in outside the US, so assumptions based on how US court costs balloon may not be accurate.

    6. Re:Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to also give legal advice posting AC on Slashdot even though you are an angry teen in your mom's basement.

    7. Re:Mistake by mfh · · Score: 1

      I think you misread what was posted if you're trying to correct me. My point isn't that Mojang could or couldn't win in a court.

      My point was that there is no point of law supporting their use of the "Scrolls" name in connection to a video game when the Elder Scrolls is so well known and trademarked, whereas there is a point of legal precedent supporting Bethesda extending their trademark use of Elder Scrolls to include other video games with the word "Scrolls" in the title, plus they could contend that use of the name "Scrolls" only could cause confusion that Bethesda was somehow involved with the Minecraft people when no such agreement was made.

      tldr: Mojang AB knows they are in deep doodoo, and they are offering Bethesda a way out and trying to make this seem trivial. Bethesda must not allow them to use the name "Scrolls" or it will forever hurt that franchise.

      Mojang could win in a court of law only if there was a jury, because juries are comprised of people who are sometimes willing to overlook points of law.

      IANAL!

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  22. Live stream please by ChocNut · · Score: 0

    See if pay per view offered legal combat settlements I'd sign up in a second. They'd need to keep it fresh though (think judge judy mixed with gamesmaster).

  23. Re:Someone's been watching too much Game of Throne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pretty much any way of settling a dispute is legal if both parties sign a contract saying that that's how they are to settle it. why would this not be legal?

  24. Sounds very unprofessional by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    He says he is serious, but unless there is something I am missing or Notch is an idiot he is not actually expecting them to agree. Supposedly Bethesda have a financial reason for suing Notch and for a actual business to engage in basically a game of chance (Quake 3 is not a game of chance but pitting two unknown team against each other in it is) to determine if they will go ahead with the suit or drop it is just irresponsible. And assuming that they are a corporation beholden to look after the best interests of their shareholders most likely an illegal act to boot.

    now i hate Bethesda as much as anybody for pulling such a stupid move and I would not dislike Notch solving a disagreement with a match of Quake 3 (and would think him even more cool for doing so), but if he actually thinks that there is a possibility that they will accept or of this is just a publicity stunt (the only two possibilities, well then I think he is being kind of stupid.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:Sounds very unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily. Bethesda has no choice but to defend a trademark. This really seems more like boiler plate legal response since it's on record he's on friendly terms with the lead developers. There's no reason they couldn't do a licensing deal as the outcome and satisfy all parties.

      Would Bethesda do it? Probably not. I wouldn't say unprofessional though.

    2. Re:Sounds very unprofessional by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me? To most who likes Notch & Bethesda? I'm sorry, but I'm all for this going down. Plus, this is an olden form of dispute solving that WAS acceptable by courts. Just before it was IRL, and slightly more dangerous. If they accept, no matter what happens, everyone comes out smelling like roses. Great PR for everyone which shareholders love.

    3. Re:Sounds very unprofessional by Zalbik · · Score: 1

      Supposedly Bethesda have a financial reason for suing Notch and for a actual business to engage in basically a game of chance (Quake 3 is not a game of chance but pitting two unknown team against each other in it is) to determine if they will go ahead with the suit or drop it is just irresponsible. And assuming that they are a corporation beholden to look after the best interests of their shareholders most likely an illegal act to boot.

      That makes the huge assumption that the financial loss caused by a game with the word "Scrolls" in it would be greater than the publicity value of a Quake 3 match over this issue. It also assumes that Bethesda feels they have a legal leg to stand on here. They may have just fired off the letter as a scare tactic.

    4. Re:Sounds very unprofessional by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      The point I was trying to make was not wouldn't it be cool if it went down or not but instead that he has absolutely no chance of getting it to go down and I think he knows it.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    5. Re:Sounds very unprofessional by Daetrin · · Score: 0

      Bethesda has no choice but to defend a trademark.

      SRSLY? You mean like the way IHOP has had to sue everyone who uses the word "House"? And how WallMart sued K-Mart into oblivion years ago? And who can forget the apocalypse of lawsuits between GameFaqs, GameStop, GameSpot, GamePro and GameSpy. Electronics Boutique was a nice place to shop before they were destroyed by that lawsuit from Electronic Arts.

      If trademark law actually forced everyone to sue anyone who used even just a part of their name then there wouldn't be a single valid name left to use anymore!

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    6. Re:Sounds very unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think possibly he's doing it just to provoke a response out of them as he doesn't seem to have had one (other than the legal filings) so far.

      If by some miracle they agree then win win, if not then he hasn't lost anything.

    7. Re:Sounds very unprofessional by Vickor · · Score: 1

      I see it as Notch offering Bethesda a way out of this that lets them save face and not come across as the evil empire. The issue seems pretty ridiculous to begin with (like if George Lucas tried to sue someone for using 'Wars' in their title), so this might be a win-win for both companies.

    8. Re:Sounds very unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh? What?

      He offered a means of a resolving the situation.

      "I will see you in court"
      "I will see you on the dueling ground"

      Why is one more valid than the other?

      Captcha: "buttock" - Always useful to remember when talking about lawyers.

    9. Re:Sounds very unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the publicity value of a Quake 3 match

      There is exactly none of that. Quake 3 is older than a lot of Minecraft players.

    10. Re:Sounds very unprofessional by Narishma · · Score: 1

      Bethesda is a private company, so they can do whatever they want.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
    11. Re:Sounds very unprofessional by Parafilmus · · Score: 2

      He says he is serious, but unless there is something I am missing or Notch is an idiot he is not actually expecting them to agree.

      Bethesda may not have anticipated the bad press that this affair is generating. Notch has offered them a face-saving way out. It would be wise of them to accept.

    12. Re:Sounds very unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He says he is serious, but unless there is something I am missing or Notch is an idiot he is not actually expecting them to agree.

      There is something you're missing. How much of a fucking buzzkill you are.

    13. Re:Sounds very unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, but my analysis runs quite to the contrary:

      If they contested it to prevent diluting their mark, then the noise they've made already is enough if there's any kind of settlement reached. Honestly, losing this trial by game would be a much better situation for them than losing a court battle. Now, if they win what do they expect to get? As nothing is being sold yet, there aren't any damages and I expect the best result for Bethesda would just be a court order for a name change on "Scrolls". So, a court battle has no more potential upside, a larger potential downside, at a higher cost (lawyers versus gamers, and probably more of the lawyers' time), and hugely damaging to PR instead of a boon. Which of these is better for the shareholders?

    14. Re:Sounds very unprofessional by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      In this context, a public company could do pretty much whatever it wants too. It's not like the CEO would have to run something like this past the board, unless their board is a bunch of micromanagers. As long as his legal signs off, this could happen, public or private, at least with most companies I've had experience with.

  25. Fanbois are retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strange I've never heard that excuse used here for Billy Gates and co.

  26. Game Over by TheRealGrogan · · Score: 2

    If serious, he just screwed himself out of using the contested name. He just expressed his willingness to change it. So now, a judge knows that it's not crucial to the project to keep the name, if he would frivolously agree to changing it over the outcome of a video game match.

    It's like this. Big bad greedy company wants your name, or your domain, or wants you to stop using it because it infringes on their trademark, or "dilutes their brand" or whatever buzzwords they use. You say you will change it if they pay you a million dollars. You probably just screwed yourself in court if they refuse, because it makes you look like a squatter.

    Remember MikeRoweSoft.com? He might have had a leg to stand on because it was his name, and he was a software developer, but as soon as he attempted to extort money from Microsoft, his prospects of winning were shot. (If I recall correctly, he settled for some free gifts from MS)

    But yeah, free publicity, anyway.

    1. Re:Game Over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...a judge knows that it's not crucial to the project to keep the name, if he would frivolously agree to changing it over the outcome of a video game match.

      Frivolous is relative. Maybe Notch is a damn good Quake 3 player and he's knows it's a sure thing.

      Or maybe it's just frivolous.

    2. Re:Game Over by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      Courts don't work that way, i.e Bethesda wouldn't win a trademark suit bases upon how much Notch wants or needs the "Scrolls" trademark. What happened to Mike Row Soft I don't know but since he settled out of court we will never know how the court would have ruled.

    3. Re:Game Over by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      After a quick review of the Mike Row Soft case, it's quite clear that the strategy from Microsoft was to make this a cybersquatting case. Such a case meant that they argued that he only registered the domain in order to extort money from Microsoft. This very same argument cannot be done for the Elder Scrolls vs Scrolls trademarks.

    4. Re:Game Over by TheRealGrogan · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is squatting in any way, I just used that as an example. The point is, he's just demonstrated that he's willing to change it over something arbitrary. (like payment of money in my examples, or in this case a blog post requesting a video game duel)

      It's not "This is my brand and I'm going to defend it from Bethesda" anymore. Now it's, "I'd be willing to change it in exchange for..." I think the challenge was a dumb thing to do, for that reason.

      Also note that doesn't mean I personally agree with that stance, it's just how I think the courts are going to react. I'd rather be wrong and see the bullies lose.

    5. Re:Game Over by Confusador · · Score: 1

      It sounds to me like he's decided that he can't afford to fight (welcome to the US legal system!), so it doesn't matter what a judge would think. At this point he's just milking the Streisand Effect for what little he can get out of it, and if this happens to make them change their mind about going to court that's just a bonus.

    6. Re:Game Over by gman003 · · Score: 2

      No. You are completely wrong on that - the law does not say anything about *needing* a trademark. In fact, the courts will probably look favorably on this attempt to settle out of court - showing a willingness to compromise is actually a bonus, not a strike against you.

      There's only a few outcomes left, now, which will show who's in the right:
      1) If Bethesda agrees, and both parties abide by the results, everyone saying this is a case of the legal department not being in touch with the rest of the company gets vindicated. Both companies end up looking like good guys, and everyone wins.
      2) If Bethesda agrees, but the loser backs out of the deal, we know which one is the real scumbag. Bethesda might lose and press on the suit anyways (even though they just shot themselves in the foot by doing so - going back on arbitration is a big no-no), or Notch could lose and decide to keep the name. Either way, it ends up in court, and one side ends up looking like a five-star douchebag.
      3) Bethesda refuses the challenge, but decides to give up on the suit "in the spirit of generosity". They end up looking very good, but also sort of schizo.
      4) Bethesda refuses the challenge, but aim for an out-of-court settlement. This might even be just buying Mojang - I wouldn't be surprised if they secretly want to do this. Depending on the terms, which may be secret, they look either like thugs, slime, or genuinely nice guys who hired bad lawyers.
      5) Bethesda refuses, and goes all the way to court. They end up looking sort of like dicks, especially if they then lose. I won't bet either way as to who would win - "Scrolls" is arguably too short to trademark, making both sides' claims invalid. Bethesda has more money, but Mojang is fighting under Swedish law, not American, giving them some advantages.

    7. Re:Game Over by F.Ultra · · Score: 2

      Well the courts wouldn't make that stance at all. And I don't really understand why you would think that they would. Bethesda does not have the trademark to "Spells" regardless of what Notch might be willing to trade it for (unless he trades it of course). The case that you brought up is irrelevant since there never was a ruling or even an indication of a ruling. He probably settled since they promised to pay his legal fees, something that they wouldn't be forced to do if they lost the case so if he had won he would have to pay thousands of dollars in legal fees and he probably didn't think that the domain was worth it.

    8. Re:Game Over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a sad world we live in where taking the initiative and stepping forward with good will to resolve a problem can actually be used to architect your own demise.

      I hope lawyers get nerfed in the next patch.

    9. Re:Game Over by ajo_arctus · · Score: 1

      This always confused me, because companies buy and sell rights to names every day, for millions of dollars, without invalidating the importance of that name. I suspect how well this argument stacks up depends, as always, on which side has more money to spend on lawyers.

    10. Re:Game Over by TheRealGrogan · · Score: 2

      (I didn't realize it would be in Sweden... it could be quite different. All bets are off)

      But I was more thinking of:

      6) Judge sternly rules to stop using the name Scrolls, and (not necessarily because) he doesn't like the court's time being wasted with frivolity. If he's willing to give up the name over the outcome of a video game, just give it up. I highly doubt the judge would identify with the chivalry and nobody is going to take that challenge seriously. It would be legally foolish for anyone on the complaining side to take it. Company executives would not allow that.

      As for the actual name, I don't think it's too much of a stretch in the USA at least, for it to be associated with Zenimax/Bethesda's product. Disagree? I guess then, Windows is also too short to trademark since it has the same number of letters, and is also a common item. Try making even an unrelated software product named that. There's a reason they call it the X Window System, and not "X Windows" like we used to say back in the 90's. Or, let's see Pella make a slide show of their inventory and call it "The Windows Screensaver".

      I was thinking of making a new game, it's a chess game. I think I'll call it Unbelievable Tournament. Surely, the word tournament should be safe? (Activision would of course crawl right up my ass and use my balls for a punching bag)

      I'll bet that if I made an arena type shooter just named "Tournament" that they would do the same thing and they've got lots of money to use, to demonstrate how wrong I am. This is how these kinds of assholes think, and it's pretty sick.

      Database software, and a web browser. Both were named Firebird, which is quite a common name for everything from mythological beasts, to cars. They don't have anything to do with each other except that they are both software. Someone had to change the name of their web browser so it didn't confuse those poor database users. (No, it didn't go to court either but the lawyers probably advised to change the name because of what would happen)

      But really, I think Confusador (comment #37125280 above) is probably right, as are others saying similar things. He already knows he's going to give up the name and is having a bit of fun and publicity. (Good for him. Lots of respect for that, being a good sport about it)

      We'll probably never know.

    11. Re:Game Over by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      "Surely, the word tournament should be safe? (Activision would of course crawl right up my ass and use my balls for a punching bag)"

      ok now I know you're doing nothing but talking out your ass.

      X360 Abronium Tournament
      PS Bakuten Shoot Beyblade 2002: Beybattle Tournament 2
      NES Battle Rush: Build Up Robot Tournament
      GC BeyBlade VForce: Super Tournament Battle
      GBC BeyBlade: Fighting Tournament
      PC Bomberfun Tournament
      GBA Bomberman Tournament
      ARC Buriki One: World Grapple Tournament '99 in Tokyo
      MOBILE Cannons Tournament
      SNES ClayFighter: Tournament Edition
      IP Golf Tournament
      XBOX Greg Hastings' Tournament Paintball Max'd
      GBA Greg Hastings' Tournament Paintball Max'd
      PSP Greg Hastings' Tournament Paintball Max'd
      PS2 Greg Hastings' Tournament Paintball Max'd
      DS Greg Hastings' Tournament Paintball Max'd
      PC Greg Hastings' Tournament Paintball Max'd
      GC Greg Hastings' Tournament Paintball Max'd
      ARC Karate Chakun Yaraku Shanku: The Karate Tournament
      GBA Klonoa 2: Dream Champ Tournament
                  Konjiki no Gashbell!! Yuujou no Dengeki Dream Tag Tournament
      CPC Lee Enfield: Tournament of Death
      C64 Lee Enfield: Tournament of Death
      GBA Mortal Kombat: Tournament Edition
      IP myPinballs Tournament System Scores
      ARC Quake - Arcade Tournament Edition
      PC Rumble Box: Tournament Edition
      PSP Steambot Chronicles: Battle Tournament
      IP Table Tennis Soul Tournament
      SNES Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Tournament Fighters
      NES Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Tournament Fighters
      GEN Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Tournament Fighters
      ARC Tekken Tag Tournament
      PS2 Tekken Tag Tournament
      ARC Tekken Tag Tournament 2
      IP Tennis Tournament
      ARC Tournament Arkanoid
      LYNX Tournament Cyberball 2072
      WII Tournament of Legends
      IP Tournament Paddles

      A trademark on "elder scrolls" is not a trademark on "scrolls"

    12. Re:Game Over by gman003 · · Score: 1

      "Willing to settle it via arbitration" is different than "willing to give it up", because there's about even odds that Mojang would end up with the trademark, not Bethesda. It's not Notch saying "we have no claim to it", it's saying "we both have equal claim to it".

      There's also the problem that Bethesda's entire suit is based on "customers could be confused into thinking Scrolls is a Bethesda game". Which is untrue for a reason that hasn't been brought up here: most gamers don't think of Bethesda's games as "the Elder Scrolls games", they think of them as "Morrowind, Oblivion, Skyrim and those other two". I've spoken to people who were honestly surprised when I told them Oblivion was the fourth game in the series. There's relatively low odds that anyone will mistake one game series for the other, since one series doesn't really use the trademark it's under (the titular "Elder Scrolls", to my memory, only appears in one quest in one game).

    13. Re:Game Over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other two are Arena and Daggerfall. Well, there was BattleSpire as well, but it wasn't the same kind of game. Anyway, at the time, it seemed like Arena and The Elder Scrolls were interchangeable and Daggerfall seemed to have a strong link to Elder Scrolls as well. It wasn't until Morrowind that the Elder Scrolls name seemed to be de-emphasized. I think it had a lot to do with their move to consoles and not wanting to make it seem like you needed to play two other games first.

    14. Re:Game Over by pilott · · Score: 1

      All he said that he is willing to enter binding arbitration over the dispute. What makes you think his choice of arbitration is arbitrary? It seems to me to be calculated and relevant considering who he is challenging.

    15. Re:Game Over by TheRealGrogan · · Score: 1

      You guys are probably right and I'm full of shit, but people can be pretty dense. For example, I personally know someone who mistook Fallout New Vegas for a new Rainbow 6 Vegas game. He's not very ambulatory and he got his housemate, who only plays a few games like golf and GTAIV, pick it up for him at EB games when he heard about it. It got all the way in the Xbox before they realized it "WTF???" lol. OK, that's quite silly and I laughed and chided them for it, but when they took it back to EB games for trade in, the employee said they weren't the only ones who made that mistake. (In a town of about 20,000. I can only shake my head.)

      When I think of Bethesda, I think of Fallout as those are the only games I've had from that company, but I've heard people speak of "Elder Scrolls" (Oblivion at the time). To me those two words go together and I would not be confused by Scrolls. Elder is the more significant word in that title. I've not played the game but knowing nothing about it, it gave me a vision of some white haired, bearded old man poring over ancient text whenever I heard it. I haven't tried it because it's not really my kind of game.

      (I have since looked into those games and I realize it's not about scrolls, whereas Scrolls actually is, for actuating spells)

  27. Sounds like a good strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a good offer for both companies ether way i goes. Less lawyer costs and great publicity for both companies.

    All gamers would see this as a more honest way too settle things then suing each other!

    (Hope they steam it if they agree too the match)

  28. Quake3? by Hsien-Ko · · Score: 1

    Why not Quake Live? Has Notch completely forgotten about that? How does he know the lawyer scrub owns a legal copy of Quake III Arena?

    Hope they don't play OpenAre-ah, forget it.

    1. Re:Quake3? by Narishma · · Score: 1

      He probably wants to avoid the Quake Live servers crashing during the match.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
  29. *sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It also assumes that Bethesda feels they have a legal leg to stand on here. They may have just fired off the letter as a scare tactic.

    They do. Lern2trademark. Bethesda's lawyers would've been foolish not to send a nastygram - they have to appear to be defending it.

    1. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're wrong. Defending the trademark means defending credible comparisons to said trademark, and more importatnly cannot be based upon a single word(Which is why Microsoft lost the Lindows dispute). Now, if Mojang had named the project something like the Ancient Scrolls Bethesda would have had a proper leg to stand on.

  30. Re:This guy needs to fuck off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Fail"?

    MineCraft has sold over 3,000,000 copies. Alpha copies went for ~$14, Beta for about $20. You do the math.

    How many tens of millions of dollars have you earned?

    I thought so.

  31. Prince by Meneth · · Score: 1

    They could go the Prince route, and make the game "previously known as Scrolls".

  32. A better name by Daetrin · · Score: 1

    No, he should call it "Roll of Parchment." Or maybe Super Cool Really Original... er, something Simulator. Quick! I need a word that starts with "L"!

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:A better name by xhrit · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Super Cool Really Original Leveling & Looting Simulator"

    2. Re:A better name by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      Nah, if he loses he'll change the name to Scrollz.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
  33. Job by G00F · · Score: 1

    So the next new hire interview will involve a frag match? How do I apply?

    On a side note, God I hate what lawyers did to our justice and legal system . . . .

    --
    The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
  34. Notch does not have the funds to match legal team by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Notch does not have the funds to match Bethesda legal team.

  35. Bethesda owns "Scrolls" trademark? by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

    I think they (both) might want to check with Steven Mancinelli. Notch's defense would run to "I can't be infringing on Bethesda's trademark, since this other trademark was plainly issued to the pertinent domain AND is more directly infringed if anyone is.

    1. Re:Bethesda owns "Scrolls" trademark? by thedarknite · · Score: 1

      Steven Mancinelli is the attorney of record, the important line is the one above it (APPLICANT) Mojang AB CORPORATION SWEDEN 1 Lagskarsvagen Johanneshov SWEDEN 12155 which means this is probably the reason Bethesda is suing.

      --
      A game has objectives and is competitive, anything else is just play
  36. They're totally going about this the wrong way by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    If you're going to have a trial, it should definitely be a trial by stone.

  37. Re:Notch does not have the funds to match legal te by Ant+P. · · Score: 0

    Notch doesn't have to match them. He has a three-million-strong army of rabid fans. Bethesda cannot afford the negative PR they risk generating through this and they know it.

  38. Awesome attitude! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to say kudos... Not only is it a more fun way to settle these things, its a great PR move. I've never heardbof these guys before, but I have respect for him not immediately getting lawyered up.

    Good on ya! I wish "real" companies took this route once in a while.

  39. asymmetrical warfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course! Notch is fighting asymmetrical warfare. Bethesda is huge, lumbering monolith of assholes. They are huge. They have lawyers for days. They can burn him to the ground in any courtroom of choice. Notch is refusing to meet them on that field (for now) by dragging the whole mess into the public eye, where he will steadily demonstrate that he represents interesting people who love games, and that Bethesda behaves as if they hate people like that. He keeps this up long enough, like any good insurgency force, he can do enough brand damage that they will be begging him to make it all go away.

  40. Tomes by jlebrech · · Score: 1

    He should just rename it to "Ancient Tomes" and be done with it!

  41. Undergrads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone realize yet that this is an episode of Undergrads; http://www.tv.com/undergrads/new-friends/episode/95828/summary.html

  42. Mortal Combat by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

    I remember as a kid/teen reading the trademarks Mortal Kombat and thought Scorpion was just stupid. So nobody can call have a character called that? (Would anybody want something so unoriginal anyways).

    --
    Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
  43. Jerks by AutumnLeaf · · Score: 1

    I'm usually not this low-brow, but I'd like to give Bethesda a roll of toilet paper, which is the trophy for winning Ass-Wipe of the Year. And if you think about it, toilet paper is rolled like scrolls are, so sue me too, ass-wipes.