Slashdot Mirror


User: seiyakun

seiyakun's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
6
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 6

  1. Re:But will it run Linux on Playstation 3 Already Won the Next Gen Battle? · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Since console makers typically sell consoles at a loss on hardware, and make it up on the software (games) and accessories, any game console that's running linux is going to end up being a money-loser.

    The PS2 linux kit is an add-on accessory, so Sony might actually break even on it. But Xbox linux just uses the existing hardware, so Microsoft almost definitely loses money on it.

  2. Re:I've got mod points... on Microsoft Plans WinXP "Reloaded" · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Whoops, now you can't use 'em on this thread. Oh well. :)

  3. Re:Hard Drive not needed on Memory Deal Bolsters Xbox 2 HD Removal Rumors · · Score: 1

    > There are already hitachi CF cards with 4 GB capacity and
    > don't be surprized to see 32GB CF cards in a year or so.

    for what it's worth, the Hitachi CF cards are actually hard drives, not flash memory.

  4. Re:Sunglasses on Global Dimming · · Score: 1

    If you read the article (ha!), it says that UV rays are not affected, just visible and IR parts of the spectrum. The leaky ozone layer problem hasn't gone away.

  5. Re:so can I sign my own software? on AMI Guy Talks About TCPA, Palladium, and Other BIOS Issues · · Score: 1
    The one question I wanted to see an answer to was whether I could designate myself as a signing authority and get the motherboard to only run code I had signed, or whether there was a fixed list of signing authorities.

    As I read the responses, that's not a BIOS or motherboard issue, but rather an OS/application issue. So sure, if you want to write your own OS that designates you as your computer's god and master, feel free. :)

  6. Re:He's a weasel on AMI Guy Talks About TCPA, Palladium, and Other BIOS Issues · · Score: 1
    How can a technology whose only purpose is to take away from us control of our own computers, and thus in a very real sense our control of ourselves, EVER, concievably, have good uses?

    First of all, you're starting from what I think is a flawed assumption. How can this technology (assuming you're talking about TCPA) take away control of your computer? It's WRITTEN INTO THE SPEC that it's an opt-in system, with the owner of the computer being the one in control.

    Second, TCPA will only be in the computer/BIOS/motherboard if you buy a computer/BIOS/motherboard with TCPA in it. Duh. So if you don't want it, let them know you don't want it.

    Third, man, you need to get out more if your sense of self is so tied to your computer. :)