IIRC, the first round or two of P3s also used the slot design. It was only the "flip chip" versions, I want to say starting with the 733MHz, that integrated the L2 cache on the die and went to Socket 370. This was the time period when the Celerons were often faster than the full-priced Pentiums: the Celerons had less L2 cache, but it was on the die in a Socket 370. Easily overclockable too. Put a couple of those in an Abit BP6 and you're really ahead of your time.
Is there anything about Safari on iOS6 that doesn't suck? Particularly egregious is the fact that it caches POST responses. Yes, you read that right. I don't know what kind of brain damage leads somebody to believe that's an acceptable thing to do.
I don't think anyone has ever believed that passing a drug test mean the person was clean for sure. Why do they store samples for X number of years in order to re-test them in the future, with better technology? It's because if it's found out later that somebody was doping, then his results are invalid.
If we find out some other way besides a drug test that somebody was doping, then his results are invalid.
But conservatives and liberals seem to be on the opposite side of this divide when it comes to economics. Liberals believe more taxes == more revenue. And that there are never any unintended consequences to, say, Obamacare, which feed back into the system and cause weird effects.
In fact, it would seem that conservatives believe it's difficult/impossible to completely understand the behavior of complex systems, while liberals believe that regulation and rules and laws, of which more is better, always have exactly the effect they expect.
Even if what you say about 10-1 outspending is true (and it probably is), you haven't established causation, only correlation. Wouldn't you expect a better, winning candidate to be able to get more money as well as more votes than the other guy?
An untraceable method of paying for things has disadvantages, yes, but also serious advantages in limiting the power of government to see and control everything we do...
Slashdot Mirror
Your solution to your credit card number being vulnerable to theft is to give away your bank account number instead? Brilliant!
IIRC, the first round or two of P3s also used the slot design. It was only the "flip chip" versions, I want to say starting with the 733MHz, that integrated the L2 cache on the die and went to Socket 370. This was the time period when the Celerons were often faster than the full-priced Pentiums: the Celerons had less L2 cache, but it was on the die in a Socket 370. Easily overclockable too. Put a couple of those in an Abit BP6 and you're really ahead of your time.
I don't see too many men (or women) complaining that only women can give birth.
Oh yes they do:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFBOQzSk14c
Tax avoidance IS the right thing to do and something to be proud of.
There's no attack here. Somebody's modifying software on his own machine for his own use.
Being allowed to fork and being allowed to call your fork "Android" are different things.
http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html
Except SPF is broken by design and shouldn't be used nor its use encouraged, ever.
Is there anything about Safari on iOS6 that doesn't suck? Particularly egregious is the fact that it caches POST responses. Yes, you read that right. I don't know what kind of brain damage leads somebody to believe that's an acceptable thing to do.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeJbOU4nmHQ
I don't think anyone has ever believed that passing a drug test mean the person was clean for sure. Why do they store samples for X number of years in order to re-test them in the future, with better technology? It's because if it's found out later that somebody was doping, then his results are invalid.
If we find out some other way besides a drug test that somebody was doping, then his results are invalid.
What are you talking about? Neither the summary nor the article say anything about a date being pushed back.
Crazy Taxi.
But conservatives and liberals seem to be on the opposite side of this divide when it comes to economics. Liberals believe more taxes == more revenue. And that there are never any unintended consequences to, say, Obamacare, which feed back into the system and cause weird effects.
In fact, it would seem that conservatives believe it's difficult/impossible to completely understand the behavior of complex systems, while liberals believe that regulation and rules and laws, of which more is better, always have exactly the effect they expect.
Free public education and teachers' unions are not equivalent to math and science education. It's possible to support the some and not others.
turn off the TVA
What!! But then who would power my TV?
Even if what you say about 10-1 outspending is true (and it probably is), you haven't established causation, only correlation. Wouldn't you expect a better, winning candidate to be able to get more money as well as more votes than the other guy?
An untraceable method of paying for things has disadvantages, yes, but also serious advantages in limiting the power of government to see and control everything we do...
My guess is that people who don't drink coffee more likely DO drink sugary sodas.
Too bad Dr Bob, DC got found out. We could use him right now.
So, the main institution responsible for scientific groupthink is going to be the arbiter of what's libel and what isn't? Brilliant!
Well, okay, then the shareholders should be wondering why their dividend is smaller than it should be.
It would also be an issue if they were making a claim to score marketing points without really caring whether they lived up to it.
Other companies large and small will probably be wondering why they couldn't just pay less for their MS licenses instead.
Absolutely. Look for the ones by Carl Barks. It was an inspiration for Indiana Jones.